Tag: Tim Farron

  • Tim Farron – 2017 Speech at Liberal Democrat General Election Manifesto Launch

    Below is the text of the speech made by Tim Farron, the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, on 17 May 2017.

    A couple of weeks ago, in Kidlington near Oxford, I met a guy called Malcolm. I say met…he came up to me in the street and started shouting at me.

    You might have seen it on the news. Or the internet.

    In the end we actually got along. But he was angry with me for not getting behind Theresa May and backing Brexit. I think I calmed him down a bit when we spoke, but I don’t think I changed his mind.

    And that’s fine. You see, when last year’s referendum took place I campaigned harder than anyone else to remain. I believed passionately that our children would have a brighter future if Britain remained in the European Union.

    But we lost – and I accept that.

    But that doesn’t mean I have changed what I believe.

    I believe that our children will have a brighter future if we are inside the European Union. That they will be safer and better off. That our economy will be stronger and our country will have more influence in the world.

    But just because I believe that doesn’t mean I think people who voted to leave are bad people. Of course they’re not. We just disagree.

    You see, I grew up in Preston in Lancashire. And most of the people in Preston voted to leave. There are parts of Lancashire where two-thirds of people voted to leave.

    Friends of mine did. Members of my family did. They don’t all admit that to my face, but I know they did.

    Those people, they’re my people. I like them. They’re good people. Decent people.

    And, as it happens, I liked Malcolm too. Once he stopped shouting at me.

    But here’s the difference between me and Theresa May – I want Malcolm, and everyone in Preston, and every single one of you, to have your say over what comes next.

    Nobody knows what Brexit will look like.

    The choices Theresa May will make will affect your life and our country for decades – your job, your weekly shop, your environment, your safety, where you can travel to and where you can live.

    And she’s already making choices that will affect those things, including the most profound choice she could make – taking Britain out of the Single Market.

    That decision alone is a time bomb under our economy. And when it blows up it is going to take our NHS and our schools down with it.

    It is going to wreck our children’s future for decades to come.

    And it is a choice. Plain and simple. It wasn’t inevitable.

    There was nothing on the ballot paper last June that said we were choosing to pull out of the Single Market. There are other countries that are outside the EU but inside the Single Market – just look at Norway or Switzerland.

    There was nothing on the ballot paper that said that people and families from Europe who have made this country their home would be left in limbo, not knowing if they can stay in the country they raise their kids in.

    And there was definitely nothing on the ballot paper that said we would turn our allies into enemies. Yet here we are, with our government making accusations of our neighbours and even threatening war with Spain.

    The choices Theresa May makes – and the compromises she negotiates with bureaucrats in Brussels – will affect our children’s future for decades to come.

    My children, your children, Malcolm’s grandchildren.

    In June last year we voted for a departure, but we didn’t vote for a destination.

    So I want you to have your choice over your future.

    Someone is going to have the final say over the Brexit deal.

    It could be the politicians or it could be the people.

    I believe it should be the people.

    You should have the final say on whether Theresa May’s Brexit deal is right for you and your family in a referendum.

    And if you don’t like that deal, you should have the choice to remain in the European Union.

    Giving you the choice over your future is exactly what our manifesto is about.

    I want you to imagine a brighter future.

    Imagine a future where our children can grow up in a country where people are decent to each other.

    Where we have good schools and hospitals.

    Where we take the challenge of climate change seriously.

    Where give our teachers and nurses and soldiers the pay rise they deserve for the service they give our country.

    Where we have an open, innovative economy.

    Where we treat the poorest and the most vulnerable with compassion.

    Where we don’t turn our back on desperate refugees.

    That’s the Britain I love. That’s the Britain I want to lead.

    But that’s not the future Theresa May is offering you. If you want to know the most revealing thing that has been said during this election, look at Nigel Farage’s Twitter.

    He wrote: “Theresa May is using the exact words and phrases I’ve been using for twenty years.”

    Think about that for a minute. The ‘exact words and phrases’.

    The Prime Minister of our great country saying the same things that Nigel Farage has been saying for twenty years.

    And not just the words and phrases. The policies too, that’s what UKIP MEP Patrick O’Flynn said this week.

    Brexit never did just mean Brexit. For Nigel Farage, Brexit was always part of a package, a world view.

    It’s a world view that includes shunning climate change…

    …that includes shrinking the state by starving our schools and our NHS of the funding they need.

    …that includes turning our backs on some of the poorest and most vulnerable people in the world, as Theresa May did when she shamefully closed the door to desperate child refugees.

    That’s Nigel Farage’s world view. The same one that leads to Donald Trump banning Muslims and building a wall. The same one that Marine Le Pen tried to impose on the decent people of France.

    Nigel Farage’s vision for Britain is now Theresa May’s. He has taken over the Conservative Party.

    Anti-Europe. Anti-refugees. Slashing funding to schools and hospitals.

    No wonder UKIP is standing down candidates and backing the Tories.

    After all, who needs UKIP if the Government is doing what they want anyway.

    Somebody has to stand up to them. Someone has to fight for the decent, compassionate Britain we love.

    But it won’t be Jeremy Corbyn.

    On the biggest issue facing us all in a generation, when all this is at stake, Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour hasn’t shown up.

    Jeremy Corbyn even ordered his MPs and Peers to vote with the Tories and UKIP.

    Not against them. With them.

    Before the vote on Article 50, he said he would order his party to vote in favour even if the Government made no concessions to them whatsoever.

    So, surprise surprise, they didn’t.

    Jeremy Corbyn didn’t have to do that. He could have voted with us to stay in the Single Market, or to give European citizens living here the right to stay. He chose not to.

    Jeremy Corbyn has always been pro-Brexit – he campaigned against Europe for years – so we shouldn’t be surprised. But we should be disappointed.

    Labour are supposed to be the opposition, but they haven’t opposed anything.

    They are supposed to stand up for working people, but they haven’t stood up for anyone.

    They are supposed to care about our children’s future, but they are letting the Conservatives wreck it.

    They have lost the right to call themselves the opposition.

    Labour has lost its purpose but we have found ours.

    The brighter future we want for all our children is at stake. Our economy is at stake. Our schools and hospitals are at stake.

    This is about the future of the open, tolerant, united country we love.

    I am here tonight to tell you that we won’t roll over.

    A few weeks ago in France, the two parties that had run the country for decades came third and fifth in the election.

    Third and fifth.

    The decent people of France decided that they did not want to just simply accept one of the two tired old parties. So they rejected them.

    And when the two old parties had been eliminated, the decent people of France faced a stark choice: a liberal, pro-European candidate who believes in an open, tolerant and united France, and the leader of the National Front.

    Hope versus fear. A brighter future versus a cold, mean-spirited one.

    Nigel Farage pinned his colours to the mast. Just like when he backed Donald Trump in America, he backed the candidate who represented his world view – anti-Europe, anti-refugees.

    He backed the National Front.

    Well, the decent people of France chose hope over fear. And the National Front lost.

    Don’t let anyone tell you the only choice you have in this election is between Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn.

    This election is about your choice and your future.

    You can choose a brighter future where our children grow up in a country where people are decent to each other…

    …where we have good schools and hospitals so that our children have a fair chance in life and our elderly are treated with dignity…

    …where we have a clean environment and an innovative economy.

    The more Liberal Democrat MPs you elect, the better the deal we will get on Europe.

    The more Liberal Democrat MPs you elect, the more jobs and more money for the NHS and schools.

    The more Liberal Democrat MPs you elect, the brighter the future for our children.

    Theresa May and Nigel Farage’s cold, mean-spirited Britain is not the Britain I love.

    The Britain I love is generous and compassionate.

    The Britain I love is one where we are decent to each other.

    The Britain I love is open, tolerant and united.

    If that is the Britain you love too then this is the moment to stand up.

    This is your chance to change Britain’s future.

    I am here tonight because when my children are my age I want to be able to look them in the eye and tell them honestly that when the moment came to stand up for their future, I stood up.

    I am determined that our children will grow up in a country where people are decent to each other.

    I am here tonight because the Britain I love is not lost yet.

    That’s the country I want to lead.

  • Tim Farron – 2017 Statement on Westminster Terror Attack

    Below is the text of the statement made by Tim Farron, the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, on 23 March 2017.

    I thank the Prime Minister for her statement and for early sight of it. I also thank her for her words from the steps of 10 Downing Street last night, which were both ​unifying and defiant, and in which she really did speak for us all. We always know that the police keep us safe, but yesterday, in the most shocking of ways, we saw how true that really is.

    In my prayers are Keith Palmer, his family and all the victims of yesterday’s outrage, and they will continue to be there. I am, and we are, beyond thankful to the police, the NHS, the emergency services and the staff of this House for keeping us safe and being so utterly dedicated to their roles. Those who attack us hate our freedom, our peaceful democracy, our love of country, our tolerance, our openness and our unity. As we work to unravel how this unspeakable attack happened, will the Prime Minister agree with me that we must not, either in our laws or by our actions, curtail these values? Indeed, we should have more of them.

  • Tim Farron – 2016 Speech to Liberal Democrat Party Conference

    timfarron

    Below is the text of the speech made by Tim Farron, the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, at the 2016 party conference.

    Liberal Democrats are good at lots of things. But the thing it seems that we’re best at, is confounding expectations.

    We were expected to shy away from taking power, but we stepped up and we made a difference.

    We were expected to disappear after the 2015 election, but we bounced back, we are almost twice the size we were then, we’ve gained more council seats than every other party in this country put together.

    And I’ve being doing a bit of confounding expectations myself. You see, I am a white, northern, working class, middle aged bloke. According to polling experts, I should have voted Leave.

    May I assure you that I didn’t.

    But mates of mine did. People in my family did. Some of them even admitted it to me. And some of them didn’t. But you told my sister didn’t you, and somehow thought it wouldn’t get back to me. You know who you are.

    I have spent most of my adult life, worked and raised a family in Westmorland. I’m proud to call it my home.

    But I grew up a few miles south, in Preston in Lancashire.

    Preston is where I learnt my values, it’s where I was raised in a loving family where there wasn’t much money around and at a time when, it appeared to me, the Thatcher government seemed utterly determined to put every adult I knew out of work and on the scrapheap.

    But our people and our community were not for breaking.

    The great city of Preston is a no nonsense place, proud of its history, ambitious about its future.

    It is the birthplace of the industrial revolution;

    It is the place where Cromwell won the most important battle in the English Civil War. The complacent establishment stuffed by the outsiders.

    Which links rather neatly to the referendum. Preston voted 53% to leave. There were some places in Lancashire where two-thirds of people voted out.

    And I respect those people.

    If you’ll forgive me, they are my people.

    And if they’ll forgive me, I’m still utterly convinced that Britain should remain in Europe.

    I was on the 23rd June, I am today, I will continue to be.

    Not because I’m some starry-eyed pro-European with Ode to Joy as my ring tone – we all know what I have as my ring tone – but because I am a patriot and believe it’s in our national interest to be in.

    For more jobs, for lower prices, to fight climate change, to stop terrorism, catch criminals, to have influence, to be a good neighbour, to stand tall, to stand proud, to matter.

    And, above all, because I believe that Britain is an open, tolerant and united country – the opposite of the bleak vision of Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson.

    Britain did not become Great Britain on fear, isolation and division – and there is no country called Little Britain.

    There is nothing so dangerous and narrow as nationalism and cheap identity politics.

    But there is nothing wrong with identity. I am very proud of mine.

    I am a Lancastrian, I am a Northerner, I am English, I am British, I am European. I am all those things, none of them contradict another and no campaign of lies, hate and fear will rob me of who I am.

    But we lost didn’t we?

    Now – I was born and raised in Preston but the football-mad half of my family is from Blackburn, so I’m a Rovers fan. Defeat and disappointment is in my blood.

    So those who say I’m a bad loser are quite wrong.

    I am a great loser.

    I have had loads of practice.

    But the referendum result to me was like a bereavement. I was devastated by it.

    We Liberal Democrats worked harder than anyone else in that campaign, we put blood, sweat and tears
    into it.

    We put the positive case for Europe, while Cameron and Osborne churned out dry statistics, fear mongering and shallow platitudes.

    It’s easy to say – after such a narrow a referendum result – that we are a divided country. But in many ways we are.

    And the split between leavers and remainers is just a manifestation of that division.

    Britain today is far too unequal. There is too much excess and too much poverty.

    Too much wealth concentrated in some parts of the country and too little in others.

    So a couple of weeks after the referendum I went back to Preston. We booked St Wilfrids Church Hall just off Fishergate.

    When my office booked the place they had no idea that it meant something to me personally. You see, the last time I’d been in there was for my Nan’s funeral ten years earlier. The last time I’d walked out of that church was as a pall-bearer for her.

    So I was in what you might call a reflective mood when I began the meeting. There were perhaps 70 people there. Most of them had voted to leave. And most of them pretty much fitted my demographic.

