Category: Economy

  • John Healey – 2026 Speech to Labour Party Conference

    John Healey – 2026 Speech to Labour Party Conference

    The speech made by John Healey, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in Liverpool on 28 September 2026.

    Now Conference, I have to be honest. 

    I’m no first-time delegate.

    My first Labour conference was in 1986, 40 years ago, in Blackpool.

    Back then, I had hair.

    Back then, Neil Kinnock was leader – he was calling for sanctions on apartheid South Africa. 

    John Smith was calling for an industrial strategy to deal with the Tory slump. 

    John Prescott was just arguing. 

    But it was a vibrant time, it was a vibrant time, and I still get that very special energy that comes when the Labour movement gets together at conference. 

    So Conference, it is the privilege of my life to stand before you today as Labour’s Chancellor of the Exchequer.

    And to have this man as our Leader.

    Our Prime Minister – and as he likes to remind us – the first ever Co-operative Prime Minister of this country.

    Andy, you have the vision, you have the determination, and you have the plan to get things done.


    To give people hope again. 

    And frankly anyone who can do the Great North Run in under two hours just deserves respect!

    I do have to say though, you’re still wrong about the best pub snack.

    And I know Manchester is a great city, just like Liverpool is a great city. 

    But give me Rotherham any day of the week.

    Conference, before I go any further, I want to pay tribute to our former Chancellor Rachel Reeves.

    She brought to this country financial discipline, she delivered two Labour budgets that mean we’re cutting NHS waiting lists and we’re lifting half a million children out of poverty.

    And after 800 years, she will always be recognised as this country’s first-ever female Chancellor. 

    And to Keir Starmer. 

    He took on this party as our leader. 

    He took us from one of our worst-ever defeats to one of our biggest-ever victories. 

    And then as Prime Minister, he rebuilt Britain’s respect and international reputation, especially standing up to Russia in defence of Ukraine. 

    On behalf of us all, we thank you, Keir.

    And you know, as politicians, we can only be as good as the people who work with us, and work behind us.

    So I can’t tell you how fortunate I count myself to have this talented team of Treasury ministers:

    Emma and Lucy, Torsten, James, Dan and David.

    And a small dedicated team who work with me in the constituency office.

    To you all, I say a huge thank you.

    And finally, there’s someone else I want to thank.

    When I say Labour is my family, I mean it literally. 

    My guide, my inspiration, my blessing, my wife Jackie.

    Jackie is a third-generation Labour activist. 

    You know, her Grandma Jones kept Labour Party meetings running throughout the Second World War in Stoke-on-Trent, even during the bombing raids.

    And Jackie worked in Labour HQ. I worked for the MSF union. 

    We met at a union conference and within two weeks we were engaged. 

    And she’s been by my side ever since. 

    Jackie, thank you. 

    Conference, today, I want to talk about the politics of hope. 

    Our belief in a better day.

    Our conviction that committed citizens can change the world.

    No matter how hard the task, how daunting the odds.

    This is our Labour politics. 

    The hope that is earned. 

    Earned through fiscal discipline, through good work and through strong industries.

    So, I want to tell you how we’ll bring back hope.

    How we’ll get Britain growing. 

    With hope for our young people.

    With good work, good jobs and a new age of industrialisation. 

    Because Conference, I believe in Britain and we believe in Britain. 

    Conference, I’m a proud optimist. 

    I’m also a proud Yorkshireman, representing a former coalfield community. 

    Like many in our area, I have a miner’s lamp on my shelf at home.

    Those miners didn’t just use their lamps to light their own steps, they shone them to help others. 

    A symbol of solidarity. A symbol of hope. 

    That no matter the darkness, there’s always light at the end of the tunnel.

    And you know, the same goes now for Britain’s future.

    Why?

    Because this country has such resilience, such strengths, still such greatness.

    We’re home to nearly half the most innovative companies in Europe. 

    We’re world-leaders in life sciences, in defence tech, in AI.

    Our financial services, led by London, are some of the best in the world. 

    Our theatre, our TV shows, our fashion, our music is treasured the world over.

    And we have the best people. 

    The veterans in the Royal British Legion at Remembrance. 

    The winners of the Daily Mirror’s Pride of Britain awards.

    The lifeboat volunteers of the RNLI risking their own lives to save others in danger on the sea.

    This is the quiet patriotism that makes Britain great. 

    So, despite everything that we face, there are many reasons for optimism.

    New leadership. New confidence. And new hope.

    Conference, much as I believe in Britain, I also believe in Labour. 

    In what we can achieve by the strength of common endeavour. 

    I was part of the Labour government in 1997 that rebuilt Britain after 18 years of Tory failure.

    Leaving the country fairer.

    Giving the next generation a better start in life.

    From the day they’re born in the NHS to the schools they go to, to the first job they get.

    And Labour in power – at our best – has always been about building institutions that we pass on to the next generation. 

    The NHS. NATO. The Open University. The national minimum wage. The Good Friday Agreement. 

    And Conference, in just the last two years, look at what we’ve achieved as a Labour government.

    Railways coming back into public hands.

    New rights for renters. New rights at work. British Steel saved.

    And look at how we acted in Andy’s first week as Prime Minister.

    We acted on the cost of living pressures.

    We cut VAT from electricity bills.

    We capped bus fares at £2.

    We reduced business rates on pubs, clubs, and music venues.

    To give people just a bit of breathing space.

    A bit of breathing space today and hope for tomorrow.

    Conference, if we don’t talk up Labour’s actions, no one else will.

    So here’s my first challenge to you as your Labour Chancellor: be confident in who we are. 

    Be confident in our past. Be confident in our future.

    Let’s tell the story of how Labour can deliver change.

    How we can change lives, and how we can change this country. 

    Let’s tell people what we’ve done, what we’re doing, and what we will go on together to do.

    Labour – creating hope again!

    Now I first worked in the Treasury under Gordon Brown, in the late nineties and noughties. 

    It was New Labour, New Promise then

    And Gordon was and is an inspiration. 

    His determination.

    His drive.

    His block cap emails in the middle of the night. 

    And I joined him in 1999 and one of my first duties was to join him at Labour Party Conference in Bournemouth that year.

    He had been at the IMF, he flew in overnight and arrived just before he was due to give his conference speech.

    So I was in this small room with this big group of Gordon’s top aides.

    I was the new boy, they were big names then.

    Ed Miliband was there, Douglas Alexander was there, Ed Balls was there.

    Suddenly, Gordon was just about to go on and I said:

    Gordon needs a red tie!


    And the only person in the room wearing a red tie was me.

    So in 1999 in Bournemouth, Gordon made his speech as Chancellor with my tie.

    I did get it back, he signed it and I’ve never worn it since. 

    Until today. 

    Now I know the nineties is having a bit of a revival, 

    To Andy’s excitement, Oasis are going back on tour. 

    To Angela’s joy, Gladiators is back on Saturday night TV.

    But I have to level with you, Conference. 

    The money New Labour had in the nineties is simply not there now. 

    Economic growth under Gordon was more than double the Tory years that followed. 

    And Britain has it harder now. 

    We had 14 years of flatlining Tory growth and living standards – when Cameron’s austerity gutted our public services.

    When Johnson’s Brexit hammered our exports.

    And Truss’s mini Budget crashed the economy and collapsed confidence in Britain’s fiscal strength.

    They lost control of Britain’s finances.

    They left a legacy of sky-high debt costs – for families and for government. 

    And yet Kemi Badenoch – her new Shadow Chancellor is the very minister who helped Truss write that mini Budget!

    And even now, he still claims there were “lots of good things” in it!

    So, I say to them:

    Your reckless actions are still causing pain for people today.

    You left crumbling public services. 

    And you left Britain spending more on debt than the Home Office, Defence and Justice put together. 

    And people won’t forget, people won’t forgive.

    The cost of the nation’s debt is not just a number in a Chancellor’s Budget. 

    It’s the money that we can’t spend on the NHS, on schools, on housing, on social care. 

    On policing our streets, on controlling our borders, on defending our country.

