Tag: Kemi Badenoch

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2025 Response to the Budget Statement

    Kemi Badenoch – 2025 Response to the Budget Statement

    The speech made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, in the House of Commons on 26 November 2025.

    Mrs Kemi Badenoch (North West Essex) (Con)

    May I congratulate the right hon. Lady on delivering her second Budget? I hope she enjoyed it, because it really should be her last. What a total humiliation—[Interruption.]

    Madam Deputy Speaker 

    Order. Can colleagues who are exiting the Chamber do so swiftly and quietly, so that we can focus on the Leader of the Opposition?

    Mrs Badenoch 

    It is a total humiliation. Last year, the Chancellor put up taxes by £40 billion—the biggest tax raid in British history. She promised that she would not be back for more. She swore that it was a one-off. She told everyone that from now on, there would be stability and she would pay for everything with growth. Today, she has broken every single one of those promises. If she had any decency, she would resign. At the last Budget, she said she was proud to be the country’s first-ever female Chancellor; after this Budget, she will go down as the country’s worst-ever Chancellor.

    Today—[Interruption.]

    Madam Deputy Speaker 

    Order. The Chief Whip in particular knows that we do not allow clapping in the Chamber.

    Mrs Badenoch 

    Today the Chancellor has announced a new tax raid of £26 billion, and Labour Members were all cheering. Household income is down. Spending policies in this Budget increase borrowing in every year. That smorgasbord of misery we just heard from her can be summed up in one sentence: Labour is hiking taxes to pay for welfare. This is a Budget for “Benefits Street”, paid for by working people.

    This Budget increases benefits for 560,000 families by an average of £5,000. The Government are hiking taxes on workers, pensioners and savers to pay for handouts to keep their Back Benchers quiet. These are the same—[Interruption.] They can chunter all they like. These are the same Back Benchers who cheered last year when the Chancellor taxed jobs and left more than 100,000 people without an income. They cheered because they did not understand the consequences of what they were doing, and they still do not.

    It has not been an easy time for the Chancellor. No one liked seeing her sitting on the Government Benches as it dawned on her that her own Back Benchers were going to do to her political career what she has done to our economy. She could have chosen today to bring down welfare spending and get more people into work. 

    Instead, she has chosen to put up tax after tax after tax—taxes on workers, taxes on savers, taxes on pensioners, taxes on investors and taxes on homes, holidays, cars and even milkshakes. There are taxes on anyone doing the right thing. She and this Government have lost what little credibility they had left, and no one will ever trust her again.

    What is amazing is that the Chancellor has the nerve to come to this House and claim that this is all someone else’s fault. She has a laundry list of excuses. Labour Members blame the Conservatives as if we have been sneaking into the Treasury under the cover of darkness to give pay rises to the unions. The Chancellor inherited an economy with inflation at 2% and record-high employment. She has tanked it in just over a year. She has endless excuses—she blames Brexit and Donald Trump, but she needs to blame herself.

    I have some news for the Chancellor—she did not seem to understand what the OBR was saying. Inflation is up, not down, and that inflation was stoked by her tax and spend decisions. The economic and fiscal outlook says that the OBR expects inflation to stay higher for longer. Everybody else has read the OBR analysis, but she still has not. She blames higher than expected borrowing costs. Where does she think they came from? [Hon. Members: “You!”] Those borrowing costs are driven by the Chancellor’s lack of grip. Labour Members are saying those costs came from us, but she is paying more to borrow than Greece. She is paying more to borrow than at any point under the 14 years of Conservative government—perhaps if Labour MPs read a book sometimes, they would know something—which included an energy crisis sparked by a war in Ukraine and a global pandemic. What is the Chancellor’s excuse? She is taking the public for fools, but they are under no illusions about whose fault this is.

    The fact is that the bad choices the Chancellor is making today—choices to break promises, choices to put up taxes, choices to spend more of other people’s money—are because of the bad choices she made at the last disastrous Budget. If you want growth, you need to start with knowing what kind of country you want to be and make a plan to get there. You need to create certainty for the people and businesses who will drive growth. There is no growth and no plan, because Labour focused on settling scores and scratching the itches it had while in opposition.

    The Chancellor promised stability. She delivered chaos. Just look at the circus around this Budget: first, the leaks—then more leaks to try to undo the damage; calling panicky press conferences and U-turning on her U-turns; rolling the pitch one day only to plough through it the next. She had the cheek to talk about stability, but she has become the first Chancellor in history to release the whole Budget ahead of time. This is extraordinary, and it tells us everything we need to know about her grip on the Treasury. She is making the UK a shambolic laughing stock to international investors, and if she does not resign for breaking her promises, she should sure as hell go for this.

    What have we got for all this chaos and disorder? There are 1 million more people claiming universal credit than there were at the time of the last Budget. Government spending? Up. Welfare spending? Up. Universal credit claimants? Up. Unemployment? Up. 

    Debt interest? Up. Inflation? Up. And what about the things that we want to go up? Growth? Down. Investment? Down. Business confidence? Down. The credibility of the Chancellor? [Hon. Members: “Down!”] Not just down, but through the floor.

    These figures are shocking. Does the Chancellor really think that anyone will be confused by the sleight of hand in her speech? Her speech today was an exercise in self-delusion. Today she had an opportunity to apologise and show some humility; instead, we have been fed puff pieces in The Times and the FT showing a woman wallowing in self-pity and whining about mansplaining and misogyny. Let me explain to the Chancellor—[Interruption.]

    Madam Deputy Speaker (Ms Nusrat Ghani)

    Order. Colleagues need most definitely to simmer down: just breathe a little and allow the Leader of the Opposition to be heard.

    Mrs Badenoch 

    All we have had is wallowing in self-pity and whining about misogyny and mansplaining, so let me explain to the Chancellor, woman to woman, that people out there are not complaining because she is female; they are complaining because she is utterly incompetent. Real equality means being held to the same standard as everyone else. It means being judged on results. Take the Chancellor’s bright idea: the Office for Value for Money. It has been closed down because it did not save a penny. In fact, it cost the taxpayer £1.6 million. You could not make this stuff up. I have identified a way to save taxpayers huge amounts of money, by sacking just one person: the woman sitting opposite me.

    The ex-chief economist of the Bank of England was not mansplaining when he said that the uncertainty around today’s Budget is

    “the single biggest reason growth has flatlined”.

    What did the Chancellor think would happen when she went on breakfast telly to do an emergency public service announcement: “I interrupt your Cheerios to bring you this frightening message about income tax”? Then, unbelievably, she changed her mind three days later. No wonder people are in despair. She says she wants people to respect her—[Interruption.]

    Madam Deputy Speaker (Ms Nusrat Ghani)

    Order. Conservative colleagues are drowning out the Leader of the Opposition’s speech, so just be mindful that nobody at home will be able to hear her.

    Mrs Badenoch 

    The Chancellor says that she wants people to respect her, but respect is earned. She apparently told Labour MPs this week, “I’ll show the media, I’ll show the Tories—I will not let them beat me.” Show us what? Making stuff up at the Dispatch Box, incompetent chaos and the highest tax burden in history? She said to them, “I’ll be there on Wednesday, I’ll be there next year, and I’ll be back the year after that.” God help us! She is spineless, shameless and completely aimless.

    Talk to any business and or anyone looking for a job—unemployment is up every single month since Labour has been in office. [Interruption.] Labour MPs do not want to hear it, but it is true. They are shouting and complaining, but they cannot create jobs. It is the worst year for graduate recruitment on record. Are they proud of that? [Interruption.]

    Madam Deputy Speaker 

    Order. If you are on the Front Bench, I can obviously see you, Mr Kyle. There is no need for you to be chuntering this loudly. Everyone else can see and hear you as well.

    Mrs Badenoch 

    Labour MPs do not want to hear the truth, but I am speaking for all those people out there who are sick of this Government. Companies like Merck and Ineos are slashing investment plans. The construction sector has shrunk. How is that house building target going, by the way? I will tell you, Madam Deputy Speaker: the Government are miles behind and will not even come close to what we achieved. Business confidence is at record lows. No wonder that today future growth was revised down for every year of the scorecard. The papers are reporting that one in eight business leaders is planning to leave Britain. Even one of Labour’s biggest ever donors, Lakshmi Mittal, has fled the country.

    What we have in front of us is a Budget littered with broken promises. The Chancellor stood on a manifesto that promised better returns for UK savers. Today she is putting up taxes on savings and on salary sacrifice even. She promised to give pensioners the security in retirement that they deserve. Today she slapped higher taxes on people saving for their pension. She promised to make Britain the best place in the world to invest and do business. Today she has raised the dividend tax rates. She and the Prime Minister had already broken their promise to freeze council tax, but today she has decided to go even further, introducing a new property tax clobbering family homes that will only raise small amounts. This is Labour’s Britain: people who work hard and save hard to buy their homes get taxed more, while those who do not work—those who, in some cases, refuse to work—get their accommodation paid for by taxpayers.

    To top it all off—because taxing your home, your car, your savings and your pension was not enough—the Chancellor has, by her own admission, broken her manifesto promise on income tax. In the last Budget, she said:

    “I am keeping every single promise on tax that I made in our manifesto, so there will be no extension of the freeze in income tax…thresholds”.

    She also said that

    “extending the threshold freeze would hurt working people. It would take more money out of their payslips.”—[Official Report, 30 October 2024; Vol. 755, c. 821.]

    But today she has done exactly that. Why should anyone believe anything she has promised in this Budget?

    Where is the money going? There are small changes to rail fares and prescriptions. Those are distractions while the Chancellor steals your wallet. The real story is that Labour has lost control of welfare spending. Not only will working people have their tax thresholds frozen while benefits go up in line with inflation, and not only has Labour abandoned reforms that would have saved the taxpayer £5 billion after pressure from its own Back Benchers, but today Labour has added another £3 billion to the bill by scrapping the two-child benefit cap. We introduced that cap, because it means that people on benefits have to make the same decisions about having children as everyone else. Even Labour voters know that it strikes the right balance between supporting people who are struggling and protecting taxpayers who are struggling themselves.

    Just this summer, the Chancellor admitted that lifting the two-child benefit cap was not affordable, but that was before the Prime Minister accidentally fired the starting gun on the race to replace him. Now he and the Chancellor are buying the votes of their own MPs with taxpayers’ money. If she wants to reduce child poverty, she should stop taxing their parents and stop destroying their jobs. She congratulated herself on a new tax on landlords. Let me tell her this: hiking tax on landlords will only push up rents. It will push landlords out of the market, and the people who will suffer are the tenants. Then she talks about taxes on electric vehicles. Those changes will hit rural drivers the hardest, but we know that Labour does not care about rural people.

    All this Budget delivers is higher taxes and out-of-control spending. Nobody voted for this. The Chancellor must take responsibility. She chose to impose the jobs tax, driving unemployment higher month after month. She chose to abandon welfare reform, meaning that the benefits bill is spiralling. She chose to spend more and more money she did not have, leaving taxpayers to foot the bill. She is out of money, out of ideas, out of her depth, and she has run out of road.

    The country simply cannot afford a Chancellor who cannot keep her own promises. Her position is untenable, and she knows it. [Interruption.] She is talking to the Prime Minister. Is he mansplaining to you, by the way? Is he mansplaining? Would you like some help? The Prime Minister should grow a backbone and sack her, but he will not, because he knows that if she goes down, he goes down with her, so we are stuck with them both, Laurel and Foolhardy.

    Does the Chancellor have any sympathy for the people facing Christmas without a salary because of her jobs tax, or for the retailers suffering sleepless nights because of their plummeting Christmas sales? People out there are crying. Last year, we had the horrors of the Halloween Budget. This year, it is the nightmare before Christmas. As for her, she is the unwelcome Christmas guest. Ten minutes through the door and she has eaten all the Quality Street.

    Let me tell the Chancellor something she has forgotten. Behind every line in today’s Red Book is a family, a home, and a lifetime of work and sacrifice. People are frightened, and they have every reason to be—the Chancellor has spent the last year terrifying them. Every decision that she and the Prime Minister make puts more pressure on the people who keep this country going. If Labour is the party of working people, why is it that every day under this Government, thousands more people are signing off work and on to benefits? It is the Conservatives who are the party of work. The Labour party should be renamed the Welfare party.

    The Government are making a mistake. The British public do not want higher welfare spending; they want people in work, providing for themselves. They want to live in a country where hard work pays—where what you put in reflects what you get out, and we agree with them. There is an alternative, and we Conservatives have set it out. This Budget could have saved £47 billion, including £23 billion from welfare. The Chancellor could have applied our golden economic rule, allocating half those savings to cutting the deficit and using the rest to cut taxes. [Interruption.] Oh, they are all pretending that they are not listening. It is the shame of the mess that they have made—

    Madam Deputy Speaker (Ms Nusrat Ghani)

    Order. Mr Vince! And Mr Thompson, you are so enthusiastic that I was worried a moment ago that you would knock Mr Waugh off his seat. We need to calm down and breathe, and we need to ensure that we can hear the Leader of the Opposition.

    Mrs Badenoch 

    Even the dog is laughing at the Chancellor, Madam Deputy Speaker.

    The Chancellor could have abolished stamp duty on homes to get the housing market moving, and she could have abolished business rates on shops to breathe life into our high streets. She could have introduced our cheap power plan, which would save a lot more money than what she announced, and would bring down energy costs for homes and businesses. That is what she should have done.

