Category: Speeches

  • Dan Jarvis – 2026 Speech at the RUSI Land Warfare Conference

    Dan Jarvis – 2026 Speech at the RUSI Land Warfare Conference

    The speech made by Dan Jarvis, the Secretary of State for Defence, on 23 June 2026.

    Almost a fortnight – time flies when you’re having fun. Thank you, Conference.

    My foremost responsibility is to our service personnel. As I speak, members of our armed forces are deployed on dozens of operations across the globe in every domain. All are serving at an increasingly dangerous moment in history. It’s now my duty to make sure that we rise to meet that moment. So while people’s attention is understandably focused elsewhere, my focus today, tomorrow and beyond will be dedicated to the job in hand.

    Twelve days ago, I was at Sandhurst on a visit to meet with cadets, thirty years after I marched into the place, awkwardly clutching a rifle and pining for a memory that will be familiar to a number in the room. The instructors’ faces had long changed; somehow the same dread that they inspired had not. Again, a feeling I’m sure is also familiar to many. Being in the company of those cadets was an inspiring experience; being in the company of those who step forward to serve always is.

    That evening I was asked to serve as the Defence Secretary. Now some people want to know why I accepted. The answer is because I was asked and it’s not my nature to back away. I crossed over the river from Downing Street into the Ministry of Defence, and honestly, it felt like I was coming home after fifteen years away. Soon afterwards, I was receiving briefings confirming what I already knew. But in those intervening years, tactics, technology and threats had changed beyond all recognition. The one thing, however, that had remained constant is the professionalism, courage and extraordinary skill of our servicemen and women.

    I should probably admit – and I think it’s fair to say – that I haven’t spent all of my professional life in uniform. People will always be our most important asset in the end. No doctrine, no technology, no plan, however sophisticated it might be, can succeed without the determination of the men and women whose experience and excellence is built from the ground up, shaped by history, hardened by experience. We produce the finest soldiers in the world. Those uncompromising standards develop exceptional NCOs who demand nothing less than the very best from their senior leaders, a truth borne out in the middle of the South Atlantic just last month, when our personnel deployed to Tristan da Cunha to help someone in desperate need of medical attention. As the then Security Minister, I worked with COBR on that operation. I did so with the utmost confidence, knowing that despite the complexity of the task, those involved would execute with precision and success.

    I think we will ask much of our service personnel in the years ahead. I know the immense weight of responsibility for every single member of the armed forces and their families that I now carry, and I know that I need to get them what they need, and I am utterly determined to make sure that I do.

    Now, it is of course a matter of public record why my predecessor and friend, John Healey, is not delivering these remarks. I accepted this job with full awareness of the task before me, and my priority is to get the Defence Investment Plan done, but not at any cost. I have a responsibility to get it right. There will be a change of Prime Minister. There will be no change in the urgent need to produce the Defence Investment Plan. The DIP is a significant and vast piece of work. The department has been working on it for twelve months. I’ve had twelve days, but I’ve made the most of all of them. I am now working to finalise and publish it before I travel to Ankara with the Prime Minister.

    And today I want to talk to you about where we are and where we’re going. This is a learned audience, but let me tell you what this government inherited: almost every single major programme behind schedule, delayed upgrades to our nuclear deterrent, and an army at its smallest size in centuries. There is no overnight remedy. There is no single defence review or funding settlement that can erase the legacy of accumulated neglect. Our armed forces and the British people they are sworn to protect deserve honesty when it comes to our national security.

    Given recent commentary, a casual observer would be forgiven for believing defence spending is somehow going down. Under this government, defence spending is going up. In fact, it’s going up by more than anyone currently in uniform has known before. To date, there is eleven billion more in the annual defence budget than there was when we entered office. Last year, we will invest two hundred and seventy billion in defence over the course of this Parliament. The DIP will mean more money added on top. We will have another spending review next year in which I expect defence to be the number one priority.

