Blog

  • Paul Scully – 2023 Speech to the Betting and Gaming Council Annual General Meeting

    Paul Scully – 2023 Speech to the Betting and Gaming Council Annual General Meeting

    The speech made by Paul Scully, the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport on 26 January 2023.

    Good morning everyone.

    I would like to start by thanking you for the invitation to speak today. And thank you for hosting it in such a convenient location for me to get to after DCMS questions in Parliament this morning.

    I am aware that you’ve seen a few different faces in the role of gambling minister in recent months and years. I took over the role in October, and I have enjoyed getting stuck into the varied and challenging issues in my remit, not the least of which is gambling.

    I have already met a wide variety of gambling stakeholders, including some of you, and I look forward to meeting more of you soon.

    Today, I want to recognise the contributions BGC members make to our national economy, but also talk about our reforms to make sure our gambling regulation suitably protects consumers from harm in the digital age.

    As you all know, our Gambling Act Review is a priority for the department, and our white paper will set out our vision for the sector in the coming weeks.

    In my role as Minister of London, I am fully aware how important entertainment sectors are in boosting the economy of a local area, by providing jobs and attracting tourism.

    I also know how online businesses provide high skill tech jobs across the country. BGC members’ ongoing commitment to apprenticeships is also welcome, and I can only encourage that to continue.

    Michael has already spoken about the recent report from EY which quantified some of these benefits, as well as the benefits to the economy and the exchequer more broadly. And it’s not always just in revenue terms.

    The millions of customers who engage with your businesses every month are for the most part choosing to spend their money on a leisure product they enjoy, and the majority suffer no ill effect. It’s important not to discount the social and entertainment benefits to customers when we think about gambling policy.

    But part of making sure the sector can flourish is making sure that we have the right regulation that protects people from harm.

    There are, to be blunt, still too many failings happening.

    Some customers continue to slip through protections and are allowed or even encouraged to spend too much.  Some go on to suffer real and serious harm, including taking their own life in extreme cases.

    I commend the actions you have been taking to address this risk, and of course the ASA and Gambling Commission have been working hard to continuously improve regulation.

    Our Act review, however, is a real opportunity to make sure we have the balance right.

    To make sure we respect people’s choice to gamble and the enjoyment they get from it. But also to follow the evidence and  address the products and practices which increase the risk of harm.

    In short, it’s an opportunity to build this county’s status as a world leader in gambling policy.

    I know you’ve all been engaged since the Call for Evidence launched and are patiently – or impatiently – awaiting the white paper.

    I also recognise regulatory certainty is important for your businesses.  We do want to have the white paper out in the next few weeks to give you that solid foundation, and so we can get on with implementing reforms.

    I want to be clear though, that the white paper is not the final word on gambling reform. It will be followed by consultations led by both DCMS and the Gambling Commission. I want the industry to stay engaged as policies are refined, finalised and implemented.

    In particular, I know one policy you’ll want to hear more on is so-called affordability checks for online customers.

    I’m not going to preempt the details of the white paper, but there are a few things I can stay at this stage.

    The first is that ‘affordability checks’ is the wrong title for the protections we’re envisaging. That word suggests that the government or Gambling Commission are going to set rules on how much people can ‘afford’ to gamble.

    Let me be really clear here, it is not the role of government or the gambling commission to tell people how much of their salary they are “allowed to” spend on gambling.

    A one size fits all approach is not the intention here. It may be more accurate to call them ‘financial risk’ checks – checking that a higher than usual level of spend is not itself an indicator of harm.

    The Commission has already identified key areas of concern, for example particularly vulnerable customers who can be harmed by even quite small losses – perhaps they have been declared bankrupt.

    Alongside that is high spending binge behaviour with the potential for lasting financial harm, and high sustained losses over a longer period of time.

    I also think ‘financial risk’ is a more appropriate term as a consideration of financial circumstances can only ever reveal that one type of risk – financial.

    I’ve heard from operators about the hundreds of markers of harm which are continuously monitored for every customer. While we all know loss and debt is often a major harm for people who are in the grip of a gambling problem, it’s not the only element.

    I don’t think we would be providing better protections to consumers by moving to a black and white world where only financial indicators are considered. It is essential that operators use all the information they have on customers and their wider risk profile to inform the right interventions.

    I also want to say a little about how this and other measures will be implemented after the white paper.

    I’ve already said that the white paper will be followed by consultations on details. When it comes to financial risk checks, the coming months will provide the opportunity to nail down and test the logistics for frictionless checks, to design the necessary data safeguards, and to establish the best possible framework for identifying and acting on financial risk. I strongly encourage you all to remain involved in the discussion, and responsive to the issues.

    Of course, making our regulatory and legislative framework fit for the digital age is also about looking at where regulation has become outdated – where it no longer provides the protection that was once intended.

    We want to make common sense changes to update the rules, preserving safeguards that do protect against gambling harm, but replacing unnecessarily restrictive controls with ones which make things better for customers and businesses. I’ll be meeting again with some of you from the land based sector in the coming weeks to talk about these issues.

    And part of the reason for getting these controls right is the economic headwinds which I know gambling businesses, particularly land based ones, are not immune from.

    I am acutely aware that many of you are still recovering from the impact of the pandemic, and recent increases in energy costs have hit your sectors particularly hard. I’m pleased we have the Energy Bill relief scheme, and I’m grateful to the BGC for its hard work to gather and submit the data to inform government decisions.

    So, we are putting the finishing touches to our white paper, making the final decisions and preparing for publication. We’re a matter of weeks away from you all seeing it, and then we can start the process of nailing down details and implementing reforms.

    As the Gambling Commission CEO said at his recent briefing for operator chief executives – the relationship between the industry and those charged with regulating it does not need to be antagonistic.

    Indeed, the BGC and its members have been very helpful throughout the review in providing data and information as requested. I hope that the spirit of positive engagement can continue after the white paper.

    I hope you enjoy the rest of your AGM, and thank you again for inviting me.

  • PRESS RELEASE : UK annual defence procurement worth more than £2 billion to Scotland [January 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : UK annual defence procurement worth more than £2 billion to Scotland [January 2023]

    The press release issued by the Ministry of Defence on 26 January 2023.

    New figures today (Thursday January 26, 2023) show Ministry of Defence (MoD) expenditure with industry and commerce in Scotland in 2021/22 was £2.01 billion.

    This is up from just under £2 billion the previous year and is the equivalent of £370 per person in Scotland.

    For the whole UK, it is £21.1 billion, working out at an average of £310 per person.

    These figures show how crucial defence is to both the security of the United Kingdom and to delivering on the Prime Minister’s priorities – growing the economy, creating better-paid jobs and opportunity right across the country.

    Scottish Secretary Alister Jack said:

    Nothing is more important than defending our country. We are so proud of our Royal Navy and all of our Armed Services. But these figures also show defence spend contributes significantly to delivering high-skilled jobs and investment in Scotland, not least through shipbuilding at which we are a world leader.

    Defence investment in Scottish shipbuilding will see order books full until the 2030s.

    In 2021/22 construction began on the first of five new Type 31 Royal Navy frigates – HMS Venturer. Building the fleet will support around 2,500 jobs both at Babcock’s Rosyth dockyard and nationally through the UK supply chain, as well as creating 150 additional apprenticeships.

