Author: admin

  • PRESS RELEASE : Report by the Head of OSCE Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina – UK statement [March 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : Report by the Head of OSCE Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina – UK statement [March 2026]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 26 March 2026.

    UK Chargé d’Affaires, Deputy Ambassador James Ford, welcomes the OSCE Mission’s continued public advocacy and work on election integrity, reconciliation and dialogue between communities.

    Thank you, Mr Chair.

    And welcome Ambassador Holtzapple to the Permanent Council. As you know, the United Kingdom is a strong supporter of your Mission’s work.

    Mr Chair, the United Kingdom remains committed to supporting a more inclusive, stable and transparent Bosnia and Herzegovina within the framework of the Dayton Peace Agreement. We are working with our international partners to support domestic institutions to respond to threats to Dayton, and to encourage constructive engagement from leaders in the wider region.  

    We believe that following the recent presidential elections in Republika Srpska there is an opportunity for the new RS President to draw a line under the past and move towards a functional, stable Republika Srpska entity respectful of the BiH constitution. We encourage all politicians – including the current leadership of Republika Srpska – to work for the benefit of all the citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

    The United Kingdom strongly values the OSCE Mission’s strong public advocacy and continuing work on reconciliation and facilitating dialogue between communities. A more inclusive and cohesive society is essential to achieving a positive future for the whole of Bosnia and Herzegovina. We particularly value the insight and proactive engagement by the nine OSCE Field Offices across the country and their role towards strengthening inter-ethnic relations. This has remained especially important amid recent divisive and inflammatory rhetoric.

    We welcome ongoing efforts to draft reforms to BiH’s Constitution and Election Law, to address electoral discrimination and bring BiH in line with European Court of Human Rights requirements. It is positive news that the Working Group, established to advance this process, has committed to meeting again this month to discuss reform proposals. We urge continued and sustained efforts to implement these reforms ahead of October’s general elections.

    The UK is pleased to have contributed to the Mission’s programme of support for improving the integrity of electoral processes in BiH. The successful rollout of election technology is a key part of strengthening political plurality and bolstering trust in democratic processes.  

    Lastly, I wanted to recognise the role played by OSCE field missions in delivering cost savings which allowed the adoption of the 2026 OSCE budget, for the first time in five years. Decisions around staffing cuts have been difficult, and we thank you for engaging so constructively with the process.

    Thank you again, Ambassador Holtzapple, for your leadership of the Mission at this important time. We highly appreciate the hard work and expertise of your team, and wish you continued success.

    Thank you, Mr Chair.

  • Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Interview with Laura Kuenssberg

    Kemi Badenoch – 2026 Interview with Laura Kuenssberg

    The text of the interview with Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Conservative Party, on 29 March 2026.

    Laura Kuenssberg: Well, Kemi Badenoch, as promised, Leader of the Opposition is here. Welcome to the studio. Now, we’ve been talking about energy with the Energy Secretary, the Conservatives are saying you should open up North Sea exploration. But how much would that actually save consumers? Because that’s what everyone’s worried about.

    Kemi Badenoch: So, what we want to see is the licences for Jackdaw and Rosebank lifted so that they can start drilling…

    Laura Kuenssberg: Fields off the North Sea.

    Kemi Badenoch: …there’s the pipeline ready there. Overall, the figures that we would have, in terms of what we would get from tax, takes about £25bn over ten years.

    Laura Kuenssberg: But what does that mean for consumers?

    Kemi Badenoch: £2.5bn could be spent on lowering household bills. There are various figures, up to £80.00. This is just one thing that you could do but also the profits and the taxes which are made from the drilling can be used to subsidise bills. Drilling is part of – drilling the North Sea is something that we need to do for our energy security, financial security as well. That’s how you get national security.

    Laura Kuenssberg: But your Shadow Energy Secretary, Claire Coutinho, who was with us a couple of weeks ago, she said on the record it wouldn’t necessarily save very much money. She said that when she was in government.

    Kemi Badenoch: Directly, directly but indirectly, yes, it does because you can use the money from there to subsidise. But more importantly jobs are disappearing, we are losing about 1,000 jobs a month in the North Sea oil and gas industry. This is very bad for Scotland in particular. We’re not getting the tax revenue. You know, the government is not sloshing around with money, it’s spending loads on benefits. Let’s use the oil and gas that we have.

