Category: Environment

  • James Bevan – 2023 Speech on Tackling Climate Change

    James Bevan – 2023 Speech on Tackling Climate Change

    The speech made by Sir James Bevan, the Chief Executive of the Environment Agency, at the UEA in Norwich on 16 January 2023.

    The Fear

    “First of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.”

    Unfortunately, that’s not one of my quotes, because it’s a very good one. As most of you probably know, it’s from the American President Franklin D. Roosevelt, in his inaugural address in 1933, at the very height of the Great Depression – when millions were forced into deprivation and were fearful of what the future would hold.

    I quote FDR because his point is just as relevant today, when we confront what for many is the scariest challenge we could imagine: the climate emergency. According to numerous studies, a sizeable majority of young people now struggle with ‘eco-anxiety’ and are fearful about the future due to the climate emergency.

    What I’m not here to do today is to tell you that everything is fine, because it isn’t. But what I do want to argue is that fear is not the most useful emotion when it comes to the climate crisis because it can paralyse us into inaction; and that there is an evidence-based case for climate optimism if we do the right things.

    The Fear = doomism

    But first let’s acknowledge that the Fear exists for good reason. We are already seeing the consequences of climate change: more extreme weather, rising sea levels, higher rainfall, bigger floods, extreme droughts, massive wildfires, ecological harm wiping out species, and rising impacts on the economy, the way we live, and the health and wellbeing of every human on this planet. This affects us all directly and indirectly. The impact is particularly hard on people in the countries of the Global South who are the least responsible for the emissions that are causing these effects but are hardest hit by them – which is why the fight against climate change is also a fight for social justice.

    So if you’re worried about climate change, that’s OK – you are right to be so. And if you are angry about those who are primarily responsible for causing it or those who are denying it (often the same people), that’s fine too: as John Lydon, singer of the punk band the Sex Pistols, used to say: anger is an energy.

    But fear tends to exhaust us rather than energise. And what we sometimes hear from sections of the media, influencers, some well-intentioned campaigners and politicians is all focussed on The Fear. The Fear that we’re running out of time. The Fear that what we’re doing is never going to be enough. The ultimate Fear, that humanity is doomed.

    In my view this climate doomism is almost as dangerous as climate denial. Indeed doomism might even be the new denial. And it’s equally misplaced. It’s not justified by the facts. And it risks leading to the wrong outcome: inaction.

    The evidence: the case for confidence

    So let me give you some evidence to combat this doomism: the case for confidence.

    My case for climate optimism is simple: we know what the problem is; we know what we have to do to solve it; we have started to do it; and if we keep on doing it we will succeed – not just in ending the climate emergency but in building a better world too.

    We know what the problem is: the massive increase in greenhouse gas emissions since the start of the industrial revolution is doing exactly what the science predicts – warming the planet and making our climate more extreme.

    We know what we have to do to solve this problem. The solutions are technically quite simple. First, we need to reduce and as far as possible stop entirely the emissions of carbon dioxide and the other greenhouse gases that are causing the climate to change: what the experts call mitigation. And second, we need to adapt our infrastructure, our economies and our lifestyles so we can live safely, sustainably and well in a climate-changed world. Because even if all greenhouse gas emissions magically stopped at midnight tonight, some climate change has already happened and will go on happening as a result of all the carbon already released into the atmosphere over the last decades.

    And we are starting to do these things.

    Mitigation

    Let me start with mitigation. Governments around the world are taking action to reduce their national emissions, including here, where successive UK governments have shown strong leadership. The 2008 Climate Change Act was the first time a major economy set legal limits to reduce its own emissions. In 2019 the UK became the first major economy to pass laws to end its contribution to global warming by getting to Net Zero by 2050.

    Just passing laws of course doesn’t make it so. But we are starting to do the things we need to do to get there. Take energy generation, which has historically been one of the biggest drivers of greenhouse gas emissions. In 1991 only 2% of the UK’s electricity came from renewable sources: wind, solar, hydro and bioenergy. By last year (2022), nearly half (43%) of our electricity came from those sources. And if you include nuclear energy, which accounts for a further 16% of our electricity, the majority of our power is now coming from low or no carbon sources. Which is why the National Grid say that the UK is well on its way to creating an electricity system that’s wholly based on renewable and carbon-free sources by the 2050 target.

