Tag: Keir Starmer

  • Keir Starmer – 2020 Keynote Speech on Scotland’s Future Role in the UK

    Keir Starmer – 2020 Keynote Speech on Scotland’s Future Role in the UK

    The speech made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 21 December 2020.

    Good morning.

    I want to start by addressing the emerging situation relating to the pandemic.

    The news over the last 24 hours has been deeply disturbing.

    The number of coronavirus cases has nearly doubled in the last week.

    Over 67,000 people have now tragically died.

    And hospital admissions are rising.

    We cannot be in any doubt.

    The virus is now out of control.

    International flights have been banned.

    International Borders have been shut.

    And there is now severe disruption at Britain’s ports.

    Make no mistake this is now a real emergency.

    I have faith in the British people to once again step up to the challenge.

    As they have done at every stage of the pandemic.

    But they expect the Government to do the same.

    We can have no more over-promising and false hope, confused messages and slow decision-making.

    We need strong, clear and decisive leadership.

    The Prime Minister needs to be straight with people about precisely what is going on.

    And precisely what he is doing about it.

    He must address the nation today after this morning’s COBRA meeting.

    And hold daily press conferences until the disruption has eased.

    He must also get the Brexit deal he promised done this week.

    This is not a game of brinkmanship.

    This is people’s lives.

    People’s jobs.

    And people’s businesses.

    They need a deal.

    They expect a deal.

    And a deal is what must happen.

    I renew my pledge to act in the national interest to help us through these dark and difficult days.

    We will support further restrictions where they are necessary.

    We will work with Government to help businesses get through the winter months.

    And we will offer constructive solutions to keep our NHS open and the vaccine distributed.

    As we struggle against the pandemic,

    And the profound health and economic consequences of it,

    Making the case for our United Kingdom could never be more important.

    We entered this pandemic together.

    We faced the enduring challenges of the pandemic together.

    We will come out of it together.

    And we must rebuild together.

    The duty to rebuild will be a shared duty.

    It is a duty not just in England, Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland.

    It is a duty across all four nations together.

    And believe you me, future generations will not forgive us if we shirk that responsibility.

    That is why the case I want to make today is the case for the United Kingdom.

    Of course there’s a case for the United Kingdom that’s measured in

    Power
    Prosperity
    Trade
    And security

    We are all stronger because we choose to pool our resources to share the risks and rewards.

    We are all better off because we can live, work and trade across borders, rather than behind them.

    And as one United Kingdom we’re better able to weather the storms of a global financial crash, a pandemic, or the climate emergency.

    But for me the case for the United Kingdom goes much deeper than that.

    The United Kingdom is shaped not just by our shared institutions,

    But by the people who made them,

    The history and experiences that shaped them

    And the amazing things we’ve achieved together.

    Together we’ve fought slavery,

    We’ve fought poverty,

    We’ve fought fascism,

    And we’re fighting Covid.

    The first baby born in the NHS – Aneira Thomas – was born in South Wales and named after the great Nye Bevan.

    Our welfare state was born out of the struggles of early Scottish activists who fought against the Scottish Poor Laws.

    Britain’s great achievements in science, innovation and discovery are all the greater because they drew on all our talents.

    The Open University was founded by a Scot, Jennie Lee and we’re a world leader in education, research and knowledge because of our great universities and our shared tradition of learning.

    The Labour Party was first led by Keir Hardie – a Scot – who ended up representing a Welsh constituency

    and such was the influence of that boy from Lanarkshire, that many years later a family in Oxted, East Surrey, decided to call their son Keir too.

    My point is this:

    Our nations are bound by our history, our values and our identity.

    Our families live across borders,

    Our businesses operate across borders,

    We’re interconnected and we’re interdependent.

    That’s not just a precious inheritance, or a description of the past, it’s what we are.

    It’s what I want for our children, for the next generation.

    I don’t believe in putting up borders across any part of our United Kingdom, in dividing people, communities, and families who have stood together for so long.

    It’s not, England, or Scotland, or Wales, or Northern Ireland,

    I’ve had enough of hearing that.

    It’s England, and Scotland, and Wales, and Northern Ireland, together.

    I believe in that core Labour principle: that we achieve more together than we do alone.

    All four nations working together to build a more open, more optimistic and outward-looking country.

    A United Kingdom that’s a force for social justice and a moral force for good in the world

    And that’s why I’m so determined to preserve and to renew the United Kingdom.

    But just as I believe in the United Kingdom,

    I equally believe in devolving power and opportunity across it.

    This is the common thread that joins so many great figures of the Scottish Labour movement.

    From John Mackintosh and Donald Dewar, to John Smith and Gordon Brown.

    A tradition that doesn’t simply see devolution as a process of shifting power from one place to another, but that sees devolution as a means to an end.

    To empower. To democratise. And to deliver social justice.

    The challenge for Labour now is how to carry on that tradition, to renew the case for devolution and to harness the energy, dynamism and creativity of all corners of the country.

    Devolution in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland was one of the proudest achievements of the last Labour government.

    Against, I might add, the opposition of the Conservatives and the indifference of the SNP.

    But since Labour lost power in Holyrood in 2007, and then in Westminster in 2010, that renewal hasn’t happened.

    In Westminster, successive Conservative governments have eroded the fabric of the United Kingdom.

