Tag: Speeches

  • Robert Jenrick – 2026 Comments on Banning Visas from Sudan

    Robert Jenrick – 2026 Comments on Banning Visas from Sudan

    The comments made by Robert Jenrick on 9 June 2026.

    Reform UK have announced we will ban visas for anyone coming from Sudan.

    Enough is enough.

    To those who ask why, here are some indicative statistics:

    -The conviction rate for violence by Sudanese migrants is nearly double that for British people.

    -Only one Sudanese criminal was successfully returned back to Sudan last year.

    -99% of asylum claims from Sudan were granted in 2024.

    -There were 14,150 Sudanese-born welfare claimants in 2019. That means nearly half of all Sudanese migrants here are on benefits.

    The only reason to have immigration is if it makes British people safer and richer. Clearly migration from Sudan is doing the opposite.

    So Reform will ban it, and finally put the British people first.

    I know from my time in Westminster that only Nigel Farage has the conviction to actually get this done.

    As for the Sudanese man arrested in Belfast for trying to behead someone, he needs to be on the first flight out of the country.

    We don’t want to hear any human rights claims from him.

    We cannot live alongside someone so barbaric.

  • Steve Reed – 2026 Business in the Community Speech

    Steve Reed – 2026 Business in the Community Speech

    The speech made by Steve Reed, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government on 2 June 2026.

    Good afternoon, I’m sorry I’m the third politician you’ve had today but it’s certainly a pleasure for me to be here to speak to all of you about our work.

    So can I first by start by thanking you Sue and everyone at the BITC for all the work you are leading at Business in the Community and the change you are driving in our communities.

    I know that for over 40 years now Business in the Community have promoted responsible business and shown the benefits it can bring to every part on the country.

    We are nation of a thousand neighbourhoods, where our identity and our sense of belonging, all depend on what we see around us.

    When the streets are clean, and our high streets thriving – that’s good. 

    But when shops are empty and crime is rife – those are the time, people ask what’s going wrong. 

    I know that for Britain to get those good times rolling again, we need the public, private, and voluntary sectors to come together.

    So businesses – like yours – are at the heart of our communities.

    You are what make our places thrive, you are why people have pride in their hometown.

    And we know that if we are to match the ambition that people have for their hometown, our government must support more businesses like yours to get behind their community.

    That’s why community businesses are central to our Pride in Place programme. 

    Across nearly 300 of our poorest communities, we are rebuilding trust by handing power and funding to communities that have been ignored for too long.

    In total, nearly £6bn is being given to Neighbourhood Boards, made up of local people, to spend on whatever the local community believes it needs to succeed.  

    This money won’t end up in the pockets of remote consultants like in previous programmes.  

    Instead, led by the communities in charge – we’ll see this money flow directly into the heart of local high streets and towns. 

    As part of the engagement process, places like Scarborough, Mansfield and Runcorn have funded local businesses to find out the priorities of local residents – bringing economic benefits through supply chains. 

    Through the publications of their 10-year plans we are beginning to see how local tradesmen, electricians, and construction companies will be involved in new youth centres, libraries and community CCTV. 

    Just think about some of the projects being designed – like the new play space in Irvine, the new pool in Abroath and the Youth Zone they built in Wrexham. 

    Building each of these will mean more money being spent throughout supply chains and across the economy. 

    We want Pride in Place to support small businesses and we want to see Neighbourhood Boards using local suppliers wherever they can.

    Later this year we will publish guidance to make sure Neighbourhood Boards have our full support to use local suppliers and invest in local businesses.

    Business in the Community’s Place programme shows what is possible when businesses back their communities. In 19 places, they are bringing the community together to make change happen. 

    We want to build on this, and I am delighted that our Pride in Place Programme reaches communities where Business in the Community have already got to work. 

    Some areas – like Redcar and Cleveland – have a local Business in the Community representative sat on their board and I want to see that everywhere.

    And in other neighbourhoods, like Weston in Southampton, the local BITC lead is helping to reach out across the community to get more local people involved. 

    But we don’t want to stop there. 