    Laura Kuenssberg: But I just want to stick on that point because you’re trying to make a big deal of this in political campaigning at the moment. But you’ve just said there that it might not help people directly with their bills but you’re presenting this as a solution to people’s fears about their bills.

    Kemi Badenoch: It’s because it requires the governments to make the link. It requires the government. The drilling isn’t going to go directly onto people’s bills, no. But if we can make sure that we stop importing from Norway. 40 per cent of our imports are coming from Norway who are drilling in the same basin. Why are we importing gas that is being drilled in that basin when we won’t drill our own? Why is it – this is a wider thing, it goes beyond bills. We want to bring bills down. We’ve got a cheap power plan for that, mostly by scrapping the silly taxes that Ed Miliband has put on, scrapping the Carbon Tax. We can do that, do something to bring bills down.

    But drilling in the North Sea is a bigger issue. This is about our energy security. Yes, let’s have renewables, yes, let’s have nuclear, but just saying no to North Sea oil and gas, something that is already there when we are not ready for a full transition, is a bad decision.

    Laura Kuenssberg: But it’s important to be clear to people about what you’re saying because you’re making a big deal of this in a campaigning moment. We’re approaching local elections, you’re implying that this is what would help people with their bills soon.

    Kemi Badenoch: It can, yes, it can.

    Laura Kuenssberg: But your colleague said it wouldn’t make a big difference but you—

    Kemi Badenoch: She said that in government in a totally context. So, let’s not… let’s not mix the two things up. Several years ago.

    Laura Kuenssberg: Okay, but you said it would help, you’ve said it might help indirectly. So, let’s just be clear about that because your political opponents say you’re misleading people by…

    Kemi Badenoch: No, not, not at all.

    Laura Kuenssberg: … if you’re going to say drill baby drill is a solution.

    Kemi Badenoch: We need to drill – we need to drill our oil and gas. We can scrap – we can scrap taxes on energy bills today. We don’t need to have them on. Many people don’t know how much of their energy bills are government taxes. We can drill in the North Sea and use the money from that to supplement, to replace. It is all related. Energy policy needs to be linked. No, I’m not saying that once you drill oil and gas in the North Sea it’s going to go straight onto your bills. No-one has said that but it is all related. And pretending that is not related is very dishonest from a government that has a terrible energy policy.

    Laura Kuenssberg: And if you take what you called ‘silly taxes’ off bills, and scrapped some of the levies, where do you get the money from to do things that energy experts tell you are absolutely vital like updating the National Grid, supporting renewables businesses? Some of those renewables subsidies have already gone from bills. But where do you get that money from if it doesn’t go on energy bills?

    Kemi Badenoch: Well, maybe we can get it from the taxes that we get from the North Sea oil and gas industry that we’re destroying. We need to make sure that we are thinking things through. Right now, what we are seeing is that the Net Zero plans are not working, we’re not getting a good transition to renewables, and we’re stopping the oil and gas drilling. So, we’re getting the worst of both worlds. What I’m saying is let’s make sure we use gas in particular, which is a transition fuel, to actually get to where we need to go.

    Laura Kuenssberg: In terms then of what might happen though, in this autumn, because this is what people are worried about. Important to remember bills in the next quarter are going to come down but what many experts are predicting is that they’re going to come up in the autumn.

    Kemi Badenoch: Yes.

    Laura Kuenssberg: The government said that they would support people who were the least well off, who needed help most. Who would you say should have support with their energy bill?

    Kemi Badenoch: So, what I’m very concerned about is that the government is prioritising benefits, benefits, benefits constantly. Right now, what I want to see is them taking the burden off everybody. That’s why I’m very focused on these taxes on bills because they help everyone.

    Laura Kuenssberg: No, but who would you support? That’s our question here. Who would you support? So, Liz Truss paid everybody’s energy bill when there was the last energy shock around the war in Ukraine, costing tens of billions to the taxpayer. Who would get support if you were in charge?

    Kemi Badenoch: So, I’m rejecting the premise of the question. I want to help everybody but we don’t have to do it with government intervention. This money is not in Keir Starmer’s pocket, it’s taxpayers’ money. So, when we say who would you support? We’re taking money from taxpayers to give to other people. And what I have said—

    Laura Kuenssberg: So, would nobody get support then with their energy bills?