    First, with a decade of austerity, which undermined our public services, widened inequalities and made communities across the country poorer and less secure.

    And then came Brexit.

    Now, I know the Prime Minister is the only person in Britain who still wants to talk about Brexit.

    So I will just say this:

    Whichever side of the divide you were on,

    We can surely all agree that the cavalier and chaotic approach the Conservatives have taken in the last four years has frayed the bonds of the United Kingdom.

    Take, for example, the Internal Markets Bill – which was railroaded through Westminster without concern for the impact it would have on devolution or the damage it would cause across the UK.

    That Bill could have been a huge opportunity to push power outwards,

    But instead, the Prime Minister showed his instinct is to hoard power, not to devolve it.

    Perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised, because we now know that the Prime Minister thinks Scottish devolution has been ‘a disaster’.

    And the reason Johnson’s comment struck home is because it spoke to a wider truth,

    The Conservatives simply don’t believe in devolution. They never have.

    And they are blind to the damage that their cavalier attitude is doing to our United Kingdom.

    They have no plan to counter Scottish separatism other than to defend the status quo

    And – to borrow the Prime Minister’s terminology – in Brexit and in austerity they’ve given separatists two big boxing gloves to pummel the United Kingdom.

    Scotland was once rightly proud and world renowned for providing an exceptional education to children from all backgrounds.

    For being a society where anyone could reach their potential.

    But after 13 years of the SNP in power, sadly that’s no longer the case.

    International comparisons show that children in Scotland are now lagging behind children in England – and in many advanced countries – for the first time

    Scotland now has one of the largest average class sizes in any major economy

    The attainment gap between the poorest and wealthiest children rises through each stage of primary education in Scotland.

    Under the last Labour Government child poverty fell by 150,000 in Scotland. But under the SNP, child poverty has risen sharply and is forecast to reach one in three Scottish children by 2030.

    And I’m afraid it’s the same story on public health.

    Life expectancy in Scotland is now the lowest in Western Europe – with Scottish men in the poorest areas expected to die 13 years before those in least deprived areas.

    The Scottish NHS hasn’t hit its cancer waiting times for seven years

    And in the first wave of Covid, the death rate in Scotland, was the THIRD highest in Europe. Tragically the percentage of Covid deaths in care homes was also far higher than anywhere else in the UK.

    And just last week, we saw the appalling extent of the drugs crisis in Scotland: Scotland now has the worst death rate from drugs in Europe.

    The SNP has also failed to build the modern, dynamic economy Scotland deserves, or to protect Scottish manufacturing jobs – as we’ve seen with the shambolic handling of the BiFab plants in Fife and Lewis – and the loss of £52m of taxpayers’ money.

    So it’s no wonder that Nicola Sturgeon wants to make next May’s elections a referendum on another referendum.

    Because on education, health and social justice the SNP has no story to tell.

    Against that backdrop, it’s Labour’s duty to offer a positive alternative to the Scottish people.

    To show that you don’t have to choose between a broken status quo and the uncertainty and divisiveness of separatism.

    And it’s our duty – my duty – to make the alternative case for a devolved and socially just Scotland in a modern United Kingdom.

    I’m under no illusion about the scale of the task Labour faces.

    We’ve lost four General Elections and the last three Scottish Parliamentary elections.

    For over a decade we’ve been in no position to decide anything, or to change anyone’s lives.

    That has to stop. And fast. Because when Labour loses elections we fail in our historic mission. We fail the people of Scotland. And we allow the fabric of the United Kingdom to be weakened.

    So I want to talk directly to people in Scotland who have given up on Labour – and given up on the United Kingdom.

    I’ve spoken to many of you since becoming leader.

    I’ve heard the arguments you’ve made and I’ve listened to your frustrations.

    I hear what you’re saying.

    I understand why you feel as you do.

    And I’m not surprised.

    For a decade there’s been a Conservative government in Westminster with priorities you don’t share.

    And there’s been a Labour opposition that keeps losing.

    When those are the alternatives, I can see why you’ve reached the conclusion you have.

    But Boris Johnson isn’t Britain.

    Just as Nicola Sturgeon isn’t Scotland.

    The United Kingdom is much more than that, more than any individual.

    It has been before – and can be again – a great force for social justice. For Security. And for solidarity.

    Under my leadership, we will do everything we can to win back your trust,

    In Labour – but equally importantly, in the United Kingdom.

    I know that won’t be easy.

    Labour has a mountain to climb, nowhere more than in Scotland.

    And nowhere matters more to me than Scotland.

    The first step on that journey is to reaffirm Labour’s commitment to a United Kingdom based on social justice and solidarity.

    And to set out the means to that end:

    A new phase of radical economic and political devolution across the United Kingdom.

    I want devolution and social justice to be the hallmarks of the next Labour government.

    In fact, I may be the first person ever to run to be Prime Minister of this country on a manifesto that will aim to win power – and then push as much power as possible away from Westminster.

    That’s because I believe there’s a desire across the United Kingdom for politics and power to be much closer to people.

    We saw this in the Brexit referendum and we’ve been ignoring it for years.

    Unless we grasp the nettle and deliver real devolution of power and resources,

    We won’t be able to renew our United Kingdom for the 2020s and 2030s.

