Tag: 2026

  • Keir Starmer – 2026 Response to Nigel Farage Comments on Henry Nowak

    Keir Starmer – 2026 Response to Nigel Farage Comments on Henry Nowak

    The comments made by Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, in the House of Commons on 3 June 2026.

    I do not believe that there is two-tier policing in this country. I am really shocked that the hon. Gentleman pretends to have respect for Henry’s family and then acts in this way.

    The grieving family have asked us not to respond in the way that the leader of Reform has responded. They have lost their son in the most appalling circumstances, and they make a simple plea of us as human beings to please not exploit that. We all need to reflect on the words of Henry’s father.

    My response, and the response of others, to be fair, has been focused on the lessons to be learned so that we can deliver justice. The hon. Gentleman’s response has been to appeal for rage. That is his response to a father who has lost his son and asked for that not to happen. Exploiting this tragedy to create grievance and division would be wrong in any circumstances, but to do it when the family are expressly saying, “Please don’t,” is unforgivable. It shows exactly who he is.

  • Lisa Nandy – 2026 Comments on Appointment of Dawn Airey as Incoming Chair of Arts Council

    Lisa Nandy – 2026 Comments on Appointment of Dawn Airey as Incoming Chair of Arts Council

    The comments made by Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, on 2 June 2026.

    I am thrilled to announce Dawn Airey as the incoming chair of Arts Council England. She will take the helm at this incredibly important time, as this Government seeks to unlock access to exceptional arts for everyone, everywhere.

    Dawn brings more than just a wide range of experience across broadcasting, theatre and the wider arts – she brings a passion for what the arts can do for this country and all the people in it. I have no doubt that she will insist on pressing ahead with long overdue action to put people back at the centre of their own national story.

    I would also like to thank Sir Nicholas Serota for his tireless dedication to the arts and to artists. His tenure as Chair was during perhaps the most challenging time for the arts, encompassing funding cuts, a global pandemic, Brexit negotiations and the downgrading of arts on the national curriculum.

    Throughout all of this he has been a calm, passionate and reassuring presence and a steadfast champion for access to great art. We owe him our gratitude.

  • Great Yarmouth and Waveney Pride – 2026 Statement on Comments Made by Rupert Lowe

    Great Yarmouth and Waveney Pride – 2026 Statement on Comments Made by Rupert Lowe

    The statement made by Great Yarmouth and Waveney Pride on 2 June 2026.

    Rupert, your comments are deeply harmful, completely misinformed, and do not represent the truth about what that flag stands for – or the reality of the lives of LGBTQ+ people, young or old, here in Great Yarmouth. Let us correct every false and damaging claim you have made:

    That flag is the Pride flag – inclusive of trans, non‑binary, and gender‑diverse people – and it stands for safety, visibility, acceptance, and dignity. It is raised to say to every queer person in our town: you are welcome here, you belong here, and you deserve to be treated with respect. It is raised for the young person who feels alone, for the family who worries about their child, and for everyone who has faced discrimination or fear just for being themselves. To twist that symbol of hope into something hateful is a gross misrepresentation.

    Your description of healthcare for trans people is factually wrong, offensive, and dangerous. Medical care is evidence‑based, regulated by the NHS and NICE, and follows strict, careful guidelines. For young people, care is supportive, therapeutic, and never involves “life‑altering drugs or surgery” without extensive assessment, consultation, and long‑term support – it is designed to reduce distress, save lives, and help people thrive. To call it “mutilation” is a cruel, dehumanising lie that ignores the lived experience of trans people and the medical consensus. This care does not “destroy lives” – it transforms them for the better, and for many, it is life‑saving.

    Language like “sick gender ideology” and “vile idea” is not debate – it is bigotry. It is the same kind of language that contributes to the shockingly high rates of hate crime, mental ill health, and isolation that LGBTQ+ people face every single day. Research repeatedly shows that when communities, councils, and public bodies show support – by raising a flag, by speaking up, by being visible – it improves wellbeing, safety, and outcomes for young people. It does the opposite of harm.

    Great Yarmouth Borough Council raising that flag is not something to be ashamed of – it is something to be proud of. It is a promise that they serve all residents, not just those who share your narrow views. It is a recognition that our community is diverse, and that everyone deserves to be seen.

    Your threat to remove this support if your political group takes control tells us everything we need to know: you do not want to represent everyone in this town. You want to erase, exclude, and marginalise people who are already vulnerable. As an MP, your job is to stand up for every single person in your constituency – including trans people, including queer young people, including their families.