    They weren’t mostly die-hards. I reckon, honestly, that three quarters of them could have been persuaded to vote Remain up until about two or three weeks out.

    One guy said that the clincher for him was George Osborne’s ‘punishment budget’.

    And when he said that, pretty much the whole room chipped in and agreed with him.

    There was near universal acknowledgement that this had been the pivotal moment.

    Here was this guy, George Osborne, who they didn’t really like.

    And who they felt didn’t really like them.

    And he’d appeared on the telly bullying them into doing something they weren’t sure they wanted to do.

    And they reacted.

    You see, if you base your political strategy on divide and rule, do not be surprised if the people you have divided decide to give you a kicking.

    I don’t blame the people in that church hall for their anger – actually, I share it. I’m angry.

    And I’m angry at the calculating forces of darkness who care nothing for the working people of this country, nothing for our NHS, nothing for those who struggle to get by, and who exploited that anger to win an exit from Europe that will hurt the poorest the hardest.

    The people in that church hall in Preston, they’d voted differently to me but I thought, you know what, we’re on the same side here.

    We see a London-centric – no, Westminster-centric – approach from politicians and the media. Treating the provinces as alien curiosities.

    Those people in Preston – and Sunderland and Newport – see a divide between those who win and those who lose. When the country is booming, they don’t see the benefit. And when the country is in decline they are the first to be hit.

    At that meeting they talked about low wages. About poor housing. About strains on hospitals and schools.

    Their problems weren’t caused by the European Union, they were caused by powerful people who took them for granted.

    By politicians who have spent decades chasing cheap headlines and short-term success for their political careers, and never acting in the long-term interests of the whole country.

    So those people in that room, like millions of others, wanted, quite understandably, to give the powerful a kicking. So they did.

    I wanted Britain to remain in the European Union and I still do.

    But we have got to listen, to learn and to understand why millions of people voted to leave. We can’t just tell them they’re wrong and stick our fingers in our ears.

    So I want to do two things.

    I want to persuade those who voted leave that we understand and respect their reasons, that we are determined to take head on the things about today’s Britain that have left so many people feeling ignored.

    And I want to give them their say over what comes next.

    Theresa May says Brexit means Brexit. Well thanks for clearing that up.

    Nearly three months since the referendum and we have a government with new departments, new titles, a new prime minister…but no plan. No vision. No clue.

    And no leadership.

    Theresa May did so little in the Remain campaign that she actually made it look like Jeremy Corbyn pulled a shift.

    And today, the absence of leadership from the Prime Minister is astonishing, the absence of clarity as to what will happen to our country is a disgrace.

    Three months on, it isn’t good enough to have brainstorming sessions at Chequers while investment and jobs steadily bleed away;

    …while our standing and relevance in the world diminishes in direct proportion to the number foreign visits by Boris Johnson.

    …while British industry is crying out for direction, for certainty, for any idea of what lies ahead.

    Make no mistake, the Conservative Party has lost the right to call itself the party of business. It has lost the right to call itself the party of the free market

    It no longer supports business, no longer understands the need for calm economic pragmatism – but instead pursues the nationalist protectionist fantasies of the Brexit fundamentalists who have won the day.

    Indeed, my message to any business in this country – large or small – is if you are backing today’s Conservative Party, you are funding your own funeral.

    There is only one party now that believes in British business – large and small; that believes in entrepreneurship and innovation: the Liberal Democrats

    We are the free market, free trade pro-business party now.

    Theresa May – tell us what Brexit really means.

    You’ve had three months. You are the Prime Minister. Stop dithering. What is your plan?

    The Liberal Democrats have a plan. We know what we want and we know where we want to take our country.

    When Theresa May does agree a deal with the EU, we want the people to decide.

    Not a re-run of the referendum, not a second referendum, but a referendum on the terms of the as-yet-unknown Brexit deal.

    And if the Tories say, ‘we’ve had enough referendums’, I say ‘you started it!’

    We had a democratic vote in June. We can’t start this process with democracy and end it with a stitch up.
    If we trusted the people to vote for our departure then we must trust the people to vote for our destination.

    Short-termism

    Politics is about serving people. And millions of people have not been well served by generations of politicians who put their own short-term political needs before the long-term interests of the people they were supposed to be serving.

    David Cameron’s handling of our relationship with Europe is a master class in selfish, shallow short-termism. Party before country at every turn.

    The Conservatives risked our country’s very future, the life chances of millions of our young people, all in a failed attempt to unite their fractured party.

    David Cameron risked our future, and he lost. And while he waltzes off to riches and retirement, our country is plunged into economic uncertainty, insecurity and irrelevance on the world stage.

    The Tories took the gamble, but Britain will pay the price. What an absolute disgrace.

    Their short-termism doesn’t stop with Brexit.

    Look at their handling of the refugee crisis. The biggest crisis facing our continent since the Second World War.

    They did nothing to help right until the point they thought it was in their short-term interest to act, when a photo of three-year-old Aylan Kurdi face down in the sand was on the front page of every newspaper.

    The people were shocked, heartbroken, they demanded action and the Tories did the bare minimum.

    But since the front pages have moved on, they have barely lifted a finger.

    Now there are some on the centre left who are squeamish about patriotism, but not me.

    I’m proud of my country; I hate it when my government makes me ashamed.

    When I was on the island of Lesbos last year, after we’d helped to land a flimsy boat of desperate refugees, I was handing out bottles of fresh water.

    And a few yards away was an aid worker from New Zealand, who knew that I was a British politician.

    She looked at me and shouted, “stop handing out bottles of water and take some f***ing refugees.”

    Because that is how Britain is seen. Mean and not pulling its weight.

    And maybe that doesn’t bother some people, but it bothers me.

    Because I am proud of who we are – always a sanctuary for the desperate, the abused and the persecuted; and I will not stand by and watch my country become smaller, meaner and more selfish.

    That is not Britain. We are better than that.

    And a year on. The crisis is worse, not better.

    Not that you’d know it. We don’t see those desperate families in the media every day.

    We aren’t confronted so often with the knowledge that they are just like us and that they need our help.

    Much to the Government’s delight, compassion fatigue has set in. The news has moved on.

    We’ve had Brexit, a new Prime Minister, a Labour leadership contest.

    And none of that makes a blind bit of difference to a nine-year-old kid stuck alone and hungry and cold in a camp in northern Greece.

    Or to the family, this morning, fleeing their burning camp in Moria.

    This government wants us to forget this crisis, it’s too difficult to solve, too risky to take a lead.

    But we have not forgotten, we will not forget, those children could be our children, how dare the Government abandon them.

    But short-termism in politics goes back a lot further than just this government.

    Look at the way the Conservatives in the 80s and Labour in the 90s treated the banks. Sucking up, deregulating, encouraging a culture of risk and greed.

    Instead of building an economy that served the long-term needs of the whole country, they put all their eggs in one basket – the banks.

    And, for a while, things were good. Britain boomed.

    But they didn’t invest in the modern infrastructure that could benefit the north of England, or Scotland, or Wales, or the Midlands, or the South West.

    They didn’t invest in the skills the next generation would need.

    They didn’t invest in our manufacturing base.

    All they did was allow the banks to take bigger and bigger risks, and build up bigger and bigger liabilities.

    And when the banks failed, we were all left paying the price.

    In lost jobs, in lower wages, in debt, in cuts to public services.

    Short-term thinking. Long-term consequences.

    And nowhere is the danger posed by short-term thinking greater than with the future of the National Health Service.

    Can you remember a time when there weren’t news reports on an almost daily basis saying the NHS is in crisis?

    For years, politicians have chosen to paper over the cracks rather than come clean about what it will really take – what it will really cost – not just to keep the NHS afloat but to give people the care and the treatment that they deserve.

    And that means, finally, bringing the NHS and the social care system together.

    In my Grandpa’s journey through Alzheimers, he had good care in the home he spent his last couple of years in. But when he first became ill after the death of my Grandma, the place he was put in was despicable.

    Lonely, unclean, uncaring.

    It’s a few years back, but as I fought to get him out of that place and into somewhere better, it occurred to me that this was a standard experience for too many older people and their loved ones.

    Maybe some people can just shrug and accept this, well I can’t.

    I’ve seen enough terrible old people’s homes. And I’ve seen enough people who’ve had to wait forever for treatment – particularly people who don’t have someone to fight their corner.

    It’s not civilised to let people slip through the net.

    It’s not civilised towards the people who love them, who go out of their way to try and make their lives easier when everything else is making their lives harder.

    It’s not civilised and it’s not good enough.

    I worry about this, not just for the NHS in general, but, if I’m honest, for myself and my family.

    We will all, if we’re lucky, grow old.

    We all deserve to know that, no matter what happens, we will be cared for properly and treated with dignity and respect.

    If the great Liberal William Beveridge had written his blue print today, when people are living to the ages they are now, there is no doubt that he would have proposed a National Health and Care Service.

    He would have been appalled about the child who has to look after their disabled parent or the hundreds of thousands of women across the country who are unable to work because they are disproportionately the care givers.

    So let’s today decide to do what Beveridge would do. Let’s create that National Health and Care Service.

    And let’s stop being complacent about our NHS.

    We have of course a brilliant NHS, the best staff in the world, free care at the point of access…but we are spending far less on it every year than we need to.

    Of the 15 original EU countries – including Spain, Greece and Portugal – we rank behind them in 13th place when it comes to health spending. It would take tens of billions of pounds a year just to bring ourselves up to their average.

    It’s not good enough.

    So we need to face the hard truth that the NHS needs more money – a lot more money – not just to stop it lurching from crisis to crisis but so that it can meet the needs and the challenges it will face in the years ahead. So that it can be the service we all need it to be for the long-term.

    That means having the most frank and honest conversation about the NHS that the country has ever had.

    What Beveridge did for the 20th century, we need for the 21st century.

    In Norman Lamb we have the politician who is most trusted and respected by the health profession – and deservedly so. And Norman and I are clear, we will not join the ranks of those politicians who are too scared of losing votes to face up to what really needs to be done.

    We will go to the British people with the results of our Beveridge Commission and we will offer a new deal for health and social care, honest about the cost, bold about the solution.

    If the only way to fund a health service that meets the needs of everyone, is to raise taxes, Liberal Democrats will raise taxes.

    Short-term thinking is the scourge of our education system too.

    Governments have designed an education system – especially at primary school level – that is focused not on developing young people for later life, for work or for further study, but on getting them through the wrong kinds of tests.

    It’s not about whether kids can solve problems, or converse in other languages – or even their own. It’s about statistics. Measurements. League tables.

    Instead of building an education system, we have built a quality assurance industry.

    It’s no wonder so many teachers are so frustrated. No wonder so many leave the profession.

    Parents deserve to know that their child’s teacher is focused on teaching.

    Teachers are professionally undervalued, driven towards meeting targets instead of developing young minds.

    And, as ever, it is the poorest kids who suffer the most.

    In the last government we introduced a policy – a long-term policy – to try and help the poorest kids keep up with their better off classmates: the pupil premium. And this school year more than two million children will benefit from that Liberal Democrat policy.

    And I am so proud of Kirsty Williams, who is making a real difference, every day, to the lives of children of across Wales.

    The Pupil Premium is not safe in the Tories’ hands – but it is safe in Kirsty’s.

    And what’s more, she’s doubled it. That’s what happens when you get into power.

    But we need to do so much more.

    I talk a lot about opportunity – about breaking down the barriers that hold people back. Nowhere is that more important than in education.

    I want our schools to be places where our teachers have the freedom to use their skill and their knowledge to open young minds, not just train them to pass exams.

    I want them to be places where children are inspired to learn, not stressed out by tests.

    So I want to end the current system of SATS in primary schools that are a distraction from the real education that professional teachers want to give their children; that weigh heavy on children as young as six and add nothing to the breadth of their learning.

    What are we doing wasting our children’s education and our teachers talents on ticking boxes?

    And what are we doing, in 2016, threatening to relegate 80% of our children to education’s second division by returning to the 11-plus?

    Every parent wants to send their kids to a good schools. But more selective schools are not the answer.

    We need better schools for all our children, not just those who can pass an exam at the age of 11. We can’t just leave children behind.

    Over the last 40 years, millions of children have been liberated by comprehensive education who would otherwise be consigned to second class status in the secondary audience.

    And it’s important to remember who did that: Shirley Williams.

    We will defend your legacy Shirley. It’s not just about being a liberal – this is personal.

    Assessment is vital, exams are important, but let’s have assessment that leads to a love of learning and a breadth of learning; that is relevant to what children will need next at school and in their future as adults.

    There is nothing more long term than the education of a child that stays with them for their entire life.

    So let’s end the box ticking. Let’s teach our children. And let’s trust our teachers.