    The Chancellor should be on the side of people who get up and go to work, people who take a risk to start a company, and people working all hours to keep their business afloat. She should be on the side of the farmer trying to hand something over to the next generation, and the investor deciding whether to spend their money in the UK or elsewhere. She should be on the side of the young person looking for their first job, the saver doing the right thing and putting money away for a rainy day, and the pensioner trying to enjoy a decent retirement. This country works when we make the country work for those people. Only the Conservatives are on their side, and our plan for them is simple: bring down energy costs, cut spending, cut tax, back business, and get Britain working again.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2025 Speech on the Government’s Asylum Policy

    Kemi Badenoch – 2025 Speech on the Government’s Asylum Policy

    The speech made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, in the House of Commons on 17 November 2025.

    I thank the Home Secretary for advance sight of her statement, most of which I read in The Sunday Telegraph. I am pleased that she is bringing forward measures to crack down on illegal immigration. It is not enough but it is a start, and a change from her previous position in opposition of a general amnesty for illegal migrants.

    I praise the new Home Secretary. She is bringing fresh energy and a clearer focus to this problem, and she has got more done in 70 days in the job than her predecessor did in a year. She seems to get what many on the Labour Benches refuse to accept, and she is right to say that if we fail to deal with the crisis, we will draw more people to a path that starts with anger and ends in hatred. We will also allow our English channel to operate as an open route into this country for anyone who is prepared to risk their life and pay criminal gangs. That is not fair on British citizens, it is not fair on those who come here legally, and it is not fair on those in genuine need who are pushed to the back of the queue because the system is overwhelmed.

    Anyone who cannot see by now that simply tinkering with the current system will not fix this problem is either living in la-la land or being wilfully obstructive. It is a shame that it has taken Labour a year in office to realise there is a borders crisis—[Interruption.] I don’t know why Labour Members are chuntering. What was their first act in government? The first act of the Home Secretary’s predecessor was to scrap the Rwanda plan, which was already—[Interruption.] Yes, they are cheering. It was already starting to act as a deterrent before it even got off the ground, and before it started, Labour Members threw away all our hard work and taxpayers’ money—they are the ones who have wasted that money, not us.

    The statement is an admission that the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill of the Home Secretary’s predecessor will not work, but I am glad to see Labour Members now changing course. The powers they are using in the Bill are ones they all voted down when we were in government, and they would not be able to do that if we had not got those measures through. None of them know the work that was done; they are just cheering nonsensically, but we know what has happened since Labour came to office. The Home Secretary will know that 10,000 people have crossed the channel in the 70 days she has been in office, and we have seen record levels of asylum claims in the last year. The problem has got worse since Labour came into office, and it is getting worse by the day.

    I am afraid that what the Home Secretary is announcing will not work on its own, and some of these measures will take us backwards. I say that to her with no ill will, and I hope she believes me when I say that I genuinely want her to succeed. Conservative Members are speaking from experience: we know how difficult this is— [Interruption.] We do, and we will not take any lectures from the people who voted down every single measure to control immigration. Some of the measures that the Home Secretary is announcing today are undoubtedly positive steps—baby steps, but positive none the less. We welcome making refugee status temporary, and we welcome removing the last Labour Government’s legislation that created a duty to support asylum seekers—she is right to do that. However, some of what she is announcing simply does not go far enough.

    Conservative Members believe that anyone who arrives illegally, especially from safe countries, should be deported and banned from claiming asylum. Does the Home Secretary agree that anyone who comes to this country illegally should be deported? I would like to know, and I think the country would like to know, because this announcement means that some people who arrive will be allowed to stay—they just need to wait 20 years before getting permanent settlement. That does not remove the pull factor. The main problem is that for as long as the UK is in the European convention on human rights, illegal immigrants and those exploiting our system will use human rights laws to block anything she does to solve this. I know that because I saw it happen again and again over the last four years, and I know she has seen it too. We even saw it this year with the Prime Minister’s one in, one out scheme, which has seen people return to France and come back on small boats yet again.

    I guarantee that the Home Secretary’s plan to reinterpret article 8 will not work. We tried that already, and Strasbourg and UK case law will prevail. I agree with her that the definition of “degrading treatment” is over-interpreted, but renegotiating article 3 internationally will take years—years we do not have if it were even possible, but the fact is that it is not. We know that because a small group of EU countries tried that earlier, and they were dismissed by the Secretary General of the Council of Europe. Her Government did nothing to support them, so I am not convinced it is the Prime Minister’s negotiating skills that will sort out that problem.

    We have looked at this issue from every possible direction, and any plan that does not include leaving the ECHR as a necessary step is wasting time we do not have. Just like the Government’s plan to “smash the gangs”, or the one in, one out policy, it is timewasting, and it is doomed to fail because of lawfare. We have seen this all before. The tough measures will be challenged in the courts and blocked, the new legal routes that the Home Secretary is talking about will be exploited, and the numbers arriving on our shores and disappearing into the black economy will keep on rising. If the Home Secretary is serious about reducing these numbers—I do believe that she is—she must be bolder. She must take steps to deter illegal immigrants from coming to Britain, and deport them as soon as they arrive. Our borders plan does just that, and I know that she has studied it in detail. I have seen the looks, and I know that she knows that we would leave the ECHR and the European convention on action against trafficking to stop the Strasbourg courts from frustrating deportations, and establish a new removals force to ensure that all illegal arrivals are deported. We would end the use of immigration tribunals, judicial review and legal aid in immigration cases, as those are the things that are slowing us down, and we would sign returns agreements that are backed by visa sanctions to ensure that we send illegal arrivals back to their place of origin. I welcome what she says about Angola and Namibia, but we all know that those countries are not the ones that are creating the biggest problems.

    We need to be bold, serious and unafraid to do what the British people demand: secure our borders. That is what is in our borders plan, so I urge the Home Secretary to take me up on my offer to work together, not just because we have some ideas that she might find useful, but because judging by the reaction of her own Back Benchers today, she may find our votes come in handy. Earlier this year, we saw what happened when the Government tried to make changes through the welfare Bill: the Prime Minister was defeated by his own Back Benchers and ended up passing legislation guaranteeing that more money would be spent on welfare. It does not appear that his grip on the party has improved since then, so we can be sure that Labour Back Benchers are already plotting to block any serious changes that she tries to make, so we can help her with that—[Interruption.] Why are Labour Members shaking their heads? We have seen them do that time and again.

    Our offer to work together is a genuine one and in the national interest. We will not play the same game that Labour Members did by voting things down for no reason. However, the Home Secretary must be clear with the House on these questions: how many people will be able to take advantage of the new work and study visa routes? What will be the level of the cap? Will it be 10,000 people or 100,000 people?

    The Government have separately confirmed that they will allow Gazan students to bring dependants. We oppose that, but can she clarify how the Government will ensure that people brought to the UK from a territory under Hamas control are not a risk to our security? If she finds that the Human Rights Act 1998 and the ECHR prevent her from enacting those proposals, will she use primary legislation to resolve that? Has Lord Hermer agreed? By her own admission three weeks ago, the Home Office is not yet fit for purpose, so why are we creating a new legal route for the Home Office to run?

    Will she take me up on my serious, genuine offer to meet and to discuss how we can work together to resolve the asylum crisis—yes or no? I urge her to put party politics aside, meet me and my shadow Home Secretary, so that we can find a way to work together—

    Madam Deputy Speaker (Caroline Nokes)

    Order. I was very generous with the time I allowed the Leader of the Opposition. I call the Home Secretary.

    Shabana Mahmood

    I thank the Leader of the Opposition for her response to the statement. I see that the shadow Home Secretary has been subbed out after his performance at Home Office oral questions, but whether it is the shadow Home Secretary or the Leader of the Opposition herself, I am very happy to take on the Conservative party any day of the week.

    Let me start by saying that we will not take any lessons from the Opposition on how to run an effective migration or asylum system. As the Leader of the Opposition knows, when the Conservatives were in Government, they gave up on governing altogether. They gave up on making asylum decisions, creating the huge backlog that this Government were left to start to deal with. In our first 18 months in office, removals are up 23% compared with the last 18 months that the Conservatives were in office, so I will take no lessons from anyone on the Conservative Benches on anything to do with our asylum system. They simply gave up and went for an expensive gimmick that cost £700 million to return four volunteers and was doomed to failure from the start.

    The Leader of the Opposition had a lot to say about the European convention on human rights, but I do not recall the Conservatives ever bringing forward any legislation to deal with the application of article 8, the qualified right to a private life. A Bill that sought to clarify the way that article 8 should apply in our domestic legislation or in our immigration rules was never introduced, so I am not going to take any lessons from the people who never bothered to do that in the first place. This Government are rolling up our sleeves, dealing with the detailed, substantive issues that we face, and thinking of proper, workable solutions to those matters.

    The position on article 3 has changed across Europe. In my previous role as Lord Chancellor, I was at the Council of Europe just before the summer recess earlier this year, and I was struck by the sheer range of European partners who want to have this conversation. It is important that the British Government lean into that conversation and seek to work in collaboration with our European partners. The one thing that will not work is simply saying that we are going to come out of the European convention altogether. That is not and will never be the policy of this Government because we believe that reform can be pursued and that this is an important convention, not least because it underpins some of our own returns agreements, including the one with France. The right hon. Lady talked about how many years it would take for us to think about reform of the convention, but as she well knows, it would take just as many years to start renegotiating lots of international agreements that would be affected by us coming out of the convention, so I am afraid that, once again, her solution will not work.

    I am always up for working in the national interest because nothing matters more to me than holding our country together and uniting it, but if the Conservatives really wanted to work together in the national interest, they could have started by voting for the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, currently going through the House, that they have voted against at every opportunity. Forgive me if I do not take this newfound conversion to working together in the national interest with much seriousness, but the Conservative party’s track record suggests that it should not be taken seriously.

    To not be taken seriously sums up the position of the Conservatives: these are the people that left this Government an abject mess to clear up. They gave up on governing, they gave up on running an effective asylum system, and now they turn up without so much as an apology to the British public, thinking that they have got anything to say that anyone wants to hear.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2025 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    Kemi Badenoch – 2025 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, in Manchester on 8 October 2025.

    Only the Conservative party can deliver the stronger economy and stronger borders that will give people a more prosperous future.

    Every generation must face its test.

    In the 1940s, our test was to defeat fascism and ensure the victory of freedom.

    In the 1980s, it was to banish socialism and deliver prosperity.

    And in the 2020s, our test is to restore a strong economy, secure our borders, and rebuild Britain’s strength so our children inherit a country that works.

    Ladies and Gentlemen, Conference, thank you.

    Thank you, for standing by the only party that can meet the test of our generation.

    The only party that can deliver a stronger economy and stronger borders.

    Everything else relies on getting this right.

    National security, order on the streets, decent healthcare, high quality education, cohesion in our communities.

    None of this exists without a strong economy and strong borders.

    A weak economy makes us poorer.

    The services we rely on get worse and people cannot build a better life for themselves or their families.

    Weak borders allow people to exploit our generosity, put our housing and public services under pressure, and fracture our sense of who we are as a nation.

    A weak economy and weak borders mean steady decline.

    I reject that fate.

    Together, we Conservatives will save Britain from that fate.

    And we can do it together because we are a strong team.

    My fantastic shadow cabinet Mel, Chris, Claire, Laura, Rob, Andrew – both of them, James – both of them, Mims, Jesse Stuart, all of you: thank you. Thank you so much.

    My front bench, experienced hands and rising stars.

    Conference, we know our MPs and peers have more collective wisdom than the rest of Parliament put together.

    And it’s not just them, lets to forget Darren and our MSs in Wales, Russell and our MSPs in Scotland, our fantastic mayors.

    Labour beater Ben Houchen and Reform slayer Paul Bristow, Councillors, activists.

    You are our party. Thank you.

    I joined our party as an activist 20 years ago.

    I was with you delivering leaflets and knocking on doors.

    I sat in this hall listening to speeches.

    I celebrated all our wins, and I felt the pain of every defeat.

    I cannot tell you how honoured, how privileged, and how proud I am to stand before you as Leader of our party.

    Leader of the Conservative Party.

    The only party that can meet the test of our generation.

    You are more than just a political party to me.

    You have supported me, you have stood by me, you have enabled me to achieve more than I ever dreamed.

    You are my family, in many ways quite literally.

    I married the deputy chairman of my association, and I certainly would not be standing here today without my husband, Hamish. Thank you.

    I love this party for what it has given me but more than that, I love it because it has made life better for so many in our country and will do so again.

    Time and time again, guided by our values.

    And our principles.

    We have steered this country through its darkest days.

    And today, we must be ready to do the same again.

    Because we are the only party that has the vision, the courage, and the competence to tear up a broken political model, deliver a new blueprint for our country, and together take Britain into an era of prosperity and security.

    To do this, Conference, we must be frank about the problems our country faces.

    Because they are not the same ones that we faced in the 1940s, or the 1980s, or even the 2010s.

    The country that Hamish and I were born in, had its issues.

    But thanks – in large part – to hard choices taken by this party

    Opportunity was there for people who worked hard.

    People had a sense of pride in our national story, and excitement about the future.

    I am not sure young people feel that way anymore.

    They feel they are living somewhere where things never get any better.

    Britain is stagnating, while the world around us moves on.

    We are competing with restless and ambitious countries around the world.

    We are competing with a billion people in India striving to become middle class.

    We are competing with economic success stories like Poland.

    15 years ago, Polish workers came here to find opportunity.

    Now, Poland is growing twice as fast as we are.

    While Britain was redefining what a woman is, China was building five nuclear reactors.

    Conference, people around the world are determined to lift their lives, and their children’s lives up to a standard that we have taken for granted.

    Some countries won’t be able to do this.

    And in those countries millions of people will decide that they want to come here instead.

    And if our borders are not secure, they will succeed.

    Especially, if our economy is addicted to migration.

    Of course, we want brilliant minds and great talents to come here.

