Category: Speeches

  • Penny Mordaunt – 2020 Statement on Covid-19

    Penny Mordaunt – 2020 Statement on Covid-19

    Below is the text of the statement made by Penny Mordaunt, the Paymaster General, in the House of Commons on 11 May 2020.

    I beg to move,

    That this House has considered Covid-19.

    We gather here today in the midst of a very great darkness that has descended upon our nation, and not just our nation—all nations. It has been by far the biggest challenge we have faced in a generation. We knew it was coming, but not when and not what its clinical characteristics would be. We trained to face it. How we have all responded to it has been a defining moment for us as individuals and as a nation. We have all been involved. We had no choice about dealing with it, but we had a choice about how we did so.

    In the past few weeks, the darkness that has engulfed us all has been emotional, economic and extensive, but it has been illuminated by a million points of light: the response from the British people has been immense. People in all our communities have performed selfless, heroic acts—stoic, disciplined, kind—from now Colonel Tom to our health and care workers, our scientific and tech community, businesses, those who came out of retirement, critical workers, volunteers and the public who through their resolve have reduced the rate of infection and sent this virus into decline.

    People have faced this crisis with personal courage and often good cheer, and I pay tribute to their resilience with pride. This virus called forth the question of who we are, and that question was answered—for families, for parents, for children, for communities, for the nation. It illuminated our values and our strengths: we chose to prioritise lives; we chose to support businesses and jobs; so many stepped up and volunteered; we pull together in times of crisis; we have seen the validation of a devolved but national health service that is free at the point of use and not linked to employment—our NHS. It has shown what we believe in and how much we value the actions of so many who are taking on a greater share of the risk to protect us all and defeat the virus, including, I am very proud to say, some Members of this House of Commons working in health or as first responders. When united in a national effort, the British people are a powerful force.

    The virus has also shown a fragility: the structural and funding complexity of social care; the invisibility of some of those in care settings and mental health, of those with learning or behavioural disabilities, as well as older people; the lack of resilience in supplies of equipment when faced with a crisis of global proportions; the obstacles to providing support to some of our most entrepreneurial people; and the challenges of getting the world working together when nations are also focused at home.

    This debate offers us parliamentarians the opportunity not just to scrutinise what has happened and the next steps in our response, but to discuss how we can continue to improve our resilience and adapt to what will be fundamental changes in the way we live

    our lives. This is, without doubt, an inflection point for our country and for the world, and we all need to rise to those challenges. We all have a role to play in finding solutions and answers.

    This debate affords us the opportunity to remember and mourn all those who have lost their lives to this disease, and to think of those who are grieving without comfort—in some cases, without having said goodbye. The reported death toll stands at 31,855 souls. Our thoughts, too, must be with those who have survived covid but whose health has been impaired as a consequence, and to acknowledge those who have had to put their treatment and therapy for other conditions on hold because the NHS would not have been able to cope unless they did so. The full cost of that sacrifice has yet to be counted.

    In particular, it is right that we acknowledge all those working in health and care who have succumbed to the disease. In full knowledge of the risks, they chose to work on the frontline to save lives, give comfort to others and provide care to those in their charge. The metaphor of this pandemic as a war against coronavirus has been used, and the courage and duty demonstrated by all those working with those who are infected is the same as going into battle. Many will have seen their friends fall ill. Some will have seen their colleagues die. And they will have headed back into the danger zone, day after day. I know that there will be disagreements during the course of this debate, but I also know that every Member of this House will want to express their gratitude and humility in the face of such service, and all will agree that, despite the difficulties, we must ensure that all frontline workers in this crisis have the equipment that they need to keep them safe. We are all aware of the challenges and of the efforts being made, but that is irrelevant. We must, and we will, do what is necessary.

    I also want to thank the volunteers who have stood up to help care and health services. This includes individuals who are facing the prospect of losing their job, financial hardship or worries about relatives. Instead of devoting themselves to their own needs or those of their families, they have gone into care homes, medical wards and Nightingale hospitals to serve their communities—often having to separate from their own loved ones to do so. Over 3 million additional volunteers stepped up.

    We should also thank the critical workers who have carried on so that we could all be fed, protected and provided for: those in the supermarket and the store; the police and fire services; post office workers; public transport workers; cleaners; prison officers; refuse collectors; pharmacists; teachers; nursery workers; public servants, especially those in the resilience forums; and, of course, our armed forces, who have delivered aid to those being shielded, brought testing to communities, and provided planning expertise at every level of this response and in every local resilience forum in the land—all while carrying out their other duties to protect the nation. They have taken risks for all our sakes.

    In the past few months we have seen so many people and organisations rally: from the businesses that adapted so swiftly to meet the needs of the nation, expanding services, altering their production lines and generously donating equipment and expertise; to the others who managed to keep their businesses going throughout this ordeal in order that they could provide for our families and support our public services. We must remember that without the wealth they generate, we cannot fund the services that we all rely on.

    We have been right to provide an unprecedented level of support to retain jobs and help cash flow, with 25,000 loans, half a million firms furloughing workers, and 600,000 grants. We as a Government and all of us as citizens must do all that we can to get Britain back to work and start the recovery, as my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister has set out.

