Category: Environment

  • Rishi Sunak – 2022 Statement at COP27

    Rishi Sunak – 2022 Statement at COP27

    The statement made by Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister, in Egypt on 7 November 2022.

    When Her Late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II addressed COP 26 last year,

    she reflected how history has shown…

    “…that when nations come together in common cause, there is always room for hope.”

    I believe we found room for hope in Glasgow.

    With one last chance to create a plan that would limit global temperature rises to 1.5 degrees,

    ….we made the promises to keep that goal within reach.

    And the question today is this: can we summon the collective will to deliver them?

    I believe we can.

    When we began our COP Presidency, just one third of the global economy was signed up to net zero…

    …today it’s 90 per cent.

    And for our part, the UK…

    …which was the first major economy in the world to legislate for net zero….

    …will fulfil our ambitious commitment to reduce emissions by at least 68 per cent by 2030.

    And because there is no solution to climate change without protecting and restoring nature …

    In Glasgow, more than 140 countries which are home to over 90 per cent of the world’s forests…

    … made a historic promise to halt and reverse forest loss and land degradation by the end of this decade.

    And just this afternoon I co-hosted the first meeting of the Forests and Climate Leaders’ Partnership to ensure this is delivered.

    Central to all our efforts, is honouring our promises on climate finance.

    I know that for many, finances are tough right now.

    The pandemic all but broke the global economy.

    And before coming here today…

    …I spent last week working on the difficult decisions needed to ensure confidence and economic stability in my own country.

    But I can tell you today…

    ….that the United Kingdom is delivering on our commitment of £11.6 billion.

    And as part of this – we will now triple our funding on adaptation to £1.5 billion by 2025.

    Let me tell you why.

    First, I profoundly believe it is the right thing to do.

    Listen to Prime Minister Mottley of Barbados, as she describes the existential threat posed by the ravages of climate change.

    Or look at the devastating floods in Pakistan…

    …where the area underwater is the same size as the whole United Kingdom.

    When you see 33 million people displaced…

    …with disease rife and spreading through the water…

    …you know it is morally right to honour our promises.

    But it is also economically right too.

    Climate security goes hand in hand with energy security.

    Putin’s abhorrent war in Ukraine and rising energy prices across the world are not a reason to go slow on climate change.

    They are a reason to act faster.

    Because diversifying our energy supplies by investing in renewables…

    …is precisely the way to insure ourselves against the risks of energy dependency.

    It is also a fantastic source of new jobs and growth.

    In Glasgow, we began an approach globally…

    ….using aid funding to unlock billions of pounds of private finance for the development of new green infrastructure.

    So instead of developing countries being unfairly burdened with the carbon debt of richer nations and somehow expected to forgo that same path to growth,

    ….we are helping those countries deliver their own fast track to clean growth.

    And the UK is making further commitments to support this today …

    ….including by investing £65 million in a range of green investment projects in Kenya and in Egypt.

    I’d like to pay tribute to President Sisi for his leadership in bringing us all together…

    ….and to thank the UK’s President of COP26, Alok Sharma…

    …for his inspiring work to deliver on the Paris Agreement and Glasgow Climate Pact.

    By honouring the promises we made in Glasgow….

    ….and by directing public and private finance towards the protection of our planet….

    ….we can turn our struggle against climate change into a global mission for new jobs and clean growth…

    …and we can bequeath our children a greener planet and a more prosperous future.

    That’s a legacy we could be proud of.

    So as we come together once again in common cause today,

    there really is room for hope.

    Together, let us fulfil it.

  • Justin Welby – 2022 Statement on COP27 (Archbishop of Canterbury)

    Justin Welby – 2022 Statement on COP27 (Archbishop of Canterbury)

    The statement made by Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury, on 5 November 2022.

    As global leaders gather at COP27, the world holds its breath. A world which has this year suffered further catastrophic flooding, drought, heatwaves and storms. A world already in crisis. A world which knows that we are perilously near the point of no return.

    I’ve seen this myself just recently in Australia, whose great wealth is no protection against the flooding in New South Wales. And if it can happen in one of the most prosperous parts of the world, how much more devastating in one of the poorest like South Sudan, where more flooding has led to food insecurity, hunger and malnutrition.

    Living as one human family, I pray that we will hear clearly the voices of those suffering on the brutal front line of climate change and climate injustice. I pray that together we will listen to young people and Indigenous Peoples. At this COP, hosted in Africa, the perspectives from that continent must be heard.