    But at the moment we are not just taking in doctors, engineers, and scientists.

    We are accepting hundreds of thousands of people, some with many dependents.

    Some with no skills at all.

    This broken immigration model is heaping pressure on our public sector.

    A public sector which already every year, demands more and more and more of our money, yet services don’t get better, they get worse.

    Everyone in this room knows what I am talking about.

    We have all felt it.

    We used to ring up our GP and get an appointment the same day.

    Now, now we have to wait on the phone to see if we’re one of the lucky ones.

    We have potholes that have been around, so long people are holding birthday parties for them.

    Underneath all of this, is a society which is struggling to cope.

    Struggling to cope with the reality of getting poorer, struggling to cope with the erosion of a sense of who we are as a country.

    We cannot drift our way into solving these problems.

    We know what drift looks like.

    It looks like allowing the trade unions to overturn years of progress in school standards.

    It looks like letting our veterans face vexatious prosecutions when we should be worrying about the strength of our military.

    Drift looks like Labour’s one-in-one-out returns deal with France that ends up letting 100 people in, for every one who leaves.

    Being timid will get us nowhere.

    We need bold ideas.

    We need a positive vision for this country.

    And a plan to deliver it.    

    We need a new approach.

    A new approach that delivers a stronger economy and stronger borders.

    We owe that to our children.

    During our time in government, we did great things.

    Labour, want to pretend the last 14 years were all bad.

    They want to forget that they were losing all that time.

    Let’s remind them.

    Between 2010 and 2020 we slashed the deficit.

    We lifted millions of people out of tax and got millions in to work.

    We sent English schools soaring up the international league tables.

    We led the coalition against Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

    But Conference, the truth is we didn’t always fight hard enough for what we believed in.

    We need to remember who we are fighting for.

    We are fighting for people who work hard and do the right thing.

    We are fighting for people who ask, “why do sickness benefits pay more than the minimum wage?”

    More than the living wage even.

    We are fighting for small business owners, people who take risks and get things done.

    We are fighting for the victims of crime.

    They want to know that we are on their side.

    That criminals will face the full force of the law.

    We are fighting for the farmers, putting food on our tables.

    These are our people.

    They are the backbone of our country.

    We fought for them before.

    And we will fight for them again.

    Conference, time and time again, we have been the only party that is bold enough to do what is needed.

    The only party that is competent enough to do it properly.  

    We were bold enough to create the modern police force, to introduce free state education for every child.

    We were radical enough to launch the Right to Buy, to free the workplace from the dead hand of the state, to give working men the vote and — better late than never — women too.

    We were courageous enough to introduce same-sex marriage.

    And of course, brave enough to take Britain out of the European Union, honouring the biggest democratic mandate in our history.

    All, Conservative, achievements.

    Yes, all of that was us.

    But enough about past glories.

    Actually, how about one more.

    Conference, do you know the one thing we Conservatives have done the most throughout our history?

    Clear up the mess left by Labour.

    And my goodness, they are making one hell of a mess.

    Never in the field of human history have so many been let down by so few.

    All they have delivered is a doom loop of higher taxes, weaker borders, and month after month of chaos.

    They had a plan to win, but no plan for power.

    No vision for Britain.

    They know how to make promises, but not how to deliver them.

    This year, the Prime Minister was asked to name his best moment in office.

    Do you know what he said?

    “Walking into Downing Street.”

    For once, I agree with him.

    It’s all been downhill all the way since.

    What have Labour given us?

    An anti-corruption minister under investigation for corruption.

    A homelessness minister who made her own tenants homeless.

    A Housing Secretary sacked for dodging housing taxes.

    You couldn’t make this stuff up.

    We had a transport secretary fired for stealing a phone.

    And our Ambassador in Washington thrown out in disgrace.

    There is an old joke, that a diplomat is someone sent abroad to lie for their country. Well at least in Peter Mandelson they had a man of experience.

    Just look at the spectacle we saw in Liverpool last week.

    Minister after Minister failing to rule out the tax rises, we all know are coming.

    The Mayor of Manchester touting his own manifesto for the country.

    But to be honest I can’t blame Andy Burnham for that one, who doesn’t want to get rid of this utterly useless weak Prime Minister.

    After five years as Labour leader, people still don’t know what Keir Starmer stands for.

    And you know what the real problem is?

    He doesn’t know himself.

    Today we learn, today we learn that Labour deliberately collapsed the trial of two men accused of spying on MPs for China because the PM wants to suck up to Beijing.

    This is squalid.

    We have got the measure of them.

    Just look at Shabana Mahmood, the new Home Secretary.

    She’s trying to convince us she’s tough.

    Right.

    I remember when she tried to stop foreign criminals being deported. Do you remember that one?

    I remember when she lay down on the ground in front of a Sainsbury’s protesting because they were selling food from Israel.

    So, forgive me, if I treat this new-found tough image with a little scepticism. You remember.

    Labour represents everything that is wrong with politics.

    Rachel Reeves likes to congratulate herself for breaking the glass ceiling.

    But what she’s really broken, is our economy.

    Attacking those who work hard, destroying business confidence, forcing wealth creators to leave the country, piling debt onto our children.

    We know, that in her November Budget of Doom, she will give us all something to cry about.

    The highest business taxes since the 1970s.

    Taxes on farmers.

    Taxes on education – an unprecedented tax punishing parents who work hard to invest in their children’s future.

    Shameful.

    The tax burden is so high.

    It is making Britain poorer.

    Because business is giving up.

    Business is leaving.

    And as they leave, or never start in the first place, people’s livelihoods, people’s hopes, people’s dreams, go with them.

    Grangemouth refinery gone, Merck, BMW, Ineos pulling investment.

    Schools for children with special needs, are shutting their doors.

    Farmers feeling they’ve got no way out.

    The London Stock Exchange dropping out of the world’s top 20 for listings.

    Our party knows that a job is the best route out of poverty.

    We got unemployment to a 40-year low.

    And what has happened since Labour came in?

    A jobs tax.

    Unemployment up.

    Inflation up.

    Borrowing up.

    These are the real-life consequences of a weak, directionless, government.

    Conference, last year, the public voted for change.

    But all they have been given is change for the worse.

    And because they are still angry with us, parties that in normal times would never be seen as a serious option for government are gaining ground, making promises they will never be able to keep.

    Let’s look at what’s on offer out there. for all those disappointed by Labour.

    Reform promising free beer tomorrow.

    Jeremy Corbyn promising free jam.

    Lib Dems promising free lentils.

    All of them promising more spending.

    Blowing up the public finances.

    Whether it’s Starmer, Farage, Corbyn or Davey all these men are shaking the same magic money tree.

    Following the same, failed playbook.

    No plan for growth.

    No honesty about the scale of the challenges.

    And it always leads to the same result.

    More government, more taxes, more debt.

    It’s irresponsible, it’s cynical, and it’s why Britain needs Conservatives back in charge.

    But we can’t beat them, simply by attacking them.

    As George Bernard Shaw said.

    ‘Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.’

    We have to offer something better.

    So, what are we going to do?

    Conference, as you may have heard, I am an engineer.

    My starting point is always to carry out a diagnosis, before producing the blueprint to put it right.

    Since I became your leader, my Shadow Cabinet and I have analysed the problems facing the country.

    Our diagnosis is clear: Britain is being held back by a broken model.

    A model which says that government always knows best.

    That high immigration is always good for the economy.

    That Britain should apologise for its history rather than be proud of it.

    We lost because we accepted the status quo.

    No more.

    When Margaret Thatcher was Leader of the Opposition, she said this.

    “If every Labour Government is prepared to reverse every Tory measure, while Conservative Governments accept nearly all socialist measures the end result is only too plain.”

    She was right. To fix our country, we must reverse Labour’s measures.

    So, we will cancel their vindictive tax on education, Vicki knows what’s coming, we will scrap their tax on family farms, Andrew, we will scrap their tax on family businesses.

    And we will reverse the terrible measures in Angela Rayner’s Unemployment Bill, written by the unions, for the unions.

    A bill that will wrap firms in red tape.

    Cost business £5 billion.

    And make Angela Rayner one of the last people in Britain to ever be legally sacked.

    But conference, simply unwinding Labour measures isn’t enough.

    We are Conservatives, not anarchists.

    I am an engineer, not an arsonist.

    So together, we are going to build something better.

    We are creating a Blueprint for Britain – a new settlement – based on Conservative values.

    So, what’s in it?

    Firstly, securing our borders.

    On Sunday I announced our plan.

    To take the UK out of the ECHR.

    To scrap the Human Rights Act.

    To deport 150,000 illegal immigrants.

    This is a plan, not a slogan.

    Next in my blueprint, work, and welfare.

    If we want to end our over-reliance on immigration, then we must make sure that every British citizen who can work, does work.

    Right now, there are six and a half million working age adults claiming benefits instead of working.

    You heard me right six and a half million.

    That is the entire population of Cardiff, Belfast, Glasgow, and Manchester.

    Combined.

    Being paid to sit at home all day.

    We cannot expect people to get up and go to work, and pay more and more in taxes, to subsidise millions of others not to work.

    It is not controversial to say this.

    Conference, we have done the hard work.

    And we have a plan to cut welfare spending.

    First, British benefits for British Citizens.

    It is common sense that you should not draw out of a system that you haven’t paid in to.

    Second, we will restrict benefits to those with more severe mental health conditions – not anxiety or mild depression.

    Yes, these challenges are real, and people should get support.

    But they cannot be treated as a reason for a lifetime off work.

    And third, we will restrict Motability vehicles to people with serious disabilities.

    Those cars are not for people with ADHD.

    These are the first steps of a radical reform of our welfare system.

    We will return to its founding principle.

    That support only goes to those that really need it.

    This should be common sense.

    But only the Conservatives understand this.

    Labour, the Liberal Dems, Greens, the nationalists, and Reform are all demanding more welfare spending.

    They don’t care that it’s not fair, but we do.

    After Covid, 2,000 people a day were being signed onto out-of-work sickness benefits.

    It is a national tragedy.

    That in just one year of Labour the latest figure has more than doubled.

    5,000 new people are signing on every single day.

    Many are young people, who are losing the chance to make something of themselves.

    Never knowing what it’s like to pay their own way.

    This isn’t just about saving money – important though that is.

    It’s far more than that.

    It is driven by our deep, Conservative conviction that work is a good in itself.

    And as people work, as they strive, as they provide for themselves and their families, they should not pay more and more of their money in taxes, to a state that provides less and less.

    So, fixing the state is next in our Blueprint.

    Since Brexit and Covid the size of the Civil Service has swollen by over a third.

    There are now more than half a million civil servants.

    And have you noticed?

    Is Government working a third better for you?

    I don’t think so.

    So, we are going to reverse this.

    We are going to cut the civil service back to where it was in 2016.

    And as Conservatives, we don’t just believe in reducing the size of the state.

    I have always said, that while Government should do less, what it does, it should do well.

    Let me give you an example.

    Conservatives are proud of our police.

    Unlike Labour, we will always have their back.

    But security and prosperity cannot exist, in a country where the law is mocked, where crime is ignored, and where criminals laugh at justice.

    Right now, tens of thousands of police hours are wasted every year on “non-crime hate incidents” and form-filling.

    Officers chasing tweets instead of thieves.

    The Shadow Justice Secretary is stopping more fare evaders than Transport for London. Thank you, Rob.

    Conference, we are going to free the police to protect the public.

    Not to chase political correctness.

    Right now, our police are spending 800,000 hours every single year waiting with mental health patients.

    Eight hundred thousand hours.

    That’s the equivalent of 400 police officers doing nothing else all year except waiting around.

    No more.

    Every single officer we free from pointless paperwork.

    We will put back on our streets.

    We will send them after the shoplifters making life a misery for high streets.

    And we will triple stop and search.

    Because the more people we stop and the more people we search, the more knives we take off the streets.

    Across public services, we are developing similarly detailed plans to make things work better.

    In the NHS, industrial action has kept waiting lists high for far too long.

    Enough is enough. We will ban doctors from going on strike.

    In education, Labour have bent over to the teaching unions – and are removing our academy freedoms which have been so successful.

    We will reverse this act of educational vandalism.

    And we will make sure that brilliant schools and teachers have the freedom to do what they do best. Teach.

    Because education should be how people change their lives.

    It should help you develop the skills you need to get on in life.

    It should ensure you get the job you want.

    So, if your name’s Rachel, you can be an economist instead of working, in customer complaints.

    And speaking of customer complaints, let’s talk about university.

    Every year thousands of young people go off to University but leave with crippling loans and no real prospects.

    Nearly one in three graduates see no economic return, and every year taxpayers write off over £7 billion in unpaid student loans.

    Wasted money, wasted talent. Its every year.

    A rigged system propping up low-quality courses, while people can’t get high-quality apprenticeships that lead to real jobs.

    And this is personal for me.

    I did two degrees.

    One in engineering. One in law.

    And I also had an apprenticeship first.

    But while I can’t remember how to do parallel integration.

    I can remember how to fix a broken computer.

    Which I learnt to do during my apprenticeship.

    I was working with adults.

    I was paying my own way.

    And it gave an eighteen-year-old me a self confidence that my university degrees never did.

    And unlike my degrees, I wasn’t left with any debt.

    So, we will shut down these rip-off courses and use the money to double the apprenticeship budget.

    We will be giving thousands more young people the chance of a proper start in life.

    Just like I had.

    Which brings me Conference, to the most important task that we will face, and the centrepiece of our blueprint.

    The reason, why the Conservative Party is the only party in Britain who can be trusted to meet the test of our generation is that none of this works without a strong economy.

    Securing our borders.

    Getting people into work.

    Policing our streets.

    Defending the nation.

