Category: Environment

  • Emma Reynolds – 2026 Speech at Groundswell Festival

    Emma Reynolds – 2026 Speech at Groundswell Festival

    The speech made by Emma Reynolds, the Environment Secretary, on 2 July 2026.

    Good afternoon, Groundswell. I’m really excited to be here today.

    I’ve heard so much about Groundswell so my expectations were quite high, but I have to say today has exceeded all my expectations. The passion, the energy, the innovation, the optimism, and the buzz about this place is infectious.  

    No wonder people call it the Glastonbury of farming. 

    I would like to thank the Cherry family for hosting such an amazing event and having the vision 10 years ago to set this up.  

    As Environment Secretary, I see nature-friendly farming not as an alternative to productive farming, but as its foundation. I believe that profitable, resilient farming comes from working with nature. That belief has been at the heart of what I’ve been doing ever since my appointment last year as Secretary of State.  

    We all know that healthy soils are central to nature-friendly farming. They store more water during droughts, they support diverse habitats, they support pollinators and they support pest control. They provide cleaner water, stronger ecosystems and more efficient use of inputs. 

    That is why I am so excited about this agenda. And earlier today I was chatting with Andy Cato.  We were talking about the government’s 25-year Farming Roadmap, which I published just last week. England’s first ever long-term farming roadmap. It provides a long-term plan through to 2050, and nature and regenerative farming runs right through it.  

    It brings together the different things that affect your farms and that I have been talking to people about this morning. The environment, land use, animal welfare and business resilience into one clear direction.  

    It sets out how improving nutrient management and input efficiency will help farmers to reduce resilience on artificial fertilisers, cut input costs and, crucially, boost resilience. 

    Ultimately, it shows that profitability and nature are not competing aims. They are inseparable. And we need innovation to help that strategic shift set out in the roadmap to a more nature-friendly farming system. 

    Last week, I announced £123 million pounds through the Farming Innovation Programme to back new technology and improve productivity.  

    That funding is already supporting some really exciting projects. This morning, I’ve met with Harper Adams University and UK Agritech Centre to discuss how technology can cut inputs, improve resilience, and work more closely with nature. 

    And I’ve seen the impact that government support has on farms across the country.  

    Earlier this year, I met Adrian and Charlotte Downing, who run Darville’s Hill Farm in Buckinghamshire. It’s a small mixed farm with native breed sheep, rare breed pigs, and an agroforestry approach that weaves trees and hedgerows into productive farmland. Over a cup of tea, and I am a big tea drinker, they talked me through their approach. The hedgerow management gives their livestock shelter and supports wildlife. Their grazing system improves soil health and environmental management.  

    They had benefited from SFI, a scheme which funds actions to directly improve soil health, the foundations of regenerative farming through actions like cover crops, herbal lays and building organic matter in the soil.  

    Window one of SFI26 opened on Tuesday and we have seen strong interest in it already.

    And I’m delighted to say today that we are allowing farmers with land management agreements that are soon to expire to apply early for SFI26 so that you have the same confidence in the future as we do.  

    So, I’m really pleased to confirm that this new functionality will be available for window two, which opens in September.  

    But as I said, behind the numbers, there is a real story. Because when we get soil right, so much else follows. It means stronger crops, lower input costs, greater resilience. So in 10, 20 years’ time, the next generation can continue to run productive farm businesses, thriving landscapes, and a countryside richer in nature.  

    It’s why I’m delighted to announce today that we are making changes to the Countryside Stewardship Higher Tier, changes that will make the scheme simpler and more accessible.  

    The scheme already supports some of the most ambitious environmental work happening on farms today, bringing wetlands, peatlands and heathlands back to life, helping threatened species recover, restoring rivers and floodplains and caring for ancient and native woodlands. 

    Until now, the Countryside Stewardship Higher Tier has been invitation only, very exclusive. That is changing. From later this summer, farmers and land managers will be able to submit an expression of interest and we are introducing simpler, single-focus agreements so applicants can focus on the environmental priorities that matter most on their land.  

    Backed by at least £50 million pounds for new agreements, this will help support targeted improvements where they can make the biggest difference. And we will set out more detail later this summer.  

    So, ladies and gentlemen, I want to take a step back now and look at how far we’ve come in just a year.  

    I’ve published a long-term roadmap for the future of farming. I’ve published a revised Environmental Innovation Programme. I’ve published the country’s first ever Land Use Framework. And we have reopened SFI with record levels of investment. And backed innovation that will help farm businesses become more productive, more profitable and more resilient.  

    Thank you all again for engaging with us to help make all of this possible, for your willingness to adapt as farmers have always adapted across the generations.  

    What I see at Groundswell gives me great inspiration and great optimism for the future. Your determination to leave the land in a better condition for the next generation is truly impressive.

    Thank you very much.

  • Mary Creagh – 2026 Statement on the Government Estate Nature Plan

    Mary Creagh – 2026 Statement on the Government Estate Nature Plan

    The statement made by Mary Creagh, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, in the House of Commons on 25 June 2026.

    Tomorrow, during London Climate Action Week, I am publishing the first ever Government estate nature plan, which sets out a new, smarter way of using Government land to support nature recovery, climate adaptation and the resilience of public services.

    Bringing together action across more than 577,000 hectares—roughly 4% of England’s land—the Government estate nature plan moves from fragmented, site-by-site efforts to a more co-ordinated, whole-estate approach, strengthening resilience and helping protect critical public services from climate impacts. This is a new way of seeing public land—not as scattered parcels, but as a living system that can restore nature, strengthen resilience and support the services that people rely on. As the largest landowner in the country, the Government will lead by example, showing how nature can be restored at scale while supporting essential public services.

    For the first time, the Government will apply the principles of the land use framework to their own estate, managing land more strategically to deliver for nature alongside core public services.

    The plan is supported by £4.1 million of funding for a series of pilot “lighthouse” projects across the estate. These projects on operational land, including defence training areas, transport corridors and prison estates, will demonstrate how nature recovery can enhance the resilience and delivery of public services. Evidence from these pilots will inform future, larger-scale delivery.

