Author: admin

  • John Hayes – 2011 Speech to the Association of Colleges Annual Conference

    John Hayes – 2011 Speech to the Association of Colleges Annual Conference

    The speech made by John Hayes, the then Education Minister, on 15 November 2011.

    Thank you Kirsty [Wark] and good afternoon everyone.

    It’s always pleasant when I’m able to begin a speech with congratulations.

    I’m sure you’ll all want to join me in congratulating Kirsty Wark on the impressively high levels of skill in the kitchen she displayed recently by reaching the final of the BBC Celebrity Masterchef competition.

    That was quite an achievement. The daytime television enthusiasts among you who have seen the show will know that its catchphrase is

    “Cooking doesn’t get tougher than this”.

    Speaking of great achievements, a second helping of congratulations must go to the UK team that competed at last month’s WorldSkills competition who are here today.

    I’m sure most of you know how fiercely competitive WorldSkills is. Yet our team, over half of whom were apprentices or former apprentices, won 5 Gold medals, 2 silvers, and 6 bronzes, plus 12 Medallions for Excellence. That placed us 5th out of 51in the competition, ahead of Germany, France, our best-ever finish.

    One of our gold medals was for cookery.

    And I can say with all due deference to Kirsty that cooking really doesn’t get tougher than that.

    If the members of the team would like to stand up. I’m sure that everyone here would like to take a closer look at the best of the best our skills system can produce and people who represent the level of achievement to which all our learners should be able to aspire.

    And I’m sure we’d all like to show them our appreciation.

    Given the fall from the state of grace with which we’ve all been struggling almost since the beginning of time, I understand why few human beings see as many reasons to be cheerful as I do.

    But we can all be cheerful about the progress the further education sector has made; is making. Progress through the changes we’ve made since coming to Government.

    It’s good to remember just how much needed to change.

    For how long FE was neglected.

    It’s easy to forget just how far we’ve travelled together over the last 18 months.

    Just how many petty restrictions we have swept away,

    Just how many pointless quangos are no longer around to interfere with your work.

    And just how many more apprentices are there gaining the skills and experience upon which they can build good careers and fulfilled lives?

    By the way, anyone who has still to be convinced of the importance of Apprenticeships could do worse than read the Institute for Public Policy Research’s new pamphlet Rethinking Apprenticeships, which is being published today and to which Vince Cable, Martin Doel and I all have contributed.

    There is always more we can do. But a record 442,700 apprenticeships starts is an achievement of which you can be proud and the Government can be proud too.

    Last year, when I spoke to you, I set out our vision of a free sector supporting growth and social renewal.

    Today I want to describe not only the journey we have been on together since then. But also the next steps.

    Of course, I know that in the FE sector new beginnings have never been in short supply. Over the last 10 years we’ve had

    Four skills strategies, two FE strategies and the Leitch Review.

    Three Acts of Parliament, the old LSC agenda for change.

    And countless Secretaries of State, and even more FE Ministers.

    I hope you agree that since we came to power the message has been clear. And it’s not all down to me, despite the compliments from the Secretary of State for Education; he deserves so much credit for all he is doing. FE – no longer the neglected middle child between schools and HE, but the prodigal son.

    And the strategy I formed with you, for you, at the outset holds firm.

    Because the simple truth at its heart holds true; it is this: If we want skills provision sufficiently responsive to meet dynamic economic and social needs, power must rest in your hands.

    In framing our plans, having listened to you over the years, I had no doubt about your capacity to respond to the most radical change in the assumptions about FE in recent years.

    This is systemic change. A paradigm shift; a sector that moves quickly.

    I am so proud of what you have achieved. Thank you.

    I am especially pleased with the way you have delivered on apprenticeships – the biggest growth in apprenticeship numbers ever. There are now 267,200 apprenticeship starts for 16-24 year olds; and 175,500 for 25+.

    That’s growing the skills of our workforce by building people’s prospects.

    This summer, we gave you yet another document. New Challenges, New Chances. It cements the strategy by responding again to what you have said.

    Following the consultation to which so many of you responded – and thank again you for that – we’re now on the verge of another package of reforms.

    But never again a signpost to a future that will never happen.

    I can’t anticipate the changes and challenges that will face our successors when our time is done, but I know that by building our strategy on time honoured principles we’ll be fit to face the journey to the future.

    A future of lives changed for the better because of the difference your work makes.

    Now “we have longer ways to go. But no matter, the road is life. “

    My direction of travel has been plotted on the roadmap you can help to draw. We have not only sought your views at every stage, we have taken them seriously.

