Blog

  • PRESS RELEASE : £400 million contract to operate military satellite communications system supports 400 UK jobs [February 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : £400 million contract to operate military satellite communications system supports 400 UK jobs [February 2023]

    The press release issued by the Ministry of Defence on 15 February 2023.

    Babcock has been awarded a six-year contract to manage and operate Skynet, the MOD’s military satellite communications system.

    • Babcock awarded the contract to operate Skynet – the UK’s military satellite communications system.
    • Expected to support 400 jobs in south-west England.
    • The contract forms part of the MOD’s £6 billion Skynet 6 Programme.

    As part of the £400 million Skynet Service Delivery Wrap (SDW) contract, Babcock and their partners will operate and manage the UK MOD’s constellation of military satellites, ground stations and integrate new user terminals.

    Skynet operations deliver information to UK and allied forces around the world, enabling a battlefield information advantage anywhere, anytime.

    Delivering on the Prime Minister’s priority to grow the economy, creating better-paid jobs and opportunity right across the country, this contract is expected to support around 400 UK jobs in Corsham, Bristol and Plymouth. Those benefiting will include engineers, scientists, space technicians and administrative staff.

    Their work will ensure that our deployed forces have a world-leading capability to communicate back to the UK, whether on the battlefield, onboard a ship or in the air.

    The SDW contract is part of the wider satellite communications SKYNET 6 programme which will provide space-based communications to 2041 and beyond, with an overall government investment of £6 billion.

    Defence Procurement Minister Alex Chalk KC said:

    Space is increasingly important for maintaining battlefield advantage.

    The UK’s next generation military satellite communications system will keep us at the forefront of this critical domain and the work under this contract will bolster our resilience for years to come.

    Providing low risk, uninterrupted services necessary to support the current Skynet 5 infrastructure, the partnership will also support the successful transition of services for future Skynet operations.

    David Lockwood, Chief Executive Officer for Babcock, said:

    We are delighted to have been chosen to support this world-leading technological safeguard. Skynet enables vital communications to the UK Armed Forces wherever they are, helping to keep them safe.

    In addition to the SDW contract, the Skynet 6 programme will deliver:

    • Skynet 6A, which comprises manufacturing and launch of the Skynet 6A satellite and is being delivered by Airbus Defence and Space UK;
    • Skynet Enduring Capability, which will deliver new space-based technology from 2028 onwards;
    • The provision of new ground and user terminal capabilities to ensure that UK war fighters have modern communications technology worldwide; and
    • A longer-term innovative approach for delivering space-based communications capability to follow on from the SDW contract.
  • PRESS RELEASE : Green maritime tech of the future to become reality thanks to £60 million boost [February 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : Green maritime tech of the future to become reality thanks to £60 million boost [February 2023]

    The press release issued by the Department for Transport on 15 February 2023.

    Regions across the UK to benefit from government funding to develop clean maritime technology.

    • companies across the UK to benefit from £60 million funding to supercharge the development of clean maritime solutions
    • Transport Secretary in Belfast to see state of the art tech allowing vessels to ’fly‘ above water, eliminating CO2 emissions and slashing fuel costs by up to 90%
    • part of UK government plans to back innovative businesses and reach net zero emissions by 2050

    The UK’s race to decarbonise the maritime sector has been given another vital boost, with £60 million in government funding distributed to innovative companies nationwide developing futuristic green technology.

    For the first time, the UK government is funding the development of new clean maritime technology across a 2-year period. Companies in 12 regions around the UK will benefit from the cash, generating highly skilled jobs across the nation and positioning the UK as a world leader in green solutions.

    The Transport Secretary, Mark Harper, visited Artemis Technologies in Belfast on Tuesday 14 February to see some of the tech in action.

    Using technologies adapted from the worlds of high-performance yacht racing, motorsports and aerospace, the company is developing vessels that effectively ‘fly’ above the water surface. The vessels produce zero emissions when foiling and offer energy savings of up to 90% resulting in significantly lower operating and maintenance costs.

    Artemis Technologies will now use the funding to help take their invention to the seas on a commercial scale.

