Tag: 2026

  • PRESS RELEASE : New safety measures introduced to protect children around banned dog breeds [June 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : New safety measures introduced to protect children around banned dog breeds [June 2026]

    The press release issued by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on 9 June 2026.

    Public protection against banned dog breeds such as XL bullies will be strengthened.

    Children will be better protected from dangerous dogs in the home under a new government measure introduced to Parliament today (June 9th) to strengthen safeguards around banned breeds, including XL Bully types.  

    From 1 November 2026, owners must not leave a child under the age of 12 in close proximity to a banned breed dog in a domestic setting or other private settings place without adult supervision. This will be a condition of the Certificate of Exemption, which allows owners to legally keep a banned breed. 

    The new safeguard will reduce the risk of serious injury to children in domestic environments, while allowing exempted dogs to remain with families where appropriate supervision is in place.  

    As with other conditions of exemption, failure to comply with this requirement may result in enforcement action. This can include seizure of the dog and potential prosecution, in line with existing powers under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991.  

    Animal Welfare Minister, Baroness Hayman said:   

    Any attack on a child by a dangerous dog is unacceptable.

    The safety of children must always come first, and this new measure will strengthen protections in the home by ensuring young children are not left unattended around banned breed dogs, including XL Bully types.  

    While many owners are acting responsibly – those that don’t should face the legal consequences.

    While this measure applies specifically to banned breed‑type dogs, young children should be supervised around all breeds of dog.  

    Further guidance will be published ahead of implementation on 1 November.  

    Also being introduced are changes to the insurance requirements for owners of exempted banned dog breeds. The requirement for third-party public liability insurance will be removed from July 1st. This reflects the withdrawal of the only available provider and the absence of any suitable alternative products in the market.  

    All other legal requirements remain in place, including requirements for exempted dogs to be muzzled and kept on a lead in public places. Owners remain fully responsible for any harm caused by their dogs.  

    Responsible dog ownership continues to be encouraged across all breeds of dog and Defra keeps current dog control rules under review to ensure they are sufficient to ensure communities are protected.

  • Liz Kendall – 2026 Speech to London Tech Week

    Liz Kendall – 2026 Speech to London Tech Week

    The speech made by Liz Kendall, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology on 9 June 2026.

    I want to talk about a great British success story.  

    It’s a story of British talent, British ingenuity, British enterprise, and ambition.  

    A story with one central theme: that this country is uniquely placed to thrive and prosper in the age of AI, to seize the incredible opportunities, and face the challenges that this powerful technology brings. 

    And today, together, we are writing Britain’s next chapter on winning the race for our future.  

    Winning for Britain and the British people.

    With the talent in this room and with a Labour Government that knows our best days lie ahead. 

    I don’t need to tell you about the huge opportunities AI brings. 

    Faster research, new treatments, and even cures for diseases. A transformation in our productivity, breakthroughs in clean energy, and so much more besides.  

    And the speed of change is dizzying. 

    In the last seven years AI models have gone from completing tasks toddlers can do to surpassing PhD level intelligence, with some model capabilities now doubling every four months.

    The potential for discovery, innovation and wealth creation can be intoxicating. But we also know AI brings real challenges and risks.  

    For our defence and national security, for people’s jobs and livelihoods, and inequality. 

    And, through the power of social media and the spread of mis- and disinformation, risks for our democracy too. 

    Dealing with these risks can seem daunting, even overwhelming, leading to some to say: enough – pull up the drawbridge. Stop AI. 

    But my view – from my time in politics and the lessons we learn from history – is that we are not powerless in the face of technological change.  

    We have agency.  We can act.  After all, that is what politics and government are for. 

    We cannot – and must not – retreat from progress as other political parties and politicians argue. 

    Doing so would be a betrayal of British talent, and British interests.  

    And it wouldn’t work even if we tried. 

    Because the choice isn’t between having AI or not.  

    The choice is between shaping AI according to our interests and values, so it works for everyone in this country, or being left at its mercy and whim.     

    This government’s choice is clear.   

    We will seize the opportunities and tackle the challenges AI inevitably brings, so we shape this powerful technology to work for all.  

    I believe Britain is in a better position than almost any other country to reap the rewards of AI and make it work for our people. 

    Because our huge strengths give us vital skin in the game.  

    Our universities are the envy of the world.  We have won more Nobel prizes per capita than any other major economy. A superb talent pool – much of which is right here in this room today. 

    An amazing, thriving tech ecosystem. 

    Our pragmatic, not dogmatic, approach to regulation.    

    A deep well of high-quality data, and our world-leading organisations like the AI Security Institute.  

    All of these alongside Britain’s long-held strengths – the world’s language, the rule of law, our stability and unwavering belief in Parliamentary democracy.   

    I’m clearly not the only one who sees this incredible potential. 