    We will support every Board to work with local businesses and social enterprises – because those wider partnerships are how we deliver the change local people want to see, and we are already seeing the results of that.

    This programme amounts to £6bn for the most deprived communities in Britain – if we can use that to support community business, we can make this investment go so much further. 

    Working with you, Pride in Place can also be an engine for work and skills – creating a pipeline of employment that will sustain long-term regeneration. 

    Bexhill-on-sea is a great example of how this can work – they are now repurposing a town centre building as a co-working and skills hub.

    In Darwen, the local board are supporting bespoke programmes to bridge the skills gap and support scaling up. 

    And in Carlton, the community are developing a skills programme to improve the employment prospects of offenders. 

    These are only a few examples of the work under way. 

    Every neighbourhood in the programme has been selected because of deprivation – and so often that is because they lack good, decent work. 

    I still remember the day when I was younger that Dad, my Grandparents, my Aunt and my Uncle all lost their jobs when the printing industry collapsed in Watford.

    That pain they felt at being thrown on the scrapheap still lingers right across this nation’s former industrial heartlands. 

    If the Pride in Place programme is going to be a success, it must bring new employment and skills that are the pathway to a better future.

    We need this ‘change you can feel’ in every part of the country, but the Pride in Place programme can only focus on the most deprived neighbourhoods.

    Through a wider focus on these principles of place right across government, we can make sure everyone lives in an area they are proud of and they can thrive.

    Earlier this month we announced plans for a new Neighbourhood Guarantee to set out clear expectations of local, regional and national government, to bring visible improvements right to people’s doorsteps.

    The Guarantee will include clear expectations for keeping streets clean and accessing the full range of public services.

    To deliver this, we will launch a new digital tool which will show our progress in every single neighbourhood.

    The guarantee will benefit every part of the country, and that includes local businesses.

    The point is this – more attractive high streets draw people into town centres, and that means people spend more in local retailers and local hospitality venues.

    Places to be proud of creates consumer confidence, and that pushes more money through local supply chains.

    Improving how every neighbourhood looks is good for the economy, good for business, and good for communities.

    That’s why we need to guarantee minimum standards.

    This is about a recognition that Whitehall alone cannot back the pride people have in their area.

    This time we are putting it in the hands of those who know their area best and that’s the local businesses and local people who live there.

    Alongside the Pride in Place programme, we are devolving radical new powers to Mayors, councils and communities.

    They are the drivers of local economic growth, and they are the ones who create jobs and put money in people’s pockets

    The new right to request process means that Mayors have a direct route to ask for new powers – and we can then more easily devolve them.

    Already we have signed off on more powers to extend public transport and provide innovation funding.

    This will support real economic growth, bringing areas out of generational stagnation, and lifting the strain on welfare budgets.

    Our approach to high streets too will echo the pride people have in their town and their local city centres.

    The state of the local high street is one of the ways people measure whether, not just their area, but the whole country is going backwards or forwards.   

    They feel a profound sense of loss when a place they are proud of and which was thriving is now boarded up, closed down, and covered in graffiti. 

    We all know that the 20th century model of high streets isn’t coming back, but we should never settle for anything less than a future better than the past.

    Our village, town and city centres need to once again become true civic centres – the places where people go to meet friends and family.

    We need to support retail and hospitality, but also turn empty units into public services and community spaces.

    I want our high streets to be thriving – full of people spending time together.

    We need the right mix of retailers and venues on the high street.

    Right now, there are too often vape shops, bookies, and barbers shops that don’t appear to have any customers. 

    The answer to how we can renew our high streets rests in supporting good business, and clamping down on those who don’t play by the rules.

    We’ve already given councils new powers to limit the number of bookies in their areas. 

    And now we’re giving councils further powers to restrict the kind of shops that bring down an area down.

    Everyone can see organised crime has been moving onto our high streets, and yet councils have lacked the power to deal with it.   

    That changes with our new High Street Organised Crime Unit in the Home Office.

    This is about supporting businesses that are good for the community, by taking on those that are not.

    Our high streets are ecosystems – and vacant shops are bad for business.

