Tag: 2024

  • PRESS RELEASE : Senegal Presidential Elections – UK statement [March 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Senegal Presidential Elections – UK statement [March 2024]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 8 March 2024.

    The United Kingdom has made a statement welcoming the announcement of Presidential elections in Senegal.

    A Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office spokesperson said:

    The United Kingdom welcomes the announcement of Presidential elections on 24 March in accordance with the Constitutional Council decisions of 6 and 7 March. In line with Senegal’s strong democratic traditions, we urge all parties to contribute to peaceful, inclusive, and credible elections, to maintain calm and the rule of law, and to respect the fundamental freedoms of the Senegalese people.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Family disputes to be resolved faster through extra £170 million investment into the justice system [March 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Family disputes to be resolved faster through extra £170 million investment into the justice system [March 2024]

    The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 8 March 2024.

    Families will benefit from new early legal advice to spare them stress of court.

    • Investment into latest technology to better protect the public
    • Part of digitisation drive to improve efficiency across the justice system

    Thousands of families will be spared the stress of court or obtain speedier justice thanks to £56 million announced in the Spring Budget.

    This will mean families can access early legal advice and resolve their disputes away from the court room, such as agreeing child arrangements, and forms part of a wider £170 million investment into the justice system announced this week.

    At the same time, vulnerable families with serious safeguarding concerns such as domestic abuse and child safety will benefit from the expansion of a new model which will see increased support and a less adversarial approach in the family courts.

    The investment into the justice system will increase the use of new technology and artificial intelligence to boost productivity and deliver better value to the taxpayer.

    This includes streamlining probation processes to bolster public protection and better assess an offender’s risk, as well as a new online system for prison staff to make administrative tasks quicker and easier.

    Increased digitisation will also save significant administrative time across the justice system ensuring frontline staff can better focus on delivering justice and keeping the public safe.

    As part of the package announced this week, £100 million will be invested in measures in prison designed to support rehabilitation and cut crime, such as schemes to help offenders find work on release. The investment will also be used to hire more staff and refurbish the workshops prisoners rely on to learn the skills that will turn them away from crime.

    The Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary, Alex Chalk, said:

    This significant new investment will ensure thousands more families can access the legal advice they need to resolve their disputes as early as possible – without the trauma of courtroom battles.

    It will also allow us to harness new technologies and fund innovative schemes, such a risk profiling for offenders, that will drive down reoffending and keep the public safer, while delivering better value for taxpayers and a more efficient justice system.

    This announcement forms part of plans for government to deliver up to £1.8 billion worth of benefits by 2029 through a total £800 million investment.

  • PRESS RELEASE : UN Human Rights Council 55 – Interactive Dialogue with Special Rapporteur on Torture [March 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : UN Human Rights Council 55 – Interactive Dialogue with Special Rapporteur on Torture [March 2024]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 8 March 2024.

    UK statement for Interactive Dialogue with Special Rapporteur on Torture. Delivered at the 55th Human Rights Council at the United Nations in Geneva.

    Thank you, Mr President.

    The UK fully supports the Special Rapporteur’s focus on the importance of adequate detention conditions in prisons.

    Detainees must be treated with humanity and dignity – this is a clear obligation under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

    With this in mind, we encourage all States to ensure allegations of mistreatment are thoroughly investigated, and to fully comply with their international obligations.

    As reflected in your report, all states must guarantee minimum standards of humane treatment. We share the concerns outlined in your press release of January 2024 that some of the evidence that may be used to prosecute Jimmy Lai was allegedly obtained through torture of Andy Li. No evidence gained via torture can be valid evidence.

    Within the UK, we are taking urgent action to improve prison safety and security. This is alongside wider reforms to overhaul the prison system, focused on the rehabilitation of offenders and delivering safer prisons.

    To help reduce the UK prison populations, we are reforming the licence period for offenders serving an Imprisonment for Public Protection sentence. Reforms include a clear statutory presumption that the licence will be terminated by the Parole Board at the end of the three-year qualifying period.

    Special Rapporteur,

    What best practices to combat overcrowding in prisons have you observed from States?

    Thank you.

  • Gillian Keegan – 2024 Speech at the ASCL Annual Conference

    Gillian Keegan – 2024 Speech at the ASCL Annual Conference

    The speech made by Gillian Keegan, the Secretary of State for Education, in Liverpool on 8 March 2024.

    Good afternoon and welcome to my home city of Liverpool!

    If you’re staying for the weekend, do make the most of everything that Liverpool has to offer… especially the nightlife.

    40 years ago, aged 16, I left a comprehensive school which was only a few miles away from this very building.

    92% of my classmates left with less than five GCSEs, or O-Levels as they were in my day, that are needed to reach the next stage of education.

    Many of my school friends left without a single qualification.

    Whilst it’s fair to say it wasn’t the best school in the country, it did have some good points.

    One teacher, Mr Ashcroft, stayed behind after school to teach me technical drawing and engineering, subjects that girls weren’t allowed to study in those days.

    He encouraged me and helped me to pass 10 O-Levels… which was considered a miracle!

    This led to the apprenticeship that kickstarted my 30-year career in international business.

    That, in a nutshell, is the power of education.

    Underperforming schools and colleges are now few and far between.

    That is thanks to your hard work.

    One of the best things about being Education Secretary is having the opportunity to visit schools and colleges around the country.

    During the last 18 months, I’ve listened, and I’ve learnt a lot.

    You told me about workload and the additional pressures being placed on our brilliant teachers.

    So, together we’ve set-up the workload reduction taskforce, aiming to reduce teachers’ and leaders’ working hours.

    You told me how difficult it can be to recruit and retain teachers.

    Together we’re building on our recruitment and retention strategy and introducing new routes into teaching, including the teacher degree apprenticeship.

    We’ve put you, the experts, in charge of leading your schools and colleges.

    How have we done that?

    Since 2010, we’ve massively expanded the number of academies from a few hundred to over 10,000.

    Giving you the power to lead and to make the right decisions for your schools and colleges.

    However, we all know that the best education systems combine trust in leaders, with consistent accountability.

    In the last 18 months I’ve been struck by the number of education ministers from countries around the world that have asked me, “how have you dramatically improved your school standards?”.