    The climate emergency is an existential global threat that requires a global response, with radical action, imagination and justice. Let us together see justice done, so that countries can access new and fair finance for the loss and damage caused by climate change.

    It is imperative that we seek justice so that those nations with greatest responsibility will take the lead, achieving net-zero carbon emissions and supporting other countries in this transition.

    God calls us to embrace justice. Christian scripture describes how we share in the ‘renewed creation of heaven and earth with justice’ (2 Peter 3:13). Let justice flow so that we see human lives and hope restored, and the life of the earth itself protected and renewed.

  • Jeremy Corbyn – 2022 Comments on COP27

    Jeremy Corbyn – 2022 Comments on COP27

    The comments made by Jeremy Corbyn, the Independent MP for North Islington, on Twitter on 7 November 2022.

    Humanity is at a tipping point.

    #COP27 must achieve climate justice, support the poorest for loss and damage, and deliver systemic change on a global scale.

    We are running out of time. Solidarity with climate activists and human rights defenders who cannot wait any longer.

  • Rishi Sunak – 2022 Comments on COP27

    Rishi Sunak – 2022 Comments on COP27

    The comments made by Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister, on 7 November 2022.

    When the world came together in Glasgow last year, nations agreed an historic roadmap for preventing catastrophic global warming. As I travel to COP27 in Egypt today, it is more important than ever that we deliver on those pledges.

    Fighting climate change is not just a moral good – is it fundamental to our future prosperity and security. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and contemptible manipulation of energy prices has only reinforced the importance of ending our dependence on fossil fuels.

    We need to move further and faster to transition to renewable energy, and I will ensure the UK is at the forefront of this global movement as a clean energy superpower.

  • Caroline Lucas – 2022 Comments on Rishi Sunak and COP27

    Caroline Lucas – 2022 Comments on Rishi Sunak and COP27

    The comments made by Caroline Lucas, the Green Party MP for Brighton Pavilion, on Twitter on 7 November 2022.

    PM has no credibility when he urges others at #COP27 to keep Glasgow commitments when his own Govt hasn’t met finance pledges, hasn’t raised ambition of UK emission cuts, is continuing fossil fuel subsidies, won’t rule out new coal and is greenlighting more oil & gas #WalkTheTalk

  • Keith Taylor – 2012 Letter to the Guardian on Cuadrilla

    Keith Taylor – 2012 Letter to the Guardian on Cuadrilla

    The letter sent by Keith Taylor, the then Green Party MEP for South East England, to the Guardian newspaper on 16 January 2012.

    Your report (13 January) of a packed village-hall meeting standing up to the chief executive and PR machine of the US multinational Cuadrilla over its plans to drill for gas clearly exposed the strength of feeling on this issue. The villagers are determined to oppose this oil and gas company’s attempt to expand its dangerous fracking practice from Lancashire to the south of England.

    There is growing evidence that fracking can cause a range of environmental problems. A recent study by the US Environmental Protection Agency reported evidence of pollution, finding a range of chemicals in the groundwater around shale gas wells in Wyoming. Last year in Lancashire a report to investigate minor earthquakes found it was “highly probable” that fracking in the Blackpool area by Cuadrilla was the cause. Mounting evidence about the negative impacts of shale gas extraction, along with the growing number of applications to drill in the UK, mean that now more than ever a thorough and independent investigation is needed into the possible effects on the environment and people’s health. Until then the government should halt drilling operations.

    In any case, shale oil will contribute little towards meeting our emissions targets. We should instead be investing in renewable energy, which is clean and safe. Other European countries are aware of the risks – France recently banned fracking. In the European parliament the Greens are questioning the European commission about whether this technique complies with EU regulations on water and chemicals, and I will be meeting constituents next week to support their campaign against fracking.

    Keith Taylor MEP
    Green, South East England

  • Keith Taylor – 2006 Speech to the Green Party’s Conference

    Keith Taylor – 2006 Speech to the Green Party’s Conference

    The speech made by Keith Taylor, the then Principal Speaker of the Green Party (alongside Caroline Lucas) on 22 September 2006.

    Great to welcome delegates here to the greenest city in the uk where, just 18 months ago we secured the highest ever UK general election vote and where next year, we are looking forward to significant gains in the local elections

    This is our first national conference since this May’s local elections where there was an increase of almost a third in the number of cllrs across the country. The elections that saw massive Labour losses and the LibDems failing to win a single seat. I’d like to congratulate those winning candidates and their local parties – their diligence and determination is an example to us all.