    Last year, Britain attracted more venture capital than France, Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland combined.   

    And already this year, almost half of all VC funding in Europe has been invested in Britain – a 16-year high.  

    Just look at the incredible companies backing Britain and growing in Britain.   

    DeepMind, Anthropic, Open AI – all expanding or opening offices here. Isomorphic Labs: using AI to completely reshape medical research, cutting years off the development of new drugs – bringing hope to families everywhere.  

    Ineffable: the new AI superintelligence company, founded by David Silver, which has just raised $1.1 billion in funding – the largest seed round in European history.   

    And Wayve: a home-grown British success story that, in under a decade, has gone from two PhD students, driving around Cambridge with a camera on the roof, to a global tech titan, valued at £6.6 billion.  

    Well done, Mr Kendall. 

    And our strengths aren’t just here in London. Far from it.  

    They’re in Liverpool, where I visited last week to see how AI is transforming materials chemistry; taking months off testing times for new consumer products used in millions of homes across the country.   

    Newcastle – the home of Sage, one of the largest tech firms in the country. 

    In Cardiff, where Space Forge is revolutionising in-space manufacturing. 

    Edinburgh – home of one of the UK’s largest semiconductor clusters and the Edinburgh Parallel Computer Centre. 

    And they are in Bristol, home of semiconductor innovator Graphcore and our Isambard supercomputer. 

    Great British AI enterprise and skill, driving innovation and growth right across the land. 

    Britmaxxing AI industrial policy.

    But I’m not resting on our laurels. And I bet you aren’t either. 

    The white heat of fierce AI competition combined with the lightning speed of change means we must go further and faster to turbo charge our existing strengths and reap the benefits throughout our economy. 

    Yesterday, at our AI adoption summit, I set out the government’s plans to make Britain the fastest AI adopting country in the G7 through a partnership with businesses and workers, backed by an initial government investment of over £200m. 

    Today I want to talk about how we double down on our AI strengths and win the race for Britain, with the next generation of Brit boosting, Brit maxxing, modern industrial policy. 

    When I describe this government’s approach, I often make the comparison with the Olympics.  

    For those of you old enough to remember, we went from a shameful 36th place in the medals table in Atlanta, in 1992, to second, behind only the US, two decades later. 

    We took what some call a ‘no compromise’ approach. Giving the most resources to our best performing sports, building the best teams, backing our best chances.  

    I think there is a lot we can learn from this for UK innovation. 

    If we want gold medal AI, we have to be strategic and lean into our priorities where we have a competitive edge.   

    That’s why earlier this year, I announced we will make a decisive shift towards backing more British AI companies, especially in the areas where we have real strengths – like life sciences, AI hardware and new approaches to foundational models.  

    This shift is critical for two main reasons. 

    First, we must reap more of the economic benefits AI brings right here in the UK.   

    So we demonstrate AI isn’t just for a powerful few but brings real, tangible improvements for British jobs, livelihoods and opportunities. 

    And second, when AI is the engine of economic power and hard power, and when 70% of global AI compute is now controlled by just 5 companies, we must gain greater sovereign control over this increasingly powerful technology. 

    For Britain, AI sovereignty isn’t about isolationism or attempting to go it alone.  

    It’s about building the best as well as using the best.   

    So we increase Britain’s leverage by being a keystone in the global tech architecture. An indispensable partner.  

    At the heart of our plans is Sovereign AI, which we launched in April – a major step which I believe will be one of the single most important things this government does to build a better future for our country. 

    SovAI is different from anything government has done before: harnessing the speed of venture, backed by the weight of the nation. 

    It will invest £500m in British AI companies to start up, scale up and win globally 

    And – crucially – it will offer the key to unlocking much wider government support where it can make a real difference. 

    Providing fully funded access to the UK’s largest super computers, fast tracking global talent, with super priority visa decisions and free visas for R&D.

    Working seamlessly with the British Business Bank and its £2bn annual investment to take companies to the next stage. 

    And mobilising the huge power and potential of government procurement to back the best of Britain.  

    The interest in SovAI has been overwhelming and they’ve already made direct investments in brilliant companies like Callosum, Ineffable and Isomophic labs.  

    I want to thank James, Suzanne, Josephine and the entire team for all their amazing work. I have no doubt this is just the start of what they will achieve – and they’ll have my full backing every step of the way. 

    And we are not stopping there. 

    Yesterday we published our new AI Hardware Plan – which I promised just a month ago. 

    One of the areas where we have a genuine advantage on the world stage is in semiconductors, and chip design.   

    Right now the global AI chips market is growing at an annual rate of 30% and expected to reach $1 trillion in the early 2030s.   

    If Britain could secure just 5% of this market it would bring $50 billion in revenue to the UK with tens of thousands of high paid jobs in tech.   

