Blog

  • Keir Starmer – 2025 Statement on British Steel

    Keir Starmer – 2025 Statement on British Steel

    The statement made by Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, on 12 April 2025.

    Today, my government has stepped in to save British Steel. We are acting to protect the jobs of thousands of workers, and all options are on the table to secure the future of the industry. Delivering security and renewal for working people is at the heart of my Plan for Change.

    This government is turning the page on a decade of decline, where our manufacturing heartlands were hollowed out by the previous government.

    In recent weeks alone, we have announced the expansion of Heathrow airport and the building of the biggest theme park in Europe in Bedford. We are reforming our planning rules to build 1.5 million homes, and the infrastructure the nation desperately needs. New roads, railways, schools, hospitals, grids and reservoirs. British steel will be the backbone as we get Britain building once more.

    This is a government of industry. That’s why we’ve secured a better deal for the workers of Port Talbot. It’s why we fought to secure the future of Harland & Wolff. It’s why we’ve pledged £200 million to Grangemouth. Our industry is the pride of our history – and I want it to be our future too.

    A secure future. A Britain rebuilt with British steel, in the national interest.

  • Jonathan Reynolds – 2025 Commons Statement on British Steel

    Jonathan Reynolds – 2025 Commons Statement on British Steel

    The statement made by Jonathan Reynolds, the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, in the House of Commons on 12 April 2025.

    Mr Speaker we meet under exceptional circumstances to take exceptional action in what are exceptional times.

    Our request to recall Parliament was not one we have made lightly. And I am grateful, genuinely grateful, to Honourable members on all sides of this House for their cooperation and for being here today as we seek to pass emergency legislation that is unequivocally in our national interest.

    I would also like to particularly thank the staff here in Parliament for facilitating today.

    I would like to thank the Prime Minister, the Chancellor and the Home Secretary for their support.

    Indeed, the only reason we can take this action today is because of the restoration of economic stability and the dedicated resources for steel in the last Budget.

    I would like to recognise my honourable friend for Scunthorpe and the honourable member for Brigg and Immingham and for all my honourable friends from Teesside for their advocacy and engagement on behalf of their constituents throughout this matter.

    As honourable members will know, since taking office this government has been negotiating in good faith with British Steel’s owners, Jingye.

    We have worked tirelessly to find a way forward, making a generous offer of support to British Steel that included sensible, common sense conditions to protect the workforce, to protect taxpayers’ money, and create a commercially viable company for the future.

    Despite our offer to Jingye being substantial, they wanted much more, frankly, an excessive amount.

    We did, however, remain committed to negotiation. But over the last few days, it became clear that the intention of Jingye was to refuse to purchase sufficient raw materials to keep the blast furnaces running.

    In fact, their intention was to cancel and refuse to pay for existing orders.

    The company would therefore have irrevocably and unilaterally closed down primary steel making at British Steel.

    Now I want to make absolutely clear that separate to any conversation about a possible deal to co-invest in new facilities, the British Government offered to purchase raw materials in a way that would have ensured no losses whatsoever for Jingye in maintaining the blast furnaces for a period of time.

    A counter offer was instead made by Jingye for us to transfer hundreds of millions of pounds to them without any conditions to stop that money, and potentially other assets, being immediately transferred to China.

    They also refused a condition to keep the blast furnaces maintained and in good working order.

    Now even if I had agreed to these terms, I could not guarantee that further requests for money would not then be made.

    In this situation, with the clock being run down, doing nothing was not an option.

    We could not, will not, and never will, stand idly by while heat seeps from the UK’s remaining blast furnaces without any planning, any due process, or any respect for the consequences.

    And that is why I needed colleagues here today.

  • Stephen Doughty – 2025 Speech at the Antalya Diplomacy Forum

    Stephen Doughty – 2025 Speech at the Antalya Diplomacy Forum

    The speech made by Stephen Doughty, the Minister for Europe, in Antalya on 12 April 2025.