    Earlier this week, the steel was cut in Rosyth on the second frigate – HMS Active. During the coming months they will rise to 6,000-tonne warships. The construction of the Type 31 frigates is part of a wider investment in UK yards and industry under the UK Government’s National Shipbuilding Strategy of more than £4 billion.

    Each ship is larger than the current Type 23s they replace but slightly shorter and lighter than HMS Glasgow and the seven other planned Type 26 frigates also being built for the fleet by BAE Systems in Govan.

    The 26s will focus on anti-submarine warfare leaving the 31s to carry out patrols wherever they are needed, from conducting counter-terrorism/drug smuggling patrols in the Indian Ocean to helping out in the aftermath of a disaster.

    Within the last couple of decades Scotland has also delivered six Type 45 destroyers, two aircraft carriers and five offshore patrol vessels.

    In 2021/22 defence has also invested in the expansion of the operational support facilities for the Poseidon P8 submarine hunter aircraft which are based at RAF Lossiemouth and there is continued investment in facilities for the Royal Navy’s submarine fleet on the Clyde.

    MoD expenditure supports around 12,700 Scottish private sector jobs – on top of the 10,400 MoD staff in Scotland. The money spent by the MoD directly supports around 25,000 jobs across the United Kingdom, plus some 20,000 jobs supported indirectly.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Two directors, Sameer Saeed and Antonia Parkes, who wrongly claimed Bounce Back Loans convicted [January 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : Two directors, Sameer Saeed and Antonia Parkes, who wrongly claimed Bounce Back Loans convicted [January 2023]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 26 January 2023.

    Following two separate cases brought by the Insolvency Service, two directors were given suspended prison sentences of 20 months and six months respectively.

    Sameer Saeed, 42, from London and Antonia Parkes, 35, from Conwy, have each been convicted for offences under the Companies Act, after being found to have abused the Bounce Back Loan financial support scheme in 2020.

    Sameer Saeed was convicted on four counts under the Companies Act and Fraud Act following an Insolvency Service investigation.

    Saeed was sole director of Digital Business Box Ltd and The Home Wills Ltd. In relation to the former, he secured a £50,000 Bounce Back Loan based on inflated turnover, and applied to dissolve the company two weeks later. In relation to the latter, he attempted to secure a £50,000 Bounce Back Loan although the company had only been established on 31 March 2020 and was therefore not eligible for any funding through the scheme. He did not receive the funds, but his attempt to secure a second loan was deemed an aggravating aspect in court.

    He pleaded guilty to offences under the Companies Act as well as fraud offences. Saeed was sentenced at Snaresbrook Crown Court on 21 December 2022 to 20 months imprisonment, suspended for 18 months, and 300 hours of unpaid work. He has undertaken to repay the £50,000 Bounce Back Loan to the bank.

    In a separate case, Antonia Parkes was convicted of an offence under the Companies Act.

    She was director of Conwy Valley Lodge Ltd, which ran a hotel close to Snowdonia in Wales. The company situation deteriorated after the start of the pandemic, and she sought financial assistance from the government. Through the Bounce Back Loan scheme, genuine businesses impacted by the pandemic could take out interest-free loans of up to £50,000.

    The Insolvency Service investigation found that Parkes had secured a £20,000 Bounce Back Loan, immediately before she applied to dissolve the company.

    The striking-off application to dissolve the company was explicit that interested parties and creditors, such as a bank with an outstanding loan, must be notified within seven days of making an application to dissolve a company. The form also highlighted that failure to notify interested parties is a criminal offence, however Parkes did not heed this warning.

    She was sentenced on 14 December 2022 at Llandudno Magistrates Court to 26 weeks’ imprisonment suspended for 12 months, with an unpaid work requirement of 120 hours.

    Julie Barnes, Chief Investigator at the Insolvency Service, said:

    In each of these two cases the company directors thought they could abuse the rules to exploit a scheme, backed by taxpayers, designed to help businesses get through the pandemic.

    We will not hesitate to prosecute these cases, and they both now have criminal convictions as a consequence of their actions.

  • Jeremy Hunt – 2023 Speech at Bloomberg on the Future of the UK Economy

    Jeremy Hunt – 2023 Speech at Bloomberg on the Future of the UK Economy

    The speech made by Jeremy Hunt, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, at Bloomberg in London on 27 January 2023.

    Good Morning

    Thank you for that welcome, thank you all for joining us at Bloomberg.

    From the way we communicate and collaborate, to the way we buy and sell goods and services, digital technology has transformed nearly every aspect of our economic lives.

    How do I know that?

    Because I too, just like Matt asked ChatGPT to craft the the opening lines of this speech.

    Who needs politicians when you have AI?

    Like other countries, the UK has been dealing with economic headwinds caused by a decade of black swan events: a financial crisis, a pandemic and then an international energy crisis.

    And my party understands better than others the importance of low taxes in creating incentives and fostering the animal spirits that spur economic growth.

    But another Conservative insight is that risk taking by individuals and businesses can only happen when governments provide economic and financial stability.

    So the best tax cut right now is a cut in inflation.

    And the plan I set out in the Autumn Statement tackles that root cause of instability in the British economy.

    The Prime Minister talked about halving inflation as one of his five key priorities and doing so is the only sustainable way to restore industrial harmony.

    But today I want to talk about his second priority, to grow the economy. (In case you weren’t sure, I have them on the screen behind me.)

    We want to be one of the most prosperous countries in Europe and today I’m going to outline the 4 pillars of our plan to get there.

    Just as our plan to halve inflation requires patience and discipline, so too will our plan for prosperity and growth.

    But it’s also going to need something else which is in rather short supply – Optimism, but we can get there.

    Just this month columnists from both left and the right have talked about an “existential crisis,” “Britain teetering on the edge” and that “all we can hope for…is that things don’t get worse.”

    I welcome the debate – but Chancellors, too, are allowed their say.

    And I say simply this: declinism about Britain is just wrong.

    It has always been wrong in the past – and it is wrong today.

    Some of the gloom is based on statistics that do not reflect the whole picture.

    Like every G7 country, our growth was slower in the years after the financial crisis than before it.

    But since 2010, the UK has grown faster than France, Japan and Italy. Not at the bottom, but right in the middle of the pack.

    Since the Brexit referendum, we have grown at about the same rate as Germany.

    Yes we have not yet returned to pre-pandemic employment or output levels.,

    But an economy that contracted 20% in a pandemic still has nearly the lowest unemployment for half a century.

    And while our public sector continues to recover more slowly than we would like from the pandemic – strengthening the case for reform – our private sector has grown 7.5% in the last year.

    Yes inflation has risen – but is still lower than in 14 EU countries, with interest rates rising more slowly than in the US or Canada.

    And yes we have to improve our productivity. But output per hour worked is higher than pre-pandemic.

    And last week a survey of business leaders by PWC said the UK was the third-most attractive country for CEOs expanding their businesses.

    Economists and journalists know you can spend a long time arguing the toss on statistics,

    But the strongest grounds for optimism comes not from debating this or that way of analysing data points but from our long term prospects: because when it comes to the innovation industries that will shape and define this century the UK is powerfully positioned to play a leading role.