    We won’t be able to tackle the root causes of the appalling inequalities and injustices that we see across our regions and nations.

    And we won’t be able to make Britain the country I know it can be: The best place to grow up in and the best place to grow old in.

    The case for the next phase of devolution was urgent before Covid, but the pandemic has put rocket boosters under it.

    Our Labour council leaders, mayors and metro mayors have stood up for their communities against a centralised Westminster-knows best response.

    A national crisis on this scale should have been the time for central government to work with and empower local communities – to bring the country together.

    But too often the UK Government’s approach has been to pit council against council; town against town; city against city, mayor against mayor.

    It’s no surprise that the many local leaders I’ve spoken to have felt distanced and ignored on decisions that have had huge consequences on people’s jobs, lives and their communities

    This has got to change.

    And that’s why I’m announcing today that in the New Year,

    Labour will launch a UK-wide Constitutional Commission to consider how power, wealth and opportunity can be devolved to the most local level.

    This won’t be an exercise in shifting power from one Parliament to another – of moving a few jobs out of London, or to devolve and to forget.

    This will be the boldest project Labour has embarked on for a generation.

    And every bit as bold and radical as the programme of devolution that Labour delivered in the 1990s and 2000s.

    It will consider all parts of the United Kingdom.

    And it will focus on delivering real – and lasting – economic and political devolution across our towns, our communities and to people across the country.

    It’ll start with listening to people in their local communities about what they want.

    It’ll look at the successes of devolution so far, but also where it’s fallen short.

    It’ll consider everything from how people can have more of a say in what happens in their community, to how we can break down barriers to democracy and participation.

    It’ll consider how we can make sure that powers coming back from Brussels are not just centralised in Westminster….but are shared across the regions and nations of the United Kingdom

    It will be particularly important for the Commission to hear from and work with our great mayors and council leaders – and to use their experience and ideas to guide our next steps.

    The Commission will make the positive case for the UK and it will champion devolution, but beyond that it will rule nothing out and I will look at the conclusions without preconceptions.

    It will have one overriding priority: to push power closer to people

    And to deliver a more democratic and socially just United Kingdom.

    It will put our nations and regions at its centre: our Metro Mayors, Mayors, local leaders and councillors.

    It will involve all parts of the labour movement: our members, trade unions and supporters.

    And it will welcome community organisations, grassroots groups, and movements for change.

    Above all, it will hear direct from the British people.

    The Shadow Cabinet and I, and everyone involved in the Commission will hear from as many people as possible from across the UK.

    That might have to start on a Zoom screen, but as soon we can, Labour will be out in local communities, in town halls, offices, colleges, factories and community centres.

    Because if this is going to work and to drive the radical change I know is needed across this country this cannot, and will not, be a project of Westminster, by Westminster and for Westminster.

    It will be of the people of the United Kingdom.

    I’m delighted that our last Labour Prime Minister, Gordon Brown has agreed to be an adviser in the setting up of the Commission.

    Of course, a project of this scale and this urgency should be initiated by the UK Government.

    But in the absence of that leadership from the Prime Minister, Labour will do what is necessary in Opposition.

    And, just as in 1997, we will make devolution a reality under the next Labour Government.

    This will of course take time.

    But I expect the Scottish section – working with Scottish Labour and our leader, Richard Leonard, to be completed as soon as possible.

    Because frankly, there’s no time to waste.

    The Scottish Parliamentary elections are just over five months away.

    Labour will fight those elections, making the case, for a socially just Scotland in a modern United Kingdom.

    And we’ll make clear that five more years of separatism and division isn’t the answer to any of the challenges facing the Scottish people.

    Whether on Covid,

    Improving Scotland’s schools and NHS,

    Protecting jobs and the economy,

    Addressing the climate emergency or

    Providing greater security at home and abroad.

    Ultimately, there’s nothing that separatism can offer to a child living in poverty in Glasgow,

    Just as there’s nothing that nationalism can offer a child living in poverty in Camden.

    And the last thing Scotland needs now is more years of division.

    So Labour will argue passionately against another independence referendum.

    We will argue that today, we will argue that tomorrow.

    It would be entirely the wrong priority to hold another Scottish independence referendum in the teeth of the deepest recession for 300 years.

    While still fighting this pandemic

    When there is such uncertainty about how Brexit, and Coronavirus will affect us.

    And when the costs and consequences of independence are still so uncertain.

    That’s why Nicola Sturgeon’s call for an independence referendum in the ‘early part’ of the next Scottish Parliament – perhaps even next year – is so misguided.

    Given the damage and division this would cause, no responsible First Minister should contemplate it – and no responsible Prime Minister would grant it.

    There should not be another independence referendum while our economic and health outlook is so precarious – nor until there has been a proper assessment of the costs, consequences and uncertainties of separation.

    Including the future of Scotland’s currency,

    Our armed forces and national security,

    As well as the potential impact on the pensions, jobs, taxes and social security of the Scottish people.

    The sterile debate between the status quo and independence will not answer these questions.

    That is why our Commission must also ensure that there is a fresh – and tangible – offer in front of the Scottish people – a path to a socially just and secure Scotland within a modern UK.

    Because only then can we ensure that the discussion on our constitution is not a re-run of 2014: with the huge uncertainty of separation pitted against an outdated status quo.