    The principles are fundamental, and they are what is at stake here. And as Andrea said, this is not just a situation where we see a complete violation of those principles that were in the Helsinki Final Act, that we all stood by, and we have stood by for those 50 years. But it’s also the UN Charter that is fundamentally under threat by Russia’s aggression.

    And of course, this isn’t just the aggression we’ve seen against Ukraine. It’s the other hybrid and destabilizing activities that they prosecute across our continents against our democracies more generally, and whether that’s disruptions, attempted disruptions, in the Western Balkans or in Moldova or elsewhere.

    This has consequences for all of us, and this matters for everybody in this room. It matters for everybody in the room if those principles of territorial integrity and sovereignty are not abided by, and it matters deeply for all of our people. Most importantly for the people of Ukraine at the moment, but for all of us.

    I was in Kyiv just a few weeks ago, and I could hear in the background the alarm going off there. For Ukrainians in the room, this would probably be the air raid alarm on their on their phones, because Ukraine is seeing that escalation every night, civilians being attacked and killed.

    I was in Bucha, which saw some of the worst, appalling atrocities that we’ve seen since the start of this conflict, and seeing those mass graves and others, but also hearing about how just the night before, how drones have come and killed civilians, and how children and others have been taken away and still no idea where those where those young people and those civilians are. That is a brutal attack on the values that all of us in this room stand for. So I think we must absolutely recognize what’s at stake here.

    That’s why we as the UK are 100% ironclad in our support behind Ukraine, not just for now, but for 100 years into the future. It’s why we’re working with our NATO partners and allies here. And it’s a genuine pleasure to be with friends – it’s a genuine pleasure to be here in Antalya and to be hosted by our Turkish allies and friends. And it’s why we must double down, not only on the support for Ukraine, but also for European, Euro-Atlantic security more generally – that’s what we’re doing.

    That’s the leadership the Prime Minister and President Macron are showing, working with President Trump on that secure and sustainable peace for Ukraine. Which Ukraine again has come forward from, and yet we do not see that same response from Moscow. And President Erdoğan very clearly set out yesterday the importance that that peace has to be sustainable. And that’s going to come through those of us who are willing to get in there, to put boots on the ground, to get the support to ensure that Ukrainian forces are able to defend, deter against future aggression. But also that we as NATO partners are stepping up, particularly European partners here, for our own defence.

    That is what we’re doing with our spending. That’s what we’re doing with our commitments. But this matters not just for us. It matters for the globe. It matters for us in this room, because these are fundamental principles that have been attacked here by Moscow.

  • NEWS STORY : Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander Outlines Vision for Inclusive UK Transport System

    NEWS STORY : Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander Outlines Vision for Inclusive UK Transport System

    STORY

    In a keynote address at the National Railway Museum in York, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander presented her vision for a more inclusive and connected UK transport system. Drawing from personal experiences in Swindon, a town emblematic of car-centric development, Alexander emphasised the need to shift towards transport networks that prioritise people over vehicles.

    Alexander recounted how Swindon’s urban planning, dominated by out-of-town shopping centres and limited public transport, influenced her understanding of mobility challenges. She highlighted that such environments restrict choices, particularly for those without access to cars, underscoring the importance of designing transport systems that serve all community members.

    While the speech did not introduce new policies, it set the tone for a transport strategy focused on inclusivity, accessibility, and community connectivity. Alexander’s narrative suggests a forthcoming emphasis on integrating various modes of transport to create seamless journeys, especially for under-served populations.This address aligns with the government’s broader initiative to develop an Integrated National Transport Strategy, aiming to empower local leaders and enhance regional transport networks.

  • Heidi Alexander – 2025 Speech at the National Railway Museum

    Heidi Alexander – 2025 Speech at the National Railway Museum

    The speech made by Heidi Alexander, the Secretary of State for Transport, in the National Railway Museum in York on 10 April 2025.

    Thank you, David, for that introduction.