    Don’t get me wrong – the DIP will shape how our armed forces fight, direct what our industry builds and deepen the strength of our alliances and partnerships. It is important, but it is not yet complete.

    Now, the measure of Britain’s security is the strength of those who defend it. The purpose of the DIP is to ensure that our armed forces are strong in the coming years. We made a promise to our allies as they did to us: 3.5% by 2035. I told the NATO Secretary General last week that promise will be met, and a credible plan will be produced to ensure that it is. I said the same to Secretary Hegseth in our first meeting — or, as Pete put it, just a couple of majors getting together to talk about defence.

    NATO has been the foundation of our security for seventy-seven years. Everyone is familiar with Article 5 — but that famous promise is only made real by the hard principle of Article 3: that we can only stand up for each other if we are able to stand up for ourselves. Britain has always met NATO’s spending commitments; under this government, we always will. Britain has always stood with our allies; under this government, we always will.

    Last week, I gave President Zelensky my personal guarantee that the UK would stand in full support with his people — today, tomorrow and for the long term. The first UK interdiction of a Russian vessel, followed by the funding of one hundred and fifty thousand Ukrainian-made drones, were a seven hundred and fifty-two million pound expression of that promise.

    The most profound change in defence during my time away has undoubtedly been the pace of innovation — where once it was measured in years, now it is measured in months. It is of course a cliché to say that we only ever prepare for the last war. What is not a cliché is doing something about it. Putin’s brutal war of aggression altered everything — from NATO’s assumptions on collective defence, to attitudes on defence spending, and not least, the way of war. The conflict in Ukraine began with troops in Soviet-era tanks. Today, it is waged with drones that think for themselves. Conflict always forces us to reach into the future. But these four years have accelerated military technology in a way that we have never seen before. A drone rules the battlefield. It would be reckless to ignore the lessons of Ukraine. Artificial intelligence, autonomy and uncrewed systems are no longer capabilities of the future. They will receive investment that reflects their strategic importance.

    There are some who hold the view that we should trade everything in the locker for drones. I understand the temptation, but there are important distinctions to make. For as long as we remain a member of NATO, we won’t fight alone. And for as long as we maintain our independent nuclear deterrent, we will always command our own destiny. Even in Ukraine, amid extraordinary advances in technology, it is still a war fought in the trenches where ground is held street by street, and where the reach of artillery and deep precision strike has proven invaluable.

    Just this year, our armed forces have been called on to protect the seabed in the High North and the skies in the Middle East. They are now readying themselves for the prospect of regenerating Ukraine’s forces and reopening the Strait of Hormuz. All the while, they protect our island home and retain the ability to respond to crises in dangerous and distant lands. Britain needs a flexible, hybrid, integrated force that can deter and fight across every domain.

    The land forces which prevail tomorrow will be those who combine high-end platforms with mass, agility and considerable expertise. General Walker has achieved this. He has done more to modernise the British Army than any other Chief of the General Staff in living memory. You heard his vision earlier. The DIP will make real those ambitions — and that includes investing in the uncrewed ground vehicles the Army requires to build the next generation of land forces.

    And let me say this: all of the Chiefs have my full support, not just during this process, but way beyond it.

    Now, I’d like to take just a moment, if I may, to address our friends from industry. Because to say recent months haven’t been easy would perhaps be an understatement. But I’m grateful to you all, and I will be relying on you to implement the DIP and to make it a success. Though my life has been spent in public service, I have never mistaken where prosperity comes from. Our defence industrial base represents a commitment to excellence and to entrepreneurialism – hallmarks of the British spirit. You are a source not only of a pay check for many, but of pride for communities across our country. Most of all, you exist to equip the finest armed forces with the most advanced technology — kit they can rely on, operate with confidence and employ with precision. Something I saw during my first engagement in this role, at the opening of the Pulsar Systems Centre in Swindon.