    What those results show is that people are turning to the Greens because the traditional politics, whether at Westminster or in their Town Hall is no longer part of the solution, it’s part of the problem.

    What those results show is that people are recognising that our vision of environmental, social and economic justice is the right vision for the 21st century.

    Those votes have been given to us so we can continue our work ..So that Caroline Lucas can fight for Fair Trade not Free Trade so Jean Lambert can defend public services and human rights. So Jenny Jones and Darren Johnson can carry on the greening of our capital city, as Londoners clearly want. So councillors across the country can bring the green revolution to people’s doorsteps..making improvements to people’s lives.

    We are doing all this, and more, delivering concrete political achievements in all the decision-making chambers to which we’re elected

    And it doesn’t take much imagination to realise how much more we’ll be able achieve once the first Greens are elected as MP’s to Westminster,

    Fellow greens, at the start of the 21st century humankind faces a climate change challenge which could literally end our time as the dominant species on this planet.

    Over the last 200 years there have been social and political challenges which have been solved by the emergence of new philosophies, new movements.

    At the beginning of the 19th century out of UK population of 16m, only 400,000 people were allowed a vote. After dedicated campaigns from reformers it took till 1928 until all adults, men and women had a vote.

    And it wasn’t til midway through the 20th century, in a bid to combat ignorance, disease, squalor, and poverty the Beveridge Report laid the foundations of the Welfare State.

    New thinking to provide new solutions to new problems.

    And now it is our climate that is on a critical path in world affairs, because of the activities of humankind.

    People are hungry for a solution, the planet is desperate for mercy, and it is green thinkers like us who have the answers..

    But when people look to the Westminster political parties for those climate change answers, what do they get?

    With the party of government, for all their posturing and ‘world leadership’ on global warming, they see carbon emissions going up not coming down under new labour!

    Furthermore, when Blair eventually does go, the country has to hope in vain his replacement will be any better – the New Labour project has entirely failed to lead the world on climate change by example – and they’ve proved leading by spin alone just doesn’t work.

    And when we look to the tories/lib dems –

    It’s good that environmental awareness has at last surfaced onto the mainstream agenda – because18 months ago at the last election it was nowhere.

    Indeed Cameron – architect of the brand new hug-a-hoodie-ride-a-bike- conservatism, failed to mention climate change at all when he wrote the Tories last manifesto.

    And as for Ming, just look and see what decisions the LibDems take when they are in power, more roads like the M74 in Scotland which was branded by FoE as probably the worst environmental decision ever taken by the Scottish Assembly.

    That’s repeated across the UK with more runways approved or supported by the LDs in Manchester, Exeter and Sheffield

    But this new found enthusiasm from the Tories and the LibDEms for tackling climate change is hollow without understanding the need for wholesale radical economic reform. The green taxes proposed by the Lds this week in Brighton are only part of the solution. A part that won’t work in isolation.

    Economic management is at the heart of tackling carbon reduction.

    For as long as the Westminster parties remain wedded to the joint beliefs the ‘market’ will deliver social and environmental solutions and that unrestrained unfettered economic growth at home and abroad must be given free rein we will make no real progress

    They are clinging to the economic strategies of the past which were about increasing consumption, about growth at any cost. But that growth brings effects the future can simply no longer absorb.

    The economic strategies of the past will not meet the needs of the future.

    Those traditional targets have no room for restrained and channeled growth, for reigning in our addiction to oil, and profligate energy use

    Nor do they accommodate or promote a world where simple solutions, using technology we already have…for wind farms, for solar panels, for energy efficient homes, … that could start us on the road to recovery and adaptation where local, small measures adopted on a global scale could make the high energy lifestyles of today unrecognizable.

    TERROR

    Since our last conference we’ve also see the fifth anniversary of the twin tower attack and since Bush and Blair declared their disastrous War on Terror.

    Five years on but disaster follows disaster and the world is now a far more dangerous place than it was five years ago…

    Tens, possibly hundreds, of thousands of people have died as a result of the War on Terror, most of them civilians. Crimes against humanity have been committed, and the situation in the Middle East is bloodier than ever.

    The Americans have simply thrown international law, and respect for international law, out of the window.

    Under the new neo-con world law, set and sheriffed by the US they seek to secure both continuous oil supplies and the destruction of any groups and governments perceived as hostile to US policies, democratically elected or not.