    We have seen charities, faced with their fundraising plans in tatters, lead the local response and, of course, the public have followed the requests of the chief medical officer by staying at home. It has been tough, especially for those in cramped housing with no gardens, but they have done it, and thanks to them R is now below 1. In the next phase of the response, we must all continue to demonstrate that resolve.

    In all the steps and all the issues that colleagues will raise in this debate, we will be more successful if we tackle them together, across party lines and across the Administrations of the United Kingdom, as we continue to do, with international co-operation, and across all sectors—public, private and the third sector—no longer deterred by dogma, just pulling together and focusing on what needs to be done.

    In that spirit, opening this debate affords me an opportunity to thank all Members of this House who joined the Cabinet Office daily calls at the start of the pandemic. They were cross-party and they were constructive. We helped each other to help our constituents, shared our ideas, cut down workloads and supported each other. The information gathered on personal protective equipment, care homes, businesses and operational matters was incredibly helpful to every Department.

    We should continue to work together not only to tackle the challenges but to seize the opportunities to tackle problems that were previously almost impossible. For example, since the start of this crisis, 90% of rough sleepers are now in accommodation. They are safe and secure. There will never be a better opportunity to wrap the services that those individuals need around them while we deal with the crisis, so we must.

    These are dark times, but they are also illuminating times. We have reminded ourselves, as a country, what we can do when we are united in a mission. Millions of us chose not to curse the dark but to light a candle. The British people have given us a beacon of hope in the days ahead.

  • Greg Hands – 2020 Statement on Mis-use of Parliamentary Stationery

    Greg Hands – 2020 Statement on Mis-use of Parliamentary Stationery

    Below is the text of the speech made by Greg Hands, the Conservative MP for Chelsea and Fulham, in the House of Commons on 11 May 2020.

    Mr Speaker, you will be aware that the Committee on Standards last week published a report following an inquiry into the use of parliamentary stationery for the purpose of a communication with my constituents. This mail-out was sent to some of my constituents in April 2019. I accept that this constituency mail-out did not conform with the rules set by the House. I also accept that it was inappropriate for me to have insisted on a reference of the case to the Committee when I had already acknowledged that I was in breach of the rules and when I had been informed by the commissioner that the Committee was not the body with which to raise a possible change to the rules.

    The Commissioner for Standards herself has recognised that this breach was at the

    “less serious end of the spectrum”.

    As I expressed in my representations throughout the inquiry, I believe the rules in question to be in need of updating, to reflect the fact that combining different communications into one single letter can save money and staff time.

    None the less, I am sorry for the length of time that this investigation has taken and accept that at the time, I acted outside the current House rules. I am therefore today taking the earliest opportunity to offer the House my apology both for the initial breach of the rules and for insisting on an unnecessary reference to the Committee, thereby extending the length of the inquiry. I undertake to reimburse the House for the relevant costs of my mailing, which the commissioner has assessed at £4,865.55.

  • Lindsay Hoyle – 2020 Statement on the Department of Health and Social Care

    Lindsay Hoyle – 2020 Statement on the Department of Health and Social Care

    Below is the text of the Speaker’s statement made in the House of Commons on 11 May 2020.

    Before calling the Prime Minister to make a statement, I would like to make a statement of my own accord. I am aware of widespread concerns across the House about delays in Government Departments, and the Department of Health and Social Care in particular, responding to written questions and correspondence. I have received representations on this matter from the Procedure Committee and from Back Benchers across the House from Opposition parties.

    Last Wednesday, the Leader of the House argued that a degree of latitude is allowable for the Department. However, the Secretary of State himself has referred repeatedly to the value of parliamentary scrutiny. Written questions and letters to Ministers are integral to such scrutiny. I accept that the Department of Health and Social Care faces many challenges, but I am sure that resources across Whitehall can be mobilised to support it in maintaining proper standards of accountability.

    While I think it is right for me to call for improvements within the Government, I also make a plea to all hon. Members to be targeted and considered in the written questions that they table at this time, and to avoid swamping Departments with questions on a fast-moving situation that will be superseded before they can be answered.

    I now call the Prime Minister, who should speak for no more than 10 minutes.

  • Boris Johnson – 2020 Commons Statement on the Coronavirus (11/05/2020)

    Boris Johnson – 2020 Commons Statement on the Coronavirus (11/05/2020)

    Below is the text of the statement made by Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, in the House of Commons on 11 May 2020.

    Mr Speaker, with permission, I will make a statement about the next steps in our battle against coronavirus, and how we can, with the utmost caution, gradually begin to rebuild our economy and reopen our society.

    For the last two months, the British people have faced a grave threat with common sense, compassion and unflinching resolve.

    We have together observed the toughest restrictions on our freedoms in memory, changing our way of life on a scale unimaginable only months ago.

    All our efforts have been directed towards protecting our NHS and saving lives.

    Tragically, many families have lost loved ones before their time and we share their grief. Yet our shared effort has averted a still worse catastrophe, one that could have overwhelmed the NHS and claimed half a million lives.

    Every day, dedicated doctors, nurses, and social care workers, army medics and more have risked their own lives in the service of others, they have helped to cut the Reproduction rate from between 2.6 and 2.8 in April to between 0.5 and 0.9 today.

    The number of covid patients in hospital has fallen by over a third since Easter Sunday.

    Our armed forces joined our NHS to build new hospitals on timetables that were telescoped from years to weeks, almost doubling the number of critical care beds, and ensuring that since the end of March, at least a third have always been available.