    The problems with how we spend money in defence are well known and long established. So too is the ritual of every Defence Secretary promising to fix them. I’ll skip that particular ritual and just ask to be judged on what I do rather than what I say. I know that I have a unique responsibility, given what Cabinet colleagues have foregone from their budgets to support mine. My commitment to them, and indeed to the British public, is that with the need to spend more comes the duty to spend wisely. The DIP will lay out significant savings, and I will continue to scrutinise every line of spend to make every pound count.

    Look, I’m acutely conscious that there is something far more important that many of you would rather be watching. I don’t want to deprive anybody of a good vantage point. So I will draw my words to a close.

    Before I do, let me say this. Above all, we must never lose sight of what service in our armed forces can demand. It can be bloody hard. It asks more than any profession ever will. I tell those considering it to think about it carefully – but in return, you have the opportunity to serve your country in a way which no other profession can offer. Purpose, responsibility and belonging. You become part of something bigger – a force which secures the safety, values and interests of every person in our nation.

    My only real ambition when I arrived through the gates of Sandhurst all those years ago was to survive the place. Not for one moment did I think that one day I would be accountable for every member of our armed forces. To do so is a privilege and a responsibility beyond measure. This moment calls for leadership, and it calls for action. That is what I will provide. And I promise every single member of our armed forces that I will seek to serve them as well as they serve us.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2026 Comments on Jonathan Haskel

    Rachel Reeves – 2026 Comments on Jonathan Haskel

    The comments made by Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 23 June 2026.

    Jonathan Haskel is an outstanding nominee for Chair. His depth of expertise in economics and his track record of independent, rigorous analysis make him exactly the right person to lead the OBR – supporting the credibility of our fiscal framework and ensuring our economy is underpinned by sound public finances.

  • David Lammy – 2026 Statement on the G7 Summit

    David Lammy – 2026 Statement on the G7 Summit

    The statement made by David Lammy, the Deputy Prime Minister, on 22 June 2026.

    I am making this statement on behalf of the Prime Minister. I spoke earlier today on the Prime Minister’s record across the country—stabilising the economy, driving down waiting lists in the national health service, and lifting half a million children out of poverty—but I want to start this statement by paying tribute to his record on foreign policy, which is second to none.

    As Foreign Secretary when we entered government, I saw at first hand the Prime Minister rebuild our relationships across the world. The EU reset that we led put Britain at the heart of Europe once again. Embracing President Zelensky on the steps of Downing Street, on one of Ukraine’s darkest days, was symptomatic of the leadership that the Prime Minister has shown across Europe and in relation to the threats from Vladimir Putin—principled, courageous and on the right side of history. He drove investment for working people, with five trade deals in two years.

    When it came to the most sober decision that a Prime Minister has to make—on a matter of life, death and war—and others were pushing for the UK to jump head first into another war in the middle east, Keir Starmer stood strong, stood firm and said, “No, this is not our war,” putting British soldiers and the national interest first. He made Britain safer, rebuilt Britain’s reputation around the world, and drove investment and growth that will support working families in Britain for decades to come. Regardless of their politics, everyone in this House owes a debt of gratitude to the Prime Minister on foreign affairs.

    I turn now to the specifics of the G7 summit, and let me start with Ukraine. Once again, Russia chose to launch a huge attack on Ukraine on the eve of an international summit. In a show of its disdain for diplomacy, Russia killed innocent civilians in Kyiv and Kharkiv, and hit the 11th-century Pechersk Lavra, a sacred site at the very heart of Ukrainian culture. The G7 has a shared sense of outrage at Russia’s conduct, but we also have a shared sense that the situation is changing. Ukraine has a new-found momentum. It is increasingly able to push Russia back on the battlefield, and the mood in Moscow is turning against the war. Almost half a million Russians have now lost their lives. Each month Russia mobilises around 30,000 people, and each month it loses the same number on the battlefield, with no progress to show for it.