    Kemi Badenoch: No, that’s not what I’ve said. I’ve said support in a different way.

    Laura Kuenssberg: So, what does that mean?

    Kemi Badenoch: Take the taxes off the bills. It’s our cheap power plan, take the taxes off the bills, those green taxes. That is a much easier way to do it. Drill in the North Sea and then you get taxes that way. It’s much more coherent.

    Laura Kuenssberg: But this is an important question. So, you can reject the premise of the question if you want…

    Kemi Badenoch: Yes.

    Laura Kuenssberg: … but I can hear people screaming at their TV, saying who would get help if there’s an energy spike and perhaps the answer is no one?

    Kemi Badenoch: And I… and I’m saying – no, I literally said we can help everybody, just not in this way.

    Laura Kuenssberg: So, are you—

    Kemi Badenoch: We need to stop pretending that there’s a big pile of cash that Keir Starmer has, which he’s just going to use to help people. He is taxing other people in order to provide that help. I am talking to businesses day in, day out, who are saying we’re sacking people, we’re closing down, because we cannot afford this. So, let’s stop pretending that Keir Starmer is a huge philanthropist who’s just trying to help people. What he is doing is taxing people to pay benefits.

    Laura Kuenssberg: That’s been—

    Kemi Badenoch: That has been this government’s strategy from the get-go…

    Laura Kuenssberg: But I want to—

    Kemi Badenoch: … and I’m saying lower taxes.

    Laura Kuenssberg: What I want to be very clear, though, is if there is a big spike in people’s energy bills, are you ruling out a direct—

    Kemi Badenoch: So, I’m not ruling out, I’m not ruling out anything. What I’m saying is let’s start off with taking the taxes. We do what we need to in government. I think government needs to do what it needs to. But let’s not pretend that these huge bailouts don’t come with a cost. We had, as a Conservative government, the biggest bailout during Covid. We paid people to stay at home and when it was happening everyone said thank you. But immediately afterwards, when the shock came, interest rates spiked, everyone forgot about that. I’m saying governments need to start by taking taxes down first before looking for bailouts which are going to cost taxpayers.

    Laura Kuenssberg: It’s a very clear philosophical divide between you and Keir Starmer but I’m just trying to press you. And maybe the answer is that you don’t know yet, you want to wait and see. But are you saying that you would never consider a direct payment to people to help with their energy bills?

    Kemi Badenoch: No, I’m not, I’m not saying that at all. What I don’t want to do is talk about the hypothetical and speculative things and set hares running when actually we don’t know what the situation is. We have, as Conservatives, done bailouts before, as you saw during Covid, the biggest bailout. Many people now see what the effects of that are. What I’m saying is that bailouts have a cost.

    Start off by reducing the taxes, drill in the North Sea, it’s good for our energy security, our financial security, our national security. Listening to Bridget sitting there saying we need to do everything, except the North Sea because of their ideological issues with it. This is all to do with Ed Miliband, he started this. He started these policies back when he was first energy secretary. He is the one running the government according to Keir Starmer. I asked him on Wednesday, he said he couldn’t make a decision because of Ed Miliband. I think that’s quite ridiculous.

    Laura Kuenssberg: Well, the Conservatives also changed their positions on energy quite a lot in recent years too. And just, we are—

    Kemi Badenoch: Well I’ve changed, I’ve changed our policy. We are under new leadership and I’m being very specific. We need to do what is right for the country today.

    Laura Kuenssberg: In terms of your leadership, what does a good result look for you like in the local elections in a few weeks’ time, and the national elections in Scotland and Wales?

    Kemi Badenoch: So, I’ve been very clear that we’ve got to fight for every seat. The era of two-party politics has turned into an era of multi-party politics. Things are different and we only just left office 18 months ago. It’s going to be very tough, and a challenge, but Conservatives are coming back. People are liking—

    Laura Kuenssberg: Are you going to gain seats?

    Kemi Badenoch: People are liking the messages. I’m sure that we will. People are liking the messages that they are hearing from us, abolishing stamp duty, getting rid of business rates for most of the high street.