    That is because only you can ensure that the sector’s teaching and learning is what’s right; what is needed.

    I’ll do all I can to see that you get the funding you need, but each of you, all of you are uniquely sighted about how best to spend it to meet the needs of your local areas.

    My view matters, but I’m certain yours matter more.

    I want to abolish as much uncertainty for FE as I can.

    So the New Challenges, New Chances reforms will be designed to help you plan for years – at least until the end of this Parliament – and to do so the ephemera of spin and soft soap must be washed away, replaced by a cleansing long term vision.

    No different strategy on my watch. This plan will last.

    And I can assure you that these plans will not be a lurch in an entirely new direction. On the contrary, they will follow the direction of travel that Skills for Sustainable Growth set a year ago and to which you contributed so much.

    I want to talk mainly about that perspective during the rest of my time today.

    About the new relationship between colleges, our economy, and the kind of civil society the coming generations deserve.

    A relationship in which colleges will be trusted not only to manage their own affairs, but to play a key part in designing the whole framework within which they operate.

    A new relationship that challenges all of us, but which is fundamentally true to the legacy of the founders of adult education in England.

    I believe, like them, that further education should exist for the benefit of local people and their communities.

    And that it should feed the local economies that sustain them.

    Crucially – that it should help ensure that every parent’s wish comes true; that their children enjoy the best chances and better prospects that earlier generations enjoyed,

    My vision is a sector freed from Governments that predict and provide. Free to reflect and respond to what it sees around it.

    What do you see from the window of the principal’s office?

    Does it make you cry out, like Miranda,

    “O wonder! How many goodly creatures are there here! How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world that has such people in it!”?

    Shops, offices, factories, open or closed.

    Groups of mainly young people talking or speaking into mobiles.

    People on foot, in cars or on buses going about their business.

    Your communities. Your people.

    But I’ll tell you what you don’t see.

    You don’t see me. Though I do know that some of you have my photo on your desks (some even on bedside tables or in wallets, I am told) and that’s perfectly understandable.

    You don’t see Vince Cable’s nor Michael Gove’s. (no photos in wallets there)

    Not Geoff Russell’s face nor Simon Waugh’s nor Sir Michael Wilshaw’s.

    What you see is where your interest lies, where your passion for learning lives.

    People write and talk a lot about localism but a lot less about what it ought to mean.

    Localism is being aware of your community’s needs, sensitive to its roots, careful about its future; feeling for the people around you, their prospects and their welfare, knowing that your fulfilment is bound to their well being; understanding that we are all part of an organic whole, each of us stronger because the whole is stronger.

    Each of our endeavours, achievements nurturing the common good.

    You are stronger for me not telling you how to relate to the people you serve.

    The past tendency in parts of Government was to see running an FE college like running a sweet shop – that is finally at an end. I know what you do – run multi-million pound organisations, which, in business terms, are large employers.

    I know that what it takes to be a successful college leader is not so different from what it takes to run any successful business and retain the support of your board of directors while drawing on their expertise.

    College governors are typically busy successful people.

    So why ask them to give up their time unless we actually allow them to govern?

    You are shaping the skills Britain needs to prosper.

    Key to the future of your communities, colleges can help to fashion Britain’s future.

    And so we must have the courage to set you free to do so.

    I don’t want the sector to be rule-bound. I want you to establish best practice yourself through collective action like this week’s publication of the Foundation Code of Governance.

    That process of liberation began when I spoke at City & Islington College 18 month ago and continued with Skills for Sustainable Growth last November.

    The outcome of our New Challenges, New Chances consultation will map how much further we will travel by the end of this Parliament.

    But I can give you just a taste of what’s to come.

    First, it’s clear that you must have the ability to innovate to meet new demands.

    Margaret Sharp and her colleagues have stressed the need for an innovative code. And I thank Margaret for her presentation this morning and for the work she has led in producing the Colleges in the Communities report. I think we’re only just beginning to understand quite how important this work and its follow-up will be.

    So I will ask my officials to organise with the AoC a series of workshops to put into practice Margaret’s proposals.

    Second, we must allow you to accelerate the speed of change.

    We can’t afford to prevaricate when employers have needs and there are unemployed adults ready to meet them, its no use waiting for the system to catch up. You need to get started with twin track qualifications and I’m pleased to tell you that Geoff Russell has found an easy way to do it – funding new start-up programmes through a simple mechanism.

    We will bring forward further plans to make real the changes heralded by Education Bill. That means more deregulation more quickly.

    Geoff may say more on that when he speaks to you on Wednesday.

