Category: Health

  • Patricia Hewitt – 2005 Speech on the UK Role in Europe

    Patricia Hewitt – 2005 Speech on the UK Role in Europe

    The text of the speech made by Patricia Hewitt, the then Secretary of State for Health, on 28 November 2005.

    Thank you Fergal for that warm introduction.

    Good morning everybody. I’d like to welcome you all to the Patient Safety Summit, which we are holding as part of our 2005 Presidency of the European Union. I’m delighted to see so many people are here today. I welcome you all to London.

    This week 15 years ago, construction workers finally drilled through the last wall of rock to join the two halves of the Channel Tunnel – linking Britain to mainland Europe for the first time since the Ice Age, 8,000 years earlier.

    Today, the Tunnel has now come to be a “normal” part of our life for many of us, providing a seamless transport link between European cities. But it also reminds us that Europe is an increasingly connected community of countries – and that European cooperation can bring visible benefits to all of our lives.

    Many of you will have used the Channel Tunnel to be here today. We have delegates from across the EU member states, from the European Commission, from other parts of Europe, and from the wider world (including international organisations the World Health Organization and OECD, and delegates from the USA, from Russia, Canada and Australia).

    Most of you will be involved in making policy in some way. That is absolutely deliberate. This Summit is about solutions and action.

    I’m also delighted to welcome a number of patients from around Europe and the world. Your participation is vital because as you’ve heard all of us need to keep in mind the individual and the family who are at the centre of our quest to improve the safety of patient care. They are the ones who suffer from any harm caused when things go wrong.

    Once again, welcome to you all.

    Patient Safety Internationally

    Patient Safety is an international issue. No country – big or small – can claim to have solved the problem. That is why we have chosen it as a headline health theme to address in our 2005 Presidency of the European Union.

    A stark figure which you will hear over and over throughout this Summit is that in approximately 1 in 10 of hospitalizations, something goes wrong. In the increasing number of developed countries where research has been carried out, over and over we find similar levels of health care errors.

    Some of these errors are fortunately mild – for example a medication error which can simple mean a patient taking their medicine at the wrong time rather than the wrong medication – tragically others are not.

    For Europe, this means that some form of unintended harm is almost certainly suffered by millions of patients every year.

    We seem to have somehow forgotten the first law of medicine formulated by Hippocrates, almost over 2 and a half thousand years ago: ”first, do no harm.”

    Of course the situation in developing countries is significantly worse. There you have dedicated staff working with desperately poor infrastructure and equipment, unreliable supply and quality of drugs, shortcomings in waste management and infection control all make the probability of adverse events much higher.

    So wherever we are facing the challenge of patient safety isn’t easy. For patients, for those delivering health care, for policy makers, and for politicians, facing up to the fact that healthcare is an intrinsically risky – that in our complex healthcare systems, things do sometimes go wrong, and patients are sometimes harmed as a result – is not a comfortable or easy thing to do.

    In seeking to be more open about patient safety, I think we find that cultures can be stubborn, old behaviours can be persistent and attitudes difficult to change.

    The research and experience of other industries shows that an approach of blame and retribution – looking for a scapegoat – leads to a climate where individuals will be afraid to admit mistakes and no learning will ever take place.

    I, for one, and I hope all of us would much prefer to be treated by a health care system that knows when it makes mistakes – and acts to reduce the risk of them being repeated – than one that did not.

    The European response

    Among the impressive programme of Summit sessions, speakers, experts – and patients – we have Fernand Sauer, the European Commission’s Director of Public Health and Risk Assessment, who will speak to us a little later on. I’m very much looking forward to that.

    I am delighted that patient safety programmes are now emerging in many countries across Europe.

    Patient safety has been a headline health priority theme of both the 2005 Luxembourg and UK Presidencies of the European Union. Activity at the European level builds on a programme established by the World Health Organization through the World Alliance for Patient Safety and the work of other key partners such as the Council of Europe.