    At the same time, the Russian economy is struggling and may already be in recession, so we will seize this moment by continuing our military support. We are providing more air defence missiles and our biggest package of drones to date, financed with the profits of seized Russian assets. We are providing vital export finance to help rebuild Ukraine’s energy system, and we are going further to increase the pressure on Russia’s economy, because we know the impact that this is having.

    At the summit my right hon. and learned Friend the Prime Minister announced 70 new sanctions, bringing the UK up to around 500 sanctions on Russia this year alone, aimed at breaking up its military procurement supply chains and the illicit finance networks it uses to circumvent sanctions and, of course, targeting the Russian shadow fleet. I am sure the whole House will pay tribute to the Royal Marines who interdicted a shadow fleet vessel in the channel last weekend alongside officers from the National Crime Agency.

    This is the moment to ramp up the pressure, and President Zelensky is clear that he is ready to talk, but this must recognise the reality on the ground and Ukraine’s new-found momentum. Any negotiations would need to be on the basis of the current line of control, not on Putin’s unrealistic demand for territory that he has failed to win on the battlefield. Russia should note the level of unity shown on this point and the G7’s pledge of unwavering support for Ukraine that will continue until we reach a just and lasting peace.

    Let me turn to the middle east. Getting to the deal between the United States and Iran has been bumpy, but it creates a moment of opportunity to bring down the cost of living for the British people and put the middle east on a better path, which is vital for global stability. We are now working to help implement this deal to ensure that the region does not go back to war and that the 60-day negotiation period ends in a longer-term settlement.

    Negotiations are the best way to secure our aims: first, that Iran is never allowed to have a nuclear weapon; secondly, that it stops its attacks across the region; and, thirdly, that the strait of Hormuz is reopened to shipping, with no restrictions and no tolls. That is why, with President Macron, we have brought together an international coalition ready to help reassure shipping. We are in talks now about how to deploy this multilateral military mission in support of the deal and to explore immediate support for de-mining in the strait.

    We should also place this in the broadest possible context, recognising the need to make progress across the region. The extremely fragile ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon must be implemented in full, and I call on the Israeli Government to show restraint to that end, including in their use of inflammatory language. The G7 agreed to work together in support of their process and to strengthen the Lebanese Government, so that they can regain the monopoly on the use of force in the country.

    On Palestine, I want to speak very frankly. Israel must stop blocking aid into Gaza, stop settlement expansion in the E1 area of East Jerusalem, which threatens the viability of the two-state solution, and stop settler violence across the west bank. We have a precious opportunity now to move on from the violence of the last three years in the interests of innocent people across the region. This should be our aim, bringing all our partners together in that effort.

    Significant progress was also made last week on migration, with a strong G7 statement outlining practical common steps on returns and sanctioning the criminal gangs. With President Macron, my right hon. and learned Friend the Prime Minister took a big step in our bilateral co-operation by agreeing to extend the groundbreaking Sandhurst agreement, which has already prevented more than 40,000 migrant crossings into the UK. Under this deal, new police units and riot squads will be deployed to French beaches to stop migrant boats before they take to the water. This is vital and important work.

    It is because of steps like that and the approach of this Government that we have removed 67,000 people with no right to be in our country. We have removed 9,000 foreign national offenders, and we are closing asylum hotels. We are turning the tide on these issues after years of failure. Under the last Government, net migration reached almost 1 million. We have reduced it by 82% in two years. UK immigration figures are the lowest today since 2012. Where the last Government failed, we are delivering.

    The same is true on growth and investment. On the eve of the summit, my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister welcomed the Prime Minister of Japan to Downing Street, to deepen our strategic partnership after they met in Tokyo in January. They agreed more than £18 billion-worth of investment in this country, creating tens of thousands of new jobs in infrastructure, offshore wind and financial services. That shows the value of building such bonds. This was followed, at the summit, with deals for a further £1.3 billion of investment from France and India in clean energy and artificial intelligence, creating more than 1,300 new jobs in Manchester, Leeds and Birmingham. My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister agreed with India’s Prime Minister Modi the entry into force of the UK-India free trade agreement. This is the UK’s quickest ever turnaround from signing to entry into force, and it is one of the biggest deals either country has ever done. It will boost British GDP by £4.8 billion and boost real wages for British workers by £2.2 billion.