    Third, there are over 2.5m people unemployed – a million of them young people – in this country at present. So I have also asked Geoff to use the normal process of reallocating funding to good performers, funding for those NEETs most in need.

    And because of the urgency of this issue we are making up to £25 million available this academic year to increase capacity to improve the skills and employment prospects of the most disengaged young people using the in-year flexibilities in the skills funding system.

    Fourth, all organisations need stability in order to plan, to innovate and to build relationships. That is why I will continue to argue for colleges to be given three-year budgets, including for capital, of the sort that universities have enjoyed for decades.

    Fifth, I want our changes to HE to have colleges at their heart. We will deliver more higher education in colleges – the 20,000 places is a beginning, not an end.

    And we will redefine higher learning through the accelerated development of level 4 and 5 apprenticeship frameworks. I will shortly announce the first round successful bids for funding for this step change.

    Sixth, on apprenticeships: we will make the growth in numbers sustainable by further cuts in bureaucracy; by marketing apprenticeships to businesses that don’t yet enjoy their benefit with fresh verve and vehemence; a renewed emphasis on quality; and ensuring good fit between welfare reform and our skills offer

    Seventh, to ensure that our teachers are the best in the world and have access to HE I can announce today that we will introduce a bursary for initial teacher training.

    Eighth, because Further Education must think increasingly broadly, looking to international opportunities I’ve asked the AoC to develop, with my department, a global strategy for FE.

    And finally, I can confirm that an independent review of professionalism in FE will be undertaken by David Sherlock CBE and Dawn Ward OBE, Burton and South Derbyshire College.

    The Government can do much to empower the learner and we are doing so, through things like the new National Careers Service, Lifelong Learning Accounts and good information on where jobs will be in the future – linking advice to opportunities and growth.

    Another sort of empowerment is recognising a shared responsibility for supporting learning; the Government providing core financial support, some individuals paying fees supported by loans and employers contributing so supporting learning too.

    But the essential relationship remains that between learner or employer and provider.

    Because first-class programmes of learning; quality of teaching; and students growing by gaining new skills. These are at the beating heart of further education.

    Some cynics claim that me declining to tell you what to do and how to do it will lead to chaos. They say you’re not ready for freedom. That by me trusting you “mere anarchy is loosed upon the world”

    I prefer another of Yeats’ memorable phrases, “a terrible beauty is born”. The beauty I envisage of is the beauty of imagination; the beauty of creative minds. And its only terror is the thrill of new.

    Some critics call me an old-fashioned Tory. And they are right.

    My approach is rooted in the Toryism of Wilberforce and Shaftesbury of Randolf Churchill and Rab Butler.

    My approach to your sector, our sector, certainly echoes the approach of my party when Disraeli, said that

    “all power is a trust; that we are accountable for its exercise; that from the people and for the people all springs, and all must exist.”

    The changes we propose – and will publish by the end of the month – are a radical shift of power, from me to you.

    But I want to make clear that I am and will remain accountable to Parliament – to the elected representatives of the people you serve- for the justness of your decisions, the excellence of your leadership; and the quality of your services.

    And after serving the people of my constituency, I see that as the greatest honour of my political life.

    Thank you for that.

    Thank you for coming with us on this journey.

    And thank you for all you do, for all those whose lives you touch.

    Further Education – once described as the neglected middle child of our education system – now favoured.

    Favoured by me; by the Government of which I am part.

    Further education grown tall. Grown strong. At last, treated as a grown up.

    Favoured Sons and Daughters, Further Education has come of age.

  • Nicky Morgan – 2022 Tribute to HM Queen Elizabeth II (Baroness Morgan of Cotes)

    Nicky Morgan – 2022 Tribute to HM Queen Elizabeth II (Baroness Morgan of Cotes)

    The tribute made by Nicky Morgan, Baroness Morgan of Cotes, in the House of Lords on 9 September 2022.

    My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Viscount. So much has already been said this afternoon, but at a time of grief it is better for us all to say something. In his message yesterday, our new King said that he and his family would draw comfort from all the sentiments of loss, mourning and gratitude that people would express in the coming days. We have heard many fantastic and moving speeches and it has been a privilege to be part of your Lordships’ House today to listen to them.

    I will offer three brief thoughts. First, as has been mentioned and as the noble Viscount just captured in his tribute, the Queen’s last service was to invite her 15th Prime Minister to form a Government. Her face in that picture was still innately curious. To have that level of curiosity at the age of 96, after everything that the Queen had seen, was truly remarkable. Her curiosity was also captured, as we heard earlier, in that very simple question to those City financiers after the 2008 financial crash: “Why did no one else see that this was going to happen?” What a good question that she asked on behalf of so many of her subjects.

