Blog

  • PRESS RELEASE : New standards for rented homes under consideration

    PRESS RELEASE : New standards for rented homes under consideration

    The press release issued by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities on 2 September 2022.

    • A new Decent Homes Standard proposed for the private rented sector for the first time
    • Consultation launched today to hear views from renters, landlords, councils and housing groups
    • Part of government’s new deal for renters to make sure homes are safe and secure

    Millions of renters could benefit from a set of improved standards for rented homes, in the next step of the government’s biggest shake up of the private rented sector in 30 years.

    The Department for Levelling Up Housing and Communities has today (2 September 2022) launched a consultation on introducing a Decent Homes Standard to the rented sector, which would mean landlords are legally bound to make sure their property meets a reasonable standard.

    The majority of landlords in the private rented sector already meet high standards but a minority are failing to meet these.

    The consultation asks whether privately rented homes should be required to be kept in a good state of repair with efficient heating, suitable facilities, and free from serious hazards like major damp or fire risks. The consultation seeks views on whether such new standards should be introduced and on how they should be enforced.

    Over a fifth of the 4.4 million privately rented homes in England are in poor condition. Today’s move shows the government is getting on with delivering its levelling up mission, to halve the number of poor-quality rented homes by 2030.

    Housing Secretary Greg Clark said:

    I want to see a thriving private rented sector, but that does not mean that tenants should have to suffer homes that are not of decent standard.

    This consultation asks what the minimum standard for privately rented homes should be.

    Alicia Kennedy, Director of Generation Rent said:

    We welcome these plans to extend the Decent Homes Standard to private rented homes.

    As the private rented sector has grown to overtake the social sector in size, not enough action has been taken on the poorer conditions private tenants must put up with. Private rented homes are more costly to heat and at a higher risk of disrepair and damp problems. There is no reason why private tenants should expect a worse service than social tenants.

    This crucial measure will help tenants get value for money, whoever they rent from, and stop landlords from profiting by cutting corners.

    Gavin Smart, Chief Executive at Chartered Institute of Housing said:

    All renters should be able to live in decent, well maintained homes. We welcome the commitment to introduce a new Decent Homes Standard to the private rented sector as part of the government’s new deal for renters.

    We look forward to seeing the details set out in the consultation and discussing the proposals with our members.

    The social housing sector has been subject to a decent homes standard since 2001. Over the last decade poor quality social housing has reduced by over a third.

    The introduction of a Decent Homes Standard in the private rented sector was outlined in the government’s landmark Fairer private rented sector white paper.

    The consultation will run for 6 weeks and seeks views from tenants, landlords, and others in the sector.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Susan Lapworth appointed as Office for Students Chief Executive

    PRESS RELEASE : Susan Lapworth appointed as Office for Students Chief Executive

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 2 September 2022.

    Susan Lapworth has been appointed as Chief Executive of the Office for Students (OfS) following an open appointment process conducted by the Department for Education.

    Susan has served as OfS interim Chief Executive since May 2022, prior to which she was its Director of Regulation, and has worked in the higher education sector for 19 years.

    The Office for Students acts as the independent regulator for Higher Education in England. The Chief Executive is responsible for setting and delivering the strategic vision for how the OfS will achieve its aims of championing the interests of every student, whatever their background, and making sure that all students have a fulfilling higher education experience.

    The appointment will take effect from 1 September 2022 until the end of August 2026.

    Susan will work closely with the OfS board, Government and higher education stakeholders to deliver the OfS’s regulatory priorities for the next four years.

    Secretary of State for Education James Cleverly said:

    As interim Chief Executive of the Office for Students, Susan has demonstrated her leadership skills and put students’ interests first. She has extensive knowledge and experience of our world-class higher education sector, so I’m pleased to make this appointment.

    I look forward to seeing her play a pivotal role in improving graduate outcomes and ensuring that all students receive the high-quality academic experience they deserve.

    Chief Executive of the OfS Susan Lapworth said:

    I am delighted to have been appointed as the OfS’s chief executive. English universities and colleges make an enormous contribution to society and individuals, through teaching, research and work in their communities.

    This complex and diverse sector would not have a regulator if its work was unimportant and I look forward to continuing to work with the excellent team at the OfS to ensure that students from all backgrounds can access and succeed on high quality courses which leave them well prepared for life after graduation.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Schools Minister calls for action against school bullies

    PRESS RELEASE : Schools Minister calls for action against school bullies

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 15 November 2010.

    Ahead of Anti-Bullying Week, Schools Minister Nick Gibb spoke to the News of the World about the importance of tackling bullying in schools:

    Around half of all children say they’ve been bullied at school and had their lives blighted by fear. And it’s not just at school where young people encounter bullying.

    It’s simply unacceptable for a child to be victimised – whether it’s in or out of school, or on their mobile phones, or on social networking sites like Facebook.