    Transport Secretary Mark Harper said:

    Our maritime sector imports 95% of goods into the UK and contributes £116 billion to our economy – more than both aviation and rail combined.

    With growing the economy one of the government’s top priorities, we must continue our efforts to ensure the UK remains a pioneer in cutting-edge clean maritime solutions.

    The funding we’re awarding today will help to do just that, bringing emission-free concepts to life and fuelling innovation.

    The funding comes from the third round of the government’s Clean Maritime Demonstration Competition (CMDC3), which focuses on developing a range of clean maritime technologies including hydrogen, ammonia, electric and wind power.

    During the 2-year investment period, successful companies will be required to demonstrate that their projects will work in the real world, helping them to progress towards becoming an everyday reality.

    CEO at Artemis Technologies Dr Iain Percy OBE said:

    The clean maritime demonstration competition is key to unlocking those innovations across the region that will transport the UK towards a more sustainable future and we are thrilled that it has once again recognised the integral role Artemis Technologies can play.

    With this latest round of funding, we are emboldened to advance our green technology projects, develop world-leading clean vessels for our seas, and continue on our mission to lead the decarbonisation of maritime.

    Other winners include a project led by Collins River Enterprises Limited to build and test a brand new fully electric ferry on the River Thames between Canary Wharf and Rotherhithe, building on research funded through the first round of the CMDC.

    Another project led by AceOn Battery Solar Technology Ltd will develop hydrogen-powered vessels to transfer crew to wind farms off the northeast coast of England from the Port of Blyth.

    WingTek are also receiving CMDC3 funding to develop and demonstrate 2 full-sized prototypes of wind-assisted ships with high tech sails, which will reduce the amount of fuel used by the vessels as well as the emissions they produce.

    CEO of the UK Chamber of Shipping Sarah Treseder said:

    Congratulations to all the successful bids, which cover a wide range of technologies and aspects of shipping.

    The UK Chamber of Shipping is committed to net zero by 2050. This funding is an important milestone in ensuring we continue to work together to achieve this important target and will help us complete the journey from theory to reality for zero emission shipping.

    Today’s funding comes from the wider £206 million UK Shipping Office for Reducing Emissions (UK SHORE) scheme, announced in March 2022.

    The CMDC is one of the many initiatives from UK SHORE to fund green technology. Last week the government launched the Zero Emission Vessels and Infrastructure competition to support projects in the latter stages of development, and the Clean Maritime Research Hub – aimed at the early science and research behind green technology.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Coffey: “UK and US must forge a more sustainable future for agriculture together” [February 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : Coffey: “UK and US must forge a more sustainable future for agriculture together” [February 2023]

    The press release issued by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on 14 February 2023.

    Environment Secretary Thérèse Coffey will call on both the UK and US to continue to stand together to a forge a more secure and sustainable future for agriculture.

    In a speech at the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) Winter Conference in Washington DC later today (15 February), the Environment Secretary will outline how UK and US co-operation is vital to promote sustainable food production and global food security and will pay tribute to the farmers of Ukraine.

    NASDA plays a crucial role in US agriculture, with representatives from the Departments of Agriculture in all 50 States and four US territories. The speech will be the first time a foreign minister has addressed the conference – demonstrating the strength of UK and US collaboration on sustainable agriculture, food security and improving nature and biodiversity.

    This follows the recent launch of the Government’s Environmental Improvement Plan – the five year delivery plan to halt and reverse the decline in nature. The Environment Secretary is expected to highlight how ensuring nature and food production go hand-in-hand is a vital, shared goal between the two countries, with both developing landmark reforms to incentivise and reward environmental stewardship, while also harnessing new markets and tackling threats posed to food security by climate change.

    Environment Secretary Thérèse Coffey is expected to say:

    It is vitally important that we continue to stand together, in defence of the freedom, democracy, and common decency that our nations treasure so deeply. We must also continue to work together to forge a more secure, more sustainable future for agriculture. We must strengthen the resilience of our environment, our businesses, and our communities, and improve the prosperity and food security of every generation to come.

