Tag: Stephen Timms

  • Stephen Timms – 2000 Speech at First Tuesday

    Stephen Timms – 2000 Speech at First Tuesday

    The speech made by Stephen Timms, the then Financial Secretary to the Treasury, on 7 March 2000.

    Introduction

    Thank you for inviting me to join you this evening.

    Let me just say at the outset that I’m excited about First Tuesday. I was in Silicon Valley last September and visited the MIT/Stanford Venture Lab which is also a public forum where entrepreneurs, managers and investors come to swap ideas and learn from each other. I impressed upon them on that occasion the opportunities for investment in the UK today, but the creative energy in that forum was unmistakable and I asked my officials what was happening here in the UK. They told me: First Tuesday. So I am delighted finally to be here.

    Just yesterday I visited Cambridge University Entrepreneurs, run by students, which has just announced the winners of its business plan competition. They had four times as many entries as they allowed for. The winners have already had individual mentoring from top industry figures, and now they are going to receive start up funding. There is a real sea change with a new enthusiasm for entrepreneurship, and tonight, I want to talk about our hopes for the knowledge economy. But first, let me put that in the context of our wider aims.

    A good way to explain what this Government is trying to do is that we want to build a new Britain which will be modern and decent – both of those things at the same time. A dynamic and enterprising economy, but one where every person has the chance to play their full part and nobody is left out.

    The first economic priority after the election was to achieve stability in the UK economy after decades of boom and bust. That has been achieved in a remarkable way, so our focus now is on locking in that hard won stability, and building on it for the future. New stability gives us the chance to express a new optimism about our future, and so Gordon Brown set out at the Pre-Budget Report in November four new ambitions for Britain in this coming decade which encapsulate our commitment to a modern and decent Britain:

    1. That we should be closing the gap with our competitors on productivity after years of slipping behind;

    2. That we should have a higher proportion of the workforce in employment, and keep it like that. Actually, we already have more people in work than ever in our history, but we want to achieve the highest proportion and do so on a durable basis;

    3. That for the first time over half of our school leavers should go on to study for a degree; and

    4. That we should halve the number of children living in poverty, on the way to the Prime Minister’s target of eradicating child poverty altogether within 20 years.

    Four ambitions for a modern and decent Britain. And, as the Chancellor spellt out in his speech about the Internet a couple of weeks ago, this industry has a vital role to play.

    Some say we have become obsessed with the knowledge economy and the Internet. But the truth is that immense strategic opportunities lie ahead of us in Britain. For example, we are leading the mobile Internet revolution. We are at the forefront of 3rd Generation Wireless development, as the current auction is demonstrating. It would be utter folly to let these opportunities pass us by and we are not going to do that.

    So this year we are focusing on putting in place three building blocks to create the most competitive, enterprising and fair knowledge economy in the world.

    Competition

    The first building block is the most pro-competition policy in the world because that is the sharpest spur to innovation, efficiency and improvement. We are reviewing every barrier to competition in the emerging e-commerce market and seeking to remove them:

    We are building on the decision to create a new independent competition authority with the Competition Act which came into force last week with its new powers to prohibit anti-competitive practices;

    For banking and financial services, the Financial Services Authority will now, for the first time, be required to facilitate competition – with a new scrutiny role for the competition authorities;

    And for the telecommunications industry, we are squarely behind OFTEL in its promotion of competition, to ensure the price of telephone calls is not a barrier to greater Internet use or to the future growth of UK e-commerce. Last month the Chancellor challenged the industry to get the cost of using the net down to US levels by end-2002. It is good to see the industry already taking up that challenge, in the recent announcements by Alta Vista and NTL.

    Finally, we are promoting a competitive environment for broadband access. BT is rolling out ADSL from the Spring, and OFTEL is ensuring that other operators can provide their own broadband services over BT’s local loop by July 2001 at the latest. In 1987, working for a start up company, I wrote a book about commercial broadband applications and its great to see these things starting to happen.
    Finally, we are looking to roll out rapidly fixed wireless technology, with the first licence available this summer.

    A more favourable tax environment

    For a higher degree of enterprise we need higher levels of investment and entrepreneurship. So our second building block is the best tax environment for investors in start-ups and high tech businesses, with improved rewards from enterprise and wealth creation.

    Corporation tax has been cut from 33 to 30 per cent. And to encourage and reward new business investment, we have cut the long-term rate of capital gains tax from 40p to 10p. We have proposed a cut in the taper so that those investing for five years will pay only 10p and for three years only 22p. Final decisions will be announced in the Budget in two weeks time;

    For the people with the skills and talent who are prepared to move from safe jobs to risk time, effort and savings to create wealth in a more challenging environment, we are also introducing a new targeted tax cut from next year. The Enterprise Management Incentive will enable growing enterprises to offer their key employees tax-advantaged options over shares up to £100,000. I know a number of start-ups have been thinking about using this scheme and I would encourage others to do so;

    We also recognise the significant role stock-options have to play here and we are currently looking at the role of employer NICs charges which we know is causing concern particularly in the entrepreneurial community.

    We want new encouragement for the venture capital industry and especially for the start up and early stage ventures, where equity is more appropriate than bank loans, but where there is insufficient encouragement to invest. Our new network of nine Government-backed regional venture capital funds, and our UK High Technology Fund which is a fund-of-funds, will both help early stage high-technology businesses.

    Making Britain the knowledge capital of the world

    The third building block for our knowledge economy open to all is to make Britain the knowledge capital of the world.

    Knowledge is the key to future business success and productivity. That puts a great premium on education and skills. I have visited a number of our universities in recent weeks – Cambridge, Oxford, Warwick, Newcastle, Durham, Sheffield – to have a look at what they are doing to commercialise the superb research which is being undertaken by them and I have been heartened by what I have seen.

    That premium on education and skills in the knowledge economy is exactly why we are pushing through huge educational reform, investing an extra £19 billion in education – so that everyone from our school children to the unemployed and low paid have the opportunity to master the skills and technologies of the new information age.

    That way we can make sure the opportunities of the new technologies are open to all, and that Britain has the size and sophistication of markets – and the quality of skills base – needed to succeed.

    Conclusion

    Our target is that within three years we want to become the world’s best environment for e-commerce. This is a huge challenge for everyone – government, business and individuals. But we are optimistic.

    We have started with a foundation of a new stability which we are determined to lock in. The building blocks we are putting in place now for a knowledge economy open for all – in competition, in investment and enterprise and in skills – those are the building blocks to help us make the most of the challenges ahead.

    Thank you for the contribution you are making and good luck for the future. Let’s work together to make this a success for all our people.

  • Stephen Timms – 2000 Speech at the Economist’s Electronic Business Conference

    Stephen Timms – 2000 Speech at the Economist’s Electronic Business Conference

    The speech made by Stephen Timms, the then Financial Secretary to the Treasury, on 4 April 2000.

    “The benefits and challenges of e-commerce”

    Introduction

    Thank you for inviting me to join you this morning.

    We are on the threshold of a new era for business. Across the country people are talking of the impact of Business to Consumer – or ‘B2C’ – e-commerce. But the growth of Business to Business – or B2B – e-commerce has the potential to be even more explosive and pervasive. I have seen US estimates suggesting B2B turnover on the net could amount to 4 trillion dollars in America alone by 2003, compared with less than 400 billion dollars of online sales to customers.

    That is a staggering amount of trade – with potentially staggering implications for our economies and our consumers, as well as business itself.

    So I am delighted to be able to join many of the world’s B2B experts here this morning.

    Budget aims

    Let me begin by putting our hopes for electronic commerce and the knowledge economy in the context of the Government’s wider aims.

    After the UK election in 1997, our first economic objective was stability. The Budget two weeks ago confirmed that in a remarkable way that has now been achieved. We are delivering a platform of stability and steady growth, with inflation low and the public finances under control.

    More people are now in work than ever before: unemployment is at its lowest for 20 years; youth unemployment is at its lowest for 25 years and there are one million vacancies on offer across all the regions of the UK.

    Inflation in Britain has also now been lower for longer than at any time for over 30 years. And today British inflation is lower than in any of our major competitors in the European Union.

    And we are also investing now a bigger share of our national wealth than our largest competitor countries in the European Union, and a bigger share even than in the US.

    The state of the public finances is sound as well.

    So things are in good shape as a consequence of the prudent measures the Chancellor has taken.

    But we have always said that our prudence is for a purpose.

