Tag: Dan Jarvis

  • Dan Jarvis – 2025 Statement on Counter Terrorism Policing Arrests

    Dan Jarvis – 2025 Statement on Counter Terrorism Policing Arrests

    The statement made by Dan Jarvis, the Minister for Security, in the House of Commons on 6 May 2025.

    With permission, Mr Speaker, I will make a statement on the series of national security-related arrests that took place on Saturday 3 May. Protecting our national security is the first duty of Government, and it is a testament to our world-leading law enforcement and intelligence services that, through their tireless commitment, so many plots against the UK have been thwarted. I pay tribute to them again today for the work that they have done not just this weekend, but in recent weeks and months, on these important operations.

    The two operations that took place across multiple locations this weekend were significant and complex. They were some of the largest counter-state threats and counter-terrorism actions that we have seen in recent times, and I am sure the whole House will want to join me in thanking the police, the security services and other partner agencies across the country, who showed their professionalism and expertise in carrying out these operations to keep our country safe.

    Right hon. and hon. Members will understand that these are complex investigations. The police and the security services need time and space to be able to pursue their investigations, and our first priority must be to protect the integrity of that work so that we do not cut across those investigations and operations at a crucial time. However, these are serious matters, and the House will rightly want to remain informed. I will therefore outline as much detail as I am able, and I hope that right hon. and hon. Members will understand that there is a strict limit to what I can say at this stage, given that investigations are now ongoing.

    I will first outline the facts around the events on Saturday 3 May. Throughout the day, counter-terrorism police undertook a series of arrests relating to two separate investigations. In total, eight men were arrested by the Metropolitan police’s Counter Terrorism Command. Five men were arrested on suspicion of preparation of a terrorist act, contrary to section 5 of the Terrorism Act 2006, as part of a proactive investigation in the areas of west London, Swindon, Rochdale, Stockport and Manchester. All five men are Iranian nationals. While four of the individuals remain in police custody, the fifth has now been bailed with strict conditions.

    As part of the investigation, police officers carried out searches at a number of addresses in the Greater Manchester, London and Swindon areas. Investigations continue, with searches and activity still under way at multiple addresses across the country. The investigation relates to a suspected plot to target specific premises. Police officers have been in contact with the affected site’s representatives to make them aware and provide relevant security advice and support. However, the police have also been clear that for reasons of operational security and public safety, they are not—and I am not—able to provide further information on the target at this time, and I urge Members not to speculate about the site.

    In a separate police investigation, two men were arrested at two different addresses in north-west London, and one man was arrested at an address in west London. All three were arrested under the National Security Act 2023. These three men are also Iranian nationals, and remain in police custody. I can confirm to the House that these are the first Iranian nationals arrested under the National Security Act.

    The operations to execute these eight arrests under both counter-terror and counter-state threat powers—in different parts of the country, and in the space of 24 hours—were intensive. They involved a range of different organisations, including different police forces, counter-terror police, the National Crime Agency, and our security and intelligence services. These operations were co-ordinated through the world-leading Counter Terrorism Operations Centre, which brings together and co-ordinates the UK’s agencies, alongside the agencies of our Five Eyes partners, to detect and tackle national security threats. I welcome the work of the previous Government to establish CTOC in 2021, and this Government have continued to support it and invest in it since taking office.

    The significant point about both counter-terrorism and counter-state threats powers is that they allow the police to intervene early to prevent and disrupt threats, not just respond after events have taken place. This is crucial for public safety, but it also makes the investigations more complex, and that is why the police need the time and space to pursue them now, so we will not be providing a running commentary on the work that they are doing. However, what now follows is an incredibly complex set of investigations, involving hundreds more officers carrying out forensic searches, collecting vital evidence across different sites across the country and securing witness statements, backed up by the continued efforts of our security and intelligence agencies. This is careful, painstaking work.

    At this stage in the operations and investigations, it would not be appropriate for me to speculate on or comment further on the details of these two cases and the motivations behind any of the threats that were posed. However, the House will be aware that these operations come against a backdrop of complex, interconnected threats to the UK, where state threats and counter-terrorism as well as serious and organised crime are intertwined together.