    Secondly, we have heard that, for those who encountered her in the flesh, it was an unforgettable experience. She said that, for those who were just going to catch a glimpse, she deliberately wore bright clothes so that she could not be missed. Whatever we might think of His Majesty’s wardrobe, he is unlikely to wear that rainbow of colours that we got so used to.

    As we heard, in 2012 the Queen visited Leicester with the new Duchess of Cambridge and the Duke of Edinburgh. It was a huge honour for both the city and county for that visit to be the first to any city in the Diamond Jubilee year. Of course, there was great excitement, but the tip that I took away, having watched Her Majesty during the lunch, was that it is acceptable to open your handbag, get out your lipstick and put it on after lunch. I have taken that tip and told many people about it; they found it a great insight into what was in her handbag—apart from marmalade sandwiches.

    We heard a story from the noble Baroness, Lady Barker, of someone encountering the Queen and not being able to speak. In my case, when I was appointed to the Privy Council, I forgot to breathe. As the black spots appeared in my peripheral vision, I suddenly realised that I had stopped breathing as I was so close to my monarch and was observing her in close quarters. We also heard about the kissing of hands. While one is not meant to go into the details of Privy Council experiences, it is fair to say that, however experienced in life you are, that ceremony of kneeling and kissing your monarch’s hand is probably the most agonising kiss that you will ever make in your lifetime.

    Thirdly, the Queen was our voice of stability at key moments. We have mentioned her Christmas afternoon broadcasts. Of course, after the death of Princess Diana, when the country needed a moment of stability, she was the one who invoked the phrase:

    “Grief is the price we pay for love.”

    That is worth remembering today. She was also asked to speak in spring 2020 when the Covid pandemic had struck with such ferocity.

    I have no doubt that His Majesty the King will provide that same stability and that our thoughts and support will be with him over the coming days and months as he takes on his new duties. In many ways, we began to see that transition of power when he was at the State Opening of Parliament in this House just a few months ago. As we have heard, all these events will be much more of a shock for everyone at every level of society and everywhere around the globe than most of us would have expected. God save the King.

  • Stephen Benn – 2022 Tribute to HM Queen Elizabeth II (3rd Viscount Stansgate)

    Stephen Benn – 2022 Tribute to HM Queen Elizabeth II (3rd Viscount Stansgate)

    The tribute made by Stephen Benn, 3rd Viscount Stansgate, in the House of Lords on 9 September 2022.

    My Lords, I hope the House will allow me to begin by saying how much I appreciated the opening speeches by the Leader of the House, the Leader of the Opposition, the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, the Convenor of the Cross-Bench Peers and the most reverend Primate the Archbishop of Canterbury, who made a collection of remarks that set the tone for today’s debate. I have listened to some wonderful tributes from other Members throughout the day and I think today’s Hansard will be a remarkable document and a testament to the person in whose honour we are holding this debate.

    I remember when I lost my own mother, as many Members will remember losing theirs. It is a very difficult thing to lose one’s mother and therefore my sympathy personally goes out to the King, from whom we will hear shortly, and his family, because of the loss they are suffering, which is of course combined, as others have said, with the duties that now fall upon the new King.

    I am one of the Members of this House who did not meet Her Majesty and I am not going to claim that I did. I was in close proximity to her on more than one occasion—at the investiture when she gave my wife an OBE, and so on—but I am not going to claim that I had any personal conversations with her. Nevertheless, I recognise the enormous importance she had to the lives of people in this country and the impact she had on them. I am sorry in some ways that my dad is not here to make a speech about his relations with the Queen, because he certainly had many stories he could have told, including his rather unsuccessful attempt to cut her head off—not in any physical sense, you understand, but in relation to British stamps. Noble Lords can read all about that in his memoirs.

    The more I have thought about it over the last 24 hours, the more I think it was no coincidence that we saw her fulfil the one last constitutional duty which only she could fulfil on Tuesday in appointing the new Prime Minister, and then sadly found that she became very unwell and died shortly after. I think she knew for weeks, as we all did, that she had this duty ahead of her and she held on to fulfil it. That would be absolutely typical, from everything I have heard anyone in this Chamber say about Her Majesty in the 70 years she reigned. I do not think it was a coincidence that she lived long enough to do it.

    I also think she is a supreme example of a successful constitutional monarch, for which we should all be very grateful. Looking back over the years of her reign, I think that this country has moved, as has been indicated by others, from a position where we were still an imperial power and had an element of what you might call hard power. Over the decades it has been transferred into soft power, and she embodied that in a way that is going to be very hard to follow.

