Category: Speeches

  • Damian Green – 2003 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    Damian Green – 2003 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Damian Green, the then Shadow Secretary of State for Education, at the Conservative Party conference held in Blackpool on 6 October 2003.

    In 1996 Tony Blair stood on this spot and famously said that his priority was education, education, education.

    Did he mean it ? Or had the autocue stuck? Whether it was truth or spin, it lacked the fundamental ingredient of substance. And ever since, his Government has betrayed teachers, parents, pupils and students.

    In those days, New Labour asked us to trust them. Trust them with the health service. Trust them to make our streets safer. Trust them to educate and train the next generation of doctors, teachers, builders and plumbers.

    Trust them? I would rather trust John Prescott to mark GCSE English.

    Labour failures

    Let’s look at the facts. One in three children leave primary school unable to read, write and count properly. One in three!

    This year, more than 30,000 children left secondary school without a single GCSE. 30,000!

    And up and down the country teachers have been made redundant and schools are plunging into deficit because this Government gives money with one hand, takes it away with the other, and then hopes that nobody notices.

    Well let me tell Gordon Brown and Charles Clarke. Parents, governors and teachers have noticed the way you have betrayed our schools. We don’t forgive you, and nor will they.

    What have six years of New Labour brought to our schools?

    · The confidence in our exam system destroyed
    · Teenagers taking so many exams that they have to give up sport, music and drama
    · Teachers spending hours filling in forms instead of teaching
    · And above all, dozens of useless targets set by Ministers

    Charles Clarke used the targets to say that incompetent heads should be, in his words, ‘taken out’. But when he missed the key Literacy and Numeracy targets in primary schools, he just changed the date by when he needed to hit them.

    So under Labour, when teachers miss their target the teacher gets sacked. But when ministers miss their target the target gets sacked.

    It’s typical. From Education, to Transport, Defence and Health, right up to No 10 itself, this is a Government full of Ministers who refuse to take responsibility, and who never ever own up.

    Let’s look at some of their initiatives. Labour doesn’t want violent pupils excluded from school. In the real world that means that the small disruptive minority can cause havoc in our classrooms. It is time to give classroom control back to the teachers where it belongs.

    Too many children have been turned off school altogether. Whose fault is this? Not the teachers.

    Two years ago, when Iain gave me this job, I stood here and said I would not blame teachers for things going wrong. And two years on I am more convinced than ever that most teachers are hard-working conscientious professionals who want the best for their children—and this Party recognises that.

    Underneath all their talk of celebrating good teachers, the Government has simply failed to trust them. That’s why teachers, and heads, and governors, and parents no longer trust this Prime Minister and his Government.

    I talk to teachers all the time. They tell me why they joined the profession. How they believed that they could inspire the children they taught. And I have seen lessons that really inspire me.

    I sat in on a lesson about Thomas Aquinas where 14-year-olds in a London comprehensive discussed his theory of the proof of God’s existence from the argument of First Causes.

    I know everyone in this hall will be familiar with the theological niceties of all this.

    But listening to a teacher guide a discussion on Thomas Aquinas in a class roughly one third Christian, one third Muslim, and one third with no religion at all was a real lesson in how to bring the best out of all our children.

    So of course good things are happening in many of our schools. But teachers also tell me other things.

    They tell me about their fear that they may be beaten up. Every seven minutes of every school day there is an attack on a teacher.

    Their sadness that at least one member of their class is unlikely to turn up, out truanting with fifty thousand others every day.

    And their disappointment that this Government, and its constant interference, is telling them how to teach their class and how to run their schools.

    So Government meddling lies at the root of these serious problems.

    We will change all that.

    And we are the only party that will deal with the real problems of discipline and standards.

    The Liberal Democrats held an education debate at their conference. Faced with the huge challenges in our schools and universities, what was the big Lib Dem idea?

    Compulsory sex education for 7-year-olds.

    And this from a party that wants to be taken seriously.

    The Conservative Approach to Schools

    Our approach will deal with the real problems. Let me tell you how we will tackle them.

    I have a unique ambition for a politician. I am the first aspiring Education Secretary to want less power not more.

    That’s because our Conservative approach, which we will all be laying before you this week, is about taking power away from the Ministries and giving it back to the British people.

    Trust the people. It was always the approach that served us best and this Conference will see us set out new policies that come from our fundamental beliefs – that local is better than central, and that power should be dispersed, not concentrated.

    Our Party is at its best when it spreads wealth and opportunity. Twenty years ago we gave millions of people their first chance to buy their council house and gain control over their lives.

    We, the Conservative Party, will now give millions of parents their first chance to choose a school they really want for their children, and gain control over how their children learn.

    Council house sales defined the new freedoms that transformed this country in the 1980s. Today I am launching our Better Schools Passport.

    These will define new opportunities that will transform our education system.

    Quite simply, these passports will give the money that the state spends on their child’s education to the parents, and let the parents decide in which school it should be spent.

    It will be a passport to a better school for all children.

    It will offer a radical extension of school choice. It will allow all children to aspire to an excellent education.

    We will start in the inner cities, where the problems are worst.

    Today I am announcing that the Passports will be piloted in big cities including Inner London, Birmingham, Manchester and Liverpool.

    And then we will introduce them to the rest of the country bringing real choice to all parents in all schools in all areas.

    Our scheme will give parents access to new schools, funded by the state but run independently, to meet the needs of those parents who can’t find the right school for their child.

    The Better Schools Passport will revolutionise our school system.

    We will allow parents and other groups to create new types of school within the maintained sector.

    What sort of new schools? All sorts.

    Some parents want small schools. Some parents want traditional schools.

    Some parents want schools like the Tabernacle School in North London which Iain and I visited earlier this year. A school started five years ago by a black-majority church to help pupils, most of whom had been excluded from their previous school. These children now find that the small classes and firm but fair discipline enable them to achieve their full potential.

    This school symbolises a vision of hope that our inner cities desperately need.

    It is a vision of hope that all parents want.

    And it is a vision of hope that only the Conservative Party, with our fundamental belief in freedom and choice, will provide.

    We believe that parents know what is best for their children. Not Tony Blair or Charles Clarke or me.

    Some parents will want a school that specialises in vocational education. And how much does this country need a vast expansion of technical schools, so that we can give a decent start in life to children with practical rather than academic abilities.

    And I will tell you one other type of school I am very confident parents will want. The sort of school where academic children from any background, rich or poor, are given a chance to stretch themselves.

    We already have 164 of these schools. They are called grammar schools and Labour and the Liberal Democrats still want to destroy them. We will support our existing grammar schools.

    And we will go further. Under this scheme we will see new grammar schools opening for the first time in a generation. They will provide a ladder out of deprivation for thousands of children, just like they used to.

    Labour politicians ask “Why do so few children from poor backgrounds go to university?” Well, I’ll tell them. It’s because they don’t go to schools that let their talents and intelligence and energy flow. Give them the right schools, with discipline and order and a love of learning, and they will have a chance of real academic achievement.

    Only a Conservative Government can give them that chance. We will give them a Fair Deal.

    Higher Education

    And we will transform the prospects of those who aspire to a university education. An aspiration that Labour’s lies and deceit on tuition fees are taking away.