    We have representatives of the 2005 Luxembourg Presidency here: Health Minister Mars di Bartolomeo will speak tomorrow.

    Our own Presidency aims to build on the excellent work of the Luxembourg Presidency to ensure that our deliberations on patient safety at the EU level are translated into clear goals, practical programmes of activity and strong partnerships. Our vision is simple – to leave a lasting legacy of safer health care for all Europeans.

    I am pleased that the United Kingdom was one of the first countries in the world to give priority to tackling patient safety. We have tried in the past year to established safety as the first domain of the standards used to assess the quality of our healthcare service. We also have a national system for reporting – with learning from patient safety problems being translated into practical solutions for safer care.

    Just four weeks ago, the National Audit Office (which scrutinises public spending on behalf of our Parliament) published its review of this country’s NHS Patient Safety programme. The report concluded that we have made progress; organisations and staff across the NHS feel that they are moving towards a more open and fair culture of safety – driven largely though our national focus on quality and safety. Although we know we have much more to do.

    UK pledge of support

    And of course our work in Europe is part of a much bigger international movement.

    In May 2002 the World Health Assembly unanimously adopted a resolution urging all member states to take action on patient safety.

    The Resolution requested WHO to take a lead in building global norms and standards and supporting country efforts in developing patient safety policies and practices. Since then, we have seen the establishment of the World Alliance for Patient Safety.

    This was launched by the Director General of WHO, Dr LEE Jong-Wook in October 2004. I am delighted to say that Dr LEE is with us here today and will be addressing us shortly.

    The UK has had a very close association with the patient safety programmes at the EU level and at the WHO through the chairmanship of Sir Liam Donaldson of the World Alliance. That partnership has been of great value both within the UK and internationally. It has allowed us to bring the best of learning and experience from the UK to the international stage as well as ensuring that we can learn from international experience.

  • Jonathan Ashworth – 2020 Comments on Silencing of Chief Nursing Officer

    Jonathan Ashworth – 2020 Comments on Silencing of Chief Nursing Officer

    The text of the comments made by Jonathan Ashworth, the Shadow Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 20 July 2020.

    It is scandalous that the nation’s most senior nurse was silenced at the height of the pandemic because she wasn’t prepared to parrot Downing Street spin about Dominic Cummings’ blatant rule breaking.

    As the Chief Nursing Officer indicates, it’s unacceptable that’s there was one rule for Johnson’s elite friends and another for the rest of us.

    What’s more, it’s astonishing that the Health Secretary refused to explain in the Commons today why he allowed for the chief nurse to be dropped in this way.

  • Jonathan Ashworth – 2020 Comments on Childhood Obesity

    Jonathan Ashworth – 2020 Comments on Childhood Obesity

    The text of the comments made by Jonathan Ashworth, the Shadow Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 16 July 2020.

    The childhood obesity crisis means we need decisive action from Boris Johnson, not more dither and delay.

    Ministers promised to tackle our growing obesity crisis but have not implemented a single measure in over two years since the second chapter of the childhood obesity report was published. Ministerial dither is putting children’s health at risk.

    Given the fears over the impact of lockdown on obesity levels, it’s urgent that children’s health is now given priority and the action needed is no longer ducked by ministers.

  • Matt Hancock – 2020 Statement on Leicester

    Matt Hancock – 2020 Statement on Leicester

    The text of the comments made by Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 16 July 2020.

    Mr Speaker, with permission, I would like to make a statement on our action against coronavirus and the decisions we’ve been taking throughout the day today to determine what we need in Leicester.

    We continue our determined fight against this invisible killer.

    The number of new cases yesterday was 642, lower than when lockdown began.

    And according to the latest figures, the number of deaths in all settings is down to 66.

    We are successfully turning the tide.

    And part of this success lies in our ability to take action locally, whenever we see it flare up.

    Often this is on a very small scale – swiftly and quietly – like in an individual farm or a factory.

    But when needed, we also act on a broader basis, as we have done in Leicester.