    Putin’s war in Ukraine has inadvertently given this move to sustainable domestically-generated energy a massive push, because no-one in Europe now wants to be dependent on Russian gas.

    Science and innovation are helping us too. Last month US scientists announced a breakthrough in the race to create nuclear fusion, which is a potential source of near-limitless clean energy. For the first time in an experiment they produced more energy from a fusion reaction than they put in to generate it.

    Now if this is to power our world in future, it will need massive scaling up: the experiment in question lasted nanoseconds and produced just about enough energy to boil seven kettles. Building a fusion machine that can produce industrial quantities of power and run constantly is a massive technical challenge. But because it can be done, and because it will be so beneficial if it is, it almost certainly now will be done. And the UK will have a part in that: the UK government has announced that the West Burton power station site in Nottinghamshire will be the home of the UK’s first prototype fusion energy plant.

    Adaptation

    Everyone talks about net zero, and I just have. That’s important: the lower our carbon and other emissions, the lower the extent and rate of climate change. But the other side of the climate coin – adaptation to make us more resilient in a climate changed world – is just as important.

    And until recently adaptation has tended to be the Cinderella of climate – getting less attention than mitigation. The good news is that is now starting to change.

    Here in the UK more and more infrastructure providers and utilities – Network Rail, National Highways, the energy providers and the water companies for example – all now have programmes to adapt their own networks and operating arrangements to make them more resilient to the impacts of the changing climate.

    Meanwhile internationally we saw a major step forward on adaptation at COP27, the UN climate change summit in Egypt last month. This was the agreement on a new Loss and Damage Fund that will help nations most impacted by climate change cope with the damage that has happened already and adapt to be more resilient in future.

    This won’t fix any of those problems immediately. It will only mean anything if it’s actually delivered, and you can argue about how much money is needed to get the job done. But the agreement matters in itself, because it signals that the rich nations recognise that they have a particular responsibility to the rest of the world and that they need to show solidarity with the developing nations and back their rhetoric with resources. And that matters because the rebuilding of trust between rich and poor countries that this agreement can help achieve will make it much more likely that we sustain the collective international commitment we need to tackle the climate emergency successfully.

    The Environment Agency is a major player on climate

    The Environment Agency which I lead is playing a central part in tackling the climate emergency. We have put it at the heart of everything we do.

    Our strategy, EA 2025, which drives all our work, has three goals: a nation resilient to climate change; healthy air, land and water; and green growth and a sustainable future. The common theme that runs through them all is the climate emergency. Tackle it successfully, and we will achieve all those goals. Fail and we will fail on all.

    The EA plays a major role in mitigation. We regulate most of the greenhouse gas emitters in this country, and have cut emissions from the sites we regulate by 50% since 2010. We run the UK Emissions Trading Scheme, which limits and will progressively reduce the emissions that airlines, steel works and other major sources of carbon are allowed to make.

    We are trying to walk the walk ourselves with our commitment to make the Environment Agency and the whole of our supply chain Net Zero by 2030. That has meant we are rethinking much of what we do – for example using hydrogen vehicles to move around, low carbon concrete or better still natural flood management (tree planting etc) for flood defences. We are even using our own pension fund to influence investors to put their money into sustainable businesses and move it out of carbon.

    The EA also plays a major role in adaptation. We build and maintain most of the country’s flood defences: that is helping ensure that communities are protected in the face of the higher tides and more violent rainfall that climate change is generating. And those defences are working, because even as we’ve seen record-breaking rainfall and river heights over the last few years, we’ve seen fewer and fewer homes and businesses suffering the trauma of flooding.

    We work with the water companies and other water users to reduce the risk of another impact of the changing climate – severe drought – by finding ways in which they can take less water from the environment and use it more efficiently.

    And in our role as a statutory consultee on all major planning decisions, we are helping design places for people to live and work which are not just more resilient to the effects of climate change (example: if you have to build homes in a flood plain, put the garage on the ground floor but the people on the first floor) but are also better places to live, both for the people and the wildlife, because we try to design in as much blue and green infrastructure – rivers, lakes, trees and grass to you and me – as we can.