    In 1997, Labour promised there would be no tuition fees. In 1998 Labour introduced tuition fees.

    In 2001, Labour promised there would be no top-up fees. If Labour win the next election then by 2006 there will be top up fees.

    Labour’s tuition fees are a tax on learning which will leave students with huge debts and universities tied up in red tape.

    Let me tell you now, the first thing a Conservative Government will do is introduce a Bill to scrap tuition fees. Under a Conservative Government entry to university will be based on the ability to learn, not the ability to pay.

    So take this simple message with you out of this hall and onto every doorstep in the country – under a Conservative Government families with children at university will face thousands of pounds less debt.

    Labour also wants to discriminate against pupils from good schools—saying that they are at an unfair advantage when they apply to university. What kind of bitter, twisted world do Labour politicians live in, when they try to penalise children for getting into a good school?

    A university place should be awarded on academic merit and potential, not as a result of social engineering and political meddling.

    Under a Conservative Government tuition will be free, and a degree will always be a meaningful and useful qualification.

    Conclusion

    Education used to be regarded by the pundits as a Labour issue. Well not any more.

    We now have schools where teachers are sworn at and assaulted. We have classrooms where teachers are afraid to innovate because Big Brother has told them exactly how to do their job. And we have universities where quantity has replaced quality as the main driving force.

    Six years of New Labour, and what have they done?

    They have messed up the exam system, downgraded key subjects, second-guessed teachers, hunted for scapegoats, insulted LEAS, demoralised professionals, overloaded governors, undermined authority, damaged confidence, ignored heads, wasted money, destroyed standards, created jargon, imposed dogma, interfered, fiddled, meddled, drivelled, bleated, huffed, puffed, and,
    as Alistair Campbell would put it, totally fluffed it up.

    At the next election we will offer a real alternative on education.

    Freedom for schools
    Trust for teachers
    Choice and diversity for parents
    And a fair deal for pupils and students

    That’s the way to give all children the start they deserve. Only a Conservative Government can deliver it – so let’s get out there and make sure we have one.

  • Steve Norris – 2003 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    Steve Norris – 2003 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Steve Norris, the then Conservative candidate for London Mayor, at the Conservative Party conference held in Blackpool on 7 October 2003.

    There is absolutely no doubt that unless we win in the cities, the Conservatives are never going to win in the country. It is where the vast majority of this country’s population actually live but, more to the point, it is where, every single day, people come up against the kind of problems that no political party can ignore if it is wants to form the Government of Britain.

    I am absolutely dedicated to the idea that politics doesn’t mean anything unless it means you want to improve the quality of life for the people around you, for yourself and your own family, for your own community. In London, I have got another mission as well: you can call it personal if you like. But I desperately believe that London deserves better than Livingstone.

    How do you win in cities? The pretty obvious truth is that you do exactly the same as you would do if you wanted to win anywhere else in the country. You wouldn’t tell people what was right for them. You wouldn’t tell people what they cared about. You would listen. Listen to what they say. I can tell you that if you do listen to people in London – and it’s certainly not something Ken Livingstone has done very much over the last three and a half years – you would find out that they all care about the same kind of things.

    They care about decent health care. They want it to be available when they need it. They want it to be the kind of quality that impresses them rather than appals them. They appreciate what a national health service means but they know it can be better.

    They want decent education for their kids. The vast majority have no alternative to the State and, in too many cases, it is simply not good enough. They just want their local school to be decent and to offer the kind of education their kids can benefit from.

    But above all, and I mean above all, what they want is to feel safe on their own streets and in their own homes. That is all. It is not much. Safe on their own streets and in their own homes. And that is what I aim to do something about in London.

    Every single conference I have been to over the past twenty years, I have listened to speakers quote me statistics about what’s going up and what’s going down. – knowing Oliver he is probably too intelligent to feed you statistics about crime – but I do know this I listen to Ken Livingstone and he tells me that crime in London is down. So that’s alright then. Livingstone has got some statistic that shows that crime in London is down. He has a problem. Which is that not only do I not believe him but that Londoners don’t believe him either. Because they don’t feel as safe now as they did three years ago when Ken Livingstone was elected.

    They feel less safe in London and that is not because of the murder rate or number of bank robberies. Last Friday night, I was in a part of London called Hornchurch in one of those suburban town centres like a hundred others. It was about seven o’clock. Night was falling. We were walking back from the tube station down the high street. Still a number of people on the street coming home from work or doing some last minute shopping. Cars driving past. And we saw a group of kids about a hundred yards away, coming out of the chip shop, next to the bus stop. Quite a crowd of them. As we were about to get into our car, I glanced over, and saw this kid, not a day over 13 I am sure of that, lift her foot – yes her foot – and just start kicking the hell out of the telephone box. And then she picked up the receiver and began smashing it onto the side. Maybe to get the money out. Maybe just to break it? I don’t know.

    But she did it without even thinking about the consequences because she couldn’t care less. She knew that no-one was going to be there and no-one was going to stop her. Because she knew that if you clipped her round the ear you’d be in court and if that she clipped you, you’d probably be in a local hospital. That is what makes people feel less safe in our capital. Low level crime. Graffiti. Just that sort of petty vandalism, public drunkenness, yob culture.

    That’s why people actually feel more threatened in their own communities, more threatened in their homes than they did before this massive additional spending which Livingstone has laid on the shoulders of council taxpayers in the capital. And for which the average Londoner feels no benefit whatsoever.

    Do you know that Ken Livingstone went to New York last year and he came back and he said, “I feel safer in New York than I do in London”. Well Mr Mayor what the hell are you doing about it? Because as far as I am concerned you could never make that statement as Mayor of London without saying, here and now, that’s not good enough. That is something that Londoners demand and deserve that the Mayor does something about.

    Incidentally, let’s be clear about one thing: the Mayor of London has the power and the responsibility to make the difference. The Mayor of London is the one person who can actually make the difference. The Mayor of London controls the £2.7billion budget of the Metropolitan Police. So never ever listen to someone like Livingstone who makes excuses by always saying, “I don’t have the power. I wish I could help but I don’t have the power.” He will always say that, because that’s his only excuse for his failure to deliver.

    Let’s be clear. The Mayor of London has got the power. He who pays the piper calls the tune. He has the budget, the responsibility and the power. All that is needed is the political will and leadership from the top to make it happen.

    And here’s the good news. It can be done.

    Twelve years ago, in New York, you had a city that people said was as out of control. You looked at New York and it was the kind of place you got into and out of as quick as you could. Because it was seen as ungovernable. Crime was everywhere. It was a city where every citizen went in fear. They had Mayors of course: Mayors who didn’t make much of a difference; Mayors who made matters worse. Along came a guy called Rudolph Giuliani – a great Mayor – a name, sadly, I suppose, since 9/11 a name known around the world. But what most people know is that what Rudolph Giuliani is actually remembered for by Americans, what his achievement was in the city of New York was that he made it a place that was safe once again.

    If it can be done in New York, it can be done in London.

    A Mayor can change the perception of a city where people fear living in their own community and make it a city where people feel more safe.

    For me this is personal. I am just a Londoner living in a particular part of a great city of seven and a half million people. But over the last three years, I have had my house burgled – I had the door battered down at four thirty in the morning. I have had my car stolen and I have been mugged.

