Tag: Speeches

  • Joanna Cherry – 2021 Speech on Data Loss at the Home Office

    Joanna Cherry – 2021 Speech on Data Loss at the Home Office

    The speech made by Joanna Cherry, the SNP MP for Edinburgh South West, in the House of Commons on 18 January 2021.

    I thank the Minister for advance sight of his statement. Two weeks ago, the Home Secretary was boasting that the United Kingdom is now a safer place because of Brexit. However, before it was disbanded by the Government, the Select Committee on the Future Relationship with the European Union heard detailed expert evidence explaining why the United Kingdom is not a safer place as a result of the law enforcement part of the Brexit deal. One of the key reasons is that we have lost real-time access to Europe-wide databases on criminal records, DNA, fingerprints and, indeed, intelligence. That is not just my view but the expert view of Lord Ian Blair, the former Metropolitan Police Commissioner, and Lord Peter Ricketts, the former National Security Adviser. Now that situation has been further exacerbated by this loss of important fingerprint, DNA and arrest history records, which the police use for real-time checks on our own UK-wide databases.

    Mr Speaker, you really couldn’t make it up, yet curiously the Home Secretary is nowhere to be seen. Instead, she has sent her junior Minister to take the flak. I have two areas of questions for him. First, was this data cleaning operation in any way connected to the removal of records from the police national computer following the end of the transition period? Does the 400,000 figure include the 40,000 records that were removed from the police national computer post Brexit, or is it on top of that? Secondly, given the UK-wide nature of the database, what discussions have taken place with police forces in the devolved nations? Will the Minister commit to full co-operation with Police Scotland and other devolved forces until this issue is resolved?

  • Nick Thomas-Symonds – 2021 Speech on Data Loss at the Home Office

    Nick Thomas-Symonds – 2021 Speech on Data Loss at the Home Office

    The speech made by Nick Thomas-Symonds, the Shadow Home Secretary, in the House of Commons on 18 January 2021.

    I am grateful to the policing Minister for his statement and for advance sight of it, and I am grateful to him for his briefing over the weekend, but I must ask where the Home Secretary is. The loss of hundreds of thousands of pieces of data—data so important for apprehending suspects and safeguarding vulnerable people—is extraordinarily serious. It was the Home Secretary who needed to show leadership and take control. That is what previous Home Secretaries have done in a crisis. On the Passport Office, Windrush and knife crime, whatever their mistakes, Home Secretaries came to and answered to this House; they did not just offer a media clip, as has happened today. This Home Secretary, who is failing on violent crime and failing on the Windrush compensation scheme, with chaos on border testing, and who was found to have broken the ministerial code, will now not even answer to Parliament and the public on this most serious of issues. The Home Secretary likes to talk tough, but when the going gets tough, she is nowhere to be seen.

    Will the Minister tell us when the Home Secretary first knew about the data loss and why the public had to find out from the media? Given that the initial reports were of 150,000 items of data, and the figure now seems to be over 400,000, can the Minister be sure of how much data has actually been lost? In his statement, the Minister said that on 10 January the process of deletion was stopped, but will he confirm that the faulty script was introduced into the police national computer on 23 November, meaning that the problem was not identified for 48 days?

    The Minister said in his statement on Friday that

    “the loss relates to individuals who were arrested and then released with no further action”.

    This is serious in itself. For example, let us consider cases of domestic abuse: when suspects are released, the data becomes very important to protecting victims and making further arrests. In a letter, Deputy Chief Constable Malik, the National Police Chiefs Council lead for the police national computer, said that the deleted DNA contains

    “records…marked for indefinite retention following conviction of serious offences.”

    This is, therefore, not only data on individuals released with no further action; it includes data about convicted criminals, so will the Minister now correct the statement that he issued on Friday?

    Will the Minister confirm whether 26,000 DNA records and 30,000 fingerprint records held on separate databases have been deleted? Will he assure the House that the engagement with the PNC to delete the Schengen information system—SIS II—database was unrelated? What is the full impact on the UK visa system from the data loss, and how is it affecting ongoing police investigations and intelligence gathering?