    And the Budget took the next steps towards that purpose, of building a modern and decent Britain, towards the four ambitions that we set ourselves last November:

    • our prosperity ambition: that we should be bridging the productivity gap with our competitors;
    • the full employment ambition: that we should achieve employment opportunity for all, and a higher proportion of people actually in jobs than we have had before;
    • the education ambition: that for the first time at least half of our school leavers should go on to university by the end of the decade;
    • our antipoverty ambition: that we should halve the number of children living in poverty by 2010, on the way to the Prime Minister’s ambition of eradicating child poverty altogether within 20 years.

    Four ambitions which I think are now attainable and which encapsulate our commitment to a modern and decent Britain. Our best route for achieving this modern and decent Britain – for an enterprising society which is also a fair society – is success in the knowledge economy.

    First Tuesday report

    A few weeks ago, John Browning, a cofounder of First Tuesday – the global B2B start- up market and meeting place for entrepreneurs – gave an intriguing evidence to the House of Lords e-commerce sub-committee on the future of e-commerce in Europe. This evidence he gave was based on an e-mail survey of their members on what they wanted national and European governments to do.

    The overwhelming view was that government has a very limited role – that it does most good where it treads lightest. Well, that is our view too.

    The Internet and e-commerce world is moving at speeds difficult for anyone to keep up with. As Tony Blair says, the wind of economic change has never blown through our economies with such force as it is doing today.

    We know the market sets the pace of that change. And it always will do.

    But our role as a Government is an important one still. Not to dictate. Not to attempt to control. But to help to enable and to empower every business and individual to win from the changes, and to extend the new opportunities to all.

    That is why we have set ourselves two parallel targets to these challenges.

    First, to make the UK the best place in the world to trade electronically by 2002.

    And second, to aim for universal access by 2005.

    Those two goals are complementary. Making sure everyone has access to the Internet will both improve our competitiveness and reduce social exclusion. A very clear example of enterprise and fairness working together.

    And we are working very hard indeed in a number of areas to achieve these goals.

    Back to John Browning’s evidence to the Lords Committee: his statement consisted of a number of lessons First Tuesday had learnt in the course of their rapid growth. I want to spend a little time examining these lessons and what they mean for governments and for e-businesses as well.

    Lesson 1: Europeans are passionate entrepreneurs

    The first lesson learned by First Tuesday was that Europeans are passionate entrepreneurs. And, to quote him, ‘contrary to conventional pessimism, they are neither defeatist nor risk averse.’

    That, I think, is clear enough from the number of European companies we have here today.

    It is also clear from the signs that the technology gap between Europe and the US is narrowing. In some areas, of course, Europe already leads.

    The first wave of the Internet came through PCs. But the next wave will come through broadband mobile and digital television.

    In both, the United Kingdom in particular ­ and Europe more generally ­ have a pretty impressive lead.

    Last month we launched the world’s first auction for third generation mobile telephone spectrum. Thirteen bidders from all round the world have been taking part and all have put in significant bids to play a role in the future market.

    Third generation mobile will give businesses the Internet on the move. Everything we now get from our PCs, digital cameras and good old voice telephones – all on our mobile phones, our PDAs, our laptops and palmtops, and a host of new devices now emerging from the research labs.

    Digital TV – interactive TV ­ is also taking off. It’s only just begun. But some forecasters suggest that as much as 75 per cent of UK households will have DTV by 2008.

    Both of these – digital TV and third generation mobile – are technologies where the UK is a world leader.

    And both are creating extraordinary opportunities for new businesses in both B2C and B2B e-commerce, new applications, new services and new jobs.

    That is why we’re seeing venture capitalists, technology and telecoms companies, and individual entrepreneurs so active today in the UK, confirming our position as the single most popular destination for inward investment into Europe.

    European enthusiasm for the new economy was out for all to see as well at the Lisbon Summit on European economic reform two weeks ago. There, the Heads of Government of our European States set a new strategic goal for the next decade – to become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge based economy in the world.

    That is a huge change. And it is the beginning of a process with tremendous implications and opportunities for our economies and our workforces.

    Lesson 2: Scale is critical to entrepreneurial success

    The second lesson First Tuesday drew was that scale is critical to entrepreneurial success.

    As they said, only by expanding quickly can companies grasp the available opportunities.

    But companies can only expand to the extent that there is the sufficient size and sophistication of markets and the quality of skills base needed to be successful.

    You cannot build a knowledge driven economy without a knowledge driven society.

    So we have to make sure that the opportunities of the new technologies are shared by every business and every worker.

    That is why the Budget two weeks ago introduced a special tax reduction to encourage a million small companies to get on line. For the next three years any small business buying computers, or investing in e-commerce and new information technology, will be able immediately to write off against tax the full 100 per cent of the cost in the year of purchase.

    We are also legislating for other tax cuts – a 100 pounds tax cut for electronic filing of tax and vat returns, and a further 50 pounds tax cut for electronic filing for those paying the working families tax credit.

    And side by side with these incentives, the new Small Business Service – opening its doors this month – will offer consultancy, advice and planning to help small businesses get on line and become e-companies.

    Of course, while getting United Kingdom on line is vital, the big prize will come when we create a single European market for electronic commerce – a single market of 375 million people and potentially 100 million more.

    Lesson 3: Speed is just as critical

    That brings me to the third lesson from First Tuesday’s evidence that speed is just as critical as scale. ‘…because the Internet is evolving so fast, and because first-mover advantage is so powerful, Internet companies have to move very, very fast.’

    A key priority for governments must be to ensure the right dynamic market framework is in place to cope with this speed of change.

    At the Lisbon Summit, European Heads of Government recognised that the speed of technological change requires new and more flexible regulatory approaches in the future.

    That is why they called on the European Council along with the European Parliament, where appropriate, to adopt as rapidly as possible, this year, pending legislation on the legal framework for ecommerce, on copyright and related rights, on e-money, on distance selling of financial services, on jurisdiction and on the dualuse export control regime.

    We have already agreed a directive on electronic signatures that introduces their legal recognition throughout the EU and sets voluntary standards for certificate providers.

    These further steps will take Europe quickly into the new digital age, boosting consumer confidence and making it far easier for a business based in one country to sell on-line in the fourteen others.

    In the UK, we are currently also reviewing every barrier to competition in the emerging e-commerce market and seeking to remove them.

    In every area we are asking what we can do to enhance competition and opportunity:

    The new Competition Act makes our competition authority independent and for the first time prohibits all anti-competitive practices.

    We are driving competition further and faster into the leadingedge communication markets, to bring prices down and give consumers more choice.

    In the last few weeks we’ve seen four different companies offering new, unmetered Internet packages.

    As the new tariffs come into effect, it will almost certainly mean that for the average Internet user at home and in business, the UK will be cheaper than anywhere else in Europe.

    We are working as well on the legal framework.

    Our electronic communications bill will allow us to update decades, indeed centuries, of legislation that refer to paper and post.

    And we are helping employees in UK high growth Internet companies by tackling the issue of employer’s National Insurance Contributions on share options. I have been asked by the Chancellor to conduct a consultation on a technical solution to the tax treatment of share options in unapproved schemes, and I’m moving quickly to fulfil his request, and, I hope, to resolve quickly the serious technical problem that currently exists.

    Lesson 4: Governments themselves are slow in using the technology

    The fourth lesson First Tuesday learned from its European survey was that governments themselves generally are slow in using the technology.

    Businesses represented here and individuals are responding to the new technologies and the new challenges. And Government has to do the same.

    Last week, Tony Blair proposed a challenging target for Government – to offer all services online by 2005.

    We need to transform relationships between government and citizen by delivering services on-line. And we need to do it quickly.

    We also need to transform policy-making by managing government online.

    The first step is to develop a clear strategy. So Andrew Smith, my colleague as Chief Secretary to the Treasury, and Patricia Hewitt, as our e-minister, are heading a crosscutting spending review to look at all aspects of Government and e-commerce.

    Our strategy for e-government will be shaped by our view of the new technologies. Yesterday, Ian McCartney, the Minister responsible for e-government, launched our Government’s e-government strategy.

    We want businesses and people to be able to access government anywhere and anytime.

    From a computer. A mobile device. A TV. A kiosk in a post office or a shopping centre.

    So the challenge to us is to make government-content, and government services, available across all our networks – wired and wireless – to all the devices.

    It’s exactly the same challenge that content-providers in the private sector are facing. Financial services information providers, for example, now integrating content, and delivering it real-time to market analysts and retail investors alike on the trading screen, the television screen and the mobile phone.

    But we also have to re-engineer government on the inside. Like every major global company, we have to move from vertical silos to horizontal processes. We have to move from inputs to outcomes. And we have to use ICT to enable all that to happen.