    But all of that is just an every day Londoner’s experience. Every night, what’s the last thing that you do? You put the chain up. You bolt the chubb lock. And frankly if you live somewhere like I do, you put the alarm so that if anyone gets in on the alarm goes off. And it just says that this is not the city that I want to live in.

    I want to do something about that.

    I will tell you something else too. It’s not just people like me. Not just white, middle class men. Because whether you are black or white, gay or straight, rich or poor, young or old, whether you live in inner or outer London. You feel the same desire to feel safe in your home and in your street. It’s a great mission. It is something that I feel absolutely determined to do in London. I know it can be done.

    Some people say but how can it be done? Let me give you just one simple example. Using the Metropolitan Police’s own figures, if you divide up the total number of officers deployed in the boroughs, there should on an average day be 600 – yes 600 police officers – in every single borough in London. And yet in any part of London at any time of day or night you’d be lucky to find more than a dozen out on the streets. That is totally unacceptable and is something I am not prepared to tolerate.

    I have said to London time and again: if I don’t succeed, don’t re-elect me. But I know that this time, that while Livingstone promises us fewer pigeons in Trafalgar Square and ignores the fact that Londoners feel less safe now than they did when he was elected, he is selling them short.

    London deserves better than Ken Livingstone.

    Next year, on the 10th June, I believe we can elect a Conservative Mayor who is going to make a difference and a Conservative-dominated Greater London Assembly that is going to support the Mayor. We are going to show people in this country and in our party that we can win in cities. And when you can win in cities, you can, as we will, win in the country.

  • Theresa May – 2003 Speech at Conservative Party Conference

    Theresa May – 2003 Speech at Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Theresa May, the then Chair of the Conservative Party, at the party’s conference held in Blackpool on 6 October 2003.

    This is the most important conference we have held in a decade. As we meet here in Blackpool, the eyes of the country are upon us. People are starting to look for a new government and they want to know if we can do the job.

    The battleground for the next election is already set.

    The people of Britain are fed up with failing public services.

    They’re fed up with paying more and more in tax.

    They’re fed up with a Prime Minister who covers up his government’s failures with spin and deceit.

    And one thing has become abundantly clear.

    Labour isn’t working again.

    Our task this week is not to tell the British people how Labour have failed. They know that already!

    Our task is to tell them how a Conservative government will succeed.

    Because for the people of Britain, we are the only alternative government of this country.

    We are the only party that can bring an end to Labour’s years of failure.

    But people need to know if we are ready.

    And this week we must give them a resounding answer -Yes we are!

    Everything we say and do must show that we are united in purpose.
    That we understand people’s lives and share their values and concerns.

    And that we have the policies, and the experience, to govern Britain better in the interests of all our people.

    And then there will be one more thing left to do.

    If we want to govern this country, we will have to win.

    And if we are going to win, then from every member of the party to every Member of Parliament, we all must have the will, the drive and the determination to win.

    No politician has the right to be elected. No political party has the right to hold power.
    There is no such thing as a natural party of government.

    So if we are to win, we will have to earn it.

    We can never forget that we are the servants of the people – and they are increasingly critical of the way that politicians behave.

    People want an end to the sniping, the point scoring, the ranting and raving that often passes for political debate in Britain today.

    They want a different kind of government.

    A government that admits when it’s got it wrong.

    A government that owns up to the fact that it doesn’t have all the answers.

    A government that knows that people’s lives are too important for politics to be conducted like a playground game.

    As Conservatives, we should take the lead.

    We should leave the yah-boo stuff to others and instead behave in a way that gives credibility to our promises.

    Politics has changed.

    The world has changed.

    In today’s Britain, we all know that the old binding ties of family or class…

    …the old habits of deference and unquestioning loyalty
    …the old tribal allegiances of party politics
    …all these have gone.

    So today’s political parties win not because they only hang on to their traditional supporters, but because they understand how the people of Britain live today, and because they offer them solutions that can work in Britain tomorrow.

    We have to show we understand the problems parents face just to get their children to a decent school.

    We have to show we recognise what it’s like to watch an elderly parent suffering in pain, because a government target says they’re not a priority for treatment.

    We have to show we care…

    …about people’s pensions being reduced year by year
    …and about the student who wants to go to university, but can’t afford to pay Labour’s tuition fees.

    Because these are the things people care about.

    They’re tired of politicians who parade across the world stage making high-minded promises when all they want is someone to make their lives a bit easier.

    Our leader, Iain Duncan Smith, has lead the way in listening to people in some of the most difficult parts of our country.

    He has shown that this Party’s message is for everyone in this country.

    People want a government that will know when to act and when to stand back.
    Not like Labour – who think government alone has the answers to all our problems.
    And that’s why Labour have got it wrong.
    And they will never get it right.

    So what’s the alternative?
    The Liberal Democrats?!
    I don’t think so.
    Now you might say that some of their policies are a bit loony.
    But the last time we said that we got into trouble.

    We received a letter from a member of the Monster Raving Loony Party’s Shadow Cabinet.
    He wrote to object to our description of the LibDem’s policies as loony.
    We wrote back and we told him that it was official Liberal Democrat policy…

    …to give votes to convicted rapists but criminalise parents for smacking their children;
    …to allow anyone to use any hard drug at home but to ban smoking in public;
    …to make it illegal for teenagers to buy pets but compulsory for seven-year-olds to get sex education;
    and even to outlaw goldfish from being given as prizes at funfairs.

    He replied – let me read you what he said:

    ‘I am afraid that kind of nonsense would find no place in the Official Monster Raving Loony Party manifesto’.

    ‘We’re loonies, not nutters’.

    But the Liberal Democrats don’t win votes because they have good policies.
    They don’t!

    What they’re good at is taking the credit when something gets done, particularly when somebody else has done it.

    And what they’re best at…

    …is being all things
    …to all people
    …all of the time.

    So it’s not good enough for us to sit back in Westminster and simply try to shout them down.

    We have to take them on …

    …on the ground…
    …and show them up…
    …for who they really are…
    …and what they – really – stand for.

    Because the truth is they stand for nothing. They have no answers for Britain.

    But we do.

    We know what we stand for and we know it works.

    Freedom.

    Choice.

    Enterprise.

    Trusting people

    Respect for those who help themselves.

    Support for those who can’t.

    Smaller government. Bigger citizens.
    A belief in the innate good sense of our people and in the enduring values of our nation.

    That is what I stand for.
    It’s what we stand for.
    It’s what we’ve always stood for.

    But today we have to apply those beliefs to new problems.
    And we must redefine them to match the world we live in.

    As Conservatives we actively pursue freedom.

    But that can’t mean leaving people to fend for themselves. Because there will always be those who for whatever reason need a helping hand.

    What it does mean is finding new ways to set people free from the interference of government. Because people always make better decisions for themselves than politicians or bureaucrats ever can.

    That’s why choice should no longer be a luxury for the rich but a reality for all of us.
    And that’s why Conservatism is as vital today as it’s always been.

    Our beliefs teach us to accept how people live and to make no judgements beyond those that are essential to ensure the greatest degree of freedom for all.

    It’s Labour that seeks to herd people into groups, to label them and deal with them collectively.

