Tag: Speeches

  • Anne-Marie Trevelyan – 2022 Statement on India Trade Negotiations

    Anne-Marie Trevelyan – 2022 Statement on India Trade Negotiations

    The statement made by Anne-Marie Trevelyan, the Secretary of State for International Trade, in the House of Commons on 24 March 2022.

    The second round of UK-India free trade agreement negotiations began on 7 March and concluded on 17 March. A delegation of 44 Indian officials undertook technical talks in London. The negotiations, at official level, were conducted in a hybrid fashion, with some negotiators in our dedicated UK negotiations facility, and others attending virtually.

    During this second round, talks focused on draft treaty text. Technical discussions were held across 26 policy areas over 60 separate sessions.

    Both countries continue to share an ambition to secure a modern and comprehensive deal that would remove trade barriers and create new opportunities for business in the UK and India. The UK-India deal is a key opportunity to deepen our economic relationship with a dynamic and fast growing economy in the Indo-Pacific region.

    This deal is part of a wider trading relationship with India. The 2030 Roadmap agreed last year sets the ambition of doubling trade with India by 2030 and provides a framework for the UK-India relationship that goes beyond the free trade agreement.

    The third round of official level negotiations is due to take place in April 2022. We will focus on agreeing treaty architecture and seeking market access commitments to deliver benefit to UK consumers and businesses.

    We remain clear that any deal the Government strikes must be in the best interests of the British people and the economy.

    The Government will keep Parliament updated as these negotiations progress.

  • Anne-Marie Trevelyan – 2022 Statement on Canadian Trade Policy

    Anne-Marie Trevelyan – 2022 Statement on Canadian Trade Policy

    The statement made by Anne-Marie Trevelyan, the Secretary of State for International Trade, in the House of Commons on 24 March 2022.

    Today, the Department for International Trade is publishing a comprehensive set of documents setting out the UK’s strategic approach to an enhanced free trade agreement (FTA) between the UK and Canada. In line with our commitments to scrutiny and transparency, these documents have been published and placed in the Libraries of both Houses.

    As a recently independent trading nation, the UK is now able to champion its own trade policy by securing agreements with new international partners, as well as by upgrading the terms of our existing continuity agreements to better suit the needs of UK businesses and the economy. We signed the UK-Canada trade continuity agreement (UK-CAN TCA) on 9 December 2020, which committed both parties to enter negotiations on a bespoke trade agreement by 1 April 2022. As such, negotiations will be launched today, 24 March 2022, with negotiations due to begin shortly afterwards. The negotiation objectives published today were informed by our call for input, which requested views from consumers, businesses, and other interested stakeholders on priorities for upgrading our agreement with Canada.

    Canada is an important trading partner with a well-developed economy. Despite the slowdown to global trade in 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic, goods exports to Canada still increased by £478 million and Canada remained one of our top 20 trading partners (ranked 16th), with total trade in goods and services worth £19.2 billion.

    UK exports enjoy an estimated £58 million less in duties under the UK-CAN TCA, relative to trading without one. An upgraded agreement can provide the opportunity to support further trade liberalisation and benefit businesses, including the 10,300 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) already exporting to Canada.

    Enhancing the terms of our agreement with a historically connected partner like Canada can provide opportunities for businesses across the entire UK, support the UK’s transition to net zero and strengthen our vision for global Britain. We share a Head of State and work together across a range of bilateral and international initiatives including as members of the Five Eyes, G7, G20, NATO, and as signatories of the Paris climate agreement. These new negotiations are just another way in which our important partnership is delivering against all the priorities as set out in the UK’s integrated review. Further, these negotiations provide a valuable opportunity to pursue high ambition in areas of mutual interest including, championing, and supporting women’s economic empowerment through trade, updating our digital trade package, promoting innovation, and supporting our role as a global leader in climate action.

    A bespoke trade agreement with Canada will also complement the UK’s accession to the comprehensive and progressive agreement for trans-Pacific partnership (CPTPP), of which Canada is an influential member.

