Tag: John Glen

  • John Glen – 2024 Keynote Speech at Reform’s ‘Reimagining Whitehall’ Conference

    John Glen – 2024 Keynote Speech at Reform’s ‘Reimagining Whitehall’ Conference

    The speech made by John Glen, the Cabinet Office Minister, at BT Tower on 9 May 2024.

    Good morning, everyone, it’s a pleasure to be here with you all.

    I would like to thank Reform for hosting this conference today.

    And I am grateful, too, for Reform’s thought-provoking ‘Making the Grade’ Report published last week – I was fortunate enough to receive it a few days in advance.

    It sets out a series of radical recommendations – a couple stand out to me, like establishing a mid-career fast stream and overhauling the methods by which we assess candidates, all of which I am keen to investigate further.

    But I was particularly taken with your description of the Civil Service having ‘a people problem’, and it’s what I would like to touch on today as we “reimagine Whitehall”.

    Indeed, if we really want to reimagine Whitehall, to make it more efficient to deliver better services for the public then we must focus on the half a million people who make up our Civil Service.

    Because it’s not the buildings that make up Whitehall, or even the physical location itself – it is the people.

    And following our Places for Growth programme, these people are now spread across the United Kingdom. With the relocation of 18,283 roles out of London, a civil servant can now work their entire career without ever having to step foot into Whitehall.

    When I spoke about this in January at the Institute for Government, I was clear that we must increase productivity in the Civil Service. Part of that work is, undoubtedly, about getting the Civil Service headcount under control.

    The Chancellor has been clear about getting it back to pre-pandemic levels. Doing so will allow us to reallocate resources to our most pressing priorities, like national security.

    But the heart of this is to get the most out of our people and deliver more with what we have.

    So, I am clear that we should have a Civil Service where the most skilled, innovative and inspired minds are called to serve, to stay and to be successful and fulfilled.

    There are three main areas of focus.

    First, performance – specifically making sure excellent performance is encouraged and poor performers are managed appropriately.

    Second, recruitment – attracting the brightest minds from the broadest backgrounds to public service.

    And third, skills – making sure the Civil Service is fit to fight the challenges we face, like the threat of climate change or cyber attacks.

    And I have seen in the Cabinet Office the transformation of our capabilities to respond urgently to the challenges around us.

    So, starting with performance.

    Now, I know from my first hand experience that there are many talented, high performing, highly motivated civil servants who work incredibly hard to serve the public each and every day.

    And for the last seven years as a minister, I’ve relied on them day in, day out – and as five years as a PPS, I observed them very closely.

    But too often, high performance doesn’t get recognised, rewarded or incentivised properly.

    The National Audit Office’s recent ‘Civil Service Workforce’ report highlighted that less than 1% of the total Civil Service pay in 21 – 22 was performance-related.

    We’re overlooking a crucial opportunity here.

    So let me be clear, I’m not advocating for hefty bonuses for civil servants. However, our current pay structure and the absence of recognition for outstanding performance can breed significant issues.

    It not only drives talented individuals towards the private sector for better compensation, but it can also fuel grade inflation, where promotions are used to circumvent government-wide pay freezes.

    This can result in a loss of expertise and excellence where it’s most needed.

    So, reimagining how we reward performance could unlock unprecedented levels of quality work within the Civil Service, sharpen our policy focus and ensure that taxpayers see tangible improvements.

    That’s why I am pleased to announce that we are developing a model of milestone based pay for some specialist functions.

    Such a system would allow departments to award performance based incentives for the delivery of specific milestones agreed with ministers.

    As a first step, we will pilot this with our most senior grades, and I hope that this will prove to be a first step in moving towards a wider system of performance related pay.

    Of course, a crucial part of ensuring a high performing Civil Service is tackling poor performance when it arises.

    From my experience in the private sector – I am sure many here would agree – there are no qualms with rooting out poor performance. Either you’re in step or you’re out of line.

    I feel this acutely, because we must never forget – as politicians – that we are stewards of taxpayers’ money, and we have a duty to do all we can to allocate efficiently.

    But we know it’s not always like that in the Civil Service. Performance management processes can be long and complicated and, frankly, that complexity means that many don’t engage at all.

    In fact, it can be all too easy for leaders to let people move to another team, to let the poor performer become someone else’s problem.

    Now, it’s understandable behaviour but it serves no one well.

    Civil servants recognise this as a problem – indeed Reform’s recent report highlighted their deep frustration with the survey work they undertook.

    We simply cannot allow poor performers to go on hiding in plain sight, dragging down their hard working colleagues and hindering  progress.