    It is the Conservative Party that respects people for who they are and welcomes them as individuals on their own merits.

    Rich or poor. Straight or gay. Black or white.
    Whoever you are, wherever you’re from, the Conservative Party is for you.

    Our trust in people will shine through each and every policy we announce this week.

    From David Willetts’ proposals to tackle the pensions crisis and end the indignity of means testing through Liam Fox and Damian Green’s plans for more choice in health and education.

    To Oliver Letwin’s innovative ideas for giving people more say in their local policing and David Davis’s plans to give power back to local councils.

    The reforms we are outlining go with the grain of our times.
    For a world that’s more competitive, for a society grown more demanding, for a people who deserve better.

    We’ll deliver a Britain freer, fairer and stronger.

    Just think…

    …once teachers are free to serve parents not bureaucrats then school hours can be set to help working families.
    …once patients are given greater choice then appointments and treatments can be set to suit them.
    …and once the police are made more responsive to local people’s demands then elderly people will not have to feel that the streets are a no-go zone.

    These are just some examples of how today’s Conservative Party could make people’s lives so much better and deliver a fair deal for everyone.

    It’s why we have begun rebuilding our support among the British people – just look at our success in May in the local council elections in England, in Scotland and in Wales.

    But people have only just begun looking around for an alternative to this government.

    There is still a lot to do.

    But have no doubt.

    Under Iain Duncan Smith’s leadership, there will be no going back.

    There is no future in the past.

    Under Iain’s leadership, the Conservative Party has set out on a new journey.

    We are on the right path.

    We are moving in the right direction.

    We’ve asked people what they want.

    And they want a fair deal for everyone so that people who build our communities, drive our economy, pay their taxes, and run our public services are not held back.

    They want a fair deal for everyone so that people who are disadvantaged, dependent on others, or who need a helping hand are not left behind.

    A fair deal for everyone.

    It’s the theme of our conference.

    It’s the mission of our party.

    It’s what we stand for.

    When you came into the hall today you were given a document.

    It’s not a manifesto.

    It’s not a policy proposal.

    It’s not a roadmap.

    It’s a message of Conservative belief and ambition for our country.

    And after every speech this week, you will receive fair deal cards that spell out how each major policy area fits into that message.

    Take them. Use them. Spread our message.

    Because remember that in an age when less and less attention is paid to what we say and do in Westminster, you are the main channel between the Party and the voters.

    I want to thank you for the work you already do.

    In many parts of the country the fair deal message is being lived out by Conservatives in local government and local communities.

    We’ve made a great start.

    But I want to ask you for more.

    We need to build a 21st Century Party to complement the 21st Century policies we have in place.

    That means…

    …turning a structure that was designed to support the government of yesterday.
    …into a vehicle that can deliver the government of tomorrow.

    Between now and the next election, I will be focusing on nothing else.

    If we are going to build a party to win, we are going to have to challenge and change the things that hold back our ability to win.

    Last year, I challenged the Party to think about the sort of candidates we should be choosing for today’s Britain, to think about finding the right people to represent our party.
    You responded, and as a result the face of our party is changing.

    What better example can we have than Wolverhampton South West? Enoch Powell’s old seat where they’ve selected an Asian woman – Sandy Verma. Well-done Sandy.

    And congratulations to Adam Afriyie who has just been selected as our candidate in Windsor.

    We have made progress.

    But there’s still more to do.

    And we have to make progress in other areas too.

    When we campaign, we must use the most up-to-date techniques. It means using email and the internet, using new media, being willing to embrace new ideas and not just relying on our tried and trusted methods or the way we’ve always done things.

    It means adopting different methods for different groups.

    Look at Conservative Future.

    They’re running a national text message campaign to tell people that only the Conservatives will scrap all Labour’s university tuition fees.

    This is the campaigning of today.

    We must look at how we target our resources too.

    I was keen that in this year’s local elections we targeted our resources carefully and the great success of those elections proved that it works.

    But we can’t leave it there – not if we are serious about getting back into government – If we’re going to win.

    We must take the fight to our opponents, not only in seats that we already hold, but in places that we need to win if we are to be the next government of this country.

    We must support the seats that will make the difference.

    This is our challenge if we want to win the next General Election and not just fight it.

    We must deliver the campaigning and organisation to win.

    It’s the task Iain has charged me with completing.

    And we must all do it because we firmly believe this party – the party I joined as a teenager…

    …the party I have always been proud to call my home has the answers to the problems Britain is facing today.

    My only interest is in winning the next election so that we can make Britain a better place to live.

    That’s why I’m here.

    That’s why we’re all here.

    We can win the next general election. But let’s not allow ourselves to think the hard work is over. Let’s not allow the speeches you hear this week to remain merely words. Let’s ask ourselves what must we do to turn those words into action?

    People care about the things that affect their lives.

    They care about their families and the places they live.

    They don’t care about the things that obsess the Westminster village.

    Bill Clinton may have got a lot of things wrong, but he was not wrong in saying this:

    “People don’t care about the rhetoric of left and right…
    And liberal and conservative…
    And who is up and who is down…
    They are real people… They have real problems… and they are crying desperately for someone who believes the purpose of government is to solve those problems”.

    Ladies and Gentlemen: we must be that government!

    And we can be that government.

    But one question still hangs in the air:

    Labour have done enough to lose the next election.

    Have we done enough to win?

    Have we done enough to earn the right to be in Government once again? Or could Labour win the next election by default? Our country cannot afford another five years of Labour Government and we are the only party that can put them out of business.

    So as the eyes of Britain focus on us this week, let us show them the real Conservative Party.

    A party of hope and aspiration.

    …of freedom and social justice.

    …of fairness and opportunity.

    A united party – for everyone, and of everyone.

    A party of today.

    A 21st Century Party.

    A party that can win…

    and be a 21st Century Government.

  • Michael Ancram – 2003 Speech on the Real Lesson of the Iraq Conflict

    Michael Ancram – 2003 Speech on the Real Lesson of the Iraq Conflict

    The speech made by Michael Ancram, the then Shadow Foreign Secretary, at a fringe event at the Conservative Party conference held in Blackpool on 7 October 2003.

    The real lesson of the Iraq conflict and its aftermath is only now becoming clear. It is the importance of a multilateral approach to genuine threats to international peace and security. The need for a multilateral response to reconstruction in Iraq is self-evident.

    What is becoming clearer is the need when undertaking military action to avoid an over-personalisation of the conflict in national terms. It was and is important that such actions are not ‘Tony Blair’s war with Saddam’ or Britain’s war against Iraq. It has to be the ‘international community’ in one form or another that undertakes the responsibility for what are essentially world policing actions. The Coalition in Iraq was wide enough, but only just, to satisfy this requirement in theory.

    In practice it was not wide enough to prevent a perception in much of the Islamic world that this was a ‘western’ adventure against one of their own number. This made the process of post conflict resolution and reconstruction more difficult. In Iraq there is an innate suspicion still as to the motives of the coalition which leads in turn to non-cooperation and even to downright hostility. Overwhelming unilateral military force wins military campaigns. It rarely wins hearts and minds after the fighting is done.

    Faced, as the world is by other serious threats to international peace and security where the involvement of the ‘international community’ will be vital, it is urgent and essential that the process of reaching sensible international consensus on action is re-examined.