    The country needs an opposition

    One thing you can’t accuse Jeremy Corbyn of is short-term thinking. His lot have waited over a hundred years for this.

    Finally, they have taken the Labour Party. Like all good Marxists, they have seized the means of production.

    They’ve even seized the nurseries too – opening branches of ‘Momentum Kids’. Or as they are also known, Child Labour…or Tiny Trots.

    The Lib Dems have never had any trouble with entryists – unless you include the Quakers.

    My problem with Jeremy Corbyn is nothing personal. After all, I used to see him quite a lot. In the Blair years he was always in our lobby.

    No, my problem with Jeremy Corbyn is that, for him, holding the government to account is not a priority.

    Winning elections is a bourgeois distraction – unless it’s his own leadership election.

    It is baffling to see the Labour Party arguing about whether or not they should even be trying to win an election.

    Can you imagine that? The Liberals and Liberal Democrats spent decades out of power and then when the opportunity finally came – in incredibly difficult circumstances, when the easiest thing in the world would have been to walk away – we chose to take power because we knew the point of politics is to put principles into action. To get things done. Not just to feel good, but to do good.

    So we took power … and we got crushed.

    So you could forgive us for thinking twice about whether power is really worth it.

    But of course it’s worth it.

    Having fine principles but no power is just turning your backs on the people who need you the most, its letting someone else win the day.

    We have huge crises in Britain today – in our NHS, in our economy, in our relationship with the rest of the world.

    We have a Conservative government that got the support of less than a quarter of the electorate at the last election, led by a Prime Minister who nobody elected, that has plunged our country into chaos.

    They spent a year going for the working poor, refugees and junior doctors.

    And what have the Labour Party been doing? Going for each other.

    Instead of standing up to the Conservatives, they were sitting on the floor of half-empty Virgin trains.

    Because maybe Jeremy Corbyn thinks there are more important things than winning elections, but for millions of people desperate for an affordable home, for a fair wage, for a properly funded NHS, they cannot wait. How dare the official opposition abandon them?

    Whichever party you supported at the last election, we all know that Britain needs a decent, united opposition.

    So if Corbyn’s Labour has left the stage, then we will take the stage.

    People say to me, ‘this is a great opportunity for the Liberal Democrats’…

    …but this is more than opportunity…it is duty.

    Britain needs a strong opposition. The Liberal Democrats will be that strong opposition.

    Do you ever listen to these Labour people arguing among themselves, throwing around the word Blairite as if it’s the world’s most offensive insult?

    I even hear some of the Momentum folks referring to Gordon Brown as a Blairite – I’m pretty sure he’s a Brownite.

    So, just to reassure you, I am not a Blairite.

    I was proud to march against his illegal invasion of Iraq. I was proud to stand with Charles Kennedy. And I was incredibly proud when Charles’ brave stance was vindicated in the Chilcot report.

    I was also proud to be in the party that stood up against his government’s attempts to stamp on our civil liberties – from compulsory ID cards to 90-day detention without charge.

    And I was proud of Vince as he called out his government for de-regulating the banks.

    But there is more to Tony Blair’s legacy than that.

    I kind of see Tony Blair the way I see The Stone Roses, I preferred the early work.

    Tony Blair’s government gave us the National Minimum Wage.

    It gave us working tax credits.

    It gave us NHS investment and a massive school building programme.

    I disagree with him a lot, but I will not criticise him for those things. I admire him for those things.

    I respect him for believing that the point of being in politics is to get stuff done, and you can only get stuff done if you win.

    Otherwise you’re letting your opponent get stuff done instead.

    The Corbyn crowd like to talk in terms of loyalty and betrayal.

    Well, there is no surer way to betray the people you represent than to let your opponents win.

    I believe in working across party lines. I’m prepared to work with people of all parties and none if it will make people’s lives better.

    But I couldn’t work with Jeremy Corbyn, because Jeremy Corbyn would never work with me.

    I wanted to work with him during the referendum campaign, but he wouldn’t share a platform.

    Labour is having its leadership contest in a few days’ time, so of course Jeremy Corbyn may not be leader for much longer. In which case, it could be Owen Smith.

    Now, I don’t know Owen Smith that well. But, unlike Corbyn, he is certainly on our side of the European debate.

    So, if Owen Smith wins, I want to make clear that I am open to working together.

    And there are others I could work with too.

    There is a contest happening now for the chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee – it is an important position but, let’s face it, it’s a retirement position.

    Among the contenders are Yvette Cooper, Caroline Flint and Chuka Umunna.

    Shouldn’t that be their leadership contest?

    What are these people doing, jostling for position in a sideshow. They should be centre stage.

    The Government needs an Opposition, and that means progressives should be prepared to put our differences aside in order to hold them to account.

    But if Jeremy Corbyn does win, where does that leave us?

    A Conservative Brexit Government that, without us to restrain them, are showing their true colours: reckless, divisive and uncaring; prepared to risk our future prosperity for their own short-term gain.

    And a Labour Party that has forgotten the people it is there to stand up for. Hopelessly divided and patently unfit for government, with no plan for the economy or the country; led by a man who is obsessed with re-fighting the battles of the past and ignoring the damage the Government is doing to our future.

    There is a hole in the centre of British politics right now; a huge opportunity for a party that will stand up for an open, tolerant and united Britain.

    There is a hole in the centre of British politics right now for a rallying point for people who believe in the politics of reason, of evidence, of moderation…

    …who want facts, not fear;

    …who want responsibility, not recklessness;

    …who want to believe that someone is looking out for the long-term good of our country.

    There is a hole in the centre of British politics right now that is crying out to be filled by a real Opposition.

    We will stand up to the Conservative Brexit Government.

    If Labour won’t be the opposition Britain needs, then we will.

    That’s what we’re fighting for. A Britain that’s open, tolerant and united.

    And we will only build that Britain if we win. So here is my plan.

    We will dramatically rebuild our strength in local government, deliberately, passionately, effectively.

    Winning council seats is our chance to shape, lead and serve our communities to put liberalism into practice.

    Liberals believe in local government, I believe in local government, every council seat matters to me.

    So my challenge to you is to pick a ward and win it, and my commitment to you is that I choose to build our party’s revival on victories in every council in the country.

    And my plan includes continuing to grow our party – our membership is up 80% in just 14 months – but that is merely a staging post, we will continue to build a movement that can win at every level.

    I will lead the Liberal Democrats as the only party committed to Britain in Europe, with a plan to let the people decide our future in a referendum on the as yet non-existent Tory Brexit deal.

    I will lead the only party with a plan for our country’s long-term future. Green, healthy, well-educated, outward-looking, prosperous, secure.

    I will build the open, tolerant, united party that can be the opposition to this Conservative government. On NHS underfunding, on divisive grammar schools, on its attacks on British business.

    I want the Liberal Democrats to be ready to fill the gap where an official opposition should be. I want the Liberal Democrats to be the strong, united opposition.

    I want us to be audacious, ambitious and accept the call of history.

    A century ago, the Liberals lost touch with their purpose and their voters, and Labour took their chance and became Britain’s largest progressive party.

    Today I want us utterly ready and determined to take our chance as the tectonic plates shift again.

    I didn’t accept the leadership of our party so that we could look on from the sidelines, I did it because our destiny is to once again become one of the great parties of government, to be the place where liberals and progressives of all kinds gather to provide the strong opposition that our country needs.

    That is my plan. I need you to join me to fight for it.

    Let’s be clear, we’re talking about doing a Trudeau.

    Now, he’s better looking than me and he’s got a tattoo – I can fix one of those things, if you insist.

    I wouldn’t get into the boxing ring with him, but I reckon I could have him in a fell race.

    But the point is Trudeau’s Liberals leapt over an inadequate official opposition to defeat a right wing Conservative government. Do you fancy doing that? ‘cos I do!

    And there are some who will say…steady on. You’ve only got eight MPs.

    Well look, maybe for the time being you might be sceptical about us doing a Trudeau, but let’s agree that we can definitely do an Ashdown.

    To take this party from a handful of seats to dozens of seats, from the fringe to the centre, from irrelevance to importance.

    But what would us doing an Ashdown mean for Britain today?

    Well, look, no one believes, whether boundary changes happen or not, that Labour will gain a single seat from the Tories.

    The SNP could only possibly take one seat off the Conservatives.

    But there are dozens of Tory seats in our reach.

    Which means that the only thing standing between the Conservatives and a majority at the next election is the revival of the Liberal Democrats.

    So let’s make it happen.

    And we have to make it happen. Because there is a new battle emerging – here and across the whole western world – between the forces of tolerant liberalism and intolerant, closed-minded nationalism.

    Of all the things that depressed me the morning after the referendum, seeing Nigel Farage celebrating really took the biscuit.

    Here is a man who fought a campaign that pandered to our worst instincts: fear, anxiety, suspicion of others.

    And he is not alone. His victory was welcomed by Marine Le Pen in France, Golden Dawn in Greece and by nationalists and populists all across Europe.

    And in a few weeks he went from standing in front of that odious Breaking Point poster demonising desperate refugees…

    To standing on a podium in Mississippi next to Donald Trump.

    And make no mistake, Farage’s victory is becoming the Government’s agenda.

    When Conservatives talk about a ‘hard Brexit’, this is what they mean.

    A Brexit that cuts us off from our neighbours, no matter what the consequences for people’s jobs and livelihoods.

    A Brexit that toys with the lives of hard-working people who have made Britain their home, paid their way and immersed themselves in their communities, just as more than a million Brits have made their homes on the continent.

    A Brexit that will leave us poorer, weaker and less able to protect ourselves.

    But we will not let Nigel Farage’s vision for Britain win.

    To coin a phrase. I want my country back.

    To people who support Labour who look at the last election result and say, can I really take the risk of backing the Liberal Democrats? Let me blunt with you: the risk is for you to do nothing.

    In 20 years’ time we’re all going to be asked by our kids, when our NHS, our schools system, our unity as a country has been impoverished by 20-odd years of Tory rule, and when our economy has been relegated, our green industries trashed, and our status diminished after two decades of isolation from Europe.

    We’re going be asked, why did you let that happen? What did you do try and stop it?

    You might explain, well we lost the referendum so we had to move on and live with it.

    Or you might explain, well I was in the Labour Party, Momentum destroyed it but I couldn’t bring myself to leave and back someone else.

    And they’ll look at you and say, why didn’t you even try?

    Why did you let us limp out of Europe? Why did you stick with a party that handed the Conservatives unlimited power?

    And you’ll know that you could have done something different. You could have joined us. You could have fought back. You could have taken a risk.

    Because joining the Lib Dems today, is a risk. It’s a big ask.

    But let me very clear. As we stand on the edge of those two horrific realities: Brexit and a Tory stranglehold on Britain, the biggest risk is that you do not join us.

    So be absolutely certain of this reality.

    The only movement with the desire and the potential to stop the calamity of Brexit and the tragedy of a generation of Conservative majority rule, is this movement, is the Liberal Democrats.

    So, you can despair if you want and accept the inevitability of a Tory government for the next quarter of a century.

    Or you can recognise that the Liberal Democrats can prevent that inevitability.

    That means you. It means us. Together.

    Together, we must fight to keep Britain open, tolerant and united.

    Together, the Liberal Democrats must be the real voice of opposition.

    Together, we must win.

  • Tim Farron – 2016 Speech on the Chilcot Inquiry

    timfarron

    Below is the text of the speech made by Tim Farron, the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, in the House of Commons on 6 July 2016.

    Today, we stand alongside the families of the 179 British servicemen and women and 24 British civilians who died in the Iraq war. We also stand beside the many more who continue to live with injuries sustained while serving their country in Iraq. We are proud of them and we honour them.

    The Chilcot report makes clear the absolute determination of the former Prime Minister Mr Tony Blair to pursue war in Iraq, no matter what the evidence. There is a stark contrast between that single-minded determination to go to war and the reckless and complete absence of any plan for what would come next. What came next was 179 British servicemen and women killed, as well as 100,000, or more, Iraqi civilians. What came next was the fuelling of what is now ISIS-Daesh, which threatens not only Iraq but the middle east and the safety of us all.

    In 2003, the much missed Charles Kennedy said in this House:

    “The big fear that many of us have is that the action will simply breed further generations of suicide bombers.”—[Official Report, 18 March 2003; Vol. 401, c. 786.]

    Will the Prime Minister now take the opportunity on behalf of his party and this House to acknowledge that Charles Kennedy was right all along in leading opposition across the country to a counterproductive war? Should not those who accused Charles Kennedy of appeasement—some of whom are still on these Benches—apologise to him, his family, our servicemen and women, our country, and the people of Iraq?

  • Tim Farron – 2016 Speech on the EU

    timfarron

    Below is the text of the speech made by Tim Farron, the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, on 6 June 2016.

    Thank you all for being here. And thank you David Cameron, Harriet Harman and Natalie Bennett for what I think you’ll agree is an unprecedented – and, frankly, pretty unlikely – showing of cross-party consensus.