    The Government are determined that any agreement must work for consumers, producers, investors, and businesses alike. We further remain committed to upholding our high environmental, labour, public health, food safety and animal welfare standards, alongside protecting the national health service (NHS).

    HM Government are committed to transparency obligations, and we will continue to update and engage with key stakeholders as well as Parliament and the devolved Administrations throughout our negotiations with Canada.

  • Will Quince – 2022 Statement on Support for Children With No Resource to Public Funds

    Will Quince – 2022 Statement on Support for Children With No Resource to Public Funds

    The statement made by Will Quince, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education, in the House of Commons on 24 March 2022.

    Today I am providing an update following a programme of work undertaken by my officials to consider access to free school meals and the early education entitlement for two-year-olds for children from families with no recourse to public funds.

    As Members may be aware, some families with an irregular immigration status have a no recourse to public funds—NRPF—condition as designated by the Home Office. This condition restricts these families from drawing on welfare support and other passported Government support and previously this has meant that their children, regardless of their own immigration status, have been unable to access educational entitlements such as free school meals and the early education entitlement for disadvantaged two-year-olds. All children are entitled to access a school place and maintained schools and academies have a duty to provide free school meals to pupils of all ages that meet the eligibility criteria. These healthy, nutritious meals ensure that children up and down the country are well-nourished, develop healthy eating habits, and can concentrate, learn and achieve in the classroom.

    Free school meals

    In 2020, we temporarily extended free school meal eligibility to include some children of groups who have NRPF. I am pleased to confirm that, following a cross-Government review, we will permanently extend eligibility for free school meals to children from all families with NRPF, subject to the income thresholds as follows:

    £22,700 per annum for families outside London with one child.

    £31,200 per annum for families within London with one child.

    £26,300 per annum for families outside London with two or more children.

    £34,800 per annum for families within London with two or more children.

    These thresholds were developed to create comparative thresholds with broad equivalence with families with recourse to public funds, and who qualify for free school meals due to being in receipt of welfare benefits.

    In addition to the income thresholds outlined, we are incorporating a capital savings threshold of £16,000. This is the same maximum capital threshold for access to universal credit and therefore achieves parity with families with recourse to public funds.

    This permanent extension will begin from the start of the summer term, 19 April 2022. Newly eligible free school meal pupils will be recorded in exactly the same way as other free school meal pupils. We will shortly publish guidance advising schools how to check and validate eligibility for NRPF families.

    All children in receipt of free school meals will attract pupil premium funding for their school and—dependent on meeting other criteria—will also be able to receive free home-to-school transport. The department will provide funding to meet the additional costs incurred through the established processes.

    Two-year-old entitlement

    The early years are crucial for children’s development and for establishing the foundations for future success.

    Since September 2020, some NRPF households have been able to access the two-year-old early education entitlement. However, my department is going to consult as soon as possible on whether there are any additional groups of children from NRPF families who should be eligible for the two-year-old entitlement that we have not already identified.

    These changes will help to ensure that every child gets the best possible start and receives the right support, in the right place, at the right time.

  • Nigel Huddleston – 2022 Statement on Incorrect Information Provided by Government

    Nigel Huddleston – 2022 Statement on Incorrect Information Provided by Government

    The statement made by Nigel Huddleston, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, in the House of Commons on 24 March 2022.

    I am repeating the following written ministerial statement made today in the other place by my noble Friend, the Minister for Arts, Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay:

    On 9 June 2020, the then Minister for Digital and Culture, Dame Caroline Dinenage MP, answered a parliamentary question from Anneliese Dodds MP (53581) on the tax treatment of emergency grants provided to freelancers by Arts Council England at the beginning of the pandemic, April 2020.

    The question was answered, in consultation with the Arts Council, on the basis of information believed to be true at the time. It stated that:

    “The Arts Council always recommends that grant recipients refer to HMRC and/or an independent advisor for advice that takes full account of their personal circumstances for tax. In general, as per the agreement reached between the Inland Revenue and the Arts Council of Great Britain in 1978, which we understand still applies, it is the Arts Council’s understanding that:

    Grants awarded to support people to take time out to develop and explore their artistic and cultural practice—such as those grants recently made under the Arts Council’s emergency response fund for Individuals—should not be treated as taxable income.

