Tag: Kemi Badenoch

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Speech on the Middle East

    Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Speech on the Middle East

    The speech made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, in the House of Commons on 13 April 2026.

    I thank the Prime Minister for advance sight of his statement, and I would like to pay tribute to our brave servicemen and women serving in the middle east right now.

    The Prime Minister is right that Britain did not start this war, but whether we like it or not, we are impacted by it, and this is likely to get worse. The cost of borrowing has jumped, and petrol prices are climbing. Inflation is rising, and living standards are falling. It is time to take decisive action in our national interest. Britain must focus on what is in our power to protect British citizens today. First, we must rapidly solve the energy crisis that this war has caused in our country. Secondly, we must make sure that Britain is ready to defend herself in this new age.

    A nuclear-armed Iran is an existential threat to the UK. We should be in no doubt whose side we are on in this war: our allies in the middle east and the United States. I welcome the Prime Minister meeting some of those allies, and I welcome his support for diplomatic efforts and military planning to restore freedom of navigation in the region, but we will need to go further than just talking. He says that Britain stands ready to play our part, but we can all see that we were not ready for this situation.

    Here is what we need to do now. First, we must take rapid action to increase our energy security and keep bills down, not just until July but longer than that—permanently. Britain is particularly vulnerable to energy price shocks because we are killing domestic oil and gas production in the North sea. Labour’s policy of more expensive energy and de-industrialisation at this time of crisis is dangerous and irresponsible. It is also harming the defence industry. We must start drilling our own oil and gas in the North sea, grant licences for drilling in the Jackdaw and Rosebank fields, and restore British production before it is too late. The Prime Minister says that this will not impact international prices, but this is about more than international prices. This is about the domestic supply, especially of gas, all of which is used in this country. Supply matters.

    Furthermore, the Government must cancel the proposed rise in fuel duty. Hiking taxes on motorists for the first time in 15 years, while prices are surging, is a disgraceful decision. If Britain is to be a stronger country, it needs a stronger economy—not one that is being hammered by the highest energy prices in the developed world. Will the Prime Minister grant those oil and gas licences and scrap the rise in fuel duty? I know that he will say that it is the Energy Secretary’s job to do that, but the Energy Secretary is not the Prime Minister. He is, so he can instruct the Energy Secretary to grant those licences.

    Secondly, to be ready, Britain must be able to defend herself, and that means we must be ready for these situations before they happen. France and Greece—[Interruption.] I do not know why Labour Members are laughing. I am surprised, because last time I checked, France and Greece sent ships to protect our bases in Cyprus while our destroyer was stuck in Portsmouth. It was a national embarrassment—on Labour’s shoulders—and it should never happen again.

    We need no further evidence that we are living in a more dangerous world than a decade ago. I am sure Labour MPs will try to think of a way to make this my fault. [Interruption.] Yes, I know, it is preposterous, the historical illiteracy on the Labour Benches, but let me remind them that Governments of all colours—including those guys on the Liberal Democrat Benches—spent the peace dividend from 1989, when the Berlin wall fell, until the Ukraine war. When that war came, the Conservative Government responded rapidly and unequivocally. We did not have anything stuck in Portsmouth when Ukraine was invaded. We trained tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers and equipped them with our missiles.

    We increased defence spending every year after the Ukraine war started, but the world has since become even more dangerous. Every serious person, especially in the military, agrees that Britain must now find a way to spend 3% of GDP on defence by the end of this Parliament. After the election, many of the plans for spending were paused for Labour’s strategic defence review. Nine months after its publication, there is still no defence investment plan that explains how we will fund this. The defence readiness Bill is also nowhere to be seen. The question is not whether we need to increase defence spending, but what tough choices we must make to do so. That is what is missing from the Government’s plan. They have a plan for welfare spending until 2031, but no plans for defence spending.

    I say to the Prime Minister: let us put party interests aside—[Interruption.] I am glad that Labour MPs are laughing. I want the public to hear Labour MPs laughing when we say, “Let’s put party interests aside,” so please, keep laughing—go on. I say to the Prime Minister: let us find the money to rearm, let us identify the spending cuts, and if we reach agreement on a joint plan, we can all support those measures in Parliament. Conservatives have already found savings to fund more than £20 billion extra in defence spending. I am willing to work with him to go further.