    We are about to face the most important decision of a generation, and one that that will determine the future of our country.

    And the fact we’re all here today shows how important we all feel this is. I know, in Europe, Britain can thrive. Together we will be a stronger and more prosperous nation, creating opportunity for future generations, respected all over the world.

    I believe in the positive case for Europe. But I cannot stand back and allow the leave campaign to guide us towards economic ruin, because of a campaign based on lies.

    How betrayed will people feel if they vote to leave Europe based on the reasons presented by the Leave Campaign, only to see in the weeks, months and years that follow that those reasons were utter, invented rubbish?

    You won’t find me saying this about the Prime Minister very often, but what he has just said is absolutely right.

    It’s not just that the Brexit camp won’t say what sort of deal we’ll get – and what rules we’ll have to play by – it’s that they will literally say anything and everything.

    The list of countries they have claimed we can emulate – Norway, Switzerland, Albania, Iceland, Turkey, Ukraine and all the others… A reminder of how absurd the Leave campaign has become, and that I really need to crack on with my Euro 2016 Panini sticker album.

    But seriously, nowhere is Leave campaign’s con-trick more pronounced than when it comes to public spending.

    Their big red bus says you can save £350m a week, and then spend it all on the NHS. A complete con. And they’re still driving it round despite the figure being rubbished by every economist under the sun.

    And it’s not just the NHS this made-up, magic money is spent on. This dossier shows they have made two dozen different spending commitments.

    Want more money for schools? You got it. Roads, railways, houses. Yep. Do you want to pay junior doctors more, increase welfare spending and slash the deficit all in one go? Of course you do.

    You can even have more submarines if that is your thing.

    How about abolishing prescription charges? Cutting your council tax by more than half? Slashing VAT – and your energy bills too while they’re at it.

    They have even said they’d spend millions and millions filling in Britain’s potholes.

    All of which sounds very tempting, especially that last one – filling in potholes is a cause very close to every Liberal Democrat’s heart.

    But, if you add all these things up, it would cost £113bn.

    One hundred and thirteen BILLION pounds.

    Another clear as day example of one of their cons was just this week. On Saturday, they said by 2020, we can give the NHS a £100 million per week cash injection. On Sunday, they said we wouldn’t leave the EU until after 2020.

    So where would this magic money come from?

    They are literally making it up as they go along, trying to con the British public along the way.

    And that’s not the end of it. Every major financial institution – from the Treasury and the Bank of England to the IMF, the OECD and the World Bank – not to mention just about every credible economist in the country, thinks leaving Europe will hurt Britain’s economy.

    A few days ago the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that it would leave us up to £40 billion short in the public finances by 2020 – and that’s before all that extra magic spending.

    It is a black hole at the heart of their spending plans of more than £150bn.

    So they’ve got to come clean to the British public. Will they now disown these commitments and admit this is fantasy economics? That these are lies? That they add up to one, big massive con-trick?

    That’s why the four of us are here together today.

    There’s not much we all agree on, but we agree on this:

    It’s time for the Leave campaign to come clean about what will really happen if we leave the European Union.

    It’s time for answers.

  • Tim Farron – 2016 Speech on the EU

    timfarron

    Below is the text of the speech made by Tim Farron, the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, on 11 May 2016.

    So much of the debate around Europe has been about financial projections, trading complex cost benefit analyses about what will happen if we stay or leave. And fascinating though that all is, my hunch is that it might not, on its own, clinch the right result.

    Because there is much more to this Referendum than the economy, crucial though that is.

    It is also about more fundamental questions such as: what sort of country will my children be living in when they grow, what sort of country will their children live in?

    What is the international legacy we want to leave to the coming generations?

    We should be clear with ourselves. This decision is not so much about the here and now, but about the impact on our children and our children’s children.

    It is about the character of our country. For instance, do you see Britain as a country that stands apart from others, glowering across the White Cliffs of Dover in bad-tempered isolation? Or do you see Britain as an outward-looking country that works with its neighbours to build a more prosperous and secure world?

    Do you see Britain as a country that should resist any changes to meet the challenges of the twenty-first century? Or do you see Britain as an adaptable country that can thrive, innovate and lead in an open, global economy?

    Do you think the only way we can protect our security against distant threats is by standing alone? Or can we make ourselves safer by sharing our response with those countries who are our friends, who share our values and who also face those threats?

    I’m a natural optimist: Liberals are natural optimists. Last Thursday, as the biggest gainers in the local elections, my optimism was vindicated.

    As a movement, we want to look forward, not back. We are in the future business.

    A few weeks back I spoke to a 97 year old chap back home in the lakes. I asked him if he was voting in or out. He looked at me and said very matter-of-factly ‘well, either way, it’s not going to affect me for long’, which was a bit grim. And whilst I was trying work out how to respond he chipped in ‘but I’ve got grandchildren and great grandchildren, so I’ll be voting to stay’.

    He didn’t expand. He didn’t need to.

    Not everyone gets it though. Yesterday, Roger Daltrey came out for Brexit. He had his reasons, I’m not going to slag him off. In the 60s he led the youthful mod revolution. He’s 72, a slip of a lad compared to my constituent. But Roger, we’re not talking about your generation. We’re not talking about mine either. The referendum is about the generations to come.

    So let me be really blunt. You may be grumpy about Brussels. But I suggest that you have no right to prejudice the future of your children, grandchildren and great grandchildren.

    Liberal Democrats fought harder than anyone to give 16 and 17 year olds the vote in this referendum. The government blocked us and let those young people down. But this vote is still more about them than it is about people of my age and above.

    Of course, if you want, you can cast your vote in a self-regarding way. But I want to challenge you, before you vote, to think of those people that your vote will actually affect the most – Britain’s next generation.

    Have you the right to limit, bind and impoverish their futures? To narrow their horizons, curtail their freedoms, hamper their ambitions and isolate the country that they will inherit?

    Some may regret that Britain is no longer the imperial power it was generations ago, sovereign over India and much of Africa., But those same individuals often fail to recognise that our own sovereignty in a complex world is a much more complex thing – shared and limited whether in Europe or out of it.

    And let’s face it. The past wasn’t all that glorious, after all: it involved massive defence spending, national service, a succession of colonial conflicts in Malaya, Kenya, Cyprus and Borneo and – let’s be honest – the empire didn’t do that much for the sovereignty of those countries that we occupied…

    But it’s Britain future that this Referendum is about, not its past – glorious or inglorious.

    We shouldn’t allow the Referendum to become a collective exorcism of our Brussels demons at the expense of a rational consideration of what is in the long-term best interest of our country and our people – and what role we want to play in the world.

    I don’t want Britain to become an offshore financial centre, hoping like a Switzerland or a Panama, helping the global rich hide their wealth from tax authorities in other countries. I don’t want Britain to lose the rest of its manufacturing capabilities, which is what would happen if we go for the unilateral free trade approach that Brexit economists have suggested as an alternative to the European single market.

    I don’t want us to become a society riven with nationalism, viewing foreigners as hostile and dangerous, closing its frontiers to outsiders– a second incarnation of King Zog’s Albania or a partner to Putin’s Russia.

    I want us to recognise the future benefits of close relations with our neighbours and natural partners, how investing in each other’s economies and sharing in prosperity can make Britain even greater than it is now.

    People talk about Europe being very good for business. The single market, no tariffs, free movement of labour. And they are right, but you know what? Even more than that, the thing that business and economies need more than anything else to prosper is…peace.

    Today we sit around the table with people that seventy years ago we were at war with. We sit around the table with people that, twenty-five years ago, had nuclear weapons on their soil pointed at us. Europe is the world’s most successful peace process.

    Our generations have enjoyed that peace, how dare we recklessly risk that peace for the generations to come?

    I want my children to grow up in a society that shares security, shares political values and shares social standards with our European neighbours, rather than risking a return to mutual hostility.

    Now, these are just a few of the vital arguments that need to be made by those of us who consider ourselves progressives.

    David Cameron’s approach seems to be to point at the door to exit and say ‘there be dragons’, to emphasise the danger. Now, there is of course much to fear from the isolation that exit would bring, but I say that the progressive case for Britain in Europe is the positive case for Britain in Europe. One the focuses on hope not fear, on opportunities not threats. A case that is uplifting, inspiring, and – crucially – patriotic.

    This is a decision too big for tribal loyalties. Progressives need to come together – and be seen to come together – to build a progressive political alliance. Because this is a choice between liberals and progressives on one side – and on the other, nationalists, who suspect foreigners of conspiring all the time to do Britain down.

    This is not about loving everything that comes out of Brussels. It is about recognising that there is a vision of co-operation, collaboration and mutual support which Britain can play leading part in.

    Look at the other side – Farage, Johnson and Goldsmith – the most conservative forces in British politics have already made their agenda clear. “These ‘Go’ rallies are one lurid blazer away from John Redwood’s fantasy cabinet.”

    They are English nationalists who want to reduce workers’ rights, reduce environmental protections and reduce financial regulations on the banks.

    Lord Lawson, the former Tory Chancellor, is just one of several Brexiteers who have argued that a vote to leave would free Britain to return to a full-blooded, hard-right Thatcherite agenda.

    Those of us who share a positive vision of a community of nations working together to tackle the immense challenges we face must come together. Those of us who claim the mantle of progressive politics have to champion the positive reasons for being in Europe. It is not enough to point out the calamity that Brexit will be.

    That is why I call on the leaders of all the progressive parties in British politics to join me on platforms such as this, going round the country making that case.

    Because fighting a positive campaign is the right thing to do.

    Last week saw the culmination of a despicable campaign for London Mayor by Zac Goldsmith, and saw the election of Sadiq Kahn, to whom I offer my warmest congratulations.

    But it also saw the emergence of a new and credible progressive voice for Londoners: Caroline Pidgeon.

    Her campaign buzzed with energy and creativity. Above all else, it was decent, positive and Liberal. Caroline’s campaign has enhanced her standing, it has enhanced the Liberal Democrats and it has enhanced London.

    But there is one thing on which I can agree with the Leave campaign:

    This is a once-in-a-generation decision.

    That’s why it’s so important that young people register to vote before the 7 June.

    We can choose isolation, only to leave our children trailing around after our European partners, haggling pathetically for the chance to get back into their markets, watching them implement the rules they tell us we have to adopt but without any influence.

    Or we can choose to remain, playing an active part in shaping the future of the European Union.

    And here’s the thing that frustrates me the most. We are one of the EU’s largest and richest countries. Why are we not leading from the front in Europe? For decades we haven’t been in the driving seat. We haven’t been in the passenger seat. We haven’t even been in the back seat. We have been rattling around in the boot with the spare tyre.

    But that’s been our choice, the choice of the British establishment, our stupid fault. Let this be the moment when we choose to use Europe to boost our power, boost our independence, boost our influence.

    We have a wealth of talent and creative energy in our tech entrepreneurs that can help shape the digital economy across Europe and that can help us tackle the delicate balance between open access and individual privacy.

    Take our creative industries, often driven by young people for the benefit of young people. One of the great British success stories and the fastest growing sector of our economy.

    The British music industry alone contributes £3.8 billion to the UK economy – over half of this comes from exports, and it is Europe that is its second-largest market.

    The EU and its member governments have led global negotiations on containing climate change – magnifying Britain’s influence through working with like-minded European partners.

    It’s only by working with our fellow European democracies that we will tackle the hiding of money around the world by the global rich revealed in the Panama Papers.

    More importantly, it is only by working with our European partners that we will tackle the kind of corporate tax evasion that is too dull to make the news but which has the most significant impact on revenue. Companies that use our infrastructure and resources, yet fail to pay their fair share.

    Their workforces are educated in our schools and treated in our hospitals. They use our roads and our railways. What an outrage that the likes of Amazon and Google who benefit from the investment of our tax payers, choose to sponge off those tax payers. Taxation is not a penalty. It is the subscription charge you pay for living in a civilised society. It is time that those corporations joined the civilised world. Remaining in Europe gives us a better chance of keeping those companies civilised, making them honest, collecting their taxes.

    And as we look forward, the Leave camp still can’t answer basic questions about what will happen if we do vote for exit.

    If we vote to leave, we will face years of uncertainty while our government negotiates different arrangements with individual governments: hitting UK employment and investment – and therefore jobs.

    In a global economy in which networked services operate across national boundaries, and cars, aircraft and smart-phones are assembled out of parts designed and assembled in different countries, we will be a bit-player, on the edge of the world’s largest single market – which is the EU.

    And as the Prime Minister said on Monday, we shouldn’t take the peaceful and open world we have benefitted from over the past 20 years for granted, either.

    Putin’s Russia is economically weak but militarily powerful and relies for its legitimacy on stoking anti-Western nationalism. So let’s not stoke our own anti-European nationalism. We’re best off working with our partners in the EU and NATO – two closely-linked organisations, as President Obama has reminded us – to contain the threat.

