Tag: Speeches

  • Sadiq Khan – 2021 Comments on ULEZ Expansion

    Sadiq Khan – 2021 Comments on ULEZ Expansion

    The comments made by Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, on 10 December 2021.

    This shows how bold action reaps rewards on air quality and climate change. Just one month after expanding the world’s first Ultra Low Emission Zone, we have seen a significant reduction in the number of older, more polluting vehicles driving in our capital. This is vitally important because toxic air is an invisible killer, responsible for one of the biggest public health crises of our generation.

    In central London, the ULEZ has already helped cut toxic roadside nitrogen dioxide pollution by nearly half. But pollution isn’t just a central London problem. Everyone should have the right to breathe clean air, which is why expanding the ULEZ was a crucial step. The high compliance rate means that millions of Londoners are already benefiting from cleaner air.

  • Michael Gove – 2014 Comments on Expansion of Free Schools

    Michael Gove – 2014 Comments on Expansion of Free Schools

    The comments made by Michael Gove, the then Secretary of State for Education, on 19 June 2014.

    Free schools are giving thousands of children from ordinary backgrounds the kind of education previously reserved for the rich and the lucky.

    Thanks to our free school programme, many more parents now have a new school in their neighbourhood offering high standards and tough discipline. Free schools put teachers – not bureaucrats and politicians – in the driving seat, as they are the ones who know their pupils best.

    As part of our long-term economic plan, we are determined to deliver the best schools and skills for our young people, and free schools are achieving exactly that.

  • Michael Gove – 2014 Comments on New School Food Menus

    Michael Gove – 2014 Comments on New School Food Menus

    The comments made by Michael Gove, the then Secretary of State for Education, on 17 June 2014.

    These new food standards will ensure all children are able to eat healthy, nutritious meals at school.

    We now have a clear and concise set of food standards which are easier for cooks to follow and less expensive to enforce. Crucially we have achieved this without any compromise on quality or nutrition.

    There has been a great deal of progress in providing healthy school meals in recent years and these new standards will help deliver further improvements.

  • Michael Gove – 2014 Statement on Schools in Birmingham

    Michael Gove – 2014 Statement on Schools in Birmingham

    The statement made by Michael Gove, the then Secretary of State for Education, in the House of Commons on 9 June 2014.

    With your permission, Mr Speaker, I should like to make a statement on schools in Birmingham.

    Keeping our children safe – and ensuring our schools prepare them for life in modern Britain – could not be more important – it is my central mission.

    Allegations made in what has become known as the Trojan Horse letter suggested children were not being kept safe in Birmingham schools.

    Ofsted and Education Funding Agency have investigated those allegations. Their reports, and other relevant documents, have today been placed in the Library of the House. Let me set out their findings and my actions.

    Ofsted states that “headteachers reported… an organised campaign to target.. schools…in order to alter their character and ethos,” with “a culture of fear and intimidation”.

    Headteachers who had “a record of raising standards” reported they had been “marginalised or forced out of their jobs”.

    One school leader was so frightened about speaking to the authorities that a meeting had to be arranged in a supermarket car park.

    Ofsted concluded governors “are trying to impose and promote a narrow faith-based ideology in what are non-faith schools”, specifically by narrowing the curriculum, manipulating staff appointments and using school funds inappropriately. Overall, Ofsted inspected 21 schools. Three were good or outstanding.

    Twelve schools were found to require improvement.

    The remaining 6 are inadequate and are in special measures.

    Let me explain why.

    At one secular primary school, terms such as “white prostitute” unsuitable for primary children’s ears, were used in Friday assemblies run exclusively by Muslim staff.

    The school organised visits to Saudi Arabia open only to Muslim pupils.

    Senior leaders told inspectors that a madrassah had been established and been paid for from the school’s budget.

    Ofsted concluded the school was “not adequately ensuring that pupils have opportunities to learn about faith in a way that promotes tolerance and harmony between different cultures”.

    At one secular secondary school, staff told officials the call to prayer was broadcast over the playground using loudspeakers.

    Officials observed lessons had been narrowed to comply with conservative Islamic teachings – in biology, students were told “evolution is not what we believe”.