    I’m not attacking anyone – I’m just stating plainly the reality of what isn’t working.

    That’s why, during my speech in January, I announced that we were reviewing the performance management regime, in order to ensure staff are supported to tackle poor performance.

    And as part of this, we are looking at options to strengthen exit processes around capability issues.

    We’ve already started this work with our most senior civil servants.

    In fact, we’re gathering evidence from all departments about how they have implemented performance arrangements for their senior leaders. Including, how they set their strategic policy objectives, how they lay down what they expect from their people and how they tackle poor performance.

    I’m pleased to say that good progress is being made and should conclude next month.

    We are also making sure that the system which our departmental leaders use to manage their staff is up to scratch by reviewing the Civil Service Performance Management Framework.

    It’s a framework that is used across the Civil Service, and its flexibility means it suits all different departments. But my concern is how it is being used.

    The Cabinet Office does not always – or, perhaps, rarely – have the force to mandate each Department’s behaviour, but we can and will guide it with the soundest frameworks and advice.

    That’s why data is being collected from all government departments to assess how effective the approach actually is, and how consistently it deals with poor performance effectively.

    By autumn, we will have a better understanding of how these tools are being used, we will then act accordingly and if required, make radical changes ahead of the next performance year.

    Next, recruitment.

    Previously, I spoke about the difficulties many new civil servants encountered in their first weeks in the role.

    The timeline from that vacancy arising to a new civil servant being sat at their desk is – frankly – just too long.

    I’m pleased to say today that we have made huge progress in this area, using automation to replicate manual tasks at a speed 84% faster than a human equivalent with reduced errors, freeing up time for civil servants to be getting on with their day jobs.

    While I’m immensely pleased by these achievements, the long-term effects of an overly lengthy recruitment process can leave key posts unfilled. Of course some will walk away from that journey, creating a strong incentive to bypass external recruitment competitions or even forgo competitions altogether to swiftly appoint an internal candidate. Even if they are not ideally suited to the position.

    Correcting this is crucial, especially when it comes to our senior roles.

    Many of our senior civil servants rise to that status without ever leaving the Civil Service ranks. This is the type of career trajectory you can plot in the public sector if you work hard.

    The trouble with such a rise is that we are in danger of group-think:  by remaining the same, we do the same things.

    That’s why, in May 2022, we reinforced the External by Default policy, to ensure all senior civil service roles were open to external candidates unless agreed otherwise by a Minister.

    We have had some tremendous success here, and thanks to this policy, we now see over 93% of permanent Director and Deputy Director roles open to the external market.

    But, as with so many things, what is a great start, we need to go further, because this figure drops to just over 61% when including temporary roles.

    So, I’m pleased to say today that we’ve asked the Civil Service Commission to review how the external by default policy is applied, so that we can reinforce this ambition.

    And I would like to extend this principle beyond senior grades.

    Opening up recruitment in this way means we can benefit from the skills and experience of those internally, but also from the wider public, voluntary and private sector.

    I want to create conditions that allow for civil servants to leave and gain skills outside the Civil Service but return efficiently and enriched at a later date – and for people with expert skills to join, whilst leaving open opportunities to return to outside sectors further down the line.

    Creating a more flexible and agile workforce matters greatly if we are going to instil technical innovation that we need in the civil service, where we really need ground-breaking leadership to bring the public sector in line with the tech sector.

    It is no secret that we have big ambitions to make the Civil Service a world-leader in technology-led public services, I believe that Dr. Laura Gilbert and Mike Potter will be delving into this in one of your panels later.

    And in this area many ways we are making progress.

    We’ve seen success here in lower grades, through our digital apprenticeships and talent programmes.

    But to turn that vision into reality, we need leadership from outside the Civil Service, we need beacons of innovation – setting an example of the type of tech-focused work which we need to adopt across Whitehall.

    And that’s something which is highlighted in Reform’s report, too, specifically how specialist roles need their own system of reward.

    That’s why I am announcing today – as part of the Senior Civil Service Strategy – that we will be developing a recruitment pathway specifically for experienced specialist talent to join the Civil Service.

    This new pathway would recruit specialists at a senior level, pay them competitively, on the right terms and conditions, so they can have real influence and drive innovation.

    But it will free them from some of the responsibilities that would come with a senior role in the civil service, such as line management, so they can remain solely focused on driving transformation.

    I look forward to updating more on this soon.

    Finally,  I would like to turn to skills.

    Of course, we cannot just rely on our innovative experts to ensure the Civil Service keeps pace with the rapid advances in technology we are witnessing.