    Like everybody else, we have to contend with legacy systems. E-mail systems that don’t talk to each other. Different data standards.

    In the next few weeks, however, we will be publishing a single set of standards for inter-operability across government. We’re following the lead of business by adopting open, I/P based standards for all government systems. Making the browser the key interface for access and manipulation of all information. Adopting XML as the cornerstone for government data inter-operability and integration. And working with the global Govtalk consortium to create the infrastructure we need for implementation.

    Conclusion

    We are optimistic our British knowledge economy can match the best:

    With individuals alive to the opportunities, and businesses sufficiently ambitious, we can rise to the challenge – making Britain and Europe the best place in the world for e-commerce.

    Thank you for the contribution you are making ­ let’s work together to make this a success for all our people.

  • Stephen Timms – 2000 Speech to the Entrepreneurial Economy Conference

    Stephen Timms – 2000 Speech to the Entrepreneurial Economy Conference

    The speech made by Stephen Timms, the then Financial Secretary to the Treasury, on 9 May 2000.

    Introduction

    Sir Peter and friends, I am delighted to be able to join you at this important conference.

    The global economy is changing at a speed difficult for any of us to keep up with. As the Prime Minister has said, the wind of economic change has never blown through our economies with such force as it is doing today.

    So this afternoon, I want to discuss the Government’s view of how we can equip ourselves to meet the challenges of this ever faster change – and achieve the prize of a modernised economy which, because opportunity and security are open to all, is both enterprising and fair.

    Stability

    After the election, our first economic objective was to achieve a new stability in the British economy. And we are now delivering a platform of stability and steady growth, with inflation low and the public finances under control.

    We can illustrate the scale of what has been achieved with what is now a pretty impressive set of superlatives:

    More people are now in work than ever before in our history. The rate of unemployment is at its lowest for 20 years and still falling and there are one million vacancies on offer across all parts of the UK.

    And what is particularly important I think is the dramatic fall in youth unemployment. Across the country, it’s at its lowest level for 25 years. Everybody sees there are incalculable benefits of having so many young people familiar now with the habits and disciplines of having a job, when so many young people have been robbed of that for so long in the past.

    We are investing now a bigger share of our national wealth than any major competitor in the European Union, and a bigger share even than the US.

    Inflation in Britain has now been lower for longer than at any time in the past 30 years. And British inflation today is the lowest of any member of the European Union.

    The state of the public finances is sound. In contrast to the deficit of £28 billion in 1997, this year we will make a debt repayment of £12 billion. So, the monetary and fiscal foundations we are building on are strong foundations. And we are determined to keep them that way.

    But our prudence is not for its own sake. It’s for a purpose. And that purpose is well summed up by the four ambitions that Gordon Brown first set out last November for Britain to achieve in the coming decade:

    our prosperity ambition: that we should be bridging the productivity gap with our competitors, after decades of lagging behind;

    the full employment ambition: that we should achieve employment opportunity for all, and that we should have a higher proportion of people actually in jobs than we have ever managed before, and do so on a durable basis;

    the education ambition: that for the first time, at least half of our school leavers should go on to study for a degree by the end of the decade;

    and finally our antipoverty ambition: that we should halve the number of children living in poverty by 2010, on the way to the Prime Minister’s ambition of eradicating child poverty altogether within 20 years.

    Four ambitions which I think are now attainable and which encapsulate our commitment to a modern and decent Britain where opportunity and security are not just for a few but for everybody.

    In the past, enterprise was open to some but all too often it was a closed circle which excluded too many.

    In the Britain we want – a Britain where there is opportunity for all, fairness to all, and responsibility accepted by all – we must have enterprise open to all as well.

    Our economy will be so much stronger – and our society too – if we can release the dynamism, the creativity and the potential of all of our people.

    The pace of reform has to match the pace of change. The societies which will prosper will be those that are open, flexible, and able to distinguish between fundamental values they must keep and policies they must adapt. Those that move too slowly, or are in hock to vested interests, reacting negatively to change, will quickly fall behind.

    I want to outline today the three fundamental areas of reform we need to push through for success in our aims:

    First, competition – creating the right competitive environment for business;

    Second, by tackling the cultural barriers to enterprise; and

    Third, by transforming the relationship between Government, business and our citizens.

    First, creating the right competitive business environment.

    We won’t achieve our aims if small businesses or enterprising individuals are denied access to the marketplace and pushed aside by vested interests. In future we need to be the champion of opening up competition, and so opening up enterprise to all. We have already rewritten our outdated framework of competition law.

    We have given the Office of Fair Trading new powers and new money to police anti-competitive practices which damage businesses and consumers alike. And now we will be consulting on the next stage, withdrawing Ministers from the decision process on merger cases.

    For banking, having accepted Don Cruickshank’s main recommendations, we will legislate to ensure the UK payments system is open to new competition.

    In our capital markets to, we must ensure there are no barriers to competition and innovation, that there are no unnecessary constraints restricting investment decisions, and that investors have every opportunity and encouragement to back dynamic small and growing companies.

    For the professions, the Office of Fair Trading has now set out a detailed remit to examine how best to ensure that the rules of professional bodies do not unnecessarily restrict or distort competition.

    Tax

    But more competition is not enough on its own. Almost by definition, an enterprise economy needs high levels of entrepreneurship and investment.

    But at the moment, too few businesses in the UK realise their potential because there is not enough investment to capitalise on our entrepreneurial talent and to enable firms to seize the new growth opportunities.

    That is why when we came into government we cut the long term rate of capital gains tax for business assets held for ten years or more.

    This year, we very greatly extended the numbers who benefit from lower capital gains rates, shortening the business assets taper from 10 right back down to 4 years. That is a step change in the incentives for investment and a huge boost in particular for many small and medium sized businesses – and an equally huge boost to the incentives to set up new ones.

    Two days after the Budget, I attended a breakfast meeting hosted by one of the larger accountancy firms. A senior tax partner there said the Budget had put him out of his old job because so many tax loopholes had been closed. But thanks to capital gains tax reform, he expects to have a new job – encouraging clients to invest more in enterprise and in their own future. I hope the accountants here today will feel the same. It’s the start of a new, proinvestment era and you have a key role to play in making a success of it. We have also radically widened the definition of business assets to include all shareholdings in unquoted companies and all employee shareholdings, encouraging more of those who are involved in the success of a business to invest in its future and to secure the rewards from their investments.

    The Budget also recognised the important role share options can play, particularly for young, growing businesses which often don’t have enough cashflow to reward their employees fully in cash.

    Now, Enterprise Management Incentives will enable companies with gross assets less than 15 million pounds to recruit and retain their 15 key employees, with tax advantaged shares options worth up to 100,000 pounds, normally without any Income Tax or National Insurance charge.

    And I have been asked by the Chancellor to conduct a consultation on a technical solution to the tax treatment of share options in unapproved schemes, and I?m moving quickly to fulfil his request, and, I hope, to resolve quickly the serious technical problem that currently exists.

    Taken together, our measures are the biggest boost for employee shareholding our country has ever seen, a boost for enterprise and a boost for security and fairness as well.

    And now – with the lowest corporate tax rates for businesses ever; the lowest ever capital gains tax rates for long term investors; and – at 22 pence – the lowest basic income tax rate for 70 years – bit by bit we are making Britain the place for companies to start, to invest, to grow and to expand.

    Cultural barriers to enterprise

    The second key area of reform is to break down all the entrenched cultural barriers to enterprise.

    Not only must the work ethic be reinvigorated in every community of Britain but there needs to be a dynamic business culture which encourages enterprise open to all.

    When we were elected in 1997, we put the restoration of the work ethic at the centre of our social and economic policy.

    The role for government today is to remove the barriers to work and let everyone move ahead. To ensure that we give everyone the chance to contribute to the enterprise economy, if they can.

    So we are building a new and modernised welfare state – one that in addition to its traditional and necessary function of giving security to those who cannot work, promotes work, makes work pay and give people the skills they needed to get better jobs – matching new opportunities with new responsibilities for the unemployed to take up the opportunities.

    And already, over 400,000 young people have joined our New Deal programme and almost 200,000 have found jobs- the vast majority sustained jobs. Now we are extending the opportunities and obligations to the long term adult unemployed as well.

    The rewards of work are being raised for working families as well. Already over one million people are receiving the Working Families Tax Credit, guaranteeing every working family with some one working full time a minimum weekly income of over 200 pounds today, and 214 pounds from next April.