    There are those who say this race is already lost. That it is too late to challenge the dominance of the established players.   

    I don’t know if it’s due to my inherent competitiveness, but I do not accept such defeatism.   

    We have a rich history of excelling at hardware.   

    The first programmable computer. The first electronic memory.  

    The first commercial computer, first parallel computer and the first widely used chip IP model all happened right here in the UK.   

    Today, a single British company – Arm – is behind the most widely used processor design on Earth.   

    In almost every smartphone, tablet and in more and more AI servers all over the world.    

    It has also just become the UK’s most valuable company, by market cap.  

    And AI compute is rapidly diversifying, with different hardware needed for different tasks.  

    This shift provides real openings for new entrants and specialist hardware that couldn’t have been predicted, even a few years ago.   

    And it is already happening. 

    Just weeks ago, British chip company Fractile announced their latest $220 million dollar funding round.   

    Following Olix – another brilliant UK chip start-up – with their own $220 million dollar round. 

    That’s nearly half a billion dollars flowing into UK chip companies in the space of just a few months.  

    The next generation of AI hardware is being built here in Britain.    

    So yes, this a competitive market. But we are a competitive nation.   

    And winning this race is what our new hardware plan is all about.   

     The plan brings together £1.1 billion of government support for companies in four key areas.  

    First: invention and early-stage chip development.  

    That is why our new £120m AI Hardware Innovation Programme, delivered by UKRI, will back teams at every stage – helping them move from initial concept to a full, validated prototype, and then on to contracts.  

    This includes an additional £20m for our Scaling Inference Lab, near Cambridge, run by ARIA and Common AI, so companies can test new chip designs in a real‑world setting. That’s £70m in total. 

    Just yesterday, Oriole – a brilliant British AI company – announced it is working with the lab to deploy pioneering photonics technology to supercharge the speed of AI data centres, together with one of the largest chip companies in the world – AMD.  

    A fantastic project. And proof of why this matters. 

    Second, we are investing £80m in the skills the semiconductor industry needs including more funding for PhD-level studies and bursaries for students in fields like electronic engineering and materials science.      

    We’re funding 300 this year, rising to 400 next year and 500 the year after, to give our top companies the talent pipeline they need.   

    Third, our new plan on procurement. 

    We will build a £750m mixed chip supercomputer.  

    Over half of this funding will be earmarked for inference chips. 

    £150m in an expanded Advanced Market Commitment to give start-ups the confidence they will have a buyer, with the government acting as a “first customer”.  

    A further £250 million will buy additional novel inference chips once the most successful versions have reached the market. 

    A total of £400m for the chip champions of tomorrow: a fantastic opportunity for all the brilliant AI hardware companies right here in the UK.  

    And last, but by no means least, I’m absolutely delighted that one of the best AI hardware investors in the world – Playground Global – is launching a new fund that will invest in British AI hardware companies. 

    And that the British Business Bank is contributing £150m – the biggest commitment it has ever made.    

    The team at Playground are setting up a new office here in the UK – their first outside the US.   

    Pat Gelsinger – one of their partners, the former CEO of Intel, and author of the US government’s CHIPS ACT – knows a thing or two about hardware investing … and his backing is further testament to the incredible talent and potential in the UK.       

    This is what we mean by winning for Britain on AI. 

    Capitalising on our strengths. Backing the best of Britain. 

    Combining the talent, innovation and ambition in this room with the power of an active, more muscular state. 

    I want to finish by saying this. 

    Back in the 70s, when Britain’s old industrial base was crumbling, the Callaghan government invested £50m in a high risk semi conductor start-up, Inmos.  

    Headquartered in Bristol, and manufactured in Newport, South Wales.  

    That bold move sparked not just a company but an industry, and it has led to many of our strengths today. To Graphcore and Isambard in Bristol, to Wales’s amazing semiconductor cluster.  

    And lest we forget, one team of Inmos alumni went on to help build what is now Britain’s most valuable company … ARM. 

    So for the all the doubters, doom-mongers and naysayers out there … let me say this loud and clear.  

    Labour governments have done this before and we will do it again. 

    We will seize the opportunities and tackle the challenges AI inevitably brings. 

    By shaping the future, not retreating from it. 

    And by securing the benefits of AI for all, not just a powerful few. 

    This is the story of national success we can and will write together.    

    Building a modern Britain for a modern age.    

    And a future that works for all.    

    Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Joint statement in response to the deteriorating situation in the West Bank [June 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : Joint statement in response to the deteriorating situation in the West Bank [June 2026]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 9 June 2026.

    Joint statement from Foreign Ministers of Australia, Canada, France, Norway, and the United Kingdom in response to the deteriorating situation in the West Bank.

