Blog

  • NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 6 October 1925

    NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 6 October 1925

    6 OCTOBER 1925

    Acknowledging the welcome of the Swiss authorities at the opening of the Locarno Conference, Mr Chamberlain referred to the services rendered by that country to humanity and to peace, and said that, once again, Switzerland was coming to their assistance. Opening the Conference proper, Mr Chamberlain suggested that no formal presidency was required, and that the delegates should meet on a footing of perfect equality, each contributing what he could to the success of their common object — the peace and prosperity of Europe. Discussion was commenced of the articles of the draft pact which were drawn up in London by the legal advisers of the Powers concerned. Agreement was at once reached with regard to a certain number of them; other articles which gave rise to draft amendments were reserved for fuller examination by the jurists.

    The Home Secretary (Sir W. Joynson-Hicks), speaking at Liverpool, gave details of his powers in regard to the Communist menace to this country, and also as to his attitude towards members of O.M.S., whose services as special constables, engineers, or transport drivers he would be a fool not to accept, but in the moment of trouble they would not be allowed to take part with military status.

    Mr Bruce, in an outline of election policy at Dandenong, said the Australian Government were determined to defeat the wreckers who would plunge Australia into chaos, misery, and class war. The Commonwealth Parliament would pass legislation empowering action against persons engaged by associations in propaganda having for its object the overthrow of the Constitution and of commerce.

    A conference lasting nearly three hours, in which representatives of the National Union of Railwaymen and the Railway Clerks’ Association met the railway companies, reached an arrangement by which the meeting of the Central Wages Board on October 14th would take place.

    The death is announced of Admiral Sir Arthur Henniker-Hughan, M.P. for Galloway.

  • James Cartlidge – 2025 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    James Cartlidge – 2025 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by James Cartlidge, the Shadow Defence Secretary, in Manchester on 7 October 2025.

    Good afternoon everybody,

    There are few greater examples of our armed forces’ unshakeable commitment to this nation than the crews of our Royal Navy submarines.

    HMS Vanguard is one of those submarines, charged with delivering our Continuous at Sea Deterrent, which has been in place every hour of every day since 1969.

    In March, Vanguard’s crew returned home following the Navy’s longest ever patrol, 204 days at sea.

    That’s nearly seven months away from their families to keep all of us safe.

    I had the privilege of meeting Vanguard’s crew on three separate occasions.

    Most recently, I bumped into them, in their uniform, outside a pub in Westminster.

    They had decamped there following afternoon tea in Downing Street, which they had rightly received as thanks for their extended deployment.

    Now, I thought they deserved a pint, after all, I wonder which felt longer, 204 days at sea or an afternoon with Keir Starmer.

    Prior to that, as a Defence Minister I sailed with Vanguard for her Trident test-firing and witnessed first-hand the extraordinary skill and professionalism of her crew.

    But it was the first time I met Vanguard’s crew, visiting their base in Scotland, that left the greatest impression.

    Recruitment and retention is our single biggest challenge, not just for submariners, but for the whole armed forces.

    So, I asked the crew, if there was one thing the Government could do to improve retention, what would that be?

    One of the officers replied:

    “We just want to know that the country’s got our back”.

    Conference, that crew goes to sea with a cargo so lethal it is beyond imagination; an extraordinary burden of responsibility.

    But like every single person who serves, what they need to know is that Britain is behind them.

    So, I am determined to show unequivocally that we, the Conservative Party, have and will always have the back of all who serve our country.

    That means focusing not just on our serving personnel, but on their families too.

    That’s why the first Shadow Defence policy I announced in June was the creation of an Armed Forces Housing Association.

    I believe that would be the best way to rebuild service family homes that is needed, but which was only made possible by the decision I took in Government to buy back the Defence estate.

    Why does this matter?

    Recruitment and retention is no longer just a policy challenge, it is existential given the threats we face.

    In 2022, the world changed.

    The era of the ‘peace dividend’ was shattered as Putin’s tanks rolled into Ukraine.

