Blog

  • PRESS RELEASE : Change of His Majesty’s Ambassador to Mauritania – Guy Harrison [November 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Change of His Majesty’s Ambassador to Mauritania – Guy Harrison [November 2024]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 12 November 2024.

    Mr Guy Harrison has been appointed His Majesty’s Ambassador to the Islamic Republic of Mauritania in succession to Mr Colin Wells. Mr Harrison will take up his appointment during January 2025.

    Curriculum vitae

    Full name: Guy Andrew Harrison

    Year Role
    2023 to 2024 Yaoundé, Deputy High Commissioner (temporary duty)
    2022 to 2023 Conakry, Head of Mission
    2018 to 2022 Lagos, Economic Counsellor
    2015 to 2018 FCO, Team Leader, South Asia Department
    2010 to 2015 Kathmandu, Deputy Head of Mission and Head of Political Section
    2010 FCO, Team Leader Strategic Finance Directorate (Spending Review)
    2009 FCO, Head of Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) Unit
    2006 to 2009 FCO, Team Leader, later Deputy Head, Global Economy Group
    2002 to 2006 Brussels Embassy, Director of Trade and Investment
    1998 to 2002 Seoul, Second Secretary (Economic)
    1995 to 1998 FCO, Migration and Visa Directorate
    1993 to 1995 Hanoi, Vice-Consul
    1992 Munich, Attaché (G7 Summit)
    1987 to 1992 Seoul, Third Secretary Political (Full-time Korean Language Training 1987-89)
    1986 to 1987 FCO, West European Department
    1986 Joined FCO
  • PRESS RELEASE : Interim Chair appointed to the Judicial Pension Board [November 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Interim Chair appointed to the Judicial Pension Board [November 2024]

    The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 12 November 2024.

    The Lord Chancellor has approved the appointment of Josephine Magure as the interim Chair of the Judicial Pension Board.

    Ministers consulted the Commissioner for Public Appointments before making the appointment which will ensure that the Judicial Pension Board has an Interim Chair while a recruitment exercise is run.

    The Judicial Pension Board is responsible for helping the Lord Chancellor manage and govern the Judicial Pension Schemes by ensuring they comply with the requirements of the Pensions Regulator.

    Appointments and reappointments are made by the Lord Chancellor and are regulated by the Commissioner for Public Appointments. The appointments has been made in line with the requirements of the Governance Code on Public Appointments.

    Biography

    Jo Maguire is a Trustee of the DH&S Retirement and Death Benefits Plan and the Price Waterhouse Coopers (PwC) Pension Fund. Previously, she was a Pensions Assurance director with PwC and an Executive Director of the Pensions Research Accountants Group.

  • OBITUARY : John Nott (1945-2024)

    OBITUARY : John Nott (1945-2024)

    OBITUARY

    John Nott, the distinguished British politician who served in prominent government roles during the 1970s and 1980s, passed away on November 14, 2024, at the age of 79. A member of the Conservative Party, Nott was a significant figure in the arenas of defence, industrial policy, and economic reform, leaving an indelible mark on British public life. Known for his pragmatic and often controversial stances, he was a figure of both respect and criticism, admired for his intellectual rigour and determination but also for his willingness to make difficult and divisive decisions.

    Early Life and Education

    John Nott was born on November 19, 1945, in the seaside town of Newquay, Cornwall. The son of a local schoolteacher, Nott grew up in a working-class family, where his parents instilled in him the value of hard work and discipline. As a bright student, Nott won a scholarship to study at Harrow School, a prestigious London-based independent school. He later attended Exeter College, Oxford, where he read Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. After completing his degree, Nott briefly worked in the civil service before entering the private sector, where he worked in finance.

    Political Career and Rise to Prominence

    Nott’s political career began when he was elected as the Member of Parliament (MP) for St Ives, Cornwall, in 1974. He entered Parliament as part of the post-World War II generation of Conservative MPs who would help shape the direction of the party through the tumultuous decades that followed. A strong advocate of free-market principles, Nott was first appointed to a significant government post by Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher when she took office in 1979. Thatcher, who valued his pragmatic, no-nonsense approach to policy, made him Secretary of State for Defence.