    In response to the deteriorating situation in the West Bank, we the Foreign Ministers of Australia, Canada, France, Norway, and the United Kingdom, have taken coordinated action to introduce sanctions and other measures to hold extremist settlers accountable for the horrific levels of settler violence against Palestinian civilians.

    Extremist violent settlers, with the backing of their supporters, continue to attack Palestinians and abuse their human rights. They use violence to displace Palestinians, destroy property and perpetuate the illegal settlement enterprise, undermining the viability of the State of Palestine and the prospects for peaceful coexistence.

    For too long, violent settlers have been able to act with near impunity, and settlement expansion and creation of outposts continue with the support and facilitation of the Government of Israel.  In some cases, settler violence takes place under the protection of Israel’s security forces. We continue to urge the Government of Israel to take action to ensure meaningful accountability for violence in the West Bank. The Government of Israel should ensure every attack is swiftly and thoroughly investigated, take action against the outposts and organisations that allow violence to flourish, and stop the incitement of violence.

    We believe that peace and security for both Israelis and Palestinians can only be achieved through the implementation of the two-state solution. Together, we will continue to work towards this goal.

    We Australia, Canada, France, Norway, and the United Kingdom have all taken the historic decision to recognise the State of Palestine, reflecting the rights of the Palestinian people and as part of our common efforts to protect the viability of the two-state solution. Today, we are acting together again in support of the same objectives.

    We stand ready to take more action if the Government of Israel does not take urgent steps to address the situation on the ground.

  • PRESS RELEASE : UK and allies sanction networks enabling settler violence in the West Bank [June 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : UK and allies sanction networks enabling settler violence in the West Bank [June 2026]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 9 June 2026.

    Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper announces co-ordinated sanctions with international partners targeting individuals and entities involved in financing and enabling settler violence in the occupied West Bank.

    • Foreign Secretary to set out tougher UK action in response to record settlement expansion and rising settler violence in West Bank, and push for urgent implementation of the 20 Point Peace Plan
    • UK brings together Australia, Canada, France, New Zealand and Norway to deliver co-ordinated sanctions against networks financing and enabling settler attacks against Palestinians in the West Bank, and firmly advises British businesses against activity in illegal Israeli settlements 
    • UK takes further action to support recovery in Gaza, including providing £1 million for humanitarian demining, and at least £10 million supporting the PA to navigate the fiscal crisis and sustain critical services

    In a statement to Parliament today, the Foreign Secretary will announce that the UK, alongside partners (Canada, France and Norway) is imposing new sanctions. The UK will impose sanctions on 6 entities and one individual involved in financing, enabling and carrying out settler violence in the occupied West Bank. Australia and New Zealand published co-ordinated sanctions last week.   

    Australia, Canada, France, Norway, and the United Kingdom have all taken the historic decision to recognise the State of Palestine, reflecting the rights of the Palestinian people and as part of our common efforts to protect the viability of the two-state solution. Today, they are acting together again in support of the same objectives. 

    Those designated will face asset freezes and, where appropriate, travel bans and Director Disqualifications. These sanctions will disrupt the flows of finance that have allowed extremist settler groups to act with impunity in the West Bank and demonstrate the UK’s commitment to a two-state solution. 

    The UK position remains clear: settlements are illegal under international law, they undermine international efforts to secure a just, lasting peace in the Middle East, and they risk doing permanent damage to the prospects of a secure and viable Palestinian state being able to live in peace alongside a secure Israel.  

    For the first time, the Foreign Secretary has also announced that the UK’s official guidance will explicitly advise businesses against economic and financial activity in illegal settlements. The UK continues to support trade with Israel within 1967 lines, but states that there should be no economic involvement in illegal settlements.  

    Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper is expected to say: 

    Today we are acting with our international partners to sanction those who support and sponsor violence against Palestinian communities in the West Bank.

    Settler expansion and violence is illegal and a fundamental threat to the viability of a two-state solution, and to long-term peace and security for Palestinians and Israelis.

    These measures show the UK is leading with our partners to target those who are fuelling this violence.

    These steps come against a backdrop of continued illegal settlement expansion including the E1 project, which further undermines the viability of a two-state solution, and record levels of settler violence designed deliberately to destroy Palestinian homes and livelihoods in the West Bank. 

    The UK continues to urge the Government of Israel to end settlement expansion, clamp down on settler violence, prosecute those responsible, and lift ongoing restrictions on the functioning of the Palestinian economy. The UK will not hesitate to take further action if the situation does not improve. 

    Today’s measures form part of a wider UK effort to advance peace and security in Israel and Palestine. This includes action to support implementation of the 20 Point Plan for Gaza and protect and strengthen a viable Palestinian state.  