    None of it is possible without the money to pay for it.

    And we are the only party with a plan to get our economy back on track.

    It starts with fiscal responsibility.

    We have to get the deficit down.

    And we must also show how every tax cut or spending increase is paid for.

    So today, I am introducing a new Golden Economic Rule.

    Every pound we save, will be put to work.

    At least half will go towards cutting the deficit.

    Because living within our means is our first priority.

    And with the rest, we will get Britain growing and bring down the taxes stifling our economy.

    Over the next decade, Rachel Reeves is going to double the deficit with her borrowing and tax doom loop.

    She is stealing from our children and grandchildren.

    And Conservatives will put an end to it.

    We will always explain – up front – where we will make these savings.

    We’re not going to do what Labour did – promise not to cut public spending, only to snatch away pensioners’ winter fuel payments.

    We are doing things differently.

    Thanks to the hard work of the Shadow Cabinet, we have already identified £47 billion in savings

    Priti has earmarked £7 billion from the overseas aid budget.

    Alex has identified £8 billion from cutting the civil service

    Helen has found £23 billion from welfare.

    Under our Golden Rule – half of those savings will go towards reducing Labour’s deficit.

    With the rest, we are going to unleash our economy.

    That’s the Conservative way.

    Responsibility today. Opportunity tomorrow.

    Like so many young people, all of my first jobs were on the high street.

    Yes, in McDonalds, have I ever mentioned that?

    But it wasn’t just me, my friends were working in similar jobs.

    Cafés, local pubs, family run shops.

    The places that make our high streets what they are.

    The shops and businesses essential to communities in every town and village.

    And so, on Monday, you will have heard Mel, make our commitment to abolish their Business Rates.

    Whether you’re a councillor, a mayoral candidate, a campaigner, I want you to go out there and spread the word.

    That the Conservatives are bringing back the high street.

    Conference, energy is growth.

    It always has been, and it always will be.

    Countries with cheap energy grow faster.

    Countries with expensive energy decline.

    Right now, we pay four times what industry in the US does for electricity.

    The result.

    We are deindustrialising.

    It’s not just manufacturing that is disappearing.

    Not just steel, not just chemicals, not just ceramics, not just oil and gas.

    We are losing our farming industry.

    We are losing our fishing industry.

    These are the foundations of a strong economy, and they are going all because we chose a slogan of Net Zero over a serious strategy for a stronger economy and a better environment.

    So, I am saying, enough.

    I am reversing this.

    We will get rid of the Climate Change Act and replace it with a proper strategy that actually works.

    A strategy which protects the natural environment and landscapes we love.

    A strategy that takes sensible steps to tackle climate change, without bankrupting ourselves in the process.

    We will cut bills for families, slash costs for businesses, end the madness that you have to tear out your boiler, or disconnect your gas hob.

    We are going to bring industry and jobs back home.

    This is real action Conference, not slogans.

    Conference, I am not a climate change sceptic.

    But I am a Net Zero sceptic.

    Britain has already done more than any major country to cut emissions.

    But we cannot have a law which will make this country poorer, while creating jobs abroad and increasing our reliance on hostile states.

    So, we will axe the Carbon Tax on electricity.

    We will scrap Labour’s wind and solar levy.

    And instead, we will give you our Cheap Power Plan.

    Through this plan we will cut bills by £165 for the average family.

    Nearly £5,000 for the average restaurant.

    And over £1,100 for the average pub.

    Those are costs that are passed on to consumers.

    Conference I won’t promise you free beer, but I do want you all to have cheaper beer.

    Now it is time to put British prosperity first, give this country the cheap, reliable energy it needs to thrive again.

    Backing nuclear but also recognising that it is pure folly to ban new oil and gas extraction, while paying to import resources that Norway takes from the very same basin.

    So, when it comes to the North Sea, we have a very simple policy, drill our oil and gas now.

    Conference, you’d would have seen, you will have seen it, out there in the fringes all over Manchester, that this is a Party fizzing with ideas, building our policy programme, setting out our plans.

    A tax cut for our high streets, a helping hand for the young with our first-jobs bonus, reforms to welfare, 10,000 new police officers, tripling stop and search, scrapping the sentencing council, a new removals force, improving behaviour in schools, doubling apprenticeships, support for our veterans, £165 off your electricity bills, drilling in the North Sea, an end to the Energy Profits Levy, scrapping the Family Farm Tax, scrapping the Family Business Tax, scrapping VAT on School Fees, out of the ECHR, a plan for our borders, a plan for a stronger economy.

    And Conference.

    Because of all the savings we’ve found and costed.

    Because of the tough decisions on what the government shouldn’t do.

    Because of our golden economic rule.

    We can afford to make one more announcement.

    As the Conservative party, we know who our people are.

    They are people who work hard.

    They are the people who save hard.

    They are the people who understand the importance of putting down roots.

    They are the people who make sacrifices today for a better life tomorrow.

    They do the right thing.

    Our people are the Brits who want to get ahead in life.

    At the heart of a Conservative Britain is a country where people who wish to own their own home, can.

    I remember the joy, when I got the first set of keys, to my first flat.

    The excitement of opening my own front door for the very first time.

    The smell of the fresh paint. I remember it just like yesterday.

    I want everyone in our country to have that feeling.

    To know, it’s your place, your house, your home.

    We Conservatives believe that owning your own home gives you a real stake in society, roots in your community.

    But our housing market is not working as it should.

    Because there’s a big barrier that keeps getting in the way.

    That barrier, Conference, is the tax you have to pay when you buy your home.

    I haven’t even said what it is yet, but you all know.

    You all know that barrier is stamp duty.

    Young people trapped in the pain of renting.

    Workers who want to further their career.

    Pensioners who want to downsize but can’t afford the thousands of pounds they have to pay in tax.

    Conference, Stamp Duty is a bad tax. It is an unConservative tax.

    The last Conservative Government cut stamp duty for thousands of homebuyers.

    But now we must go further, we must free up our housing market.

    Because a society where no one can afford to buy, or move, is a society where social mobility is dead.

    So I have looked at the Stamp Duty thresholds to see if we can change them.

    I have looked at the rates you have to pay to see if we can lower them.

    I have decided we can’t.

    Because that simply wouldn’t be enough.

    Conference, the next Conservative Government will abolish stamp duty on your home. It will be gone.

    I thought you’d like that one. Thank you.

    That is how we will help achieve the dream of home ownership for millions.

    Home ownership should be a dream that’s open to everyone.

    Abolishing stamp duty on your home is a key to unlock a fairer and more aspirational society.

    We cannot unpick every tax, the debt, the deficit and the damage this Labour government is creating means we cannot do everything all at once.

    Scrapping stamp duty will benefit people of all ages because Conservativism must speak to all generations.

    The young professional, buying their first flat.

    The couple looking for somewhere to bring up their first baby.

    The growing family hunting for their forever home.

    The pensioner who wants somewhere a little smaller, or maybe to move nearer the grandchildren.

    No longer will they be punished with a tax that is a barrier to doing the right thing for them, for their family, and for society.

    And this change will bring wider benefits to our economy, too, because every time a home is sold it triggers a chain reaction of activity.

    Movers, builders, decorators.

    Flat pack furniture and DIY.

    Trips to Next, John Lewis and IKEA.

    And I can afford to do this while still leaving space within my golden economic rule.

    Because that’s the fiscally prudent way to do things.

    That’s what Conservatives do.

    Conference, I want to see a better Britain, where people have a brighter and more prosperous future.

    The Labour Party fails when it follows its principles.

    We fail when we don’t follow ours.

    We are going to follow the same timeless, Conservative principles which have led us to success in the past.

    Personal responsibility.

    Free enterprise.

    Family.

    Freedom of speech.

    People want to know what I stand for; I stand for a government that takes less of your money and doesn’t interfere in your life.

    Where the state does less but does it better.

    Where those who create wealth are welcomed with open arms, not driven from our shores.

    Where reward matches effort.

    Where Britain stands tall in the world.

    I stand for an economy where profit is not a dirty word.

    Where enterprise is supported not crushed.

    I stand for a country where what you put in determines what you get out.

    Where excellence is celebrated.

    I stand for a country where actions have consequences.

    Where we talk about responsibilities as well as rights.

    Where crime is punished and justice is served.

    Where the welfare of victims outweighs the welfare of criminals.

    I stand for a society where free speech trumps hurt feelings.

    Where everyone knows what a woman is.

    Where people are judged by the content of their character not the colour of their skin.

    Where the vulnerable are supported.

    But where freeloaders are told where to get off.

    Conference, I stand for stronger borders and a stronger economy.

    So that the young can fulfil their potential, the old can live out their years in dignity, and everyone can achieve their dreams – to own a home, run a business, raise a family.

    This is the Britain I stand for.

    If it is the Britain, you stand for then stand with me.

    And let’s build it together.”

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2025 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    Kemi Badenoch – 2025 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Conservative Party, in Manchester on 5 October 2025.

    Thank you.

    Conservatives love Manchester. It is a great city of free trade and free thinking.

    240 years ago, in the 1780s, this was still a small market town.

    But something was stirring.

    A spirit of enterprise that would turn Manchester into a global economic powerhouse.

    And it was back in the 1780s that the very first Jewish community was established in this city.

    A small group of families, worshipping in a rented room in a back alley, just a short walk from where I am standing.

    And right from the very start, Jewish people have been part of the fabric of Manchester.

    Adding their distinct, unique contribution to this fantastic city, while at the same time embracing Britain as their home.

    The horrific and despicable attack at Heaton Park Synagogue on Thursday has shocked us all.

    But for many in the Jewish community, it did not come as a surprise.

    Many have been living with a sense of rising dread that an attack like this was becoming inevitable.

    Yesterday, I met members of the congregation and visited the site of the attack.

    The strength of Manchester’s Jewish community is humbling.

    Targeting the centre of community life on the holiest day of the year, was not just an attack on British Jews, it was an attack on all of us.

    It was an attack on our humanity and our values of freedom, compassion, and respect.

    It was an attack on the idea that Britain is a safe place for Jews.

    On Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement, Jews take time for introspection. To ask themselves – where have we gone wrong in the past, and what do we need to do, to be better in the future?

    These are questions we urgently need to ask ourselves as a nation.

    Extremism has gone unchecked.

    We see it manifest in the shameful behaviour on the streets of our cities. Protests which are in fact carnivals of hatred directed at the Jewish homeland.

    You hear it in the asinine slogans.

    You hear it in ‘From the river to the sea’ – as if the homes, the lives, of millions of Jewish people should be erased.

    You hear it in ‘Globalise the intifada’ – which means nothing at all, if it doesn’t mean, targeting Jewish people for violence.

    We have tolerated this in our country for too long.

    And we have tolerated the radical Islamist ideology that seeks to threaten not only Jews, but all of us, of all faiths and none, who want to live in peace.

    So, the message from this conference, from this party, from every decent and right-thinking person in this country must be that we will not stand for it, anymore.

    We cannot import and tolerate, values hostile to our own.

    We must now draw a line and say that in Britain you can think what you like, and within the bounds of the law, you can say what you like but you have no right to turn our streets into theatres of intimidation. And we will not let you do so anymore.

    To our Jewish friends, we stand with you shoulder to shoulder.

    You are part of the fabric of Britain, and you always will be.

    We pray for the recovery of the victims still in hospital.

    And we mourn with you the loss of Adrian Daulby and Melvin Cravitz.

    May their memories be a blessing.

    But we must never let terrorism defeat our democratic process. We must demonstrate that it is through political argument, not violence, that we reach our decisions and improve our country.

    We all know the scale of the challenge we face, the mountain we have to climb.

    Last year, the public sent us a clear message.

    One we could not mistake and which we will never forget.

    They want serious change.

    For politics to be done differently so our country can get back on track.

    That’s what I promised you when I stood for the leadership of our party.

    A reset. Politics done differently. Politics done properly.

    A Conservative Party under new leadership ready to earn the trust of the British people again.

    In the last 12 months we’ve started doing politics in a new way.

    No more making the announcement first and working out the policy detail second.

    No more thinking we can leave quangos and bureaucrats to their own devices and then wonder why we don’t see results.

    No more accepting that our laws can be used as a tool to subvert democratic decisions and basic common sense.

    An end, once and for all, to the drift of our institutions away from truth, honesty and decency. And a return to the values that define our country at its best.

    That’s what this week is all about.

    But I didn’t say it would be easy, and I didn’t say it would be quick.

    Nothing really worth doing is.

    Anyone who tells you there are easy answers to the big questions our country faces is either lying to you or lying to themselves.

    We are taking a new approach.

    Credible plans rooted in Conservative values.

    Hard though the task is, we have plenty of reasons to be cheerful.

    Because as one of my great predecessors, Margaret Thatcher put it ‘the facts of life are Conservative.’

    The facts of life are Conservative, Conference. The fact that countries, like families, have to live within their means.

    The fact that individuals know better than governments how best to spend their own money.

    The fact that freedom depends on order and only works under the rule of law.

    There is a gap for the responsible, optimistic, competent Conservative approach.

    An approach rooted in values.

    Values like personal responsibility – as my dad often said to me: “only 20% of what happens to you is down to others. 80% is down to your actions and your choices”.

    Like citizenship – a commitment to a country and the people in it.

    Family – different shapes and sizes, the bedrock of social stability and the foundation of our society.

    Freedom – freedom to think, to speak and to live as each of us chooses.

    These are the values of British people.

    They are crying out for a politics rooted in those values which puts their needs first.

    Conference they are crying out for a Stronger Economy – where hard work is rewarded and everyone has a chance to get on.

    For Stronger Borders – where we control who comes here and can remove those with no right to stay.

    This is our political DNA as Conservatives.