    That’s why the coalition agreement that unites the government gives priority to tackling bullying and raising standards of behaviour in the classroom.

    There are 3 clear principles behind the government’s position:

    • we can’t allow any young person to go to school dreading the treatment they will get
    • when a bullied child is brave enough to speak out, we must support them – not the bully
    • when bullies are identified, we can’t just suspend them for a couple of days and then allow them to saunter back into school to torment their victims all over again

    Our schools white paper later this month will put heads and teachers back in control, giving them a range of tough new powers to deal with bullies and the most disruptive pupils. Heads will be able to take a zero-tolerance approach and will have the final say – both in and outside of school.

    We will also give teachers the right to remove disruptive children from the classroom without fear of legal action. They will be able to search pupils for weapons, and items like iPods and mobile phones, and confiscate them.

    Schools will have revised guidance to make sure they know how to tackle bullying effectively.

    We trust headteachers and teachers to use these powers. But there will be no-notice inspections for schools where behaviour, including bullying, is out of control.

    As Schools Minister, I am determined to do everything I can to tackle bullying and to help schools raise standards of behaviour in the classroom.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Government announces end of complex school financial reporting tool

    PRESS RELEASE : Government announces end of complex school financial reporting tool

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 15 November 2010.

    Michael Gove today announced the decision to scrap the complex and burdensome Financial Management Standard in Schools (FMSiS) with immediate effect.

    Following discussions with local authorities and schools, there was an overwhelming consensus to scrap FMSiS and develop a simpler standard.

    FMSiS was introduced in the early 2000s and made compulsory for all schools in 2007.

    Schools were required to meet the standard every 3 years by going through a burdensome self-evaluation tool. Schools, particularly primary schools, found the system required too much documentation and was implemented in an overly bureaucratic manner. For example, it required them to submit documentation to meet more than 100 different assessment criteria ranging from providing evidence that meetings on school budgets were ‘consistent with the deadlines for important financial decisions’ to showing how the school had made staff aware of the local authority whistle-blowing policy.

    Last year the Audit Commission said FMSiS focuses on processes rather than achievement of economy and efficiency, and that schools have not drawn an explicit link between its introduction and value for money.

    The government recognises the importance of ensuring schools have the right arrangements in place to manage their budgets effectively and so we will now work with interested parties, including local authorities and schools, to develop a new, simpler way of doing this. It is hoped the replacement system will be introduced next year.

    Michael Gove said:

    We are committed to reducing the administrative burden on teachers and school governing bodies and have already cut the burdensome self-evaluation forms for school inspections. Today we are ending the overly bureaucratic Financial Management Standard in Schools, and we will continue to work with schools and local authorities to reduce the bureaucratic burden further.

    Today’s announcement was welcomed by headteachers. John King, Headteacher of Gable Hall School in Essex, said:

    This marks the end of a hugely time consuming, burdensome bureaucratic and, in parts, senseless system of checking financial competency.

    Claire Axten, Headteacher of Brookside Community Primary School in Somerset, said:

    Our experience is that FMSiS was a very lengthy and burdensome process. The aim of FMSiS was to achieve value for money but the process was so time consuming this defeated the aim at the beginning! I am very pleased the government has decided to end the current system and replace it with a much simpler, national standard.

    Pippa Dodgshon, Headteacher at Hall Cross School in Doncaster, said:

    The system was unwieldy and the process was expensive – a massive burden to schools.

  • Shirley Williams – 1974 Interview on Rising Prices

    Shirley Williams – 1974 Interview on Rising Prices

    Part of the interview broadcast on Good Afternoon on Thames TV on 9 August 1974 with Shirley Williams, the then Secretary of State for Prices and Consumer Protection.

    INTERVIEWER

    Shirley Williams, can you tell me what effective steps you’ve taken to control rising prices?

    SHIRLEY WILLIAMS

    Yes, indeed and I think I have to say that I’ve always said there are some things you can do and some things you can’t do. And I’ll now list the things that I’ve tried to do.

    We first of all, declare a cut across the board in the retail margins of profit by 10%. We extended it not just to fresh food, but all the way across including all the non food items as well. We then declared a three months gap between price increases except to the few very rare cases. We ended the business of increasing prices of goods bought at the same price for stock goods on display, the so called sticky label racket.

    The next group of things we did was to bring in a Prices Bill which is now law, which enabled us to subsidise foods and under it we’ve subsidised bread, milk, butter, flour, and cheese. And that’s not the end of it, there’ll be others. We took powers to require the display of maximum prices for these subsidised foods and the orders on that are going out at the present time. We took powers to introduce unit pricing of particularly fresh foods, especially fruit and vegetables, meat and fish. And the first orders on that tool will be going out in the next few weeks.