    And I tell you these levels of debt are an assault on our common sense, they are an affront to our values. 

    And that’s why the Prime Minister and I are in lockstep that we will meet the fiscal rules. 

    That we will maintain control of Britain’s finances.

    And it’s not just the debt the Tories have left us. 

    Over the decades – as Andy has argued – this country has seen:

    Political power centralised.

    Economic control privatised.

    Britain deindustrialised.

    And the result? 

    Too many people today feel that Britain hasn’t been working for them, for their family, and for their area.

    And we also know how worried people are about the cost of living. The insecurity of work. The cost of business. 

    And they’re worried about the world, and they’re right. 


    Because the worldwide economic shocks, conflicts, trade tensions are felt hard here at home.

    From the prices at the pump to the cost of the monthly mortgage payments.

    But Conference, you know what?

    These times demand of us a greater resolve, a greater determination, and a greater hope.

    To build a more resilient country.

    And remember, Conference, we are Labour. 

    It was Labour that stepped up to clear the slums and build the council houses during the Great Depression.

    It was Labour that stepped up to build NATO and the NHS after the war.

    It was Labour that stepped up to lead the world through the global financial crisis. 

    When times are tough, we step up.

    And now, Conference, we are stepping up again.

    With a Plan for Britain.

    With our international leadership.

    And with our Labour values. 

    That is the Labour I know. 

    That is the Labour I love.

    So let me tell you how we’ll do it. 

    How we’ll bring fresh hope to Britain. 

    Built on the rock of fiscal discipline.

    Built on a growing economy, with good work and jobs in more places.

    Built on a new age of industrialisation. 

    On day one as Chancellor, I said my first duty is fiscal discipline. 

    And I’ll tell you why.

    It underwrites every promise this Government makes. 

    On growth, on jobs, on national security, and on public services. 

    We can’t succeed without it. 

    That’s why the Prime Minister and I are united in meeting the fiscal rules.

    Balancing the books, with a buffer against uncertainty.

    Controlling borrowing to bring down inflation.

    And reducing long term pressures on our finances.

    Conference, that commitment is so important. 

    There’s nothing progressive about losing control.

    Because it’s working people who pay for it. 

    And Conference, just look at who offers the opposite.

    It’s not just the Shadow Chancellor. 

    But Reform UK.  

    Dodgy donors, fantasy funding behind every plan. 

    And Nigel Farage, he wants you to think he’s a man of the people.

    But when it comes to the economy, he’s Liz Truss with a Bitcoin account.

    That’s not my politics. That’s not our politics. 

    And so, through the core of the Budget I deliver a month today will be fiscal discipline.

    To give families and businesses a bit of breathing space.

    To drive good growth and jobs in more places. 

    And to write a new chapter of hope for Britain’s future. 

    Conference, that miners lamp on my shelf at home in Rotherham came from Cortonwood Colliery – the pit where the miners’ strike started.

    Where Thatcher’s crusade against coalfield communities started.

    And our last pit – in Silverwood – was closed by the Tories in 1994. 

    The jobs went away.

    Hope and opportunity went too. 

    One in three men were unemployed.

    So when I was first elected, I had as my first top three priorities jobs, jobs,  and jobs.

    And now, as then, I still have that burning determination.

    Good work. Good jobs. Britain working again.

    This Party, our party, was founded by workers, for working people.

    The rhythms of work, the value of work, the pride that good work brings.

    That’s been Labour’s watchword for more than 100 years. 

    In the 30s, it drove the Jarrow Crusade to London. 

    In the 40s, it drove the Attlee Government to build full employment.

    And in the 90s, it drove Gordon and Tony to launch the New Deal for Young People.

    Getting them off benefits and into work for the first time.

    Their futures transformed. And making their contribution to the future of the country.

    Now, Conference, we all remember our first job. Mine was in a pub called the Milburn Arms in North Yorkshire. I washed pots and glasses.

    I worked for John and Betty Young. 

    They worked me hard, but fair. 

    And that job taught me the basics – about turning up on time, about getting on with others, about respecting those with more experience.

    It also taught me the glory of a hand-pulled pint.

    But every person, every young person should know the pride of getting their first job, and taking home their first pay check. 

    And while I learnt about work in the Milburn Arms, it’s Alan Milburn’s work now, for government, that lays bare the scale of the challenge young people face once again today.

    After Covid, and before the election, the Tories let the number of young people in this country not in employment, in education, or training rise to nearly one million.

    Two thirds have never worked.

    Potential wasted. Ambition frustrated. Opportunity closed. 

    Signed off, written off.

    And I know it’s tough for young people today. 

    Some find it hard to face the world. 

    And I hear the fear in their mum’s and dad’s voices when they talk about their kids’ futures, when they talk about the dark forces on the internet.

    And our social security system must always be there for those who can never work.

    But for everyone else, benefits should be a bridge to work, to wider participation, to a better life, not a trap that people can’t escape. 

    And Conference, it is simply not progressive to allow a bigger and bigger benefits bill and a system which offers an income but doesn’t offer a future. 

    So once again, as a Labour Government it falls to us to act. 

    And this is more than an economic must.

    This is a moral duty. 

    And Conference, I refuse to write off a million young people like the Tories have done. 

    When some people see a million youngsters with no work and no training, they see despair. 

    I see hope. 

    I see the future workforce of a reindustrialised Britain. Future business founders. Future union stewards. Future homeowners.

    I see a generation born this century, digital natives, whip smart, questioning, ambitious, brave. 

    I see the best asset we have in Britain: in our young people. 

    And I believe this generation has the potential to be a great generation.

    I believe we can help this generation move from Generation Jeopardy to Generation Hope. 

    Let me tell you about an apprentice pipe fitter called Ste. 

    I met him on Saturday when I went with Andy Burnham and Mayor Steve Rotheram on the first newly built ferry across the Mersey in 60 years.

    Ste helped build it, built here on the Mersey at Birkenhead. 

    And I asked him what advice he would give to a younger brother or sister about apprenticeships. 

    And he said: “Just go for it.”

    “Just go for it” he said, “because you’re earning and learning at the same time. And you can take these skills anywhere in the world.”

    Well Conference I’m happy to say that Ste is here today with some of those other apprentices, 150 at the Cammell Laird yard, that helped build that ferry.

    Lads, it’s great to see you today. Thanks for joining us, and thanks for what you’re doing for this great city.

    So today I want to announce a downpayment on Alan Milburn’s work.

    A Local Apprenticeships Service, expanded to more places, led by Mayors, targeted at these young people.

    Delivering thousands more apprenticeships for those young people.

    With local teams, a bit like football scouts for apprenticeships.

    Local teams who will go to local firms that’ve never taken on a trainee, and say: we’ll help you do it.

    That will go to the youngsters who’ve been out of work and say: we’ve got a place for you.

    Led by mayors, because it’s the mayor that knows their areas best. 

    They know which firms are hiring, they know which colleges are delivering, and they know which estates have been left behind.

    That’s what devolution means.

    And we had planned to start in a few areas. Now every mayor will have the chance to do it.

    Backed by an extra £100 million, fully funded by savings from the DWP.

    Because Conference the best thing we can offer a young person isn’t a benefit payment.

    It’s a first job. With training. And a wage.

    Our determination to help matched by their determination to hope.

    Conference, my politics have been shaped by the industrial heartlands of South Yorkshire. 

    The most brutal day of that bitter Miners’ strike was at Orgreave.

    Today, on the site of the Orgreave pit, is Rotherham’s Advanced Manufacturing Park. 

    One of the most concentrated areas of innovation anywhere in Britain.

    It’s where South Yorkshire’s young people are working with high-tech systems, making things that their grandparents could never have dreamed of.

    And one of those young people is Sean.

    Sean’s dad was a local miner – but there were no pit jobs for Sean.

    So he joined the Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre, he joined as an apprentice.

    So while his Dad mined the coal that kept Britain’s lights on, above the same coal seam Sean is now working on high tech research for the future of nuclear power. 

    Our coal mines are not coming back. But this is how Britain’s industrial past is being remade now for the modern world. 