    Conference, there are those who claim that Nigel Farage’s party are the ‘true conservatives’.

    But let us remind ourselves what happened when Putin launched his all-out invasion.

    On that day, what did Farage do? Whose side was he on, as our continent was suddenly threatened with war for the first time since 1945?

    That day, he chose to blame NATO for provoking Putin.

    What did we do that day?

    Instead of blaming our closest allies, we took real action to defend freedom, by arming the Ukrainians at lightning speed.

    With NLAW anti-tank weapons.

    Half a million artillery shells.

    The first Government to provide main battle tanks and long-range missiles.

    And by training 50,000 Ukrainian soldiers.

    This is what it means to be a true Conservative, standing up to Putin, just like Churchill did to Hitler; and Thatcher to Galtieri, in this Party we will always stand up for freedom and be prepared to defend it.

    While we should all be incredibly proud of our efforts to help Ukraine avoid an early collapse, the war rages on and the threats to our own nation are only growing.

    Royal Navy ships attacked by the Houthis in the Red Sea.

    Russian spy vessels threatening our critical national infrastructure.

    And now Russian drones and jets violating NATO airspace.

    Putin is deliberately testing our resolve and, in response, we must stand strong with our NATO allies and be prepared to take all necessary action to defend ourselves.

    On the home front this demands a total focus across Government on rearmament and war readiness, because the best way to avoid war is to deter it from happening in the first place.

    And that’s why the huge gulf between Labour’s rhetoric and reality on Defence is so alarming.

    For all Starmer’s claims on Defence, Labour have simply not shown the urgency the threat requires.

    The threat we face is now, but Labour’s defence promises, deliver at best, in a decade.

    Labour’s big headline from their Strategic Defence Review was up to 12 attack submarines by the 2040s.

    Now, that’s a key phrase, ‘up to 12’ submarines.

    Conference, I could promise to buy up to 12 Ferraris, but it won’t happen if I haven’t got the money.

    Like my Ferraris, those submarines are a fantasy, because the money to pay for them doesn’t exist.

    Strong defence needs a strong economy.

    Instead, we have Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer unable to cut welfare and deliver the cash defence needs.

    As a result, they’ve had to resort to smoke and mirrors to make defence spending look bigger than it really is.

    Because if Labour get their way, defence spending could be redefined to include rural broadband; the Lower Thames Crossing and civil scientific research vessels.

    Conference, I kid you not, in future, UK defence spending could include, BOATY McBOATFACE.

    In the meantime, with no real extra money for Defence, procurement is effectively frozen.

    Our brilliant British businesses have provided some of the very best drones and counter-drone technology used on the frontline by Ukraine.

    But almost none of this kit has been made available to our own army.

    In their first financial year, Labour confirmed to me they only bought three new drones for the British armed forces.

    Not three thousand or even three hundred. Just three drones.

    Conference, with all our experience supporting Ukraine, the UK could be leading the drone revolution. Instead, Labour’s penny pinching is starving our defence industry of cash and stifling our fighting capability.

    But Conference, there is one exception where Labour have allowed the MOD to urgently commit taxpayers’ money.

    Thirty-five billion pounds on their crazy Chagos deal, to lease back British territory that we currently own freehold.

    At the same time, surrendering sovereignty over Diego Garcia, one our most important military bases.

    Now when Labour announced their Chagos deal in Parliament, they said those who opposed them were siding with Russia, China and Iran.

    Well conference, opposing Labour’s Chagos deal does not make us traitors, it makes us patriots.

    Now, I’m sure we can all think of better ways to spend thirty-five billion pounds of public money than on tax cuts for the people of Mauritius.

    For me, it’s pretty straightforward, we should scrap Labour’s Chagos deal, and spend every penny on the British armed forces.

    But when it comes to investing in our military, whilst drones and technology are vital, the most important capability of all is still our people.

    Those who serve today, but also those who served in the past, especially in Northern Ireland.

    Because of our Legacy Act, those brave veterans who protected all of us from terrorism could sleep soundly in their beds, safe from the fear of a knock on the door in the middle of the night.

