Category: Foreign Affairs

  • James Cleverly – 2023 Statement on the Execution of Alireza Akbari

    James Cleverly – 2023 Statement on the Execution of Alireza Akbari

    The statement made by James Cleverly, the Foreign Secretary, on 14 January 2023.

    The execution of British-Iranian Alireza Akbari is a barbaric act that deserves condemnation in the strongest possible terms. Through this politically motivated act, the Iranian regime has once again shown its callous disregard for human life.

    This will not stand unchallenged and we will be summoning the Iranian Charge d’Affaires to make clear our disgust at Iran’s actions. Our thoughts are with Mr Akbari’s family.

  • James Cleverly – 2023 Statement Warning Iran Not to Execute Alireza Akbari

    James Cleverly – 2023 Statement Warning Iran Not to Execute Alireza Akbari

    The statement made by James Cleverly, the Foreign Secretary, on 13 January 2023.

    The Iranian regime should be in no doubt. We are watching the case of Alireza Akbari closely.   Iran must not follow through with their brutal threat of execution.

  • David Rutley – 2023 Statement on the UN Security Council Open Debate on the Rule of Law

    David Rutley – 2023 Statement on the UN Security Council Open Debate on the Rule of Law

    The statement made by David Rutley, the Minister for Americas and the Caribbean, at the UN Security Council on 12 January 2023.

    Thank you, Mr President. I am grateful to our briefers for their valuable contributions today.

    The UK has long been an advocate for the rules-based international order as the foundation of international peace, development and human advancement, and we remain deeply committed to it today.

    At the heart of this order, is the UN Charter.

    Since its inception in 1945, 193 countries have ratified that Charter, committing to work together to save future generations from the scourge of war, promote human rights, and uphold international law.

    And within that Charter, Articles 1 and 2 are of particular importance to today’s Security Council discussion. These Articles provide the foundations for global peace and security. They include an express commitment by Member States not to threaten or use force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. And they oblige Member States to settle disputes by exclusively peaceful means.

    These are principles we have all made a commitment to. And for all the tragedies and bloodshed of the last 8 decades, the remarkable truth is that global commitment has made a difference, with the number of deaths in state conflicts as a share of global population falling by 95% between 1946 and 2020.

    And yet, while many countries – indeed the vast majority – have demonstrated how seriously they take their commitments under the UN Charter, a handful continue to show their disregard for the rules-based international order, and the Rule of Law.

    Mr President, Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine is a particularly stark example. Through its unprovoked invasion, sham referenda and illegal attempted annexations, Russia has shown contempt for its obligations under the UN Charter. Russia has clearly violated the prohibition of the use of force and the principle of non-intervention in contravention of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. This is made more egregious by the fact Russia is a permanent member of this Council, which brings with it a particular responsibility.

    Elsewhere too, we continue to see certain Member States act in a way which demonstrates a disregard for the rules-based international order.

    Iran’s nuclear programme has never been more advanced than it is today. It is threatening international peace and security and undermining the global non-proliferation system.

    In North Korea, the unprecedented launch of 70 ballistic missiles in 2022 violates multiple Security Council Resolutions also continues to threaten international peace and security.

    And in Syria, the targeting of schools, hospitals and emergency first responders – by the Regime and Russia – are flagrant violations of international law and, indeed, basic human decency. Rape and sexual violence have been widely used as a weapon of war, notably by Regime pro-government forces.

    Today’s discussion is timely. Any breach of the UN Charter and its fundamental principles, which underpin global peace and security, represents a threat to us all. And so now, more than ever, the International Community must come together to reiterate our support for the UN Charter, and the Rule of Law; commit to work together to strengthen the rules-based international order and the Rule of Law, and to send a clear signal that we will not tolerate efforts to undermine the rules-based international order. The United Kingdom looks forward to working with you all to do so.

    Thank you, Mr President.

  • David Rutley – 2023 Statement at the UN Security Council Meeting on Colombia

    David Rutley – 2023 Statement at the UN Security Council Meeting on Colombia

    The statement made by David Rutley, the Minister for Americas and the Caribbean, at the UN Security Council on 11 January 2023.

    Thank you President, Special Representative Massieu.

    The UK Government remains committed to supporting the consolidation of peace in Colombia through the full implementation of the peace agreement with the FARC.

    We welcome the Colombian Government’s commitment to implement the 2016 agreement as a fundamental part of its work to secure a broad and lasting peace.

    We have been pleased to see renewed momentum over the past three months, including the government purchase of 3 million hectares from the Cattle Ranchers Association; the reactivation of the National Reintegration Council, and the concluding resolutions passed by the Special Jurisdiction for Peace.

    We welcome today’s Council’s decision to expand the mandate of the UN Verification Mission, to cover progress on the rural reform and ethnic chapters of the peace agreement. It is clear that progress on these two chapters is vital.

    As the Secretary-General set out in his recent report, violence remains the greatest threat to the consolidation of peace in Colombia.

    We welcome the decisive action taken by the Government to strengthen public security forces in new reintegration areas, and the Vice-President’s announcement of increased funding to safeguard women leaders and human rights defenders.

    We share the Government’s concern about attacks on human rights defenders, environmental advocates, and other civil society activists. We are committed to tackling these threats together in order to secure a better future for the Colombian people. We also welcome the continued close cooperation between Colombia and its international partners on tackling drugs and organised crime.

    In this context, we welcome Government-led efforts to secure a ceasefire, in order to reduce insecurity and alleviate the suffering of conflict-affected populations.

    We also welcome Special Representative Massieu’s support for the Government’s ongoing dialogue with the ELN.

    President, Colombia remains an example to the world of the transformative potential of dialogue and leadership. I’ve seen that commitment first-hand on a recent visit.

    As the Colombian people seek to overcome the remaining barriers to a broad and lasting peace, the UK is proud to stand with them.