    It’s how people are starting to tell each other stories of the future, and not the past.

    And this, Conference, is a story we can tell across the country. 

    In Scotland, where Dundee’s old tyre factory closed, a new innovation park stands in its place. 

    On Deeside in Wales, where generations of Shotton steelworkers were laid off, Airbus is now recruiting hundreds of workers to build the wings that fly the world.

    And in Derby, where they made the Spitfire engines, Rolls-Royce now build nuclear reactors and put the UK at the front of clean energy globally.

    And today, I can announce that Rolls-Royce will invest an extra £300 million more into its British factories.

    In Derby, in Bristol, in Glasgow, and in Rotherham.

    Conference, this is the new age of industrialisation. This is the new confidence in Britain.

    Lit by this government. Driven forward by business.

    So don’t tell me, don’t tell me it’s not possible to create a new age of British industry.

    Don’t tell me it’s not possible to have good growth in every postcode.

    And don’t tell me that people can’t hope again.

    Conference, we will use everything we can to create good jobs and industrialise Britain. 

    We’ll use the National Wealth Fund – creating and supporting a further 130,000 jobs across the UK by 2030. 

    Pulling in the private investment to create jobs in AI, in tech, in defence, and in clean energy. 

    And we’ll use the power of public procurement to direct more of British taxpayers’ money to British business, British jobs, and British innovation. 

    We’ll work in partnership with business and unions. 

    We’ll work with patriotism.

    Proud to back British firms, promote British exports and get British people working people in the jobs we create. 

    I know how national industrial strength is national security. 

    It means no dictator, no adversary can ever push us around.

    And so I want to confirm today that this British government will commit to £6 billion of contracts for our British shipyards.

    They’ll build the new docks for the new submarines that will defend us all for decades to come. 

    Built in Britain, by British workers because of decisions taken of this Labour Government.

    And Conference, credit where credit is due – to the GMB for helping us get this over the line.

    Because I’m proud to say that the British trade unions are full partners in this new age of industrialisation. 

    Proud it was a Labour government that put unions as full members on our Industrial Council.

    And yes, unions on the board of the Bank of England. 

    Because Britain’s economic success is built on the success of working people. 

    So to every union delegate in this hall, especially to those of you who serve as union reps and stewards.

    Today, I’m also announcing the rebirth of the Union Learning Fund.

    Set up by Labour. Abolished by the Tories. Now re-established by this Labour Government. 

    I talked before about the quiet patriotism that makes this country great. 

    These volunteers who step forwards to help their colleagues in the workplace, they do so as volunteers, sometimes at a cost to themselves, but always with the strength of the trade union behind them. 

    They too are the very best of us all.

    So I’m proud to bring back this Union Learning Fund.

    I’m proud of the fact that last time, 180,000 workers every year got new training opportunities through that fund. 

    And we’ll do that again.

    Better skills, better prospects, for British workers because of decisions taken by this Labour Government.

    And Conference, I want this new Learning Fund to come with a new focus. 

    To help British workers harness Artificial Intelligence, not be outrun by it. 

    AI is the greatest innovation of our time.

    It’s a general-purpose technology that will simply transform our society at every level.

    Every business, every community, every hospital, every school, everywhere can benefit from adopting it.

    It’s at the centre of a groundswell of new, world-leading British tech companies.

    And it’s the driving force with which this new age of industrialisation can be built. 

    Yes we need to face the serious risks to national security, to personal data, and our children’s wellbeing. 

    And it will change our labour market in fundamental ways.

    But I give you this commitment: 

    We won’t let AI leave Britain’s workers behind.

    And we will make sure that Britain wins in this AI revolution.

    Conference, as we draw inspiration from our values, we also draw strength from our past.

    And it was 70 years ago, at a Labour conference, Tony Crosland published his book on the future of our Party.

    He wrote it then believing that economic growth will take care of itself and that Labour’s job was simply to share out the proceeds.

    20 years later, he realised he’d been wrong. 

    That growth doesn’t just happen. We have to work for it. We have to create the conditions for it.

    And without growth, there is no social democracy.

    You can’t fund the ends without the means.

    That’s the lesson for our generation.

    Labour isn’t here just to cut the cake in a different way. We have to bake a bigger cake, and make sure that it’s fairly shared.

    So whether it’s the cost of business or the cost of living, the only long-term answer is growth.

    Good growth in every postcode.

    A dual mission from the Treasury and No10 North. 

    London, the powerhouse of Britain’s economy for so long – should not shoulder the economic burden alone. 

    We need growth generated in more places. 

    We need wealth created in more places. 

    And I want our government decisions and our policies to bring new levels of confidence, investment and yes, profits in British business.

    Because it’s businesses that will create this country’s jobs, and wealth, and growth.

    And I say, growth isn’t just a graph or a spreadsheet.

    It’s a family at the kitchen table saying: yes, it looks like we can afford that holiday this summer.

    It’s the sole trader saying: yes, for the first time I think I can take on that apprentice.

    And it’s the community looking at its high street or its town centre and saying: there are new shops, there are new businesses, the pubs haven’t closed. We’re turning a corner.

    And this is what I dedicate myself to as Britain’s Chancellor. 

    The growth that drives progress: better wages, better lives.

    That is the Labour way. 

    So Conference, let’s bring back hope to Britain.

    For the next generation of young people.

    For a new age of industrialisation.

    For growth made here, by British firms and British workers.

    So, when you leave this hall, when you leave this conference, remember that miner’s lamp.

    Those Cortonwood workers didn’t carry it for themselves.

    They carried it for those beside them. They carried it for their community. 

    They carried it for the ones who came after.

    That is our job now.

    To light the way for a generation that’s been told there is no way through.

    Good work. Fresh hope. A new age of industry. 

    And the solidarity that has always carried this country forward.

    A country that can hope again. 

    A country that will hope again. 

    Earned by Labour. Delivered for Britain. 

    Thank you.

  • Lucy Rigby – 2026 Speech at UK Finance

    Lucy Rigby – 2026 Speech at UK Finance

    The speech made by Lucy Rigby, the Economic Secretary to the Treasury, in London on 8 September 2026.

    Thank you Bob and to UK Finance for bringing us together today. And thank you for inviting me.

    As you know, I have spent a couple of months away from being City Minister. I think you’d be hard pressed to describe doing the Chief Secretary role as a holiday – I’ve certainly had more relaxing breaks – but it is fantastic to be back and supporting the success of the financial services sector and its contribution to growth and prosperity in every corner of the country.

    I am pleased that while I have been away, the digitalisation and tokenisation agenda has continued to accelerate. And as many of you know, building on this momentum is one of the things I am most excited to do back in this role.

    Because we are used to waves of technological development improving our lives; putting new products on to shelves, including digital shelves, and ensuring we benefit from new services.

    But there are also moments in the history of economic development where technology transforms the very infrastructure on which an economy operates. In the 1980s and 1990s we saw the shift from paper to electronic trading radically transform our financial markets. I believe we have reached a similar moment a generation later with the move from electronic to digital.

    So it is a pleasure to be here as UK Finance launches this report. This report, reinforcing the Digital Wholesale Champion’s report published in July, demonstrates a powerful message for the sector, which is that digitalisation is no longer a conversation taking place at the margins. It is moving firmly into the mainstream.

    And that matters because the opportunities before us are significant. For the City, the whole financial services sector, and importantly, for the entire UK economy.

    Today, I want to deliver a clear message. That the digitalisation of wholesale financial markets is now a national endeavour. An endeavour that requires industry, government, and regulators to work together.

    To maintain and enhance our global competitiveness; in what is an increasingly competitive landscape.

    The government can create the conditions and advocate for the UK. The regulators can provide clarity. But it is industry; market participants; you; that innovate, compete, forge new pathways and drive us forwards.

    That is why the work of organisations such as UK Finance is so important, and why I wholeheartedly welcome today’s report.

    One thing has become increasingly clear as I speak to firms across the sector. The debate isn’t whether wholesale markets will become tokenised; it’s when.

