Tag: Bridget Phillipson

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2024 Speech on Schools and Teaching

    Bridget Phillipson – 2024 Speech on Schools and Teaching

    The speech made by Bridget Phillipson, the Secretary of State for Education, on 19 July 2024.

    I am today announcing the launch of an independent expert-led curriculum and assessment review. The review will consider the existing national curriculum and statutory assessment system, and pathways for learners in 16-to-19 education, to drive high and rising standards for every young person. The review will be chaired by Professor Becky Francis CBE, an expert in education policy, including curriculum and education inequality.

    The review will contribute to the Government’s missions to break down the barriers to opportunity for every child and young person at every stage, and to kick-start economic growth.

    The review will build on the Government’s commitment to high standards in the curriculum in England, while ensuring greater attention to breadth and flexibility and that no child or young person is left behind. The review will seek to address the key problems and hard barriers to achievement in the curriculum and assessment system from key stage 1 to key stage 5.

    Specifically, the review will seek to deliver:

    An excellent foundation in core subjects of reading, writing and maths.

    A broader curriculum, so that children and young people do not miss out on subjects such as music, art, sport and drama, as well as vocational subjects.

    A curriculum that ensures children and young people leave compulsory education ready for life and ready for work, building the knowledge, skills and attributes young people need to thrive. This includes embedding digital, oracy and life skills in their learning.

    A curriculum that reflects the issues and diversities of our society, ensuring all children and young people are represented.

    An assessment system that captures the strengths of every child and young person and the breadth of the curriculum, with the right balance of assessment methods, while maintaining the important role of examinations.

    The review will be rigorously evidence-driven and will look closely at the barriers which hold children and young people back, particularly those who are from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds, have a special educational need or disability and/or are otherwise vulnerable.

    The review will seek evolution not revolution, build on the existing relative strengths of a system with finite resources, and not add unnecessary burdens by seeking to fix things that are not broken.

    The review will build on the hard work of teachers and staff across the system, and will be undertaken in close consultation with education professionals and other experts; parents; children and young people; and stakeholders such as employers, colleges, universities and trade unions.

    The review will start this autumn with a call for evidence. The call for evidence will set out the areas where the review group would particularly welcome evidence and input from the sector and stakeholders, and will direct the focus of the engagement with the sector over the autumn term. The review group will publish an interim report in the new year setting out its interim findings and confirming the key areas for further work. We plan to publish the final review with recommendations in autumn 2025.

    Alongside the review, the Department for Education will make legislative changes so that all state schools, including academies, will be required to teach the national curriculum. This will support the Government’s ambition for every child to receive a rich and broad curriculum taught by excellent teachers, wherever they are in the country, to set them up with the knowledge and skills to thrive in the future.

    The review marks the Government’s first step towards an education system where background is no barrier and every young person leaves school or college with the best life chances.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2023 Speech to Labour Party Conference

    Bridget Phillipson – 2023 Speech to Labour Party Conference

    The speech made by Bridget Phillipson, the Shadow Education Secretary, in Liverpool on 11 October 2023.

    Thank you, Jayne, and thank you, Conference.

    Growing up in the North East in the 1990s, it was teachers and support staff like Jayne, who not only gave me an amazing education, but in doing so, taught me so much about why education matters.

    They saw the value and worth, in each and every one of us.

    And I never forget, that I am standing here today, above all, because I was lucky.

    Lucky, to have a family filled with love.

    Lucky, to have a school that cared.

    And today I have the amazing good fortune, to be Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary, with a fantastic team of shadow ministers around me.

    Helen, Matt, Seema, Catherine, and in the Lords, Fiona, Debbie and Glenys.

    But Conference, it goes to the heart of all our values, that life should not come down to luck.

    That opportunity belongs to everyone.

    That the role of government is to extend opportunity – fundamentally to extend freedoms – to each of us, and to all of us.

    Freedom from fear, from ignorance, from illness.

    Freedom from insecurity, from injustice and from poverty.

    Freedom to achieve and to succeed, to learn and enjoy, to take part and to speak out.

    These are the opportunities which for 13 years, this government has ripped away.

    Those are the freedoms our children deserve, and it is the future which once again a Labour government will give them.

    Conference, I joined Labour not simply because I knew Britain could be better, not just because I shared Labour’s values. No.

    I joined Labour, 25 years ago this autumn, because I had seen what the Tories did to our country.

    Then as now, the public realm literally crumbling around the next generation.