    And today I wanted to update the House on the situation in Leicester.

    At the end of June we made the decision to close schools and non-essential retail in the city, and not to introduce the relaxations that applied elsewhere from 4 July, like the reopening of pubs.

    This was not an easy decision, but it was one that we had to take.

    At that point, the 7-day infection rate in Leicester was 135 cases per 100,000 people, which was 3 times higher than the next highest city.

    And Leicester was accounting for 10% of all positive cases in the country.

    This decision was taken with the agreement of all local leaders.

    And I am grateful to the leader and officers of Leicestershire County Council, and to the officers of Leicester City Council, for their support and hard work.

    Since then, we’ve doubled testing.

    And through a monumental programme of communications and community engagement, we’ve been pushing our important messages.

    I committed to reviewing the measures in Leicester every 2 weeks.

    This morning I chaired a Gold meeting of the Local Action Committee to discuss the latest situation.

    And this afternoon, I held a further meeting with local leaders, Public Health England, the JBC, the local resilience forum, and my clinical advisers.

    The latest data show that the 7-day infection rate in Leicester is now 119 cases per 100,000 people, and that the percentage of people who have tested positive is now at 4.8%.

    These are positive indicators, especially in light of the huge increase in testing in the local area.

    But they still remain well above the national average, and the average for surrounding areas.

    Thanks to the incredible efforts of people of Leicester, who have followed the lockdown, even while others have had their freedom relaxed, we are now in a position to relax some, but not all, of the restrictions that were in place.

    So, from 24 July we’ll be removing the restrictions on schools and early years childcare and taking a more targeted approach to the restrictions on non-essential retail.

    Replacing the national decision to close non-essential retail with a local power to close them where necessary. This is all part of our more targeted approach.

    However, other restrictions, like those for travel and only having social gatherings of up to 6 people, for example, will remain in force.

    And measures introduced on 4 July, like re-opening the hospitality sector, will also not yet apply.

    The initial definition of the geography covered by the lockdown was a decision I delegated to Leicestershire County Council, and they made and published.

    The Leader of Leicestershire County Council, Nicholas Rushton, has advised me, based on the data and the best public health advice, that he recommends these restrictions now apply only to the Oadby and Wigston area of Leicestershire, as well as the City of Leicester itself.

    And I have accepted his advice.

    Some say that the local lockdown is unnecessary. I wish this were true.

    But sadly it remains vital for the health of everyone in Leicester, and the rest of the country, that these restrictions stay in place.

    We will review them again in a fortnight.

    I hope that this careful easing of restrictions will provide some comfort to people in Leicester and Leicestershire.

    And I’d say this directly to the people of Leicester and Leicestershire – I’d like to pay tribute to you all.

    Your perseverance and your hard work has brought real and tangible results.

    And you have shown respect for one another.

    I understand this hasn’t been easy.

    Strong representations have been made to me by my honourable friends, the members for Charnwood, Harborough and South Leicestershire and for the members opposite who represent the city of Leicester, on behalf of constituents who have been impacted, and constituents who wanted to see the lockdown lifted too.

    However, there is still a lot to do. And the public health messages remain critical.

    So please get a test if you have symptoms.

    Keep following the rules that are in place.

    Please do not lose your resolve.

    Because the sooner we get this virus under control, the sooner we can restore life in Leicester, and across the country, to normal.

    Mr Speaker, this statement also gives me the opportunity to inform the House of an issue relating to testing.

    We have identified some swabs that are not up to the usual high standard that we expect, and we will be carrying out further testing of this batch.

    As a precautionary measure and while we investigate further, we are requesting that the use of these Randox swab test kits are paused in all settings until further notice.

    This problem was brought to my attention yesterday afternoon. We contacted settings using these swabs last night, and published the pause notice immediately.

    Clinical advice is that there is no evidence of any harm.

    Those test results are not affected.

    There is no evidence of issues with any of our other tests swabs.

    And there is no impact on access to testing.