    And we want to see this new culture of enterprise extend to every part of the country, so that in places where in the past it was assumed that you would never get a job, in the future people will be starting their own enterprises and making a success of them for their own benefit and for the benefit of their communities.

    Education

    Rights and responsibilities are at the heart of our education programme too.

    In an economy where there is an increasing premium on skills and where people need to be properly equipped to cope with change, we will devote more resources to education, including IT, so that everyone – at all ages – can move ahead.

    So we have extended nursery education, reoriented our primary school system around numeracy and literacy, with startlingly good results, doubled the annual capital spending on schools, and committed resources for an extra 800,000 people in further and higher education by 2002.

    And to close the digital divide we are investing 1.7 billion pounds in our national IT strategy. Connecting all schools and libraries through the National Grid for Learning and providing. money for teacher and librarian training. Offering cheap PCs to low-income families. And creating up to 1000 IT Learning Centres to enable disadvantaged communities across the country to acquire basic ICT skills.

    Our £1.7 billion investment will deliver a new network of computer learning with a single purpose: that the whole of Britain is equipped for the information age. So that the opportunities of the new technologies are shared by everyone.

    For people in work, our proposals for a million Individual Learning Accounts and a University for Industry recognise that people should not only upgrade their skills throughout life but they should be encouraged to take responsibility for doing so.

    Our University for Industry will use the latest technology, including the Internet, to do in this decade for lifelong learning what in the 1970s the Open University did for university learning.

    Enterprise Insight

    Finally, we want young people in every area of the country to see that enterprise really is open to them.

    Every one of us here has a role to play in building this new enterprise culture.

    In two days time, on the 11th of May, the Prime Minister will be launching a business led national enterprise campaign, together with the British Chambers of Commerce, the CBI and the Institute of Directors.

    The campaign, under the name Enterprise Insight, will raise awareness about the role and value of business and enterprise, with a national network of businesses ambassadors – including Reuben Singh, Alan Sugar, Richard Branson and others – who will take part in young people’s forums, roadshows, seminars and media events throughout the country.

    Please get involved in what ever way you can.

    The new campaign will build on the steps business and government are already taking to boost enterprise skills nationwide, from school to adulthood.

    Government

    The third and final area for reform is Government itself.

    Some say in these heady times of change that government is a defunct piece of machinery which no longer has any relevance to the way a modern economy is run.

    Certainly the winds of change challenge government to reform as much as any business or individual.

    That’s why, last month, the Prime Minister proposed a challenging target for Government – to offer all services online by 2005.

    We need to transform relationships between government and citizen by delivering services on-line. And we need to do it quickly.

    We also need to transform policy-making by managing government online.

    The first step is to develop a clear strategy. So Andrew Smith, my colleague as Chief Secretary to the Treasury, and Patricia Hewitt, as our eminister, are heading a crosscutting spending review to look at all aspects of Government and e-commerce.

    We want businesses and people to be able to access government anywhere and anytime.

    From a computer. A mobile device. A TV. A kiosk in a post office or in a shopping centre.

    The Small Business Service, headed by David Irwin who is next on the programme, will offer a single electronic point of entry, for all small businesses – providing advice and information, backed up by new call centres.

    The challenge to us is to make government content, and government services, available across all our networks – wired and wireless – to all the devices.

    But as well as reforming the ways of government, perhaps even more importantly, government must articulate the case for reform by allying it to a purpose for the reform; to a vision of the future; to the values that underpin it. That’s how political direction and leadership can exert their own beneficial modernising influence.

    Conclusion

    So we have begun with a new platform of stability and we are determined to maintain it. And with these three key areas of reform – for a more competitive business environment, for a modern enterprise culture and for a transformed Government – we are optimistic our new enterprise economy can rise to the challenges ahead – delivering opportunity and security to everybody.

    Our objectives are two-fold – to build an enterprise economy and a fair society. The two go together. They are not alternatives. Doing well and doing good go hand in hand. An enterprise economy is the route to jobs and prosperity. And a fair society where there are opportunities for all will have an economy which is more competitive and more productive.

    The challenges are enormous but if we work together the prize is an enormous one too – a modern enterprise economy offering optimism for the future, ready to provide opportunity and greater prosperity to all our people in the years ahead.

    Thank you for the contribution you are making – let’s work together to make this a success for all our people.

  • Stephen Timms – 1999 Speech at the Asian Business Development Forum Conference

    Stephen Timms – 1999 Speech at the Asian Business Development Forum Conference

    The speech made by Stephen Timms, the then Financial Secretary to the Treasury, in Leeds on 29 October 1999.

    I am grateful to you for your kindness in both inviting me and welcoming me here tonight. Tonight I want to say a few words about our aspirations for the British economy in the next century.

    Modern and decent

    1. But let me first put this in the context of the wider aims of our Government over the last two years. What we have embarked on is a twenty year programme to build a new Britain which will be modern and decent. Both of those things at the same time.
    2. Modern Britain will have an economy where the vital new stability has been locked in for good, beyond our past decades long record of boom and bust. We want thriving knowledge-based firms exploiting the know how, creativity and expertise of British people. We want to create the best environment in the world for electronic commerce. Higher levels of investment, in information technology, in infrastructure, in skills. Higher levels of productivity to catch up after decades with our competitors. We’ll have higher standards at school, have harnessed the potential of further and higher education, and provide high quality opportunities for our young people. As individuals and collectively we shall have confidence in the future.
    3. Decent Britain will be an inclusive society where everyone has the chance to play their full part. Over the twenty year period, child poverty will be eradicated. There will be help for those trapped on benefits or in poor housing or without a job, and those unable to work through disability or through caring for somebody else. We’ll have a health service which people will have confidence in. There will be decent standards for those at work. We’ll confront crime, anti-social behaviour and drug taking which cast a shadow over too many young lives. We want to entrench decent values – society pulling together, and with rights matched by responsibilities.
    4. So modern and decent – that’s where we want to be in the years ahead.

    The Business Community

    1. We want a thriving business community in Britain. Our enemy today is not competition – it is cartels. It is not profits – it is privilege. It is not markets – it is monopoly. We want to see more enterprise. More competition and more innovation too. We know – and you know too – that companies, indeed countries which fail to adapt, reform and lead get left behind.
    2. The businesses represented in this room have learnt that lesson.
    3. Businesses from the Asian community contribute £8 billion each and every year to the British economy. More importantly in my view, you epitomise the spirit of enterprise and the determination to succeed that is so vital if the British economy is to lead the way in the next century.
    4. I’ve seen this from close quarters. Green Street in East London marks the boundary of my constituency. 35 years ago when Ahmed Din, the first Asian trader opened his shop there, it was a drab and declining inner city shopping street. Today, I claim it is the most successful Asian shopping street in the country. It is a vibrant and exciting place, attracting shoppers from all over the UK and continental Europe, and it has been the determination, vision and commitment of Asian entrepreneurs in East London which has brought the transformation about.
    5. We – Government and businesses together – face a profound challenge in this country of ours. How to create a high investment, high productivity and high employment economy.

    Stability

    1. We start with stability. It is the precondition of success in the modern global economy. That’s why our first priority when we came to office was moving from the violent cycles of stop go that we had seen too often in the past, to an economy capable of sustained and steady growth.
    2. Now – 2 years later – with the Bank of England independent and the lowest interest rates and mortgages in decades, it is now clear that we have steered a course for stability in what have been troubled times for the world economy. The British economy is growing. Inflation is low and set to remain low. The public finances are under control. Employment is up by over 600,000 since the election. We have a record number of people in work and a record number of job vacancies too.
    3. So what we can rightly say now is that for the first time in a generation we have the prospect of sustained economic stability in Britain. But that is not enough. Our task now is to use this platform of stability to do what no government has tried to do before – to work with business in taking an unashamedly long term view about modernising the British economy.