    Our challenge now is to find a way forward that preserves our hard won gains, while easing the burden of the lockdown.

    And I will be candid with the House: this is a supremely difficult balance to strike.

    There could be no greater mistake than to jeopardise everything we have striven to achieve by proceeding too far and too fast.

    We will be driven not by hope or economic revival as an end in itself, but by data, and science and public health.

    And so the Government is submitting to the House today a plan which is conditional and dependent as always on the common sense and observance of the British people, and on continual re-assessment of the data.

    That picture varies across the regions and Home Nations of the United Kingdom, requiring a flexible response. Different parts of the UK may need to stay in full lockdown longer but any divergence should only be short-term because as Prime Minister of the UK, I am in no doubt that we must defeat this threat and face the challenge of recovery together.

    Our progress will depend on meeting five essential tests: protecting the NHS, reducing both the daily death toll and the infection rate in a sustained way, ensuring that testing and PPE can meet future demand – a global problem, but one that we must fix, and avoiding a second peak that would overwhelm the NHS.

    A new UK-wide Joint Biosecurity Centre will measure our progress with a five-stage Covid Alert System, and the combined effect of our measures so far has been to prevent us from reaching Level Five, a situation that would have seen the NHS overwhelmed, and to hold us at Level Four.

    Thanks to the hard work and sacrifice of the British people by following the social distancing rules, we are now in a position where we can move in stages to where I hope the scientific advice will tell us that we are down to Level Three.

    But this will only happen if everyone continues to play their part, to stay alert and to follow the rules.

    We must also deal with the epidemic in care homes, where a tragic number of the elderly and vulnerable have been lost and while the situation is thankfully improving, there is a vast amount more to be done.

    And of course we need a world-leading system for testing and tracking and tracing victims and their contacts so I’m delighted that Baroness Harding, the chair of NHS Improvement, has agreed to take charge of a programme that will ultimately enable us to test hundreds of thousands of people every day.

    All this means we have begun our descent from the peak of the epidemic, but our journey has reached the most perilous moment where a wrong move could be disastrous.

    So at this stage, we can go no further than to announce the first careful modifications of our measures, Step 1 in moving towards Covid Alert Level 3, a shift in emphasis that we can begin this week.

    Anyone who cannot work from home should be actively encouraged to go to work.

    And sectors that are allowed to be open should indeed be open, but subject to social distancing.

    These include food production, construction, manufacturing, logistics, distribution, scientific research.

    And to support this, to explain this again, we are publishing guidance for businesses on how to make these workplaces safe. Covid secure.

    People who are able to work from home, as we’ve continually said, should continue to do so, and people who cannot work from home should talk to their employers about returning this week and the difficulties they may or may not have.

    Anyone with covid symptoms obviously – or in a household where someone else has symptoms – should self-isolate.

    We want everyone travelling to work to be safe, so people should continue to avoid public transport wherever possible because we must maintain social distancing which will inevitably limit capacity.

    Instead people should drive or better still walk or cycle.

    With more activity outside our homes, we would now advise people to wear a cloth face covering in enclosed spaces where social distancing is not always possible, and you are more likely to come in contact with people you do not normally meet.

    The reason is face coverings can help to protect each other and reduce the spread of the disease, particularly if you have coronavirus like symptoms.

    But this does not mean – and I must stress this – this does not mean wearing medical face masks, 2R or FFP3, which must be reserved for people who need them.

    We have all lived so far with onerous restrictions Mr Speaker on outdoor spaces and exercise, and this is where my honourable friend interjects as I know he’s a keen swimmer and unfortunately we can’t do anything for swimming pools but we can do something for lakes and the sea. and this is where we can go significantly further because there is a lower risk from outdoors than indoors.

    So from Wednesday there will be no limits on the frequency of outdoor exercise people can take.

    You can now walk, sit and rest in parks, you can play sports and exercise, and you can do all these things with members of your own household, or with one other person from another household, provided you observe social distancing and remain 2 metres apart from them.

    And I do hope that’s clear Mr Speaker. I’m conscious people want to come back and ask questions in more detail and I’d be very happy to answer.

    We shall increase the fines for the small minority who break the rules, starting at £100 but doubling with each infringement up to £3,600.

    You can drive as far as you like to reach an outdoor space, subject to the same rules and the laws and guidance of the Devolved Administrations.

    I am sorry to say however, Mr Speaker, that we shall continue to ask those who are clinically vulnerable – including pregnant women and people over 70, or those with pre-existing chronic conditions – to take particular care to minimise contact with those outside their households.

    And we must continue to shield people who are extremely vulnerable. They should, I am afraid, remain at home and avoid any direct contact with others.

    I know that easing restrictions for the many will only increase the anguish of those who must remain shielded, so the Government will look at every possible way of supporting the most vulnerable.

    Mr Speaker, all of our precautions will count for little if our country is re-infected from overseas, so I give notice that we shall introduce new restrictions at the UK border, requiring 14 days of self-isolation for international arrivals, while respecting our common travel area with Ireland.

    Every day, we shall monitor our progress, and if we stay on the downward slope, and the R remains below 1, then – and only then – will it become safe to go further, and move to the second step.

