Blog

  • PRESS RELEASE : UK and Taiwan deepen trade and technology cooperation [October 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : UK and Taiwan deepen trade and technology cooperation [October 2026]

    The press release issued by the Department of Business on 2 October 2026.

    The UK and Taiwan have held the 28th annual UK-Taiwan Trade Talks in London, alongside the launch of a new Science, Innovation and Technology Arrangement and engagement with a Taiwanese business delegation.

    28th annual UK-Taiwan Trade Talks

    The Trade Talks were co-chaired by Minister for Trade Lord Sarwar and Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs Cynthia Kiang. The UK and Taiwan discussed opportunities to strengthen trade and investment ties, deepen cooperation on digital trade and clean energy, and support collaboration in advanced manufacturing and resilient supply chains.

    The UK and Taiwan have held annual Trade Talks since 1991, providing a regular opportunity to discuss trade and economic issues and strengthen cooperation in areas of mutual interest. Taiwan is the UK’s sixth-largest trading partner in the Asia-Pacific region, with total bilateral trade reaching £8.9 billion in 2025.

    Minister for Trade Lord Sarwar said:

    “The UK and Taiwan share a strong trading relationship that is delivering growth, jobs and investment for both economies.

    “Today’s trade talks have helped identify new opportunities in digital trade, clean energy and advanced manufacturing to support our industrial ambitions and drive growth in every postcode.”

    Ministers also met representatives from UK and Taiwanese businesses to discuss opportunities to expand trade and investment between the two economies. These discussions took place alongside a wider programme of engagement undertaken by Taiwanese businesses visiting the UK to strengthen commercial partnerships and explore investment opportunities.

    Alongside the Trade Talks, Ruth Bradley-Jones, British Representative, Taipei and Vincent Yao, Taipei Representative, London signed a Memorandum of Understanding between UK Export Finance and Taiwan EximBank to strengthen cooperation on export credit opportunities.

    UK-Taiwan Science, Innovation and Technology Arrangement

    The two representatives also signed the UK-Taiwan Science, Innovation and Technology Arrangement, witnessed by the UK’s National Technology Adviser, Dr Dave Smith, and Deputy Minister Bing-Yu Chen of Taiwan’s National Science and Technology Council (NSTC).

    Dr Dave Smith, the UK’s National Technology Adviser, said:

    “The UK and Taiwan are natural partners in emerging technologies – from semiconductors and photonics to space and next-generation communications.

    Our strengths are genuinely complementary: world-leading UK research, design and innovation alongside Taiwan’s unrivalled capability in advanced manufacturing and hardware. This Arrangement gives that partnership a lasting framework to deliver tangible outcomes for researchers and businesses on both sides.”

    The Arrangement establishes a framework to support collaboration between the UK Department of Business, Innovation, Science and Trade and Taiwan’s National Science and Technology Council. It builds on existing collaboration between the UK and Taiwan, focusing new bilateral efforts to drive joint research and development in areas of mutual interest, such as semiconductors, space, telecommunications, net zero and AI standards.

    In advance of the launch, NSTC Minister Cheng-Wen Wu met separately with Baroness Lloyd, Minister for Space, Cyber and Regulatory Reform, to discuss arrangements for the signing and exchange views on UK-Taiwan S&T opportunities more broadly.

    Notes to editors

    • The UK and Taiwan share a strong, unofficial relationship across cultural, educational, and trade-related areas, including trade policy, investment, science, technology and innovation, climate, and health.
    • The UK and Taiwan have held annual Trade Talks since 1991.
    • Taiwan was the UK’s sixth-largest trading partner in the Asia-Pacific region in 2025, with bilateral trade worth £8.9 billion.
    • Ministers reviewed progress under the UK-Taiwan Enhanced Trade Partnership, including cooperation on investment, digital trade and energy and net zero.
    • The Science, Innovation and Technology Arrangement is a non-legally binding framework between the UK and Taiwan to support cooperation in science, innovation and technology.
  • PRESS RELEASE : UN Human Rights Council 63 – UK Statement for the Interactive Dialogue with the High Commissioner on the oral update on Ukraine [October 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : UN Human Rights Council 63 – UK Statement for the Interactive Dialogue with the High Commissioner on the oral update on Ukraine [October 2026]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 2 October 2026.