    Our job is to prove to the country that we are the only party that can deliver it.

    Conference, post-war, Conservatives spread prosperity and built millions of new homes – the bedrock of the property-owning democracy.

    In the 1980s, Mrs Thatcher broke the cycle of high inflation, low growth, and trade union strife, giving Britain back her national pride and economic strength.

    Labour accuse us of achieving nothing in the 14 years since 2010.

    I’ll tell you what we did.

    Remember what we inherited from them back then.

    They spent all the money, sold the gold, piled up debt.

    Like every Labour government in history, they left unemployment higher than they found it.

    We were elected to fix it and Conservatives got to work.

    We slashed the deficit every year so that when the pandemic hit, we had the means to weather the storm.

    We reformed our schools to put rigour back into the curriculum.

    And today, a whole generation of young people will enter the world with better maths and literacy skills than any generation before them.

    We reformed welfare.

    We got people into work.

    Four million new jobs were created.

    Over a million new businesses

    We gave the British people a choice on our membership of the EU, and we implemented that decision.

    And what followed?

    The fastest vaccine roll-out in the west.

    Billions of pounds worth of trade deals.

    No other party would have done these things.

    But they were right for our country, and we can all be proud of them.

    And Conference, we mustn’t forget that in each election from 2010 to 2019, our vote share went up.

    That’s unprecedented in modern history.

    And the British people don’t get it wrong.

    But if we take pride in what we got right, we also have to face up to what we got wrong.

    People won’t listen to us again until we show them, we have learnt from our mistakes and changed.

    We’ve got to do this and do it properly.

    What have we learned?

    That you can’t have a budget that has £150 billion of spending giveaways and billions more in tax cuts without saying where the money is coming from.

    We have to show that we have learnt from the policy mistake of letting bureaucrats decide the immigration system.

    We failed to bring numbers down and stop the boats. Let’s be honest.

    And that happened on our watch.

    Yes, we tried but put simply, we didn’t achieve enough.

    After years of responsible and effective government our mistakes on the economy and on immigration lost us the trust and confidence of the public.

    So, we start this week saying we have learnt, and we will never repeat the financial irresponsibility of spending commitments without saying where the money is coming from.

    Never again, Conference.

    This week we will set out how we have changed, how we will be different – and, most importantly, how we will make a difference.

    Economic responsibility is the hallmark of the Conservative approach and today it is right back at the heart of everything we stand for.

    We may be in Manchester, but the theme of economic responsibility will run through this conference like the words in a stick of Blackpool rock.

    You’ll be hearing a lot more about that this week

    But there are two parts to our message at this conference: Stronger Economy, Stronger Borders.

    And it’s stronger borders that I want to talk to you about today.

    I was elected leader because I promised to renew this party and our policies,

    So, we can win the next election and then rewire the state to make it work for people again.

    We are not interested in superficial fixes.

    Instead, we are taking a systemic approach.

    Asking the difficult questions that others avoid.

    We have the courage to follow through with credible plans to answer them.

    It’s the rigorous, practical, Conservative way.

    And on so many of those questions, the answers come back to the same thing.

    Why is it that every time we try to build anything in this country, we have to spend millions of pounds on paperwork, and still get bogged down in litigation?

    Why are protesters allowed to block roads and disrupt lives, time and time again?

    Why are our veterans, relentlessly chased through the courts by activist lawyers?

    Why couldn’t we deport those foreign nationals, who raped girls in communities across the UK?

    Why do we still allow them to remain in the very same towns where their victims live? Why?

    It is fundamental, why can’t we control our borders and remove those who need to go?

    All these questions boil down to who should make the laws that govern the United Kingdom?

    Conservatives, believe it should be our sovereign Parliament, accountable to the British people.

    The reality today, is that this is simply not the case.

    I saw it again and again in government.

    So often, we had the right instincts and the right policies, but our hands were tied by a system that frustrated democratic control.

    This use of litigation as a political weapon is what I call lawfare.

    Well-meaning treaties and statutes – like the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Convention on Action against Trafficking drafted with the best of intentions in generations gone by, and more recent additions like the Modern Slavery Act, are now being used in ways never intended by their original authors.

    What should be shields to protect the vulnerable, have instead become swords to attack democratic decisions and frustrate common sense.

    Conference, this isn’t just damaging our security, it’s also damaging our prosperity.

    It is that whole system which we need to reform.

    And the place to start is the European Convention on Human Rights.

    None of us has a problem with the rights in the original charter.

    It was drafted in 1950 by British lawyers – Conservative lawyers – and it drew on British traditions.

    The problems stem from how it has been enforced and how its meaning has been twisted and changed.

    Today, it is used as a block on deportations, a weapon against veterans, and a barrier to sentencing and public order.

    Labour pretend it can be fixed, but when a group of nine European countries, led by Italy, recently pushed for reforms at the court, the Labour government didn’t support them.

    They wouldn’t even try.

    Our human rights lawyer Prime Minister, and his good friend the Attorney General. An Attorney General who likened those of us questioning ECHR membership to Nazis will never fix this problem.

    Instead, Conference they have gone in the opposite direction.

    Paying to surrender British territory in the Chagos Islands,

    And plotting to force everyone in this country to carry Starmer’s digital ID. Conference, we will fight them every step of the way.

    Reform just shout that we should “leave” the ECHR without any plan to do so or understanding any of the consequences.

    They are practicing that old, failed politics I talked about.

    That politics of announcements without a plan.

    That’s the way to chaos and failure.

    It is only the Conservatives who are taking the honest, responsible approach, prepared with a plan to deliver.

    To make sure we can strike at the root of the problem, we need to understand the full extent of the problem.

    That’s why I identified five essential policies that the Government must be able to implement, if we are to secure our border and restore order to our society.

    Five tests that a country has to pass to be truly sovereign.

    First, can we deport foreign criminals and those who are here illegally?

    Second, can we stop our veterans being harassed through the courts?

    Third, can we put British citizens first for social housing and public services?

    Fourth, can we make sure protests do not intimidate people or stop them living their lives?

    And fifth, can we stop endless red tape and legal challenges choking off economic growth?

    Any self-respecting sovereign nation should be able to answer all five of those questions with a clear, yes.

    Anything that is stopping us from doing so is a barrier we have to remove.

    So, I asked the Shadow Attorney General, the distinguished King’s Counsel Lord Wolfson, to lead an in-depth analysis.

    The question I posed was whether these five tests can be lawfully met, as a signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights, bound by the court in Strasbourg.

    I want to thank Lord Wolfson for his immense and detailed work. So forensic, so thorough.

    In nearly 200 pages of legal advice, he has provided his answer.

    This is what he said.

    ‘When it comes to control of our sovereign borders, preventing our military veterans from being pursued indefinitely, ensuring prison sentences are applied rigorously for serious crimes, stopping disruptive protests, or placing blanket restrictions on foreign nationals in terms of social housing and benefits, the only way such positions are feasible would be to leave the ECHR.’

    And so to me and the shadow cabinet, the resulting policy decision is also clear.

    We must leave the ECHR and repeal the Human Rights Act.

    Conference, I want you to know that the next Conservative manifesto will contain our commitment to leave.

    Leaving the Convention is a necessary step, but not enough on its own to achieve our goals.

    If there are other treaties and laws, we need to revise or revisit then we will do so. And we will do so in the same calm and responsible way, working out the detail before we rush to announce.

    The rights we enjoy did not come from the ECHR.

    They were there for hundreds of years in our common law.

    Parliament has legislated over centuries to reflect and protect our freedoms.

    Human Rights in the United Kingdom did not start in 1998 with the Human Rights Act, and will not end with it.

    As we work through our detailed plan, we are clear that leaving the ECHR and repealing the Human Rights Act will not mean that we lose any of the rights we cherish.

    But this is the only way to end spurious legal claims from immigrants with dubious stories and excuses.

    This is the only way to allow a British Government, the next Conservative Government, to deliver a British BORDERS plan in full.

    Conference, the Shadow Home Secretary, Chris Philp, has done a brilliant job pulling together this BORDERS plan. The Conservatives are a strong team. And he will be saying more about this shortly, including our plans to remove 150,000 illegal immigrants a year.

    Lord Wolfson has also advised that leaving the ECHR is fully compatible with the Belfast Agreement – the Good Friday Agreement.

    But I know that there will be particular challenges in Northern Ireland.

    The difficulties are not a reason to avoid action, they are a reason to work harder to get it right.

    So, to ensure that this is an orderly and respectful process across the whole United Kingdom. I am asking Shadow Northern Ireland Secretary Alex Burghart to lead a review into Union-wide implementation.

    So, at the next election, we will present the people of the United Kingdom with a clear, thorough and robust plan.

    Not the vague mush that we see day in, day out from Labour

    Nor the vacuous posturing that we see day in day out from Reform.

    Conference, you would have seen last week, both Labour and Reform shouting at one another, trading insults instead of solutions.

    One flings around the word racist and will not be realistic about what is going wrong.

    The other whips up outrage, offering simplistic answers that fall apart on first contact with reality.

    That is not serious politics.

    Conference, neither offers the leadership Britain deserves.

    The truth is that Labour and Reform are two sides of the same coin.

    Both deal in grievance.

    Both divide our country into tribes and labels.

    Both practice identity politics which will destroy our country.

    I am saying no: no to division and no to identity politics.

    Conference, what Britain needs is national unity.

    I am black.

    I am a woman.

    I am a Conservative.

    And I know that identity politics is a trap.

    It reduces people to categories and then pits them against each other.

    But I am more than black, female, and even Conservative.

    I am British.

    Conference, I am British, as we all are.

    My children are British.

    And I will not allow anyone on the Left to tell them they belong in a different category or anyone on the Right to tell them they do not belong in their own country.

    Yes, Britain is a multiracial country.

    That is part of our modern story.

    But it must never become a multicultural country where shared values dissolve, loyalty fragments and we foment the home-grown terrorism we saw on the streets of Manchester this week.

    Nations cannot survive on diversity alone.

    We need a strong, common culture, rooted in our history, our language, our institutions, and our belief in liberty under the law.

    That is what holds us together.

    And that is why borders matter.

    Why numbers matter.

    But most of all why culture matters.

    Who comes here, why they come, and how they contribute that is how we protect the inheritance that generations before us fought for and died for.

    Conference, Britain needs deep change.

    But I reject the politics that everything must go. Everything must be torn down. That everything is broken.

    But if we leave it to Labour or Reform, Britain will be divided.

    Only the Conservatives can bring this country back together.

    This is a battle we must win.

    By combining secure borders, with a shared culture, strong values, and the confidence of a great nation, we can win the debate, and win the next election.

    Conference, this is a party under new leadership and with a renewed purpose.

    We have listened, we have learned, and we have changed.

    Only Conservatives will tell you the truth.

    Take the difficult decisions.

    Do the hard work.

    Only Conservatives have the courage, the honesty, and the plan to strengthen our borders, restore our sovereignty, and rebuild our prosperity.

    So, I say to you all, as we start our conference.

    Yes, we have a mountain to climb but we have a song in our hearts.

    And we are up for the fight.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2025 Comments Following the Death of Norman Tebbit

    Kemi Badenoch – 2025 Comments Following the Death of Norman Tebbit

    The comments made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Conservative Party, on 8 July 2025.

    Our Conservative family mourns the loss of Lord Tebbit today and I send my sincerest condolences to his loved ones.

    Norman Tebbit was an icon in British politics and his death will cause sadness across the political spectrum.

    He was one of the leading exponents of the philosophy we now know as Thatcherism and his unstinting service in the pursuit of improving our country should be held up as an inspiration to all Conservatives.

    As a minister in Mrs Thatcher’s administration he was one of the main agents of the transformation of our country, notably in taming the trade unions.

    But to many of us it was the stoicism and courage he showed in the face of terrorism which inspired us as he rebuilt his political career after suffering terrible injuries in the Brighton bomb, and cared selflessly for his wife Margaret, who was gravely disabled in the bombing – a reminder that he was first and foremost a family man who always held true to his principles.

    He never buckled under pressure and he never compromised.

    Our nation has lost one of its very best today and I speak for all the Conservative family and beyond in recognising Lord Tebbit’s enormous intellect and profound sense of duty to his country.

    May he rest in peace.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2025 Speech on the “For Women Scotland” Supreme Court Ruling

    Kemi Badenoch – 2025 Speech on the “For Women Scotland” Supreme Court Ruling

    The speech made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, in the House of Commons on 22 April 2025.

    I thank the Minister for Women and Equalities for advance sight of her statement, even if it was mostly a shameless work of fiction. I could not believe my eyes, or my ears, this afternoon.

    In 2021 the Prime Minister said it was “not right” to say that only women have a cervix. In 2022 he said it was the law that “trans women are women”. In 2023 he said, “99% of women don’t have a penis”. I know what a woman is, and I always have. The people of this country know what a woman is. We did not need the Supreme Court to tell us that, but this Government did: a Labour Government so desperate to jump on a bandwagon that they abandoned common sense, along with the Scottish National party—which put rapists in women’s prisons—and, of course, the Liberal Democrats.

    The Supreme Court ruling is a powerful victory for the determined women behind For Women Scotland, and for people all over the UK who know how important it is to give privacy and dignity to women and girls who need it, but it follows years of battle. Individual women took action to uphold the law at great personal cost, losing their jobs and their reputations. A few weeks ago I met the Darlington nurses who were forced to bring legal action after a male nurse started using their changing room. Even their union, the Royal College of Nursing, refused to represent them. Women should not have to battle the NHS or their employers through the courts.