    For 20 years, the greatest focus of our national security work was on terrorism—primarily from Islamist terrorism, with additional threats from Northern Ireland-related terrorism and other areas—and those threats have not gone away. Fifteen terrorist attacks have taken place since 2017, and there have been 43 late-stage disruptions of terrorism plots, but alongside that we have seen a serious, growing and complex challenge from state threats. Last year, Sir Ken McCallum, the director general of MI5, said that MI5 state threat investigations had increased by 48% in the previous 12 months. He added that, since January 2022, the police and MI5 had responded to 20 Iran-backed plots presenting potentially lethal threats.

    In March, I told Parliament that the UK is facing a growing and evolving threat from malign activity carried out by a number of states. My statement in March outlined the Government’s response to the unacceptable threat that we face from the Iranian state, and the steps we are taking to ensure that our intelligence and law enforcement agencies have the tools they need to disrupt and degrade Iran’s malign activity on UK soil. We have delivered on the commitments made. I announced that the whole of the Iranian state, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Ministry of Intelligence and Security, would be placed on the enhanced tier of the foreign influence registration scheme. I laid the regulations to make this happen in the House on 1 April and committed to bring the scheme into force on 1 July. I trust that all Members will vote in favour when those regulations are debated shortly.

    Let me be clear: anyone in the UK who works for the Iranian state must declare it or they will be committing a serious criminal offence. We will also go after the criminal networks and enablers that Iran uses to carry out its work. Last month, the Government sanctioned the Foxtrot network—a network involved in violence against Jewish and Israeli targets in Europe on behalf of the Iranian regime. Training and guidance on state threats activity is now being offered by Counter Terrorism Policing to all 45 territorial police forces across the UK.

    The independent reviewer of terrorism and state threats legislation, Jonathan Hall KC, was asked by the Home Secretary to review the parts of our counter-terrorism framework that could be applied to modern-day state threats such as those from Iran. The Home Secretary specifically asked the reviewer to look at a state threats proscription tool, so we are not held back by limitations in applying counter-terrorism legislation to state threats. Jonathan Hall has now completed his review and will publish it shortly, and the Government will not hesitate to take action in response to Mr Hall’s advice.

    As we continue to support the police and the security services in their investigations, I can also tell the House that the Home Secretary has instigated a series of security assessments that are being done or refreshed in the light of the cases this weekend and the further information surrounding them, which will ensure that the Government can respond robustly and comprehensively to any wider national security issues raised by these cases.

    Working alongside our international allies to counter state threats is central to our success. The Foreign Office is engaging with our closest allies to outline the disruptive action that has taken place and will be considering potential future response options as the investigation progresses. The Home Secretary remains in close contact with my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary, who is committed to doing everything necessary to protect the country from these threats and to bring to bear all the diplomatic tools at our disposal.

    The Home Secretary and Ministers will provide an update on the national security position when we are able to do so, following both these operations and investigations and the wider security assessments that are under way. The Government will not hesitate to act robustly to respond to these plots at the appropriate time, but first, we must allow the investigations to continue. Our police, security and intelligence agencies are the best in the world and stand ready at all times to take action to keep our country safe. I am sure they will have the support of the whole House as they continue this vital work. I commend this statement to the House.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2025 Statement on Irish Republican Alleged Incitement by Kneecap

    Dan Jarvis – 2025 Statement on Irish Republican Alleged Incitement by Kneecap

    The statement made by Dan Jarvis, the Minister for Security, in the House of Commons on 29 April 2025.

    I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his urgent question. Let us never forget that we lost two Members of this House, Jo Cox and Sir David Amess, in tragic circumstances. Both Jo and Sir David were passionate advocates for their constituents, and they cared deeply about a range of issues and embodied the finest democratic qualities, traditions and values of this House. I know that the thoughts of the whole House will be with their families today and every day.

    I want to reiterate the Home Secretary’s words and fully condemn the comments that have been made. Such remarks are dangerous and irresponsible, and this Government utterly reject the views expressed by this group. Let me be crystal clear: political intimidation and abuse have no place in our society.

    I know that the House will want immediate answers on this issue, but as the Minister of State for Policing and Crime Prevention said yesterday, in relation to the urgent question on the Headingley case, the desire for immediate answers is often constrained by the obligation that we have, as Ministers and as Members of this House, not to do or say anything that would interfere in what is a live police investigation.