    Her death is still a shock and for many people it will continue to be so. When we hear from the new King in a moment, it will begin to bring itself to bear on people’s lives. However, there is a great deal to celebrate. We all know that she lived to see an unrivalled Platinum Jubilee celebration. Although she was not able to take that much of a part in many of the events, the country, the nation and the Commonwealth had a chance to say thank you to her, and her own contribution was, in a way, to live to see it unfold in front of her. However, there is still a great deal of mourning now.

    Reference has been made to the remarkable interviews that she gave when she was younger and her pledge to serve her country and the Commonwealth whether her life “be long or short”. It turned out to be remarkably long, for which we are all very grateful. She served her country as she promised to do and fulfilled her promise. You cannot ask for more than that and I do not think we will see her like again in our lifetime.

  • PRESS RELEASE : 150 pages of unduly complex guidance slashed to just 8 [November 2011]

    PRESS RELEASE : 150 pages of unduly complex guidance slashed to just 8 [November 2011]

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 14 November 2011.

    • Ministers dispel health and safety school trip myths

    Teachers must no longer be discouraged from taking children on school trips because of misplaced health and safety concerns, Education Secretary Michael Gove and Employment Minister Chris Grayling have said.

    A myth-busting statement, prepared by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), has been published for schools and local authorities – explaining what teachers should consider when organising trips. The statement dispels myths about legal action and encourages all schools to ditch unnecessary paperwork, ensuring that precautions are proportionate to the risks involved.

    Newly revised health and safety guidance for schools has also been published by the Department for Education, summarising how the existing health and safety law affects schools, local authorities, governing bodies, and staff – particularly in relation to school trips. This advice has been slashed from 150 pages of unduly complex information to just eight pages.

    At the moment, many schools wrongly believe that:

    • written risk assessments – some totalling up to 100 pages – must be completed for every activity that takes place outside of school, such as visits to museums
    • teachers must ask parents to complete written consent forms for every school trip or visit.

    The new guidance clarifies these myths and urges a common sense approach, making it easier for schools to give pupils more opportunities to learn outside of the classroom.

    Education Secretary Michael Gove said:

    Children should be able to go on exciting school trips that broaden their horizons. That is why we are cutting unnecessary red tape in schools and putting teachers back in charge.

    This new, slimmer advice means a more common sense approach to health and safety. It will make it easier for schools to make lessons more inspiring and fun.

    Employment Minister Chris Grayling said:

    Memories of our school trips stay with us. Learning outside the classroom brings the curriculum to life and is essential to our children’s development. We cannot let confusion over health and safety requirements deprive them of the opportunities we had.

    I want to dispel the myths and remind schools, teachers and local authorities that a disproportionate fear of prosecution should not get in the way of common sense.

    The revised guidance:

    • summarises the legal duties of head teachers, governing bodies and local authorities on health and safety, and covers activities that take place on and off school premises
    • makes clear that a written risk assessment does not need to be carried out every time a school takes pupils on a regular, routine local visit, for example to a swimming pool or museum.
    • tackles myths and teachers’ fears about being prosecuted by making the law clearer
    • clarifies that parental consent is not necessary for pupils to take part in the majority of off-site activities organised by a school, as most of these activities take place during school hours and are a normal part of a child’s education.

    The fear of prosecution is often cited as an obstacle to arranging school trips, but action is rare. In the past five years, only two cases have been brought by the HSE for breaches of health and safety law in relation to school visits and this was where there was evidence of recklessness or a clear failure to follow sensible precautions.

    To help schools further, the Department for Education has also developed a ‘one-off’ parental consent form, which covers activities outside the normal school day. These include residential visits in school holidays and at weekends, adventure activities, off-site sporting fixtures outside the school day, and all off-site activities for nursery schools which take place at any time. The consent form will cover all activities and will only need to be signed once, when a child enrols at the school.

    Schools will then only need to inform parents in advance of each activity and give them the opportunity to withdraw their child from the activity if they wish, rather than conducting bureaucratic form-filling exercises for every school trip.

  • PRESS RELEASE : First special and alternative provision free schools given the green light [November 2011]

    PRESS RELEASE : First special and alternative provision free schools given the green light [November 2011]

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 14 November 2011.

    • Court houses and Department for Education offices could house new schools
    • Total number of new school applications approved reaches 87

    The first ever special and alternative provision free schools have been approved to open from September 2012. Approved plans include a new school for vulnerable young people to be run by Everton Football Club.

    The 8 new Free Schools – including 3 special schools and 5 alternative provision schools – join 79 others that are due to open from next year onwards.