    We entered on a voluntary agreement with the retail trade covering essential foodstuffs which weren’t subsidised, in an attempt to try to keep the margins down as low as possible on that, and finally, we’ve taken steps with the local authorities to greatly extend consumer advice centres and we hope that in a short space of time, these will also engage in price monitoring. That’s just on the prices side. I will leave out the consumer protection side where we’ve tried to do some things also. Net effect you want to ask, between four and five points on the food index, up to now with a bit more to come.

    INTERVIEWER

    Well, there’s lots and lots of points to take up there. And perhaps we could start with subsidies? Now the classic argument is you must know only too well against food subsidies is that we all get them, regardless of whether we need them or not. And to back this up yourself, you said recently in the House that only a quarter of the people who benefit from subsidies earn less than 30 pounds a week, actually 24%, are they then the best way of helping people who need help?

    SHIRLEY WILLIAMS

    Oh, Tony, you’ve got yourself stuck into a statistical difficulty that all the House of Commons got itself stuck in, so I can’t blame you. No, it’s 24% of households. But you see, most pensioners are households of one or two people. So that that many households represents far more people than the household figure gives you. Now we know three things about this. The first says that pensioners benefit most, they actually benefit in absolute terms most, that’s to say they make more out of subsidies per head than anybody else in the population. Reason for this quite simply is they buy more staple foods and they spend more of their budget on food. They don’t spend the same amount on cars and holidays and entertainment that no doubt you and I do. So they benefit the most, absolutely. They also benefit the most proportionately, and so do the poor families.

    The other part of the argument, I’ll be as quick about this as I can, of course it’s true that the average benefit of 60 pence a week goes to everybody. But the great difference is that anybody who earns over 60 pounds a week is paying an extra tax much more than he’s getting in subsidy. And anybody earning under 20 pounds a week is paying nothing extra in tax at all. So the whole of the subsidy benefits him and it’s what we call a give and take scheme, quite simply.

    INTERVIEWER

    But isn’t it true that the point of subsidies is completely lost if the good effect they have on lowering the cost of living is completely eroded by the government’s decision to put extra charges on the services of nationalised industries, things like electricity and gas, which pensioners need just as much as everybody else? I mean, isn’t that whole effect completely eroded away, and therefore we’re back to square one?

    SHIRLEY WILLIAMS

    As I began this programme by saying, there has been a definite impact on the food index and a definite impact on the pensioner index. The reason for this is that, although I agree with you nationalised industry prices do affect the pensioner, the pensioner does spend more of his income on food and rent. The two crucial things that had been directly affected in one case by subsidy and the other by freeze, then does anybody else in the population except the very poor large family.

    Now coming to nationalise industries prices. I mean, obviously, as the Prices Minister, I hate to see nationalise industries prices go up. But I think it’s fair to say that the scale of the subsidy was running at about 1,400 million pounds at the end of February, that the only way to sustain this would have been a massive further increase in income tax and other taxes including VAT. Therefore the feeling was in the government, and indeed in the Conservative government before it, that we could had to set a ceiling to these nationalised industry subsidies. And the only other point I would make is this. We have tried to protect the less well off, for example, rail fares to commuters have gone up substantially less than rail fares for people travelling InterCity because our studies have shown us that commuters include far more lower paid people.

    INTERVIEWER

    But you mentioned the word income then. Isn’t it really better to give people the money in some form or another, like increase pensions or family allowances or even less tax ,or some sort of tax credit then they can decide what they themselves would like to spend the money on?

    SHIRLEY WILLIAMS

    It’s no good giving people pensions on the one hand, and then see the whole lot eroded by increases in prices on the other. But the other point I want to make is this, because I think you have got a serious point about family allowances. Subsidies affected the cost of living immediately. It takes perhaps four weeks, six weeks to bring in a subsidy scheme, at least in areas where you can properly inspect it. There are some things like meat, but I’ve always admitted it’s very difficult to do.

    You can’t bring in a new family allowance system in anything like that time. You’ve got to print the books, you’ve got to set up the staff and so on. So can I just say this too quickly? The services have never been intended to be permanent, they’re intended to take the top off inflation. There is nothing in subsidies to preclude the government moving on to family allowances, moving on to higher pensions, but it can’t be done as quickly. It even took pensions up to July to be done although Mrs. Castle worked overtime and so did her staff and that was the shortest possible time.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Young people to be offered lessons in Mandarin

    PRESS RELEASE : Young people to be offered lessons in Mandarin

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 10 November 2010.

    Education Secretary Michael Gove today announced a pioneering new partnership with China to train 1000 more Mandarin teachers for secondary schools in England.

    During a visit to China to build stronger education partnerships with the Chinese, Mr Gove launched the joint programme between the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust and Hanban (the Confucius Institute Headquarters). It is to run over the next five years.

