Tag: Dan Jarvis

  • Dan Jarvis – 2025 Speech on Cyber Threats

    Dan Jarvis – 2025 Speech on Cyber Threats

    The speech made by Dan Jarvis, the Security Minister, in London on 24 November 2025.

    It’s great to be here with you all today. 

    I’m also really pleased that the invitation for today’s conference actually reached you, and didn’t fall into your email’s junk folder. 

    But if you are here because you picked up this invitation in your spam, I just want to be crystal clear – we are not giving away a free Lamborghini at today’s event.

    Hopefully everybody is connected to the wifi, and if you’re not, the password is very simple to remember.

    It’s the full text of the Magna Carta in Latin.

    Anyway, it’s great to be able to welcome you all to the House of Commons. 

    But at first glance, it may seem like Parliament and Cyber are two mutually exclusive concepts. 

    Our democracy has – historically – been very wary of new technologies.

    There was a Parliament Technology Gap from when an innovation was created until it was introduced in Parliament. 

    First, the printing press.

    From the 1480s, printing became more common in this country. Thomas Hansard began printing Parliament’s debates independently in 1811 and it took a select committee in 1909 to adopt Hansard’s innovation as a legitimate part of their service. 

    A Parliament Technology Gap of about 400 years. Not a great start.  Next, broadcast cameras and microphones, which came into use in the early 1900s.

    Initially, the BBC couldn’t broadcast anything said in either House until two weeks after it had been discussed.  But eventually, cameras entered Parliament by 1989. A Parliament Technology Gap of about 90 years – so something of an improvement.  

    Finally, the personal computer and the internet – which became commonplace from the late 1970s. Parliament was again slow to take up the benefits of IT. 

    One MP, during a debate in 1988, said “the technological revolution – of which we are so proud in Britain – seems to have passed Westminster by”.

    From 1994, every MP with a personal computer was given internet access. A Technology Gap of only 20 years – the best yet. 

    And what about the technology of the future?

    Now, much like Steve Jobs and black rollnecks, Parliament and tech are now becoming inseparable.

    Parliament is more proactive. Its ‘Information and Technology Strategy’ faces the future stating how Parliament must continually adapt to the evolving landscape. 

    This is exactly the right approach to take. 

    The pace of change is only accelerating and the speed in which new technology is introduced and adopted is becoming shorter and shorter. So, we must protect ourselves against the threats of tomorrow. 

    Because cyber-attacks taking place across the world are only getting worse.

    If cybercrime were a national economy, it would be the third largest in the world.

    Microsoft’s Digital Defence Report said that – by 2027 – scams are expected to cost the world $27 trillion a year.

    As a joint Minister between the Cabinet Office and the Home Office, I have heard from my policing colleagues about the sometimes unseen cyber offending. Some that are central to truly awful online crimes.

    Like those that hack into accounts to steal and then trade intimate images mostly of women and children. 

    Or the community groups that blur boundaries between cyber and violence in the most despicable way. 

    These are growing trends and of deep concern, all of which show that our collective exposure to serious impacts is growing at an unprecedented pace.

    This is especially true when it comes to our world-leading business sector. It is essential for every organisation to operate in a way that minimises the risks of a cyber incident.

    The mindset for businesses should not be ‘if’ we get attacked but ‘when’ we get attacked. That means our cyber defences and technical resilience must evolve to cope with the threat.

    Which is why we’re doing more than ever before to keep our businesses and society safe from cyberattacks and cybercrime. 

    And we’re doing that through the building we’re all in today.

    Just a couple of weeks ago, the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill was introduced to Parliament.

    It will boost cyber protections for the services that people and businesses rely on every day. And it will ensure any breaches in cyber security are dealt with quickly.

    This is a vital piece of work, as is our Counter Political Interference and Espionage Action Plan.

    Because we know that Parliament is also a target, which is why we are taking this decisive action against foreign interference and espionage operations.

    The Action Plan will strengthen our legislation to disrupt the threat, help those who work in politics to recognise, resist and report the threat, and help break down the ecosystem of proxy organisations used by foreign powers to target our democratic institutions.

    We’re also giving more direct support to businesses to make sure they remain safe.

    The new tools we have created through the National Cyber Security Centre will help every kind of business, from the SME with a handful of employees, to larger corporations with hundreds of staff. 

    Our ‘Cyber Action Toolkit’ that we launched last month is designed to empower sole traders and small businesses to take their first steps toward cyber protection. 

    Our ‘Cyber Essentials’ certification proves your organisation is protected against common cyber threats.

    And over 13,000 organisations are part of the free ‘Early Warning’ service, giving them exclusive access to information on potential cyber-attacks. 

    All of this work will be enhanced next year when we publish the new National Cyber Action Plan. 

    It will outline how we will continue to build resilience and combat the technological threats facing us to secure economic growth.

    And, of course, it’s vital that the police, National Crime Agency, and our security services continue to work together so we can ruthlessly pursue and disrupt these cyber threats. 

    These criminals need to know we will use all of the tools at our disposal to counter their activity.

    We must support our businesses in any way we can. But businesses cannot be protected by the government alone. 

    Which is why last month, a letter was sent to the CEOs of the FTSE 350 companies that implored those business leaders to recognise the threat that is facing them.

    Now, today I’m talking to some great leaders from our tech sector – a sector that knows the importance behind rigorous security. 

    And I believe we are staring at a potential win-win situation for us if our business leaders increase their cyber security, working alongside the innovative UK cyber industry that brings in over £13billion in revenue. 

    Because this should be a priority for everyone driven at board-level, and I implore any business leader who thinks they may be exempt from gripping cyber risks to think again.

