Category: Speeches

  • Henry Kissinger – 1976 Letter to Harold Wilson Following His Resignation

    Henry Kissinger – 1976 Letter to Harold Wilson Following His Resignation

    The letter sent by Henry Kissinger to Harold Wilson on 18 March 1976.

    Dear Harold,

    The announcement of your decision to retire as Prime Minister has left me with a profound sense of loss. I have known you as long as any political leader in the world either in or out of office. In addition to the privilege of being associated with you in political life, I have always considered you a personal friend as well and have had, throughout these years, tremendous respect and admiration for your vision, dedication and leadership. We will miss you.

    Warmest regards,

    Henry A. Kissinger

  • Harold Wilson – 1966 Letter to Cabinet Colleagues on the Hawker Siddeley P.1127

    Harold Wilson – 1966 Letter to Cabinet Colleagues on the Hawker Siddeley P.1127

    The letter sent by Harold Wilson, the then Prime Minister, to cabinet colleagues on 20 December 1966.

    We have to take a decision by the end of the year on whether or not we should continue with the P.1127. In discussion in the Defence and Oversea Policy Committee there was a division of view and, although preponderant opinion was in favour of continuation, the decision is one which the Cabinet will wish to take.

    I attach a note by officials setting out the considerations on either side.

    H.W.

    10, Downing Street, S.W.1.

    20th December, 1966

    SECRET

    P1127

    Note by Officials

    Introduction

    The P1127 is an aircraft intended to provide close support for our ground forces. It is a major advance in this field through the exploitation of its unique ability to operate from very short rough strips in the forward area (short take off and landing capability or STOL) and to operate from small landing sites in the vertical take off and landing (VTOL) mode with a bomb or rocket load. At the time of the Defence Review it was hoped that the VTOL performance, which is limited in range and load, could be appreciably improved through incorporating plenum chamber burning, but further studies have established that this is not the answer and the most likely alternative would be costly in both development and production. There are, however, indications that engine thrust increases can be achieved in the normal course of development which will lead to worthwhile improvements in aircraft performance.

    There is no aircraft which can replace the special V/STOL characteristics of the P1127, but it is possible — admittedly with some detriment to the operational efficiency of our forces — to provide close support for the Army by means of different combinations of the Spey-Phantom and of the Anglo-French Jaguar. The latter course would be cheaper, but would involve additional expenditure in foreign currency and would have industrial implications for the future of the United Kingdom aircraft industry. The question is the degree of priority to be accorded to the gain in operational efficiency.

    Defence Requirements

    The Defence Review made provision for the purchase of 110 P1127 aircraft (93 solos and 17 duals). In considering the Review in February (CC(66) 9th Conclusions) the Cabinet agreed that the P1127 was important for United Kingdom industrial reasons and that at that stage we should plan on the assumption that it would be developed. The Cabinet, however, reserved the right to take a different decision should technical developments or the escalation of costs make it desirable to do so. Following their discussion, the Defence and Oversea Policy Committee agreed in March (OPD(66) 15th Meeting, Item 1) that an order should be placed for 60 aircraft, with an option for a further 40, and that the issue should be further considered in the autumn in the light of feasibility studies, the cost of production and the prospect of export orders.

    The present position is that the programme is going well, the first two aircraft are flying and development should be completed within the estimate of last March. Our commitments to the end of December in respect of both research and development and production will total about £45 million, which is over one-third of the estimated cost of the development and production of the first 60 aircraft (£120 million to £125 million) and 13 per cent of the total ten year programme cost of £336 million. In addition, we have spent, including contributions from the United States and German Governments to the Kestrel programme and payments on the cancelled P1154, a further £70 million on the technology of vectored thrust.

    The further defence studies might call also for a review of the number of P1127 (or alternative aircraft) which will be required. These studies will not be completed until July, 1967 and, theoretically, the decision on the future of the P1127 should be taken then in the light of the cost and implications of the alternative courses. By then, however, a further £26 million will have been committed on the P1127 and effectively deferment now would be equivalent to a decision to continue with the aircraft. The choice on whether to continue or cancel the P1127 is therefore open to us only until the end of the year.