    The lesson of Iraq is that the UN Security Council when put to the test failed. The self-indulgent threat of inevitable veto by France prevented the second Resolution being tabled. The dismissive talk by Tony Blair of ignoring ‘unreasonable’ vetoes without defining what was meant by unreasonable other than that he personally disagreed with them raised questions about the whole way the UNSC works. The answer is that on this occasion it didn’t. When it was most needed, it gridlocked.

    Multilateralism requires an effective Security Council. Failure to develop one will strengthen the arm of unilateralism with all the downstream weaknesses that inevitably flow from it.

  • Tim Yeo – 2003 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    Tim Yeo – 2003 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Tim Yeo, the then Shadow Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, at the Conservative Party conference on 8 October 2003.

    Party conferences are when politicians set out their stall at the seaside.

    Two weeks ago we learned that the Lib Dems won’t let you smack your children

    Even if they’re seven years old and miss a sex education class.

    With Labour the trouble is what they do doesn’t get mentioned at Conferences.

    Last week Tony Blair didn’t tell us about Labour’s sixty tax increases.

    The tax increases on health and pensions and insurance and investment.

    Tax increases on petrol and cars and lorries and diesel.

    Tax increases on jobs and self-employment and marriage and mortgages.

    You name it and they’ve increased the tax on it.

    You can avoid tax increases under Labour

    As long as you don’t save, don’t insure, don’t have a pension, don’t have a job, aren’t self-employed, don’t drink, don’t bet, don’t drive, don’t get married don’t buy a home, if you do buy a home, don’t have a mortgage.

    It could be worse, though.

    Yes, really.

    If the Lib Dems had their way tax would be even higher.

    Let me make one thing clear

    I will never agree to a rise in damaging business taxes

    I’ll tell you what else we won’t do.

    I won’t tell people how to run their businesses.

    I won’t second-guess markets.

    I won’t intervene in relations between employers and employees any more than is absolutely necessary.

    But under Patricia Hewitt there are more laws telling employers how to treat their workforce than ever before.

    Patricia Hewitt learned her politics under Neil Kinnock.

    That’s a bit like being taught to ski by Eddie the Eagle.

    If the Cabinet were in Celebrity Big Brother

    She’d be out first.

    Unless of course Gordon Brown had the vote.

    Then she’d be out second.

    Because we all know who Gordon wants to get rid of.

    This week we’ve set out how we’ll make Britain a better place to live in.

    Making our streets safer with 40,000 extra police.

    Helping sick people with our Patients’ Passport.

    Giving parents more say over schools.

    Ending Labour’s war on the motorist.

    Making everyone more secure in retirement.

    Restoring trust in government.

    But we can’t make Britain a better place to live in unless we also make it a better place to do business.

    Delivering a fair deal for everyone depends on wealth creation.

    A fair deal for business and enterprise isn’t just crucial to business people, it’s crucial to everyone.

    We believe in business for its own sake.

    Unlike Gordon Brown, who sees business only as a milchcow from which to extract more and more tax.

    Instead of helping business create wealth for everyone’s benefit.

    He wants business to provide wealth he can spend for Labour’s benefit.

    Do you remember how Tony Blair and Gordon Brown posed as the friends of business?

    Six wasted years later

    After £47 billion of new business taxes

    Hasn’t that turned out to be the biggest spin of all?

    Nothing less than a cynical fraud against Britain’s hard-working business people.

    Gordon Brown talks about his golden rule.

    There’s only one golden rule for business when it comes to Labour.

    Don’t believe a word they say.

    Like many of you I’ve been in business myself.

    I remortgaged my home to start a business.

    I woke up in the night wondering where the next order was coming from.

    I worried about the people whose jobs depended on me.

    I worked in service industry and manufacturing, for companies small and large.

    I learned first-hand the challenges business faces.

    Today investment and jobs are more mobile than ever before.

    Businesses are moving from Blackpool to Bangkok.

    Norwich Union staff now process insurance claims more quickly and more cheaply in East India than East Anglia.

    Industries where Europe used to lead the world are migrating to the Asia Pacific region.

    And sadly, Britain faces this challenge weaker than it should.

    After six years Tony Blair and Gordon Brown have squandered their golden economic inheritance.

    Britain’s deficit in traded goods is the worst since records began in 1697.

    Business investment is collapsing.

    Productivity has risen only half as fast as it did under the Conservatives.

    More days were been wasted through strikes last year than in any year for over a decade.

    More than 2,000 manufacturing jobs have been lost every single week since Labour came to power.

    Worsening trade, collapsing investment, slowing productivity, more strikes and haemorrhaging jobs.

    Is this what Tony Blair meant when he said things could only get better?

    And surprise, surprise, even the low unemployment total Tony likes to trumpet is more spin than substance.

    Jobs in the productive, wealth-creating part of the economy are falling.

    A fall that’s hidden by the huge rise in the number of Government bureaucrats.

    That can’t go on forever.

    You can’t conceal a loss of manufacturing jobs by manufacturing new jobs for pen pushers in the public sector.

    Under Labour Britain has become a worse place to do business.

    In four years small business failures have trebled.

    More businesses went bust in 2002 than in any year since 1994.

    Company profits have fallen to its lowest level since 1993.

    That’s the dossier on business even Alastair Campbell couldn’t sex up.

    No wonder foreign investment in Britain, which boomed under the Conservatives, has halved in the last two years.

    Never mind, the DTI are on the case.

    Or a case, anyway.

    While business struggles, DTI bureaucrats have drawn up a new foliage strategy.

    I’m not kidding.

    I’ll quote the document:

    “Where an area has moved to New Ways of Working (defined as open-plan, having new-style furniture and soft seating (break-out areas)) funded displays will be allocated only to the break-out areas. Any movement of plants outside of these areas must be agreed prior to its happening and will be subject to Health and Safety restrictions”.

    There’s a complete chain of command to determine where the office yucca plant should go.

    The DTI may not do much for business

    But they’re obviously keen on pukka yucca.

    Don’t we all know exactly where business would tell Labour to stick its yucca.

    Unlike Labour, we’ll make Britain a better place to do business.

    We’ll restore the competitive advantages Margaret Thatcher won when she transformed Britain from being the sick man of Europe into a country which held its head high.

    We’ll cut regulation, which the Institute of Directors says costs Britain £6 billion a year.

    We’ll halt the rise in business taxes.

    We’ll rebuild our infrastructure.

    And we’ll give our workers the skills they need.

    You’ve heard the pledges Michael Howard, Tim Collins and Damian Green made about tax, transport and education.

    I’ll now make a pledge about regulation.

    Within days of taking office I’ll lighten the burden.

    Because regulation hurts every business, raises prices for every consumer, cuts returns for every saver.

    And it harms especially small and medium sized businesses, the engines of job creation.

    The British Chambers of Commerce say that employment admin costs the smallest companies 50 times as much per worker as the largest.

    We will never regulate disproportionately to risk.

    We will never regulate by law if a voluntary approach is possible.

    The smaller the organisation, the lighter our touch.

    So a business with two employees has a lighter burden than one with two hundred thousand.

    That’s why I’ll make sure firms with fewer than twenty workers are exempt from the most onerous burdens.