    Perhaps the Parliament of the past was right. 

    They could more or less evade utilising technology and, by doing so, they could keep their discussions mostly private and keep the country running. 

    That is not an option open to any of us today. Technology enhances everything we do. 

    It keeps our democracy transparent, it keeps our businesses successful, it keeps people connected and safe. 

    But this interconnection between technology and society can be exploited by those who seek to cause us harm.

    Many of you in this room lead by example.

    Our tech sector is one of the most crucial chips in the economy’s motherboard. One that takes its cyber security seriously.

    I hope that, through Government support and their own initiative, that the rest of our business leaders follow in your footsteps. 

    Thank you very much.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2025 Speech at the International Security Expo

    Dan Jarvis – 2025 Speech at the International Security Expo

    The speech made by Dan Jarvis, the Home Office Minister, on 1 October 2025.

    Good morning. It’s good to see everyone. This is slightly more people than I was expecting but I hope that’s a good thing.

    I can’t quite believe it’s been a year since I was last at this event.

    If a week is a long time in politics, then a year is… well, a very, very long time in politics!

    Last year, I was relatively new in post.

    And this year, I’m relatively new in another post, but back with more experience, more insight, and – unfortunately – much more grey hair!

    One thing is the same though – I’ve had to dash back from my Party Conference to be here with you this morning!

    But rightly so.

    There are many reasons why I wanted to ensure I was here with you this morning.

    This event showcases the very best that our security sector has to offer, and I learn a lot from the collective wisdom in this room and in the hall out there.

    And there’s also the added bonus that I feel like I’m less likely to be heckled here than at the Labour Party Conference!

    So far, this has proved to be the case. We’ll see where we get to.

    And as with last year, I’ve not yet been lobbied by anyone dressed as a badger, but let’s see what the rest of the morning brings!

    Seriously, though, it’s a great pleasure to join you all at ISE 2025.

    Looking back at my speech a year ago, I was struck by how much has changed.

    Twelve months ago, I was talking about building my policy knowledge based on watching Spooks, Narcos and Line of Duty.

    You’ll be pleased to hear that I’ve come a very long way since then.

    For one thing, I’ve now watched Slow Horses!

    So that’s helped – not to mention all the briefings, meetings and visits.

    And in that vein, can I take the opportunity to thank Peter and Rachel from the NineteenGroup, for inviting me to speak here this morning.

    Now I told last year’s expo that the threats and challenges we face are more complex and interchangeable than ever before.

    And it is an assessment that bears repeating.  

    We are living through a period of deep global instability and volatility.

    And the sources of danger are broader and more connected. 

    Fraud. Border security risks. Hostile state activity. Terrorism. Cyber crime.

    All pose acute risks to our democracy, our economy and our society.

    Just recently, criminal cyber gangs targeted our critical national infrastructure at Heathrow and other European airports.

    This has followed similar attacks on Marks & Spencer and Jaguar Land Rover.

    These incidents serve as a stark reminder why so many of the companies that we see here today are vital to defending our thriving industrial base.

    And of course, the government is taking concerted action to repel the many different threats we face.

    For example, we are ramping up enforcement activity and returns agreements to tackle border security challenges at source, introducing tougher offences for espionage, sabotage and foreign interference and improving our domestic sanctions regime to target terrorist-linked groups.

    On cyber, earlier this year, I announced a new package of measures to tackle ransomware, and we are boosting police powers through the Crime and Policing Bill.

    And during the recent government reshuffle, which is quite a nerve-wracking experience I can tell you, my role has expanded to be shared across the Home Office and the Cabinet Office.

    This is a recognition from the Prime Minister that we did not need separate spheres of activity when it comes to national security, and a single minister working with all the key agencies and individuals, driving forward a single vital agenda across government and beyond.

    More broadly, our recently published National Security Strategy sets out a historic commitment to invest 5% of GDP on national security by 2035.

    This transformative uplift in funding underscores the government’s unshakeable commitment to protecting our country and all those who live here.

    And it is also about backing ourselves…

    …developing our sovereign capabilities…

    …rebuilding our industrial base and supporting UK plc.

    It is about recognising that industry is not just another supplier, but is absolutely fundamental to our national security.

    That is why the National Security Strategy sits alongside the Strategic Defence Review.

    Taken together, they map out for a vision for a ‘whole-of-UK’ approach to national security, delivered through partnerships across government, industry and society.

    And we strive to make this vision a reality, the security sector will undoubtedly have a vital role to play.

    The numbers bear that out: the security sector alone directly employs 148,250 people in the UK over the last 10 years, turnover has grown by 176%, and exports by 244%.

    In 2024, the UK Security Industry achieved £24 billion in turnover and contributed £11.7 billion in value added to the UK economy and the most recent statistics show £11 billion in security export sales.

    These are big numbers and this success funds innovation in increasingly crucial strategic capability areas, including AI, cyber, communications, digital forensics, border screening, counter drone capabilities and many others.

    They span across many of the IS-8 sectors highlighted in the Industrial Strategy – specifically Defence and National Security, Advanced Manufacturing, Professional and Business Services, and Digital and Technologies.

    These strategies mark a clear shift towards embedding SMEs into national security innovation, with funding, procurement reform and eco-system building all designed to support their growth.

    Understanding threats and developing strategies to mitigate them is only one part of the mission.

    As we move into the second year of this government, my focus is on implementation and delivery.   

    When I visited Intersec Riyadh last year – one of the Middle East’s leading exhibitions for safety, security and emergency response – I saw first-hand just how highly UK expertise is regarded on the global stage.

    For my part, I want to amplify your success every opportunity I get.