    The Labour movement has a long and proud tradition of fighting for greater devolution and social justice.

    For Labour, devolution has never been about power itself, but a means to build a fairer, more socially just society.

    Under my leadership, that will be our focus again.

    And if we get this right, then I believe Labour can play a key role in defeating the forces of separatism.

    And once again make clear that it’s only by harnessing the strength and dynamism of the whole United Kingdom that we can tackle the huge challenges we all face.

    Because a separatist agenda won’t solve inequality, injustice or poverty.

    And it won’t make us stronger on the international stage,

    And it won’t make us better able to lead in the global fight against climate change.

    Separatism will leave us all weaker – just as defending the status quo will.

    That’s why it’s time to build a new partnership between our nations and regions.

    To make Britain fit for the decades ahead.

    That is the challenge we face,

    And the Labour Party I lead must rise to that challenge.

  • Keir Starmer – 2020 Statement on Christmas Covid-19 Rules

    Keir Starmer – 2020 Statement on Christmas Covid-19 Rules

    The statement made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 20 December 2020.

    Yesterday’s announcement about restrictions over Christmas was heart-breaking.

    This has been such a difficult year for everyone. The British public have been asked to make so many sacrifices.

    And now – with just days to go – millions of families are having to tell children and loved ones, that their plans for Christmas cannot go ahead.

    I know just how devastating that is. I know the hurt people are feeling – and the anger – because Christmas is more than just a holiday. It is a part of who we are as a nation.

    Sadly, the measures the Government announced yesterday are necessary and we support them.

    But there is no getting away from the fact – and what angers people the most and frustrates me the most is that – yet again – the Prime Minister waited until the eleventh hour to take this decision.

    It was blatantly obvious last week that the Prime Minister’s plan for a free-for-all over Christmas was a risk too far. And yet, rather listening to concerns and taking them seriously the Prime Minister did what he always does.

    Dismissed the challenge, ruffled his hair and made a flippant comment.

    The Prime Minister’s claim that this is all down to a new form of the virus that has only just emerged just doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.

    On Monday last week, the Health Secretary told the House of Commons about a new strain of the virus.

    On Tuesday, medical professionals warned the lifting of restrictions over Christmas would be a ‘major error’ and I called for a review.

    On Wednesday, I challenged the Prime Minister to toughen up the restrictions.

    We have known about rising infections and the NHS reaching capacity in many parts of the country for weeks.

    The new strain was actually first spotted in September. The alarms bells have been ringing for weeks, but the Prime Minister chose to ignore them.

    A virus of this sort demands early action. Decisive action. A clear plan and a clear message. Yet we have had none of that.

    The Prime Minister delayed. He told the country to go ahead and have a merry little Christmas. Told people in London and the South East to carry on shopping. And to make plans to see families.

    And yet, three days later he tells millions of families to rip up those plans. And introduces further restrictions.

    What I want to know this morning, and what everyone across the country wants to know this morning is this: How on earth did this happen?

    How could the Government allow people to go on as they were, when they knew they had lost control of the virus?

    It is an act of gross negligence by a Prime Minister who once again has been caught behind the curve.

    Who once again offered confusion, not clarity.

    Who undermined public confidence.

    Who always over promises and under delivers.

    And who is now asking the British people to pay the price for his incompetence.

    No one expects the Government to get it right all of the time. But a government that fails to learn from its mistakes ends up making the same mistakes over and over again.

    Month after month, week after week.

    We have a Prime Minister who is so scared of being unpopular that he is incapable of taking tough decisions until it is too late. Whether that was going into lockdown in the first place extending the furlough scheme, bringing in a circuit break in October to protect the economy and now Christmas.

    It is this indecision and weak leadership that is costing lives and it is costing jobs.

    As a result, the United Kingdom ends 2020 with one of the highest death tolls in Europe the deepest recession of any major economy, with the virus once again out of control and with Christmas cancelled for millions.

    My message to the Prime Minister is simple: We cannot go on like this.

    We can’t start next year as we have ended this. Our country needs you to show political leadership. There can be no more dither. No more delay. No more fearing bad headlines.

    No more wishful thinking, no more empty promises.

    Prime Minister you need to get the virus back under control; so we can get our economy going; and get our children back into school in January.

    The British people have done everything asked of them. Our NHS and social care workers have done everything asked of them – and more.

    Our key workers – police officers, fire fighters, supermarket workers and posties – have kept us going.

    Our businesses have stepped up. Our communities have pulled together. Now all of them – the British people – expect their Government to deliver.

    2021 can be the year of recovery, but only if the Government gets it right.

    That’s why I renew my offer today to work with you and the Government to get this right.

    To secure our economy by supporting businesses in the toughest restrictions.

    To protect our NHS by ensuring it has the staff and resources to care for people throughout the winter months.

    And to rebuild our country by guaranteeing the swift and safe roll out of the vaccine.

    These are the priorities of the British people.

    They are Labour priorities.

    And they are my priorities.

    Finally, to everyone who has had to cancel plans.

    To all those who have the increasingly familiar feeling that they have been let down or abandoned.

    Who can’t see an end to the gloom and the bad news.

    Or who are having to spend Christmas alone.

    I am truly sorry.

    But please don’t lose faith.