    The argument for cancellation

    The argument for cancelling the P1127 is its cost and its low defence priority. Pressure on the Defence Budget has increased. There is still the problem of attaining the Defence Review target of £2,000 million at 1964 prices in 1969-70: and further defence studies are being undertaken to consider the possibility of substantial additional savings by 1970-71. To provide the total 110 P1127 aircraft which would be necessary for the defence commitments envisaged in the Defence Review would cost £130 million more over a ten-year period than a likely alternative. Such an alternative, although cheaper in budgetary terms, could, however, involve expenditure of £40 million in dollars, plus perhaps a further £25 million for the foreign currency element of the additional Anglo-French Jaguars. (Until the further defence studies are completed it is uncertain whether this requirement for a number of P1127, or alternative aircraft, can be reduced: it is therefore impossible to calculate with any precision the additional budgetary cost of the P1127 and the cost in foreign exchange of the alternative.)

    Although the P1127 is desirable on grounds of operational efficiency the priority to be accorded to it on defence grounds alone is not such as to justify its continuation in view of the pressure on the Defence Budget. The incidence of expenditure on the P1127 would moreover give rise to awkward budgetary problems in 1969-70 and 1970-71 and although alternatives to it, giving us a similar capability, could also do this, there would be greater room for manoeuvre. If the continuation of the P1127 is approved, then the Defence Budget will be higher than the total to which it could otherwise be reduced in consequence of the Defence Review and the further defence studies.

    The argument for continuation

    The argument for continuing with the P1127, apart from the gain in operational efficiency and the saving in foreign currency, is that it is the only advanced military aircraft at present under development in the United Kingdom and the only major national aircraft project this Government has initiated. Its adoption as a part replacement for the Hunter was intended to mitigate the cancellation of the TSR 2, P1154 and HS 681. If it were to be cancelled now the effect on the aircraft industry could be disastrous, particularly in the context of the uncertainty of the future of the Anglo-French variable geometry (VG) aircraft. Although the balance of probability is that the French will agree to the continuation of the latter, this is not certain, and if they withdrew we should then have to consider whether or not to continue with the development of a somewhat simpler form of this aircraft in the United Kingdom alone. This uncertainty is relevant to the future of the United Kingdom industry.

    Although the main work for a design team in the immediate future would be on a VG aircraft and not on the P1127, the loss of confidence from the abandonment of the P1127 alone would be such that it is doubtful if men of the right industrial, scientific and technological standing could be retained in the industry. In particular, this is the major project in the programme for Hawker Siddeley. It is around this firm, and its management, that the Government’s proposals for reorganising the airframe industry are built. If this project were now cancelled, Hawker Siddeley’s willingness to remain in the industry could evaporate: in that event any prospect of an effective United Kingdom aircraft industry on the basis of the Government’s proposals would disappear.

    Furthermore, the development of the VTOL and STOL capability is the only part of aircraft technology in which at present the United Kingdom is in advance of the rest of the world. To abandon the P1127 would be permanently to throw away that lead, with wider consequences for our technological capacity.

    Export Prospects

    The export prospects of the aircraft are necessarily uncertain until it is clear whether or not the Government intend to go ahead with production, since we cannot expect to sell military aircraft unless the RAF order them. However, a number of countries have shown interest. The most promising prospects so far appear to be Israel, India and Finland. In general, the Head of Defence Sales considers the export prospects are good but of course there can be no certainty of them.

    Numbers to be ordered

    If a decision were taken in favour of the continuation of the programme there would then be a choice between ordering now 60 single and ten dual aircraft (essential for training purposes) at a programme cost of £242 million while keeping an option open for a further purchase, the cost of which cannot be quantified until the end of the defence studies, or ordering now the full number of 110 (including 17 duals) at a programme cost of £336 million. The advantage of the former course is that it would leave options open if the defence studies showed either a requirement for fewer than 110, or that alternative cheaper aircraft should be provided for the full remaining requirement. The advantage of ordering the full 110 now is that if this number is required it would be marginally cheaper and that it would give greater industrial certainty and enhance exports prospects.

    The Choice

    The choice lies between:

    (1) cancelling the P1127 and

    (2) continuing the programme, in which case the choice is between:

    (a) ordering 70 aircraft now and keeping the option open on the remainder until mid-1967; and

    (b) ordering the full 110 now.

  • Harold Wilson – 1964 Christmas Letter to Cabinet Colleagues

    Harold Wilson – 1964 Christmas Letter to Cabinet Colleagues

    The letter sent by Harold Wilson, the then Prime Minister, to his Cabinet colleagues on 23 December 1964.

    I should like to take this opportunity to wish all my colleagues in the Government a very happy Christmas.