    To that end, I will shortly be chairing a briefing with all of the government’s trade envoys.

    These roles are held by senior parliamentarians who support the government’s growth mission by engaging with key markets right around the world. I am determined to raise their awareness of the innovation and world leading capabilities the UK security sector has to offer.

    I am also writing to every UK ambassador and high commissioner across our diplomatic network – asking for their direct support in driving UK security exports at source, including identifying market opportunities for UK companies to access.

    I have engaged with international counterparts to promote what UK security industry has to offer, including countries as diverse as Poland, Columbia, Morocco and Saudi Arabia. 

    But I also repeat the ask I made of you a year ago.

    You are the experts grappling with the challenges of maintaining competitive advantage and driving the industry forward.

    I therefore need you to tell me what more we can do to secure our sovereign capabilities and access market opportunities, both here and abroad.

    Because we are here to back you.

    UK SMEs, particularly those operating in the security sector, now have access to a diverse range of government-backed funding opportunities designed to support innovation, growth and export potential.

    These include Innovate UK, which offers grants and innovation loans for Research and Development and commercialisation and the British Business Bank, which provides loan guarantees, equity investment, including the Cyber Seed Fund, and startup support.

    UK Export Finance can help SMEs secure international contracts through guarantees and insurance.

    And Sector-specific programmes such as the Defence and Security Accelerator (DASA) and the UK Defence Innovation Fund offer targeted funding for emerging technologies like AI, autonomous systems and cybersecurity.

    Strategic initiatives like the Defence Industrial Strategy, Defence SME Action Plan, and the National Security Strategic Investment Fund further embed SME support into national security and industrial policy, promoting access to procurement, partnerships and regional growth.

    Alongside all the work we are doing to support industry, strengthen resilience and supply chains and build up our security ecosystem, we must also make sure our laws are fit for purpose.

    And that brings me on to the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act, which became law earlier this year.   

    The Act is more commonly known as ‘Martyn’s Law’ after Martyn Hett, who alongside 21 other victims, was killed in the horrific Manchester Arena attack of 2017.

    Martyn’s mother Figen Murray, who is here today, has campaigned heroically for the changes we are now implementing.

    The Act will ensure the public are better protected from terrorism by requiring certain public premises and events to be prepared and ready to keep people safe in the event of an attack.  

    We intend for there to be an implementation period of 24 months before the act comes into force. 

    This is to give those responsible for premises and events time to understand their new obligations, and to plan and prepare accordingly.

    Over the summer, officials from the Home Office and the SIA have briefed over 1,000 people on the implications of the act through their webinars. 

    And we will continue to engage far and wide with those in scope of the legislation to adopt good protective security practices support stakeholders in different ways.

    For example, we heard yesterday from Jon Savell from CT Policing about the launch of ACT for local authorities. This Home Office sponsored project is designed to provide local authorities and partners with specialist support to embed good CT practice into their everyday activity.

    Since taking over the oversight for the SIA, I am overseeing a substantial programme of work to enhance it and deliver the government’s ambitious agenda.

    This includes strengthening the SIA’s approach to past criminality, tackling training malpractice and delivering on the Manchester Arena Inquiry Monitored Recommendations 7 and 8.

    The SIA’s public consultation on its stricter approach to past criminality by applicants received strong support and I have asked the SIA to begin implementation.

    This will improve the SIA’s approach to public safety, as it will mean there is a presumption to refuse anyone with sexual, child abuse or serious offending, and a broader range of offences will be considered when assessing applicants.  

    To improve this further, my officials are considering options to introduce higher level criminal record checks for certain security roles across the UK.

    On tackling training malpractice, the SIA is developing a joint strategic approach whilst scaling up enforcement activity.

    The government also remains committed to delivering the intended outcomes of the Manchester Arena Inquiry. 

    My officials have carefully reviewed Monitored Recommendations 7 and 8, and have worked with the SIA to develop practical proposals for implementation.

    I am keen to ensure a wide range of views are included on the significant changes proposed, and that the cost and regulatory burden from the changes is proportionate.

    I am also keen that, if necessary, this government will deliver primary legislation in support of these ambitious changes to the SIA. This will be one of the few times any government has delivered primary legislation for the SIA to increase better public safety.

    I am very pleased to announce the formation of the S12, a new industry led initiative to bring together various parts of the private security industry and speak to the government with one voice.

    Earlier this morning we had a good and constructive meeting with the elected leaders who make up the S12 and listened to how they will organise to improve standards in the security industry. I am keen for the government and the SIA to work closely with them.

    And before I finish, I want to take the opportunity to encourage everyone here to visit the government zone, speak to officials and explore ways how we can deepen our collaboration.

    We have a team within the Home Office called the Joint Security and Resilience Centre who are here to support, listen and feed back.

    JSaRC is a bridge between government and industry. Tell them about your company, the sectors you operate in and the challenges and opportunities where we can deepen collaboration.

    The Accelerated Capability Environment or ACE, a name you might recognise, are also showcasing their innovation expertise in the government zone. Engage with them to explore collaboration opportunities and how we can come together to unlock the potential of data, technology and AI for government.

    Finally, the Home Office will also be hosting, alongside our ADS partners the Security and Policing event in Farnborough next March to showcase UK industry solutions across the world.

    This year’s event was the biggest and best ever with just under 10,000 visitors across the 3 days and over 400 exhibitors in attendance. I would encourage you all to sign up for what is a truly flagship event for the UK security sector and for the UK government.

    I will wrap up with a word of thanks and a challenge.

    First, the thanks.

    Whatever sector, field or discipline you work in, you are part of the most important mission for any society – namely keeping people, organisations and institutions safe from harm.