    The school invited the preacher Sheikh Shady al-Suleiman to speak despite the fact that he is reported to have said:

    Give victory to Muslims in Afghanistan… Give victory to all the Mujahideen all over the world. Oh Allah, prepare us for the jihad.

    Ofsted concluded that “governors have failed to ensure that safeguarding requirements and other statutory duties are met”.

    At another secular secondary school inspectors described “a state of crisis” with governors reportedly using school funds to pay private investigators to read the emails of senior leaders, Ofsted found a lack of action to protect students from extremism.

    At a third secular secondary school, Ofsted found students are “vulnerable to the risk of marginalisation from wider British society and the associated risks which could include radicalisation”.

    And at a secular primary Ofsted found, that “pupils have limited knowledge of religious beliefs other than Islam”, and “subjects such as art and music have been removed – at the insistence of the governing body”.

    Inspectors concluded that the school “does not adequately prepare students for life in modern Britain”.

    Ofsted also reports failures on the part of Birmingham City Council.

    They found that the council did not deal adequately with repeated complaints from headteachers. School leaders expressed “very little confidence” in the local authority and Ofsted concluded that Birmingham has not exercised adequate judgement. Indeed the chair of one of the schools found to be inadequate, Tahir Alam, was in a business relationship with the former Lead Member for Children and Young People.

    Mr Speaker, these findings demand a robust, but also a considered, response.

    It is important that no one allows concern about these findings to become a pretext for criticism of Islam itself, a great faith which brings spiritual nourishment to millions and daily inspires countless acts of generosity.

    The overwhelming majority of British Muslim parents want their children to grow up in schools that open doors rather than close minds.

    It is on their behalf that we have to act.

    There are, of course, questions about whether warning signs have been missed.

    There are certainly questions for Birmingham Council, Ofsted and the Department for Education.

    I have today asked Birmingham Council to review their history on this issue, and the Chief Inspector has advised me that he will be considering the lessons learnt for Ofsted.

    I am also concerned that the DfE may not have acted when it should. I am asking the Permanent Secretary to investigate how my department dealt with warnings both since the formation of this government in 2010 and before.

    We all must acknowledge there has been a failure in the past to do everything possible to tackle non-violent extremism.

    But let me be clear, no government and no Home Secretary has done more to tackle extremism.

    In the Prime Minister’s Munich speech of 2011;

    In the Home Secretary’s own review of the Prevent Framework;

    And in the conclusions of the government’s Extremism Task Force last year.

    This government has made clear that we need to deal with the dangers posed by extremism well before it becomes violent.

    And since 2010 the DfE has increased its capacity to deal with extremism. We set up Whitehall’s first ever unit to counter extremism in public services with help from former intelligence and security professionals. That unit has developed since 2010 and we will continue to strengthen it.

    Ofsted now train inspectors to understand and counter extremist Islamist ideology. And inspections of schools at risk, like those in Birmingham, are carried out by the most senior inspectors – overseen by Sir Michael Wilshaw himself.

    But there is – of course more to do – and today’s reports make action urgent.

    First, we need to take action in the schools found inadequate.

    Academies will receive letters saying I am minded to terminate funding agreements.

    Local authority schools are having governors replaced.

    We have already spoken to successful academy providers who are ready to act as sponsors.

    We need to strengthen our inspection regime even further.

    The requirement to give notice of inspections clearly makes it more difficult to identify and detect danger signs.

    Sir Michael Wilshaw and I have argued in the past that no-notice inspections can help identify when pupils are at risk.

    I have asked him to consider the practicalities of moving to a situation where all schools know they may receive an unannounced inspection.

    I will also work with Sir Michael Wilshaw to ensure, as he recommends, that we can provide greater public assurance that all schools in a locality discharge their full statutory responsibilities and we will consider how Ofsted can better enforce the existing requirement that all schools teach a broad and balanced curriculum.

    I have talked today to the leader of Birmingham Council and requested that it sets out an action plan to tackle extremism and keep children safe.

    We already require independent schools, academies and free schools to respect British values.

    Now we will consult on new rules that will strengthen this standard further, so that all schools actively promote British values.

    And I will ask Ofsted to enforce an equivalent standard on maintained schools through changes to the Ofsted framework.