    Mandarin is an increasingly popular subject choice for young people at GCSE but in England there are currently only around 100 qualified Mandarin teachers, and only 16 per cent of secondary schools offered Chinese language teaching in 2009.

    This new partnership will increase the quality and quantity of Mandarin teaching in schools and allow more young people than ever before the chance to study this important language. Increasing the number of Mandarin speakers will help equip Britain’s future workforce with the skills we need to compete in a globalised economy.

    Speaking from Beijing, Michael Gove said:

    I am delighted to be building a stronger education partnership with the Chinese. There is a lot our countries can learn from each other and we want to work together to deliver world-class standards in schools through the greater sharing of knowledge and experience.

    This is not just about fostering a better understanding of China among our young people. Offering every young person the chance to learn Mandarin will help to encourage mobility between the two countries, equip the next generation with the skills they need to succeed, and ensure the long-term success of our economy and society.

    Elizabeth Reid, Chief Executive at the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust, said:

    China is at the centre of the global economy, and the next generation will need to understand its culture and be able to work in its language – which is why we are delighted to be signing a memorandum of understanding with Hanban to train 1000 teachers of Mandarin Chinese over the next five years to meet the growing demand in England.

    This new five-year programme will be co-financed by the two organisations and will begin in July 2011. The programme is aimed at dealing with the immediate shortage of Mandarin teachers and enabling schools to meet the rapidly rising demand for Mandarin teaching. In five years, the supply of qualified Mandarin teachers should have increased sufficiently to match demand, but the situation will be kept under review.

     Notes to editors

    1. Hanban is the Confucius Institute Headquarters / Office of Chinese Language Council International.
    2. Mandarin GCSE entries across the UK increased by more than five per cent between 2009 and 2010 and by nearly 40 per cent since 2002.
    3. Currently there are approximately 100 qualified Mandarin teachers in the UK.
    4. In a CBI survey in 2010, UK employers mentioned Mandarin and Cantonese as second only to French as language skills they would be looking for in future employees.
  • PRESS RELEASE : Nick Gibb calls for more focus on primary school reading and writing

    PRESS RELEASE : Nick Gibb calls for more focus on primary school reading and writing

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 11 November 2010.

    Commenting on statistics showing Key Stage 1 attainment by pupil characteristics, Schools Minister Nick Gibb today stressed the need for a greater focus and emphasis on the teaching of reading and writing in primary schools.

    The results are available via the Department’s Research and statistics gateway.

    Nick Gibb said:

    Though there is a slight increase in the proportion of seven-year-olds reaching the expected level in reading, it is a real concern that almost a third of all Key Stage 1 children receiving free school meals are failing to achieve the standard in reading and writing. Additionally, over a third of boys receiving free school meals fail to make the grade in reading and writing.

    Getting the fundamentals right is crucial to a child’s success in secondary education and throughout their adult life, and the Government is committed to getting all children reading and writing to a high standard.

    That is why we are promoting the use of systematic synthetic phonics in primary schools and why we are introducing a short reading test for six-year-olds, so we can identify those who need extra help. We will also support the most disadvantaged children by introducing a pupil premium which will provide extra funding for those schools with the most challenging intakes.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Lord Bew appointed to chair external review of testing

    PRESS RELEASE : Lord Bew appointed to chair external review of testing

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 5 November 2010.

    Lord Bew will lead a small review panel consisting of two education experts, a number of primary headteachers and one secondary school head. The panel is due to launch a 12-week call for evidence, following which it will publish a progress report summarising the evidence gathered. The panel will publish its final report by June 2011.

    The review will look at a number of issues, including

    • how best to ensure schools are properly accountable to pupils, parents and the taxpayer for the achievement and progress of every child, on the basis of objective and accurate assessments
    • how to ensure parents have good-quality information on the progress of their children and the success of schools
    • how to avoid, as far as possible, the risk of perverse incentives, over-rehearsal and reduced focus on productive learning
    • how to ensure performance information is used and interpreted appropriately within the accountability system by other agencies, increasing transparency and preserving accountability to parents, pupils and the taxpayer while avoiding the risk of crude and narrow judgements being made.

    Education Secretary Michael Gove has acknowledged the current system can be improved to ensure concerns – such as children being ‘drilled’ at the expense of broad learning – are overcome while the information parents want is still provided.

    Michael Gove said:

    We know parents support clear, rigorous and transparent testing at the end of primary school, and the OECD has concluded that external accountability is a key driver of improvement in education and particularly important for the least advantaged. So we must continue to allow parents to know how their local primary schools are performing.

    Raising standards and narrowing gaps are the central goals of the Government’s education policy. It is not our intention that the accountability system should be punitive or unfair to schools working in difficult circumstances but it must be able to identify and tackle cases of sustained underperformance.

