Tag: 1998

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Strengthening International Financial Systems [October 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Strengthening International Financial Systems [October 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 30 October 1998.

    Significant reforms to strengthen the international financial system were announced today by Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown in the UK’s role as Presidency of the G7 leading industrial nations.

    The statement, agreed by all G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, reflects the shared determination of the UK and G7 to modernise the financial system and to put in place new rules and procedures that will promote stability and growth. It affirms that the G7 commit themselves to :

    create or sustain conditions for strong, domestic demand-led growth
    develop improved procedures for managing crises and preventing them from spreading, including an enhanced IMF financing mechanism supported by private and bilateral finance as appropriate
    develop and implement international principles and codes of best practice on: fiscal policy, financial and monetary policy, corporate governance and accounting; and to work to ensure that private sector institutions comply with new standards of disclosure
    improve global regulation through co-operation and co-ordination of the activities of key international institutions and national authorities in the management and development of policies to foster stability and reduce systemic risk in the international financial system and better exchanges of information support reforms to improve the effectiveness of the IMF, including transparency and accountability and changes in lending policies and terms of lending.

    The agreement follows intensive discussions between G7 countries. As G7 President, Gordon Brown has led this process of negotiation, following agreement at the IMF meetings in Washington earlier this month to develop quickly proposals for reform.

    G7 Finance Ministers and Governors will monitor progress and report to Heads of Government before the Cologne Summit on the impact of the measures they have taken today, and their proposals for further action.

    Key Points

    The agreement reflects the shared determination of the UK and G7 to modernise the financial system and to put in place new rules and procedures that will promote stability and growth. The key points are that the G7 :

    agree that the balance of risks in the world economy has shifted from high inflation to concerns about low growth, and commit themselves to create or sustain conditions for strong, domestic demand-led growth;
    agree to implement new arrangements for finance to deal with contagion, including an enhanced IMF financing mechanism supported by private sector involvement, and by bilateral finance as appropriate;
    commit to develop and implement international principles and codes of best practice on fiscal policy, financial and monetary policy, corporate governance and accounting; and to work to ensure that private sector institutions comply with new standards of disclosure;
    agree to encourage all countries to meet these standards, and call on the IMF to monitor and report on countries compliance;
    agree to establish a new process for surveillance of supervisory regimes, and to bring together the international institutions and national regulators to cooperate, coordinate, and exchange information;
    commit to develop better procedures for crisis management,including more orderly workouts of debt, effective insolvency and debtor-creditor regimes, lending into arrears by the IMF, and innovative financing techniques by the private sector;
    commit to a presumption in favour of openness at the IMF and World Bank and to establish a formal mechanism for evaluation of IMF policies and operations;
    undertake to do further work on strengthening prudential regulation, maintaining sustainable exchange rate regimes, developing new structures for coordinating official finance, and strengthening the Interim Committee and the Development Committee at the IMF and World Bank.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : VAT Relief for Charities´ Welfare Services to be Extended [October 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : VAT Relief for Charities´ Welfare Services to be Extended [October 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 29 October 1998.

    Charities will soon be able to get VAT relief for a wider range of welfare services, such as cooking and cleaning, announced Economic Secretary Patricia Hewitt today.

    Speaking at the Charities Aid Foundation conference in London, Ms Hewitt said:

    “A number of welfare services – including bathing, dressing and feeding – are provided on a not-for-profit basis to the elderly, sick, distressed or disabled people, and are eligible for VAT exemption. A recent VAT Tribunal decision extended the definition of welfare services to include daily living tasks such as cooking, cleaning and laundry.  In the light of this, Customs are reviewing existing policy with a view to extending exemption to these additional services.

    “This is a very welcome and sensible step forward, and we will be consulting charities on the exact circumstances in which such services will be exempt.”

    Ms Hewitt stressed the importance of the growing partnership between the Government and the voluntary sector:

    “The Government values highly the contribution that the voluntary sector makes to society, and the Compact between Government and this sector, due to be launched in November, will further cement the strong relationship we are building.

    Turning to the Review of Charities’ Taxation,  Ms Hewitt assured delegates that the Review was making good progress:

    “It is important that we give this initiative the time it needs. We received over 3000 responses from our request for ideas for the review, and we have been carefully evaluating them.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Building Blocks for Better Construction Contract Performance [October 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Building Blocks for Better Construction Contract Performance [October 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 29 October 1998.