    I am sure the Prime Minister, in his response, will be tempted to misrepresent my position and pretend that I demanded he join in the initial strikes. [Interruption.] Yes—Labour MPs cannot resist the temptation, but he and I both know that is not true, so let us get serious. It is time for us to act decisively in our national interest. Let us show our allies what we bring to the table. Let us show our enemies that we are able and ready to defend ourselves. That requires a defence investment plan, so when exactly will that plan be published, and what action is the Prime Minister taking to find the money to pay for it?

    The Prime Minister

    I notice that the right hon. Lady’s opening sentence has changed. She used to say, “We didn’t start the war, but like it or not, we’re in it, and we should be in it.” That was her position. Now she says—well, they cannot make their mind up. They supported the war without thinking through the consequences, and now they are pretending they did not support the war and were against it all along. She challenged my position, and she did the mother of all U-turns on the most important decision the Leader of the Opposition ever has to take.

    I thank the right hon. Lady for her support for the planning that we are doing with other countries. It is important. It has a number of components: the political and diplomatic component; the logistics of getting the vessels through, on which we are working with the sector; and, of course, the military component. We have been working on that for two or three weeks, and now, with President Macron, we are bringing together the summit later this week.

    Yes, we all want to get energy bills down, and oil and gas will be part of the mix for many years, but it is because we are on the international market that our bills have gone up. That is the problem. The strait of Hormuz is a choke point for oil and gas getting to the international market. That has pushed the price up, and that is being reflected in every household. That is why the only way to take control of our energy bills is to go faster on energy independence.

    The Leader of the Opposition used to make that argument. In 2022 she said that

    “it’s investment in nuclear and renewables that will reduce our dependence on fossil fuels”

    and keep costs down. She changes her mind on everything. That was her argument; now, just like she pretends she was not in favour of getting involved in the war, she pretends she was not in favour of keeping costs down.

    The Leader of the Opposition says that we must be ready. That is coming from a party that hollowed out our armed services. On the Conservatives’ watch, frigates and destroyers were reduced by 25%. Minehunting ships were reduced by 50% on their watch. Yet she lectures us about being ready, having hollowed out our armed forces and hollowed out our capabilities. We are investing £300 million more in shipbuilding, and we have 13 ships on order. That is the difference between the two parties. I hope that she, and they, will forgive me, but after 14 years of their breaking everything under their watch, I am going to resist the offer of joint planning from the party that crashed the economy, hollowed out our armed forces and trashed our public services. Thanks, but no thanks.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Comments on Illegal Traveller Sites

    Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Comments on Illegal Traveller Sites

    The comments made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, on 7 April 2026.

    Too many towns and villages have had to accept criminality in their communities because each attempt to deal with illegal traveller sites has fallen foul of the ECHR.

    The Conservatives will take back our streets and green spaces, leave the ECHR, and get Britain working again.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Statement Following Disorder in Clapham

    Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Statement Following Disorder in Clapham

    The statement made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, on 1 April 2026.

    Children smashing up shops in broad daylight, stealing and even filming themselves doing it as if it were a game, is a much bigger problem than is being recognised. This is a total collapse of consequences.

    To those making snide comments about race or black kids – you do not see scenes like this in Lagos or Nairobi. Not because the children there are different, but because actions have consequences. There are clear boundaries. Parents, communities, and the authorities do not wring their hands or look the other way.

    Here, we have created a culture where too many young people believe they can do what they like and nothing will happen. That is the problem.

    And we should be honest about where that leads. If a child loots a shop today, films it for social media, and faces no real consequence, they are going to do much worse tomorrow.

    This is why under my leadership Conservatives are focusing on ENFORCEMENT, not just making more and more rules.

    Our Take Back Our Streets Campaign is about getting 10,000 more police officers, immediate justice and immediate punishment. But let’s be honest, this is not just a policing issue. It is a failure of authority at every level.

    Parents need to know where their children are and what they are doing. Discipline should start at home, not in a courtroom.

    We have also weakened the system around them. Deterrence is the backbone of criminal justice. Labour have changed the law so anyone receiving a sentence under 12 months will automatically walk free, instead receiving a suspended sentence. When people believe offences like this will not lead to meaningful punishment, we should not be surprised when more of it happens. You get more of what you tolerate.

    It’s not like we haven’t been here before. In 2011, when riots spread, the Conservative response was swift and visible. People saw consequences. And behaviour rapidly changed. That is what is missing now.

    This all comes down to fairness. Law-abiding people should not feel like fools while gangs smash and grab without consequence. The sad truth is the communities most damaged by this behaviour are often the very ones these young people come from.