    Laura Kuenssberg: Not according to their polls. I mean your personal ratings have improved a bit since – in the last couple of months. But according to the polls, and there they are as if by magic, you were 26 per cent when you took over, now you’re down at 17 per cent. The public doesn’t agree with you.

    Kemi Badenoch: Well, actually, as I said the last time you asked me this question on your show, sometimes when you have a long term strategy, in the short term you do face difficulties. But I’m not going to be dissuaded from doing the right thing. There is only one party that is actually making proper plans, not just announcing random things, and that’s the Conservative Party. Serious plans and people are – when the general election comes, people are going to want to know what is actually going to happen. And they’ll be looking to the Conservative Party because we’re the only credible alternative to Labour.

    Laura Kuenssberg: Okay, well we will see. Kemi Badenoch, thanks very much indeed for coming in to see us today.

  • PRESS RELEASE : UN Human Rights Council 61 – UK Statement for the Interactive Dialogue on Mali [Mach 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : UN Human Rights Council 61 – UK Statement for the Interactive Dialogue on Mali [Mach 2026]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 26 March 2026.

    UK Statement for the Item 10 Interactive Dialogue with the Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Mali. Delivered at the 61st Human Rights Council in Geneva.

    Thank you, Mr Vice President,

    The United Kingdom welcomes Mali’s continued engagement with the Human Rights Council and the mandate of the Independent Expert. Respect for human rights, justice and accountability is fundamental to achieving lasting security and stability, and we urge the government of Mali to maintain their engagement with the Independent Expert.

    The human rights situation remains concerning. We are troubled by ongoing reports of violations and abuses affecting civilians, including women and children. As the Independent Expert notes, armed opposition groups violate international humanitarian law with impunity. Restrictions on civic space, the detention of opposition figures and journalists, and limitations on political participation are also of concern.

    The United Kingdom remains committed to supporting the Malian people. This financial year, the UK is providing around $55 million in assistance, including support for health, education, and humanitarian assistance for those displaced by conflict.

    We welcome efforts taken by the government of Mali to address challenges facing the Malian people and encourage them to take further steps to strengthen the protection of human rights and end impunity.

    Mr Vice President, what further steps could the international community take to support Mali in strengthening accountability and protecting civic space?

  • PRESS RELEASE : UN Human Rights Council 61: UK Statement on the Democratic Republic of the Congo [March 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : UN Human Rights Council 61: UK Statement on the Democratic Republic of the Congo [March 2026]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 26 March 2026.

    UK Statement for the Item 10 Enhanced Interactive Dialogue on the oral update by the High Commissioner on the situation of human rights in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Delivered at the 61st Human Rights Council in Geneva.

    Thank you, Madame Vice President.

    The UK thanks the Deputy High Commissioner for her update on the situation of human rights in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, including the challenges and concerns that she has raised. We urge the DRC government to engage with these.

    The UK remains gravely concerned by the situation in eastern DRC, where the security and human rights situation continues to deteriorate, driven by M23’s advances with the support of the Rwanda Defence Force.

    Intensifying armed conflict has displaced more than 5 million people, and widespread human rights abuses and violations are being committed by all parties to the conflict. We remain particularly concerned by the scale of conflict-related sexual violence. We remind all parties of their obligations under international law to hold perpetrators to account.

    At the same time, humanitarian workers face unprecedent obstacles. We urge all parties to allow full and unhindered humanitarian access.

    The UK calls on all parties to the conflict to immediately respect the ceasefire, return to the negotiating table and implement their commitments under the Doha Framework and Washington Accords.

    Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : New legislation to keep brothers and sisters connected in care [March 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : New legislation to keep brothers and sisters connected in care [March 2026]

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 26 March 2026.

    Right to maintain contact with siblings to be strengthened in law for children in care via amendment to Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill.

    Children in care will be better supported to build and maintain relationships with their brothers and sisters under new measures brought forward in law by the government, making life better for vulnerable children and ensuring they have the opportunity to get on in life.

    All local authorities in England and Wales will be required to promote and facilitate contact for children in care who are separated from their siblings. This change puts sibling contact on an equal footing with parental contact —recognising the vital role these relationships play in providing stability, continuity and emotional support.