    And, importantly, if the UK can move quickly enough to be a leader in that global transition. And I say we can.

    And 2026 has already been such an important year for delivery. Significantly, we have seen the publication of the first report from the UK’s Wholesale Digital Markets Champion, Chris Woolard. That report sets out an industry-led roadmap for accelerating the digitalisation of UK wholesale financial markets, identifies priority use cases, and focuses attention on the practical issues that must be solved if digital markets are to scale.

    It also establishes nine industry action groups, and I am looking forward to the composition of these groups being announced very soon. It has also been great to see the number and variety of firms participating, from new entrants to large incumbents, as well as the senior individuals who are giving their valuable time to contribute.

    I am looking forward to seeing the outputs of the next phase.

    The key to the success of this work is not the technology itself. The technology already exists and we have individuals and organisations with the skills to deploy it effectively. The roots of the challenge are in coordination in order to build…

    How do firms move together?

    How do platforms interact with one another?

    How do we ensure interoperability?

    How do we build liquidity?

    How do we create common standards and ensure the UK is leading the global discussion?

    And how do we generate sufficient confidence for markets to move from pilots to scale?

    The answers to these questions are why this work matters so much

    And the additional question for government and regulators is then: how do we ensure that regulation effectively and appropriately accommodates digitalisation?

    Regulation is often criticised for being slow to adapt to new technological challenges and a rapidly changing environment. Well, we’re trying to address this.

    As you know, we have the Digital Securities Sandbox, and as UK Finance’s report highlights, it offers a nimble way of modifying UK legislation to enable firms to roll out innovative digital solutions to market.

    16 firms are currently participating, with the first firm recently approved to do live activity, and I am sure we will see more live activity soon.

    And we know there is more to do to ensure that the UK legal framework supports digital beyond the sandbox, building on work the government has done already to clarify the law.

    We will be engaging actively with the sector to map out the changes needed, and the plan for delivering them, including using the legislative tools we already have to make changes.

    All this builds on other work we are doing as government to support digital. This year, we have also seen continued progress on the Digital Gilt Instrument, DIGIT, which will be critical to establishing the foundations for a broader digital market ecosystem. DIGIT will be issued in Q1 2027, and we have announced our intention to prepare for potential further issuances, subject to the success of the first transaction.

    There is also work well underway to modernise the UK’s payments ecosystem, including through infrastructure upgrades and regulatory reforms that support stablecoins, tokenised deposits and the next generation of digital settlement.

    In particular, I wanted to recognise the efforts of UK banks in progressing the Great British Tokenised Deposit initiative, working with UK Finance to bring tokenised sterling deposits into the UK market.

    The work to tokenise bank deposits complements the work that the government and the regulators are undertaking to deliver a regulatory regime for stablecoins, all in order to provide payment settlement solutions for a truly digital market.

    Across all these areas, we are entering a critical delivery phase over this Autumn.

    Let’s continue to work together and whether it is the leadership shown by UK Finance.

    Whether it is the drive and the work of Chris Woolard and the Wholesale Digital Markets Champion Taskforce.

    Whether it is the Digital Securities Sandbox.

    Whether it is DIGIT.

    Each represents a different part of the same story. A story of a sector and a city choosing to innovate; whose sense of pride and ambition compel us to want to lead.

    A story of a country choosing to modernise.

    With a sense of national purpose to ensure that the markets of the future are built here in the United Kingdom.

    Thank you.

  • John Healey – 2026 Announcement of October 2026 Budget

    John Healey – 2026 Announcement of October 2026 Budget

    The statement made by John Healey, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 31 July 2026.

    This government is working fast to restore hope and back Britain’s communities.

    In the past two weeks, we have begun to kickstart growth in every postcode.

    We have backed British jobs, British skills and British businesses. 

    And we have provided just a bit of breathing-space for those families and businesses that feel so squeezed, that feel without hope.  

    Today, I’m confirming the date of my first Budget as Chancellor will be Wednesday 28th October.

    This will be a Budget that moves money and power out of Westminster, and into every postcode around Britain.

    It will be built on fiscal discipline.  

    It will meet our fiscal rules. It’ll give businesses and families some of the stability they need to plan for the future.

    Now, let’s get on with the job.

  • NEWS STORY : John Healey appointed Chancellor in Burnham’s first major Cabinet move

    NEWS STORY : John Healey appointed Chancellor in Burnham’s first major Cabinet move

    STORY

    John Healey has been appointed Chancellor by new Prime Minister Andy Burnham, in the first major appointment of the new Government following Sir Keir Starmer’s resignation. The appointment came as Burnham began reshaping the Cabinet on his first day in Downing Street, with several senior figures from the Starmer administration leaving Government as the new Prime Minister sought to establish his own political direction.

    Healey, who previously served as Defence Secretary and has held Treasury, housing and local Government roles during his long parliamentary career, will now take charge of the Government’s economic policy at a time of pressure over public spending, growth and living costs. His appointment was seen as a surprise by some in Westminster, with Shabana Mahmood and Ed Miliband among those previously discussed for the Treasury, but Burnham is expected to argue that Healey brings Cabinet experience and a grounding in domestic policy to one of the most sensitive posts in Government.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2026 Resignation Statement

    Rachel Reeves – 2026 Resignation Statement

    The statement made by Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 20 July 2026.

    It has been the privilege of my life to serve as the Chancellor of the Exchequer. The economy today is stronger, fairer and more resilient because of the choices we have taken as a Labour Government over the past two years.

    Stability restored, investment delivered and reform to our economy under way. I said when I was appointed Chancellor that I would judge my time in office if the lives ordinary working class people have been improved.

    I’m proud to say that they have. And to every young woman and girl let my time in office show there should be no ceilings on your ambitions, your hopes or your dreams. I wish the very best of luck to my successor, Andy and his cabinet.

    You have my full support, and I will continue to play my part in helping this Labour government deliver the change the country needs.

  • John Redwood – 2026 Comments on Andy Burnham’s Financial Options

    John Redwood – 2026 Comments on Andy Burnham’s Financial Options

    The comments made by John Redwood on 20 July 2026.

    Mr Burnham today should set out which companies he will nationalise. Will he make taxpayers pay compensation to owners or will he confiscate the assets? Does he realise people’s savings and pension funds are at risk if he steals them and foreign investors could stop investing?

  • John Redwood – 2026 Comments on Higher Taxation

    John Redwood – 2026 Comments on Higher Taxation

    The comments made by John Redwood on 14 July 2026.

    Rumours of higher taxes on capital gains and higher incomes is speeding more of the wealthy to leave the UK. If government wants to get more tax from the rich it needs to levy at rates people will stay to pay. People with plenty of money can afford air fares and a new home.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2026 Comments on Jonathan Haskel

    Rachel Reeves – 2026 Comments on Jonathan Haskel

    The comments made by Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 23 June 2026.

    Jonathan Haskel is an outstanding nominee for Chair. His depth of expertise in economics and his track record of independent, rigorous analysis make him exactly the right person to lead the OBR – supporting the credibility of our fiscal framework and ensuring our economy is underpinned by sound public finances.

  • Mel Stride – 2026 Speech on Backing Business to Create Economic Growth

    Mel Stride – 2026 Speech on Backing Business to Create Economic Growth

    The speech made by Mel Stride, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, in the House of Commons on 18 May 2026.

    This King’s Speech is an empty vessel, which is a surprise, because only last week the Prime Minister was telling anybody who cared to listen that the Government would be leaning into economic growth in a more radical way, and would eschew managerial incrementalism, yet we have heard nothing other than managerial incrementalism, at best, from the right hon. Lady just now. [Interruption.] Of course, I meant the right hon. Gentleman. If only the Chancellor were here, Mr Speaker, I would be right about everything.

    The Prime Minister also said that Labour would tread more lightly on our lives. Well, we have seen what that has meant in the last few weeks. The Chancellor said that it would all be growth, growth, growth. The Secretary of State trots out and trumpets the latest uplift—a very modest one—in the International Monetary Fund’s forecast, but he neglects to mention that although it is forecasting 1% growth today, it forecast 1.3% back in January.

