Tag: Dan Jarvis

  • Dan Jarvis – 2025 Statement on Irish Republican Alleged Incitement by Kneecap

    Dan Jarvis – 2025 Statement on Irish Republican Alleged Incitement by Kneecap

    The statement made by Dan Jarvis, the Minister for Security, in the House of Commons on 29 April 2025.

    I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his urgent question. Let us never forget that we lost two Members of this House, Jo Cox and Sir David Amess, in tragic circumstances. Both Jo and Sir David were passionate advocates for their constituents, and they cared deeply about a range of issues and embodied the finest democratic qualities, traditions and values of this House. I know that the thoughts of the whole House will be with their families today and every day.

    I want to reiterate the Home Secretary’s words and fully condemn the comments that have been made. Such remarks are dangerous and irresponsible, and this Government utterly reject the views expressed by this group. Let me be crystal clear: political intimidation and abuse have no place in our society.

    I know that the House will want immediate answers on this issue, but as the Minister of State for Policing and Crime Prevention said yesterday, in relation to the urgent question on the Headingley case, the desire for immediate answers is often constrained by the obligation that we have, as Ministers and as Members of this House, not to do or say anything that would interfere in what is a live police investigation.

    As Members know, the investigation and prosecution of criminal offences are matters for the police and the Crown Prosecution Service to determine, and they are operationally independent of the Government. It is important that the police are allowed to carry out their ongoing investigations free from political interference.

    However, for the benefit of the House, let me recap what the Metropolitan police have themselves said about these reports. They said:

    “We have been made aware of the video and it has been referred to the counter-terrorism internet referral unit for assessment and to determine whether any further police investigation may be required.”

    Although I will not comment further on this specific case, the safety and security of Members of this House, and all those who serve in elected office, is an issue to which I attach the utmost seriousness, as does the Home Secretary and as do you, Mr Speaker.

    Elected representatives at all levels and across all parties must be able to perform their duties safely and without fear, and, through the defending democracy taskforce, we are driving a whole-of-government effort to ensure that that is the case. The taskforce has recently agreed a programme of work to tackle the harassment and intimidation of elected Members. The taskforce is also supporting the Speaker’s Conference that is addressing these issues.

    Those of us who attend this place are all too aware of the devastating consequences of violence against our colleagues and friends. We may not always agree, but if there is one universal truth to which we would all subscribe it is surely that our politics is better when it is conducted respectfully and safely. I hope and trust that that will have the support of Members right across the House.

    The Home Secretary and I condemn the comments that have been made and we will work tirelessly to ensure the safety and security of all those who step forward to serve in public office.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2024 Speech on Working with Partners to Defeat Economic Crime

    Dan Jarvis – 2024 Speech on Working with Partners to Defeat Economic Crime

    The speech made by Dan Jarvis, the Security Minister, in London on 12 December 2024.

    Let me start by thanking UK Finance for inviting me and for organising the Economic Crime Congress.

    The irony hasn’t escaped me that we’re in Angel today to discuss how we tackle the devils of economic crime.

    It’s especially good to be here in the Business Design Centre.

    It’s a magnificent institution with a long, illustrious history that can trace its origins back to the Smithfield club, established by the fifth Duke of Bedford.

    Now he’s someone who’s famous for his opposition to the hair powder tax, which was levied to fund a war with France.

    I’m sure that you will be very relieved to know that this government has no plans to bring back the hair powder tax or to go to war with France.

    Turning to more pressing matters, let me put on record this government’s wholehearted support for the financial services, which are so vital for our country’s success.

    And they are by no means confined to the City of London.

    And I want to pay tribute to UK Finance for the sterling work that they do on behalf of more than 300 firms.

    And this, I think, is a really important event today, because it brings together the whole community involved in fighting economic crime.

    Economic crime drives many other crimes and security threats, as well as being a hugely destabilising phenomenon in its own right.

    And as Security Minister, these issues cross my desk every single day.

    So, I know too well, just like all of you in the room, about the pernicious nature and the vast scale of economic crime.

    We also know that fraud is only a subset of economic crime, and yet fraud alone is the most prevalent crime, accounting for around 39% of all surveyed crime.

    39%.

    And anyone could all too easily become a victim.

    Around one in 16 adults were victim to fraud the year ending June 2024.

    Fraudsters have a demonic talent for hurting us in our homes, whether by knocking on our door or getting us on the phone or online.

    The agony of the financial crime, the harm that they wreak is compounded by the psychological damage they leave behind.

    I think that national security and economic growth are key foundations for long term change of the government’s missions, and it’s clear that economic crime presents a major threat both to our national security and our economic prosperity.

