Blog

  • NEWS STORY : Lords to Question Ministers on Windrush, Health and UK-EU Food Rules

    NEWS STORY : Lords to Question Ministers on Windrush, Health and UK-EU Food Rules

    STORY

    Members of the House of Lords are due to question ministers this week on issues including healthy life expectancy, the Windrush Compensation Scheme, paternity leave for the self-employed and youth offending in England and Wales. The questions form part of the Lords programme for 18 to 21 May.

    On Monday, peers are scheduled to question the Government on the fall in healthy life expectancy in England, a new local government pension fund guide and inconsistent decision-making for victims under the Windrush Compensation Scheme. Peers will also raise regulatory flexibilities and innovation linked to the proposed UK-EU sanitary and phytosanitary agreement.

    The Lords will also continue debating the King’s Speech during the week. The Monday debate is focused on justice, home affairs and the Union, before later debates cover education, culture, technology, energy security, health, housing, transport, foreign affairs and defence.

  • NEWS STORY : Commons Returns to King’s Speech Debate as Steel Bill Set for Later in Week

    NEWS STORY : Commons Returns to King’s Speech Debate as Steel Bill Set for Later in Week

    STORY

    MPs are continuing the debate on the King’s Speech this week, with the House of Commons sitting from 14:30 today. The main subject for Monday’s debate is backing business to create economic growth.

    The parliamentary schedule for the week also includes debate on energy security on Tuesday, Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday and the conclusion of the King’s Speech debate on defence readiness. Justice questions, science questions and business and trade questions are also due to take place across the week.

    The Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill is scheduled for second reading on Thursday. The bill is expected to be one of the key legislative measures watched closely during the new parliamentary session, following recent Government interventions in the steel sector.

  • NEWS STORY : New Registration Rules Begin for Paid Tax Advisers

    NEWS STORY : New Registration Rules Begin for Paid Tax Advisers

    STORY

    New mandatory registration rules for paid tax advisers have begun rolling out, with HM Revenue and Customs introducing a single digital system for advisers who interact with HMRC on behalf of clients. The new requirement came into effect from Monday 18 May 2026.

    HMRC said the reforms are intended to raise standards in the tax advice market, protect taxpayers and make advisers easier to identify. Registration will be free and phased between May 2026 and March 2027, with different categories of advisers invited to register during separate windows.

    The first registration window, from 18 May to 18 August, applies to new tax advisers and advisers interacting with HMRC without an agent services account, Self Assessment account or Corporation Tax account. HMRC said eligible advisers who fail to register by the relevant deadline could face sanctions.

  • NEWS STORY : Government Announces New Measures to Target Waste Crime

    NEWS STORY : Government Announces New Measures to Target Waste Crime

    STORY

    The Government has announced new reforms aimed at stopping waste criminals from exploiting loopholes in the regulatory system. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said the measures would introduce stricter background checks for waste carriers and tougher penalties for illegal dumping.

    The reforms form part of the Government’s Waste Crime Action Plan and are intended to make it harder for rogue operators to remain active in the sector. Waste Minister Mary Creagh (in photo) said that the changes would help remove corrupt operators from the industry and strengthen action against those responsible for fly-tipping and illegal waste activity.

    The Environment Agency said the reforms would give it stronger powers to revoke permits and issue enforcement notices. The Government said lawbreakers could face up to five years in prison under tougher penalties for waste crime.

  • NEWS STORY : National Conversation Launched to Examine Divisions Across Britain

    NEWS STORY : National Conversation Launched to Examine Divisions Across Britain

    STORY

    A new National Conversation project has been launched to examine what unites and divides people across Britain. The initiative is being led by the Independent Commission on Community and Cohesion, co-chaired by former Conservative Chancellor Sajid Javid and former Labour policy chief Jon Cruddas.

    The commission is asking members of the public to complete a survey and record a short voice note setting out their vision for their community and country. The project will look at questions of British, English, Scottish and Welsh identity, as well as what connects people to their neighbours and makes places feel like home.