    Grants awarded to support the delivery of a specific project or projects would be treated as taxable income.”

    Arts Council England was subsequently informed by HMRC that it considered the payments made from the emergency response fund would fall into the taxable category. This was on the basis that—similar to other covid relief grants—they were made to support businesses and jobs, replacing lost revenue of the claimants. This means that, where the claimant is self-employed, the receipts should be included in the computation of their trading profits.

    Given the complexity of the tax treatment of grants, and the importance of this issue to recipients, Arts Council England and DCMS queried this decision with HMRC officials. Ultimately, however, HMRC were of the view that these grants needed to be treated consistently with other support funds.

    There was a regrettable delay between this decision being finalised and recipients being informed of the tax treatment by the Arts Council. In addition, incorrect information was given from HMRC channels which relied on the statement made in the original answer to the parliamentary question, compounding the confusion.

    I therefore asked DCMS and HMRC officials to agree that individuals would not be penalised where they had unknowingly submitted incorrect information and that they would be given the opportunity to correct their tax returns.

    Arts Council England wrote on 19 January to all those in receipt of payments from its emergency response fund to advise them of HMRC’s position.

    7,484 grants were awarded under Arts Council England’s “Emergency Response Fund for Individuals” programme, totalling £17.1 million, meaning an average grant of c. £2,285.

    Recipients were therefore advised, ahead of the submission deadline, that:

    they would not be charged a penalty if they filed their self-assessment return up to a month after the deadline;

    if they needed to correct their tax return, HMRC would not charge any penalties for errors related to the grant payment in the original return; and that

    if recipients did not correct their tax return—for instance, because they remain unaware that they have made an error—and HMRC subsequently discovers the error, HMRC would not charge a penalty if the error is a result of relying on incorrect official information.

    This was an unfortunate error on the part of a number of Government and non-governmental bodies. I am very sorry for it. I trust the actions taken by my officials and agreed with HMRC have ensured that no individual is unfairly penalised as a result of this error.

  • Greg Hands – 2022 Statement on Bulb Energy

    Greg Hands – 2022 Statement on Bulb Energy

    The statement made by Greg Hands, the Minister for Energy, Clean Growth and Climate Change, in the House of Commons on 24 March 2022.

    Today I will lay before Parliament a departmental minute describing a contingent liability arising from the issuance of a letter of credit for the energy administrators acting in the special administration regime for Bulb Energy Limited (‘Bulb’).

    It is normal practice when a Government Department proposes to undertake a contingent liability of £300,000 and above, for which there is no specific statutory authority, for the Department concerned to present Parliament with a minute giving particulars of the liability created and explaining the circumstances.

    I regret that, due to negotiations with the counterparty having only just concluded, I have not been able to follow the usual notification timelines to allow consideration of these issues in advance of issuing the letter of credit.

    Bulb entered the energy supply company special administration regime on 24 November 2021. Energy administrators were appointed by court to achieve the statutory objective of continuing energy supplies at the lowest reasonable practicable cost until such time as it becomes unnecessary for the special administration to remain in force for that purpose.

    My Department has agreed to provide a facility to the energy administrators, with a letter of credit issued, with my approval, to guarantee such contract, code, licence, or other document obligations of the company consistent with the special administration’s statutory objective. I will update the House if any letters of credit are drawn against.

    The legal basis for a letter of credit is section 165 of the Energy Act 2004, as applied and modified by section 96 of the Energy Act 2011.

    HM Treasury has approved the arrangements in principle.

  • Brandon Lewis – 2022 Statement on Northern Ireland Terrorism Threat Level

    Brandon Lewis – 2022 Statement on Northern Ireland Terrorism Threat Level

    The statement made by Brandon Lewis, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, in the House of Commons on 22 March 2022.

    MI5 has lowered the Northern Ireland-related terrorism threat level in Northern Ireland from “SEVERE” to “SUBSTANTIAL”.