    Through the high streets rental auctions programme, we are reducing vacancies by helping councils to forcibly take over the lease of long term vacant premises.

    This will open these spaces to new tenants – not just because taking out eyesores, but providing businesses with access to tenancies at below market rent.

    In the first year of the programme, this helped bring down vacancy rates in one of our pilot areas – Harworth & Bircotes – from 11% to just 3%.

    Just imagine if we could replicate that on every high street.

    Today I can announce an expansion of the programme with an additional £10m over the next two years, giving councils access to more refurbishment grants.

    I want all councils to use these powers and tackle vacancies.

    It’s all part of a wider plan to support local businesses to drive change in their area.

    Just this week we announced changes to the planning system to speed up decision-making.

    New regulations will let planning officers – rather than council committees –make the call on minor applications.

    This means that if shopkeepers or pub landlords want to make improvements, they’ll be able to get on with it much quicker.

    Now we have passed the landmark English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act, we also have new powers to support the hospitality industry.

    In historic city centre nightlife areas like Soho, businesses are in a constant battle with groups that intentionally try to close down local hospitality businesses and stop new venues from opening

    Through the new powers we’ve just taken, we will give the Mayor, who’s got a London-wide mandate, the ability to overrule important licensing decisions, so that hospitality venues can stay open, create jobs and provide for the millions who just want to go out and enjoy themselves.

    The future of our high streets relies on a partnership, and I know that many of you will have formed that through Business Improvement Districts.

    We want to let BIDs get on and make their area thrive.

    That is why our High Streets Strategy will also include measures to modernise the BID rule book.

    We will simplify voting procedures, strengthen transparency and accountability,  and crucially, include property owners in the process.

    This will unlock huge potential for investment.

    Across the country , businesses and BIDs have shown what they can contribute to revitalising high streets – as a government we need to support that, and show you that we are on your side.

    This is about a politics that respects people enough to back the pride they feel in their community.

    Respect for hometowns and for high streets.

    respect for the roads and the neighbourhoods that people live in.

    Partnering with business is the way that we can build that kind of politics.

    It is central to our Pride in Place programme, our Neighbourhood Guarantee, our devolution and our approach to high street regeneration.

    But it must also be a principle embedded right across government.

    I look forward to working with all of you, as we outline a radical new approach that shares the pride people have in their own community and in their own home town.

  • Kate Osborne – 2026 Comments on Pride Volunteers Being Abused

    Kate Osborne – 2026 Comments on Pride Volunteers Being Abused

    The comments made by Kate Osborne, the Labour MP for Jarrow and Gateshead East, on 7 June 2026.

    Overnight, Pride in Hebburn banners were torn down and damaged – less than 24 hours after volunteers had put them up. Volunteers trying to repair the damage were then subjected to abuse, which is absolutely disgraceful.

    At a time when Reform leaderships in South Tyneside, Gateshead, Sunderland and Durham have shown indifference, and in some cases disdain, towards Pride, this shows exactly why it matters so much.

    I have already written to Cllr Paul Mackings expressing my disappointment at the decision to remove the Pride flag after just one day.

    Let’s be clear the financial contributions to Prides from Council is minimal – but the signal this rhetoric sends is that the LGBT+ community are not welcome.

    This hate will not win.

    To every LGBT+ person who has seen this and felt unsafe or unwelcome: you are not alone, our community stands with you, and the majority stand with you.

  • Shabana Mahmood – 2026 Statement on the Henry Nowak Case

    Shabana Mahmood – 2026 Statement on the Henry Nowak Case

    The statement made by Shabana Mahmood, the Home Secretary, in the House of Commons on 2 June 2026.

    With permission, Mr Speaker, I will make a statement about the murder of Henry Nowak.

    Last December, Henry – aged just 18 – was a first-year university student with his life ahead of him. He was kind, hard-working, loved by his family and friends. His murder – at the hands of Vickrum  Digwa – was a horrifying act.

    Digwa murdered Henry and then lied about him, as he lay dying, falsely accusing him of racism. It was an evil act and I know the thoughts of the whole House will now be with Henry’s family and his friends just as mine are.