    As Defence Secretary, Nott presided over a major restructuring of the British military, a decision that was both revolutionary and divisive. His decision to reduce defence spending and prioritise a leaner, more technologically advanced military force was highly controversial at the time. Many criticised Nott for weakening Britain’s military capabilities, particularly in the wake of the Falklands conflict, which placed increased focus on the role of the armed forces in national security. However, Nott was steadfast in his belief that Britain’s future defence lay in new technologies, including nuclear deterrence, rather than maintaining the large conventional forces of the past. His decisions to cut back on older, more traditional forms of military infrastructure were seen by some as forward-thinking and necessary but were labelled by detractors as ‘penny-pinching.’

    Perhaps Nott’s most significant and contentious achievement as Defence Secretary was his role in the 1981 defence review, which proposed deep cuts in defence spending, focusing instead on modernising the Royal Navy and investing in new technology, such as advanced submarines. This plan faced a considerable backlash from both the military establishment and the political opposition.

    The “Nott Review” and Industrial Policy

    Though his defence work is perhaps his most well-known achievement, John Nott’s political legacy is also defined by his work in other areas of public policy. In the early 1980s, Nott was appointed Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, a position that allowed him to influence Britain’s industrial and economic direction. Here, Nott took a bold stance in favour of privatisation, economic liberalisation and deregulation, echoing the free-market reforms championed by Thatcher.

    In 1984, Nott published what became known as the ‘Nott Review’, a groundbreaking report on Britain’s industrial policy. The report outlined strategies for privatising inefficient state-owned industries and embracing market-driven competition. While the report was lauded by many for its foresight and its encouragement of entrepreneurial activity, it was also fiercely criticized by the Labour Party and trade unions, who viewed the policies as threatening to workers’ rights and public services. Nevertheless, the review had a profound effect on the direction of British economic policy during the 1980s and 1990s.

    Nott was instrumental in overseeing the privatisation of major national industries such as British Airways, British Telecom, and British Gas. His arguably pragmatic approach to the challenges of economic restructuring earned him the respect of many of his colleagues, but he also faced considerable opposition from those who believed the government’s free-market zeal was harming working-class communities.

    The Later Years: A Shift in Political Identity

    In the mid-1980s, Nott began to distance himself from some of the more ideological elements of the Thatcher government. He became increasingly concerned about the social and economic implications of the government’s austerity measures, particularly in terms of rising inequality. In 1986, he announced that he would not stand for re-election as a government minister, choosing instead to focus on his consulting work and writing.

    By the 1990s, Nott’s political views had evolved. He became one of the more vocal critics of certain aspects of Thatcherism, particularly with respect to the dismantling of the welfare state and the weakening of labour protections. He expressed concern over the long-term effects of these policies on social cohesion and the fabric of British society. Nott’s post-political career as a public intellectual included authoring several books on economic and social policy, as well as working as a consultant to businesses seeking to navigate Britain’s increasingly globalised economy. Despite his critical stance towards some of Thatcher’s policies, Nott remained a committed Conservative and continued to champion the free-market principles that had defined much of his early career. He never returned to frontl-ine politics, but his writings and speeches on economic and social reform continued to influence political debates in Britain well into the 21st century.

    Legacy and Personal Life

    John Nott’s legacy is complex, marked by his transformation from a hardline defender of austerity and privatisation to a more reflective and nuanced voice on issues of economic and social policy. He was a man of formidable intellect, capable of balancing economic theory with practical decision-making. His work continues to resonate in the debates over the role of the state in the economy, defence policy, and social welfare. Whether hailed as a visionary or criticised as a cold technocrat, there is little doubt that Nott was a significant figure in shaping Britain’s modern political landscape.

    Nott is survived by his wife, Margaret, and their three children. Known for his deep love of literature and classical music, Nott was also a keen sailor and spent many summers in his later years navigating the Cornish coastline he had known since childhood.

  • NEWS STORY : UK pledges £1.5 Billion to Protect Forests and Indigenous Communities

    NEWS STORY : UK pledges £1.5 Billion to Protect Forests and Indigenous Communities

    STORY

    The UK’s Foreign Secretary has delivered a speech highlighting the importance of indigenous communities in protecting forests. The speech, which was delivered at the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, emphasized the link between indigenous land rights and forest conservation. The Foreign Secretary announced that the UK will commit £1.5 billion to protect forests and indigenous communities. This funding will be used to support programs that strengthen indigenous land rights, promote sustainable forestry practices, and combat deforestation.