    UK Statement for the Interactive Dialogue with the High Commissioner on the oral update on Ukraine. Delivered by the UK’s Human Rights Ambassador, Eleanor Sanders.

    Mr Vice-President,

    The High Commissioner’s latest report sets out starkly the severity of sexual violence against Ukrainian prisoners of war. Sixty three percent of those interviewed reported conflict-related sexual violence at Russian hands. This included rape, genital mutilation, electric shocks and beatings to the genitals, and forced nudity – inflicted to strip prisoners of dignity and humiliate them before fellow captives and guards, sometimes over years.

    Beyond captivity, the report shows how Russia is using sexual violence as an instrument of control – a weapon to enforce its occupation, terrorise communities, and assert dominance over Ukrainian civilians.

    Chillingly, children have not been spared: the youngest documented rape survivor was four, and some women now bear children born of rape. These harms have profound and lasting consequences, underlining the need for child-sensitive, survivor-centred support and justice.

    These findings may only offer a glimpse into the true scale of the crimes being committed.

    Russia continues to refuse monitoring missions access to occupied territory, prisoners of war and detainees.

    Russia has passed laws that grant servicepersons near total immunity for crimes committed during military service.

    High Commissioner, based on the evidence available to your Office, to what extent can conflict-related sexual violence in Russian detention be understood as a systemic practice rather than a collection of individual crimes?

    Thank you.

  • Ellie Reeves – 2026 Attorney General Swearing-in Speech

    Ellie Reeves – 2026 Attorney General Swearing-in Speech

    The speech made by Ellie Reeves, the Attorney General, at the Royal Courts of Justice in London on 2 October 2026.

    My Lady Chief Justice, Lord Chancellor, members of the Court.

    It is an honour to take my oath this morning.

    It was less than a year ago I was being sworn in as Solicitor General.

    It was a job I loved, and gave me an insight into the talent, the dedication and the professionalism of the people who work in the department.

    The Attorney General’s Office is a place where we get things done.

    So, while I am new to this role, I am not new to the work, and I am pleased to drive it forward.

    I want to take a moment to recognise the judiciary and the extraordinary work you do.

    You uphold the rule of law with independence and integrity, often in the most difficult and sensitive circumstances.

    I will work hard to protect this independence, which is at the core of our justice system.

    I look forward to working closely with you, Lady Chief Justice, and with judges across our courts, to strengthen public confidence in our justice system.

    I also want to take a moment to pay tribute to Richard Hermer.

    It was a privilege to serve alongside him. I learnt a lot from him and owe him a debt of gratitude.

    And I am really pleased to have Andy Slaughter as our Solicitor General.

    I could not think of a better person to have in the role.

    His longstanding experience of Parliament and the criminal justice system will serve him, and all of us, extremely well.

    Andy, you often say you’ve only waited 21 years for your appointment.

    I think that confirms that you possess two qualities essential for any Law Officer: remarkable patience and an admirable refusal to give up.

    And it is a genuine relief to know I will now have you beside me at the Justice Select Committee rather than the other side of the table, asking the difficult questions.

    Having served both as the Shadow Solicitor General and as Chair of the Justice Select Committee, I cannot think of a better person to have in this important role.

    And of course, it’s a privilege to see our new Lord Chancellor in post.

    He and I were elected to Parliament on the same day, just over nine years ago.

    As a Minister in the Home Office, Alex had to grapple with some of the most difficult challenges facing our government.

    He tackled those issues with determination, respect and thoughtfulness. As Lord Chancellor he’ll show those same qualities.

    And I know how committed he is to the rule of law and ensuring that our justice system delivers for ordinary people.

    Lady Chief Justice, you touched on my own journey into law.

    It is true that growing up I didn’t know any lawyers.

    I went to my local South East London comprehensive and when I was around 17 I distinctively remember saying to my dad that I might want to study law at university, maybe even become a barrister, but I didn’t think that was something girls like me from schools like mine did.

    Dad – I still remember your words today. You said, “Well Ellie, if you don’t do it, how will things ever change!”