    Farmers are the original friends of the earth, the first to understand that making space for nature can and must go alongside food production. This is not mutually exclusive, but absolutely symbiotic. Working with nature – not against it – is the natural instinct of every farmer I have ever had the pleasure of meeting.

    As we work together to promote sustainable food production, we need to commend the immense contribution farming makes to our communities, and the sheer grit, ingenuity and determination it takes to keep us fed.

    The Environment Secretary will also pay tribute to farmers in the breadbasket of Europe, Ukraine, for their efforts in continuing to promote food security across the globe, and will outline the UK’s continued support to Ukraine.

    Thérèse Coffey is expected to add:

    Amidst the turmoil of war, it is truly extraordinary that the farmers of Ukraine have managed to get so much of the 2022 harvest in. At a time when Ukrainians themselves are suffering so much, the initiative to get grain from Ukraine, to some of the poorest and most vulnerable people in the world, is an act of global humanity at its very best.

    I was proud to send a contribution to support those efforts, on behalf of our government and our people, as I know the United States have done as well. This forms part of the wider support that we are sending to Ukraine, and the work that the UK has led through the G7 to help identify stolen grain and frustrate Russia’s efforts to profit from that theft.

    During her trip to the US, the Environment Secretary also met with US government officials, Senators, and CEOs from agri-tech start-ups. She also visited a brewery which makes craft beers from a combination of American and imported British ingredients, North Carolina State University’s new plant science facility and the Alexandria AgTech Innovation Centre.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Karen Carney appoints expert panel to support major review of women’s football, launched by UK Government [February 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : Karen Carney appoints expert panel to support major review of women’s football, launched by UK Government [February 2023]

    The press release issued by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport on 14 February 2023.

    Next step in ongoing review of domestic women’s football, launched in September 2022, examining issues affecting the game at elite and grassroots level.

    • Former professional footballer turned pundit Ian Wright and former Lionesses head coach Hope Powell to advise Carney on next stage of review
    • Wider group of sports executives including from the NFL will offer advice in areas such as commercial and grassroots participation
    • Carney today meets with Chelsea women’s head coach Emma Hayes at Kingsmeadow Stadium

    Football pundit and former professional footballer Ian Wright and former Lionesses head coach Hope Powell will advise a review looking at ways to boost participation  and strengthen the commercial standing of women’s football in the UK.

    Representatives from the NFL, the Women in Football group, sports business administrators and campaigners have also been appointed by review chair Karen Carney.

    Carney, a former England and Great Britain footballer, was commissioned by the UK government to look at the state of the women’s professional game, from the grassroots to the elite level, following a recommendation in the fan-led review of football governance.

    Carney has spent the last six months gathering evidence and today’s appointment of a panel of football and commercial experts will help shape the recommendations her review will make to the government. The review is expected to be published in the summer.

    The women’s game has made significant progress in recent years, with UEFA Women’s EURO 2022 highlighting the changing attitudes to women’s sport. Records were shattered: there was a record global audience of more than 365 million people, almost 575,000 tickets were sold, with nearly half of ticket holders female and almost 100,000 children. There were sell-out crowds wherever the Lionesses played, and the final broke the all-time record attendance for a EUROs final – in either the men’s or women’s game.

    Carney announced the panel as she met with Chelsea FC Women head coach Emma Hayes at Kingsmeadow Stadium to discuss the review’s progress, early findings and get her views on the state of the domestic game.

    Ian Wright has become a highly respected voice on the state of the women’s game while Hope Powell was the first black and first female head coach of an England national team. She was also head coach at Brighton & Hove Albion Women’s Football Club.

    Other appointees include Jane Purdon, chair of the Professional Game Academy Audit Company and director of the Women in Football group. She is a former director of governance at the Premier League and co-authored the Code for Sports Governance in 2016.

    Brett Gosper, head of Europe and UK for the National Football League (NFL) and a former CEO of World Rugby, will advise on how to improve the fan experience. Dan Jones, a former global lead partner for sports business at Deloitte, will examine the commercial and financial model of the women’s professional club game.