    Money laundering, for example, has been allowed to run riot in our country for too long. This is not some abstract, victimless crime.

    Money laundering directly enables the organised crime groups which bring such misery to our communities, drawing young people into crime and fuelling violence on our streets.

    Inevitably it is difficult to quantify, but the impact on UK corporate structures costs hundreds of billions of pounds annually.

    But the problem runs even deeper, because the proceeds of economic crime are not just fuelling criminal empires and terrorist threats, but rogue states too.

    Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine placed the spotlight on the trade craft associated with illicit finance.

    The Russian government is powered by dirty money and kleptocracy illicit financial flows linked to Russia pose serious risk to our national security.

    The cyber-attack and ransomware gangs which operate out of Russia with the consent and the approval of the Putin regime pose a daily threat to our infrastructure, our public services and our companies, large and small.

    And, as a new-ish government, we are determined to lead the world when it comes to standing up against economic crime, because everything else we want to achieve as a government is undermined if we do not.

    Fraud undermines the personal and financial security of our families and communities.

    Money laundering undermines legitimate businesses and financial organisations.

    Bribery and corruption undermines the institutions which are fundamental to our economy and our society.

    The UK’s economic growth depends upon our reputation for strong institutions and the rule of law. That’s how we persuade investors to come here.

    Economic crime undermines all of that, so we need to treat it, yes, as a crucial economic vulnerability, but also as a crucial national security vulnerability.

    Now, tackling economic crime requires a team effort.

    It demands a system wide response with a pivotal role for the financial sector and the UK’s public private approach is admired right around the world, and I’m pleased to confirm that this government will maintain that approach and completely deliver the economic crime plan too.

    Banks have invested significantly in trying to prevent fraudulent transactions, but we recognise that the banking sector can’t do everything on its own.

    This is a massive challenge that affects us all, and it requires a joint response, government, law enforcement and from wider industry partners.

    For example, data sharing is a vital piece of the puzzle.

    Both the public and the private sectors hold vast amounts of data that can be better utilised.

    The benefits of public private partnership have been seen in the data fusion pilot, which has reinforced the importance of sharing data across the system and working together to detect and disrupt organised crime.

    The government is very pleased to be developing with UK finance, a joint economic crime and data strategy which will help to create a unified data system, because without a fundamental shift in our approach, we risk being left further behind, and we have to be more responsive to technological changes and to the modus operand of criminals.

    And we have to do this together.

    So the government has worked with the private sector to define a clear set of priority areas to cover the highest money laundering harms.

    This will enable us to focus resources on key threat areas and maximise our collective impact.

    I’m very grateful for all the work the financial sector has done, and I wanted us to continue this close working relationship the tech the telecommunication sectors and other key players in the fight against fraud.

    Data from the City of London Police and the banking sector suggest that the amount of fraud originating online could be as high as 80%.

    Following a call to action from the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s Mansion House speech, the Chancellor, the Home Secretary and the Secretary of State for DSIT wrote to tech and telco companies to urge them to go further and faster on fraud and to impress that the government would be closely monitoring their progress.

    It is only right that companies accept their responsibility for keeping their customers safe.

    Government will do its bit by putting in place the right incentives to encourage industry constantly to improve protections.

    The Online Safety Act will provide a framework for that, as will a continuous dialogue between government and industry.

    Emerging technologies such as AI bring both significant risk and potential solutions.

    They can help protect customers from fraud, detect money-laundering and improve customer service.

    We want to work with you to keep people safe.

    This government will go further.

    We have been clear about the need for stronger action against organised criminals, fraudsters, corrupt oligarchs and kleptocrats.

    My excellent colleague Lord Hanson of Flint has been tasked with overseeing the government’s response to fraud.

    He is working closely with law enforcement and industry, including some of you here today, to better protect the public and businesses from this appalling crime.

    He will be speaking later on about the government’s work on fraud, and I hope you will join him.

    And, over the coming months, we will be developing our new fraud strategy.

    But before then, we will publish a new UK Anti-Corruption strategy to address the UK’s vulnerabilities to corruption.

    We will make it harder for corrupt actors to operate in the UK and overseas by tackling the movement of corrupt funds.

    Our new strategy will improve global resilience to corruption through improved international partnerships.

    Now, just on Monday, we announced the appointment of Margaret now Baroness Hodge, as our new Anti-Corruption Champion to drive action in government, build partnerships and advocate for international action.

    Margaret is immensely capable and experienced and has been a tireless campaigner on Anti-Corruption and illicit finance, and I am excited that she is bringing with her this wealth of knowledge and expertise.