    Only one approach will fix this: clear rules, real consequences, and the confidence to enforce them.

    It’s time to Take Back Our Streets and bring back a culture of enforcement.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Interview with Laura Kuenssberg

    Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Interview with Laura Kuenssberg

    The text of the interview with Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Conservative Party, on 29 March 2026.

    Laura Kuenssberg: Well, Kemi Badenoch, as promised, Leader of the Opposition is here. Welcome to the studio. Now, we’ve been talking about energy with the Energy Secretary, the Conservatives are saying you should open up North Sea exploration. But how much would that actually save consumers? Because that’s what everyone’s worried about.

    Kemi Badenoch: So, what we want to see is the licences for Jackdaw and Rosebank lifted so that they can start drilling…

    Laura Kuenssberg: Fields off the North Sea.

    Kemi Badenoch: …there’s the pipeline ready there. Overall, the figures that we would have, in terms of what we would get from tax, takes about £25bn over ten years.

    Laura Kuenssberg: But what does that mean for consumers?

    Kemi Badenoch: £2.5bn could be spent on lowering household bills. There are various figures, up to £80.00. This is just one thing that you could do but also the profits and the taxes which are made from the drilling can be used to subsidise bills. Drilling is part of – drilling the North Sea is something that we need to do for our energy security, financial security as well. That’s how you get national security.

    Laura Kuenssberg: But your Shadow Energy Secretary, Claire Coutinho, who was with us a couple of weeks ago, she said on the record it wouldn’t necessarily save very much money. She said that when she was in government.

    Kemi Badenoch: Directly, directly but indirectly, yes, it does because you can use the money from there to subsidise. But more importantly jobs are disappearing, we are losing about 1,000 jobs a month in the North Sea oil and gas industry. This is very bad for Scotland in particular. We’re not getting the tax revenue. You know, the government is not sloshing around with money, it’s spending loads on benefits. Let’s use the oil and gas that we have.

    Laura Kuenssberg: But I just want to stick on that point because you’re trying to make a big deal of this in political campaigning at the moment. But you’ve just said there that it might not help people directly with their bills but you’re presenting this as a solution to people’s fears about their bills.

    Kemi Badenoch: It’s because it requires the governments to make the link. It requires the government. The drilling isn’t going to go directly onto people’s bills, no. But if we can make sure that we stop importing from Norway. 40 per cent of our imports are coming from Norway who are drilling in the same basin. Why are we importing gas that is being drilled in that basin when we won’t drill our own? Why is it – this is a wider thing, it goes beyond bills. We want to bring bills down. We’ve got a cheap power plan for that, mostly by scrapping the silly taxes that Ed Miliband has put on, scrapping the Carbon Tax. We can do that, do something to bring bills down.

    But drilling in the North Sea is a bigger issue. This is about our energy security. Yes, let’s have renewables, yes, let’s have nuclear, but just saying no to North Sea oil and gas, something that is already there when we are not ready for a full transition, is a bad decision.

    Laura Kuenssberg: But it’s important to be clear to people about what you’re saying because you’re making a big deal of this in a campaigning moment. We’re approaching local elections, you’re implying that this is what would help people with their bills soon.

    Kemi Badenoch: It can, yes, it can.

    Laura Kuenssberg: But your colleague said it wouldn’t make a big difference but you—

    Kemi Badenoch: She said that in government in a totally context. So, let’s not… let’s not mix the two things up. Several years ago.

    Laura Kuenssberg: Okay, but you said it would help, you’ve said it might help indirectly. So, let’s just be clear about that because your political opponents say you’re misleading people by…

    Kemi Badenoch: No, not, not at all.

    Laura Kuenssberg: … if you’re going to say drill baby drill is a solution.

    Kemi Badenoch: We need to drill – we need to drill our oil and gas. We can scrap – we can scrap taxes on energy bills today. We don’t need to have them on. Many people don’t know how much of their energy bills are government taxes. We can drill in the North Sea and use the money from that to supplement, to replace. It is all related. Energy policy needs to be linked. No, I’m not saying that once you drill oil and gas in the North Sea it’s going to go straight onto your bills. No-one has said that but it is all related. And pretending that is not related is very dishonest from a government that has a terrible energy policy.