    Rapid population growth, economic weakness and political disorder across much of Africa and the Middle East are pushing waves of migrants cross the Mediterranean.

    There’s no way any European country can manage this long-term challenge on its own.

    The Leave campaign have conjured up the idea that the greatest threat to Britain’s future comes from Europe itself: that Brussels is a new Roman Empire, aiming to reduce Britain to colonial status. That’s absurd and the politics of the conspiracy theorist.

    And as for Trump in the latest Leave.EU video… Could anything set the bar for credible celebrity endorsement any lower?

    Our neighbours are also democratic states, with open societies and vigorous political debates. These societies share our values; they share our recent memory; if you want to know why they say to us ‘stay’ it is because they share the same experience of total war that we did. They’re like us, warts and all.

    Our British Identity

    We should celebrate our diversity and the fact that Britain’s character and identity has been shaped by successive waves of immigration from the continent: Saxons, Danes, Normans, then later French Huguenots, Russian Jews, and in the turmoil of two world wars German and Austrian Jews, displaced Poles and Ukrainians, Italian prisoners-of-war who stayed here to work.

    The British Establishment is as diverse as the rest of us. Winston Churchill’s mother was American. Boris Johnson’s grandmother was Turkish. Zac Goldsmith has a French grandmother. Nigel Farage has a German wife.

    Michael Gove has a romantic fantasy of Britain as naturally free and perfectly democratic, facing a continent that is naturally authoritarian: he’s even described the EU as ‘Soviet’.

    What an insult to those now free countries, once our enemies, now our friends within the EU who could tell Michael Gove all about life under soviet imperialism. The EU is the antithesis to that authoritarianism. They should know – they were liberated from it and chose instead to belong to an international club that has freedom and liberalism at its heart.

    Of course the EU is far from perfect; but then Westminster and Whitehall are far from perfect – for example, Michael, thanks to you, the Department for Education is now a basket-case. It doesn’t mean that I want to leave Britain.

    Even though of course Britain isn’t a spotless miracle of democracy either. As police investigations into the Conservatives’ election expenses show.

    Liberal Democrats are as frustrated at the obstacles to political reform in Westminster as in Brussels. But that doesn’t mean we want to blow the Palace of Westminster up, any more than we want to take our bat home from Brussels.

    The Leave campaign has vigorously dismissed the long succession of English-speaking heads of government, the Australian and Canadian prime ministers, the US President, who have told them they are wrong. These are the leaders of the countries Boris Johnson and Michael Gove think we should be moving closer to, in an imagined ‘Anglo-sphere’ of special relationships. But the reality is that the people they want to work with think they are fools – and they certainly believe that to leave is the most foolish course of action.

    Since they see European governments in the EU as hostile to Britain, and find American and Commonwealth leaders urging us to remain an EU member, they might like to adopt the old Millwall chant as their theme song: ‘Nobody likes us, and we don’t care’.

    I care about the future of this country, and I’m sure that future will be more secure and more prosperous if we continue to work together with the Dutch and Danes, French and Spanish, Germans and Italians.

    The EU is not a monster directed against Britain by a secret conspiracy in Brussels. It’s a grouping of friendly democratic governments, struggling to master the many challenges we all face.

    The unavoidable compromises among 28 governments, with different pressures from their domestic publics, don’t always reach the perfect answer that some in Britain demand.

    But life isn’t perfect, and politics is about compromise; and political negotiation among democratic governments across Europe is far better than what our grandparents suffered in war, or the numbing fear and anxiety of those of us who grew up through the cold war.

    So in this referendum, my challenge to voters of my age or older, is to use your vote in the interests of those that your vote will affect the most. Your children and grandchildren. And my challenge to younger voters is that you should leave no-one in any doubt that the Britain you will inherit must be outward looking, positive, ambitious – not isolated, limited and negative.

    I want my children to grow up in a confident Britain that pursues prosperity and peace in cooperation with our neighbours, countries that are also our cousins; not a sullen country cut off from the continent. Britain is a European country; we share democratic and liberal values.

    We share Europe’s history.

    We share Europe’s future.

    That’s why I vote to remain.

  • Tim Farron – 2016 Speech to Commons on Queen’s 90th Birthday

    timfarron

    Below is the text of the speech made by Tim Farron, the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, in the House of Commons on 21 April 2016.

    I thank you, Mr Speaker, for calling me to speak, especially as I managed to make it into the Chamber only when the Prime Minister was concluding his remarks—my apologies to him. On this occasion I am convinced that, not having heard one of his remarks, I would have agreed with them all.

    It is a massive honour to give praise and to acknowledge the service of Her Majesty on her 90th birthday. Unlike many people in this place, I have spoken to Her Majesty on only a limited number of occasions. It was on one occasion really, as a very new Member of Parliament. She was asking me how I was getting on as a new MP and how I was coping with the correspondence. I did confide that, on occasions, people would come up to me in the street and say thank you, or acknowledge a letter that I had written to them, and I would sometimes just go blank. I am sure that colleagues share that sensation and think, “Right, what are they talking about? I can’t quite remember the detail.” Her Majesty said, “Yes, that happens to me all the time. I always say that it is the least I could do”. Perhaps we should all cling on to that as a good get-out-of-jail card.

    Her Majesty has had occasion to visit formally my part of the world—Westmorland—on two occasions in her reign. The first was in 1956, which was 14 years before I was born. It was the year of the Suez crisis; the year of the Clean Air Act; and the year that the United Kingdom turned on its first nuclear power station. The second occasion was three years ago, when I was privileged to meet her in Kendal as the Member of Parliament for Westmorland and Lonsdale. In the 57 years between those two visits, and indeed since she assumed the throne, so much has changed for all of us. Much, much more has changed for Britain and the world in which we live. The Elizabethan age will be reviewed by history as a vast, transformational and tumultuous era, during which our Queen has provided immeasurable constancy, which will be looked back on as the thread that runs through all of it, and that has made change possible without the uncertainty and instability that could have come about otherwise.

    In Her Majesty’s time, Governments have indeed come and gone. She has seen them lead Britain into the European Common Market, and then seen her people vote to remain—that was when I was five years of age. She has seen Britain lead the world by becoming the first G7 country to commit 0.7% of GDP to international development aid. She has seen Britain become a world leader in renewable energy and make great strides in tackling climate change. She has seen technological advances race ahead from when a telegram or a radio programme was a thing of great excitement to the prevalence of satellite television, the iPhone, letters being supplanted by email and playground conversations by tweets and Facebook status updates.

    Through all those years of change and upheaval, Her Majesty’s selfless service to Britain has remained a constant. She is admired at home and around the world for her constant and consistent advocacy of Britain at its best. I am bound to say—others have reflected on this—that she embodies the value of a constitutional monarchy. She is a neutral person who is above politics and who is the foundation of our constitution. She is someone to whom all of us, whatever our political views, can look, and with whom we can share an allegiance. That is an immeasurably valuable thing.

    Even as we contemplate the monumental things that have occurred during Her Majesty’s reign, it is worth remembering that birthdays are very personal occasions. They are opportunities to celebrate the lives we lead and give thanks with friends and families. Hers has been an extraordinary life and she is an extraordinary example to all of us in public life of the meaning of public service. As we and others pay tribute to her example, I hope that she, who has so many friends, children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren and a loving husband, experiences the same joy and pleasure that we all do when we get together to celebrate with those whom we love. On this wonderful and historic day, on behalf of my party and my constituents in Westmorland and Lonsdale, I pay tribute to Her Majesty, to her dedication, to a lifetime of public service and to her faith, and wish her a very happy birthday and many more to come. I thank God for her service. Long live the Queen.

  • Tim Farron – 2016 Opening Speech to Liberal Democrat Spring Conference

    timfarron

    Below is the text of the speech made by Tim Farron, the Leader of the Liberal Democrat, at the party’s spring conference on 12 March 2016.

    When you’re sat in the front row, it’s impossible to miss your cue to get on stage.

    But for those of you who were at conference in the autumn, you may have noticed I was a little late to the stage.

    I was sitting very happily having a cup of tea in the green room, completely oblivious to what was happening

    I didn’t think I was due on for at least 5 more minutes.

    So, in my own good time, I wandered on stage, reasonably calm and collected, unaware that panic had set in.

    People were dashing around backstage trying desperately to find me.

    One member of my team, frantically rushed into the toilets thinking I was stuck inside and broke down a door.

    So, not only do I have to apologise to the Bournemouth Arena for the broken door but also to the poor person who was actually sat on the toilet at the time.

    Thank you so much to Lauren and all the amazing people who’ve spoken tonight.

    With talent and energy like that we know that our future is very bright.

    I met Lauren when I went to campaign in her council by-election.

    She knew everyone and everything about that community.

    I was massively impressed. I said, “Lauren how long have you lived here?”

    “18 years she said”. I thought for a second. “How old are you Lauren?” … 18.

    Well for Lauren, and anyone here who wants to, I hope that each one of our new members tonight has the best opportunity to become a member of parliament.

    And I’m not going to be neutral about this. I am crystal clear that we can make a difference and make that happen by supporting Sunday’s diversity motion, and creating a better chance of getting them there.

    I don’t believe in laissez faire economics because it doesn’t create fairness. Surely now we understand that laissez faire doesn’t create fairness when it comes to diversity.

    And that’s one of the reasons we’re all here in York, and why we come to conference.

    To debate our polices;

    debating diversity;

    debating cannabis when no other party has the confidence to do so;

    and debating the intrusive way the Government wants to gather our most personal data.

    Together we are shaping the fightback…

    one member one vote, opening our doors and opening our debate to every member, shaping this movement, building our distinctive, radical, Liberal agenda that can transform Britain from the grassroots up.

    And there are millions of liberals in this country. Our mission is to turn them into Liberal Democrat members.

    As we heard from Saleyha, she joined because she believes in what we believe in.

    Of course, Saleyha joined – crucially – because someone asked her.

    So, I’m sure you have seen there are two membership forms on every seat.

    My challenge to you is to recruit two new members each before the end of this month.

    And together we will be part of a growing, exciting team that will make a difference in May, and secure the result we all want in the referendum.

    So, the EU referendum. If like me, you were born after 1957, this is the first time you will get to vote on our future in Europe.

    This is likely to be the biggest vote you will ever cast.

    So it’s important we weigh up all the arguments. And in that spirit you’ll see that there is a stall here for the Leave campaign.

    And they are here for 2 reasons.

    One, we are lovely liberals who like a debate.

    Two, they are giving us cash.

    Cash, ladies and gentlemen, we will spending on a campaign, to beat them.

    So, this is the biggest campaign you will ever fight.

    The biggest stakes, the most to gain, the most to lose.

    So the campaign has begun.

    Lots of noise and it’s only going to get louder.

    People in the UK are waiting for a clear honest case.

    Over these last few weeks as I’ve been knocking on doors, more and more people are mentioning Europe.

    And most of them, don’t want to tell me their views, they want to know mine.

    Now obviously, they’ve come to the right person – trust me, I’m a politician.

    So let’s be honest about where we stand.

    We believe that Britain is stronger in Europe.

    And this vote is so much more important than the tedious internal Tory party soap opera that’s playing out in the news every day,

    And more important, indeed, than what the Queen really thinks… about Michael Gove.

    I, of course, would not dream of speculating as to Her Majesty’s views on Europe.

    All I will say is that she is a shining example… a shining example of European integration and harmony – of how a Greek family and a German family can be united in peace and happiness for 70 years.

    Aside from the soap opera, people really want to know the substance.

    They want to know what it will mean for their family, for their business, their job, their children’s future, our safety.

    So here goes:

    200,000 British companies currently export goods to Europe.

    Yes we pay in, but the CBI says Britain’s access to the European single market is worth 78 billion pounds.

    The car industry, reliant on European trade, employs 700,000 people.

    The single market gives us access to 500 million consumers.

    British families benefit from cheaper goods and services – everything from phone tariffs to flights – are cheaper because of European cooperation.

    So you can fly on holiday for less, and then when you get there post really tedious selfies from the beach at a fraction of the cost.

    Thousands of criminals are no longer on our streets because our police can share information.

    And hundreds of criminals have been brought back to justice here in Britain.

    And British workers have better annual leave, they have better protections from harassment at work, and better maternity leave.

    Strength in numbers, clear benefits, common sense.

    So there is an enormous net financial, economic and business benefit of being Europe.

    That doesn’t stop those who want to exit, constantly talking of the cost of being in Europe.

    But I look around our continent, at the scars of the last hundred years, and I see a far more painful cost of a dis-united Europe.

    People have different reasons for their stance on Europe.

    Business interests, the opportunities for their children, or maybe they just saw an opportunity to gain a bit more attention in their bid to become the next Tory leader.