    Good evening, everyone, and welcome to the National Railway Museum in York.

    I’m tempted to say we’re in the country’s finest transport museum, but as a Swindon MP and a former Deputy Mayor for Transport in London, I feel I should tread carefully.

    So welcome to ONE of the VERY BEST transport museums in the country!

    It feels fitting for me to do my first big transport speech here.

    The history of our transport network — the stories of the men and women who designed it, built it, operated and used it — are woven into the fabric of our communities in 21st century Britain.

    And it’s you — the people in THIS room — who are adding to that rich tapestry every day.

    You keep life moving.

    You get children to school, commuters to work, and families to their holidays.

    You move the goods that stock our shelves, fuel our industries, and keep businesses thriving.

    You don’t just connect places — you connect people with the things that they need to get on in life.

    And it’s in the spirit of connection that I’d like to tell you a story.

    I hope you won’t be disappointed to learn that I haven’t invited you here for a big policy announcement or news headline, but rather to share a little bit about who I am and what I believe.

    I want to tell you a story about the people and places who have shaped my thinking.

    I grew up in Swindon.

    A proud railway town on the M4 corridor – a place with much to be proud of.

    It’s also a humble football town – and I can tell you, that as a Swindon Town supporter, I have learnt the lessons of humility all too well.

    By fate and circumstance, that’s where my journey began.

    Outside our semi detached house, I remember my dad’s first van parked up — ‘Malcolm Alexander Electrical Services’.

    I remember the first bike I was given – blue with a basket on the front — a bit like the blue crate I’ve got on my bike now.

    And I remember learning to drive around the town’s infamous Magic Roundabout.

    And the car factories that punctuate the town’s history – Rover, Honda and now, BMW.

    It’s fair to say that in 1980s Swindon, the car was king.

    It still is.

    The proliferation of out of town shopping centres, urban expansions and a minimal public transport network shaped the transport destiny of my town.

    Now, I won’t pretend that urban planning preoccupied my teenage mind too much.

    Back then, I was much more concerned about whether Wham! were going to make it to Number 1.

    But when I moved away and got my first job, I began to see the bigger picture…

    … that a poor transport network will limit choices.

    … that it can block the aspirations of young people.

    And, most important of all, a good transport network can do precisely the opposite.

    I was the first person in my family to go to university.

    And like so many, I found work and opportunities in the capital.

    And so it was, at the age of 29, I walked into Lewisham Town Hall as a newly elected councillor – becoming the cabinet member for regeneration just two years later.

    I loved that job, and I fell in love with transport.

    Now, I’ll admit …

    It wasn’t the language of highways management that enthralled me: “There’s no such thing as a speed hump Cllr Alexander, only speed tables and speed cushions.”

    But it was the extension of the East London Line, the creation of new brownfield sites around major railway stations, the improvements to walking and cycling links that really got me hooked.

    I learnt quickly that transport shapes a lot more than roads and railways.

    And equally important, I learnt that it takes a lot of people to shape transport itself.

    At Lewisham, I saw first-hand how transport investment could make a dramatic difference to people’s lives.

    Take Brockley Railway Station.

    For years, it was an uninspiring, inaccessible place.

    Uninviting, a bit run down.

    Not somewhere you’d instinctively love as you rocked up for your morning commute.

    But working with local campaigners, we delivered step-free access, a stunning landscaped ramp and better connectivity along the London Overground.

    Today, Brockley is thriving.

    It’s a place where the old and the new coexist.

    The Wetherspoons on the corner and fried chicken shops sit side-by-side with bakeries, breweries and a pedestrianised square.

    It was a transport scheme that built a stronger, more connected community.

    And, it was transport that made the difference down the road in Lewisham too.

    We transformed it — relocating and improving a bus station, moving a roundabout, redesigning the roads, creating land for new homes, new public spaces and new opportunity.

    And when I say “we”, I mean the hundreds of people from different organisations who made it happen — people like you.