    Like Academies, Free Schools have greater freedoms than local authority run schools, giving teachers the power to make decisions that are right for local children. Free Schools will help raise standards for all children, particularly those living in disadvantaged communities.

    Six government or publicly owned sites have also been identified as being suitable to house Free Schools – including 2 Department for Education offices and 4 court houses. They are:

    • Balham Youth Court, London
    • Haringey Magistrates Court, London
    • Mid-Sussex Magistrates Court, Haywards Heath
    • Sutton Coldfield Magistrates Court, Sutton Coldfield
    • Department for Education, Mowden Hall, Darlington
    • Department for Education, Castle View House, Runcorn.

    Groups can apply to open schools in these – and other – government buildings that are surplus or under-used, where appropriate. The government also wants more surplus or under-used public buildings to make space available to Free Schools.

    The first special Free Schools are being set up by passionate and talented groups, who want to improve state education provision and choice for families with children with special education needs (SEN) and disabilities. Too often, parents struggle to find a special school that meets the needs of their child.

    New alternative provision Free Schools will allow more children, who would not receive the right education in a mainstream school, to get a good education. Pupils that attend alternative provision schools are some the most vulnerable young people in society. They include pupils who have been excluded, are ill, have been severely bullied or are teenage parents. Current provision is very mixed, and the vast majority of pupils leave alternative provision without the qualifications they need for employment or further study.

    Three special schools and five alternative provision schools have been approved today. They are:

    • Rosewood school, Southampton (Age 2 – 19 special school)
    • City of Peterborough Academy special school, Peterborough ( Age 4 – 18 special school)
    • The Lighthouse School, Leeds (Age 11 – 19 special school)
    • Derby Pride Academy, Derby (Age 11 – 16 alternative provision school)
    • Harmonize Academy, Liverpool (Age 13 -19 alternative provision school)
    • Stone Soup Learns, Nottingham (Age 11 – 19 alternative provision school)
    • Everton in the Community Free School Trust, Liverpool (Age 14 – 19 alternative provision school)
    • East Birmingham Network, Birmingham (Age 13 – 16 alternative provision school)

    Education Secretary Michael Gove said:

    No child – regardless of their circumstances – should be denied an excellent education that is close to home. An education where teachers are free to decide what is best and where standards are high.

    Through Free Schools, we are breaking down barriers to make this a reality for some of the poorest and most vulnerable children in the country. The good schools lottery must end.

    Recent statistics show that just 1.4 % of children in alternative provision in 2009/10 achieved 5 or more GCSEs at grade A*-C, or equivalent, including English and mathematics. This compares with 53.4 % in all schools in England.

    Along with Free Schools, the Government’s behaviour adviser, Charlie Taylor, is also looking at other ways of improving alternative provision in England.

    In addition, groups wishing to open Free Schools, University Technical Colleges (UTCs) and Studio Schools from September 2013 will be able to access the application form and guidance from the Department’s website from today. The New Schools Network is also on hand to provide support to Free Schools groups throughout the application process.

    Successful Free School applications for those wishing to open from September 2013 will be announced in July 2012. Successful UTCs will be announced in May 2012.

    David Moyes, Manager of Everton FC, said:

    This would represent a fantastic opportunity for Everton Football Club and its charitable arm, Everton in the Community, to further extend its reach into a wide variety of communities across the Merseyside region. It would, unquestionably, provide a real chance for some less-privileged, less-fortunate children to embrace – and to benefit from – a high-quality education.

    Barry Day, Chief Executive of the Greenwood Dale Foundation Trust, said:

    We are delighted that this Special Free School application is proceeding to the pre-opening stage. The group greatly looks forward to offering a new special school, co-located with a mainstream school to support the Government’s agenda for further integrated special provision within other settings.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Consultation launched on free early education [November 2011]

    PRESS RELEASE : Consultation launched on free early education [November 2011]

    The press release issued by the Department for Education on 11 November 2011.

    The Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg and Children’s Minister Sarah Teather set out the plans in a consultation on changes to free early education.

    The consultation includes proposals to:

    Make the free entitlement to 15 hours per week of early education more flexible, so it can be taken between 7am and 7pm, and spread across two days instead of the current three days.
    Use the criteria which is used for free school meals to decide which disadvantaged two-year-olds should qualify for free early education,
    Include two-year-olds who are looked after by the state in the eligibility criteria for free early education.
    Slim down statutory guidance for local authorities from 100 pages to fewer than 20 pages.
    Under the plans, up to 140,000 disadvantaged two-year-olds will be entitled to 15 hours a week of free early education. The announcement follows the Government’s commitment, made by the Deputy Prime Minister in October 2010, to extend 15 hours of free early education – currently available to all three- and four-year-olds – to disadvantaged two-year-olds from September 2013.