    Modernisation

    1. We will do so in five ways.
    2. First, modernisation requires nothing less than a skills revolution. In today’s world it is no longer access to financial resources – capital – or to physical resources – iron and steel – that make or break a country.
    3. Now – as never before – our key asset is our human resources – it is labour that counts. Now on the verge of a new century, the challenge for government and business working together is to equip all of our people to succeed in the new knowledge economy.
    4. Hence our emphasis on education. The investment we are making not just in our schools, but in our colleges and universities too. In this new information age education can no longer end at the school gate. Lifelong learning is the only way in the modern world to keep Britain one step ahead of the rest.
    5. Second, modernisation means encouraging innovation and invention. That’s why last year we put an extra £1 billion into university science. And it’s why next year we’ll introduce a new tax cut for R&D that will become one of the best incentives for innovation anywhere in the industrialised world.
    6. It will help British companies to turn new British ideas into new British innovations, new British innovations into new British products and new British products into new British jobs.
    7. Third, we need more and better investment. For decades the UK has invested less than our competitors.
    8. We know in particular that businesses – if they are to grow- need help with investment. That is why the Treasury with Don Cruickshank, former head of Oftel, is working with the banks to look at how they might more effectively provide support, especially to smaller firms.
    9. Fourth, modernisation means a new emphasis on enterprise. Companies create wealth not governments. But what governments do or do not do can help or hinder that process. This Government wants to see a new culture of enterprise in Britain – where we have more people starting their own business, having a go, taking risks.
    10. Here the Asian community provides an example to the rest of Britain. The Asian community has placed real value and respect on entrepreneurship which has helped Asians to become a driving force particularly in small business development in Britain. Ethnic minorities, of which the Asian community forms a large part, account for twice as many business start-ups as their share of the population. And, as some of my fellow guests here tonight will testify, a number of these small businesses have been built up into some of largest companies in Britain today.
    11. We know that in the future jobs growth will come from a large number of small firms rather than a small number of large firms. That is why we have cut the rate of corporation tax to the lowest rate in our history, in Europe and in any major industrialised country so that those who create wealth keep more of it to reinvest in growth and jobs.
    12. That brings me to the fifth and final way that we are seeking to tackle the modernisation challenge our country faces: through a modern employment policy. One that matches rights with responsibilities. One that provides new opportunities for work. And one that through a reformed tax and benefit system makes work pay.
    13. When we came into office, four and a half million adults lived in households where nobody worked, double the level of 20 years ago.
    14. Nearly one in five children were growing up in households where no-one is working, twice the rate of France and four times the rate of Germany.
    15. And the reason that this issue of unemployment poses a massive challenge is that it is now the primary cause of poverty.
    16. 20 years ago, pensioners made up the largest section of those in poverty, today it is those living in workless, working age households.
    17. Simply compensating people for their poverty through benefits is not enough. The task must be to deal with the causes of poverty. And the best form of welfare is work.
    18. Our strategy has been to tackle the barriers that people face to getting into work – the lack of employment, the unemployment and poverty traps, the absence of necessary skills, even the absence of child care.
    19. Under the old system the tax system set a personal allowance that failed to ensure that work paid, and also made thousands pay tax even as they claimed benefits.
    20. In the new tax system working families will be guaranteed a minimum income, so that in future no-one in work should have to go to the benefits office to receive a living wage.
    21. These then are our radical approaches to modernising our economy. Our objectives are two-fold – to build an enterprise economy and a fair society. The two go together. All too often in the past they were viewed as antagonistic even irreconcilable objectives. That is not this Government’s view. Rather we believe that the one relies on the other. An enterprise economy is the route to jobs and prosperity. And a fair society where there are opportunities for all will help make our economy more competitive and productive. That means building an inclusive society where not only are there opportunities for all – regardless of class, of gender, or of race – but where success depends on merit and merit alone. Our ambition is to widen the winners circle in Britain. That is what modernisation means for our country.
    22. We want to see a Britain where there is economic stability; a Britain which is business-friendly; a Britain where public and private sectors, instead of working against one another, work with each other to create greater enterprise and greater fairness.
    23. The Government will play its part in modernising Britain so that we can be a leader in the knowledge economy.
    24. But so too must British business. Our challenge to business is this. Work with us. Use not just the skills of a few in your workforce, but invest in training and new technology for the many. Overcome with the Trade Unions the culture of us and them that can have no place in a modern knowledge-based economy that relies on the skills of the many not the few.
    25. The challenges are enormous but if we work together the prize is an enormous one too – a modern economy fit for the future, ready to offer employment opportunity and greater prosperity for all our people in the years ahead. It is a challenge that together we can meet.
  • Stephen Timms – 1999 Speech at the Proshare Conference

    Stephen Timms – 1999 Speech at the Proshare Conference

    The speech made by Stephen Timms, the then Financial Secretary to the Treasury, on 25 November 1999.

    I’m delighted to able to speak at this conference of Proshare which as an organisation has done so much to advance employee share ownership in an imaginative, progressive and effective way.

    Modern and decent

    Let me first put our aims for the new all employee share plan this in the context of the Government’s wider aims.

    What we have embarked on is a twenty year programme to build a new Britain which will be modern and decent. Both of those things at the same time.

    Modern Britain will have an economy where the vital new stability has been locked in for good, beyond our past decades long record of boom and bust. We want thriving knowledge-based firms exploiting the know how, creativity and expertise of British people. We want to create the best environment in the world for electronic commerce. Higher levels of investment, in information technology, in infrastructure, in skills. Higher levels of productivity to catch up after decades with our competitors. We’ll have higher standards at school, have harnessed the potential of further and higher education, and provide high quality opportunities for our young people. As individuals and collectively we shall have confidence in the future.

    Decent Britain will be an inclusive society where everyone has the chance to play their full part. Over the twenty year period, child poverty will be eradicated. There will be help for those trapped on benefits or in poor housing or without a job, and those unable to work through disability or through caring for somebody else. We’ll have a health service which people will have confidence in. There will be decent standards for those at work. We’ll confront crime, anti-social behaviour and drug taking which cast a shadow over too many young lives. We want to entrench decent values – society pulling together, and with rights matched by responsibilities.

    So modern and decent – that’s where we want to be in the years ahead. And it is my view that the new all employee share plan is exactly the type of initiative we need to take forward both strands of that commitment.

    Promoting an enterprise culture

    Make no mistake, employee share ownership is about to take a big step forward in the UK and, when it does, we shall be taking a big step towards our goals. One of our key priorities, as I have said, is to raise the levels of productivity in British industry, stubbornly stuck significantly behind those of France, Germany, the US, Japan. Another of our priorities is to give everyone a stake in the success of the economy, so that everyone can benefit from Britain’s growing prosperity. And increasingly, people recognise how much boosting employee share ownership will contribute to those two aims.

    When Gordon Brown, the Chancellor, stood up two weeks ago and presented the Pre-Budget Report, he laid out four new ambitions for the next decade: that over half of all our school-leavers go on to degrees; a higher percentage of people in work than ever before; child poverty reduced by half; and that we should be catching up on productivity with our competitors.

    We know that if we are to meet the productivity challenge, Britain needs to promote innovative thinking and enterprise. We need to encourage our workforce to think like entrepreneurs and to recognise the challenges of a competitive market place. We want them to think more like owners and to see the benefit of making their company successful. We want people to recognise that they have a part to play in our economy and a contribution to make to Britain’s growth.

    We believe that only by pursuing both enterprise and fairness together – enterprise and fairness for all – can we equip Britain for the future and secure rising living standards for all. So we want all employees to enjoy the rewards of success, not just the privileged few. Where people generate growth they should also benefit from it. Where they are working with their companies to become more efficient and to become more productive, they should also reap their reward.

    This is why employee share ownership is so important to this Government. And this is why we want to encourage more companies to offer all their employees a stake in their business.

    Employee shareholders have a direct interest in the performance of their company and a real stake in its success. Research in both the US and the UK shows there is a clear link between employee share ownership and improvements in productivity. Over time, employees have an incentive to contribute more actively to the development of the business. And if the majority of employees have an ownership stake, then individual efforts become mutually reinforcing.

    Employee shareholders also feel a greater commitment to their company which helps the company recruit and retain employees and improves its return from investment in employee skills and training. Employee shareholders better understand the risks faced by the business, which in turn can lead to greater pay responsibility.

    The role of the new plan

    Our target is to double the number of companies offering all-employee share ownership schemes. We want widespread employee ownership and long term shareholding by employees, and to encourage the new enterprise culture of team work in which everyone contributes and benefits from success.

    The plan will be an important step towards meeting that target.

    But we recognise that we need to encourage both companies and employees to take up the new plan if we are going to change the culture in the workplace. So we have devised a plan that is the most generous all employee plan ever introduced into the UK. One that offers significant tax benefits to both employees and companies. And one that will appeal to small as well as to large companies by offering a range of different features.

    The process

    We decided early on that we would not achieve the type of change we want to see just by tweaking the existing schemes. We want a plan which will meet our objectives and be attractive to all employees and companies.

    To help us achieve this, an Advisory Group, made up of representatives from leading share scheme practitioners, companies, academics and trade union members, have worked with the Inland Revenue in the development of the new plan. Two members of that group (Graham Rowlands Hempel and David Tuch) are speaking here today and I would like to thank them – and all their colleagues as well – for the tremendous commitment and support that they have given to this work.