    Recent independent analysis indicates that the Government estate has the potential to generate ecosystem services with an estimated value of up to £67 billion where natural assets are maintained in good condition.

    This new plan is the first of its kind globally. By managing land more strategically across the Government estate and working with partners, it will support the delivery of Environment Act targets on biodiversity, water quality and woodland cover, and ensure progress to the UK’s commitment to protect 30% of land and sea for nature by 2030. A digital map of the Government estate will be published by April 2027 to support transparency and improve spatial planning.

    The Government estate nature plan sits alongside a wider set of plans published by the National Estate for Nature, a coalition of 26 major landowners who together manage around 10% of England’s land. Members include Government Departments and public bodies, as well as organisations such as the National Trust, the Crown Estate, the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall, the Church Commissioners and the RSPB.Toggle showing location ofColumn 30WS

    Together, partners have set out how they will manage their landholdings to restore and enhance priority habitats, and contribute to national targets. These include commitments such as increasing woodland cover, restoring peatlands, and expanding nature-friendly farming practices.

  • Tim Farron – 2026 Speech on Thames Water

    Tim Farron – 2026 Speech on Thames Water

    The speech made by Tim Farron, the Liberal Democrat spokesperson for the Environment, in the House of Commons on 16 June 2026.

    I start by associating myself closely with the Secretary of State’s remarks about Jo Cox. It was a privilege to serve alongside her in this place, and we still miss her deeply.

    I am grateful to the Secretary of State for advance sight of the statement and for the helpful briefing that I received earlier. Since Conservative privatisation more than 35 years ago, some £85 billion of billpayers’ money has flowed out like a torrent into the pockets of mostly overseas shareholders and executives paying themselves unearned bonuses. That money could and should have gone into cleaning up our waterways and modernising infrastructure. Instead, sewage was released into our lakes, rivers and seas for 1.8 million hours last year, and more than 100,000 of those were in the Thames region alone. Some 20% of our water leaks out of its pipes before it even reaches our homes. For Thames Water, the figure is even worse, with 25% of that water wasted.

    Now Thames Water’s investors are asking for more time for more opportunity to take money before they inevitably run. The Secretary of State is right, then, that the creditors’ offer is a disgrace. They get to keep making money, and Thames Water billpayers get to pay even more to keep them going, while getting the privilege of seeing long-overdue infrastructure improvements delayed for yet another decade. Thames Water is taking the mickey. The Liberal Democrats say, “No more, and no thanks.”

    It is clear that Thames Water has failed in its basic performance as a water company, and that gives the Secretary of State all the reason she needs to place it into special administration, so why is she not doing that instead? Her letter to Ofwat is, I am afraid, a sign of dreadful weakness. She has to beg an equally weak Ofwat to show a resolve that it institutionally lacks. Thames has failed in its performance, so just put it into special administration and migrate the company to a mutually owned model, where the billpayers own the company and call the shots. That way, investment will be made, sewage spills will stop and water leaks will cease. By doing that, she could begin the process whereby all our water companies are owned not by private equity, overseas investors or the sluggish state, but by the people. If she did that, she would win the favour of people from Witney to Windermere. Why does she not stop faffing about and do that instead?

    Emma Reynolds

    I thank the hon. Gentleman, I think, for his support for my statement today, although it was slightly half-hearted. He is right to say that there have been serious pollution incidents in different water companies, but especially in the Thames, and that is of grave concern to the public and to Thames Water’s customers in particular. I point out to him that there are two types of special administration regime. An insolvency SAR is an insolvency process and is for the company directors to determine. A performance SAR would be triggered if a company was in serious breach of its statutory duties or if the company breaches an enforcement order in a way that is so serious that it is inappropriate for the company to retain its licence. The Government stand ready for all eventualities, including a SAR.

  • Toby Perkins – 2026 Speech on Thames Water

    Toby Perkins – 2026 Speech on Thames Water

    The speech made by Toby Perkins, the Labour MP for Chesterfield, in the House of Commons on 16 June 2026.

    Thames Water customers are paying the price for the incompetent regulation that allowed Macquarie to saddle the company with eye-watering debts at the same time as its environmental performance was so disgraceful. That debt ultimately led to shareholders writing the equity value down to zero. Those who bought the debt are now making this proposal. I entirely understand why the Secretary of State would not want customers to receive a service that was failing in its environmental responsibilities while they paid higher bills, but what assessment has she made as to whether Thames Water is a viable business? We have been told that this is the final offer from the company. Is there a viable business there that will deliver long-term investment within a reasonable cost window for billpayers? If there is not, at what point does public administration become inevitable?

    Emma Reynolds

    As I set out in my letter to the regulator, Ofwat, I am concerned that the proposal will mean delays to environmental improvements and to improvements to water infrastructure, with, as my hon. Friend rightly says, unfair cost being laid at the door of Thames Water customers. He asks whether it is a viable business and about next steps. This is a stage in the process where I have given my early views on this proposal. It is now for Ofwat to decide what to do next, and we wait to see what happens.

  • Victoria Atkins – 2026 Speech on Thames Water

    Victoria Atkins – 2026 Speech on Thames Water

    The speech made by Victoria Atkins, the Shadow Environment Secretary, in the House of Commons on 16 June 2026.

    First, I echo the Secretary of State’s comments in remembrance of her dear colleague Jo Cox. Her loss was felt across the House and across party political lines, and I send all of our very best wishes to her loved ones and friends.

    I thank you, Mr Speaker, and I thank the Secretary of State for advance sight of her statement and for a briefing call on this announcement. As you know, I have been trying for months to coax the Secretary of State to the Dispatch Box to explain major events within her portfolio, from the Government’s EU handover negotiations to their lack of support for farmers. Finally, she emerges into the light. We all assumed that it would be to announce progress towards resolving the many issues facing Thames Water and its customers; instead, it is to make a statement about a letter to the regulator. There is nothing new in this statement—no change in the situation of Thames Water, and still no certainty for billpayers.