    Let’s just look at some of them.

    In digital technology, as we heard from Michelle, we have become only the third economy in the world with a trillion-dollar sector.

    We have created more unicorns than France and Germany combined with eight UK cities now home to two or more unicorns.

    The London / Oxford / Cambridge triangle has the largest number of tech businesses in the world outside San Francisco and New York.

    PWC say that UK GDP will be up to 10% higher in 2030 because of AI alone. Fintech attracted more funding last year than anywhere in the world outside the US.

    Or life sciences, where we have the largest sector in Europe. And a brilliant advocate with our superb Science Minister George Freeman.

    We produced one of the world’s first Covid vaccines, estimated to have saved more than 6 million lives worldwide.

    We identified the treatment most widely used to save lives in hospitals, saving more than a million lives across the globe.

    We are behind only the US and China in terms of high-quality life science papers published, and every one of the world’s top 25 biopharmaceutical firms has operations in the UK.

    Another big growth area is our green and clean energy sector.

    The UK is a world leader here, with the largest offshore wind farm in the world. Last year we were able to generate an incredible 40% of our electricity from renewables. But on one day, a rather windy December 30th, we actually got 60% of our electricity from renewables – mainly wind.

    McKinsey estimate that the global market opportunity for UK green industries could be worth more than £1 trillion between now and 2030.

    And we are proceeding with the new plant at Sizewell C, led by our excellent Business Secretary who also spoke very wisely and surprisingly classically earlier on.

    I could also talk about our creative industries which employ over two million people and grew at twice the rate of the UK economy in the last decade.

    They have made the UK the world’s largest exporter of unscripted TV formats and help give us a top three spot in the Portland Soft Power index.

    Or our advanced manufacturing sector, key to exports, where we produce around half of the world’s large civil aircraft wings and its biggest aeroengines as well as around half of the world’s Formula One Grand Prix cars.

    The golden thread running through the industries where the Britain does best is innovation.

    Amongst the world’s largest economies, the Global Innovation Index ranks us fourth globally.

    Those innovation industries now account for around a quarter of our output. They have been responsible for nearly all our productivity growth since 1997.

    And they’re also the reason that all of you are here.

    In the audience we have leaders from Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple and Google, the world’s largest tech companies all with major operations in the UK.

    We have Monzo and Revolut, shining examples from our world-beating fintech sector.

    And we have founders and CEOs from some of our most exciting UK technology companies, like Proximie and Matillion.

    You are all vital for Britain’s economic future, but Britain is vital for your future too.

    So I want to ask all of you to help our country achieve something that is both ambitious and strategic.

    I want you to ask you to help turn the UK into the world’s next Silicon Valley.

    What do I mean by that?

    If anyone is thinking of starting or investing in an innovation or technology-centred business, I want them to do it here [in the UK].

    I want the world’s tech entrepreneurs, life science innovators, and green tech companies to come to the UK because it offers the best possible place to make their visions happen.

    And if you do, we will put at your service not just British ingenuity – but British universities to fuel your innovation, Britain’s financial sector to fund it and a British government that will back you to the hilt.

    Our universities are ranked second globally for their quality and include three of the world’s top ten.

    In order to support the ground-breaking work they do in so many new fields the government has protected our £20 billion research budget, now at the highest level in history.

    And as you look for funding to expand, we offer one of the world’s top two financial hubs and the world’s largest net exporter of financial services.

    The capability of the City of London combined with the research strengths of our universities makes our aspiration to be a technology superpower not just ambitious but achievable – and today I am here to say the government is determined to make it happen.

    But like any business embracing new opportunities, we should also be straight about our weaknesses.

    Structural issues like poor productivity, skills gaps, low business investment and the over-concentration of wealth in the South-East have led to uneven and lower growth. Real incomes have not risen by as much as they could as a result.

    Confidence in the future though, starts with honesty about the present.

    We want to be one of the most prosperous countries in Europe, so today I set out our plan to address those issues.

    That plan, our plan for growth, is necessitated, energised and made possible by Brexit.

    The desire to move to a high wage, high skill economy is one shared on all sides of that debate.

    And we need to make Brexit a catalyst for the bold choices that we’ll take advantage of the nimbleness and flexibilities that it makes possible.

    This is a plan for growth and not a series of measures or announcements, which will have to wait for budgets and autumn statements in the years ahead.

    But this plan is a framework against which individual policies will be assessed and taken forward.

    I set out that plan, those priorities under four pillars. They build on the “People, Capital, Ideas” themes set out by the Prime Minister last year in his Mais Lecture and as such are the pillars essential for any modern, innovation-led economy.

    For ease of memory the 4 pillars all happen to start with the letter ‘E’ . The Four ‘E’s of economic growth and prosperity. And they are Enterprise, Education, Employment and Everywhere.

    So let’s start with the first ‘E’ which is enterprise. If we are to be Europe’s most prosperous economy, we need to have quite simply, its most dynamic and productive companies.

    There is a wide range of literature citing the importance of entrepreneurship on business dynamism, whereby more productive firms enter and grow and less productive firms shrink.

    But I don’t just believe the theory, I have put it into practice.

    I set up and ran my own business for 14 years. It was one of the best decisions I ever made – and I actually owe it to Margaret Thatcher and Nigel Lawson.

    Because by the time I got to university and was thinking about my career options, they had changed attitudes towards entrepreneurship. Had they not, I would have probably ended up in the City or the Civil Service.

    Instead I took a different route to end up at the Treasury – less the Fast Stream, more the Long Way Round.

    Like thousands of others setting up on their own, I learned to take calculated risks, live with uncertainty and work through failures (of which there were many).

    Every big business was a start-up once – and we will not build the world’s next Silicon Valley unless we nurture battalions of dynamic new challenger businesses.

    Today, we are already ranked by the World Bank as the best place to do business amongst large European nations and second only to America in the G7.

    And the result of that pro-business climate is that since 2010 we have created more than a million new businesses in this country.

    But the question I want to ask is how are we going to generate the next million?

    Firstly, we need lower taxes. In Britain, even after recent tax rises, we have one of the lowest levels of business tax as a proportion of GDP amongst major countries.

    But we should be explicit: high taxes directly affect the incentives which determine decisions by entrepreneurs, investors or larger companies about whether to pursue their ambitions in Britain.

    With volatile markets and high inflation, sound money must come first.

    But our ambition should be to have nothing less than the most competitive tax regime of any major country.

    That means restraint on spending – and in case anyone is in any doubt about who will actually deliver that restraint to make a lower tax economy possible, I gently point out that in the three weeks since Labour promised no big government chequebook they have made £45 billion of unfunded spending commitments.

    But it isn’t just about lower taxes. We also need a more positive attitude to risk taking.

    Let’s start with one of the most public risks taken this year. Richard Branson, his team and the UK Space Agency deserve massive credit for getting LauncherOne off the ground in Cornwall.

    The mission may not have succeeded this time, but what we learn from it will make future success more likely.

    We should heed the words of Thomas Edison who said: “I have not failed 10,000 times – I’ve successfully found 10,000 ways that will not work.”

    Edison was American – and our attitude to risk in this country can still be too cautious compared to our US friends.