  • Jesse Norman – 2023 Statement on Travellers from China and Covid-19 Testing Requirements

    Jesse Norman – 2023 Statement on Travellers from China and Covid-19 Testing Requirements

    The statement made by Jesse Norman, the Minister of State at the Department for Transport, in the House of Commons on 9 January 2023.

    The Government have taken action, under powers within the Public Health (Control of Diseases) Act 1984, to limit the risk of covid-19 infections from travellers originating from China.

    The Government have announced these precautionary and temporary measures to improve the UK’s ability to detect potential new variants of covid-19 from China, following an increase in cases there and the easing of their border measures from 8 January.

    The decision has been taken due to a lack of comprehensive health information shared by China. The situation remains under review and if there are improvements in information sharing and greater transparency then the temporary measures will be amended.

    On 30 December 2022, the Government announced that they would require people flying directly or indirectly from mainland China to England to provide proof of a negative pre-departure test, taken within two days of departure. This came into effect as of 4 am on 5 January 2023. This applies to transiting passengers, as well as those whose final destination is England.

    In addition, we announced that the UK Health Security Agency will launch surveillance that will see a sample of passengers from China, arriving at Heathrow airport only, undertaking PCR tests for covid-19 on a voluntary basis. UKHSA activated this process on 8 January in readiness for the first flights arriving later this week. All positive samples will be sent for sequencing to enhance existing measures to monitor for new variants.

    The UK joins a growing list of countries across the world, including the US, France, Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Spain, Malaysia and India, in announcing measures designed to help to detect and assess any new covid-19 variants.

    While public health is a devolved matter and these measures currently apply only in England, the Government continue to work closely with the devolved Administrations.

    The Government recognise the impact that these temporary health measures may have on businesses and passengers. The situation remains under constant review and the UK is working with industry and closely monitoring the situation on the mainland while encouraging China to provide greater transparency on their covid data.

  • Rishi Sunak – 2023 Comments on the UK and Japanese Relationship

    Rishi Sunak – 2023 Comments on the UK and Japanese Relationship

    The comments made by Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister, on 11 January 2023.

    In the past 12 months, we have written the next chapter of the relationship between the UK and Japan – accelerating, building and deepening our ties. We have so much in common: a shared outlook on the world, a shared understanding of the threats and challenges we face, and a shared ambition to use our place in the world for global good, ensuring our countries prosper for generations to come.

    This Reciprocal Access Agreement is hugely significant for both our nations – it cements our commitment to the Indo-Pacific and underlines our joint efforts to bolster economic security, accelerate our defence cooperation and drive innovation that creates highly skilled jobs.

    In this increasingly competitive world, it is more important than ever that democratic societies continue to stand shoulder to shoulder as we navigate the unprecedented global challenges of our time.

  • James Cleverly – 2023 Statement on the Executions of Mohammad Mahdi Karami and Seyyed Mohammad Hosseini

    James Cleverly – 2023 Statement on the Executions of Mohammad Mahdi Karami and Seyyed Mohammad Hosseini

    The statement made by James Cleverly, the Foreign Secretary, on 7 January 2023.

    The execution of Mohammad Mahdi Karami and Seyyed Mohammad Hosseini by the Iranian regime is abhorrent.

    The UK is strongly opposed to the death penalty in all circumstances and the Iranian regime has done further lasting damage to its reputation at home and overseas with yet another disproportionate response to the Iranian people protesting legitimately against their oppression.

    We have and will continue to make our views clear to the Iranian authorities – Iran must immediately halt all executions and end the violence against its own people.

  • Gordon Brown – 2008 Statement on Georgia

    Gordon Brown – 2008 Statement on Georgia

    The statement made by Gordon Brown, the then Prime Minister, in the House of Commons on 10 September 2008.

    Between 8 and 12 August, Russian and Georgian troops clashed in Georgia’s separatist region of South Ossetia. The resulting conflict led to a tragic loss of civilian life, and the displacement of over 100,000 people.

    From the start of the conflict, the UK and its international partners have been involved in intensive discussions, including through the UN, EU, NATO, G7 and OSCE, to agree a ceasefire and to find a durable and peaceful way forward. I spoke to Russian President Medvedev and to other Heads of State, including Presidents Bush and Sarkozy, to try to find a way forward. My Rt hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary (David Miliband), visited Georgia where he met President Saakashvili and members of his government.

    On 12 August, the EU and OSCE were able to broker a ceasefire between the parties and agreement to a way forward. This agreement included six key principles:

    1. the parties not to resort to the use of force;
    2. the parties to stop all military actions for good;
    3. the parties to allow free access for humanitarian aid;
    4. Georgian armed forces to return to their places of usual permanent deployment;
    5. Russian armed forces to withdraw to the line they occupied before the start of military actions. Until such time as an international mechanism is created, Russian peacekeeping forces to implement additional security measures;
    6. the parties to engage in international discussions on the modalities of security and stability in Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

    Despite this plan, on 26 August, Russia unilaterally recognised the independence of South Ossetia and of Georgia’s other separatist region, Abkhazia. Russia also refused to withdraw its forces from Georgia and in some cases moved to reinforce them.

    It was in this context that I and my Rt hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary attended the Extraordinary European Council on 1 September, convened by French President Nicolas Sarkozy, in his capacity as current Presidency of the EU, to discuss the current crisis in Georgia.

    At this meeting the European Council unanimously condemned Russia’s decision to recognise the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia; and expressed its grave concern about the consequences of the conflict and Russia’s disproportionate military action.  Russia’s actions were in clear breach of international law and of successive UN Security Council Resolutions.

    In response to Russian actions, the Council decided to conduct a comprehensive review of EU-Russia relations. This evaluation has begun and will continue in the run up to the next EU-Russia Summit scheduled to take place in Nice on 14 November 2008. The EU has decided to suspend negotiations with Russia on the new EU Partnership and Co-operation Agreement (PCA) until Russian troops withdraw from Georgia to their pre-conflict line. We strongly support this decision. As I made clear during Council discussions, although the EU should continue discussions with Russia on areas of interest and concern to the EU, it cannot be “business as usual”. This review will allow us to take a considered decision about the future of EU-Russia relations.