    There’s an important point there that I alluded to earlier: which is that if we tackle the climate emergency right, and treat it not just as an existential risk but as a massive opportunity, we can actually build a better world: one in which we make cities which don’t just generate less carbon or which are just more resilient to the changed climate but are also better places to live; in which we invent new technologies that don’t just help mitigate and adapt but also help nature recover from the battering we’ve given it over the last few decades and thrive; in which we find new ways to run successful economies so there is sustainable, inclusive growth for everyone; and in which by ending the impacts of climate change on the weakest and helping them recover from things which they did not cause, we help deliver justice for all.

    UEA is a player too

    You here in the University of East Anglia are also a major player on all those things because of your own outstanding work on climate, and I want to recognise that and thank you for it.

    I know that UEA was one of the early pioneers of climate research and that you’ve been producing world class analysis for nearly 50 years now. I know that the Climatic Research Unit and the Tyndall Centre here have both broken new ground in understanding what is actually happening to our climate, what that means for society, and how best to address those consequences. All that is giving us News We Can Use – the best of all academic research.

    I also know – and here I feel particular solidarity with you – that that endeavour hasn’t been consequence-free, and that you have been the subject of aggressive targeting by climate deniers and others who don’t like the clarity or the consequence of your messaging. To which I can only say: let’s stick together, keep going, follow the evidence and have the courage of our convictions.

    The ingredients for success: none of us is as good as all of us

    But it’s not enough of course for UEA, the Environment Agency or the UK government to be taking action on climate on our own. The climate emergency is a textbook example of a problem that can only be successfully dealt with if everyone takes action, not just in this country but around the world.

    And here too I see cause for optimism, because that is pretty much what is now happening. Think about the things which have to be true in order to tackle the climate emergency successfully.

    There needs to be international consensus on the need for action and on what action should be taken, and a mechanism to make sure it actually happens. There is: the United Nations COP process. Is it perfect? No. Is it moving as far and as fast as we’d all like? No. But is it a necessary condition of success, and is it making progress in the right direction? Yes and yes.

    There needs to be national action by individual governments all around the world. And increasingly there is – not least because ordinary people, in the developing world even more than in the rich west, are feeling the impacts of climate change on their own lives and livelihoods and demanding that their governments take that action. I’ve spent over forty years working with politicians around the world, and one thing that is true in all countries – democratic or not – is that politicians pay attention to what the public want, because giving it to them is ultimately the best way of staying in office.

    There needs to be action by business, both because businesses are a large source of the problem and because they are a key ingredient of the solution: most of the money in the world, as well as a lot of the innovation, both of which are critical for success – is found in the private sector. And over the last few years we’ve seen more and more businesses adapt what they do and how they do it in ways which are helping tackle the climate emergency. In some cases that’s happening because it’s the right thing to do, in others because it’s the smart thing to do: businesses which innovate, get out of carbon and don’t trash the planet will ultimately have stronger futures and better profits than those that don’t.

    And critically there needs to be action by each of us as individuals, because in what we do in our daily lives we are all part of the problem and so all part of the solution. And here too in the last few years we are seeing people all over the world, not just the young or privileged western elites, take action to change how they live and the impact they have on the planet – whether by using low emission vehicles or public transport, insulating their homes, sharing or freecycling possessions, or lobbying their own governments to take action.

    The spearhead of this movement is the new generation of adults who are now in their twenties or thirties. And these are the people – and I may be looking at some of them right now – who over the next two critical decades will be running the country, leading major organisations, or shaping public opinion. That too gives me confidence that the right decisions will get made and that we will indeed tackle the climate emergency and come out on the other side with a better world.

    The EA: environment plus agency

    There is no free lunch, so let me conclude with a brief commercial for the Environment Agency. Our job is to create a better place. We are always looking for talented people who have a passionate commitment to that goal. There is a lot of that talent and commitment in this room, and in UEA more widely.

    So if you are interested in building a better world, think about joining us. If you are interested in the environment, the clue is in the first word of our name. The other clue is the second word – agency. If you actually want some, and you want to make a real difference to the real world, please also think about joining us. Because ultimately the best cure for fear is agency – taking back control, to coin a phrase.

    I can do no better than end with a quotation from Mae Jemison, who was the first African American woman to travel into space, which she did as a mission specialist on the US Space Shuttle Endeavour:

    “Don’t let anyone rob you of your imagination, your creativity, or your curiosity. It’s your place in the world; it’s your life. Go on and do all you can with it, and make it the life you want to live.”