    Some people claim all this red tape comes from Brussels and there’s nothing we can do about it.

    That’s not true.

    At Maastricht we won the opt-out which kept the pound and the opt-out from the Social Chapter, which Labour threw away,

    Conservatives proved that a Government determined to defend British interests can do so.

    The trouble is that Ministers often make European regulations tougher when they’re applied here in Britain.

    Like the charges slaughterhouses pay for health inspections – optional in France and Germany and Italy and Spain but compulsory in Britain.

    When I’m Secretary of State I’ll never destroy British jobs by forcing our people to play by rules other countries are flouting.

    Because when a British small business pays a compulsory charge, it can’t take on the extra workers its continental competitors can.

    When paying that charge involves form-filling British business people are stuck in the office at 10 o’clock on Friday night ticking boxes on a form for faceless bureaucrats to file while their continental competitors are at home with their families.

    When a voluntary code is replaced by a compulsory one British ceramics companies find a nine-page guidance document turned into a ninety-page Directive

    Which Labour Ministers haven’t looked at

    Which needs more bureaucrats in Whitehall to enforce and more inspectors in the regions

    To monitor the way business monitors its own workforce.

    And all this is paid for by you and me.

    The new Proceeds of Crime Act requires retailers to report every individual theft to the National Criminal Intelligence Service. This will cost £50 for each of the seven million retail crimes each year.

    In the rest of Europe only the largest crimes are reported individually. The others are aggregated together.

    But here in Britain retailers and shoppers face a £350 million bill simply because labour says we must.

    And that’s before Tony Blair’s thrust the EU constitution down our throats.

    The one he won’t let us vote on.

    When I exempt the smallest firms from the most onerous laws

    When I apply sunset clauses to Labour’s Employment Acts so we can find out if they’re creating jobs or destroying them

    I’ll do it not for the sake of employers but for employees.

    To help workers of all ages, both sexes and any skill level find decent, satisfying work.

    To make sure no business is held back.

    And no worker is left behind.

    I’ve talked a lot about regulation but I’m concerned about consumers, too.

    The DTI is responsible for one industry where each of us is a consumer.

    Energy.

    We’ve been reminded lately what happens when the power fails.

    Chaos on the streets. People stuck in the Underground. Offices in the dark. Old people injured at home.

    Modern life, at home and at work, depends on electricity.

    Yet Labour have let the safety margin of generating capacity fall to its lowest level for years.

    The experts fear this means more cuts.

    If your house is cold this winter, if your child is sent home from school because the lights go out, you’ll know who to blame.

    And looking ahead, it’s not getting any better.

    Britain has used up its cheap North Sea oil and gas and soon we’ll be importing gas on a huge scale.

    Half all of our needs in 2010. Ninety per cent in 2020.

    Most of it from Russia, Algeria and Iran, funny countries on which to depend to keep the lights on.

    And Ministers are ignoring climate change, too.

    Right now, Britain’s carbon dioxide emissions are going up, not down.

    We’re failing to meet our international commitments to reduce them.

    Despite all those bright sparks at Number Ten, Labour haven’t a clue what to do about energy.

    There’s another thing the DTI is responsible for, that we all use every week.

    The Royal Mail and the Post Office.

    Under Labour the Royal Mail has lost £1.8 billion in the last two years.

    Three thousand post offices are being closed.

    To make matters worse, Ministers cancelled our plans to let every pensioner go on receiving their pension in cash at their local post office.

    Over the next couple of years that’ll make life hard for thousands of vulnerable people.

    And because someone who gets cash at a post office counter often spends a bit of it in the same shop Labour’s policy will force more post offices to close.

    Next month I’ll set out a better future for Royal Mail and Post Office workers and pensioners and for Post Offices, without spending a pound of taxpayers’ money.

    And when I am Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, I’ll cut the bureaucracy in the DTI itself.

    I’ll bang on the desks of my Cabinet colleagues

    To make sure they know what they’re doing to business.

    Under the Conservatives everyone in Whitehall will know that Britain must be made a better place to do business

    So we can achieve the other things we want.

    We’ve got a message for Tony Blair.

    Instead of increasing National Insurance Contributions he should cut the tax on jobs.

    Instead of taxing pensions he should encourage saving.

    Instead of forcing universities to dumb down he should back our world class institutions.

    Instead of abolishing the House of Lords and ignoring the House of Commons he should answer for his Government’s mistakes.

    But Tony Blair’s had his chance

    And he’s squandered it.

    Lost the trust of the British people.

    Voters are fed up with all the broken promises.

    Fed up with the arrogance and the lies and the spin.

    Fed up with a Government that says it’s listening but goes on lecturing.

    Fed up with a Third World transport system.

    Fed up with a Government that’s destroyed the security of every pensioner.

    Fed up with a Prime Minister who’s corrupted our constitution and now wants to give Brussels more power under a European one.

    In 2003 Britain is a nation yearning for politicians who provide leadership they can trust.

    A nation yearning for a Government that has integrity.

    A nation yearning for Ministers who show courage.

    A nation yearning for policies that are honest.

    As I look around this hall I see people who yearn for the Conservatives

    To provide that leadership

    To offer that integrity

    To display that courage

    To deliver that honesty.

    Iain Duncan Smith and the Conservative Party are rising to that challenge.

    Our task is urgent.

    We must begin today.

    He that hath no stomach to this fight: let him depart.

    To everyone else I say

    Together we can drive Tony and his cronies out of Downing Street.

  • Michael Howard – 2003 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    Michael Howard – 2003 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Michael Howard, the then Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, at the Conservative Party conference on 8 October 2003.

    Introduction

    I want to begin by thanking my team. Howard Flight, Stephen O’Brien and Mark Prisk in the Commons; Maurice Saatchi and Judith Wilcox in the Lords; Theresa Villiers in the European Parliament; and Mark Hoban, our Whip, have all worked hard to help me expose Gordon Brown’s mismanagement of our economy. I am very grateful to them all.

    Of course if you listen to Labour ministers, things have never been more rosy.

    And let’s give credit where credit’s due.

    It’s true that, where they have stopped taking the decisions, like setting interest rates, the decisions have generally been the right ones.

    But where they’ve taken the decisions, they’ve generally been wrong. And our job is to hold them to account.

    Public Services

    Let’s start with our public services.

    In Bournemouth, Labour promised a new Jerusalem for our public services. Just give us more time, they said.

    Yet in the very same week, a 72 year old pensioner won a court case against the Government because she had been forced by the length of waiting lists to have her operation abroad.

    That is the reality behind the rhetoric.

    Six and a half years. And still no delivery.

    · 60 tax rises, but one in three children leaving primary school unable to read, write and count properly.

    · 60 tax rises, but crime up by almost 800,000 in the last five years.

    · 60 tax rises, but almost a million people on waiting lists, and 300,000 people without any health insurance having to pay for their

    treatment every year – three times as many as when Labour took office.

    Is it any wonder that Trade Secretary Patricia Hewitt said: `When we talked about delivery, that may have been something of a mistake’?

    Yes – she did say it.

    You see sometimes they do tell the truth – by accident.

    As we have seen from the Hutton inquiry, this is a Government that only tells the truth by accident.

    Is it any wonder that they’ve lost the trust of the people?