    Russia’s actions in Georgia illustrate the need for Europe to intensify efforts to ensure its long-term energy security. The European Council tasked the EU with examining initiatives to be taken to this end. We should explore all options for the diversification of energy supply in the EU, including increased support for infrastructure that diversifies energy sources, an increased commitment to renewable energy, measures to improve energy efficiency and measures to improve the internal market.

    The international community must support Georgia in rebuilding the damage caused by the conflict. The European Council made clear the EU’s commitment to supply humanitarian aid and support for Georgia’s long-term reconstruction efforts, including in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. The Council and the Commission have been tasked to start preparations for an international conference to bring focus to reconstruction efforts. The UK will play its part. We have already committed £2million to Georgia in humanitarian aid. The EU has pledged to step up its relations with Georgia, including through visa facilitation measures, appointing an EU Special Envoy and the possible establishment of a full and comprehensive free trade area as soon as the conditions are met.

    At the European Council, the EU unanimously called on the parties to implement the EU/OSCE peace plan in full.  On 8 September, President Sarkozy, EU Commission President Barroso and EU High Representative Solana travelled to Moscow to press Russia to abide by its commitments. I welcome the agreement reached during this meeting that Russia will withdraw its troops from Georgian territory outside Abkhazia and South Ossetia and that Russia will commit to international discussions on future security modalities. This is a good first step towards peace and security. But it is only the start; Russia must now implement these commitments and must engage fully in finding a lasting solution to the crisis.

    The international community will support efforts to ensure lasting peace and security in the region, including through the presence of observers on the ground. In line with the EU Council Conclusions and the 8 September Moscow agreement, the European Union will contribute to these efforts. EU Foreign Ministers will discuss the deployment of EU monitors at the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) on Monday, 15 September. It is vital that international monitors are given free and unfettered access by all sides to carry out their mandate.

    The EU’s response to this crisis must also consider the implications for the EU’s common neighbourhood. On 27 August my Rt hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary travelled to Kiev where he made a speech on the need for closer ties between the EU and the region. I am pleased that the Council agreed that the EU should strengthen its relations with the region, including Ukraine. I welcome the successful EU – Ukraine Summit which took place yesterday (9 September). I look forward to the Commission’s proposals for enhancing EU relations with the region, due in December this year.

    The UK will continue to work with international partners to ensure that effective support is given to Georgia and that a lasting, peaceful solution is reached as soon as possible.

    My Rt. Hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary and I will continue to keep the House informed of developments.

  • Gordon Brown – 2008 Joint Press Conference with David Miliband at the EU Council Meeting

    Gordon Brown – 2008 Joint Press Conference with David Miliband at the EU Council Meeting

    The press conference with Gordon Brown, the then Prime Minister, and David Miliband, the then Foreign Secretary, in Brussels on 16 October 2008.

    Thank you very much for joining us at the end of the European Council meeting.

    Can I start by saying that yesterday the G8 group of countries called for a meeting of world leaders to agree the necessary and urgent reforms to the international financial system as a result of events of recent months. Today the European Union in its communiqué has welcomed this leaders meeting, and has also agreed the principles and the priority areas for global action that we believe should be agreed at the meeting.

    The five principles we have agreed for the financial system are that there should be transparency, sound banking, responsibility, integrity and global governance.  And we have also agreed that, based on these principles, we should move to early decisions about transparency, global standards of regulation, cross-border supervision of financial institutions, crisis management, the avoidance of conflicts of interest – included in that are executive remuneration packages – and the creation of an early warning system for the world economy.

    The reform of the international financial system is not only necessary to prevent a crisis happening again, it is essential to end the current crisis.  People need to feel confident that their institutions cannot act irresponsibly.  So we must ensure that off-balance sheet vehicles are brought back on to balance sheets and fully declared, we must have total transparency in the activities of banks, we must set up immediately the 30 major financial institutions with their colleges of supervisors by the end of the year, we must remove the conflicts of interest, executive remuneration packages must reflect the values of hard working families, that you reward hard work and enterprise and effort and responsible risk-taking, but you do not reward excesses and irresponsibility. And we also agreed we must reform the International Monetary Fund and the Financial Stability Forum for a more effective early warning system to prevent future crises.

    The other major subject of discussion at the Council last night and this morning was the energy and environmental package.  We agreed that we would make our final decisions in December.  We also agreed that faced with high and volatile oil prices it was more essential than ever that we end our dependency on oil.  We discussed the impact that these high oil prices have had on our economies.  Although the price of oil is still too high, it has fallen in recent weeks and months to around $80 a barrel from a peak of around $150 a barrel in the summer.  It is encouraging that we have seen petrol prices fall in the UK in recent days with some supermarkets reducing their prices below £1 a litre, but I would like to see other retailers following that lead. The average price is still £1.07 a litre and there is still too much variation in price across our country.  In some areas the petrol price is still as high as £1.20 a litre.  That must change.

    You will have before you in the next few minutes all the conclusions of the Council, but David Miliband and I are very happy to answer any questions that you have in detail on the issues that I have raised and the other issues of the Council.

    Question: Prime Minister while obviously what you have done here has been greeted on the world stage, surely back home you must be feeling particularly anxious that your bank bailout scheme effectively doesn’t seem to be working.  Markets again are in freefall today.

    Prime Minister: I think markets are reflecting not just events in one country, but what is happening in every part of the world and there will be uncertainty until we finalise many of the decisions that have been made in other countries as well as ours.  I notice that Switzerland has announced measures today to refinance their banking system.  I am pleased that not only the Euro Group but other countries have followed the lead that has been taken, and obviously we are pleased that in America changes are taking place for the recapitalisation of banks.