    But we are capable of smart risking in this country: at the start of the pandemic we bought over 350 million doses of vaccine without knowing if they would actually work – and ended up with one of the fastest and most effective vaccine programmes in the world.

    We also need, if we are going to deliver those competitive enterprises, smarter regulation.

    Brexit is an opportunity not just to change regulations but also to work with our experienced, effective and independent regulators to create an economic environment which is more innovation friendly and more growth focused.

    Our Chief Scientific Adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, is currently reviewing how the UK can better regulate emerging technologies in high growth sectors and the government is identifying where to reform the laws we inherited from the EU.

    In the digital space Patrick is working with the brilliant , Matt Clifford – who we heard from earlier- and our amazing Culture Secretary Michelle Donelan, both of whom gave excellent speeches.

    Before we conclude those findings, we want to hear from you. That why we’ve invited you this morning – and we will repeat the process for green industries, life sciences, creative industries and advanced manufacturing.

    Finally when it comes to the ‘E’ of Enterprise there is a critical need for easier access to capital, particularly scale ups.

    I am supporting important changes to the pensions regulatory charge cap and I have used the regulatory flexibility provided by Brexit to change the Solvency II regulations which will begin to be implemented in the coming months.

    Alongside other measures announced in the Edinburgh reforms, this could unlock over one hundred billion pounds of additional investment into the UK’s most productive growth industries.

    But there is much more to be done and I want to harness the ideas and the expertise in this room to turn the ‘E’ of enterprise into an enterprise culture built on low taxes, reward for risk, access to capital and smarter regulation.

    The next ‘E’ is Education.

    This is an area where we have made dramatic progress in recent years thanks to the work of successive Conservative education ministers.

    The UK has risen nearly 10 places in the global school league tables for maths and reading since 2015 alone.

    Our teachers and lecturers are some of the best in the world.

    And as the Prime Minister has said, having a good education system is the best economic, moral, and social policy any country can have.

    That is why the Autumn Statement we gave schools an extra £2.3 billion of funding and why the Prime Minister recently prioritised the teaching of maths until 18.

    But there is much to improve. We don’t do nearly as well for the 50% of school leavers who do not go to university as we do for those who do.

    We have around 9 million adults with low basic literacy or numeracy skills, over 100,000 people leaving school every year unable to reach the required standard in English and maths.

    That matters.

    We are becoming an adaptive economy in which people are likely to have to train for not one but several jobs in their working lives.

    Not having basic skills in reading and maths makes that difficult, sometimes impossible.

    And equally important is what happens beyond school.

    We have made progress with T-levels, boot camps and apprenticeships and Sir Michael Barber is advising the government on further improvements to the implementation of our reform agenda and we want to ensure our young people have the skills they would get in Switzerland or Singapore.

    If we want to reduce dependence on migration and become a high skill economy, the ‘E’ of education will be essential – and that means ensuring opportunity is as open to those who do not go to university as to those who do.

    So, Silicon Valley enterprises; Finnish and Singaporean education and skills; let me now turn to the third ‘E’ which is Employment.

    If companies cannot employ the staff they need, they cannot grow.

    High employment levels have long been a strength of our economic model.

    Since 2010, the UK has seen a record employment rate, the lowest unemployment rate in nearly fifty years and labour market participation at an all-time high.

    Partly thanks to the coalition reforms of a decade ago we are at 76% ,employment levels higher than Canada, the US, France or Italy.

    But the pandemic has exposed weaknesses in our model. Total employment is nearly 300,000 people lower than pre-pandemic with around one fifth of working-age adults economically inactive.

    Excluding students that amounts to 6.6 million people – an enormous and shocking waste of talent and potential.

    Of that 6.6 million people, around 1.4 million people want to work. But a further five million do not.

    It is time for a fundamental programme of reforms to support people with long-term conditions or mental illness to overcome the barriers and prejudices that prevent them working.

    We will never harness the full potential of our country unless we unlock it for each and every one of our citizens.

    Nor will we fix our productivity puzzle unless everyone who can participate does.

    So to those who retired early after the pandemic or haven’t found the right role after furlough, I say: ‘Britain needs you’ and we will look at the conditions necessary to make work worth your while.

    That is why employment is such a vital third ‘E.’

    Enterprise, Education and Employment – three key components for long term prosperity.

    I conclude with my final ‘E’ – Everywhere. That means ensuring the benefits of economic development are felt not just in London and the South-East but across the whole of the UK.

    It is socially divisive if young people feel the only way to make a decent living is to head south. But it is also economically damaging.

    If our second cities were the productive powerhouses we see in the other major countries, our GDP would be nearly 5% higher – making us second only to the United States and Germany for GDP per head.

    That is why levelling up matters. And why last week it was so exciting to see the progress being made.

    Since February 2020, when the levelling up agenda really got underway ,70% of new employed jobs have been created outside of London and the South-East.

    Thanks to our powerhouse regions we remain one of the top 10 manufacturers globally, and the same is starting to happen with new industries: whether fintech in Bristol, gaming in Dundee or clean energy in Teesside.

    Every region has seen pay grow faster than London since 2010, which shows that our approach to regional growth is working.

    But there is much more to do, and whilst government grants can play a galvanising role they are not the whole answer.

    We also need the connectivity that comes from better infrastructure.

    That is why in the Autumn Statement we protected key projects like HS2, East West Rail and core Northern Powerhouse Rail.

    Digital connectivity matters as well. Under Michelle’s leadership, full-fibre broadband now available to more than 40% of all homes in the UK.

    Last year four million more premises got access, with the biggest increases in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

    But the ‘E’ of Everywhere has to be about local wealth creation as much as about local infrastructure.

    So this year we will announce investment zones, mini-Canary Wharfs, supporting each one of our growth industries, and each one focused in high potential but underperforming areas, in line with our mission to level up.

    They will be focused on our research strengths and executed in partnership with local government, with advantageous fiscal treatment to attract new investment.

    We will shortly start a process to identify exactly where they will go.

    But spreading opportunity everywhere needs local decision making alongside local infrastructure and local enterprise.

    So we must also give civic entrepreneurs the ability to find and fund their own solutions without having to bang down a Whitehall door.

    Shortly over 50% of the population of England will be covered by a devolution deal and two thirds covered by a unitary authority and that’s a very important part of that.

    But we need to move more decisively towards fiscal devolution so that fantastic local leaders like Ben Houchen and Andy Street have the tools they need to deliver for their communities.

    Four ‘E’s – Enterprise, Education, Employment and Everywhere – four ‘E’s to unlock our national potential to be one of Europe’s most exciting, most innovative and most prosperous economies.

    Bill Gates is supposed to have said people overestimate what they can do in one year and underestimate what they can do in ten.

    When it comes to the British economy, we are certainly not going to fall into that trap.

    We will remember the essential foundation on which long term prosperity depends, namely the sounds money that comes from bringing down inflation. But right now, starts our longer-term journey into growth and prosperity.

    World-beating enterprises to make Britain the world’s next Silicon Valley.

    An education system where world-class skills sit alongside world-class degrees.

    Employment opportunities that tap into the potential of every single person so businesses can build the motivated teams they need.

    And as talent is spread everywhere, so we will make sure opportunities are as well.

    Yes there are many structural challenges to address. And working our four pillars we will do just that. Never forgetting though the combination of bold ingenuity and quiet confidence that defines our national character.