    So, please know that your efforts matter, they are making a difference, and they are appreciated by me, by the Home Secretary and by the whole government.

    Finally, the challenge – and this applies to the public and private sectors alike:

    Let’s set our sights even higher, let’s break new ground in our quest for new and better solutions to the challenges we face and let’s make the partnerships we already depend on stronger than ever.

    That is I think the way forward, and it is the way we will build a stronger, more secure country for us all.

    Thank you.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2025 Statement on Counter Terrorism Policing Arrests

    Dan Jarvis – 2025 Statement on Counter Terrorism Policing Arrests

    The statement made by Dan Jarvis, the Minister for Security, in the House of Commons on 6 May 2025.

    With permission, Mr Speaker, I will make a statement on the series of national security-related arrests that took place on Saturday 3 May. Protecting our national security is the first duty of Government, and it is a testament to our world-leading law enforcement and intelligence services that, through their tireless commitment, so many plots against the UK have been thwarted. I pay tribute to them again today for the work that they have done not just this weekend, but in recent weeks and months, on these important operations.

    The two operations that took place across multiple locations this weekend were significant and complex. They were some of the largest counter-state threats and counter-terrorism actions that we have seen in recent times, and I am sure the whole House will want to join me in thanking the police, the security services and other partner agencies across the country, who showed their professionalism and expertise in carrying out these operations to keep our country safe.

    Right hon. and hon. Members will understand that these are complex investigations. The police and the security services need time and space to be able to pursue their investigations, and our first priority must be to protect the integrity of that work so that we do not cut across those investigations and operations at a crucial time. However, these are serious matters, and the House will rightly want to remain informed. I will therefore outline as much detail as I am able, and I hope that right hon. and hon. Members will understand that there is a strict limit to what I can say at this stage, given that investigations are now ongoing.

    I will first outline the facts around the events on Saturday 3 May. Throughout the day, counter-terrorism police undertook a series of arrests relating to two separate investigations. In total, eight men were arrested by the Metropolitan police’s Counter Terrorism Command. Five men were arrested on suspicion of preparation of a terrorist act, contrary to section 5 of the Terrorism Act 2006, as part of a proactive investigation in the areas of west London, Swindon, Rochdale, Stockport and Manchester. All five men are Iranian nationals. While four of the individuals remain in police custody, the fifth has now been bailed with strict conditions.

    As part of the investigation, police officers carried out searches at a number of addresses in the Greater Manchester, London and Swindon areas. Investigations continue, with searches and activity still under way at multiple addresses across the country. The investigation relates to a suspected plot to target specific premises. Police officers have been in contact with the affected site’s representatives to make them aware and provide relevant security advice and support. However, the police have also been clear that for reasons of operational security and public safety, they are not—and I am not—able to provide further information on the target at this time, and I urge Members not to speculate about the site.

    In a separate police investigation, two men were arrested at two different addresses in north-west London, and one man was arrested at an address in west London. All three were arrested under the National Security Act 2023. These three men are also Iranian nationals, and remain in police custody. I can confirm to the House that these are the first Iranian nationals arrested under the National Security Act.

    The operations to execute these eight arrests under both counter-terror and counter-state threat powers—in different parts of the country, and in the space of 24 hours—were intensive. They involved a range of different organisations, including different police forces, counter-terror police, the National Crime Agency, and our security and intelligence services. These operations were co-ordinated through the world-leading Counter Terrorism Operations Centre, which brings together and co-ordinates the UK’s agencies, alongside the agencies of our Five Eyes partners, to detect and tackle national security threats. I welcome the work of the previous Government to establish CTOC in 2021, and this Government have continued to support it and invest in it since taking office.

    The significant point about both counter-terrorism and counter-state threats powers is that they allow the police to intervene early to prevent and disrupt threats, not just respond after events have taken place. This is crucial for public safety, but it also makes the investigations more complex, and that is why the police need the time and space to pursue them now, so we will not be providing a running commentary on the work that they are doing. However, what now follows is an incredibly complex set of investigations, involving hundreds more officers carrying out forensic searches, collecting vital evidence across different sites across the country and securing witness statements, backed up by the continued efforts of our security and intelligence agencies. This is careful, painstaking work.

    At this stage in the operations and investigations, it would not be appropriate for me to speculate on or comment further on the details of these two cases and the motivations behind any of the threats that were posed. However, the House will be aware that these operations come against a backdrop of complex, interconnected threats to the UK, where state threats and counter-terrorism as well as serious and organised crime are intertwined together.

    For 20 years, the greatest focus of our national security work was on terrorism—primarily from Islamist terrorism, with additional threats from Northern Ireland-related terrorism and other areas—and those threats have not gone away. Fifteen terrorist attacks have taken place since 2017, and there have been 43 late-stage disruptions of terrorism plots, but alongside that we have seen a serious, growing and complex challenge from state threats. Last year, Sir Ken McCallum, the director general of MI5, said that MI5 state threat investigations had increased by 48% in the previous 12 months. He added that, since January 2022, the police and MI5 had responded to 20 Iran-backed plots presenting potentially lethal threats.

    In March, I told Parliament that the UK is facing a growing and evolving threat from malign activity carried out by a number of states. My statement in March outlined the Government’s response to the unacceptable threat that we face from the Iranian state, and the steps we are taking to ensure that our intelligence and law enforcement agencies have the tools they need to disrupt and degrade Iran’s malign activity on UK soil. We have delivered on the commitments made. I announced that the whole of the Iranian state, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Ministry of Intelligence and Security, would be placed on the enhanced tier of the foreign influence registration scheme. I laid the regulations to make this happen in the House on 1 April and committed to bring the scheme into force on 1 July. I trust that all Members will vote in favour when those regulations are debated shortly.