    The Foreign Secretary is also expected to announce today that the UK will provide an additional £1 million for humanitarian mine action in Gaza in addition to the £4 million already contributed. She will call on the Government of Israel to open all crossings and remove arbitrary restrictions on the delivery of humanitarian aid and equipment to ensure that UK aid can reach all those who desperately need it.

    She will also announce that she will travel to Paris this week in advance of the Peace Building Conference, which is bringing together Israeli and Palestinian civil society, and international partners dedicated to advancing the two-state solution.

    In addition, the Foreign Secretary will confirm at least £10 million in financial and technical assistance to the Palestinian Authority in 2026, including support to navigate the fiscal crisis and sustain frontline services such as healthcare. 

    Background 

    Sanctioned individuals and entities include: 

    • The Farms Association: provides financial and organisational support to Israeli settler farms and outposts in the West Bank, including those associated with violence, intimidation and forced displacement of Palestinians 
    • Ahavat Gilad: serves as a financial conduit for the Farms Association, channelling donations to settler outposts including those associated with violence against Palestinians 
    • Ari Yshag: fundraises for illegal settler outposts associated with violence, intimidation and forced displacement of Palestinians 
    • Artzenu: promotes, finances and resources settler farms and outposts associated with violence against Palestinians, including fundraising for tactical military equipment for armed settler squads 
    • Shivat Zion Lerigvey Admata: the registered legal vehicle through which Artzenu’s financial activities are conducted, channelling donations to outposts linked to serious human rights abuses 
    • Eyal Hari Yehuda: construction and demolition company that facilitates, supports and is responsible for owners, staff, associates and family members who have used company resources while hired on construction and demolition jobs in the West Bank to destroy Palestinian land and property, as well as physically attack, shoot and kill Palestinians, which has led to the wider displacement of Palestinians
    • Itamar Yehuda Levi: owner of EYAL HARI YEHUDA COMPANY LTD (also designated today) that facilitates, supports and is responsible for owners, staff, associates and family members who have used company resources while hired on construction and demolition jobs in the West Bank to destroy Palestinian land and property, as well as physically attack, shoot and kill Palestinians, which has led to the wider displacement of Palestinians
  • Ed Davey – 2026 Comments on Violence in Northern Ireland

    Ed Davey – 2026 Comments on Violence in Northern Ireland

    The comments made by Ed Davey, the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, on 10 June 2026.

    I am horrified by the disorder and racist violence in Belfast last night.

    Far too often now, we see extremists exploiting people’s anger and grief to spread hatred and violence – with the help of divisive algorithms on social media.

    This has to stop.

  • Robert Jenrick – 2026 Comments on Banning Visas from Sudan

    Robert Jenrick – 2026 Comments on Banning Visas from Sudan

    The comments made by Robert Jenrick on 9 June 2026.

    Reform UK have announced we will ban visas for anyone coming from Sudan.

    Enough is enough.

    To those who ask why, here are some indicative statistics:

    -The conviction rate for violence by Sudanese migrants is nearly double that for British people.

    -Only one Sudanese criminal was successfully returned back to Sudan last year.

    -99% of asylum claims from Sudan were granted in 2024.

    -There were 14,150 Sudanese-born welfare claimants in 2019. That means nearly half of all Sudanese migrants here are on benefits.

    The only reason to have immigration is if it makes British people safer and richer. Clearly migration from Sudan is doing the opposite.

    So Reform will ban it, and finally put the British people first.

    I know from my time in Westminster that only Nigel Farage has the conviction to actually get this done.

    As for the Sudanese man arrested in Belfast for trying to behead someone, he needs to be on the first flight out of the country.

    We don’t want to hear any human rights claims from him.

    We cannot live alongside someone so barbaric.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Universities face ban on international students over visa abuse [June 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : Universities face ban on international students over visa abuse [June 2026]

    The press release issued by the Home Office on 4 June 2026.

    Raised standards for recruiting foreign students come amid continued visa abuse. Student asylum claims already down 30% as government action delivers results.

    Universities will be stripped of the right to recruit international students if too many drop out, as the government tightens the screws on visa abuse. 

    New sponsorship rules will introduce a sliding scale of penalties for higher education institutions that fail to recruit responsibly. 

    It comes after asylum claims from work, study and tourist visas more than tripled under the previous government – reaching 37% of all claims, with foreign students accounting for the largest share.  

    Asylum claims by students have since fallen by 30% in the past year alone following tough action taken in partnership with the sector. 

    The Home Secretary has also imposed a first-of-its-kind visa brake on study visas for nationals of Afghanistan, Cameroon, Myanmar and Sudan following a surge in asylum claims. 

    These reforms build on that progress, raising the pass marks of the annual test used to monitor visa sponsors – across all three of its metrics: 

    • Visa refusal rate: must remain below 5% (previously 10%) 
    • Course enrolment rate: must reach at least 95% (previously 90%) 
    • Course completion rate: must reach at least 90% (previously 85%) 

    Minister for Migration and Citizenship Mike Tapp said: 

    The UK will always welcome genuine international students, and our universities are rightly admired around the world. 