    I tell them it’s thanks to you, our fantastic school and college leaders, that around 90% of schools and 92% of colleges in this country are now rated ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’.

    We’ve just heard from Martyn, who I was delighted to appoint as Ofsted’s chief inspector.

    Martyn has a wealth of experience, so I hope you’ll agree he’s an excellent choice.

    As you’ve heard, Ofsted wants to improve, it wants to listen.

    Now, since the pandemic, we’ve seen a worrying trend of more children being absent from school.

    What’s the point in building a world class education system if children aren’t in the classroom?

    At the G7 in Japan, I was reminded that attendance is actually a challenge in many countries.

    In January, the education minister in New Zealand spoke to me about how their overall absence rates had increased from 8% in 2019 to 12% in 2023.

    Even now they have over 40% of children persistently absent from school.

    That’s why access to data is critical.

    That’s why we’ve revolutionised ours.

    Making it some of the most comprehensive daily attendance data collected anywhere in the world.

    It’s the data that we’re receiving from 89% of schools which is helping us overcome this challenge.

    From September, all schools will be required to share daily data, providing 100% coverage.

    This work has helped ensure that there are 380,000 fewer children persistently absent or not attending school than last year.

    There’s been a theme of togetherness running through everything I’ve said today.

    We’re working together to tackle challenges, but also to grasp opportunities.

    We’re working together to improve school standards for all young people.

    We’re working together to get attendance back to pre-pandemic levels.

    It’s that theme of togetherness that we need to take forward.

    I can’t think of a more appropriate city to be in, to talk about togetherness.

    A city with a great sense of family and community.

    So, I’d like to leave you with a quote from one of the most loved sons of this city, Jürgen Klopp, the manager of undoubtedly the best football team in the world.

    He said, “to be successful, you need to be brave, you need to make decisions, and you need to feel responsibility”.

    I know you feel that responsibility.

    I know you will continue to be brave and take the tough decisions that are improving education standards for the children of this country.

    For that, I say thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Statement from the Secretary of State on the Operation Kenova Interim Report [March 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Statement from the Secretary of State on the Operation Kenova Interim Report [March 2024]

    The press release issued by the Northern Ireland Office on 8 March 2024.

    The statement follows the findings of the report that was published on the 8th of March.

    Northern Ireland Secretary, Chris Heaton-Harris, said:

    This statement is in response to the publication of the Operation Kenova Interim Report into the activities of an alleged agent known as ‘STAKEKNIFE’, which has just been published by the Police Service of Northern Ireland.

    There can be no doubt that the way Operation Kenova has conducted its work since being commissioned in 2016 has gained the trust of many families who have long been seeking answers as to what exactly happened when their loved ones were so brutally murdered by, and on the orders of, the Provisional IRA.

    Over 3,500 people from all parts of the community were killed during the Troubles and tens of thousands more injured. Over 1,000 of those killed were members of the security forces. Their bravery, courage, dedication and sacrifice in seeking to uphold democracy and the rule of law must never be forgotten.

    We must remember too that the vast majority of deaths during the Troubles, around 90 per cent, were perpetrated by terrorist organisations – in the substance of this report, by the Provisional IRA.

    As this is an “interim” report, I will not comment at this time on behalf of the Government on the detail of the report. It contains several specific, very serious allegations that remain subject to consideration by the courts.

    It would not be right for the Government to make any comment on the substance of the Interim Report until the conclusion of litigation related to it. I note the recent decisions made by the Public Prosecution Service for Northern Ireland in relation to files passed to them by Operation Kenova, which once again go to show how difficult it is to achieve criminal justice outcomes in legacy cases. Due to numerous related civil cases, however, that remain ongoing, it would be inappropriate to comment further at this time. There is also the prospect of appeals against any of the recent decisions made by the Director for Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland.

    I would like to put on record again my deepest sympathy with all the families who lost loved ones during the Troubles – including as a result of the actions of the Provisional IRA.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Activation of a maritime corridor to deliver humanitarian assistance to Gaza: joint statement [March 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Activation of a maritime corridor to deliver humanitarian assistance to Gaza: joint statement [March 2024]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 8 March 2024.

    The UK, European Commission, Cyprus, United Arab Emirates and United States gave a joint statement on activating a maritime corridor to deliver aid to Gaza.

    Joint statement from the European Commission, the Republic of Cyprus, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States endorsing the activation of a maritime corridor to deliver humanitarian assistance to Gaza:

    The humanitarian situation in Gaza is dire, with innocent Palestinian families and children desperate for basic necessities. That is why today, the European Commission, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, the Republic of Cyprus, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States announce our intent to open a maritime corridor to deliver much-needed additional amounts of humanitarian assistance by sea.

    Cyprus’ leadership in establishing the Amalthea Initiative – which outlines a mechanism for securely shipping aid from Cyprus to Gaza via sea – was integral to enabling this joint effort to launch a maritime corridor.  Together, our nations intend to build on this model to deliver significant additional aid by sea, working in coordination with UN Senior Humanitarian and Reconstruction Coordinator for Gaza Sigrid Kaag – who is charged with facilitating, coordinating, monitoring, and verifying the flow of aid into Gaza under UN Security Council Resolution 2720. The dedicated efforts of the UAE to mobilize support for the Initiative will result in the initial shipment of food by sea to the people of Gaza.

    Cyprus will soon convene senior officials to discuss how we can accelerate this maritime channel supporting those in need, supplementing land and air routes, including from Egypt and Jordan. The United States announced an emergency mission led by the US military to establish a temporary pier in Gaza, in coordination with humanitarian partners and other countries, to enable the delivery of significant quantities of assistance by sea. These efforts will be closely coordinated with the Government of Israel.

    The delivery of humanitarian assistance directly to Gaza by sea will be complex, and our nations will continue to assess and adjust our efforts to ensure we deliver aid as effectively as possible. This maritime corridor can – and must – be part of a sustained effort to increase the flow of humanitarian aid and commercial commodities into Gaza through all possible routes. We will continue to work with Israel to expand deliveries by land, insisting that it facilitate more routes and open additional crossings to get more aid to more people. We affirm that protecting civilian lives is a key element of international humanitarian law that must be respected. And together, we must all do more to ensure aid gets to people who desperately need it.

  • Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech at the Nuffield Trust Summit

    Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech at the Nuffield Trust Summit

    The speech made by Victoria Atkins, the Health and Social Care Secretary, on 7 March 2024.

    Good morning everyone, what an absolute pleasure it is to be here at the Nuffield Trust.

    This is one of the landmark moments in the calendar of a Secretary of State for Health.

    I know that I am about to be scrutinised – and indeed cross examined – by some of the country’s leading experts in healthcare.

    So, believe you me, this makes Jeremy’s outing at the Budget yesterday feel very easy in comparison.

    But can I thank the Nuffield Trust for inviting me to speak to you today – it is a great honour.

    But it is also a privilege.

    Because the National Health Service is, genuinely, one of the reasons I came into politics.

    And today, having the privilege of speaking to you – those who work in healthcare, but also who are very, very conscious of its future, of the challenges we face today, but also our determination to prepare it for the years and decades to come, I would like to have a little bit of intellectual freedom to look at its future in a different light.

    Our national conversation around healthcare has tended to focus on older people, who are living longer, and with more health conditions.

    And later this afternoon the Chief Medical Officer – the wonderful Chris Whitty – will outline how we’re supporting them to live more independently, and with more years in good health, and rightly so.

    But I think there is a set of voices that is not heard often enough – the voices of young people.

    Young people not only pay for the NHS of today, but they will also use the NHS of tomorrow.

    And we know that high costs of living and rising rents are making it difficult for our young people to make those long-term decisions that are so important to us all, such as buying a house or starting a family.

    We cannot therefore expect them to foot the bill for an infinite increase in healthcare spending.

    The Chancellor’s Budget yesterday rightly recognised that we cannot continue to have a larger tax burden falling on a smaller number of working people.

    For me, the path we must take is obvious.

    We must build a more productive state, not a bigger one.

    And research proves this point.

    Today there are 3.3 workers to support every pensioner.

    In less than 50 years, there will be fewer than 2 workers to support every pensioner.

    So, we need to stop the next generation being dragged into a tax and spend black hole – where they put more in to get less out.

    Because this is a recipe not just for them losing faith in the institutions that we hold so dear, but also I worry for losing faith in capitalism, and losing faith in our democracy.

    But the decisions we took in yesterday’s Budget will make a meaningful difference.

    We took decisions that will reduce long-term demand, and improve productivity – not just throughout the NHS, but across the economy.

    Because the two go hand in hand.

    A strong economy helps pay for the NHS.

    And a strong NHS supports a growing economy.

    So today, I want to share our plan to achieve both of these things through productivity and accountability.

    But before I do that, there is of course one topic that is fundamental to my plan to reform the NHS to make it faster, simper, and fairer – and that is prevention.

    In the coming weeks, I will set out further thoughts on this very important topic.

    But I hope you’ll forgive me, following yesterday’s incredibly significant announcement at the budget, I wanted to focus today on productivity and how it can make meaningful changes to the NHS that we all want to see.

    Now, to productivity.

    I know that you’ve heard about this already.

    And indeed, Thea Stein has observed that NHS staff and clinicians don’t get out of bed in the morning thinking about how they could be more productive.

    I get that.

    They are motivated by doing the very best they possibly can for patients. And that is the way it should be.

    So when I talk about productivity, this is not about telling staff they need to work harder.

    It is about giving them the tools – and the time – to give patients the best care they can.

    Now, we know the NHS can be productive.

    From 2010 to the start of the pandemic in 2020, productivity growth in the NHS outstripped the wider economy by more than 1 per cent a year.

    But since then, it has gone into reverse.

    The causes are complex.

    The pandemic has clearly increased demands on staff, and spending on agency staff has risen as a result.

    Our Long-Term Workforce Plan, the first in NHS history, will get this spending in check – reducing it by as much as £10 billion over time.

    And we should also be frank about the significant problems and pressures that industrial action has caused across the system…

    …including, sadly, the 1.4 million appointments and operations that have been cancelled since strikes began in December 2022.

    Nonetheless, a reasonable and fair deal can be struck, and I’m really pleased that unions are recommending our new offer to NHS consultants.

    Should their members accept this deal – and I hope they will – we will all be able to move forward with providing patients with the care they need and see waiting lists fall.

    But the Budget will deliver savings for everyone who works in the NHS.

    The 2p cut in National Insurance will grow the average nurse’s pay packet by more than £500 a year.

    This is on top of the National Insurance cut that we’ve already delivered this year, that taken together will benefit the average worker by more than £900.

    But the Budget went further.

    As well as helping the NHS meet the pressures it will face in the coming years with an additional £2.5 billion, it set out our determination to return to the productivity we all know the NHS has – and can – deliver by funding a £3.4bn capital investment plan to invest in technology.

    The productivity plan, along with the Long-Term Workforce Plan, will see productivity grow by 2 per cent per year.

    Meeting and exceeding the growth we saw in the last decade, and unlocking £35 billion of savings by the end of this decade.

    We will digitise operating theatres, opening up an extra 200,000 operating slots a year.

    We will set up a new NHS staff app, making it easier to roster electronically and ending the use of expensive off-framework agencies.

    We will update IT systems, giving our doctors and nurses millions of hours back to spend with patients; rather than on hospital computer screens or computers on trolleys.

    We will support every hospital to use electronic patient records, making the NHS the world’s largest digitally integrated healthcare system.

    And we will improve the NHS app so patients can use it to confirm and modify all appointments.

    This will increase choice, reduce the number of missed appointments by half a million every year, and make the NHS app the front door for prevention as well as for cure – somewhere patients can book vaccinations and access all their preventative tests in one place.

    This productivity plan will make life simpler for staff and cut waiting lists for patients.

    And it is our responsibility – and I would go as far to say, it is our duty – to prepare the NHS for the future.

    This is why we want to seize the opportunities of AI for the benefit of our health.

    It has already revolutionised stroke care across the NHS – halving the time it takes to treat people and tripling the number who recover to reach functional independence.

    Now, we will use AI to potentially cut in half the form filling by doctors and nurses. And upgrade over one hundred MRI scanners across England, so that more than 130,000 patients a year can receive their results faster.