    Lisa O’Keefe is the secretary general of the International Working Group on Women and Sport. A former director of insight at Sport England, O’Keefe helped deliver the widely acclaimed ‘This Girl Can’ campaign which has successfully persuaded nearly four million women to get active since its launch in 2015. She will look at how to improve grassroots participation.

    Chair of the review of domestic women’s football Karen Carney MBE said:

    For this review, it was important to me to get the advice and support of experts across various fields, from sport to business. So I’m really pleased that Hope, Ian, Jane, Brett, Dan and Lisa have come on board.

    Their experience, expertise and understanding of the world of sport will be incredibly valuable as we set out our recommendations for the growth of the game. Best of all, I know they share my ambition to make the UK one of the best places in the world to play, watch and invest in women’s football.

    Culture Secretary Lucy Frazer said:

    There has been a huge surge in interest in women’s football over the past year and now is the time to supercharge the game’s growth.

    Karen has chosen a range of experts from different fields to help make sure her review can really revolutionise the game, from the grassroots to the elite level, and do so in a positive and sustainable way.

    This panel will bring valuable knowledge to help boost the commercial side of the sport while improving participation.

    The review, launched in September 2022, has a particular focus on:

    1. Assessing the potential audience reach and growth of the game – by considering the value and visibility of women’s and girls’ football in England, including the potential to grow the fanbase for women’s football and whether current growth can be achieved without overstretching infrastructure.
    2. Examining the financial health of the game and its financial sustainability for the long term. This will include exploring opportunities and ways to support the commercialisation of the women’s game, broadcast revenue opportunities and the sponsorship of women’s football.
    3. Examining the structures within women’s football. This includes the affiliation with men’s teams, prize money, the need for women’s football to adhere to the administrative requirements of the men’s game; and assessing the adequacy, quality, accessibility and prevalence of the facilities available for women’s and girls’ football for the growth and sustainability of the game.

    Since the launch of the review, Carney has asked for written evidence from a range of stakeholders from across the women’s game and met people from across the women’s football community.

    This includes the technical staff and players at several Women’s Super League and Women’s Championship clubs, former players, the football authorities and representatives from other organisations to discuss the issues facing the game’s development.

    She has also met with financial and commercial experts, alongside major broadcasters and sponsors to discuss the game’s financial health and broadcast rights.

  • Nicola Sturgeon – 2023 Resignation Statement

    Nicola Sturgeon – 2023 Resignation Statement

    The statement made by Nicola Sturgeon, the First Minister of Scotland and the Leader of the SNP, on 15 February 2023.

    Being First Minister of Scotland is in my – admittedly biased – opinion the best job in the world.

    It is a privilege beyond measure – one that has sustained and inspired me, in good times and through the toughest hours of my toughest days.

    I am proud to stand here as the first female, and longest serving, incumbent of this great office.

    And I am proud of what has been achieved in the years I’ve been in Bute House.

    However, since my first moments in the job, I have believed that part of serving well would be to know – almost instinctively – when the time is right to make way for someone else.

    And when that time comes, to have the courage to do so – even if, to many across the country, and in my party, it might feel too soon.

    In my head and my heart I know that time is now;

    That it is right for me, for my party, and for the country;

    And so today, I am announcing my intention to step down as First Minister and leader of my party.

    I have asked the National Secretary of the SNP to begin the process of electing a new party leader, and I will remain in office until my successor is in place.

    I know there will be some across the country who feel upset by this decision, and by the fact I am taking it now.

    Of course, to balance that, there will others who – how should I put this – will cope with the news just fine!

    Such is the beauty of democracy.

    But to those who do feel shocked, disappointed, perhaps even a bit angry with me, please know that, while hard – and be in no doubt, this is really hard for me – my decision comes from a place of duty and of love.

    Tough love perhaps – but love nevertheless, for my party and above all for the country.

    Let me set out – as best I can – my reasons.

    First, though I know it will be tempting, unavoidable perhaps, to see it as such, this decision is not simply a reaction to short term pressures.

    Of course, there are difficult issues confronting the government just now. But when is that ever not the case.