    Currently, sibling relationships are not prioritised as much as parent relationships for children in care by local authorities. Many care-experienced people have talked about the difficulties of losing contact with siblings as a result of being placed in care, and the long term impact this can have.

    The new legislation will ensure that local authorities will do all they can to provide sibling contact, even if, for instance, they are living a long way away from each other. This includes half and step siblings.

    It will apply unless it is not in children’s best interests, such as in cases of violence or abuse or where social workers have other concerns about wellbeing.

    Children’s Minister Josh MacAlister said:

    It’s a travesty that children in care can end up losing contact with their brothers and sisters when they go into care, and we want that contact to be maintained wherever possible for the sake of their emotional stability and their futures.

    Every child’s circumstances are different, but this amendment is aimed at making life better for more vulnerable children and giving them the best possible start in life.

    Chris Hoyle, who was in the care system as a child, said:

    After being initially separated, being reunited with my brother in the same foster placement changed my life. My brother is the longest relationship I have ever had, by some distance. How do you define the value of that? How do you put a price on still being in contact with the person who loved you first? I can’t. 

    Jonny is a rock in my life. A 6’2 rock who supports the wrong football team. He keeps me grounded in my identity and provides a safety net that has lasted a lifetime.

    The Department for Education once called us ‘The Hoyle Brothers’. We are a package deal thanks to the bravery of senior staff who decided that sharing a bedroom was not worth losing something that cannot be bought.

    Wherever it is safe and possible, the relationships of siblings in care should be a priority. Those relationships can last a lifetime and are priceless.

    Parice, who has experienced the care system, said:

    Sibling relationships are often built on a strong foundation of support, offering both emotional reassurance and practical help throughout life.

    For those who have experienced the foster care system, these bonds can be especially significant, providing a vital sense of belonging in times of uncertainty. Shared history and memories create a unique connection, alongside similarities that can feel unlike any other relationship.

    The amendment to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill was welcomed in the House of Lords on Wednesday 25 March, following continued discussions with stakeholders and parliamentarians. Final confirmation is expected following further debate in the House of Commons after Easter.

    This change forms part of the government’s wider work to reform children’s social care and ensure that every child has the opportunity to grow up in a stable, loving environment.

    This includes work to reduce care placements far from home, and allocating £10.8 million for an expansion of Regional Care Co-operatives to enable better placement planning for children in care.

    The DfE is also supporting more siblings in care to stay together with ambitious plans to create 10,000 more foster care places, backed by a total investment of £88m, including £25m to expand existing foster carers’ homes so they can foster more children, including sibling groups. 

    This is on top of £2.4 billion of investment in the Families First Partnership Programme to help keep families together through early intervention, a pilot for financial support for kinship carers, and reforms to support for adoptive families.

    Cathy Ashley, Chief Executive of Family Rights Group, said:

    Growing up alongside brothers or sisters is a fundamental part of childhood that so many of us take for granted. Yet, for too long, our care system has overseen a quiet injustice that the wider public rarely sees: breaking the links between siblings, often when they need one another the most. 

    By tabling this amendment, the Government is finally righting this historic wrong. When we provide young people with the right scaffolding, we set them up for a lifetime of success, and sibling bonds are the very foundation of that support. This is a victory for care-experienced young people to ensure our system actively protects the relationships that matter most.

    Anela Anwar, Chief Executive of Become, said:

    We’re delighted the government has agreed to change the law to better protect relationships between children in care and their siblings.

    Too often, children are separated from their brothers and sisters, with little done to maintain those relationships. This change will strengthen duties on local authorities to keep siblings connected and better protect these vital bonds.

    The amendment is part of the government’s landmark Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill which is the most transformative piece of child protection legislation in a generation and will put children at the centre of education and social care.

    The government will continue working with the sector to support implementation, share best practice, and ensure children across the country benefit from stronger, more stable care arrangements.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Russia’s illegal occupation of Crimea and continued aggression against Ukraine – UK statement to the OSCE [March 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : Russia’s illegal occupation of Crimea and continued aggression against Ukraine – UK statement to the OSCE [March 2026]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 26 March 2026.

    UK Chargé d’Affaires, Deputy Ambassador James Ford, condemns Russia’s attempts to justify its illegal occupation of Crimea. He reaffirms that Crimea is Ukraine and calls on Russia to end its occupation and cease its wider war of aggression.