    The Secretary of State also neglects to mention that the increase in growth in the first quarter of this year is on the back of risible growth performance in Q4 of last year. The situation in Q4 was exacerbated, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility and the Bank of England, by the Chancellor’s making every possible tax rise; that had a material impact—it depressed the economy. Some of the growth is simply a bounce back from the mistakes made at the end of last year.

    The Secretary of State refused to answer the question from my hon. Friend the Member for Rutland and Stamford (Alicia Kearns) about what happened to GDP per capita, so let me tell him that it has been utterly anaemic throughout this Government’s period in office. He also failed to mention that the notes to the IMF’s comments on upgrading the growth forecast for this year point to domestic uncertainty possibly weighing down on consumer spending and investment decisions. I wonder what “domestic uncertainty” could possibly be referring to. As to our record, I remind the Secretary of State that on the day of the general election, the previous Conservative Government had inflation bang on target at 2%. It is now 50% more than that. We also had the fastest growth in the G7, employment at near record levels, and near record low levels of unemployment, and we had 13 consecutive months of real wage growth.

    Max Wilkinson
    (Cheltenham) (LD)
    On the subject of mistakes made and growth, does the shadow Chancellor accept that the Brexit that he and his party left us has knocked between 4% and 8% off our GDP?

    Sir Mel Stride
    As I will come on to argue, our problems actually rest a little closer to home, rather than having anything to do with our relationship with the European Union.

    The Labour party promised stability. It also—Members should try not to laugh too loudly—said that it would create the most pro-business Government in the history of our country. None of that has come to pass. It is not just the Prime Minister who is the problem; if this Prime Minister is replaced, whoever goes on to lead the Labour party will not do any better, because Labour had no plan at all for improving our economy. It had a plan for winning an election—keep as low a profile as possible, hold the Ming vase and tiptoe across the shiny floor towards that loveless landslide—but no plan for the people of our country. The Labour Government are in hock to their Back Benchers. Every time they try to do something that requires some backbone, they are stopped by their Back Benchers.

    The record of this Government is appalling, and not just on growth. I notice that the Secretary of State did not mention unemployment once, and he certainly did not mention youth unemployment. Under this Government, we are seeing the highest unemployment in five years, and youth unemployment is nudging up towards 20%. Under the previous Labour Government, youth unemployment increased by more than 40%; under the previous Conservative Government, it reduced by more than 40%.

    Sir Ashley Fox
    (Bridgwater) (Con)
    Is it not shameful that the Government are having to subsidise employers who take on young people, when it is the Government’s actions—their imposing higher national insurance charges, a higher minimum wage, and a higher burden through the Employment Rights Act 2025—that caused the problem in the first place?

    Sir Mel Stride
    My hon. Friend is entirely right. It is like trying to apply the accelerator while having the brake on fully. That is what this Government are doing. That is the total illogicality of their approach.

    Inflation is up on where it was under the Conservatives. It is about the highest in the G7; it certainly was last year. As we lean into the challenges of oil and gas price spikes, that is a weak position to be in. Most economists will make that point. The Labour Government will have borrowed a full quarter of a trillion pounds more across this Parliament than would have been borrowed under the plans that they inherited. It is no wonder that our borrowing costs are the highest in the G7—higher than those of Greece, and higher, even, than those of Morocco. Why? We know why: it is just what socialists do. Socialists believe that you can tax your way to prosperity, but I tell the Secretary of State: you cannot.

    The £25 billion of additional tax on businesses—national insurance increases—has crucified business in this country. The burden has fallen predominantly on young people, because there was not just an increase in the rate, but a reduction to the threshold at which the tax cuts in, meaning that young people have borne the brunt of that tax increase. The sectors that rely predominantly on first-time jobbers and on young, part-time and female workers have been crucified, including the retail, hospitality and leisure sectors, in which more than 100,000 jobs have been destroyed by this Government.

    Alison Griffiths
    (Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) (Con)
    On Friday, I opened the new Premier Inn in my constituency—a project that was passed under the last Conservative Government—but many businesses in my constituency are failing because of increased costs and regulation. Does my right hon. Friend agree that this is an absolute travesty for our country?

    Sir Mel Stride
    My hon. Friend is absolutely right. I have had the great pleasure of visiting her constituency to speak to businesses, and that is exactly what they complain of. The Government made no effort, in the King’s Speech, to get on top of the benefits bill. There was a reference to the Timms review of the personal independence payment, but we know that in the review’s terms of reference, there is an explicit statement that it is not about controlling the welfare bill. There will be no savings as a consequence of the Timms review. That is not good enough. We have got to be about getting people off benefits and back into work.

    Tom Tugendhat
    Does my right hon. Friend not agree that we are seeing not only young people let down, but the deeply immoral act of people being kept on welfare? In five or 10 years’ time, people will have been on welfare for so long that they will not have any options. They will effectively have been left slaves of a state that has no concern for them. Nobody in this Chamber will have any power over how the welfare state will behave then, and those people will have no options. It will be the fault of this House and this Government for having kept those people there, and having imprisoned them.

    Sir Mel Stride
    That is entirely right. The Conservatives know that work matters, and getting people off benefits matters. People’s mental health is improved by going to work, and by having the social interaction, routine and sense of pride and self-worth that comes with work. That is why the level of unemployment and the failure of this Government to tackle benefits is so appalling.

    Dawn Butler
    (Brent East) (Lab)
    I used to work in the employment service, and Thatcher encouraged us not to sign people on, and to instead put them on the sick. The Conservatives created a whole generation of people on the sick, just to manipulate the numbers. How do you like those apples?

    Sir Mel Stride
    All these flashbacks to the 1980s are a slightly desperate attempt to get away from the 2020s, I think.

    The other thing that socialists love to do is borrow, borrow, borrow, and spend, spend, spend until they have run out of other people’s money. That is precisely what this Government have done. The Secretary of State mentioned the fiscal rules, but of course he failed to mention that in the run-up to the election, the Chancellor said that she would abide by our fiscal rules, and then promptly changed them, so that she could borrow more, flipping the definition of “debt” from public sector net debt to public sector financial liabilities. That allowed her to take her foot off the brake and borrow and spend even more.

    Charlie Maynard
    (Witney) (LD)
    Flashing back to the 1980s, would the right hon. Member like to remind us when the Conservatives last balanced a budget?

    Sir Mel Stride
    The current account went into a slight surplus just around 2015-16. [Interruption.] It did, actually. That was on the back of our inheriting a £160 billion deficit in 2010, which was over 10% of GDP—another example of the disasters of a Labour Government.

    The Secretary of State rightly spoke of artificial intelligence and the opportunities that it presents, but what we know of artificial intelligence is that it will have a profound and very uncertain effect on the labour market. We need a flexible skills offer to deal with that, and flexible labour markets, but through the Employment Rights Act, the Government are making the labour market more rigid, and that will hurt younger people in particular, who do not have a track record in employment, so do not be surprised if youth unemployment continues to hover around 16% or 17% as a consequence of the actions of this Government.

    When it comes to leaning into these challenges, we know that there is no plan. This Government are not going to do anything. They are just involved in internecine introspection—a civil war, now—within the Labour party. They said that they would tread lightly on our lives; in fact, they are now stampeding all over them. The rivals to the Prime Minister will be looking to double-down on the ruinous policies that I have just set out.

    We have seen the real effects of this in recent days. On Friday, after the former Member for Makerfield said that he would step down in order to ease the passage of Andy Burnham to this place, what happened to gilt yields? They spiked up 18 basis points. I have done a little bit of research, and I can tell the House that, if sustained through the forecast period, that would mean over £5 billion of additional debt servicing costs. That is about £300 for every working family in this country. That is the effect of Andy Burnham, and he has not even arrived here yet.