    So what madness is it, that at a time of war in Europe, this Government should be reopening the floodgates of vexatious claims against those who served this country to keep us safe.

    Ladies and gentlemen, our veterans defended us and now it’s our turn to defend them.

    So can I ask you to join me in welcoming on stage two of the staunchest defenders of veterans of the British army:

    Former soldier and spokesman for the Northern Ireland veterans movement, Paul Young. And my fellow Shadow Armed Forces minister Mark Francois.

    Conference, you’ve heard first-hand the sheer strength of feeling from our veterans.

    All of us struggle to understand how a Government could be enabling the persecution of our former soldiers when the threat we face is so stark.

    So why is this happening?

    The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Hilary Benn, has been crystal clear why he is scrapping our Legacy Act, and I quote exactly what he said:

    “Because the legislation is incompatible with our obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights”.

    Now, I’m someone who has always recognised that the ECHR was set up for good reason in the aftermath of the tragedy of the Second World War.

    But as Shadow Defence Secretary it’s become blindingly clear to me that the ECHR totally undermines our ability to deter the renewed threat of war that we face today.

    The most basic duty of Government is defence of the realm.

    But no Government can discharge that duty if the rule of an international court overrides our sovereign right to defend this nation.

    Because it’s not just our Legacy Act that’s at risk; it’s not just veterans.

    Lord Wolfson warns that there is even a threat that our 2021 laws which protect UK forces on overseas operations, could be struck down if we stay in the ECHR.

    What would that mean for today’s soldiers if they are sent peacekeeping in Ukraine?

    The thought is chilling.

    I therefore wholeheartedly support Lord Wolfson’s conclusion that remaining in the ECHR makes it impossible to fully protect our veterans and service personnel from the threat of vexatious claims.

    Thank you.

    Because this would be serious at the best of times; but with the military threat as intense as it is, this is simply unacceptable.

    Conference, Kemi has taken the crucial decision to commit a future Conservative government to leave the ECHR.

    Knowing that we will not be bound by its strictures; I can give you this guarantee.

    If new laws are required to give legal certainty on overseas operations, we will pass those laws.

    If Labour repeal our Legacy Act, we will legislate to restore full legal protection for our veterans.

    Whatever it takes,

    You have my word,

    We will protect those who protected us.

  • Robert Jenrick – 2025 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    Robert Jenrick – 2025 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Robert Jenrick, the Shadow Justice Secretary, in Manchester on 7 October 2025.

    Hello Conference,

    It’s great to see you all today.

    Isn’t Donna brilliant?

    Conference, we are going to get Donna elected as the first Mayor of Hampshire and the Isle of Wight.

    Forget the King of the North; we’re going to have a Queen of the South.

    And it’s going to be Donna Jones!

    Now, I want to talk to you today about how four famous blondes tell the story of the predicament our party faces today and how we’re going to overcome it.

    Because right now, it’s true: it’s tough being a Tory.

    Six months ago, the Tory legend Sir Michael Fabricant went on the Big Brother House.

    He lasted four days.

    Last week, one of our most energetic young campaigners, Emily Hewertson, entered the Big Brother House.

    She lasted just 11 hours.

    She didn’t even get to spend the night.

    And now, Conference, I’ve heard that a third Tory blonde is in negotiations to enter the Big Brother House: Liz Truss.

    But negotiations have broken down, Conference.

    She’s asking to be paid by the minute. Too soon, perhaps?

    Look, I’ll come back to the blondes in a moment. But, Conference, it’s not all doom and gloom right now.

    Last month, I received some good news, courtesy, surprisingly, of Angela Rayner.

    Keir Starmer’s emergency reshuffle, otherwise known as, remember, Phase 2. Anyone recall that? Well, I think Keir Starmer would like to forget it too. Anyway, it led to a great privilege for me.

    I now shadow a new Justice Secretary: David Lammy.

    Now, David has a somewhat chequered past.

    You may recall his appearance on the BBC’s Celebrity Mastermind.

    David Lammy. Celebrity Mastermind.