    But our visa system must not be used as a backdoor to asylum and illegal working. 

    Student asylum claims are down 30% in the last year. I thank the sector for their co-operation in achieving this, but we must go further. 

    Those seeking to game the system should know we are watching – and won’t hesitate to act.

    High drop-out rates can indicate students have entered the illegal working economy rather than studied whilst high visa rejection rates or low enrolment figures suggest some institutions have not done enough due diligence on applicants. But from summer 2027, a new traffic light rating system will make clear to regulators, and the public, which institutions are recruiting responsibly.  

    Those rated red will face restrictions on the number of students they can recruit and must fund a 12-month action plan to fix failing practices.  

    Those that don’t improve face losing international student recruitment rights altogether.

    The changes were announced during a visit to Manchester Metropolitan University by Home Office Minister Mike Tapp, hosted by Vice-Chancellor Professor Malcolm Press and Universities UK.  

    Professor Malcolm Press CBE DL, President of Universities UK said: 

    UK universities are one of our greatest success stories, and we should be proud that people from around the world aspire to study here. We are fully committed to protecting the integrity of the visa system and working in partnership with the Home Office. 

    International students bring significant economic and soft power benefits, contributing £37 billion in export earnings. We want the UK to remain open and welcoming, but that depends on responding quickly to any risks of abuse. 

    What universities need from government is policy stability, transparent visa decision-making, and real-time data to act on emerging concerns. The sector relies on international student income, and recent sharp declines have led to substantial cost-cutting and job losses. It is essential that we build a fair, stable, and transparent system that works in the national interest.

    The Home Office is actively exploring new ways to share data with the education sector, within a robust data protection framework.  

    Education institutions also hold valuable data of their own, and the government continues to urge them to work together to share intelligence across the sector and crack down on abuse wherever it occurs.   

    Since last summer, the Home Office has contacted 306,000 students whose visas are due to expire – warning that meritless asylum claims will be swiftly refused and those without the right to remain must leave or face removal. 

    These measures form part of the government’s broader drive to restore order and control to the immigration system – under which net migration has now fallen by 74%.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Change of His Majesty’s Ambassador to Djibouti – David Hall [June 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : Change of His Majesty’s Ambassador to Djibouti – David Hall [June 2026]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 3 June 2026.

    Dr David Hall has been appointed His Majesty’s Ambassador to the Republic of Djibouti, in succession to Mr Vinay Talwar, who will be transferring to another Diplomatic Service appointment.

    Dr Hall will take up his appointment during October 2026.

    Curriculum vitae 

    Full name: David Ian Hall 

    DatesRole
    2022 to 2025MOD, Deputy Director, Counter Proliferation
    2021FCDO, Head of Security Policy
    2017 to 2020Vienna, Ambassador and Permanent Representative to IAEA/CTBTO
    2015 to 2017Vienna, Deputy Permanent Representative, UKMis
    2012 to 2015Nairobi, Political Counsellor
    2009 to 2012FCO, Counter Proliferation Department
    2007 to 2009FCO, Africa Directorate
    2003 to 2007Brussels, First Secretary (Nuclear Policy, NATO)
    1993 to 2003MOD
  • PRESS RELEASE : GCHQ confirms heavy Russian losses as Moscow avoids negotiations and civilian casualties grow – UK Statement to the OSCE [June 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : GCHQ confirms heavy Russian losses as Moscow avoids negotiations and civilian casualties grow – UK Statement to the OSCE [June 2026]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 3 June 2026.

    Mr Chair, only a just and lasting peace in Ukraine, one that safeguards its sovereignty, will deter further Russian aggression. The United Kingdom’s commitment is unwavering: we will maintain pressure on Russia, continue supporting Ukraine’s Armed Forces, and help secure a peace that endures.

    President Putin expected a swift victory. More than four years on, he has achieved none of his strategic aims, while inflicting immense suffering on Ukrainians and on his own people.

    And make no mistake, militarily Russia is under severe strain. The Director of the UK’s Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) recently confirmed intelligence indicating nearly 500,000 Russian soldiers have been killed since the start of the full-scale invasion, assessing that the Russian military is “going backwards on the battlefield”. Monthly losses remain extremely high, while territorial gains have slowed markedly in 2026. The already devastatingly slow rate of advance has halved so far in 2026. This illegal campaign only serves to consume vast resources, inflict mass casualties for limited, reversible gains.