    The work is being convened by the Together Coalition and is expected to run until the end of August. A report later this year will combine public evidence with academic research, expert testimony and the commission’s own deliberations.

  • NEWS STORY : Lammy Warns Labour Against Renewed EU Membership Row

    NEWS STORY : Lammy Warns Labour Against Renewed EU Membership Row

    STORY

    David Lammy has criticised calls for Labour to reopen the question of UK membership of the European Union, describing the issue as a distraction from the Government’s immediate priorities. The Deputy Prime Minister said Labour had been elected on a manifesto that ruled out joining the single market or customs union.

    The comments followed remarks by Wes Streeting, who has argued that the UK should rejoin the EU in the future. Lammy said Labour should focus on delivery rather than internal arguments, warning that extended party infighting would risk weakening the Government and strengthening Reform UK.

    The intervention came as Labour faces wider internal tension over its direction after recent electoral losses. The issue is also politically sensitive because Andy Burnham is seeking a return to Parliament through the Makerfield by-election, in a constituency where Brexit remains a significant electoral factor.

  • NEWS STORY : Starmer Refuses to Set Departure Timetable as Labour Pressure Continues

    NEWS STORY : Starmer Refuses to Set Departure Timetable as Labour Pressure Continues

    STORY

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer will not set out a timetable for leaving office despite pressure from within the Labour Party following its poor local election results, Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy has said. Reuters reported that Lammy told Sky News there would be no timetable for departure after speaking to the Prime Minister twice on Sunday.

    The pressure on Starmer follows Labour losses in the 7 May elections, with Reuters reporting that almost a quarter of Labour MPs have called for him to go. Former Health Secretary Wes Streeting has said he would stand in any formal leadership contest, while Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham is seeking a parliamentary route that could allow him to challenge for the leadership.

    Starmer has said he intends to fight any leadership challenge. Under Labour rules, a formal contest would require one MP to submit 81 nominations, equal to 20% of Labour MPs, before a leadership race could begin.

  • NEWS STORY : Sadiq Khan Criticises Northern England Olympic Bid Plan

    NEWS STORY : Sadiq Khan Criticises Northern England Olympic Bid Plan

    STORY

    Sadiq Khan has criticised Government plans to explore a possible Olympic and Paralympic Games bid centred on the north of England, warning that excluding London would be a missed opportunity. Ministers have asked UK Sport to carry out an initial strategic assessment of whether the Games could be hosted in the north in the 2040s, including the likely costs, socio-economic benefits and chances of a successful bid.

    The BBC reported that the Mayor of London has argued that a future UK bid should make use of the capital’s existing sporting infrastructure, including venues developed for London 2012. A spokesperson for Khan said London was the “sporting capital of the world” and that a country-wide bid using assets across the UK, including the publicly owned London Stadium, could help deliver a greener and more sustainable Games.

  • John Slinger – 2026 Speech on Getting Britain Working Again

    John Slinger – 2026 Speech on Getting Britain Working Again

    The speech made by John Slinger, the Labour MP for Rugby, in the House of Commons on 14 May 2026.

    I do not know if colleagues noticed, but a lot of rhetoric and rumours have been flying around Westminster recently. MPs have been huddled in the Tea Room and the corridors, whispering feverishly—tensions are high. After all the anticipation and the angst, today was the day. Rumour became reality.

    Members will have guessed it: today it was announced that, for the start of 2026, we had the fastest GDP per capita growth in four years. In Q1, the UK’s growth was the fastest of six G7 nations for which we have data. Reports of the economy being in demise under the stewardship of my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer have been greatly exaggerated, as have reports of the political demise of my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister. Today’s good economic news matters for my constituents in Rugby. Economic growth matters for jobs and public services, for tackling the cost of living and much more.

