Tag: Sharon Hodgson

  • Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Sharon Hodgson on 2016-04-12.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how much each local authority in England has received from the Adoption Support Fund since its creation.

    Edward Timpson

    The table below shows how much each local authority in England has received from the Adoption Support Fund since its creation:

    LA

    ASF Total Spend to Date (£)

    Barking and Dagenham

    44,196.20

    Barnet

    166,813.26

    Barnsley

    29,235.00

    Bath and North East Somerset

    40,261.47

    Bedford

    81,340.50

    Bexley

    70,451.00

    Birmingham

    160,325.87

    Blackburn with Darwen

    81,696.80

    Blackpool

    57,601.98

    Bolton

    55,920.00

    Bournemouth

    28,727.76

    Bracknell Forest

    21,444.10

    Bradford

    309,173.00

    Brent (prev Herts)

    43,973.00

    Brighton and Hove

    123,200.90

    Bristol

    199,771.70

    Bromley

    12,314.00

    Buckinghamshire

    205,907.10

    Bury

    70,376.30

    Calderdale

    102,775.50

    Cambridgeshire

    251,323.18

    Camden

    93,988.70

    Central Bedfordshire

    88,479.91

    Cheshire East

    184,035.96

    Cheshire West and Chester

    151,425.46

    City of London

    Cornwall

    260,491.05

    Coventry

    66,094.00

    Croydon

    37,369.65

    Cumbria

    362,150.10

    Darlington

    25,810.00

    Derby

    58,166.80

    Derbyshire

    301,734.86

    Devon

    458,850.32

    Doncaster

    182,252.82

    Dorset

    19,004.00

    Dudley

    77,882.90

    Durham

    145,119.27

    Ealing (prev Herts)

    387,675.71

    East Riding of Yorkshire

    147,132.67

    East Sussex

    374,962.27

    Enfield

    95,085.44

    Essex

    276,241.07

    Gateshead

    8,984.00

    Gloucestershire

    1,213,955.86

    Greenwich

    91,407.75

    Hackney

    165,218.00

    Halton

    32,759.50

    Hammersmith and Fulham

    35,313.56

    Hampshire

    244,384.30

    Haringey

    203,142.10

    Harrow (prev Herts)

    57,459.50

    Hartlepool

    17,631.96

    Havering

    1,170.00

    Herefordshire

    58,998.20

    Hertfordshire

    293,849.02

    Hillingdon (prev Herts)

    8,301.84

    Hounslow (prev Herts)