    The decision to change the threat level is taken by MI5, independently of Ministers.

    This is a systematic, comprehensive and rigorous process, based on the very latest intelligence and analysis of factors which drive the threat.

    The fact that the threat level is being lowered from where it has been since September 2010 is a testament to the Government’s ongoing commitment to protecting the peace process and tackling Northern Ireland-related terrorism, as well as the tremendous efforts of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and MI5 for their hard-won gains over the past decade that have helped to make Northern Ireland a safer place to live and work.

    Despite the change in the threat level, terrorism remains one of the most direct and immediate risks to our national security and to communities in Northern Ireland. There remains a small group of people determined to destabilise the political settlement in Northern Ireland through acts of terrorism.

    “SUBSTANTIAL” means that a terrorist attack is likely and might well occur without further warning.

    As ever, the public should remain vigilant and report any concerns they may have to the police.

    The Government, police and intelligence agencies will continue to work tirelessly to address the threat posed by terrorism in all its forms. The threat level will be kept under constant review.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2022 Statement on Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

    Kemi Badenoch – 2022 Statement on Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

    The statement made by Kemi Badenoch, the Minister for Levelling Up Communities, in the House of Commons on 22 March 2022.

    On 18 January 2022,1 announced to the House that the Secretary of State was minded to intervene at Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (“the authority”) and to appoint Commissioners to take over functions associated with the governance and scrutiny of strategic decision making, and of those relating to the appointment and dismissal of statutory officers.

    At the same time, I sought views on how best to improve political stability in the authority’s leadership and to move towards a four-yearly election cycle.

    These proposals followed the publication of a “Value for Money Governance” review by the authority’s external auditor, Grant Thornton, issued to the authority on 3 December 2021. The review makes 45 wide-ranging recommendations, three of which are statutory recommendations, and in my view provides considerable evidence that the authority has failed to comply with its best value duty over a number of years. This is a requirement set out in the Local Government Act 1999 to make arrangements to secure continuous improvement in the way in which its functions are exercised, with regard to a combination of economy, efficiency and effectiveness.

    The Governance review paints a deeply troubling picture of mismanagement and of ineffective scrutiny and accountability arrangements at the authority. While the review recognises the recent progress made under the Interim Chief Executive, Kim Bromley-Derry CBE DL, it also notes how, historically, senior officers and members have been unable to make the changes required to move away from the past.

    While the Secretary of State is encouraged by the “green shoots” of progress described in the report, his view is that the risk of progress stalling or slowing is significant. He believes the proposed intervention is necessary and expedient to secure compliance with the best value duty.

    As part of my announcement in January, I invited the authority to make representations about my proposals to formally intervene on or before 11 February 2022.

    Representations were received from 15 parties: the authority, its Conservative Councillor Group, an independent Councillor, three MPs, eight residents and one residents’ group. With one exception, all the representations supported the intervention and the proposal to appoint Commissioners.

    The authority welcomed the support of the Department with its improvement, and stated that it looked forward to working with Commissioners and developing a clear improvement plan. In relation to elections, the authority confirmed that it is in the process of developing an action plan which includes consultation and engagement activity.

    The Conservative Group and the independent Councillor pledged to work with the Commissioners. Residents were universally supportive of the intervention and keen to see real improvement in the authority’s services.

    While two MPs supported intervention, one was opposed, citing the need for the progress made by the Council’s new senior leaders not to be undermined by Commissioners.

    Best value intervention in Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

    Following consideration of these representations, the Secretary of State has decided to proceed with the proposals announced on 18 January.

    Appointing Commissioners for Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council the Secretary of State has decided to appoint two Commissioners with a proven record of leadership, transformation and strong governance, and the specific expertise that will be relevant to their functions.

    The Governance review recognises that it is the interim Chief Executive Officer, Kim Bromley-Derry CBE DL, that has been driving change within the authority since his arrival in August 2021. It is for this reason that the Secretary of State has decided to appoint Mr Bromley-Derry as Managing Director Commissioner, a role which will enable him to continue the work that he has already begun, and to provide the authority with the consistent leadership capacity that it needs to continue its recovery. I would also like to thank Mr Bromley-Derry’s employers, McLaren Construction Group, for enabling his appointment.