    I hope that we can all feel that, having regard to the circumstances which we found when we came into office, we have not done too badly since 16th October. We have launched important new initiatives in economic and industrial policy, in defence and foreign policy and in the field of the social services; and in many other respects we have set in hand a good deal of work, which will bear fruit in due course, to achieve the objectives which we set ourselves in our Election Manifesto. We must maintain this momentum; and we must be ready to tackle 1965 with no less energy and determination.

    Meanwhile I trust that all my colleagues will have a well-earned rest over the holiday. I hope that they will also take the opportunity to do a little quiet stock-taking in the light of the first few weeks of office and to consider how we can improve still further our handling of Government business. I suggest that, among other things, we should all study afresh the memorandum on Questions of Procedure for Ministers (C. (64) 1) which I circulated on 19th October, 1964. I know that Ministers were very busy at the time when it was circulated and now is a good time to look at it again. It contains a lot of valuable guidance, which has been tested by experience; and it gains added force when it is re-read against the background of a few months of practical Ministerial responsibility. The sections dealing with contacts with the Press, television and public opinion in general are particularly worth attention. Recently, there have been one or two occasions when information about our intentions seems to have leaked prematurely; and this kind of thing, if it continues, is not only bad in itself but tends to undermine the whole concept of collective responsibility. I ask my colleagues to take particular care in this respect; and I would suggest that, for their own protection, they should preferably be accompanied by some responsible witness when they meet representatives of the Press, even if only informally, and that they should also ensure that their Departmental Information Officers are promptly informed of all such meetings and of what has passed on such occasions in order that any follow-up action which may be necessary can be taken. A few simple precautions of this kind can save a lot of subsequent trouble.

    H.W.

    10 Downing Street, S.W.1.

    23rd December, 1964

    CONFIDENTIAL

  • Dan Jarvis – 2026 Comments on the Drone Facility in Swindon

    Dan Jarvis – 2026 Comments on the Drone Facility in Swindon

    The comments made by Dan Jarvis, the Secretary of State for Defence, on 12 June 2026.

    The character of warfare is changing, and it is changing fast. From Ukraine to the Middle East, we are seeing right now how uncrewed systems are rapidly evolving and reshaping conflicts – on land, in the air and at sea

    Our new DroneTEX facility at the heart of our Uncrewed Systems Centre is Europe’s largest drone test and development facility, and will help us ensure the UK embraces technologies that are redefining warfare.

    Where once new technology could take years from inception to reaching our Armed Forces, we will now be able to develop and field new tech in a matter of weeks – because in this new era, those who innovate fastest will win.

  • Fiona Twycross – 2026 Speech on Libraries

    Fiona Twycross – 2026 Speech on Libraries

    The speech made by Baroness Fiona Twycross, the Libraries Minister, at Libraries Connected in Kenilworth on 10 June 2026.

    Thank you, and I’d like to say a massive thank you for the invitation for me to speak here today. I’m absolutely delighted to be here, I’ll just say a few words at what I hear has been a brilliant and at times very moving conference.

    I’ve been the Libraries Minister responsible for Libraries for just over a year and as someone who always has at least one book on the go, it is an absolute delight and privilege. And I’ve been very much enjoying meeting a number of you when I’ve been on visits around the country.

    It’s great to see skilled and experienced people in the libraries sector coming together to share your insights and expertise. I know you work tirelessly – and enthusiastically – to deliver great services to your communities.

    I understand you have been covering a range of topics that are important for the sector – censorship, access, trust and reading for pleasure. I am also really pleased to see there has been a session on data as that is another priority for me, as it helps me sell what the sector does across Government.

    These are all issues that we are taking seriously in the centre of Government too and I would like to talk briefly today about how I will be carrying them forward into the forthcoming libraries strategy. And I think we had hoped that we’d be able to unveil the strategy today. We’re not quite there, but hopefully we’ll get there soon.

    I want to start by saying – and I don’t need to say this to you – but libraries matter. From the pop-up site I saw in Grimsby last month to the civic hub that is Liverpool Central, every time I visit a library I hear such enthusiasm from staff and users about the work you do and the impact you have, from supporting health and wellbeing, building businesses and showcasing arts and cultural experiences, libraries offer so much.

    Libraries matter because they are places where everyone can build their knowledge and skills. People depend on libraries for trustworthy information in the face of misinformation and a rapidly changing world. They also support freedom of speech, a core value of our society. I know that this is a lively topic of debate for the sector, not least here in Warwickshire, and I want to support you to see library collections continue to represent a variety of perspectives and topics.