    To get the very best from our public services now and into the future, we need a Civil Service that is adept, agile and resilient.

    The capabilities and skills we valued in the past are changing, and they’re changing rapidly.

    Now more than ever before we need to embrace people’s potential, and that’s why we’re focusing on our peoples’ skills.

    Not only does investing in skills increase retention and staff motivation, it also ensures that civil servants can adapt to the changing world of work.

    We need to Invest in leadership and management skills so that organisations are agile in the face of rapid change – and in digital and data skills, so that our people are confident in designing and using efficient processes that deploy new technologies

    And we must keep investing in professional skills – commercial, financial, analytical – to boost productivity and to deliver more efficient public services to our citizens.

    That’s why we’re investing in a new digital platform to make it easier for civil servants to identify and access the right training, and are working on a skills plan and new curriculum that will develop the skills we need for the future with training delivered around the country, supporting our places for growth agenda.

    It’s why we are developing digital and data skills to make the best of new technology.

    We also need to look at our organisational structures and whether these are setting us up for success.

    Within the Civil Service, managers oversee too few staff, leading to micromanagement, disempowerment and inefficiency.

    Conversely, there’s an excessive number of hierarchical levels, resulting in bureaucratic bottlenecks and delayed decision-making.

    I’m determined to address these issues by broadening management spans and flattening organisational structures to promote agility and responsiveness.

    Ladies and gentlemen, if we want to reimagine Whitehall, that act starts and ends with our civil servants.

    It’s about getting the right people in the right job, and enabling them to fulfil their potential.

    Across every department, every function and profession and across the United Kingdom.

    I’m pleased to have set out today the real progress we have made since I last spoke on this in January.

    But, I know we can and must do more.

    We need to embrace innovation.

    Make sure that skills keep pace with that innovation.

    All driven by inspiring leaders to make these ambitions a reality.

    I know the Civil Service can be a universally high achieving organisation, I also know we’re capable of so much more.

    So my message is: let’s realise the full potential of our workforce and as a consequence provide better public services to those we serve. Thank you very much.

  • John Glen – 2024 Speech at the Institute for Government’s Annual Conference

    John Glen – 2024 Speech at the Institute for Government’s Annual Conference

    The speech made by John Glen, the Minister for the Cabinet Office, on 23 January 2024.

    Ladies and Gentlemen, it’s a pleasure to be here with you all today.

    I would like to start by thanking the Institute for Government for hosting this event. In particular, thank you to Dr Hannah White for her engagement leading up to it. I enjoyed your blog and the recently released Whitehall monitor.

    Today, I want to outline the next steps of civil service reform and how I will build on my predecessors’ work to make the Civil Service a lean, keen and productive machine.

    But, before I look to the future, I would like to look to the past.

    Modernisation and reform have always been a crucial part of the Civil Service.

    In fact, the modern Civil Service was born out of a report f- as I’m sure many of you know – from 1854, one that argued the case for urgent reform.

    The Northcote-Trevelyan Report focused on creating a permanent Civil Service based on integrity and honesty.

    Now, I’m paraphrasing here, but the report ends by stating: “Our priorities are, to provide efficient public servants, to foster merit, to overcome the fragmentary nature of the service”.

    To get the best people to encourage good work, to improve the structures of central government.

    It could have been written yesterday, but actually next month that report celebrates its 170th anniversary.

    I think these priorities will speak to the public’s concerns. They want a public service that is easy to navigate, one where the best people are in the right jobs, where their lives are made easier by Government decisions.

    It’s these priorities that I will discuss today and how I will seek to help the Civil Service to achieve them.

    Recent Change & Future Challenge

    Now, the size of our Civil Service has always shifted.

    It shrunk following the financial crisis after 2010, in 2016, it grew to deliver Brexit and it grew in 2020 to respond to the pandemic.

    It’s clear that if the world changes, the Civil Service must change, too. And this is right – the public would expect an adaptive and agile service, one that can respond to the big challenges facing the country.

    Just think of the Furlough scheme, the AI Safety Summit, or all the work that’s gone into making us one of the highest performing education leaders in the world, these are significant achievements worth remembering.

    It is also worth remembering the range of roles in the Civil Service.

    They make up our government departments, agencies and public bodies, but they’re also the people who translate policies of politicians into action.

    They work incredibly hard but crucially hard work does not always equal great productivity.

    We must improve to keep pace with innovation in the private sector. For too long, productivity in the public sector has not been a high-enough priority, we have thrown more people at our biggest challenges, but have more to do to embrace the potential of technology and innovative ways of working.