    When a few years later I became the Member of Parliament for Lewisham East, transport was always right at the top of the list of my constituents’ concerns.

    The longer train station platforms that were worse than useless without the longer trains to stop at them.

    The toxic air being pumped into homes around the South Circular.

    And when I later became Deputy Mayor for Transport in London, I had the privilege of working on those concerns more closely than I had ever done before.

    Look, London is big.

    So yes, naturally, I’m proud of the big stuff:

    Straining to keep the capital moving through Covid.

    Working on the Elizabeth line to deliver the jewel in the crown of the UK’s rail network.

    Sticking to my guns on the Silvertown Tunnel, a new river crossing that enables London’s red double-deckers to go under the Thames to the east of Tower Bridge for the first time.

    But honestly, big doesn’t always mean beautiful.

    Transport isn’t just about the price tag on the project.

    It’s about delivering a better everyday experience – buses that come on time, accessible stations, well managed road works.

    I’m just as proud of the smaller projects that made a big difference — many delivered in London by my good friend and then colleague Will Norman — segregated cycle lanes on Jamaica Road and Evelyn St, more secure cycle parking, slower speeds on roads with high KSIs, a direct vision scheme to improve visibility from the cabs of HGVs.

    These were transport interventions which ultimately delivered better public health, as well as better public realm.

    So when I moved back to Swindon a couple of years ago, I wasn’t just carrying a dream about becoming the MP for my home town.

    I arrived with baggage — determined to deliver for Swindon in a similar way to London.

    Not the same solutions — as every place is different, but to give people options and opportunity.

    There isn’t something in the water that makes Swindonians love their cars more than Londoners.

    Just a reality that public transport is better in London.

    And I think it’s a failure of imagination, as much as a failure of policy, that young people in Swindon don’t have better options than I had decades ago.

    Because change is possible.

    Across the country — from Swindon to Shrewsbury,  Rotherham to Peterborough — we have underused transport assets.

    Unloved railway buildings — land surplus to requirements or land that could be made so.

    Neglected stations, like Brockley.

    Potential that shouldn’t go to waste, but we know that, too often, it does.

    And with vision, funding and collaboration, these could become hubs of regeneration, places that don’t just usher people through — but bring people together.

    We talk about delivering “London style” transport to other places.

    But I think we should talk more about “Swindon style” transport for Swindon, or “York style” transport for York.

    And I want to support the capability and capacity within councils and combined authorities to deliver regeneration, investment and tangible improvements.

    We have great mayors.

    We have great local leaders.

    We have great organisations working nationally and regionally.

    We have a lot of talent in this room and beyond.

    So, the question for me, is how do we best harness that?

    Obviously, this is a question that has vexed me particularly since I took a call from the Prime Minister at the tail end of November, asking me to serve as his Transport Secretary.

    And as someone who has skin in the game as a local MP and a passion to build on the work started by the force of nature, Lou Haigh, I naturally said yes.

    And here I am.

    Full-circle in some ways, and trying to shape a new path in another.

    And the task is to build a better decade for transport.

    Towards a better railway…

    Laying the foundations for reform — establishing Shadow Great British Railways and launching a consultation on the upcoming Railways Bill to unify track and train.

    Towards public ownership…

    Passing the Passenger Railway Services Act, with the first operators — Southwestern and c2c — moving into public hands in the coming months.

    Towards better buses…

    Introducing the Bus Services Bill, giving local authorities greater control over routes, timetables, and fares — backed by over £1 billion in investment to improve reliability and frequency.

    Towards better roads…

    Investing £1.6 billion in local highways, an uplift of £500 million on last year — enough to fill an extra 7 million potholes.

    Towards fairer work…

    Enshrining greater protections for seafarers in law.

    Towards cleaner skies…

    Introducing the Sustainable Aviation Fuel mandate and launching a consultation on the revenue certainty mechanism.

    Towards a fossil-free future…

    Supporting the installation of thousands of new EV charge points—helping to drive record electric car sales, with 31% of new cars sold in December last year being electric.