    Kim Bromley Derry CBE DL (Managing Director Commissioner)—Kim has more than 35 years of public sector experience, including eight years as Chief Executive of the London Borough of Newham. He was also Director of Children’s Services at both the London Borough of Newham and South Tyneside Council and a Children’s Services Director at Leicester City Council. Kim was appointed Interim Chief Executive of Sandwell Council in August 2021 after being temporarily released from his role as Group Director for strategic partnerships at McLaren Construction Group. Kim has also been President of the Association of Directors of Children’s Services and chaired the Government’s Libraries Taskforce.

    Jim Taylor (Assistant Commissioner)—Jim served for six years as Chief Executive of Salford City Council prior to his retirement in 2021. He also fulfilled the role of Interim Chief Executive of Trafford Borough Council simultaneously from July 2018 to February 2019. Prior to this Jim was the Chief Executive of Rochdale Council having also served as Director for Children’s Services at Tameside MBC. In June 2021 Jim was appointed by the Secretary of State to undertake an external assurance review of governance at Slough Borough Council.

    The Commissioners have been appointed for two years from 22 March 2022 to 22 March 2024, or such earlier or later time as we determine. We are clear that the directions should operate for as long, and only as long, and only in the form, as necessary.

    The Commissioners will be asked to provide their first report within the next three months. Further reports will be provided every six months, or as agreed with the Commissioners.

    I want to be clear that most decisions will continue to be made by the authority; the intention being that Commissioners will only use their powers as a last resort if they are dissatisfied with the authority’s improvement processes.

    Commissioners will work collaboratively with Emma Taylor, Chief Executive of Sandwell Children’s Trust and Mark Gurrey, the Department for Education’s children’s services adviser and Chair of the Council’s improvement board for children’ services. This will ensure that the improvements overseen to date through the Department for Education’s statutory intervention continue to be made.

    I would also like to thank the LGA for the continued support it has provided to the authority, most recently through a Corporate Peer Challenge.

    As with other interventions led by my Department, the authority will be directed to meet the costs of the Commissioners. The fees paid to individuals are published in appointment letters which are available separately on www.gov.uk. I am assured this provides value for money given the expertise that is being brought, and the scale of the challenge in councils requiring statutory intervention.

    Conclusion

    The Government will continue to work closely with the political, business, and cultural leadership of Sandwell, and is committed to making sure the residents of Sandwell have what they need from their local council, including confidence in its governance and service delivery.

    I have published the directions and explanatory memorandum associated with this announcement at https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/proposed-intervention-at-sandwell-metropolitan-borough-council.

  • James Cartlidge – 2022 Statement on Personal Injury Reforms

    James Cartlidge – 2022 Statement on Personal Injury Reforms

    The statement made by James Cartlidge, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, in the House of Commons on 22 March 2022.

    My hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Lord Wolfson of Tredegar) has made the following statement:

    I announce today the publication of Part 2 of the Government’s response to the ‘Reforming the soft tissue injury (‘whiplash’) claims process’ consultation paper on www.gov.uk.

    In November 2016, the Government published a consultation that set out proposed measures to tackle the number and cost of road traffic accident related personal injury claims. This consultation covered both legislative proposals for tackling the number and cost of whiplash claims, and a ‘Call for Evidence’ on several related issues.

    The Government response was split into two parts, with Part 1 covering the primary and secondary legislative measures which made up the Whiplash Reform Programme, and Part 2 covering the ‘Call for Evidence’. Part 1 of the response was published in February 2017, but a decision was taken to defer work on Part 2 to enable focus on developing and implementing the significant whiplash reform measures.

    Now that the whiplash reforms have been successfully implemented, it is appropriate to revisit the issue of publishing the deferred Part 2 Government response. The newly published response includes a summary of stakeholder views and specific analysis of the responses received on issues relating to credit hire, rehabilitation, early notification of claims, recovery of disbursements, Insurance Fraud Taskforce actions, and consideration of a Barème scheme. It also details the next steps to be taken in relation to these topics.

