Tag: John Healey

  • John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Healey on 2014-03-28.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the Answer of 25 March 2014, Official Report, columns 232-3W, on social security benefits: young people, if he will publish information relevant to the original question in whatever format that is available.

    Esther McVey

    The information you require is not available.

  • John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Healey on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, if he will place in the Library the model and detailed methodology used for the forecast of the effects of affordable rent on housing benefit expenditure published by his Department in the document, Impact Assessment for Affordable Rent, in June 2011.

    Kris Hopkins

    The Affordable Rent Impact Assessment, published in June 2011, sets out the methodology and assumptions used at the time to model the expected impact of Affordable Rent on Housing Benefit expenditure. The Impact Assessment is published here:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6021/1918816.pdf

  • John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Healey on 2014-04-02.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the Answer of 27 March 2014, Official Report, columns 348-9W, on social security benefits: young people, if he will publish any information relevant to the original question that is available at proportionate cost.

    Esther McVey

    Information on Jobseekers Allowance Severe Hardship decisions for 16 and 17 year olds is provided attached but please be aware that it does not relate solely to estrangement. Information on Income Support and Employment Support Allowance is not available. Similarly it is not possible to disaggregate Appeals information on an age basis.

  • John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Healey on 2014-04-29.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what is the average (a) social rent and (b) Affordable Rent is for units funded under the Affordable Homes Programme in each region of the UK.

    Kris Hopkins

    The information is not centrally held in the form requested.

  • John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Healey on 2014-04-29.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what the average housing benefit award is for housing benefit claimants paying Affordable Rent under the Affordable Homes Programme in each region of the UK.

    Kris Hopkins

    The information is not centrally held in the form requested.

  • John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Healey on 2014-04-29.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what the grant per property was for new affordable housing under the National Affordable Housing Programme, by region, in each year since the inception of the Programme.

    Kris Hopkins

    Average grant allocated per property for the National Affordable Housing Programme, which operated from 2008-09 to 2010-11, broken down by Homes and Communities Agency operating area, is set out below.

    Operating area

    2008/09

    2009/10

    2010/11

    East and South East

    £42,692

    £45,165

    £39,793

    London

    £83,376

    £89,381

    £72,092

    Midlands

    £40,961

    £40,005

    £41,942

    North East, Yorkshire and the Humber

    £39,392

    £37,113

    £42,744

    North West

    £44,519

    £42,060

    £44,484

    South and South West

    £45,284

    £49,430

    £47,273

    Source: Homes and Communities Agency

    Since 2011, the new Affordable Rent model allows for new affordable housing to be delivered with a lower grant cost to taxpayers.

  • John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Healey on 2014-06-04.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what the average rent was for new homes built under the Affordable Homes programme in each local authority from the launch of that programme to date.

    Kris Hopkins

    The information is not held centrally.

  • John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    John Healey – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Healey on 2014-06-05.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment he has made of the potential effects of removing dedicated funding for local welfare assistance; and if he will review the current local welfare assistance arrangements introduced in 2013 before any such change is made.

    Steve Webb

    In the next spending round period, from April 2015, central government will continue to provide support to local authorities through general funds, as part of the coalition Government’s commitment to reducing ring-fencing and ending top-down Whitehall control.

    It was always the intention that 2014-15 would be the last year of separate funding for local welfare provision from the Department for Work and Pensions. Councils will continue to provide support to those in their community who face financial difficulties or who find themselves in unavoidable circumstances.

    In contrast to a centralised grant system that was poorly targeted, councils can now choose how to best support local welfare needs within their areas. As this is an administrative change only no assessment has been made of the effects. However we are carrying out a review of the current arrangements, working with the Local Government Association and the Department for Communities and Local Government. Once completed it is our intention to place a copy of the findings in the House Library.

  • John Healey – 2022 Speech at Labour Party Conference

    John Healey – 2022 Speech at Labour Party Conference

    The speech made by John Healey, the Shadow Secretary of State for Defence, on 27 September 2022.