    And because I saw with my own eyes, a Labour government making Britain better.

    Year by year, step by step. We did it then, and we will do it again.

    And just as life shouldn’t come down to luck, government cannot be left to chance.

    It’s why Keir has set out, the five missions we will take, from opposition into government.

    Because to be Labour is to believe, that the future is something we shape together, not face alone.

    Conference, our missions speak to that ambition, that determination, that faith in our collective strength.

    Rising growth. Falling crime. Healthier lives. Greener energy.

    And the greatest of all, a determination that for each of us, and for all of us, background will be no barrier to opportunity.

    And education is the key to that.

    Now, I don’t need to remind you, that we see every day, how 13 years of Conservative failure means children’s backgrounds aren’t just limiting their opportunities.

    It’s worse than that.

    Conference, for too many children, across too much of our country, their backgrounds are ravaging their opportunities, all their lives long.

    I tell you, it breaks my heart.

    It starts with our smallest children.

    The Tories have committed to slashing staffing and standards in early years childcare, and they have no plan for early education at all.

    And as children grow, when school begins, the gaps widen just as the curriculum narrows.

    Because for our children, the teachers aren’t there, aren’t qualified, or it isn’t their subject. The buildings are turning to dust.

    Just on Friday, we found out the Conservatives had botched next year’s schoolsbudget. By a staggering £370 million.

    The mess that the next Labour government is going to have to sort out in education simply beggars belief.

    Conference, every parent wants the best for their children. Every parent. Not just those who can afford it.

    Aspiration and ambition are for everyone, and so too must be excellence and opportunity.

    And I understand why parents worry about the education that the Tories are prepared to offer our children.

    Parents want their children to read and write, to master maths.

    But they want a lot more than that.

    They want their children to learn about the joy of life too: to delight in music, to enjoy sport, to experience the beauty of art, and to know the wonder of science.

    They want their children confident, ready to speak up and speak out.

    They want them to carry a love of learning, right throughout life, that sets them up to achieve and thrive.

    Conference, I want those standards, those expectations, those dreams, for every child.

    Because I worry that for too many children, the fire that education should kindle in every mind, it doesn’t start, or it doesn’t catch.

    The Prime Minister talks about extending maths to 18.

    But if young people hate maths at 16, it’s just too late.

    These problems need to be tackled early, not left to fester.

    Apprenticeships down. Qualification reforms, botched then junked. A levy on employers that doesn’t deliver for companies or communities, for individuals or for our economy. Other people’s children. Our children, not theirs.

    Again, with universities.

    Degrees are for their children, not ours: it’s never their kids’ choices or chances, that they’re keen to wind back.

    Student debt for nurses, for young people starting out, looking to buy a home and build a family – not their problem. Other people’s children.

    The Education Secretary has made their ethic her motto: “nothing to do with me”.

    Conference, I tell you, we will change every part of it, and we will change it for good.

    In every part of our system, in every year of children’s lives, in every corner of our country, Labour will be the party of high and rising standards.

    Conference, we know what the private schools lobby think of our ambition. They were arrogant enough to write it down. ‘Chippy’.

    And if they or anyone else doubt my determination to deliver on our dream, then I have a message for them.

    Chippy people make the change that matters. I will make the change that matters.

    Together we will make the change the matters.

    We will end the tax breaks that private schools enjoy to deliver high and rising standards, in every school for every child.

    Now, Conference, our ambition starts, as education starts, at the beginning of all our lives: our childcare system must be about life chances for children, as well as work choices for parents.

    That is why I am determined that new investment in childcare comes with ambitious reform, to ensure early education is available in every corner of our country for every family and every child.

    To drive up standards for our youngest children and lift up the amazing people who support and teach them.

    It’s why we’ll end restrictions on councils delivering childcare.

    It’s why today I’m announcing that Sir David Bell, former primary school teacher, and former Chief Inspector of Schools, will lead Labour’s work, to develop the Early Years Plan.

    The next generation deserve, to bring high and rising standards, for the workforce we need, for the qualifications they’ll have, for the settings where it’ll happen, for the education they’ll give, to deliver our ambition for a modernised childcare system, supporting families from the end of parental leave to the end of primary school.

    Conference, high and rising standards cannot just be for families who can afford them.

    I want them for my children. For your children. For all of our children.

    That’s why as children start at primary school, we’ll deliver breakfast clubs to start each day, funded by closing tax loopholes for the global super-rich.