    Thank you, Mr Chair.

    Last week, Russia used this Council to “celebrate” the so‑called reunification of Crimea with the Russian Federation. Russia even claimed that this “confirms that there are alternatives to violence and hatred”.

    Mr Chair that was disinformation not worthy of this forum, and it warrants a clear rebuttal.  Russia knows that its invasion, occupation and attempted annexation of Crimea in 2014 was achieved through force. And nothing in the reality of Crimea today supports the narrative Russia presented here last week.

    In the drafting of the Helsinki Final Act, the USSR itself was insistent on the inviolability of frontiers in Europe. It is notable that Russia is now the State seeking to erode this foundation of our collective security.

    Indeed, Russia’s actions in Crimea in 2014 violated multiple Helsinki principles, including: sovereign equality; the inviolability of frontiers; territorial integrity; refraining from the threat or use of force; and the peaceful settlement of disputes. The events of 2014 were not a spontaneous expression of popular will. They followed an anti‑constitutional seizure of territory, conducted under military occupation, and accompanied by systematic pressure on local populations. This included Crimean Tatars, whose fundamental rights have since been routinely violated.

    Twelve years on, Russia’s attempts to retroactively justify its actions do not alter these facts. Nor do they change the reality that Crimea’s occupation marked another milestone – alongside Russia’s actions in Moldova and Georgia – in Moscow’s assault on European security. Russia’s actions of 2014 culminated in the full‑scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and of course continue today.

    Independent reporting shows that the tactics Russia employed in Crimea have since been applied across other occupied areas of Ukraine: methods like detention, disappearances and deportations, targeting Ukrainian communities and attempting to erode Ukrainian identity.

    And Russia’s continued large‑scale aerial assaults across Ukraine demonstrate how this same pattern of coercion and disregard for civilian life continues today. Earlier this week, Russia launched nearly one thousand drones and dozens of missiles in the largest attack over a 24-hour period since the war began. Among the sites damaged were Lviv’s 16th‑century Bernardine Monastery – a UNESCO World Heritage site – and a maternity hospital. These attacks are part of a sustained strategy of intimidation that demonstrates, yet again, Russia’s contempt for peace talks and its refusal to resolve disputes through diplomatic or lawful means.

    Mr Chair, OSCE participating States have repeatedly reaffirmed the Helsinki Final Act and underlined that its principles are non‑negotiable. Russia agreed to these principles freely; in fact, it strongly advocated for some of them. It cannot choose to invoke them when convenient while discarding them in practice.

    The United Kingdom reaffirms that Crimea is part of Ukraine, today as in 2014. We call on Russia to meet its OSCE commitments by ending its occupation of Crimean territory, and all occupied territory, and ceasing its war of aggression against Ukraine.

    Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Government safeguards critical UK CO2 supplies with restart of plant [March 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : Government safeguards critical UK CO2 supplies with restart of plant [March 2026]

    The press release issued by the Department for Business and Trade on 26 March 2026.

    The Government has shored up the UK’s critical supplies of CO2 vital for Britain’s nuclear, packaged meats, fresh food and healthcare by temporarily restarting the Ensus bioethanol plant in Wilton, Teesside.

    • CO2 supplies vital for critical sectors protected as government backs plant to resume production.
    • Three-month temporary plant restart measure provides resilience for CO2 supply essential for healthcare, food supply, and civil nuclear. 
    • Government had safeguarded CO2 production at the plant for this situation, ensuring Britain maintains critical supply during Iran war disruption.

    The Government has shored up the UK’s critical supplies of CO2 vital for Britain’s nuclear, packaged meats, fresh food and healthcare by temporarily restarting the Ensus bioethanol plant in Wilton, Teesside today.  

    The Ensus plant will operate for a three-month period, to bolster domestic CO2 production significantly, providing more resilience to essential sectors. The plant ceased production in Autumn 2025 and was set to close permanently; however, following intervention by the Government, the company agreed to keep it on standby to provide resilience for critical sectors. 

    Disruptions to European fertiliser production — combined with difficult market conditions — have significantly reduced the reliability of CO2 imports, and rising gas prices driven by the Iran conflict, plus unplanned maintenance at several European CO2 producing sites, mean that the UK’s market for CO2 risks being undersupplied. 