    A three-year action plan to improve Government performance in procuring major construction projects is being developed, Paymaster General Geoffrey Robinson announced today.

    Mr Robinson was speaking at the launch of two reports highlighting areas for improvement in the procurement and performance of Government construction contracts. These were prepared by Professor Andrew Graves of the Bath University Agile Construction Initiative for HM Treasury and the Government Construction Client Panel (GCCP).

    Mr Robinson said :

    “These reports provide the building blocks for a step change in Government performance in dealing with the construction industry.

    “The public sector accounts for 40 per cent of construction industry contracts in the UK. As such a significant client, the Government is excellently placed to provide both a lead for other client sectors to improve their performance and the motivation for the industry itself to change. The industry tells us regularly that change will only occur when Government is seen to be improving itself. We are committed to doing exactly that.

    “We shall build on the findings of these two valuable reports in five ways, through :

    an action plan to implement the Client Improvement Study recommendations within three years developing better performance measurement and benchmarking, taking account of time, cost and quality criteria applied in the pilot study improved training and skill development for project sponsors, building on a successful scheme developed with the Civil Service College and Reading College of Estate Management six further guidance documents on key aspects of client performance, in addition to three already issued working with all Government Departments and the National Audit Office to develop a strategy to deliver and monitor improvements identified in the Client Improvement Study.

    “These reports are entirely complementary to the findings and recommendations of Sir John Egan’s Task Force and ensure that improving Government client performance will be implemented within the framework of Sir John’s work.

    “Our actions in response to the reports show our commitment to better client performance. As a construction industry client, the Government has the profile, critical mass and size of business to lead change. That is what we are determined to do.”

    The first of Professor Graves’ reports, “The Government Client Improvement Study”, compares Government client and supply side performance against UK and, for the first time, international best practice. It provides directions for Government client improvement in four areas : project management; measurement; standardisation; and integration.

    The report highlights a number of areas for improvement:

    empowerment of the project sponsor role
    flexible use of rules and regulations
    need for greater integration in the procurement process
    early involvement of all parties in the planning and design of projects; and
    use wherever possible of standard processes, components and integrated information technology systems.
    The action plan set out today will seek to implement the recommendations of the report in all these areas.

    The second report, the “Pilot Benchmarking Study”, examines some 60 projects completed in the last five years, with a combined value in excess of £500 million. It shows, for the first time on Government construction projects, that high level data can be used to demonstrate relationships between project characteristics and project success. This will enable Government to identify and focus on factors which will provide the best basis for the successful delivery of construction projects.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Geoffrey Robinson calls for joint venture to sell government services into wider markets [October 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Geoffrey Robinson calls for joint venture to sell government services into wider markets [October 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 26 October 1998.

    A workshop aimed at making better use of  government assets by developing joint projects between the public and private sector and selling them into a wider market is being opened today in London by Paymaster General Geoffrey Robinson.

    The new initiative allows the private sector to use its entrepreneurial skills in developing joint ventures as part of a move to ensure that the public sector is getting full value for  its many and varied assets.

    Speaking at the Treasury’s Wider Markets workshop, Geoffrey Robinson said:

    “Wider Markets is a marvellous opportunity and a challenge for us all.  This Government believes that both the public and private sectors have key roles to play in delivering public services and encouraging  investment.  We need public private partnerships to get the best out of the assets  – physical and intellectual – that we have.

    “This is one – but only one – of the contributions government itself can make to meet the productivity challenge the Chancellor has set us all.

    “This initiative is also about changing the culture in Whitehall.  It’s about giving departments incentives to operate efficiently rather than just telling them to do so. It’s about the Treasury giving guidance and support. A partnership in government as well as between government and the private sector.”

    Government has many assets which it believes could be used more intensively – not just to physical assets: land, property and equipment, but also to non-physical assets such as software, databases, know-how and other intellectual property.

    Wider markets policy allows Departments to retain the receipts from selling services they have developed from using spare capacity.  This can be achieved by developing commercial services based on public assets in partnership with the private sector.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Steering a course of stability in Britain [October 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Steering a course of stability in Britain [October 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 22 October 1998.