    But for me, one thing stands out above all else.

    Countries who once had warheads pointing at each other, today work together in peace.

    I don’t remember the last war.

    But I remember the cold war.

    There’s an odd, stone building in the woods near our village, and I always joke with the kids that it’s the entrance to a nuclear bomb shelter, that there are four men from Kendal still down there, fighting over the last potnoodle thinking the bomb dropped three decades ago.

    When I was a teenager, I remember coming down Fishergate Hill in Preston on a Sunday morning.

    I did a double take because the old laundrette had changed hands, instead it had become a showroom for nuclear fallout shelters.

    I was 14, and I thought: One, nuclear fallout shelters cost a lot of money,

    Two, nobody I knew in Preston had any money, Three, here was a shop apparently successfully selling these things anyway,

    Four, ergo, the end of the world was imminent.

    And that threat might seem laughable now.

    But it wasn’t then.

    It was 1984, we lived in a divided Europe, we lived in the shadow of the bomb.

    Now, as it happens, I drove down Fishergate Hill with my dad a couple of weeks ago and its gone back to being a laundrette.

    Over those years, Paranoia and aggression has given way to cooperation and hope.

    After decades of brutal conflict, European nations came together.

    Countries behind the iron curtain are our allies.

    The Warsaw Pact gave way to a unified Europe.

    Those who wish to turn their backs on Europe, turn their backs on history.

    When we face a dangerous world, I want to stand with my neighbours.

    I thank God that today, that our leaders sit around a table with leaders of countries who a generation ago had nuclear weapons on their soil pointed right here.

    If that was the only reason to remain, it would be good enough for me.

    So, our arguments are powerful, the cause is crucial but the campaign is not going to be easy.

    But we will make it even more difficult if we refuse to accept that things aren’t perfect.

    Just as we know that Westminster is not perfect. So Europe is not perfect.

    Just as we want to change Westminster, we should also want to change the European Union.

    And you don’t affect change by storming off in a huff.

    As any kid who’s picked up the ball in a sulk and stalked off home will tell you, that’s not the way you make friends.

    And it’s definitely not the way to win the match.

    Before we can convince the British people that Europe offers a great future for Britain, we should recognise that too often the Union appears out of touch and out of reach.

    It needs further renewal and reform to meet the challenges of the 21st century.

    By leading, and not leaving, we can maximise our influence to drive renewal and reform of the EU.

    This is Britain’s time to lead the way.

    Let’s reduce the moments where it has become too burdensome, bureaucratic and bloated, but let’s drive forward the things it does so well, to create opportunity, drive prosperity and open our eyes to the world.

    Let’s complete the single market, and drive forward the digital economy.

    Let’s give small business much greater representation in Brussels.

    And let’s spearhead green growth and sustainability.

    Some of the rhetoric in the campaign recently has been unpleasant to put it mildly

    Iain Duncan-Smith has said we’d be at greater risk of Paris style terror attacks if we remain, and people on both sides have tried to scare monger about borders, refugees and migrants.

    Using desperate people fleeing war and terror, as pawns to score points, is appalling and it is weak.

    This campaign needs the opposite.

    This campaign needs strength and compassion.

    If the leave campaign wish to play nasty, we can’t really affect that.

    The same forces who used images of babies in incubators to campaign in the AV referendum can’t wait for a race to the bottom on immigration, migration and refugees.

    But Liberal Democrats, I will not stand for it.

    There are many people on the leave side who are complaining about something they call ‘project fear’.

    Now, as you know, I believe that being in Europe is better for Britain, and I know I can run a campaign that is positive, that is hopeful, optimistic and praises the benefits of our membership.

    But, I can’t ignore the fact, that the prospect of leaving scares me.

    It’s quite sensible to be afraid of something that is dangerous.

    But to use fear of the other, to demonise those who are different to you, that is disgraceful and we will call it out whenever we see it.

    And to make matters worse, all this anti-European nationalism is charting the way for Neil Hamilton’s political comeback.

    The Hamiltons!

    Neil Hamilton is now the top of the list for UKIP in Wales.

    What on earth has Wales done to deserve that?

    And not only is Neil Hamilton on the list. Mark Reckless, the poor-man’s Douglas Carswell, is also looking to Wales for his comeback.

    Two Englishmen who took democracy for granted, assuming that Wales will accept what England has rejected.

    Another reason why Kirsty Williams’ leadership is so vital in giving Wales positive politics against the rise of nasty isolationism.

    So… the referendum, do you remember AV? That went well.

    Do you remember, at the time, there was a newly elected left wing Labour leader who wouldn’t put his back into the campaign?

    Sound familiar? History seems to be repeating itself.

    Jeremy Corbyn, please do not let your own internal party chaos get in the way of winning this campaign.

    I know you may have wanted to leave in the past, but we treat your conversion as genuine and so I ask you to show the zeal of the convert and get on board.

    If ever there was a time you needed to show your party, and the country, that you can lead, now is that time.

    Shall we cross party lines, put our party interests aside for the good of our country?

    Because if you won’t, I’ll make a direct appeal to those Labour party members now.

    The Liberal Democrats are a united force.

    We are Britain’s internationalist party.

    We believe in international cooperation, that Britain stands tall in the world because we stand tall in Europe, that British business is more successful, that our streets are safer, and we are better equipped for those challenges that don’t stop at borders.

    If your party leadership remains blinkered to the risk, then your party is sleepwalking to the exit.

    So, come with us, share a platform, and let’s make the positive, unified case that we all believe in.

    In together, let’s make Britain’s future better, by making Britain’s future one that is in Europe.

    Recently, Nicola Sturgeon gave a big speech, on why we should remain in Europe.

    It was a strong pro-European speech. She made this important speech in London, which is not in Scotland.

    Perhaps she didn’t want the Scottish people to hear it.

    She called for a positive case to be made for Britain to stay in Europe…

    And then focussed her entire attention on threatening the rest of the UK with a leave campaign of her own.

    In fact Nicola has spent the last month talking about what’s going to happen if we lose the referendum, rather than working with others to try and win it.

    We know that the EU referendum is just another opportunity for nationalists to pursue their single minded, destructive goal of separation at all costs.

    They are lining up to tell us that a vote to leave would inevitably lead to a second referendum on independence for Scotland.

    That will not help persuade a single wavering voter.

    What Nicola Sturgeon is doing is blowing a dog whistle giving permission to separatists to vote to leave the EU so that Scotland can then leave the UK.

    The EU referendum is too important to be treated as an excuse to hark back to the independence debate.

    When we look to Scotland we should remember how the referendum there was won.

    Charles Kennedy, Michael Moore, Jo Swinson, Willie Rennie – they were out on the streets with campaigners from all parties and none. Making the positive, liberal case.

    They shunned the aggression and nastiness of the online battles, and offered hands of friendship and cooperation.

    I am a patriot, and patriots love their country. Nationalists hate their neighbours.

    We will campaign as patriots, as liberals, we will campaign together.

    In Britain we have a menu of parties in this debate:

    Those that are resolutely anti Europe – UKIP

    Those split down the middle – Tories and Greens

    Those who are half hearted with ulterior motives – the nationalists

    Or the half-hearted and just a bit rubbish – Labour.

    And then there’s the party, the only party, passionate about a reforming Britain, in a reforming Europe.

    A prosperous Britain in a prosperous Europe, a green Britain in a green Europe, a secure Britain in a secure Europe.

    There are millions of people in Britain who know that this is the biggest choice for our country in their lifetimes, and that just as Britain is stronger together with others, so are we as individuals stronger when we join those of like mind to achieve what is right.

    The Liberal Democrats offer you the chance to work with those who think like you about our future in Europe.

    We need you, you need us – join us today, join the party that is united in the shared belief that Britain’s position in Europe is vital to the country’s future security and prosperity.

    And this campaign will be a major focus as we rebuild our party.

    In together we will fight for a stronger and more prosperous nation, creating opportunity for future generations, respected all over the world.

    The global issues that we face can only be overcome by international cooperation.

    Those who believe we can be stronger alone are turning their backs on the real world, a modern world, lost in a sepia tinted view of memories and false nostalgia.

    We could once separate our politics between domestic and international.

    But not anymore.

    The questions is not whether Britain can survive alone,

    it is whether Britain can better thrive with others

    When we face the world together, there is no doubt in my mind that for our future prosperity and safety, we should vote to remain.

    There is no doubt in my mind that to work alongside those countries who share our interests and share our values, we need to remain.

    And there is no doubt in my mind that to be the beacon of hope and freedom, in a turbulent and dangerous world, we must vote to remain.

    We are a proud nation that stands tall in the world.

    We are home to freedom, ingenuity, creativity.

    In these next 14 short weeks, the post-war European project of peace, co-operation and prosperity lies in Britain’s hands.

    Europe looks to us.

    We are clear.

    Britain must not leave.

    Britain must lead.

  • Tim Farron – 2016 Speech to Liberal Democrat Spring Conference

    timfarron

    Below is the text of the speech made by Tim Farron, the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, to the party’s Spring Conference on 13 March 2016.

    You will be unsurprised to hear that I was recently interviewed by Stylist magazine.

    They asked me lots of exciting questions regarding my colossal sense of glamour.

    They also wanted me to write about a woman who had been my hero.

    I wanted to be completely honest, and pick the woman who was indeed my hero.

    Neva Orrell.

    She was a local councillor in Leyland when I first joined the Liberals… but Stylist magazine said that they wanted me to pick someone a bit more well known.

    So I tried Shirley Williams – they said no.

    I tried Elizabeth Warren. Nope.

    So in the end, they asked me to write about that well known woman. Bill Clinton.

    ***

    So, Neva Orrell.

    First off, she was actually a woman.

    But also, Neva was a teacher.

    She was a local councillor in our area when I first joined the Liberals.

    She was four-foot-ten, had a tangerine rinse and – to the best of my knowledge – was the only person Tony Greaves was scared of.

    Neva had lived through the war.

    She’d lost loved ones, witnessed the devastation, the grief and the tragedy of war – and she became convinced that we must work together to build a world where hatred and war might be overcome.

    She wanted to join a movement that would fight for tolerance, peace and freedom, for the things that would make a repeat of that war least likely.

    In 1949 she joined the Liberals. Neva spent the next 53 years of her life being the greatest servant that her community in Leyland had ever known.

    Getting people rehoused, improving roads, cleaning up the environment, meeting the needs of individuals throughout the town.

    Maybe some would be dismissive about this; A great internationalist, a great liberal? Who then spent her time on pavement politics?

    But that is how it should be.

    Because if you are a liberal then you will walk the walk, committed to your community.

    Your community.

    The place you live

    The experiences and identities you share

    The people with whom you feel you belong

    Community is what you make it, and where we – where you – make a difference.

    We say we care about people, and we prove it by serving people, empowering people, getting things done.

    And it is what makes us liberals.

    We stand for election not to be something, but because we want to do something.

    We campaign not to be grand, but to do grand things – make a difference.

    It is what makes us different.

    I joined the Liberal Party at 16.

    Now, you may be surprised to discover this, but this was not a carefully calculated career move.

    Not a career move, but not a cop-out either.

    I didn’t join a pressure group. I joined a movement.

    Determined to use power to make a difference – and give people opportunities.

    Because every family, every small business, everyone in Britain deserves a clear path to fulfil their own ambition.

    ***

    Now, as well as stylist, I’ve also made the hallowed feature pages of Autocar magazine.

    They had heard that my car had been written off in the floods.

    They were impressed by my dedication and commitment to something so battered and beaten up…

    They also wanted to know about my Volvo…

    It was early December and I had agreed to do an interview with BBC News about the floods.

    Half an hour before I was on air, I was in the car with my kids and the river wall in front of me broke.

    In two seconds flat the car had filled up to our waists…

    We had to bail out and do it quickly.

    We were a few miles from the nearest village, stranded, and completely soaked by the side of the road… and then the phone went, it was the BBC.

    So, John Simpson style, me and the kids reported live from the scene while my Volvo, and a very large number of precious prefab sprout CDs disappeared from view.

    Now, we lost a car. That’s nothing.

    I lost my beloved pre-fab sprout CDs. Even they can be replaced,

    But friends of mine lost their homes, their businesses.

    ***

    And here in York more than six hundred homes and businesses, some just a couple of hundred yards from where we are today, were under water.

    Many are yet to recover.

    And yet, when I look around York, as I did on Friday, I see the same tremendous spirit I see at home in Cumbria – testament to the determination of people who come together and support one another.

    When a community is tested, you see it’s true character.

    And as we can see by being here for Conference, York is open for business – Cumbria, the Scottish borders, the north, we’re all open for business.

    Even when this Government is barely lifting a finger to help, the spirit of the people is the real northern powerhouse.

    ***

    Within a few weeks of my birth in 1970, two disastrous things happened.