    This will not happen until 1st June at the earliest, but we may then be in a position to start the phased reopening of shops; to return children to early years’ settings, including nurseries and childminders; to return primary schools in stages, giving priority to the youngest children in reception and year 1, and those in year 6 preparing for secondary school; and to enable secondary school pupils facing exams next year to get at least some time with their teachers.

    Our ambition – and I stress this is conditional Mr Speaker –is for all primary school pupils to return to the classroom for a month before the summer break.

    To those ends, we are publishing guidance on how schools might reopen safely.

    Step two could also include allowing cultural and sporting events behind closed doors for broadcast, which I think would provide a much needed boost to national morale.

    But nothing can substitute for human contact and so the Government has asked SAGE when and how we could safely allow people to expand their household group to include one other household, on a strictly reciprocal basis.

    Finally, and no earlier than July, we may be able to move to step three – if and only if supported by the data, and the best scientific advice.

    We would then aim to reopen some remaining businesses, including potentially hospitality, cinemas and hairdressers as well as places of worship and leisure facilities.

    And this will depend on maintaining social distancing and new ways of providing services, so we will phase and pilot any re-openings to ensure public safety.

    And I must be clear again: if the data goes the wrong way, if the Alert Level begins to rise, we will have no hesitation in putting on the brakes, delaying or reintroducing measures – locally, regionally or nationally.

    Mr Speaker, our struggle against this virus has placed our country under the kind of strain that will be remembered for generations.

    But so too has the response of the British people, from dedicated shopworkers keeping our supermarkets open, and ingenious teachers finding new ways of inspiring their pupils, to the kindness of millions who have checked on their neighbours, delivered food for the elderly, or raised astonishing amounts for charity.

    In these and in so many other ways, we are seeing the indomitable spirit of Britain.

    And Mr speaker let me summarise by saying that people should Stay Alert by working from home if you possibly can, by limiting contact with other people, by keeping your distance 2 metres apart where possible – by washing your hands regularly, and if you or anyone in your household has symptoms, you all need to self-isolate.

    Because if everyone stays alert and follows the rules, we can control the virus, keep the rate of infection down and the keep number of infections down.

    And this Mr Speaker is how we can continue to save lives, and livelihoods, as we begin to recover from coronavirus, and I commend this statement to the House.

  • Boris Johnson – 2020 Statement on the Coronavirus (11/05/2020)

    Boris Johnson – 2020 Statement on the Coronavirus (11/05/2020)

    Below is the text of the statement made by Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, on 11 May 2020.

    Good evening and thank you for joining us for this Downing Street press conference.

    First of all, I want to update you on the latest data in our fight against coronavirus. I can report through the Government’s ongoing testing and monitoring programme that, as of today:

    1,921,770 tests for coronavirus have now been carried out in the UK, including 100,490 tests carried out yesterday;

    223,060 people have tested positive, that’s an increase of 3,877 cases since yesterday;

    11,401 people are currently in hospital with coronavirus, down from 11,768 the previous day.

    And sadly, of those tested positive for coronavirus, across all settings, 32,065 have now died. That’s an increase of 210 fatalities since yesterday. This figure includes deaths in all settings not just in hospitals.

    Before we begin questions from the public and from the media I just want to remind people of a number of important things I said in my address to the nation last night.

    First, in order to monitor our progress, we are establishing a new COVID Alert Level System. The COVID Alert Level has five levels, each relating to the level of threat posed by the virus. The level will be primarily determined by the R value and the number of coronavirus cases. In turn, that COVID Alert Level will determine the level of social distancing measures in place. The lower the level the fewer the measures; the higher the level the stricter the measures.

    Throughout the period of lockdown which started on March 23rd we have been at Level 4 – meaning a Covid19 epidemic is in general circulation, and transmission is high or rising exponentially. Thanks to the hard work and sacrifices of the British people in this lockdown, we have helped to bring the R level down and we are now in a position to begin moving to Level 3, in steps.

    And we have set out the first of three steps we will take to carefully modify the measures, gradually ease the lockdown, and begin to allow people to return to their way of life – but crucially while avoiding what would be a disastrous second peak that overwhelms the NHS.

    After each step we will closely monitor the impact of that step on the R and the number of infections, and all the available data, and we will only take the next step when we are satisfied that it is safe to do so.

    Step 1 – from this week:

    Those who cannot work from home should now speak to their employer about going back to work.

    You can now spend time outdoors and exercise as often as you like.

    You can meet one person outside of your household outside (outdoors), provided you stay 2 metres apart. The social distancing measures remain absolutely crucial to us keeping the infection rate and the number of cases down as low as we possibly can.

    Step 2 – from June 1, at the earliest, as long as the data allows, we aim to allow:

    Primary schools to reopen for some pupils, in smaller class sizes;

    Non-essential retail to start to reopen, when and where it is safe to do so;

    Cultural and sporting events to take place behind closed doors, without crowds.

    And then Step 3 – no earlier than July 4, and again, only if the data says it safe, we aim to allow:

    More businesses and premises to open, including potentially those offering personal care such as leisure facilities, public places, and places of worship. Many of these businesses will need to operate in new ways to ensure they are safe, and we will work with these sectors on how to do this.

    So, given we have taken the first step in carefully adjusting some of the measures today, and therefore our advice to people on what to do, we have also updated our messaging. We are now asking people to Stay Alert, Control the Virus and Save Lives.

