Tag: Dan Jarvis

  • Dan Jarvis – 2025 Statement on Irish Republican Alleged Incitement by Kneecap

    Dan Jarvis – 2025 Statement on Irish Republican Alleged Incitement by Kneecap

    The statement made by Dan Jarvis, the Minister for Security, in the House of Commons on 29 April 2025.

    I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his urgent question. Let us never forget that we lost two Members of this House, Jo Cox and Sir David Amess, in tragic circumstances. Both Jo and Sir David were passionate advocates for their constituents, and they cared deeply about a range of issues and embodied the finest democratic qualities, traditions and values of this House. I know that the thoughts of the whole House will be with their families today and every day.

    I want to reiterate the Home Secretary’s words and fully condemn the comments that have been made. Such remarks are dangerous and irresponsible, and this Government utterly reject the views expressed by this group. Let me be crystal clear: political intimidation and abuse have no place in our society.

    I know that the House will want immediate answers on this issue, but as the Minister of State for Policing and Crime Prevention said yesterday, in relation to the urgent question on the Headingley case, the desire for immediate answers is often constrained by the obligation that we have, as Ministers and as Members of this House, not to do or say anything that would interfere in what is a live police investigation.

    As Members know, the investigation and prosecution of criminal offences are matters for the police and the Crown Prosecution Service to determine, and they are operationally independent of the Government. It is important that the police are allowed to carry out their ongoing investigations free from political interference.

    However, for the benefit of the House, let me recap what the Metropolitan police have themselves said about these reports. They said:

    “We have been made aware of the video and it has been referred to the counter-terrorism internet referral unit for assessment and to determine whether any further police investigation may be required.”

    Although I will not comment further on this specific case, the safety and security of Members of this House, and all those who serve in elected office, is an issue to which I attach the utmost seriousness, as does the Home Secretary and as do you, Mr Speaker.

    Elected representatives at all levels and across all parties must be able to perform their duties safely and without fear, and, through the defending democracy taskforce, we are driving a whole-of-government effort to ensure that that is the case. The taskforce has recently agreed a programme of work to tackle the harassment and intimidation of elected Members. The taskforce is also supporting the Speaker’s Conference that is addressing these issues.

    Those of us who attend this place are all too aware of the devastating consequences of violence against our colleagues and friends. We may not always agree, but if there is one universal truth to which we would all subscribe it is surely that our politics is better when it is conducted respectfully and safely. I hope and trust that that will have the support of Members right across the House.

    The Home Secretary and I condemn the comments that have been made and we will work tirelessly to ensure the safety and security of all those who step forward to serve in public office.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2024 Speech on Working with Partners to Defeat Economic Crime

    Dan Jarvis – 2024 Speech on Working with Partners to Defeat Economic Crime

    The speech made by Dan Jarvis, the Security Minister, in London on 12 December 2024.

    Let me start by thanking UK Finance for inviting me and for organising the Economic Crime Congress.

    The irony hasn’t escaped me that we’re in Angel today to discuss how we tackle the devils of economic crime.

    It’s especially good to be here in the Business Design Centre.

    It’s a magnificent institution with a long, illustrious history that can trace its origins back to the Smithfield club, established by the fifth Duke of Bedford.

    Now he’s someone who’s famous for his opposition to the hair powder tax, which was levied to fund a war with France.

    I’m sure that you will be very relieved to know that this government has no plans to bring back the hair powder tax or to go to war with France.

    Turning to more pressing matters, let me put on record this government’s wholehearted support for the financial services, which are so vital for our country’s success.

    And they are by no means confined to the City of London.

    And I want to pay tribute to UK Finance for the sterling work that they do on behalf of more than 300 firms.

    And this, I think, is a really important event today, because it brings together the whole community involved in fighting economic crime.

    Economic crime drives many other crimes and security threats, as well as being a hugely destabilising phenomenon in its own right.

    And as Security Minister, these issues cross my desk every single day.

    So, I know too well, just like all of you in the room, about the pernicious nature and the vast scale of economic crime.

    We also know that fraud is only a subset of economic crime, and yet fraud alone is the most prevalent crime, accounting for around 39% of all surveyed crime.

    39%.

    And anyone could all too easily become a victim.

    Around one in 16 adults were victim to fraud the year ending June 2024.

    Fraudsters have a demonic talent for hurting us in our homes, whether by knocking on our door or getting us on the phone or online.

    The agony of the financial crime, the harm that they wreak is compounded by the psychological damage they leave behind.

    I think that national security and economic growth are key foundations for long term change of the government’s missions, and it’s clear that economic crime presents a major threat both to our national security and our economic prosperity.

    Money laundering, for example, has been allowed to run riot in our country for too long. This is not some abstract, victimless crime.