    1. England got knocked out of the world cup by West Germany

    2. The Liberals had an electoral disaster that made last May look quite good by comparison.

    We almost disappeared altogether.

    But we fought back. Not by accident, but by careful design.

    And we fought back by making a virtue of the fact that there is more to life than Westminster.

    Young Liberals led the rebuild of our party by taking our philosophy and our ideals into their communities and putting them into practice.

    They got their hands well and truly dirty, turning a belief in the individual into action, galvanising communities, winning change, challenging the self-satisfied power of the town hall and Whitehall.

    In 2016 let us choose that path back to power.

    Community politics is what we are for.

    The establishment is increasingly out of reach and out of touch, locally and nationally, it is down to us to make the difference.

    In every community I want us to be the antidote to the kind of politics that makes people go off politics altogether.

    ***

    In 1997 The Liberal Democrats made a tremendous leap forward, securing 46 MPs.

    One of those MPs was our excellent Chief Whip Tom Brake.

    I recently found out that Tom has also been a magazine star.

    It was an interview that had originally been offered to me, but without me knowing, my team decided Tom was much better suited for such a challenge.

    So you all have the press office to thank for the fact that last April’s centrefold in Men’s Health magazine, was not this gut on stage before you, but the rather more toned one of the chief whip.

    The feature involved posing without a shirt on, exercising every day for seven weeks, and eating healthily.

    Alistair was devastated not to have been asked.

    In 2001 and 2005 our numbers increased to 52 and 62.

    We got to 63 when Willie won Dunfermline.

    Indeed we reached that peak at a point when we didn’t even have a leader…Don’t go getting any ideas.

    In 2010, you know the story, we did the right thing, but paid a heavy price.

    We put country before party and I am dead proud that we did.

    But were the seeds of our setback in May sown many years before?

    Because Westminster can be a beguiling place.

    When you are there, there’s constant temptation to try and be like everyone else.

    We’ve had a full shadow cabinet. We’ve had junior spokespeople.

    We’ve even had enough for some troublesome backbenchers.

    Mind you, even with 8 we still have some of those.

    But, we must always ask ourselves, when we are a Westminster force, is it too tempting to get obsessed with Parliament that we forget the community politics that put us there?

    Westminster’s rules are laid down by parties that have an opposite agenda to ours – with powerful vested interests to protect, not people to liberate.

    For the establishment parties it is the best Old Boys’ Club in town, and they have stacked the rules to protect it.

    We arrive in the big league on our terms. But we too often attempt to remain on theirs.

    When we ran the biggest councils in this country, Liverpool and Newcastle, Bristol and Cardiff, Edinburgh and Sheffield. We did so because of who we were.

    We were never the council’s representatives to the people, we were the people’s representatives to the council.

    And as we rebuild we will – and must – continue to be the people’s representatives in Parliament too.

    We must return to our roots.

    No matter the office, always remaining true to our instincts.

    It’s time to focus not on parliamentary games, but on real life.

    It’s time we got back to community politics.

    ***

    In 2008 I started a campaign to bring a chemotherapy unit to my local hospital.

    We walked the 44-mile journey to the nearest unit to highlight our case, gathered 10 thousand signatures, and 600 people wrote personal stories to the local trust.

    We campaigned, we lobbied and we stood up for our community. In 2011, we got it.

    Shortly afterwards, an elderly couple called me over in the street and the lady told me that they had decided she wasn’t going to go through with treatment for her cancer because she couldn’t cope with the vast round trip…

    But when the new unit opened, she changed her mind.

    It’s about making a difference to people’s lives.

    In Bradford, Jeanette Sunderland saw that a library was closing. She pulled together local businesses and not only saved the library, but raised £1.4million to turn it into an enterprise centre, creating jobs and new businesses.

    It was Simon Hughes, who heard the plight of a gay Iranian man. He was facing deportation to a country that had killed his boyfriend. To this day he says that Simon’s action saved his life.

    In Sutton, the Liberal Democrats have just secured funding for the second largest cancer centre in the world, that will create 13,000 jobs, and develop two new cancer drugs every five years.

    Here in in York, Keith Aspden passed a budget protecting frontline services and have increased investment in community-based mental health care.

    And it was Michael Moore who secured a commitment from the Government to spend 0.7% commitment on international aid. Our commitment to the international community. Money which is currently saving hundreds of thousands of lives across the world.

    Community politics at every level.

    Lives across the country and across the globe are better because of the work we do.

    The work that you do.

    ***

    “The moral test of government is how that government treats those who are in the sunrise of their life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the elderly; and those who are in the shadows of life—the sick, the needy and the disabled.”

    Those are the words of Hubert Humphrey, Lyndon Johnson’s Vice-President.

    There is no doubt.

    Hubert Humphrey would mark this Conservative Government an abject failure.

    Just this week they voted through plans to cut £30 a week from the benefits of sick and disabled people.

    They are pushing ahead with cuts to Universal Credit, so low income working families will lose on average £1000 a year.

    And they still plan to exclude youngsters from being able to claim housing benefit, leaving vulnerable young people with nowhere else to go.

    Their benefit cuts are a calculated political choice – hurting millions of people.

    And their latest move is to cut Personal Independence Payments, by more than £1billion.

    640,000 people with disabilities are set to lose vital support that helps them live truly independent lives.

    As is his style, this Chancellor uses smoke and mirrors to distort the truth.

    His clever accounting and theatrical budgets mask the true scale of what he has planned.

    His agenda isn’t just a parliamentary game, it strikes right at the heart of the communities we represent.

    And we will not stand for it.

    ***

    We start, not with politics but with people, with communities.

    But the chancellor is currently placing the very foundations of a happy and healthy community – under threat.

    Our schools, our homes, our environment, even our health.

    The basic building blocks for life that can have the biggest impact.

    On housing…

    A decent home isn’t just a roof over someone’s head; it’s an opportunity to get a job, it’s an opportunity for security and peace of mind.

    So tackling the housing crisis must be the first priority for any community politician.

    Build more affordable homes… Invest in house-building… set up local housing companies by councils…create a Housing Investment Bank to bring in private capital… and allow councils to borrow to build.

    On education…

    The pupil premium not just a few pounds chucked into the pot; It’s tailored support to help a child thrive.

    Education is what creates the level playing field so that every individual can play a full part in their community.

    We will defend the pupil premium we fought to introduce, fight short-sighted cuts to school budgets, and challenge political interference.

    On the environment…

    Climate change isn’t just a fashionable campaign, it is a battle for the future of our planet.

    The environment is local. Home insulation, solar panels, flood protection. The world around us, the air we breathe and the land we rely on to survive, are under threat.

    And on health…

    Parity of esteem between mental and physical health isn’t just technical jargon.

    We will stand alongside Norman Lamb as he leads our battle to make sure someone with a life-threatening eating disorder has the same right to treatment for their condition as a patient with cancer.

    Housing. Education. Environment. Health.

    Essential for our communities. Essentials in life.

    All relying on Britain’s incredible public sector, and the people who work in it.

    ***

    And at a time when they should be focussing on improving public services, this Government is locked in a dispute with junior doctors.

    Instead of taking action to safeguard the future of the NHS – the Conservative government is running it into the ground.

    In Coalition the Conservatives had to be dragged kicking and screaming just to fund the very basics.

    Norman refused to back down when they tried to diminish our health service, and now on their own, the Tories are hoping we won’t notice what’s happening.

    Instead of working to strengthen and protect the NHS, Jeremy Hunt is jeopardising it.

    Junior Doctors are working tirelessly for the good of the British people and they have people’s lives in their hands – yet as we heard on Friday from Dr Saleyha Assan, they feel under attack.

    We should be working with them to save the NHS. They are the future of healthcare.

    Jeremy Hunt, enough is enough.

    You have mishandled this dispute with junior doctors.

    You have lost their confidence.

    You have lost the confidence of NHS staff.

    You have lost the confidence of the British people.

    You have proved that the NHS is at risk in Tory hands.

    The battle with junior doctors is the tip of the iceberg.

    The scale of this crisis is too big.

    It’s time for a full cross party commission.

    As Norman said, we need a new Beveridge deal for the 21st century.

    We cannot allow our NHS to wither because of the shameful politics of short termist politicians.

    ***

    Talking of which… George Osborne.

    This week he will come forward with his budget.

    We have already heard that more cuts are coming our way.

    George Osborne’s approach to the budget is political theatre. It’s about politics, headlines and calculated positioning.

    Not a long term economic plan, but a short term political scam.

    Our focus is 100% on people. How will this budget impact the lives of those around us?

    Osborne asks how will this play in the Daily Mail.

    We ask, how will this play in daily life?

    Thanks to the tough choices we took, the structural deficit will be abolished by next year.

    So, the UK now stands at a crossroads.

    Osborne is taking an unnecessary political choice to cut further.

    If the Chancellor really wanted to help the economy, he should invest in, and help our local communities.

    Because its time to give public sector workers the pay rise they deserve

    It is time to be active and ambitious by investing in capital spending on housing, broadband and public transport.

    It’s time to support the skills people want and need for the future.

    It’s time to make the tax system work for small businesses.

    ***

    Communities thrive when enterprise and small business can thrive.

    But far too often the cards are stacked against them.

    Google and Facebook can negotiate with the tax office for months, yet small businesses can’t even get through on the phone.

    So. We all know the system favours the big multinationals.

    well, it’s time we transformed the way we treat small business in this country.

    Instead of Government fawning over the multi-nationals, how about putting small business at the centre of our business economy?

    And we need to ensure our taxation system is fit for the future.

    It will be the new micro breweries, the community hubs, the app developers, the new firms in our communities who will make the difference.

    Some small businesses are small for good, the backbone of our economy.

    Some small businesses are small for now. If we back them they will build our future.

    We need a system that works for all small businesses, the small for good, and the small for now.

    Ensuring the tax system is a level playing field will take some work.

    But that is why I am delighted to announce that Vince Cable has agreed to chair an expert panel for me to look at how we radically reform the way we tax businesses.

    Over the next year, Vince’s team will come forward with a new approach, that’s fit for the future

    Because when the system is broken, we Liberal Democrats will not defend it, we should fix it.

    ***

    We are a proud to be Britain’s internationalist party.

    We believe that Britain should lead a response to the refugee crisis, not bury our heads in the sand.

    We believe Britain thrives when we lead amongst our neighbours in Europe, and will be diminished when we walk away from of the most important group of nations on the planet.

    And that’s why it is deeply humiliating for Britain when Barack Obama criticised the Prime Minister for having a ‘free ride’ on defence.

    Nowhere is it more plainly seen than in this government’s dismal treatment of the Afghan interpreters.

    For thirteen years we relied on the skills of these brave and loyal individuals to keep our troops safe in a brutal, bloody conflict.

    Yet our Government is sending them back to Afghanistan to live at the mercy of the Taliban, or is leaving them in refugee camps as they desperately try to reach the UK, the country they served.

    David Cameron; your treatment of the Afghan interpreters is a disgrace.

    Britain is better than a ‘free ride’ at the expense of those who laid their lives on the line for us.

    Show the world that we value those who show the ultimate loyalty to our country and bring them back to Britain without delay.

    It’s hard to miss the inflammatory rhetoric creeping into politics. Rather than looking for solutions, people look for someone to blame.

    None of this is more apparent or scary than in the United States.

    Now, I confess, I am conflicted about Donald Trump.

    He can’t be all bad – he has a cameo role in one of the greatest films of all time, Home Alone 2, and his only line is to give McAuley Culkin’s character directions to the hotel reception desk.

    And, ladies and gentlemen, they are accurate directions.

    Mind you, McCauley Culkin then goes to the reception desk and commits credit card fraud to pay for ridiculous luxuries that he could not otherwise afford.

    This was a popular and influential film, and frankly it’s a short hop from this kind of short-sighted consumer credit greed to the subprime market scandal, the fall of the banking system and a world-wide recession.

    For which, on second thoughts, I now hold Trump personally responsible.

    Is he a joke or is he terrifying?

    Well, we see that building walls and splitting communities, spouting hatred and venom, and attacking the vulnerable and voiceless, now constitutes a political movement. And I think that is terrifying.

    But don’t scoff at our cousins across the water, thinking ‘only in America, it couldn’t happen here!’

    Because across British politics there are the flag waving nationalists, those who demonise the other.

    But this party is the polar opposite of all that.

    We will be the beacon of tolerance and acceptance.

    Standing for what unites us, not the differences that divide us.

    As we see the tension at Trump rallies rise, I want to be absolutely clear:

    No matter where you’re from, who you are, the colour of your skin, your faith or who you love, we stand by your side.

    ***

    When you are a new leader, you fight to get attention, to make a mark.

    A journalist said to me the other day ‘all I know about you is that you’re that bloke who keeps banging on about refugees’.

    He meant it as a rebuke.

    I took it as badge of honour.