    And Mum and Mike, your words were just as impactful, you both thought I should apply because, and I quote: “you love arguing with people, so you may as well get paid for it.”

    So, with that ringing endorsement, off I went to Oxford University to study law.

    In one of my earliest seminars, our professor told my class we were practically guaranteed a training contract in a magic circle law firm, but I knew that wasn’t why I was studying law.

    There is nothing wrong with that work, but I wanted to be able to make a difference to people’s everyday lives.

    So, after being called to the bar in 2004, I trained as an employment rights lawyer, representing trade unions and their members for over a decade, before setting up my own consultancy, to support women facing maternity and sex discrimination at work.

    Representing people at work taught me that law doesn’t exist in a vacuum.

    It’s people’s pay packets, it’s their livelihoods, it’s their safety and their dignity at work. 

    The law makes a real difference to people’s lives.

    And that’s what has shaped my work in law, and in Parliament, and will continue to do so in this role, as Attorney General.

    As Solicitor General, I made tackling violence against women and girls my number one priority.

    I was proud to be able to help design and publish the Government’s VAWG strategy;

    To unlock five million pounds for the CPS to better support domestic abuse victims in the crown courts and roll out the early Victims Right to Review scheme.

    And as Attorney General just this week I have announced the national roll out of the Victim Transformation Programme, including dedicated victim liaison officers for victims of domestic abuse.

    That is progress, but there are more challenges we still face.

    Public confidence in our criminal justice system is low, and there is much more to do to deliver for victims.

    I will work closely with the Lord Chancellor and Home Secretary to make sure we do.

    I know there is impatience. People want government to get things done. And done now.

    That’s why, a few weeks ago, I changed the Legal Risk Guidance.

    I want to empower our brilliant government lawyers to find creative and innovative solutions, support ministers to take legally sound decisions that stand up to scrutiny.

    And crucially, I want them to enable this Government to deliver for ordinary people.

    Lady Chief Justice, to swear this oath today is an honour and a great responsibility.

    As Attorney General, I will work to uphold the rule of law, strengthen confidence in our justice system, and ensure the law continues to serve the people it exists to help.

    The legal profession should be open to everyone, regardless of their background.

    If there is one bit of advice I could give any aspiring lawyers thinking the profession might not be for them, it would be this. Follow your dreams and don’t let barriers get in the way, instead: strive to break them down.

    And as Attorney General, I will work to break down those barriers, increase opportunity and help widen access to our brilliant profession.

  • NEWS STORY : Government Proposes Tighter Controls on Materials Used to Produce Ricin and Abrin

    NEWS STORY : Government Proposes Tighter Controls on Materials Used to Produce Ricin and Abrin

    STORY

    The Government has announced proposals to restrict access to castor beans and rosary peas because they can be used to produce the highly toxic substances ricin and abrin. The materials would be added to the regulated poisons list, making it a criminal offence to sell them to members of the public who do not hold a valid licence.

    The measures follow recommendations from the first phase of the Southport Inquiry. Police investigating the Southport attacker found evidence that he had bought castor beans online to produce ricin, resulting in his conviction under the Biological Weapons Act 1974. Ricin and abrin are already controlled, but the seeds from which they can be produced remain available for purposes including gardening and decoration.

    Further controls have been proposed for other poisons and chemicals capable of being used to manufacture explosives. Businesses would be required to report suspicious transactions, while individuals with a legitimate requirement for a controlled substance could apply for a licence. Security Minister Dan Jarvis said the changes would close gaps exposed by the Southport attack and reduce the risk of dangerous chemicals being weaponised. A consultation is seeking views from the public, businesses and industry.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Crackdown on chemicals used to make dangerous weapons [October 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : Crackdown on chemicals used to make dangerous weapons [October 2026]

    The press release issued by the Home Office on 2 October 2026.

    New controls proposed for toxic substances, acting on recommendations made by the Southport Inquiry.

    Chemicals that could be used to make explosives and dangerous weapons – including those found in the Southport attacker’s home – will be tightly controlled under new proposals to boost national security. 