    And towards a transport system that supports the aspirations of everyone in this country…

    It’s why I am so proud to work with the ministerial team at the Department for Transport.

    Like me — and like all of us — they’ve seen the difference that good services make…

    …Whether it’s the tap-and-go trams and buses in Mike Kane’s patch, with fares capped at £2 on Greater Manchester’s Bee Network.

    …Or in Simon Lightwood’s patch, where the mass transit system will improve integrated travel options in West Yorkshire, improving access to opportunities for people in Leeds and Bradford.

    …Or, in Nottingham, where one of the local bus operators, Nottingham City Transport, has been voted UK operator of the year a record six times, with passenger satisfaction amongst the highest in the country. I hear Lilian Greenwood is a pretty good local MP too …

    And as for Peter Hendy, who is his own walking museum of transport knowledge, he has a phrase that I would like to steal.

    He talks about transport needing to be “boringly reliable”.

    And he’s right.

    If public transport options are boringly reliable, then it means day-to-day life is easier for everyone.

    So, by 2035, I want public transport to play a greater role in national life, becoming the easiest, most attractive choice… brilliantly and boringly reliable.

    Enrique Peñalosa, a former mayor of Bogotá, once said:

    “An advanced city is not one where the poor have to own a car, but one where the rich choose to use public transport.”

    That’s a vision I believe in.

    But I can picture the headlines now — so let me counter the column inches before they emerge: there is no such thing as a war on motorists.

    I drive. I own a car and I love it — a racing green Mini Cooper convertible.

    I walk. I cycle.

    I take buses, trains, and taxis.

    And I’ll bet most of you do too.

    No serious person is proposing to ask people like my dad, a self employed electrician, to swap their van for a bus, forcing them to lug all their kit around — I certainly am not.

    Through his career, my dad was a professional problem solver, and I hope I’ll carry the torch for that family tradition.

    But I’ll be focussing on solving the real problems, not wasting time on the invented ones.

    Because I’m sure everybody in this room would agree that where you live shouldn’t determine what you can achieve…

    …that your hometown, no matter how big or how small, should provide the transport options to meet your aspirations…

    … and that — if transport doesn’t nurture young people with the opportunities they deserve, then our entire economy misses out on the talent it needs to grow.

    That’s why we’re here today.

    To have the conversations that bring us closer together.

    I want to harness your talents, your expertise and your drive to solve real problems.

    Because, no matter where people are travelling to, they should be proud of where they’re coming from.

    Thank you, and have a lovely evening.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Coalition of the Willing – Joint UK-France statement following 10 April meeting [April 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Coalition of the Willing – Joint UK-France statement following 10 April meeting [April 2025]

    The press release issued by the Ministry of Defence on 11 April 2025.

    A statement from Defence Secretary John Healey MP and Defence Minister Sébastien Lecornu following the meeting of the Coalition of the Willing on 10 April 2025.

    The UK Defence Secretary and the French Ministre des Armees convened counterparts from 30 countries and representatives from the EU Commission, EU Council and NATO, to reaffirm our commitment to work together to drive progress towards a just and lasting peace in Ukraine.

    Ukraine’s security is inseparable from Euro-Atlantic security. Only a lasting peace in Ukraine that safeguards its strength, security, and sovereignty will deter Russia from further aggression in the future.

    Our work today is part of detailed military planning led by the UK and French Chiefs of Defence over the last month supported by hundreds of military planners from across Europe and beyond, and directly supports the ambitions laid out by Prime Minister Starmer and President Macron at recent international Summits.

    We are leading this work together, side by side to secure the best possible outcome for Ukraine. The UK and France are building this coalition on solid foundations, having spent almost 15 years developing the common tools and culture to enable such a force through our Combined Joint Expeditionary Force.

