Category: Transportation

  • Grant Shapps – 2021 Statement on Transport for London Funding

    Grant Shapps – 2021 Statement on Transport for London Funding

    The statement made by Grant Shapps, the Secretary of State for Transport, in the House of Commons on 18 May 2021.

    The Government and the Mayor of London have agreed to extend the current Transport for London (TfL) funding deal. The deal was due to expire on 18 May 2021 but this extension will continue to support the capital and the transport network until 28 May 2021 on the same terms as now. The extension will provide certainty while we finalise the terms of the next funding deal which will get TfL onto a more financially sustainable footing.

    The extension comprises an additional funding payment of £65 million with a top-up grant available based on actual passenger revenues.

    The Government have repeatedly shown that they are committed to supporting the running of essential services across the capital with over £3 billion emergency funding provided since the start of the pandemic. Support for London needs to be balanced with the national recovery and ensure fairness and value for money for the taxpayer. The Government will continue to work with TfL and the Mayor so TfL can be financially sustainable as soon as possible.

  • Jim McMahon – 2021 Comments on the Williams Review

    Jim McMahon – 2021 Comments on the Williams Review

    The comments made by Jim McMahon, the Shadow Secretary of State for Transport, on 20 May 2021.

    Whilst we welcome steps to increase public control and ownership over the railways, there remains many unanswered questions in today’s report.

    Despite two press releases in six hours, a morning media round and a statement to the house, the Transport Secretary still seems unable to explain how his flexible ticketing offer will actually deliver saving for passengers.

    Labour has long argued that public ownership of the rail network will provide better value for the taxpayer and for passengers, who deserve more than rhetoric from this Government.

  • Tracy Brabin – 2021 Comments on Buses in West Yorkshire

    Tracy Brabin – 2021 Comments on Buses in West Yorkshire

    The comments made on Twitter by Tracy Brabin, the Mayor of West Yorkshire, on 11 May 2021.

    Second day in job as West Yorkshire Mayor and heading to work on the bus. Timetable online doesn’t match actual arrival/journey times, no information at bus stops (bus number would help). 15 min drive 1hr+ on the bus. We must be able to do better than this. @arrivayorkshire

  • Andy Street – 2021 Comments on HS2

    Andy Street – 2021 Comments on HS2

    The comments made by Andy Street, the Mayor of the West Midlands, on 11 May 2021.

    First day back as Mayor with hundreds of new HS2 jobs secured.

    The £570m contract to build Curzon Street is a major investment, and we’ll run training courses so local people can get the skills they need to get to work.

    All part of my plan for 100k new jobs in two years.

  • Grant Shapps – 2021 Statement on Covid-19

    Grant Shapps – 2021 Statement on Covid-19

    The statement made by Grant Shapps, the Secretary of State for Transport, on 7 May 2021.

    Good afternoon.

    Welcome to today’s Downing Street press conference.

    I’m pleased to be joined here today by Dr Jenny Harries, the Chief Executive of the UK Health Security Agency and Paul Lincoln, Director General of Border Force.

    We’ve made enormous progress this year tackling the pandemic across Britain.

    We’re not at the end of it, but the signs are very hopeful.

    That progress has been hard won.

    Won by the speed and success of our NHS vaccination programme.

    By the huge scale of our testing.

    And by the sheer sacrifice and the discipline of the public.

    And it’s so important that we don’t risk undermining all that, now.

    Getting a vaccination feels like being given your life back.

    The newly vaccinated thanking the wonderful volunteers.

    People in tears of relief.

    But as well as the joy, there is also concern about a resurgence of Covid.

    And it’s a caution we absolutely share as a government.

    And it’s why the only route out of this pandemic is a careful, prudent, responsible one.

    Of course we’re also a nation that thrives on travel, a nation with family ties across the globe.

    Notably, nearly 1 in 3 new mothers in the UK was born overseas.

    And, in 2019, UK residents took over 93 million trips abroad.

    So, I’m glad to be standing here today (7 May 2021) announcing the first, albeit tentative, steps towards unlocking international travel.

    We want a summer in which, with the help of vaccines and testing, we can reunite family and friends.

    Travelling to places we love.

    We want to start looking outward again.

    Whilst Covid has isolated us, travel reunites us.