    This winter will pass.

    This pandemic will end.

    And when it does we will be reunited with our loved ones, and with the places and the things we miss.

    And we will build a better country, together.

    Thank you.

  • Keir Starmer – 2020 Christmas Card Message

    Keir Starmer – 2020 Christmas Card Message

    The Christmas Card message from Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 8 December 2020.

    The clap for carers was a moment of huge national solidarity, and we continue to owe our carers and key workers a huge debt of gratitude. Their courage and dedication in the face of this virus has been truly incredible.

    This Christmas, carers and emergency workers, alongside our Armed Forces and other key workers, will step up yet again. They will sacrifice precious time with their families to keep us safe.

    We must repay them, not just with our gratitude, but by fighting for fair pay and conditions for all those who have given so much to help our country through this pandemic.

  • Keir Starmer – 2020 Comments on Small Business Saturday

    Keir Starmer – 2020 Comments on Small Business Saturday

    The comments made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 5 December 2020.

    Small businesses across the country have made a monumental effort during this crisis. They have stepped up when it was most needed, supporting their local communities and making huge sacrifices to help tackle the spread of the virus. Now we must repay them.

    The Government must ensure businesses, particularly those facing the toughest restrictions, are supported to see them through the winter.

    This Small Business Saturday and beyond, we can all do our bit to stand by small businesses, by shopping safely where we live, including online, or ordering from local restaurants.

    On behalf of the Labour Party I want to celebrate the small businesses who are at the heart of our communities. We will stand by them over the crucial months ahead in fighting for the support they need.

  • Keir Starmer – 2020 Statement in the House of Commons on Winter Plan

    Keir Starmer – 2020 Statement in the House of Commons on Winter Plan

    The statement made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 1 December 2020.

    Thank you Mr Speaker.

    Can I start by welcoming the fall in infection numbers, the number of people being admitted to hospital, and crucially that the R rate is now below 1.

    Before this lockdown, the infection rate was doubling every two weeks, the R-number was above 1 in every part of England, and the number of people in hospital was going up sharply across the country. In other words, the virus had been allowed to get out of control.

    And if anyone doubts a lockdown was necessary – I would point out: Since 2nd November – when this lockdown started, 10,711 people have tragically died in England within 28 days of testing positive for Covid-19. In the last week there were an average of 460 deaths per day. Those are appalling numbers. Every one a tragedy.

    So we can argue about why this lockdown didn’t happen sooner. When the infection rate was lower. As we argued for several weeks ago. But it’s clear that the lockdown was necessary and has helped to reduce infections.

    I also want to welcome further progress on vaccines. I have nothing but admiration for our scientists. And for the amazing progress that’s been made. This will go down as one of the great moments for science in this country. I saw this for myself a couple of weeks ago at Oxford University.

    A vaccine may now be in sight, and we must do everything we can to encourage take-up and make sure that it’s rolled out quickly, fairly and safely.

    But Mr Speaker, the questions before the House today are these: How can we save as many lives and livelihoods as possible until we reach the light at the end of the tunnel? And are the measures the PM announced today going to: Control the virus; And provide the right support for the communities worst affected by these restrictions?

    Labour has supported the Government in two national lockdowns. And I recognise the need for continuing restrictions. I also recognise that the tiers have been toughened – as it was obvious to everyone that the previous tiers were a one-way street. But I’m far from convinced by what the PM said today.

    In particular, the economic package is nowhere near sufficient to support the communities worst affected. And who have been suffering now for many months.

    I also fear that without the right health measures in place, in particular a working trace and isolate system, there are real risks that this plan is incapable of controlling the virus this winter.

    I want to set out this out in more detail. The first point I want to make is this: We’ve been here before. On 10th June the PM first told of us his “whack a mole” strategy to control local infections. We were told these would be so effective they would only last a few days or weeks. Far from reality. Leicester, for example, has had 154 days of restrictions. By the time these regulations run out on 2nd Feb – it will be 217 days. So that didn’t work.

    Then on 22 September – with infections rising in 19 of the 20 areas then under restrictions, the PM announced new restrictions including the rule of 6, which the PM told the House would: “curb the number of daily infections and reduce the reproduction rate to 1”. That didn’t work.

    Two weeks later, 12 October, with the precise opposite happening the PM introduced a three-tier system. Again, we were assured this would work.

    The PM told the House that: “would deliver the reduction in the R rate, locally and regionally, that we need”. That didn’t work.

    Fourth attempt: 19 days later: in a hurried press conference, the PM announced that the tiered system had failed, the virus was out of control and a national lockdown was now “unavoidable”.

    The reason this all matters is that there is a pattern here: the PM has a record of over-promising, and under-delivering. Short-term decisions are taken, that then bump into the harsh reality of this virus. So a new plan is conjured up a few weeks later, and with even bigger promises that never materialise.

    After eight months of this, the PM should not be surprised that we – and many of the British people – are less than convinced this time around.

    The second point I want to make is this: The public health risk of the PM’s approach is significant. The prevalence of the virus remains high. The R-rate is only just below one. We know the virus is at its most deadly during the cold winter months. And that the NHS of course at that point will be under its greatest strain.

    So if we are to keep R below 1 during the winter – and not waste the progress made in the last four weeks, we have to proceed with precision and caution.