    Yet a state under pressure can still inflict immense suffering, as recent strikes and threats demonstrate. On 23–24 May, Russia launched one of the largest air assaults on Kyiv, damaging or destroying more than 30 residential buildings. In May alone, Russia fired 197 missiles, including 72 ballistic or hypersonic, alongside hundreds of daily drone strikes, levels that have now become deeply alarming in their regularity. In its latest mass attack on Monday night and early Tuesday morning, Russia launched 656 drones and 73 missiles, resulting in the death of at least 18 civilians and leaving dozens injured. This was the largest ballistic/hypersonic missile attack since the full-scale invasion. Russia has not acknowledged responsibility for any of this.

    Civilian suffering continues to intensify. In the first four months of 2026, civilian casualties increased by 21% compared to the same period in 2025. Since the start of the full-scale invasion, at least 16,149 civilians have been killed and more than 46,000 injured. The United Nations projects that up to 504,000 additional people could be displaced this year, with a further 2.7 million affected by ongoing strikes.

    Russia’s warnings of “systematic strikes” on the capital and the targeting of decision-making centres are wholly unacceptable. Despite threats and warnings to evacuate, missions have remained in place, with the G7 and partners making clear they will continue to stand alongside Ukraine. This sustained presence sends a clear signal: attempts at threats intimidation will not succeed, and the international community remains engaged and visible in Kyiv.

    Russia’s actions so clearly violate the core OSCE principles: sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the prohibition of the use of force. The Code of Conduct makes clear that such actions are a matter of direct and legitimate concern to all participating States, requiring solidarity and coordinated response.

    Ukraine has demonstrated repeatedly that it is the party of peace, including by agreeing to a full, immediate, and unconditional ceasefire, and by engaging constructively with partners. Russia, by contrast, has failed to engage seriously. It continues to advance maximalist demands tantamount to Ukraine’s surrender, while prolonging negotiations and intensifying attacks. Russia continues to demand that Ukraine withdraw from areas it has failed to occupy after years of fighting. That is not diplomacy, it is attempted coercion.

    Mr Chair, Russia can end this war now, by engaging seriously in negotiations, withdrawing its forces, and respecting Ukraine’s sovereignty. The United Kingdom is fully committed to supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty, security and right to self-defence. Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Ministry of Defence confirms the death of Lance Corporal James Stewart Freeman

    PRESS RELEASE : Ministry of Defence confirms the death of Lance Corporal James Stewart Freeman

    The press release issued by the Ministry of Defence on 3 June 2026.

    It is with great sadness that the Ministry of Defence must confirm the death of Lance Corporal Freeman, who died in Iraq during routine training activity on 31 May 2026. He was 29 years old.

    Lance Corporal Freeman was born on 1 January 1997. He joined the Army in June 2016, attending the Infantry Training Centre Catterick, before joining 1st Battalion, the Royal Anglian Regiment (The Vikings) in February 2017.

    Lance Corporal Freeman was a dedicated and experienced Viking and Royal Anglian Regiment soldier. He deployed on Operations in South Sudan, contributed to the national response to the COVID-19 pandemic, supported force protection missions in Cyprus and most recently Operation SHADER, Iraq. In addition, he served in the Falklands, Jordan, Romania and Kenya. He served in a variety of roles throughout his career, including rifleman, mortarman and machine gunner. However, it was his most recent appointment, as a Section Second in Command within the Assault Pioneer Platoon, that was most notable. He was deeply invested in this role, pushing the capability, and always suggesting improvements to techniques, kit and equipment. He had a promising career ahead of him.

    A lover of the outdoors, he would often go clay pigeon shooting and regularly share stories about shooting with his dad. He also enjoyed gaming and would often play video games into the late hours with soldiers across the battalion.  

    Above all, he was a devoted family-man and never passed up on the opportunity to share that with his peers. He put them first in every situation whether it was a passing comment in a hard situation or expressing his excitement to see them when he was away.

    Colonel James WHM Bishop, Commander British Forces Operation SHADER, said:

    I am devastated at the loss of Lance Corporal Freeman. He was a highly professional Junior Non-Commissioned Officer whose dedication to his friends, his sub-unit in the United Kingdom Mobility Company, and the wider Battalion represented the very best of his generation. Larger than life and magnetically charming, he was a trusted junior leader who naturally brought people together, forming a wide and fiercely loyal group of friends across the entire Op SHADER contingent.

    His absence leaves a profound, irreplaceable void, and he will be missed beyond measure by everyone who had the privilege to serve alongside him. I offer my deepest condolences to his wife, his family, and the 1st Battalion, The Royal Anglian Regiment.

    Lieutenant Colonel Nick JP McGinley, Commanding Officer, 1st Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment, said:

    I am deeply saddened and shocked to hear of the death of Lance Corporal James Freeman. A soldier with a bright future ahead of him, he was everything you could wish for in a junior leader – selflessly committed, thoughtful and professional. His loss is felt profoundly by all those who had the privilege of serving alongside him. Most of all, our thoughts are with his family to whom he was utterly devoted. My condolences go out to them at this incredibly difficult time.