    As Members know, the investigation and prosecution of criminal offences are matters for the police and the Crown Prosecution Service to determine, and they are operationally independent of the Government. It is important that the police are allowed to carry out their ongoing investigations free from political interference.

    However, for the benefit of the House, let me recap what the Metropolitan police have themselves said about these reports. They said:

    “We have been made aware of the video and it has been referred to the counter-terrorism internet referral unit for assessment and to determine whether any further police investigation may be required.”

    Although I will not comment further on this specific case, the safety and security of Members of this House, and all those who serve in elected office, is an issue to which I attach the utmost seriousness, as does the Home Secretary and as do you, Mr Speaker.

    Elected representatives at all levels and across all parties must be able to perform their duties safely and without fear, and, through the defending democracy taskforce, we are driving a whole-of-government effort to ensure that that is the case. The taskforce has recently agreed a programme of work to tackle the harassment and intimidation of elected Members. The taskforce is also supporting the Speaker’s Conference that is addressing these issues.

    Those of us who attend this place are all too aware of the devastating consequences of violence against our colleagues and friends. We may not always agree, but if there is one universal truth to which we would all subscribe it is surely that our politics is better when it is conducted respectfully and safely. I hope and trust that that will have the support of Members right across the House.

    The Home Secretary and I condemn the comments that have been made and we will work tirelessly to ensure the safety and security of all those who step forward to serve in public office.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2024 Speech on Working with Partners to Defeat Economic Crime

    Dan Jarvis – 2024 Speech on Working with Partners to Defeat Economic Crime

    The speech made by Dan Jarvis, the Security Minister, in London on 12 December 2024.

    Let me start by thanking UK Finance for inviting me and for organising the Economic Crime Congress.

    The irony hasn’t escaped me that we’re in Angel today to discuss how we tackle the devils of economic crime.

    It’s especially good to be here in the Business Design Centre.

    It’s a magnificent institution with a long, illustrious history that can trace its origins back to the Smithfield club, established by the fifth Duke of Bedford.

    Now he’s someone who’s famous for his opposition to the hair powder tax, which was levied to fund a war with France.

    I’m sure that you will be very relieved to know that this government has no plans to bring back the hair powder tax or to go to war with France.

    Turning to more pressing matters, let me put on record this government’s wholehearted support for the financial services, which are so vital for our country’s success.

    And they are by no means confined to the City of London.

    And I want to pay tribute to UK Finance for the sterling work that they do on behalf of more than 300 firms.

    And this, I think, is a really important event today, because it brings together the whole community involved in fighting economic crime.

    Economic crime drives many other crimes and security threats, as well as being a hugely destabilising phenomenon in its own right.

    And as Security Minister, these issues cross my desk every single day.

    So, I know too well, just like all of you in the room, about the pernicious nature and the vast scale of economic crime.

    We also know that fraud is only a subset of economic crime, and yet fraud alone is the most prevalent crime, accounting for around 39% of all surveyed crime.

    39%.

    And anyone could all too easily become a victim.

    Around one in 16 adults were victim to fraud the year ending June 2024.

    Fraudsters have a demonic talent for hurting us in our homes, whether by knocking on our door or getting us on the phone or online.

    The agony of the financial crime, the harm that they wreak is compounded by the psychological damage they leave behind.

    I think that national security and economic growth are key foundations for long term change of the government’s missions, and it’s clear that economic crime presents a major threat both to our national security and our economic prosperity.

    Money laundering, for example, has been allowed to run riot in our country for too long. This is not some abstract, victimless crime.

    Money laundering directly enables the organised crime groups which bring such misery to our communities, drawing young people into crime and fuelling violence on our streets.

    Inevitably it is difficult to quantify, but the impact on UK corporate structures costs hundreds of billions of pounds annually.

    But the problem runs even deeper, because the proceeds of economic crime are not just fuelling criminal empires and terrorist threats, but rogue states too.

    Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine placed the spotlight on the trade craft associated with illicit finance.

    The Russian government is powered by dirty money and kleptocracy illicit financial flows linked to Russia pose serious risk to our national security.