  • Gordon Brown – 2009 Podcast on Copenhagen Climate Change Summit

    Gordon Brown – 2009 Podcast on Copenhagen Climate Change Summit

    The text of the podcast made by Gordon Brown, the then Prime Minister, on 21 December 2009.

    This weekend the world came together in the first step towards a new alliance to overcome the enormous challenges of climate change.

    But, as you saw, the talks in Copenhagen were not easy. And, as they reached conclusion, I did fear the process would collapse and we would have no deal at all.

    Yet, through strength of common purpose, we were able finally to break the deadlock. In a breakthrough never seen on this scale before – secure agreement from the international community.

    But this cannot be the end – in fact, it is only the beginning and we must go further still.

    To do that, we must learn lessons from Copenhagen and the tough negotiations that took place.

    Never again should we face the deadlock that threatened to pull down those talks. Never again should we let a global deal to move towards a greener future be held to ransom by only a handful of countries.

    I believe that in 2010 we will need to look at reforming our international institutions to meet the common challenges we face as a global community.

    And we’ll need to harness the best of low carbon technology for the world to continue to grow whilst keeping to our pledge made this weekend to limit the increase in global temperatures to two degrees celsius.

    I am convinced that Britain’s long term prosperity lies in leading the necessary transformation to a low carbon, greener future.

    We must become a global leader not just in financing greener technologies but in the development and manufacture of wind, tidal, nuclear and other low-carbon energy.

    And as we look towards a new decade, be assured that your government will play its part in supporting the ambitions of our entrepreneurs and leading businesses and the expertise of our scientists and engineers in making this transformation.

    For it is not just at international summits that Britain must lead the fight to tackle climate change – it’s here at home too.

    Working to protect the only planet we have is about our moral duty to our children and grandchildren.
    Like every parent, I understand we all want to see our children get on and do well in life and I believe that each generation should have greater opportunities and possibilities than the last.

    And I believe in making Britain more ambitious and in helping you to fulfil your aspirations for a better quality of life and a better standard of living.

    A fairer Britain is the driving force behind everything we do. Government is there to help people get on, not just get by.

    That’s why we have helped ensure that the past year has not been as bleak for the vast majority of you as past recessions.

    Last week we had encouraging news that as we approach Christmas, there are more people in jobs, and also that more young people are being helped through these challenging times.

    If the experience of the last recession had been repeated, unemployment would have been so much higher; repossessions twice as bad and company insolvencies two and a half times worse.

    And it’s not just the economic measures which are giving me cause for optimism.

    Crime has continued to decline – bucking the trend of every other recession when it has soared.

    Of course, there are no grounds for complacency. Challenging months and tough decisions lie ahead and we’re determined to do more.

    Jobs, apprenticeships, training and work experience will help kick start the careers of thousands of young people, giving them the confidence and self-esteem that comes with playing an active role in society.

    We’ve also guaranteed that every person on unemployment benefits for six months – whatever their age – will be £40 a week better off when moving into work.

    So our message is that we are a country of aspiration and opportunity and we as a government will support the hard-working majority and that is a government of optimism.

    We have faith in our young people, in our shared futures and in a greener, fairer Britain for all that I’ve just talked about.

    Can I take this opportunity to wish you and your family a very happy Christmas.

  • Ben Price – 2023 Interview on the Norwich Western Link

    Ben Price – 2023 Interview on the Norwich Western Link

    The interview with Ben Price, the Leader of the Green Party group at Norfolk County Council, on 2 January 2023.


    (i) Do you agree with the council’s suggestion that the road is essential for economic growth or do you feel that there are alternatives? What would the Green Party’s solution be to improving transport links in the county and also ensuring that there is economic growth?

    The Green party does not agree with the idea that building this road will create the sustainable economic growth that Norfolk is crying out for. We need to transition our local economy to create the jobs and industry of tomorrow. Norfolk can be a world leader in renewable energy and clean hydrogen production, and the eco house building and retrofitting industries, if only there was the vision and strength of character in council leaders and local MP’s to seize the opportunity.

    (ii) Is the suggested need for the Norwich Western Link simply a legacy of an inadequate public transport system in the county?