    Several of the governors whose activities have been investigated by Ofsted have also been active in the Association of Muslim Schools UK – which has statutory responsibilities in relation to state Muslim faith schools.

    So we have asked AMSUK to satisfy us that they are doing enough to protect children from extremism and we will take appropriate steps if their guarantees are insufficiently robust.

    I have also spoken to the National College for Teaching and Leadership and we will further strengthen the rules so that from now on it is explicit that a teacher inviting an extremist speaker into a school can be banned from the profession.

    I will, of course, report in July on progress in all the areas I have announced as well as publishing the findings of the report of Peter Clarke, who is investigating the background behind many of the broader allegations in the Trojan Horse letter.

    The steps we are taking today are those we consider necessary to protect our children from extremism – and protect our nation’s traditions of tolerance and liberty.

    Mr Speaker, the conclusions of the reports today are clear.

    Things that should not have happened in our schools were allowed to happen.

    Our children were exposed to things they should not have been exposed to.

    As Education Secretary, I am taking decisive action to make sure those children are protected.

    Schools that are proven to have failed will be taken over, put under new leadership and taken in a fresh new direction.

    Any school could now be subject to rigorous, on the spot inspections – with no advance warning and no opportunities to conceal failure.

    And we will put the promotion of British values at the heart of what every school has to deliver for children.

    What we have found was unacceptable. And we will put it right.

    I commend this statement to the House.

  • Michael Gove – 2014 Comments on Extremism in Schools

    Michael Gove – 2014 Comments on Extremism in Schools

    The comments made by Michael Gove, the then Secretary of State for Education, on 9 June 2014.

    We have to ensure children are safe in our schools. Evidence uncovered in Birmingham clearly indicates that schools have used the notice they have been given of inspections to evade proper scrutiny. Sir Michael Wilshaw will now examine the practicalities of moving to a position where all schools know they may face an unannounced inspection.

    Our children need to be protected in schools, kept safe from the dangers of extremism and guaranteed a broad and balanced curriculum. This change will help provide parents with the reassurance they need.

  • Michael Gove – 2014 Comments on Teacher Training

    Michael Gove – 2014 Comments on Teacher Training

    The comments made by Michael Gove, the then Secretary of State for Education, on 1 May 2014.

    There has never been a better time to be a teacher. There are more teachers in England’s classrooms than ever before, with a rise of 9,000 in the last year, and there is no doubt that the current generation of young teachers is the best ever.

    While we have already taken steps to improve teacher training, including through the popular School Direct route, it is right that we look at how we can ensure all courses are providing the best possible training.

    I am very pleased to appoint Andrew Carter to lead this important review. He has a wealth of experience in this area and I look forward to receiving his report.

  • Michael Gove – 2014 Comments on Amanda Spielman

    Michael Gove – 2014 Comments on Amanda Spielman

    The comments made by Michael Gove, the then Secretary of State for Education, on 15 April 2014.

    Throughout her tenure, Amanda has proven to be a respected chair of the Ofqual board, ensuring that Ofqual has been a strong regulator, driving up standards in exams and increasing confidence in the system. Under her guidance Ofqual has retained its focus and rigour, making sure that our examinations push pupils to reach their full potential, and I am delighted she will be continuing as chair.

  • Michael Gove – 2014 Comments on Arts GCSEs

    Michael Gove – 2014 Comments on Arts GCSEs

    The comments made by Michael Gove, the then Secretary of State for Education, on 9 April 2014.

    I am passionate about great art, drama, dance, music and design, and I am determined to ensure every child enjoys access to the best in our culture. I also want all schools to be able to nurture creative talent in every child.

    That is why I am delighted that new high-quality qualifications in creative and cultural subjects will be made available to all students. They will now have the chance to take these new qualifications from September 2016.

  • Michael Gove – 2014 Statement on GCSEs and A-Levels

    Michael Gove – 2014 Statement on GCSEs and A-Levels

    The statement made by Michael Gove, the then Secretary of State for Education, in the House of Commons on 9 April 2014.

    The Government is today announcing the next steps in the reform of GCSEs and A levels.