    Finally, the House will note that tomorrow marks the 10th anniversary of the Brexit referendum. We know the world has changed fundamentally since 2016. We know that Brexit has damaged the economy, so there is no doubt in our mind where the national interest lies today—in closer co-operation with Europe. EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister agreed to intensify work to deepen our economic ties. We look forward to a forthcoming second UK-EU summit at the earliest opportunity.

    Unity on Ukraine to protect our collective security; unity on the middle east to bring down the cost of living and bring back stability; progress on tackling illegal migration, driving down the numbers day after day; and huge new investments in the UK, creating new opportunities and changing people’s lives—real results for the British people. At the same time, the Government have brought down mortgage rates and inflation to help with the cost of living, and have held them flat to fight what is happening globally.

    We are supporting families with the summer savings package, so that they can spend time together this August. We are banning social media for children to keep them safe, lifting half a million people out of poverty, boosting workers’ rights and renters’ rights, and bringing down NHS waiting lists at the highest rate for 17 years. This Government are focused on what really matters: serving the national interest and delivering for the British people. I commend this statement to the House.

  • Darren Jones – 2026 Comments on Keir Starmer’s Resignation

    Darren Jones – 2026 Comments on Keir Starmer’s Resignation

    The comments made by Darren Jones on 22 June 2026.

    I was proud to stand on Downing Street with the Prime Minister this morning.

    And I’m proud of the Britain that this Labour government is working to deliver – a country where power, wealth and opportunity is shared amongst the many and not the few.

    Keir Starmer brought our Labour Party back from the brink into government after 14 years in opposition.

    He did so because the public trusted us on the economy and on national security, and because they voted for our manifesto.

    My party mustn’t forget the lessons of our successive defeats, and must remember why and how we won only two years ago.

    Whatever happens next, we can be grateful for Keir Starmer’s leadership and the work his government has done to put Britain back on a path to a brighter future.

    We wish Keir and his family all the best for what comes next, and remain forever grateful for what he has done for my party and for our country.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2026 Comments on Keir Starmer’s Resignation

    Rachel Reeves – 2026 Comments on Keir Starmer’s Resignation

    The comments made by Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 22 June 2026.

    From taking our party from the worst defeat in modern history, Keir Starmer turned it around and delivered a landslide majority just four years later.

  • Stella Creasy – 2026 Comments on Keir Starmer’s Resignation

    Stella Creasy – 2026 Comments on Keir Starmer’s Resignation

    The comments made by Stella Creasy, the Labour MP for Walthamstow, on 22 June 2026.

    For some time now Labour has left too many questions unanswered. The “who?” replacing the necessary debate and work to address the “what?”. That isn’t just about policy making, but our culture and our campaigns too.

    That is down to us all. As he stands down as PM wish Keir Starmer the very best for his future, as he tried to govern without those questions being answered – and urge the whole Labour movement to recognise if we don’t grip the question of purpose history will always be against us.

    The British public need to see how and why we offer a better future against those who only offer hate and half baked promises – now is the time for us to show not just who we are but why that matters and how it makes a difference.

  • Heidi Alexander – 2026 Statement on the Bedford Rail Crash

    Heidi Alexander – 2026 Statement on the Bedford Rail Crash

    The statement made by Heidi Alexander, the Secretary of State for Transport, in the House of Commons on 22 June 2026.

    With permission, Madam Deputy Speaker, I would like to make a statement on the tragic collision between 2 passenger trains on Friday, 19 June 2026.

    I realise honourable members will be aware of some of the details, but today I’d like to set out the facts as we know them so far.

    At approximately 17:15 on Friday evening, 2 East Midlands Railway passenger trains collided at Elstow near Bedford.