    As a recent Chief Secretary to the Treasury, I know that public finances are tight, they are always tight. Having established the Public Sector Productivity Review, I focused on squeezing every pound to deliver for taxpayers and I carry that focus with me in my new role in the Cabinet Office.

    I know how important it is that the Civil Service cracks its productivity puzzle, because doing so will open the door to greater productivity across our entire public sector.

    We can only afford a Civil Service that embraces innovation, especially when we consider the challenges ahead.

    Demand for public services is growing – not just because of the immediate cost-of-living pressures, but an ageing population means we need to carefully consider many of our policies.

    The cost of running Government is also increasing – tech costs more, and Government debt costs more to manage.

    So, we have a public that is rightly expecting more, but it is also costing us more just to stand still.

    As the Minister responsible for Civil Service reform, I am relentlessly focused on its future.

    It is clear we have to do more with less, but I don’t think it’s about cutting corners.

    It’s about being more productive. It’s about encouraging the best possible performance. It’s about bringing our people with us, to embrace the possibilities that modernisation brings.

    Changes Already Made

    Now, I hope I’m not arrogant enough – 10 weeks into the job – to think I’m the first to recognise these challenges.

    My predecessors have set some fantastic work in motion already – most recently Sir Jeremy Quin, and not least the inimitable Lord Maude and his series of reforms. I was happy to discuss this speech with him yesterday evening.

    The foundation for my work is the Declaration on Government Reform led by Michael Gove in 2021, where all permanent secretaries and the Cabinet agreed a programme of reform.

    It was an ambitious programme focussed on greater efficiency and productivity – and we’ve already made some great progress.

    Like merging 200 legacy IT systems into 5 corporate services.

    And we’ve moved 16,000 London Civil Service roles into cities like Aberdeen, Cardiff, Wrexham and Belfast, making a Civil Service representative of the public it serves.

    That’s all good, but what’s missing?

    For me, there are three areas we can focus on to accelerate Civil Service modernisation: embedding technology, embracing simplicity, and enabling people’s potential.

    Embedding Technology

    So, first, let me turn to technology.

    My vision is that every single civil servant is either actively delivering – or enabled by – digital technology in their day-to-day job, whether that’s eliminating bureaucracy. or coming up with new ideas to support our citizens.

    Much of the focus is on how we in Government use AI, but I am clear that is not an inevitable solution.

    AI will only work if it’s properly embedded, if it’s clear why and how we’re using it, and that civil servants get the right training and support to use it well.

    I’m pleased to say we are already taking exciting first steps to unlock the benefits of generative AI, ensuring that our AI teams are working with industry experts, in order to solve some of the public sector’s most pressing problems.

    Like launching AI pilots to make it easier for people to claim compensation in the case of criminal injury.

    I believe better use of technology allows us to encapsulate everything that I’ve already spoken about: powered by the right people, it will improve how we deliver to the public at lower cost.

    For example: before, if you wanted to sign a mortgage deed, complete a DBS check, or manage your company’s apprenticeship scheme, you had to sign in to each specific Government website, re-enter your personal details again and again and again.

    So, we released a Gov.UK app that uses the One Login system, it’s already been downloaded 4.5 million times, and it has whittled 29 service logins down to just one sign-in process.

    It’s so successful we’re rolling it out to over 100 other services this year.

    It’s a great example of how we can better serve the public especially where they engage directly with public service.

    Embrace Simplicity

    But tech and artificial intelligence are not a one-size fits all solution to our issues, I believe there is a lot we can do by simplifying our processes.

    Inevitably, the Government is – and always will be – a complex organisation. But I fear that now, it’s more complex than it needs to be.

    Complex processes hide inefficiencies, simplifying how we work will make the Civil Service more productive, and will help us improve public services.

    I want to acknowledge the work of my Ministerial colleague Esther McVey, who has come into her new post in the Cabinet Office to root out our inefficiencies.

    She brings a refreshing clarity and analysis to how the Government works, a clarity which I – and the public – truly welcome.

    It was a vision shared by Lord Maude, who also wanted to see improved accountability.

    Today, we are considering ways to improve accountability in the Civil Service, including accountability to ministers.

    The public expect no less, because they too want the processes and services they use to be more straightforward.

    Take Universal Credit, for instance: it replaced a complicated landscape of multiple benefits administered by multiple organisations.

    When we were delivering it, people were complaining it was taking too long, but we stuck to it, and steadily implemented it, and now, five years after its introduction, the change it has brought is remarkable.

    It provided essential support throughout the pandemic rapidly, and will save £650m per year by 2027.