    What they have been through is heart-breaking and for most of us, unimaginable. I know nothing can take their pain and loss away, but yesterday, we saw some measure of justice. Digwa was sentenced to life imprisonment. He will serve a minimum term of 21 years.

    His mother, Kiran Kaur, has been convicted of “assisting an offender”. She is due to be sentenced on 17 July and today, the Crown Prosecution Service has authorised further charges against other members of the attackers’ family with further sentencing and possible charges pending. We must be cautious still in what we say about this case so that we do not place any proceedings at risk.

    However,I can and must pay tribute today to the dignified and powerful words of the Nowak family, in the statement they gave after yesterday’s sentencing. They deserve answers. They deserve answers, in particular, about what happened on that awful night and the actions of the police officers who arrived on the scene.

    I expect many in this House and many more across this country have now seen the police officer’s bodycam footage, released last night. It is, without question, a disturbing and tragic thing to see.

    People are rightly asking questions about how the situation was handled and they are shocked, and disquieted, to hear Henry’s words: “I can’t breathe.”

    I know that it is difficult to wait any longer for answers but there is a proper process to assess whether there have been incidents of police misconduct led by the Independent Office for Police Conduct – the IOPC. They will determine what could and should have been done differently. They will determine what action may need to be taken against individual officers.

    The family yesterday called on me and I quote: “To ensure the IOPC has the resources, authority and independence it needs to conduct a full, fearless and transparent investigation.” I can confirm to you today that we will do so. The IOPC will be equipped and encouraged to act, to find the truth and to ensure, if necessary, that there are consequences.

    There have been accusations, I know, of two-tier policing: That one community has been prioritised over another. It will be for the IOPC to determine the facts with regards to this specific case and I cannot and will not comment on them, but let me say this on the question of preferential treatment more widely. The police in this country have a sacred duty: To police without fear or favour.

    Everyone in this country is equal before the law. It is the promise upon which our whole justice system rests and the equality of every citizen is the foundation on which the openness, tolerance and generosity of this country rests.

    Let me also be clear about one other thing – a dangerous undercurrent that I have seen in the reaction to this awful crime. Threats against police officers are utterly unacceptable. There can be no justification for intimidation, abuse or attempts to take the law into one’s own hands.

    A police officer, unrelated to this case, has been misidentified online and subjected to death threats. He has been forced to relocate, to protect himself and his family. Misinformation and inflammatory commentary is making a dreadful situation even worse. We must all, together, condemn it and we must allow the facts to be established through the appropriate investigations and the courts. We must do so calmly and responsibly.

    The Nowak family, and Henry’s memory, deserve answers. They have also called on us all to take action: action to address the daily tragedy of knife crime in this country. This government is committed to halving knife crime in this decade.

    Since the start of this Parliament, we have made progress: knife crime has fallen by 10%, Knife homicides are down 27%, at their lowest level in a decade. Clearly, we must do more, while there are still tragedies like this one. For that reason, we have recently published our Halving Knife Crime Plan. It sets out how we will go further to drive sustained reductions in violence. It brings together action across government and across society to stop people from turning to knife crime and to ensure perpetrators are caught and brought to justice.  

    Amongst a range of measures, this will see: Schools and families supported to address the root causes of knife crime through the establishment of 50 Young Futures Hubs; police using new crime mapping tools to target enforcement more precisely; and making better use of Stop and Search and cruel and exploitative drug gangs stopped from criminally exploiting children, preventing the knife violence driven by the county lines trade.

    In relation to knife controls, there have been calls to limit the right of Sikh’s to carry their ceremonial knife, the kirpan – one of the 5 holy items in their faith. The Offensive Weapons Act of 2019, passed under the previous government, clarified and strengthened existing legal protections in relation to long kirpans. This included extending defences so that kirpans can be lawfully possessed for religious reasons and used in religious and ceremonial contexts.

    Let me be clear: carrying a knife for the purpose of religious observance is one thing. Using it, as so tragically occurred in this case, is quite another: it is a vile act. A crime of the utmost severity and it will be met with the severest punishment.