    We are also listening to companies directly though the focus groups led by ProShare, who have organised today’s conference. Up to 60 companies have participated in these groups, which must be something of a record ­ even for New Labour! Again, many thanks to all of you who have given your time to attend meetings and to write to us. Your input has been extremely valuable and is reflected in the features of the plan which will have been outlined today.

    This initiative is an excellent example of how this Government is bringing private and public sectors together to create policies which work well in practice.

    Buying shares

    Let me outline some of the key features of the new plan.

    First, employees for the first time will be able to buy shares in their company out of their pre tax salary. Employees will immediately have a stake in the company – they will become “owners” from day one.

    Of course, holding shares is risky, unlike the one way bet of an option – employees will need to understand this when they decide to buy shares and employers will need to communicate this carefully to their employees. We are currently considering ways that the Revenue can help in this process.

    There are also features of the new plan to help reduce this risk. Because they buy shares out of the pre-tax salary employees are in effect always buying shares at a discount. Employers who offer matching shares to their employees add to that cushion, as indeed do employers who provide shares over a 12 month period based on the most favourable price.

    And we have set limits within the plan which should mean that no-one overreaches themselves and uses more of their salary to buy shares than is advisable.

    The second revolutionary feature reflects the fact that many companies have told us that they want employees to demonstrate their commitment to the company by buying shares. They also want to reward this by matching these with additional shares. Before now this has not been easy to achieve for everyone. The new plan will change this significantly and as a result many companies will for the first time want to set up a plan.

    Rewarding performance

    Other companies have told us that they have been put off from having a plan in the past because they would have to give shares to all their employees, regardless of their performance or their commitment to staying with the company. So our third innovation in the new plan is that companies can now award shares on a performance basis, if they want to. They can also take back shares awarded to employees who decide not to stay with them.
    Rewarding performance in this way will help companies to create a more competitive environment within their business. This in turn will lead to greater efficiencies and more innovation. But again, all this must be done on a basis that is fair to employees. It will be up to companies to choose any performance measure that suit their business, as long as these are objective and fair. Companies must be open with their workforce about how performance will be measured. Indeed this is how any modern, successful business should treat its employees if it is going to get the best from them.

    Smaller companies

    I want to say a few words about smaller companies. Our aim is to increase the number of companies who offer shares to all their employees. To achieve this, we need to encourage and help companies setting up their first plan. Many of these will be the smaller quoted and unquoted companies.

    Our fourth innovation is for these companies – the new plan can now be a very simple plan if this is what you want. It has also been designed so that you can set up a plan which can develop as the company grows.

    We recognise that smaller companies, particularly unquoted ones, face more obstacles in setting up plans and, like all businesses, have to look carefully at the costs. That is why the new plan contains a number of innovative features aimed at smaller and unquoted companies. In addition we are looking closely, again with the help of the Advisory Group and the industry generally, at ways in which Government can give more help.

    The internet gives us a tremendous opportunity to revolutionise the way that we can help companies set up plans and reduce the burdens on business of providing information to us. Next year we will have available on the net, and therefore free of charge, a set of draft rules that any company can take away and use to set up a plan.

    Conclusion

    We want to hear your views on the new plan. Many of you have said that you find it difficult to comment, not knowing what is going to happen to the existing schemes. I appreciate this. But as we have said all along, we need to be sure that the new plan will deliver the changes that we want to see happen, before we make any decisions on the existing schemes. Your input into the process so far has helped enormously in shaping the new plan. Just as we want to get the new plan right, we want to make the right decision on the existing schemes.

    From what we have heard already, we think the new plan will be very successful. These developments herald a dramatic change in the way many businesses operate, and point towards a new era of partnership between employees, shareholders and managers. They are a key building block for Britain’s future prosperity, for the modern and decent Britain we are working for. Join with us in promoting employee share ownership, so that we can make the most of the benefits which are on offer.

    Thank you.

  • Stephen Timms – 1999 Speech at the Launch of the CBI Report on Corporate Venturing

    Stephen Timms – 1999 Speech at the Launch of the CBI Report on Corporate Venturing

    The speech made by Stephen Timms, the then Financial Secretary to the Treasury, on 11 November 1999.

    Introduction

    1. Thank you for inviting me to speak to you today. Over the past two and a half years this Government has started to build a new Britain which we want to be modern and decent – a new enterprise economy open to all the talents. That’s why the Chancellor set out on Tuesday as ambitions for the next decade the goals that we should have productivity moving closer to our major competitors, a larger proportion of people in work, halve the number of children in poverty, and for the first time over half of our school leavers should go on to study for a degree.
    2. For too long British investment has been too low, productivity increases too slow, the potential of new markets, new technologies and new skills too often squandered. I want that to change and for corporate venturing to fulfil its potential in the new Britain, promoting long term investment across British businesses. 

    The report

    1. The CBI/Natwest report into corporate venturing is a timely piece of research – highlighting the important benefits that corporate venturing can bring.
    2. Compared to the US, corporate venturing in this country barely skims the surface of the investment pond. When I was in Silicon Valley, in September, I met Stephen Nachtsheim, the Vice President for Corporate Business of Intel. He told me that Intel had invested over $3 billion dollars in more than 250 companies – most of them start-ups – some working from the owners’ garage. Corporate venturing is having a big impact on they way Intel does business and is as integral to their corporate strategy.
    3. Case studies in the report show that companies outside the US have also benefited from corporate venturing. Reuters, the information service provider, is helping to reshape its business through corporate venturing. 3M is using corporate venturing as a part of its growth strategy for the continued generation of new ideas, products and technologies.
    4. But examples like these outside the US are scarce. The report says, many large firms still don’t really know what corporate venturing is. And that worries me.
    5. We are in an era where business is changing dramatically, where the difference between business success and failure is the speed at which new technologies are adopted. British business is missing out on the benefits of corporate venturing.
    6. For example, in 1997, Intel conducted virtually no business on the Internet. In 1998, their Internet business had risen to 20 per cent thanks to corporate venturing. And this year they expect to carry out a staggering 50 per cent of all their business over the World Wide Web. It is becoming ever more noticeable that in the relentless competition of today’s global markets, large Goliaths of industry who cannot defeat the quicker Davids join them instead – creating innovative strategic partnerships – or symbiotic relationships as Patricia Hewitt called it – to the benefit of both firms. 

    PBR measures

    1. Enterprising attitudes are necessary in both established firms and new businesses. We need an enterprising culture which reflects the attitudes across society – attitudes to risk, reward and failure, and wealth creation.
    2. In the 1999 Budget we set out our intentions for a new tax incentive to promote corporate venturing. Following consultation, Gordon Brown announced on Tuesday in the Pre-Budget Report that we will provide an up-front corporation tax relief of 20 per cent for all large companies that invest in growing companies for over 3 years. This underwrites one fifth of their investment and takes into account the needs of Britain’s small high-tech firms.
    3. But we don’t just want companies to invest through corporate venturing once, we want them to become serial corporate venturers. Your report drew some interesting conclusion about the success of corporate venturing. 80 per cent of alliances were still going forward. 50 per cent of firms had gone on to undertake further partnerships.
    4. So our measures go further.
    5. To encourage serial corporate venturing, if a corporate venturer sells its investment at a profit and reinvests again through corporate venturing, it can defer the corporation tax charge on the gain.
    6. This incentive could be worth up to £100 million if businesses rise to the challenge and invest £500 million through corporate venturing .
    7. A thriving enterprise economy calls for a larger number of small businesses. That is why the Pre-Budget Report contained a number of new incentives for small businesses – the backbone of our economy. But we know that investments in smaller higher-risk trading companies are more risky. That is why as part of the corporate venturing tax relief we are providing a capital write-off against income for investments that do not work. Depending on the loss, a corporate venturer will be able to get additional relief of up to £24 for every £100 it has invested.
    8. These tax relief measures provide strong financial incentives to undertake corporate venturing. But, I agree with Patricia that corporate venturing is about more than money. So we will continue to work with the Department of Trade and Industry, developing further non-tax measures to help create a corporate venturing culture.
    9. Your research found that 38 per cent found partners through informal Networks. While I was in Silicon Valley I went to a meeting of the MIT/Stanford Venture Lab. This is a public forum where entrepreneurs, managers and investors can meet and learn about the small firms. I hope the CBI’s programme of regional seminars following this report will start the ball rolling in the UK. But we also need to look at other ways of encouraging dialogue between established companies and new firms.
    10. We need to take corporate venturing into the boardrooms of the largest corporates and into the workshops and laboratories of our smallest firms. We must get the message across that corporate venturing can provide finance, support and technical expertise to turn innovative talent into commercial success.