    Look, the issue for me is what we can do to help hard working families in our country, what we can do to help people facing the high petrol prices, with high gas and electricity bills, people looking for mortgages and not able to get them, small businesses worried about the finance that is available to them.  I have said that Stage one is to make sure that we have stability in the financial system, and that we have worked upon with measures over the last few days, that will take time to come through but will show a difference in the way the financial institutions are acting; and Stage two, to restore confidence that people’s savings will always be safe and to ensure that people have trust in the banking system are the reforms that we are going to be making over these next few weeks.  And I think you have got to look at the programme of activity that we have settled on together and [indistinct] see that reflected in prices coming down for hard working families for petrol, I want to see the mortgage market resume in our country and that is something that we are working on at the moment, and obviously I want to help people who are worried about their jobs or are facing redundancy, to help them get jobs for the future.

    Now these are the issues that we are working on every day and I believe that we will see changes as a result of the work that we have done.  But let us remember this is a hard time for the whole world economy, these are difficult and troubled times for many countries in other parts of the world, we will see this through by being fair to hard working families in our country.

    Question: Prime Minister two questions really, the first about what you said about transparency and bringing off-balance sheet vehicles on to balance sheets, do you think there is a need in our national finances in terms of private finance initiatives and the rest possibly to clarify our own national books as well as far as debt?  And secondly, even if you stabilise the banking system there seems to be  a view that there isn’t the confidence out there in the markets, so do you feel we are now approaching a situation akin to the United States in the ‘30s where we do need to see a Keynesian boost in our public sector spending to keep the economy going?

    Prime Minister: Well we are spending more to get the economy moving, we are spending more obviously on our work programmes, we are also continuing our high levels of investment in transport, in schools, hospitals and infrastructure, and we have said because we have got low national debt we are in a position to borrow to keep the economy moving forward and to move the economy forward where it has been falling behind.  So we are doing that already.

    As far as off-balance sheet activities are concerned, we conform to all the international standards.  The decision about what is on balance sheet is made by  the Office of National Statistics, which is independent of the government, and at the same time they conform to the international standards of accounting practice in these areas.  So everything that we do is related to international standards that we are happy to follow.

    Question: Prime Minister, again two questions.  First, the Japanese Prime Minister this morning has come out against the idea of a world leaders summit to discuss Bretton Woods II saying very specifically that this would be just one step away from the worst case scenario, our honest feeling is that we want to prevent a situation where we need to hold such a summit.  And secondly, several of your Ministerial colleagues are getting very excited about the way you are handling the financial crisis. When they suggest you should hold a snap general election, how tempted are you?

    Prime Minister: I am getting on with the job of trying to take us through these difficult times and that is the only thing that is on my mind, it has got my undivided attention and the whole attention of the government.  Having created this new Economic Council, on which David and other Ministers sit, we are working hard on all the issues that worry people:  the mortgage market, what can happen to their jobs and employment, what we can do about that, and how we can help small businesses in particular.  These are the issues that are concerning us at the moment.

    I think there is a growing international consensus for the leaders meeting that we talked about yesterday.  It is interesting that in the G8 communiqué which was signed by all members of the G8 the proposals for the leaders meeting was included, and it also said that we had to come to quick decisions about reforming the international system.  You see the reason why I am interested in making these changes that make for proper disclosure and transparency and avoid conflicts of interest is that people need to know now that the institutions in which they are saving, in which their life savings are often held, in which their pension is being invested, in which their hard earned money is being put, they need to know that these institutions are acting responsibly and to make the changes that we are proposing is a necessary element of building confidence that we will solve these problems and that all the irresponsibility that has happened in the past is rooted out.

    So I think these changes are not academic, they are not some side-show, they are not something to look at once you have got through the difficulties of today, they are a means of solving the problems of today by assuring people that they can have trust and confidence in the financial institutions of our country, and indeed of all countries round the world.

    And I think, as I said, that there is a growing consensus that we need to formulate proposals that can be implemented quickly.  What the European Council has actually done today is set out the principles that we should follow and I am pleased that these are the five principles that we have talked about over the last few weeks, they have also set out the priority areas for action, and if people are sure that institutions are acting in a transparent way, if people know that conflicts of interest are being avoided, if they know that everything is on balance sheet instead of off-balance sheet, then people will be far more confident about the future, we are investing and saving in these financial institutions.

    So these are changes that I think are needed now and I believe we can build international support for them.

    Question: You talk about the markets, there is a view in the markets that actually shares are falling because of concerns about the real economy.  Now we appreciate that you make your detailed economic forecasts in the pre-budget report, but given the growing concern about some of these things do you feel under any pressure to look the country in the eye, to level with families and businesses and say we now ought to prepare at least for the possibility of the British economy entering a recession?

    Prime Minister: Well I have said very clearly to people, and other government members have said exactly the same, that these are very difficult times, they are difficult times because of two shocks to the global economy.  The reason that people’s standards of living have been hit is because oil prices have gone up and food prices have gone up and that means that the price at the petrol pumps, the price of gas and electricity, all these things have gone up, and at the same time you have had the price of basic essentials like bread and milk and eggs, they have gone up as well.  So people have suffered that hit on their standards of living as a result of the rise in global oil prices and food prices. And at the same time we have had this credit crunch.

    These are both what you might call the problems of an economy that is now global, so we have seen the first resources crisis of the global economy when oil demand has been higher than supply, and we have seen the first financial crisis of this new age of globalisation and that is what we are trying to deal with at the moment.

    I think people know that these problems did not start in Britain, that they started in America as far as the banking system is concerned, I think they know that every government round the world is trying to deal with them.  It is my aim to take the British people through these difficulties and do so in the fairest possible way so that we can help people such as pensioners facing fuel bills with a higher winter allowance than last year, so that we can help people on low incomes with their gas and electricity bills, as we are doing with the special tariffs that are available to them, and so that we can expand the new deal to help people who are facing difficulties in employment.