    Laura Kuenssberg: And if you take what you called ‘silly taxes’ off bills, and scrapped some of the levies, where do you get the money from to do things that energy experts tell you are absolutely vital like updating the National Grid, supporting renewables businesses? Some of those renewables subsidies have already gone from bills. But where do you get that money from if it doesn’t go on energy bills?

    Kemi Badenoch: Well, maybe we can get it from the taxes that we get from the North Sea oil and gas industry that we’re destroying. We need to make sure that we are thinking things through. Right now, what we are seeing is that the Net Zero plans are not working, we’re not getting a good transition to renewables, and we’re stopping the oil and gas drilling. So, we’re getting the worst of both worlds. What I’m saying is let’s make sure we use gas in particular, which is a transition fuel, to actually get to where we need to go.

    Laura Kuenssberg: In terms then of what might happen though, in this autumn, because this is what people are worried about. Important to remember bills in the next quarter are going to come down but what many experts are predicting is that they’re going to come up in the autumn.

    Kemi Badenoch: Yes.

    Laura Kuenssberg: The government said that they would support people who were the least well off, who needed help most. Who would you say should have support with their energy bill?

    Kemi Badenoch: So, what I’m very concerned about is that the government is prioritising benefits, benefits, benefits constantly. Right now, what I want to see is them taking the burden off everybody. That’s why I’m very focused on these taxes on bills because they help everyone.

    Laura Kuenssberg: No, but who would you support? That’s our question here. Who would you support? So, Liz Truss paid everybody’s energy bill when there was the last energy shock around the war in Ukraine, costing tens of billions to the taxpayer. Who would get support if you were in charge?

    Kemi Badenoch: So, I’m rejecting the premise of the question. I want to help everybody but we don’t have to do it with government intervention. This money is not in Keir Starmer’s pocket, it’s taxpayers’ money. So, when we say who would you support? We’re taking money from taxpayers to give to other people. And what I have said—

    Laura Kuenssberg: So, would nobody get support then with their energy bills?

    Kemi Badenoch: No, that’s not what I’ve said. I’ve said support in a different way.

    Laura Kuenssberg: So, what does that mean?

    Kemi Badenoch: Take the taxes off the bills. It’s our cheap power plan, take the taxes off the bills, those green taxes. That is a much easier way to do it. Drill in the North Sea and then you get taxes that way. It’s much more coherent.

    Laura Kuenssberg: But this is an important question. So, you can reject the premise of the question if you want…

    Kemi Badenoch: Yes.

    Laura Kuenssberg: … but I can hear people screaming at their TV, saying who would get help if there’s an energy spike and perhaps the answer is no one?

    Kemi Badenoch: And I… and I’m saying – no, I literally said we can help everybody, just not in this way.

    Laura Kuenssberg: So, are you—

    Kemi Badenoch: We need to stop pretending that there’s a big pile of cash that Keir Starmer has, which he’s just going to use to help people. He is taxing other people in order to provide that help. I am talking to businesses day in, day out, who are saying we’re sacking people, we’re closing down, because we cannot afford this. So, let’s stop pretending that Keir Starmer is a huge philanthropist who’s just trying to help people. What he is doing is taxing people to pay benefits.

    Laura Kuenssberg: That’s been—

    Kemi Badenoch: That has been this government’s strategy from the get-go…

    Laura Kuenssberg: But I want to—

    Kemi Badenoch: … and I’m saying lower taxes.

    Laura Kuenssberg: What I want to be very clear, though, is if there is a big spike in people’s energy bills, are you ruling out a direct—

    Kemi Badenoch: So, I’m not ruling out, I’m not ruling out anything. What I’m saying is let’s start off with taking the taxes. We do what we need to in government. I think government needs to do what it needs to. But let’s not pretend that these huge bailouts don’t come with a cost. We had, as a Conservative government, the biggest bailout during Covid. We paid people to stay at home and when it was happening everyone said thank you. But immediately afterwards, when the shock came, interest rates spiked, everyone forgot about that. I’m saying governments need to start by taking taxes down first before looking for bailouts which are going to cost taxpayers.

    Laura Kuenssberg: It’s a very clear philosophical divide between you and Keir Starmer but I’m just trying to press you. And maybe the answer is that you don’t know yet, you want to wait and see. But are you saying that you would never consider a direct payment to people to help with their energy bills?

    Kemi Badenoch: No, I’m not, I’m not saying that at all. What I don’t want to do is talk about the hypothetical and speculative things and set hares running when actually we don’t know what the situation is. We have, as Conservatives, done bailouts before, as you saw during Covid, the biggest bailout. Many people now see what the effects of that are. What I’m saying is that bailouts have a cost.

