Blog

  • David Winnick – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    David Winnick – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by David Winnick on 2014-06-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will arrange for the hon. Member for Walsall North to receive a reply to her letter to the Director General, UK Visas and Immigration, of 1 May 2014 on behalf of a constituent, CTS ref M5845/14.

    Karen Bradley

    The Director General responsible for Immigration Enforcement, responded to the hon. Member on 17 June 2014.

  • Bob Ainsworth – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Bob Ainsworth – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Bob Ainsworth on 2014-06-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what proportion of (a) adult and (b) child passport renewal applications were processed within the three-week service standard in each of the last six months.

    James Brokenshire

    he table below shows the number of straightforward passport applications
    received within the UK which were processed within 3 weeks.

    Month

    Proportion of straightforward applications processed within 3 weeks

    Dec 13

    99.99%

    Jan 14

    99.99%

    Feb 14

    99.98%

    Mar 14

    99.95%

    Apr 14

    99.59%

    May 14

    92.26%

    Her Majesty’s Passport Office does not hold a further breakdown of this information by
    application type. The cost of bringing that information together would be
    disproportionate and so it is not possible to provide the information you have
    requested.

  • Liam Byrne – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Liam Byrne – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Liam Byrne on 2014-06-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many meetings she has had with her Department’s Chief Scientific Adviser in the last 12 months.

    Karen Bradley

    As was the case under previous administrations, details of internal meetings are not normally disclosed.

  • David Ruffley – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    David Ruffley – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by David Ruffley on 2014-06-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many drink-driving offences were recorded in (a) Bury St Edmunds, (b) Suffolk and (c) England and Wales in each of the last five years; and how many successful prosecutions for such offences there have been.

    Norman Baker

    Drink driving is a summary offence, and not a notifiable offence. The Home Office only collects data on notifiable offences.

    The number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates’ courts and found guilty at all courts for offences relating to drink driving, in England and Wales from 2009 to 2013 can be viewed in Table 1. The same data for Suffolk can be viewed in Table 2. This data is held by the Ministry of Justice.

    Data is not available below Police Force Area level, and so data for Bury St Edmunds cannot be provided.

  • David Hanson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    David Hanson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by David Hanson on 2014-06-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how much in overtime costs has been spent in HM Passport Office in each month of 2014.

    James Brokenshire

    Overtime costs in Her Majesty’s Passport Office in each month of 2014 are as follows

    January – £199,146
    February – £400,812
    March – £840,588
    April – £793,559
    May – £964,742

  • David Hanson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    David Hanson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by David Hanson on 2014-06-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the current anticipated turn-round time for passport processing is for (a) applications from UK residents making new applications, (b) new applications for a child’s passport and (c) UK residents applying abroad.

    James Brokenshire

    Expected service standards for passport applications are published on
    www.gov.uk.

  • Chris Williamson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Chris Williamson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Chris Williamson on 2014-06-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what discussions her Department has had with the National Farmers’ union on the details of the injunction relating to protestor activities around the badger culls scheduled to take place in Gloucestershire and Somerset in 2014.

    Damian Green

    Home Office officials have had discussions with officials from the Department
    for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the National Farmers’ Union
    about the use of civil injunctions, in the context of a broader engagement with
    both organisations, on the badger culling activity for 2014.

  • David Hanson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    David Hanson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by David Hanson on 2014-06-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what representations she has received from the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs on the processing of passport applications from abroad since 1 January 2014.

    James Brokenshire

    Home Office Ministers have regular discussions with Ministerial colleagues and
    others. As was the case with previous administrations, it is not the government’s
    practice to provide details of all such meetings.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Dan Jarvis – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Dan Jarvis on 2014-06-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the effectiveness of the TecSOS system for high risk victims of domestic abuse; and what plans she has to rollout the programme to other areas of the country.

    Norman Baker

    The report by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) on the police
    response to domestic abuse, published in March 2014, clearly set out the
    importance of using new technology to help protect victims of domestic abuse.
    Whilst it is an operational matter for chief constables on procuring
    technology, we are aware that the TecSOS system is used by 16 police
    forces across England and Wales.

    Through the National Oversight Group, set-up and chaired by the Home Secretary
    to drive delivery against the HMIC recommendations, the Government is ensuring
    that best practice on the use of new technology, like TecSOS, is identified and
    shared so that the policing of domestic abuse is robust.

    As part of its commitment to support high risk victims of domestic abuse, the
    Government part-funds 144 Independent Domestic Violence Advisors and 54
    Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conference co-ordinator posts. This funding
    amounts to £3.4 million per year.

  • Richard Fuller – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    Richard Fuller – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Richard Fuller on 2014-06-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, if she will review the effectiveness of Part 8 of the Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003; and if she will bring forward legislative proposals to extend the scope of these provisions to include complaints on high hedges.

    Nick Boles

    Part 8 of the Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 (‘High hedges’) addresses private disputes about tall evergreen hedges adversely affecting neighbouring homes and gardens. We have no current plans to undertake a specific review of this part of the 2003 Act.