    The Foreign Secretary also highlighted the importance of the UK-Norway partnership, which has helped to reduce deforestation in the Amazon rainforest. The partnership has provided funding and technical assistance to indigenous communities and local governments in the Amazon region. The Foreign Secretary’s speech was welcomed by indigenous leaders and environmental groups. They praised the UK’s commitment to protecting forests and indigenous communities.

  • David Lammy – 2024 Speech on Indigenous Peoples and Protecting Forests

    David Lammy – 2024 Speech on Indigenous Peoples and Protecting Forests

    The speech made by David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, on 12 November 2024.

    Can I just begin by saying what an absolute honour it is to be standing here as Labour’s first Foreign Secretary here at COP after 14 years out of power.

    And what a pleasure it is to be here as Foreign Secretary sharing the stage with wonderful Indigenous peoples, wonderful philanthropists, ministers – all dedicated to dealing with the climate emergency.

    It’s one of the privileges of my life to be back in power. Actually able to do something about this agenda.

    So let me just start by first saying:

    • why do I care about forest tenure rights in the first place?
    • second, why should the world care?
    • and third, working together, what we can do about it?

    The bottom line is I got into politics because I care about helping my community secure equity, equal opportunities and justice.

    I represent, in north London, the constituency of Tottenham. It’s where I’m from and it would be described traditionally as an inner-city neighbourhood in London.

    So let me just tell you a bit about my story. My parents arrived from Guyana, just on the northeast corner of South America. My father came to Britain in 1956. He was part of what we talk about in Britain as the Windrush generation. Windrush because that was the boat that people first arrived on in 1948, bringing people from the Caribbean.

    Many of them had contributed to the building of Britain after the second World War and fought during the second World War, and they arrived determined, with a gleam in their eye, for a new prospect in life.

    Over the course of that period then, I’m thinking about the community I represent because many of them faced poverty, and their families have faced poverty. Education was key. Social justice was hugely important to those communities. And, of course, coming from Guyana and the Caribbean I’m thinking about what they left behind.

    In a lecture I gave very recently in Kew, I was reminded that my father used to take me to Kew Gardens in London. I had no reason why as a child he was taking me to the other side of London to hang out in a very large park. And, of course, it was because he wanted to be close to nature. I know that now to be true. And I have committed in my own life to support the rights of Indigenous peoples.

    My wife and I are founders of a conservation centre, it’s called Sophia Point. We work on the Essequibo in the middle of the rainforest in Guyana. We work alongside Akawaio, groups of Amerindian people. Helping them preserve what is in their rainforest.

    Working with the University of Guyana. Helping them with their own rights. Assisting them – they are the custodians of the land. We have a long lease on the land. Working alongside them in a charitable effort. Understanding and wanting to be part of a community that I am originally from.

    But I guess that the other part to that story, of course, is recognising that I stand here as a Briton. We talk about Britain, the green and pleasant land. Think about Robin Hood. You’re thinking about Epping Forest and Sherwood Forest, and those wonderful forests that we have in Britain.

    The point is that all of us have a connection with nature. All of us have a history, and that, in a sense, grounds me as I come to this event. So that’s why I dedicated my first major speech as Foreign Secretary to tackling this crisis. And is why, I explained in that speech, my commitment not just to the issue and to Sophia Point but what more we could do.

    So how do we build an economic model that allows us to continue to live in harmony with nature. The most heartening aspect of what I’ve seen at Sophia Point is hearing how it works to give communities agency in their lives.

    And tenure security gives communities the right to object to environmentally damaging projects and it gives them alternative routes to sustainable livelihoods so that they can thrive as guardians of nature.

    So that’s why I care about this issue. Why should you all care sitting there?

    Well, here are just a few statistics:

    • Indigenous peoples and local communities manage and live in at least half of the world’s land
    • this land contains much of the world’s remaining biodiversity and over a third of intact forests
    • the world’s forests are declining at an alarming rate – every year, we lose an area that is just a bit larger than Azerbaijan itself
    • but the rights of Indigenous peoples and local communities are protected in just 10% per cent of the land in which they reside
    • and over 1 billion people worldwide feel insecure about their rights to property or land

    Funding for forest tenure and management is sadly very low – it received less than 1 per cent of all climate finance in the previous decade, much of which went to governments and NGOs. Almost 2,000 land and environmental defenders were killed between 2012 and 2022, and research shows that these were disproportionately likely to be in Indigenous peoples.