    But instead of levelling with the British public, the PM has spent the weekend telling his backbenchers that the plan is all about: “loosening restrictions across the country” and fuelling a promise that within days, local areas have the prospect of dropping from one Tier to another. In my view, that’s highly unlikely.

    It’s obvious that the new Tier One may slow but won’t prevent a rise in infections. And it’s far from certain that the new Tier Two can hold the rate of infection. I hope it does – but it depends on other factors all falling into place at the same time.

    And – although like everyone else we want the chance to see our loved ones at Christmas – I’m not convinced that the Government has a plan in place to prevent a spike in infections over the New Year.

    I recognise this is difficult, and that any system would have risk. But that brings me to my third point: The risk we face today is so much higher, because the PM has failed to fix the major problems with the now £22bn Track and Trace system.

    Before the PM simply brushes this point aside – again – let me remind the House that one of the major reasons that SAGE advised a circuit break back in September was because Track and Trace was only having “a marginal impact on transmission”. So if we’re to control the virus, this really matters. And the PM having his head in the sand isn’t helping.

    I know the PM has made much of the advances in testing. I recognise that and I hope it helps tackle this virus. But as the Chief Scientific Officer said: “testing is important, but of course it only matters if people isolate as well”.

    PM knows only a fraction of people are able to self-isolate when asked to do so. But he still hasn’t addressed the reasons for this. Including the huge gaps in support: I know PM has announced a change for those notified by the app – a ridiculous omission in the first place. But it doesn’t affect basic eligibility.

    Only one in eight workers qualify for the one-off £500 self-isolation support. Anyone not receiving that has to rely on Statutory Sick Pay which is the equivalent of £13 a day. That’s a huge problem. People want to do the right thing. But for many, there’s a real fear that self-isolation means a huge loss of income that they simply can’t afford.

    And that’s not the end of the problems with track and trace. On tracing, the latest figures show: 137,000 close contacts missed by the system in one week. That is the highest weekly figure yet. And it means that over 500,000 close contacts have been missed by the system in the last month.

    That’s not just a statistic, it means that last month alone, there were half a million people who should have been self-isolating but instead were moving around with their friends, their families and their communities. That’s a huge gap in our defences. I raise this every week. Every week the PM pretends it’s getting better, but it never does. And the PM now seems almost to have given up on it – and to be hoping instead that mass testing can solve this on its own. Again, blind optimism – not a plan.

    My fourth point is about the level of economic support provided. Have to say to the PM: It’s hard to overstate the level of anger about this – particularly in communities that have been in restrictions for months on end.

    Yesterday I was on a virtual visit to the North West talking to local businesses. Their emotions ranged from deep disappointment at the Government, to raw anger that the PM and Chancellor just aren’t listening. And don’t get the impact that months of endless restrictions have had on local communities and on people’s lives.

    In March, the Chancellor vowed to do “whatever it takes” to support households and businesses. But there’s now been 6 economic plans in 9 months. And the level of support around this latest package is still insufficient.

    First, it doesn’t fairly reflect the difficulties faced by businesses across the country. Three aspects to this: Let me start with the Additional Restrictions Grant. That gives a flat figure to a local area regardless of how long it’s been in restrictions. So, Greater Manchester, which will be on its 40th day of severe restrictions when it enters Tier 3 tomorrow, has received the same one-off support as the Isle of Wight, which went into restrictions far later and will emerge tomorrow into Tier 1.

    That can’t be fair.

    The second aspect is that this grant doesn’t take account of the number of business that need support in each area. So our great cities are being asked to spread the same sum far more thinly. That’s also that’s clearly unfair.

    The third aspect: even allowing for today’s announcement on pubs – which I think is the definition of ‘small beer. Many businesses are now receiving less support than they did during the first wave. That’s a huge strain for many businesses – particularly after so long under restrictions, and it makes no economic sense for the Government to allow them to go to the wall.

    The second major point on economic support is that millions of self-employed people remain unfairly excluded from Government support schemes. Again, there’s nothing in this latest package to address this.

    I’ve raised this many times with the PM – every time he chooses to talk about those he is helping and ignore the millions he isn’t. Reality: the government have had 8 months to fix this and they’ve failed.

    The third point about the economic package is that the Government must remove the uncertainty around furlough and rule out changing the scheme again in January. The Chancellor’s made this this mistake before. That uncertainty caused real economic damage. He can’t make the same mistake again.

    So taken together the business and economic support just doesn’t stack up.

    But I also want to make a wider point on the economic damage this pandemic – and this Government – have done to our economy. Last week’s Autumn Statement laid bare the huge and worsening economic cost of this crisis.

    I know there are those who say that is a reason to end restrictions. But the reality is – you can’t protect the economy if you lose control of the virus. That just leads to more uncertainty. More restrictions. And more long-term damage to the economy. And it’s this failure to get control of the virus, or to take a long-term approach to shielding our economy that’s left the UK with the worst recession in the G7 and the highest death total in Europe.

    Fifth and final reason for scepticism about the Government’s approach is this: messaging and priorities. The last 48 hours have been a summary of the mistakes the Government has made in this crisis. The PM is fatally split between appeasing his backbenchers and following the science. It’s why he ends up pleasing nobody.