    Conclusion

    1. Corporate venturing has been a mainstream in the US economy since the 1960s and has had a big impact on the shape of their economy. Let us now grasp this opportunity to make corporate venturing a success for British businesses as well.
    2. Thank you.
  • Stephen Timms – 1999 Speech at Launch of Management Consultancy Best Practice Statement

    Stephen Timms – 1999 Speech at Launch of Management Consultancy Best Practice Statement

    The speech made by Stephen Timms, the then Financial Secretary to the Treasury, on 10 November 1999.

    Introduction

    1. I am delighted to launch this Statement of best practice working relationships between Government and the key consultancy associations. The Statement is a clear demonstration of this Government’s intention to work more closely and more effectively with its suppliers. I would particularly like to welcome the three parties who have worked so hard together to get this far: The Management Consultancies Association (represented by Chris Harrison, Vice Chairman), The Institute of Management Consultancy (represented by Richard Popple – President) and the Treasury’s Procurement Group (represented by Mike Burt).

    Procurement

    1. Improving procurement is part and parcel of this Government’s wider modernisation programme for the public services. Central Government is the largest buyer of goods and services in the country. Our procurement budget totals £13 billion, and that includes half a billion pounds a year spent on consultancies. So there is a lot at stake.
    2. The need for change has been given new urgency by the rapidly changing nature of the public sector’s relationship with the private sector.
    3. The Government’s dealings with the private sector have increased both in number and in complexity so the Government’s procurement activity has also become more complex.
    4. Take for example the enormous investment process that is now underway in IT. Or the opportunities posed by the Internet and electronic commerce, for organising Government activities in new, innovative and more effective ways. All of these changes demand a new emphasis on professional procurement and a new approach to it too.
    5. The private sector recognised long ago that procurement processes and procedures were central to the strategic planning and policy of any organisation. The public sector should be no different. Indeed without change in the public sector there will continue to be adverse consequences for the private sector, not least for the suppliers and consultancies with whom we do business.
    6. The problems in Whitehall’s approach to the procurement of committee projects and our procurement are well-known – poor projects definitions, poor project management, poor contract management and poor management of suppliers.
    7. We have also had some nasty surprises. There have been a number of major projects both in fields such as construction and IT which quite frankly have simply gone wrong. They raised the question as to whether the public sector had the professional skills required to define and manage major capital projects of this sort.

    Office of Government Commerce

    1. That’s why towards the end of last year we asked Peter Gershon, Managing Director of GEC Marconi to conduct a review of the structure of procurement and to tell whether we had the organisation, the skills, the processes and procedures that would see us into the next Millennium. His report which we endorsed in July, provides a recipe for swift progress.
    2. The report recommended the setting-up of the Office of Government Commerce which will, on the principle of subsidiarity, support departments by doing things centrally that are best done centrally, while leaving individual units freedom to pursue their individual interests locally where it is clearly best to do so.
    3. The Office of Government Commerce will be responsible for defining the electronic procurement agenda. It will oversee the management of supplier relations and it will be a source of project management skill which will be world class and which it will make available to departments. It will be a single source of authoritative guidance and will manage up the skills available across Whitehall. 

    Best Practice Statement

    1. This Statement is one of the first practical demonstrations of this Government’s commitment to improving its relations with its suppliers, as set out in Peter Gershon’s procurement review. It also puts into practical effect the call by the Modernising Government White Paper for modern and effective Government business. This is the first statement of its kind and I believe can be the model for other expressions of best practice relationships.
    2. It is a clear expression of how client departments and consultants should work together to achieve a mutually beneficial relationship and outcome. It sets out the best practice standards which should be adopted at every stage of the procurement and delivery of the contract. It reflects the real need for both sides of the contract to put behind them the confrontational and adversarial approaches which have too often been a feature of past working relationships and which deliver neither value for money nor the best results for either side, nor ultimately for the taxpayer.
    3. I bring a good deal of conviction to the task of commending the Statement because of my experience of working as a management consultant. I knew well the potential for management consultancy to make an enormous contribution to problem solving in a creative way – but also how much achieving that potential is dependent on a good relationship between client and consultant.
    4. We have developed the Statement with other Government Departments, the Management Consultancies Association and Institute of Management Consultancy on behalf of their members. But if it is to have real impact, its principles must be disseminated to everyone in Government involved in procuring consultancy services and to every consultant employed to deliver those requirements. And I look to everyone present here today to play their part in making this happen. We also recognise the need for its adoption and application to be monitored and fed back to those who will be responsible for reviewing, amending and refining the statement. So we will be putting in place the means for achieving this
    5. Working together with business has been a key theme of this Government. This Statement clearly demonstrates those values. Consultancies, the Government and the taxpayer all stand to gain. With your support, we can ensure that the Statement delivers tangible results, becoming the “yardstick” for modern procurement practices across the UK.
    6. Thank you.
  • Stephen Timms – 2022 Speech on Entrepreneurs from Ethnic Minority Backgrounds

    Stephen Timms – 2022 Speech on Entrepreneurs from Ethnic Minority Backgrounds

    The speech made by Sir Stephen Timms, the Labour MP for East Ham, in Westminster Hall, the House of Commons, on 20 December 2022.

    I beg to move,

    That this House has considered support for entrepreneurs from ethnic minority backgrounds.

    I am delighted to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Hosie. I am grateful to Mr Speaker for granting this debate, and I am very pleased to see the Minister in her place.

    I represent in Parliament the eastern half of the London Borough of Newham, which is probably the most ethnically diverse community on the planet. Last year’s census showed that just 45% of residents were born in the UK, and that 52% identify as Asian, compared with 9% nationally, and another 14% identify as black. Some 25% identify as white, compared with 82% nationally, so ethnic minority entrepreneurship is very important for the prosperity of the community that I represent. I regret the closure of the Department for Work and Pensions support programme for self-employment, with no sign of a replacement as yet. That programme gave helpful support to a significant number of my constituents to start up in business for themselves.

    Minority-led businesses have made a lot of progress. Minority Supplier Development UK, a not-for-profit membership group that champions diversity and inclusion in public and private sector supply chains, highlighted in a report last year called “Minority Businesses Matter” that of the UK’s 23 unicorns—start-ups valued at $1 billion or more—eight had ethnic minority founders, including Deliveroo. That gives a sense of the huge potential in this area, which we need to realise much more. In May, the London Chamber of Commerce and Industry published the report “Ethnic Diversity in Business”. I commend the work of Esenam Agubretu and her colleagues. That report identifies the barriers that minority-led businesses face.

    In 2021, about 14% of the UK population was from an ethnic minority background, but ethnic minority-led businesses constituted just 5% of small and medium-sized enterprises in 2020, and those businesses also tend to be in lower-paying sectors. We need to be doing much better than that. The economic contribution of ethnic minority-led businesses is large, but the potential is larger still. Baroness McGregor-Smith’s 2017 review, “Race in the workplace”, concluded that

    “If BME talent is fully utilised, the economy could receive a £24 billion boost.”

    We need to realise that opportunity. The Social Market Foundation has found that ethnic minority-led businesses are often more innovative, with a lot to contribute to levelling up the economy, and that the economy is weaker because those businesses lack support.

    I want to highlight two main points arising from the London Chamber of Commerce and Industry report: the need to address the barriers that ethnic minority businesses face in accessing finance, and the need for better data on how those businesses are getting on. The key barrier, and the focus of that report, is problems accessing finance. Black entrepreneurs in particular report bad experiences with banks, and Asian entrepreneurs struggle to access funding outside their own communities. Those who do apply for funding are far less likely to receive it. The London Chamber of Commerce and Industry quotes Ismail Oshodi describing his experience:

    “we had different people dealing with us and I had to repeat myself on several occasions, even with all of that, we were unable to get the amount we needed. We weren’t given a clear reason why, we was just told we did not meet their criteria.”

    The LCCI says that 44% of black African business owners and 39% of black Caribbean business owners fear prejudice from financial providers, compared with just 4% of white owners. Let us be frank: racism is part of the problem. It is not that the banks do not recognise the problem; they do, and they are trying to do something about it. UK Finance published a report in July, “Supporting Ethnic Minority Entrepreneurship in the UK”, which profiled numerous initiatives. HSBC sponsored last year’s Black Business Week and Black Business Show. Santander works with a network of women of colour in business and supports a black inclusion programme. NatWest has a racial equality taskforce and an ethnicity advisory council. Barclays has a black founders accelerator.