    Under the proposed changes, access to natural materials needed to produce the toxic substances ricin and abrin will be heavily restricted to reduce the risk of people using them to cause harm.  

    During searches of the Southport attack perpetrator’s home, police found evidence that he had bought castor beans online to make ricin, leading to his conviction under the Biological Weapons Act 1974.  

    In response, the government is proposing to add castor beans containing ricin and rosary peas containing abrin to the list of regulated poisons under UK law. This will make it a criminal offence to sell them to members of the public who do not hold a valid licence.

    This action comes as part of the government’s commitment to implement all the recommendations made in phase one of the Southport Inquiry, which recommended greater regulation was needed around the availability of castor beans.

    Ricin and abrin are already strictly controlled under UK law because of their extreme toxicity, but the seeds which can be used to produce these dangerous chemicals can be purchased for use in gardening and decoration.

    Security Minister, Dan Jarvis said: 

    Protecting the public is our first duty. While these substances can have legitimate uses, we must stop them from being weaponised by those who want to cause harm.

    We will close the gaps exposed by the Southport attack and tighten the law to stop these dangerous chemicals falling into the wrong hands.

    As part of the move, the government is also seeking to make it harder for people to access other dangerous poisons and chemicals which can be used to make explosives and pose risks to national security. 

    This would mean that it would be much harder for people to access these substances without having a licence and require shops and businesses to report any suspicious transactions. 

    The proposed changes come under the Poisons Act 1972, which controls poisons and explosives precursors, restricting the general public’s access to the most dangerous materials.  

    In certain circumstances, people can apply for a licence to buy and use a regulated substance if they have a genuine need for it and there is no safer alternative.

    The changes will be subject to a consultation which was launched yesterday. It seeks views from the public, industry and business to gauge how these changes would affect them.

  • PRESS RELEASE : The UK will defend universal rights without fear or favour – UK Statement at the UN Third Committee [October 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : The UK will defend universal rights without fear or favour – UK Statement at the UN Third Committee [October 2026]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 2 October 2026.

    Statement by Ambassador Sarah MacIntosh, UK Permanent Representative to the UN, at the UN Third Committee on Human Rights.

    Across the world, people are being denied their human rights through conflict, repression, discrimination, and the misuse of power and technology. 

    The principles that we defend in this Committee are not abstract. 

    They protect human dignity, support peaceful and inclusive societies, and help to prevent instability and conflict.

    At a time of growing pressure on human rights and on the multilateral system, we must

    turn our shared commitments into practical change for people.

    Yet the human rights landscape is becoming more dangerous. 

    Attacks on women, girls and LGBT+ people, and shrinking civic space are compounding the effects of conflict and authoritarian repression. 

    Our response must put human rights and the rule of law at its heart.

    In Gaza, basic humanitarian needs remain unmet. 

    All parties must uphold international law, protect civilians, and facilitate rapid and unimpeded humanitarian access. 

    We condemn abuses by Hamas and other non-state actors. 

    Hamas must decommission its weapons and its terror infrastructure and have no role in Gaza’s future governance. 

    We support full implementation of the 20-Point Plan. 

    And we remain committed to a credible political process towards a two-state solution.

    In the West Bank, settlement expansion, settler violence, and displacement are

    undermining that prospect for a two-state solution. 

    The UK has taken recent action to address this priority, including restrictions targeting settlement activity and those who support, facilitate, or profit from it. 

    We call on all parties to uphold international law, protect civilians, and facilitate humanitarian access.

    In Ukraine, five years into Russia’s full-scale invasion, the human cost continues to grow. 

    The United Nations’ independent monitoring and investigative mechanisms are essential. 

    Russian forces have attacked civilian infrastructure, tortured detainees and prisoners of war, and unlawfully deported and militarised Ukrainian children. 

    Russia must be held accountable, and Ukraine’s sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity must be upheld.

    In Sudan, civilians face atrocity crimes, conflict-related sexual violence, displacement, and hunger. 

    The illegal flow of weapons and external support is sustaining that conflict. 

    All states must stop supporting the warring parties, respect international humanitarian law and use their influence to protect civilians, secure humanitarian access, and end the violence. 