    Start off by reducing the taxes, drill in the North Sea, it’s good for our energy security, our financial security, our national security. Listening to Bridget sitting there saying we need to do everything, except the North Sea because of their ideological issues with it. This is all to do with Ed Miliband, he started this. He started these policies back when he was first energy secretary. He is the one running the government according to Keir Starmer. I asked him on Wednesday, he said he couldn’t make a decision because of Ed Miliband. I think that’s quite ridiculous.

    Laura Kuenssberg: Well, the Conservatives also changed their positions on energy quite a lot in recent years too. And just, we are—

    Kemi Badenoch: Well I’ve changed, I’ve changed our policy. We are under new leadership and I’m being very specific. We need to do what is right for the country today.

    Laura Kuenssberg: In terms of your leadership, what does a good result look for you like in the local elections in a few weeks’ time, and the national elections in Scotland and Wales?

    Kemi Badenoch: So, I’ve been very clear that we’ve got to fight for every seat. The era of two-party politics has turned into an era of multi-party politics. Things are different and we only just left office 18 months ago. It’s going to be very tough, and a challenge, but Conservatives are coming back. People are liking—

    Laura Kuenssberg: Are you going to gain seats?

    Kemi Badenoch: People are liking the messages. I’m sure that we will. People are liking the messages that they are hearing from us, abolishing stamp duty, getting rid of business rates for most of the high street.

    Laura Kuenssberg: Not according to their polls. I mean your personal ratings have improved a bit since – in the last couple of months. But according to the polls, and there they are as if by magic, you were 26 per cent when you took over, now you’re down at 17 per cent. The public doesn’t agree with you.

    Kemi Badenoch: Well, actually, as I said the last time you asked me this question on your show, sometimes when you have a long term strategy, in the short term you do face difficulties. But I’m not going to be dissuaded from doing the right thing. There is only one party that is actually making proper plans, not just announcing random things, and that’s the Conservative Party. Serious plans and people are – when the general election comes, people are going to want to know what is actually going to happen. And they’ll be looking to the Conservative Party because we’re the only credible alternative to Labour.

    Laura Kuenssberg: Okay, well we will see. Kemi Badenoch, thanks very much indeed for coming in to see us today.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Speech on the Prime Minister’s Visit to China and Japan

    Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Speech on the Prime Minister’s Visit to China and Japan

    The speech made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, in the House of Commons on 2 February 2026.

    I thank the Prime Minister for advance sight of his statement, but it is utterly reprehensible that he began it by accusing the previous Government of isolationism—the same Conservative Government who—[Interruption.] The Business and Trade Secretary is laughing, but let me tell him this. That same Conservative Government led the world in our response to the invasion of Ukraine and signed the vital strategic alliance of AUKUS—[Interruption.] The Business Secretary asks how many free trade agreements we did. We signed Britain’s biggest post-Brexit trade deal—the CPTPP—bringing us closer to the 11 Indo-Pacific nations, including Japan. I know about that deal because I signed it myself.

    I welcome the Prime Minister’s efforts to collaborate more with our long-standing ally Japan, but let me turn to China. Of course Britain should engage with China. Even though the Chancellor was not allowed to go, even though it is an authoritarian state that seeks to undermine our interest, even though it spies on us—sometimes within the walls of this building—and even though it funds regimes around the world that are hostile to our country, China is a fact of life, a global power and an economic reality. Let me be clear: it is not the Prime Minister engaging with China that we take issue with. What we are criticising is his supine and short-termist approach.

    I am sure that the Prime Minister means well, but his negotiating tactic has always been to give everything away in the hope that people will be nice to him in return. Before the Prime Minister had even got on the plane, he had already shown that he would do anything to demonstrate his good relationship with China. China, however, uses every interaction to improve its own position. The Prime Minister looked like he enjoyed his trip—in fact, it looked like a dream come true for a man who was virtually a communist most of his life.

    Apart from the Labubu doll in his suitcase—which I hope he has checked for bugs—the Prime Minister has come back with next to nothing. We all want cheaper tariffs for Scotch whisky, but if the Prime Minister had bothered to speak to the whisky industry, as I did two weeks ago, he would know that what it really needs is cheaper energy and lower taxes. The Prime Minister also got us visa-free travel, but China already offers that to other countries. It is not big enough for a prime ministerial visit.