    Even if video calls have kept us all connected during the lockdown, there’s simply no substitute for human contact.

    Travel is of course also crucial for rebuilding our economy.

    Bringing long-awaited relief to hard-hit airlines, airports and the tourism sector, which taxpayers have spent £7 billion in supporting.

    But I have to be straight with you.

    Our success in combatting Covid here, with two thirds of adults now vaccinated, is not yet replicated in many places abroad.

    We in this country have managed to construct a fortress against Covid.

    But the disease is still prevalent in other parts of the world, most notably at the moment in India.

    In fact, more new cases of Covid have been diagnosed around the world in the last 7 days than at any time since this pandemic began.

    Nobody wants to go back into lockdown. Not Ever!

    That is why today’s announcement, removing the ‘Stay in the UK’ restriction from the 17 May (2021), is necessarily cautious.

    We must make absolutely sure that the countries we reconnect with are safe.

    That their infection rates are low, and their vaccination rates are high.

    It means making sure that they are not incubating the most dangerous variants and that their data is reliable and trustworthy.

    That is why our Global Travel Taskforce has come up with a traffic light system classifying destinations by risk.

    This is based on data by the Joint Biosecurity Centre, which will be published on gov.uk.

    Red countries are those we should not be visiting except in the most extreme of circumstances, where repeated testing and isolation in designated government hotels on return is compulsory.

    Non-UK residents who have been in a red country in the last 10 days will still be barred from entering the UK.

    I have to tell you now that due to concerns about Covid rates and variants of concern, Turkey, the Maldives and Nepal must, regrettably, be added to the red list.

    Amber countries form the biggest group. As with Red list countries, you should not be travelling to these places right now

    Returnees will have to test 3 times, once before departure and twice after arrival, and isolate in a place of their choosing for 10 days.

    Finally, we have the green countries, which you will have the opportunity to visit no earlier than the 17th May (2021) so long as you take a pre-departure test before returning to England, and a second – PCR test – 2 days after your return.

    And with these green countries, you do not need to quarantine.

    Travellers will be glad to hear that we have been successful in driving down the cost of tests.

    However, by necessity, this initial green list must be limited.

    So, I am announcing today that from May 17th, you will be able to travel to 12 green list countries and territories including Portugal, Gibraltar and Israel.

    I regret that favourite summer destinations, like France, Spain and Greece are not yet included.

    But, every 3 weeks from reopening we will review countries to see if we can expand the green list.

    So this is just a first step.

    The signs overseas are now more promising as their vaccination programmes begin to crank up and as the summer progresses we hope that more traditional tourist destinations will be unlocked.

    But we have to turn that key slowly, and green list countries will be placed on a “watchlist” if we start to have concerns.

    And if it’s necessary, because of a new upswing in cases or a new variant, we will not hesitate to act fast and withdraw green status.

    So it’s up to you to check thoroughly before travelling.

    If you are thinking of booking a holiday in a green list destination, please check the restrictions applying to new arrivals.

    You can get this information on gov.uk and it’s important because each country has its own restrictions.

    Indeed, our strong advice is not to book any holiday which does not include a refund in the event of Covid-related cancellation.

    And, I’m afraid, we do expect longer delays at the airport. Paul will say more about that in a moment.

    But all these measures are necessary to protect us from new variants, and guard against a resurgence of infections.

    That is why the UK has now developed the most comprehensive testing regime on the planet. Testing up to 2 million people per day.

    Mobilising our world-leading genome sequencing to spot mutations that can lead to new variants. These are the walls of our fortress.

    Because the first duty of any government is to preserve the safety of its people.

    But it’s also our responsibility to show global leadership.

    To work with other countries to create safe standards for international travel.

    These were issues I discussed with G7 Transport Secretaries when I chaired a meeting with them earlier this week.

    And I was able to set out our own traffic light system.

    As part of this international leadership, the government is working to develop global standards for digital travel certification.

    So from 17 May, English residents will be able to use their existing NHS health app to gain access to their vaccine records.

    Alternatively, they will be able request a paper letter to verify their vaccination status.

    Before I finish, let me make one final point.

    I know there are many watching who might want restrictions to be lifted faster and to go further.

    And there are, if anything, more people who prefer a slower pace.