    Now these are all the things that government can do.  Yes, these are hard and difficult times for everybody in every country of the world, but our intention is to take the British people through this and I believe we are entering these difficulties with a far sounder economy than before because we have low interest rates, we have the corporate balance sheet of firms outside the financial sector in a good position, and we have at the same time of course low national debt which allows us to borrow at times of difficulty to enable the economy to be pushed forward.

    Question: It would appear that at least one of the banks involved in the government’s bailout scheme is insisting on paying dividends to its shareholders.  Is that acceptable?  And just secondly, on climate change it would appear that last night’s discussion has set things back rather than push things forward vis a vis December, could you comment?

    Prime Minister: Well I think first of all we are obviously shareholders of both these banks that we have invested substantial amounts in and we are talking to them day by day about how we can help improve the position, but we have already stated what our position is and we will continue to look at it with the banks.

    On the question of climate change, I think it was a very full discussion last night and then a very full discussion this morning, but we have agreed that the principles on which the Council decisions were made last year and this year are the principles that we are following, and we have also agreed that we have got to come to decisions in December.  Now we will have a new American President in January.  Both candidates in the American Presidential elections are proposing major changes in America’s climate change policy.  Europe must have its own climate change policy to go to the negotiations in Copenhagen to reach the successor of the Kyoto agreement.

    So it is very important that Europe comes to an agreement about what the detailed measures are to deal with climate change. And I am confident after this morning that everybody understands the importance of reaching that agreement, and of course there is intricate work that has got to be done with the Presidency and with the Commission over the next few weeks so that we can make these decisions in December.

    David, you have been following this, haven’t you?

    Foreign Secretary: Well I think it is very clear when you see the Council conclusions, there has been no step back.  But what you are right to point out is that in a number of countries there is a bit of what you might call buyer’s remorse about the agreement in March 2007.  What I think is significant about the discussion over the last 24 hours is that the Presidency and then the whole Council insisted there was no going back on the agreements of March 2007 and March 2008, no going back on the determination to have an agreement by the end of this year, and no going back on the determination for Europe to set a lead on the connected issues of climate and energy.

    And I think there is going to be some very hard talking over the next couple of months, led by the Presidency and by the Commission, but what is clear is that we will ensure that Europe hits its 20% target and is in a position to hit the 30% target if other countries come to the Copenhagen negotiations with appropriate offers, and that is the very important basis on which we can then share out the national allocations and the national effort as part of the coordinated European plan.

    Question: I think there was some discussion overnight about the idea of some sort of European industrial policy to supplement the financial package you have already announced and I suspect that Britain and some of the other liberal countries were reluctant to sign up to some of the language originally in Paragraph 10.  Could you just give us a bit of the flavour of the discussions?

    Prime Minister: I don’t know whether you have got the old paragraph 10 or the new paragraph 10.

    Question: The old one.

    Prime Minister: But there have been changes made in the discussion.  Outside the financial sector the European Council underlines its determination to take the necessary steps to support growth and jobs in the economy, and then it requests the Commission to make appropriate proposals by the end of the year, and then it mentions the need to preserve the competitiveness of industry.  And I think that is where we are, but there are structural reforms that are going to continue to be necessary, the competitiveness of industry is important and we have got to look at all aspects of the real economy during this difficult period.

    Foreign Secretary: It is also worth pointing to paragraph 5, which you will be very interested in, which has a commitment to support the Commission’s implementation [indistinct] of the rules of competition policy, particularly state aids, continuing to uphold the principles of the single market and the state aid regime.

    Question: Two questions for the Prime Minister.  Prime Minister do you have an idea of how the International Monetary Fund should be reformed in order to meet the principles that the European Union has set out for a sound international financial system?  And the second question is when do you expect the European Union to be able to resume its negotiations with Russia on the partnership agreement?

    Prime Minister: I will ask David to deal with the Russia question because he has been intimately involved with it.

    As far as the International Monetary Fund is concerned, this all sounds very abstract, but it is very important that we have an international organisation that is capable of being an early warning system for the world economy so it can spot these problems in advance and spot what is happening in one continent before it affects other continents.  It is also very important that we have an organisation that can deal with crises that can take place in the world economy, and it is also important that we have the surveillance of what is going on all the time so that we know how growth is proceeding in different continents and countries and what needs to be done to improve the functioning of the world economy. And we need, as you know, the transparency and the disclosure in the financial markets that have been a problem in recent months and recent years and we need someone at an international level monitoring what is happening.

    Now we have the Financial Stability Forum and we have the International Monetary Fund. The Financial Stability Forum is a group of countries that are the main financial centres that have come together and they have made a number of recommendations.  The IMF of course represents all major economies in the world and I think what we are looking for is an International Monetary Fund that is more independent, more like an independent central bank in the way it operates, which was by the way the original proposal for the International Monetary Fund made by Keynes in the 1940s, but also one that is capable of bringing countries together to deal with crises as they arise.

    So these are quite fundamental reforms, what some people call a new Bretton Woods, reflecting where the first Bretton Woods agreement came in America, and I think we are ready to move towards decisive action in creating a global framework to deal with what are essentially, as everybody now knows, global flows of capital that can affect every continent but where at the moment we only have national supervision.

    Foreign Secretary: On Russia, all 27 welcomed the withdrawal that has happened from the buffer zones around South Ossetia and Abkhazia, while recognising that … complete finish of the Russian commitments under the agreements that took place in August.  There is an audit going on of EU-Russia relations which will be complete by the time of the next General Affairs Council on 10 November and I don’t want to spoil all your anticipation of the conclusions that will be coming out, but you will see in paragraph 21 that it makes clear that the decision on the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement should be dependent, in part, on that audit and on continuing Russian compliance with those commitments that it made in August.

    Question:Prime Minister you mentioned that some oil companies are not passing on the reduction in oil price at the petrol pumps.  Is there anything that you can actually do about that?  Will you summon the oil companies to Downing Street?  And is there anything that the government itself can do in terms of cutting fuel duty?