    Equally, I recognise concerns from heads and teachers about the current system. That is why I have ordered a review – to see whether there is a better way to give parents the information they want and hold schools to account, while overcoming the concerns.

    I am delighted that Lord Bew, a hugely experienced, cross-bench peer, has agreed to lead the review, and I look forward to considering the panel’s findings next year.

    The Education Secretary also announced today new arrangements for delivering National Curriculum tests and assessments following the abolition of the QCDA. Working within the Department, an executive agency will oversee statutory tests and assessments for children up to age 14. Its exact remit will be confirmed following consideration of the recommendations of Lord Bew’s review.

    Michael Gove said:

    It is essential that the statutory assessment arrangements put in place following our review are delivered in a timely and effective way. It is right that accountability for ensuring this rests with ministers, and that is why I am establishing an executive agency within my department that will be accountable to me for the secure delivery of its functions.

    As the independent regulator, Ofqual will continue to have an important role, as it does now, in keeping under review the agency’s functions relating to National Curriculum tests and assessments.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Michael Gove announces review of key stage 2 testing

    PRESS RELEASE : Michael Gove announces review of key stage 2 testing

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 5 November 2010.

    Education Secretary Michael Gove today appointed the cross-bench peer, Lord Bew, to chair the external review into Key Stage 2 testing, assessment and accountability.

    Lord Bew will lead a small review panel consisting of two education experts, a number of primary headteachers and one secondary school head. The panel is due to launch a 12-week call for evidence, following which it will publish a progress report summarising the evidence gathered. The panel will publish its final report by June 2011.

    The review will look at a number of issues, including:

    • how best to ensure schools are properly accountable to pupils, parents and the taxpayer for the achievement and progress of every child, on the basis of objective and accurate assessments
    • how to ensure parents have good-quality information on the progress of their children and the success of schools
    • how to avoid, as far as possible, the risk of perverse incentives, over-rehearsal and reduced focus on productive learning
    • how to ensure performance information is used and interpreted appropriately within the accountability system by other agencies, increasing transparency and preserving accountability to parents, pupils and the taxpayer while avoiding the risk of crude and narrow judgements being made.

    Education Secretary Michael Gove has acknowledged the current system can be improved to ensure concerns – such as children being ‘drilled’ at the expense of broad learning – are overcome while the information parents want is still provided.

    Michael Gove said:

    We know parents support clear, rigorous and transparent testing at the end of primary school, and the OECD has concluded that external accountability is a key driver of improvement in education and particularly important for the least advantaged. So we must continue to allow parents to know how their local primary schools are performing.

    Raising standards and narrowing gaps are the central goals of the Government’s education policy. It is not our intention that the accountability system should be punitive or unfair to schools working in difficult circumstances but it must be able to identify and tackle cases of sustained underperformance.

    Equally, I recognise concerns from heads and teachers about the current system. That is why I have ordered a review – to see whether there is a better way to give parents the information they want and hold schools to account, while overcoming the concerns.

    I am delighted that Lord Bew, a hugely experienced, cross-bench peer, has agreed to lead the review, and I look forward to considering the panel’s findings next year.

    The Education Secretary also announced today new arrangements for delivering National Curriculum tests and assessments following the abolition of the QCDA. Working within the Department, an executive agency will oversee statutory tests and assessments for children up to age 14. Its exact remit will be confirmed following consideration of the recommendations of Lord Bew’s review.

    Michael Gove said:

    It is essential that the statutory assessment arrangements put in place following our review are delivered in a timely and effective way. It is right that accountability for ensuring this rests with ministers, and that is why I am establishing an executive agency within my department that will be accountable to me for the secure delivery of its functions.

    As the independent regulator, Ofqual will continue to have an important role, as it does now, in keeping under review the agency’s functions relating to National Curriculum tests and assessments.

    Further information

    Lord Bew is a cross-bench peer, Professor of Irish Politics at Queen’s University in Belfast, and a Member of Royal Irish Academy (MRIA). He was a historical adviser to the Saville Inquiry from 1998 to 2001.

    Membership of the panel in full is:

    • Lord Bew – Chairman
    • Miriam Rosen – Former Executive Director, Ofsted
    • Ruth Miskin – Founder, Read-Write Inc. and former primary headteacher
    • Greg Wallace – Headteacher, Woodberry Down Community Primary School in Hackney
    • Helen Clegg – Headteacher, Shiremoor Primary School in North Tyneside
    • Kate Dethridge – Headteacher, Churchend Primary School in Reading
    • Lubna Khan – Headteacher, Berrymede Junior School in Ealing
    • Tim Sherriff – Headteacher, Westfield Community School in Wigan
    • Sally Coates – Principal, Burlington Danes Academy in West London

    Representatives of Ofsted and Ofqual will act as observers.