    Now – that was a big idea with big benefits and it didn’t just happen.

    It took the combined effort of civil servants, local councils, politicians and thousands more to make it work.

    I pay tribute to them all, who – over half a generation – have transformed this complex service into a simple and productive one.

    Projects like that demonstrate how our approach to policy development needs to change.

    It needs to prioritise productivity as a goal from the outset, and ensure we are building an evidence base demonstrating which interventions work and which don’t.

    But it’s not just the public-facing work we need to reconsider we also need to re-evaluate the labyrinth of processes that make up the back office of government.

    That means doubling down on the functional reform agenda that Lord Maude began.

    Which is why we introduced functions in 2013 to raise standards of specialist work across government.

    Renewed approaches to functions like commercial, finance and project delivery have delivered £7.8bn in efficiencies just between 2020 and 2022.

    But we need to go further, and actually create a way of doing things that gets things done well and done quickly.

    So let me give you an example of the kind of efficiency I’m talking about.

    Let’s say you’re a new civil servant, and it’s your first day in a Government department.

    You need to get an ID card, but security clearance is a rigorous process, and for some that can take many months, so you get a temporary pass.

    You need a laptop, but I.T. don’t have one available, so you have someone else print out all your induction material, and you remain offline for a while in a very online world.

    It’s now a couple of weeks. Without proper access to the building, you don’t have a laptop and you don’t have an online account, and to resolve each one of these pressing issues, you have to speak to a different person.

    Does this sound productive to you? Of course it doesn’t.

    From launching a job advert to getting that new civil servant sat at their desk, takes – an astonishing average – of up to 115 days.

    We can, we must and we will do better.

    Which is why we are piloting a new model to make one person accountable for this process end to end, making sure that new starters in the Civil Service can start quickly with all their needs met and be productive from day one.

    Enabling People’s Potential

    That leads me on to my final focus for my speech – people.

    Undeniably, people are the Civil Service’s greatest asset, but I believe that the current system is letting us all down and doesn’t enable our staff to achieve their best.

    Complex structures mean that measuring progress can be difficult, our ways of incentivising high-quality performance are limited, people feel like the only way they can progress is to shuffle roles, all leading to dissatisfaction which, of course, results in the Civil Service churn being too high.

    It’s a serious challenge for us – one which the IFG says costs the public nearly £36m a year on recruitment, training and loss of productivity.

    We know that pay isn’t everything for civil servants, but it is undeniable that it is a deciding factor for them to move roles.

    Pay, too, can prevent the external talent the Civil Service desperately needs.
    Only one in five successful Senior Civil Service recruits is external, and vacancy rates for crucial digital and data professionals are at 15%, which undermines our digital transformation ambitions.

    So, my ambition is simple: a smaller, more skilled Civil Service that is better rewarded.

    Its simplicity masks the challenge, however, in implementing it, but I believe the time to make that change is now.

    Which is why I am pleased that we are reviewing our pay framework for digital and data professionals, to ensure these roles can compete with similar roles in the private sector, especially those that will be at the forefront of AI delivery.

    Not only will this attract and retain talent, but it will also save the taxpayer money, with savings of up to £270m by reducing reliance on expensive contractors.

    My message to today’s tech leaders is this: yes, the Civil Service is doing everything it can to compete on pay – but no tech giant, no FTSE100 company, no unicorn anywhere will ever compete with the level of the work you will do in the Civil Service.

    I have been fortunate enough to work in a number of Government departments, alongside many great people and some of them are here today. I’m loathed to name any of them individually, yet the commitment they showed me, the great advice they have given me, and go the extra mile –  all this allowed me to achieve everything I could.

    That environment often comes down to the culture our line managers create, they help improve performance, giving their teams clarity, support and accountability.

    When line management is done well, it is transformational. There are over 100,000 civil servants with line management duties and, if they’re good at their job, this can improve productivity by providing clear expectations, training and support for their teams.

    We also know that standards of performance management can too often vary between teams and departments.

    Staff might not be getting full, honest feedback that helps them address issues, or help them progress their career at the right pace.

    That is why we will be setting out the line management standards we want across the Civil Service and providing the support to managers they need to achieve these.

    Yet, in some cases, consistently underperforming staff can languish in roles, or move between departments without properly addressing the reasons for poor performance.

    In the worst cases, managers can too often feel unable to remove consistently poor performers

    This is a problem that needs a solution, which is why I’m pleased to announce that I will work with Civil Service leaders to review our performance management approach.

    This will build on the best practice already happening across much of the Civil Service and it’s only fair to our staff that we support them with proper, honest management.