    The Labour party is aptly named: labour, work. It is a party founded to represent working people in this House of Commons. We want people to work, and we are doing much to help people find work, to help people who face challenges of all kinds to get into work, to ensure that all have dignity when they are in work, to help them navigate a rapidly changing world of work and to ensure compassion and support for those who cannot work but who can still contribute and lead fulfilling lives. Because we are Labour we believe in an active state, not in the laissez-faire approach of the Conservatives or the money-from-who-knows-where approach of Reform UK. We believe in work.

    It is easy for people in here and for people outside to assume things about someone’s professional and work background. Even I have made that mistake. After reading the Reform UK leaflets that came through my door about the local elections, emblazoned with the face of the hon. Member for Clacton (Nigel Farage), I made the schoolboy error of thinking that, given his mythical status as a man of the people, his work background was varied, perhaps even working class. It turns out that this tribune of the people was a commodities trader in the City of London—nothing wrong with that.

    I would not want hon. Members to assume anything about my professional background. To misquote President Reagen in 1984, I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponents’ inexperience in blue collar jobs. My career has been varied. I did a paper round, I have been a gardener, I have done farmwork, I worked in a cinema, and I share with the Leader of the Opposition the fact that I worked in a McDonald’s restaurant for several years, although not the same one as her. I have been a waiter and a bartender, I was a hospital porter for two years, and I even worked here 20 years ago for Labour MPs. However, I have spent most of my career in the private sector in strategic communications consultancy.

    I say that because all jobs are important. All add value—public or private, blue or white collar, full time or part time. From our teenage years, they teach us that our labour is valuable and that we can benefit not only ourselves but the wider community. Members across the House will know that I have spoken many times about engaging young people and ensuring they have the best start in life. That has been a core tenet of my philosophy as an MP, and I am pleased to see it reflected in the King’s Speech, with policies that give young people more freedom, more opportunity and more hope, because building the foundations of a young life through work helps us strengthen the foundations of our country.

    In the Prime Minister’s much analysed speech on Monday, he described a vision to relentlessly pursue opportunities for our young people, promising a closer relationship with Europe, where young people can benefit from the Erasmus+ scheme and a new youth experience programme, which I strongly commend. He placed an even greater emphasis on young people: we will invest in apprenticeships, technical excellence colleges and a guaranteed offer of a job, training or work placement for every young person. Those measures will be brought forward in Bills announced in the King’s Speech.

    I welcome this Government’s laser focus on getting Britain working because, sadly, the latest official statistics make for depressing reading. They show that nearly 1 million 16 to 24-year-olds are not in education, employment or training. I want to see that figure come down, as I am sure all Members do. Not only does this situation rob young people of opportunity; it also risks condemning them to a life of inactivity, reliant on the state for their needs. That is unfair both to them and to the rest of the tax-paying population. The costs are borne by the individual, too. Analysis suggests that someone who is long-term unemployed loses around £1 million in lifetime earnings, which is absolutely shocking.

    Make no mistake, Madam Deputy Speaker: the scale of the problem is a direct consequence of 14 years of Tory rule. Under their watch, the number of 16 to 24-year-olds who are not in education, employment or training rose from 673,000 to 921,000. Shamefully, young people were written off, while the enormous benefits bill continued to grow. The Green party attracts those who are disillusioned with the status quo, but it offers no concrete pathways into work or training. I cannot see Reform offering anything substantial either, apart from Orwellian, un-British slogans about “remoralising” our youth. Young people do not need their morals recalibrated by that party or any other.

    Young people already have the initiative and the talent; they just need to be encouraged and helped. The Bills and measures announced in the King’s Speech will do just that and go beyond what this Government have already achieved to tackle the national scandal of young people being written off: the youth guarantee, backed by £820 million of new funding; hundreds of thousands of new training and work experience placements; and a new jobs guarantee that fully subsidises six months of paid employment for 18 to 21-year-olds who are long-term unemployed and on universal credit. Alan Milburn’s review seeks to dig deeper into this issue, and I have been in touch with him to contribute to the much-needed work he is conducting with the Secretary of State.