    We at Great Yarmouth and Waveney Pride will continue to stand for truth, for equality, and for love. We will continue to lift up voices that are silenced, and to fight for a town where everyone can live safely and freely. We invite you to educate yourself, to listen to trans people and their families, and to use your position to bring people together – not to spread fear and division.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Bradford housebuilder, Ishfaq Hussain, cheated creditors by secretly transferring company land to his partner [June 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : Bradford housebuilder, Ishfaq Hussain, cheated creditors by secretly transferring company land to his partner [June 2026]

    The press release issued by the Insolvency Service on 2 June 2026.

    • Ishfaq Hussain secretly moved £250,000 of development land out of a failing company leaving creditors with nothing
    • Hussain told investigators the land had gone to a stranger when it had gone to the mother of his eight children
    • He signed documents under a false name, denied it was him, and was caught on CCTV

    A Bradford housebuilder who transferred development land worth £250,000 out of his failing construction company to a firm controlled by his partner has been sentenced.

    Ishfaq Hussain signed over the two pieces of land from Reeson Homes Ltd, a company where he was sole director, to Paddington Homes Ltd, as creditors closed in and the company faced insolvency.

    Paddington Homes Ltd was incorporated on the same day Hussain instructed solicitors to transfer the land, with his partner appointed as its sole director.

    No money changed hands despite transfer documents falsely recording a payment of £250,250.

    The 54-year-old then claimed the land had been sold to an unconnected third party and that payment had been made.

    Hussain, of Sunbridge Road, Bradford, pleaded guilty on the first day of his trial earlier this year to an offence of fraudulently transferring company property under the Insolvency Act 1986.

    He was sentenced to six months in prison, suspended for 12 months, when he appeared at Leeds Crown Court on Monday 1 June.

    Hussain was also disqualified as a company director for four years and ordered to complete 180 hours of unpaid work.

    Mark Stephens, Chief Investigator at the Insolvency Service, said:

    Ishfaq Hussain deliberately moved his company’s most valuable asset into the hands of a connected company at the very moment his creditors were closing in. This was not a mistake or a misunderstanding but a calculated attempt to ensure that people owed money would never be paid.

    Hussain repeatedly lied to investigators, denied any personal connection to his partner’s company, and even used false names to cover his tracks.

    Directors who think they can defraud their creditors and then lie their way out of it should be in no doubt that we have the tools and the determination to hold them to account.

    Reeson Homes Ltd was set up in Bradford by Hussain in November 2014.

    In 2015 and 2016, the company purchased two adjoining pieces of land on the south side of Wilsden Road, Allerton, Bradford, known as Sandy Lane, with the intention of developing them for housing.

    Hussain engaged a number of contractors to carry out development work, running up significant debts that Reeson Homes Ltd did not pay.

    By early 2017, the company had no income and its debts to creditors exceeded £183,000. The Sandy Lane land was its only significant asset.

    Hussain instructed solicitors to transfer the Sandy Lane land out of Reeson Homes Ltd on the same day that Paddington Homes Ltd was incorporated in February 2017.

    Paddington Homes Ltd was run by Hussain’s partner who he later repeatedly told investigators was merely a business acquaintance he owed money to.

    The two pieces of land were transferred to Paddington Homes Ltd by deed the following month, with paperwork recording a sale price of £250,000. No money was ever paid.

    A winding-up petition was issued against Reeson Homes Ltd by a company owed more than £40,000 for work carried out on the Sandy Lane site. Reeson Homes Ltd was wound-up by the court in June of that year.

    In the months that followed, Hussain made repeated false statements about the transfer to insolvency practitioners, creditors and official investigators.

    At a creditors’ meeting, he described the land as having been sold to an “unconnected party”.

    He told the Official Receiver – a court-appointed official who investigates how and why companies fail – he had no personal connection to Paddington Homes Ltd.

    Hussain also signed a personal guarantee for work carried out on the Sandy Lane site under the false name “Adam Khan”, using a contact number registered to him.

    When CCTV footage from the day the guarantee was signed was later obtained, it showed Hussain as the person who had signed it. He nevertheless denied having signed any personal guarantee and claimed “Adam” was a childhood nickname.

    The land was subsequently recovered through civil proceedings brought by the liquidator at Bradford County Court in 2019.