  • John Hayes – 2010 Speech to the New All-Age Careers Service

    John Hayes – 2010 Speech to the New All-Age Careers Service

    The speech made by John Hayes, the then Education Minister, on 4 November 2010.

    Good afternoon everyone.

    For anyone who feels as passionately as I do about the value of practical skills, it’s a pleasure to be here in Belfast. This is a city in which skill has always been honoured, whether it’s the skill needed to build a ship or to produce the perfect Ulster Fry.

    And it’s a city whose people are, in consequence, more vividly aware than most of how important it is for the young to gain the skills that will serve them well when they try to find their place in the local jobs market. So I congratulate the Institute warmly on their choice of venue for this year’s conference.

    Of course I’m fully aware that the different parts of the United Kingdom each have their own approaches to careers guidance. But no one has a monopoly of wisdom in this area and one of the reasons why this conference is so valuable is that it offers the chance for us to compare approaches and learn from each other.

    Differences only go so far. What I hope we all have in common is a recognition that even the best skills system in the world can’t deliver half its potential unless it is supported by a structure that helps prospective learners to take well informed decisions.

    Like me, many of you will no doubt recall the Everyman Library. The library’s still going strong after more than a century. But I guess most of us still know it best from the pocket-sized red hardbacks that can still be found in any second-hand bookshop.

    J M Dent’s original and very laudable aim in establishing the series was to make 1,000 of the classics of world literature available to ordinary working people at a shilling a time.

    There are those, no doubt, who would dismiss that aim as an example of Edwardian paternalism. But at a time when compulsory schooling ended at the age of twelve, there was nevertheless a great deal of truth in the epigraph that opened every volume:

    _Everyman, I will go with thee
    and be thy guide,
    In thy most need to go
    by thy side.
    _
    There’s certainly no doubt that, a hundred years ago, most adults needed guidance to help them progress down the road to self-improvement through self education. Just as it’s true that today, in the 21st century, many people need extra help to get onto the ladder that leads to success in life.

    I’m not speaking only of people from disadvantaged backgrounds, though it is for them that the stakes are perhaps highest. Because, if navigating the canon of world literature can be confusing, so can mapping a path through the seemingly inexhaustible range of career options and qualifications routes that are available in the modern world.

    Because we are determined to eradicate unfairness and disadvantage from our society, to create an environment in which the only limit on any person’s ability to go far is the extent of their own efforts. We must first identify and then overcome the barriers which currently hinder people from progressing.

    So what I want to say to you today is not just about careers guidance but about what good guidance can achieve. Careers guidance makes a difference. It’s in the engine room of social mobility; a vital part of the machinery of social justice.

    Good advice doesn’t just transform lives. It transforms our society by challenging the pre-conceived ideas about what each of us seeks. And what all of us can achieve.

    I take it that no one here would disagree that one of the biggest barriers that many people face today lies in the inability to match the right learning opportunities with the right employment choices to achieve their aspirations. Unless we inherit great wealth, this is an obstacle that virtually all of us have to face.

    And to face it successfully, there are few people who would not do better with good, professional advice of the right kind, at the right time. If we believe in fairness and if we believe in social justice, then we must also believe in the value of advice and guidance in helping people find the right path.

    The evidence clearly supports that conclusion.

    We know that young people who stay in education or training post-16 are more likely to find employment, and that guidance in the final year of compulsory schooling is an important factor in their decision to stay on. We know that many young people drop out of post-compulsory education or training because it does not meet their expectations, or because their chosen course was unsuitable.

    The right guidance is no less important to adults. 82 per cent of adults receiving careers guidance say that it is instrumental in their decision to learn or seek training. And over 20 per cent say that a lack of information is a significant barrier to learning.

    Guidance is also an important key in unlocking access to learning and progression for those facing disadvantage, helping them become socially mobile.

    Early career decisions can have the most important impacts on mobility through the course of people’s lives. Failing to progress can have a damaging effect on social confidence, which can hamper mobility. There is also evidence that guidance of insufficient quality can create barriers to learning for young people who face significant disadvantages.

    Guidance is also essential in helping people aim as high as they can. Alan Milburn recognised this in his report on access to the professions, noting that “guidance is crucial in helping young people to develop ambitious but achievable plans, which are more likely to lead to positive outcomes.”

    Sir Martin Harris’s report on widening access to Higher Education reinforces this picture, noting that students with similar qualifications from disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to apply to and attend the most selective courses or institutions than their more advantaged peers. He also notes the impact of good quality advice on social confidence.

    And most recently, Lord Browne has made very clear recommendations in his review of Higher Education. In his view, “[careers guidance should] be delivered by certified professionals who are well-informed, benefit from continued training and professional development and whose status in schools is respected and valued.”

    So whether promoting social mobility, or helping people make educational and training choices, the importance of high quality careers guidance cannot be ignored.