    We are on the edge of a precipice economically, leaning into a very turbulent time. These are the policies of the madhouse, yet we are told not to worry. The hon. Member for Liverpool Wavertree (Paula Barker), who I believe is an outrider for Andy Burnham, said of the bond markets that they would just have to “fall into line”. Andy Burnham himself said in the New Statesman:

    “We’ve got to go beyond this thing”—

    Paula Barker
    (Liverpool Wavertree) (Lab)
    Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

    Sir Mel Stride
    I will in a moment.

    Paula Barker
    On a point of order, Mr Speaker. My understanding is that if an hon. Member wishes to mention another hon. Member in the Chamber, they are supposed to give advance notice of that. I have received no such notice.

    Mr Speaker
    That is not the case. A Member should be informed if they are not here, but the hon. Lady is sitting here, quite rightly, and I am sure that the shadow Chancellor is ready to give way immediately.

    Sir Mel Stride
    I am always ready to give way, Mr Speaker, and to take your direction.

    Paula Barker
    Thank you, Mr Speaker, and I thank the shadow Minister for giving way. I agree that what I said might not have been the most eloquent of answers. However, I would say that people in this country are fed up of the bond markets dabbling in the democracy of our country.

    Sir Mel Stride
    That is a rather unfortunate example of doubling down or continuing to dig, if I may say so. Also, the hon. Lady’s comments pale in comparison with Andy Burnham’s comments in the New Statesman, where he said:

    “We’ve got to go beyond this thing of being in hock to the bond markets”.

    He also suggested that defence spending should lie outside the fiscal rules, as if spending and borrowing to defend our country were a different form of borrowing from any other borrowing that this Government might entertain. He is not so much the king of the north; he is more like King Canute, sitting in his chair on the sand, dressed in his football kit, trying to push back the tide of the bond markets and saying things like, “You’ve got to fall in line” as the waters lap at his ankles and we all ultimately get swept away. It is ludicrous.

    The King’s Speech included a holiday tax that will increase the cost of the most budget holidays in this country, clobbering people who have saved up hard and just want to make some memories with their children. We also have the nationalisation of steel, which seems to be just some kind of political sop to the left on the Labour Benches.

    The Government are also going to put a stop to new oil and gas exploration. This is lunacy, when we are importing gas from Norway that is extracted from the same basin. We are also importing liquefied natural gas, formerly from Qatar and now predominantly from the United States, which has four times the carbon footprint compared with if we had extracted it ourselves using our own resources. All that energy security blown, all those jobs destroyed and all that tax revenue forgone, simply because of the ideological madness of the Labour party.

    Harriet Cross
    The shadow Chancellor is completely right to reflect on the plight of the oil and gas sector under this Labour Government: 1,000 jobs are being lost in the sector every single month, which is affecting all our constituents, not just those in the north-east of Scotland. Does he share my dismay that a Labour Government do not take that more seriously?

    Sir Mel Stride
    I do indeed. I have been up to Aberdeen, met my hon. Friend and heard at first hand about the economic effect this is having. It is utter madness. If we have an opportunity in government, we will put that right.

    I have already mentioned benefits. There was nothing of any substance about welfare in this King’s Speech. There was nothing about the defence investment plan. Where is it? It was promised back in September.

    Then we have the regulating for growth Bill—an oxymoron if ever there was one. “Regulating for growth” says all we need to know about this Labour Government. They know nothing about the economy, nothing about job creation and nothing about businesses.

    Jim Shannon
    Will the shadow Minister give way?

    Sir Mel Stride
    Briefly.

    Jim Shannon
    I thank the shadow Minister for what he is saying. Does he share my concern, and the concerns of probably many in this House, that small and medium-sized businesses will suffer more than most? The figures for Northern Ireland indicate that between 85% and 89% of the job creators there are small businesses. Northern Ireland needs something special from this Government. Does he see something special coming, or are we just wondering what is going to happen?

    Sir Mel Stride
    I am afraid that what I see coming is what is already baked in: business rates going through the roof. In some cases, small businesses on our high streets are facing 140% increases in the amount they have to pay in business rates.

    Conservative Members believe in enterprise, opportunity, aspiration and markets. We believe in risk takers, in people who work hard, and in people who get up early in the morning and do the right thing—go out and create wealth, create jobs and grow our economy. Because of that, at our last conference we set out £47 billion-worth of savings, predominantly—£23 billion—on the welfare budget. With that we could do two wonderful things: first, we could start to bear down on the deficit and get on top of the debt, which is out of control under this Government; and secondly, we could get taxes down, particularly on the productive parts of the economy. We therefore announced the abolition of stamp duty and a tax cut for young people.

    There is more in our alternative King’s Speech: a Bill to back our high streets and cut business rates for a quarter of a million of our high street businesses; a get Britain working Bill to reverse the damage done by the Employment Rights Act; a reducing bureaucracy Bill to remove the mountain of environmental, social and governance regulations; a save British industry Bill to get rid of the Climate Change Act 2008 and abolish the zero emission vehicle mandate; a cheap energy Bill to get rid of renewables subsidies and bring down bills for households and businesses; a getting Britain drilling Bill to reinvigorate our North sea oil and gas industry, creating jobs and boosting our exports; and a welfare reform Bill to get the benefits bill under control and restore the two-child cap. That is the serious plan that our economy needs. That is the plan to back our businesses and deliver growth. That is a Conservative plan for a better Britain.

  • Peter Kyle – 2026 Speech on Backing Business to Create Economic Growth

    Peter Kyle – 2026 Speech on Backing Business to Create Economic Growth

    The speech made by Peter Kyle, the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, in the House of Commons on 18 May 2026.

    Mr Speaker, I heard your call for decency and respect, and I hope those will be the watchwords for today’s debate.

    My right hon. Friend the Chancellor is with her G7 colleagues today, so I am grateful for the opportunity to open the King’s Speech debate on backing British business to create economic growth. That is economic growth for a purpose: not simply to exceed the growth rate of other European members of the G7, which we achieved in the last year; not simply to have the highest growth rate in the G7, which we achieved in the last quarter; and not simply to deliver on the Government’s primary mission; but for the purpose of achieving greater social justice for all.

    Economic growth is the surest path to higher living standards, improved public services and better quality of life for people up and down our country. We know that economic growth is the catalyst for new opportunities, the pathway to greater prosperity, and the vehicle for greater equality and security for working people. That is why it matters so much.

    The growth figures published last week show that, despite the many international headwinds, the UK economy grew by 0.6% in the last quarter—the fastest growth among G7 countries. There is silence from the Opposition Benches. I would have thought that the party that champions Britain and calls for economic growth would be celebrating economic growth when they see it, but no: silence, silence, silence.

    The situation is much better than the one we inherited, continuing to exceed the forecast of the doom-and-gloom mongers on the Opposition Benches and in the right-wing media, and even beating market expectations. When the Conservatives were in government, they and their strangely related first cousins, Reform, let down Britain’s economic future. Now, in opposition, they talk down Britain’s economic present. You can bet your bottom dollar that they will do so again today, ignoring the facts.

    The facts are that the UK experienced the highest GDP growth among European countries in the G7 last year. Just today, the International Monetary Fund has upgraded the UK growth forecast, with the UK projected to have the fastest cumulative growth among European G7 economies over 2026 and 2027. None of this happened by accident, just like the damage done to the economy by the Tories did not happen by accident.

    Alicia Kearns
    (Rutland and Stamford) (Con)
    Does the Secretary of State not concede that GDP per capita is down? Can he tell me that a single one of his constituents, apart from those on welfare, feels better off under this Government?

    Peter Kyle
    The whole purpose of the debate is to emphasise that economic growth matters. In the last full year in which the Conservatives were in office, economic growth stood at 0.4%. In the first full year of this Government, it was 1.4%. The hon. Lady should be apologising for the state in which she left the economy, leaving us to pick up the pieces.