    I have previously spoken in Parliament about driving job creation for young people. I have visited Rugby College in my constituency and met with Intec Business Colleges, and I am campaigning for a youth hub that will offer employment advice and wellbeing support. I recently supported Jobcentre Plus and the DWP in organising a well-attended jobs fair in Rugby. I want to do all I can to help everyone right across my constituency into work.

    However, young people need more attention, resources and empowerment. They and their needs must be elevated in the decision-making process and the lawmaking process, as we govern more widely, and among other stakeholders in society. To co-ordinate that, I hope the Government will consider going further by appointing a youth commissioner, or even better, a dedicated Cabinet Minister for young people and the future generations. Such a role would scrutinise the work of Government, so that the benefits and trade-offs are assessed against the needs of young people and the future generations, ensuring that every decision takes their future into account. Their demographic is too often overlooked, but the legislation set out in the King’s Speech offers the Government an opportunity to give young people a genuine voice.

    Since January last year, I have been making the case for what I call a youth triple lock—a commitment to protecting and expanding the opportunities for young people in the same way that we protect pensioners. That idea is also supported by my hon. Friend the Member for York Outer (Mr Charters). It could include free bus travel, increasing maintenance loans above inflation or a voucher scheme for constructive activities—answers on a postcard.

    Before I draw my remarks to a conclusion, I want to pay tribute to my hon. Friend the Member for Jarrow and Gateshead East (Kate Osborne) for her moving words about her autism diagnosis. I am sure it is a difficult thing to speak publicly about.

    The Government should take this moment, and be bold in their approach. The Prime Minister set out on Monday that we can no longer continue with the status quo, or go back to the status quo ante, and that we must bring urgency to everything we do. I am glad we have a Chancellor, a Prime Minister, a Government and a parliamentary Labour party committed to ensuring that young people are empowered to become the architects and owners of the future, not merely tenants of one built by others. This is work in progress. This King’s Speech shows that Labour is the party of work, and we are making progress.

  • Caroline Voaden – 2026 Speech on Getting Britain Working Again

    Caroline Voaden – 2026 Speech on Getting Britain Working Again

    The speech made by Caroline Voaden, the Liberal Democrat MP for South Devon, in the House of Commons on 14 May 2026.

    It is a real pleasure to speak in this King’s Speech debate, which is my first in this Chamber. Last time around, I was sat on my own in a hotel room on the south bank with covid, warmly shared as a welcome gift by a lovely new colleague just after I entered this place.

    After the local election results last week, it is clear that the country has spoken. People right across this great nation are deeply, viscerally disappointed in the performance of this Government since the general election two years ago. This Government came in with such promise and such a huge majority that they could have done anything they wanted. They could have swung into action on day one, giving people real hope, with a real commitment to turbocharge the economy, to clean up our dying and degraded natural environment and to provide truly affordable and social homes, rather than more million-pound new builds like those we see carpeting South Devon. Instead, two years on, people are struggling to pay their bills, young people are failing to find their first job, parents are still fighting with local authorities to secure a decent education for their child, and thousands upon thousands of people simply cannot afford a secure roof over their head.

    Peter Swallow

    The hon. Member knows how fond I am of her, but how can she possibly in one voice condemn building new homes and in the next sentence suggest that we do not have enough homes for young people to live in? She simply cannot have her cake and eat it.

    Caroline Voaden

    What I said is absolutely correct. In my constituency of South Devon, new build homes in developer-led housing estates are selling for £950,000. We are not providing the homes we need—the social homes and the truly affordable homes that young people, young couples, young families and people who want to move out from their parents’ home need. We are providing the wrong sort of homes. Having a system led by housing developers that are driven by profit will never provide the homes that we need.