    Alan Milburn’s report was titled “Unleashing Aspiration”, and that is exactly what I believe high quality careers guidance has the power to do, for young people and adults everywhere.

    There is also another important reason why we need to act.

    The impact of changing economic circumstances means that skills demands will increase at every level.

    As Leitch put it, better skills will be needed at higher levels “to drive leadership, management and innovation – the key drivers of productivity growth”, at intermediate levels to implement investment and innovation, and basic skills are “essential for people to be able to adapt to change”.

    The OECD stresses that as emerging economies start to deliver high skills at moderate cost, the OECD countries must themselves reform their skills policies. High quality advice and guidance is key to this development, but as Leitch pointed out “the current system in England is fragmented and fails to integrate advice on learning with careers advice”.

    We have to respond to these challenges.

    In whichever part of these islands we live, if we seek to promote social renewal by enabling more young people and adults to realise their aspirations of getting on in life; if we seek to support growth and productivity at every level; then effective, high-quality careers guidance is indispensible to our cause.

    At present, in England, we are falling short of that ideal far too often. We have not moved on far enough from the days when, to quote Disraeli, “To do nothing and get something formed a boy’s ideal of a manly career”.

    So let me outline what we propose to do about it.

    Of course, we must start from the position that the coalition Government inherited. And that’s by no means all bad.

    But while I recognise that there are examples of the Connexions service providing good careers guidance, the quality of careers advice for young people has not been consistently high. The universal aim of the Connexions service has meant, in practice, a dilution of its capacity to provide high quality, expert, impartial careers guidance.

    So I am clear that we need to restore a focus on specialist expertise in careers guidance for young people.

    Meanwhile, for adults, I appreciate that the Next Step service is an important achievement. But I want to go further still.

    Many of you know that I have long argued for the creation of a single, all-age careers service.

    A single, unified careers service would provide major benefits in terms of transparency and accessibility. And a single service with its own unique identity would have more credibility for people within it as well as users than the more fragmented arrangements that are currently in place.

    There are a range of other benefits, including the ability to support young people more effectively during their transition to adulthood. And that’s why creating an all-age service will be one of my and my Departments’ most important tasks over the coming months and years.

    As we go about this, it’s important to recognise that we’re not starting from scratch. On the contrary, we will build on Next Step, and on Connexions because we must not lose the best of either.

    In advocating this, I am certainly under no illusions about the Spending Review settlement. But if we are going to create the sort of comprehensive guidance service that I and many others think we need, then we will simply have to do more with less.

    That’s by no means an impossible task. Not if you approach it with pride in the importance of the task and with a willingness to use innovation and creativity where money is in short supply.

    So we will find new ways of providing face to face guidance that give young people, adults and communities what they need, and get the best from careers professionals

    Bringing careers advice for young people and adults together will help us to achieve some savings. But we will need to go further, and become much more imaginative in the way we make use of resources.

    We have a golden opportunity to build a service that will endure and the sector must rise to this challenge. There are always a hundred reasons to delay action until times change.

    There are doubters who will argue that we should wait until the financial situation is easier. Or until other reforms have bedded down. Or because it’s just less bother to let sleeping dogs lie.

    But I am a doer not a doubter, I believe that reform is needed now. Both to meet our national labour market needs better and to widen individual opportunities.

    We must build a path to a fairer and more open society.

    My vision for that future rests on two core principles:

    The first is that independent advice must be underpinned by professional expertise. That implies both strong leadership and a workforce of the highest calibre.

    Whatever good careers advisers achieve – and it’s a great deal – their public status too infrequently matches the importance of their job.

    So we will revitalise the professional status of careers guidance, looking to the Careers Profession Alliance to establish common professional standards and a code of ethics for careers professionals.

    We will implement the recommendations of the Careers Profession Task Force. In doing so, we will consider the Taskforce’s recommendation on levels of qualification, particularly the speed at which we could move towards establishing Level 6 – equivalent to an Honours degree – as the minimum standard for practising careers advisers within the service.

    We will also work with the Careers Profession Alliance and with awarding bodies to ensure that careers qualifications include an appropriate focus on the essentials of careers guidance.

    And we will insist that the all-age service meets demanding quality standards. Competition will be important in avoiding the complacency that can cause quality to slide.

    But most importantly, whether the public comes to recognise a culture of excellence amongst careers advisers depends mainly on you.

    On your ability to embrace the opportunities that reform offers. On your willingness to step up to the task of raising the status of your profession. On your determination to deliver the change we need to make individual dreams come true as they fulfil their potential.

    The second core principle of reform is independence.

    Young people and adults need impartial advice, which is independent of any organisation with a vested interest, and which is underpinned by objective and realistic information about careers, skills and the labour market.

    Just as I want to make sure that everyone has access to professional, independent advice, I also want to make sure that institutions know where that advice can be found.