    This will allow them to start treatment sooner, free up clinicians to spend more time with patients who need them most, and save taxpayers money.

    And so that’s what I mean when I say that technology can make our NHS faster, simpler, and fairer.

    As well as improving performance across primary, secondary and community care, technology can also strengthen social care – keeping people out of hospital and helping them live well at home.

    This is what the Accelerating Reform Fund is all about.

    It provides local authorities with £40 million of government funding to invest in the most innovative new technology to help look after older people.

    Whether that’s through introducing new digital tools to boost recruitment and retention, or increasing social prescribing, which can reduce costs and help people build connections with their communities.

    Our Long-Term Workforce Plan set out that NHS productivity growth of between 1.5 and 2 per cent was possible.

    And thanks to the productivity plan we announced yesterday, Amanda Pritchard has committed to delivering 2 per cent.

    It will be challenging, but if we work together, we can get this done.

    Today, I also want to send a clear message about accountability.

    Trusts, ICBs, regional boards, and NHS England are responsible for billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money.

    It’s not our money, it’s not government’s money.

    It is the money that all our nurses, porters, receptionists, as well as shop workers, waiting staff, and the self-employed have earned and then paid to government from their wages.

    It is therefore our duty to ensure that this money is spent as well as possible.

    Poor performance cannot be tolerated, and good performance must be rewarded.

    To achieve this, by the summer, NHS England will start reporting against new productivity metrics, not only at the national level, but also across integrated care boards and trusts.

    And I want us to go further – because I’ve listened to you – by introducing new incentives to reward providers that hit productivity targets.

    So, I want to see providers retain the surpluses they generate through productivity improvement, and reinvest them in frontline services to support the clinicians who made these savings possible.

    Now of course, accountability extends beyond productivity to all of the work that the NHS does.

    I have been very honest about my own experiences of the NHS.

    I have received great care, but I have also seen some of the darker corners of our health system.

    And technology and the data it will produce, can be used by the public, as well as professionals to shine a light on poor performance.

    Care will not just be scrutinised by committees of MPs in dusty, ancient committee rooms in the Palace of Westminster, it will also be scrutinised by the public on their phones.

    This is what digital natives expect in every other area of their lives, and healthcare should not lag behind.

    Now we’re already making progress.

    People can find out how their local trust is performing with a few taps on a screen.

    Quite rightly, the pubic expect to receive the best care, and that care should not be prescribed by where they happen to live.

    And I say this of course as a proud Lincolnshire MP, which is a very different healthcare proposition from central London or central Birmingham.

    Postcodes can still determine the speed and quality of care.

    This is seen starkly in waiting lists.

    The long hangover of the pandemic must be tackled and waiting lists must be cut.

    Yet half of the NHS’s longest waits are concentrated in just 15 trusts.

    And in those trusts, the longest waits are centred on particular specialities, such as gynaecology or orthopaedics.

    Now, we are giving patients who have waited longest the choice to transfer to another provider.

    But that cannot be the only solution.

    And so, my ministers and I are working with NHS England to support those trusts to improve, but also to hold them to account.

    In urgent and emergency care, it’s a similar story.

    In January, just 15 trusts made up over half of the hours lost to ambulance handover delays, and just 13 trusts met the interim target to deal with 76 per cent of urgent and emergency patients within four hours.

    This can – and must – change.

    We have a range of tools to help trusts. From support from NHSE, to lending resources and people as well as peer support.

    Because we all recognise that is often the best way to drive up standards.

    And there should be rewards for success.

    That’s why NHS England will once again offer additional capital funding to Trusts who exceed their emergency targets.

    And if I may, I have been concerned when I hear of a few, only a few, ICB leaders who apparently do not consider it part of their job to speak to local Members of Parliament, people who represent local communities, or to explain their funding decisions.

    As someone who is – I promise you – very accountable to the public, we have to recognise that as public services are funded by the public, for the public, that attitude is not acceptable and must change.

    Now, as part of my focus on spending taxpayers’ money well, I am bringing commercial expertise into the Department of Health and Social Care to help drive results for us as a department.

    Steve Rowe, the former CEO of Marks and Spencer, has led a lot of work within the department to streamline our processes.

    And today, I’m delighted to announce that Steve is joining the department as one of our Non-Executive Directors, with a remit to accelerate delivery, and ensure the productivity plan, which is fully funded, improves care throughout England.

    Conclusion

    Now, I started my speech with young people – and the pressures they face – but also the need to meet the future with confidence.

    We can do this.

    We are standing on the cusp of a medical revolution, here technology, personalised therapies, and better data can transform outcomes for a generation who are more health conscious than any that came before them.

    The NHS, and indeed we, must seize this opportunity and look to the future – not restrict ourselves to what has always been done.

    In fact, it needs to have, to borrow a phrase, an M&S moment.

    This much-loved British brand, a stalwart of our high street for decades, realised change was needed, and embraced modernity.

    Pivoting towards the next generation, winning them over, and securing its long-term future.

    This is what the NHS needs to do to make sure it’s there for the next 75 years, just as it has been there for us.

    And as I’ve seen on visits to hospitals, GPs, dentists, and pharmacies up and down the country, the people working in the NHS have the drive, the dedication, and the determination to build a brighter future, and therefore support a stronger economy for the next generation.

    In conclusion, this is because this isn’t just any health service, it’s our National Health Service.

    Thank you all very much.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2024 Speech at Chatham House

    Kemi Badenoch – 2024 Speech at Chatham House

    The speech made by Kemi Badenoch, the Business and Trade Secretary, at Chatham House on 7 March 2024.

    To understand the role of the UK in the global trade landscape we must describe what that landscape looks like right now.

    Everyone in this room is old enough, at least I think everyone in this room is old enough, to have seen for themselves the transformational power of trade.

    You don’t have to go as far as back as Adam Smith and David Ricardo to understand the arguments.

    Look to Eastern Europe and what’s happened since the fall of the Berlin Wall or to countries in the Indo-Pacific like Malaysia or even China.

    As free trade has grown, it is no coincidence that more than a billion people have been lifted out of extreme poverty over the same period.