    In considering the responses received, we have acknowledged that these were views provided in 2016, and that in some areas, developments in the sector have altered the position considered in the ‘Call for Evidence’. We will continue to monitor several of the areas identified and remain open to working with specific stakeholder groups to develop and implement industry-led solutions to issues in areas such as rehabilitation and credit hire.

    The consultation response paper can be found here:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/reforming-the-soft-tissue-injury-whiplash-claims-process.

  • Paul Scully – 2022 Statement on Postmasters Compensation

    Paul Scully – 2022 Statement on Postmasters Compensation

    The statement made by Paul Scully, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, in the House of Commons on 22 March 2022.

    As the House is aware, the Post Office Horizon scandal, which began over 20 years ago, has had a devastating impact on the lives of many postmasters. The High Court Group Litigation Order (GLO) case against the Post Office brought by 555 postmasters exposed the Horizon IT scandal which had seen many postmasters forced to “repay” to Post Office sums which they had never received. Many were dismissed, prosecuted and even imprisoned.

    The Government have long considered unfair the unequal treatment received by members of the GLO and their non-GLO peers. I am therefore pleased to announce that the Chancellor will make additional funding available to give those in the GLO group compensation similar to that which is available to their non-GLO peers.

    Because they had signed a “full and final” settlement of their court case in 2019, postmasters in the group were ineligible to apply to the Historical Shortfall Scheme (HSS) which their legal action had established. So despite winning the case, the group was left worse off than the other affected postmasters for whom they had blazed the trail. Each postmaster in the group received an average of around £20,000.

    To enable the GLO Group to undertake litigation against Post Office they secured funding from litigation funders Therium. Following extensive work to ensure the full compensation went to the postmasters, I am pleased that Therium have agreed to waive their rights to any claim on this compensation.

    I plan to return to the House in due course to announce our next steps.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2022 Response to the Spring Statement

    Rachel Reeves – 2022 Response to the Spring Statement

    The speech made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, in the House of Commons on 23 March 2022.

    Thank you, Mr Speaker. Today was the day that the Chancellor could have put a windfall tax on oil and gas producers to provide real help for families, but he did not. Today was the day he could have set out a proper plan to support businesses and create good jobs, but he did not. Today was the day that he could properly have scrapped his national insurance hike, but he did not. Labour said it was the wrong tax at the wrong time, and the wrong choice; and today the Chancellor has finally admitted that he got that one wrong. Inflation is at its highest level for 30 years, and rising. Energy prices are at record highs, and people are worried sick. For all his words, it is clear that the Chancellor does not understand the scale of the challenge. He talks about providing security for working families, but his choices are making the cost of living crisis worse, not better.

    The situation following Putin’s criminal assault on Ukraine remains gravely serious. Just one month after the invasion, so much has changed, and there will be repercussions for years to come. The Chancellor has today failed to explain why he chose to sign off on a reduction in our country’s armed forces last October. Will he confirm whether the Government’s target Army size is still being reduced by 10,000 troops? I say this to the Chancellor: Labour will support whatever is needed on defence and security, in order to keep our country safe.

    The tremors following Putin’s aggression will impact Britain, including economically, but the cost of living crisis predates Putin’s attack on Ukraine. In October, inflation was already forecast to be double the Bank of England’s target, yet the Prime Minister said that fears of inflation were unfounded. Today we learn that inflation has reached 6.2%, and it is expected to go higher in the coming months. People are rightly looking to their Government to help them weather this storm. Labour will support sensible measures to ease the pressure, but what the Chancellor has announced today says everything we need to know about his priorities.

    The cost of living crisis is hitting people particularly hard because incomes have been squeezed during the past 12 years of Conservative Governments. Ordinary families, disabled people, and pensioners are facing difficult choices. Mums are skipping meals so that their children do not. Families are struggling to buy new school shoes and uniforms for their children. Older people are hesitating to put the heating on, because they are worried about the cost.