    Planning so far has looked across the full range of military capabilities from Europe and beyond. Discussions have centred on how participating nations can contribute their own capabilities to ensure Ukraine’s future security, whether by strengthening Ukrainian capacity or direct contributions. Our objectives are to reassure, support and protect Ukraine to ensure that any peace settlement secures against the risk of future Russian aggression.

    It is important to maintain discretion when commenting on the specific details of these discussions, until the conditions of the necessary ceasefire are clear. But we are making solid progress, as a Coalition, on building a multi-national effort to support Ukraine’s transition to peace time in a position of strength.

    We are showing that through this coalition, Europe together with other international partners are willing to step up and support the US and Ukraine to achieve a just and lasting peace.

    President Putin must prove he is serious about peace and sign up to a full and unconditional ceasefire, as Ukraine has done. We are working very closely with Ukraine on developing these future plans, as well as NATO to ensure that our collective support to Ukraine strengthens the wider European-Atlantic security architecture.

    This Coalition will continue to meet regularly to drive progress and generate firm commitments in pursuit of a just and lasting peace in Ukraine.

  • Keir Starmer – 2025 Statement on British Steel

    Keir Starmer – 2025 Statement on British Steel

    The statement made by Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, on 11 April 2025.

    As Prime Minister, I will always act in the national interest.

    …to protect British jobs and British workers.

    This afternoon, the future of British steel hangs in the balance.

    Jobs. Investment. Growth.

    Our economic and national security…

    …are all on the line.

    I’ve been to Scunthorpe.

    I’ve met the steel workers.

    I know how important steel is…

    …not just to the region, but to the whole country.

    It’s part of our national story.

    Part of the pride and heritage of this nation.

    And I’ll tell you this – it is essential for our future.

    Our Plan for Change means we need more steel not less.

    So we will act with urgency.

    Now, we should be clear –

    This situation – and our response – is unique.

    While it is true that we are facing a new era of global instability…

    Our concerns about this plant…

    And negotiations to protect it…

    Have been running for years.

    This moment could have happened at any time.

    But it has happened now.

    And I will not stand by.

    There is no time to waste.

    So we are recalling Parliament tomorrow

    For a Saturday sitting.

    We will pass emergency legislation

    In one day

    To give the Business Secretary the powers

    To do everything possible to stop the closure of these blast furnaces.

    And as I have said, we will keep all options on the table.

    Our future is in our hands.

    This government will not sit back and just hope.

    We will act to secure Britain’s future…

    With British steel: made in Britain, in the national interest.

  • PRESS RELEASE : The UK remains steadfast in our commitment to gender equality, human rights and the Sustainable Development Goals – UK statement at the 58th session of the Commission on Population and Development [April 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : The UK remains steadfast in our commitment to gender equality, human rights and the Sustainable Development Goals – UK statement at the 58th session of the Commission on Population and Development [April 2025]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 11 April 2025.

    Explanation of position by Tara Soomro, UK Ambassador to ECOSOC, at CPD58.

    Thank you, Chair. The UK aligns itself with the statement delivered by South Africa.

    We extend our appreciation to you and the co-facilitators for your commitment and steadfast efforts to progress this important agenda.

    Despite the broad cross-regional commitment and goodwill demonstrated by many in this room, we are disappointed to have not achieved a consensus outcome that upholds and advances the mutually reinforcing principles and ambitions of the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) and Agenda 2030.

    Neisha, the UK’s youth delegate to the CPD, came before this Commission and spoke with passion and conviction about the realities young people face, the unmet sexual and reproductive health needs of adolescent girls, the devastating impacts of humanitarian crises on their futures and the urgent need for policies that reflect their lived experience.

    The inability to achieve consensus on this year’s CPD resolution is not just a procedural failure, it is a failure to uphold the commitments we have made to people around the world.

    The ICPD Programme of Action recognises that investing in human rights, gender equality, and sexual and reproductive health and rights is central to sustainable development.

    That truth has not changed.

    Yet today, we stand at a crossroads where previously agreed principles are being questioned and hard-won rights are being chipped away.