    Given the potential impact of a shortage on essential UK sectors, including healthcare, nuclear and food and drink production, the Government has taken the decision to back the restart of activity at Ensus to safeguard critical national infrastructure and maintain a resilient supply of CO2. 

    When the Government could have stepped back and let the plant close last year, we stepped in to keep it on standby. 

    The Government has been in negotiations with Ensus since September to temporarily retain the plant and its operation, to give it the optionality to restart production when needed.  This is the difference an active and strategic state makes.

    Business Secretary Peter Kyle said: 

    As a government of action we will always do what’s needed to ensure resilience and protect British businesses from the worst impacts of global uncertainty. That’s why we have been in discussions with Ensus since September to keep this critical plant on standby for situations like this. 

    By restarting this plant we’ve acted swiftly to boost the resilience of our supply chains and protect critical UK sectors like food production, water and healthcare, as well as the jobs and communities that depend on these industries.” 

    This action forms part of wider government work designed to ensure the UK maintains access to its critical industrial inputs during global supply shocks, such as the ongoing Iran conflict. 

    The Government will continue to monitor market conditions closely and will work with industry, including CO2 suppliers, to manage supply, and ensure value for money for the taxpayer. 

    The Government is also taking steps to diversify the UK’s long term CO2 supply, to strengthen UK resilience and reduce future reliance on imports. We will work with industry on our long term plan to secure resilience in the sector. 

    While previous governments closed Britain’s gas storage, time and again we have stepped in to support our resilience: from keeping the blast furnaces running at Scunthorpe to saving the chemical cracker at Grangemouth. 

    Grant Pearson, Chairman of Ensus, said: 

    This agreement of support from the UK Government is excellent news for our employees and those in our extensive supply chain. It strengthens the broader Teesside manufacturing economy and the UK’s resilience in relation to biogenic CO2 supplies, which are vital to food and drinks companies, as well as being important to hospitals, abattoirs and the nuclear industry. 

    When the production plant is in operation the deal will also be very supportive to the UK agricultural and fuel markets including the expansion required in more sustainable aviation and maritime fuels and the future manufacture of more sustainable chemicals. 

  • NEWS STORY : Asda boss denies petrol price rigging amid Iran-linked fuel spike

    NEWS STORY : Asda boss denies petrol price rigging amid Iran-linked fuel spike

    STORY

    Asda’s executive chairman Allan Leighton has denied that the supermarket is rigging petrol prices to take advantage of the crisis linked to Iran, as motorists face rising costs and temporary shortages at some forecourts. He said higher prices were being driven by increased wholesale costs and tight supply rather than profiteering by retailers.

    Leighton said demand had jumped as drivers filled up in expectation of further price rises, putting pressure on supplies at some of Asda’s 800 petrol stations. He said the company was selling more fuel but was not being given extra allocations by suppliers, leading to short-lived shortages of petrol or diesel at some sites.

    His comments came after petrol prices in Britain rose above 150p a litre, with the conflict in the Middle East adding to pressure on oil markets and fuel supply chains. Leighton rejected suggestions that retailers were exploiting the situation, saying Asda’s own margins were being squeezed rather than expanded by the recent turmoil.

  • NEWS STORY : US President Mocks British Aircraft Carriers

    NEWS STORY : US President Mocks British Aircraft Carriers

    STORY

    Donald Trump has caused anger in Britain after dismissing the UK’s aircraft carriers as “toys” and saying their support was not needed. The remark, made as he criticised allied contributions during the Iran conflict, was widely seen as a slight against one of America’s closest military partners and against the service personnel connected to the Royal Navy’s carrier fleet.

    The comments were also politically awkward because they came at a time when Trump was again attacking NATO allies more broadly, questioning the value of the alliance and complaining about the level of support offered by European partners. That has added to the sense of a US president increasingly at odds with traditional allies rather than trying to hold them together.

    In Britain, the insult landed badly because the two carriers, HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales, are major national defence assets and symbols of British military commitment.

    The timing has only sharpened criticism of the beleaguered President who is fending off allegations of corruption and involvement with the Epstein Files. Reuters/Ipsos polling published this week put Trump’s approval rating at 36%, representing a further fall.