    Thames Water has repeatedly failed its customers and the environment with a record of pollution, leakage and chronic under-investment. The latest figures lay this bare. The company is responsible for around a third of the nation’s worst pollution incidents, even as billpayers face steep increases in their bills. These are not abstract failures; untreated sewage has been poured into the rivers and chalk streams that local communities cherish, while customers are asked to pay more for less. The priority now must be a financial arrangement that keeps the company afloat and protects billpayers and taxpayers. While the Secretary of State’s Government are in chaos, paralysed by the Prime Minister’s weakness and the Mayor of Greater Manchester’s leadership ambitions, Thames Water continues to fail. If no deal is reached, Thames Water could collapse—again, at enormous cost to taxpayers.

    The Secretary of State has said that she does not want a scenario where customers

    “pick up the bill for the company’s failures”,

    but when the Conservatives tried to amend the Water (Special Measures) Act to prevent consumers from being on the hook in the event of a company going into special administration and tried to impose a lending ratio limit on water companies to prevent this situation from happening again, Labour voted it down. Why? I also remember that under the former Secretary of State, the right hon. Member for Streatham and Croydon North (Steve Reed), an investor pulled out of a previous rescue deal, partly due to political risk—in other words, the former Secretary of State had talked himself out of a deal. How is the current Secretary of State avoiding the failures of the now Secretary of State for Housing?

    There are those who are urging nationalisation, a word that is thrown around carelessly by Labour Back Benchers and by Reform—in fact, I think I heard it just now. None of them ever explains that nationalisation would be extremely expensive, potentially costing the taxpayer up to £20 billion. For those who are wondering what that means, it is roughly equivalent to the defence funding shortfall we have heard so much about in recent days. However, there are reasonable concerns about how Thames Water’s failures will be managed during the Government’s restructuring of the sector and the abolition of Ofwat, so can the Secretary of State please confirm that the existing penalty regime will not be downgraded or diluted, which has been briefed to the newspapers? What safeguards will be put in place to ensure Thames Water remains fully responsible for its environmental and operational failures? How will the Government ensure that billpayers are not left bearing the cost of past mismanagement, and have they offered or begun any process to recommend an alternative deal?

    Public trust in the water industry is already at rock bottom.

    Ministers have still not explained how investment in the sector will actually be paid for. Indeed, the Secretary of State’s predecessor had to admit that so-called private water industry investment is in reality paid for by higher bills, and the Secretary of State has repeated that today. Families already struggling with the cost of living should not become the safety net for a company that rewarded its executives while letting its infrastructure crumble. This is an important moment for the Government to show that they can balance financial stability with strong regulatory oversight and put accountability and the interests of billpayers and the environment at the heart of water reform. The Government must now deliver on the big promises they made during the election for the water sector.

    Emma Reynolds

    I am always happy to receive brownie points, Mr Speaker, so thank you for what you said.

    The shadow Secretary of State rightly says that untreated sewage has poured into our waterways, and it did, in the long years that her party was in government. They cut the Environment Agency’s enforcement budget and moved to an approach where water companies marked their own homework—the so-called self-monitoring approach. She has some brass neck in lecturing us when we saw a series of failures under her Government.

    We are here today, and we as a Government inherited record levels of pollution in our waterways, because of the failure by the Government of the right hon. Lady to see what was happening before their eyes. It was a failure of regulation, a failure of the regulators and a failure of the previous Government.

    I am proud of what we have achieved in the two short years that we have been in power. I am proud of the Water (Special Measures) Act 2025. When did the Conservatives ever cap polluting water bosses’ bonuses? Never. The right hon. Lady lectures me about amendments to our Act. Our Act did more in less than a year than her party did in 14 years to ensure a fairer deal for customers and a better deal for the environment.

    The right hon. Lady asks about nationalisation. I gently say that a special administration regime is not the same as nationalisation. [Interruption.] I am just clarifying for the House; I do not wish to have an exchange with her across the ballot box—sorry, the Dispatch Box—if I can possibly help it. The ballot box might be at some other point. There is a difference between nationalisation and a special administration regime. With nationalisation, the Government would be taking ownership of the company. With a special administration regime, the Government would finance a special administrator appointed by the courts to run the company.

    The right hon. Lady talks about public trust in our water sector being at record lows. All I can say is that we are clearing up her party’s mess. [Interruption.] It was under her Government that Thames Water was plunged into unmanageable levels of debt.

    Mr Speaker

    Order. Can I just say to the shadow Secretary of State that I want to hear the Secretary of State? We do not need a running commentary all the way through. I made sure that those on the Government Front Bench listened to her.

    Emma Reynolds

    I am not surprised that there are not many Opposition Back Benchers here, given the Conservatives’ terrible record on the water industry. In our clean water Bill, which we will introduce later in the Session, we will take forward a desperately needed, once-in-a-generation reform of the water sector to introduce a powerful single regulator that holds water companies to account.

  • Emma Reynolds – 2026 Statement on Thames Water

    Emma Reynolds – 2026 Statement on Thames Water

    The statement made by Emma Reynolds, the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, in the House of Commons on 16 June 2026.

    Before I begin, let me say that this is a solemn day, as we remember our dear friend and colleague Jo Cox—I got to know her when we were living in Brussels in our 20s. I pay tribute to her formidable sister and their family for all their vital work to honour her memory.

    I will make a statement regarding the position of Thames Water and the proposed recapitalisation package under consideration. This Government were elected with a clear mandate to clean up our rivers, lakes and seas, having inherited record levels of pollution incidents from water companies. Thames Water has underperformed for 15 years. It has regularly missed performance targets, it has unacceptable levels of serious pollution incidents, and the company is heavily indebted. This situation, which delivers poor outcomes for consumers and the environment, cannot continue.

    To fix this, over the course of the past two years, the company has been undertaking a recapitalisation process to seek vital long-term funding. The Government have been clear throughout that any investor will need to have a credible and robust turnaround plan, the implementation of which must be monitored by regulators and must restore the company’s financial resilience and operational performance. Ofwat, with the support of Government, have been in discussions with the London and Valley Water consortium—a group of Thames Water’s creditors—regarding the terms of a proposal. On 6 March, the consortium presented its proposal for Thames Water to both Ofwat and the Government. Ofwat has been continuing its discussions with the consortium since then, and I wanted to update the House on the next stage of the process.