    Let us be clear, universal access to sexual and reproductive health services and reproductive rights are not an abstract debate.

    This is about whether women and girls can make decisions over their own bodies, whether young people have access to comprehensive information that can save their lives, and whether those most at risk, especially in humanitarian crises, receive the care, justice and services they need.

    Over 700 women a day die from preventable causes.

    This is the reality of the issues we debate here in this room.

    We are letting these women and girls down.

    A text that weakens these commitments does not reflect progress, it signals retreat.

    Ignoring the links between health, climate change, and inequality does not make them disappear.

    The world’s most vulnerable populations, women and girls, migrants, those facing humanitarian crises continue to bear the brunt of these overlapping global challenges.

    The UK and our many cross-regional partners, remain steadfast in our commitment to gender equality, human rights and the Sustainable Development Goals.

    These are not just words on a page, they are promises we have made to future generations and to each other.

    We recognise the progress made at all levels by grassroots organisations, civil society, national governments and also commend UNFPA’s leadership and remain committed to supporting this, making real change for women and girls around the world.

    As we reflect on this outcome, we must ask ourselves, what kind of world are we building? One that advances dignity, equality, and progress? Or one that turns its back on those most in need?

    The UK chooses to stand on the side of ambition, rights and the future we all committed to in 2015 when we pledged to leave no one behind.

  • NEWS STORY : UK Government Moves Toward Nationalising Steel Industry in Historic Intervention

    NEWS STORY : UK Government Moves Toward Nationalising Steel Industry in Historic Intervention

    STORY

    In a bold and unprecedented move, the UK government is set to begin the process of nationalising parts of the country’s beleaguered steel industry, as fears grow over mass job losses and the collapse of domestic steel production.

    Ministers are expected to unveil emergency legislation this weekend granting the government powers to intervene directly in strategically vital steel firms, including British Steel and Tata Steel’s operations in the UK. The plan would give ministers the ability to take temporary control of assets, inject public funding, and ensure production continuity in regions heavily dependent on steelmaking.

    The decision follows mounting pressure from trade unions, Labour backbenchers, and local leaders, particularly in industrial heartlands like Scunthorpe and Port Talbot, where thousands of steelworkers face redundancy due to the planned closure of blast furnaces and the shift toward electric arc furnace technology.

    ‘A Matter of National Interest’

    Announcing the move, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds told reporters: “Steel is not just a symbol of our industrial heritage—it is a cornerstone of our future. From defence and infrastructure to the green transition, we cannot afford to lose sovereign capacity in steel production. The government is acting decisively in the national interest.”

    The proposed intervention would mark the UK’s most significant act of nationalisation since the bailout of the banking sector in 2008, and the first re-entry of the state into steel ownership since British Steel was privatised in 1988.

    Under the legislation—dubbed the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Bill—the government would gain temporary ownership rights over sites deemed economically or strategically vital, with compensation mechanisms for current owners. The move is expected to focus initially on preserving production at British Steel’s Scunthorpe site, which is facing imminent shutdown.

    Backlash and Support

    The proposal has already stirred fierce debate. Business leaders warn it could send the wrong signal to investors, while union leaders have welcomed the plan as a necessary step to protect livelihoods and national resilience.

    Unite the Union’s General Secretary Sharon Graham called the move “long overdue,” adding: “The market has failed. The government is right to step in. You cannot build a green economy or a serious industrial strategy without a steel industry.”

    The Conservative opposition has accused the Labour government of returning to “1970s-style economics.” Shadow Business Secretary Kemi Badenoch said the decision was “ideologically driven” and risked “saddling taxpayers with costly liabilities for failing companies.”

    Why Now?

    The nationalisation proposal comes amid a perfect storm for the industry. Rising energy prices, global overcapacity, and the reimposition of US tariffs on British steel have all contributed to financial instability. Meanwhile, the transition to green steel has raised urgent questions about investment, competitiveness, and employment.