    You don’t need to be a lawyer to know that was a violation of the Trade Descriptions Act.

    He was asked, “Which famous blue cheese is paired with port?”

    He replied, “Red Leicester.”

    It gets worse.

    “Which Marie won the Nobel Prize for Physics?”

    He responded instantly, “Marie Antoinette.”

    And my personal favourite:

    “Which monarch succeeded Henry VIII?”

    His answer? Henry VII.

    Now, just to clarify, Henry VII preceded Henry VIII, not the other way around.

    I’m not sure Mastermind was the show for David.

    Perhaps he could try Pointless.

    He’d work as either a contestant or an answer.

    But in all seriousness, it’s great to be here in the proud, historic city of Manchester.

    A city that has given our country so much but which has also suffered great tragedy.

    Most recently, last week, when Heaton Park synagogue was attacked.

    It was an attack on us all.

    Thoughts and prayers? Yes, absolutely.

    But I don’t know about you; I’m fed up with platitudes. We’ve had enough of those, haven’t we? I believe in justice and action.

    While other parties have waxed and waned, I am so proud that our party, the Conservative Party, has always stood with our Jewish community.

    And under Kemi’s leadership, I know we always will.

    Because, Conference, a Britain where our British Jewish friends are afraid is just not Britain. And we will never stand for it.

    Next year marks the thirtieth anniversary of another devastating attack in Manchester.

    The IRA unleashed the biggest bomb to explode in England since the Second World War.

    In more recent times, long after the Troubles ended, IRA members used so-called human rights laws to sue the British government for compensation while dragging our soldiers through the courts.

    To stop this injustice, the last Conservative government passed the Legacy Act.

    We took the side of our brave servicemen, the side of the victims, and above all, the side of the decent people of Britain.

    We refused to give in, and that’s something everyone in this room should be truly proud of.

    Now, I had a moral reason to back that bill, but also a personal one.

    Like most Saturdays, my nan and grandad, Ivy and Sid, were here in Manchester city centre when that bomb went off.

    We heard about it back home on the radio and had an anxious couple of hours while we waited.

    Until finally, we heard that my grandparents had arrived home safely and were unharmed.

    Fast forward to today, and elderly veterans who risked their lives to protect us from terrorists like those who bombed this city face spending their final days being dragged through the courts.

    Why? Because Labour wants to repeal our Legacy Act.

    It is shameful. Let that sink in.

    The last generation’s heroes, betrayed by this generation’s sellouts.

    It’s not right. It’s not justice.

    And, Conference, never on our watch.

    Now, we all knew Keir Starmer would be a bad Prime Minister.

    But I don’t think anyone anticipated he would be this bad.

    He’s combined the management style of David Brent with the administrative grip of Blackadder’s Baldrick.

    He’s proven himself to be a freebie-grabbing, free speech-stifling, criminal-releasing, tax-raising, farmer-hating, Brexit-betraying, aspiration-sapping, sorry excuse for a leader.

    And, Conference, this is someone who makes a hole in the air look substantial, Peter Mandelson appears trustworthy, and Mr Bean seems a model of competence and grip.

    Despite all this, and this might surprise you, I think we have reason to be optimistic.

    Because in the ways that matter most profoundly, the fantasists masquerading as experts are seeing their myths busted.

    The people got it right while they got it wrong.

    Wrong on mass migration.

    Wrong on free speech.

    Wrong on net zero.

    Wrong on two-tier justice.

    Make no mistake.

    The old order is collapsing, and a new one is coming.

    For too long, the chattering classes drowned out the voice of the people.

    Our job, Conference, is to ensure that the people’s will prevails.

    But it won’t be easy.

    Because right now, the gap between the government and the governed is wider than ever before.

    And, ladies and gentlemen, let me give you just one example of that great gulf: the Attorney General, Richard Hermer.

    Like one of those infamous mafia lawyers of yesteryear, Hermer always chose a particular type of client: Shamima Begum, Osama bin Laden’s right-hand man, terrorists involved in 7/7.