    Pre-emptive strike policies have now become a valid form of defence, and god help anyone who stands in their way. Right-thinking people the world over hope the lessons of Iraq are learnt before the same mistakes are made in Iran.

    This policy is both illegal – It violates the UN charter – and immoral

    And our own country’s involvement has been ignoble and shameful with Yo Blair’s act-now-pray-later-anything-you-say-boss-brown-nosing adoration of Bush and anything American.

    Blair is responsible for crimes against humanity and should be tried alongside Bush accordingly It’s not only abroad that the New Labour project is intent on leaving their damaging mark on our society.

    With both Blair and Brown’s support for a Trident nuclear weapons replacement they are spending billions in contravention of the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty.

    And in championing Trident, a replacement for a system which was designed to be a deterrent in a cold war which no longer exists, they have the full support of the Tories, and though the Lib Dems might be sitting on the fence we al know which way they are going to jump!

    Trident – the nuclear weapons system that, as part of the world wide web of WMD’s, ensures we are all only seconds away from annihilation at any one time.

    Tragedy is that whilst the nuclear nations spend billions on more efficient ways of killing people, millions die of malnutrition or lack of clean water for want of aid

    And at home, when we look at the energy crisis and government enthusiasm for a new programme of nuclear power stations we can see just how out of touch the they really are, both with the aspirations of this generation and any sense of responsibility to generations yet to come.

    We already have 2.3 million cubic metres of nuclear waste in storage,every single tax payer in this country is already paying 1000 pounds a head to clear up the toxic legacy of our current generation – but the government want to build more! There are better, cleaner, safer and cheaper alternatives, that don’t endanger our children’s health. That provide cheap and reliable energy and an end to fuel poverty, that don’t leave a dirty dangerous and expensive legacy for future generations to deal with.

    We should immediately rule out a greater use of the nuclear option and focus on cleaner, safer, renewable forms of energy. There should be a national strategy in place now to address the impacts of Peak Oil

    The challenge for the Green Party

    So how can the GP increase the pressure? Simply put, to achieve change through the political process we nee more greens elected.We already have the policies that can appeal to millions, now we have to sharpen up our act in admin delivering our message We need to be presenting our case across doorsteps, in works canteens, in colleges and meetings. We must all be messengers that another world is possible We must keep faith as other parties make their half-hearted attempts to jump on the green bandwagon.As it says on the back of a pair of Levis, beware of imitations.the time is arriving for our party, we have a job to do and a responsibility to step forward with our green solutions

    CALL TO ARMS

    The UK needs a new political order to deliver a new political will, to breathe life into the aspirations of people in their millions waking up to the real threat climate change poses, to put people at the centre of policies and curb the corporate takeover of the UK.

    The Green Party are a central part of that new political order

    That’s because, unlike the major parties with their self interest in preserving their own structures and government’s corporate links, we’re different. We are honest, trustworthy and courageous. We are not afraid to challenge and change the political climate, and the patronage that supports it. We need drastic, radical action on global warming – not tinkering round the edges. We have already adopted Tradeable Carbon Quotas and Contraction and Convergence – these together with a basket of other measures are solutions that will work and they must be widely adopted right now because we don’t have time to squander.

    The Westminster parties have failed to take decisive action, as yet they have not adopted these models

    But the greens are prepared to do this, because we are motivated by more than political expediency and tomorrow’s headlines. Our overarching ambition at home and abroad is a just and sustainable world.

    This means facing some hard choices and having the courage to challenge the status quo of life in Britain today and the effects it has

    ….Something the other parties aren’t prepared to do.

    They aren’t prepared to look at a country where…

    1 in 4 children grow up in poverty where the gulf between rich and poor is every day widening, public services are being eroded schools and hospitals sold off to the highest bidder and civil liberties eroded in the name of respect where billions are wasted on the Big Brother ID card scheme

    ….no, the other parties don’t want to go there..let alone say “something has go to change”

    They would prefer not to admit that…

    the world’s policeman has turned into a bully-boy and words like intolerance, bigotry, hatred, persecution and ethnic cleansing are stock in trade of evil leaders and the rich live in excess at the expense of the poor or that the world’s poorest are suffering the impacts of our over travelled, over consumptive lives in the West, and where extreme weather events are more frequent and the dead and displaced are measured in their millions

    We must not shirk from confronting these wrongs

    We have a part to play in returning true environmental, social and economic justice whether it be to the Transit camps at DarfurOr the refugee camps in Gaza

    Conference, I think now is the time that we must declare war on carbon.