    Attached is an extract from the speech given by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown today to the European Investment Bank Forum.

    Just as we are working for stability internationally, so in this uncertain and unstable world where growth forecasts for the world and for national economics are being downgraded by national and international authorities alike, the government is steering a course of stability for Britain.

    It because we created a new monetary framework, by making the Bank of England independent, and tackled the inflation problem – that is at the root of the boom bust cycle of the past – that we are better placed to withstand the uncertainties of the global economy.

    Inflation has been brought down and is at its target of 2.5 per cent.  And the bank of England has now been able to reduce interest rates while setting policy to meet that target.

    And it is because we tackled the fiscal deficit -the 28 billion pounds deficit we inherited – that we are better placed.  In our first year we took the difficult decision to work within the public spending plans we inherited and to tighten fiscal policy – with a reduction in borrowing of 20 billion pounds last year, amounting to 3.5 per cent of GDP from financial year 1996-97 to financial year 1999-2000.

    And just as we have consistently taken a prudent and cautious approach to managing the public finances, we will continue to do so.  I will of course be delivering the Pre-Budget report on 3 November, with the half yearly assessment of the economy and the public finances which every chancellor gives.  But I can say – as I said last July – that our plans and projections have been based on cautious assumptions which have been audited by the independent national audit office, including a cautious and realistic assumption about trend growth – one quarter per cent a year lower than the conservative assumption.

    It is one of the central features of our new spending regime that we built in margins to cover uncertainties, including the risk of slower growth and its effect on revenues.  And we have laid out, as our new code for fiscal stability requires, clear fiscal rules which we will achieve over the economic cycle and which explicitly allow the automatic stabilisers to operate in periods of more moderate activity.

    The Pre-Budget statement I will make to the house of commons in ten days time will show that in an uncertain and unstable global economy we in Britain are steering a stable course for both our national economy and our public finances.  It would not be in the national economic interest for us to be diverted by opportunist calls for emergency cuts in public investment which are not justified on economic grounds.

    For it is because of our prudent management of public finances – including last years 20 billion pounds cut in the deficit – that we remain on track to meet our strict fiscal rules over the economic cycle while maintaining our commitment to an additional 40 billion pounds for improvements in health and education.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Geoffrey Robinson calls on PFI bidders to work with Trade Unions [October 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Geoffrey Robinson calls on PFI bidders to work with Trade Unions [October 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 21 October 1998.

    New Treasury Taskforce guidelines highlighting staff consultation will lead to greater openness in PFI projects, Paymaster General Geoffrey Robinson announced today.

    The procedures outlined today – which have the full support of the CBI and TUC – are designed to encourage transparency and openness during the consultation with staff and other interested parties.  Calling for greater trust and cooperation between Departments, bidders and trade unions, Geoffrey Robinson said:

    “The quality of the service which PFI projects deliver depends on the skills and commitment of its staff.   Openness between bidders,  trade unions and staff is an essential part of  any well run procurement process.

    “By working closely with staff representatives and acting positively, and by taking on the responsibility for retraining affected staff, the private sector can deliver a good deal for
    the public as well as creating valuable alternative employment opportunities. Trade unions know this too. Applied sensibly, these guidelines will ensure that their concerns are listened to.  I want to see trade unions use it in that way.

    “I also look to other Departments and public bodies to remove the cloak of secrecy surrounding PFI and allow the free flow of information on PFI projects. Hiding behind the empty phrase “commercial confidentiality” will no longer be the easy option.”

  • Gordon Brown – 1998 Speech to the British Retail Consortium Annual Dinner

    Gordon Brown – 1998 Speech to the British Retail Consortium Annual Dinner

    The speech made by Gordon Brown, the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 13 October 1998.

    Just as we must work with our international partners to secure global stability and growth, so we have been taking action at home to set in place a long-term and credible  platform to achieve the stability that is an essential  pre condition for long-term investment, growth and jobs.

    It is in pursuit of our long-term goals – high and stable levels of growth and employment- and the rejection of the short-termism and stop-go polices that have undermined the UK economy in the past- that we have taken tough decisions.