    The cyber-attack and ransomware gangs which operate out of Russia with the consent and the approval of the Putin regime pose a daily threat to our infrastructure, our public services and our companies, large and small.

    And, as a new-ish government, we are determined to lead the world when it comes to standing up against economic crime, because everything else we want to achieve as a government is undermined if we do not.

    Fraud undermines the personal and financial security of our families and communities.

    Money laundering undermines legitimate businesses and financial organisations.

    Bribery and corruption undermines the institutions which are fundamental to our economy and our society.

    The UK’s economic growth depends upon our reputation for strong institutions and the rule of law. That’s how we persuade investors to come here.

    Economic crime undermines all of that, so we need to treat it, yes, as a crucial economic vulnerability, but also as a crucial national security vulnerability.

    Now, tackling economic crime requires a team effort.

    It demands a system wide response with a pivotal role for the financial sector and the UK’s public private approach is admired right around the world, and I’m pleased to confirm that this government will maintain that approach and completely deliver the economic crime plan too.

    Banks have invested significantly in trying to prevent fraudulent transactions, but we recognise that the banking sector can’t do everything on its own.

    This is a massive challenge that affects us all, and it requires a joint response, government, law enforcement and from wider industry partners.

    For example, data sharing is a vital piece of the puzzle.

    Both the public and the private sectors hold vast amounts of data that can be better utilised.

    The benefits of public private partnership have been seen in the data fusion pilot, which has reinforced the importance of sharing data across the system and working together to detect and disrupt organised crime.

    The government is very pleased to be developing with UK finance, a joint economic crime and data strategy which will help to create a unified data system, because without a fundamental shift in our approach, we risk being left further behind, and we have to be more responsive to technological changes and to the modus operand of criminals.

    And we have to do this together.

    So the government has worked with the private sector to define a clear set of priority areas to cover the highest money laundering harms.

    This will enable us to focus resources on key threat areas and maximise our collective impact.

    I’m very grateful for all the work the financial sector has done, and I wanted us to continue this close working relationship the tech the telecommunication sectors and other key players in the fight against fraud.

    Data from the City of London Police and the banking sector suggest that the amount of fraud originating online could be as high as 80%.

    Following a call to action from the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s Mansion House speech, the Chancellor, the Home Secretary and the Secretary of State for DSIT wrote to tech and telco companies to urge them to go further and faster on fraud and to impress that the government would be closely monitoring their progress.

    It is only right that companies accept their responsibility for keeping their customers safe.

    Government will do its bit by putting in place the right incentives to encourage industry constantly to improve protections.

    The Online Safety Act will provide a framework for that, as will a continuous dialogue between government and industry.

    Emerging technologies such as AI bring both significant risk and potential solutions.

    They can help protect customers from fraud, detect money-laundering and improve customer service.

    We want to work with you to keep people safe.

    This government will go further.

    We have been clear about the need for stronger action against organised criminals, fraudsters, corrupt oligarchs and kleptocrats.

    My excellent colleague Lord Hanson of Flint has been tasked with overseeing the government’s response to fraud.

    He is working closely with law enforcement and industry, including some of you here today, to better protect the public and businesses from this appalling crime.

    He will be speaking later on about the government’s work on fraud, and I hope you will join him.

    And, over the coming months, we will be developing our new fraud strategy.

    But before then, we will publish a new UK Anti-Corruption strategy to address the UK’s vulnerabilities to corruption.

    We will make it harder for corrupt actors to operate in the UK and overseas by tackling the movement of corrupt funds.

    Our new strategy will improve global resilience to corruption through improved international partnerships.

    Now, just on Monday, we announced the appointment of Margaret now Baroness Hodge, as our new Anti-Corruption Champion to drive action in government, build partnerships and advocate for international action.

    Margaret is immensely capable and experienced and has been a tireless campaigner on Anti-Corruption and illicit finance, and I am excited that she is bringing with her this wealth of knowledge and expertise.

    Currently, the UK’s response to corruption suffers from a variety of challenges and problems due to the hidden nature of corruption and the complexity of cases.

    Our understanding of the true nature of the corruption threat in the UK is still limited.