    This is a war we CAN win, and a war we MUST win for human survival. The front line is here, the time for action is now.

    And I believe the Greens are the party with real and pragmatic plans to get us out of this hole

    A party that understands to lower our emissions by 90% by 2050

    reduce energy demand source from renewable sources, improve efficiency.

    ..We must have binding , compulsory carbon reduction targets

    We need to control and reduce aviation emissions, with a special aviation emission trading system

    We need to look at the way we live and how we can change that to fit within the resources of one world.

    And we must shout loud and clear that voters shouldn’t be taken in by the green-sounding platitudes of the gray parties.

    There is only one party that’s really green, and that’s the Green Party

    And we have the solutions that the future needs.Because we only have one planet, and we only have one chance, and that is why we will continue to win peoples hearts and minds. And that’s why people will vote Green.

    Conference, we must never give up our quest, because the future is in our hands, and history waits to see if humankind is up to the challenge we’ve been given.

    Thank you.

  • Peter Ainsworth – 2002 Speech at the Tenant Farmers Association AGM

    Peter Ainsworth – 2002 Speech at the Tenant Farmers Association AGM

    The speech made by Peter Ainsworth, the then Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, on 12 February 2002.

    I know that this has been for many of you a truly terrible year. Your chairman has described it as ‘horrendous’.

    It was horrendous even by the standards which your industry had sadly come to expect.

    In the three years to June 2001, over 60,000 farming jobs were lost, and total farm incomes crashed from over £5 billion to £1.8 billion. What other industry could take that kind of punishment and survive?

    By the start of last year, for many of you, achieving the National Minimum Wage was a pipe dream.

    You could be forgiven for asking what you had done wrong to invite the series of traumas, akin to the plagues of Ancient Egypt, which one after another struck. BSE, Classical Swine Fever, dreadful harvests, unprecedented rainfall, a collapse in commodity prices.

    And just when you thought it could not possibly get worse – it did.

    Next week will see the grim anniversary of the date on which Foot and Mouth became official.

    The scale of the disaster remains vividly in the mind. Over 2000 confirmed cases across thirty counties. Many of you saw your livelihoods quite literally vanish before your eyes as some 6.5 million animals were slaughtered, often in brutal circumstances, on nearly 10,000 farms.

    These are the official figures.

    Some estimates have put the number of animals slaughtered at nearer 10 million.

    I know that these numbers, horrific as they are, don’t tell the whole story. It is hard for anyone who was not directly touched by the tragedy to understand the emotional impact on the farming communities and families where the culling took place.

    I am acutely aware of the vital role played by this Association in providing advice, information and consolation during those painful months. It was a ghastly time, but the worst of times can often bring out the best in people and the whole country was moved by the resilience, determination and decency of the farming community during those days.

    There remain many questions to be answered by the Government over its handling of Foot and Mouth. When, precisely, did Ministers first become aware that the disease had broken out? Why was there a three day delay in imposing a total movement ban? Why were Ministers so slow in grasping the need for urgent action? Why was there no contingency plan in place? Why didn’t they mobilise local vets? Why did they rule out vaccination? Why was chaos allowed to develop before the army was finally called in to help with the disposal of carcasses? Was contiguous culling carried out legally? Who drew up the maps on which the culling was based? Why does the Prime Minister refer all enquiries to Defra when it was he who assumed personal responsibility for managing the outbreak?

    Were the Government’s eyes so transfixed by the date of the General Election that they couldn’t see the tragedy unfolding before them?

    All these questions, and more, we will continue to ask.

    But the honest way to learn the Lessons of Foot and Mouth would be to hold an independent public inquiry.

    Just why the Government has set its face against a thorough public scrutiny of its handling of the disease can only be guessed at. The fact is that if they have nothing to hide they have nothing to fear from a Public Inquiry, and in the absence of openness, we are left to draw our own conclusions about what it is they do not want to have exposed.

    What is certain is that the Prime Minister’s stance on this issue has done nothing whatever to heal the growing rift between Government and countryside which was already all too visible before the last Election.

    To make matters worse, the first measure introduced by the Government since the outbreak, the Animal Health Bill (Animal Death Bill) confers sweeping new powers of entry and destruction on Ministers and officials, and insinuates that farmers were chiefly responsible for the spread of Foot and Mouth.