  • PRESS RELEASE : £1 billion to cut costs for businesses, drive growth and clean up UK roads [March 2026]

    PRESS RELEASE : £1 billion to cut costs for businesses, drive growth and clean up UK roads [March 2026]

    The press release issued by the Department for Transport on 25 March 2026.

    The Zero Emissions Truck and Van grants and the Depot Charging Scheme aim to help businesses make the switch to electric vans and trucks.

    • £1 billion boost for British businesses to roll out clean trucks and vans and install new EV chargers at depots – helping to build resilience against fuel price uncertainty
    • companies will save up to £81,000 off the heaviest zero emission trucks – covering up to 40% of the cost – and up to £5,000 off new zero emission vans, cutting costs, supporting jobs, and slashing emissions
    • Businesses and public authorities will also save up to £1 million when installing chargers for vans, coaches, and HGVs

    Businesses across the UK are being backed to roll out electric vans and trucks with £1 billion of funding – saving them cash, cleaning up millions of journey miles, and helping hauliers become more resistant to global price changes.

    The Zero Emissions Truck and Van grants and the Depot Charging Scheme (DCS) aim to tackle two of the biggest barriers to businesses making the switch – upfront costs and access to charging.

    Global fuel price uncertainty is challenging for businesses, and these grants will support industry to switch to electric, helping to reduce exposure to fuel price uncertainty.

    The truck grant will offer savings of up to £81,000 off the heaviest zero emissions trucks, covering up to 40% of the cost. The van grant will continue to offer discounts of up to £5,000 off the cost of electric vans.

    On top of that, businesses and public authorities could save up to £1 million, covering up to 70% of the cost, when installing charging infrastructure for vans, coaches, and eHGVs, thanks to a £170 million boost to the government’s Depot Charging Scheme.

    Aviation, Maritime and Decarbonisation Minister Keir Mather, said:

    This £1 billion investment cuts cost for British businesses, supports jobs, cleans up our roads, and gives operators protection against shifting global fuel prices.

    The logistics sector is the backbone of the UK economy, worth £170 billion and supporting 2.7 million jobs. We’re helping them expand and decarbonise their fleets whilst saving them cash, driving growth up and down the country.

    The new funding comes after the government announced an £18 million uplift in January to slash up to £120,000 off the cost of green lorries, making it cheaper for businesses to go electric, with companies like M&S and Wren Kitchens and Bedrooms taking advantage of funding to decarbonise their fleets and reduce operational costs.

    Lee Holmes, Transport and Logistics Director at Wren Kitchens and Bedrooms, said:

    Government investment gives businesses like Wren the confidence to accelerate fleet decarbonisation while maintaining operational stability, even in periods of economic uncertainty.

    With this support, we’ve brought a number of 44-tonne e-trucks into our fleet alongside a rapid charging infrastructure, reducing our reliance on traditional fuels and strengthening resilience and reliability against ongoing market volatility.

    Julian Bailey, Head of Group Transport at M&S, said:

    In 2021, we set ourselves the ambitious target of becoming a net zero business across our value chain by 2040. Since then, we’ve made some great progress, which includes the onboarding of 24 battery electric vehicles across our transport fleet.

    We welcome this investment which serves as a reminder of the importance of the logistics sector in the UK and its role in decarbonisation.

    Alongside support for operators, the government is also helping families make the switch through the Electric Car Grant which has helped over 80,000 drivers buy an EV, by saving them up to £3750 in the process. This is tackling upfront costs which is one of the biggest barriers to EV adoption.

    With 1 in 4 cars sold now electric, it’s crucial to expand the UK’s charging infrastructure and so the government is spending over £600 million to rollout hundreds of thousands of EV chargers across the country, giving drivers the confidence they’ll be able to charge up whether at home, at work or on the go. This will build on the over 118,000 chargers already available.

    Toby Poston, BVRLA Chief Executive said:

    The Depot Charging Scheme is playing a vital role in helping fleet operators and rental companies to install affordable, reliable charging infrastructure at their depots.

    The vehicle rental sector faces one of the most challenging paths to decarbonisation, and this additional support for depot charging will play a major role in building confidence. It will encourage more rental operators – particularly SMEs – to electrify at scale, reduce costs, and contribute to the UK’s net zero goals.