    Tata Steel’s move to shut its blast furnaces in Port Talbot and replace them with cleaner electric arc furnaces has left 2,800 workers facing redundancy. British Steel, owned by Chinese firm Jingye, is reportedly losing nearly £700,000 per day.

    Government sources insist the nationalisation plan is “temporary and targeted,” with a long-term strategy still focused on delivering a modern, decarbonised steel sector through public-private partnerships.

    Looking Ahead

    The Steel Industry Bill will be debated in Parliament over the coming week, with a fast-tracked schedule to avoid production halts. If passed, the first sites could come under public control as early as next month.

    With steel at the centre of defence supply chains, infrastructure plans, and the green transition, ministers are expected to argue that keeping it in UK hands is not just a question of economics—but of sovereignty.

    As one senior government official put it: “You can’t build a clean energy future on foreign steel. Not if you’re serious about reindustrialisation.”

    The stakes are high, but so is the symbolism. After decades of managed decline and global retreat, the state is stepping back into the furnace.

  • NEWS STORY : Trump Humiliated by Another Tariff U-Turn as US Reverses Course on Electronics Levies

    NEWS STORY : Trump Humiliated by Another Tariff U-Turn as US Reverses Course on Electronics Levies

    STORY

    In yet another dramatic reversal, the Trump administration has scrapped plans to impose sweeping tariffs on smartphones, laptops, and other electronic goods—just days after championing them as a cornerstone of his “America First 2.0” trade crusade. The decision, which blindsided Republican allies and delighted global markets, marks the second major tariff climb-down in as many weeks and has been widely described in Washington and abroad as a political embarrassment for former President Donald Trump, who is eyeing a return to the White House in November.

    The now-abandoned tariffs, announced with typical fanfare during a campaign rally in Michigan, were intended to target Asian tech manufacturing hubs, including South Korea, Vietnam, and China. Trump claimed they would protect American jobs and “punish countries who cheat,” but the announcement triggered immediate backlash from US tech giants, Wall Street, and international trade partners. The proposed levies, which would have added up to 25% on imports of phones, tablets, and household electronics, were labelled “economic lunacy” by industry groups, with Apple and Samsung warning of price hikes and supply chain chaos in the run-up to Christmas.

    Facing pressure from the tech industry, consumer advocacy groups, and even Republican governors concerned about inflation, Trump’s trade team issued a late-night statement on Friday confirming the tariffs would no longer go ahead. The statement cited “a re-evaluation of market dynamics” and “ongoing stakeholder consultations”—Washington code for “this went down like a lead balloon.”

    Critics were quick to pounce on the retreat.

    “This is a humiliation for Trump,” said Democratic Senator Maria Campbell. “You can’t play strongman one day and wave the white flag the next. It shows the chaos and incoherence of his entire trade agenda.”

    Even some Republicans expressed frustration at the backpedal. “If we want to lead, we need clarity—not chaos,” said Senator Rick Burns, a long-time proponent of tough trade policies. “This does nothing for credibility.”

    Across the Atlantic, European officials greeted the U-turn with a mix of relief and amusement. One senior UK trade official quipped, “It’s becoming hard to keep up. One day it’s a tariff war, the next day it’s a group hug. We’re just trying not to get caught in the crossfire.”

    The White House has remained tight-lipped, with aides reportedly scrambling to contain the fallout. Sources close to the Trump campaign admitted privately that the proposal was “poorly timed” and “politically damaging.”

    This latest U-turn follows hot on the heels of Trump’s embarrassing reversal on steel and car part tariffs—also scrapped after diplomatic uproar and pressure from American manufacturers.

    Observers now question whether Trump’s “tough on trade” posture has any remaining credibility. “The pattern is clear,” said Dr. Lena Alvarez, an international trade analyst. “Bluster, backlash, backtrack.”

    As Trump prepares for upcoming televised debates and eyes a second presidency, critics are warning voters to expect more volatility—and more headlines like this.