    But I’m not here to give you a cliché-ridden lecture on how great trade is. The case for it is overwhelming yet despite that it has become a tough sell for politicians. I’m here to respond to the criticisms that the UK no longer has a place in the world, and that free trade has been part of the problem rather than the solution.

    I’m here to give you reasons for optimism and reasons to be proud about our role on the world stage.

    Across the West and beyond, low growth has become a profound and stubborn problem. In many countries, wages have failed to keep pace with rising prices, with lower and middle income families being hardest hit.

    Many, as you know, blame free trade. They say we have allowed other countries to steal our lunch, that the momentum is now [with] the BRICS nations.

    In trade negotiations I often encounter a belief that trade is a zero-sum game, that if we gain from someone we must lose something in exchange.

    Proving that trade within a free market provides mutual benefit is hard when your counter-party believes that the objective is to try and take something from you.

    I spent all of last week in Abu-Dhabi at the World Trade Organization’s 13th Ministerial Conference.  This is where the rules-based trading system and democracy come together to have a big row.

    I am still baffled at how 164 countries make any decisions at all, given the need for unanimity. I saw a lot of arguments, I also saw some tears.

    While the disagreements in Abu Dhabi were not between countries which were pro Israel or pro Palestine, not even really between developed and developing nations.

    The principal disagreements were often within the BRICS nations, between those who support free trade and those who don’t.

    So it’s a choice between the agenda which the head of the WTO, Dr Okonjo-Iweala Ngozi, is promoting – a forward-looking agenda that is about services, green, digital and inclusive trade and an alternative protectionist agenda ending up as a race to the bottom.

    The rules-based system which you often hear about is under threat. One country can stop 163 others from coming to a decision.

    The role of the UK here is not just to prevent the WTO from being held back by a small minority but to ensure that it can live up to its founding principles, using free trade as a means to raise living standards, create jobs, and improve people’s lives – something which we have championed right from the very beginning.

    When I became the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, I told my team that our mission was to be the Department for Economic Growth.

    And I set five priorities to establish how we would deliver on that promise with an outward looking, international agenda.

    To remove market access barriers for UK businesses was the first. Second, to grow British exports. Third, to become the No 1 destination for investment in Europe. Fourth, to sign high quality trade deals. And, finally, and most importantly, to defend free and fair trade.

    These priorities exist in a world where protectionism peaked just as we embarked on our own independent trade policy.

    We took our own seat at the WTO just as many had lost faith in the institution and lost faith in the value of free trade.

    We were repeatedly told that without the clout of the EU bloc we would not open up trade with the markets of the future.

    And three myths have arisen which are regularly repeated on growth, exports and investment.

    The first is that Brexit has hampered our growth, relative to comparable economies.

    That is not the case. The IMF predicts that between 2024 to 2028 the UK will outgrow the G7 economies of France, Germany, Italy, and Japan.

    And our economy is expected to be 17 per cent larger than France’s by 2035.

    The second is that exports have declined.

    That is also not the case. The value of our exports in 2016 – the year of the referendum – was £576 billion.

    In 2020, the year we left the EU, it was just under £624 billion- that’s including the impact of COVID.

    And today our exports are worth over £850 billion […] despite the challenges we’re experiencing following COVID and Putin’s war in Ukraine.

    The third claim was that after Brexit investment would dry up.

    However, last year, our car sector alone attracted £23.7 billion in investment commitments – more than the past 7 years combined. The UK’s car production is now growing at its fastest rate since 2010.

    And the latest figures show that we are the number one destination in Europe for foreign direct investment.

    So, we have succeeded, not in spite of embracing free trade, but because of it.

    In just a few years, we’ve negotiated more free trade agreements than any other independent country in the world.

    In the coming weeks, we will pass our bill [on] the CPTPP – the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership […]. This will make over 99% of UK goods eligible for zero tariffs in Asia-Pacific member countries – a region that will drive global Britain over the next few decades.

    Of course, it’s easy to produce statistics showing that exports and investments are up.

    It’s a lot harder to demonstrate how we are defending the system that we helped create.

    I tell my department we should start by not being ‘knowingly naïve’.

    By that I mean not blindly believing that just because rules are written, they will be followed or that culture and politics are not relevant and it’s only the regulations that count.

    It’s about realism. Realism, realism, realism.

    Which brings me to the criticisms that the government typically faces on trade.

    When the US brought in the Inflation Reduction Act, there were many calls for the UK to do the same – lots of articles written about how leaving the EU meant we were already in decline.

    My response was that copying and pasting policy from other countries is not a strategy.

    It is not possible for every economy to subsidise its way to growth. Some will go bankrupt doing that. That will not be us.

    At a time when other countries are engaging in subsidy wars, we need to be smart and work with those allies who understand what is at risk.  We have to be pragmatic.

    Yes, that means offering targeted support to tackle specific issues facing our economy and yes we want a level playing field for our entrepreneurs so that they can compete globally, but it doesn’t mean hosing industries down with subsidies or slapping tariffs on products from abroad.

    Trade wars inevitably fan the flames of global tensions – the very last thing we need right now.

    This wouldn’t be a Kemi Badenoch speech without a reference to my favourite economist, Thomas Sowell, who pointed out that trade wars are economically counter-productive.

    He argues, for example, that the Smoot-Hawley tariffs played just as great a role in prolonging the Great Depression as the Wall Street crash itself. I agree.

    We would be wise to heed his advice because history shows that countries who engage in protectionism and in ‘beggar thy neighbour’ trade policies are always weaker and poorer as a result.

    So, we lead by example. We work with allies. We are not alone. Countries like New Zealand, Japan, Switzerland and Singapore and many others are with us.

    So in my department, I have to grapple with maintaining a competitive UK steel industry that can stand on its own two feet against a global oversupply of steel, as China floods the market, while also ensuring vital safeguards for the domestic sector. Not an easy trade off.

    I have to manage the lowering of tariffs to bring down costs while not undercutting our own producers when other countries are subsidising theirs. Not easy – there is a trade off.

    I have to strike the right balance between embracing the import of goods from developing countries to help them grow with the need to maintain the high standards on quality and safety which the British people rightly expect.

    We make choices.