    But let me be clear – we are not dodging our responsibilities to deal with bad performance.

    Where there is consistent poor performance in a very small minority of staff, we must take necessary action to address that.

    It’s something which is a cause of real frustration for our civil servants – particularly senior civil servants – some of whom can feel they have to tiptoe around a colleague’s lacklustre performance, or have to work extra hard to make up for it.

    It’s just one of the many things that frustrate them which can be resolved by better management. Another is working from the office.

    There is no denying that there are many benefits to colleagues working all together in an office. People can be more productive, and complex tasks often can be overcome more efficiently.

    I have already set out the expectation for staff to be in the office at least 60% of the time, and I believe that our senior civil servants need to set an example as leaders.

    I want to consider how this expectation can be baked into our management of senior staff, which is why we will be making this distinction clearer for senior civil servants at the start of the performance year.

    Ultimately, I want staff to bring themselves – their ideas, their passion and their dedication – into the office to tackle problems together.

    I’ve already spoken about how we are building a public sector that reflects the society it serves, but I know there have been questions raised on the role of staff networks in supporting that effort.

    Now, I’m sincerely grateful to the work of civil servants to make their profession open and inclusive.

    Staff networks can create collaborative spaces, build a sense of belonging, helping us to work across-departments.

    But, managing these networks should not become a second job.

    I believe we have an opportunity to improve how these networks operate and ensure they do not impact our broader productivity.

    So I have been working with Ministerial colleague Esther McVey to look into how staff networks operate across the civil service, and we will be publishing guidance in due course.

    We must also ensure these networks uphold the Civil Service’s long-established rules on impartiality.

    That’s why we are introducing new impartiality guidance which will support Civil Servants to remain objective when engaging in diversity and inclusion work.

    We must make sure our civil servants can express themselves and maintain the trust and confidence of the public.

    Conclusion

    So, ladies and gentlemen, we have seen – whether it’s in 1854 or in 2024 – our civil servants have the capacity to adapt to the challenges of the day, but we must adapt today to prepare for the urgent challenges of tomorrow.

    Over the next six months, I will address these and other Civil Service priorities, including the use of consultants in the public sector, and the responsibility of public bodies to the government.

    But, for today, I want to reaffirm the kind of Civil Service I want to help create: a Civil Service that can meet the productivity challenge, where the most innovative and inspired minds are called to serve, to stay, and to be successful and fulfilled, where our processes are borne of robust evaluation, where innovation supports how people actually use our public services.

    Our citizens deserve nothing less, and I believe we can do so much more to serve them better.

    Thank you very much.

  • John Glen – 2023 Speech to the Transforming Infrastructure Performance Conference

    John Glen – 2023 Speech to the Transforming Infrastructure Performance Conference

    The speech made by John Glen, the Minister for the Cabinet Office, on 27 November 2023.

    Good morning, everyone.

    It’s a great pleasure to be here with you all today.

    I don’t think I could have picked a better place to give my first speech as the new Minister for Cabinet Office, because here today, in this audience, at this Live Summit, are the leaders who will create the public sector that we all vitally need – a public sector of the future.

    I know you’ve all been very busy – in fact this year, we’ve recorded the biggest portfolio of projects on record. I’ve been in post now for 14 days and it was great to sit down with Nick Smallwood last week to discuss his work and understand the challenges and opportunities that he and all of you face.

    It’s reassuring for me to remember, as a former Treasury minister, that in 2024/25 we are investing 30 billion pounds more in real terms than at the start of this Parliament. In fact, this year we recorded the biggest portfolio of projects on record. two-hundred-and-forty-four to be exact, with an overall worth of eight-hundred-and-five-billion pounds.

    I want to thank you all for your dedication to this work. Through the teamwork between the public and private sector, we are delivering a vibrant infrastructure, one that will benefit every one of our citizens.

    Whether it’s nuclear power stations generating clean energy, our prisons rehabilitating offenders giving them a chance to lead a crime-free life, or our hospitals providing critical healthcare, we are delivering for the British public.

    Challenges

    Your delivery is remarkable, not only for the complexity of the task, but for the challenging circumstances you’re delivering these major construction projects through.

    The Covid pandemic and the war in Ukraine have created both high inflation and low affordability.

    But those challenges shouldn’t deter us – on the contrary, they are the reason the projects we work on must be delivered effectively.

    Public infrastructure plays a vital role in economic growth, and, indeed, it is a growth industry in itself, and we’ll need over a million new workers until 2025 to deliver the projects currently scheduled.