    At the weekend, the Chancellor was asked about fuel poverty, and he did not even know the numbers. That is shameful, because when Martin Lewis predicts that 10 million people could be pushed into fuel poverty, the Chancellor should sit up and listen. We know that pensions and social security will not keep up with inflation, and pensioners and those on social security will be getting a real-terms cut to their income. What analysis has the Chancellor done on the impact of benefits being uprated by less than inflation? How many more children and pensioners will drift into poverty because of the choices of this Government?

    Who does the Chancellor’s prioritise?

    He continues to defend the record profits of the oil and gas producers who themselves admit that they now have “more money than they know what to do with.”

    BP describes this crisis as a ‘cash machine’ for them, but it is British people who are paying out.

    And it is deeply regrettable that the SNP have joined the Tories in wanting to shield oil and gas producers from Labour’s progressive measures.

    When I set out Labour’s plans for a windfall tax in January, we estimated that it would have raised £1.2 billion.

    Now, because of the continued rise in global oil and gas prices, it would today raise over £3 billion.

    That’s money that could be used to help families, pensioners and businesses.

    With a cut to VAT – a real Brexit dividend that would help working families and pensioners across our country.

    And a targeted Warm Homes Discount that would see families and pensioners on the lowest and modest incomes being supported by £600.

    Today the Chancellor comes along after 12 years of failure on energy efficiency and announces a VAT cut on building materials.

    This is wholly inadequate.

    A proper energy efficiency scheme like the one we have set out could cut bills by £400 to people from next year.

    And the silence from the Chancellor on our energy intensive manufacturing industries is appalling.

    At this time of national crisis, people and businesses need a government that is on their side.

    Now the Chancellor spoke of difficult choices. And I agree – there are always choices to be made.

    Like who to tax and who to shield.

    Despite the Chancellor’s reluctant measures, the facts are that he is taking money out of people’s purses and wallets with an increase in national insurance contributions.

    The changes he is making today, begs the question why did he embark on these changes in the first place?

    Despite the warnings from the Labour Party and many, many others.

    Now it’s one thing for the Prime Minister and Chancellor to disagree with each other, but the centre piece of the statement that the Chancellor has delivered today is based on a disagreement with himself.

    And for all his tax rising on the millions in the middle, where is the increased tax contribution from the very wealthiest in society?

    A landlord with a large number of properties won’t be paying a penny more in taxes.

    But their tenants will.

    Someone with significant income from buying and selling stocks and shares won’t be paying any more in tax.

    But those people powering our economy will.

    The Chancellor has made the wrong choices.

    Now, the Chancellor says he can’t help everyone. And that’s absolutely true.

    But who has the Chancellor been helping out?

    Those who have been swindling the taxpayer.

    The Chancellor left open the vaults for widespread waste, crony contracts and a frenzy of fraud.

    It was, as his former Tory Treasury minister put it: “happy days if you are a crook”.

    7 billion items of PPE not usable and now being burnt. Taxpayers’ money literally going up in smoke.

    £3.5 billion worth of contracts awarded to friends, donors and pub landlords.

    It gets worse.

    The Chancellor has been signing cheques to fraudsters – including organised criminals and drug dealers.

    Let’s put the Chancellor’s fraud failure in context.

    He has lost a staggering £11.8 billion of public money to fraud.

    This is twice the amount a previous Conservative government lost on Black Wednesday.

    As a result of – let’s face it – this jaw-dropping incompetence, the Conservatives have been funding crime instead of fighting it.

    And now the Chancellor has the audacity to come to British taxpayers asking them to pay more to fill his black hole.

    But there can be no cover-up to hide political embarrassment.

    Let’s call in the National Crime Agency to investigate.

    We need answers.

    People held to account.

    Because let’s be clear: taxpayers want their money back.

    The truth is Mr Speaker, people can no longer afford the Conservatives.

    Working families can’t. Pensioners can’t. Businesses can’t.

    The weak growth forecasts we’ve seen today should be flashing red on the Chancellor’s desk.