    Conference, it’s always an honour to address you.

    Thank you for staying the full course today.

    Thank you for the massive welcome you gave the choir and speakers from Ukraine.

    Thank you for your contributions throughout this debate.

    You showed Labour’s total condemnation of Russia; and Labour’s total solidarity with Ukraine.

    You showed we share the same values – democracy, freedom, human rights, respect for international law.

    When Putin invaded Ukraine, Labour – like the British people – wanted faster, tougher sanctions. Faster, more compassionate treatment for Ukrainian refugees. Faster, stronger UK backing for war crimes investigators.

    But on Britain’s military help to Ukraine, and on reinforcing NATO allies, the Government has had – and will continue to have – our full Labour support.

    Conference, we will win a Labour Government.

    So, let’s make clear to President Putin, there will be a change to Labour but there will be no change in Britain’s resolve to confront Russia’s aggression and stand with Ukraine to confound Russia’s attempts to divide NATO, hold Europe hostage over energy and flood our society with disinformation.

    And I say this, conference: those who call ‘stop the war’ more loudly than ‘win the war’ are playing into Putin’s hands.

    A ceasefire cedes new territory to Russia. Risks Russia regrouping their forces; deepening their occupation; legitimising their regime of torture, rape and execution.

    We are not fighting. We don’t decide when it ends. Only Ukraine can make this call. Our duty will be to support Ukraine in negotiations, just as we are now in the fighting.

    Britain’s military have responded magnificently to support Ukraine. And we pay tribute to the serving men and women of our Armed Forces.

    We are the party of public service. Theirs is the ultimate public service.

    They defend the country, at home and abroad.

    Yet over 12 Tory years, they’ve seen their pay cut, numbers cut, family support cut.

    Satisfaction with Service life itself has plunged below half.

    We must renew the nation’s contract with those who serve. We will put the Armed Forces Covenant fully into law. We will make Britain the best country to be a veteran. The Tories won’t; Labour will.

    And over 12 years, the Tories leave Britain weaker in the world.

    They have weakened Britain’s global influence by breaking international law, antagonising our European allies, slashing development aid and failing to stand up for human rights.

    They have cut our full time Armed Forces by over 40 000, axed one in five of the Navy’s surface ships; and taken 200 planes out of RAF service in the last five years alone.

    They have got the big calls wrong. They failed to see and plan for a Taliban take-over in Afghanistan or a Russian invasion of Ukraine. Even as threats to Britain increase, they plan to cut the Army by a further 10 000 troops.

    And they’ve overseen a broken procurement system, wasting over £15 billion through bad MoD management.

    The NLAW anti-tank missiles have been vital to Ukraine. This is day 216 of Putin’s war. Yet there’s still no MoD contract signed, still no production to restock for Ukraine and for our own Army.

    The Tories are failing British troops, and British taxpayers.

    When a country is facing threats or forced to fight, its Armed Forces depend on the strength its industry and resilience of its people.

    Attlee and Bevin understood this in the late 1930s. And yes, so did Nye Bevan.

    As the Party of working people and trade unions, we know when done well spending on defence strengthens our UK economy and our UK sovereignty.

    So, in government, we will make it fundamental that British defence investment is directed first to British business, with a higher bar set for any decisions to buy abroad.

    The first test is the Navy’s new fleet support ships. The Tories want to build them abroad, in cut-price shipyards with non-union labour.

    Conference, I say to you today:

    Under Labour, these ships will be built in Britain by British workers.

    Under Labour, trade unions will be industrial partners.

    Under Labour, defence spending will help lead our mission to buy, make and sell more in Britain.

    Conference, let us draw one more lesson from Ukraine.

    Ukraine is winning because its people – people of diverse faith, age, ethnicity and language – have a national story of hope to unify them.

    To be a democratic country at peace with its neighbours, free to determine its own future. A people with security, prosperity and respect.

    These are Labour’s hopes for the British people.