    Since taking office, we’re told Lord Hermer’s advice to Starmer and his cronies has been to give away the Chagos Islands to an ally of China and to pay billions of pounds for the privilege. In each of these incidents, he’s wasted no time establishing himself as a useful idiot for our enemies.

    His rise symbolises the central truth of Keir Starmer’s government.

    Labour is just not on Britain’s side.

    Why on earth would Britain’s Attorney General change the law to enable our country’s enemies to sue the very government he represents?

    Well, it makes more sense when you realise another of Lord Hermer’s former clients was, you guessed it, Gerry Adams.

    Not long ago, a man with his past would have had no place in mainstream politics.

    Now he sits at the cabinet table and influences decisions about our country, the same cabinet table the IRA tried to blow up in 1991.

    Shame on him and shame on the man who appointed him.

    Last week, at Labour Conference, Labour lined up to attack me for scrutinising judges for mind-bogglingly absurd judgments, like the Albanian criminal who avoided deportation because his son didn’t like the taste of foreign chicken nuggets in Albania.

    Labour just don’t get it. They really don’t.

    Now, you might be wondering what I have in this box.

    Well, don’t worry; I’m not about to do a Michael Fabricant tribute act.

    This is actually serious.

    For those of you at the back of the room who can’t see, I have here a judge’s wig.

    It’s something we should respect and revere.

    When a judge dons their wig, it signifies a transition from their everyday personality and identity to that of a legal arbiter.

    It’s a visual representation of the judge’s role as an unbiased mediator, focused solely on upholding the law and delivering justice.

    An unbiased mediator: that is what a judge should be.

    That is what the vast majority of judges in our legal system do.

    They wear the wig. They respect and revere it.

    And that’s why, in turn, our legal system is respected and revered all around the world.

    But we’ve got a problem, Conference.

    Today, I’ve uncovered dozens of judges with ties to open-borders charities, who take to social media to broadcast their open-border views, who’ve spent their careers fighting to keep illegal migrants in this country.

    Some even continue to do so while, astonishingly, serving as judges.

    It’s like finding out halfway through a football match that the referee is a season ticket holder for the other side.

    The public rightly ask, how independent are they?

    They dishonour generations of independent jurists who came before them and undermine the British people’s trust in the law itself.

    Judges who blur the line between adjudication and activism can have no place in our justice system.

    Which is why we won’t just tinker with a broken system and reform immigration tribunals.

    We will abolish them, once and for all.

    And we won’t stop there.

    We will restore the proper role of our judiciary, putting ultimate power back where it belongs: in the hands of Parliament and ministers accountable to you, the people of our country.

    So, I can announce today that we will restore the Office of the Lord Chancellor to its former glory.

    We will reverse the constitutional vandalism of Tony Blair and New Labour.

    The Lord Chancellor will once again appoint the judges. No more quangos.

    And they will be instructed to never permit activists of any political hue to don the wig, ever again.

    They will also be responsible for issuing new sentencing guidelines.

    The two-tier Sentencing Council is not fit for purpose, so it must be abolished altogether.

    Never again will this country and our people face the prospect of two-tier justice under two-tier Keir.

    Every single person will be treated exactly the same.

    Not equity. Equality.

    That, ladies and gentlemen, is the conservative, no, that is the British way to do justice.

    Now, I know you’re all wondering: who’s the fourth blonde I mentioned at the beginning?

    The one who would point the way to how we recover the fortunes of our party.

    Is it Margaret Thatcher? Not this time.

    Boris Johnson? No.

    Lord Heseltine? Bear with me.

    Now, as you can imagine, Michael Heseltine and I do not agree on everything.

    But he told me that when he was a young man in opposition in the 1970s under Margaret Thatcher, he would wake up every morning and ask his wife, “How am I going to fight, fight, fight Labour today?”

    And at the end of that day, he would lie in bed and ask his wife (he obviously wasn’t the most romantic man), “Tomorrow, how am I going to fight, fight, fight Labour?”

    Now, I don’t say that to my wife in bed.

