Tag: 2014

  • John Robertson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    John Robertson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by John Robertson on 2014-06-09.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate she has made of the average waiting time for people (a) applying for a passport renewal and (b) waiting for a call back from the Passport Office.

    James Brokenshire

    The information requested is as follows:

    (a) Expected service standards for passport renewals are published at
    https://www.gov.uk.
    (b) The current guideline for returning calls to customers is to do so within
    48 hours. Her Majesty’s Passport Office gives priority to those with the
    most immediate travel plans.

  • Lord Jopling – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Leader of the House of Lords

    Lord Jopling – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Leader of the House of Lords

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Lord Jopling on 2014-03-11.

    To ask the Leader of the House what steps he has taken to ensure that Ministers make sure, before signing replies to Questions for Written Answer, that the replies answer the questions which have been put.

    Lord Hill of Oareford

    It is the responsibility of individual ministers to decide what answers they give to Questions for Written Answer (QWAs), and they are of course accountable to the House for those answers. The importance of this direct accountability is such that I recently decided, following the introduction of a new system for answering QWAs electronically, to require Ministers in this House to continue providing personally signed answers to noble Lords. The Ministerial Code states that “It is of paramount importance that Ministers give accurate and truthful information to Parliament”.

  • Hilary Benn – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    Hilary Benn – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Hilary Benn on 2014-06-09.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what plans he has to carry out a post-implementation review of the local government standards framework in the Localism Act 2011.

    Brandon Lewis

    [Holding Reply: Thursday 12 June 2014]

    As stated in the impact assessment on the abolition of the Standards Board regime (published in January 2011), a post implementation review will be carried out three to five years after implementation of the policy which was in July 2012.

    My Department routinely receives representations about standards arrangements in local government, and indeed, on a whole range of local government issues. We will have regard to representations and comments when we undertake our post implementation review.

    However, Ministers are clear that the new provisions are a significant improvement on the old, discredited regime. The Localism Act has clarified predetermination rules allowing elected councillors to campaign and speak up on local issues. We have reversed the petty culture of malicious and unfounded complaints that wasted time and energy and undermined the good reputation of local government. We have increased transparency on councillors’ interests, and put in place criminal sanctions for the very rare instances of corruption. This is complemented by the role of political parties in ensuring good conduct, the law of libel, and the ultimate sanction: the ballot box.

  • Mr Frank Field – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Mr Frank Field – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Mr Frank Field on 2014-03-10.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many (a) men and (b) women who are victims of human trafficking are nationals of non-EEA countries have received return and reintegration assistance through the Assisted Voluntary Returns for Irregular Migrants programme since April 2011; and how much was so made available to those trafficked from (i) inside and (ii) outside the EU.

    Karen Bradley

    16 victims of trafficking (1 male, 15 female) have received financial
    assistance under the programme since April 2011.

    While the Assisted Voluntary Return for Irregular Migrants (AVRIM) programme
    does not normally include financial assistance, a discretionary sum of up to
    £1000 is provided for specified vulnerable cases, and this includes victims of
    trafficking. Assisted Voluntary Return is only available to non-EEA nationals
    and the support is not dependent upon whether the individual has arrived from
    inside or outside the EU.

    The figures provided are sourced from a Home Office management information
    system which is not quality assured under National Statistics protocols and is
    subject to change due to internal data quality checking. Figures provided from
    this source do not constitute part of National Statistics and should be treated
    as provisional.

  • Ivan Lewis – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Ivan Lewis – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Ivan Lewis on 2014-06-09.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, which charitable projects based in Northern Ireland have benefited from the armed forces covenant (Libor) fund.

    Anna Soubry

    The importance of the covenant to the Government was highlighted by the decision of the Chancellor to transfer £35 million from fines levied on the banks for attempting to manipulate LIBOR to the Ministry of Defence for use in supporting the Armed Forces community. The fund has now closed and money has been allocated to some 97 projects.

    The Northern Irish Armed Forces community will benefit from a number of UK-wide projects which have been allocated over £16 million of LIBOR funding. In addition, we have provided £50,000 of funding to the UDR & Royal Irish Aftercare Service to set up a welfare support network and advisory service for veterans and their dependants in Northern Ireland.

  • Philip Davies – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Philip Davies – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Philip Davies on 2014-03-10.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many defendants charged with each offence type were sent to the Crown Court for sentence by magistrates in each of the last five years.