    Tax Rises

    Tony Blair told the British people he had `no plans to increase tax at all’.

    Now, every year they say higher taxes are needed for better public services.

    But every year we just get the higher taxes.

    · 60 tax rises since 1997.

    · 50 per cent more tax than we paid in 1997.

    What does it actually mean for the people of our country?

    It means:

    · Higher taxes for families buying a home.

    · Higher taxes on petrol for people driving to work or to school.

    · Higher taxes on energy for industry trying to create wealth and jobs.

    · Higher taxes on those taking out insurance, including pensioners taking out medical insurance.

    · Higher taxes on IT entrepreneurs and on charities.

    · Higher taxes for getting married.

    · Higher taxes on jobs.

    · Higher Council Taxes

    Tax rises this year alone cost a typical family £568 a year.

    Labour’s Council Tax rises are driving those people on fixed incomes like pensioners into real hardship. Labour talk about relieving poverty – the sad truth is they are creating poverty.

    Is it any wonder that they’ve lost the trust of the people?

    The fact is that people are fed up.

    Fed up with endless tax rises.

    Fed up with endless promises.

    And fed up with failure to deliver.

    Waste and Lack of Reform

    And why is it that Labour are taxing and spending and failing?

    The answer is simple.

    They promised reform.

    They’ve talked about reform.

    But they have failed to deliver reform.

    Without reform of our public services, the extra money Labour have spent just hasn’t made the difference.

    That is the central failure of this Government. They have spent the money – taxpayers’ money – but they’ve not carried out the reform.

    And here are some facts you won’t find in Labour speeches:

    · More bureaucrats than beds in the NHS.

    · A 22 per cent rise in health spending leading to a 2 per cent rise in treatments.

    · And spending on running government departments up by £6.7 billion a year, nearly 50 per cent more than in 1997 – more than double the annual capital budget of every school in the country.

    The cost of running the Treasury alone has doubled.

    Gordon Brown

    It can’t all have been spent on Gordon Brown’s campaign drinks parties.

    Last Monday he delivered his campaign speech.

    In one of his less coded sentences, he told the Labour Conference that ‘TB’ was `a curable disease’ – and that he was the cure.

    By Wednesday he was looking much less hopeful.

    In two days flat he went from the Incredible Hulk to the Incredible Sulk.

    From Brown to green with Blair in between.

    Further Tax Rises

    Now. I want to be perfectly honest with you this afternoon.

    There are splits on tax.

    Peter Hain says Labour should put up taxes.

    Gordon Brown and Tony Blair want him to shut up.

    They all want to put up taxes. They just cant agree on whether they should admit it.

    That’s the real split on tax.

    And that’s what the media should be concentrating on.

    Everybody knows that, under Labour, taxes will rise again.

    Tax rises are at the heart of Labour. Old Labour. New Labour. Any Labour.

    They have put up taxes.

    They are putting up taxes.

    And because of the failure to reform the public services, they will put up taxes for as long as they’re in power.

    Liberal Democrats and Tax

    Of course it’s not only Labour that wants higher taxes.

    Anything Labour can do, the Liberal Democrats can do worse.

    Let me tell you of the taxes they want to pile on.

    · A regional income tax.

    · New regional NI contributions.

    · A new higher rate of income tax.

    · VAT on new homes.

    · A new Development Tax.

    · New toll taxes.

    · New parking taxes.

    · An energy tax.

    · A new capital gains tax on death.

    I haven’t finished yet!

    · A water tax.

    · A higher Landfill Tax.

    · More powers for the European Union to levy taxes.

    · And last but not least they want a local income tax – meaning families with two people at work will see bills soar.

    Of course they don’t spell all this out in their leaflets!

    One Liberal Democrat activist was seen distributing a leaflet which said:

    `Your local Liberal Democrats have succeeded in having speed humps removed from your street’.

    An alert resident said to him:

    `Hang on a minute. Weren’t you distributing a leaflet six months ago which said “Your local Liberal Democrats have succeeded in having speed humps installed in your street”?`

    The Liberal Democrat looked round furtively to make sure no-one was listening and said:

    `You know. You’re the very first person who’s noticed’

    It’s an absolutely true story. The alert local resident is closely connected with our favourite newspaper – the Guardian. He’s in the hall this afternoon.

    Pensioners

    Taxpayers are not the only people counting the cost of Labour’s broken promises.

    Gordon Brown’s pension tax has cost 12 million savers on average around £400 a year.

    A typical pension saver now retires on just half of what he or she would have received five years ago. Yes. Half!

    In opposition, Gordon Brown told the Labour Party Conference `I want the next Labour Government to achieve … the end of the means test for our elderly people’.

    But almost 6 in 10 pensioners are subject to the means test as a direct result of the changes he has introduced.

    In all up to 25 million people could soon be in households on means-tested benefits.

    And that rise in means-testing sends out loud and clear this signal: the more you save, the less you’ll get.

    In opposition, Labour said ‘Britain needs a `savings culture’.

    But the amount people save has halved since Labour came to power.

    Is it any wonder that Labour have lost the trust of the people?

    Labour’s Broken Promises: the Economy

    And what an example Gordon Brown is setting!

    At the last election he said it was partly by cutting interest payments on government debt that he was able to fund health and education.

    But just look at him now!

    Two years ago he forecast borrowing at £30 billion. Last year his forecast went up to £72 billion. This year it went up to £118 billion – a fourfold increase in two years!

    High taxes and falling real incomes mean that families are borrowing more too.

    Taken together, families and Government are now borrowing more than 15 per cent of the nation’s income – the highest amount since records began.

    Yet this is the Chancellor who said `you cannot build the New Jerusalem on a mountain of debt’.

    This is the Chancellor who said productivity growth was a ‘fundamental yardstick of economic performance’.

    But, Britain’s productivity growth has almost halved under Labour.

    This is the Chancellor who described investment as the `key to future economic success’.

    But business investment has suffered its biggest fall for almost a decade.

    Is it any wonder that they’ve lost the trust of the people?

    Roadshow

    Now everyone knows that, since Sweden said no to the euro, British membership this side of an election is a dead duck.

    But do you remember the roadshows Tony Blair promised, to sell the euro?

    We haven’t seen much of those so we’ve been asking a few questions.

    · Tony Blair told Parliament there had been 60 events.

    · But Number Ten said none involved him. And none was planned.

    · The Treasury said they were too many events to list. But they had all been low-key. There was no specific start date. And they couldn’t actually identify any of them.

    · The Foreign Office said they hadn’t even started.

    · Then finally the Minister for Europe said it was never meant to be a literal roadshow. That, he said, was just a figure of speech.

    Just like all this Government’s promises. Never meant to be taken literally. Just figures of speech.

    Lessons for Conservatives

    But there are lessons for us in what has happened to Labour.

    Lessons on how we should approach government. Lessons for us in opposition too. Lessons we’ve learned under Iain’s leadership.

    He and I know we must only make promises we can keep.

    Only pledge what we can deliver.

    Let me make one thing clear.

    We believe in low taxes.

    We are the Party of low taxes.

    All our instincts are for low taxes.

    We know that under Labour, people and businesses have been hammered by higher taxes, and too much of their money is being wasted. We know that people have worked hard for their money, and that Governments must spend it wisely.