    So the money they get to defend their rights, to be custodians, of our wonderful forest and the danger that they face in much of the world is serious and extreme. That’s why it should alert us all.

    Now in recent years, we have seen some positive steps in the right direction.

    Extended rights, with Brazil acknowledging 10 new Indigenous Territories since President Lula took office.

    We are seeing new legislation, indeed in Guyana we saw new legislation, but also places like the Democratic Republic of Congo’s law on Indigenous peoples’ rights.

    We’re seeing greater implementation, such as Indonesia’s rollout of its social forestry programme,

    And more focus from donors, with increasing engagement at events like this one.

    Still, we are starting from such a low base that there is much, much more that we need to do.

    Today’s event is about what precisely we should be doing.

    There will be lots of ideas in this room, but I want to kickstart just some ideas about how we can play a role.

    If you are a donor – whether from a government like mine or a philanthropic foundation – this is about commitment, and it’s about the long haul. Sustained commitment.

    Committing to funding for nature, committing to funding for forests, and committing for forest communities, particularly their livelihoods and their rights to protect that nature on our behalf.

    I am pleased to confirm that the UK will ensure that of our £11.6 billion in climate finance, three billion will be for nature and within that 1.5 billion for forests.

    With us today are key partners in that, our wonderful friends from Norway who have got a longstanding commitment in this area and of course the Bezos Foundation who have done so much amongst the 25 donors who, with the UK, made the IPLC Forest Tenure Pledge at COP26 in Glasgow, which assigned 1.7 billion dollars by 2025.

    I am delighted we are on track to meet that commitment and to confirm the UK will play its part, keeping our promise to provide over 10% of that funding.

    And I hope today we can talk about how we develop the next phase of that historic Pledge, next year in Brazil. To show our commitment beyond 2025, I can also announce a new 10-year programme.

    Which will provide initial funding of £50 million over 2 years to reduce illegal logging and benefit forest people.

    This builds on partnerships the UK has been forming in these communities for decades and generations, going almost back to when I first started in politics 25 years ago.

    And we are complementing this with new initiatives that invest even further in forest communities.

    A £94 million programme to strengthen forest communities’ voices in governance processes particularly for the Amazon, and a project to train local scientists in the Congo Basin.

    Now if you are a partner government like Brazil, or many others who are here today, this is also about guaranteeing rights.

    As I have said, there are some really important examples of this happening around the world.

    And I hope countries like the UK can work with you to build on this.

    This year, for instance, we launched a Land Facility programme to partner with Global South governments to develop more effective and transparent land governance systems, that better protect rural and forest tenure rights and I hope this model is one that we can continue to build on.

    Last, but not least, for Indigenous peoples and local communities, I hope this can be about seizing an opportunity.

    I recognise you have been speaking up for decades. Fighting to be heard with your own heritage, and thanks to the many Indigenous communities that I have met over the last few years, I am all too aware that there can be a powerful sense that the system is rigged against you.

    But I hope that, as quickly as possible, we can turn things around. Ensure that your rights are protected under the law.

    And that you have the tools you need to make the right choices for you, for your communities and for your environment.

    This is our goal for the next IPLC Forest Tenure Pledge. Our goal for the new programmes I have announced. But I don’t want you to take my word for it.

    We need, more than anything else, to listen to you, to hear you, and to hear how we can continue to make further improvements.

    Let me just end with one story. The community that I work with on the Essequibo coast in the rainforest of Guyana. When we were building the conservation centre, because of some of these rights issues, too often what was happening on their land is illegal mining, some of it very dirty, very disruptive to the environment.

    But communities from the Indigenous Amerindian communities finding that they had to do that because it was all they could do. The conservation centre brings new people alongside them into the environment. It brings scientists, academics, not doing helicopter science, flying in and flying out with the knowledge, but actually working with local communities on the IP, working with local university students on the IP alongside them.

    Again, that brings livelihoods to those communities. It brings documentary filmmakers and others because Guyana is a region of the top of the Amazon base and is less well known.

    So that’s what I mean about coming alongside communities, able to give them livelihoods, livelihoods based on rights and purpose that helps us all in this global fight to make sure that our forests make that contribution to our desire to meet that 1.5 commitment.