    Mr Speaker, our ability to take action on this local level is the keystone of our plan to defeat coronavirus.

    So we can keep this virus on the run and defeat it once and for all.

    I’m grateful to you for allowing me to make this statement at this time and I commend this statement to the House.

  • Jo Churchill – 2020 Comments on Review of Babies’ and Children’s Health

    Jo Churchill – 2020 Comments on Review of Babies’ and Children’s Health

    Text of the comments made by Jo Churchill, the Health Minister, on 15 July 2020.

    Most babies are born healthy and enjoy a safe and nurturing childhood. We know the first 1,000 days of a child’s life is critical, providing a solid foundation as children for growth and development throughout their lives.

    However, some do not have the same advantages. We want to remove barriers so that all babies and young children are supported and nurtured to be ready for school and ready for life.

    This review will help ensure every child has an opportunity to thrive, regardless of their background and achieve their potential. We look forward to receiving Andrea Leadsom MP’s recommendations.

  • Matt Hancock – 2020 Comments on Review of Babies’ and Children’s Health

    Matt Hancock – 2020 Comments on Review of Babies’ and Children’s Health

    Text of the comments made by Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 15 July 2020.

    All parents aspire to provide their children with the best possible start in life and this government is committed to ensuring that no child is left behind.

    Everybody should have a solid foundation on which to build their health and this review will look to reduce the barriers and improve early childhood experiences.

    We are determined to level up the opportunities for children, no matter where they come from or grow up.

  • Jonathan Ashworth – 2020 Comments on Face Coverings

    Jonathan Ashworth – 2020 Comments on Face Coverings

    The text of the comments made by Jonathan Ashworth, the Shadow Secretary of Health and Social Care, in a letter to Matt Hancock on 13 July 2020.

    Conflicting advice and conflicting statements from the Government only hinder our fight against the virus. Clear communication is vital in combatting the spread of Covid-19.

    For the public to know that they are doing the right thing in shops, restaurants and other crowded places, I am asking that you urgently set out the position on face coverings.

    As lockdown rules are further relaxed this week, it is vital that updated guidance on this issue is published by the Government without delay.”

  • Holly Lynch – 2020 Comments on NHS Surcharge for Health and Care Workers

    Holly Lynch – 2020 Comments on NHS Surcharge for Health and Care Workers

    The text of the comments made by Holly Lynch, the Shadow Immigration Minister, on 13 July 2020.

    Over seven weeks after the Prime Minister pledged to scrap the immigration health surcharge for NHS and social care workers under pressure from Labour, no system has been put in place to implement this.

    This is a shameful way to treat those doing so much to keep us safe. So low is trust in the government on this issue that this will be a major financial concern for many people serving in the frontline in this crisis and deserve far better.

  • Alex Norris – 2020 Speech on Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review

    Alex Norris – 2020 Speech on Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review

    Below is the text of the speech made by Alex Norris, the Labour MP for Nottingham North, on 9 July 2020.

    I am grateful to the Minister for coming to make this statement today and for providing advance sight of it.

    “Ignored”, “belittled”, “derided”, “gaslit”—those who have campaigned to highlight the harm caused by Primodos, sodium valproate and pelvic mesh have been called every name under the sun, but today they are one thing alone: proven right. I thank the noble Baroness Cumberlege for overseeing a piece of work that will make a huge difference to so many people, both today and in the future. It is hard to read, but it is vital that we do, and that we understand it and learn from it. It is really important to note that campaigners have universally said how well the review team treated them.

    The review’s report thoroughly investigates what happened in respect of each of the three areas that I mentioned. Although, on the surface, they are separate, they have an awful lot in common, not least that they were all taken and used by women, and in two cases, pregnant women. This is clearly no coincidence and I was glad to see that the Minister referenced that the healthcare system must do better to protect women, because these cases reek of misogyny from top to bottom— ​and ageism and ableism as well. They also share the reaction of the healthcare system, which, according to the report, failed to monitor the use of these medicines and medical devices, then failed to identify and acknowledge that things had gone wrong, and then failed to work in a joined-up fashion to improve. The healthcare system failed to protect these people. As the review says, it has taken the act of having a review to shine a light on these systemic failings. I share with everybody else the love affair that we, as a nation, have with our health system, but we cannot be blind to its faults, and it is time that we act on them.