    But I do think it.

    And that is what each and every one of us must do.

    Fight this failing Labour government. Fight for the future of our country.

    And when we fight, we win.

    Like forcing Sadiq Khan to go after those fare-dodgers who blight the capital.

    Stopping two-tier sentencing rules and guidelines.

    And ensuring there is equality before the law for everyone.

    And, most importantly of all, led by Kemi, shaming the Labour Government to hold a full national inquiry into the rape gang scandal.

    Don’t let anyone tell you that opposition is pointless.

    It matters. And right now, it matters more than ever.

    And, Conference, your support matters.

    To the door knockers, the pavement pounders, the envelope stuffers, the tweeters, and the TikTokkers, the members and councillors across the length and breadth of this country: let me say to you, thank you.

    Each day, in all kinds of ways, you’re getting things done far away from the wood-panelled corridors of Westminster.

    Thank you for everything you are doing. You are making our country a better place.

    And please, though it may feel tough, don’t ever forget what you are doing for all of us right now.

    Now, we all know that feeling when you’ve eaten too much and you simply think, “Enough.”

    As those of you who have known me for a while will know, I used to feel that a lot more often than I do today.

    But speaking to people out in the country, I think the British people are now using that same word: enough.

    Enough of being overlooked.

    Enough of being treated like fools.

    They see it, don’t they? When they watch freeloaders brazenly walk out of shops laden with goods they haven’t paid for.

    They hear it when morons blast their music in public places with utter disregard for others.

    And they feel it when they see the police ignore all these things yet find time to knock on someone’s door and scold them for a post on social media.

    Dismissed, derided, and demeaned for so long.

    The British people are patient and tolerant.

    But only up to a point.

    They’ve had enough.

    I’ve read countless stories about how talented young people are abandoning the UK, emigrating to Dubai, Singapore, or Australia.

    And not just because of the weather.

    Conference, this is my message to you: we may be a little down, but our country is not out.

    Because there is a better way.

    There is so much good in our country that’s worth fighting for.

    We’ve got so much to cherish about who we are.

    Blue remembered hills, seen from Black Country towns.

    Big skies over the flat acres of Nottinghamshire.

    The best farmers, food, and drink in the world: from Aberdeen Angus beef to Hawkstone Lager.

    A love of pubs, a love of animals.

    The common law, jury trials, a Royal Family so admired that they make the most powerful man in the world go weak at the knees, a military that has defeated every force on the planet.

    The roar of the crowd at Twickenham when the Red Roses beat the Canadians, or Chris Woakes, arm in a sling, goes out to bat at the Oval.

    The quiet kindness of our hospice movement.

    The millions of volunteers whose helping hands and broad shoulders make our society strong.

    The spirit of builders, of makers, of doers, of givers.

    These are the reasons our hearts swell when we think of Britain.

    I see it, Conference, and so do you.

    I see it when I travel around our country, even making the occasional video.

    I’ve developed a Michael Portillo-esque knowledge of Britain’s motorway service stations.

    So, if you’re watching, hello to all my friends at Greggs at Peterborough North Services. You might see me later this week.

    But above all, as I’ve been visiting communities, I’ve asked a lot of questions.

    And I’m telling you, out there, the spirit is strong.

    I felt it when I went to Epping and stood with local mums, sick of illegal migration and determined to keep their families safe.

    I felt it when I went out with tradesmen, gasfitters like my dad, sick of their livelihoods being wrecked when scumbags break into their vans and nick their tools, then sell them in plain sight at the local car boot sale.

    I felt it when I talked to folk putting up flags, sick of their identity being sneered at.

    The collapse of the old order is in sight. A new one is coming.

    Because the British people are fighting back.

    And, Conference, there’s absolutely nothing Labour can do to stop them.

    The only choice we have is whether we have the spirit to fight with them.

    Are we going to quit when the going gets tough? Or are we going to dig deep and fight like never before?

    How long will our battle last?

    As long as it takes.

    Because Britain, for all its present flaws, is too precious to lose.

    Let me not see our country’s honour fade.

