Tag: Steve Rotheram

  • Steve Rotheram – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    Steve Rotheram – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department of Health

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Steve Rotheram on 2014-06-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many times ambulance response times in (a) the North West and (b) each ambulance service trust in England have exceeded (i) 15, (ii) 20, (iii) 30 and (iv) 60 minutes since May 2010.

    Jane Ellison

    The information is not available in the format requested. The attached tables show that in April 2014, North West Ambulance Service responded to 95% of Category A immediately life threatening calls within 17 minutes and that 99% of calls were responded to within 31 minutes. The tables also provide response time information for each ambulance service trust in England since April 2011.

  • Steve Rotheram – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Steve Rotheram – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Steve Rotheram on 2014-03-12.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many individuals convicted of (a) murder or (b) attempted murder in each of the last 10 years have been released with exclusion zones forming a part of their licence arrangements.

    Jeremy Wright

    Unfortunately, it is not possible to answer these questions without carrying out a manual search through all relevant individual offender files, at disproportionate cost.

    Conditions such as an exclusion zone may be applied to an offender’s licence where it is necessary to manage the risk that the individual offender poses following release into the community – and where it is proportionate to that risk. Where qualifying victims have exercised their statutory right to make representations about the offender’s licence conditions, the exclusion zone set will take into account those representations. In each case, the supervising officer proposes conditions as appropriate and requests these from the appropriate authority, which applies it to the licence on behalf of the Secretary of State. In the case of determinate sentence prisoners, the authority is the prison governor; in the case of indeterminate sentence prisoners, or others whose release is on the direction of the Parole Board, the authority is the Parole Board.

    These conditions must be kept under review, and are intended to be flexible to the possible resettlement needs of an offender in the community and any new risks that arise.

    An exclusion zone will rarely be absolute, as it is recognised that there may be exceptional reasons why the offender needs to enter the exclusion zone. Thus, where an exclusion zone is included in the offender’s licence, it will usually be open to the supervising officer to grant the offender permission to enter the exclusion zone, for a temporary period and for a specific purpose.

    As this is a purely localised decision, there is no national record of the number of occasions such permission has been given. It is, therefore, not possible to answer the questions regarding how many times an offender has been granted permission to enter the exclusion zone applied to his licence.

    Data from the last 10 years is not available in the required electronic format to answer the question relating to numbers of offenders with exclusion zones included in their licence. To provide such information would again require a manual interrogation of offenders’ records and this would incur disproportionate cost.

  • Steve Rotheram – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    Steve Rotheram – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Justice

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Steve Rotheram on 2014-03-12.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, on how many occasions an individual on licence for an attempted murder conviction has been granted permission to enter an exclusion zone which has been formed as part of their licence arrangement in each of the last 10 years.

    Jeremy Wright

    Unfortunately, it is not possible to answer these questions without carrying out a manual search through all relevant individual offender files, at disproportionate cost.

    Conditions such as an exclusion zone may be applied to an offender’s licence where it is necessary to manage the risk that the individual offender poses following release into the community – and where it is proportionate to that risk. Where qualifying victims have exercised their statutory right to make representations about the offender’s licence conditions, the exclusion zone set will take into account those representations. In each case, the supervising officer proposes conditions as appropriate and requests these from the appropriate authority, which applies it to the licence on behalf of the Secretary of State. In the case of determinate sentence prisoners, the authority is the prison governor; in the case of indeterminate sentence prisoners, or others whose release is on the direction of the Parole Board, the authority is the Parole Board.

    These conditions must be kept under review, and are intended to be flexible to the possible resettlement needs of an offender in the community and any new risks that arise.

    An exclusion zone will rarely be absolute, as it is recognised that there may be exceptional reasons why the offender needs to enter the exclusion zone. Thus, where an exclusion zone is included in the offender’s licence, it will usually be open to the supervising officer to grant the offender permission to enter the exclusion zone, for a temporary period and for a specific purpose.