    I have spent almost three decades in front line politics – a decade and a half on the top or second top rung of government.

    When it comes to navigating choppy waters, resolving seemingly intractable issues, or soldiering on when walking away would be the simpler option, I have plenty experience to draw on.

    So if this was just a question of my ability – or my resilience – to get through the latest period of pressure, I would not be standing here today.

    But it is not.

    This decision comes from a deeper and longer term assessment.

    I know it might seem sudden but I have been wrestling with it – albeit with oscillating levels of intensity – for some weeks.

    Essentially, I have been trying to answer two questions.

    Is carrying on right for me?

    And – more importantly – is me carrying on right for the country, for my party and for the independence cause I have devoted my life to?

    I understand why some will automatically answer ‘yes’ to that second question.

    But in truth, I’ve been having to work harder in recent times to convince myself that the answer to either of them – when examined deeply – is ‘yes’.

    And I’ve reached the conclusion that it’s not.

    The questions are inextricably linked but let me take them in turn.

    I’ve been First Minister for over 8 years; and I was Deputy First Minister for the best part of 8 years before that.

    As I said earlier, these jobs are a privilege.

    But they are also – rightly – hard.

    And, especially in the case of First Minister, relentlessly so.

    Now to be clear, I am not expecting violins – but the fact is, I am a human being as well as a politician.

    When I entered government in 2007, my niece and youngest nephew were babies, just months old.

    As I step down, they are about to celebrate their 17th birthdays.

    Exactly the age to be horrified at the thought of your devoted auntie suddenly having more time for you.

    My point is this.

    Giving absolutely everything of yourself to this job is the only way to do it. The country deserves nothing less.

    But in truth that can only be done, by anyone, for so long. For me, it is now in danger of becoming too long.

    A First Minister is never off duty.

    Particularly in this day and age, there is virtually no privacy.

    Ordinary stuff that most people take for granted, like going for a coffee with friends or even for a walk on your own becomes very difficult.

    And the nature and form of modern political discourse means there is a much greater intensity – dare I say it, brutality – to life as a politician than in years gone by.

    All in all – and for a long time without it being apparent – it takes its toll, on you and on those around you.

    And if that is true in the best of times, it has been more so in recent years.

    Leading this country through the Covid pandemic is, by far, the toughest thing I’ve done.

    It may well be the toughest thing I ever do. I certainly hope so.

    Now, by no stretch of the imagination – to be clear – was my job the hardest in the country during that time.

    But the weight of responsibility was immense.

    And it’s only very recently, I think, that I’ve started to comprehend, let alone process, the physical and mental impact of it.

    So, what I am saying is this.

    If the only question was, can I battle on for another few months, then the answer is yes. Of course I can.

    But if the question is can I give this job everything it demands and deserves for another year, let alone for the remainder of this parliamentary term – give it every ounce of energy that it needs, in the way that I have strived to do every day for the past 8 years – the answer, honestly, is different.

    And as that is my conclusion – hard though it has been for me to reach it – then given the nature and scale of the challenges the country faces, I have a duty to say so now.

    I feel that duty, first and foremost, to our country – to ensure that it does have the energy of leadership it needs, not just today, but through the years that remain of this parliamentary term.

    And, right now in a very particular sense, I feel that duty to my party too.

    We are at a critical moment.

    The blocking of a referendum as the accepted, constitutional route to independence is a democratic outrage.

    But it puts the onus on us to decide how Scottish democracy will be protected and to ensure that the will of the Scottish people prevails.

    My preference of using the next Westminster election as a de facto referendum is well known.

    I’ve never pretended it is perfect – no second best option ever is – nor that there are no alternatives.

    That is why I have always been clear that the decision must be taken by the SNP collectively, not by me alone.

    But I know my party well enough to understand that my view as leader would carry enormous, probably decisive, weight when our conference meets next month.

    And I cannot – in good conscience – ask the party to choose an option based on my judgment whilst not being convinced that I would be there as leader to see it through.

    By making my decision clear now, I free the SNP to choose the path it believes to be the right one, without worrying about what it means for perceptions of my leadership, and in the knowledge that someone else will lead, successfully, along whatever path is chosen.