    Norfolk has been largely ignored by Westminster. Having Conservative MPs dominate the region clearly hasn’t helped change that approach. The underfunding and systematic dismantling of a national public transport system by central government is felt more acutely here in this large rural county, than most other places across England. All the scientific research is pointing towards a change in how people live and work. How we travel, and why we travel is changing. The rate of change has only increased since the Covid pandemic. Most countries that are currently experiencing economic growth understand that you need to build and maintain a good, cheap and reliable public transport system, that integrates rail, bus and bike seamlessly. Public transport underpins sustainable economic growth and transition. The Western Link is an expensive and highly damaging folly. It’s yesterday’s solution, and will not solve the issues of tomorrow.

    (iii) Do you think a tipping point has been reached where the building of new roads is difficult to justify given the push for Government to take increasingly environmentally conscious decisions?

    Looking at the scientific evidence, the tipping point was some years ago. The UK Government is only now slowly catching up. Under the new carbon neutrality commitments, road building is absolutely prohibitive. We need to reduce the damage to the natural environment. You can’t just plant trees to excuse large carbon generating projects. Going forward with projects like The Western Link, with the knowledge of the damage it will cause, and understanding the commitments we have made to reducing carbon, can only be described as ecocide. These types of projects need to be challenged in court, and there is no way that they can be reasonably justified. History will judge the actions of today.

  • First Bus Eastern Countries – 2019 Letter of Support for the Norwich Western Link

    First Bus Eastern Countries – 2019 Letter of Support for the Norwich Western Link

    The letter sent by First Bus in Norfolk to Norfolk County Council on 17 May 2019.

    Dear Sirs,

    RE: Proposed Norwich Western Link

    As the main public transport provider in Norwich, we are acutely aware of the impact that traffic congestion has on our services and the lives of our passengers. With the planned introduction of thousands of new homes, not only in the Greater Norwich area, but specifically to the west of the city, this congestion is only going to get worse.

    A good public transport system is a key part of any thriving city and this is almost impossible to deliver if buses are stuck in traffic queues along with general traffic.

    The Broadland Northway has already delivered viable alternative routes for general traffic to traverse the city, instead of going directly through the centre and we have as a result, seen a reduction in congestion on some corridors.

    There is however, still a significant amount of traffic that uses Dereham Road, the outer ring road and many of the rural roads through Costessey, Drayton and Taverham along with its surrounding areas to travel between the A47 and the A1067 and beyond, to link with the Broadland Northway.

    The proposal to build a western link that would remove the need to either use key arterial routes in the city, or rat run through rural roads, therefore reducing congestion, is one that First East Counties would entirely support.

    Managing Director

    First Eastern Counties Buses.

  • Chloe Smith – 2019 Letter to Norfolk County Council on Norwich Western Link

    Chloe Smith – 2019 Letter to Norfolk County Council on Norwich Western Link

    The letter sent on behalf of Chloe Smith, the Conservative MP for Norwich North, to Norfolk County Council on 24 May 2019.

    I am writing to you to reiterate Chloe’s strong support for the bid being made by Norfolk County Council and others for funding for the Norwich Northern Distributor Road Western Link “the Western Link”.

    Chloe has been a longstanding supporter of both Northern Broadway and the Western Link, having been the subject of one of her very first interventions in Parliament. It has long been her contention the road is necessary for future development, for jobs, for growing our economy – and to reduce the environmental impact of traffic queueing in and around Norwich. Chloe is pleased to have led lobbying for funding in the past and to have been a part of the campaign that successfully welcomed the NDR opening last year and I am pleased to confirm her strong, ongoing support for the Western Link.

    As you aware, the NDR has made travel in and around Norwich much easier but ends on a small A-class road leaving Norwich heading towards Fakenham (and A1067) and inevitably leads to problems with congestion. The Western Link will allow a complete circuit of dual carriageways to the north and south of the city, making journeys through the historic, and crowded, city centre unnecessary and will make a significant contribution to the flow of traffic, congestion and air quality in Norwich. It will also support the significant housing growth that is already planned and improve the strategic connectivity of the national road network.

    We look forward to continuing to work with you, the rest of the council and others to make the Western Link a reality.