    I think the PM knows that tough restrictions are now needed, but he pretends that the restrictions might not be in place for long. And that it’s quite possible that everyone can be in a lower tier in two weeks’ time. But the reality is that tough restrictions will be needed until a vaccine is rolled out. And that may be months away.

    So the PM will doubtless be back in a couple of weeks with another “plan”. But the PM doesn’t feel able to make that case today, or to provide the certainty and consistency we need. So instead we’ve had 48 hours of concessions, letters and promises to his MPs – not clear and reliable messaging to the public. It’s sadly symptomatic of the last eight months.

    Mr Speaker, coronavirus remains a serious threat to the public’s health, to our economy and to our way of life. We recognise the need for continued restrictions. It would not be in the national interest to vote against these restrictions today. So we will allow the regulations to pass. But this is another wasted opportunity.

    The PM could have spent the last four weeks fixing track and trace, putting in place the support people need to isolate, building the economic package our great towns and cities need to protect jobs and people’s income, and restoring public confidence.

    Instead, we see more short-termism. A PM stuck between his backbenchers and the national interest. And I fear that just won’t work.

  • Keir Starmer – 2020 Letter to Every Gurdwara in the Country

    Keir Starmer – 2020 Letter to Every Gurdwara in the Country

    The letter sent by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 30 November 2020.

    Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh.

    I would like to send my heartfelt best wishes to all Sikhs throughout the UK and across the world, as you celebrate the 551st birth anniversary of Guru Nanak Dev Ji, the founder of the Sikh faith.

    I want to use this opportunity to extend my gratitude for the huge contribution the Sikh community has made during the pandemic. Gurdwaras and Sikh organisations have looked after their local communities and those most vulnerable in our society. Even when Gurdwaras were closed for worship, volunteers went in to prepare langar and thereafter delivered free warm meals for people in the community. Sikhs have also been on the frontline as key workers, who have been the backbone of our nation.

    We owe a huge debt of gratitude to the Sikh community in exemplifying the core teachings of Guru Nanak. The seva (selfless service) of Sikhs during the pandemic is a shining example of their community spirit. Guru Nanak championed oneness of humanity and I have seen these founding values embodied by British Sikhs.

    I appreciate that due to Covid-19 restrictions, Gurpurab celebrations will not be the same. I know how incredibly difficult and upsetting this will be for families and communities, who won’t be able to come together as they normally would. However, Guru Nanak’s teachings of selfless service and perseverance will continue to be an inspiration to us all.

    On behalf of everyone at the Labour Party, I would like to wish you and your families a very happy Gurpurab.

    Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa,

    Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh.

  • Keir Starmer – 2020 Comments on the Appointment of Jane Ramsey

    Keir Starmer – 2020 Comments on the Appointment of Jane Ramsey

    The comments made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 27 November 2020 following the appointment of Jane Ramsey as the party’s senior advisor on implementing the EHRC recommendations.

    I am delighted that Jane is leading our party’s implementation of the EHRC’s recommendations. Jane brings a wealth of experience to this role. I have every confidence she will ensure the party’s new, independent complaints process is put in place as a matter of urgency.

    Since I was elected Labour leader, I have made it my mission to root out antisemitism from our party. I remain utterly determined to restore trust with the Jewish community and make the Labour Party a safe place for Jewish people.

  • Keir Starmer – 2020 Speech on Covid-19 and the Winter Plan

    Keir Starmer – 2020 Speech on Covid-19 and the Winter Plan

    The speech made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, in the House of Commons on 23 November 2020.

    I thank the Prime Minister for advance sight of his statement and for his telephone call earlier today, when he set out a summary of the proposal.

    Let me start with the good news: the tremendous progress on vaccines. Last week, the shadow Chancellor and I went to the Oxford vaccine group at Oxford University. It was inspiring. It was remarkable to see the work that they are doing. Our thanks, and I think those of the whole nation, go to all those who have taken part in the vaccine trials and research. We wish them Godspeed. I also want to make an open offer to the Prime Minister: Labour will provide any support we can in the national effort to deliver the vaccine safely across the country. That is an open offer.

    I welcome the fact that the Prime Minister is seeking a four-nation approach on the arrangements over the Christmas period. We will obviously await details on that, and the evidence that supports the steps being taken, but the four-nation approach is the right approach.

    Now for the more difficult bit. The vaccine is the light at the end of the tunnel; the question today is how we get there and protect lives and livelihoods along the way. The Prime Minister proposes a return to the three-tier system. That is risky, because the previous three-tier system did not work. Tier 1 areas drifted to tier 2, almost all tier 2 areas ended up in tier 3 and those in tier 3 could not see a way out, and we ended up in national lockdown. That was the sad reality of the tiered system before. Nobody wants a repeat of that.

    I accept that the new tiers are different from the old tiers, but many of the questions are the same. They are not trick questions. I acknowledge that none of this is easy, but if the Prime Minister is going to carry Parliament and the country on this, they need answering.