    Further information

    • Ishfaq Hussain is of Sunbridge Road, Bradford. His date of birth is 14 January 1972
  • Kay Mason Billig – 2026 Comments on Norfolk County Council Lowering Ukraine Flag

    Kay Mason Billig – 2026 Comments on Norfolk County Council Lowering Ukraine Flag

    The comments made by Kay Mason Billig on 2 June 2026.

    Why would we not support our friends in Ukraine?

    We have a Memorandum of Understanding with the Lviv region for economic exchange between their area and us here in Norfolk. Everyone benefits.

    We welcomed refugees from the illegal and unjust war perpetrated by Russia. Some have stayed until the conflict is over, others have gone home. We offered a safe place for innocent people.

    We stand with Ukraine. It costs us NOTHING to fly their flag in solidarity.

    BUT…. Reform at County Hall don’t agree. They have torn down the flag.

    Shame on them.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Escalation in Lebanon and across the Blue Line risks undermining critical negotiations to achieve peace across the region – UK statement at the UN Security Council [May 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : Escalation in Lebanon and across the Blue Line risks undermining critical negotiations to achieve peace across the region – UK statement at the UN Security Council [May 2026]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 2 June 2026.

    Statement by Ambassador James Kariuki, UK Chargé d’Affaires to the UN, at the UN Security Council meeting on Lebanon.

    The United Kingdom joined in calling this meeting to condemn the severe escalation of Israeli military action in Lebanon over recent days.

    This reckless and disproportionate escalation of Israeli military action has exacerbated an already devastating environment for Lebanese civilians and placed the Government of Lebanon under further strain. Civilians have been killed and over 1 million displaced, civilian homes and infrastructure destroyed, and the space for diplomacy eroded.

    Further escalation on this scale is simply not proportionate and cannot set the conditions for lasting peace.

    We reiterate that Hizballah, at the instigation of Iran, have dragged Lebanon into a war that its government and people do not want. We strongly condemn Lebanese Hizballah’s ongoing attacks against Israel. We also condemn recent comments by

    Hizballah’s leadership that seek to destabilise the democratically elected Government of Lebanon within their own country. Hizballah does not speak or act for the people of Lebanon.

    We are clear Hizballah must end attacks on Israel and disarm.  

    UNICEF reported last week that 15 children were killed and 62 injured in Lebanon last week as a result of the conflict – that’s 11 children killed or injured every 24 hours. Healthcare workers are also facing death and injury as they carry out their duties.

      The escalation must end. We call upon all parties to uphold their obligations under international law. 

    Israel’s legitimate concerns about the security of their northern communities will not be solved by military escalation. The talks convened by the US between the Governments of Israel and Lebanon are the only viable path towards a lasting political settlement and the disarmament of Hizballah.

    We warmly welcomed these talks – and yet progress is being undermined by both Hizballah and Israel. All parties must implement a genuine and lasting cessation of hostilities to allow space for real diplomatic progress.  

    We support the efforts of the Lebanese government to extend its authority throughout the country in line with UNSCR 1701, including through the strengthening of Lebanese state institutions and security forces, and the disarmament of Hizballah. We call for swift implementation. Escalation in Lebanon and across the Blue Line risks further destabilising Lebanon and undermining critical negotiations to achieve peace across the region.  

    The UK will continue to support diplomatic efforts that deliver lasting peace and security for both Lebanon and Israel.

  • Peter Mandelson – 2024 Letter to David Lammy

    Peter Mandelson – 2024 Letter to David Lammy

    The letter sent by Peter Mandelson to David Lammy on 18 November 2024.

  • PRESS RELEASE : UK Trade Secretary in New Delhi to progress next stage of trading relationship [June 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : UK Trade Secretary in New Delhi to progress next stage of trading relationship [June 2026]

    The press released issued by the Foreign Office on 1 June 2026.

    Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle will meet India’s Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal in New Delhi to advance trading relationship already worth £48 billion.

    • Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle will meet India’s Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal in New Delhi to advance trading relationship already worth £48 billion
    • With the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz causing global economic shocks, the UK-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) can unlock a timely boost for both economies
    • FTA will slash 99% of UK tariffs and 90% of Indian tariffs, benefiting businesses in both countries from day one

    Businesses and consumers across Britain and India are set to receive a timely boost in the face of global economic shocks, as the UK ramps up work this week to bring the UK-India Free Trade Agreement into force as soon as possible.

    Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle will arrive in New Delhi tomorrow (2 June) to meet Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal to discuss bringing the FTA into force as quickly as possible, a priority for both governments.