    With best wishes,

    On behalf of Chloe Smith.

  • George Freeman – 2022 Statement on the Norwich Western Link

    George Freeman – 2022 Statement on the Norwich Western Link

    The statement made by George Freeman, the Conservative MP for Mid Norfolk, on 4 December 2020.

    For too long we have seen development in Norfolk without the necessary infrastructure.

    Long term infrastructure needs to be got right – planned and developed in a way that minimises damage to our Norfolk landscape & supports the 21st century priorities, patterns of work, healthy living and a more sustainable local economy. This is key to our vibrant future economy.

    Covid is an opportunity to Build Back Better. We need to seize it. That means ensuring we reduce traffic and congestion, invest in good cycle, rail, digital & road infrastructure, and make sure big infrastructure like the A47, NDR and Wensum Link are planned and designed sensitive to the needs of local villages and the local landscape.

    These aren’t easy pay-offs. But with good community consultation, transparency and leadership from elected local MPs and Cllrs we should be able to get it right and leave our beloved county better than we found it.

  • Nova Fairbank – 2022 Comments on the Norwich Western Link

    Nova Fairbank – 2022 Comments on the Norwich Western Link

    The comments made by Nova Fairbank from Norfolk Chambers of Commerce.

    The Norwich Western Link will facilitate easier access to both Norwich airport and Great Yarmouth port. It will further help to improve journeys into and around the west of the city, support potential housing and jobs growth; provide the infrastructure to manage the additional traffic this will create, and improve quality of life for people living in the area.

    This final piece of the puzzle will ensure that Norfolk has infrastructure that will meet our growth ambitions. It will create stronger and more effective links to the Midlands and the North and will help Norfolk businesses to thrive and deliver greater economic growth and jobs.

  • CPRE – 2017 Report on Road Projects Increasing Traffic

    CPRE – 2017 Report on Road Projects Increasing Traffic

    The report published by the CPRE in 2017 entitled “The End of the Road? Challenging the Road-Building Consensus”.

    CPRE Report (in .pdf format)

  • CPRE – 2021 Letter to Norfolk County Council on Norwich Western Link

    CPRE – 2021 Letter to Norfolk County Council on Norwich Western Link

    The letter sent by CPRE to Norfolk County Council on 1 June 2021.

    Letter (in .pdf format)

  • Natalie Bennett – 2021 Comments on the Environment and Norwich Western Link [Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle]

    Natalie Bennett – 2021 Comments on the Environment and Norwich Western Link [Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle]

    The comments made by Natalie Bennett, Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle, in the House of Lords on 15 September 2021.

    My Lords, I have to question the description given by the noble Lord, Lord Hylton, of HS2 as affecting a

    “small area of ancient woodland”,

    given that the Woodland Trust says that 108 areas of ancient woodland are at risk of “loss or damage”. However, it will probably please your Lordships’ House to know that I will not restart the HS2 debate at this moment.

    I will focus on Amendment 100, to which we in the Green Party would have attached one of our names, had there been space. We are talking about something very ancient and precious, and we can make comparisons with cathedrals and indeed with your Lordships’ House. I was on the site of what is supposed to be the Norwich western link, standing at the base of an oak tree that was a sapling when Queen Elizabeth I was on the throne. An ancient woodland containing trees like that is comparable to your Lordships’ House or a cathedral. Think about the protections we offer to those and all the money we are thinking about putting in to preserving this building; we are in a different place on that.

    We often think of ancient woodland as being out in the countryside somewhere. I want to be a little parochial and point out that Sheffield has 80 ancient woodlands within its boundary. I want to think and talk about the benefits to human health and well-being of having these ancient woodlands—indeed, London has some of them, and, when I lived here, I used to walk in them as well. They have enormous human health benefits that we have to take account of.

    Returning to the subject of walking through ancient woodland in Sheffield or the threatened woodland in Norwich, we are talking about not just trees here but crucial, utterly irreplaceable habitats for bats and insects. These woodlands would have a chance truly to flourish without air pollution and other factors. Lichens and mosses—crucial, complex organisms that are absolutely foundational to rich, healthy ecosystems—depend on those ancient trees to thrive and indeed survive. So I commend both these amendments to your Lordships’ House, and I encourage the noble Baroness to press Amendment 100 in particular to a vote.