    Our free trade agreements are helping us make the right choices because they are all about diversification and resilience.

    That is what the Indo-Pacific tilt is about, but we need to make sure that the facts are out there. It still baffles me how desperate people are to blame everything on leaving the EU. Because criticisms arrive often because it is the first time many are watching the ins and outs of an independent trade policy, played out live.

    These events took place in a black box when we were in the EU. We didn’t have the real-time updates of what was happening with trade negotiations as we do now. It is new. And for those of us who are optimists, exciting. For those of us who are pessimists, scary, and want to make it all go away.

    The problems that they see now, we had when we were in the EU, like harmonizing standards and regulations across different trade agreements, or engaging with countries that have exceptionally different and diverse models of trade, or striking deals with countries that don’t have our values of democracy, the rule of law, and a market economy.

    But when we encounter these same standard negotiating issues, it’s put down to the UK being isolated or being in decline.  This is not a serious analysis of trade for the 21st century.  It is not serious commentary. Let’s have more realism.

    The reality is that the geopolitical climate, and the global conditions for economic security, are more precarious now than at any other time since the Cold War.

    In the Middle East, conflict is raging. In the Red Sea, the free flow of trade is under attack, which is why together with our allies we have taken coordinated military action to protect it.

    Covid and Putin’s war against Ukraine have permanently reconfigured supply chains.

    The challenges in trade we face are different from just a few decades ago. We live in a vastly more interconnected global economy with complex supply chains, cheaper international travel, and the free flow of information.

    That interdependence means there can be no retreat into splendid isolation.

    We must continue to pursue free trade and avoid the tariffs and taxes which stifle growth and push up inflation.

    That open, outward-looking, approach is compatible with protecting our long-term economic security.

    We need investors to feel confident in the UK, confident not only that their assets will grow over time but that fraud or illicit finance will never be tolerated.

    Through our Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act we will make the UK one of the safest places in the world to do business.

    Our National Security and Investment Act is preventing the hostile acquisition of assets.

    This matters because our power plants, our 5G networks and our critical national infrastructure should never be in the hands of those who would do us harm.

    And we are taking similar precautions with regards to exports leaving the UK, updating our Strategic Export Licensing Criteria and significantly enhancing our Military End Use Control.

    Our key aim in all of this work is to prevent hostile countries from ever acquiring British weapons or advanced British technology.

    And to those who would do harm to us or to our allies, we say that we will not allow you to use your economic might to meddle with another state’s affairs.

    The vision of Global Britain remains.  Once mocked as a nation of shopkeepers, we know the value of trade and are staying true to our heritage as a global trading nation that once ruled the waves.

    We received a great inheritance from previous generations; it is important that we create an even greater one to hand down to the next.

    So, the next time you’re asked what role the UK is playing, you can say that from sanctions to supply chain resilience, we are a global leader in economic security, and we are defending free and fair trade underpinned by a rules-based system.

    As you saw in the budget yesterday, we are doing all of this with economic growth at the forefront of our minds.

    And I will conclude by saying we have a Prime Minister who is clear-eyed about the opportunities and the challenges that lie ahead.

    Where investor confidence in many countries has been shaken, he has sent a loud and clear message that Britain is open for business.

    Where there is instability abroad, he has helped to intervene, to bring economic stability at home. He has a plan.

    And where countries are embracing protectionism, we are opening up our markets and lowering the barriers to free, open trade – reducing costs and widening choice for the British consumer, ensuring that our economy is strong, resilient and protected from states that threaten us, threaten our allies, and threaten our international security interests.

    That is the role the UK is playing on the global stage.

  • PRESS RELEASE : International Women’s Day 2024 – UK Statement to the OSCE [March 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : International Women’s Day 2024 – UK Statement to the OSCE [March 2024]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 7 March 2024.

    In response to the address by the Special Representative of the OSCE Chair-in-Office on Gender, Ambassador Holland outlines the UK’s commitment to improving the outlook for women and girls globally.

    Thank you, Madam Chair. I would like to welcome Special Representative Palihovici back to the Permanent Council, and to thank you for your insightful opening remarks.

    Madam Chair, as we approach International Women’s Day in 2024, global progress towards gender equality remains contested. Over 800 women or girls die every day due to pregnancy or childbirth complications. One in three women will suffer physical or sexual violence in their lifetimes. Violence against women continues to grow online. And in the OSCE region today, horrific evidence continues to emerge of conflict-related sexual violence perpetrated through Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine.

    The theme of International Women’s Day in 2024 is “Invest in Women: Accelerate Progress”. This focuses on the challenges caused by the alarming lack of global financing for gender equality measures. The COVID pandemic, conflicts, climate disasters and economic turmoil have pushed an extra 75 million people into severe poverty since 2020, with a disproportionate impact on women and girls. If current trends continue, more than 342 million women and girls could be living in extreme poverty by 2030.

    These challenges can only be addressed through solutions that empower women. Ensuring women’s and girls’ rights across all aspects of life is the only way to secure prosperous and just economies, and a healthy planet for future generations.

    The UK is committed to improving the outlook for women and girls globally. Exactly one year ago our (then-) Foreign Secretary launched the UK’s International Women and Girls Strategy, which sets out how the UK is putting women and girls at the heart of everything we do – domestically and internationally.

    Since 2015 the UK has supported the education of over 10 million of the world’s most vulnerable girls. We have helped over 25 million women worldwide to access family planning advice. Through our flagship £38 million global programme, we have supported the work of over 600 women’s rights organisations. We are also helping to drive the global conversation, for example, through a series of Wilton Park conferences which place women’s rights organisations at the centre of the debate.

    We know that urgent action is needed to accelerate progress to end gender-based violence. In November of last year, we announced a new package of support for women’s rights organisations to drive forward locally-led and survivor-centred approaches to tackling violence against women and girls, including in conflict and crisis settings. Since the launch of the Preventing Sexual Violence in Conflict Initiative in 2012, we have committed over £60 million to tackling conflict-related sexual violence globally.

    Empowering women and girls, and preventing violence against them, will remain a UK priority. We are committed to ensuring every girl receives at least 12 years of quality education, and to ending the preventable deaths of mothers, new-born babies and children by 2030.

