Tag: Speeches

  • Amanda Solloway – 2021 Comments on App to Spot Loneliness

    Amanda Solloway – 2021 Comments on App to Spot Loneliness

    The comments made by Amanda Solloway, the Science Minister, on 18 January 2021.

    The social restrictions necessitated to tackle coronavirus, while essential, have brought into sharp focus just how much we all rely on face-to-face interaction in our everyday lives.

    Addressing loneliness in our communities is an issue that is particularly close to my heart and this pioneering satellite-enabled app will tap in to the goodwill of our heroic frontline workers and volunteers so that they can identify and help those most in need of support through the pandemic and for years to come.

  • James Duddridge – 2021 Statement on Presidential Elections in Uganda

    James Duddridge – 2021 Statement on Presidential Elections in Uganda

    The statement made by James Duddridge, the Minister for Africa, on 16 January 2021.

    The UK Government welcomes the relatively calm passing of the elections in Uganda and notes the re-election of H.E. Yoweri Museveni as President.

    Many in Uganda and beyond have expressed concerns about the overall political climate in the run up to the elections as well as the electoral process. It is important these concerns are raised, investigated and resolved in a peaceful, legal and constitutional manner. We ask that all parties, including the security services, but also all of Uganda’s political movements, act with restraint to ensure the peaceful resolution of disputes.

    We commend the role of the media, observers and civil society throughout the elections. The UK is concerned by the national internet shutdown, which clearly limited the transparency of the elections, and constrained the freedoms that Ugandans are entitled to.

    The UK is a steadfast advocate for Ugandan democracy and we will continue to work to achieve inclusive democratic progress that delivers for future generations. As a longstanding partner, we urge Uganda to continue to strive to meet its own international human rights commitments, including respecting the right to freedom of opinion, freedom of expression and freedom of the media.

  • Nick Thomas-Symonds – 2021 Letter to Priti Patel Over Home Office Data Loss

    Nick Thomas-Symonds – 2021 Letter to Priti Patel Over Home Office Data Loss

    The letter from Nick Thomas-Symonds, the Shadow Home Secretary, to Priti Patel, the Home Secretary, on 16 January 2021.

    Dear Priti,

    I write in regard to the deeply worrying revelations that 150,000 fingerprint, DNA and arrest history records, held on the Police National Computer, have been deleted.

    This is incredibly serious and it is unacceptable that the news emerged as a result of a media story, rather than a proactive statement from the Government.

    As a result, I expect that you will be making a formal Oral Ministerial Statement to the House of Commons on Monday 18 January 2021.

    There are grave issues posed by this situation. As a result, there are a number of vital questions that must be answered urgently:

    – When were ministers first made aware of this data breach?

    – Have local police forces been informed of potential impacts of their area and ongoing investigations?

    – What mitigating steps are being taken to retrieve lost data?

    – What measures have been put in place to identify the cause of the breach and institute safeguards to ensure such a mistake cannot be repeated?

    – Have conversations been held with policing to assess whether operations or investigations have been undermined, including on counter-terrorism?

    – What guidance has been issued to police and local authority safeguarding teams who often rely on data such as that deleted to manage risk?

    – Has there been an impact on the work of gang units and county lines operations?

    – Is there a breakdown available of the types of records that were deleted, including by crime type and geographical area?

    – Will this breach result in the need for DNA profiles to be regenerated?

    There have also been reports from police sources that warnings have previously been made about problems with PNC systems: can you confirm if this is the case and whether the issues raised related to these failings?

    It is vital that as Home Secretary you show personal responsibility and leadership on an issue as serious as this. Anything less is an abdication of responsibility.

    Public safety has been put at risk yet again by unacceptable incompetence. The reality is that these are not isolated incidents, but rather part of a pattern of deeply worrying mistakes at the Home Office under this Government’s leadership.

    I await your urgent response.

    Yours sincerely,

    Nick Thomas-Symonds MP

    Shadow Home Secretary

  • Anneliese Dodds – 2021 Letter to Rishi Sunak on Flexible Furlough

    Anneliese Dodds – 2021 Letter to Rishi Sunak on Flexible Furlough

    The letter sent from Anneliese Dodds, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, to Rishi Sunak, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 15 January 2021.

    Dear Chancellor of the Exchequer,

    Thank you for your letter of 7 January. I welcome the change that your department has made to the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) guidance. However, I remain concerned about several remaining issues with the scheme. This follows worrying new evidence that has come to light on the impact that school closures are having on the employment of parents, particularly mothers.