    This growth has been driven by an activist, interventionist Government who back British business—a Government who are not afraid to roll up their sleeves and make the big calls when big times demand it. From Jaguar Land Rover in the west midlands to Ineos in Scotland, Agratas in the south-west, Tata Steel in Wales, and Harland & Wolff across the United Kingdom, we step in to invest, modernise and protect British industry when necessary. We step back by reducing unnecessary regulation when that is possible, and step up to modernise our critical national economic infrastructure where that is vital: supporting the third runway at Heathrow that the Conservative party curtailed; expanding the Oxford-Cambridge corridor where the Conservative party hesitated; backing Northern Powerhouse Rail which the Conservative party cancelled. This Government have confirmed £45 billion of funding for Northern Powerhouse Rail to upgrade lines east of the Pennines and to bring forward a brand-new route connecting Liverpool and Manchester.

    Harriet Cross
    (Gordon and Buchan) (Con)
    That was a great list, but what was missing from it was the oil and gas sector, and specifically the £17 billion of investment that was lost as a result of the Government not scrapping the energy profits levy and the £50 billion of investment lost because of their ban on new licences, and other hostile policies. Will the Secretary of State reflect on those, and on the damage that the Government are doing to growth not only in the north-east of Scotland but in the United Kingdom as a whole?

    Peter Kyle
    This Government have invested in industry up and down the country, from Agratas in the south-west, where we are investing in gigafactories, to Ineos in Scotland. We are investing in the industries that are keeping our country going, and we have put growth into the economy.

    Gavin Robinson
    (Belfast East) (DUP)
    The Secretary of State was kind enough to mention Harland & Wolff. Successive Governments have introduced a number of support measures, and have ensured that that company can thrive by itself. However, in taking at face value what the Secretary of State has said, does he recognise that if this Government continue to refuse to designate Programme Euston a defence project and open it to international tender, not only will they not support British business and yards like Harland & Wolff, but the project will be delayed by three years? If the Secretary of State wants to inject business growth and economic growth, he should designate it a UK defence project, and keep the work and the investment in the UK.

    Peter Kyle
    The right hon. Gentleman knows full well the commitment that I personally have to Northern Ireland and its economic success. All the issues related to national resilience are things that we have to consider at this moment in time, unlike any other moment in time in peacetime. They are issues that I look at very closely, and in the days and weeks ahead I shall be talking a great deal more about how we can support industry and business across Northern Ireland.

    Jim Shannon
    (Strangford) (DUP)
    I commend the Secretary of State for what he is saying. I know he is a regular visitor to Northern Ireland because he loves the country, and we appreciate that.

    According to the Federation of Small Businesses in Northern Ireland, more than half the enterprises trading between Great Britain and Northern Ireland face severe friction, with more than a third halting trade entirely. Can the Secretary of State explain explicitly how the proposed regulating for growth Bill will help? I know he is committed to it, so let us hear what he has to say.

    Peter Kyle
    I have been aware of those issues from opposition into government. Of course, rebuilding the relationship with the European Union is also partly about smoothing that barrier across the Irish sea, and we will continue to do so.

    We are building the critical national economic infrastructure that the Conservative party consistently failed to deliver, on runways, reservoirs and railways. Just as we are modernising Britain’s critical economic infrastructure, we are maximising Britain’s industrial strength by delivering our modern industrial strategy. Written for business with business, our strategy creates the right conditions for business to succeed. Since its publication, we have been tackling the high costs of energy. Our supercharger saves firms hundreds of millions of pounds every year, and our British industrial competitiveness scheme will help more than 10,000 eligible manufacturing businesses, saving them up to £40 per megawatt hour from next April. I am very aware of challenges faced by the ceramics sector; I will meet representatives of the sector tomorrow to discuss how the Government might be able to support it, and I hope to be able to say more about that very soon.

    To cut the red tape that is holding back British businesses we are ending mandatory strategic reports for medium-sized companies and ending directors’ reports for businesses of all sizes, saving firms £230 million each and every year. We are stripping out unnecessary rules and regulations. Through the regulating for growth Bill, announced in the King’s Speech, we will create regulatory sandboxes—economic growth laboratories where innovators can trial cutting-edge technologies safely and speedily.

    Whereas the Conservatives, with their destructive ideology of deliberate de-industrialisation—from monetarist Thatcherism to Brexit isolationism—drove British manufacturing businesses to the wall and destroyed the jobs that depend on them, this Government are determined to maximise the UK’s competitive advantage, not just through reindustrialisation, though that is necessary, but through new industrialisation in advanced manufacturing, clean energy, artificial intelligence and new technology. That is why we have rolled out new AI growth zones and confirmed the site of the UK’s first small modular reactor—a milestone in the journey to becoming a clean energy superpower.

    Gregory Stafford
    (Farnham and Bordon) (Con)
    The Secretary of State talks about deregulation, but does he not accept that adding 330 pages-worth of regulation in the Employment Rights Act 2025, at a cost of a billion pounds to the economy, is having the opposite effect? Youth unemployment in my constituency has gone up by 28% in just one year.

    Peter Kyle
    I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for giving me the opportunity to point out that, in my Department, the overall net regulatory burden is reducing, not expanding. I will not stand in front of the Tories and apologise for giving new rights to workers that are fit for the age we are living in. Over their entire 14 years in office the Tories failed to make sure that people have protections and rights at work that are fit for the age we are living in. We can move forward with growth in the economy that takes forward businesses and the people who work in them. That is to be celebrated, not condemned like the Tories are doing.

    John Glen
    (Salisbury) (Con)
    The right hon. Gentleman is, quite reasonably, setting out his assertions about where he wants the Government to go, but does he not see the irony? After all the events of last week, the cost of borrowing in the UK is higher than that of many of our competitors, and all business leaders say they feel the instability. The right hon. Gentleman’s words will not ring very true for people who seriously wonder about the Government’s future direction, with putative leadership contenders talking about fundamental changes in direction and different fiscal rules.

    Peter Kyle
    The right hon. Member mentions irony; this is from the party that gave us the Liz Truss mini-Budget, which wreaked havoc on our economy. Mortgage rates went up for every mortgage holder across the country, with inflation peaking at 12%, yet the Conservatives talk about instability. The country still lives with the instability that they wreaked on it.

    Our major expansion of DRIVE35 is channelling investment into batteries, electric motors and power electronics—part of the biggest Government investment in the British car industry since the second world war. “Invest”, “modernise” and “protect” are the watchwords for the new industrialisation of Britain through our biggest industries, our biggest sectors and our boldest companies.

    Iqbal Mohamed
    (Dewsbury and Batley) (Ind)
    The Secretary of State talks about deregulation, but we have seen what that has led to in the finance sector, the banking sector and the water industry: consumers end up paying the price. The Secretary of State also talks about AI; speaking way back in 2014, Stephen Hawking cautioned:

    “The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race.”

    Why do the Government believe that deregulating AI is going to assist their growth mission? It will put consumers’ lives and the human race at risk.

    Peter Kyle
    The Government are investing in AI infrastructure, but also making sure that the regulatory and legislative landscape is up to date for the time we are living in. The hon. Gentleman wants to turn the clock back. The world is awash with AI technology. We cannot stop it coming to our country, but we can shape how it interacts with our economy and its people. That is why we are investing in the training of 7.5 million people throughout the economy, including a million students, to make sure we can seize the opportunities that AI presents but also protect people from the potential damage it could cause.

    Not only are we creating the conditions for new industrialisation, but we are ambitious for the success of Britain’s small businesses. Our “Backing your Business” plan is one of the most generous packages of support rolled out by any Government, with new hospitality zones and reduced red tape for bars and cafés. We have brought in an £11 billion lending package to help small firms to grow internationally and take advantage of the trade agreements we have negotiated with India, South Korea and the United States. This may trigger the Opposition, but we are also going to deepen Britain’s trading relationship with the European Union, Britain’s most significant international marketplace. That is what our European partnership Bill is all about.

    Vikki Slade
    (Mid Dorset and North Poole) (LD)
    I welcome the deepening of the relationship with the EU and the measures on late payments, but the elephant in the room is that while the jobs tax exists, and the Government do not make the most of business rate changes in retail, hospitality and leisure, the benefit to small businesses is more than outweighed by the extra difficulties they face. Does the Secretary of State accept that there need to be changes on that front, even if we have to wait until the Budget for them?