    And as global conflicts including the continued blockade of the Strait of Hormuz are causing economic shocks across the world’s biggest economies, Peter Kyle sees advancing the UK’s vital economic partnership with India as a key priority, with significant mutual benefits.

    The Trade Secretary’s visit during this time of rapid global change signals the UK’s determination to unlock the next phase of our modern economic partnership with India, so it can deliver growth for people in both countries. Bilateral trade is already worth £48 billion a year and the FTA will liberalise 99% of UK tariffs and 90% of Indian tariffs, supporting cheaper, quicker, and easier exports and trade between our markets.

    The Trade Secretary will also meet with Indian and British industry leaders aiming to support businesses to prepare for the deal coming into force.

    The UK-India FTA is the biggest and most economically significant bilateral trade deal the UK has agreed since leaving the European Union. It covers 30 chapters – including standalone chapters on gender, innovation, environment, and labour – making it one of the most comprehensive trade deals that India has ever signed.

    The visit follows the Prime Minister’s trade mission to India late last year, where he and the Trade Secretary were joined in Mumbai by 125 of the UK’s most prominent CEOs, entrepreneurs and business leaders, unlocking significant opportunities for British business across numerous industries following the signature of the FTA.

    Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle said:

    From whisky to automotives, this landmark deal will unlock massive opportunities for businesses and consumers in the UK and India.

    I’m here in New Delhi to progress implementing this win-win agreement, which is worth billions to our economies.

    I look forward to working with Piyush Goyal to make sure everybody can start to feel the benefits as soon as possible.

    The UK Government is committed to delivering the certainty and stability that businesses need to grow in tough times. The trade deals we have struck with partners around the world support businesses to export and grow, boost jobs and increase wages. In May, the UK became the first G7 country to agree a trade deal with the Gulf Cooperation Council. This marked the fifth agreement following major deals with India, the US, the EU and South Korea. 

  • PRESS RELEASE : Boost for Britain’s air defence stockpiles in the Middle East with hundreds more UK-made missiles [June 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : Boost for Britain’s air defence stockpiles in the Middle East with hundreds more UK-made missiles [June 2026]

    The press release issued by the Ministry of Defence on 1 June 2026.

    New contracts worth £36 million to supply hundreds of Lightweight Multirole Missiles for UK Armed Forces.

    The Ministry of Defence has signed new contracts with Thales in the UK to supply hundreds more Lightweight Multirole Missiles to the Armed Forces – boosting UK stockpiles and strengthening the protection of British personnel in the Middle East and beyond.

    Deliveries will begin in the coming months and continue throughout 2026, ensuring the Armed Forces remain equipped to counter aerial threats.

    The contracts support around 700 highly skilled jobs at Thales in Belfast, where the missiles are designed and manufactured. This Government is backing UK defence industry – supporting jobs while boosting national security and resilience.

    The latest contract, placed by the National Armaments Director Group in May, follows an additional order for the battle-proven Lightweight Multirole Missiles in April.

    Lightweight Multirole Missiles have already proven highly effective on operations. They have played a key role in defeating drone attacks in the Middle East, with more than 100 drones shot down using the missiles, including by RAF Regiment gunners using the Rapid Sentry air defence kit.

    Defence Secretary, John Healey MP, said:

    Our UK defence industry is the backbone of our Armed Forces. This is our new partnership with industry in action.

    We’re getting UK-built kit into the hands of our forces faster as we support good skilled jobs and drive growth across the UK. These interceptor missiles are battle-proven – successfully used in action by our RAF sharp shooters over recent months.  

    With these LMMs, our dedicated Armed Forces will continue to keep the UK and our partners more secure in the Middle East and beyond.

    The missiles are also deployed on Royal Navy Wildcat helicopters, helping defend British people, bases, and allies from UK bases in Cyprus.

    This investment forms part of wider work by the Ministry of Defence and National Armaments Director Group to increase resilience in munitions supply chains and ensure the UK can sustain operations alongside allies.

    This year, the UK has stepped up its defensive presence across the Middle East, with more than 1,000 personnel deployed across the region, including fast jet squadrons and specialist counter-drone teams protecting British people, bases, and allies.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Domestic abusers to be evicted under new landmark housing law [June 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : Domestic abusers to be evicted under new landmark housing law [June 2026]

    The press release issued by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government on 1 June 2026.

    The government’s landmark Social Housing Bill is returning to Parliament for its Second Reading today.