    Ofwat is currently evaluating the consortium’s proposal and, as the independent regulator, is responsible for deciding whether to accept it. If Ofwat decides to accept the proposal, this would be subject to a public consultation and a court-sanctioned restructuring process. A recapitalisation process of this size is complex and will take time. As the Environment Secretary, I have several duties, set out in section 2 of the Water Industry Act 1991. These include protecting consumers, securing the proper delivery of water and sewerage services, and ensuring that companies can finance those services and that statutory obligations are properly carried out. Today, I can confirm that I have sent a letter to Iain Coucher, Ofwat’s chair, outlining my early views on the proposal linked to my section 2 duties. These should not be taken as, nor do they constitute, a direction from Government to Ofwat.

    I do not believe that the current proposal goes far enough to protect customers and the environment. I have three particular concerns about the proposal: the unfair cost to customers, delays to vital infrastructure investments, and delays to environmental improvements. The 16 million Thames Water customers are front and centre of my consideration, and I am primarily worried about the impact on them. There is an expectation in the proposal that customers will fund—and therefore bear an undue cost for—investment in the company.

    In addition, I am not convinced about the proposal’s request to reduce performance standards, nor about the significant delay to vital infrastructure investments. This would mean delays to environmental improvements, particularly those related to waste-water treatments linked to statutory requirements, as well as to projects that are important for drinking water safety and supply. I am therefore concerned that the long-term resilience of the water and waste-water systems may not be adequately protected. The Government will always act in the national interest, and my priority as Environment Secretary is protecting customers and the environment. We will stand ready for all eventualities.

    I conclude by emphasising this Government’s commitment to turning around the water sector. In under two years, we have taken swift, decisive action. We have introduced the Water (Special Measures) Act 2025 to raise standards, enforce accountability, and make pollution cover-ups a criminal offence. We have banned more than £4 million in bonuses for polluting water bosses; we have unlocked £104 billion of private investment to rebuild vital infrastructure; and we have commissioned Sir Jon Cunliffe to lead the most comprehensive independent review of the water sector since privatisation. Together, those steps have paved the way for the landmark clean water Bill announced in the King’s Speech. The Bill fulfils the commitments we set out in the water White Paper earlier this year and will deliver the fundamental reforms that are so desperately needed. This once-in-a-generation Bill will create a single powerful water regulator, moving away from a system where water companies mark their own homework by putting in place stronger, active supervision. This will strengthen water companies’ financial resilience and the long-term stability of the sector, with modernised economic regulation and new powers to drive turnaround where companies perform poorly.

    Additionally, the reforms will strengthen the consumer advocate, providing a more independent, authoritative voice that can challenge the system, drive improvements in outcomes and ensure that customers’ interests are put first. We will also improve water quality by cutting pollution at its source. Finally, we will avoid the situation we are discussing today happening again: our reforms will give the new regulator the powers to ensure water companies do not accumulate unmanageable levels of debt. More broadly, they will secure the long-term stability of the sector and ensure that companies are financially resilient. Put simply, our reforms will deliver better outcomes for customers and the environment.

    I commend this statement to the House.

  • Angela Eagle – 2026 Statement on Bovine TB Control in England

    Angela Eagle – 2026 Statement on Bovine TB Control in England

    The statement made by Angela Eagle, the Minister for Food Security and Rural Affairs, in the House of Commons on 10 June 2026.

    Today, I can inform the House of the publication of the co-designed bovine tuberculosis control strategy for England, developed and recommended by the steering group of the Bovine TB Partnership. It is now available on the Government-industry TB Hub website.

    We said in our manifesto that we would work with farmers and scientists on measures to eradicate bovine TB, and that is exactly what this process has done. The recommended strategy reflects the contribution of farmers, vets, scientists, industry representatives, and members of the public, brought together through several dedicated working groups and public dialogue workshops.

    I want to place on record my thanks to all those who took part, giving their time, their expertise, and their experience to help shape this work.

    Bovine TB remains one of the most difficult and persistent animal health challenges we face. We know the toll it takes, not only on cattle but on farmers, their families, vets, and rural communities. Too many have lived with that burden for too long.

    We must also recognise that bovine TB is a deeply contested and often polarised issue, particularly around wildlife and the role of badgers in disease spread. Let me be clear: the badger cull is ending, and no new licences can be issued under that policy, as we instead keep the focus on cattle while also protecting wildlife.

    When we announced the co-design of a new strategy in August 2024, this Government committed to end the badger cull by the end of this Parliament, and we have made good on that commitment.

    The 2025 culling season marked the final year of industry-led culling in England’s high risk and edge areas. Today, just one licence remains in Cumbria in the low risk area. However, no decision has been taken by Natural England to authorise culling under that licence in 2026, and I understand that the licence will be formally revoked by it, with a transition to badger vaccination now under way.

    Against that backdrop, I welcome the steering group’s recommended strategy. It sets out a clear direction, and what we now need to deliver: reducing TB in cattle, improving early detection, giving farmers and vets more agency to manage disease risk, strengthening biosecurity, and keeping a firm focus on the long-term prize of achieving officially bovine TB free status for England by 2038.

    This goal matters. It means lifting the shadow of this disease from farming families, restoring confidence for the future, growing the rural economy, and supporting profitable, resilient farm businesses.

    The publication today is an important step forward. It responds directly to the challenge set by Professor Sir Charles Godfray and his panel to increase the pace and urgency of our efforts. Crucially, it also sets a clear ambition to deploy a cattle vaccine and a DIVA—detect infected among vaccinated animals—test by 2030. A licence application for the vaccine has already been submitted to the Veterinary Medicines Directorate.

    The Government will now consider the steering group’s proposals carefully, and we will do so at pace. We will continue to work closely with farmers, vets, scientists and industry partners to move swiftly from recommendation to delivery, so that the momentum we have begun is not lost.