    We would not be here without the campaigners. Without their tireless activism—for many decades in some cases—this would have been ignored. I want to take the opportunity to highlight a few of the groups that have done such tremendous work. That is a dangerous game, I know, and I can only apologise to those whom I do not have time to mention. Marie Lyon has led the way in bringing to attention the damage that hormone pregnancy tests, including Primodos tablets, can do. This report has finally proven her to have been right all along, stating that opportunities were missed to remove them from the market. She is right, too, that the Department for Work and Pensions has mugged campaigners over the condition insight report. I hope the Minister will commit to righting that wrong, too. Janet Williams and Emma Murphy, who founded the Independent Fetal Anti-Convulsant Trust—In-FACT—have fought so long to be believed and for action to be taken regarding sodium valproate, the risks associated with which far too many expectant mothers were unaware of. Kath Sansom, who founded Sling the Mesh, has provided so much support for so many people living in incredible pain because of pelvic mesh. This is a sombre day for those people, but I hope that they can take some satisfaction that their efforts have paid off in this way.

    I would not often say this, but this is a day for parliamentarians, too. It was not clinicians or regulators who brought this to the surface. It was right hon. and hon. Members who listened to and believed campaigners and fought for them, too. Again, there are too many to name, but I will mention my hon. Friends the Members for Bolton South East (Yasmin Qureshi), for Kingston upon Hull West and Hessle (Emma Hardy), for Lancaster and Fleetwood (Cat Smith), the right hon. Member for Elmet and Rothwell (Alec Shelbrooke), my hon. Friend the Member for Blaydon (Liz Twist) and my predecessor as shadow Public Health Minister, my hon. Friend the Member for Washington and Sunderland West (Mrs Hodgson).

    There is not time for me to cover all the recommendations, but I want to highlight a few. Recommendation 1 calls for a fulsome apology. It was right that the Minister did that, and it will be greatly appreciated. Recommendation 3 of the report calls for a new independent redress agency for those harmed by medicines and medical devices, to create a new way of delivering redress in the future. It suggests that manufacturers and the state could share the costs. I would be interested in the Minister’s reflections on that. When does she think that could be implemented by?

    Recommendation 4 suggests separate schemes for each intervention—HPTs, valproate and pelvic mesh—to meet the cost of providing additional care and support ​to all those who have experienced avoidable harm. That is the ethical responsibility of the state and manufacturers. Will the Minister today commit to that recommendation —to providing some redress for those who have suffered avoidable psychological, physical and neurodevelopmental harm? Will she commit, critically, to work on that with these people? For too long, they have had things done to them and they are owed the opportunity to shape their futures.

    On recommendation 6, regarding the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, I said at every stage of the Medicines and Medical Devices Bill that the timing for that Bill was challenging, although that was inevitable as we had to get on with it, because the report would have profound implications for the MHRA—and, boy, does it. I would like the Minister to commit to amendments in the other place to make sure that the MHRA regulatory regime is as strong as possible.

    Finally, and absolutely critically, recommendation 9 calls for the immediate creation of a taskforce to implement the recommendations. Will the Minister commit to that? It was right for her to say that she needed time for reflection, but I would be keen to have a definition of how long she feels the Government will need to reflect.

    This is a sombre moment. It is incredibly hard to read the report, but it is vital that we do so. Campaigners and those affected have got justice today; now they need action. We will not let the report gather dust on a shelf. We will be fighting every day to get the recommendations implemented and to meet the needs and the expectations of those who have fought for so long.