    • Landlords get new powers to evict domestic abuse perpetrators from social homes
    • Decades of new-build social housing sell-off stopped as Right to Buy rules overhauled and tightened  
    • Backed by the government’s £39bn investment in social and affordable housing – the biggest in a generation

    Abusers will be evicted from social homes and victims will be able to stay safely in their communities, under a new landmark Social Housing Bill returning to Parliament for its Second Reading today (Monday 1 June).

    Under new protections, landlords and courts will be able to evict perpetrators of domestic abuse from social housing – without the victim having to leave first. 

    Currently, landlords can only evict a perpetrator after the victim has already left the home, and in joint tenancies, the only option for the victim is to end the tenancy entirely – potentially leaving them homeless.

    The Bill also closes a loophole that let abusers serve a Notice to Quit to make victims homeless. Under the proposed new law, a Notice to Quit served by a perpetrator will not end the social housing joint tenancy while court proceedings are ongoing.  

    In addition, for joint tenancies, courts will be able to transfer the tenancy into the victim’s sole name, or where staying is not appropriate, require the landlord to provide suitable alternative accommodation where available. 

    Last year, around 15,000 households in England were forced to find a new social home because of domestic abuse. This Bill means victims can stay safely in their homes and communities, close to support networks, schools, and work. 

    The news follows the swift introduction of the Bill earlier this month, which also includes the biggest overhaul of Right to Buy in a generation to reverse the decline of social housing.

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer said:

    “No victim of domestic abuse should face the awful choice between staying in danger or losing their home. This government is putting that right, so perpetrators are forced out and survivors and their children can stay safely in the homes and communities they know and love.

    “We’re also fixing the systemic issue of failing to protect and invest in social housing. I will never stand by as much-needed housing is sold off while families do not have a safe place to call home and children are growing up in temporary accommodation.

    “This government will stop at nothing to get Britain building, invest in social housing, and restore pride in communities in every part of our country.”

    Housing Secretary Steve Reed said:

    “Victims of domestic abuse have faced an impossible choice – stay in danger or make themselves homeless. This is a moral failure this government is determined to end and these changes are deeds not words that put victims first, give landlords the powers they need, and make sure perpetrators can no longer use housing as a weapon of control. 

    “But protecting tenants is only half the picture. We also need more social homes – and this Bill tackles the decades of sell-off that has left over a million families on waiting lists with nowhere to turn. Together, these reforms will make social housing safer, fairer and built to last.”

    The Bill also addresses and fixes the long-term decline in social housing. More than two million homes have been sold under the Right to Buy scheme since 1980, with many never replaced, and between 2012 and 2025, around 133,000 council homes were sold against just 51,000 replacements.

    Not only has this depleted much-needed stock, but it has also reduced the motivation and confidence of councils to build, and restricted broader investment in council housing. This has depleted supply, undermined councils’ confidence to build and restricted investment – at a time when 1.3 million households are on councils’ waiting lists and more than 175,000 children are living in temporary accommodation.

    The Right to Buy scheme provides an important route for social housing tenants to own their own home, many of whom may not otherwise be able to access home ownership, boosting social mobility and opportunity for families across the country.

    The Bill rebalances Right to Buy without closing the door on home ownership. Following extensive consultation, reforms will see eligibility rise from three to 10 years, newly built social homes protected for 35 years, hard-to-replace rural homes will be exempt, and discount rules will be updated to reflect the cash discounts cap introduced in November 2024. Councils will gain a stronger right of first refusal to buy back properties – helping recover homes lost to the scheme.

    The Bill also strips out outdated and unimplemented requirements from the Housing and Planning Act 2016, including rules forcing councils to sell high-value homes, offer fixed-term tenancies and charge higher rents to higher-income tenants, giving providers the certainty they need to build for the long term. 

    These reforms are backed by £39 billion through the 10-year Social and Affordable Homes Programme – the biggest investment in a generation. Together, they will protect existing social homes and build at the scale the country needs.

    Domestic Abuse Commissioner, Dame Nicole Jacobs said:

    “Sharing a social home with a perpetrator presents victims and survivors of domestic abuse with an impossible choice. Remaining in their home means facing further abuse but leaving could put them at risk of homelessness and struggling financially. 

    “Alongside survivors and campaigners, I have been calling for action to be taken to stop perpetrators from weaponising joint tenancies – and I’m pleased to see that the government has listened. 

    “People experiencing domestic abuse need safety and stability in order to recover and rebuild free from harm. This will be an important step towards that for many.”