    I am clear that the tone in which politicians talk about our public libraries can also have a chilling effect, and I am also clear that our libraries should be for everyone. When I was reading through my speech on the train, I thought it actually makes me sad and angry that I even feel I have to say that out loud.

    Throughout the year, it is great to see themed displays of books celebrating the diversity across our communities. Books about so many topics are at the heart of what libraries offer and it is always good to see you celebrate projects centred around reading.

    I was really pleased to see last weeks’ Libraries Change Lives Week focused on supporting the National Year of Reading through initiatives like ‘Discover Your Library Day’.

    I’m also proud that DCMS gave a £150,000 funding boost to 72 library authorities covering 100 places, providing opportunities to extend reading projects and activities. These are all places which are disadvantaged by high deprivation, weak social infrastructure and low library engagement.

    I look forward to finding out and hearing more about the impact of projects to deliver increased membership and use of libraries in those places, during 2026 and beyond.

    I’m also delighted that some of the regional winners of the Library of the Year award are here today. They were recipients of an £1,000 cash prize from DCMS with the money going towards continuing local reading projects.

    But the value of libraries – and why libraries matter – is often only available to people if they are members. I’m keen to see even more people signing up and using their local library, and getting the benefits that come with membership. Libraries are essential services in any neighbourhood. After all, public libraries in England have 6 million members and around 143 million physical visits a year.

    That is four times the number of people who attend the Premier League, Championship and EFL Leagues 1 and 2 annually!

    A third of adults regularly use their library, but there’s still more we can do to open up library services to more people, particularly those from underrepresented groups.

    I want everyone to find something of value at their local library. I want to support you in your work removing barriers to library membership such as worries about the affordability of fines. And I also want to increase active use and share the brilliant practice we see in so many places.

    I would like to see every child as a member of their local library so the next generation can enjoy the lifelong benefits libraries bring. The benefits they brought to me, in other words. We will work with the Local Government Association and others to consider how places like Best Start Family Hubs, schools, and other local public services can be supported to promote children’s library membership.

    I know the Culture Secretary, Lisa Nandy, wants to make a difference in the places that need it the most. This is why DCMS has published our Culture Priority Places. These will help us prioritise and target investment in those areas to build social and community cohesion and to enhance opportunity where outcomes are poorest.

    We have also committed to continuing the Libraries Improvement Fund until 2030. From this year LIF assessments will integrate our Culture Priority Places. And over the course of this parliament, we will invest up to £27.5 million in the Fund, supporting library services to upgrade physical and digital infrastructure to meet changing user needs.

    I would like to see us collectively work together to ensure public libraries are well run, well used and well connected. And, more than anything, have an impact in their local communities.

    I will continue to promote the critical contribution public libraries can and do make to so many important Government strategic objectives. For example, I recently met with Ministers in the Department for Education to talk about how we can build stronger partnerships between libraries, schools and Best Start Family hubs.

    When I or the Libraries Team have these discussions, it is always valuable to have robust data and evidence on library usage and impact that we can use to help to make your case and inspire policy makers across Government.

    Public libraries have always been engines to deliver change and I want to shine a spotlight on how libraries support the government to provide opportunities for all.

    I do recognise the difficult context that libraries are working in, and the constraints that this creates. Our view is not that libraries should deliver more without resource, but that it can be highly effective and cost effective to maximise libraries’ role in communities.

    I know that you are all waiting quite patiently for the forthcoming government libraries strategy. Many of you have already shared your views and feedback to help shape it, so thank you for that. And I hope I have given you a flavour of some of the things you can expect to see in it. I really value the input you have provided and those conversations I have had with people when on visits. I’d especially like to thank those of you who provided excellent case studies on the impact your library services have on your communities. They’re a really inspiring read. From Oldham, who are placing local data at the centre of service design, to Leicester who are working seamlessly across public and academic libraries. We have been blown away by the response.

    The examples and all of the case studies underline what we absolutely know to be true: that you are making a difference in people’s lives in the communities you serve through your work.

    I am committed to support you from central government to do that the best you can. We all have a part to play in ensuring that our public libraries continue to be the gateway to opportunity.