    It’s why we’ll roll out early interventions to transform children’s speech and language skills, and tackle the attainment gap, in settings across our country.

    It’s why, we’ll bring in the School Support Staff Negotiating Body, because we know it’s support staff, as well as teachers, who will deliver the change our children need, and Labour will value and respect them just as much.

    And it’s why I’m proud to tell you today, that we’ll tackle our chronic cultural problem with maths, by making sure it’s better taught at six, never mind 16.

    The last Labour government began a revolution in reading standards, a revolution still unfolding in our schools.

    It’s past time, we brought that same focus to maths.

    One in four of our children leave primary school without the maths they need. That is a disaster.

    Maths is the language of the universe, the underpinning of our collective understanding.

    It cannot be left until the last years of school.

    I am determined that Labour will bring maths to life for the next generation.

    Better training for teachers to teach, with confidence and success.

    Better standards for our children, so they’re set up to succeed.

    Because be it budgeting or cooking, exchange rates or payslips, maths matters for success.

    And I want the numeracy all our young people need – for life and for work, to earn and to spend, to understand and to challenge, I want that to be part of their learning right from the start.

    Conference, high and rising standards.

    A richer curriculum woven through with speaking, listening and digital skills.

    Through every subject and year of school.

    It’s why we’ll invest in more teachers, in careers guidance, in mental health support, in work experience,

    For all our children, in all our schools.

    And we’ll deliver those standards not by ending inspection, but by improving it.

    With annual inspection for the issues that matter most.

    And we won’t stop there, because education doesn’t end there.

    We’ll change the way students pay for their time at university, so none of our young people, fear the price they’ll pay for the choice they’d like.

    And after 13 years of drift, Labour will create Skills England to bring leadership and ambition to England’s skills system.

    A Growth and Skills Levy driving opportunity in every workplace.

    Technical Excellence Colleges right across our country.

    Skills not just for each of us, but for all of us.

    Training the generation ahead, to build the greener, safer, healthier future we need.

    Ours will be a government with not just vision, but drive. Not just a dream, but a plan.

    Conference, the difference between us and the Conservatives, it isn’t just about values, competence, ideas.

    It’s simpler: it’s all about hope.

    Not just hope for each of us, but hope for all of us.

    Hope for our society, and our country, as well as ourselves, and our families.

    Hope that our greatest days are yet to come.

    Conference, Labour will again bring hope to a new generation.

    Labour is the party for the future we all deserve.

    Thank you.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2023 Speech on Higher Education

    Bridget Phillipson – 2023 Speech on Higher Education

    The speech made by Bridget Phillipson, the Shadow Secretary of State for Education, in the House of Commons on 17 July 2023.

    I thank the Secretary of State for advance sight of her statement.

    Today’s statement tells us several stories about this Government. It tells a story about their priorities: why universities, and why now? It tells a story about their analysis: what they think is wrong and what they think is not. It tells a story about their competence: why these changes, when their own regulator has used a different approach for so long? It tells a story about their prejudice, about why they continue to reinforce a binary choice for young people: either academic or vocational, university or apprenticeship. Above all, it tells a story about values—about the choice to put caps on the aspirations and ambitions of our young people; about Ministers for whom opportunity is for their children, but not for other people’s children; about a Government whose only big idea for our world-leading universities is to put up fresh barriers to opportunity, anxious to keep young people in their place. It tells you everything you need to know about the Tories that this is their priority for our young people.

    This is the Tories’ priority when we are in the middle of an urgent crisis in this country; when families are struggling to make ends meet; when patients are facing the biggest waiting lists in NHS history; when children are going to school in buildings that Ministers themselves acknowledge are “very likely” to collapse; and when a spiral of low productivity, low growth, and low wages under the Tories is holding Britain back. It is because the Prime Minister is weak and he is in hock to his Back Benchers that we are not seeing action on those important priorities. Instead, after more than 13 years in power, the Government have shown what they really think of our universities, which are famous across the world, are core to so many of our regional economies and were essential to our pandemic response: that they are not a public good, but a political battleground.

    The Government’s concept of a successful university course, based on earnings, is not just narrow but limiting. I ask the Secretary of State briefly to consider the case of the right hon. Member for Richmond (Yorks) (Rishi Sunak). The Prime Minister has a degree in politics from one of our leading universities, yet his Government lost control of almost 50 councils this year, he was the second choice of his own party, and now he is on track to fail to deliver on the pledges he set himself publicly. Does the Secretary of State believe that the Prime Minister’s degree was in any sense a high-value course?