    Is it any wonder that voters across the country have turned to the extreme ends of our political spectrum to stick two fingers up at what they see as an ineffective political class that has completely ignored them? “Blame the immigrants” or “blame the billionaires” seem to be the two easy answers thrown out by these parties to the difficult, thorny, complicated questions that this country faces. The sad truth is that neither of those two propositions will be enough to make the changes we need to see to reform the structures of our economy and public services and to improve the lives of those who need it most.

    Ten years ago, we saw a referendum that cut our country in two, like a chainsaw through the trunk of a mighty oak tree, and that division has not healed. The arguments still rage, the communities still feel left behind, and the false promise offered in that awful referendum has turned out to be nothing but smoke and mirrors. People are still angry on both sides of that debate. The House will not be surprised to hear that as a Liberal Democrat, I welcome the Government’s promise to strengthen ties with our nearest neighbours in Europe. The House will probably not be surprised to hear me also say that that promise does not go far enough, especially if we are to get Britain working again.

    The upcoming EU reset Bill is just the latest example of the Government’s lack of ambition when it comes to rebuilding our trading links with Europe. When we talk of Brexit red tape, nowhere is that more limiting than in the red lines that Labour tied around itself in its 2024 manifesto. It said on coming into office that the previous Conservative Government had left a £22 billion black hole in the UK’s public finances, yet the botched Brexit deal has left a £90 billion hole, similar in scale to the damage wreaked by the 2008 financial crash.

    Businesses in South Devon regularly talk to me about the nightmare of trying to do business with Europe. Many have just given up on it altogether. Others are hanging on, desperately hoping that trading restrictions will be eased and customers will come back. I welcome the promise of a sanitary and phytosanitary deal, which cannot come fast enough for my food and farming businesses. We want to hear the Government talk about a customs union with the EU to slash the red tape that is holding us back, because economic growth has stagnated in this country for far too long. We also want to see the UK at the heart of European defence co-operation, not only for the benefits it would bring to national security, but for the investment opportunities it would provide for the supply chain. We must be front and centre of those negotiations. Europe would welcome our involvement, and we must be confident about shaping and leading that discussion.

    There is so much to cover in the King’s Speech, but I will just touch on a couple of other areas. I have talked about people feeling ignored and forgotten. Nowhere is the visible representation of that starker than in our high streets, with boarded-up shops, endless vape shops, cafés and pubs struggling to survive, and exorbitant rents making it impossible to get a new business off the ground. The Government have pledged to nationalise British Steel to protect fewer than 3,000 jobs. I have no doubt that the wider economy in and around Scunthorpe will truly benefit from that decision, but why is there nothing in this speech to protect our once vibrant and precious hospitality industry, which has lost nearly 100,000 jobs in the past year? Those jobs are less visible than the closure of a steelworks or a car plant, because it is 10 jobs here and 20 jobs there, but the effect of the national insurance rise has been devastating up and down the country. Businesses have been calling last orders once and for all or simply shrinking their offer.

    In my constituency, Rockfish, the California Inn, the Maltsters Arms and the Berry Head hotel—I could go on and on, because hospitality is the backbone of our economy—are cutting staff hours, choosing not to employ extra staff or closing two days a week so that they can manage on one exhausted chef, rather than employing a second, with the owner of the pub having to step into the kitchen when the chef has a few precious days off. This death by a thousand cuts is having a devastating impact on youth employment and part-time jobs. Those are the jobs that so many people rely on to combine with parenting, caring or studying. Let us not forget that every teenager who gets a job washing pots or waiting tables is learning valuable skills that will take them forward in the job market for years to come.

    As the Secretary of State said earlier today, this is about the story of their lives, and I was pleased to hear his passion for supporting young people into work, but youth unemployment now stands at around 20%. That is utterly shameful. One in five of our young people is unable to even get a start in the workforce. The new small business protections Bill is laudable, but it falls far short of a proper plan to protect small businesses. We are disappointed that the Government have not listened to our plan to scrap the national insurance rise, reform business rates and prioritise a high street revival.