    Money laundering directly enables the organised crime groups which bring such misery to our communities, drawing young people into crime and fuelling violence on our streets.

    Inevitably it is difficult to quantify, but the impact on UK corporate structures costs hundreds of billions of pounds annually.

    But the problem runs even deeper, because the proceeds of economic crime are not just fuelling criminal empires and terrorist threats, but rogue states too.

    Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine placed the spotlight on the trade craft associated with illicit finance.

    The Russian government is powered by dirty money and kleptocracy illicit financial flows linked to Russia pose serious risk to our national security.

    The cyber-attack and ransomware gangs which operate out of Russia with the consent and the approval of the Putin regime pose a daily threat to our infrastructure, our public services and our companies, large and small.

    And, as a new-ish government, we are determined to lead the world when it comes to standing up against economic crime, because everything else we want to achieve as a government is undermined if we do not.

    Fraud undermines the personal and financial security of our families and communities.

    Money laundering undermines legitimate businesses and financial organisations.

    Bribery and corruption undermines the institutions which are fundamental to our economy and our society.

    The UK’s economic growth depends upon our reputation for strong institutions and the rule of law. That’s how we persuade investors to come here.

    Economic crime undermines all of that, so we need to treat it, yes, as a crucial economic vulnerability, but also as a crucial national security vulnerability.

    Now, tackling economic crime requires a team effort.

    It demands a system wide response with a pivotal role for the financial sector and the UK’s public private approach is admired right around the world, and I’m pleased to confirm that this government will maintain that approach and completely deliver the economic crime plan too.

    Banks have invested significantly in trying to prevent fraudulent transactions, but we recognise that the banking sector can’t do everything on its own.

    This is a massive challenge that affects us all, and it requires a joint response, government, law enforcement and from wider industry partners.

    For example, data sharing is a vital piece of the puzzle.

    Both the public and the private sectors hold vast amounts of data that can be better utilised.

    The benefits of public private partnership have been seen in the data fusion pilot, which has reinforced the importance of sharing data across the system and working together to detect and disrupt organised crime.

    The government is very pleased to be developing with UK finance, a joint economic crime and data strategy which will help to create a unified data system, because without a fundamental shift in our approach, we risk being left further behind, and we have to be more responsive to technological changes and to the modus operand of criminals.

    And we have to do this together.

    So the government has worked with the private sector to define a clear set of priority areas to cover the highest money laundering harms.

    This will enable us to focus resources on key threat areas and maximise our collective impact.

    I’m very grateful for all the work the financial sector has done, and I wanted us to continue this close working relationship the tech the telecommunication sectors and other key players in the fight against fraud.

    Data from the City of London Police and the banking sector suggest that the amount of fraud originating online could be as high as 80%.

    Following a call to action from the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s Mansion House speech, the Chancellor, the Home Secretary and the Secretary of State for DSIT wrote to tech and telco companies to urge them to go further and faster on fraud and to impress that the government would be closely monitoring their progress.

    It is only right that companies accept their responsibility for keeping their customers safe.

    Government will do its bit by putting in place the right incentives to encourage industry constantly to improve protections.

    The Online Safety Act will provide a framework for that, as will a continuous dialogue between government and industry.

    Emerging technologies such as AI bring both significant risk and potential solutions.

    They can help protect customers from fraud, detect money-laundering and improve customer service.

    We want to work with you to keep people safe.

    This government will go further.

    We have been clear about the need for stronger action against organised criminals, fraudsters, corrupt oligarchs and kleptocrats.

    My excellent colleague Lord Hanson of Flint has been tasked with overseeing the government’s response to fraud.

    He is working closely with law enforcement and industry, including some of you here today, to better protect the public and businesses from this appalling crime.

    He will be speaking later on about the government’s work on fraud, and I hope you will join him.

    And, over the coming months, we will be developing our new fraud strategy.

    But before then, we will publish a new UK Anti-Corruption strategy to address the UK’s vulnerabilities to corruption.

    We will make it harder for corrupt actors to operate in the UK and overseas by tackling the movement of corrupt funds.

    Our new strategy will improve global resilience to corruption through improved international partnerships.

    Now, just on Monday, we announced the appointment of Margaret now Baroness Hodge, as our new Anti-Corruption Champion to drive action in government, build partnerships and advocate for international action.

    Margaret is immensely capable and experienced and has been a tireless campaigner on Anti-Corruption and illicit finance, and I am excited that she is bringing with her this wealth of knowledge and expertise.

    Currently, the UK’s response to corruption suffers from a variety of challenges and problems due to the hidden nature of corruption and the complexity of cases.

    Our understanding of the true nature of the corruption threat in the UK is still limited.

    Despite the Home Office’s 2020 Economic Crime Survey estimating there could have been as many as 130,000 bribes in the previous 3 years offered to UK businesses across 7 key sectors.