    Yes – staying alert, for the vast majority of people, still means staying at home as much as possible. But there are a range of other actions we’re advising people to take as we modify measures.

    People should Stay Alert, by:

    working from home if you can;

    limiting contact with other people;

    keeping distance if you go out – 2 metres apart where possible;

    washing your hands regularly;

    wearing a face covering when you are in enclosed spaces where it’s difficult to be socially distant – for example in some shops and on public transport;

    and if you or anyone in your household has symptoms, you all need to self-isolate.

    Because if everyone stays alert and follows the rules, we can control coronavirus by keeping the R down and reducing the number of infections. This is how we can continue to save lives, and livelihoods, as we begin as a nation to recover from coronavirus.

  • Keir Starmer – 2020 Response to the Prime Minister’s Statement

    Keir Starmer – 2020 Response to the Prime Minister’s Statement

    Below is the text of the statement made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 10 May 2020.

    This statement raises more questions than it answers, and we see the prospect of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland pulling in different directions.

    The Prime Minister appears to be effectively telling millions of people to go back to work without a clear plan for safety or clear guidance as to how to get there without using public transport.

    What the country wanted tonight was clarity and consensus, but we haven’t got either of those.

  • Boris Johnson – 2020 Statement on the Coronavirus (10/05/2020)

    Boris Johnson – 2020 Statement on the Coronavirus (10/05/2020)

    Below is the text of the statement made by Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, on 10 May 2020.

    It is now almost two months since the people of this country began to put up with restrictions on their freedom – your freedom – of a kind that we have never seen before in peace or war.

    And you have shown the good sense to support those rules overwhelmingly.

    You have put up with all the hardships of that programme of social distancing.

    Because you understand that as things stand, and as the experience of every other country has shown, it’s the only way to defeat the coronavirus – the most vicious threat this country has faced in my lifetime.

    And though the death toll has been tragic, and the suffering immense.

    And though we grieve for all those we have lost.

    It is a fact that by adopting those measures we prevented this country from being engulfed by what could have been a catastrophe in which the reasonable worst case scenario was half a million fatalities.

    And it is thanks to your effort and sacrifice in stopping the spread of this disease that the death rate is coming down and hospital admissions are coming down.

    And thanks to you we have protected our NHS and saved many thousands of lives.

    And so I know – you know – that it would be madness now to throw away that achievement by allowing a second spike.

    We must stay alert.

    We must continue to control the virus and save lives.

    And yet we must also recognise that this campaign against the virus has come at colossal cost to our way of life.

    We can see it all around us in the shuttered shops and abandoned businesses and darkened pubs and restaurants.

    And there are millions of people who are both fearful of this terrible disease, and at the same time also fearful of what this long period of enforced inactivity will do to their livelihoods and their mental and physical wellbeing.

    To their futures and the futures of their children.

    So I want to provide tonight – for you – the shape of a plan to address both fears.

    Both to beat the virus and provide the first sketch of a road map for reopening society.

    A sense of the way ahead, and when and how and on what basis we will take the decisions to proceed.

    I will be setting out more details in Parliament tomorrow and taking questions from the public in the evening.

    I have consulted across the political spectrum, across all four nations of the UK.

    And though different parts of the country are experiencing the pandemic at different rates.

    And though it is right to be flexible in our response.

    I believe that as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom – Scotland, England, Wales, Northern Ireland, there is a strong resolve to defeat this together.

    And today a general consensus on what we could do.

    And I stress could.

    Because although we have a plan, it is a conditional plan.

    And since our priority is to protect the public and save lives, we cannot move forward unless we satisfy the five tests.

    We must protect our NHS.

    We must see sustained falls in the death rate.

    We must see sustained and considerable falls in the rate of infection.

    We must sort out our challenges in getting enough PPE to the people who need it, and yes, it is a global problem but we must fix it.

    And last, we must make sure that any measures we take do not force the reproduction rate of the disease – the R – back up over one, so that we have the kind of exponential growth we were facing a few weeks ago.

    And to chart our progress and to avoid going back to square one, we are establishing a new Covid Alert System run by a new Joint Biosecurity Centre.

    And that Covid Alert Level will be determined primarily by R and the number of coronavirus cases.

    And in turn that Covid Alert Level will tell us how tough we have to be in our social distancing measures – the lower the level the fewer the measures.

    The higher the level, the tougher and stricter we will have to be.

    There will be five alert levels.

    Level One means the disease is no longer present in the UK and Level Five is the most critical – the kind of situation we could have had if the NHS had been overwhelmed.

    Over the period of the lockdown we have been in Level Four, and it is thanks to your sacrifice we are now in a position to begin to move in steps to Level Three.

    And as we go everyone will have a role to play in keeping the R down.

    By staying alert and following the rules.

    And to keep pushing the number of infections down there are two more things we must do.

    We must reverse rapidly the awful epidemics in care homes and in the NHS, and though the numbers are coming down sharply now, there is plainly much more to be done.

    And if we are to control this virus, then we must have a world-beating system for testing potential victims, and for tracing their contacts.

    So that – all told – we are testing literally hundreds of thousands of people every day.

    We have made fast progress on testing – but there is so much more to do now, and we can.

    When this began, we hadn’t seen this disease before, and we didn’t fully understand its effects.

    With every day we are getting more and more data.

