Blog

The below Parliamentary question was asked by Tulip Siddiq on 2016-04-27.

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, (a) how many and (b) what proportion of companies newly registered with Companies House have been (i) directly incorporated and (ii) set up by third parties such as trust or company service providers in each year since 2004; and in each of those years how many complaints Companies House received about the conduct of companies in each group.

Anna Soubry

Companies House does not hold the information requested. Newly incorporated companies are not categorised on the basis of whether they were formed directly or by a third party such as a Trust or Company Service Provider.

The below Parliamentary question was asked by Tulip Siddiq on 2016-04-27.

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many cases of alleged malpractice by directors of companies the Insolvency Service investigated in each year since 2009; and in each of those years how many directors of such companies were disqualified from practising on account of offences committed (a) in the UK and (b) abroad.

Anna Soubry

When a company enters into formal insolvency proceedings, the insolvency practitioner (IP) has to file a report on the conduct of the directors unless an official receiver is in office; and each of those reports is assessed by the Insolvency Service to determine if a more detailed investigation is appropriate. When a company enters into compulsory liquidation, although this is not itself an indication of misconduct, the official receiver will in all cases make enquiries to determine the cause of insolvency and the conduct of the directors of the company.

The number of reports of misconduct submitted by IPs is detailed in the table below, alongside the total number of compulsory liquidations each year.

Reporting year	IP reports of misconduct	Compulsory liquidations	Total disqualifications
09/10	7,030	5,418	1,386
10/11	5,373	4,573	1,453
11/12	5,401	5,125	1,165
12/13	5,335	4,001	1,034
13/14	4,671	3,734	1,282
14/15	4,620	3,588	1,210
15/16	4,277	2,778	*810

*Disqualifications in the period from April 2015 to December 2015, the latest period for which official statistics are available.

All of these cases relate to companies based in and trading in the UK. In many cases, a disqualification will be obtained in a period subsequent to the submission of a report or the insolvency of the company. Each case may encompass a number of directors.

The below Parliamentary question was asked by Tulip Siddiq on 2016-04-27.

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many companies have disclosed information to Companies House on persons with significant control in their company as part of their company register since that requirement came into force on 6 April 2016.

Anna Soubry

The requirement for companies to have a register of people with significant control was commenced on 6 April. However, the requirement to disclose this information to the Registrar does not commence until 30 June 2016. In most cases companies will deliver this annually with their Confirmation Statement, which replaces the Annual Return.

The below Parliamentary question was asked by Tulip Siddiq on 2016-04-27.

To ask the Attorney General, (a) how much funding he has allocated to and (b) how many full-time equivalent staff were employed by the (i) Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and (ii) SFO’s Proceeds of Crime Division in each year since 2009.

Jeremy Wright

The information requested is contained in the following tables.

	2009-10	2010-11	2011-12	2012-13	2013-14	2014-15	2015-16
SFO gross budget	£44.6m	£41.3m	£40.1m	£43.7m	£54m	£59.4m	£62.2m
SFO Proceeds of Crime Division 2	£0.920m	£1.021m	£1.571m	£1.683m	£1.931m	£2.304m	£2.674m
Full time equivalent staff 3	2009-10	2010-11	2011-12	2012-13	2013-14	2014-15	2015-16
SFO	307	305	306	292	305	4014	393
SFO Proceeds of Crime Division	13	17	21	20	23.43	32.71	31.43

1. The figures includes any blockbuster funding received in each year. They exclude capital expenditure, annually managed expenditure.
2. The Proceeds of Crime figures include the budget for the current year and outturn for the previous years. They do not include £110k funding received from the Department for International Development in the financial years 2014-15 & 2015-16.
3. This data covers FTE staff in post as at 31^st March each year including fixed term contractors, but not agency staff. Complete records for staff in post in the Proceeds of Crime division before 2011-12 are not held centrally and the figures provided for these years are based on available data.
4. This is a revised figure which corrects the number previously published in the SFO Annual Report and Accounts 2014-15.

The below Parliamentary question was asked by Tulip Siddiq on 2016-04-27.

To ask the Attorney General, (a) how much funding he has allocated to and (b) how many full-time equivalent staff were employed by the CPS’s Proceeds of Crime Unit in each year since 2009.

Jeremy Wright

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) allocated the following funding to its Proceeds of Crime Unit since 2009.

2008/09 £ 2,556,535

2009/10 £ 4,339,422

2010/11 £ 7,311,688

2011/12 £ 6,096,729

2012/13 £ 5,967,226

2013/14 £ 6,125,024

2014/15 £ 8,378,651

2015/16 £10,035,821

The following average full-time equivalent staff in post for Proceeds of Crime Unit since 2009 were:-

2008/09 41.9

2009/10 60.0

2010/11 73.1

2011/12 65.1

2012/13 77.3

2013/14 77.7

2014/15 124.4

2015/16 140.4