    There are two further reflections that have weighed in my decision – these, I suppose, are more about our political culture and the nature and impact of the dominance and longevity that comes from success in politics.

    The first, I hope my party will take heart from.

    One of the difficulties of coming to terms with this decision is that I am confident I can and would lead the SNP to further electoral success.

    Even in a time of challenge, we remain by far the most trusted party in Scotland.

    And while for every person in Scotland who ‘loves’ me, there is another who might not be quite so enthusiastic, the fact is we remain firmly on course to win the next election – while our opponents remain adrift.

    But the longer any leader is in office, the more opinions about them become fixed and hard to change. And that matters.

    Individual polls come and go, but I am firmly of the view that there is now majority support for independence.

    But that support needs to be solidified – and it needs to grow further if our independent Scotland is to have the best possible foundation.

    To achieve that we must reach across the divide in Scottish politics.

    And my judgment now is that a new leader would be better able to to this.

    Someone about whom the mind of almost everyone in the country is not already made up, for better or worse.

    Someone who is not subject to quite the same polarised opinions, fair or unfair, as I now am.

    The good news – as the country will now get to see more clearly perhaps – is that the SNP is full of talented individuals more than up to that task.

    My second reflection is related – and I think there is ample evidence of this in our current debates.

    I feel more each day just now that the fixed opinions people increasingly have about me – as I say, some fair, others little more than caricature – are becoming a barrier to reasoned debate.

    Statements and decisions that should not be controversial become so when it’s me making or taking them.

    Issues that are controversial end up almost irrationally so – and for the same reason.

    Too often I see issues presented and as a result viewed – not on their own merits – but through the prism of what I think and what people think about me.

    It has always been my belief that no one individual should be dominant in any system for too long.

    But while it’s easy to hold that view in the abstract as a leader, it is harder to live by it.

    With this decision, I am trying to do so.

    Indeed, if all parties were to take this opportunity to try to to de-polarise public debate just a bit;

    To focus more on issues than on personalities;

    And to reset the tone and tenor of our discourse;

    Then this decision – right for me and, I believe for my party and the country – might also prove to be good for our politics.

    I live in hope.

    Now, a couple of final points before I take a few questions.

    While I am stepping down from leadership, I am not planning to leave politics. There are many issues I care deeply about and hope to champion in future.

    One of these is The Promise – the national mission, so close to my heart, to improve the life chances of care experienced young people and ensure that they grow up nurtured and loved.

    My commitment to these young people will be lifelong.

    And, obviously, there is independence.

    Winning independence is cause I have dedicated a lifetime to. It is a cause I believe in with every fibre of my being.

    And it is a cause I am convinced is being won.

    I intend to be there – as it is won – every step of the way.

    Yesterday I attended the funeral of a dear friend and long standing independence activist, a wonderful man by the name of Allan Angus.

    It was actually during that service that I went from being 99% certain about this decision to 100% certain – though I know Allan would not be at all happy to have played any part in my departure.

    But his funeral reminded me that the cause of independence is so much bigger than any one individual; that all of us who believe in it contribute in different ways, at different stages of our lives.

    Since I was 16, I have contributed as an activist, a campaigner and a leader.

    And so now, as we look to what I firmly believe is the final stage in Scotland’s journey to independence – albeit a hard one – I hope to use all the experience and perspective I have gathered over these years to help get us there.

    Lastly, there will be time in the days to come for me – and others – to reflect on what has been achieved during my time as First Minister. I am sure there will be plenty of commentary on my mistakes too.

    I will have more to say before I demit office, but allow me some brief reflections now.

    Scotland is a changed country since 2014 – and in so many ways it is changed for the better.

    Young people from deprived backgrounds have never had a better chance of going to university than now.

    Our investment to double early learning and childcare is transforming opportunities for the youngest children. It is also enabling more women to return to work.

    The baby box is enshrining our aspiration that every child should have an equal start in life.

    Scotland is fairer today than it was in 2014. We have a more progressive approach to taxation and a new social security system, with the Scottish Child Payment at its heart.