    As I say, it’s a great, great privilege to be here for my first event as Foreign Secretary in the UK. Centring of course climate within broader foreign policy and I’m very pleased now that we’re able to watch a video about why Indigenous peoples and local communities really matter.

    Thank you very much.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Human rights must be protected – UK Statement at the UN Third Committee [November 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Human rights must be protected – UK Statement at the UN Third Committee [November 2024]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 12 November 2024.

    Statement by Liz Page, First Secretary Cyber, Digital and Technology at the UN Third Committee on the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime.

    Chair, the UK’s EOP at the conclusion of negotiations explained our basis for joining consensus on this Convention. Building on this, I will focus today on addressing views and interpretations expressed by stakeholders and some delegations.

    Stakeholders are right to highlight the potential risks that this Convention could pose to human rights given its broad scope of international cooperation for the sharing of e-evidence and its intrusive procedural powers.

    These risks led the UK, and many others, to insist on effective human rights safeguards in the final text. If applied properly and in good faith, these safeguards mean that human rights will be protected as the Convention is implemented. This is a legal obligation applicable to all State Parties.

    Article 24, relating to the Convention’s procedural powers, is an example. Paragraph 1 of this Article says a Party’s domestic law shall provide for conditions and safeguards, which shall provide for the protection of human rights, in accordance with international human rights law.

    While those conditions and safeguards will be provided for in a Party’s domestic law, the obligation to establish them is not optional. Nor is the obligation subservient to domestic law.

    As is made clear by 24(4), these human rights obligations apply equally at the domestic level and when engaging in international cooperation.

    It is concerning that a few Member States have already tried to deny or dodge them.

    Chair, good faith adherence to safeguards is essential for building trust and unlocking the greater level of international cooperation most Member States aspire to. The UK will play close attention to the implementation of, and adherence to, the safeguards. The stakeholder community must also play an important role here.

    The UK stands ready to cooperate with States who respect the letter and the spirit of the Convention, and support their efforts through capacity building.

    To be clear – the UK will not cooperate with any country which does not comply with the safeguards required by this Convention.

    Ultimately, while the commitments in the Convention are critical, it is how State Parties implement them in the real world which will determine whether this Convention makes a practical difference to efforts towards our common aim to prevent and combat cybercrime.

    Finally, the UK appreciates Vietnam’s offer to host a signing ceremony – but expresses our strong concern at the unprecedented procedure by which this amendment has been introduced after the Ad Hoc Committee had concluded its work.

    We accept this amendment on the basis that there are no PBIs and, noting the commitment Vietnam has expressed to an open dialogue with stakeholders, encourage Vietnam to maintain the inclusive spirit of the Ad Hoc Committee by enabling participation of stakeholders at the signing ceremony.

  • NEWS STORY : Rajan Naidu and Niamh Lynch Charged With Vandalising Stonehenge

    NEWS STORY : Rajan Naidu and Niamh Lynch Charged With Vandalising Stonehenge

    NEWS STORY

    Rajan Naidu, 73, and Niamh Lynch, 20, have both been charged with one count of destroying or damaging an ancient protected monument and one count of causing a public nuisance by attempting to damage Stonehenge. The pair attacked the historic monument, with English Heritage issuing a statement saying that they had been able to mitigate against the damage done to the stones but that the damage had potentially caused environmental damage to the lichen.

  • NEWS STORY : Pharmacies Across UK Cutting Hours Amid Funding Crisis

    NEWS STORY : Pharmacies Across UK Cutting Hours Amid Funding Crisis

    STORY

    A wave of pharmacy closures and reduced operating hours is sweeping across the UK, leaving communities with limited access to vital healthcare services. Independent pharmacies are taking drastic measures in response to a decade of under-funding, with many forced to cut hours or shut down altogether.

    The National Pharmacy Association (NPA) reports that nearly all independent pharmacies in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland voted in favour of reducing hours beyond the minimum required by their contracts. This means fewer pharmacies will be open during evenings and weekends, impacting access to essential medications and healthcare advice.

    “Pharmacies are the cornerstone of community healthcare,” says NPA chairman Nick Kaye, “But years of underfunding have pushed us to the brink. We don’t want to reduce services, but we’re left with no choice.”

    The funding crisis has also led to cuts in locally commissioned services, such as emergency contraception, addiction support, and stop-smoking programs. This reduction in services further jeopardises public health and places additional strain on an already overburdened NHS.