    Madam Chair, we can only build a fairer, freer, safer, wealthier and greener world if we put women and girls at the heart of the OSCE’s work. Women’s inclusion in leadership and meaningful decision making is essential for local, national and regional progress.

    It is vital that we, as OSCE participating States, fulfil our commitments to gender equality – as set out in the 1999 Charter for European Security, and related decisions – and ensure adequate funding for OSCE executive structures working to implement the organisation’s gender equality commitments.

    As the UK has stated previously, the principles we mark on International Women’s Day are not just for a day. Advancing gender equality is a policy from which everyone benefits, bringing freedom and peace, boosting prosperity and trade, building resilience and strengthening global and regional security. It is vital that we follow through on our commitments to ensure the equal rights of all women and girls.

    Thank you, Madam Chair.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Lord Parkinson at Heritage Day hosted by The Heritage Alliance [March 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Lord Parkinson at Heritage Day hosted by The Heritage Alliance [March 2024]

    The press release issued by the Department of Culture, Media and Sport on 7 March 2024.

    Lord Parkinson has delivered a speech to members of the heritage sector at the annual Heritage Day hosted by The Heritage Alliance.

    Thank you for having me along to Heritage Day again – it’s a great pleasure to be back with you.

    Lizzie, Ingrid, and the whole team at the Heritage Alliance do us all a great service by bringing people together to share ideas and insights, champion our heritage heroes, and speak with a collective voice about what the sector needs to keep flourishing – reflecting the power of collaboration, as you have put it so well for your theme for this year.

    It’s a power you are harnessing for the sake of the millions of people who benefit from our heritage today, and for the sake of future generations.

    Heritage Day is a great opportunity to look back on the progress we’ve been able to make together over the past year, and to talk about some of the things we want to see next – perhaps all the more important in an election year.

    The past twelve months have provided some sad but powerful reminders of how much heritage means to us all – through the senseless loss (I would use a stronger term, but I’m mindful that criminal investigations are ongoing …) of the Crooked House pub
    in August, and the beloved tree in the Sycamore Gap of Hadrian’s Wall the following month.

    Both of these cases sparked immediate and visceral reactions, not just from people who lived nearby, but from around the world  I think i’m right in saying the videos the National Trust put out about it were their most viewed ever. – a potent sign of the importance of our built and natural heritage.

    Heart-wrenching though both these cases were, they offered an important reminder of how much that shared heritage means to us all – and why it’s worth fighting for.

    When I stood before you last year at the Charterhouse, I set out some of the things I was keen to work on with you – so it’s gratifying to look back and see how much we’ve been able to do together.

    When we met last, the Levelling Up & Regeneration Bill had just arrived in the Lords – it’s now an Act of Parliament, putting protection for more of our heritage assets, including Scheduled Monuments and World Heritage Sites, on a statutory footing – and benefiting from some valuable improvements thanks to lobbying and engagement by people in this room.

    A quarter of a century since it arrived on the statute book, we’ve also updated the Treasure Act – widening the definition so that more of the extraordinary artefacts being discovered can be saved and shared with the public.

    And we announced the ratification of the 2003 UNESCO Convention on the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage – after twenty years of campaigning by many here today.

    We’ve also published guidance for custodians of contested heritage assets – a tricky issue, but one which benefited from the careful deliberations of our Heritage Advisory Board, and which I’m pleased to say was received with similar thoughtfulness.

    I’ve had the great  honour of opening the National Trust’s Heritage and Rural Skills Centre in Oxfordshire, and English Heritage’s ‘reawakened’ Belsay Hall in Northumberland.

    I also had the pleasure of joining a meeting of the National Amenity Societies, and helping to launch the Heritage and Carbon report alongside Historic England, the National Trust, Grosvenor, Peabody, and the Crown Estate – a powerful example of collaboration there!

    We’ve done all that while designating over 170 listed buildings and Scheduled Monuments, helping the National Portrait Gallery to save Sir Joshua Reynolds’s Portrait of Mai for the nation, thanks to the largest ever donation from the National Heritage Memorial Fund, and support from across the sector, reuniting the three Thornborough Henges in the National Heritage Collection and publishing the Tentative List for new World Heritage Sites.

    This time last year, I announced my intention to expand the official Blue Plaques scheme across the country. Today, I’m proud to stand here and say we’ve done it.

    In September, we changed the law to enable the scheme which has been so brilliantly run i by English Heritage for many years to be expanded across the country.

    Thanks to some great work by Historic England (and responding to the demands of an impatient Minister!), we had the great pleasure two weeks ago of unveiling the first national Blue Plaque in Ilkley, to Daphne Steele, the first black matron in our National Health Service. Joining her son Robert in West Yorkshire to celebrate her life and legacy was one of the true highlights of my time in Government.

    We’ve already announced the next two plaques – honouring Clarice Cliff, one of the most influential ceramists of the 20th century, and George Harrison, the music icon and humanitarian. I’m looking forward to those being unveiled – and to seeing which other figures from all over the country will join them in the future once public nominations open in the summer.

    The new, national scheme will help us to tell the stories of a wider range of people – showing how people from towns, villages, and cities across this country went on to change the world, and I hope inspiring new generations to know that they can do the same.

    So thank you to everyone who worked together to make that happen so quickly.

    Last month, I was also delighted to join Historic England to mark the protection – through Grade II designation – of a number of historic gas lamps in Covent Garden.

    London’s gas lamps have been an integral part of the city’s identity for more than two centuries. From the novels of Charles Dickens and John Buchan to the adventures of Sherlock Holmes, Mary Poppins and The Muppet Christmas Carol, they’ve provided an evocative backdrop to many of our capital’s most cherished events and imaginings.

    When they were threatened, the London Gasketeers sprang into being to protect them. Thanks to their dedication, and the expert advice of Historic England, Westminster City Council has committed to preserve any gas lamps which are given listed status – a number which I’m delighted to say has already risen by a dozen, with many more under consideration.

    This will ensure that their inimitable glow can continue to brighten the lives of Londoners — and the millions of visitors the city welcomes — for generations to come.