    And the Chancellor, says that ‘the work starts today’.

    Is he serious?

    The Conservatives have been in government now for 12 years, not 12 hours.

    What’s taken them so long?

    Because since his party entered government, the UK has experienced the biggest downgrade in growth of any major economy.

    With the last Labour government economic growth was 2.1% a year.

    12 years of the Conservatives and growth has averaged 1.5%.

    And now we know that growth has been downgraded this year too.

    Growth is essential for funding our public services, keeping taxes under control, and keeping a handle on public finances too.

    That’s why Labour have announced a tough set of fiscal rules to get our debt and deficit down.

    But the truth is that because of this government’s failure to get the economy growing, it’s this Chancellor that has put up taxes on families and businesses a staggering 15 times.

    This Chancellor has raised taxes more in the last two years than any Chancellor in the last 50.

    He says it’s all down to the pandemic.

    But the truth is the Conservatives have become the party of high taxation because they are the party of low growth.

    Now, I understand the Chancellor has a portrait of Nigel Lawson above his desk.

    Well, today we’ve got an energy price crisis.

    Record prices at the pumps.

    Inflation is back.

    And the truth is, he’s not Nigel Lawson, Mr Speaker.

    He’s Ted Heath with an Instagram account.

    Labour would be getting the economy firing on all cylinders. Ensuring we buy, make and sell more in Britain.

    Scrapping business rates and replacing them with a fairer system fit for the 21st Century.

    Something that small businesses and high street businesses are crying out for, and the Chancellor mentioned it not at all in his statement today.

    A Climate Investment Pledge to decarbonise the economy, create good jobs in every part of Britain, and strengthen our energy security too.

    Businesses are seeing unprecedented increases in their costs right now, but all we hear from this Chancellor today is a promise of jam tomorrow rather than the support that is needed now.

    And today’s statement lacks a long term plan for productivity, skills and growth. Where is it Chancellor?

    Mr Speaker I can’t help but feel that in both the Chancellor’s recent Mais Lecture and in his statement today, we are presented with increasingly incredible claims.

    Perhaps the Chancellor has been taking inspiration from the characters in Alice in Wonderland. Or should I say – ‘Alice in Sunakland’.

    Because nothing here is quite as it seems either.

    It’s the sort of place where a Chancellor celebrates giving people £200 to help with spiralling energy bills,

    before explaining that he needs it all back.

    In Sunakland, the Chancellor proclaims “I believe in lower taxes.” While at the same time hiking Alice’s National Insurance contributions.

    Alice asks the Chancellor: when did ‘lower’ taxes mean ‘higher’ taxes? Has ‘down’ really become the new ‘up’?

    The Chancellor follows Humpty Dumpty’s advice and says “when I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.”

    Alice knows that under the Conservatives, taxes are at their highest level in decades – as a result of the policies of this very same Chancellor!

    In fact this Chancellor was the only G7 Finance Minister to raise taxes on working people during this crucial year of recovery.

    Curiouser and curiouser.

    As Alice climbs out of the rabbit hole to leave Sunakland, she recalls the words of the White Rabbit, and concludes that perhaps the Chancellor’s “reality is just different from yours.”

    The actual reality, Mr Speaker, is that this Chancellor’s failure to back a windfall tax and his stubborn desire to pursue a National Insurance tax rise are the wrong choices.

    In eight days’ time, people’s energy bills will be rising by 54%.

    Two weeks today the Chancellor’s latest tax hike will start hitting working people and their employers.

    His National Insurance tax rise was a bad idea last September, and he’s admitted it’s an even worse one today.

    The Chancellor is making an historic mistake.

    Today was the day to scrap the tax rise on jobs.

    Today was the day to bring forward a windfall tax.

    Today was the day for the Chancellor to set out a plan to support British businesses.

    But on the basis of the statement today – and the misguided choices of this Chancellor – families and businesses will from now on endure significant hardship as a result.

    The Chancellor has failed to appreciate the scale of the challenge that we face.

    And he is yet again making the wrong choices for our country.