    The UN Fact-Finding Mission must continue its vital work to preserve evidence and lay the foundations for accountability.

    In South Sudan, renewed political tensions, attacks on civilians, forced recruitment, sexual violence, and restrictions on political space threaten stability and risk a return to wider conflict. 

    Leaders must exercise restraint, pursue genuine, inclusive dialogue, and respect the commitments of the peace agreement.

    In Myanmar, we condemn human rights violations and abuses, particularly those committed by the military, including airstrikes on schools, hospitals, and places of worship. 

    We continue to support efforts to collect and preserve evidence so that perpetrators can be held to account.

    In Syria, we welcome the steps taken by the Syrian government to make progress on her

    political transition, including convening a new Parliament, and the steps taken

    to ensure accountability and transitional justice both for Assad-era crimes and recent incidents of sectarian violence. 

    We continue to encourage the Syrian Government to ensure an inclusive and representative political settlement that protects the rights of all Syrians, and holds those responsible for human rights abuses and violations to account. 

    This is essential for the long-term stability and prosperity of the Syrian people.

    In Afghanistan, Taliban decrees systematically exclude women and girls from education, work, and public life, restrict access to justice, and entrench discrimination against religious and ethnic minorities. 

    These policies are indefensible. 

    And the Taliban must reverse them.

    In Iran, thousands of peaceful protesters were killed by security forces in January. 

    Protesters have since been executed, and many more remain on death row.

    Reports of torture and ill-treatment, including of women, ethnic minorities, and religious communities, are deeply concerning. 

    Iran must end her violent suppression of dissent, establish a moratorium on executions, and cooperate with UN accountability mechanisms.

    Beyond conflict, governments are also using technology, law, and state power to silence dissent.

    In China, evidence of violations in Xinjiang and Tibet persists. 

    The Ethnic Unity Law risks entrenching restrictions on the rights and freedoms of ethnic minorities. 

    China should implement the recommendations of the 2022 assessment, release those arbitrarily detained, address reports of forced labour, and allow meaningful independent access to Tibet.

    In Hong Kong, recent convictions underscore how the National Security Law is being used to restrict political expression. 

    Earlier this year, Jimmy Lai was sentenced to 20 years in prison; we call for his release.

    Mr President, in these country contexts and elsewhere, civil society and human rights defenders turn commitments into change. 

    But they face intimidation, reprisals, and transnational repression, including for cooperating with the United Nations. 

    The United Kingdom unequivocally condemns such retaliation. 

    We are proud to support the Lighthouse Fund, providing protection for human rights defenders under threat.

    We will also continue to defend the rights of women and girls globally. 

    This includes tackling all forms of violence against women and girls and promoting comprehensive sexual and reproductive health and rights. 

    We will champion women’s economic empowerment and their full, equal, and meaningful participation in public life and in decisions on peace and security.

    Human rights are universal. 

    They apply equally to every person, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and other LGBT+ people. 

    No one should face violence, criminalisation, or exclusion because of who they are, or who they love, or how they express themselves.

    At a time of pressure on the UN human rights system, the answer is not to lower our ambition. 

    It is to focus the system where it adds unique value: through independent scrutiny, through credible evidence, through accountability, and through protection for those whose voices are silenced. 

    The United Kingdom will listen, act, and work with partners from every region. 

    And we will defend universal rights without fear or favour because defending human dignity is the surest way to build a safer and a fairer world.

  • NEWS STORY : Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Launches High Court Challenge Over Police Search Warrants

    NEWS STORY : Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Launches High Court Challenge Over Police Search Warrants

    STORY

    Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has launched legal action against Thames Valley Police over warrants used to search his homes following his arrest earlier this year. The former prince is seeking a judicial review of the warrants which authorised searches of his residence on the Sandringham Estate and his former home at Royal Lodge in Windsor Great Park. The Judicial Office has confirmed that a private High Court hearing will take place on Thursday before Mr Justice Hilliard.

    Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested in February on suspicion of misconduct in public office following allegations that he shared sensitive Government information with Jeffrey Epstein while serving as the United Kingdom’s special representative for international trade between 2001 and 2011. He was questioned by detectives and remains under investigation. He has not been charged and has denied wrongdoing in relation to Epstein.