    Why has it been such a battle? Because something as simple as biological reality became politicised and corrupted by activists pushing this ideology as foolish politicians cheered. Even the Minister—who said in her statement that this was “personal” to her—stated just last year that men should access women’s spaces. Whether it is female victims in our courts being forced to refer to their male sex attackers as “she” or the NHS using confusing “gender-neutral” language, putting the health of women at risk, this is a serious matter.

    At every point when we have fought for women, we have faced hostility from activist groups and the Labour party: in 2020, when we rejected Labour’s calls to introduce self-identification, and in 2021, when the then Home Secretary, my right hon. Friend the Member for Witham (Priti Patel), ordered police forces to stop recording offences by trans women in female crime statistics. The current Culture Secretary, the right hon. Member for Wigan (Lisa Nandy), said that crimes committed by men should be recorded how they wished, and that those convicted of serious sexual offences should be held in jails that matched their chosen gender. It was crazy then, and it is crazy now.

    I spent years battling abuse from Labour Members as I fought to uphold biological sex in government and blocked the SNP’s introduction of its mad self-identity laws, and I will take no lectures from them about what to do on this issue. Women and gay rights groups such as the LGB Alliance were even refused stands at the Labour party conference. The idea that Labour has supported this all along is for the birds. The Foreign Secretary described opponents of self-ID as “dinosaurs”. Labour now says that it knows what a woman is, and that transgender people should use services and facilities designated for their biological sex. It has never said that before, and this is a U-turn, but we welcome it.

    Now that we have legal clarity, will the Prime Minister show some courage and do the right thing? Will he apologise to the hon. Member for Canterbury (Rosie Duffield), who faced so many security concerns as she was hounded out by the Labour party, and who was rebuked by the Prime Minister, and by many Labour MPs who are sitting there looking at me, for stating what the Supreme Court has now ruled to be true? Will the Minister apologise to the hon. Member for Canterbury? I doubt it. Will the Prime Minister crack down on the groups whom we saw defacing statues of suffragists over the weekend with the same energy that he reserves for his political opponents, or will we see more two-tier justice? Last time we saw Labour MPs standing next to them with no rebuke whatsoever. Will the Minister ensure that the Equality and Human Rights Commission has the Government’s full support in its enforcement of the code of practice? In particular, will she condemn the Labour Ministers who described Baroness Falkner’s entirely correct position on the judgment as “appalling”?

    We need to root out gender ideology from our institutions. This Government now have a serious job to do, as many organisations will still fail women. I ask the following questions. As Minister for Women and Equalities, I published guidance for schools that made it clear that toilets and changing rooms must be provided separately for girls and boys, but the Minister scrapped that guidance. Will she stand up to the unions and urgently publish what she now admits is the law? She has also scrapped relationships, sex and health education guidance that would prevent schools from teaching contested gender ideology as fact. Will she now publish the guidance, and remove materials that mis-state the law? Will she act to stop passports and licences being issued with information on them about self-declared, rather than legal, sex? Will the Government support our amendments to the data Bill to ensure that digital ID systems record biological sex accurately? Finally, the Minister says that she is here to protect transgender people, many of whom were misled by Labour’s mis-statements on this issue. Some are now left very anxious. She has not provided any reassurance, and she should not use them as a shield to protect her failure.

    This is not the end of the matter, but the beginning of the end. There is so much to do, and the Conservative party, under my leadership, will be relentless in ensuring that the Government do the right thing.

    Bridget Phillipson

    I am delighted to see the right hon. Lady in her place today. Many would run from a record like hers on these matters, but not the right hon. Lady. She and the Conservative party had 14 years to provide clarity on the issues that they now claim to take an interest in. The Supreme Court has confirmed that Labour’s Equality Act 2010 is the basis for single-sex spaces and protection, but the Conservatives did not provide that clarity. Before I say a bit more about her record, I will say a little more about mine. I will come to the questions—[Interruption.] If the right hon. Lady has some patience, I will respond to her questions.

    I have supported countless women and children fleeing appalling male violence, sexual violence and domestic abuse. I have campaigned for decades on women’s rights. I know more than most about the importance of spaces for women—I have fought for them, I have delivered them and I have run them. While I was running a refuge, and while Labour was delivering the groundbreaking Equality Act, which, as this ruling confirms, sets in law the basis for single-sex spaces, what was the Leader of the Opposition doing? Forever the keyboard warrior, she was busy hacking the website of the leading architect of the Equality Act, and she has learned nothing from her party’s crushing electoral defeat last year. She held the post of Minister for Women and Equalities for two years and did precisely nothing. She provided no clarity in the law and nothing to improve the lives of women, which got materially worse on her watch.

    The right hon. Lady comes here claiming to speak for women, but let us look at her record and her party’s record. There has been an increase in stalking offences. Prosecutions and convictions for domestic abuse have nearly halved since 2015. The rape charge rate is at a record low. Survivors of sexual violence are waiting years for justice. There has been a 2,000% increase in the use of mixed-sex wards in only 10 years. That is the Conservatives’ record.

    The right hon. Lady asks about the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s statutory code of practice. I have set out that I am expecting an updated version of that as soon as possible. I will work with the Equality and Human Rights Commission to implement the code of practice, to make sure that everyone has the clarity that they require, and I expect the EHRC to work quickly and thoroughly on this matter.

    The right hon. Lady asks about gender-questioning guidance and RSHE guidance. I am afraid that too is simply laughable. Mere months before the election was called, the Conservatives published a version of the draft guidance for gender-questioning children. Since that time, we have had the final review by Dr Hilary Cass published. It is right that we ensure that the guidance aligns with Dr Cass’s final review.

    On the RSHE guidance, the consultation concluded after the election. We could not be clearer that we will always protect single-sex spaces, and we Labour Members are focused on delivering for women. Whereas the Leader of the Opposition has described maternity pay as “excessive” and called the minimum wage “harmful”, we are improving protections for pregnant women at work. We are ensuring that women can take maternity leave and come back to good, secure jobs. We are expanding childcare, the first 750 new free breakfast clubs opened today, and we have brought forward the single biggest piece of child protection legislation in a generation to protect young women and girls.

    It is Labour’s groundbreaking Equality Act that provides the basis for what we have set out today about single-sex spaces for biological women. This Labour Government have a plan for change; a plan that will deliver for women. It is time for the Conservative party to get offline and get on board.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2024 Speech on Planning, the Green Belt and Rural Affairs

    Kemi Badenoch – 2024 Speech on Planning, the Green Belt and Rural Affairs

    The speech made by Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative MP for North West Essex, in the House of Commons on 19 July 2024.

    It is a delight to be back at the Dispatch Box, and I have been looking forward to speaking opposite the right hon. Lady for a very long time. She and I have never really met, and certainly never spoken to each other, despite being in this House together for seven years. We have some things in common, although not much. We were both born in 1980, although I am older and wiser than she is. People often think we are both much younger than we really are, because we have got such great skin and good hair, and we are both known as being quite feisty. I am really pleased to be able to congratulate her on her elevation to Secretary of State and Deputy Prime Minister. This is a phenomenal achievement.

    She will be a great inspiration to young people, particularly young women, in many communities across the country. That is a wonderful thing. That is the sort of Britain we are: where people from all walks of life can grow up and reach the top. It is an extraordinary story, dare I say it, of Conservative success. Because unlike me, the right hon. Lady grew up under a Conservative Government, with a welfare state that provided a safety net, a strong economy and opportunity. I mostly grew up in Nigeria, under a socialist military Government, who used a lot of the rhetoric that I heard her promote when she was sitting on the Opposition Benches. She may not credit the Conservatives for what she has achieved, but we will take some of the credit anyway.

    I would like to extend a very warm welcome to the right hon. Lady on her first outing as a Minister in the Chamber, because it will only be downhill from here. The thing is, I have been a Secretary of State, and after five years as a Minister one learns a thing or two about government that cannot be learned in Opposition. I have been there and done it, and I can tell the right hon. Lady that she has been stitched up. It is quite clear that the Bills and policies from the King’s Speech that she just referenced were written not by her, but by the Chancellor and her advisers. We all know that because we watched the Chancellor announce them in far more detail in her speech last week.

    All the stuff that the Secretary of State worked on in Opposition, such as her new deal for workers, has been taken off her and given to the Business Secretary. I am sorry to tell the right hon. Lady that her colleagues—the Prime Minister, the Chancellor and their many advisers—have written a manifesto and made promises that are not deliverable, and they have hung them around her neck and said, “Ange, you go out there and you sell it.” I am sad to see many of her shadow team not sitting beside her as Ministers. They worked for free, grinding in opposition for years, only to watch the children of the chosen ones get the ministerial cars and salaries before their maiden speeches were written. Wow. Sue Gray was a lot nicer to me when she worked in my Department.

    I think we know who is in charge, and it is not the right hon. Lady. She has been stitched up—her colleagues have made her the fall guy. The Government have promised 1.5 million houses by the end of this Parliament—over 800 houses per day—and we are already two weeks in. As she goes on, day after day, she will realise that a backlog is building, and there is no way out. I want her to know that I am here for her. I will be here to hold her hand and walk her through what is likely to be a very difficult time. I may even give her some tips because, having worked in that Department, I know what needs to be done. I know what we should have done but did not do, and I know that the Labour Government will make the same mistakes.

    It is not that 1.5 million homes by the end of this Parliament is unachievable, but it will require the sort of systemic change that Labour Members are not ready for. I know that because of how they voted in the last Parliament and how they campaigned in their own constituencies. I will not read out the long list of all the Cabinet members who have been opposing planning in their backyard, including the Housing Minister. Many of them thought that they would get into government and concrete over lots of Tory constituencies. Three weeks ago, just 15% of the green belt was in Labour constituencies. Now it is 50%. They are not Tory constituencies now—they are Labour. [Hon. Members: “Hear, hear!”] Yes, they are Labour. I say to Labour Members, “They are now your voters and your electorate, and you’re going to have to tell them that you’re going to do something that many of you promised locally that you would never do, not that long ago.”

    However, mostly it will not be the problem of the Cabinet, who will look after themselves. It will be the Back Benchers—all those bright, shiny faces I see sitting behind the right hon. Lady, who are really excited to be here. They have not started getting those angry emails that we have been replying to for 14 years. Many of those voters, on whom their narrow, slim majorities now rely, will be writing to them.

    In the spirit of sisterly support, I will let the right hon. Lady know what will happen over the next few weeks and months. Labour Members are looking so nervous right now. The right hon. Lady will have a consultation period, which will take this long. Then, she will have to respond to that consultation, which will take that long. Assuming that nothing goes wrong with either of those processes, we reach December or January. Six months will have passed—10% of the Parliament—and the Government will not have built any extra homes. At this point, she will be running 500 homes behind the target every single day and they would not have started building properly. [Interruption.] The Minister of State in the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, the hon. Member for Greenwich and Woolwich (Matthew Pennycook), is chuntering from a sedentary position, “You wait and see.” We have seen. We have been there. We know; you don’t.

    And as it becomes clear to their voters what is happening in their new Labour constituencies—for which, congratulations—in the green belt, those MPs are going to receive a lot more emails. I mean, a lot more. They are going to want a lot of public meetings, because they will know that the decisions she announced are now being taken out of local hands and made by central Government. And the only way that they can register their concern is by appealing to their local MPs, who will all be appealing to her.

    Well, this is what being in power is. Government is about making difficult decisions. Opposition is easy—we have been watching Labour do it for 14 years, and it has spent all that time telling the people of this country that they will do better. So here is the record that they are going to have to beat: we built 1 million new homes in the course of the last Parliament, while safeguarding the green belt; and 2.5 million since 2010, despite covid. We delivered nearly 700,000 new affordable homes and over 172,000 of those were for social rent. We put in place the £11.5 billion affordable homes programme. Does the right hon. Lady even know yet if the Chancellor will give her up to £11.5 billion? She is going to need a lot more than that if she is going to beat our record.

    And let us not forget what Labour did just last year. We had a majority in this House, but not in the other place, where they whipped Labour Lords to vote against an amendment on nutrient neutrality, using new Brexit powers to unlock 160,000 homes. Many new Members did not see that happening. They are going to find it shocking. We legislated for that and they blocked it—destructive opposition. Are they going to reverse that decision? I have a feeling they will not. And that is why I am worried about the right hon. Lady. Is she going to be able to face down her Back Benchers? Or will Labour carry on not doing the things that have to be done in order to build homes?

    Let us look at Labour’s record. The right hon. Lady talked about what happened after the last world war. In the year to June 2009, when everybody here was alive and they were last in government, they only built 75,000 new homes—the lowest level of housebuilding since the 1920s. And what are they doing where they currently are in government? In London, Sadiq Khan has failed to hit his own targets, beginning just 21,000 new homes in 2022, despite us giving him pots and pots of money. We were forced to intervene on his housebuilding failures. Why has he not built on all those car parks that she was talking about in her speech? In Wales, the Labour Administration promised to deliver 20,000 new homes for social rent by 2026. They have barely delivered a quarter. The right hon. Lady may pretend that building homes is easy, but Labour know it is not easy because they failed in London and they failed in Wales, and they are already making new mistakes.

    We all know that immigration increases housing demand. Just this week, we heard that they are going to be fast-tracking 90,000 illegal immigrants who already landed here. If they are permitted to stay, they will require permanent housing. We put the Rwanda scheme in place to limit illegal immigration. They have scrapped it. With no plans whatsoever to tackle the problem, has she got 90,000 homes ready for the people the Home Secretary is going to be fast-tracking through? If not, she is already 90,000 homes down on the target the Prime Minister has set for her.

    So that is why I am feeling very generous towards the right hon. Lady, because she has been stitched up. She is going to need some friends, and I want her to know that we are all here for her. [Laughter.] Some people think opposition is about throwing mud across the Chamber or calling your opponents scum, but often it is about saying, “I told you so.” I want to reassure the right hon. Lady that I will be here to say, “I told you so” when these targets are missed.