    In the face of rising inflationary pressure and the large structural deficit we inherited, we made the bank of England independent, the MPC raised interest rates and we tightened fiscal policy by 20 billion pounds last year, amounting to 3.5 per cent of GDP from financial year 1996-97 to financial year 1999-2000.

    There must be no return to the boom-bust we saw in the late 1980s and early 90s, when interest rates reached 15 per cent, 1 million manufacturing jobs were lost, nearly 170,000 businesses went under and thousands who faced mortgage misery and negative equity are even now not yet recovered from it.

    We are committed to steering a path of stability based on a stable monetary framework and sound public finances.

    And it is because of the reduction in borrowing and tough action on inflation, which has today seen us meet our inflation target for the second month in succession, that Britain is now better placed to steer a path of stability in these troubled times for the global economy.

    We have consistently taken a prudent and cautious approach to managing the public finances and we will continue to do so. Our projections have been based on cautious assumptions which have been audited by the independent national audit office and our plans have built in margins to cover uncertainties, including the risk of slower growth.  We have worked within the previous government’s spending plans for the first two years and our careful plans mean that current spending is now  set to grow in real terms by less over this parliament than the last.

    As I have said, slower world growth makes it inevitable that growth in Britain next year will be more moderate than previously expected.

    But because of the prudent approach we have followed, even with more moderate growth next year we remain on track to meet our strict fiscal rules over the economic cycle while maintaining our commitment to an additional 40 billion pounds for improvements in health and education.

  • Patricia Hewitt – 1998 Speech on the Global Economy

    Patricia Hewitt – 1998 Speech on the Global Economy

    The speech made by Patricia Hewitt, the then Economic Secretary to the Treasury, at the Fleming’s Seminar in 12 October 1998.

    Introduction

    1. Thank you for inviting me. The current turmoil in the global economy makes the timing of this conference pertinent.

    2. Today, I want to focus on the reform that is needed to respond to globalisation. Both in Europe and the rest of the world. I also want to raise the issue of free trade and capital controls.

    Global change and Europe’s response

    3. Today’s global economic problems are ones of the modern age. They could not have happened when finance was confined within sheltered and wholly national financial systems. These are new global problems which require new global solutions.

    4. Today, in an interdependent and instantaneous global marketplace, nations depend on investment flows from all over the world. And the punishment for getting things wrong can be immediate and severe. The premium everywhere is on monetary and fiscal stability

    5. All countries will benefit from setting clear long-term policy objectives for monetary and fiscal stability that build confidence.

    6. But equally, in today’s deregulated, liberalised financial markets, governments can no longer try to deliver stability through the strict application of over-rigid monetary targets. Stability will come through setting out clear objectives for monetary policy, and having the openness and transparency necessary to give credibility to the process.

    7. There have been considerable advances in stability and prudence over recent years.

    8. Member states have taken the Maastricht process very seriously and this has not been easy.

    9. In the 1990s deficits, which were a high proportion of GDP right across Europe, have fallen very heavily, from a peak of around 6 per cent of GDP to around 2 1/2 per cent.

    10. Inflation, which has been very high in some countries over many decades is now very low, around 2 per cent compared to a 1990 peak of over 5 1/2 per cent.

    11. Of course there is room for more progress on debt, which remains around 72% of GDP. But overall these are big changes signalling big advances in stability and prudence – and these advances have also brought greater convergence.

    Structural reform

    12. Macroeconomic policy will not in itself guarantee the levels of employment and growth that we want to see for Europe and the rest of the world. It is on the supply side that the rate of sustainable non-inflationary growth that an economy can achieve is determined. Structural reforms are essential for any country to remain competitive in this global age.

    13. Reforms of labour, product and capital markets that are now being suggested represent a third way for Europe. A third way which combines our enduring commitment to social cohesion and social justice with a commitment that, through economic reform, we help to ensure that Europe enjoys the rewards of an efficient dynamic economy.

    14. Globalization brings big opportunities and significant economic and social benefits, but it brings risks and social costs too. The benefits are not evenly distributed. People must now respond more quickly to the uncertainty and unpredictability. Jobs may not last as long and skills may quickly become obsolete as technological change accelerates. This can be difficult for people to accept and those who are unable to adapt quickly can get stuck in a vicious circle of social exclusion. But we can be sure that the social costs of doing nothing of isolationism or of protectionism are far higher. Open international markets benefit us all.

