Blog

  • Douglas Chapman – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Douglas Chapman – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Douglas Chapman on 2015-10-19.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether all UK service personnel deployed to malarial areas since 2013 have been individually assessed for contraindications for mefloquine; and what the method of assessment was for those who were individually assessed.

    Mark Lancaster

    Since 2013, it has been Ministry of Defence policy that mefloquine should only be prescribed after an individual risk assessment. To verify that an individual assessment has been undertaken in every case since 2013 would require the examination of the medical records of all individuals who have deployed since 2013. This could only be achieved at disproportionate cost.

    Templates exist to optimise consistency in the preparation of personnel requiring anti-malarials, including mefloquine. Defence Primary Healthcare has a malaria protocol to guide clinicians to use these templates. Work is currently in hand to develop it further, taking previous lessons into account, to ensure that all individuals are assessed in a consistent manner.

  • Andrew Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Andrew Smith – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Andrew Smith on 2015-10-19.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, in which countries UK defence attachés are posted.

    Mr Julian Brazier

    There are resident Defence Attachés in the following countries:

    Afghanistan – Kabul

    Algeria – Algiers

    Argentina – Buenos Aires

    Australia – Canberra

    Austria – Vienna

    Bahrain – Manama

    Estonia – Tallinn

    Bangladesh – Dhaka

    Bosnia and Herzegovina – Sarajevo

    Brazil – Brasilia

    Brunei – Bandar Seri Begawan

    Burma – Rangoon

    Canada – Ottawa

    Chile – Santiago

    China – Beijing

    Colombia – Bogota

    Croatia – Zagreb

    Cyprus – Nicosia

    Czech Republic – Prague

    Denmark – Copenhagen

    Egypt – Cairo

    Ethiopia – Addis Ababa

    France – Paris

    Georgia – Tbilisi

    Germany – Berlin

    Ghana – Accra

    Greece – Athens

    India – New Delhi

    Indonesia – Jakarta

    Iraq – Baghdad

    Ireland – Dublin

    Israel – Tel Aviv

    Italy – Rome

    Jamaica – Kingston

    Japan – Tokyo

    Jordan – Amman

    Kazakhstan – Astana

    Kenya – Nairobi

    Korea – Seoul

    Kuwait – Kuwait City

    Lebanon – Beirut

    Libya – Tripoli

    Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Skopje

    Malaysia – Kuala Lumpur

    Mexico – Mexico City

    Morocco – Rabat

    Nepal – Kathmandu

    Netherlands – The Hague

    New Zealand – Wellington

    Nigeria – Abuja

    Norway – Oslo

    Oman – Muscat

    Pakistan – Islamabad

    Poland – Warsaw

    Qatar – Doha

    Romania – Bucharest

    Russia – Moscow

    Saudi Arabia – Riyadh

    Serbia – Belgrade

    Sierra Leone – Freetown

    Singapore – Singapore City

    Somalia – Mogadishu

    South Africa – Pretoria

    South Sudan – Juba

    Spain – Madrid

    Sudan – Khartoum

    Sweden – Stockholm

    Thailand – Bangkok

    Turkey – Ankara

    Uganda – Kampala

    Ukraine – Kyiv

    United Arab Emirates – Abu Dhabi

    United States of America – UK Mission to UN

    United States of America – Washington

    Uzbekistan – Tashkent

    Vietnam – Hanoi

    Yemen – Sana’a

    Zimbabwe – Harare

    There is Non-Resident Accreditation for a further 82 countries.

  • Poulter – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Poulter – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Poulter on 2015-10-19.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what recent assessment he has made of progress on defeating Daesh; and what steps his Department plans to take to protect national security from the threat of terrorism.

    Penny Mordaunt

    The UK is making a significant contribution to the coalition of more than 60 countries, supporting the Iraqi security forces to deny ISIL the freedom to operate in 30% of the Iraqi territory it once held, helping Syrian Kurds take 17,000 sq km from ISIL in Syria, and degrading ISIL’s ability to refine oil or to access the international financial system.

    But defeating ISIL is not a military task alone and the global coalition is working to defeat ISIL on all fronts – militarily, cutting off ISIL finance, reducing the influx of fighters, challenging its ideology and providing humanitarian assistance.