    Prime Minister: Well we have got, as I understand it this morning, two supermarkets that have reduced their price below £1 a litre, and given that the average price was about £1.18 at its peak that is a considerable cut in prices.  But that should be a cut in prices to reflect that the barrel of oil which was once $150 is now nearer $80 a barrel.  And I want to see the competition between the supermarkets reflected, and the oil companies, in lower prices at the pumps. And I think you will see over the next few days people giving a great deal of attention to what the price is that is being charged by different companies.  So let me say that the first thing we want to do is to see retailers following the lead that has been taken by some people.

    I think the public know that when oil prices go up it is reflected very quickly in the petrol pump price, what they want to know is that when oil prices come down, that is also reflected in the pump price.  So over these next few days we will be monitoring what is happening, but I expect other companies to follow the lead that has been taken by two supermarkets in the last day.

    I think we have also got to remember, and we have had a number of reports done on this by the Office of Fair Trading and others, that the petrol price is high in some parts of the country and it is still at a price of £1.20 a litre in some areas, and that we will continue to look at that as well.  We have had reports done on this before to look at what is happening in the market place, we will continue to examine these things but I believe that also must change.

    Question: You mentioned during one of your answers that you want the mortgage market to resume, what can you tell us about the moves that the government is taking specifically to get the mortgage market going again?

    Prime Minister: Well as you know we have had the Crosby report which is looking at the features of the mortgage market that may need to change, but in the last few days the agreements that we have signed with the major banks is a commitment on their part to resume lending and to offer lending at 2007 levels.  Now that is the first stage to the resumption of the mortgage market.  Obviously we continue to look at other things that we can do.  As you know, we have brought forward our house building programme for local authorities and housing associations, we have entered the market ourselves with some of them actually buying up some of the surplus houses in the market place, and we will continue to look at other things that we can do to help people, both hard pressed mortgage payers in instances where we want to see action to prevent repossessions, but at the same time to get the mortgage market moving so that in Britain it can move quickly again.

    We do not have the problem that some other countries have.  If you go to America or Spain there has been an over-building of houses, or that is how the market is interpreted by people, so there is a surplus amount of houses in these countries and it may take longer to resume both the building and the sales that have happened in the past.  In our case we know that there is a high demand that is latent for new housing, lots of young couples not able to get houses, lots of people wanting to move and not able to do so, and obviously we can help in that, but that is the banks resuming normal lending that is going to make the biggest difference.  So we are taking action and we will consider any further measures that are necessary.

    Question: Are you specifically considering tax cuts in the UK to stimulate the economy, and what is the EU as a whole discussing in order to avoid a deep and prolonged economic recession?

    Prime Minister: Well as you know we have got an income tax cut for basic rate payers that is coming through at the moment, it is £120, we froze petrol duty and of course we have raised the winter allowance for pensioners in our country.  But any other decisions are a matter, I can say on this occasion, for the Chancellor.

    Question: And for the EU as a whole?

    Prime Minister: There is no proposal for the EU to involve itself in either tax raising or tax cutting.

    Question: Prime Minister was there further discussion of closing down tax havens today?

    Prime Minister: This is a major subject of discussion usually at the Finance Ministers meeting.  I must say that today what we were trying to lay down were the principles that will guide our approach to international financial sector reform.  Obviously what is happening in different parts of the world will be reflected in our discussions, but the principles have been laid down and some of the priorities.  And I think disclosure and transparency in the conduct of different countries round the world is a big issue and that is at the heart of some of the concerns that you raise.

    Question: You had bilateral meetings this morning with Mr Zapatero.  You told him, or we have been told that you told him that you want Spain to go to this international summit. Can you please tell us why do you feel it is important for Spain to go to that meeting?

    Prime Minister: Well Spain is a big economy and it has got a government that has been making proposals about how we reform things internationally.  I have very good relations with Prime Minister Zapatero and some of the proposals that he has been putting forward are very interesting.  If there is, let’s say, a G20 meeting, and Spain is not a member of the G20, I think, and I have said to President Bush that Spain should be represented at this meeting.

    Question: Mr Zapatero has invited you to visit Spain, do you know when you are going?

    Prime Minister: I am hoping to visit Spain soon.  I don’t know if that is a very detailed answer.

    Question: As we see the regulation coming in that is probably we are not seeing the City as it used to be over 200 years, that is flexibility, [indistinct] a German bank and other banks across Europe do business in the city which they couldn’t do back at home … this is a big contribution to the GDP of the UK.  How do you think this will affect the overall GDP growth and will you ask Brussels one day to help out with these regulations to bring down the City?

    Prime Minister: Let’s be absolutely clear, we see the City of London and our financial services industry as not only a strong industry but one that will be a leader in the world for many, many years to come.  Indeed in many, many areas we are the global centre, we are the leading financial centre in the world and we will continue to be so.  I said a few days ago we are not going to take the over-hasty action, such as [indistinct] Oxley in the United States of America after Enron and other cases.  We are going to have a considered view about what is the best thing to do to match what is the need for competition to be strong, and at the same time standards to be upheld.  So I see no reason why by leading this debate about how we can improve financial services and the way we have transparency, the City of London will be enhanced by this, not diminished.

    Question: Various people have commented on how you have very much dominated the agenda at this summit.  Could I ask you to describe what you believe your own role and influence is in the discussion to get Europe and the world out of this economic crisis?

    Prime Minister: I think we are all doing what we can.  I think President Sarkozy chaired this summit with a great deal of brilliance.  These were very difficult discussions on climate change, as David and I have reflected, and very detailed discussions on the world economy.  And I do want to praise his leadership and that of President Barroso in this set of discussions which are important not just for Europe but for the rest of the world.  And I also have worked very closely over the last few days with Jean Claude Trichet and with Jean Claude Junker, the President of the Euro Group, and their leadership has been very important also to what we have managed to agree at this summit.