    Our intention is therefore to translate this strategy into action without delay, through a series of rolling three to five year delivery plans that ensure progress is sustained, transparent, and felt on the ground.

    I will update the House further in due course.

  • Angela Eagle – 2026 Statement on the  Sustainable Farming Incentive

    Angela Eagle – 2026 Statement on the Sustainable Farming Incentive

    The statement made by Angela Eagle, the Minister for Food Security and Rural Affairs, in the House of Commons on 11 June 2026.

    I am today updating the House on the sustainable farming incentive, one of this Government’s environmental land management schemes that pay farmers to manage their land in ways that improve nature, soil health and the environment, alongside supporting sustainable food production.

    Farmers in England will soon be able to apply for the improved SFI. Building on previous announcements, the revised scheme is designed to be simpler to access and better suited to modern farm businesses.

    The new SFI cuts unnecessary complexity while continuing to reward the practical actions that underpin productive, resilient farm businesses, from healthier soils and cleaner water to better habitats for bees, birds and other wildlife.

    We have worked with farmers and industry to shape the new scheme, backed by £240 million for new SFI agreements and building on around £560 million already committed to farmers delivering over 39,000 live SFI agreements.

    Applications are scheduled to open from 30 June 2026 for two groups: small farms and farms without an existing ELM revenue agreement. A second application window will open in September 2026, giving all farmers and land managers the opportunity to apply.

    The first application window opens with up to £60 million available, followed by a second window opening in September to all farms with the remainder of the £240 million budget available.

    The SFI offer in 2026 is an iterated version of the 2024 scheme. For continuity, the large majority of scheme features will remain as they were—the look and feel of SFI should be familiar to farmers who have applied previously. However, we have made some improvements to produce a simpler and more streamlined offer.

    In the previous version of SFI, a quarter of funding went to just 4% of farms. For SFI in 2026, we have introduced a new £100,000 annual agreement cap to help ensure funding reaches more farm businesses. Each farm business will be able to hold one SFI26 agreement, helping spread available funding more fairly across the sector.

    The new offer also contains several actions which encourage the reduced use of synthetic fertilisers in favour of more sustainable options, cutting input costs and boosting resilience to global market shocks such as the closure of the strait of Hormuz.

    The Government have listened to farmers who said they need time to understand the offer before applications open. We published “Get ready to apply” guidance on gov.uk on 6 May and near-final versions of the scheme guidance, terms and conditions, and actions last week on 2 June, allowing farmers to review the offer available and consider which actions may work best for their farm business. Final scheme guidance, developed with industry input, will be published next week.

    Alongside the new SFI offer, the Government are making at least £50 million available for new countryside stewardship higher tier agreements this year, helping farmers and land managers deliver targeted environmental improvements where they can have the greatest impact.

    The Government are also progressing the next group of landscape recovery projects expected to move into implementation this year, supporting large-scale action to restore rivers and habitats across England.

    Together, these schemes form a comprehensive package of support for farmers, helping to boost food production, strengthen farm resilience and drive nature recovery, while underpinning the UK’s long-term food security.

  • Emma Reynolds – 2026 Speech on Food Security

    Emma Reynolds – 2026 Speech on Food Security

    The speech made by Emma Reynolds, the Environment Secretary, at the British Ambassador’s Residence in Paris on 12 February 2026.

    Good evening, bonsoir, mesdames et messieurs. Distinguished guests, colleagues and friends. Thank you for welcoming me to Paris this evening.

    And thank you Andrew for that kind and rather cheesy introduction.

    Je suis ravie d’etre ici ce soir avec vous. Paris occupe une place toute particulière dans mon cœur. J’ai travaillé en France dans ma tendre jeunesse à l’âge 19 ans comme serveuse a la gare de Lyon Partdieu. J’en ai retenu deux choses essentielles: l’importance d’un service de qualité… et une passion toujours aussi intense pour le fromage, la charcuterie et le vin français.

    And in fact, when I reflect on my time living here in France I can see some similarities between being a waitress and being a politician – you’re working long hours, serving the people, and also, alas, dealing with complaints – but unfortunately, we politicians can’t blame the kitchen when things go wrong!

    This impressive residence – Hotel Charost – has a rich history. The Duke of Wellington bought it off Napoleon’s sister, but don’t worry; the money and indeed the gold Britain paid for it was used by the French emperor to finance his return from exile!

    And this residence has served for over 200 years as a place where British and French people have come together to discuss the issues of the moment and explore the opportunities ahead.

    That is exactly what I want to do this evening with you.

    Today has been a day full of rich conversations.

    I had the great pleasure of meeting my French counterpart, Minister Annie Genevard, to discuss the future of our farming sectors, international trade and the agreement that we are negotiating between the UK and the EU on sanitary and phytosanitary rules – un accord sur les normes sanitaires et phytosanitaires – which you can see why we shorten to “SPS agreement”.

    I have also had meetings with Ambassador Olivier Poivre D’Arvor to discuss our shared ocean priorities – from marine protected areas to the plastics treaty.

    And Ambassador Barbara Pompili and I covered the biodiversity agenda, including our joint work on biodiversity credits.

    What struck me throughout today’s meetings was a common thread: a shared commitment to high standards, practical cooperation, and the understanding that the challenges we face – from climate to food security to ocean health – do not respect borders. And that we can stand tall in the world, working together in partnership to solve these challenges.

    Why food security matters now

    And that reminded me of something I learnt from my many years working in Brussels.

    That the relationship between the United Kingdom and our European neighbours is not simply a matter of treaties and trade statistics, as important as they are. It is built on something deeper.

    We have shared values, shared culture and a shared history. And most importantly we have a shared future.

    As the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves said yesterday, Britain’s future is inextricably bound with Europe’s future. For economic reasons, for security, for resilience and for defence. Geography matters in our world today. None of the trade agreements the UK has done around the world are as important as our trade arrangements with the EU.

    That is why our Labour government committed to the British people that we would reset and deliver on the partnership with our European friends. And that is exactly what we are doing.