    5,640.25

    Hull

    116,738.65

    Isle of Wight

    36,944.00

    Isles of Scilly

    Islington

    78,032.34

    Kensington and Chelsea

    18,535.01

    Kent

    367,991.20

    Kingston

    56,034.14

    Kirklees

    294,390.30

    Knowsley

    30,508.70

    Lambeth

    75,001.00

    Lancashire

    440,242.16

    Leeds

    199,474.72

    Leicester

    105,823.75

    Leicestershire

    189,426.69

    Lewisham

    139,396.50

    Lincolnshire

    109,876.35

    Liverpool

    50,392.10

    Luton

    19,413.60

    Manchester

    263,742.75

    Medway

    113,923.40

    Merton

    121,835.40

    Middlesbrough

    24,273.84

    Milton Keynes

    129,924.42

    Newcastle upon Tyne

    132,122.00

    Newham

    29,051.00

    Norfolk

    472,360.80

    North East Lincolnshire

    169,037.20

    North Lincolnshire

    3,603.50

    North Somerset

    82,103.50

    North Tyneside

    61,443.20

    North Yorkshire

    612,921.58

    Northamptonshire

    209,503.74

    Northumberland

    28,498.90

    Nottingham

    172,346.00

    Nottinghamshire

    97,291.97

    Oldham

    20,030.50

    Oxfordshire

    34,818.65

    Peterborough

    51,391.02

    Plymouth

    221,433.97

    Poole

    13,321.38

    Portsmouth

    77,709.42

    Reading

    26,652.00

    Redbridge

    54,632.80

    Redcar and Cleveland

    16,840.00

    Richmond

    320,954.40

    Rochdale

    61,243.50

    Rotherham

    201,774.40

    Rutland

    Salford

    89,485.40

    Sandwell

    26,059.00

    Sefton

    29,383.92

    Sheffield

    300,284.78

    Shropshire

    92,774.00

    Slough

    16,578.00

    Solihull

    247,751.00

    Somerset

    144,238.40

    South Gloucestershire

    90,356.73

    South Tyneside

    86,296.60

    Southampton

    42,207.80

    Southend-on-Sea

    69,489.25

    Southwark

    264,437.46

    St. Helens

    17,909.80

    Staffordshire

    248,092.20

    Stockport

    37,947.87

    Stockton-on-Tees

    42,182.60

    Stoke-on-Trent

    131,143.67

    Suffolk

    390,301.42

    Sunderland

    165,319.14

    Surrey

    302,995.50

    Sutton

    52,715.00

    Swindon

    58,167.50

    Tameside

    127,575.59

    Telford and Wrekin

    Thurrock

    21,901.60

    Torbay

    51,134.40

    Tower Hamlets

    16,004.00

    Trafford

    59,046.76

    Wakefield

    260,394.68

    Walsall

    30,730.00

    Waltham Forest

    5,552.00

    Wandsworth

    273,035.42

    Warrington

    63,546.60

    Warwickshire

    344,023.10

    West Berkshire

    40,060.00

    West Sussex

    400,439.03

    Westminster

    38,383.88

    Wigan

    30,686.85

    Wiltshire

    69,687.65

    Windsor and Maidenhead

    59,604.50

    Wirral

    8,334.40

    Wokingham

    51,360.90

    Wolverhampton

    63,073.60

    Worcestershire

    201,224.60

    York

    188,133.45

    TOTAL

    19,892,053.92

    * Shropshire provides Telford and Wrekin’s Adoption Service

    * Leicestershire County Council provides Rutland’s Adoption Service

    * Cornwall make applications on behalf of the Isles of Scilly

    * City of London have had no adoptions from care during the relevant period.

  • Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Sharon Hodgson on 2016-06-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, when he plans to respond to the Independent review of consumer protection measures concerning online secondary ticketing facilities, published on 26 May 2016; and if he will present his response in a format similar to that of a government response to a select committee report.

    Nick Boles

    The Government will publish its response to Professor Waterson’s independent review in due course.

  • Sharon Hodgson – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport

    Sharon Hodgson – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Sharon Hodgson on 2015-11-13.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what representations his Department has received on including art and design within the curriculum for STEM subjects.

    Mr Edward Vaizey

    The Department works closely with the Department for Education and Arts Council England to increase access to music and cultural education for every child. This Government has ensured that art and design remain core subjects that must be taught in Key Stages 1-3 as part of the National Curriculum.

  • Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Attorney General

    Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Attorney General

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Sharon Hodgson on 2016-01-11.

    To ask the Attorney General, what recent steps the Crown Prosecution Service has taken to improve the conviction rate for rape and domestic violence.

    Robert Buckland

    I refer the Hon. Member to the answer I gave to the oral question from the Hon. Member for Delyn earlier today.

  • Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Sharon Hodgson on 2016-02-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 28 January 2016 to Question 23325, how much specific additional funding her Department has provided to Ofsted and the Care Quality Commission to support their inspection of the effectiveness of local areas in fulfilling their new special educational needs and disabilities duties.

    Edward Timpson

    Local area inspections will begin in May 2016 and will be completed over the next five years. For this financial year of 2015-16, the Department has allocated £349,087 of funding to Ofsted and the Care Quality Commission to meet the costs of developing this new type of inspection. We intend to provide Ofsted with funding to support this activity over the next five years.

    The data we will draw on to determine whether the special educational needs and disabilities provisions of the Children and Families Act have improved outcomes for children with special educational needs or a disability will include data on outcomes achieved by disabled children.

  • Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Sharon Hodgson on 2016-04-18.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking to assess the potential benefits of applying school food standards to all schools as part of the Government’s childhood obesity strategy.

    Mr Sam Gyimah

    Tackling obesity, particularly in children, is one of our major priorities. We will be launching our cross-government Childhood Obesity Strategy in the summer. It will look at everything that contributes to a child becoming overweight and obese. It will also set out what more can be done by all.

    The School Food Standards apply to all local authority maintained schools and to academies that opened prior to 2010 and from June 2014 onwards.

    1,420 academies have voluntarily registered to follow the standards, including some of the largest Multi-Academy Trusts. Many academy caterers also hold the Food for Life Catering Mark, which also guarantees compliance with the School Food Standards.

  • Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Sharon Hodgson on 2016-06-10.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether her Department plans to adjust the pupil premium funding for schools to take account of the additional responsibilities proposed in the Children and Social Work Bill in its current form.

    Mr Sam Gyimah

    The Children and Social Work Bill proposes a new duty on schools to appoint a designated teacher to promote the educational achievement of previously looked after children.