    We are introducing more rigorous content into reformed GCSEs and A levels to be taught from September 2016 and 2015 respectively.

    Our changes will make these qualifications more ambitious, with greater stretch for the most able; will prepare young people better for the demands of employment and further study; will address the pernicious damage caused by grade inflation and dumbing down, which have undermined students’ achievements for far too long; and will give pupils, parents, teachers, universities and employers greater confidence in the integrity and reliability of our qualifications system.

    GCSEs

    In November of last year, the Department for Education published details of revised content for GCSEs in English and mathematics, for first teaching from September 2015.

    Today, I am publishing revised content for GCSEs in science, history, geography and languages, which will be taught in schools from September 2016.

    These GCSEs set higher expectations. They demand more from all students and specifically provide further challenge to those aiming to achieve top grades.

    In science, the level of detail and scientific knowledge required has increased significantly, and there are clearer mathematical requirements for each topic. New content has been added, including the study of the human genome, gene technology, life cycle analysis, nanoparticles and space physics.

    In history, every student will be able to cover medieval, early modern and modern history – rather than focusing only on modern world history, as too many students do now. Greater emphasis has been placed on British history, which will account for 40% of GCSE rather than 25%, as now; balanced by an increase in the number of geographical areas studied, and an explicit expectation that students will study the wider world. The new GCSE will also be clearer about the range of historical knowledge and methods students will need to develop, from critical assessment of sources to an understanding of chronology, individuals, events and developments.

    In geography, the balance between physical and human geography has been improved – developing students’ locational and contextual knowledge of the world’s continents, countries and regions and their physical, environmental and human features – alongside a requirement that all students study the geography of the UK in depth. Students will also need to use a wide range of investigative skills and approaches, including mathematics and statistics, and we have introduced a requirement for at least 2 examples of fieldwork outside school.

    In modern languages, greater emphasis has been placed on speaking and writing in the foreign language, thorough understanding of grammar and translation of sentences and short texts from English into the language. Most exam questions will be set in the language itself, rather than in English; and there will be a sharper focus on using the language appropriately in different contexts, from personal travel to employment or study abroad.

    Finally, ancient languages have been given a separate set of criteria for the first time, reflecting their specific requirements. Students will now need to translate unseen passages into English, and will have the option to translate short English sentences into the ancient language. We have also provided greater detail about the range and type of literature and sources to be studied, without specifying particular set texts.

    A levels

    I am also publishing revised content for A levels in English literature, English language, English literature and language, biology, chemistry, physics, psychology, history, economics, business, computer science, art and design and sociology, for first teaching from September 2015.

    The content for these A levels was reviewed and recommended by Professor Mark E. Smith, vice-chancellor of Lancaster University, drawing on advice from subject experts from higher education establishments and subject associations.

    By placing responsibility for the content of A levels in the hands of university academics, we hope that these new exams will be more rigorous and will provide students with the skills and knowledge needed for progression to undergraduate study.

    I thank Professor Smith and all of those involved for their conscientious work and thoughtful suggestions – and I have accepted all of their recommendations for A level content.

    In the sciences, computer science, economics and business, mathematical and quantitative content has been strengthened: for example, understanding standard deviation in biology and the concepts underlying calculus in physics.

    In computer science, basic ICT content has been removed and emphasis has been placed instead on programming and far more detailed content on algorithms.

    In the sciences, there will also be a new requirement that students must carry out a minimum of 12 practical activities, ensuring that they develop vital scientific techniques and become comfortable using key apparatus. This will make sure that all A level scientists develop the experimental and practical skills essential for further study.

    In history, as well as covering the history of more than one country or state beyond the British Isles, A level students will also now be required to study topics across a chronological range of at least 200 years – increasing breadth of focus.

    In English literature, to ensure a broad and balanced curriculum, specified texts will include three works from before 1900 – including at least one play by Shakespeare – and at least one work from after 2000. In addition, we have reintroduced the requirement for A level students to be examined on an ‘unseen’ literary text, to encourage wide and critical reading.

    Finally, in economics, content has been updated to include the latest issues and topics – for example, financial regulation and the role of central banks.

    Copies of the content for these reformed GCSEs and reformed A levels are available.