    Because this partnership, based on our shared values, matters even more in this uncertain world.

    War on our continent, with the illegal Russian invasion of Ukraine.

    Increasing geopolitical tensions.

    New biosecurity threats – plant and animal diseases that do not respect borders.

    All these challenges demand greater cooperation, not isolation.

    And climate change is placing unprecedented pressure on food systems, biodiversity, and the natural resources we all depend upon.

    This is not a distant threat. Droughts, floods, extreme weather events – are already disrupting harvests, straining supply chains, and driving up costs for farmers and consumers alike.

    Food security has direct consequences for the safety and wellbeing of our populations. In this new geopolitical reality, it is inseparable from national security.

    That is why food security has become a strategic priority for governments across Europe – and why the strength of our relationships with our closest partners matters more than ever.

    For our shared security. And our shared prosperity.

    UK-France food systems are deeply connected

    The English Channel, la Manche, is one of Europe’s most important food corridors.

    Every day, high-value, time-sensitive goods cross in both directions, serving consumers and supporting producers on both sides.

    France exports over €7 billion euros in agri-food products to the UK each year.

    In return the UK exports over €3 billion euros of such produce to France.

    French produce on British tables; British products in French markets.

    Indeed, some of the finest French produce can be found in some of the best French restaurants – many of which are of course in London.

    French wine, cheese, chocolate and croissants are fantastically popular back home amongst the French expats but also les roast bifs.

    I must confess a particular weakness for a good Côtes du Rhône or indeed Burgundy.

    I read of President Macron’s visit to the trade show, Wine Paris, just this week, championing French producers and seeking new markets.

    We share that instinct: to support our agricultural sectors, defend quality, and find partners who value what we grow and make.

    And I’m sure that many of you have your own British favourites. I know that British salmon, whisky and lamb are valued in French restaurants and markets. Some of you might even drink a morning cup of tea.

    These flows of agri-food products represent millions of meals, thousands of livelihoods, and generations of trade built on trust. And something more, that the French know better than anyone else, food is culture.

    What crosses the Channel reflects not just commerce, but connection.

    Our supply chains are not national systems operating in parallel. They are integrated networks.

    The UK’s food security benefits when France and the wider EU are thriving. French resilience benefits when UK production and supply are stable.

    SPS agreement benefits

    This brings me to the agreement we are working towards with the EU.

    The SPS agreement is designed to restore the Channel corridor to its full potential.

    Exports of British farm products to the EU have dropped by a fifth in the five years since Brexit. And I heard in a roundtable this afternoon with French producers that they have had similar challenges exporting to the UK.

    That’s not good for farmers and consumers on both sides of the channel.

    This agreement will change that.

    It will make trade faster, easier, and cheaper.

    Businesses large and small will benefit from less time and money spent on complex paperwork at the border.

    Consumers will have greater access to the high-quality products they value.

    The agreement will mean over €300 million euros worth of cheese entering the UK from France would no longer need to be checked at the border and can reach customers more quickly.

    It also means that over €500 million euros worth of UK fish arriving in France each year can be sold faster and more reliably.

    Frictionless trade, efficient borders, open supply chains – these directly support farmer incomes, consumer prices, and shared resilience.

    The mutual benefits are significant.

    They tie the UK and EU together on food security and improve movement and reliability on both sides of the Channel.

    Shared high standards

    There is sometimes a temptation, when discussing trade agreements, to suggest that standards must be traded off against supply.

    My government rejects that view.

    The UK and EU are natural allies in upholding high standards of animal welfare and environmental protection – and in championing these principles internationally, protecting the integrity of our food systems while leading the global transition to sustainable agriculture.

    High standards are not a barrier to trade. They are what makes trade valuable. They are what consumers trust. And they are what will distinguish European agriculture in an increasingly uncertain world.

    Sustainable farming and food security

    The climate crisis means we cannot secure our food systems simply by producing more. We must produce food differently.

    Sustainable farming is not a constraint on food security – it is the foundation of it. Soil health, water management, biodiversity, reduced emissions – these are not luxuries. They are the conditions on which productive agriculture depends.

    Farmers who protect and restore their land are not just producing food. They are safeguarding the capacity to produce food for generations to come.

    As G7 and G20 members, the UK and France have both the platform and the obligation to drive global action on climate – in our food systems but also in energy, trade, and the protection of natural ecosystems worldwide.

    Last week I addressed scientists and policymakers gathered in Manchester for the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.

    At that gathering, I delivered remarks on behalf of His Majesty the King, who spoke of nature as “the ultimate foundation of our societies and, critically, our economy” – and of the urgent need to reverse biodiversity loss.

    His Majesty is right. Together we will demonstrate that protecting and restoring nature isn’t just an environmental necessity, it is essential for our security, our economy, and our future.

    The King also highlighted the International Advisory Panel on Biodiversity Credits, jointly established by the UK and French governments, as a model for how nature finance can channel investment towards nature across the world.

    That partnership – practical, innovative, and rooted in shared values – extends to the work ahead.

    And tomorrow I look forward to meeting Environment Minister Monique Barbut to discuss how we can work together through France’s G7 presidency this year and beyond – and demonstrate what multilateralism can deliver.

    Today has been a reminder of why these partnerships matter – not just in policy documents, but in practice.

    The conversations I’ve had with my French colleagues and counterparts, have reinforced my belief that the UK and France are ready to write the next chapter together.

    Because the challenges we face – climate change, geopolitical instability, pressures on our food systems – are not challenges any country can meet in splendid isolation.

    They demand cooperation between trusted partners who share not just interests, but values.

    That is what the UK and France have built together.

    Not a relationship of convenience, but one grounded in shared history, mutual respect, and a common vision for the future.

    In the months ahead, as we work to finalise the SPS agreement and deepen our cooperation, I am confident we will demonstrate what this partnership can achieve – not just for our two countries, but as a model for how neighbours can work together in an uncertain world.

    And in the spirit of partnership, I should warn you: the sparkling wine you have been drinking is produced by the finest English vineyards! But don’t worry – le vin rouge est francais!