    Thames Valley Police said its investigation into suspected misconduct in public office remained ongoing and confirmed that it was engaged in legal proceedings relating to warrants previously obtained from the Central Criminal Court. The force said it would be inappropriate to comment further while those proceedings continued. The judicial review will consider whether the warrants and searches were lawful and will not determine the underlying allegations against Mountbatten-Windsor.

  • NEWS STORY : Kieran Dams Resigns as Local Green Party Coordinator Following Zionism Vote

    NEWS STORY : Kieran Dams Resigns as Local Green Party Coordinator Following Zionism Vote

    STORY

    Green councillor Kieran Dams has resigned as coordinator of his local Green Party following the decision by members to adopt the controversial “Zionism is Racism” motion. Dams, who represents Waterloo on Sefton Council, said he had devoted evenings and weekends to campaigning and organising for the party but could not remain silent when he believed something was wrong. He described himself as “genuinely gutted” by the decision to step down.

    Dams had voted against the motion at the Green Party conference, although he stressed that he continued to condemn the actions of the Israeli Government and support Palestinian rights. He said his objection concerned the decision to define Zionism itself as racism and the possible consequences for Jewish people inside and outside the party. He had also supported an unsuccessful amendment intended to reaffirm opposition to antisemitism and protect Jewish members from exclusion or collective blame. The main motion was approved by 1,022 votes to 813.

    Dams said he had received hundreds of abusive and threatening messages since speaking against the policy, adding that some were serious enough to be reported to the police. He encouraged other members who shared his concerns to speak publicly. His resignation is the latest sign of internal division following the conference decision, which was opposed by four of the party’s five MPs and has attracted criticism from Jewish organisations. Dams has not announced that he is leaving the Green Party or resigning as a councillor.

  • NEWS STORY : Green Party Faces Internal Division After Members Back ‘Zionism Is Racism’ Motion

    NEWS STORY : Green Party Faces Internal Division After Members Back ‘Zionism Is Racism’ Motion

    STORY

    The Green Party of England and Wales is facing significant internal division after members approved a conference motion declaring that Zionism should be treated as a form of racism. The motion was supported by 1,022 members and opposed by 813 at the party’s conference in Brighton. It defines Zionism as an ethnonationalist political project, formally establishes the party’s opposition to it and supports the creation of a single democratic state across historic Palestine with Jerusalem as its capital.

    Four of the party’s five MPs opposed the motion, while former leader Caroline Lucas also warned against its adoption. Green Party leader Zack Polanski was absent from the vote while campaigning in the Holborn and St Pancras by election. Members also rejected an amendment stating that the policy should not be used to pressure, proscribe or discipline members because of their links to synagogues or other Jewish organisations which identify as Zionist. Critics within the party said the decision risked alienating Jewish members and undermining its work on peace and human rights.

    The Green Party said the matter had prompted a serious and deeply felt debate among its membership, adding that it remained committed to opposing racism and supporting the rights of both Palestinians and Jewish people. A joint statement from the party’s MPs, leader and deputy leaders said there was no conflict between supporting the two communities. Jewish organisations have strongly criticised the decision, arguing that the policy could make Jewish members feel unwelcome and expose those connected with mainstream communal institutions to disciplinary complaints.

  • NEWS STORY : BBC Three and BBC Scotland Face Reported Online Only Future

    NEWS STORY : BBC Three and BBC Scotland Face Reported Online Only Future

    STORY

    BBC Three and the BBC Scotland television channel could be moved online as the corporation seeks to reduce expenditure, according to reports. Staff concerns have increased following the start of a voluntary redundancy process in the BBC’s television and streaming division.

    BBC Director General Matt Brittin is expected to provide staff with further information next week as part of plans to save £500 million and remove as many as 2,000 posts. BBC Three previously operated as an online only service between 2016 and 2022, while BBC Scotland was launched as a television channel in 2019.

    The reported proposals follow changes in viewing habits and concerns about the cost of services attracting relatively small linear audiences. The BBC said that it would not comment on speculation and no decision about either channel has been formally confirmed.