    As a south-west MP, there is a list of Bills that I would have loved to see in the King’s Speech but are sadly missing. Yet again, the rural south-west seems to have been ignored. We have £45 billion for Northern Powerhouse Rail, but not a word about boosting vital bus services across the villages of the south-west. If we are to get people working again, we have to get them to work. If there are no buses, they cannot get there. There was nothing on boosting digital connectivity for hard-to-reach areas.

    Sam Rushworth

    I hear what the hon. Lady is saying—we have exactly the same challenges in my rural community, where people cannot get to job interviews or to jobs—but we passed the Bus Services Act 2025 in the last Session.

    Caroline Voaden

    I thank the hon. Member for his intervention. We do not have a mayor in Devon, so we miss out on a lot of that legislation’s benefits. I have loads of villages that do not even have a bus, so talk of bus fares is completely irrelevant when there is literally no service. How are young people supposed to get to college or work or seek opportunities if they cannot get out of their village?

    There was no legislation to require banks to offer a minimum service guarantee to their customers. Lloyds bank made nearly £7 billion in profit in 2025, yet it closed branches with impunity, and the Government’s promises to address the lack of banking services have led to nothing so far.

    There are some things in the King’s Speech that I would like to welcome. I am pleased to see the Government pledge finally to break the link between gas and electricity prices, which is vital in a country that depends more heavily on gas than many of our neighbours. Investment in home-grown renewable power is also welcome, but we want to see the focus of solar on warehouses and car parks, not on prime farmland. We also want to see stronger community benefits from new renewable infrastructure, empowering communities with the right to buy and sell community energy locally.

    Talk of farmland leads me to a devastating omission from the King’s Speech: not once was the word “nature” mentioned. As my hon. Friend the Member for South Cotswolds (Dr Savage) so beautifully laid out in her speech last night, that was probably something that the King himself was disappointed to see. Where is the desire to protect our green spaces, to prompt a revival in nature, to restore our ancient forests and our peatlands, and to clean up our dirty rivers and waterways once and for all? We live in one of the most nature depleted countries in the world, yet nature is not a priority for the Government, despite all the benefits that it brings to people’s health and wellbeing. If we truly want to cut the NHS bill, that would be a really good place to start.

    The new water Bill is welcome. The Liberal Democrats have long called for Ofwat to be replaced by a regulator that actually has some teeth, but until the Government address the elephant in the room and look at the ownership of the water industry, nothing will really change. No one should be making a profit from water: something that is so vital not only to us as humans, but to the health of all our planet’s ecosystems. The Liberal Democrats have long led the campaign in Parliament against the sewage scandal, tabling 44 amendments to the Water (Special Measures) Bill, none of which the Government or the Conservatives accepted. They must do more.

    Lastly, I will mention the education for all Bill. We all know that support for children with special educational needs is broken, so I welcome the Government’s commitment to tackling it; we urgently need this reform. As my party’s schools spokesperson, I will scrutinise every line of the legislation when it comes before the House, so I will no doubt have time to say far more about it, but let me say this. We must build a system designed around the potential that every child has and that works to their strengths, noticing their gifts and talents and what they can achieve given the right support. We must stop judging them by their limitations, ostracising them, separating them from their peers and causing lifelong damage to their mental health and confidence.

    Reform to SEND must be done with children and parents at its heart, with open, honest consultation with families, and with a serious commitment to invest the money needed in our educators and our schools so that they can rise to the challenge and truly build a more inclusive system that works for every child, from those facing the hardest of challenges to the lucky and blessed high achievers among them.

    It is a strange thing to deliver this speech opposite Government Benches that are so clearly riven by intrigue, and not knowing who will be leading this legislation through Parliament. It is my hope that whatever path our Government colleagues decide to go down today—or over the next few days and weeks—they will commit to going further in the areas that I have set out, remember the challenges and higher costs faced by rural areas in service delivery and communications, and prioritise nature in every single major decision they make about infrastructure and new building programmes. Think bigger, think bolder, think greener for the benefit of everyone.