    Yesterday, the Trades Union Congress published results from a survey of working mothers, collected between the 7th and 10th January[1].The survey found that mothers are being particularly badly affected by school closures. A quarter are taking annual leave to manage childcare, nearly one in five have been forced to reduce their working hours and one in 14 are currently on unpaid leave and therefore receiving no income from work.

    Furlough via the CJRS should be an option for the vast majority of these mothers, but 40 per cent are unaware they are eligible and 78 per cent of those mothers affected by school closures have not been offered furlough by their employer. It is particularly concerning that 7 in 10 eligible mothers who asked for furlough had their request refused by their employer. Left to continue, this situation risks forcing many parents out of work altogether.

    On Monday 11th, the Leader of the Opposition argued that there should be a legal and enforceable right for working parents to request paid flexible furlough, with employers expected to grant this request except in exceptional circumstances.

    I am calling on you to adopt this proposal, and to bring forward the cut-off date for furlough eligibility so that the many parents and others who have changed jobs since October 31st can make use of the scheme.

    I am also again calling on you and your department to provide an evidence-led assessment of the impact that employer contributions to National Insurance and pension contributions, which were not part of the original CJRS design, may be having on employers’ uptake of the scheme.

    I hope you consider the above proposals and look forward to receiving your reply.

    Yours sincerely

    Anneliese Dodds

  • Anneliese Dodds – 2021 Comments on Flexible Furlough

    Anneliese Dodds – 2021 Comments on Flexible Furlough

    The comments made by Anneliese Dodds, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 16 January 2021.

    Evidence is mounting that the latest lockdown is putting parents – especially mothers – under severe financial pressure.

    The Chancellor can fix this today by introducing a legal right for working parents to request paid flexible furlough.

    That’s the right thing to do for working parents and the right way to secure the economy by protecting family incomes and supporting businesses through this lockdown.

    No more incompetence and indecision. We need action to secure our economy, protect our NHS and rebuild our country.

  • Keir Starmer – 2021 Speech to the Fabian Society

    Keir Starmer – 2021 Speech to the Fabian Society

    The speech made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 16 January 2021.

    Good morning.

    I think this is the fifth time that I’ve spoken at your New Year Conference. A lot has happened in that time. Two General Elections, a referendum, and a couple of Labour leadership elections too!

    In fact, this time last year I was rushing back to speak to you after the first leadership hustings in Liverpool. It seems another lifetime ago.

    Of course I wish we could all be here in person today…but I want to thank everyone at the Fabian Society for making this happen – virtually – today.

    There’s no getting away from it: 2020 was an awful year. And 2021 hasn’t started any better. We’re in the darkest moments of the pandemic – 1,000 people are dying every day. Businesses are closed. Our high streets are empty. People can’t see their families or their loved ones.

    This wasn’t inevitable. And it isn’t bad luck

    What we’re seeing now is the consequences of the PM’s decisions during those crucial days in December. When he ignored the science and was so slow to act.

    It’s a national tragedy. And we need a national effort now to get through this.

    But amid all the darkness there are two reasons to be optimistic:

    First, the vaccine. Second, in four days’ time, Trump will no longer be President.

    And it’s the second of those I want to talk about today. Because, this isn’t a normal transition of power from one President to another. The pictures on our TVs in the last few weeks make that clear. The outgoing President is in the middle of being impeached: charged with incitement to violence, no less. And the US is more divided than at any time I can remember.

    Amid all that, this is a moment of huge optimism. Of hope winning out over hate.

    And it can also be a turning point. Not just in America but also for Britain’s relationship with the US, and for global politics

    Last week I set out Labour’s immediate policy priorities for this year. And I’m going to be saying much more in the coming weeks about Britain’s role in the world. I also want to thank Lisa Nandy – who’s speaking here this afternoon – for all the work she’s doing on this.

    Today, I want to set out the principles that will drive us.

    First, Labour’s foreign policy will always be rooted in our values. We’re proudly patriotic. And we’re proudly internationalist too. I believe that after a decade of global retreat Britain needs to be a far stronger and more confident voice on the international stage.

    Because even before the pandemic we faced huge global challenges from the rise of authoritarianism whether in Russia or China; from nationalist, xenophobic populism whether in Europe, South America and the US as well as global terrorism, rising poverty, inequality and human rights abuse, plus, of course, the single biggest foreign policy challenge of our time: the climate emergency.

    Faced with that, I don’t believe Britain should step back from our international responsibilities, pull up the drawbridge, retreat. Or to break our promises to the world’s poorest and most vulnerable.

    It’s why I’m so angry – and why Britain should be so ashamed – that Boris Johnson has broken his manifesto promise to keep the 0.7% target for international aid.