    As we look to the future of the listing process, we should be asking ourselves whether we are missing important parts of our heritage, such as late Victorian and Edwardian buildings; whether there are ways to ensure that listings cover every part of the country, and can better recognise craftsmanship and quality in the buildings we consider. I am interested in the role that the Principles of Selection for Listed Buildings – last updated six years ago – has to play in this.

    Harnessing the power of collaboration, I will work closely with Historic England and others – such as the amenity societies and the Historic Environment Forum – to look at this alongside other possible interventions.

    Last week, I had the pleasure of chairing the latest meeting of the Heritage Council – a brilliant way of facilitating collaboration across Government, as well as between us and the sector. We talked about the preparations for next year’s Railway 200 celebrations – the bicentenary of the first passenger rail journey – as well discussing some of the challenges and opportunities facing heritage rail, following up on many of the points which were raised when I attended the Heritage Railway Association’s annual conference in Newcastle, that cradle of the railways, in November.

    We also talked about a topic raised at last year’s Heritage Day – underwater and marine heritage.

    I was pleased to be joined by Ministerial colleagues from the Ministry of Defence, the Department for Transport, DEFRA, and the Foreign Office as well as colleagues from the sector to explore these two areas of mobile heritage.

    I am following our discussions up by looking at the Memorandum of Understanding we’ve had for the past ten years between my Department and the MoD – and, in the longer term, continuing to pursue the ratification of the 2001 UNESCO Convention on Underwater Archaeology, which I see is included in your refreshed Heritage Manifesto.

    But one UNESCO Convention I’m delighted to say we are ratifying very soon – I go to Paris next month to deposit the signed papers – is the 2003 Convention on Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage.

    The French have a better name for this: they call it ‘le patrimoine vivant’ – ‘living heritage’. I think that captures well the traditions and practices we pass on from generation to generation; things which have shaped us, and which we shape in turn.

    Of course, our tangible and intangible heritage are not separate – they are linked through the spaces, stories, products, and indeed the vital crafts and skills that maintain our built heritage.

    We will launch a call for applications for an inventory of intangible cultural heritage in the UK this summer, which I want to ensure represents the full range of our living heritage.

    Thank you to the many people here who have been engaging with the team at DCMS as we consult on implementing the Convention. We have had a fantastic response, so please stay involved and help us to keep shaping it.

    Yesterday, of course, was Budget Day, which saw some great news for our sector.

    Through the third round of the Levelling Up Fund we are investing in our great cultural heritage across the country, including £15 million for the National Railway Museum in York and County Durham, and £10 million to the International Slavery Museum in Liverpool’s Grade I-listed Royal Albert Dock.

    We also pledged £10 million to safeguard the extraordinary Temple Works building in Leeds – a Grade I-listed flaxmill with Egyptian Revival architecture and a frankly bonkers roof which used to be covered in grass and had a herd of sheep to help mow it. This investment (alongside the £1 million already provided by Historic England) will help to bring the site into public ownership and explore its potential to become the new northern home of the British Library.

    We also provided more than £26 million for the Grade II* listed National Theatre – just a stone’s throw from here, and one of the finest examples of Brutalist architecture in the country.

    The Chancellor announced £1 million for a war memorial honouring Muslim soldiers who fought for our Armed Forces in both world wars and £10 million for culture and heritage projects in the West Midlands and £6 million for community regeneration projects across the country with the King’s Foundation.

    There was also support for the creative industries which heritage is such an important part of. I was downstairs in the crypt trying on the virtual reality headsets seeing how we transform our business services at heritage sites. Of course these places and heritage are an inspiration for many of our creative stories.

    And I’m delighted to say that Gift Aid legislation will be amended to ensure that charities can still claim Gift Aid while complying with new protections for consumers under the Digital Markets, Competition, and Consumers Bill – something I know that has been a concern for many organisations here today, and which our colleague Lord Mendoza has been taking up in the debates on that Bill.

    But of course, there are always more areas which need our support. I couldn’t stand in this glorious, Grade II*-listed church – built with a grant from Parliament – without, first, thanking Canon Giles for hosting us, but also recognising that much of our ecclesiastical heritage is at risk, imperilling not just the buildings but also the communities and congregations they serve.

    Since 2010, the Government has returned £346 million to churches, synagogues, mosques and temples through the Listed Places of Worship Grant Scheme.

    Thousands of buildings have benefited – including, I’m glad to say, this one, which has received £1 million since 2015 for several works, including the installation of a new lift and the creation of a narthex café and welcome area.

    But still many more could benefit from this scheme. That’s why, just before Christmas, I wrote to all MPs to highlight its positive impact in their constituencies, and to encourage more places of worship to take advantage of it.

    But, as someone in a meeting I had recently put it, this scheme is about getting the tax back on works churches and others do; what they also need is help to fund that work in the first place. I recognise that, and am pleased to be working with the Church of England, the Churches Conservation Trust, the National Churches Trust, the National Lottery Heritage Fund, Historic England, and others to see how we can provide that broader support for these cherished buildings and all the good things that they do.

    Our work continues, but is stronger for being done together.

    Another part of our heritage which is much cherished, but which also needs support, is our seaside heritage – something I’ve seen on my visits to coastal communities including Brighton, Eastbourne, Margate, Scarborough, Torquay, and my native North Tyneside.

    Some of you have heard me extol the virtues of the Spanish City in Whitley Bay before – the Grade II-listed, neo-Baroque pleasure garden facing out across the North Sea in my hometown.

    It is far from alone. Around our coastline, winter gardens, esplanades, harbours and piers remain at risk, whether from neglect, from salty water, or from the long overdue need to adapt to changing times.

    That’s why I’m delighted to announce that we will soon be launching a dedicated fund to support enhancements to our seaside heritage, drawing on the successes of recent programmes like the High Streets Heritage Action Zones, to help protect and rejuvenate coastal assets which are in need of love and attention. As always, we’re keen to do that in collaboration with the brilliant people and organisations in the sector – so please watch out for more details, and help us make a difference to coastal communities across the country.

    So, a busy year gone, and a busy year ahead – but none of the things I’ve mentioned would be possible without the support and hard work of the people and organisations represented here today.

    Thank you for a year of powerful collaboration in support of our nation’s heritage – and here’s to many more!