    Yesterday, the Nowak family ended their statement with a powerful call to us all. I quote: “We do not want his death to be used to create further division, hatred or tension.” They quoted the words of the prosecuting lawyer and I quote again: “This is not a case about Sikhism. This is not a case about racism. This is a case about murder.”

    I echo those words. We cannot allow this murder to turn communities against one another. We must condemn those who seek personal political profit from tragedy.

    Instead, we must show who we really are in this country. This was a murder: a vile and violent crime. The punishment must be reserved for those who are responsible for the act. We do not believe in collective punishment in this country.

    Instead, we stand together against an act of pure evil. We condemn those who committed this heinous crime, not all those who share their faith or their ethnicity.

    Yesterday, a sentence was handed down in court. I know it will never be enough. The loss felt by Henry Nowak’s family and friends will last forever. A wonderful young man will never enjoy the promise of the life that stretched out before him.

    The evil acts of his murderer and accomplice will never be undone. But we can choose to use this moment to pursue positive change. We are still limited in what we can say: there is a sentence to be handed down and further charges may follow and there is an IOPC investigation ongoing.

    I call on everyone here to be responsible in this moment, to allow justice to run its full course. However, while we must be limited in what we say, we must not be limited in how we act.

    I will end with the words of the Nowak family, once more. Last night, they wrote that “no other family should experience the heartbreak and horror of losing a child to knife crime.”

    Let that be the challenge to us all. Across this House, across government and across society.

    It is the very least we can do to honour the memory of Henry Nowak.

    I commend this statement to the House.

  • Ed Miliband – 2026 Comments on Clean Energy

    Ed Miliband – 2026 Comments on Clean Energy

    The comments made by Ed Miliband, the Secretary of State for Energy and Net Zero, on 2 June 2026.

    As Britain faces the second fossil fuel shock of the decade, the only way to protect family and business finances is to drive for clean homegrown power that we control.  

    What has been achieved so far by businesses and communities across the country is a great British success story – cutting costs by upgrading homes, backing British businesses, supporting one million good jobs according to new analysis from CBI Economics, and protecting our beautiful countryside.  

    Some people want to stick their heads in the sand and let our children face the consequences of climate breakdown – but this government believes in the timeless British value of protecting our country for generations to come.

  • Keir Starmer – 2026 Response to Nigel Farage Comments on Henry Nowak

    Keir Starmer – 2026 Response to Nigel Farage Comments on Henry Nowak

    The comments made by Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, in the House of Commons on 3 June 2026.

    I do not believe that there is two-tier policing in this country. I am really shocked that the hon. Gentleman pretends to have respect for Henry’s family and then acts in this way.

    The grieving family have asked us not to respond in the way that the leader of Reform has responded. They have lost their son in the most appalling circumstances, and they make a simple plea of us as human beings to please not exploit that. We all need to reflect on the words of Henry’s father.

    My response, and the response of others, to be fair, has been focused on the lessons to be learned so that we can deliver justice. The hon. Gentleman’s response has been to appeal for rage. That is his response to a father who has lost his son and asked for that not to happen. Exploiting this tragedy to create grievance and division would be wrong in any circumstances, but to do it when the family are expressly saying, “Please don’t,” is unforgivable. It shows exactly who he is.

  • Lisa Nandy – 2026 Comments on Appointment of Dawn Airey as Incoming Chair of Arts Council

    Lisa Nandy – 2026 Comments on Appointment of Dawn Airey as Incoming Chair of Arts Council

    The comments made by Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, on 2 June 2026.

    I am thrilled to announce Dawn Airey as the incoming chair of Arts Council England. She will take the helm at this incredibly important time, as this Government seeks to unlock access to exceptional arts for everyone, everywhere.

    Dawn brings more than just a wide range of experience across broadcasting, theatre and the wider arts – she brings a passion for what the arts can do for this country and all the people in it. I have no doubt that she will insist on pressing ahead with long overdue action to put people back at the centre of their own national story.

    I would also like to thank Sir Nicholas Serota for his tireless dedication to the arts and to artists. His tenure as Chair was during perhaps the most challenging time for the arts, encompassing funding cuts, a global pandemic, Brexit negotiations and the downgrading of arts on the national curriculum.