    Police in England and Wales recorded just 169 corruption offences in the year ending June 2024, 19 of which were bribery offences.

    That is a very concerning gap.

    Now, at the moment, UK law enforcement doesn’t have the capacity to uncover and investigate cases, and this has to change.

    So, I’m announcing today that the Home Office and the City of London Police have established a new pilot Domestic Corruption Unit.

    It will considerably enhance intelligence development capabilities and provide useful insights on the corruption landscape and threat.

    Crucially, it will lead proactive investigations, providing much needed capacity and a dedicated response in areas where previously this has been lacking.

    This unit will bring together the different pieces of the system, such as national agencies, local forces, devolved policing bodies will work in unison to bring corrupt individuals to justice.

    To conclude, dirty money, fraudsters and crimes of any kind are not working in the United Kingdom.

    If left unchallenged, economic crime will continue to damage our families and our communities, our businesses and our economy and our international reputation.

    Driving down economic crime is, therefore, central to the government’s goals to reduce crime, deliver growth and keep the people of Britain safe.

    I know sometimes talk can be cheap, but this government will walk the walk.

    And, with a bigger and better fraud strategy and a new UK Anti-Corruption strategy, we will take stronger, more effective action against economic crime – a corrosive force that undermines our prosperity, threatens our security and destroys trust in on our institutions.

    This body demands a united front with the public and the private sectors working shoulder to shoulder together.

    I know that we will commit to delivering the justice, security and integrity that the people of our country rightly deserve.

    Thank you.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2023 Parliamentary Question on the Fan Led Review of Football Governance

    Dan Jarvis – 2023 Parliamentary Question on the Fan Led Review of Football Governance

    The parliamentary question asked by Dan Jarvis, the Labour MP for Barnsley Central, in the House of Commons on 26 January 2023.

    Dan Jarvis (Barnsley Central) (Lab)

    Whether she plans to implement the recommendations of the Fan-Led Review of Football Governance.

    The Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (Michelle Donelan)

    When we published our response to the recommendations made by the independent Fan-Led Review of Football Governance, we were clear that football needs reform to ensure the game’s long-term sustainability and to safeguard clubs, and I have met the authorities to push for action now. We will publish a White Paper setting out our detailed position within the next couple of weeks. That will set out the direction of travel for significant reform within football.

    Dan Jarvis

    I do not know whether I need to declare an interest as a supporter of Barnsley football club, but I put that on the record anyway. Further to the point made just a moment ago, we are still waiting for progress between the Premier League and the English Football League on increased funding to the pyramid, which could, hopefully, avoid another Bury football club or Derby County scenario. The Minister and the Secretary of State have mentioned the White Paper, but given that it may be 18 months before any new regulator is operational, can the Secretary of State say what she will do in the interim to break the deadlock and ensure that football clubs are financially sustainable for the longer term?

    Michelle Donelan

    While we will publish the White Paper in two weeks’ time, it is clear that football does not need to wait for the Government to act. Both the Minister for Sport and I have had several meetings trying to push that along. I urge football to act now because it is in its interests, too, to safeguard clubs and to protect the interests of fans.

    Damian Collins (Folkestone and Hythe) (Con)

    I welcome the news that the Government’s White Paper will be published shortly. Does the Secretary of State agree that most football clubs that get into financial difficulties are already trading outside of the rules of the competitions they play in? If those rules were properly enforced, these problems would not occur, and that is why we need the regulator to ensure that transparency exists.

    Michelle Donelan

    As always, my hon. Friend talks a great deal of sense, and I completely agree with him. That is why this Government will be acting and standing up in the interests of clubs and fans to ensure that the regulator is in place to do just that, but of course the rules of the game could be enforced now.

    Mr Speaker

    I call the shadow Secretary of State.

    Lucy Powell (Manchester Central) (Lab/Co-op)

    Everton football club is reportedly up for sale, with its stadium half-built. With others up for sale, this looks set to be a record year for premier league clubs changing hands. Many others face financial problems and ownership uncertainties, all since the Fan-Led Review was published. Yet fans will have no say and new owners are not subject to robust independent checks. We still do not have the deal on financial distribution in the pyramid. Will the Secretary of State take responsibility for the clubs that go under or get themselves into trouble before the independent statutory regulator is finally implemented?

    Michelle Donelan

    This Government have proven time and again that we are on the side of the fans. We committed to the review in our manifesto. We stepped in during covid to protect clubs with a £600-million sport survival package. We stepped in again to prevent the super league —a competition that no fans wanted. Whenever fans have needed us, we have been in their corner. This will be a huge shake-up of football, and I will not apologise for taking the time to get it right. We will come forward with the White Paper in the next two weeks.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2015-11-10.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues about providing more comprehensive support for ex-servicemen and women and their families.