    One thing I did want to say ahead of us publishing the Libraries Strategy formally is to give you some assurance about the national development agency function. After consideration and discussion with the Arts Council, sector bodies and the British Library, and with a number of representations from some of you in the room, we have decided to retain the function with the Arts Council. [Applause] The Arts Council are really keen to keep this function as well.

    We know that there is work to be done together to understand what the sector wants from its development agency and to build a refreshed offer that serves your needs. But I hope that this allays any concerns you may have had and we look forward to taking the next steps on this together.

    Over the next five years I want the ambitions outlined in our strategy to shape our work plan for the future. I want us to work together to realise these ambitions. You are the guardians of a system that can, in my case and the case of so many others, turn a weekly choice of five books into a lifetime of opportunity. Long may that be the case! And thank you so much for everything you do, sometimes in hugely difficult circumstances. It really is genuinely appreciated, thank you.

  • Keir Starmer – 2026 Letter to John Healey Following his Resignation

    Keir Starmer – 2026 Letter to John Healey Following his Resignation

    The letter sent by Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, to John Healey on 11 June 2026.

    Dear John,

    The world today is more dangerous and uncertain than at any point in our lifetimes. That requires a serious response to build our economic resilience and our national defences.

    We have achieved a great deal working together. We inherited a situation where our armed forces had faced years of underfunding and neglect. Our work leading the Coalition of the Willing on Ukraine, defending our Gulf allies, and working together with like-minded nations on a plan for the Strait of Hormuz has helped make the world more secure. I am proud of our record on funding. When we entered government in 2024, I took the decision to increase defence spending after the Conservatives hollowed out our armed forces. That required a cut to the international aid budget but the result was the highest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War. I will always do what is needed to keep our country safe. I thank you for your work to deliver on all of this.

    You are also right that we have to go further. The Defence Investment Plan does just that — delivering an unprecedented increase in defence spending in a sustainable way. It will provide the resources our military needs to keep us safe and the clarity the British defence industry needs to plan. It will make the big strategic investments we need for the long term and give the certainty which private finance needs to invest. It will allow our armed forces to transform and modernise and back them with the tools they need to change the way we fight — and to deter our enemies. And crucially it will ensure the money spent is spent wisely and used to back jobs and growth here in Britain.

    We are backing this with the necessary investment. The increases in spending that underpin this plan will be sustainable and fair. They will mean significant reallocations of funding from across government departments and the right choices to protect our nation. Strong public finances are part of what keeps us safe – irresponsible borrowing only puts that at risk.

    Taking these decisions is never easy. I am determined to rebuild our country after years of being buffeted by crises. I am sorry that you will not be part of that work going forward.

    All best wishes,

    Keir

  • James Murray – 2026 Speech at NHS ConfedExpo

    James Murray – 2026 Speech at NHS ConfedExpo

    The speech made by James Murray, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 11 June 2026.

    I am really pleased to be here so soon after being made Secretary of State for Health and Social Care.

    Today, in fact, is exactly four weeks since the Prime Minister called me and asked me to take on this role.

    And I can tell you that, from the moment that phone call with the Prime Minister ended, my head – and my heart – have been filled with thoughts and feelings of how important a role this is and how much I want to do.

    I have spent the last four weeks meeting as many people as possible – patients, staff, outside experts.

    I have been taking finely balanced decisions with all the sensitivity they deserve.

    And I have been reading reams and reams of policy papers and briefing packs from front to back.

    As my advisers will tell you, I like getting my head under the bonnet.

    And one reason for that is that I want to understand the challenges you are facing inside and out so that we can work together to move things forward.

    In all the previous roles I have held in public office – whether as a council cabinet member, as a deputy mayor in London, or as a minister at the Treasury – I have learned that the most effective way to deliver is to work openly and collectively with all members of the teams I have led.

    And it is in that same spirit that I have joined this team of 1.5 million people, who work in the NHS, and the 1.5 million more, who work in social care.

    I want our workforce to feel valued and rewarded, where they come in for every shift with a sense of purpose and go home from every shift with a sense of achievement.

    Because as political leaders we can set the direction of travel.

    But it is only by working with leaders throughout the system, and those on the frontline, that we will see our commitments to the people we serve become a reality.

    And I want to thank you for everything that you and your teams, clinicians and non-clinicians alike, have done over the past two years:

    We have moved toward our 18-week electives improvement target; delivered 1.8 million dental appointments; offered online requests for GP appointments; cut waiting lists by more than 400,000; getting ambulance response times and four-hour waits in A&E down; and improving productivity across the health system.