    Let me be clear: anyone in the UK who works for the Iranian state must declare it or they will be committing a serious criminal offence. We will also go after the criminal networks and enablers that Iran uses to carry out its work. Last month, the Government sanctioned the Foxtrot network—a network involved in violence against Jewish and Israeli targets in Europe on behalf of the Iranian regime. Training and guidance on state threats activity is now being offered by Counter Terrorism Policing to all 45 territorial police forces across the UK.

    The independent reviewer of terrorism and state threats legislation, Jonathan Hall KC, was asked by the Home Secretary to review the parts of our counter-terrorism framework that could be applied to modern-day state threats such as those from Iran. The Home Secretary specifically asked the reviewer to look at a state threats proscription tool, so we are not held back by limitations in applying counter-terrorism legislation to state threats. Jonathan Hall has now completed his review and will publish it shortly, and the Government will not hesitate to take action in response to Mr Hall’s advice.

    As we continue to support the police and the security services in their investigations, I can also tell the House that the Home Secretary has instigated a series of security assessments that are being done or refreshed in the light of the cases this weekend and the further information surrounding them, which will ensure that the Government can respond robustly and comprehensively to any wider national security issues raised by these cases.

    Working alongside our international allies to counter state threats is central to our success. The Foreign Office is engaging with our closest allies to outline the disruptive action that has taken place and will be considering potential future response options as the investigation progresses. The Home Secretary remains in close contact with my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary, who is committed to doing everything necessary to protect the country from these threats and to bring to bear all the diplomatic tools at our disposal.

    The Home Secretary and Ministers will provide an update on the national security position when we are able to do so, following both these operations and investigations and the wider security assessments that are under way. The Government will not hesitate to act robustly to respond to these plots at the appropriate time, but first, we must allow the investigations to continue. Our police, security and intelligence agencies are the best in the world and stand ready at all times to take action to keep our country safe. I am sure they will have the support of the whole House as they continue this vital work. I commend this statement to the House.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2025 Statement on Irish Republican Alleged Incitement by Kneecap

    Dan Jarvis – 2025 Statement on Irish Republican Alleged Incitement by Kneecap

    The statement made by Dan Jarvis, the Minister for Security, in the House of Commons on 29 April 2025.

    I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his urgent question. Let us never forget that we lost two Members of this House, Jo Cox and Sir David Amess, in tragic circumstances. Both Jo and Sir David were passionate advocates for their constituents, and they cared deeply about a range of issues and embodied the finest democratic qualities, traditions and values of this House. I know that the thoughts of the whole House will be with their families today and every day.

    I want to reiterate the Home Secretary’s words and fully condemn the comments that have been made. Such remarks are dangerous and irresponsible, and this Government utterly reject the views expressed by this group. Let me be crystal clear: political intimidation and abuse have no place in our society.

    I know that the House will want immediate answers on this issue, but as the Minister of State for Policing and Crime Prevention said yesterday, in relation to the urgent question on the Headingley case, the desire for immediate answers is often constrained by the obligation that we have, as Ministers and as Members of this House, not to do or say anything that would interfere in what is a live police investigation.

    As Members know, the investigation and prosecution of criminal offences are matters for the police and the Crown Prosecution Service to determine, and they are operationally independent of the Government. It is important that the police are allowed to carry out their ongoing investigations free from political interference.

    However, for the benefit of the House, let me recap what the Metropolitan police have themselves said about these reports. They said:

    “We have been made aware of the video and it has been referred to the counter-terrorism internet referral unit for assessment and to determine whether any further police investigation may be required.”

    Although I will not comment further on this specific case, the safety and security of Members of this House, and all those who serve in elected office, is an issue to which I attach the utmost seriousness, as does the Home Secretary and as do you, Mr Speaker.

    Elected representatives at all levels and across all parties must be able to perform their duties safely and without fear, and, through the defending democracy taskforce, we are driving a whole-of-government effort to ensure that that is the case. The taskforce has recently agreed a programme of work to tackle the harassment and intimidation of elected Members. The taskforce is also supporting the Speaker’s Conference that is addressing these issues.

    Those of us who attend this place are all too aware of the devastating consequences of violence against our colleagues and friends. We may not always agree, but if there is one universal truth to which we would all subscribe it is surely that our politics is better when it is conducted respectfully and safely. I hope and trust that that will have the support of Members right across the House.

    The Home Secretary and I condemn the comments that have been made and we will work tirelessly to ensure the safety and security of all those who step forward to serve in public office.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2024 Speech on Working with Partners to Defeat Economic Crime

    Dan Jarvis – 2024 Speech on Working with Partners to Defeat Economic Crime

    The speech made by Dan Jarvis, the Security Minister, in London on 12 December 2024.

    Let me start by thanking UK Finance for inviting me and for organising the Economic Crime Congress.

    The irony hasn’t escaped me that we’re in Angel today to discuss how we tackle the devils of economic crime.

    It’s especially good to be here in the Business Design Centre.

    It’s a magnificent institution with a long, illustrious history that can trace its origins back to the Smithfield club, established by the fifth Duke of Bedford.

    Now he’s someone who’s famous for his opposition to the hair powder tax, which was levied to fund a war with France.

    I’m sure that you will be very relieved to know that this government has no plans to bring back the hair powder tax or to go to war with France.

    Turning to more pressing matters, let me put on record this government’s wholehearted support for the financial services, which are so vital for our country’s success.

    And they are by no means confined to the City of London.