    So, it is up to government to get those trained workers in place – the apprentices, technicians, graduates – indeed, all skilled workers, and give them the opportunity in this thriving area.

    But that’s not the only opportunity we’re focused on – no, through the infrastructure you’re building we are embracing new opportunities, to be greener, to be more innovative, to be more modern than ever before.

    I want to thank the IPA for their leadership here. Their ‘Transforming Infrastructure Performance’ programme describes a vision for the future in which we must prioritise societal outcomes, paving the way for sustainability, digitalisation and modernisation.

    It’s the right approach to take, and we want to ensure that when people invest in our infrastructure, they’re investing in a revitalised sector. One which can withstand new challenges, adapt to and adopt new technologies, and benefit our citizens and the whole of society.

    Already our net zero promises are the cornerstone of our New Hospitals Programme and the Schools Rebuilding Programme.

    These are fantastic new initiatives, and they allow us to put the design and planning innovations to the test.

    The government will progress the National Infrastructure Commission’s April recommendations on planning by delivering reforms to return the nationally significant infrastructure project regime to the two and a half year average consenting time achieved in 2012.

    Productivity

    The government will take further action by including the publishing of spatial data on major infrastructure projects for the first time and ensuring a more reliable process for updating national policy statements.

    As you saw last week in the Chancellor’s remarks at Autumn Statement, we are also taking steps overall in the reform of planning – a new premium planning service, new guaranteed accelerated decision dates, and a critical national priority designation for nationally significant low carbon energy projects, which will also be a helpful intervention. As well, the reforms to the grid connection process, halving the time to build new grid infrastructure.

    My new boss, The Deputy Prime Minister – and, indeed, my predecessor – spoke about the role that data and AI will play in our public services, and I believe it will have a crucial position in your sector.

    We have seen how digitalisation is already being used in our infrastructure – the new prison HMP Millsike, for example, has digital and data throughout its processes. Its progress is being tracked in real-time, supply-chain progress and decisions are being digitally recorded. That means reduced cost and reduced risk – time saved and timescales on target.

    The new prison HMP Fosse Way was also built 22% faster than a traditional build, all thanks to 70% of the project using modern methods of construction.

    And generative AI was used on HS2 London Tunnels in Euston to shorten the build time by 86 working days, which also saved twelve-million-pounds. Better efficiency, safety and quality was the result – this is what innovation brings.

    And I’m delighted to say that, next year, the IPA will launch a new benchmarking service to improve decision making, which I hope will lead to stronger business cases and greater confidence in cost and schedules – all powered by innovative practices.

    Conclusion

    Ladies and gentlemen, now is the time for the UK to be at the forefront of creativity, innovation and a clean future.

    I passionately believe the new methods this industry has been leading on will not only provide economic stability, it will also provide opportunity throughout our regions, levelling up all public infrastructure to an excellent level.

    I can promise you that, in my new role, I will always put people at the very heart of our projects, whether that is the taxpayer or business leaders, whether in a big city or a small town.

    I want to reiterate my thanks to all of you – yes, we are aware of the challenges ahead of us, but I believe we have an ever more sophisticated plan to tackle them.

    I look forward to a future where our TIP principles not only create thriving UK towns and cities, but are used as an example of how to create world-leading infrastructure.

    And I look forward to working with you to make those ambitions – your ambitions, our ambitions – a reality.

    I wish you well with your conference today and with the workshops that you will be doing later this morning. Thank you for the opportunity to make this my first speech as the minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General.

  • John Glen – 2023 Statement on Customs Fraud and the European Union

    John Glen – 2023 Statement on Customs Fraud and the European Union

    The statement made by John Glen, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, in the House of Commons on 9 February 2023.

    In March 2018, the European Commission took the first steps towards infracting the UK, alleging that between November 2011 and October 2017, the UK had failed to prevent undervaluation fraud involving importations of Chinese textiles and footwear. On 8 March 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) published its judgment, finding against the UK on most liability points.

    The UK has argued throughout the case that it took appropriate steps to counter the fraud in question. However, since these infringement proceedings were raised, the UK has taken proportionate and increased steps to combat this fraud without impacting legitimate trade, including by liquidating suspect traders through enforcement action. The UK takes a comprehensive and dynamic approach to tackling customs fraud risk and evolves its responses as any new potential threats emerge.

    Whilst the UK has now left the European Union and this is a legacy matter from before our departure, the Government are keen to resolve this long-running case once and for all and are committed to fulfilling their international obligations.