    The NPA warns that without adequate government intervention, the situation will continue to deteriorate, leaving communities with reduced access to vital healthcare services. The impact will be felt most acutely in rural areas and under-served communities, where pharmacies often serve as the primary healthcare provider. The Government is facing mounting pressure to address the funding crisis and ensure the sustainability of community pharmacies. The future of local healthcare hangs in the balance as pharmacies struggle to keep their doors open.

  • NEWS STORY : UN Calls for Immediate Action to Protect Civilians in Sudan as Conflict Rages On

    NEWS STORY : UN Calls for Immediate Action to Protect Civilians in Sudan as Conflict Rages On

    STORY

    Lord Collins of Highbury, Minister for Africa and the UN, spoke at the UN Security Council Meeting that the ongoing conflict in Sudan has reached a critical juncture, with devastating consequences for civilians. Almost 19,000 people have been killed and 33,000 injured in the past 18 months, according to UN reports. Mass rape, torture, and ethnically targeted killings are rampant. In a statement, Collins said:

    “We must act now, and these recommendations are a positive step towards more action to protect civilians. It is now for us as states, civil society and members of the UN family to consider how to use them. To be successful, we must confront the context we face, rather than the one we would want or like to see.”

    A devastating civil war has gripped Sudan for the past 18 months, leaving a trail of death and destruction in its wake. The conflict, which erupted in April 2023, has resulted in nearly 19,000 fatalities and 33,000 injuries, with civilians bearing the brunt of the violence. Reports from the UN paint a grim picture of mass atrocities, including widespread rape, torture, and ethnically motivated killings. The warring factions have shown a blatant disregard for human life and have obstructed humanitarian aid, leaving millions facing starvation.

  • PRESS RELEASE : The most effective way to protect civilians is the immediate cessation of hostilities – UK statement at the UN Security Council [November 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : The most effective way to protect civilians is the immediate cessation of hostilities – UK statement at the UN Security Council [November 2024]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 12 November 2024.

    Statement by Lord Collins of Highbury, Minister for Africa and the UN, at the UN Security Council meeting on Sudan.

    After eighteen months the conflict in Sudan has had a devastating impact on civilians.

    Almost 19,000 people have been killed and 33,000 injured. These numbers, and the suffering they mask, are unacceptably high.

    The UN reports that mass rape, torture, the destruction of livelihoods, ethnically-targeted killings have been perpetrated on a large scale.

    I thank the Secretary-General for his recommendations on the protection of civilians, as requested by resolution 2736. The overarching message is clear – the most effective way to protect civilians is an immediate cessation of hostilities.

    Efforts to secure this continue: we must offer our full support to the UN as they seek to mediate between the parties, and we call on the parties to engage in good faith with this process.

    But the last eighteen months have also shown that we cannot just wait for a ceasefire.

    We must act now, and these recommendations are a positive step towards more action to protect civilians. It is now for us as states, civil society and members of the UN family to consider how to use them.

    To be successful, we must confront the context we face, rather than the one we would want or like to see.

    I note the Secretary-General’s assessment that the conditions do not currently exist for the effective deployment of a UN force to protect civilians in Sudan.

    We must keep this under review but also remember that the deployment of UN forces is only one lever amongst many.

    We can all see that the warring parties have failed to uphold their commitments in the Jeddah Declaration to protect civilians and allow unfettered humanitarian access.

    I urge them to establish a robust and transparent compliance mechanism to ensure their commitments bear tangible results on the ground.

    They can achieve this, including with the support offered by the UN. Many civilians are suffering because of direct violence. But many more because they are starving, deliberately stopped by the warring parties from getting life-saving help.

    I strongly support the Secretary-General’s recommendation that the parties agree to humanitarian pauses to allow the safe passage of civilians and facilitate the unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid.

    The potential closure of the Adré border crossing looms large. Its closure would mean millions more civilians would be at risk.

    The crisis demands adaptable approaches.

    Ordinary people have stepped up and taken unimaginable risk to protect their communities, through the Emergency Response Rooms and other mutual aid groups.

    The international community must listen to the Secretary-General’s call to consider how we can further support those local efforts. And this requires warring parties to back scalable, locally-negotiated ceasefires and violence reduction measures.

    I urge all member states, civil society organisations, and stakeholders to be motivated by the Secretary-General’s recommendations, to step up coordinated, international action to protect the people of Sudan.