    And I want to pay tribute to UK Finance for the sterling work that they do on behalf of more than 300 firms.

    And this, I think, is a really important event today, because it brings together the whole community involved in fighting economic crime.

    Economic crime drives many other crimes and security threats, as well as being a hugely destabilising phenomenon in its own right.

    And as Security Minister, these issues cross my desk every single day.

    So, I know too well, just like all of you in the room, about the pernicious nature and the vast scale of economic crime.

    We also know that fraud is only a subset of economic crime, and yet fraud alone is the most prevalent crime, accounting for around 39% of all surveyed crime.

    39%.

    And anyone could all too easily become a victim.

    Around one in 16 adults were victim to fraud the year ending June 2024.

    Fraudsters have a demonic talent for hurting us in our homes, whether by knocking on our door or getting us on the phone or online.

    The agony of the financial crime, the harm that they wreak is compounded by the psychological damage they leave behind.

    I think that national security and economic growth are key foundations for long term change of the government’s missions, and it’s clear that economic crime presents a major threat both to our national security and our economic prosperity.

    Money laundering, for example, has been allowed to run riot in our country for too long. This is not some abstract, victimless crime.

    Money laundering directly enables the organised crime groups which bring such misery to our communities, drawing young people into crime and fuelling violence on our streets.

    Inevitably it is difficult to quantify, but the impact on UK corporate structures costs hundreds of billions of pounds annually.

    But the problem runs even deeper, because the proceeds of economic crime are not just fuelling criminal empires and terrorist threats, but rogue states too.

    Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine placed the spotlight on the trade craft associated with illicit finance.

    The Russian government is powered by dirty money and kleptocracy illicit financial flows linked to Russia pose serious risk to our national security.

    The cyber-attack and ransomware gangs which operate out of Russia with the consent and the approval of the Putin regime pose a daily threat to our infrastructure, our public services and our companies, large and small.

    And, as a new-ish government, we are determined to lead the world when it comes to standing up against economic crime, because everything else we want to achieve as a government is undermined if we do not.

    Fraud undermines the personal and financial security of our families and communities.

    Money laundering undermines legitimate businesses and financial organisations.

    Bribery and corruption undermines the institutions which are fundamental to our economy and our society.

    The UK’s economic growth depends upon our reputation for strong institutions and the rule of law. That’s how we persuade investors to come here.

    Economic crime undermines all of that, so we need to treat it, yes, as a crucial economic vulnerability, but also as a crucial national security vulnerability.

    Now, tackling economic crime requires a team effort.

    It demands a system wide response with a pivotal role for the financial sector and the UK’s public private approach is admired right around the world, and I’m pleased to confirm that this government will maintain that approach and completely deliver the economic crime plan too.

    Banks have invested significantly in trying to prevent fraudulent transactions, but we recognise that the banking sector can’t do everything on its own.

    This is a massive challenge that affects us all, and it requires a joint response, government, law enforcement and from wider industry partners.

    For example, data sharing is a vital piece of the puzzle.

    Both the public and the private sectors hold vast amounts of data that can be better utilised.

    The benefits of public private partnership have been seen in the data fusion pilot, which has reinforced the importance of sharing data across the system and working together to detect and disrupt organised crime.

    The government is very pleased to be developing with UK finance, a joint economic crime and data strategy which will help to create a unified data system, because without a fundamental shift in our approach, we risk being left further behind, and we have to be more responsive to technological changes and to the modus operand of criminals.

    And we have to do this together.

    So the government has worked with the private sector to define a clear set of priority areas to cover the highest money laundering harms.

    This will enable us to focus resources on key threat areas and maximise our collective impact.

    I’m very grateful for all the work the financial sector has done, and I wanted us to continue this close working relationship the tech the telecommunication sectors and other key players in the fight against fraud.

    Data from the City of London Police and the banking sector suggest that the amount of fraud originating online could be as high as 80%.

    Following a call to action from the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s Mansion House speech, the Chancellor, the Home Secretary and the Secretary of State for DSIT wrote to tech and telco companies to urge them to go further and faster on fraud and to impress that the government would be closely monitoring their progress.

    It is only right that companies accept their responsibility for keeping their customers safe.

    Government will do its bit by putting in place the right incentives to encourage industry constantly to improve protections.

    The Online Safety Act will provide a framework for that, as will a continuous dialogue between government and industry.

    Emerging technologies such as AI bring both significant risk and potential solutions.

    They can help protect customers from fraud, detect money-laundering and improve customer service.

    We want to work with you to keep people safe.

    This government will go further.

    We have been clear about the need for stronger action against organised criminals, fraudsters, corrupt oligarchs and kleptocrats.

    My excellent colleague Lord Hanson of Flint has been tasked with overseeing the government’s response to fraud.

    He is working closely with law enforcement and industry, including some of you here today, to better protect the public and businesses from this appalling crime.

    He will be speaking later on about the government’s work on fraud, and I hope you will join him.

    And, over the coming months, we will be developing our new fraud strategy.

    But before then, we will publish a new UK Anti-Corruption strategy to address the UK’s vulnerabilities to corruption.

    We will make it harder for corrupt actors to operate in the UK and overseas by tackling the movement of corrupt funds.

    Our new strategy will improve global resilience to corruption through improved international partnerships.

    Now, just on Monday, we announced the appointment of Margaret now Baroness Hodge, as our new Anti-Corruption Champion to drive action in government, build partnerships and advocate for international action.

    Margaret is immensely capable and experienced and has been a tireless campaigner on Anti-Corruption and illicit finance, and I am excited that she is bringing with her this wealth of knowledge and expertise.