    Ladies and gentlemen, being a technology entrepreneur changed my life.

    Being a technology superpower can change our country’s destiny.

    So let’s make it happen.

    Thank you very much.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Chair says collaboration needed to protect local economies and nature on the coast [January 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : Chair says collaboration needed to protect local economies and nature on the coast [January 2023]

    The press release issued by the Environment Agency on 26 January 2023.

    EA Chair Alan Lovell delivers a speech at the annual Coastal Futures Conference.

    It’s great to be here in this city made global by the Tidal Thames; braved centuries of seafaring trade. That river and its tide of course bring threats too. The city is visited by the North Sea twice a day and it can be tough. Our now collective job is to ensure that it’s not as destructive as on occasions it could be.

    This weekend, we mark 70 years since the horrifying East Coast Surge of 1953. My uncle Charlie was farming on Canvey Island in the Thames Estuary in 1953, and I remember vividly him talking about the desperate measures to bring people and some animals to safety, and subsequently losing all his agricultural equipment.

    That disaster of course led to many developments in flood protection, including the construction of the Thames Barrier. I was chief contractor for the Thames Barrier about 10 years after it was built and we were certainly very proud of the work that it was doing. It helps to protect around 125 square kilometres of land and over £320 billion of property and infrastructure.

    Opened in 1984, it’s been raised in anger 207 times, so about 5 and a half times a year. It was originally envisaged to be just once a year so that gives some illustration of the change, and not surprisingly it’s been on a rising, although not uniform, trend.

    Although the Barrier was built to hold back storm surges, since the 1990s increasingly intense rainfall events have also seen it raised at low tide on several occasions to create space for water that’s arrived from the other direction.

    We are constantly surveying the future, but we are reasonably confident that this Barrier will continue to provide protection until at least 2070, but we need to think creatively about how we can transform the estuary edges. We want Londoners to feel secure, to enjoy their river, and without being cut off from the river that makes London what it is.

    The Thames Estuary 2100 Plan sets a long-term approach to managing risk in partnership with communities, developers and place-makers.

    It’s that sort of collaborative working which is what the Coastal Futures Conference is all about. It’s clear from recent successes that shared ownership of the risks and recognition of the steps to be taken by the public and private sectors, and by non-government, they can bring about the changes that are needed.

    I shall be telling you about some of the big projects that we have engaged in, but also some of the smaller and vital collaboration with parties which make a difference.

    According to the UN, more than 600 million people – around 10 percent of the world’s population – live in coastal areas that are less than 10 metres above sea level. On this small-island nation at the north-east edge of the Atlantic Ocean, nearly two thirds of people live within 15 kilometres of the sea and over a third live within 5 kilometres. The risk is obvious.

    The coastline itself is never static. Throughout our history land has been lost to the sea and created out of it. Like our Dutch neighbours, we have not always taken the sea’s word as final.

    The most productive agricultural land in England is often on land historically claimed from coastal wetlands that, due to soil erosion, is close to, or even below, sea level now.

    Since 1900 the UK has seen 16 centimetres of sea level rise and scientists believe we could see a further metre of even more in the next 80 years. And as we all know, higher sea levels create waves which carry greater energy to shore, and by the end of the 21st century, sea level events we currently describe as once a century, may occur every year.

    Another statistic to alarm is that about 12 percent of England is on the floodplain and 9,000 kilometres of the coast are at risk of sea flooding, erosion and landslips.

    Happily, the Government is on the case. You will be aware the flood plan for the 2015 – 2021 period saw us spend £2.6 million and better protect about 320,000 properties. And in this next stage, from 2021-2027, the government is investing £5.2 billion to create new flood protections, alongside support to help households and businesses get back on their feet more quickly after flooding.

    Of this big sum, £1.6 billion is directed towards coastal erosion and sea flooding projects. Very importantly, that spend on big projects is supported by a £40 million regional coastal monitoring programme which monitors evidence on beach levels, coastal habitat, tides and waves. We make all this data publicly available.

    The data helps us target investment decisions and also Shoreline Management Plans, which offer a framework for adapting to climate change. Local planning authorities are encouraged to embed Shoreline Management Plan policies in their spatial plans.

    This includes making provision for any vulnerable properties and infrastructure that may need to be relocated in the future. This could include supporting roll back of the coastline or development facing the threat of coastal erosion. Earlier this week I was in Lincolnshire and I saw some of the caravan cities, sites of constant negotiation with local authorities, which understandably are looking to support the local economy in the area, whilst we are worried about the medium, or not so medium, term impacts.

    We need to work together with coastal communities to learn, and put into practice, the best possible ways to keep them safe and prosperous.

    The government is also investing £200 million in a Flood and Coastal Innovation Programme, which includes eight local authority coastal projects.

    The National Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy sets out how the Environment Agency will work in partnership with others – including risk management authorities, partners and communities – towards the ambition of climate resilient coastal communities.

    Every year people make around 270 million recreational visits to the English coast. Alongside delicious seafood, picturesque towns and recreational activities, people travel to the seaside simply to enjoy the view and to breathe the air.

    England’s national story is a story about our relationship with the coast; a century of air travel has not totally eroded our reliance on ports and estuaries to deliver the things we need.

    Many who live on the coast were drawn by employment opportunities. Yet, some coastal towns are now among the most deprived in the country. We need a concerted effort to better protect coastal communities and economies while enhancing the marine environment.

    So to summarise, long term prosperity on the coast is vital; preserving England’s precious natural resources is also vital.

    No one wants to trade these two priorities off against each other; we need look at the evidence and work in partnership to serve both. It’s partly with that in mind that I am launching the Environment Agency’s latest The State of the Environment report.

    Scientific research and analysis underpins everything the Environment Agency does. It helps us to understand and manage the environment effectively.

    Our own experts work with leading scientific organisations, universities, and other parts of the Defra group to bring the best knowledge to bear on the environmental problems that we face now and in the future. Our scientific work is published as reports, freely available to all.

    Today’s report, produced by our Chief Scientist’s Group, looks at the coastal and marine environment in particular.

    It covers the degradation of coastal and marine ecosystems, caused by a number of pressures such as climate change, overfishing and chemical pollution. And it tells a clear story of both challenge and opportunity.

    We know that a healthy marine environment provides flood and coastal protection, nutrient and carbon absorption; it improves water quality, enhances biodiversity and provides food as well as health and well-being benefits from recreation.

    Our report shows evidence that long term, human activities have changed water temperature, acidity, salinity, sea level and degraded coastal and marine ecosystems.

    For instance, salt marshes. England’s salt marshes store the carbon equivalent to nearly 40 million people’s annual domestic emissions.

    Salt marshes provide flood protection to around 24,000 properties in suburban areas and 17,000 properties in urban areas in the UK. We can’t afford to lose these benefits, but an estimated 85 percent of salt marsh has already been lost since the 1800s.

    We are working with many partners – including some of you in this room – to address this through our habitat compensation and restoration programme, but we need to accelerate that work.

    So a small step in the right direction has been made. The latest mapped extent of salt marsh in England is just over 35,500 hectares.