    But what unites us all is the belief that we do not want a return to the days of misery, suffering and loss.

    We must keep our fortress, built at such huge cost to us all, secure.

    Until brighter days, when unrestricted travel will allow us to meet the people who mean the most to us.

    But for now, we must tread carefully – respecting the science that will guide us along the way.

    I’d now like to turn to Jenny to cover the epidemiological position and then Paul to discuss the Border Force situation.

  • Alok Sharma – 2021 Speech on Zero Emissions for Road Transport

    Alok Sharma – 2021 Speech on Zero Emissions for Road Transport

    The speech made by Alok Sharma, the COP26 President, on 4 May 2021.

    Good afternoon.

    The future of the road transport sector is clear. And that future is zero emissions.

    The transition is happening faster than ever before.

    The pace of zero emissions vehicle sales has been quickening.

    In the EU, 10 percent of the cars sold in 2020 were hybrid or electric, that is expected to rise to 15 percent this year.

    In Norway electric car sales have overtaken petrol and diesel.

    Six months ago, the UK was planning to phase out new polluting vehicles by 2040.

    Today, we will do so by 2030.

    Matching the ambition shown by the likes of Sweden, Iceland, Denmark, and the Netherlands.

    While Norway is set for a 2025 phase-out.

    Manufacturers are taking action too. Volvo will phase out internal combustion engine sales by 2030, General Motors by 2035.

    We know that action from governments and business reinforce one another.

    So, as we look to speed-up the transition to green transport, we need action from both groups.

    And we must speed it up, because, today, road transport is responsible for 10 percent of global emissions.

    To meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, we need all new car sales to ]be zero emission by 2040. Earlier in the most advanced markets.

    And a faster transition can benefit us all. Thanks to economies of scale reducing costs.

    So, to help get the transition moving faster, the UK COP26 Presidency established the Zero Emission Vehicle Transition Council.

    Bringing together ministers and governments representing some of the world’s biggest car markets, to look at how we can work together.

    Our work is very much informed by consultations with business and civil society.

    I hope your discussions today also help to establish ways to accelerate the move to zero emissions vehicles.

    And I encourage those of you who have not yet done so to make bold commitments.

    Commitments that push the world closer towards its clean future.

    And that help your company, or your countries’ manufacturers, to get ahead.

    To capitalise on the now inevitable transition to zero emissions road transport around the world.

    So I wish you the best of luck with your discussions and deliberations.

    Thank you.

  • Grant Shapps – 2021 Comments on Green Motoring

    Grant Shapps – 2021 Comments on Green Motoring

    The comments made by Grant Shapps, the Secretary of State for Transport, on 5 May 2021.

    As hosts of COP26, we want to drive decarbonisation on the global stage, which is why we’re going further and faster to make the journeys of our future as clean as possible.

    With news that the half-a-million milestone has now been met, together with the UK now having the second largest EV market in Europe, it’s clear that the shift to green motoring is accelerating at speed.

  • Grant Shapps – 2021 Comments on All Lane Running Motorways

    Grant Shapps – 2021 Comments on All Lane Running Motorways

    The comments made by Grant Shapps, the Secretary of State for Transport, on 20 April 2021.

    Despite the data showing that fatalities are less likely on All Lane Running motorways than on conventional ones, this doesn’t mean all drivers necessarily feel safe on them.

    That is why I tasked Highways England last year with delivering an action plan to raise the bar on safety measures even higher. This progress report shows the extensive work already carried out, but we want to do more.

    Alongside the raft of measures already undertaken, today I am announcing that all new All Lane Running motorways will open with stopped vehicle detection technology in place, as well as a programme to speed up the roll-out of the technology on previously built stretches of All Lane Running motorways to next year. This will help us further reduce the risk of accidents on the country’s roads.

    So-called smart motorways started to be built in 2001 and I am determined to ensure that technology and exacting standards are in place.

  • Jim McMahon – 2021 Comments on Smart Motorways

    Jim McMahon – 2021 Comments on Smart Motorways

    The comments made by Jim McMahon, the Shadow Transport Secretary, on 20 April 2021.

    The Conservatives had a very straightforward choice to make and an opportunity to protect lives on smart motorways.

    Yet ministers appear to have decided to ignore the pleas of those who have already lost loved ones, and of the coroners who investigated their deaths.