    As the Institute for Fiscal Studies confirmed last week, the poorest families with children in Scotland are now £2000 better off as a result of our policies.

    For many – in this cost of living crisis – that will be the difference between food on the table and a warm home, or not.

    There are stronger protections for victims of domestic abuse, and Parliament will soon consider legislation to improve access to justice for victims of rape and sexual offences.

    To be clear, I will be the strongest possible backbench advocate for these reforms.

    We have also shown over these past few years what can be done with the full powers of a nation – creating new institutions that are part of the transition to becoming independent.

    New tax and social security agencies, a network of trade hubs across the world, and a state owned investment bank ready to help the country reap the industrial benefits of our vast renewable resources.

    There is so much that I am proud of.

    But there is always so much more to be done. I look forward to watching with pride as my successor picks up the baton.

    There will also be time in the days to come for me to say thank you to a very long list of people, without whom I wouldn’t have lasted a single day in this job, let alone 8 years.

    I won’t do so today – I might inadvertently forget someone or, perhaps more likely, start to cry.

    But there are a couple of exceptions.

    Firstly, my husband and family. Few people understand the price families of politicians pay for the jobs we choose to do. Mine have been my rock throughout.

    And, of course, the SNP.

    Since I was 16 years old, you have been my extended family. Thank you for the honour of being your leader.

    And I don’t know about you, but it seems to me that 8 emphatic election victories in 8 years ain’t a bad record together.

    Finally – and above all – the people of this beautiful, talented, diverse, at times disputatious, but always wonderful country.

    We faced the toughest of times together.

    I did everything I could to guide us through that time, often from my very familiar podium in St Andrews House.

    And in return I was sustained through that period by a wave of support from you that I will remember and value for the rest of my life.

    So to the people of Scotland – to all of the people of Scotland – whether you voted for me or not – please know that being your First Minister has been the privilege of my life.

    Nothing – absolutely nothing – I do in future will ever come close.

    Thank you from the bottom of my heart.

  • NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 15 February 1923

    NEWS FROM 100 YEARS AGO : 15 February 1923

    15 FEBRUARY 1923

    Three British sailors from HMS Dublin were attacked by a number of Portuguese men in Lourenço Marques, now Maputo, causing serious injury. A Portuguese senator managed to prevent further injury before police and more sailors came to the defence of the attacked men.

    The date of the Darlington by-election was set as 28 February 1923.

    The situation in the Ruhr Valley, occupied by French troops, worsened and tensions were inflamed across Germany about the actions taken by the French Government. Members of the French occupying army had been threatened and it was reported in the media that there was a growing danger to their lives as armed opposition increased.

  • ISSUE OF THE WEEK 4 : 1847 General Election

    ISSUE OF THE WEEK 4 : 1847 General Election


    The 1847 United Kingdom general election was held in July and August of that year, with the Whigs securing 292 seats, the Conservatives 325 and others 39 seats. The election was significant for the strong showing of the Irish Repeal Association, who won 36 seats, which advocated for the repeal of the Act of Union and Irish independence. Richard Dorset has written a book which details the results of the 1847 General Election constituency by constituency. We asked him a few questions about that election.

    Was the General Election in 1847 politically important?

    Inasmuch as John Russell continued as the Prime Minister, it didn’t ultimately become a landmark General Election which changed politics, but it was an important part of the free trade and protectionism debate. The free traders were broadly the candidates from the Peelites, Liberals, Whigs and Radicals. This was at a time when there was a growing movement amongst entrepreneurs and industrialists to reduce tariffs to allow them to export their goods abroad. The election led to a Government empowered to remove tariffs and that was seen in 1849 when the restricting Navigation Acts were repealed.

    Were there any election results that were significant?

    The most notable result is perhaps the election of Feargus O’Connor in the second seat at Nottingham, in what proved to be the only Chartist who was ever elected as an MP. There were high hopes for the party following this result, but they gained little over 10% of the vote at the next General Election in 1852. Nationally it was still early days for the political concepts called for by the Chartists and they were only able to field nine candidates.