    Nick Clegg said:

    I want us to give every child the best possible start – so free education for toddlers from the most disadvantaged homes will now be a right and not a privilege. Crucially the extra care will be flexible and easy to access. Parents across the country are bending over backwards to balance work and home. The Coalition wants to help in whatever way we can.

    Sarah Teather, Children’s Minister, said:

    Our priority is to increase social mobility by helping children from the poorest backgrounds in their earliest years. High quality early education is the key to making a difference early on in a child’s life. It’s crucial for their healthy development and means they’re not falling behind before they have even started primary school.

    We want more children to be able to access their full early education entitlement. Too often, the most disadvantaged children don’t get what they are entitled to. It’s important we target early education at those who stand to benefit the most.

    We also want to make the entitlement more flexible, so that children don’t miss out on early education and parents can help balance their work and family life more easily.

    All 152 local authorities in England have been delivering a targeted offer of between 10 and 15 hours of free early education to some of the most disadvantaged two-year-olds since September 2009. The extension of 15 hours to all disadvantaged two-year-olds will mean an increase in the number of places across the country, from 20,000 per year to around 140,000 per year.

    The Department is funding 15 trials in 18 local authorities to test approaches to expand free early education for disadvantaged two-year-olds. The trials are looking at the challenges that local areas face to deliver the expansion as well as helping them to share learning and best practice across the country. The trials will run until 31 March 2012.

    The Department is also consulting on how to improve the way in which local authorities tell parents how they are ensuring sufficient childcare places in the local area. An annual report to parents would replace the overly bureaucratic childcare sufficiency assessment that local authorities must currently do every three years.

  • Colm Gildernew – 2022 Comments on Healthcare in Northern Ireland

    Colm Gildernew – 2022 Comments on Healthcare in Northern Ireland

    The comments made by Colm Gildernew, the Sinn Fein Health Spokesperson in Northern Ireland, on 16 September 2022.

    Reports that pressures in our health service had led to 300 more deaths than expected this year are staggering and underlines the urgent need to get the Executive up and running and for all parties to work together to make health the priority.

    How much longer will the DUP sit on the sidelines and continue to boycott government while people suffer on waiting lists and our health service continues to feel the pressure?

    We will meet the health minister next week on the urgent need to recruit more doctors and nurses, cut waiting lists and to properly invest in our cancer and mental health services.

    Sinn Féin is ready to form an Executive today, to work with others, and start to fix our health service by investing an extra £1 billion and securing a three-year Budget.

  • PRESS RELEASE : In less than three months, Ukraine fulfilled about half of the recommendations of the European Commission – Ihor Zhovkva [September 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : In less than three months, Ukraine fulfilled about half of the recommendations of the European Commission – Ihor Zhovkva [September 2022]

    The press release issued by the President of Ukraine on 16 September 2022.

    Deputy Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine Ihor Zhovkva had a telephone conversation with Minister of European Affairs of the Czech Republic Mikuláš Bek.

    The interlocutors discussed the results of the visit of President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen to Ukraine on September 15. The significant progress of our country in implementing the recommendations of the European Commission regarding EU membership and the true democracy of Ukrainian society, which shares and defends European values on the battlefield, were noted.

    “In less than three months, Ukraine fulfilled about half of the recommendations of the European Commission. We are on an optimistic path to their full implementation by November of this year,” Ihor Zhovkva emphasized.

    The parties coordinated joint political and practical steps for Ukraine’s advance on the European integration track. They also discussed Ukraine’s participation in the high-level EU events that will take place during the Czech Presidency of the Council of the European Union until the end of 2022, in particular, in the informal meeting of EU heads of state and government on October 6 and 7 in Prague (Czech Republic).

    “We expect that the leadership of the Czech Presidency of the Council of the EU will influence the opening of a window of opportunity for the start of negotiations on Ukraine’s accession to the European Union in the near future,” said the Deputy Head of the President’s Office.

  • Nick Gibb – 2011 Article in TES on Teacher Pensions

    Nick Gibb – 2011 Article in TES on Teacher Pensions

    The article by Nick Gibb, published as a press release by the Department for Education, in the TES on 11 November 2011.

    Rising life expectancy is a miracle of the modern age. The average 60-year-old in this country is now living 10 years longer than 30 years ago. And people over the age of 60 are staying healthy for longer too. Both advances are to be celebrated.