    15. In Europe, the challenges may not appear so severe. The EU has some of the most efficient, competitive, and well-regulated markets in the world. But we must be frank. With the advent of the single currency from 1.1.99, prices will become more transparent, exchange rate uncertainty will be reduced, and competitive pressures will sharpen. Less efficient industries will no longer be able to hide behind the fig-leaf of exchange rate uncertainty. If we want to make EMU a success, and if we want our economies to be able to deal satisfactorily with shocks, Europe’s governments must turn to the supply side, undertaking fundamental reform of labour markets, product markets and capital markets.

    16. It is vital that as Governments we take the actions that are needed to help tackle unemployment and raise employment. We need to combine making the structural reforms that are needed in our labour markets with measures to improve the employability of our workforces. We need, for example, to review our tax and benefit systems and make sure that they give the necessary incentives to make work pay and we need to ensure that our education systems are producing school leavers with the written, oral, numeracy and other basic skills that employers need and should expect.

    17. We have already made good progress. At both the EU level and individually within member states we are all doing this. With the Employment Chapter, Employment Guidelines and Employment Action Plans we have a new framework for policy and action at the European level. We have agreed employment guidelines with specific targets for action and each member state has produced Employment Action Plans showing what they are doing to implement. It is only by making the necessary reforms that we will tackle unemployment and raise living standards across the EU. But we have made good progress.

    18. But it is not only in the labour market that structural reform can yield significant results. In product markets, we must strive for a competition policy that creates more dynamic markets, is effective against those cartels and monopolies that hold new businesses and job creation back, and – in large areas where European-wide competition is still inadequate – pushes forward the frontiers of the single market. We must also work to increase competition internationally. So the era of anti-competitive policies is ending. The era of new pro-competitive policies and prosperity is beginning.

    19. In the financial markets, EU states have increasingly opened up to firms from other member states, widening the choice for consumers to let them widen portfolios and diversify risk. Many are working on far-reaching pension reforms which will significantly expand their capital markets. Regulatory and investor protection systems are being improved. But we know that there is much more to be done.

    20. More efficient equity markets have the potential to expand significantly, to the benefit of investment and jobs. The era of ignoring capital market reform is over. The era of pro-investment capital market reform has begun.

    21. There is also significant potential growth for venture capital markets. Britain’s venture capital market has been a significant creator of high quality jobs and companies. But it is much smaller than that of the USA. There is a new interest throughout Europe in examining how to enlist capital as a more effective route to job creation.

    Progress

    22. The EU has made significant progress in advancing the economic reform agenda. This year at Cardiff, Heads of Government agreed that Member States should each produce short annual reports on their product and capital markets, for discussion with their peers. And the Commission will produce a report too, for those common policies which impact on product and capital markets, such as competition and the Single Market.

    23. It will clearly take time to get results – there are no quick fixes with economic reform. But we should be encouraged. Economic reform has been recognised as the next big challenge for Europe in the globalised economy, and together Member States have set out an ambitious programme.

    Free trade

    24. Globalisation requires us to look beyond Europe. We remain committed to working with others to keep markets for trade and investment open while pushing for further and deeper liberalisation for the benefit of all.

    25. The gains from free trade are clear: better quality and more choice at lower prices. Efficient and innovative firms building a dynamic economy with rising growth productivity and living standards.

    26. But some fear free trade and globalisation leading to calls for protectionism. These pressures are increasing in the face of widening trade deficits with Asia. However, these fears are misplaced and must be resisted. The global economic crisis is causing painful adjustment – which is a necessary part of the cure for the crisis. We must not yield to the temptation to fall back on a protectionist response against cheaper imports. This is not an example of ‘unfair’ competition. Trade must be allowed to drive the restoration of global growth levels and re-integrate the countries in crisis back into the global economy. We have already pledged to guard against protectionism – but the surest way to fight protectionism is through further global trade liberalisation.

    27. The free trade message must be kept on the agenda – especially given the slowing of the growth of trade. This is why we are giving our full support to an early start to a millennium round of comprehensive liberalising trade negotiations at the WTO.

    28. The recent turbulence in world financial markets has led to some calls for capital controls. It is certainly clear that short-term capital flows can be destabilising and can disrupt markets when investors are insufficiently informed and when institutions lack credibility.