    As this is a purely localised decision, there is no national record of the number of occasions such permission has been given. It is, therefore, not possible to answer the questions regarding how many times an offender has been granted permission to enter the exclusion zone applied to his licence.

    Data from the last 10 years is not available in the required electronic format to answer the question relating to numbers of offenders with exclusion zones included in their licence. To provide such information would again require a manual interrogation of offenders’ records and this would incur disproportionate cost.

  • Steve Rotheram – 2022 Speech to Labour Party Conference

    Steve Rotheram – 2022 Speech to Labour Party Conference

    The speech made by Steve Rotheram on 26 September 2022.

    Conference, Steve Rotheram, Liverpool Walton CLP – and the proud Mayor of the Liverpool City Region – the heartland of our Party in Power.

    Six Local Authority Leaders.
    One Police and Crime Commissioner.
    Sixteen out of seventeen MPs.
    And one Metro Mayor.
    All – Labour.

    Conference, this week we will be hearing a lot about strategy; proposals, policies and plans for a Labour Government.

    But what will it all mean to ordinary people’s lives?

    It has been a long hard 12 years, that’s seen Tory austerity wreak havoc on our communities.

    But – despite what some would have you believe, being out of Downing Street doesn’t mean we have been out of power.

    That would do a gross disservice to Mark in Wales and Labour administrations up and down the country who are making a tangible difference to people’s lives, demonstrating that there is an alternative – to this bizarre Thatcher tribute act.

    Look for instance at the work of our Metro Mayors – who are using devolution to put Labour values into action.

    Just imagine – how we could turbo charge things for everyone with a Labour Prime Minister and a Government of the people, for the people, that would show how you can grow an economy – whilst still helping those most in need.

    One that would build a country fit for the future.

    Take energy – a Labour Government would accelerate plans for the transition to renewables, decarbonising transport and energy intensive industries.

    Imagine Ed Miliband and Jonny Reynolds leading the race to net zero and the Green Industrial Revolution.

    Whilst creating tens of thousands of well-paid jobs in the process.

    Locally they would put rocket boosters on our plans for Hydrogen Production; a mass retrofitting programme for energy inefficient homes and a Mersey Tidal project that would produce enough clean, green predictable energy to power a million homes for over a century.

    Or on skills, where Labour would fix the mess the Tories have made of our education and skills system but which would also look to the future.

    Just imagine Bridget Phillipson giving hope and opportunity to our ‘next generation’ by rolling out a Young Persons Guarantee, a genuine choice between university, or a proper apprenticeship, funded though the billions of apprenticeship levy underspend.

    Locally it would help us train more people for jobs in the industries of tomorrow, as well as more brickies today.

    Or on Transport where Labour would put the public back into public transport.

    Imagine Louise Haigh rolling out the model of bus re-regulation being led by myself here in the Liverpool City Region and Andy Burnham in Greater Manchester, with smart ticketing and capped fares.

    Our City Region is also the first in the country to buy our own trains, investing half a billion pounds into new rolling stock.

    But that’s not all.

    We are buying a fleet of hydrogen buses, building new rail stations and expanding our Active Travel network, demonstrating the difference Labour can make in power.

    And – Labour should commit to the renationalisation of the whole rail system.

    For the naysayers, for those who’d rather be out of the tent than in, I say – it is our movement that has been the greatest force for social justice in this country’s history.

    It’s time to back us, not attack us.

    Because winning the next general election is in our grasp.

    I can hear the realisation of defeat in Tory voices.

    I can sense the inevitability of loss in Tory body language.

    I can see Labour victory in Tory eyes.

    Conference, imagine a Labour Government.

    It’s easy if you try.

  • Steve Rotheram – 2022 Comments on Bradford’s City of Culture Bid

    Steve Rotheram – 2022 Comments on Bradford’s City of Culture Bid

    The comments made by Steve Rotheram, the Metro Mayor of the Liverpool City Region, on 16 May 2022.

    Liverpool’s Capital of Culture year was a catalyst for transformation across our whole city region, and we’re still reaping the rewards almost 15 years on. Bradford’s bid could be a boost for the whole North.