    Also of note was the election of Lionel de Rothschild in the City of London as he was the first practicing Jew to win election to the House of Commons. This proved problematic for Parliament as Jews weren’t allowed at the time to serve as MPs, so John Russell led moves to create the Jews Relief Act to allow Rothschild to take his seat. The Lords resisted and it took until 1858 before change was approved and Rothschild was able to actually sit as an MP. This change also enabled Benjamin Disraeli to become Prime Minister for the first time in 1868.

    Was the famine in Ireland a major political issue in the country?

    Surprisingly not as large as might have been expected and there’s been some recent research which shows what a lost opportunity this was to tackle the Great Famine at an earlier point. It was notable that the Irish Repeal party led by John O’Connell (son of Daniel O’Connell) secured 36 seats, an increase of 16 from the 1841 General Election. But the political class at the time were generally wealthy and so they were lagging behind in representing the poorest in society who were suffering. The famine was to become important in the years after as demands for Irish independence started to grow.

    What were General Elections like at a constituency level?

    Raucous and this was in part because of the open nature of the election result as the secret ballot wasn’t introduced until 1872. That led to treating the voters with plenty of food and drink being supplied by those candidates who could afford it. The publication of electors and their votes cast led to corruption and also meant that there was no freedom of expression allowed. The problem of bribery was raised in the House of Lords in July 1847 by Henry Brougham who had previously served as the Lord High Chancellor. He wanted every newly elected MP to have to state on oath in Parliament that they had not bribed any voter, saying that no voter could hold their heads up in public if they were found to have lied about this.

    There was also frequent violence at a local level and the amount of free alcohol offered to treat voters also led to a relatively large number of disturbances during campaigning, public meetings and at the count itself. Deaths also weren’t unheard of and at the 1847 general election a young surgeon lost his life when a crowd got excited at the arrival of a beer wagon. There was another issue in Norwich when a group of navvies working on the rail network came to support Peto, himself an owner of the railways locally, and were attacked by residents in the city. The navvies found safety in a pub but the crowd tried to smash their way in and it was only calmed down following the arrival of the police.

    Was the 1847 election fought on the same boundaries as the previous election in 1841?

    Yes, although with the exception of the Sudbury constituency which had been disenfranchised in July 1844 following reports of corruption. The electors were moved into the Western Suffolk constituency, although a new Sudbury constituency was later created in 1885.

    Are you looking to write any further books?

    The current book is just a basic list of results from that election with details obtained from a number of different sources. I’m planning a longer book about the election which tells the story of numerous candidates and their experiences of politics in the 1840s. I’m also including details of many of the issues that occurred in constituencies, not least the violence and disruption that I’ve already mentioned.

  • Keir Starmer – 2023 Comments on Anti-Semitism

    Keir Starmer – 2023 Comments on Anti-Semitism

    The comments made by Sir Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on social media on 15 February 2023.

    Antisemitism is an evil and no political party that cultivates it deserves to hold power.

    I am proud to lead a party and a team that is working tirelessly to root it out.

    I will not rest until the job of changing the Labour Party and our country for the better is complete.

  • Kirsten Oswald – 2023 Comments on the Resignation Announcement of Nicola Sturgeon

    Kirsten Oswald – 2023 Comments on the Resignation Announcement of Nicola Sturgeon

    The comments made by Kirsten Oswald, the SNP MP for East Renfrewshire, on Twitter on 15 February 2023.

    Nicola Sturgeon has been an outstanding leader for our country. We’ve been so fortunate to have someone with her talents at the helm. I am so sorry she is standing down.

  • Stewart McDonald – 2023 Comments on the Resignation Announcement of Nicola Sturgeon

    Stewart McDonald – 2023 Comments on the Resignation Announcement of Nicola Sturgeon

    The comments made by Stewart McDonald, the SNP MP for Glasgow South, on Twitter on 15 February 2023.

    Nicola Sturgeon is the finest public servant of the devolution age. Her public service, personal resilience and commitment to Scotland is unmatched, and she has served our party unlike anyone else. She will be an enormous loss as First Minister and SNP leader. Thank you!