    We can and we will reform public services. We will always be a lower tax government than Labour. And we do plan to cut taxes.
    But unlike Labour’s, our plans will be carefully costed. And unlike Labour’s, they will be clear for all to see.

    Their overhyped rhetoric and overblown promises, their `figures of speech’, are not for us. That is not our way.

    Fair Deal

    Under the Conservatives, as Iain has always insisted, a fair deal on tax and improving the public services will go hand in hand.

    Because reforming and improving the public services is the only way to break Labour’s vicious circle of ever higher taxes and ever failing services. It is the key to everything we want to achieve. It has got to be done and we’ll do it.

    People want to know there’s a real alternative to Labour’s policy of tax, and spend and fail – not just the Liberal Democrat alternative of tax more, spend more and fail more.

    And that’s what the work we’ve done under Iain’s leadership has been about.

    A new asylum policy. That would pay for 5,000 more police officers every year.

    Increasing pensions in line with earnings. And showing how we would pay for it.

    Saving children from being trapped in failing schools.

    And giving NHS patients a passport to choose their hospital inside or outside the NHS so that waiting times can be cut for all.

    That’s our alternative to tax and spend and fail.

    We will give power to the people.

    Conclusion

    We’re here to make people’s lives better. We’re here to help people fulfil their potential and remove the obstacles holding them back.

    We’re here to put principles back into politics.

    We won’t do it through flashy smiles or empty promises.

    We’ll do it by telling the people the truth. What we’re going to do. How much it will cost.

    And by the commitment, the drive and the determination to put these ideals into practice.

    Under Iain’s leadership that exactly what we are doing. We are focusing on the things that matter to people. We are winning the arguments over policy.

    This next election will be the most exciting for a generation. For the first time in fifty years the people of our country will have a real choice about how our public services are to be delivered.

    They can opt for the old failing system or they can choose a newer way which will respond to their needs, which will achieve their aspirations, which will truly improve their lives.

    It’s a heavy responsibility. We must show our country that there is an alternative to this deceitful, dishonest, and discredited government.

    There is a better way.

    We must show that we can save our country from this deceitful, dishonest and discredited government.

    We must not be found wanting.

    Because my friends, for Britain, for this country we love, nothing but the best will ever do.

  • Mick Whelan – 2022 Letter to Grant Shapps on Rail Strikes

    Mick Whelan – 2022 Letter to Grant Shapps on Rail Strikes

    The letter sent by Mick Whelan, the General Secretary of ASLEF, to Grant Shapps, the Secretary of State for Transport, on 10 August 2022.

    Dear Secretary of State,

    Public comments regarding ASLEF members at Avanti West Coast

    I’m writing in regard to comments that you have made about Avanti West Coast’s failure to run its promised timetable. The company has blamed its failure on a lack of staff caused by “unofficial strike action by ASLEF members.” You have gone on to repeat this claim and blame “unofficial strikes” for the disruption.

    It’s of great interest to us that you go on to mention that “archaic rules from 1919 mean working on rest days is voluntary,” and “outdated rules mean the rail industry relies on goodwill of drivers volunteering to work overtime to ensure services run 7days a week.”

    I must confess, that your comments have caused a great deal of confusion, which I do hope you might be able to allay. Firstly, why are you repeating an unfounded lie that ASLEF has organised unofficial strike action? There are only two explanations. One, that you have been duped by the company who are covering themselves for gross mismanagement, or alternatively that you are knowingly repeating a lie.

    Secondly, we’d love to know what these archaic rules from 1919 are, because collectively, we are flummoxed.

    Thirdly, we believe that for train drivers to safely transport thousands of people, they must have rest days in which they are allowed to rest. The clue is in the name. Do you believe that train drivers should be forced to work on allotted rest days?

    Lastly, I am pleased to inform you that we do agree with one of the points you make in your otherwise confused comments. That is that it’s absurd that “the rail industry relies on goodwill of drivers volunteering to work overtime to ensure services run 7days a week.” That is why it has been ASLEF policy for decades to bring Sundays into the working week. It’s something our negotiators try to achieve, and have achieved, in many companies. I regret to inform you that it’s not ASLEF or 103 year old rules preventing this from happening. It’s the companies you have handed contracts to over the last couple of years. They’ve made the calculation that operating a railway on overtime, is cheaper than employing enough train drivers to run timetabled services, even if that means services are unreliable. I’m starting to have concerns that perhaps these companies are prioritising profit over quality of service.

    It shouldn’t be surprising that we have policy in favour of Sunday in the working week. You see, this would mean more high quality green jobs, and as the train drivers’ union, we think that’s a very good idea.

    It is pretty clear that Avanti West Coast has had to cancel huge amounts of trains and is providing an abysmal service due to complete mismanagement, including not employing enough drivers, yet has decided to blame the insufficient number of drivers it does employ. The same drivers you thanked profusely in letters to me, and in public, during the pandemic. It is nothing short of a disgrace that a secretary of state for transport should parrot these lies.

    These unfounded comments risk the welfare of our members and increase the risk of abuse. I therefore ask that you publicly correct your previous statements and check that any statements you make about our members in the future are, in fact, true.

    Yours sincerely,

    MICK WHELAN

    General Secretary

     

  • Mick Lynch – 2022 Comments on the Carmont Tragedy

    Mick Lynch – 2022 Comments on the Carmont Tragedy

    The comments made by Mick Lynch, the General Secretary of the RMT, on 12 August 2022.

    We are extremely concerned that Network Rail is dragging its feet dangerously on key safety recommendations following the Carmont Rail Tragedy.

    In fact, instead of focusing on improving rail safety, it is proposing to make matters even worse by cutting thousands of safety critical jobs across the network.

    Our railways do not need safety cuts which will make it more likely tragedies like Carmont will happen again.

    Network Rail needs to act on safety recommendations and swiftly reverse its safety critical jobs cull.

  • Mick Lynch – 2022 Comments on Strikes on the Tube and Overground

    Mick Lynch – 2022 Comments on Strikes on the Tube and Overground

    The comments made by Mick Lynch, the General Secretary of the RMT, on 18 August 2022.

    Tube bosses are having secret negotiations with the government about slashing jobs and undermining working conditions and pensions all in the name of removing subsidies.

    This government-led assault on staff will be disastrous as no other comparable urban transport system in the world operates without financial support from central government to ensure good and reliable services.

    The government needs to stop trying to get services on the cheap by slashing jobs and wages and invest in what should be a world class transport network.

  • Mick Lynch – 2022 Comments on Fire and Re-Hire Proposals

    Mick Lynch – 2022 Comments on Fire and Re-Hire Proposals

    The comments made by Mick Lynch, the General Secretary of the RMT, on 19 August 2022.

    Despite his denials Mr Shapps has clearly been dictating how the train companies should conduct negotiations with RMT and now he’s ordering them to fire and re-hire workers.

    The minister also appears to be increasingly desperate and out-of-touch making wild claims about train services between London and Manchester without having a clue what is actually happening.

    Instead of threatening to cut thousands of safety-critical jobs, introducing driver-only trains, closing ticket offices, bailing out the private rail companies as well as bringing in more anti-union laws the government and the employers should enter meaningful negotiations with RMT.