    The 16:40 service from Corby to London St Pancras struck the stationary 15:50 service from Nottingham to St Pancras. 

    Within minutes, emergency services were on the scene. 

    A joint response then followed, including Fire and Rescue Services, the ambulance service, National Police Air Service, British Transport Police, Bedfordshire Police and railway staff.

    They evacuated passengers safely, provided medical assistance, secured the railway and began recovery operations.

    By 23:00, all passengers were clear of the scene.

    Madam Deputy Speaker, it deeply saddens me to confirm to the House that the driver of the Corby to London St Pancras train died in the collision.

    His family have asked for privacy at this horrendously difficult time, but I am sure I speak for the whole House when I offer them our deepest condolences. 

    According to the latest information I have from the BTP, at least 33 people were taken to hospital, with a third of those in a serious condition.

    At least 56 other people were treated for injuries.

    A number of the injured remain in a critical condition today.

    We are thinking of all of them and their families.

    Madam Deputy Speaker, all responders, to a person, acted quickly, professionally and bravely in the most challenging of circumstances.

    Circumstances that many of us will never experience nor quite understand.

    Indeed, Chief Constable Lucy D’Orsi of the British Transport Police told me over the weekend that the teamwork between emergency services, railway staff and the Rail Accident Investigation Branch was the best she’d ever seen.

    Let me take this opportunity to thank every single one of them.

    I would also like to thank the NHS staff who are still providing care to the injured as we speak.

    Often in the hours and days after events such as these, small acts of compassion and selflessness start to emerge.  

    Whether it was members of the local community, who lived near the stranded trains, providing bottles of water to stranded passengers.

    The Salvation Army’s food truck that’s been on the scene since the incident.

    Or station staff along the route, who supported passengers amid the disruption.

    I was particularly moved to hear the ticket inspector on the Corby train, despite being injured himself, radioed in to close the rail line whilst also checking everyone else was ok. 

    As I’ve said before, I truly believe the best of us show up in the worst of times – and that is again the case here.

    Madam Deputy Speaker, this is news no Transport Secretary ever wants to deliver.

    And while I completely understand the strength of feeling out there. While I hear clearly the clamour for answers, for the need to understand the cause of this tragedy.

    I must ask everyone for some patience – as hard as I know that will be.

    I am determined we get all the answers we’re looking for and that lessons are learned.

    The Rail Accident Investigation Branch – whose inspectors were on the scene within hours – have already launched an independent investigation. And they have confirmed there will be an update in the coming days.

    They, and they alone, will identify the cause and will make recommendations which I will consider with the utmost care and due diligence.

    Meanwhile, I urge everyone to await their findings and to hold off on speculation.

    Madam Deputy Speaker, those most affected by this tragic incident will continue to receive the support they need.

    In addition to direct care provided by the emergency services, East Midlands Railway have a customer care and welfare support team to provide assistance to passengers.

    They have also set up a dedicated care line that anyone affected can contact.

    Throughout, my department will remain in close contact with the British Transport Police and local emergency services, Network Rail, East Midlands Railway, the Rail Accident Investigation Branch and the Office of Rail and Road.

    The Rail Minister has already spoken to the General Secretaries of the RMT and ASLEF.

    As well as to honourable members, including the Member for Bedford, the Member for Milton Keynes North, the Member for Mid Bedfordshire, the Member for Corby and East Northamptonshire, the Member for Wellingborough and Rushden and the Member for Kettering.

    Madam Deputy Speaker, now that investigators have gathered evidence from the scene, Network Rail will recover the trains and restore the infrastructure.

    This will be a complex operation – involving lifting and removing damaged trains, repairing the rails and removing and replacing overhead lines. 

    That is why the railway is expected to remain closed between Bedford and Luton for the rest of the week. There will, however, be services running between Luton and London St Pancras.

    Rail replacement services were already in place along the Midland Main Line due to planned engineering works over the weekend. Those works were cancelled, but the replacement services continue to offer passengers alternative routes to travel.