    Head of Domestic Abuse Housing Alliance, Nicki Clarke said:

    “The Domestic Abuse Housing Alliance (DAHA) welcomes the Government’s tenancy reforms proposed within the Social Housing Bill. These changes represent an important and long overdue step forward, with the potential to transform the lives of many domestic abuse victims.

    “Domestic abuse typically takes place in the home and it is where most women are killed. By enabling landlords to safeguard victims and hold the perpetrators of abuse to account, these reforms will enable domestic abuse victims, including children, to achieve safety, stability and long-term housing security. This is essential for all individuals impacted by domestic abuse to rebuild their independence and move forward with lives free from harm.

    “We look forward to working with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to support the development and implementation of these measures, and to ensure that the detail of the reforms delivers meaningful, practical outcomes for those affected.”

    Head of External Affairs at Women’s Aid, Veronica Oakeshott said:

    “Today, the Social Housing Bill has received its second reading, and we are pleased to see that it contains measures to protect some survivors of domestic abuse in joint tenancies, which Women’s Aid, along with sector colleagues, have long campaigned on.

    “For too long, survivors have been faced with impossible choices – either staying with their abusers or risking homelessness – all because of outdated practices. The measures introduced in this Bill begin to change that picture by enabling social landlords to transfer a tenancy to a survivor in certain circumstances or, where needed, evict perpetrators and prevent them from unilaterally ending a tenancy. While ultimately we hope the measures will go further to enable more survivors to qualify, this is an important start.”

    Chief Executive of the National Housing Federation, Kate Henderson said:

    “This Bill demonstrates the government’s commitment to safeguarding our social homes for future generations and to strengthening protections for survivors of domestic abuse.

    “No one should be forced to lose their home to escape abuse. We strongly welcome new powers to evict perpetrators of domestic abuse from social housing. This will support survivors to remain safely in their homes where that is the right option for them and reduce their risk of homelessness.

    “Reforms to Right to Buy are an essential step towards protecting social housing stock. The policy has led to the sale of over two million social homes in its lifetime, severely depleting numbers available for low-income families.

    “We look forward to continuing to work in partnership with the government to deliver a decade of renewal for social housing and to build the new social homes our country needs.”

    Further information

    The Social Housing Bill was confirmed in the King’s Speech on 13 May 2026 and introduced to Parliament on 14 May 2026.

    For further details on the full list of measures in the Bill are available here.

    The Bill’s Right to Buy reforms build on the steps the government has already taken to date, including returning the maximum Right to Buy cash discounts to the pre-2012 levels, following a review of the impact of the higher discounts on social housing stock.

    The government response to the consultation on Reforming the Right to Buy was published in July 2025.

    The Right to Buy reforms in this Bill include:

    • Extending the minimum period of secure public sector tenancy to be eligible for the scheme from 3 to 10 years
    • Reforming the percentage discounts for the scheme, to start at 5% of the property value, increasing by 1% per annum up to a maximum of 15%, subject to the revised cash caps (whichever is lower).
    • Exempting newly built social and affordable homes from the scheme for 35 years.
    • Exempting rural properties from the scheme, which will include homes in National Parks, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty and areas designated as rural.
    • Preventing tenants who have previously benefitted from the Right to Buy from using the scheme again, with exceptions for victims of domestic abuse and in cases of irretrievable relationship breakdown.
    • Exempting council homes for market rent from the Right to Buy.
    • Extending the period in which, on resale of the property, the council has the right to ask for all, or part, of the Right to Buy discount to be repaid, from 5 to 10 years.
    • Extending the right of first refusal, in which a former Right to Buy property when sold must first be offered to the former landlord, from 10 years after the original sale to in perpetuity.
    • Allowing the Secretary of State to determine the rules governing the spending of Right to Buy capital receipts through issuing a determination.
    • Amending the Right to Acquire scheme for housing association tenants in line with the changes to the Right to Buy, to better align the two schemes.
    • Supporting councils with the administration of Right to Buy applications.

    The territorial extent of the Bill is England and Wales, with all measures at introduction applying to England only. 

    Eligibility for social housing remains unchanged. Asylum seekers are not eligible for social housing. 

    The Bill does not make changes to the private rented sector. From 1 May 2026, the Renters’ Rights Act gives private renters greater security and stability.

    For the social rented sector this Act will be implemented from October 2027.

    Under the Bill, a Notice to Quit served by a perpetrator in a social housing joint tenancy will not take effect where a notice under the domestic abuse grounds is in force, or during ongoing court or eviction proceedings, preventing the misuse of such notices to force tenants out of their homes.