    That decision will harm Britain’s standing, reduce our global reach and of course it betrays our commitment to the world’s poorest. Instead, I believe Britain can – and must – be a moral force for good in the world. Self-confident, outward-looking and optimistic. Building global coalitions for social, economic and climate justice. Protecting global human rights. Championing international development. Trading with the world. And leading the fight against climate change.

    That’s the vision I have of global Britain – a country that keeps our word and defends international law.

    But of course, we can only achieve that if we work with our global partners, if we strengthen international institutions – NATO, the UN, the WHO, and if we’re clear and confident about our values.

    I care passionately about this. I was a human rights lawyer for 20 years and I worked in many countries around the world so defending human rights and international law will always be incredibly important to me. It’s also clear to me that all the major problems we face, including of course a global vaccine programme, can only be solved if countries work together.

    Britain hosts the G7 this year. That’s a huge opportunity to shape the recovery, to bring countries together, in order to secure and rebuild our economy and to repair our climate.

    Britain needs to seize this chance to lead in the world again. Just as Blair and Brown did over global poverty and the financial crisis, that’s what Britain can achieve. #

    But Boris Johnson has spent the last few years cosying up to people who don’t have Britain’s interests at heart – thumbing his nose at our friends, breaking international law and courting the idea that he’s “Britain’s Trump”.

    As a result he’s on the wrong side of the times and he’s out of step with Britain’s interests. And just when Britain needs to be leading the global recovery Johnson has left us isolated from those we have stood shoulder to shoulder with over the past century.

    Our job now is to repair that breach and to rebuild alliances. So you can see why I’m counting down the days to a new President in the White House. In particular, one who is also internationalist, multilateralist and wants to work together on tackling issues such as the climate emergency.

    In short, a President who is everything that we haven’t seen for the last four years.

    Our relationship with the US matters to me enormously. I’m anti-Trump but I’m pro-American. And I’m incredibly optimistic about the new relationship we can build with President Biden.

    America is our most important security ally, we have a shared history, we face shared challenges and so many of our citizens have families on both sides of the Atlantic.

    So it’s crucial that we also have a strong future together on everything from global security, climate change, aid and trade.

    I believe that Britain’s national interest lies in once again being the bridge between the US and the rest of Europe. I believe we’re at our strongest when we link our two closest partners together, when we are confident in our shared values and when we work as one to achieve our common goals:

    Strengthening the global economy

    Delivering social justice and

    Fighting climate change

    I know that Labour can do that, to be pro-American, pro-European and internationalist. Looking out to the world, defending our values and building strong alliances.

    But after ten years of Conservative government, after Trump, and after Brexit, it’s clear that both parts of that bridge need urgent repairs.

    First, this Government’s relationship with the incoming administration won’t be helped by how close Boris Johnson and his Cabinet were to President Trump.

    Remember in May 2018 when Boris Johnson said that Trump should be candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize? He wasn’t a backbencher then or a columnist. He was Foreign Secretary.

    Of course, Michael Gove went to Trump Towers to do a fawning interview and the Defence Secretary – Ben Wallace – gave an interview just a few weeks ago saying how he would “miss” President Trump.

    Personally, I don’t think that’s how you show how pro-American are you, stand up for our national interest or defend British values. And it is certainly isn’t my idea of how to build alliances.

    And then there’s the second part of the bridge we need to rebuild: with the rest of Europe.

    I’ve spent the last three conferences here talking about Brexit so I’m not sure you want to hear too much about it again! But I do want to say this:

    We have left the EU – that issue is now settled – but we will always be European and I, and the Labour Party, will always be an internationalist party. We can now write a new chapter with our European friends and partners and build on the deal that’s been agreed.

    I want that to be a close economic relationship rooted in our values, based on high standards and with protections for businesses, for working people and the environment.

    Of course, Boris Johnson will never do that. He wants something completely different from Brexit. To deregulate, to lower standards, to slash rights.

    And we’re already seeing that workers’ rights are at risk. The 48-hour week and the Working Time Directive could be ripped up. Of course that would break clear and repeated promises by Boris Johnson and Michael Gove. But when has that stopped them?

    Labour and the trade union movement will fight this tooth and nail. We’ll always stand up for workers’ rights and environmental protections. And we’ll make the case that a strong, close relationship with Europe is still possible. Not as members, but as partners and that Labour would build that in government.

    Breaking down barriers to trade for our businesses and protecting rights for working people.

    These are incredibly turbulent times in British and global politics. But there is cause for optimism. And I know that Labour can set a new path for this country – patriotic, internationalist and rooted in our values.