    Shailesh Vara

    The answers to both questions are contained in the following tables:

  • Stephen Timms – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    Stephen Timms – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Stephen Timms on 2014-06-09.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate he has made of the proportion of claimants of (a) jobseeker’s allowance and (b) employment and support allowance on Help to Work who will enter employment within (i) six months and (ii) 12 months.

    Esther McVey

    The information requested is not available.

  • Chris Ruane – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Speaker’s Committee on the Electorial Commission

    Chris Ruane – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Speaker’s Committee on the Electorial Commission

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Chris Ruane on 2014-03-10.

    To ask the hon. Member for South West Devon, representing the Speaker’s Committee on the Electoral Commission, which local authority (a) augmented and (b) did not augment Department for Work and Pensions data matching with the electoral register with local authority data matching.

    Gary Streeter

    The Electoral Commission informs me that 137 local authorities provided data to them on their local data matching activities following the trial of matching with the DWP in 2013. The table below lists these local authorities. Those that did not provide data may still have carried out local data matching work.

    Reported on local data matching activities

    Amber Valley

    Argyll & Bute

    Ashfield

    Aylesbury Vale

    Barking & Dagenham

    Bassetlaw

    Bath & North East Somerset

    Bexley

    Blaby

    Bolsover

    Bournemouth

    Bracknell Forest

    Brighton & Hove

    Bromley

    Bromsgrove

    Broxbourne

    Broxtowe

    Burnley

    Calderdale

    Canterbury

    Carlisle

    Central Bedfordshire

    Ceredigion

    Cheltenham

    Christchurch

    Conwy

    Coventry

    Dartford

    Daventry

    Denbighshire

    Derbyshire Dales

    Dudley

    Dumfries & Galloway

    Durham

    East Dorset

    East Dunbartonshire

    East Lindsey

    East Lothian

    East Northamptonshire

    East Renfrewshire

    Eastleigh

    Eden

    Edinburgh, City of

    Elmbridge

    Flintshire

    Forest of Dean

    Gosport

    Gravesham

    Guildford

    Gwynedd

    Halton

    Hambleton

    Hammersmith & Fulham

    Harborough

    Harrogate

    Hastings

    Havant

    Herefordshire

    High Peak

    Hillingdon

    Hyndburn

    Inverclyde

    Ipswich

    Kensington and Chelsea

    Kettering

    Kingston upon Thames

    Lewisham

    Lincoln

    Luton

    Mansfield

    Medway

    Melton

    Midlothian

    Milton Keynes

    Mole Valley

    Neath Port Talbot

    New Forest

    Newport

    North Dorset

    North Kesteven

    North Lincolnshire

    North Somerset

    North Tyneside

    North Warwickshire

    North West Leicestershire

    Nottingham

    Orkney Islands

    Oxford

    Pendle

    Poole

    Purbeck

    Redcar & Cleveland

    Redditch

    Renfrewshire

    Richmond upon Thames

    Richmondshire

    Rossendale

    Rotherham

    Rushcliffe

    Rushmoor

    Sandwell

    Sedgemoor

    Sefton

    Sheffield

    Shepway

    Shropshire

    South Derbyshire

    South Gloucestershire

    South Kesteven

    South Ribble

    Southend-on-Sea

    St Edmundsbury

    St. Helens

    Staffordshire Moorlands

    Stockport

    Surrey Heath

    Swale

    Swindon

    Tamworth

    Tandridge

    Thanet

    Thurrock

    Tonbridge & Malling

    Walsall

    Warrington

    Watford

    Waverley

    West Berkshire

    West Dunbartonshire

    West Lindsey

    West Lothian

    Wigan

    Wiltshire

    Wolverhampton

    Wychavon

    Wyre

    York

  • Luciana Berger – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Luciana Berger – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Luciana Berger on 2014-06-09.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will revise the Government’s Responsibility Deal to include sugar in the list of ingredients that companies should work with caterers to reformulate in meals as part of the H4 pledge on Healthier Staff Restaurants.

    Jane Ellison

    There are 169 organisations currently signed up to the H4 pledge which includes a requirement for employers to work with caterers to reformulate recipes to ensure staff meals are lower in fat, salt and energy and do not contain artificial trans fats. There are currently no plans to include sugar in this list of ingredients. However, as part of the Public Health Responsibility Deal, 11 catering companies have signed up to take a range of actions to help people consume fewer calories, including through reformulation to reduce sugar content.

  • Ian Lucas – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Cabinet Office

    Ian Lucas – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Cabinet Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Ian Lucas on 2014-03-07.

    To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what change there has been in median gross pay for women in Wrexham constituency since 2010.

    Nick Hurd

    The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the Authority to reply.