    The uncompensated financial loss caused by Foot and Mouth to the livestock industry stands at over £1 billion.

    But the true costs to the wider economy have been far greater.

    It was only in the aftermath of the devastation that the Government seems to have begun to grasp the idea that farming is not an isolated activity, and that what happens to farming affects us all. That is why the future of agricultural policy is so important.

    Much has been said and written of the opportunities which now exist to develop a radical new approach to farming policy, but Ministers who lecture the rural community about the need for change must remember that before change must come trust. There remains an urgent need to restore consumer confidence in British farm produce, but equally urgent is the need to address the dysfunctional relationship between Government and the farming community.

    The most important policy objective must be to enable a return to profitable farming; this, more than any new regulations, will help to ensure the future of the rural environment. In fact the swathes of red tape are part of the problem and the Curry report has some useful recommendations to make in this area. Of course there is a need for regulation where issues concerning human health, the environment and animal welfare are concerned, but the command and control culture which originates from the Common Agricultural Policy and finds its expression in the Defra paperchase would be quaint if it were not so damaging.

    In all the discussions about the Future of farming, too little attention has been paid to the particular difficulties suffered by the tenant farmers. Given that you account for some 9.5 million hectares, 40% of land farmed in this country, your interests might be expected to form rather more than a footnote.

    If structural changes are believed to be necessary to farming, then Government thinking must take account of tenant farmers. With no assets to rely on, facing retirement can be a daunting prospect.

    That is why, before the last Election, we promised to use the Rural Development Regulation to introduce a retirement package for tenant farmers which would not only benefit existing tenants but also, importantly, help encourage newcomers into the tenanted sector.

    The Government made a similar pledge but so far they have done nothing to keep it; and we will work with you to hold them to their promise.

    Many of the problems facing farming and the environment will yield no easy or quick solutions, but a determined effort to get government out of the daily management of rural businesses would be a start.

    It seems that hardly a week goes by without some new regulation making life harder. In fact, since 1997 there have been a staggering 15,000 new regulations which have impacted on farming in some way. From the Right to Roam to the vibration of tractors, nothing can be allowed to happen without Ministerial approval and the endless, wasteful unproductive bureaucracy that goes with it.

    As Iain Duncan Smith said recently;:

    “It sometimes sees that what is not illegal is becoming compulsory”.

    What is happening to our country? What is happening to our freedom?

    And what is the meaning of Free Trade when British farmers are being asked to compete for supermarket orders with overseas producers who are less constrained by animal welfare, hygiene and environmental regulations?

    We must ensure that you are able to compete on fair terms.

    When it comes to farming, I want to hear a little less about free trade and a lot more about fair trade.

    The Curry Report had little to say about this, but it had much to say about modulation; indeed although it contains helpful thinking on better marketing and streamlining bureaucracy, modulation is its Big Idea.

    I am keen to help you do what, by and large, you have always done: manage the environment in sustainable way. The beauty of our landscape is of huge economic benefit, but it is more than that. For most of us, whether we live in the countryside or in cities, it has an intangible strength; something which cannot be adequately portrayed in a picture postcard; something essential to the way we think of ourselves as a nation.

    This environment is your work place and it has been fashioned by farmers over the centuries. It didn’t get there by accident, it got there because of you and your predecessors.

    But the words sustainable development become meaningless if sustainable does not also mean profitable.

    What worries me about the enthusiasm shown by Curry for modulation is that, under existing EU laws, it could simply mean that the taxpayer ends up paying an even higher bill, whilst farm incomes continue to decline and farmers become more, not less, dependent on the state.

    I will not attempt, this afternoon, to reform the CAP, although radical reform is urgently needed. The present stand off between the Commission on the one hand and Poland on the other shows just how great the problems are. Let me just say that you have a right to expect the British Government to have identified clear objectives long before now and to be taking a lead in mapping out the future of European agricultural policy. Well, if you know what Margaret Beckett wants out of CAP Reform do let me know, because I haven’t got a clue and don’t suppose she has either.

    The problems centred around the CAP and WTO talks must not be allowed to divert attention from measures which could be taken now. I have touched some of them:

    Start cutting bureaucracy now;

    Begin to rebuild trust;

    Help with retirement plans;

    Encourage new entrants to farming;

    Tackle unfair imports.

    And how about this? Margaret Beckett is keen to talk about encouraging local consumption of local food. We all think this is a good idea. Why doesn’t the Government take a look at its own food procurement policies and put its money where its mouth is (or vice versa)?