    Currently, the UK’s response to corruption suffers from a variety of challenges and problems due to the hidden nature of corruption and the complexity of cases.

    Our understanding of the true nature of the corruption threat in the UK is still limited.

    Despite the Home Office’s 2020 Economic Crime Survey estimating there could have been as many as 130,000 bribes in the previous 3 years offered to UK businesses across 7 key sectors.

    Police in England and Wales recorded just 169 corruption offences in the year ending June 2024, 19 of which were bribery offences.

    That is a very concerning gap.

    Now, at the moment, UK law enforcement doesn’t have the capacity to uncover and investigate cases, and this has to change.

    So, I’m announcing today that the Home Office and the City of London Police have established a new pilot Domestic Corruption Unit.

    It will considerably enhance intelligence development capabilities and provide useful insights on the corruption landscape and threat.

    Crucially, it will lead proactive investigations, providing much needed capacity and a dedicated response in areas where previously this has been lacking.

    This unit will bring together the different pieces of the system, such as national agencies, local forces, devolved policing bodies will work in unison to bring corrupt individuals to justice.

    To conclude, dirty money, fraudsters and crimes of any kind are not working in the United Kingdom.

    If left unchallenged, economic crime will continue to damage our families and our communities, our businesses and our economy and our international reputation.

    Driving down economic crime is, therefore, central to the government’s goals to reduce crime, deliver growth and keep the people of Britain safe.

    I know sometimes talk can be cheap, but this government will walk the walk.

    And, with a bigger and better fraud strategy and a new UK Anti-Corruption strategy, we will take stronger, more effective action against economic crime – a corrosive force that undermines our prosperity, threatens our security and destroys trust in on our institutions.

    This body demands a united front with the public and the private sectors working shoulder to shoulder together.

    I know that we will commit to delivering the justice, security and integrity that the people of our country rightly deserve.

    Thank you.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2023 Parliamentary Question on the Fan Led Review of Football Governance

    Dan Jarvis – 2023 Parliamentary Question on the Fan Led Review of Football Governance

    The parliamentary question asked by Dan Jarvis, the Labour MP for Barnsley Central, in the House of Commons on 26 January 2023.

    Dan Jarvis (Barnsley Central) (Lab)

    Whether she plans to implement the recommendations of the Fan-Led Review of Football Governance.

    The Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (Michelle Donelan)

    When we published our response to the recommendations made by the independent Fan-Led Review of Football Governance, we were clear that football needs reform to ensure the game’s long-term sustainability and to safeguard clubs, and I have met the authorities to push for action now. We will publish a White Paper setting out our detailed position within the next couple of weeks. That will set out the direction of travel for significant reform within football.

    Dan Jarvis

    I do not know whether I need to declare an interest as a supporter of Barnsley football club, but I put that on the record anyway. Further to the point made just a moment ago, we are still waiting for progress between the Premier League and the English Football League on increased funding to the pyramid, which could, hopefully, avoid another Bury football club or Derby County scenario. The Minister and the Secretary of State have mentioned the White Paper, but given that it may be 18 months before any new regulator is operational, can the Secretary of State say what she will do in the interim to break the deadlock and ensure that football clubs are financially sustainable for the longer term?

    Michelle Donelan

    While we will publish the White Paper in two weeks’ time, it is clear that football does not need to wait for the Government to act. Both the Minister for Sport and I have had several meetings trying to push that along. I urge football to act now because it is in its interests, too, to safeguard clubs and to protect the interests of fans.

    Damian Collins (Folkestone and Hythe) (Con)

    I welcome the news that the Government’s White Paper will be published shortly. Does the Secretary of State agree that most football clubs that get into financial difficulties are already trading outside of the rules of the competitions they play in? If those rules were properly enforced, these problems would not occur, and that is why we need the regulator to ensure that transparency exists.

    Michelle Donelan

    As always, my hon. Friend talks a great deal of sense, and I completely agree with him. That is why this Government will be acting and standing up in the interests of clubs and fans to ensure that the regulator is in place to do just that, but of course the rules of the game could be enforced now.

    Mr Speaker

    I call the shadow Secretary of State.

    Lucy Powell (Manchester Central) (Lab/Co-op)

    Everton football club is reportedly up for sale, with its stadium half-built. With others up for sale, this looks set to be a record year for premier league clubs changing hands. Many others face financial problems and ownership uncertainties, all since the Fan-Led Review was published. Yet fans will have no say and new owners are not subject to robust independent checks. We still do not have the deal on financial distribution in the pyramid. Will the Secretary of State take responsibility for the clubs that go under or get themselves into trouble before the independent statutory regulator is finally implemented?

    Michelle Donelan

    This Government have proven time and again that we are on the side of the fans. We committed to the review in our manifesto. We stepped in during covid to protect clubs with a £600-million sport survival package. We stepped in again to prevent the super league —a competition that no fans wanted. Whenever fans have needed us, we have been in their corner. This will be a huge shake-up of football, and I will not apologise for taking the time to get it right. We will come forward with the White Paper in the next two weeks.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2015-10-29.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what estimate he has made of the number of cases of hypothermia diagnosed in (a) Barnsley Central constituency, (b) Yorkshire and Humber and (c) the UK in each year since May 2010.