    The entente may be tested, but I trust it will remain cordiale.

    But in all seriousness, I hope you’ll join me in toasting the friendship between our nations – past, present, and future.

    À notre amitié – d’hier, d’aujourd’hui et de demain.

    Merci.

  • Emma Reynolds – 2026 Speech at the Oxford Farming Conference

    Emma Reynolds – 2026 Speech at the Oxford Farming Conference

    The speech made by Emma Reynolds, the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on 8 January 2026.

    Good morning,

    It’s a real pleasure to be here at my first Oxford Farming Conference.

    This conference has a remarkable history – 90 years of new ideas being tested, challenges being confronted, and the future of British farming being shaped.

    Farmers are the custodians of 70% of England’s land and provide 65% of the food we eat.

    You are at the heart of our national life – for what you produce, the communities you sustain, and the landscapes and heritage you protect.

    I live in a rural area and I represent a rural constituency with 89 farms. So I came to this role with an understanding of the challenges you face – and the opportunities ahead.

    One of my first conversations as Secretary of State was with the NFU’s President, Tom Bradshaw. Since then, I’ve had frequent discussions with him and stakeholders from across the sector – hearing about your concerns, your frustrations, and your ambitions.

    And every one of those conversations has deepened my respect for what you do.

    For your resilience in the face of increasingly unpredictable weather and volatile markets.

    For your innovation in finding new ways to farm productively and sustainably in a changing climate.

    And for your determination to build businesses you can pass on to the next generation.

    Speaking of your determination, I also want to take this opportunity to thank farmers who have been out clearing roads and helping to protect their local communities in the recent snow.

    You step up when your communities need you and you are the heart of rural Britain.

    Today I’m going to cover a lot of ground, but there are 3 commitments that run throughout my speech.

    First, that this government is serious about partnership with your sector.

    Second, that we’re committed to giving you clarity and stability.

    Third, that we’re backing you to grow with confidence and resilience.

    Let me start with the announcement we made just before Christmas.

    Since starting this role in September, I’ve listened to farmers and stakeholders about your concerns on proposed changes to inheritance tax.

    You told me the threshold was too low. You told me it would hit small family farms – the very farms we want to protect.

    Farms that have been in families for generations. Farms you understandably want to pass on to your children.

    We have listened and we are making changes – increasing the inheritance tax threshold for Agricultural and Business Property Relief from £1 million to £2.5 million pounds.

    That means couples can pass on up to £5 million pounds without paying inheritance tax on their assets. That’s on top of the existing allowances such as the nil-rate band.

    Around 85% of estates claiming APR, including those also claiming BPR, will pay no more inheritance tax.

    Good governments listen. And when they hear real concerns, they act.

    That’s exactly what we’ve done and now we can move forward together.

    That commitment to partnership is why we asked Baroness Minette Batters to lead an independent review into farming profitability.

    We are working through all of her recommendations and we will set out a more detailed response in our 25 year Farming Roadmap, built with you, later this year.

    However, we have issued our initial, high-level response.

    She underlined the need for government to work in close partnership with the agriculture and food industry.

    I completely agree.

    So we will set up a Farming and Food Partnership Board to bring together the whole agri-food system – farmers, food processors, retailers and finance.

    Because food security isn’t just about what happens on the farm. It’s about the whole chain – from farm to fork.

    I will chair this new Board with my excellent colleague, the Farming Minister, Angela Eagle, as my deputy.

    Farmers will have a seat at the table when policy is developed. And it is your voice that will shape what government does.

    It also means that government can ask things of you – and of the wider food system.

    When we open new export markets, we need the industry ready to seize them.

    When consumers want more British produce, we need retailers committed to stocking it.

    When there’s an opportunity to grow, we need the whole system pulling in the same direction.

    That’s what partnership means. Not just listening but acting together.

    And it won’t be a one-size-fits-all approach.

    Different parts of our food system face different challenges and opportunities.

    We will develop sector plans – initially with horticulture and then with poultry. This will be followed by other sectors – where there’s real scope to grow more of our own food.

    Because when British farming thrives, consumers benefit – with affordable, high-quality food on their tables.

    Alongside creating the partnership board and sector plans, we have also announced planning reform to unlock food and farming infrastructure.

    Stepping up action on supply chain fairness.

    Bringing together farmers and financial institutions to tackle barriers to private investment.

    And dedicated trade missions to showcase British food and drink overseas.

    However, it’s not just the relationship between government and farmers that matters – it’s farmers’ relationships with one another.

    The Batters review highlights that collaboration between farmers and indeed with experts will be key to closing the productivity gap and improving farm profitability.

    So today I’m pleased to announce our new Farmer Collaboration Fund of £30 million pounds, over 3 years.

    We want to make it easier for farmers to share knowledge with each other. To make best practice common practice.

    Across the country, farmers are already coming together – sharing that best practice, managing rivers that cross boundaries, and accessing private investment that would otherwise be out of reach.

    We want to support these existing networks and help get new ones off the ground.

    Our vision is to help farmers improve their productivity and profitability; and to collaborate on delivering positive environmental change together.

    After all, the best ideas in farming don’t come from Whitehall. They come from farmers. You know your industry better than anyone else.

    There’s no such thing as a typical farm.

    A dairy farm faces different challenges to a horticultural business. A hill farmer in Cumbria operates differently to an arable farmer in East Anglia.

    Our approach must recognise this diversity.

    And nowhere is that more important than in our uplands.

    They provide over 70% of our drinking water, support rural livelihoods and are home to precious wildlife and beautiful landscapes.

    And they produce food in some of the most challenging conditions anywhere in the country.

    For too long, upland communities have faced a perfect storm. Economic fragility. Social isolation. Environmental pressures.

    We want to change that.

    Over the last year, we’ve started working with social entrepreneur Dr Hilary Cottam on a new approach.

    An approach where we get out on the ground and talk directly to upland communities.

    So today, I’m announcing that Dr Cottam and Defra will start a long-term partnership with communities in Dartmoor, then Cumbria.