    I am especially pleased, with my former Treasury hat on, that these achievements have been possible with us living within our means for the first time in nearly a decade.

    I know that you have been under considerable pressure to meet the ambitious targets that we have set you, to do it while keeping on top of the finances, and to do it in the face of strikes, an early flu spike, supply chain challenges, disease outbreaks and record demand.

    And I don’t want to diminish how tough the organisational changes have been on you and your colleagues, especially those in my department, in NHS England and in ICBs.

    I think it is easy to forget in talk of headcount and savings that what we mean are people’s jobs and livelihoods – and however necessary the changes are, that is certainly not lost on me.

    But some people doubted our ability to make the progress we promised, and you are all proving them wrong.

    You have risen to the challenge.

    And the public are beginning to feel the improvements that you are making – whether that is on waiting times, urgent and emergency care, ambulance response times, or GP access.

    It is no surprise that we have seen the biggest drop in dissatisfaction with the NHS since 1998 – and the first increase in satisfaction since before the pandemic.

    And whilst we know there is a long road ahead, we have shown that by working together we can drive and deliver real and impressive progress.

    For me to come into this role on the back of that growing sense of optimism and momentum, is a real gift.

    My promise to you, is that I will work with you day and night to realise the opportunity that gives us to go further.

    Now, in pursuing that goal, I do not want to waste a second.

    Too often in the past, a change of Health Secretary has come with a change of priorities.

    As a result, the service gets flooded with messages of what they need to focus on next, and progress gets delayed.

    The lesson of the last two years for me is that you are at your best, and you are able to deliver fastest, when the message from the top is clear.

    And so let me say clearly that the focus and targets of this government on electives, UEC, and access to GPs and dentists remain.

    The Medium-Term Planning Framework remains.

    And the 10 Year Plan remains.

    The level of improvement required across the system in future years cannot be achieved through performance management alone.

    What we have done in the first two years, on the back of record investment, is to make improvements while starting to modernise the NHS.

    And now that we have stabilised the system, my job is to work with you not only to maintain and extend those improvements in performance, but also to put our feet to the floor on reform.

    What I am bringing to this role is not a change of course but a change of gear.

    I am determined that we accelerate our fundamental transformation and modernisation of the NHS by making sure that we make the fullest possible use of technology, digitisation and AI.

    I know what benefits this can bring.

    When I was responsible for tax collection at the Treasury – that made me popular I put HMRC on course to conduct 90% of interactions digitally by 2030.

    And with more and more people able to meet their day-to-day tax needs through digital self-service, HMRC is now freeing resources that can help resolve the most complex cases that need a human eye.

    AI tools are now being used to support evidence in criminal investigations, and voice recognition technology is being used to speed up taxpayers accessing support and to helping to write call logs to save on the costs of admin.

    But one important barrier that we knew we had to overcome at HMRC – one that I recognise from many years in public service – is the risk aversion that too often limits innovation.

    Too often the question is, ‘What if it goes wrong?’ – and of course that is an entirely legitimate question to ask, especially in health and social care where we are talking about profound consequences.

    But I think we also need to balance that question by giving equal weight to another important question, ‘What if we don’t do this and leave things the same?’

    I want you to have the confidence that I will back you in using new technology to improve the experiences and outcomes of patients.

    I believe people expect their public services to be as easy and convenient to use as they get from the private sector – and it is our job to make that a reality.

    Now I know that when challenging targets loom large and near on the road ahead, reform and modernisation can get pushed further from view.

    Modernisation is seen as a promise for tomorrow, rather than a way of tackling the challenges of today.

    And let me be clear that the challenges of today are very real.

    All of us in this room know that for all the progress that we’ve made, things still aren’t good enough for far too many people in far too many parts of the country.

    As we meet here, there will be someone who can’t get through to their GP to make an appointment, someone off work and in pain who has been waiting too long for treatment, someone in crisis who can’t get the support they need, and someone stuck in a bed in the humiliating and undignified surroundings of a corridor.

    But the NHS cannot simply manage its way out of the current pressures.

    It must transform its way out of them.

    The simple truth is that the NHS will only become sustainable in the long term if it changes the way care is delivered.

    The choice is not between reform and recovery; the task is to use reform to accelerate recovery.

    And you are showing us the way.

    The community wellness team in South Cumbria that cut emergency admissions by two thirds, did so by identifying a small group of high need patients responsible for a disproportionate share of hospital bed days – they are demonstrating how creating neighbourhood services will reduce the demand on A&E not just a decade from now but over the next few years.