    The PNC and the police national database are due to be replaced by the national law enforcement data programme, but the assessment by the Infrastructure and Projects Authority is that the successful delivery of the project is in doubt. Is it still in doubt? If so, why? There are reports that 18 months ago senior police outlined that the Home Office was not investing in the PNC and that it presented a significant risk to the police’s ability to protect the public. Was that warning heeded?

    Finally, if it is not possible to recover data via the process currently under way, what contingency plans are in place to seek to recover the data via other means? Does the Minister accept that maintaining the security of this vital data is critical to addressing crime, bringing criminals to justice and keeping our communities safe, and that if the Home Office is not doing that, it is failing the public?

  • Kit Malthouse – 2021 Statement on Data Loss at the Home Office

    Kit Malthouse – 2021 Statement on Data Loss at the Home Office

    The statement made by Kit Malthouse, the Policing Minister, in the House of Commons on 18 January 2021.

    With permission, Mr Speaker, I would like to make a statement about the technical issues that we have experienced with the police national computer over the past week.

    The records and information held by the police help to keep us safe, but they, like many other public bodies, have an obligation to ensure that the information they hold is properly managed. As I am sure you are aware, Mr Speaker, not all information and records held by the police can be held indefinitely. To ensure that the police are complying with their legal obligations in respect of the records they hold, a regular housekeeping process is undertaken to delete personal data and records from the police national computer and linked databases: in this case, data relating to individuals who were investigated by the police but where no further action was taken. This is undertaken for a variety of reasons, but chiefly to abide by legal obligations.

    With such a large database, holding some 13 million records, an automated process is used to remove records that the police national computer has no legal right to hold. A weekly update was designed by engineers and applied to the police national computer, which then automatically triggers deletions across the PNC, and other linked databases. Last week, the Home Office became aware that, as a result of human error, the software that triggers these automatic deletions contained defective coding and had inadvertently deleted records that it should not have, and indeed had not deleted some records that should have been deleted. An estimated 213,000 offence records, 175,000 arrest records and 15,000 person records are being investigated as potentially having been deleted. It is worth the House noting that multiple records can be held against the same individual, so the number of individuals affected by this incident is likely to be lower. Operational partners are still able to access the police national computer, which holds, as I say, over 13 million records. Clearly this situation is very serious, and I understand that colleagues across this House will have concerns, which of course I share.

    By your leave, Mr Speaker, I want to set out for the House the steps that we have taken to deal with this complex incident. On the evening of 10 January—the same day the Home Office became aware of the incident—engineers put a stop on the automated process to ensure that no further deletions took place. All similar automated processes have also been suspended. Early last week, Home Office civil servants and engineers worked quickly to alert the police and other operational colleagues, and established a bronze, silver and gold command to manage the incident and co-ordinate a rapid response. The gold command provided rapid guidance for police forces and other partners to ensure that they were kept abreast of the situation.

    Secondly, Home Office officials and engineers, working closely with the National Police Chiefs Council, police forces and other partners, immediately initiated rapid work, through the gold command, to assess the full scale and impact of the incident. This included undertaking a robust and detailed assessment and verification of all affected records, followed by developing and implementing a plan to recover as much of the data and records as is possible, and to develop plans to mitigate the impacts of any lost data. This is being done in four phases. Phase 1 involves writing and testing a code to bring back accurate lists of what has been deleted as a result of the incident. Phase 2 will involve running that code and then doing detailed analysis on the return to fully analyse the records that have been lost and establish the full impact. Phase 3 will be to begin the recovery of the data from the police national computer and other linked systems. Phase 4 will involve work to ensure that we are deleting any data that should have been deleted as usual when this incident first began. Phase 1 of the process has taken place over the weekend, and I am assured that it has gone well. The second phase is now under way, and I will hopefully have an update in the next few days.