    This is an overall increase of 7 percent compared with figures from 2006 to 2009. Around 37 percent of the increase is as a result of flood management schemes and habitat creation. All this area is dear to our heart.

    The Environment Agency is leading a partnership initiative, Restoring Meadow Marsh and Reef, to restore at least 15 percent of priority estuarine and coastal habitats by 2043.

    This will build on the existing investment of £120 million in the next five years to compensate for habitat loss due to coastal squeeze and the development of sea defences.

    So we are doing a lot. But nevertheless, our report raises some concerning issues, one of these is about pollution and the impact of storm overflows along the coast. Increased frequency of storms increases the transport of pollutants and untreated waste-water into the sea from storm overflows and diffuse pollution from agricultural land.

    An initial assessments of levels of persistent, bio accumulative and toxic chemicals – carried out in 2019 – showed, in blue mussels, harbour porpoise and dab, a sort of flat fish, levels of at least one of the four substances tested exceeded toxic effect thresholds in all three species.

    As I’m sure you are all aware, only 14 percent of England’s rivers are of ‘good’ ecological status – as defined in the Water Framework Directive.

    Nobody is going to say that is remotely acceptable. And, 0 percent are classed as of good chemical status (though I might say in that context this is down from 97 percent, and this change is not due to degradation but due to severe tightening of classifications which is designed to shine light on a very important area which we need to do something about).

    The Environment Agency’s updated River Basin Management and Flood Risk Management Plans, launched in 2022, include the local actions that government, regulators, the water sector, and other partners, and we ourselves need to deliver to protect the water environment from catchment to coast over the next five years.

    It also says that more than £5 billion of investment over the next five years will enhance and limit further deterioration of England’s waters, giving us increased resilience to the impacts of climate change.

    One other small but important project that we are working on too help us with estuarine and coastal recovery, the Environment Agency is investing £1.8 million over the next 3 years in Championing Coastal Coordination – 20 projects will receive funding this year.

    These are innovative projects mixing citizen science, local on-the-ground restoration and large-scale work to bring a more coordinated approach to coastal management.

    At one level, this is a drop in the ocean, but we hope what we learn from this innovation will enable us to join with others in scaling up projects and programmes that champion coastal resilience.

    Please come and talk to our team at our stall here at the conference about the work we’re doing in this field and whether you’d like to be involved in it.

    Happily, bathing water quality at beaches and resorts has shown enormous improvements in recent decades. The latest bathing water results for England show 97.1 percent of bathing waters were in decent standards following testing at over 400 designated sites.

    But, even with these excellent results, we still need the public to be aware of the risks and to make informed choices. We do encourage people to check bathing water quality on the Environment Agency’s Swimfo website before going swimming.

    Before I go, I would like to say something about winter flooding as it is so topical at the moment.

    In the last month, we have been dealing with the real impacts of more extreme weather. I recently visited the Somerset Levels where I saw the Environment Agency’s great work – temporary barriers and pumps operating there and along the River Severn.

    This is my first winter in the EA and I must say I am extremely impressed by the fantastic work both of our staff and of partners. We estimate that 138 properties are were flooded in the serious flooding 10 days ago which is too many. But set that against the fact that our estimate is that well over 5,000 properties have been protected in the West Midlands, in the Southwest and along the Thames, by the work that has been done over the last 10 years.

    We hesitate to give that relatively good statistic of the work done with still a month of winter left to go. And we need to keep reminding people that flood defences can’t provide 100 percent protection, so it’s vital that we all sign up for free flood warnings and take it seriously.

    I began this speech talking about the Thames Barrier – one of several protecting the people from the North Sea. I’ve also been to the Ipswich Barrier and on Monday, I visited the Boston Barrier, which protects over 14,000 homes and businesses. It was built after 800 properties were flooded in the 2013 tidal surge – a fantastic example of how engineering can increase the security and prosperity of those living on the coast.

    As I have mentioned today, the benefits of working with nature not only include flood and coastal protection, but also nutrient and carbon absorption; improved water quality, enhanced nature, and food as well as health and well-being benefits from recreation.

    If coastal communities are to thrive, we need to collect and share evidence of what is happening on the coast and work together to enhance both resilience and the marine environment.

    The Environment Agency is proud to sponsor of the Coastal Futures Conference 2023.

    We are delighted to be involved with it and with you all, and I look forward to our continued collaboration in the challenging, and rewarding, years to come.

  • PRESS RELEASE : We will not become numb to the suffering caused by Russia’s illegal invasion – UK statement to the OSCE [January 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : We will not become numb to the suffering caused by Russia’s illegal invasion – UK statement to the OSCE [January 2023]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 26 January 2023.

    Ambassador Bush condemns Russia’s attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure, and stresses Russia will not break the resolve of the Ukrainian people.

    Thank you Mr. Chair. Last week I, and many others spoke about the devastating Russian missile attack on an apartment building in Dnipro. The lives of 46 innocent Ukrainian civilians were tragically cut short, including six children, with 80 injured and 11 still missing. This horrific attack was yet another example of Russia’s numerous and sustained violations of international law over the course of the last 11 months, which continue to this day. Following reports of further Russian strikes overnight, we stress our solidarity with Ukraine. Russia will not break the resolve of the Ukrainian people.

    Since the start of Russia’s illegal invasion, and following several investigations by the Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine (OPG), ODHIR, the UN and through the Moscow Mechanism (to name but a few), there can be no doubt as to Russia’s culpability for atrocities and human rights violations carried out in Ukraine. The evidence is overwhelming.

    We have seen indiscriminate attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure, and the use of wide area, inaccurate weapons in residential and highly populated areas resulting in loss of life and widespread devastation. The theatre in Mariupol sheltering children. The railway station in Kramatorsk where women and children were fleeing. The shopping centre in Kremenchuk. Too many stories. Too many innocent victims.

    We’ve heard harrowing testimony from survivors, detailing summary executions, unlawful confinement, torture, rape and other sexual violence committed in areas once under Russian control. As recorded by the UN’s Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine, family members, including children, were sometimes forced to witness the crimes – powerless to act. We have spoken of Russia’s disturbing policy of filtration and of those who have disappeared, some unlawfully deported to Russia – including orphaned children. We recall the attacks against sites with protected status – medical and educational facilities, cultural and religious sites, and energy infrastructure. We commend the investigators seeking the truth, often under dangerous conditions, and those courageous survivors willing to share their testimony to ensure justice is delivered.

    As reported by ODHIR, the sheer number of accounts describing allegedly systematic torture and ill-treatment inflicted upon civilians by Russian forces seems to suggest these practices were carried out in an atmosphere of impunity.

    However, we will not allow ourselves to become numb to the immense suffering caused by Russia’s illegal invasion. The victims and the survivors will be remembered. We must, and we will, deliver justice and accountability for all of them. For those in Bucha, Irpin, Izium, Makariv, Kupiansk, Mariupol. The list is far too long and the price paid by Ukrainians for their freedom far too high.

    There can be no lasting peace in Ukraine without justice. In London this March, Justice Ministers from across the world will meet to discuss further provision of financial and practical support to the International Criminal Court investigation in Ukraine. We will ensure the ICC has all it needs to pursue investigations and prosecute those responsible. The UK has joined a core group of partners to ensure criminal accountability for Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. UK legal expertise will be utilised to ensure Russia’s leaders are held to account fully for their actions. We continue our work with the Atrocity Crimes Advisory Group (ACA) for Ukraine, bringing together multinational experts to assist and advise the OPG War Crimes units in their tireless work.