    Despite the Home Office’s 2020 Economic Crime Survey estimating there could have been as many as 130,000 bribes in the previous 3 years offered to UK businesses across 7 key sectors.

    Police in England and Wales recorded just 169 corruption offences in the year ending June 2024, 19 of which were bribery offences.

    That is a very concerning gap.

    Now, at the moment, UK law enforcement doesn’t have the capacity to uncover and investigate cases, and this has to change.

    So, I’m announcing today that the Home Office and the City of London Police have established a new pilot Domestic Corruption Unit.

    It will considerably enhance intelligence development capabilities and provide useful insights on the corruption landscape and threat.

    Crucially, it will lead proactive investigations, providing much needed capacity and a dedicated response in areas where previously this has been lacking.

    This unit will bring together the different pieces of the system, such as national agencies, local forces, devolved policing bodies will work in unison to bring corrupt individuals to justice.

    To conclude, dirty money, fraudsters and crimes of any kind are not working in the United Kingdom.

    If left unchallenged, economic crime will continue to damage our families and our communities, our businesses and our economy and our international reputation.

    Driving down economic crime is, therefore, central to the government’s goals to reduce crime, deliver growth and keep the people of Britain safe.

    I know sometimes talk can be cheap, but this government will walk the walk.

    And, with a bigger and better fraud strategy and a new UK Anti-Corruption strategy, we will take stronger, more effective action against economic crime – a corrosive force that undermines our prosperity, threatens our security and destroys trust in on our institutions.

    This body demands a united front with the public and the private sectors working shoulder to shoulder together.

    I know that we will commit to delivering the justice, security and integrity that the people of our country rightly deserve.

    Thank you.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2023 Parliamentary Question on the Fan Led Review of Football Governance

    Dan Jarvis – 2023 Parliamentary Question on the Fan Led Review of Football Governance

    The parliamentary question asked by Dan Jarvis, the Labour MP for Barnsley Central, in the House of Commons on 26 January 2023.

    Dan Jarvis (Barnsley Central) (Lab)

    Whether she plans to implement the recommendations of the Fan-Led Review of Football Governance.

    The Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (Michelle Donelan)

    When we published our response to the recommendations made by the independent Fan-Led Review of Football Governance, we were clear that football needs reform to ensure the game’s long-term sustainability and to safeguard clubs, and I have met the authorities to push for action now. We will publish a White Paper setting out our detailed position within the next couple of weeks. That will set out the direction of travel for significant reform within football.

    Dan Jarvis

    I do not know whether I need to declare an interest as a supporter of Barnsley football club, but I put that on the record anyway. Further to the point made just a moment ago, we are still waiting for progress between the Premier League and the English Football League on increased funding to the pyramid, which could, hopefully, avoid another Bury football club or Derby County scenario. The Minister and the Secretary of State have mentioned the White Paper, but given that it may be 18 months before any new regulator is operational, can the Secretary of State say what she will do in the interim to break the deadlock and ensure that football clubs are financially sustainable for the longer term?

    Michelle Donelan

    While we will publish the White Paper in two weeks’ time, it is clear that football does not need to wait for the Government to act. Both the Minister for Sport and I have had several meetings trying to push that along. I urge football to act now because it is in its interests, too, to safeguard clubs and to protect the interests of fans.

    Damian Collins (Folkestone and Hythe) (Con)

    I welcome the news that the Government’s White Paper will be published shortly. Does the Secretary of State agree that most football clubs that get into financial difficulties are already trading outside of the rules of the competitions they play in? If those rules were properly enforced, these problems would not occur, and that is why we need the regulator to ensure that transparency exists.

    Michelle Donelan

    As always, my hon. Friend talks a great deal of sense, and I completely agree with him. That is why this Government will be acting and standing up in the interests of clubs and fans to ensure that the regulator is in place to do just that, but of course the rules of the game could be enforced now.

    Mr Speaker

    I call the shadow Secretary of State.

    Lucy Powell (Manchester Central) (Lab/Co-op)

    Everton football club is reportedly up for sale, with its stadium half-built. With others up for sale, this looks set to be a record year for premier league clubs changing hands. Many others face financial problems and ownership uncertainties, all since the Fan-Led Review was published. Yet fans will have no say and new owners are not subject to robust independent checks. We still do not have the deal on financial distribution in the pyramid. Will the Secretary of State take responsibility for the clubs that go under or get themselves into trouble before the independent statutory regulator is finally implemented?