    Within the UK the Home Office has the lead for counter terrorism but certain military specialist capabilities are always available, should they be required.

  • Stephen Hammond – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Stephen Hammond – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Stephen Hammond on 2015-10-19.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps his Department has taken to prepare for the implementation of the proposed General Data Protection Regulation; which non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) and agencies overseen by his Department will be affected by that regulation; and what estimate he has made of the potential liability of his Department, its agencies and NDPBs in connection with that proposed regulation.

    Mark Lancaster

    Until the General Data Protection Regulation has been finalised, the Department is not able to prepare for its implementation or make any estimate of the affect that it might have.

  • Jim Shannon – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Jim Shannon – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Jim Shannon on 2015-10-19.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what support he has received from the US Army in order to assist with the protection of Camp Bastion, Afghanistan.

    Penny Mordaunt

    The last UK troops left Camp Bastion in November 2014. Prior to that point, security arrangements for Camp Bastion, the adjacent Camp Leatherneck and the surrounding area were shared between the UK forces and the US Marine Corps. These arrangements were the subject of extensive investigation by the Defence Select Committee in their 2014-15 inquiry into the September 2012 attack on the Bastion-Leatherneck complex. Large areas of what was Camp Bastion now form part of Camp Shorabak, which is used by elements of the Afghan National Defence Security Forces.

  • Julian Lewis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Julian Lewis – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Julian Lewis on 2015-10-19.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the oral Answer given on 19 October 2015, which moderate, non-Islamist groups with credible ground forces, other than Kurds, are fighting Daesh in Syria.

    Michael Fallon

    There are a number of moderate opposition forces focused on fighting the Assad regime. Many are also fighting ISIL in areas of strategic importance, for example north of Aleppo. The vast majority of these opposition groups are Islamist.

  • Andrew Rosindell – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Andrew Rosindell – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Andrew Rosindell on 2015-10-19.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to the recent announcement by President Putin of a Russia-led Central Asia taskforce, what assessment he has made of the security implications for (a) NATO and (b) the conflict against the Taliban.

    Michael Fallon

    We are aware of this statement. The Russians have not released any details of such a task force.

  • Jim Shannon – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport

    Jim Shannon – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Jim Shannon on 2015-10-19.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what recent steps he has taken to ensure data protection legislation is up to date; and what guidance he has issued to companies on compliance with such legislation.

    Mr Edward Vaizey

    The Government takes the protection of personal data very seriously and is committed to making sure that the data protection legislation is up to date. The Government is currently negotiating a new EU data protection package and it is important that it meets the needs of both individuals and of business.

    Compliance with the Data Protection Act is regulated and enforced by the Information Commissioner’s Office which maintains guidance relating to the Act. Guidance for companies on compliance with the Act can be found at the ICO’s website: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/

  • Peter Bone – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport

    Peter Bone – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Peter Bone on 2015-10-19.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what steps he is taking to support the establishment of an NFL franchise in London.

    Tracey Crouch

    As the Chancellor stated in October 2014, the Government fully backs the NFL franchise, and HM Treasury is currently in discussions with the Greater London Authority about increasing the number of NFL matches in London.

  • Stephen Hammond – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport

    Stephen Hammond – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Stephen Hammond on 2015-10-19.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what steps his Department has taken to prepare for the implementation of the proposed General Data Protection Regulation; which non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) and agencies overseen by his Department will be affected by that regulation; and what estimate he has made of the potential liability of his Department, its agencies and NDPBs in connection with that proposed regulation.

    Mr Edward Vaizey

    Negotiations on the proposed General Data Protection Regulation are still continuing and we are taking into account the likely impact on Government Departments, NDPBs and agencies. Once the outcome of trilogue negotiations between the Council of the European Union, the European Parliament and the Commission are complete, and the Regulation has been adopted, the liabilities will be further assessed. There will then follow a maximum implementation period of two years. Between now and then, Government departments who will be affected by the Regulation are closely involved in work led by the Department for Culture, Media & Sport to consider the implications of the text as it develops through the negotiating process.