    The worst thing was the Prime Minister claiming a glorious triumph with the lifting of sanctions on four Conservative MPs, as if he had done us a favour. Let me tell him this: those MPs were sanctioned because they stood up to China. They stood up against human rights abuses, and they stood up against a country that is spying on our MPs in a way that the Prime Minister would not dare to do. Those Members do not want to go to China. The Chinese know that. They know that they are giving him something that costs absolutely nothing. Why can the British Prime Minister not see that?

    I say to you, Mr Speaker, and to the whole House that, like with the Chagos islands, the Prime Minister has been played. China is about to build an enormous spy hub in the centre of London—a ransom he had to pay before he could even get on the plane. I would never allow Britain to be held over a barrel like that. Yet again, the Prime Minister has negotiated our country into a weaker position in the world. His entire economic policy is to tax businesses more, regulate them harder and make energy so expensive that we deindustrialise, and then we can import Chinese wind turbines, solar panels and batteries for electric vehicles—all manufactured in a country that builds a coal-fired power station every other week. Did he speak to the Chinese about that?

    What did the Prime Minister’s trip achieve for Jimmy Lai? Nothing. Did China promise to stop fuelling Putin’s war machine in Ukraine? It does not sound like it. What did this trip achieve for the Uyghurs who are being enslaved? Absolutely nothing. Has China agreed to stop its relentless cyber-attacks? We all know the answer to that. The reality is that China showed its strength, and Britain was pushed around, literally. It is no wonder that President Xi praised the Labour party; the Conservatives stood up for Britain—we do not get pushed around.

    Britain is a great trading nation. Of course we should engage with other countries, even hostile ones—[Interruption.]

    Mr Speaker

    Order. Mr Kyle, you said to me when you were going to China how well you would behave and how you owe me a big thank you. You are not showing it today!

    Mrs Badenoch

    Mr Speaker, I am not worried about the Business Secretary; the entire business community thinks he is a joke and does not know what he is talking about.

    As I was saying, of course we should engage with other countries, even hostile ones, but we need to do so with our eyes open and from a position of strength. That requires a Prime Minister and a Government who put our national interest first.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Comments on Sacking Robert Jenrick

    Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Comments on Sacking Robert Jenrick

    The comments made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, on 15 January 2026.

    I have sacked Robert Jenrick from the Shadow Cabinet, removed the whip and suspended his party membership with immediate effect.

    I was presented with clear, irrefutable evidence that he was plotting in secret to defect in a way designed to be as damaging as possible to his Shadow Cabinet colleagues and the wider Conservative Party.

    The British public are tired of political psychodrama and so am I. They saw too much of it in the last government, they’re seeing too much of it in THIS government.

    I will not repeat those mistakes.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Comments on Energy Prices

    Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Comments on Energy Prices

    The comments made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, on 14 January 2026.

    Labour promised to cut your energy bills. The opposite has happened.

    Ed Miliband cares more about ideology and his vanity projects than saving you money.

    If Keir Starmer had a backbone, he would back the Conservative’s Cheap Power Plan, abandon the absurd Net Zero ideological zealotry, and lower bills for everyone now.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Comments on Limiting Social Media for under-16s

    Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Comments on Limiting Social Media for under-16s

    The comments made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, on 12 January 2026.

    Enough is enough.

    Social media is taking childhood from our children.

    Today, Laura Trott and I met with a group of parents crying out for stronger safeguards for children online. That’s why we have a plan to introduce age limits for social media access for under 16s.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Comments on West Midlands Police and Football Policing Decision

    Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Comments on West Midlands Police and Football Policing Decision

    The comments made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, on 6 January 2026.

    West Midlands Police capitulated to Islamists and then collaborated with them to cover it up.

    They knew extremists were planning to attack Jews for going to a football match, and their response was to blame and remove Jewish people instead. They presented an inversion of reality and misled a Parliamentary Committee.

    We have had enough of this in Britain.

    The Chief Constable’s position is untenable.

    The British Police serve the British public, not local sectarian interests.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Comments on the Chagos Islands

    Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Comments on the Chagos Islands

    The comments made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, on 5 January 2026.

    Last night the Conservatives defeated the Government four times over its Chagos surrender. Surrendering a vital military base weakens our security and costs £35bn.

    Britain must project strength. Only the Conservatives will stand up to hostile actors and for our national interest.