    Peter Kyle
    Once again, the Lib Dems condemn every fundraising measure we have brought in to invest in our public services and get our country back on its feet, but they never say how they will pay for the alternative. They never say how they will raise the money themselves. I am not going to apologise for any of the measures. I will come in a moment to the investment we have made in small businesses and in hospitality, and I will give way to the hon. Lady again if she wants me to at the time, but will she please say what the alternative is from her perspective? The Lib Dems want to spend all the money in the world but they do not want to tell people how it is.

    The lending commitment we have secured with the UK’s five leading banks will support Britain’s small businesses to succeed and prosper. Our business rates support package, worth £4.3 billion, will protect ratepayers from large overnight increases in bills. We have introduced permanently lower multipliers for retail, hospitality and leisure properties. That is worth nearly £1 billion a year and will benefit over three quarters of a million properties.

    I know that many businesses, particularly in the hospitality and retail sectors, would like us to go further. I get that. They are impacted by changes in the shopping and social habits of their customers, as well as the financial and geopolitical pressures in the wider economy. We are absolutely aware of and attuned to that. However, the crocodile tears of the Conservatives about these industries are laughable and lamentable. Theirs is the party that urged us to join the costly military action in the Gulf, which will heap further pressure on hospitality and other sectors throughout the economy. It is not our war, but the Conservative party would make British businesses and consumers pay the price.

    Ben Obese-Jecty
    (Huntingdon) (Con)
    The Secretary of State mentions crocodile tears; what would he say to the hospitality businesses in my constituency that have been impacted by the rise in national insurance contributions, the minimum wage rise and the business rates that he just talked so effusively about? What message would he give to them as they struggle to deal with the outcome of the Budget?

    Peter Kyle
    Unfortunately, none of the Conservative Members was listening to what I just said in outlining the measures we are taking, and the admission that we get it and we are listening. Fundamentally and foundationally, what those businesses need is what every business in this country needs, which is a growing economy. In the last year the Conservatives were in office, growth was 0.4%, but in the first year in office of this Government, it was 1.4%. That is what every business needs across the country, and when it comes to specific sectors at specific moments in time, we are watching and attuned, and I am acting where necessary. When the right hon. Member for Central Devon (Sir Mel Stride) addresses the House, I am certain that on that and so much more he will display all the symptoms of the economic illiteracy and ideological incompetence that for too long have engulfed the Conservative party. By contrast, we are taking practical action to end these conditions.

    We are bringing in new measures to tackle late payments. The small business protections (late payments) Bill will give the UK the strongest legal framework in the entire G7. Late payments cost the UK economy £11 billion a year, forcing the closure of 38 businesses every single day. For 14 years it was the same under the Conservatives, and they did nothing. The Bill tackles the scourge of late payments, brings in stronger powers for the Small Business Commissioner, sets out strict maximum payment terms of 60 days, and bans the deduction of retentions in construction contracts. The Federation of Small Businesses has said that tackling late payment is one of the biggest things the Government can do to help small businesses to grow. That is the difference that an activist, interventionist Labour Government can make.

    Finally, let me turn to another example of the difference. The ghost of free market Thatcherism still haunts many of the industrial areas of this country. It can be seen in the scars of de-industrialisation still marking too many communities around our country. It is high time to exorcise the ghost of de-industrialisation. When I published the steel strategy last month, I told the House I would never hesitate to fight for British industry in defence of the national interest. The legislation we are bringing forward is proof positive of that commitment.

    Tom Tugendhat
    (Tonbridge) (Con)
    I am grateful to my right hon. Friend—forgive me, I should not call him that; he will be embarrassed. I am grateful to the right hon. Member for his point about the steel industry. Understandably, he has chosen to support one particular aspect of the industry, the steelmaker, but at the expense of and to the cost of every other part of the industry—the steel consumers. How will he balance that and what provision will he make for those who will see steel prices rises because of his intervention?

    Peter Kyle
    I have committed to invest in, modernise and protect the steel industry where I need to. Those are watchwords that I apply throughout the economy in highly volatile times. We are investing up to £2.5 billion to modernise and transform the steel sector, from blast furnaces to electric arc furnaces—those are the kinds of transformations we need to make. If I had invested that money but not also protected our sector, that would be pouring vast amounts of public money straight down the drain. In certain circumstances I have had to step in and use measures to protect the domestic British industry. I am not introducing measures for any products that are not manufactured in the UK. I am doing so wisely; I am doing so to protect and ensure that we can build and retain a steel industry that is fit for the future and sustainable.

    We will move forward and ensure that, in an era of global instability, we have the key aspects of our supply chain that we need for our resilience as a nation—yes, in defence; yes, in industry; and yes, in all the money we are investing in infrastructure. We must reserve those capabilities. I am listening and engaging with all parts of the steel sector, and the manufacturers and businesses that depend on it. I am listening closely to them. If there are any impacts, I will of course engage with them to understand and see how it will be possible, where necessary, to provide support.

    Ayoub Khan
    (Birmingham Perry Barr) (Ind)
    Will the Secretary of State give way?

    Peter Kyle
    No, I am going to carry on. I appreciate Members’ kind offers to intervene again and again; I look forward to all their speeches.

    The Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill will give us the authority to bring British Steel into public ownership, not as an ideological exercise but as a practical means of safeguarding the national interest. It will allow us to retain the Scunthorpe plant as a critical piece of our national infrastructure that is essential to British economic resilience. Britain has long been a proud steelmaking nation. Whatever I have to do to make it so, Britain will retain its capacity and capability to manufacture steel. That is my commitment to Members in this House and to the remaining steel communities of our country. The strength of that commitment can be measured in our determination to boost domestic steel production to ensure that 50% of the steel used here is made here.

    Britain cannot make its way in the world as a services-only economy. We have to make our way—earn our way—to greater prosperity, equality, security and opportunity. We cannot do that by economic isolationism, neoliberalism, greater protectionism or a command economy. We cannot regulate our way to prosperity. We can achieve it only through practical and pragmatic policies that support British businesses to be profitable, to scale up, to create jobs and to grow.

    We have to end the outdated free-market ideologies, failed economic theories and siren voices that all but destroyed Britain’s manufacturing base and drove the British public towards Brexit. Britain’s future prosperity can be built only by business success. There is no other way, no shortcut, no easy option and no magic bullet—no matter how attractive and simplistic slogans and superficial soundbites may appear to some.

    George Freeman
    (Mid Norfolk) (Con)
    The Secretary of State is making a wonderful speech about the 1980s. While I agree with many of his points, the truth is that the country today has come a long way in all sorts of sectors, and I am proud to have done my bit to help that. On regulation, the Secretary of State agrees that leadership on regulating new industries, and having sandboxes and testbeds, is a great UK strength. He also wants us to get closer to the European market; is he worried that if we do, we may end up losing our competitive advantage in a number of areas where we could genuinely attract investment into new industries, such as agri-tech and gene editing?

    Peter Kyle
    To clarify, I am talking about how we recover from the scars of the 1980s, how we learn the lessons, and how we ensure that we never repeat mistakes that cause scars that endure for generations. To answer the hon. Gentleman directly, we will align with the European market only where that is in the national interest.

    We cannot turn back the clock to build future success. The partnerships that this Government have built with businesses, local government and trade unions are delivering resilient growth and helping to build a stronger economy. They are building a fairer country, in which wages are up and public borrowing is down. There have been six interest rates cuts and 500,000 children are being lifted out of poverty. The FTSE 100 has reached historic highs, and the UK is raising more venture capital funding this year than France, Germany and the Netherlands combined.

    This Government faced enormous challenges on taking office, and the conflict in the Gulf presents us with even greater challenges. Despite that, we are making progress. It will take time for the benefits of progress to be sufficiently seen and properly felt. The recent election results show that. The only sure route to proving the benefits of change is growing the economy, and the only certain way to grow the economy is through British business success. Our task is to create the right conditions for Britain’s businesses to invest, succeed, and win in an increasingly competitive global marketplace. We have made a start, and we will see this through to the finish.