    Boris Johnson has left us isolated and alienated from our allies but I know Labour can rebuild both parts of that bridge:

    Working closely with a new US President

    Building a strong relationship with Europe

    And making Britain – once again – a moral force for good in the world.

  • Jonathan Reynolds – 2021 Comments on Universal Credit

    Jonathan Reynolds – 2021 Comments on Universal Credit

    The comments made by Jonathan Reynolds, the Shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, on 16 January 2021.

    Britain is facing the worst economic crisis of any major economy. The chancellor’s decision to wind down support with his cut to universal credit will be devastating for families already struggling to get by and leave unemployment support at a 30 year low.

    Bringing in a one off payment that doesn’t even equal half the amount the government is planning to cut from millions of families’ incomes will damage our recovery. With jobs being lost each day and the furlough cliff edge looming, a lump sum rather than extended support will leave many to fall through the gaps.

    Instead of yet another inadequate sticking plaster, the government needs to do the right thing and cancel the cut to universal credit. If the chancellor refuses, we urge Conservative MPs to vote with Labour on Monday to give families the security and support they need.

  • Emily Thornberry – 2021 Comments on UK Import Ban on Soya

    Emily Thornberry – 2021 Comments on UK Import Ban on Soya

    The comments made by Emily Thornberry, the Shadow International Trade Secretary, on 16 January 2021.

    Boris Johnson clearly has so little new to say on the environment and climate change – even in the vital year that the UK is chairing COP26 – that he’s reduced to telling the media that he’s ‘considering’ an import ban which the government consulted on back in August, and announced it was implementing ten weeks ago.

    If he is actually serious about what is happening in countries like Brazil, he would take action against all damaging destruction of rainforest and woodland, not just deforestation deemed illegal by local laws, and he would extend the proposed due diligence law to protect the human rights of indigenous peoples, as well as their homelands.

  • Dominic Raab – 2021 Statement on Gibraltar

    Dominic Raab – 2021 Statement on Gibraltar

    The statement made by Dominic Raab, the Foreign Secretary, in the House of Commons on 13 January 2021.

    In the UK approach to negotiations on the future relationship with the EU as published in February 2020, the Government stated that they would act in these negotiations on behalf of all the territories for whose international relations the UK is responsible, which includes Gibraltar.

    We have worked side by side with the Government of Gibraltar to honour this commitment. As a consequence of the EU’s negotiating mandate which it adopted in February 2020, Gibraltar was not within scope of the UK-EU trade and co-operation agreement (TCA). The Commission made a declaration alongside the TCA stating that this would “not preclude the possibility to have separate agreements between the Union and the United Kingdom in respect of Gibraltar”, and that it stood ready “to examine any request from Spain, in agreement with the United Kingdom, to initiate the procedure for the negotiation of such separate agreements should they be compatible with Union law and Union interests”.

    To that end, the UK, working side by side with the Governments of Gibraltar and Spain, reached agreement on 31 December over a political framework to form the basis of a separate treaty between the UK and the EU regarding Gibraltar. We have sent this framework to the European Commission in order to initiate negotiations on the treaty.

    The political framework covers issues of key importance to Gibraltar and the surrounding region, including on border fluidity. It creates the basis for a bespoke model for Gibraltar’s future relationship with the EU that will permit an absence of physical checks at the land border with Spain, and therefore ensure fluidity of movement of people and goods between Gibraltar and the EU. The Governments of both the UK and Gibraltar judge that this framework provides a firm basis to safeguard Gibraltar’s interests.

    The UK and Gibraltar are committed to ensuring that cross-border arrangements can continue in the interim, until a new treaty enters into force. Arrangements have been agreed with Spain that include provisions for the border (goods and people), road transport, healthcare, waste disposal, and data. In addition, the UK Government provided financial and other support to ensure that Gibraltar was fully prepared for the end of the transition period.

    We remain steadfast in our support for Gibraltar, and its sovereignty is safeguarded.

  • Christine Jardine – 2021 Speech on Small Business Support

    Christine Jardine – 2021 Speech on Small Business Support

    The speech made by Christine Jardine, the Liberal Democrat MP for Edinburgh West, in the House of Commons on 13 January 2021.

    It is unfortunate that I have to raise, and not for the first time with this Government, an issue that faces so many of our businesses, particularly small enterprises. There can surely be nobody in the House—or, indeed, the country—who is unaware of the impact of the pandemic on them, on their businesses, their employees and their families. Every business in every sector in this country is actually a group of people or often only an individual. My concern for their future is matched only by my admiration for how so many of them, working and using their ingenuity to stay within the rules and restrictions on covid-19, are staying afloat, too often without any support at all.