    Currently, the UK’s response to corruption suffers from a variety of challenges and problems due to the hidden nature of corruption and the complexity of cases.

    Our understanding of the true nature of the corruption threat in the UK is still limited.

    Despite the Home Office’s 2020 Economic Crime Survey estimating there could have been as many as 130,000 bribes in the previous 3 years offered to UK businesses across 7 key sectors.

    Police in England and Wales recorded just 169 corruption offences in the year ending June 2024, 19 of which were bribery offences.

    That is a very concerning gap.

    Now, at the moment, UK law enforcement doesn’t have the capacity to uncover and investigate cases, and this has to change.

    So, I’m announcing today that the Home Office and the City of London Police have established a new pilot Domestic Corruption Unit.

    It will considerably enhance intelligence development capabilities and provide useful insights on the corruption landscape and threat.

    Crucially, it will lead proactive investigations, providing much needed capacity and a dedicated response in areas where previously this has been lacking.

    This unit will bring together the different pieces of the system, such as national agencies, local forces, devolved policing bodies will work in unison to bring corrupt individuals to justice.

    To conclude, dirty money, fraudsters and crimes of any kind are not working in the United Kingdom.

    If left unchallenged, economic crime will continue to damage our families and our communities, our businesses and our economy and our international reputation.

    Driving down economic crime is, therefore, central to the government’s goals to reduce crime, deliver growth and keep the people of Britain safe.

    I know sometimes talk can be cheap, but this government will walk the walk.

    And, with a bigger and better fraud strategy and a new UK Anti-Corruption strategy, we will take stronger, more effective action against economic crime – a corrosive force that undermines our prosperity, threatens our security and destroys trust in on our institutions.

    This body demands a united front with the public and the private sectors working shoulder to shoulder together.

    I know that we will commit to delivering the justice, security and integrity that the people of our country rightly deserve.

    Thank you.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2023 Parliamentary Question on the Fan Led Review of Football Governance

    Dan Jarvis – 2023 Parliamentary Question on the Fan Led Review of Football Governance

    The parliamentary question asked by Dan Jarvis, the Labour MP for Barnsley Central, in the House of Commons on 26 January 2023.

    Dan Jarvis (Barnsley Central) (Lab)

    Whether she plans to implement the recommendations of the Fan-Led Review of Football Governance.

    The Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (Michelle Donelan)

    When we published our response to the recommendations made by the independent Fan-Led Review of Football Governance, we were clear that football needs reform to ensure the game’s long-term sustainability and to safeguard clubs, and I have met the authorities to push for action now. We will publish a White Paper setting out our detailed position within the next couple of weeks. That will set out the direction of travel for significant reform within football.

    Dan Jarvis

    I do not know whether I need to declare an interest as a supporter of Barnsley football club, but I put that on the record anyway. Further to the point made just a moment ago, we are still waiting for progress between the Premier League and the English Football League on increased funding to the pyramid, which could, hopefully, avoid another Bury football club or Derby County scenario. The Minister and the Secretary of State have mentioned the White Paper, but given that it may be 18 months before any new regulator is operational, can the Secretary of State say what she will do in the interim to break the deadlock and ensure that football clubs are financially sustainable for the longer term?

    Michelle Donelan

    While we will publish the White Paper in two weeks’ time, it is clear that football does not need to wait for the Government to act. Both the Minister for Sport and I have had several meetings trying to push that along. I urge football to act now because it is in its interests, too, to safeguard clubs and to protect the interests of fans.

    Damian Collins (Folkestone and Hythe) (Con)

    I welcome the news that the Government’s White Paper will be published shortly. Does the Secretary of State agree that most football clubs that get into financial difficulties are already trading outside of the rules of the competitions they play in? If those rules were properly enforced, these problems would not occur, and that is why we need the regulator to ensure that transparency exists.

    Michelle Donelan

    As always, my hon. Friend talks a great deal of sense, and I completely agree with him. That is why this Government will be acting and standing up in the interests of clubs and fans to ensure that the regulator is in place to do just that, but of course the rules of the game could be enforced now.

    Mr Speaker

    I call the shadow Secretary of State.

    Lucy Powell (Manchester Central) (Lab/Co-op)

    Everton football club is reportedly up for sale, with its stadium half-built. With others up for sale, this looks set to be a record year for premier league clubs changing hands. Many others face financial problems and ownership uncertainties, all since the Fan-Led Review was published. Yet fans will have no say and new owners are not subject to robust independent checks. We still do not have the deal on financial distribution in the pyramid. Will the Secretary of State take responsibility for the clubs that go under or get themselves into trouble before the independent statutory regulator is finally implemented?