    Last week we and many participating States asked the Russian Federation for a comprehensive response to the reports of SMM vehicles being used in eastern Ukraine. These are the assets of the organisation and its participating States.

    In closing, Mr Chair, the international community must collectively send a strong message to the Russian government – through our words and through our actions. We will not stand for unbridled aggression against a sovereign state; we will not tolerate violations and abuses of international law and human rights; we will not sit back and allow the perpetrators of such egregious crimes in Ukraine go unpunished; and we will seek and see justice delivered for those who have suffered at the hands of Russian aggression.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Climate change conference addresses future needs in defence [January 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : Climate change conference addresses future needs in defence [January 2023]

    The press release issued by the Ministry of Defence on 26 January 2023.

    The Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl) has hosted its first climate change event focusing on sustainability and climate security for defence.

    The event gave experts, practitioners and stakeholders from defence and security, academia and industry an important opportunity to collaborate, develop relationships, and share ideas and expertise.

    Climate change could have many implications for defence, experts were able to come together to develop a clear understanding of science and technology activities (past, current and future), to identify and understand potential science and technology solutions to climate change problems for defence, as well as de-conflict efforts, and identify gaps in research programmes.

    The 2 day event in January 2023, opened by Dstl’s Chief Technical Officer, Professor Andy Bell, combined insightful presentations with roundtable working groups.

    Andy said:

    It is absolutely vital that defence collaborators work together to address the challenges and effects that climate change can have on how our armed forces operate. Attendees at the symposium discussed the major issues and looked at problem solving and ways forward, and was a huge success.

    Lt General (Retd) Richard Nugee provided the first keynote speech setting the scope of the challenge. Richard has earned international recognition for bringing the implications of climate change and sustainability to the defence and national security sectors. After a full career in the British Army, as his final role he wrote a review of defence’s approach to climate change and Sustainability. He is now the Non-Executive Director for Climate Change and Net Zero for the Ministry of Defence (MOD).

    The focus throughout the event was on collaboration; James Clare, MOD Director Levelling Up, The Union, Climate Change and Sustainability (Dir-LUCCS) reinforced the message that climate change is not a future concern.

    It will change where we operate, who we operate with, what we need to operate, and how we need to operate. Climate change will also impact on how the MOD will function as an organisation and that response has to be whole system or whole enterprise.

    Gen (Retd) Tom Middendorp, Chairman of the International Military Council on Climate and Security (IMCCS) gave a presentation on Walking the Climate-Security Talk with the clear message to ‘think big, act small, start somewhere.’ In this he gave examples of how defence has and can build partnerships and ecosystems and provided an overview of a climate-security ecosystem bringing together security experts, research institutes and government officials through the IMCCS.

    Lt Gen Richard Wardlaw emphasised that delivering the outcomes sought through the recently published Sustainable Support Strategy will require collaboration across defence and with academia, industry and our allies.

    In a motivating keynote Lt Gen Wardlaw said:

    We must focus our attention to the Sustainable Support Strategy as, this is an opportunity for defence, a solution for the future force in a climate changed world. It is also an opportunity to enhance military capability with emissions reduction as a consequence not as a force driver. I would ask that with the recent publication of the Sustainable Support Strategy, we view this event an open invitation to help us on that journey.

    This event is just the beginning for the science and technology research programme.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Government to introduce legislation to pave way for new National Holocaust Memorial [January 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : Government to introduce legislation to pave way for new National Holocaust Memorial [January 2023]

    The press release issued by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities on 26 January 2023.

    Holocaust Memorial Bill will update historic legislation and progress the building of a new memorial in London.

    • Holocaust Memorial Bill will update historic legislation and progress the building of a new memorial and learning centre in Victoria Tower Gardens, Westminster
    • Located next to the Houses of Parliament, memorial will serve as a powerful reminder to the whole of society
    • Memorial and learning centre will be free to visitors and its careful design means the memorial will enhance the gardens.

    The Government will introduce new legislation to progress the construction of a national Holocaust memorial.

    The Prime Minister announced in the House of Commons yesterday (25 January) that the Holocaust Memorial Bill will update historic legislation, removing a statutory obstacle that has previously prevented the building of a new memorial and learning centre in Victoria Tower Gardens in Westminster.

    Located next to the Houses of Parliament, the memorial will serve as a powerful reminder to the whole of society of the Holocaust, its victims and where prejudice can lead if unchallenged.

    The Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, said:

    “This important Bill brings us one step closer to delivering a national Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre at the heart of our democracy in Westminster, where it rightly belongs.

    “The Memorial will honour the memory of those who were so cruelly murdered and preserve the testimonies of brave survivors so that future generations will never forget the horrors of the holocaust.

    “As the remaining survivors become older and fewer in number, it is vital that we push ahead with the Memorial which is supported by all major political parties.”

    Secretary of State for Levelling up, Housing and Communities, Michael Gove said:

    “As the Holocaust moves from living history, to history, it becomes ever more important that we take the time to remember the six million Jewish men, women and children murdered and pay tribute to the survivors.

    “We are committed to building the Memorial next to Parliament, a site which reflects its national significance and is close to other important memorials including the Cenotaph.

    “We owe it to Holocaust survivors, to the British people and future generations to remember where hatred can lead.”

    Rt Hon Ed Balls and Rt Hon Lord Eric Pickles, Co-chairs of the UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation said:

    “As the generation of brave Holocaust survivors passes away, we have a duty to create this memorial to make sure that the memory and the truth of the Holocaust is preserved.

    “Victoria Tower Gardens, at the heart of Westminster and alongside the great symbol and heart of our democracy, is absolutely the right place to construct the national Memorial to the Holocaust.”

    Manfred Goldberg BEM, a Holocaust survivor who was held captive in Stutthof concentration camp, Poland, said:

    “Several years ago survivors were promised a Holocaust Memorial in close proximity to the Houses of Parliament. I am a 92 year old survivor who would be so grateful to be alive when this project, uniquely situated next to the Mother of Parliaments, comes to fruition.”

    Planning consent for the Holocaust Memorial to be built in Victoria Tower Gardens was granted in July 2021, but the decision was quashed by the High Court in April 2022 due to historic legislation that requires the garden to be maintained as a garden open to the public.

    The memorial and learning centre will be free to visitors, with timed entry tickets.

    Careful design means the memorial will enhance the gardens, ensuring they continue to provide an important public garden available to residents and visitors to Westminster. Paths and seating will be more attractive, accessible and landscaping improvements will enhance the local environment, maintaining public access.

    Holocaust Educational Trust Chief Executive Karen Pollock said:

    “As the Holocaust fades further into history, and with survivors becoming fewer and frailer, time is of the essence. Located in the heart of our democracy, the UK Holocaust Memorial will send a clear signal for years to come of the place the Holocaust should always have in our national consciousness and the importance of learning its lessons for generations to come.”

    The proposal to construct a new national Memorial to the Holocaust, with an accompanying learning centre, was announced by the then Prime Minister with cross-party support in January 2015, and the decision to build the memorial at Victoria Tower Gardens was announced in January 2016.