    Let us see our land retain her soul, her pride, her freedom.

    Conference, every tide turns. And I can feel Britain’s fortunes turning.

    So, let’s pick ourselves up and dust ourselves down.

    Let’s draw on Britain’s greatness to make it greater still.

    Let’s fight for a better future.

    Let’s build this new order.

    Let’s take our country back.

  • NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 5 October 1925

    NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 5 October 1925

    5 OCTOBER 1925

    The Security Pact Conference opens at Locarno, Switzerland, today.

    The French Prime Minister, M. Painlevé, in a speech at Nîmes, declared that France’s foreign policy of “liberate and reconcile” was still her ideal, but in order that reconciliation in Europe should be possible, it must first be realised on the Rhine. Franco-German reconciliation was the cornerstone of European civilisation.

    Spanish forces in Morocco have now taken possession of Ajdir, the former Riffi headquarters, and most of the territory around the Bay of Alhucemas; and the French troops have started a new offensive, which is proving successful, and which has been aided considerably by night air bombardments.

    Representatives of the National Union of Railwaymen and the Railway Clerks’ Association are to meet the companies’ representatives to-day to deal with difficulties which have arisen in respect of the matters to be dealt with at the forthcoming meeting of the Central Wages Board. Mr C. T. Cramp, in a speech at Chester, said the railwaymen would shortly have to face a crisis of their own. He was proud to say that they rallied to the defence of the miners, and having helped others to secure the principle of maintaining at any rate the right to live, they would refuse, he was certain, to see their own standards unduly thrown down.

    Members of the British Fascisti in the Merseyside area to the number of between 2000 and 3000 have decided to enrol as special constables in the Liverpool Police Force so that their services may be available in emergencies.

  • Robert Jenrick – 2025 Comments Defending “White People” Speech

    Robert Jenrick – 2025 Comments Defending “White People” Speech

    The comments made by Robert Jenrick in Manchester on 7 October 2025.

    I was very clear in the remarks that I gave at that meeting, this is not about the colour of your skin or the faith that you abide by. It’s that, wherever possible, I want communities to be well integrated, and for people of all faiths and skin colour to be living side by side in harmonious, well integrated communities. That does not happen in all parts of our country.

    I do not want my children to grow up in a country where people of one skin colour live in one part of town, people of another skin colour live in another world, the Muslims, the Jews, the Christians have got their bits of town. Come on. We’re better than that. This is Britain.

  • NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 4 October 1925

    NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 4 October 1925

    4 OCTOBER 1925

    It was reported in West Ham that a new scheme of offering paper vouchers to the unemployed was causing issues for local shopkeepers who claimed that they were becoming overwhelmed by them. Criticism was made of the West Ham Board of Guardians for how the scheme was implemented, but the aim was to improve the well-being of those struggling financially in the area.

    The Northern Ireland Government said that if Archbishop Daniel Mannix attempted to enter Ulster then he would be expelled.

  • NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 3 October 1925

    NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 3 October 1925

    3 OCTOBER 1925

    Replying to a protest against the closing of Rosyth and Pembroke Dockyards, Mr Bridgeman said that an endeavour would be made to effect the reductions in staffs in such a way as to cause the least possible hardship; and he added that any applications by private individuals for the use of the establishments would be considered.

    French disappointment at the outcome of the Washington debt discussions is reflected by the newspaper comment. The Ministry of Finance, summarising the results, stated that France had recognised her debt, had obtained a reduction of the total claimed, and would make payments based on her capacity to pay without accepting any foreign control, while her political and commercial debts would be combined. Discussing his country’s capacity to pay, M. Labeyrie, Director of the Cabinet at the Ministry of Finance, stated that future reconsideration of this question in no way implied that America could exert financial control over France.

    The conclusion of a Russo-German commercial treaty is imminent. Chicherin, in an interview with the representative of a Berlin paper, expressed strongly anti-British sentiments, and said that Britain’s Pact policy was directed towards driving Germany into a coalition against Russia.