    Michelle Donelan

    This Government have proven time and again that we are on the side of the fans. We committed to the review in our manifesto. We stepped in during covid to protect clubs with a £600-million sport survival package. We stepped in again to prevent the super league —a competition that no fans wanted. Whenever fans have needed us, we have been in their corner. This will be a huge shake-up of football, and I will not apologise for taking the time to get it right. We will come forward with the White Paper in the next two weeks.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2015-11-04.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what is being done to raise awareness of diabetes and to encourage people to seek medical advice for this condition.

    Jane Ellison

    The NHS Health Check programme is one of the mandatory public health functions of local authorities in England. It aims to prevent some of the biggest causes of premature death and disability in people aged 40-74.A routine part of NHS Health Check involves assessing a person’s risk of Type 2 diabetes and, for those at risk, a diagnostic test to confirm whether they have the condition. This then informs a discussion on, and agreement of, the lifestyle and medical approaches best suited to managing the person’s risk of developing cardiovascular diseases such as Type 2 diabetes.

    As the National Diabetes Prevention Programme (NDPP) begins phased national roll out in 2016/17, the programme will be providing information that helps raise awareness of the risk factors associated with developing Type 2 Diabetes and the lifestyle changes that they can make to reduce their risk – including, if eligible attending the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme. This activity is already underway in our seven demonstrator sites that the programme is working with. Within Yorkshire and the Humber, Bradford is one of these demonstrator sites.

    Building on the NDPP, the Department is developing its plans to improve outcomes for those with and at risk of diabetes. These will be announced in due course.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2015-11-18.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, for what reasons the triple lock on pensions does not apply to disability war pensions.

    Mark Lancaster

    Compensation payments under the War Pensions Scheme are uprated annually in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) figure. This is the same measure the Department for Work and Pensions uses for uprating social security disability benefits and is in keeping with other public service schemes. Our approach ensures consistency with the measure of inflation used by the Bank of England.

    The triple lock applies only to the State Pension. Members of the Armed Forces will therefore benefit from the triple lock once they reach State Pension age.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-01-20.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will take steps to ensure that asylum seekers are not housed in properties that make their status as asylum seekers easily identifiable.

    James Brokenshire

    Home Office officials are working closely with our housing providers to ensure that asylum seeker accommodation is not easily identifiable. I am not aware of a uniform door colour being the practice in any other region. My officials have also spoken to our housing providers to tell them that such a practice is not acceptable.

    I was first made aware of this issue when The Times contacted the Home Office in mid-January. G4S has investigated correspondence and discussions on the issue of external door colour in the North East and has confirmed that it was raised in 2012 by a Middlesbrough local councillor and was considered by the G4S audit and assurance team, no complaints from asylum seekers relating to this matter were found and a response was issued.

    As I said to the House on 20 January, I instructed officials to look into this issue as a matter of urgency and I expect that the audit will be concluded on the Home Office side very shortly.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-01-29.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what progress his Department has made on bringing forward legislative proposals to introduce a new power of guardianship for family members in the financial affairs of missing persons.

    Dominic Raab

    I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to my hon. Friend the hon. Member for York Outer on 15 June 2015, which can be found at http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2015-06-08/1400/.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-02-10.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many unaccompanied child refugees in Europe the Government expects to relocate in 2016.

    James Brokenshire

    My Written Ministerial Statement of 28 January set out the government’s plans to reinforce its response to refugee unaccompanied children from Syria, other conflict regions and within Europe. That included a commitment to work with partners, including the European Asylum Support Office, to help identify and support unaccompanied children on arrival in the EU. The government has also created a new fund of up to £10 million to support the needs of vulnerable migrant children in Europe.

    If an unaccompanied child claims asylum in a European country participating in the Dublin Regulation we will consider requests to take responsibility where there are close family members legally present in the UK. Unaccompanied minors already in Europe may also apply for family reunion under the Immigration Rules.

    We have asked the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to advise us on what more we can do to assist unaccompanied refugee children fleeing conflict and persecution in the Syrian region and more broadly across the globe. The number the UK will resettle will be dependent on the UNHCR’s assessment and whether it is in the child’s best interests and our capacity to absorb them.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-02-29.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what proportion of senior civil servants in his Department are women.

    Mike Penning

    The percentage of senior civil servants broken down by gender is reported on an annual basis within the Department’s Diversity report. The published report for 2014/2015 can be found at the following link:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/diversity-report-2014-to-2015

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-03-17.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, how much funding his Department received from the European Social Fund (a) between 2007 and 2014 and (b) from 2014 to the last month for which data is available.

    James Wharton

    None.