    Finally, the negligent approach to controlling illegal food imports is a disgrace which should be put right immediately. After all that went wrong last year, after all the waste and the cost and the heartbreak, perhaps the most disturbing thought is that literally nothing has been done to prevent Foot and Mouth being imported again tomorrow.

    I am once again, extremely grateful for the opportunity to share some thoughts with you today.

    In the months ahead, I look forward to working with TFA to develop the policies which you need, which we all need, for rural Britain to reverse the years of decline and to become once again a vibrant place to work and a source of physical and emotional nourishment.

    And I will never forget that all too often, Government has been part of the problem not part of the solution.

  • Keir Starmer – 2022 Article on Rishi Sunak and the Environment

    Keir Starmer – 2022 Article on Rishi Sunak and the Environment

    A section of the article written by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, in the Observer Newspaper on 6 November 2022.

    Sunak is the latest person to attempt to govern an ungovernable party. He is unable to focus on Britain’s future because he’s plastering over the mess the Tories have made. Just this weekend, he used his first interview as prime minister to shrug his shoulders and say he can’t fix the problems we face. This tired, fatalistic, outdated approach is a recipe for more of the same. It has no chance of grasping a fairer, greener future.

    It is time for a fresh start. One that recognises the crises we face are linked and will only be solved by a new approach.

    The UK’s energy bills disaster was exacerbated by Putin’s grotesque invasion of Ukraine. But it was caused by 12 years of failure by Tory governments to unhook Britain from its dependence on fossil fuels.

    At the same time, we have an accelerating climate crisis, illustrated most recently by the devastating floods in Pakistan and Britain’s first 40C days.

    The truth of our age is that the solution to both of these calamities is adopting cheap, clean, homegrown power as fast as we can. We are lucky; our island nation has abundant natural resources of wind, water and solar. It is an act of national self-harm not to prioritise them over more expensive gas. I wouldn’t be dragged to Cop27 as prime minister, I’d be leading the way. My first objective would be to persuade world leaders that we need to get to clean energy as quickly as possible. It’s why I have set a world-leading commitment for Britain to be the first major economy to reach 100% clean power by 2030. The ambition of those plans is matched only by my determination to deliver them. Under my Labour government, the UK will become a clean energy superpower.

  • Alok Sharma – 2022 Speech at the Ceremonial Opening Speech at COP27

    Alok Sharma – 2022 Speech at the Ceremonial Opening Speech at COP27

    The speech made by Alok Sharma, the COP26 President, on 6 November 2022.

    Distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen, it gives me great pleasure to declare open the twenty-seventh session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

    Friends, let me begin by thanking our friends here in Egypt for such a warm welcome.

    My team and I know just how demanding hosting such a conference is, and how many people have worked incredibly hard to get us to this point.

    So congratulations, and thank you again.

    Now as the UK Presidency comes to an end, I want to reflect on what we achieved together in Glasgow,

    and also what has happened since in our Presidency year.

    Last November, the world gathered at COP26 against a fractured and fractious geopolitics, as a once-in-a-century pandemic dragged mercilessly on.

    And yet, leaders recognised that, despite their differences, often profound, cooperation on climate and nature is in our collective self-interest.

    And thanks to that spirit of cooperation and compromise, we forged together the Glasgow Climate Pact.

    Collectively we achieved something historic, and something hopeful.

    With your help:

    We closed the Paris Rulebook.

    We made unprecedented progress on coal, and on fossil fuel subsidies.

    We committed to rapidly scale up finance, and to double adaptation finance by 2025.

    We reiterated the urgency of action and support for loss and damage, and established serious work on funding arrangements.

    We hope that this will pave the way for a formal agenda item and tangible progress here in Egypt.

    And every Party, and I repeat this, every Party agreed to revisit and strengthen their 2030 emissions reduction targets, to align with Paris.

    I want to thank the 29 countries which have already updated their NDCs since Glasgow.

    From Australia to Micronesia.

    India to Vanuatu.

    Norway to Gabon.

    And we also made progress outside the negotiating rooms, with commitments from business, from finance, from philanthropy.

    Friends, thanks to the work we did together, we achieved our objective, the goal at the heart of the Paris Agreement:

    we kept 1.5 degrees alive.

    Now, none of us could have anticipated the year that followed.

    We have been buffeted by global headwinds that have tested our ability to make progress.