    We, of course, will be a constructive Opposition. We want to see homes built in the right places with the right infrastructure. We are here to help. I doubt the same can be said of the biggest local nimbys in the country, the Liberal Democrats. There are many more of them now—you wouldn’t know it, but there are—usually elected on promises not to build anything anywhere in their communities. In the last Parliament, I watched them oppose planning reforms on permitted development; reforms that would have allowed us to build on land that was already in use. It will be very interesting to see how they square their nimby tendencies with their manifesto promises—but then again, saying one thing and doing another has never bothered the Liberal Democrats. The right hon. Lady will not get any help from them, but we are here for her.

    I have heard some of Labour’s plans. Introducing mandatory targets while introducing new regulatory costs will not work. Without taxpayer funding, Labour’s affordable housing targets are unviable. Where is that money going to come from? The mandate that Labour wants to enforce implies a consequence for missing the target. What will that consequence be for local councils? Is Labour going to scrap the neighbourhood plans that communities have put together to deliver more homes? What will those councils say when they are forced to do things that they promised they would not do just eight weeks ago?

    We have heard from Labour Members that they will introduce mechanisms for overriding local decision making to identify the land for development. That is fine, but identifying land does not mean that homes or infrastructure will be built. I look forward to the Second Reading of the right hon. Lady’s Bill, when she will have to explain the plans that the Chancellor and her spads have written up for her, and she can tell us in great technical detail how they will be delivered—although I suspect that she will leave the tricky stuff to her junior Ministers. We Conservatives may not be as many as we used to be, but we still know all the stuff that we learned over 14 years as we delivered 2.5 million homes. We know where the difficulties are, and we know the technicalities; the right hon. Lady is just learning. We will be ready and waiting to show that she and her party have made promises that they cannot keep, and in many cases have no idea what they are doing.

    The Labour Government have a tough act to follow—[Laughter.] They do! However, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, and I am pleased to see that they have been copying and pasting many of the policies that we had in government. We introduced metro mayors with substantial powers; now they are announcing that they are going to do more. We put billions of levelling-up funding into communities, backing metro mayors such as Ben Houchen; let us see whether Labour will follow that for all its new mayors. In the last local government finance settlement we made £64.7 billion pounds available to local authorities, a 7.5% increase in cash terms. Let us see whether Labour tops that, rather than just moving money from one part of the country to another.

    We would like to see the Labour Government get the Holocaust Memorial Bill—which we initiated—on to the statute book, as the Prime Minister promised, and we will support them in that. We must do right by our Jewish communities, and we provided record levels of funding to protect them from harm and extremism. We took decisive action to tackle growing sectarianism, so we were disappointed not to see any mention in the King’s Speech of how Labour would continue that. In the election we saw independent MPs win seats from Labour on the back of sectarianism and integration failures, a problem whose existence Labour continually denies even as we are watching riots in Leeds.

    It is time to put away the childish displays and fake outrage that Labour has been showing. The right hon. Lady will need to get very serious very quickly, and where she has the right ambition, we will do what we can to support her in facing down those members sitting behind her who still do not get it.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2024 Speech at Chatham House

    Kemi Badenoch – 2024 Speech at Chatham House

    The speech made by Kemi Badenoch, the Business and Trade Secretary, at Chatham House on 7 March 2024.

    To understand the role of the UK in the global trade landscape we must describe what that landscape looks like right now.

    Everyone in this room is old enough, at least I think everyone in this room is old enough, to have seen for themselves the transformational power of trade.

    You don’t have to go as far as back as Adam Smith and David Ricardo to understand the arguments.

    Look to Eastern Europe and what’s happened since the fall of the Berlin Wall or to countries in the Indo-Pacific like Malaysia or even China.

    As free trade has grown, it is no coincidence that more than a billion people have been lifted out of extreme poverty over the same period.

    But I’m not here to give you a cliché-ridden lecture on how great trade is. The case for it is overwhelming yet despite that it has become a tough sell for politicians. I’m here to respond to the criticisms that the UK no longer has a place in the world, and that free trade has been part of the problem rather than the solution.

    I’m here to give you reasons for optimism and reasons to be proud about our role on the world stage.

    Across the West and beyond, low growth has become a profound and stubborn problem. In many countries, wages have failed to keep pace with rising prices, with lower and middle income families being hardest hit.

    Many, as you know, blame free trade. They say we have allowed other countries to steal our lunch, that the momentum is now [with] the BRICS nations.

    In trade negotiations I often encounter a belief that trade is a zero-sum game, that if we gain from someone we must lose something in exchange.

    Proving that trade within a free market provides mutual benefit is hard when your counter-party believes that the objective is to try and take something from you.

    I spent all of last week in Abu-Dhabi at the World Trade Organization’s 13th Ministerial Conference.  This is where the rules-based trading system and democracy come together to have a big row.

    I am still baffled at how 164 countries make any decisions at all, given the need for unanimity. I saw a lot of arguments, I also saw some tears.

    While the disagreements in Abu Dhabi were not between countries which were pro Israel or pro Palestine, not even really between developed and developing nations.

    The principal disagreements were often within the BRICS nations, between those who support free trade and those who don’t.

    So it’s a choice between the agenda which the head of the WTO, Dr Okonjo-Iweala Ngozi, is promoting – a forward-looking agenda that is about services, green, digital and inclusive trade and an alternative protectionist agenda ending up as a race to the bottom.

    The rules-based system which you often hear about is under threat. One country can stop 163 others from coming to a decision.

    The role of the UK here is not just to prevent the WTO from being held back by a small minority but to ensure that it can live up to its founding principles, using free trade as a means to raise living standards, create jobs, and improve people’s lives – something which we have championed right from the very beginning.

    When I became the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, I told my team that our mission was to be the Department for Economic Growth.

    And I set five priorities to establish how we would deliver on that promise with an outward looking, international agenda.

    To remove market access barriers for UK businesses was the first. Second, to grow British exports. Third, to become the No 1 destination for investment in Europe. Fourth, to sign high quality trade deals. And, finally, and most importantly, to defend free and fair trade.

    These priorities exist in a world where protectionism peaked just as we embarked on our own independent trade policy.

    We took our own seat at the WTO just as many had lost faith in the institution and lost faith in the value of free trade.

    We were repeatedly told that without the clout of the EU bloc we would not open up trade with the markets of the future.

    And three myths have arisen which are regularly repeated on growth, exports and investment.

    The first is that Brexit has hampered our growth, relative to comparable economies.

    That is not the case. The IMF predicts that between 2024 to 2028 the UK will outgrow the G7 economies of France, Germany, Italy, and Japan.

    And our economy is expected to be 17 per cent larger than France’s by 2035.

    The second is that exports have declined.

    That is also not the case. The value of our exports in 2016 – the year of the referendum – was £576 billion.

    In 2020, the year we left the EU, it was just under £624 billion- that’s including the impact of COVID.

    And today our exports are worth over £850 billion […] despite the challenges we’re experiencing following COVID and Putin’s war in Ukraine.

    The third claim was that after Brexit investment would dry up.

    However, last year, our car sector alone attracted £23.7 billion in investment commitments – more than the past 7 years combined. The UK’s car production is now growing at its fastest rate since 2010.

    And the latest figures show that we are the number one destination in Europe for foreign direct investment.

    So, we have succeeded, not in spite of embracing free trade, but because of it.

    In just a few years, we’ve negotiated more free trade agreements than any other independent country in the world.

    In the coming weeks, we will pass our bill [on] the CPTPP – the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership […]. This will make over 99% of UK goods eligible for zero tariffs in Asia-Pacific member countries – a region that will drive global Britain over the next few decades.

    Of course, it’s easy to produce statistics showing that exports and investments are up.

    It’s a lot harder to demonstrate how we are defending the system that we helped create.

    I tell my department we should start by not being ‘knowingly naïve’.

    By that I mean not blindly believing that just because rules are written, they will be followed or that culture and politics are not relevant and it’s only the regulations that count.

    It’s about realism. Realism, realism, realism.

    Which brings me to the criticisms that the government typically faces on trade.

    When the US brought in the Inflation Reduction Act, there were many calls for the UK to do the same – lots of articles written about how leaving the EU meant we were already in decline.

    My response was that copying and pasting policy from other countries is not a strategy.

    It is not possible for every economy to subsidise its way to growth. Some will go bankrupt doing that. That will not be us.

    At a time when other countries are engaging in subsidy wars, we need to be smart and work with those allies who understand what is at risk.  We have to be pragmatic.

    Yes, that means offering targeted support to tackle specific issues facing our economy and yes we want a level playing field for our entrepreneurs so that they can compete globally, but it doesn’t mean hosing industries down with subsidies or slapping tariffs on products from abroad.

    Trade wars inevitably fan the flames of global tensions – the very last thing we need right now.

    This wouldn’t be a Kemi Badenoch speech without a reference to my favourite economist, Thomas Sowell, who pointed out that trade wars are economically counter-productive.

    He argues, for example, that the Smoot-Hawley tariffs played just as great a role in prolonging the Great Depression as the Wall Street crash itself. I agree.

    We would be wise to heed his advice because history shows that countries who engage in protectionism and in ‘beggar thy neighbour’ trade policies are always weaker and poorer as a result.

    So, we lead by example. We work with allies. We are not alone. Countries like New Zealand, Japan, Switzerland and Singapore and many others are with us.

    So in my department, I have to grapple with maintaining a competitive UK steel industry that can stand on its own two feet against a global oversupply of steel, as China floods the market, while also ensuring vital safeguards for the domestic sector. Not an easy trade off.

    I have to manage the lowering of tariffs to bring down costs while not undercutting our own producers when other countries are subsidising theirs. Not easy – there is a trade off.

    I have to strike the right balance between embracing the import of goods from developing countries to help them grow with the need to maintain the high standards on quality and safety which the British people rightly expect.

    We make choices.

    Our free trade agreements are helping us make the right choices because they are all about diversification and resilience.

    That is what the Indo-Pacific tilt is about, but we need to make sure that the facts are out there. It still baffles me how desperate people are to blame everything on leaving the EU. Because criticisms arrive often because it is the first time many are watching the ins and outs of an independent trade policy, played out live.

    These events took place in a black box when we were in the EU. We didn’t have the real-time updates of what was happening with trade negotiations as we do now. It is new. And for those of us who are optimists, exciting. For those of us who are pessimists, scary, and want to make it all go away.

    The problems that they see now, we had when we were in the EU, like harmonizing standards and regulations across different trade agreements, or engaging with countries that have exceptionally different and diverse models of trade, or striking deals with countries that don’t have our values of democracy, the rule of law, and a market economy.

    But when we encounter these same standard negotiating issues, it’s put down to the UK being isolated or being in decline.  This is not a serious analysis of trade for the 21st century.  It is not serious commentary. Let’s have more realism.

    The reality is that the geopolitical climate, and the global conditions for economic security, are more precarious now than at any other time since the Cold War.

    In the Middle East, conflict is raging. In the Red Sea, the free flow of trade is under attack, which is why together with our allies we have taken coordinated military action to protect it.

    Covid and Putin’s war against Ukraine have permanently reconfigured supply chains.

    The challenges in trade we face are different from just a few decades ago. We live in a vastly more interconnected global economy with complex supply chains, cheaper international travel, and the free flow of information.

    That interdependence means there can be no retreat into splendid isolation.

    We must continue to pursue free trade and avoid the tariffs and taxes which stifle growth and push up inflation.

    That open, outward-looking, approach is compatible with protecting our long-term economic security.

    We need investors to feel confident in the UK, confident not only that their assets will grow over time but that fraud or illicit finance will never be tolerated.

    Through our Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act we will make the UK one of the safest places in the world to do business.

    Our National Security and Investment Act is preventing the hostile acquisition of assets.

    This matters because our power plants, our 5G networks and our critical national infrastructure should never be in the hands of those who would do us harm.

    And we are taking similar precautions with regards to exports leaving the UK, updating our Strategic Export Licensing Criteria and significantly enhancing our Military End Use Control.

    Our key aim in all of this work is to prevent hostile countries from ever acquiring British weapons or advanced British technology.

    And to those who would do harm to us or to our allies, we say that we will not allow you to use your economic might to meddle with another state’s affairs.

    The vision of Global Britain remains.  Once mocked as a nation of shopkeepers, we know the value of trade and are staying true to our heritage as a global trading nation that once ruled the waves.

    We received a great inheritance from previous generations; it is important that we create an even greater one to hand down to the next.

    So, the next time you’re asked what role the UK is playing, you can say that from sanctions to supply chain resilience, we are a global leader in economic security, and we are defending free and fair trade underpinned by a rules-based system.

    As you saw in the budget yesterday, we are doing all of this with economic growth at the forefront of our minds.

    And I will conclude by saying we have a Prime Minister who is clear-eyed about the opportunities and the challenges that lie ahead.

    Where investor confidence in many countries has been shaken, he has sent a loud and clear message that Britain is open for business.

    Where there is instability abroad, he has helped to intervene, to bring economic stability at home. He has a plan.

    And where countries are embracing protectionism, we are opening up our markets and lowering the barriers to free, open trade – reducing costs and widening choice for the British consumer, ensuring that our economy is strong, resilient and protected from states that threaten us, threaten our allies, and threaten our international security interests.

    That is the role the UK is playing on the global stage.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2023 Speech at the Global Investment Summit

    Kemi Badenoch – 2023 Speech at the Global Investment Summit

    The speech made by Kemi Badenoch, the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, at Hampton Court on 27 November 2023.