    We are shining the light of science on this invisible killer, and we will pick it up where it strikes.

    Because our new system will be able in time to detect local flare-ups – in your area – as well as giving us a national picture.

    And yet when I look at where we are tonight, we have the R below one, between 0.5 and 0.9 – but potentially only just below one.

    And though we have made progress in satisfying at least some of the conditions I have given.

    We have by no means fulfilled all of them.

    And so no, this is not the time simply to end the lockdown this week.

    Instead we are taking the first careful steps to modify our measures.

    And the first step is a change of emphasis that we hope that people will act on this week.

    We said that you should work from home if you can, and only go to work if you must.

    We now need to stress that anyone who can’t work from home, for instance those in construction or manufacturing, should be actively encouraged to go to work.

    And we want it to be safe for you to get to work. So you should avoid public transport if at all possible – because we must and will maintain social distancing, and capacity will therefore be limited.

    So work from home if you can, but you should go to work if you can’t work from home.

    And to ensure you are safe at work we have been working to establish new guidance for employers to make workplaces COVID-secure.

    And when you do go to work, if possible do so by car or even better by walking or bicycle. But just as with workplaces, public transport operators will also be following COVID-secure standards.

    And from this Wednesday, we want to encourage people to take more and even unlimited amounts of outdoor exercise.

    You can sit in the sun in your local park, you can drive to other destinations, you can even play sports but only with members of your own household.

    You must obey the rules on social distancing and to enforce those rules we will increase the fines for the small minority who break them.

    And so every day, with ever increasing data, we will be monitoring the R and the number of new infections, and the progress we are making, and if we as a nation begin to fulfil the conditions I have set out, then in the next few weeks and months we may be able to go further.

    In step two – at the earliest by June 1 – after half term – we believe we may be in a position to begin the phased reopening of shops and to get primary pupils back into schools, in stages, beginning with reception, Year 1 and Year 6.

    Our ambition is that secondary pupils facing exams next year will get at least some time with their teachers before the holidays. And we will shortly be setting out detailed guidance on how to make it work in schools and shops and on transport.

    And step three – at the earliest by July – and subject to all these conditions and further scientific advice; if and only if the numbers support it, we will hope to re-open at least some of the hospitality industry and other public places, provided they are safe and enforce social distancing.

    Throughout this period of the next two months we will be driven not by mere hope or economic necessity. We are going to be driven by the science, the data and public health.

    And I must stress again that all of this is conditional, it all depends on a series of big Ifs. It depends on all of us – the entire country – to follow the advice, to observe social distancing, and to keep that R down.

    And to prevent re-infection from abroad, I am serving notice that it will soon be the time – with transmission significantly lower – to impose quarantine on people coming into this country by air.

    And it is because of your efforts to get the R down and the number of infections down here, that this measure will now be effective.

    And of course we will be monitoring our progress locally, regionally, and nationally and if there are outbreaks, if there are problems, we will not hesitate to put on the brakes.

    We have been through the initial peak – but it is coming down the mountain that is often more dangerous.

    We have a route, and we have a plan, and everyone in government has the all-consuming pressure and challenge to save lives, restore livelihoods and gradually restore the freedoms that we need.

    But in the end this is a plan that everyone must make work.

    And when I look at what you have done already.

    The patience and common sense you have shown.

    The fortitude of the elderly whose isolation we all want to end as fast as we can.

    The incredible bravery and hard work of our NHS staff, our care workers.

    The devotion and self-sacrifice of all those in every walk of life who are helping us to beat this disease.

    Police, bus drivers, train drivers, pharmacists, supermarket workers, road hauliers, bin collectors, cleaners, security guards, postal workers, our teachers and a thousand more.

    The scientists who are working round the clock to find a vaccine.

    When I think of the millions of everyday acts of kindness and thoughtfulness that are being performed across this country.

    And that have helped to get us through this first phase.

    I know that we can use this plan to get us through the next.

    And if we can’t do it by those dates, and if the alert level won’t allow it, we will simply wait and go on until we have got it right.

    We will come back from this devilish illness.

    We will come back to health, and robust health.

    And though the UK will be changed by this experience, I believe we can be stronger and better than ever before. More resilient, more innovative, more economically dynamic, but also more generous and more sharing.

    But for now we must stay alert, control the virus and save lives.

    Thank you very much.

  • Tim Yeo – 2004 Speech at Conservative Party Spring Conference

    Tim Yeo – 2004 Speech at Conservative Party Spring Conference

    Below is the text of the speech made by Tim Yeo on 6 March 2004.

    Welcome to this session – delighted to have David Davis and Shailesh Vara with me. You’ll be hearing from them soon and later from four of our outstanding PPCs.

    “Young and hopeful” – I think that includes us on the platform.

    It certainly includes most of you in the audience.

    But it’s really the millions of young people who are the future of our country.

    Who are being let down by this Labour Government.

    We can all remember Tony Blair’s promise that education, education, education would be their priority.

    Seven years later what has Labour delivered?

    Take class sizes. An important issue for parents.

    Labour promised to reduce them.

    But the number of secondary school classes with 30 pupils or more has gone up by more than half since 1997.

    That’s 130,000 more young people in classes with over 30 pupils than when Tony Blair gave that pledge.

    What about exam results?

    Ministers try to persuade us standards have risen.