    Putin’s brutal and illegal war in Ukraine has precipitated multiple global crises: energy and food insecurity, inflationary pressures and spiralling debt.

    These crises have compounded existing climate vulnerabilities, and the scarring effects of the pandemic.

    And yet, despite this context, there has been some progress in implementing the commitments we delivered in Glasgow.

    Over 90 percent of the global economy is now covered by a net zero target, up from less than 30 percent when the UK took on the COP26 role.

    The biggest companies and financial institutions in the world have committed to net zero and they have done so in force,

    with a global wall of capital creating green jobs, and directing billions into the green industries of both today and tomorrow.

    Countries and companies are making tangible sectoral progress,

    from Zero Emission Vehicles to our Breakthrough Agenda,

    and are accelerating the rollout of renewable energy across the world.

    The Secretary General has been clear: our shared long-term futures do not lie in fossil fuels and I agree with him wholeheartedly.

    Every major report published this year underscores the point that progress is being made.

    Thanks to the commitments we garnered ahead of and at COP26, and indeed in our Presidency year, emissions in 2030 are expected to be around six gigatons lower.

    That is the equivalent of 12 percent of today’s global annual emissions.

    And with full implementation of all the commitments in place today, including NDCs and net zero targets, the reports suggest that we are heading to 1.7 degrees warming by the end of the century.

    Not 1.5.

    But still, progress.

    So, to those who remain sceptical about the multilateral process, and of the COP process in particular, my message is clear:

    as unwieldy and sometimes as frustrating as these processes can be, the system is delivering.

    And there are many people to thank for that.

    And certainly too many to name.

    The Prime Ministers and Presidents who have sensed the changing wind, and indeed sought instead to harness it.

    The Ministers to the miners who have recognised a just and sustainable future can only be delivered with a clean energy transition.

    The civil society organisations, youth representatives and indigenous peoples who pushed us to consider and reconsider what was possible in Glasgow, have continued to do so since.

    And, of course, the brilliant officials, the brilliant civil servants around the world, not least in the UK’s COP Unit, who have helped to deliver progress.

    And yet, despite this progress, I fully recognise the scale of the challenge still in front of us.

    Just as every report shows that we are making some progress, they are equally clear that there is so much more to be done in this critical decade.

    Friends, we are not currently on a pathway that keeps 1.5 in reach.

    And whilst I do understand that leaders around the world have faced competing priorities this year,

    we must be clear,

    as challenging as our current moment is, inaction is myopic, and can only defer climate catastrophe.

    We must find the ability to focus on more than one thing at once.

    How many more wake-up calls do world leaders actually need?

    A third of Pakistan under water.

    The worst flooding in Nigeria in a decade.

    This year, the worst drought in 500 years in Europe, in a thousand years in the US, and the worst on record in China.

    The cascading risks are also clear.

    Entire economic sectors becoming unsustainable and uninsurable,

    entire regions becoming unlivable,

    and the strain on the global movement of goods,

    and the pressure on people to relocate because of the climate crisis, becoming almost unimaginable.

    So, this conference must be about concrete action.

    And I hope that when the world leaders join us today, they will explain what their countries have achieved in the last year, and how they will go further.

    It is very simply, a matter of trust.

    Without its constituent members delivering on their commitments, and agreeing to go further, the entire system falters.

    I will do everything in my power to support our Egyptian friends.

    The UK is here to reach ambitious outcomes across the agenda, including on mitigation, on adaptation, and on loss and damage.

    And we know that we have reached a point where finance makes or breaks the programme of work that we have ahead of us.

    So whilst I would point to some of the progress shown on the $100 billion,

    I hear the criticisms, and I agree that more must be done, by governments and by the Multilateral Development Banks,

    including on doubling adaptation finance by 2025, and establishing a post-2025 goal.

    Ultimately though, I remain hopeful.

    Look back to where we were before Glasgow.

    Look back to where we were before Paris.

    Indeed, as we mark the thirtieth anniversary, look back to where we were before Rio.

    With thanks to all of you, the UK’s Presidency ends as a demonstration that progress is possible, is happening and is continuing.

    Yes, we need to accelerate that progress in the remainder of this decisive decade.

    But I believe fundamentally that we can.

    We know what we need to do to keep 1.5 degrees alive.

    We know how to do it.

    And Sameh, you and your team have our full support.

    So now friends, let’s make sure we delivery, let’s make it happen.

    Thank you.