    Michelle Donelan

    This Government have proven time and again that we are on the side of the fans. We committed to the review in our manifesto. We stepped in during covid to protect clubs with a £600-million sport survival package. We stepped in again to prevent the super league —a competition that no fans wanted. Whenever fans have needed us, we have been in their corner. This will be a huge shake-up of football, and I will not apologise for taking the time to get it right. We will come forward with the White Paper in the next two weeks.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2015-11-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps he is taking to reduce the number of suicides by young men.

    Alistair Burt

    We know that men are three times more likely than women to die by suicide. The cross-government suicide prevention strategy, Preventing Suicide in England, identifies young men as a high risk group to prioritise suicide prevention activities.

    The strategy also recognises that schools, social care and the youth justice system have an important contribution to make in suicide prevention by promoting mental wellbeing and identifying underlying issues such as bullying, poor self-image and lack of self-esteem.

    We provide financial support for the National Suicide Prevention Alliance and work with a range of experts and partner organisations to deliver suicide prevention activities across all age groups, including young men. I will be meeting experts again shortly to advance the strategy.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2015-11-17.

    To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what plans he has to encourage investment in improvement of the environment as part of the Northern Powerhouse initiative.

    Greg Hands

    The Chancellor will set out the next steps in his plans for the Northern Powerhouse and investment in the environment in the combined Autumn Statement and Spending Review on 25 November.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-01-20.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when she expects the inquiry announced by her Department on 20 January 2016 into the housing of asylum seekers in the north-east of England to report its findings.

    James Brokenshire

    Home Office officials are working closely with our housing providers to ensure that asylum seeker accommodation is not easily identifiable. I am not aware of a uniform door colour being the practice in any other region. My officials have also spoken to our housing providers to tell them that such a practice is not acceptable.

    I was first made aware of this issue when The Times contacted the Home Office in mid-January. G4S has investigated correspondence and discussions on the issue of external door colour in the North East and has confirmed that it was raised in 2012 by a Middlesbrough local councillor and was considered by the G4S audit and assurance team, no complaints from asylum seekers relating to this matter were found and a response was issued.

    As I said to the House on 20 January, I instructed officials to look into this issue as a matter of urgency and I expect that the audit will be concluded on the Home Office side very shortly.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Women and Equalities

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Women and Equalities

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-01-28.

    To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, how many meetings she has had on increasing the number of women receiving public appointments since May 2015.

    Caroline Dinenage

    I am working closely with the Cabinet Office to modernise recruitment practices and attract a more diverse field of candidates from an ever-wider range of social and professional backgrounds.

    This includes engaging with government departments, the private sector and a range of different diversity networks and groups. We have engaged with them through online advertising, social media and at events to promote and raise awareness of public appointments and better understand the barriers or concerns for those considering a public appointment.

    The most recent figures published show that we are making real, consistent, progress in increasing the number of public appointments going to women. Last financial year 44% of new appointments were made to women.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-02-22.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment he has made of the potential effect of reductions in the public health grant for local authorities on local smoking cessation services in (a) Barnsley Central constituency, (b) Yorkshire and the Humber and (c) the UK.

    Jane Ellison

    Local authorities, funded by the Government’s public health grant, have responsibility for providing a programme of tobacco control that meets the needs of their populations, including the provision of locally commissioned services. Over the next five years, local authorities will receive £16 billion through the public health grant.

    The evidence shows that specialist stop smoking services are the most effective way to help smokers quit. Public Health England supports local authorities by developing and distributing information and advice for the commissioning of effective regional approaches to tobacco control which maximise value for money at a local level.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-03-02.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of the effect of the extension to the Right to Buy scheme for housing association tenants on the supply of housing in the UK.

    Brandon Lewis

    Under the terms of the voluntary agreement with the National Housing Federation and the housing association sector, housing associations will deliver an additional home through new supply nationally for every home sold under the voluntary right to buy. This will provide a significant increase to the overall supply of new housing.

    This agreement is a further step towards meeting our ambition to build a million more new homes.