    I think the important thing is that everybody contributes to what they know is a problem that has got to be dealt with.  The G8 statement yesterday talked about deficiencies that we had found in the financial system.  If we can deal with these deficiencies quickly then people’s confidence and trust in the system will be not only restored but enhanced. And I think it is very important to see this as Stage one and Stage two, Stage one was the stabilisation of the banking system, that is measures that we have taken over the last few days;  Stage two is to build the confidence in the future of the financial system that will make people feel, rightly so, that their savings and deposits are safe.  And if we can play a small part with some of the proposals that we have been working on now for some years for the global financial system, as well as learning the lessons of what has happened in the last year or two, then I think that is all to the good of the world economy.

    And I think you should regard this as a cooperative effort where different countries, as with Prime Minister Zapatero, where different proposals are now coming together, and know now that you cannot leave this until the next crisis, or you cannot treat the reforms as abstract academic points of discussion, you have got to take the action now so that people are convinced that we have done everything in our power to deal with the problems in the financial system, to clean it up where it needs to be cleaned up, and we will continue to look at every area where there are problems, and then to agree not just nationally but globally on the common standards that are necessary for the future.

    Question: You attended the Euro Group meeting a few days ago, I was wondering if your thinking on the UK joining the euro has changed at all in the last few days?

    Prime Minister: Our position on joining the euro has not changed.  We continue obviously as we have said before to review it but we have got no plans to join the euro.

    Question: You have been talking about who is going to be invited to the leaders’ conference, can you say when and where it will take place?

    Prime Minister: I can’t make that decision, many people have got to be consulted on what is the appropriate time that suits their diaries and their programmes.  What I do know is that there is an agreement now from the G8 that we will discuss not only the current issues about recapitalising the banking system, we will also discuss the problems that people have in their day to day goals, with what has happened to the price of oil, we will be discussing the reform of the international financial system and we will be discussing how we can get a trade agreement, a world trade agreement which will be a signal that protectionism is completely unacceptable.

    Now various proposals have been made, I think President Sarkozy and others are talking about this summit in New York, but that date is still to be agreed.  And obviously there are going to be discussions this weekend, President Sarkozy is meeting President Bush, I am in regular contact with President Bush, I have talked to all the other European leaders over the last few days, I have talked also to Premier Wen in China and I have talked to President Lula in Brazil.  I think it is very important that all the different players in the world economy are involved in the making of decisions that affect not just one or two continents, but every continent round the world.

    Question: Can you tell us whether an agreement has been reached on this reflection group, or the group of wise men, and whether the UK is sending a member and what do you expect from this group?

    Prime Minister: On the reflection group, Richard Lambert is indeed our member, and I think you will find in the communiqué a reference to the continuing work of the reflection group.  Richard Lambert, for people who may not know him, is the Director General of the Confederation of British Industry, I don’t want to single out one newspaper, but formerly Editor of the Financial Times, and he has been a member of the Monetary Committee of the Bank of England, so he has a great deal of experience to bring to this group.

  • Gordon Brown – 2008 Speech to the House of Commons on the European Union

    Gordon Brown – 2008 Speech to the House of Commons on the European Union

    The speech made by Gordon Brown, the then Prime Minister, on 20 October 2008.

    With permission, Mr Speaker, I should like to make a statement about the European Council held in Brussels which I attended with my Rt. Hon Friends the Chancellor and the Foreign Secretary on 15th and 16th October – the main business of which was to consider European actions to stabilise financial markets and how we can work together to reform our international financial systems. The council also welcomed the co-ordinated interest rate cut by central banks around the world.

    But at the heart of our considerations was our shared understanding that the massive reduction in global financial activity and the fracturing of the global financial system has been the result of irresponsible and often undisclosed lending that started in American sub prime markets.

    And while national action is necessary, the root problem can only be dealt with by changes in our financial systems – to recapitalise banks and to reform supervision around the principle of rewarding hard work enterprise and responsible risk taking but not irresponsibility and excess.

    Market estimates suggest that in recent years some $2 trillion of us originated loans – many of them toxic – were bought by ED banks. So to strengthen our banks the council welcomed the comprehensive action on liquidity, capital and funding guarantees of our government and of the euro zone countries under the leadership of President Sarkozy, President Barroso and, ECB President, Jean-Claude Trichet.

    The council also welcomed the joint commitment from the leaders of the G8 countries to hold a leaders’ meeting and agreed the principles and priority areas for global action.

    Mr Speaker, stage one to recovery has been to stabilise financial markets thereby securing a resumption of lending.

    In Britain almost 50 billion pounds has been injected as capital into our banks.

    The government alone has taken shares worth 37 billion in two of our largest banks. And across the world more than 300 billion pounds has now been approved from public funds to recapitalise banks.

    At the heart of the British decision was that medium term funding was conditional on bank recapitalisation. And we also welcome the agreement of the council that EU countries will provide medium term state guarantees for new interbank loans.

    And I particularly welcome the decision of the European investment bank, following my initial proposals at the G4 summit in Paris earlier this month, to mobilise and frontload 30 billion Euros to support new lending to Europe’s, and Britain’s, small businesses.

    However, confidence today depends also on there being confidence about the future. So we agreed on the need to achieve a reform of the global financial system based upon five principles – transparency, integrity, responsibility, sound banking practice and global governance with coordination across borders.

    Mr Speaker, we will submit a detailed set of proposals to the international leaders meeting. I will be putting these proposals to all countries – including emerging countries. And I have already put them to president bush and will be putting them to both presidential candidates in the US.

    I can tell the house today that these include:

    • Insisting on openness and disclosure, with off balance sheet vehicles brought back on to balance sheets, greater transparency around the use of credit derivatives and a rapid adoption of internationally agreed accounting standards so that value-impaired assets can no longer be hidden.
    • Removing once and for all the conflicts of interest which have distorted behaviour and undermined trust so that credit rating agencies no longer act as advisers to the companies they rate and executive remuneration rewards not excessive or irresponsible risk taking but hard work, enterprise, effort and responsible risk taking.
    • Ensuring board members have the competence and expertise to manage the risks for which they are ultimately responsible – and cannot walk away from their obligations.
    • Regulation which looks at both solvency and liquidity and ensures the financial system supports wider economic stability.
    • And a new international architecture for the global financial sector
    for the years ahead.