    Madrid is rejoicing over the Spanish success at Ajdir, in Morocco.

  • NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 2 October 1925

    NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 2 October 1925

    2 OCTOBER 1925

    Mr Stanley Baldwin, the Prime Minister, was presented with the freedom of Glasgow, and was afterwards entertained at a civic luncheon. Later in the day the Premier opened two of the Corporation Housing Schemes and a Child Welfare Centre. After his outdoor engagements, Mr Baldwin, at a gathering in the City Chambers, made an important statement on the housing conditions in Scotland.

    After rejecting an amendment in favour of nationalisation of land without compensation, the Socialist Party Conference at Liverpool carried on a show of hands a resolution submitted by the Executive outlining policy on the land problem and declaring that, pending the accomplishment of public ownership, land values should be subject to taxation. Mr Ramsay MacDonald defended his conduct of foreign policy during his late Premiership.

    An official resolution, moved by Mr Sidney Webb at the Socialist Party Conference, pressing for public ownership and control of the banks and credit system, and the development of co-operative and municipal banks, was adopted.

    Mr Ramsay MacDonald, in an address on “What is Socialism?” said capitalism organised human beings for economic and material ends, whereas Socialism organised economic and material resources for human ends. He did not believe in revolution, because we had now got democracy.

    What is described as a temporary settlement of the question of the French debt to the United States has been reached, and M. Caillaux has sailed from New York for France. No agreement has been signed, however.

  • NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 1 October 1925

    NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 1 October 1925

    1 OCTOBER 1925

    In reply to a correspondent regarding the organisation for maintenance of supplies during a general strike, the Home Secretary says that citizens would be performing a patriotic act by allying themselves with this or any other similar body.

    Lord Balfour and Sir Robert Horne have given their support to a movement under which the public will be given tuition by post to prepare them to refute Socialist and Communist arguments.

    The policy of the Socialist party in industrial and Imperial affairs was discussed at the Liverpool Conference. An attempt to revive the Zinoviev letter controversy and to commit the party to an apology to the Soviet Government proved unsuccessful, the resolution tabled by the extremists being defeated on a show of hands.

    In the French debt negotiations at Washington an approach to a compromise was reached.

    Feeling in Germany is divided on the British and French Memoranda on Germany’s reply to the invitation to a conference on security.

    Both the French and Spanish armies in Morocco have launched attacks on the Riff positions, and report their objectives as taken.

    In order to meet the shortage of coal owing to the strike of American miners, New York dealers have concluded contracts for supplies from Wales.

    The Prime Minister arrived in Glasgow. He will receive the freedom of the city today.

  • NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 30 September 1925

    NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 30 September 1925

    30 SEPTEMBER 1925

    Their Majesties the King and Queen made a formal visit to Aberdeen, where they took part in the inauguration of the Cowdray Hall, part of the new buildings forming an extension of the Art Gallery.

    The Socialist party Conference at Liverpool carried by an overwhelming majority the Executive’s proposal to continue the exclusion of Communists from membership.

    The text of the German reply to the invitation to the Security Pact Conference is published, as well as Mr Chamberlain’s answer.

    According to a Washington message, the chief obstacle in the way of the debt settlement between France and America is M. Caillaux’s insistence upon the clause in the agreement permitting revision in case of French inability to pay.

    It is expected that about 70 parish areas in Scotland will poll in the No-Licence campaign this year. Eight areas which are at present “dry” have sent in requisitions for a poll, which may, in some cases, cause the repeal of the No-Licence resolution.

    Several destroyers and a battleship of the French Fleet bombarded the territory in Morocco of the rebel Beni Said, in support of an advance by the friendly Harkos.

    The death is announced of M. Léon Bourgeois, a former French Premier.

    Mr Amery, Colonial Secretary, in an interview, discussed the Mosul dispute. It would have been disgraceful, he said, for Britain to have scuttled out of Iraq. For the first time in their history the Arabs and the Christian population were enjoying equal treatment. Britain was not claiming anything from Turkey; she was simply seeking to maintain the integrity of Iraq.