    The initiatives that I have seen most of are those supported by Lloyds bank. It has a black business advisory committee, chaired by Claudine Reid MBE, whom I first met when I was a Minister in the Department of Trade and Industry 20 years ago. I had embarked on a tour of social enterprises and found myself at PJ’s in Croydon, set up and run by Claudine and her husband. I also know the work Lloyds does with the Black Business Network, founded and chaired by Shari Leigh, which was highlighted to me by my former constituent Shi Dolor, whom I knew when she was a teenager and whose Noir Squared branding business has worked with the network.

    In September, the network published the second of three annual reports called “Black. British. In Business …and Proud!” As a Lloyds executive recognises in her foreword, it makes for “uncomfortable reading”. The report refers to a

    “breakdown in trust of formal institutions”,

    and reports that 67% of black business owners have been negatively discriminated against in their past entrepreneurial efforts, that 84% of business owners see racism and society’s attitude to black entrepreneurs as a barrier to their business, and that black business owners turn to their friends, black business community groups or social media groups rather than banks for advice and support.

    Dr Lisa Cameron (East Kilbride, Strathaven and Lesmahagow) (SNP)

    I thank the right hon. Gentleman for bringing this vital debate to the House. Does he agree that where there is intersectionality between ethnic minority groups and disability or gender, the barriers faced by people can be multiplied, and that banks and the Government should also take that into account?

    Sir Stephen Timms

    I very much agree with the hon. Member. That point is made in the London Chamber of Commerce and Industry report, and she is right to highlight it.

    Over half of black business owners say that they have seen banks taking action to deal with the problem, but only 12% think that that action taken is significant. Minority-led businesses also account for very little venture capital investment, less than 2% of which went to all-ethnic founder teams in 2019, according to the London Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Black African firms are four times more likely than white firms to be refused a loan, according to the British Business Bank. Mainstream services do not seem to be working for ethnic minorities. Ethnic minority groups have less wealth than their white counterparts, and there is a strong correlation between that and business success. They have fewer savings, so they are more reliant on external financial support.

    Given that, it is no surprise that minority-led businesses do less well. According to London Chamber of Commerce and Industry research, 38% of Asian and other minority business owners and 28% of black business owners reported making no profit, compared with 16% of white business owners. Thirty-nine per cent. of black entrepreneurs and nearly half of Asian and other ethnic minority entrepreneurs stopped working on their business idea because of “difficulties getting finance”, compared with a much smaller proportion—just a quarter—of white entrepreneurs.

    We need to be doing better than this, for the sake of not just business owners but the wider prosperity of our society. I welcome the Labour party review of start-up funding, led by Lord O’Neill, who was a Treasury Minister in the coalition Government. The review will consider how to ensure that ethnic minority entrepreneurs can access the finance, support and networks they need. Newham-based Shpresa is a community organisation supporting self-help among London’s Albanian community. It was founded and led by the remarkable Luljeta Nuzi, a social entrepreneur I first met when she came to the UK seeking asylum from Kosovo. She went on to graduate from the School for Social Entrepreneurs, and when today’s debate was announced, she drew my attention to the school’s match trading initiative, which provides enterprise grant finance, supported by Lloyds bank; the aim is that racially minoritised social enterprises should be early adopters.

    When the Minister responds, can she give us the Government’s assessment of the lending practices of financial institutions to ethnic minority businesses, and say whether she sees real progress being made? It is welcome that between 2012 and 2018, over 11,000 ethnic minority entrepreneurs received Government-backed start-up loans. The additional action that is needed is largely for the financial services industry, but there is one area where Government action is particularly needed: public procurement. A big section of the report by the London Chamber of Commerce and Industry is devoted to this area, and it calls for a Government taskforce to work on increasing public procurement from ethnic minority businesses.

    The LCCI wants the Government to move beyond merely “best endeavours” to introducing, for example, minimum target percentages for procurement from minority-owned businesses, in order to simplify procurement procedures and increase public purchasing from micro-businesses. It also wants tenders to be scored, in bid assessments, on supply chain diversity, and the Government to establish prestigious awards to highlight the achievements of minority-owned businesses.

    In the LCCI’s report, a quote caught my eye from Demi Ariyo, founder of a funding platform:

    “It became clear to me that there was a problem to be solved upon witnessing my church’s experience and hearing the first-hand experience of other minority ethnic entrepreneurs who had tried to seek funding.”

    As the chair of the all-party parliamentary group on faith and society, I would like there to be greater support for entrepreneurship among people who are coming together in faith groups. Britain’s history is replete with great businesses that have their roots in religious faith. Let us have more of them, and newer ones.

    My second point is about the lack of reliable data on ethnic diversity in business, which the report describes as “a recurring theme”. Here again, we need action by Government and by business. Companies House does not record the ethnicity of company directors. There is no legal requirement for businesses to publish their ethnicity pay gap, although they are rightly obliged to publish their gender pay gap. In 2017, the then Prime Minister, the right hon. Member for Maidenhead (Mrs May), promised to ask large employers to publish their ethnicity pay gap data. It has not happened yet. Can the Minister tell us whether that 2017 commitment still stands, and if so, when it will be implemented?

    The paucity of data means that there is a lot that we just do not know. Without detailed and reliable data on ethnic minority entrepreneurship, we cannot fully understand the barriers that exist, as we must if we are to remove them. In this recession, the gap between ethnic minorities and others in business may well get worse. We need to grip this issue now, so that trends can be monitored and support appropriately targeted. We cannot meet the needs of minority-led businesses without having adequate information about their characteristics and their performance.

    In the LCCI report, Dr Tony Matharu, chair of the LCCI’s Asian Business Association, and Lord Michael Hastings, chair of its Black Business Association, call for financial institutions to collect data about their support for ethnic minority businesses, as they do for women-led businesses under the Investing in Women code.

    The two issues that I have highlighted are part of a much bigger set of challenges. When the Minister responds, can she assure us that the Government recognise the need, spelled out by the LCCI, for strategic engagement between the business community, Government and ethnic minority entrepreneurs?

    Sir Peter Bottomley (Worthing West) (Con)

    I support the right hon. Gentleman’s efforts on faith and society. As one of the officers of the all-party parliamentary group on black and minority ethnic business owners, I am supported by Diana Chrouch. I direct hon. Members’ attention to an article in The Sunday Times of 14 February 2021, by Oliver Shah, talking to Wol Kolade, who has the initiative 10,000 Black Interns. He talks about unkinking the pipeline of black talent. It seems to me that letting people get through and do what they are capable of is what we should be aiming for.

    Sir Stephen Timms

    I completely agree with the Father of the House. I had not seen that article, but it sounds to me as though it makes exactly the case that needs to be made.

    I wonder whether the Minister will commit to better engagement between the groups I mentioned, in order to boost diversity in business. Bridging this large and persistent ethnic diversity gap is not straightforward. Realising the potential to which the Father of House has rightly drawn our attention is a long-term challenge. We need to be determined to end racial and ethnic inequality across UK society, including when it comes to start-up support, and to closing gaps that have persisted for far too long.

    I hope that the Minister can reassure us that the Government recognise the importance of the issue, and will set out plans to make sure that we can all benefit from the skills and contributions of all those who want to set up in business but are too often excluded by unfair and unnecessary barriers.

  • Stephen Timms – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Stephen Timms – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Stephen Timms on 2015-10-16.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential benefits of re-introducing compulsory work experience for under 16 year olds.

    Mr Sam Gyimah

    We are making the whole education system much more closely linked to the world of work. We have put more emphasis on mastering vital skills, more respected qualifications, and given employers greater influence over the content of courses, so young people have the skills that universities and employers value.

    We want more young people to have the opportunity to take part in high quality work experience that helps to prepare them for the workplace and develop the employability skills that employers require. Work experience is an important element of post-16 provision – new personalised study programmes include some form of work experience or work-related learning that is relevant to the career aspirations of students.

    We recognise that younger children benefit from contact with employers but we trust head teachers to decide what is best for their pupils, including when and how to take part in work experience. We are providing valuable support through a new employer-led Careers & Enterprise Company has been tasked with increasing the level of employer input into schools and colleges.

  • Stephen Timms – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport

    Stephen Timms – 2015 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Stephen Timms on 2015-10-21.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, pursuant to his Answer of 13 October 2015 to Question 11722, which companies provide fixed broadband services in the UK.

    Mr Edward Vaizey

    Any company that complies with Ofcom’s General Conditions Entitlement has authorisation to provide telecommunications services in the UK. This Department does not hold a comprehensive list of companies that provide fixed broadband services in the UK.