    Throughout this process, the Government have also been conscious of the risk of further protracted legal proceedings, which could open UK taxpayers to not only a larger principal bill, but also continued substantial interest accrual. Considering this, in June 2022 the UK took the proactive step of making a payment of €678,372,885.63, which the then Chief Secretary to the Treasury set out in a statement to the House on 30 June (HCWS167). This represented the minimum, indisputable amount the UK considered due at that time in light of the CJEU judgment and, vitally, stopped interest accruing on this portion of the bill.

    Following further discussions with the European Commission, on 13 January 2023, the UK made a final principal payment to the EU of €700,351,738.31. This constitutes the entire remaining principal due and the figure paid reflects the 12.43% share back that the UK is entitled to from its time as a member state.

    On 6 February 2023, the UK made a final payment to the EU of €1,227,884,519.53, representing the interest due on the principal amounts paid. These are substantial sums but represent the final payments and draw a line under this long running case, with the UK fulfilling its international obligations.

    Now that the UK is no longer part of the EU customs union, we do not have to remit any duties to the European Union, a tax that in 2021-22 represented a £4.9 billion contribution to the Exchequer. Outside the EU, we can set our own law, including tax and trade policies, that work for the UK. Furthermore, taking into account the financial settlement with the EU, the Government have determined how an additional £14.6 billion of spending by 2024-25 can be allocated to its domestic priorities, rather than be sent in contributions to the EU. This additional spending was already included in the overall spending plans that the Government set out at previous spending reviews.

  • John Glen – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    John Glen – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Glen on 2016-02-22.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what plans NHS England has to involve NICE in the specialised commissioning policy development process.

    George Freeman

    NHS England is in discussions with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in relation to two areas of potential support to its clinical commissioning policy development process for directly commissioned specialised services from 2016/17.

    The first is the delivery of rapid evidence reviews (systematic reviews of the available evidence of clinical effectiveness for particular treatments and indications). The second is the production of commissioning support documents for licenced drugs which NHS England commissions directly.

  • John Glen – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    John Glen – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Glen on 2016-05-19.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, with reference to his Answer of 9 May 2016 to Question 35866, what the capital spend by (a) the Health Protection Agency on its National Incident Coordination Centre in 2011 at Buckingham Palace Gate and (b) Public Health England on its National Emergency Operations Centre in Wellington House was in 2015.

    Jane Ellison

    Public Health England was established in 2013. Therefore the Department has not been able to specifically identify the historical costs of creating the National Incident Coordination Centre (NICC) in 2011.

    The works to install the NICC was part of a wider refit of 5th Floor North in Wellington House. The project cost for this refit was £43,000; the cost of installing the NICC cannot be specifically identified.

  • John Glen – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    John Glen – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Glen on 2016-02-22.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if NHS England will publish a list of the commissioning policies scheduled to be developed in (a) 2015-16, (b) 2016-17 and (c) 2017-18.

    George Freeman

    There are no plans for NHS England to publish the list of clinical policies in development.

  • John Glen – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    John Glen – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Glen on 2016-07-12.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what recent assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the introduction of the English language tuition scheme in supporting Muslim women to learn English.

    Mr Marcus Jones

    As the first step in rolling out the new £20 million programme we have committed just over £3 million to enable six providers who delivered the Department’s previous community-based English language programme to provide new tuition to over 10,000 people by March next year.

    We will shortly be issuing a new Prospectus, inviting applications to run the bulk of the new programme from 2017. The nature and targeting of that provision will be informed by Louise Casey’s Review of Integration and Opportunity.

    We will monitor the new Programme to assess its effectiveness in meeting its objectives.

  • John Glen – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    John Glen – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Glen on 2016-02-22.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if NHS England will publish the (a) agendas and (b) minutes of all future meetings of the (i) Clinical Advisory Group and (ii) Specialised Commissioning Committee within a reasonable period after each such meeting takes place.

    George Freeman

    The specialised services commissioning committee provides regular updates of its business to NHS England’s public board, of which a summary is published online.

    NHS England is considering how to further improve transparency, while not inhibiting the free and frank exchange of views.

  • John Glen – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    John Glen – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Glen on 2016-07-12.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, how many women have received tuition under the English language tuition scheme since January 2016.

    Mr Marcus Jones

    As the first step in rolling out the new £20 million programme we have committed just over £3 million to enable six providers who delivered the Department’s previous community-based English language programme to provide new tuition to over 10,000 people by March next year.

    We will shortly be issuing a new Prospectus, inviting applications to run the bulk of the new programme from 2017. The nature and targeting of that provision will be informed by Louise Casey’s Review of Integration and Opportunity.

    We will monitor the new Programme to assess its effectiveness in meeting its objectives.