    Let us be clear what today’s announcement is really about. Many of our most successful newer universities—the fruits of the determination of successive Governments, Labour and Conservative, to spread opportunity in this country—often draw more students from their local communities. Many of those areas are far from London, far from existing concentrations of graduate jobs. Many of those students come from backgrounds where few in their family, if any, will have had the chance to go to university. Many of those young people benefit from extra support when they arrive at university to ensure they succeed. We on the Labour Benches welcome the success of those universities in widening participation and welcoming more young people into higher education, yet today, the Secretary of State is telling those young people—including those excited to be finishing their studies this year—that this Government believe their hard work counts for nothing. Can the Secretary of State be absolutely clear with the House, and tell us which of those universities’ courses she considers to be of low value?

    The Secretary of State is keen to trumpet her party’s record on apprenticeships, but let me set out what this Government’s record really is. Since 2015-16, apprenticeship starts among under-19s have dropped by 41%, and apprentice achievements in that age group are down by 57%. Since the Secretary of State entered this place, the number of young people achieving an apprenticeship at any level has more than halved, failing a generation of young people desperate to take on an apprenticeship.

    Lastly and most importantly, the values that this Government have set out today are clear: the Conservatives are saying to England’s young people that opportunity is not for them and that choice is not for them. The bizarre irony of a Conservative Government seeking to restrict freedom and restrict choices seems entirely lost on them. Labour will shatter the class ceiling. We will ensure that young people believe that opportunity is for them. Labour is the party of opportunity, aspiration and freedom. Let us be clear, too, that young people want to go to university not merely to get on financially, but for the chance to join the pursuit of learning, to explore ideas and undertake research that benefits us all. That chance and that opportunity matter too. Our children deserve better. They deserve a Government whose most important mission will be to break down the barriers to opportunity and to build a country where background is no barrier. They deserve a Labour Government.

    Gillian Keegan

    As usual, the hon. Lady has more words than actions. None of those actions was put in place either in Wales, where Labour is running the education system, or in the UK when it was running it in England. We have always made the deliberate choice of quality over quantity, and this is a story of a consistent drive for quality, whether that is through my right hon. Friend the Schools Minister having driven up school standards, so that we are the best in the west for reading and fourth best in the world, or through childcare, revolutionising the apprenticeship system—none of that existed before we put it in place—and technical education and higher education.

    I was an other people’s child: I was that kid who left school at 16, who went to a failing comprehensive school in Knowsley. I relied on the business, and the college and the university that I went to. I did not know their brand images and I knew absolutely nobody who had ever been there. I put my trust in that company, and luckily it did me very well. Not all universities and not all courses have the trusted brand image of Oxford and Cambridge, which I think is where the hon. Lady went, along with my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister. I have worked with many leaders all over the world in my many years in business, and the Prime Minister is a world-class leader.

    On apprenticeships, it is a case of quality always over quantity. What we found, and this is why I introduced the quality standards, is that, yes, the numbers were higher, but many of the people did not realise they were on an apprenticeship, many of the apprenticeships lasted less than 12 months and for many of them there was zero off-the-job training. They were apprenticeships in name only, which is what the Labour party will be when it comes to standards for education.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2023 Speech on SEND and Alternative Provision

    Bridget Phillipson – 2023 Speech on SEND and Alternative Provision

    The speech made by Bridget Phillipson, the Shadow Education Secretary, in the House of Commons on 6 March 2023.

    I am grateful to the Minister for advance sight of her statement.

    “Every family in the country with anyone with special educational needs will have felt at times like they’re battling the system…you’re fighting for it, fighting for support.”

    This is how the Education Secretary spoke about the SEND system last week, and I know that her words will chime with many parents and families across the country. So my question to the Minister today is this: does she really believe this plan is good enough? Does she truly believe it will shift the dial and end the fight for support, end the battle for places at special schools and end the scandal that sees so many children with special educational needs held back?

    I know there is support right across this House for action to improve the lives of children and young people, yet in the words of the Children’s Commissioner, the plan the Government have set out risks seeing

    “more years of children being fed”

    into a “vicious cycle” of poor outcomes. Much of the substance in this plan will not even come into effect until 2025 or even 2026, at best six years after the review was announced. New national standards, new special school places, new standardised digital education, health and care plans—none of this will be coming online until a further 300,000 children with SEND have left secondary school. So can the Minister say what the Government are doing right now for the children in the system today? How can parents, carers, and families be better supported now for the children whose needs are currently going unmet?