    So we want to move to early decisions with our international partners about:

    • Reform of the international monetary fund and financial stability forum, including the creation of an early warning system for the global economy
    • Globally accepted standards of supervision applied equally and consistently in all countries.
    • Effective cross-border supervision of global firms – starting with establishing 30 international colleges of supervisors by the end of this year.
    • Cross border co-operation and concerted action in a crisis

    And we also want to see greater global macroeconomic co-ordination and to prevent the return of protectionism we want to see the reopening of the world trade talks. And I welcome the proposals from Australian Prime Minister Rudd.

    Mr Speaker, the events of the last few days have demonstrated that we need urgently to deploy in Eastern Europe and emerging markets the IMF’s facilities and resources to the fullest extent – and also those of the multilateral development banks:

    • To prevent capital flight;
    • To engage in and support counter cyclical policies;
    • And to finance domestic growth where exports are declining and capital has flown outwards.

    And we need urgently to consider creating a new IMF facility for emerging economies in the current crisis.

    Rescuing eastern European countries is particularly urgent and I have asked the European bank for reconstruction and development, the European investment bank and the World Bank to consider what they can do.

    Mr Speaker, the council also discussed in detail how each of our economies was being affected by the global economic downturn that started in America.

    Had we not acted to stabilise the banking system the effect on households and businesses would have been even more severe; but notwithstanding the action that has been taken the world is facing a severe global economic downturn with negative growth already seen in France, Germany and Italy this year and in the US last year.

    The UK cannot insulate itself from this global downturn, but with interest rates low and falling and inflation expected to come down over the next year, our underlying economic indicators are stronger than at any other previous downturn and debt has been considerably lower than a decade ago and lower than all G7 countries except Canada – enabling the government to increase borrowing at the right time to support the economy.

    The Government will do whatever it takes for mortgage holders, for small firms and for employees to help families and business through what will undoubtedly be a difficult period ahead.

    Like all governments across the world we are considering how fiscal policy can support the economy at this time, carefully targeted rigorously worked through investments that help people fairly through the downturn and lay the foundations for stronger growth in the future. And in Britain’s case we start from the position of low public debt. So we will bring the same focus and determination to the task of safeguarding jobs and homes and small business as we did to avert the threatened meltdown of financial systems.

    Mr Speaker,this will be the central mission of the government over the coming weeks and months. And I welcome the support in the national interest of all prepared to give that support. And let us be clear: it is also action that we take globally to get to the root of the problem in global banking that will make the biggest difference.

    Mr Speaker, the council also reached important conclusions on energy and climate change; on Russia and Georgia and on the European pact on immigration and asylum.

    Next year in Copenhagen, the world has an historic opportunity to secure prosperity for generations ahead with international action on climate change.

    While there are those who will seek to use current global financial problems as an excuse to pull back from change, to pull up the drawbridge and renege on commitments, in fact, it is now more essential than ever before to push forwards with our ambitious agenda on energy security and climate change.

    As the Stern Report showed, weak or delayed action will cost us all more in the years to come, both financially and economically.

    The council reaffirmed its commitment to reach agreement by December on its energy and climate change package for 2020. We made clear the importance in doing so of achieving a fair balance – with all member states accepting new commitments; that there must be flexibility for member states to meet targets in the most cost-effective way; and that Europe’s package must send the strongest possible signal to encourage the rest of the world to aim high at the Copenhagen summit next year.

    Mr Speaker, as last week’s statement from my Rt. Hon Friend, the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change made clear, this government is committed to the most ambitious targets – cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by the middle of this century. Not just for the future of our environment – but as a crucial part of our strategy for energy security.

    But we cannot fulfil our aspirations for climate change without nuclear power and European and international co-operation. And that is why we will fully engage with the European Union on the environment and not pursue a policy based on unilateralism and detachment.

    Faced with historically high and volatile oil prices, it is more essential than ever before that we act to end our dependency on oil.

    The council looked for:

    • Greater diversification of energy sources
    • The completion of fully functioning EU energy markets
    • And improved critical energy infrastructure, for example, in the southern corridor. Our London energy meeting in December will seek to drive forward progress in the critical dialogue between oil producing and oil consuming nations.

    And today I would urge OPEC at its meeting on Friday to work through dialogue with consumer countries to stabilise the energy market as a whole. Mr Speaker, the council has expressed its grave concern over Russia’s actions in Georgia and called on all sides to implement in full the six-point plan agreed with European leaders.

    The council therefore welcomed the withdrawal of Russian troops as an essential additional step in the implementation of the agreements of 12th August and 8th September; and the launching in Geneva of the international discussions provided for by those agreements.

    Mr Speaker, the council and commission will continue to make a full in-depth evaluation of relations with Russia ahead of the EU-Russia summit in nice next month.

    The council also resolved to continue to support its eastern neighbours in their efforts to achieve democracy and economic modernisation and to consider a future EU “eastern partnership.”

    Finally, the council considered the European pact on immigration and asylum, underlining the importance of ensuring coherence between union policies, including free movement.

    Mr Speaker, Britain and Europe benefits economically from free movement – but free movement cannot be an unfettered right. It must bring with it clear responsibilities – with failure to meet them carrying clear consequences including, where appropriate, the loss of that right entirely.

    I discussed this point in further detail with a number of European leaders in the margins of the council, building considerable support across member states and agreement to look further at the responsibilities associated with free movement where crimes are committed by EU residents in the EU but outside their country of origin – and to return to this issue in December.

    Mr Speaker, this summit showed that in facing global challenges, whether the credit crunch, climate change or energy security, we succeed best not in isolation but in co-operation, not with unilateralism and separation from our European neighbours but in active partnership with them. And that is why our policy will rightly remain one of being fully engaged at the centre of Europe.

    And I commend this statement to the House.