    First, on the tier system—the Prime Minister touched on this—which local areas will be in each tier? This is the red-hot question. This is the question everybody is going to be asking over their kitchen table tonight. I had a roundtable with business leaders this morning, and it was the first question they asked me. The Prime Minister says it will be decided later this week, possibly Thursday. I cannot emphasise enough how important it is that these decisions are taken very quickly and very clearly so that everybody can plan. That is obviously particularly important for the millions who were in restrictions before the national lockdown, because the message to them today seems to be, “You will almost certainly be back where you were before the national lockdown, probably in even stricter restrictions.” People need to know that so that they can plan for that. I really emphasise how important that is for the Prime Minister.

    Secondly—the Prime Minister said he wanted uniform rules—will the tiers simply be imposed region by region, come what may, from 3 December, or will there be an element of local consultation and negotiation? I understand the uniform rules, but simply to impose them runs the risk of not getting buy-in from local leaders and local communities, which is incredibly important to people complying with the rules.

    Thirdly, how long does the Prime Minister anticipate each local area will remain in each tier? For those that are going to come out of lockdown and almost certainly go back to more restrictions than they left, that is going to be a very pressing question.

    Fourthly, will there be a new economic package to accompany these new tiers? There is huge concern among many businesses about their viability in tier 3, particularly a strengthened tier 3, so what new support can they expect? May I touch again on those who are self-employed who are outside the self-employed scheme—the so-called excluded? They will be hearing a message about the next three months in relation to schemes that they are not currently in, and that needs urgently to be addressed.

    I turn to the public health impact of this approach, because one of the major reasons that we ended up in a national lockdown was that, in the words of the Government’s scientific advisers—the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies—test, trace and isolate was only having

    “a marginal impact on transmission”.

    It is one of the reasons that they suggested a national lockdown.

    I know that the Prime Minister will talk about increased testing, mass testing. That is welcome but it is only part of the story, because the other two parts—trace and isolate—are not fit for purpose. SAGE advised, and continues to advise, that for trace and isolate to be effective, the percentage of contacts traced needs to be about 80%. It is currently nowhere near that level. It has never been near that level, and the figures are not getting any better. The latest figures actually show that every week, about 120,000 close contacts—that is, people who should be self-isolating—are not being traced by the system. The likelihood of getting the virus under control when 120,000 people who should be self-isolating are moving around their communities is very low.

    Only a fraction of people able to self-isolate are doing so when asked to. We said to the Prime Minister that this needed to be fixed in the period of the national lockdown, and it has not been. It was barely mentioned in the Prime Minister’s statement today, and many people will be forgiven for thinking that the Prime Minister has given up on trace and isolate and is about to abandon that scheme altogether to reach out for a different scheme—mass testing. It is very important that we understand that if we are going into a tiered system, abandoning trace and isolate, or not getting trace and isolate where it should be, we are running a major risk.

    This is not about knocking those on the frontline or knocking those working on track and trace; it is about being grown up about risk. If we are reintroducing a three-tier system without having fixed trace and isolate, that is a major risk and we all need to acknowledge it, because it raises the million-dollar question: how confident is the Prime Minister that the approach he is proposing today will keep the R rate below 1? If it does not, the infections will go up. They will go back out of control and we could well be back in a national lockdown. That is the million-dollar question.

    Labour has backed the Prime Minister on all the big decisions that the Government have had to take to protect public health, including the two national lockdowns. We have done so because we want there to be a national consensus on such difficult issues and because we will always put public health first. Ideally, I would like to be in a position to do so again, but there are huge gaps in this plan, huge uncertainties and huge risks. We will await the detail. We want the Prime Minister to get this right. He has got a week to do so. Will he start by answering these straightforward questions?

  • Keir Starmer – 2020 Comments on Priti Patel Bullying Allegations

    Keir Starmer – 2020 Comments on Priti Patel Bullying Allegations

    The comments made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 20 November 2020.

    Yet again, the Prime Minister has been found wanting when his leadership has been tested. If I were Prime Minister, the Home Secretary would have been removed from her job.

    It is hard to imagine another workplace in the UK where this behaviour would be condoned by those at the top. The Government should be setting an example. Instead, it is one rule for Boris Johnson and his friends, another for everyone else.

    The Prime Minister has previously said he ‘loathes bullying’. Yet when one of his own ministers is found to have bullied their staff he ignores the damning report sat on his desk and instead protects them.

    In the interest of transparency, the report into Priti Patel’s conduct and any drafts should now be fully published and the Prime Minister and Home Secretary should come to the House on Monday to face questions on their conduct.

  • Keir Starmer – 2020 Statement on Jeremy Corbyn’s Continued Suspension from the Labour Party

    Keir Starmer – 2020 Statement on Jeremy Corbyn’s Continued Suspension from the Labour Party

    The statement made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Labour Party, on 18 November 2020.

    Since I was elected Labour leader, I have made it my mission to root out antisemitism from the Labour Party.

    I know that I will be judged on my actions, not my words.

    The disciplinary process does not have the confidence of the Jewish community. That became clear once again yesterday.

    It is the task of my leadership to fix what I have inherited. That is what I am resolute in doing and I have asked for an independent process to be established as soon as possible.

    I’m the Leader of the Labour Party, but I’m also the Leader of the Parliamentary Labour Party.

    Jeremy Corbyn’s actions in response to the EHRC report undermined and set back our work in restoring trust and confidence in the Labour Party’s ability to tackle antisemitism.

    In those circumstances, I have taken the decision not to restore the whip to Jeremy Corbyn. I will keep this situation under review.