    Following an international competition, a design team of Adjaye Associates, Ron Arad Associates and Gustafson Porter + Bowman was selected. A planning application was submitted in December 2018 and planning consent was granted in July 2021, following a lengthy public inquiry.

    A High Court judgment in April 2022 found that the London County Council (Improvements) Act 1900 imposed an obligation to maintain Victoria Tower Gardens as a public garden, and that this obligation was an obstacle to construction of the Holocaust Memorial at that site. Based on this conclusion, the High Court quashed the decision to grant planning consent.

  • PRESS RELEASE : EA Chair says collaboration needed to protect local economies and nature on the coast [January 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : EA Chair says collaboration needed to protect local economies and nature on the coast [January 2023]

    The press release issued by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on 26 January 2023.

    More work is needed to ensure the protection, recovery and restoration of our coastal and marine environment, and to enable coastal populations to thrive.

    A concerted effort is needed to better protect our coastal communities and economies whilst enhancing our marine environment, said Environment Agency Chair Alan Lovell today (26 January) as the EA launches its latest ‘State of the Environment: Coast and Marine’ report.

    Speaking at the Coastal Future’s Conference, Alan Lovell said that with over a third of the UK population living within 5km of the coastline, more work is needed to ensure the protection, recovery and restoration of our coastal and marine environment, and to enable coastal populations to thrive.

    Alan Lovell said:

    England’s national story is a story about our relationship with the coast and a century of air travel has not totally eroded our reliance on ports and estuaries to deliver the things we need.

    Yet, coastal towns are now among the most deprived in the country.

    We need to work together with coastal communities to identify the best possible way to keep them safe and prosperous.

    We need a concerted effort to better protect coastal communities and economies while enhancing the marine environment.

    The report, produced by the EA’s Chief Scientist’s Group, draws attention to the many consequences of climate change, with 85% of England’s salt marshes – which store the carbon equivalent of nearly 40 million people’s annual domestic emissions – estimated to have been lost since the 1800s, as well as up to 50% of seagrass meadows and 95% of our native oyster population. Meanwhile over 100,000 people are estimated to be at risk from significant coastal flooding – a figure likely to increase by 300% this century, even if global warming is kept to 2 degrees.

    However, the report also shows important progress towards tackling these threats to our marine and coastal environment, including salt marsh restoration, helping fish populations recover and improving water quality in designated bathing waters.

    Reflecting on this, Alan Lovell also said:

    Continued action must be taken to curb the threat of climate change – through evidence based, collaborative approaches spanning from large-scale projects, local on-the-ground restoration and working alongside coastal communities to identify the best possible approach to coastal management.

    The EA continues to invest in a healthy coastline through many outlets including our National Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management strategy and our Restoring Meadow Marsh and Reef initiative.

    Although some progress has been made, there is a great deal more to be done and I hope that what we learn from innovative projects such as these will encourage others to join us and invest in ways that champion coastal resilience and help in the fight against climate change.

    The EA’s Restoring Meadow Marsh and Reef initiative is just one of the programmes taking action to tackle climate change, and aims to restore at least 15% of priority estuarine and coastal habitats by 2043.

    Additionally, the EA’s £120m Habitat Compensation and Restoration Programme, funded through Flood and Coastal Risk Management, has created over 1200ha of salt marsh and mudflat since 2005 to keep pace with protected habitat lost as a result of managing risk to people and property. The latest mapped extent of salt marsh in England shows an overall increase of 7% compared with 2006 to 2009 figures, nearly half of which is as a result of habitat creation in this programme. The restoration initiative aims to build on this experience for salt marsh and help to build an accelerated programme for this and other inshore habitats.

    Other investments by the EA to protect and restore the coastal and marine environment include:

    • £1.8m in Championing Coastal Coordination over the next 3 years with 20 projects receiving funding in 2022/23. Innovative projects will mix citizen science, local restoration and large-scale work to generate resilient coastlines, and Alan Lovell has today called for further investment to scale up solutions.
    • More than £5 billion over 5 years in River Basin Management Plans which will enhance and limit further deterioration of England’s waters giving us increased resilience to the impacts of climate change. This includes 23 specific estuarine and coastal measures, ranging from habitat restoration plans and citizen science campaigns, to tackling marine litter and pollution.
    • Support to the Natural Capital Ecosystem Assessment Programme through an ambitious Land Sea Interface project. The project will provide new evidence on the value of our marine environment and underpin our restoration ambition with knowledge of all the benefits our marine ecosystem provides, encouraging policy and management decision-making that achieves a resilient coast.

    The Environment Agency will continue to invest in innovation, partner collaboration and local on-the-ground restoration to ensure a coordinated approach to manage our coastal and marine environment, combat the effects of climate change, and mitigate the damage that has already been done.

  • David Neal – 2023 Statement on Suella Braverman and Windrush Lessons Learned Review

    David Neal – 2023 Statement on Suella Braverman and Windrush Lessons Learned Review

    The statement made by David Neal, the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration, on 26 January 2023.

    I am disappointed the Home Secretary has decided not to progress Recommendation 10, since this presented an ideal opportunity to take stock and examine a number of issues relating to the independence and effectiveness of the ICIBI.

    The ICIBI was established in 2009; its budget has been stagnant since then, and staffing levels have actually decreased, even as borders and immigration issues have grown in prominence and complexity. A role and remit review would have provided an opportunity to assess whether the level of resourcing provided to the inspectorate is appropriate.

    Moreover, unlike other inspectorates, the ICIBI does not have the power to publish its own reports. The Home Office is responsible for publishing ICIBI’s reports, and it regularly fails to meet its commitment to ensure that reports are published within 8 weeks of submission. In many cases, reports are published considerably beyond this timeframe. So this is a missed opportunity to look at increasing powers regarding the publishing of reports as explicitly recommended by Wendy Williams. Of the 23 ICIBI reports that have been published during my tenure, only one was laid in Parliament within the agreed 8-week window. The inspection report on the initial processing of migrants arriving via small boats that I completed in February 2022 – and that documented security breaches at Tug Haven and Western Jet Foil – was not published until the week before last year’s summer recess, nearly five months after it had been submitted to the Home Secretary and some 13 weeks late. Such delays affect perceptions of the ICIBI’s independence and effectiveness and may hinder timely scrutiny of the Home Office’s performance.

    It is disappointing as well that no role and remit review will examine Wendy Williams’s recommendation that a duty be placed on ministers to justify the non-acceptance of ICIBI recommendations and that the Chief Inspector will not be able to work closely with a Migrant’s Commissioner when formulating his inspection programme, as the Home Secretary has also decided not to proceed with Recommendation 9.

    A role and remit review would also have provided an opportunity to explore how greater synergies could be established between the ICIBI and other similar inspectorates.

    While I regret that the role and remit review called for in the Windrush Lessons Learned Review will not go forward, it is my hope that the ICIBI will nonetheless be able to work with the Home Office to address these issues. Wendy Williams recognised that the ICIBI is ‘a critically important external review mechanism for the department’. I look forward to engaging with ministers and officials to ensure further progress towards meeting Williams’s call for the Home Office to become ‘an organisation that is more confident under the gaze of external scrutiny’.