    Our surest defence for Britain is to build a country where security, prosperity and respect are guaranteed to all.

    A country worth defending and determined to defend itself.

    A country whose citizens can say proudly: in the face of the most severe threats, we stood with Ukraine, we stood with our allies, we stood with each other.

  • John Healey – 2022 Speech on Ukraine (September 2022)

    John Healey – 2022 Speech on Ukraine (September 2022)

    The speech made by John Healey, the Shadow Secretary of State for Defence, in the House of Commons on 5 September 2022.

    I welcome this statement on day one after the recess and on day 194 of Russia’s brutal illegal invasion of Ukraine. I thank the Defence Secretary for the regular briefings he has given during this period to those in all parts of the House and on all sides. On behalf of Members on all sides, may I say that we trust that he will remain in his post in the new Truss Cabinet?

    I say on behalf of my party that we now stand ready to work with the new Prime Minister to maintain the UK’s united support for Ukraine and united determination to stand up against Russian aggression. President Putin expected Ukraine to fall within six days. Six months on, the massively brave Ukrainian resistance, military and civilian alike, is stronger now than it was in February, and all the Government’s moves to provide military, economic, diplomatic and humanitarian help to Ukraine will continue to have Labour’s fullest backing.

    We strongly support the UK’s training programme for new Ukrainian army recruits, which the Labour leader and I saw for ourselves on Salisbury plain. I am humbled by the fact that those brave new recruits whom we met last month are now on the frontline, fighting in Donbas. I thank the Defence Secretary and Brigadier Justin Stenhouse for organising our visit. Will this training under Operation Interflex be extended beyond the initial commitment of 10,000 troops and beyond the basic soldiering skills currently covered?

    We also welcome the extra long-range missiles and unmanned air systems announced over the summer. What is the strategy behind our military assistance? Is it designed to help Ukrainians hold current ground or take back more territory from Russian forces? What action has been taken to replenish our domestic stockpiles? How many new contracts have been signed? Has the production of replacement NLAWs—next generation anti-tank and anti-armour weapons—now finally started?

    The war is entering a critical new stage, with Russia unable to deploy the overwhelming force needed for a decisive breakthrough and Ukraine well on the way to sapping the will of the Russian army to fight, hitting ammunition dumps, command posts and airfields deep into Russian-held territory. With the Russian military leadership under increasing military pressure, does the Defence Secretary agree that we are approaching another turning point, where Putin is likely to step up efforts to persuade the west to lean on Ukraine to agree to a ceasefire and negotiations? What are the Government doing to counter such activities?

    What are the Government doing to explain to the public that the energy crisis and supply disruptions are not a result of Russia’s war, but an essential part of Russia’s war? Russia is fighting on the economic battlefield, not just the military battlefield. What action will the new Prime Minister take to help the country with escalating energy costs, rapidly rising food costs and the highest rate of inflation in this country for 40 years?

    On the subject of the new Prime Minister, before the Tory leadership campaign, the Defence Secretary and Defence Ministers said that the invasion of Ukraine proved the integrated review right. They said:

    “if more money were made available, there are other things that we would do more immediately than regrow the size of the Army.”—[Official Report, 18 July 2022; Vol. 718, c. 688.]

    Then, towards the end of the leadership campaign, the Defence Secretary wrote of the new Prime Minister:

    “I welcome her plans to update the integrated review, reconsider the shape of our forces, and increase defence spending.”

    I welcome his conversion to the arguments that Labour has been making for well over a year, but what does he believe now needs updating in the integrated review? Will he halt his plans for Army cuts? Will the £1.7 billion cut in day-to-day MOD spending now be replaced?

    Finally, very few people believed Ukraine would still be fighting Russia’s invasion six months on. We now know that Russia’s aggression will go on a lot longer. Will the Government set aside individual announcements and instead set out a grand strategy of long-term military, economic and diplomatic support, so that we can help ensure Putin’s invasion really does end in failure?