    Jane Ellison

    The table below sets out the count of finished admission episodes (FAEs)1 with a primary diagnosis2 of hypothermia3 in Barnsley Central constituency4, North Yorkshire and Humber, West Yorkshire, and South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw Area Teams of residence5 and England for years 2010-11 to 2013-146

    Activity in English NHS Hospitals and English NHS commissioned activity in the independent sector

    2010-11

    2011-12

    2012-13

    2013-14

    Barnsley Central constituency

    *

    *

    *

    *

    North Yorkshire & Humber Area Team of Residence

    53

    60

    61

    73

    South Yorkshire & Bassetlaw Area Team of Residence

    33

    50

    36

    55

    West Yorkshire Area Team of Residence

    73

    78

    76

    78

    England

    3,390

    3,406

    3,942

    3,837

    Source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), Health and Social Care Information Centre

    Notes:

    1. Finished admission episode

    A finished admission episode (FAE) is the first period of inpatient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. FAEs are counted against the year or month in which the admission episode finishes. Admissions do not represent the number of inpatients, as a person may have more than one admission within the period.

    2. Primary diagnosis

    The primary diagnosis is the first of up to 20 (14 from 2002-03 to 2006-07 and 7 prior to 2002-03) diagnosis fields in the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data set and provides the main reason why the patient was admitted to hospital.

    3. ICD-10 Codes

    The following ICD-10 codes were used to identify hypothermia:

    T68.X Hypothermia

    R68.0 Hypothermia, not associated with low environmental temperature

    P80.- Hypothermia of newborn

    4. Parliamentary constituency of residence

    The parliamentary constituency containing the patient’s normal home address. This does not necessarily reflect where the patient was treated as they may have travelled to another parliamentary constituency for treatment. This field is only available from 2009-10 onwards.

    5. Area Team of residence

    The area team containing the patient’s normal home address. This does not necessarily reflect where the patient was treated as they may have travelled to another area for treatment.

    6. Assessing growth through time (Inpatients)

    HES figures are available from 1989-90 onwards. Changes to the figures over time need to be interpreted in the context of improvements in data quality and coverage (particularly in earlier years), improvements in coverage of independent sector activity (particularly from 2006-07) and changes in NHS practice. For example, changes in activity may be due to changes in the provision of care.

    7. Small numbers

    To protect patient confidentiality, figures between 1 and 5 have been replaced with “*” (an asterisk). Where it was still possible to identify figures from the total, additional figures have been replaced with "*". Where the symbol "-" (dash) appears this represents the absence of data.

    Note that HES disclosure control rules only apply to ‘known’ values, e.g. small numbers where the age is unknown do not need to be replaced with "*".

  • Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Dan Jarvis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2015-11-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what estimate he has made of the number of medical negligence cases which may be affected by the Government’s proposals to introduce fixed recoverable costs in cases worth up to (a) £10,000, (b) £25,000, (c) £50,000, (d) £100,000 and (e) £250,000; and what the average saving he hopes to secure at each level is.

    Ben Gummer

    NHS Litigation Authority data shows that the number of medical negligence cases which may be affected by the Government’s proposals to introduce fixed recoverable costs is as follows:

    In cases worth up to £25,000 there are 12,831 cases, up to £50,000 there are 17,971 cases, up to £100,000 there are 24,519 cases, and up to £250,000 there are 29,334 cases; the average saving will depend on any final arrangements agreed.

    Information related to cases worth up to £10,000 is not held in the format requested.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-01-11.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what progress has been made on the Government’s plans to commemorate (a) the First World War and (b) the Battle of the Somme.

    Tracey Crouch

    Since the Prime Minister set out plans for the Centenary in October 2012 the Government has delivered highly successful commemorative events for the start of the First World War and the Gallipoli Campaign.

    In May 2016, commemorative events will be held for the Battle of Jutland, and in July 2016, we will mark the centenary of the Battle of the Somme by holding national events at the Thiepval Memorial in France, at Manchester Cathedral, and at Heaton Park. In addition, a national vigil will be held at Westminster Abbey, and there will also be vigils in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

    Other centenary activities such as the UK Tour of the “poppies” and the national repair and conservation of War memorials also continue, more details can be found at

    https://www.gov.uk/government/topical-events/first-world-war-centenary

  • Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Women and Equalities

    Dan Jarvis – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Women and Equalities

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2016-01-27.

    To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, how many meetings she has had with chief executives of FTSE 100 companies since May 2015 at which she raised the issue of increasing the number of women on company boards.

    Caroline Dinenage

    The Secretary of State for Education and Minister for Women and Equalities and I have met with many business representatives since taking on our roles as Ministers for Women and Equalities. We have also met employers and business representatives as part of our plans to introduce gender pay gap reporting and always ensure that we use these opportunities to raise the issue of achieving a better gender balance on boards. This includes attending and speaking at conferences and events, including at the 30% Club and the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), which represents 190,000 businesses in the UK.

    Since May 2015, we have met numerous business leaders at conferences and events, including meetings with:

    • Lord Davies of Abersoch CBE

    • Baroness Ruby McGregor-Smith, CBE, CEO, Mitie Group PLC (in her capacity as Chair of the Women’s Business Council)

    • Baroness Ruby McGregor-Smith, CBE, CEO, Mitie Group PLC

    • Cilla Snowball, CBE, Group Chairman and Group CEO, Abbott Mead Vickers BBDO

    • Denis Woulfe, Partner, Deloitte LLP

    • Emer Timmons, President, BT Global Services UK

    • Fiona Dawson, Global President, Mars Food, Drinks, and Multisales, Mars Food

    • Sue Langley, OBE, Non-Executive Chairman, A J Gallagher UK, UK Asset Resolution Limited (Northern Rock Asset Management and Bradford & Bingley)

    • Sue O’Brien, OBE, Partner, Ridgeways Partners

    • Amanda Harrison, HR Director, Centrica PLC

    I also spoke at the launch of Lord Davies’s final report, which was attended by a large cross section of over 100 businesses.