    I welcome the fact that the Minister has listened to Labour’s call for a focus on the early years. Identifying children’s needs early is vital and the evidence could not be clearer, yet over 5,000 early years childcare providers have closed since August 2021. I am proud of Labour’s record in Government: the network of life-changing children’s centres we delivered across the country. The Minister’s Government closed over 1,300 children’s centres, and now, 13 years on, why on earth do Ministers expect parents to be grateful for the promise of the much more limited family hubs?

    The plan sets the aim of reducing the number of children with education, health and care plans. Reducing EHCPs through improving support in mainstream schools and getting better support in place early would be welcome, but it must not simply be seen as a means of reducing costs within the system. Which of the proposals discussed will reduce the need for EHCPs, and how will they be delivered? Will the Minister provide reassurance to parents, already facing an adversarial system, that an EHCP will not become more difficult to obtain for children who do need that level of support?

    I want to thank the thousands of staff working every day to support young people with special educational needs and disabilities. School support staff are frequently working with children with the most complex needs, yet all too often they are not given the training or recognition they need and deserve. Meanwhile, less than half of teachers feel that they receive sufficient training to support pupils with SEND. I am sure the Minister will point to the promised new practice guides, again, sadly, not due until 2025, but can she today go further and tell us when all school staff working with children with additional needs will receive greater support?

    The plan talks about accountability within the system. After 13 years of Conservative Governments, we hear time and again about the same problems: “significant weaknesses” in local services for pupils with SEND; health services disengaged; families bounced from pillar to post, unable to access the support they need. This is a national pattern of failure that requires a national response. When do the Government intend to get their own House in order?

    Parents, providers and all people working in the system to support children and young people are already asking whether Labour will stand by the direction of travel set out in this plan, because while it is right to test policies to ensure they work, this plan is symptomatic of a Government who have simply given up, and who are governing through a mixture of distraction and delay, pushing the tough decisions to the other side of the election. So, I say to all parents, carers and children with additional needs, “Labour wants to work with you to get this right and deliver the system that you have rightly been calling for over so many years, and to enable every child and every young person to achieve and thrive.”

    Claire Coutinho

    I would like to come back on some of those points.

    First, on the ambition of the reforms, these are systemic reforms: we are looking at every single part of the system and addressing a lot of the challenges that providers and parents talk about. Communications with councils comes up a lot with parents, for example, and we are setting out a new standard on that. On timeliness of EHCPs, we are working on joint-partnership working with health providers and local councils so that they can deliver on that. On teachers, we are talking about training as well. So, yes, I do think this is an ambitious set of reforms and that it will improve people’s lives.

    On the timeline, we have not waited for the publication of the improvement plan. Not only have we increased the amount of funding for the high needs block by over 50% in the last four years, but we have also taken schools funding to historic record real-time highs, so anyone who is in mainstream funding can also get additional support.

    We have also set out £2.6 billion on a capital programme to increase the number of specialist places. We set out 33 new pre-schools last week, but we have already built 92 and there are 49 in the pipeline with seven due to open in September. We have also set out funding on educational psychologists. So there is much that we have already started to do, and we have not waited for the improvement plan. When setting out steps like national standards, however, it is important that we consult and take time to get it right.

    The hon. Lady mentioned teacher training. We are going to review both initial teacher training and the early careers framework, which will work in tandem with our best practice guides to make sure that all teachers have the best possible evidence base to work from.

    Lastly, accountability is something that we have been baking into the system for a while. We have put forward a new area inspection framework. Again, that brings in all the partners, because we know that education is as important as health. We will have a new social care inspector on those area inspections for the first time. In 2019, we changed the standards for schools so that a school cannot be considered good or outstanding unless it gets good outcomes for its special educational needs children. We are looking at all those points of accountability to ensure that the system works as well as possible.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2023 Comments on Whether Jeremy Corbyn Should be Allowed to Be a Labour MP

    Bridget Phillipson – 2023 Comments on Whether Jeremy Corbyn Should be Allowed to Be a Labour MP

    The comments made by Bridget Phillipson, the Shadow Secretary of State for Education, on The News Agents podcast on 10 February 2023.

    [Bridget Phillipson was asked by Jon Sobel if Jeremy Corbyn should be allowed to return to the Parliamentary Labour Party]

    BRIDGET PHILLIPSON

    I think for someone who has had ample time to reflect on what took place, under his leadership, not least the outcome of the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s investigation into the actions of the party under his leadership, he shows a staggering lack of self reflection and has never apologised really for what took place under his leadership. You know, I think Jeremy Corbyn has known for a long time that there was a responsibility on him to apologise for what took place under his leadership.