    We will discuss with the sector how best to do that, perhaps by establishing a register of providers who meet the highest standards, and by a kite-mark, and by awards for excellence.

    I want all careers advisers to take pride in their profession, and to take their own professional development seriously. They must be seen to be the experts in their field and the most trusted source of advice.

    I want the professional organisations to lead the process of continuing to strengthen the status of advisers. That’s in their own interests, just as it’s in ours to empower them to play that role

    Because with greater independence comes greater responsibility.

    The rationale for change and the basic aims for reform are clear. So we need now to get on with the job.

    It is never too soon to fight the battle for social justice. We must not delay.

    So I can announce today that we will put in place as much as possible of the basis for an all-age careers service by September next year. And building on that, we will push ahead so that the all-age service is in place by April 2012.

    An indispensible part of that work will be gaining the confidence of educational institutions at all levels.

    Individual schools and colleges know their own learners and are better placed to assess their needs than anyone else. So it follows that on them must fall the responsibility for ensuring that all learners get the best advice and guidance possible.

    That should, of course, include information on vocational options like apprenticeships, as well as on academic options.

    I know that many schools do this very well already. They work effectively with their local Connexions service, and I have no doubt that they will continue to work effectively with the all-age careers service.

    But we ask too much of our teachers when we expect them to be excellent pedagogues and professional careers advisors. So too many schools are not equipped to provide young people with a full understanding of the options open to them. As a result, the ambitions of some are prematurely limited.

    That’s a waste that we just can’t afford.

    And that’s why I am clear that close partnerships – whereby schools work together with expert, independent advisers – must be at the heart of our new arrangements.

    I’m acutely aware that, with so much already expected of them, it would be asking too much to expect schools to keep up to date with all the latest developments in the labour market. So I want them to recognise the importance of independent, impartial, professional careers guidance, and to invest in it.

    I am confident that schools will want to secure the best for their students.

    For our part, we will provide them with the information and tools to secure independent and impartial guidance that empowers pupils make informed decisions about their future.

    With over 40 per cent of young people progressing to higher education these days, there’s an important role for universities too.

    Universities will continue to provide their own advice and guidance. But we will still encourage use of the all-age service and encourage its quality standards to be widely applied.

    I recognise that all this represents a significant shift for many within the careers sector, and, in particular, for local authorities, who are currently responsible for ensuring all young people receive careers guidance through the Connexions service.

    So let me make it clear that they will continue to have a vital role to play. Without them, we could not meet our target of achieving full participation by 2015.

    Local authorities in England will continue to be responsible for helping vulnerable youngsters to move forward in their lives and to participate in education, employment or training.

    They will need to maintain – as they do now – accurate data on young people’s participation in order to target support effectively on those who would otherwise suffer disadvantage.

    All this amounts to a serious programme of work. But my ambition, and that of the Coalition Government, does not stop there. Over time, I want to create an environment in which English careers guidance is recognised for the important public good it is, in which young people, adults, schools, colleges, universities and whole communities see its value, use it and invest in it.

    That’s a big task and it will require us to make some important changes. And I wanted this conference to be the first to hear them.

    I can confirm today that:

    First, we will ask the schools inspectorate to carry out a thematic review of careers education and other information, advice and guidance services for young people;

    Second, we will ask relevant national bodies to work with the careers sector to help schools, colleges and training organisations to learn from and share examples of good practice.

    Third, we will collate and publish clear evidence of the benefits and uses of careers guidance.

    Fourth, we will look at ways of recognising success and excellence, for example, developing awards for careers guidance professionals and those who have benefitted from it.

    And finally, we will consult you, the careers sector, on the scope for introducing a License to Practice for careers guidance, and the role it might play in securing quality.

    I will be asking the members of the Careers Profession Taskforce to monitor the progress we are making across this range of work, and intend to follow their recommendation to ask them to do so via two reports to the Government, one in March 2011 and one in March 2012.

    Careers guidance is often an important part of the journey for each individual. Very often when advice is bad, so are outcomes.

    But provided at the right time and in the right context, good advice from a trusted source can make the difference between sustained engagement in education, employment or training and a lifetime of disappointment,

    Engaging, inspiring, increasing social mobility – the job you do is the stuff of dreams.

    My plans aim to a radical and challenging programme of change. Delivering it successfully will require not just the efforts of those directly involved in providing careers guidance services, but of the wider education and training sector, too.

    Nevertheless, I know that the will for change, and a recognition of the benefits it can bring to millions of people’s lives, thrives here.

    And I know that the Institute will welcome the announcement of an all-age service for England.

    You called for it. We promised it in opposition. And we will deliver it in Government.

    In our hands lies the chance to change peoples prospects. What greater privilege, greater challenge can there be than the chance to change the future.

    I trust that you will have questions for me.

    Thank you.