  • Nadine Dorries – 2020 Statement on Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review

    Nadine Dorries – 2020 Statement on Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review

    Below is the text of the statement made by Nadine Dorries, the Minister for Patient Safety, Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, in the House of Commons on 9 July 2020.

    With permission, Mr Deputy Speaker, I would like to make a statement about the independent medicines and medical devices review. This review was announced by my right hon. Friend the Member for South West Surrey (Jeremy Hunt) in February 2018, in response to public concern about the safety of medicines and medical devices used by the NHS. It focused on three areas. The first is Primodos, a hormone-based pregnancy test that is claimed to have led to miscarriages and birth defects during the 1960s and ’70s. It was prescribed to more than 1.5 million women before it was withdrawn from use in 1978. The second is sodium valproate, an anti-epilepsy drug that has been definitively linked to autism and learning disabilities in children when taken during pregnancy. The third is the vaginal mesh implants used in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, which have been linked to crippling, life-changing side-effects.

    Baroness Cumberlege was asked to conduct a review into what happened in each of those three cases, including whether the processes that were followed were sufficient when patients’ concerns were raised. She was also asked to make some recommendations for the future, such as: how to consider the right balance between the criteria or threshold for a legitimate concern; how best to support patients where there might not be a scientific basis for their complaint, but where they have still suffered; how we can enhance the existing patient safety landscape; and how we can be more open to the insights that close attention to patient experience can bring.

    The report has now been published, and a copy has been deposited in the Library of the House. It makes for harrowing reading. Every page makes clear the pain and suffering that has been felt by so many patients and their families. As Baroness Cumberlege herself said, they suffered “avoidable harm”. She said that she had listened to the heart-wrenching stories of acute suffering, of families fractured, of children harmed and so much more.

    On behalf of the health and care sector, I would like to make an apology to those women, their children and their families for the time the system took to listen and respond. I would also like to thank every single person who has contributed to the review. I know that some of them wanted to be here in the House today. They felt as though their voices would never be heard, but now they have been, and their brave testimony will help patients in the future. I have watched and read some of their testimonies. They left me shocked, but also incredibly angry and most of all determined to make the changes that are needed to protect women in the future. It is right and proper that the victims were the first people to see this report. As a Government, we have now received its findings and, as hon. Members will understand, we are taking time to absorb them before we respond. That is the least that the report deserves. We will update the House at the very earliest opportunity.

    I would like to thank Baroness Cumberlege, who has carried out her work with thoroughness and compassion. She has worked tirelessly to ensure that patients and ​their families have been heard, and I would like to pay tribute to her and her team. I know that the patients’ stories that they have heard have been harrowing and, at times, frankly beyond belief. She has done us all a great service by highlighting them, along with the suffering of so many women and their families. I know that there will be strong feelings across the House about the report, and that hon. Members will be eager to hear a fuller response. However, it is imperative for the sake of those who have suffered so greatly that we give the review the full consideration that it absolutely deserves.

    It is clear, as I am sure the whole House will concur, that the response to these issues from those in positions of authority has not always been good enough. The task now is to establish a quicker and more compassionate way to address issues of patient harm when they arise. We must ensure that the system as a whole is vigilant in spotting safety concerns, and that we rapidly get to grips with the concerns identified by the report. We must make sure that different voices are invited to the table and that patients and their families have a clear pathway to get their answers and a resolution. The issues tackled in this report are, from one perspective, complex—matters of regulation, clinical decision making and scientific judgment—but there is one simple core theme that runs through all of this, and it goes to the heart of our work on patient safety. It comprises just two words: listening and humility. So much of the frustration and anger from patients and families stem from what they see as an unwillingness to listen—for us to listen and for them to be heard. We need to make listening a much stronger part of clinical practice and to make the relationship between patients and clinicians a true and equal partnership.

    While the review has been progressing, the Government and the NHS have taken a number of steps relating to the concerns it has raised. However, there is always more that we can do, and it is clear that change is needed. We owe it to the victims and their families to get this right. I commend this statement to the House.