    Alongside these announcements, Ofqual is today setting out its decisions on how these new GCSEs and A levels should be assessed – with linear assessment rather than modules, and a greater focus on exams rather than controlled assessment.

    All of these reformed A levels will be ready for first teaching in schools from September 2015, and reformed GCSEs from September 2016.

    Awarding organisations will publish their detailed specifications for these A levels this autumn, and for these GCSEs next autumn – giving schools plenty of time to prepare.

    New A levels and GCSEs from 2016

    Based on the advice of the A level content advisory board established by the Russell Group of leading universities, I have also already announced that A levels in mathematics, languages and geography will be reformed for first teaching from September 2016.

    I can announce today that GCSEs and A levels in religious studies, design & technology, drama, dance, music and PE – and GCSEs in art & design, computer science and citizenship – will also be reformed and brought up to these new, higher standards for first teaching at the same time, in September 2016.

    Awarding organisations and subject experts will draft content for these new A levels and GCSEs over the coming months, and we will consult on their recommendations for content – while Ofqual consults on its recommendations for assessment – later in the year.

    All our reforms to GCSEs and A levels complement the changes we have already made to technical and vocational qualifications, removing those which are not endorsed by businesses or employer bodies from league tables, and leaving only those which represent real achievement.

    Taken together, these changes mean that every young person in this country will have the opportunity to study high-quality, rigorous, demanding qualifications across the academic and vocational curriculum from September 2016 onwards.

    These changes will increase the rigour of qualifications, strengthening the respect in which they are held by employers and universities alike. Young people in England deserve world-class qualifications and a world-class education – and that is what our reforms will deliver.

  • Michael Gove – 2014 Statement on Jimmy Savile

    Michael Gove – 2014 Statement on Jimmy Savile

    The statement made by Michael Gove, the then Secretary of State for Education, in the House of Commons on 27 March 2014.

    I wish to inform the House that the Department for Education has received information about Jimmy Savile relating to several children’s homes and schools in England, dating back to the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. This information was uncovered as part of the document review process undertaken by the Metropolitan Police Service on behalf of the Department of Health.

    Having reviewed the information, I have decided that the Department for Education should pass the information to the appropriate organisations for further investigation. In most cases the work will be conducted by the relevant local authority; in others the relevant institution or a legacy organisation will take the lead.

    In order to ensure consistency of approach with the NHS Savile investigations, I am replicating the arrangements adopted by the Department of Health to quality assure the work. I have appointed Lucy Scott-Moncrieff to provide independent oversight and quality assurance of the process, undertaking a similar role to that of Kate Lampard in the NHS trust investigations. I have asked Lucy Scott-Moncrieff to ensure that investigating organisations take all practicable steps to establish what happened and why at the time of the incidents, and any lessons there might be to inform current safeguarding practice in our schools and children’s homes.

    I will inform the House of the outcome of this work.

    Information has been provided to responsible organisations as set out in the table below:

    Institution(s) mentioned in the information Investigating body Area
    Children’s home (name unknown) Local authority Bournemouth
    Colletton Lodge Local authority Devon
    The Ride Children’s Home Local authority Hounslow
    Parklands Children’s Home Local authority Gloucestershire
    Sevenoaks School Sevenoaks School Board of Governors Kent
    Northways Residential School Local authority Leeds
    Beechcroft Children’s Home Local authority Leeds
    Henshaw School for the Blind Henshaw Society for Blind People Leeds
    Notre Dame Grammar School Notre Dame Catholic College Board of Governors Leeds
    Care home (name unknown) Local authority London Borough of Islington
    Hollies Care Home Local authority London Borough of Southwark
    St Leonard’s Children’s Home Local authority London Borough of Tower Hamlets
    Sarah Laski Home Local authority Manchester
    Broome House Children’s Home Local authority Manchester
    Children’s home (name unknown) Local authority Manchester
    Aspley Wood School Local authority Nottingham
    Bassetlaw School Local authority Nottinghamshire
    National Children’s Home, Penhurst Action for Children Oxfordshire
    Beach Holme Children’s Home Local authority Surrey
    Broomfield Children’s Home Local authority Surrey
    Barnardo’s children’s home (name unknown) Barnardo’s Redbridge