    29. But a retreat to capital controls is not the solution. This simply damages the prospects for stability and growth.

    30. So we favour an approach to capital account liberalisation which is bold in concept, but cautious in implementation. It has become clear that a host of preparatory reforms are needed before countries can fully benefit from integration into the world economy. Orderly liberalisation requires sound banking and financial systems and appropriate macroeconomic policies – consistent with the codes of good conduct we have proposed fiscal policy and monetary and financial policy.

    31. I hope that all in Europe can firmly back this consensus – both in encouraging properly sequenced liberalisation and in opposing unilateral actions taken as a substitute for necessary reform.

    Conclusion

    32. This programme of economic stability and structural reform will maximise our contribution to global stability and growth.

    33. We will have a Europe that builds on our long standing strengths of stability and cohesion as a continent but which makes reforms where necessary to compete more effectively globally.

    34. And it will mean we are better placed to steer a course of stability in an uncertain and unstable world.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Delivering the Mauritius Mandate [October 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Delivering the Mauritius Mandate [October 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 1 October 1998.

    In Ottawa today Chancellor Gordon Brown unveiled a comprehensive strategy to assist in the poorest and most vulnerable countries’ efforts to reduce poverty.

    The international community has made the halving of world poverty levels an overarching objective for the new millennium.  For those countries burdened by debt and the legacy of conflict, we need a comprehensive approach to support them in achieving this goal.  This approach should involve:

    • Decisions by Spring 1999 on a framework for helping post conflict countries, which will provide early financial and technical assistance; advance debt relief; and deal with arrears;
    • A wide-ranging review of the HIPC Initiative in mid 1999.  Such a review will help to ensure that the HIPC Initiative really does provide a lasting and final exit from the burden of unsustainable debt;
    • Ensuring that 22 countries have reached their decision points under HIPC by the end of 1999; and
    • Making further progress on an international commitment to ensure that export credits will only support productive expenditure.

    The UK is committed to achieving these objectives.  We will press forward with this agenda at the Annual Meetings.  The UK is prepared to support these policies by;

    • Contributing to any IDA managed trust fund for post conflict countries;
    • Clare Short, Secretary of State for International Development, will announce tomorrow a substantial additional contribution to the HIPC trust fund to help the African Development Bank meet its share of HIPC costs;
    • A willingness to contribute to international efforts to fill any financing gaps that remain to secure debt sustainabillity  for HIPCs that require more than 80% relief from the Paris Club;
    • A further contribution to funding for technical assistance in debt management, to support faster resolution of debt reconciliation, and support the principle of a stronger debtor voice; and
    • A UK commitment to allowing export credits for HIPCs only for productive expenditure.

    The Chancellor said:

    “The priority now is to deliver the Mauritius Mandate.  It would be a tragedy if the turmoil in emerging markets led the world to lose sight of the plight of some of poorest indebted countries.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : New Treasury Taskforce PFI Policy Team Announced [October 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : New Treasury Taskforce PFI Policy Team Announced [October 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 24 April 1998.

    Tim Wilson, who previously worked for HM Prison Service, has been appointed to succeed Peter Wanless as Head of the Treasury Taskforce Private Finance Policy Team, following the departure of Mr Wanless to the Department for Education and Employment, the Treasury announced today.

    Since May 1995, Mr Wilson has been head of the Contracts and Competition Group (CCG) unit within HM Prison Service (England and Wales), responsible for the award of contracts for the private management of prisons. Since then, the CCG has delivered 1,900 PFI prison places at three sites, all of which were brought into use on time or ahead of schedule.

    Mr Wilson has spoken about the contractual management of prisons and PFI procurement at a number of conferences in the United States and Canada as well as in England. He is due to speak at a workshop session on the Prison Service’s experience at the first Taskforce Conference (“Better, Faster, Cheaper – Making the PFI Work”) at the Business Design Centre, London on Monday 27 April.

    He is also a member of the Evaluation Panel for the Republic of South Africa’s privately funded prison programme which is based on many of the same approaches to the contractual management of prisons and PFI procurement as those followed by the Prison Service.

    Mr Wilson is due to take up appointment at the beginning of May. He is 47, and has four children.