    [Jon Sobel mentioned that Corbyn has apologised for some things]

    BRIDGET PHILLIPSON

    Our party was absolutely scarred by the horrific instances of anti-semitism that took place and I don’t think Jeremy Corbyn has ever fully acknowledged what happened or his responsibilities. He isn’t reflecting on what took place. He again is looking to blame others or to make excuses and I don’t think that’s good enough. Over the period of time since Keir Starmer has been Labour leader we’ve rebuilt relationships with Jewish communities in our country and Keir Starmer set out his personal apology for what took place in the Labour Party. And that’s right. I just, I do not understand why Jeremy has not reflected on what took place and why he has still failed to offer an apology on that.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Bridget Phillipson – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Bridget Phillipson on 2015-11-27.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many children in (a) England, (b) the North East and (c) Sunderland required 24-hour care due to life-limiting or life-threatening conditions in 2014-15.

    Jane Ellison

    Information is not held centrally on how many children in England required 24-hour care due to life-limiting or life-threatening conditions in 2014-15. The local clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) do not collect information for the North East and Sunderland.

    CCGs (and in the case of specialised services, NHS England), will commission a range of care to support children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions, including paediatric care, and community-based nursing. A child with a life-limiting condition may be eligible for a package of continuing care, where their needs are such that they require clinical care in addition to that routinely commissioned. This might include one-to-one support. NHS England also allocates an annual grant of £11 million to children’s hospices to support their provision of palliative and respite care.

    Children and young people with complex needs may also be eligible for local authority-commissioned social care to support living, short-breaks, and special educational support, where they have a special educational need.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Bridget Phillipson – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Bridget Phillipson on 2015-12-14.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the Answer of 28 October 2015 to Question 12730, what steps his Department is taking to improve palliative care for children in England.

    Ben Gummer

    NHS England has continued to provide £11 million to children’s palliative care providers through the annual Children’s Hospice and Hospice-at-Home Grant.

    The Department has also provided grant funding to ‘Together for Short Lives’ to support the Transition Taskforce, which is developing improved approaches to providing care and support to young people with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions.

    NHS England has led work on behalf of the Government in developing draft currencies for palliative care (for all ages) which are now being tested with provider organisations. The aim is to put funding for children and adult hospices on a more equitable and sustainable footing, by clearly identifying the costs of care, so that it can be commissioned locally by clinical commissioning groups.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Bridget Phillipson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Bridget Phillipson on 2016-02-04.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answers of 2 February 2016 to Questions 23949 and 24848, for what reasons the action plans and operational assurance audit referred to are commercially sensitive.

    Andrew Selous

    The MoJ determines that information is commercially sensitive including when documents contain information that if released, would be likely to prejudice someone’s commercial interests. The Ministry of Justice has robust contract management processes aligned with National Audit Office Guidelines and will manage the plan strictly in accordance with the contract.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    Bridget Phillipson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Bridget Phillipson on 2016-05-04.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether his Department is taking steps to provide support for people living in supported housing who will be affected by the cap of housing benefit at the same level as local housing allowance.

    Justin Tomlinson

    On 1 March 2016 we announced, via a Written Ministerial Statement, that the effect of the LHA cap for those living in social sector supported housing would be deferred by a year, pending the outcome of a review, This means that the measure will only effect those who have taken on or renewed a tenancy from April 2017 rather than April 2016.

    We have done this because we understand the importance of ensuring that both those living in supported housing and those who provide this type of accommodation receive appropriate protections. This is why we are awaiting the outcome of a “Supported Accommodation” research project and subsequent policy review, to ensure support is focused on the most vulnerable and appropriate groups are safeguarded.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Bridget Phillipson – 2016 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Bridget Phillipson on 2016-10-07.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether she plans to bring forward legislation to allow for the forcible conversion of schools to academy status in underperforming local authority areas.

    Edward Timpson

    We have been clear that we want to see all schools, over time, become academies. But our focus is on schools where standards need to be raised. So we will continue to convert all schools that are judged inadequate by Ofsted, and work with those that are coasting or otherwise underperforming to identify the support they need to improve. We expect that in some cases this support will be through conversion to become a sponsored academy. No new legislation is required for these purposes.