    Labour will continue to press the Transport Secretary to reinstate the hard shoulder immediately while full safety reviews are undertaken and before more lives are lost.

  • Rachel Maclean – 2021 Speech on Hammersmith Bridge

    Rachel Maclean – 2021 Speech on Hammersmith Bridge

    The speech made by Rachel Maclean, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport, in the House of Commons on 14 April 2021.

    I congratulate the hon. Member for Putney (Fleur Anderson) on securing this important debate on funding for the restoration of Hammersmith bridge and on her detailed speech this evening. I agree with her on the issues that she highlighted, setting out the devastating impact on the physical and mental health of residents and local businesses on both sides of the river, due to the long-standing catalogue of failures and lack of action by Hammersmith and Fulham Borough Council.

    The hon. Lady led a protest that took place on Easter weekend, and I commend her for doing so. I want to acknowledge her passion for getting the bridge reopened.

    Andy Slaughter

    Will the Minister give way?

    Rachel Maclean

    I will just make some progress.

    I assure Members that the Government wish to see the bridge reopen as soon as is safely possible. [Interruption.] I will take interventions, but I need to correct a number of inaccurate statements before I do.

    We want to make sure that Londoners can move around the capital easily by public transport, through active travel and on our roads and rivers. Therefore we want Hammersmith bridge to be reopened, despite having no statutory responsibilities for the bridge—particularly because it is wholly owned by the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. The Government have stepped in to try to work collaboratively to find a solution. That is why we established a taskforce in September, led by Baroness Vere, bringing together all the relevant organisations to agree the best way forward and unblock any challenges.

    I reiterate that Hammersmith bridge is owned by the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. That means that the responsibility for maintaining the bridge and making decisions on its repairs and funding lies solely with the borough and not the Government. It is a travesty that we have got to a situation where the bridge has to be closed altogether, given that the council could have prevented the serious safety concerns through regular repairs and maintenance.

    I would like to ensure that Members in the House and those watching are clear about what funding has been provided by the Government and what action has been taken. Since the structure was closed to vehicles in 2019, and to pedestrians, cyclists and river vessels in 2020, funding for maintenance and repairs has come from a variety of sources. The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham is the highway authority for the section of the A306 that runs over the bridge, so it has funded the acoustic monitoring and temperature control systems to the bridge. Those alert the borough to potential changes and allow it to take informed decisions about the safety of the bridge.

    I will correct the first inaccuracy that has been stated. As part of the TfL deal on 31 October 2020, the Government ensured that £4 million—much more than a penny—was committed to start immediate mitigation works on Hammersmith Bridge during the 2021 financial year. That has funded the blast cleaning and a visual inspection of the western pedestals, giving the borough a better insight into the condition of the bridge. That is a vital step before any other engineering works can be undertaken. Members and residents need to understand that.

    The funding means that risk mitigation works can begin so that the full repair programme is in the best possible position on cost, schedule and technical risk. As well as that, we have made the ferry service a condition of the TfL bridge deal, so that people, prams and bikes can cross the river safely.

    Andy Slaughter

    Will the Minister give way?

    Rachel Maclean

    I want to address one further inaccuracy. If I have time after that, I will take an intervention.

    As with any local infrastructure project, the Government expect the local authority to take the lead in promoting the scheme. We have heard from the leader of the council, who does not believe that the borough has the capital funds available to meet the costs of repairing the bridge. Indeed, on several occasions he has said that his residents are not users of the bridge and should therefore not be liable for the works.

    In discussions with the leader of the council and my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State, various options for contributions for funding the project have been discussed. Unfortunately, the council seems to look to the national Government with gold-tinted lenses, not understanding that we cannot and will not hand out a blank cheque for the works. How would that be fair to taxpayers up and down the country and to those who have been responsible, such as the constituency of my hon. Friend the Member for Kensington (Felicity Buchan)? This is what councils all over the country have to do when they are carrying out major infrastructure works.

    Sarah Olney

    Will the Minister give way?

    Rachel Maclean

    I am afraid I cannot, because I need to clarify a number of inaccuracies.