    Throughout all of this he has been a calm, passionate and reassuring presence and a steadfast champion for access to great art. We owe him our gratitude.

  • Rupert Lowe – 2026 Comments on Controversial Reform Advert

    Rupert Lowe – 2026 Comments on Controversial Reform Advert

    The comments made by Rupert Lowe, the MP for Great Yarmouth, on 3 June 2026.

    Reform putting out an attack ad on Kemi Badenoch misquoting her over Henry Nowak’s tragic death is a deeply misguided, ugly and offensive move.

  • Great Yarmouth and Waveney Pride – 2026 Statement on Comments Made by Rupert Lowe

    Great Yarmouth and Waveney Pride – 2026 Statement on Comments Made by Rupert Lowe

    The statement made by Great Yarmouth and Waveney Pride on 2 June 2026.

    Rupert, your comments are deeply harmful, completely misinformed, and do not represent the truth about what that flag stands for – or the reality of the lives of LGBTQ+ people, young or old, here in Great Yarmouth. Let us correct every false and damaging claim you have made:

    That flag is the Pride flag – inclusive of trans, non‑binary, and gender‑diverse people – and it stands for safety, visibility, acceptance, and dignity. It is raised to say to every queer person in our town: you are welcome here, you belong here, and you deserve to be treated with respect. It is raised for the young person who feels alone, for the family who worries about their child, and for everyone who has faced discrimination or fear just for being themselves. To twist that symbol of hope into something hateful is a gross misrepresentation.

    Your description of healthcare for trans people is factually wrong, offensive, and dangerous. Medical care is evidence‑based, regulated by the NHS and NICE, and follows strict, careful guidelines. For young people, care is supportive, therapeutic, and never involves “life‑altering drugs or surgery” without extensive assessment, consultation, and long‑term support – it is designed to reduce distress, save lives, and help people thrive. To call it “mutilation” is a cruel, dehumanising lie that ignores the lived experience of trans people and the medical consensus. This care does not “destroy lives” – it transforms them for the better, and for many, it is life‑saving.

    Language like “sick gender ideology” and “vile idea” is not debate – it is bigotry. It is the same kind of language that contributes to the shockingly high rates of hate crime, mental ill health, and isolation that LGBTQ+ people face every single day. Research repeatedly shows that when communities, councils, and public bodies show support – by raising a flag, by speaking up, by being visible – it improves wellbeing, safety, and outcomes for young people. It does the opposite of harm.

    Great Yarmouth Borough Council raising that flag is not something to be ashamed of – it is something to be proud of. It is a promise that they serve all residents, not just those who share your narrow views. It is a recognition that our community is diverse, and that everyone deserves to be seen.

    Your threat to remove this support if your political group takes control tells us everything we need to know: you do not want to represent everyone in this town. You want to erase, exclude, and marginalise people who are already vulnerable. As an MP, your job is to stand up for every single person in your constituency – including trans people, including queer young people, including their families.

    We at Great Yarmouth and Waveney Pride will continue to stand for truth, for equality, and for love. We will continue to lift up voices that are silenced, and to fight for a town where everyone can live safely and freely. We invite you to educate yourself, to listen to trans people and their families, and to use your position to bring people together – not to spread fear and division.

  • Kay Mason Billig – 2026 Comments on Norfolk County Council Lowering Ukraine Flag

    Kay Mason Billig – 2026 Comments on Norfolk County Council Lowering Ukraine Flag

    The comments made by Kay Mason Billig on 2 June 2026.

    Why would we not support our friends in Ukraine?

    We have a Memorandum of Understanding with the Lviv region for economic exchange between their area and us here in Norfolk. Everyone benefits.

    We welcomed refugees from the illegal and unjust war perpetrated by Russia. Some have stayed until the conflict is over, others have gone home. We offered a safe place for innocent people.

    We stand with Ukraine. It costs us NOTHING to fly their flag in solidarity.

    BUT…. Reform at County Hall don’t agree. They have torn down the flag.

    Shame on them.