    Mark Lancaster

    The Career Transition Partership (CTP) contract for Service personnel was re-let on 1 October 2015; for the first time, CTP pulls all elements of transition support under one mechanism so that every Service leaver, regardless of time-served or reason for departure, has access to transition support. In addition, using the CTP contract mechanism, Joint Forces Command and the Royal Air Force are running an initial two year Spouse Employment Support trial offering a limited number of places for eligible Service spouses to access tailored employment support at selected locations.

    Spousal support is mirrored in wider initiatives, such as the Wolverhampton University business startup course. Originally funded for a two year period by the Armed Forces Covenant (LIBOR) funding, HSBC have provided additional funding to extend the project. It is a 10 month business start-up and mentoring programme designed specifically for Armed Forces families. Current funding will provide 540 places between now and 2020.

    The Ministry of Defence (MOD)has announced the development of a Families Strategy, in coordination with families and the 3rd Sector, during its annual Welfare Conference on 9 November 2015. At the same event, the Secretary of State welcomed Barclay’s Veterans Employment Transition Support (VETS) programme, which was launched on 19 November 2015 following an initial trial period; this is due to provide mentoring, training and advice to veterans. A partnership of leading companies and charities, it will support the MOD and CTP with additional avenues of support to help veterans and Service leavers.

    As part of the Armed Forces Covenant, the Covenant Reference Group (CRG) chaired by the Cabinet Office includes representatives from all of the main Government Departments. The CRG meets regularly to guide and direct work on the Armed Forces Covenant, including support for the veteran community. Other members of the CRG include the three Service Families Federations, the Confederation of Service Charities and other Armed Forces charities.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Transport

    Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Transport

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2015-12-14.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what his policy is on the construction of a road tunnel to replace the A628 which connects Barnsley to Manchester.

    Andrew Jones

    In November, the Secretary of State received the interim report of the Strategic Study into a potential Trans-Pennine Tunnel. This early work has shown that a tunnel is technically feasible, and that there is a clear strategic case for linking Greater Manchester and South Yorkshire.

    However further work is needed into the costs and economic benefits of such a tunnel before any judgement can be reached about whether or not it will be value for money. The full report of the study, due in 2016, should address these issues.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Transport

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Transport

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-01-22.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what plans are in place to provide more step-free access at London Underground stations.

    Mr Robert Goodwill

    Transport is a devolved matter in London and therefore the responsibility of the Mayor and Transport for London (TfL).

    In October 2014 the Mayor announced an extra £76 million partnership fund for step-free access schemes where contributions can be found from developers and other third parties, including the boroughs. TfL is carrying out a review of all accessible information, and will be working with disabled people, and the organisations that represent them, to ensure their feedback is incorporated into any improvements.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-02-09.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, if his Department will publish flexible working arrangements by default in job adverts.

    Joseph Johnson

    Jobs in the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills are already advertised as open to flexible working arrangements, unless in exceptional circumstances which must be approved by a Director General.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for International Development

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for International Development

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-02-25.

    To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what political representations UK officials have made to the Afghan government with respect to the Afghan Minerals Law and amendments currently being considered by the Afghan government; and whether UK officials have provided technical assistance in the preparation of those amendments.

    Mr Desmond Swayne

    The British Embassy regularly consults the National Unity Government on improving the Minerals Law to encourage responsible investment into the extractives sector. The UK proposed revisions to the Minerals Law in a review commissioned by the Ministry of Mines and Petroleum and provided support for the incorporation of recommendations by transparency organisations and donor partners into amendments.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-03-14.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what controls arising from health considerations are placed on manufacturers on the use of formaldehyde.

    Justin Tomlinson

    The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has responsibility for the regulation of workplace health and safety in the UK, and it is the legal duty of those who create risks through work activities to understand those risks and ensure they are adequately controlled. This includes ensuring that duty holders/employers identify and obtain relevant information on the hazardous properties of the substances or materials they use or manufacture.

    The Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and restriction of Chemicals Regulation (REACH) requires those who place chemicals such as formaldehyde on the market to provide information on the hazards associated with the chemical both up and down the supply chain. This includes the provision of Safety Data Sheets which must accompany chemicals through the supply chain, providing the information users need to ensure that chemicals are safely used and managed.

    The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH) also applies in the workplace when hazardous substances, such as formaldehyde, are manufactured, used, or where processes are undertaken that generate hazardous substances. COSHH requires the employer to carry out a risk assessment to establish what, if any, risks to health are associated with the products/processes their employees are using/undertaking and then to put in place measures to eliminate or control exposure to those risks.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-03-17.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how much funding her Department received from the European Social Fund (a) between 2007 and 2014 and (b) from 2014 to the last month for which data is available.

    Karen Bradley

    The Home Office’s finance system has no record of the Department receiving funds from the European Social Fund.