    It has been reported in the press by the hon. Member for Putney that my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Transport has asked the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham to contribute 50% of the cost. That option was discussed. All that was requested of the borough was that the leader send a plan for the borough’s funding proposal. So far, the so-called bids that have been sent in amount to nothing more than letters asking for an unsubstantiated amount. It is simply not appropriate to ask for funding from central Government on that basis. The Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham should have taken the time to understand what is required to submit a bid to the Government. We stand ready to help. There is plenty of help available for officials to put these bids together, but that has not been happening.

    When evaluating any temporary crossing solution, the complexity of procurement and requirement of various consents must be considered. Given these challenges, the borough and the taskforce determined that a ferry service would provide an immediately available alternative river crossing for pedestrians and cyclists. That has been provided and we are very grateful to the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames for its support.

    The closure of the bridge has affected not just those who need to cross it, but those who travel along the river beneath it. The taskforce is an essential first step. Contrary to statements earlier, the taskforce has met regularly. It stands ready to meet any Member who would like to meet my noble Friend Baroness Vere in the other place; she is more than happy to discuss in full the detailed complexities that we cannot possibly air in a 30-minute debate in a political environment such as we have here tonight.

    These are serious and complex engineering works. I am afraid that it is completely inaccurate to make the point in this House that there is no action from the Government. I will not stand here and let Opposition Members say that. We have taken on additional responsibilities—well over and above our statutory responsibilities—as Opposition Members know. We have gone out of our way to help.

    Andy Slaughter

    I am most grateful to the Minister for giving way. We need £4 million towards investigation work and there is a bill of over £140 million for repairs. Where does the Minister think that money is going to come from? She knows that it cannot come from TfL or from the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. Her speech will be greeted with absolute dismay by people across London and beyond who use this major arterial route. The issue is simply not being addressed, after two years. It is a wholly irresponsible position for the Government to take. Where is that £140 million going to come from?

    Rachel Maclean

    I suggest to the hon. Member that his comments tonight are wholly irresponsible, because they have not reflected the work on the Government side to engage constructively with the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham in order to understand its funding position and what it can afford. The borough has not come back on any of the engagements and discussions that we have extended to it regarding realistic sums of money. If it cannot afford that amount of money, it should come back and tell us what it can afford. That is how infrastructure projects up and down the country are conducted. The hon. Member knows that very well.

    Sarah Olney

    I am grateful to the Minister for giving way. She referred earlier to fairness to taxpayers. Does she think that this is fair to the taxpayers of Richmond upon Thames, who are the most affected by this bridge closure? Their lives are being ruined, their businesses are closing, they cannot get to school or work, they cannot access medical services, and they have no say over what the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham does with its budget, but they understand that £140 million is more than that borough can afford. They are looking to the Government for assistance, and all they ask for is a commitment for the funding. The Minister stands here and talks about all the administrative barriers that are in the way. All we ask for is a commitment.

    Rachel Maclean

    I thank the hon. Lady for her comments. It is not fair to taxpayers in any part of the country that that London borough should think that, due to its lack of a maintenance programme on this bridge over the years, people from outside the borough should be expected to stump up for its failure and incompetence. No, it is not fair to them.

    In summary, as we have heard tonight, the closure of the bridge has affected not just those who need to cross it but those who travel along the river beneath it. The taskforce has enabled an agreement between the Port of London authority and the borough to allow limited and controlled river transits from 12 April when work is not being undertaken on the bridge. That is a very important point. It is welcome news for commercial river users, who can now continue operations as national lockdown restrictions ease.

    Ruth Cadbury

    Will the Minister give way?

    Rachel Maclean

    In a moment. I have given way several times already.

    I reassure Members that the Department continues to work closely with all parties involved to reach a funding solution that is fair to national taxpayers. As I have said many times, there are demands on the public purse from all over the country for all kinds of things.

    We must ensure that this bridge is reopened as soon as is safely possible. In all genuineness, I encourage the Members on the Opposition Benches to work constructively with the local council to get it to engage with the Government, who are going outside their statutory responsibilities to help to get this bridge reopened so that commuters, people listening tonight, residents on both sides of the Thames, users of the river, emergency services and wider businesses can make use of the crossing and ease pressures on Putney and Chiswick bridges.

    We cannot do any more without a detailed funding solution. The buck stops with Hammersmith and Fulham. It needs to present that case to the Government and then we can take action.