    As with practically everything else in the past year, circumstances have dictated a different approach for us all, from how we go about our daily lives to how we shop to how we do business. We have watched as companies have skilfully adapted to ever-changing circumstances, but we have also seen the cost to our arts and entertainment sector, our hospitality sector and quite starkly to our retail sector, where even big names have been vulnerable. To be fair, the Arcadia Group was perhaps already vulnerable before covid-19, and likewise Debenhams, but that is no consolation to the thousands of people who spend their time worrying about whether their jobs can be saved from the rubble of what were once some of the proudest names on our high streets, or whether they might be next.

    In the run-up to Christmas, small businesses had to face the reality that the usual festive volume of trade, which they need to enjoy a profitable or often even a survivable year, was gone. The two most recent former Conservative Prime Ministers made no secret of the fact that they believed that small business was the backbone of the British economy. Promises were made. I ask this Government to consider whether they have been fulfilled or whether, as I believe, more needs to be done. Yes, there are packages of support, loans and furlough, but they are all short term. They are patches—knee-jerk, bit-by-bit responses to a long-term problem with unprecedented implications. Surely it is long past time to bring those patches together and create a long-term strategy to support that backbone of the economy.

    As a politician, one of the things I believe we should try to do is to get to the heart of what people actually need and find practical, workable solutions that can make a difference to people’s lives. In the past year, that has been a challenge. For example, the most recent forecast from the Office for Budget Responsibility suggests that the economy will have shrunk by a frightening 11.3%. At the end of September, GDP was already down 9.7%. We should remember exactly what it is we are talking about. Behind all the numbers and equations are people who feel the ramifications of the sums that we do.

    Before Christmas, I wrote to the Chancellor urging him to support an idea that I believe would still have value in supporting small businesses, particularly those in retail: covering their postage fees, to help level the playing field with online giants. Freeing small shops of delivery costs for online purchases would go some way to help combat the decreased footfall over months of lockdown. As restrictions are tightened and our worlds become even smaller, the impact of such a move cannot be underestimated. Together with the suspension of business rates, it could support small businesses in much the same way as the Eat Out to Help Out scheme rightly pumped £800 million of Exchequer cash into hospitality. It would also give them something with which to fight back against the online giants, who have soaked up so much custom as we all seek ways of shopping during enforced home time. The Federation of Small Businesses welcomed the idea as providing its members with the boost they need to help level the playing field.

    Too many people have been completely left out of support. We need to innovate our way out of this crisis, so where is the help for the self-employed and the entrepreneurs whose ingenuity and inventiveness we will rely on as we look for growth? We need them to survive along with those small businesses, until they are all able to thrive once again. In arts and entertainment, an industry in which there are so many small companies and self-employed people, there is a huge hole that we need to fill—a gap in the safety net that this Government promised when they said they would do whatever it took to get us through this.

    I am a great believer in putting yourself in someone else’s shoes to look at an issue—the constituent with a problem, the business facing bankruptcy because it is following rules or the make-up artist, musician or freelance journalist who cannot work and whose pleas for support have fallen on deaf ears for 10 months. Perhaps it is easier for me to appreciate that last category. In a previous career, I was a freelance broadcaster for some years. I can see only too clearly what my life might have been in this time. I see it reflected in their campaign and in their hardship. I saw it every day in my constituency when I was still able to shop, socially distanced and wearing a face mask, in the many and varied independent outlets that are the lifeblood of my community.

    A high street is not just a thoroughfare. It is where people come together and support their communities, whether or not they are making a conscious decision to do so. We might not have thought about it before as we nipped between the newsagent and the bakers. We would notice it now, however, if they were no longer there to nip to. We often speak about businesses as if they are just there to fill the coffers and there are no humans behind them at all. Behind every idea and every counter is someone with a family and a mortgage who has been brave enough to try. They need us to take on covid for them, because that is what they deserve. Just as they have adapted to serve our needs and bring us hope and joy, we have to adapt. We have to extend furlough, suspend business rates and admit that schemes in place for last summer will no longer be enough come the spring.

    We need communication across all four nations, and we need every Government in this United Kingdom to put politics aside and do what is best and what is right for those who need it most. To that end, I ask the Government to put pressure on the Scottish National party at Holyrood to expedite the many applications from people who are still waiting for support, even though the money is there. Tonight I spoke to a constituent in precisely that position. As an MP, the health of my communities is always at the forefront of my mind, even in good times. I hope and ask that our small businesses are at the forefront of the Government’s.