    The pupil premium plus is additional funding for schools to support the educational needs of looked-after children and those who were previously looked after but who have left care through an adoption, Special Guardianship or Child Arrangements Order. The Spending Review confirmed that the pupil premium will be protected at current rates over the course of this Parliament. This protection applies to the pupil premium plus, which will continue at £1,900 per pupil.

    Pupil premium plus funding for pupils who were previously looked after is allocated directly to schools and it is for the head teacher to decide how best to use it to support the needs of these pupils.

  • Sharon Hodgson – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Sharon Hodgson – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Sharon Hodgson on 2015-11-13.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what plans her Department has to take steps to promote the STEAM agenda in schools to support the development of skills for careers in creative digital sectors.

    Nick Gibb

    Both the arts and STEM subjects are important in developing the skills people need for the global economy, including the creative digital economy.

    The national curriculum sets the expectation that pupils study the arts subjects in Key Stages 1 to 3 and the arts are one of four "entitlement areas” at Key Stage 4. Provisional figures show that since 2012, the percentage of pupils for all schools with at least one GCSE entry in an arts subject has increased from 44.4% to 48.7% in 2015.[1] We are reforming all GCSEs and A levels, including STEM and arts subjects, to make them robust and rigorous; to match the best education systems in the world; and to keep pace with universities’ and employers’ demands.

    It is important that pupils are given the information and advice to choose a combination of subjects that will open doors for their future. The Careers & Enterprise Company (CEC) is an employer-led, independent organisation strengthening links between schools, colleges, employers and careers and enterprise organisations, including in the digital and technological sectors, to inspire young people and prepare them for the world of work.

    [1] https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/473178/EBacc_and_non-EBacc_subject_entries_and_achievement.pdf

  • Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Sharon Hodgson on 2016-01-20.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether her Department plans to publish A-Level data for each type of special educational need.

    Edward Timpson

    Information regarding the attainment of students with special educational needs (SEN) in England is broken down by type of SEN and published in the “Phonics screening check and key stage 1 assessment: England 2015”[1], “National curriculum assessments at key stage 2: 2015”[2] and “GCSE and equivalent results in England: 2015”[3] statistical first releases.

    A wider summary of available SEN information is provided in “Special educational needs – an analysis and summary of data sources”[4]

    Information on the average points score of students with a hearing impairment or the number that achieve three A* to A grades or better at A level is not held by the Department. The Department also does not hold information on the number of students with a hearing impairment who have not achieved a level 2 qualification in English by the age of 19.

    Currently, there are no plans for the Department to publish A-level data split by type of special educational need or to collect additional data on the outcomes achieved by students who have a disability but not an identified special educational need, although this is reviewed every year as part of the collection process.

    [1] Phonics and KS1 assessments for 2014/15: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/phonics-screening-check-and-key-stage-1-assessments-england-2015

    [2] KS2 for 2014/15: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/national-curriculum-assessments-at-key-stage-2-2015-revised

    [3] KS4 for 2014/15: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/revised-gcse-and-equivalent-results-in-england-2014-to-2015

    [4] https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/472575/Special_educational_needs-_an_analysis_and_summary_of_data_sources.pdf

  • Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Sharon Hodgson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Sharon Hodgson on 2016-02-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 28 January 2016 to Question 23325, whether she has carried out a review since 2014 of whether local authorities are meeting statutory requirements for the content of Education, Health and Care plans.

    Edward Timpson

    Since September 2014, Education, Health and Care (EHC) plans have been regularly monitored and reviewed. This is part of the Department’s ongoing work to support and challenge local authorities’ implementation of the reforms to the Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) system. The Department also gathers information about EHC plans from parents and young people, through termly surveys of Parent Carer Forums, correspondence, and regular dialogue with parents’ and young people’s groups.

    Where individual EHC plans are considered not to be fully compliant, advice on how to improve them has been provided directly to the local authorities concerned by the Department’s team of SEND advisors. Thus far, our SEND advisors have noted issues around non-compliance for 29 local authorities, all of which were subsequently given advice about improving their EHC plans in order to fulfil statutory requirements

    Our advisors are currently delivering a number of workshops for local authorities on how to write high quality, legally compliant EHC plans, and to share good practice. The training resources from these workshops will be published shortly.

    There are a number of places where local authorities can find guidance about EHC plans. This includes the statutory SEND Code of Practice, which clearly sets out what must be included in a plan, and provides detailed guidance on the process that must be followed to produce one. There are also examples of good quality EHC plans produced by the SEND Pathfinder local authorities.

    The review of EHC plans carried out in 2014 looked specifically at EHC plan templates.