    But these dramatic demographic and social changes, coupled with the turbulent economic times, present enormous challenges for the long-term provision of pensions. Across the world, countries are debating how best to support an ageing population.

    The new offer on public sector pensions made by the government last week is a good one. A better accrual rate will mean that a teacher retiring on a salary of £37,800 will receive an inflation-proof pension of £25,200. And no one within a decade of retirement will see any difference at all. These proposals are fair for teachers, fair for the taxpayer and can be sustained for years to come.

    The Government is offering a good deal for teachers. Following representations from teachers and their unions, we are now proposing a better offer than the original package. We are ready to continue open and honest discussions about what a reformed Teachers’ Pension Scheme might look like.

    On the one hand, we must reward public service workers for their years of dedicated service. Teachers and lecturers are fundamental to the strength of our nation and the Government is determined to ensure that the profession is recognised and valued through good pay, good pensions and good conditions. On the other hand, we cannot avoid the costs that arise from people living longer and the need to bring public finances under control if we are to get our economy back on track and deliver growth.

    Doing nothing is not an option. Expenditure on teachers’ pensions is projected to double from the £5 billion a year it cost in the financial year 2005 to 2006 to almost £10 billion in 2015 to 2016, while the overall public sector pension bill has risen by a third in the last decade to £32 billion – and will continue to rise. This is simply not sustainable without eating into other areas of public spending such as schools and hospitals. Already, more than two-thirds of each teacher’s and lecturer’s pension is met by the taxpayer, rather than employer and employee contributions.

    Former Labour cabinet minister Lord Hutton’s report earlier this year was clear that public service pensions need more fundamental, lasting changes. We’ve already had to make the hard decision to ask staff to contribute more to their pensions from next April, as part of the government’s plans to save £2.8 billion from public sector pensions between 2012 and 2015.

    But the Hutton report found that we need a firmer grip on long-term costs to the taxpayer. That means changing the structure of the scheme, recognising increases in life expectancy through changes to the retirement age and spreading the costs more evenly between employees and employers.

    We also need to make pensions fairer because, as Lord Hutton showed, lower-paid staff simply do not get as good a deal for their pension contributions as their higher-earning colleagues. Our starting point has always been that public sector pension schemes such as the Teachers’ Pension Scheme will remain among the best available.

    The Government will honour teachers’ and lecturers’ existing accrued pensions in full. No one will lose a penny of the final salary pension they have already built up – and that final salary will be the final salary at the time of retirement. We will continue to provide a guaranteed amount in retirement, calculated as a proportion of staff’s salary and not dependent on whether the stock market goes up or down.

    But it is important for teachers to understand how their pensions compare to other professions, including people in the private sector. Most private sector pensions in this country have already undergone big changes as businesses reassess their costs both now and in the future. A diminishing number of private-sector employees have a company pension. The number enjoying final salary or defined benefit schemes is even smaller. But public sector workers will still be sheltered from this uncertainty.

    Employers will continue to make significant contributions to the Teachers’ Pension Scheme, while the scheme strikes a fairer balance between high earners and others. We want to secure the very best outcome for teachers, which will ensure that the scheme continues to provide good quality pensions for teachers, but is fairer to the taxpayer and sustainable for the future. Our job over coming weeks is to work through the detail with the unions to get the decisions that are right for the profession.

    The previous government made big changes to the Teachers’ Pension Scheme for new staff joining the profession from 2007, but Lord Hutton concluded that further reform is necessary. A good deal, agreed by all, will also mean that teachers continue to have one of the best retirement deals available to any profession.

  • Howard Flight – 2022 Tribute to HM Queen Elizabeth II (Lord Flight)

    Howard Flight – 2022 Tribute to HM Queen Elizabeth II (Lord Flight)

    The tribute made by Howard Flight, Lord Flight, in the House of Lords on 9 September 2022.

    My Lords, I add my grateful thanks and tribute to Her Majesty the late Queen. I raise these points both professionally and at a personal level. She has always been professional in the delivery of her duties and responsibilities, and it is wonderful to see how much she is recognised across the whole world.

    I stood with my parents 69 years ago in Birdcage Walk to watch the coronation procession and I can remember that to this day. Little did I know that I was witnessing the beginning of a reign of 70 years by such a wonderful and human Queen. At the tender age of only 18, the Queen committed herself to her duty, her standards and all the action that has come since.

    A mere 67 years ago, the Queen opened the science building at my school, Brentwood School. Very many other enterprises have been supported thus by the Queen. While I am sure Charles III will make an excellent King, I am saddened greatly by the departing of my Queen. She has left us, a wonderful person. We will not see her like again.