    But the truth is that one in three 11 year-olds leave school unable to read, write or count properly.

    That’s a fact that ought to shame even Tony Blair.

    And here’s another one. Last year more than 33,000 young people left school without a single GCSE.

    Maybe that’s partly because the number of pupils bunking off from school has risen more than a fifth since 1997, despite more than £600 million of spending on various Ministerial initiatives and gimmicks.

    For those who are at school the situation inside the classroom isn’t always good. According to the teaching union NASUWT there’s an attack on a teacher every seven minutes.

    A year ago a poll showed that one in three teachers are considering leaving the profession within five years, because of the target-driven culture and lack of discipline.

    And for youngsters going to university, Labour’s broken promises on top-up fees means they’ll start their working lives burdened with huge debts.

    As for bureaucracy, under Labour non-teaching staff are recruited faster than teachers.

    So Tony Blair’s school report is not good.

    Meddling Ministers.

    Money wasted.

    Frustrated teachers.

    Stagnating standards.

    So much for Labour.

    What will we do to put this right?

    Our plan is radical. It has three elements.

    First, we believe it’s time to give pupils and parents much greater control over how the Government spends their money on their children’s education. I’ll come back to this in a moment.

    Second, we will give schools more freedom. We know it’s the commitment of teachers that determines the quality of education.

    It’s time to get the target-obsessed bureaucrats off their backs.

    To set teachers free.

    To be accountable first and foremost to parents.

    Free to restore discipline in schools and stop the small minority of disruptive pupils from wrecking the chances of their classmates.

    Free to do what they do best – teach.

    Which brings me to the third element.

    Restoring confidence in standards.

    Whatever the spin about better exam results, we know Labour has downgraded the system with its culture of prizes for all which undermines students’ real achievements.

    Universities and employers tell the same story of falling confidence in the qualifications young people acquire at school.

    We will make the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority institutionally independent like the Bank of England, to prevent political manipulation.

    We will address other problems too. Wearing my health hat for a moment, I know that physically active young people are healthy too.

    Because of that we will bring sport back into the schools, something Labour has been too busy flogging off school playing fields to attend to.

    As a parent myself I know what benefits sport can bring.

    Labour’s failures are not confined to schools.

    Our universities are under-funded.

    Labour’s solution will saddle students with huge debts.

    By contrast, we will keep our promises on top-up fees and tuition fees, while giving universities the cash they need.

    That’s good news for students and universities. Bad news for Labour MPs who have to explain why they broke their manifesto promises.

    And under the Conservatives universities won’t be told by yet another bureaucrat, appointed by the Minister, who they can admit and who they can’t.

    But fixing the funding of our universities is not enough.

    We need vocational training that stimulates and skills up those young people who don’t go to university.

    Labour’s system of vocational training is an expensive mess – respected by neither students nor employers.

    Later this year I will set out our Conservative framework for skills training which will address this fundamental failing, a failing that becomes more and more critical as international competition for jobs and investment intensifies.

    Let me close by returning to my first element – the core of our strategy to improve standards in schools.

    The Pupil Passport.

    The right for every parent to choose the school their child goes to.

    Take the example of a child in an inner city borough, with two secondary schools in the vicinity, one good and one bad.

    Currently if the good school is full and the bad one has empty seats then parents may be compelled by the surplus places rule to send their child to the bad school, regardless of their wishes.

    The only way parents can avoid this is to appeal against the decision.

    But although appeals have risen 50 per cent since 1997, only a third are decided in the parents’ favour.

    The Pupil Passport means that child would be able to attend the good school, which itself could expand.

    I can announce today, following Oliver Letwin’s speech setting out the spending plans of the next Conservative Government, and confirming that extra cash will be available for schools, that the Pupil Passport will not be confined to inner city areas as we originally envisaged.

    Instead it will be rolled out progressively across the whole country.

    Because we want every family to be empowered.

    To have the choices which in the past have been available only to the better-off.

    People who could afford to move to the catchment area of their favoured school.

    Under the Conservatives you’ll be able to go to the right school even if your family lives in the wrong street.

    Good schools will attract more pupils.

    And since every girl or boy who is accepted by a school will have funding that goes automatically with her or him, that school will be able to expand in response to demand.

    A popular faith school, for example, within the maintained sector, will be able to grow. So would a successful comprehensive.

    In some areas, completely new schools will spring up. The other side of this coin is that schools which few parents choose for their children will find their numbers decline.

    That will put pressure on budgets.

    It will provide a spur to encourage those schools to improve.

    No longer will they be able to rely on the LEA to ensure that their classrooms are filled with youngsters whose parents have been ordered to send them there.

    Unlike Labour a Conservative Government will not reward failure.

    Because we will abolish the surplus places rule.

    The rule which enables the council to decide the school your child goes to, even if you know it’s the wrong one.

    We are talking to local government colleagues and others about what this means for the future role of LEAs.

    And about how money will be allocated.

    About how the value of the Passport will be set.

    Our aim is to give every family the power now enjoyed by a few.

    Because we know the power of choice is the power to force improvement.

    At the next General Election we will offer the country a clear choice.

    Either continue down this Labour path of stagnating standards where Ministers know best, where you take what you are offered. Don’t you dare ask for anything different.

    An education system in which the State looms too large and people are too small.

    Or follow the new Conservative path.