    I’ve also instructed train operators to accept tickets from customers using alternative routes.

    However, my message to passengers who would normally use this route is that if your travel is not essential, please make alternative arrangements. 

    Madam Deputy Speaker, I realise the following words may ring hollow to those affected by Friday’s events, but they remain important nonetheless.

    Britain does have one of the safest railways in the world.

    Thankfully, incidents like this are extremely rare, and, when they do occur, they are taken very seriously.

    Safety remains the absolute priority across our rail network – of that there should be no doubt.

    In addition to the railway’s own safety experts and the Railway Accident Investigation Branch, we also have an expert independent safety regulator. 

    I expect all of them to be studying the findings from the investigation and I will ensure the right steps are then taken.

    Madam Deputy Speaker, I would like to close by reassuring the House that we will provide updates as more information becomes available.

    And I would like to offer my sympathies again to everyone affected and express my heartfelt thanks to those who responded so heroically in the aftermath.

    I commend this statement to the House.

  • Sam Rushworth – 2026 Comments on Keir Starmer’s Resignation

    Sam Rushworth – 2026 Comments on Keir Starmer’s Resignation

    The comments made by Sam Rushworth, the Labour MP for Bishop Auckland, on 22 June 2026.

    Keir Starmer is a good man. A family man. He transformed the Labour Party and took us back to power. People don’t see it yet, but history will judge him well.

    Whoever we choose to lead next will have my loyal support, like Keir has had, as we go on serving the country we love.

  • Lisa Nandy – 2026 Comments on Keir Starmer’s Resignation

    Lisa Nandy – 2026 Comments on Keir Starmer’s Resignation

    The comments made by Lisa Nandy, the Labour MP for Wigan, on 22 June 2026.

    Keir Starmer took the Labour Party from our worst election defeat in nearly a century into government, where we have started to rebuild our public services, invest in our communities and open up opportunities for a generation again.

  • Nadia Whittome – 2026 Comments on Keir Starmer’s Resignation

    Nadia Whittome – 2026 Comments on Keir Starmer’s Resignation

    The comments made by Nadia Whittome, the Labour MP for Nottingham East, on 22 June 2026.

    The Prime Minister has made the right decision.

    I want to thank Keir for all his work as leader of our party. While we haven’t always seen eye to eye, I believe he cares deeply about the people of this country, and his dedication to the role has never been in question. He achieved a historic victory at the last general election and, under his tenure, our government has passed the biggest uplift to renters’ and workers’ rights in a generation; taken important action to tackle violence against women and girls; lifted children out of poverty; prioritised clean energy; and renationalised train services.

    On a personal level, I have appreciated the kindness and respect Keir has shown me, including during difficult conversations. I wish him and his family well during this period of transition and for the next chapter of their lives.

    I am sad that it has come to this, just two years into a Labour government – a precious, rare opportunity that has largely been squandered, burning through political goodwill and opening the door to a far-right government come the next election.

    Even though I did not vote for Keir to become leader, I desperately wanted him and our party to succeed. Throughout many disagreements and mistakes, I hoped the situation was retrievable and that he could change direction. Last November, when it became clear that the Prime Minister and those around him were unwilling to genuinely listen and learn from their errors, I publicly called for him to stand down.

    Going forward, we cannot continue with more of the same, just with someone new at the helm. We need a change of direction that is much bolder on the cost-of-living crisis, refuses to give an inch to Reform and aims to unite the country in the face of division.

    When Keir stood to be Labour leader in 2020, he ran on a platform that largely had my support. That platform – which included taxing the rich, public ownership, putting human rights at the heart of foreign policy, and defending migrants’ rights – came far closer to meeting the demands of our times than the direction in which he took the party afterwards. We should return to those ideas and our party’s core values, while restoring party democracy to safeguard against the same errors being made in the future.

    There must now be a timely and fully democratic contest, in which candidates set out their policies and Labour and affiliated trade union members elect the next leader.