    The overall vision is to develop a place-based approach for what these communities need; co-designing solutions to specific problems.

    By developing a common understanding of how land can be best used for food production and the public good.

    It’s vital we build governance that reflects the local challenges and opportunities of these areas.

    Together we will look at pooling public, private and third sector resources. Laying the foundations for new income streams. And creating the skills and networks that let communities lead their own transformation.

    That’s the most important thing here, that communities lead change from the ground up.

    During our time with upland communities, we also heard how much farmers value our Farming in Protected Landscapes programme.

    Today I’m pleased to announce we’re extending the programme for another three years – with £30 million pounds in funding next year.

    The programme has partnership at its core. It brings farmers, protected landscape organisations and communities together to deliver change at a scale no single holding could achieve alone.

    This extension means more farmers can deliver for wildlife, climate and their communities in England’s National Parks and National Landscapes.

    Productive farms at the heart of thriving rural areas.

    And that partnership approach continues with the new SFI offer launching this year.

    You’ve told me, loud and clear, that you need clarity, stability and predictability.

    I have a background in business. So I know how important margins, risk, and long-term investment are to you. Running a farm means balancing immediate pressures with decisions that will play out over decades.

    To make those decisions, you need to know where you stand.

    Protecting the environmental foundations of farming isn’t separate from profitability. It’s essential to it.

    Because without healthy land, there is no food. And without profitable farms, there are no farmers to produce it.

    Healthy soil. Clean water. Thriving pollinators. These aren’t nice to haves. They’re business fundamentals, environmental necessities and the foundations of our food security.

    And with more than 50,000 farm businesses already in environmental land management schemes, many of you clearly agree.

    But I’ve heard your frustrations. The SFI scheme became too complex. The unexpected closure last year damaged trust and confidence. And too much of the available funding was being absorbed by bigger farms.

    So we’re making three changes to fix that.

    First: we’re making it simpler and more focused.

    90% of spending currently goes on fewer than 40 of the 102 actions available.

    So we’re streamlining it. Fewer actions. Less complexity. Easier to apply.

    You’ll still have plenty of choice – but this government recognises SFI must work alongside food production not displace it.

    So we will limit how much land can be put into certain actions and review payment rates for others.

    These changes will make funding go further, allowing more people to benefit from agreements.

    Second: we’re improving fairness and accessibility.

    Right now, a quarter of the money goes to just 4% of farms.

    How can that be fair?

    We want to see farmers helping nature thrive everywhere, not just in a few places.

    So, we’re considering ways to address this such as an agreement value cap.

    This will help us meet our ambitious Environmental Improvement Plan target to double the number of farms delivering for wildlife.

    I’ve heard you say that you need planning certainty.

    I know many of you will have Environmental Land Management agreements expiring later this year.

    So I can confirm today, that we will open two SFI application windows this year.

    An initial window from June for small farms, and also those without existing Environmental Land Management agreements.

    Then a further window from September for all farms.

    Third: we’re going to provide certainty and transparency.

    From day one, I’ve heard loud and clear how important it is for you to plan for the future.

    I recognise that mistakes were made in the past, and that’s why I acted quickly – extending Countryside Stewardship Mid-Tier agreements and opening applications for the new and improved Higher-Tier offer.

    I am determined to provide you with that same stability going forward.

    So we will publish full scheme details before the first window opens and set clear budgets for each window – just like with the Capital Grants offer last year.

    There will be no more sudden unexpected closures.

    We’ll give you regular updates so you know when a window is close to being fully subscribed.

    Together, we will work with you to get the detail of these three changes right to deliver an SFI that is simpler, fairer, and more stable.

    An SFI shaped with you, that works for you.

    Once these changes are in place, the main design of SFI will be stabilised for the rest of this Parliament. So you know what to expect in the years to come.

    Because growth in farming depends upon solid environmental foundations.

    And British farming is a key growth sector – one we are backing for the long term.

    I’ve met farmers who want to build. Farmers who want to export. Farmers who want to invest in new technology.

    Too often, you’ve been held back by bureaucracy. Our government is changing that.

    I’ve heard from many of you that the planning system has stopped you building the vital infrastructure you need.

    That’s why last month, we launched a consultation on planning changes to make it easier to build on-farm reservoirs, greenhouses, polytunnels, and farm shops – so you are free to diversify, adapt and grow.

    Planning should enable ambition, not stifle it.

    But your ambitions don’t stop at the farm gate. Many of you want to reach new customers – not just here, but abroad.

    We’re opening doors to new markets by promoting British agriculture in trade deals with India, the US and Korea.

    Our deal with the EU on food standards will slash red tape and costs, improving access to the EU market.

    And our network of global agri-food attachés has unlocked export deals worth over £125 million pounds in the last year alone.

    We’re also backing the technology that will define the next generation of British farming – precision agriculture, new breeding techniques, and smarter use of data.

    And as this year’s OFC report rightly states, “farming has always evolved” and your “ability to innovate, adapt and be resilient remains your greatest asset”.

    And we will support you with that resilience.

    You know better than anyone how quickly extreme weather and disease can overturn months of work.

    That’s why we’re investing a record £10.5 billion pounds in flood defences and transforming our animal disease prevention capability through a new National Biosecurity Centre.

    The growth opportunities for British farming are significant. And we are backing you to seize them.

    So let me finish where I began.

    Partnership. We will work with you, not impose on you. Through our new Farming and Food Partnership Board. Through peer-to-peer networks. Through community-led change. And through engagement on the detailed changes to SFI.

    Clarity and stability. You will have the certainty you need to plan. Clear budgets. Clear timelines. And a clear Farming Roadmap for the future.

    Growth built on strong foundations. Trade deals that open new markets. Planning reforms that cut through barriers. Investment that backs your ambition.

    And most importantly, profitable farming and a thriving environment – not as a trade-off, but as two sides of the same coin.

    These are my commitments to you.

    The foundation for the bright future we are building together.

    That’s what modern British agriculture looks like.

    Productive. Profitable. Sustainable.

    Thank you.