    The biggest humanitarian crisis in Europe for 70 years, with no sign of this tragedy coming to an end.

    190,000 refugees entered Europe in 2014, a post war record.

    Last year that number increased to 1 million.

    This year, the UN thinks there could be 3 million.

    And most refugees aren’t even coming to Europe.

    There’s a million in Lebanon, 700,000 in Jordan, 2.7million in Turkey.

    So many facts and figures.

    Such big numbers.

    Every one of them an individual, a person.

    In Calais, Cologne, Lesbos and in refugee centres here in the UK I’ve only met a hundred or so of them. But they are meetings I cannot forget. I will not forget.

    I confess that I am personally affected by every one of them.

    And so I feel personally ashamed by our government’s response to this crisis.

    A crisis right on our doorstep, yet our government chooses to look the other way.

    All those desperate people and the Prime Minister will not take a single one of them.

    Not the orphaned 11 year old in Calais.

    Not the shivering 85 year old woman I met in Lesbos.

    Not the family sleeping rough in Macedonia.

    Now, I heard one conservative columnist this week say that ‘the Prime Minister is bound by public opinion, and that will of course limit his room to act on the refugee crisis’.

    Well, do you know what, maybe it’s time politicians stopped following and had the guts to lead.

    Now is the time to say that when thousands of innocent kids are stranded cold and alone in camps in Europe, we don’t give a monkeys what the focus groups say.

    Now is the time to turn and face this crisis, to choose to play our part.

    Now is the time to take a stand, to lead.

    Because this is not about statistics.

    This is about people just like you and me.

    This is about dignity and decency.

    Do to others as you would have them do to you.

    On the morning of October 27th last year, I stood on the beach on the island of Lesbos and I met a couple in their thirties: a carpenter and a nursery teacher from the Daesh occupied region of Iraq.

    With them, still in their flimsy life jackets, they had their two little girls, aged three and five.

    To distract them from the terror of the journey over the sea to Europe they’d sung songs to the girls and told them stories for hours and hours.

    Why did they put them through this?

    They love their children as much as I love mine yet they risked their daughters’ lives…why? Because the bigger risk was to stay and not to flee.

    And the Britain I believe in, offers that family sanctuary, hope and a future.

    David Cameron has gone through Calais plenty of times recently on his way to Brussels.

    But he’s never got off the train there.

    He’s never seen for himself the heartbreak of those who have had to leave everything, to flee towards a country and a continent that you thought represented peace and security but got there only to be treated like dirt.

    He’s refused to meet the proud people, broken by the wickedness of those who sought to kill them at home, and broken again by the callous indifference of those to whom they looked for sanctuary.

    Being 12 and alone in a camp thousands of miles from home.

    Being in a boat tossed to and fro as you sought land in the darkness, hearing the screams of the people in the neighbouring vessel as it went down.

    Having to leave your town at night, the town you grew up in, the only home you ever knew.

    Seeing children as young as you slaughtered by Daesh.

    Their stories stay with me, they motivate me.

    No one should have to live as they have lived.

    But we don’t have to allow these stories to end with desperation and tragedy.

    They can be about hope and opportunity.

    Three weeks ago I went to Cologne.

    I met newly arrived refugees from Syria who were being integrated into German culture.

    I sat a dozen young Syrian men who were being taught intensive German.

    They had vital skills and were on the path to a career, on the path to being a massive asset to the country that had given them a second chance.

    And then a week ago I met 6 young people from Eritrea and South Sudan – refugees from persecution.

    They’d got their way to England, to Gravesend.

    They spend their days sat in a hostel with little to do.

    The UK authorities would not even provide them with basic English language lessons.

    One of these six had got herself onto a nursing course from September, but the rest were being left to rot.

    Their clear cases for asylum were being kicked off into the long grass.

    Bored, scared, directionless, young people overflowing with talent and denied opportunity by a government that is deliberately blind to their potential.

    Refugees in Germany, welcomed, trained, empowered – transformed into enthusiastic, tax-paying Germans.

    Refugees in Britain, held in contempt, trapped, their talents wasted, and let down by people who act in our name.

    Britain is better than that.

    And so I will continue bang on about it.

    To speak for British values, for common sense, for action to help the desperate, for fear to give way to opportunity.

    ***

    But we can be sure that the UK has no chance of exercising any kind of leadership if it opts for isolation and irrelevance.

    And in just over fourteen weeks, we will face a vote on Britain’s future in Europe.

    By the way, when I came in this morning, the leave stand was closed. They had indeed left.

    They did clearly did feel, it was better off out.

    So, it is exactly 25 years ago this very week – in what is a quite spooky coincidence – since my second favourite band, the Clash, had their one and only number one hit.

    ‘Should I stay or should I go’.

    The lyrics are, ‘if I stay there will be trouble, if I go it will be double’- project fear there from Strummer and Jones…

    Whether David Cameron’s renegotiation impresses you or not, this is so much bigger than Cameron’s deal.

    Here are the questions that we must all answer:

    We belong to the biggest most successful market on the planet. Are we more prosperous staying in, or getting out?

    We live in dangerous times. Are we safer alongside our friends and neighbours, or isolated.

    We face vast international challenges: climate change, the refugee crisis, a global economy. Do we best tackle these together or on our own?

    They are the big questions, and the answers to me are crystal clear.

    We are stronger together.

    We are stronger in.

    For our prosperity, our security, our relevance, Britain must remain.

    ***

    And our national security is being challenged by more than the referendum.

    Right now the Government are using it as an excuse to extend snooping powers.

    Theresa May won’t just have access to your Facebook messages, but to everything from your medical records to your child’s baby monitor.

    And it’s not just MI5 and MI6 – your local council will be able to know where you’ve been and who you’ve spoken to, as will the tax office.

    Not even the Home Office can pretend that this is purely about keeping people safe.

    Trying to fight terrorism by gathering more and more irrelevant information is illiberal and totally counterproductive.

    The haystacks of information will become so huge that finding the needle will be near impossible.

    No matter what the government calls it, don’t make any mistake – this is the Snoopers’ Charter back again and we won’t have it.

    ***

    This is what we’ve come to expect from the Conservative Government.

    Here’s a party which took office, backed by just 36% of British voters.

    They cling to a tiny majority of just 12, yet govern with a care-free arrogance, decimating social housing, demolishing green energy, and demonising refugees.

    And they are taking their chance to change the rules in their favour.. attacking public funding for the opposition to hold them to account, opposing Lords reform, gerrymandering boundaries and undermining the independence of the BBC.

    Even if you are a hardened Tory, you should be appalled by what this government is doing to our democracy.

    ***

    And you know what? It makes me unbelievably angry…. With Labour.

    Let me be clear about this.

    I’m not angry because Labour is now run by the kind of people who used to try and sell me tedious newspapers outside the Students’ Union. That’s their funeral.

    I am angry with Labour because their internal chaos is letting this government off the hook.

    The Corbyn agenda is about taking over the Labour party, not rescuing Britain.

    ***

    I will not stand by while the Tories dig in for a generation.

    We can be, we must be, what stands in their way.

    We have to build that force.

    Ward by ward, house by house, issue by issue.

    Pick a ward and win it.

    This May, next May, all year round.

    We can win anywhere, you can win anywhere if you immerse yourself in your community.

    You keep in touch, you get things done.

    We know, that no matter where you’re from, your parents’ wealth, the colour of your skin, your gender, your faith, or who you love, you must have every opportunity to succeed. And you have a home with us.

    Together we can show a liberal vision for Britain that isn’t obsessed with self interest, or the here and now, but the long term future of our country.

    With strategic capital investment.

    Strong, local public services.

    And a well paid public sector.

    Where enterprise is encouraged.

    Where clean energy creates jobs.

    And where everyone has the right to a decent home.

    And where desperate people fleeing war and persecution are not demonised, they are welcomed.

    We are the opposition that will talk to our country about our country.

    A champion for communities when they need it.

    The voice for junior doctors.

    Standing by our teachers.

    Backing innovation.

    A movement.

    We can be the voice that Britain needs, and become the movement to make that difference.

    Find your community, and make that difference.

    Liberal Democrats. This is our vision for Britain.

    Thank you.

  • Tim Farron – 2015 Speech on Syrian Air Strikes

    timfarron

    Below is the text of the speech made by Tim Farron, the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, in the House of Commons on 2 December 2015.

    As has been mentioned already, the spectre of the 2003 Iraq war hangs over the debate in this House and in the whole country. In 2003, the late and very great Charles Kennedy led the opposition to the Iraq war and he did so proudly. That was a counterproductive and illegal war, and Daesh is a consequence of the foolish decision taken then. Charles Kennedy was also right, however, in calling, in the 1990s, for military intervention in Bosnia to end a genocide there. I am proud of Charles on both counts.

    My instincts, like those of others, are always to be anti-war and anti-conflict. In many cases, the automatic instinct will be that we should react straightaway and go straight in. Others will say that under no terms, and not in my name, should there ever be intervention. It is right to look at this through the prism of what is humanitarian, what is internationalist, what is liberal, what is right and what will be effective. I set out five principles that I have put to the Prime Minister. I will not go into all of them here, with the time I have available, but they are available on the website and people can go and have a look at them. My very clear sense is that any reasonable person would judge them to have been broadly met.

    James Berry (Kingston and Surbiton) (Con):

    Will the hon. Gentleman confirm that, unlike the Leader of the Opposition, he and his party supported airstrikes against Daesh in Iraq and that today’s vote is about extending those airstrikes across the border that Daesh itself does not recognise, into Syria, to degrade Daesh as far as possible?

    Tim Farron:

    I am happy to confirm that.

    For me, and probably for many other Members, this has been one of the toughest decisions, if not the toughest decision, I have had to take in my time in this place. The five principles that we have set out have been broadly met, but I will not give unconditional support to the Government as I vote with them tonight. There are huge questions on the financing of Daesh by states such as Turkey, with the trade that is going on there. There are huge questions on the protection of civilians. Yes, a ceasefire, as discussed in Vienna, is the ultimate civilian protection, but we absolutely must continue to press for safe zones to be established in Syria. I continue to be very concerned about the lack of political and state involvement, notwithstanding what the King of Jordan said overnight, by close-by regional states, such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. I continue to be concerned about our failure to take our fair share of refugees, as part of the overall EU plan. I welcome what the Prime Minister said earlier, but I want a lot more than just “looking into” taking 3,000 orphan children from refugee camps. I want them here in Britain.

    Stuart C. McDonald (Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) (SNP):

    I am very grateful to the Liberal Democrat leader for giving way. Given that he has pressed so hard for the Government to take more refugees, why is he content to bomb that country when the Prime Minister has refused to give that assurance? This is ridiculous.

    Tim Farron:

    I will come to that in a moment. The reality is that this is a very tough—an incredibly tough—call.

    A final point I wanted to press the Prime Minister on concerns the funding of Daesh from within UK sources. I am very pleased to hear that there will now be a full public and open inquiry. It must cut off that which fuels this evil, evil death cult.

    This is the toughest call I have ever had to make, certainly in this House. What pushes me in the direction of voting for action is, above all, United Nations resolution 2249, which calls for us to eradicate the safe haven that Daesh has in Syria. The resolution does not just permit, but urges this country and all members capable of doing so, to take all necessary action to get rid of Daesh. If we had just been asked to bomb Syria, I would be voting no: I would be out there demonstrating in between speeches and signing up to emails from the Stop the War coalition. This is not, however, a case of just bombing; this is standing with the United Nations and the international community to do what is right by people who are the most beleaguered of all. I was so proud and moved to tears when I watched at Wembley the other week English fans singing La Marseillaise—probably very badly indeed, but doing it with gusto—and standing shoulder to shoulder with our closest friends and allies. How could we then not act today, when asked to put our money where our mouth is?

    What has really pushed me into the position where I feel, on balance, that we have to back military action against Daesh is my personal experiences in the refugee camps this summer. I cannot pretend not to have been utterly and personally moved and affected by what I saw. I could give anecdote after anecdote that would break Members’ hearts, but let me give just one in particular. A seven-year-old lad was lifted from a dinghy on the beach at Lesbos. My Arabic interpreter said to me, “That lad has just said to his dad, ‘Daddy are ISIL here? Daddy are ISIL here?’” I cannot stand in this House and castigate the Prime Minister for not taking enough refugees and for Britain not standing as tall as it should in the world, opening its arms to the desperate as we have done so proudly for many, many decades and throughout our history, if we do not also do everything in our power to eradicate that which is the source of the terror from which people are feeling.

    We are absolutely under the spectre of a shocking, illegal and counterproductive war in Iraq. It is a lesson from history that we must learn from. The danger today is that too many people will be learning the wrong lessons from history if we choose not to stand with those refugees and not to stand as part of the international community of nations. This is a very tough call, but on balance it is right to take military action to degrade and to defeat this evil death cult.