    Good morning Ladies & Gentlemen and welcome to the 2023 Global Investment Summit.

    Thank you to everyone who has travelled from across the globe to be here today to mark the next chapter in this country’s future.

    Two years ago at our inaugural Global Investment Summit, we were still in the throes of a pandemic, yet investors put a near £10 billion vote of confidence in our country because they saw the huge potential for growth that we had to offer.

    It sowed the seeds for our hugely successful Northern Ireland Investment Summit in September which put Belfast and Northern Ireland firmly on the global boardroom map.

    And as a growing science and technology superpower, the Prime Minister held our first-ever AI Summit earlier this month to ensure the UK is at the forefront of a pioneering world of artificial intelligence.

    Now, it won’t come as news for many of you in this room, but the UK is already a fantastic place to invest. That’s why you’re here.

    We are now third in the world for total inward investment, currently standing at $2.7 trillion, and are the top destination in Europe for FDI projects. We have attracted more greenfield FDI than Germany and France combined.

    We also have the most valuable tech sector, only the third in the world to reach $1 trillion in value.

    Last year alone we created 112,000 jobs in all corners of the UK from inward investment, with many more being created here today.

    Since the Department for Business & Trade was formed just a few months ago, we have seen even greater investment in this country.

    In my first few days as Business Secretary, I ushered in a momentous deal for Airbus and Rolls-Royce providing new aircraft for Air India.

    In September, BMW announced a transformation of their Oxford Mini plant which secured 4,000 jobs, with Stellantis pledging £100 million for electric vehicles at Ellesmere Port.

    Our investment minister Lord Johnson signed a £10 billion MoU with Marubeni just last month for green projects.

    Tata Group have pledged £4 billion to create a new gigafactory site in Somerset which will transform our battery supply chains and create thousands of jobs.

    And last week, we saw £21 billion of Korean investment in renewable energy, life sciences and tech during the South Korea State Visit.

    And on Friday we secured £2 billion from Nissan for their sites in Sunderland, which will help secure thousands of jobs.

    And that’s not to mention the global leadership we are showing in free and fair trade.

    Such as joining the CPTPP trading bloc, ushering in our first post-Brexit free trade agreements with Australia and New Zealand, and unlocking £6.5 billion of fresh export opportunities across 75 markets in the last year alone.

    We’re also taking huge steps to ensure that the UK’s manufacturing sector is a world leader in innovation.

    Yesterday I launched our £3 billion Advanced Manufacturing Plan which will invest in the long-term future of our innovative manufacturing industry by reducing costs and removing barriers to business.

    This comes off the back of the UK’s manufacturing sector leapfrogging France to become the eighth biggest in the world.

    But we cannot stand still. The world is changing fast, and the global economy is a very competitive place.

    Just months ago our historic trade deal with Australia came into force – since then we’ve secured £10 billion from IFM Investors and £5 billion from Aware Super to turbocharge green transition, infrastructure, tech and life science projects, as well as £100 million from Patrizia for sustainable housing projects.

    As part of a total £12 billion programme, Ibedrola have today confirmed £7 billion for our world-leading renewables sector, with Partner Groups’ portfolio companies North Star and Gren committing £1 billion and £500 million for new offshore wind infrastructure and community energy projects respectively.

    And the UK tech scene continues its world-leading charge, with combined investments totalling nearly £6 billion from Microsoft, BioNTech, Yondr, the Ellison Institute, Aira, Oxford Quantum Circuits and MediaTek.

    These investments total nearly £30 billion – a colossal vote of confidence in the UK, proving further how we are one of the best places in the world to invest.

    But I want to take this further.

    I want the UK to be even more innovative, even more dynamic and even more successful. I want business to look at the UK and see it as a dynamo for investment, free trade and growth.

    I have said that my door is always open. My office is called the Department for Business.

    I want your ideas on how we can create a more friendly common-sense regulatory environment; what things we should be doing differently rather than sticking to the status quo.

    I want to move away from just seeing regulation as the solution, and focus instead on solving your problems.

    The numbers speak for themselves, and at today’s summit you will see why we’re already on the path to even greater things.

    I’m delighted to welcome the Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, to the stage to tell us more.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2023 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    Kemi Badenoch – 2023 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Kemi Badenoch, the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, in Manchester on 2 October 2023.

    The last time I gave a speech at conference was 6 years ago. It was absolutely terrifying. Not because I was a new MP. But because standing on this stage, means something…

    It means standing on the shoulders of some of the greatest Conservatives this country has ever produced.

    On the conference stage in 1988, a Cabinet Minister said, “you can build far greater and far more lasting prosperity, by letting people cooperate in the freedom of the market place, than by making them submit to the coercion of Government regulations and state bureaucracy.”

    That minister was the late Nigel Lawson, our greatest chancellor and a man who helped turn this country’s fortunes around …

    We here today are custodians of that tradition. At every significant moment of British history, Conservatives have applied our values for the good of the country.

    As Business Secretary, I have the privilege of travelling all around our United Kingdom listening and learning from the people who make this country great: the entrepreneurs, the risk-takers, the problem-solvers who are inventing new products, creating new jobs, and generating prosperity.

    And as Trade Secretary, I am filled with pride at the huge honour of representing the UK on the world stage.

    And you know what? Everywhere I go other countries speak with nothing but admiration and respect for Britain.

    Then I feel a twinge of sadness, because I remember that our political opponents back home and their friends in the media continue to speak about our country like it’s an irrelevant nation. We reject this narrative.

    But that is why Conservatives must always be vigilant. We look at the world as it is, not as we wish it to be. Nigel Lawson said, “To govern is to choose”. Conference, we know if you can’t choose, you can’t govern.

    We are honest about costs and trade-offs. We are prepared to make difficult decisions.

    Our opponents are not honest and they are not prepared. Liberal Democrats want more immigration but no housing. Labour’s big idea…after 13 years in opposition is to slap 20% on school fees…a policy not seen since Jeremy Corbyn’s manifesto! And as for the SNP…well let’s wait until the outcome of the police investigation.

    My 6-year-old asked me, “Mummy, What’s a Business Secretary. What does that mean?”. I told him it means “everything is my business”.

    From supermarkets to labour markets, supply chains to strikes, small business to big business we are working to keep Britain on top.

    And it has been a difficult time to be in government anywhere in the world.

    Ministers in other countries tell me about supply chain issues affecting everything from getting car components to stocking supermarket shelves. They tell me about how they are coping with unfilled vacancies as societies from Germany to Japan get older.

    But it is only when I am back in the UK that l am told that all these issues are down to Brexit.

    Our political opponents are obsessed with viewing every problem as Brexit. Relentlessly talking down our country.

    So as your Business and Trade Secretary, I’m here to set the record straight.

    They told us Brexit would hold back our recovery from the pandemic and we have the worst economic performance in Europe. Wrong.

    The UK’s recovery from COVID has outpaced France and Germany. This year we overtook France to become the third 3rd largest manufacturer in Europe.

    They tell you ‘Our exports have dropped to an all-time low’. Wrong. This year we rose from the world’s 6th to 5th largest exporter of goods and services.

    They told you that Brexit would be the end of the City. Wrong. London remains the top financial investment destination in Europe. Far from losing jobs in the City, they are at a record high. 8% more today than in 2019.

    But I’m not here to tell you that leaving the EU was without challenges. That would not be true. People knew it would take time and there would be challenges along the way. What is true, is that we are working to fix them.

    Whether it is the Prime Minister’s landmark Windsor Framework or the great work of my Lords ministers, Malcolm Offord and Timothy Minto lowering export barriers and removing unnecessary regulations, I want you to know we are solving those problems one by one.

    But this government’s vision for business and trade is about more than Brexit. My ministers and I have been securing investment, delivering jobs, and levelling up the UK.

    An hour from here is Ellesmere Port, where car manufacturer Stellantis have invested £100 million in the new production plant, the first of its kind for them in the world.

    Ellesmere Port may have a Labour MP, but it’s a Conservative government that is delivering for them.

    In Oxfordshire, BMW is investing £600 million to build electric Minis…

    In Somerset, thanks to the hard work of my investment minister, Lord Johnson, we secured a £4 billion investment in a new gigafactory. Creating up to 4,000 highly skilled jobs.

    Minister Nus Ghani helped deliver a fantastic deal with Airbus, Rolls Royce and Air India. Worth more than £100 million of investment to Wales.

    Last month, I announced our plans to regenerate Port Talbot steelworks. Creating a plant that is more profitable, less polluting and ensures we are not dependent on countries like China to produce steel. It will level up a part of South Wales which many had written off. Saving 5,000 jobs.

    Port Talbot may have a Labour MP, but it’s a Conservative government that is delivering for them.

    But we are not just securing increased investment today…we’re delivering long term economic security for tomorrow through trade.

    My proudest achievement, with the help of minister, Nigel Huddleston, has been securing the membership of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, CPTPP.

    We are joining a club of fast-growing countries committed to free trade. A club with no membership fees, no political union, and no free movement of people. A club that will give us access to a region that will account for 54% of global growth and home to half of the world’s middle-class consumers. A club in which we will never again be asked to sacrifice our sovereignty.

    Conference, I’m not listing these achievements to make us feel good. Actually, we must acknowledge what we might lose if we assume the arguments are won forever.

    The people who tell you that Brexit is the cause of every problem, do so because they think the answer to everything is the EU.

    Listen to what Keir Starmer says… His answer to the global challenges we face is to tax more, regulate more and ask the EU what to do next.

    This is not someone who believes in the UK’s ability to think for itself.

    Our Prime Minister is different. He set out his five priorities in black and white. He refused to cave to the public sector union barons, or dance to the tune of the metropolitan bubble on energy policy.

    What he did two weeks ago was brave. Shattering a lazy consensus about the costs of Net Zero.

    We can’t deliver our net zero targets with magical thinking, expecting those who can least afford it, to not have cars or heat their homes.

    We are on your side. The side of hard-working people, and entrepreneurs who take risks with their money and livelihoods to provide jobs and services for others.

    We are on the side of those who toil. Not those who tweet.

    We are on the side of those whose voices have been ignored for too long. Sometimes it feels like the system is against you. Sometimes the system gets it wrong.

    That happened with the Post Office Horizon scandal. Scores of postmasters across Britain were wrongly convicted due to faulty software. Hardworking men and women endured unimaginable hardship, financial ruin, jail time. I was determined to right this wrong.

    No amount of money can fully compensate for liberty unjustly taken away. But with the help of my business minister Kevin Hollinrake, last month we announced that every wrongfully convicted postmaster will receive £600,000 in compensation.

    Telling the truth is the most important thing in politics. It’s the only way to really show who’s side we’re on.

    One of my heroes is the economist, Thomas Sowell. He says “When you want to help people, you tell them the truth. When you want to help yourself, you tell them what they want to hear.”

    Nowhere is this more important than in my role as Women and Equalities minister. I’m not a difficult woman but I do like doing difficult things. Conservatives aren’t afraid of doing difficult things.

    Last year I published a report that told the truth about race in the UK. Labour didn’t like it. They want young people to believe a narrative of hopelessness.

    A narrative that says there is no point in trying, because British society is against you and you’re better off asking for reparations.

    A narrative that tells children like mine that the odds are stacked against them. I tell my children that is the best country in the world to be black – because it’s a country that sees people, not labels.

    Conservatives want young people to be proud of their country when others want them to be ashamed. It wasn’t a tough decision for us to reject the divisive agenda of critical race theory. We believe as Martin Luther King once said, people should be judged by the content of their character – not the colour of their skin. And if that puts us in conflict with those who would re-racialise society, who would put up the divisions that have been torn down – well, Conference, all I can say is: bring it on.

    Let Labour bend the knee before this altar of intolerance. We’ll keep building a country that is, in every way, stronger and fairer for all.

    The left accuses us of fighting a culture war. But we will not apologise for fighting for common sense.

    I will not apologise for fighting for a society that knows what a woman is.

    It was this Conservative government that stopped shameful SNP and Labour politicians in Scotland pursuing a self-ID policy that let convicted rapists pretend that they were actually women so they could be housed in a women’s prison with potential new victims.

    I pay tribute to the many women’s and LGBT groups such as Conservatives for Women, Sex Matters and the LGB Alliance who despite unbelievable opposition kept fighting this policy, refusing to be cancelled and speaking the truth.

    There is no other party that will defend common sense.

    Next week, Labour will tell the country that it is ready for government. But ladies and gentlemen, let me ask you this if Labour MPs can’t tell us what a woman is, what else aren’t they telling us?

    Conference, I think it is obvious that I love my country, I love my party and I love my job. I’m proud of what my ministers and I have achieved in the last year.

    No, the job is not yet finished… it never is. But we have done great things and we cannot let our good work be undone by letting Labour in.

    The biggest threat to Britain’s future would be the calamity of a Labour government and when we get closer to the election the starkness of that choice will become clearer.

    We have in Rishi Sunak, a Prime Minister who is making decisions for the long term interest of our country, even when he gets flak for it. He protects businesses and employees when in crisis as he did during Covid. But he says no to lazy subsidies and anti-competitive regulations.

    He has the intellect and work ethic to steer us through whatever comes next, to tell the country what it needs to hear, not just what it wants to hear.

    Brexit was perhaps the greatest ever vote of confidence in the project of the United Kingdom – and we will soon be asking the country to trust that this project is safe in our hands.

    We’ll do this by reminding them that Conservative ideas are just as powerful, just as relevant today as they have been in the past. That Government is not the answer to every problem and neither is more spending.

    We’ll remind them that just as Margaret Thatcher and Nigel Lawson did in the 1980s we are taking tough decisions for the long-term future of the country today.

    A new British success story is getting started: we must not let Labour ruin it.