    Bigger citizens who have more control. Where you choose what you want.

    A path which leads to higher standards.

    Transforming the way public services are delivered.

    That’s the choice we’ll offer the next generation of young and hopeful Britons to help fulfil their aspirations.

    Together our task is to help them choose the right option.

  • Caroline Spelman – 2005 Speech on Traveller Camps

    Caroline Spelman – 2005 Speech on Traveller Camps

    Below is the text of the speech made by Caroline Spelman on 21 March 2005.

    Last November we began consulting on the best way to deal with illegal traveller camps.

    Today we can announce a seven-point plan to deal with both illegal and unauthorised development, to give stronger rights to local residents and to ensure planning controls are fairly enforced for all.

    First, as Michael has said we are reviewing the so-called Human Rights Act – if it cannot be improved, we will scrap the Act.

    Second, Conservatives will give councils the power to refuse applications for retrospective planning permission. This will stop the cynical manipulation of the planning system by travellers or rogue developers who wilfully ignore the rules.

    Third, we will make traveller trespass a criminal offence as they have done in the Republic of Ireland. This will stop local residents having to pay up to evict travellers from their land and give the police a fast track system to evict illegal occupiers.

    Fourth Conservatives will give councils new powers to ensure the rapid removal of caravans from illegal sites, and allow the courts to levy larger fines to stop travellers from profiting illegal developments.

    Fifth we will extend councils powers of compulsory purchase, where the land is the subject of a continuing breach of a Stop Notice. This will protect local residents from being forced to purchase land from speculators, at vastly inflated sums, just to avoid the threat of illegal encampments.

    Sixth, we will provide clearer, more effective guidance for the police. Mr Blair’s Government’s new guidance is a trespassers’ charter, restricting the ability of the police and councils to take action. We will issue revised guidance, undoing John Prescott’s changes, and encouraging police to tackle criminal or anti-social behaviour on traveller sites.

    Finally, Conservatives will give local people a greater say on where sites go. We oppose the imposition of arbitrary quotas on councils to provide traveller camps. We will abolish the unelected regional assemblies and regional housing boards which now threaten to silence the voice of local communities.

    Our proposals are sensible and practical. They will deal with the problem of illegal traveller camps – a problem which Mr Blair’s Government has created. Yesterday Labour said that action to tackle this issue was “tapping into … bigotry”.

    They’re wrong. It’s not bigoted. It’s about fairness. And it’s about standing up for the right values. People want a government that upholds the law – not one that turns a blind eye when the law is flouted.

  • Michael Howard – 2004 Speech on Housing

    Michael Howard – 2004 Speech on Housing

    Below is the text of the speech made by Michael Howard, the then Leader of the Opposition, on 27 October 2004.

    There are few things more important to us than the home we live in.

    People in this country want to own their home. Owning your own home gives you security, stability and a base. It gives you a real stake in society. It gives you freedom and security.

    A lot of people do already own their own home. But for more and more people – particularly first time buyers – it’s becoming very difficult.

    Everyone knows someone who is desperate to buy their own home – someone just starting out on a career, or a young couple that have just got married and want to start a family.

    Twenty or thirty years ago, their parents would have found it difficult, but they would have managed. But for today’s young people, the difficult dream has become the impossible dream.

    But it’s not just young people who have a problem. It’s easy to forget that many older people want to move home – to a home that is more suitable or to one that is nearer their family.

    So we need practical policies that that will help put a home within their reach.

    Some people think the answer is to build more houses. We certainly do need more homes – the level of homebuilding in this country is at its lowest for more than eighty years – and we will be publishing our detailed proposals on this shortly.

    But what we emphatically do not want is to concrete over the south east with millions of homes, which are simply dumped on communities and which are unsustainable.

    Labour have been all talk. They have promised action, but they have not delivered. In many ways, through stealth taxes such as stamp duty and council tax, they have made owning your own home even more difficult.

    I won’t promise to solve the housing problem overnight. But we are putting forward today a series of practical policies that will make a difference, policies that will address different housing needs and tackle the problem of affordable housing.

    As Caroline said, we’ve been working on our policies for many months now. We’ve talked to a huge range of people and held wide-ranging discussions. Today’s document is the fruit of a lot of hard work.

    The policies in this document will help increase home ownership in this country. They will help give young people the start they need and support older people who want to move house.

    At the heart of our approach is people, not buildings.

    We haven’t simply asked – how can we build more homes?

    We’ve asked some different questions – how we can we make homes more affordable? How can we open up the existing supply of homes? How can we give more people a greater stake in the home they live in?

    In short, how can the Party that gave people the Right to Buy today give people the Right to Own?

    This is what we are going to do:

    First, we will extend the Right to Buy to over a million housing association tenants who don’t have that right at the moment.

    Second, we will allow social housing tenants to buy the home of their choice, not just the house in which they currently live. We’re going to do that by giving tenants transferable discounts that can be used towards the cost of any suitable property on the market.

    Third, we will enable tenants to steadily build-up a stake in their home through a Right to Shared Ownership.

    Fourth, we will bring the property ladder back within reach of ordinary home buyers – young and old – by extending shared equity schemes.

    These proposals will help bring more homes within reach of more people.

    They will increase home ownership.

    They will make homes more affordable.

    They will help people live in the homes that are right for them.

    And they will help us invest in building more social housing.