    Major James SD Pugh, Officer Commanding A (Norfolk) Company, 1st Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment, said:

    Lance Corporal Freeman was the very essence of a Viking soldier and a highly regarded member of the Royal Anglian Regiment. Unfailingly dependable, he set the highest standards for those he led, demonstrating consummate professionalism in every task he undertook. He was the kind of soldier you wanted by your side – steadfast and resolute. His enthusiasm, unwavering humour in the face of adversity, and determination were the cornerstones of his success. Whatever the challenge, he brought people with him.

    Beyond his military excellence, Lance Corporal Freeman was a devoted husband and father. His greatest pride was his daughter, and the simple walks to and from school were the moments he cherished most each day. His loss will be deeply felt by his fellow Vikings, but none more so than by his family. My thoughts and deepest sympathies are with them during this profoundly difficult time.

    Captain Daniel Bradnam, Company Second-in-Command, B (Suffolk) Company, 1st Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment, said:

    Lance Corporal Freeman was my go-to man – steadfastly dependable, unwaveringly professional, and a genuine joy to be around. He earned the respect and affection of everyone he met, and quick-witted humour never failed to brighten a room. I will always remember LCpl Freeman for his deep commitment and dedication to his family, whom he loved dearly and spoke about with great pride.

    It has been an absolute privilege to have commanded and served alongside LCpl Freeman. He will forever remain in the hearts and memories of all those in B (Suffolk) Company and will be sorely missed.

    WO2 Bradley P Hilton, Company Sergeant Major, B (Suffolk) Company, 1st Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment, said:

    Lance Corporal Freeman was the epitome of a Viking Non-Commissioned Officer. He was utterly reliable and I could always count on him. If I ever asked how he was progressing, he would flash a cheeky side smile and say, “Don’t worry Sir, I’m on it” – and he always was.

    He excelled as a junior leader and commander whilst deployed in Iraq. A devoted family-man and a true mate to his comrades. I extend my deepest sympathies to his wife, daughter, and family during this difficult time.

    Lieutenant Samuel Frost, Officer Commanding, 7 (Assault Pioneer) Platoon, 1st Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment, said:

    As his Platoon Commander, he was the first person I would turn to. As well as his professionalism, we will remember him for his strength of character and sense of humour. He was often to be found sitting in the office, laughing, telling stories about the Platoon on previous exercises, and was a genuine pleasure to be around. An impressive soldier, he particularly stood out for his leadership and initiative.

    He loved his role and was pivotal in the re-creation of the Assault Pioneers Platoon and its subsequent success. Working with Lance Corporal Freeman has been a huge pleasure, and he will be sorely missed, rightfully commemorated, and never forgotten. He was one of the best. His passing is a shock to the Company, and his wife and daughter have my profound sympathy.

    Sergeant James Cobbold, Platoon Sergeant, 7 (Assault Pioneer) Platoon, 1st Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment, said:

    I have had the privilege of serving as Lance Corporal Freeman’s Platoon Sergeant over the past eight months. James was everything you would want in a Section Second in Command, when something needed doing, you knew James would get it done. More than that, James had that rare ability to lift those around him; whether through his example, his work ethic, or simply his presence.

    Outside of work, a devoted family man, who spoke about his wife and child with pride and carried this responsibility with purpose. In the short time I knew him, James was a reliable soldier, a committed father and a truly good man.

    Corporal William S Thorpe, Section Commander, B (Suffolk) Company, 1st Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment, said:

    James was my best friend. A man who was committed to achieving any task before him to the highest standard and always professional, but also someone to talk to in confidence, either for advice or, most often, for a moan. I do not believe I would be where I am today without him, especially for the amount of “just do me a favour” favours I owe him.

    Lance Corporal Cameron AW Donald, Section Second-in-Command, A (Norfolk) Company, 1st Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment, said:

    Lance Corporal James Freeman has had a large influence on me as an individual and as a soldier from very early in my career. Having spent my first months with him in Troodos, Cyprus I quickly got to learn what kind of man he was. Not just an experienced and high-quality soldier, but also a deeply compassionate soul, who was willing to help the next man out before himself.

    James and I clicked very quickly, and we realised we had a very similar sense of humour. I considered him one of my best friends within work, and someone I looked up to as he steered me in the right direction to promote as a Lance Corporal. The world has lost a tremendous character, and we have lost a brother.

    Defence Secretary John Healey MP said:

    Lance Corporal James Freeman served our country with dedication, professionalism and pride. He was a greatly valued member of his regiment who will be deeply missed.

    My thoughts are with his family, loved ones and colleagues at this devastating time. The tributes paid to James make clear he was an exceptional soldier, leader and friend.