    Likewise, the eTriage tool being used by Royal Berkshire and others to reduce the number of face-to-face appointments, shows that new technology will not just improve the speed and convenience for outpatients a decade from now but, again, will do so over the next few years.

    The Health and Growth Accelerator pilots to boost people’s health and get them back to work show how preventing sickness will improve the nation’s physical and economic health not just a decade from now but over the next few years.

    In the same way that investment and modernisation are two sides of the same coin, delivery and reform are not separate agendas.

    In fact, as the targets become more and more ambitious, it will be nigh on impossible to meet them if the system stays the way it is currently working.

    Tomorrow must come to the aid of today.

    And so I want to make sure that, at the centre, we use the modernisation and reform agenda to step up delivery straight away, and at the same time create new ways of working that give you the platform to innovate and drive improvement locally.

    We have already made a start on that with the NHS Modernisation Bill, the changes we are making to ICBs, and the creation of Advanced Foundation Trusts and Integrated Healthcare Organisations.

    I do not want to tie your hands in red tape.

    I want you to be free to innovate, to be creative and to get on with what works, because I know that delivery does not happen from behind a desk in Whitehall.

    Indeed, more often than not the system is way ahead of us.

    North East Ambulance Service now delivers the fastest response times across all six national standards and is reducing pressure on emergency departments by increasing ‘hear and treat’ rates and improving handover times.

    Princess Alexandra Hospital has significantly reduced elective waiting times by, among other things, expanding diagnostic capacity, introducing an ‘advice and refer’ model, and working with patients and primary care to redesign pathways.

    These are the kinds of enterprising initiatives that are going to make the NHS better for patients, better for staff, and better for taxpayers.

    I very much hope to see more of them and to make sure we help spread them and embed them throughout the system.

    The real challenge is not choosing between short-term performance and long-term sustainability but ensuring that each reinforces the other.

    Now, we all know the NHS matters deeply to people right across our country, because of how deeply it touches all of our lives.

    For my part, the NHS came to my rescue when I was diagnosed 18 years ago with a serious and rare neurological condition that threatened my ability to run, to write, and to talk.

    It is only thanks to the support of the NHS that I am able to stand here today, as the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care.

    The NHS gave me a second chance at life – and I will fight for it every single day with the strength that it has given me back.

    And I need your help to do that.

    I want to work with you to implement the 10 Year Plan.

    To quicken the pace of reform by embracing technology, digitisation and AI.

    To innovate and take the right risks – and to know that, as you do so, I will be by your side.

    We are going in the right direction and we must not ease our foot off the pedal for a second.

    I am looking forward to working with you very much, and I cannot wait to see what we can achieve together.

    Thank you.

  • Ben Wallace – 2026 Comments on the Resignation of John Healey

    Ben Wallace – 2026 Comments on the Resignation of John Healey

    The comments made by Ben Wallace, the former Secretary of State for Defence, on 11 June 2026.

    John Healey shadowed me for over 4 years. While I didn’t agree with everything he did I know he tried his best and had the interests of the Armed Forces at his heart. I know he loved the job and it will have not been easy to resign. His loyalty to his Party and PM was not reciprocated by them when it mattered and I think he was left with no choice. I wish him the very best. His resignation was one of principle.

  • Ed Davey – 2026 Comments on the Resignation of John Healey

    Ed Davey – 2026 Comments on the Resignation of John Healey

    The comments made by Ed Davey, the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, on 11 June 2026.

    Healey’s resignation is a wake-up call for Starmer and Burnham.

    Stop repeating the mistakes of the Conservatives and get serious about funding our armed forces properly.

    We cannot afford years more political chaos while our national security is put at risk.

  • James Murray – 2026 Comments on Measles

    James Murray – 2026 Comments on Measles

    The comments made by James Murray, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 11 June 2026.

    My thoughts are with the families who have suffered such unimaginable loss. These deaths are a heartbreaking reminder that measles is not a harmless childhood illness. 

    Measles can lead to serious complications that can be fatal, and the MMR vaccine, which has saved countless lives, remains the best protection we have against this highly infectious disease. 

    I urge all parents and carers to check that their children are up to date with their vaccinations as it is never too late to catch up – even if you miss a dose. By ensuring our children are vaccinated, we not only protect them but also help safeguard the most vulnerable in our communities.