    While any loss of data is unacceptable, other tried-and-tested law enforcement systems are in place that contain linked data and reports to support policing partners in their day-to-day efforts to keep us safe: for example, the police national database or other local systems. The police are able to use these systems to do simultaneous checks.

    I urge patience while we continue our rapid internal investigation and begin the recovery. I hope the House will appreciate that the task in front of us is a complex one. Public safety is the top priority of everyone working at the Home Office, and I have full faith that Home Office engineers, our partners in the National Police Chiefs Council and police forces throughout the country, with whom we are working, are doing all they can to restore the data. Although that is rightly our immediate priority, the Home Secretary and I have commissioned an internal review as to the circumstances that led to this incident, so that lessons can be learned. I will update the House regularly on the process. I commend this statement to the House.

  • Chi Onwurah – 2021 Comments on Digital Surveillance at Work

    Chi Onwurah – 2021 Comments on Digital Surveillance at Work

    The comments made by Chi Onwurah, the Shadow Digital Minister, on 19 January 2021.

    Guidance and regulation to protect workers are woefully outdated in light of the accelerated move to remote working and rapid advancements in technology.

    The bottom line is that workers should not be digitally monitored without their informed consent, and there should be clear rules, rights and expectations for both businesses and workers.

    Ministers must urgently provide better regulatory oversight of online surveillance software to ensure people have the right to privacy whether in their workplace or home – which are increasingly one and the same.

  • Ed Miliband – 2021 Comments on Employment Rights

    Ed Miliband – 2021 Comments on Employment Rights

    The speech made by Ed Miliband, the Shadow Secretary of State for Business, on 19 January 2021.

    After dismissing media reports and promising the Government has no plans to rip up workers’ rights, Kwasi Kwarteng has now let the cat out of the bag and admitted that they are conducting a review of those rights – including opting out of the 48 hour week which protects workers in key sectors like the NHS, road haulage and airlines from working excessive hours.

    A government committed to maintaining existing protections would not be reviewing whether they should be unpicked. This exposes that the Government’s priorities for Britain are totally wrong.

    Neither workers nor business want Ministers to take a wrecking ball to the hard-won rights of working people and families.

  • Thangam Debbonaire – 2021 Speech on the Government’s Future Homes Standard Announcement

    Thangam Debbonaire – 2021 Speech on the Government’s Future Homes Standard Announcement

    The speech made by Thangam Debbonaire, the Shadow Housing Secretary, on 19 January 2021.

    This is a real disappointment, given the Conservatives had suggested they would be accelerating the Future Homes Standard.

    The Government is already seriously behind on our climate targets. Cancelling Labour’s Zero Carbon Homes policy in 2015 wasted years of progress.

    To rebuild our country from Covid, we should be building homes now that are affordable to heat and durable for the future. This announcement sets out four more years of delay, which isn’t good for families, builders or the environment.

  • Alok Sharma – 2021 Speech at Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week

    Alok Sharma – 2021 Speech at Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week

    The speech made by Alok Sharma, the COP26 President, on 19 January 2021.

    Good afternoon.

    It is an absolute pleasure to join you today. At the beginning of what is a momentous year for our planet.

    Together we must make 2021 the year of climate action.

    And we have just ten years to bring our emissions under control. A decade to limit global temperature rises, to the levels set out in the Paris Agreement.

    The choices we make today will determine whether we or not we achieve it.

    The science is clear on the destruction we will unleash if we do not.

    Water supplies strained. Nature devastated. Human health increasingly stunted by the air we breath.

    So it is vital that we act now.

    As President of the next UN climate conference, COP26, I want this to be the year that all of us unite around the aims of the Paris Agreement.

    From governments, cities, and civil society. To businesses, investors, and development banks.

    So it is great to see Clover Hogan on today’s panel. Who is working to empower young people.

    And of course, my friend Laurent Fabius, who delivered the historic Paris Agreement.

    And Francesco La Camera. Under whose leadership, IRENA is supporting the clean energy transition around the world.

    I have four key goals.

    One, to strengthen adaptation – to respond to the realities of a changing climate.

    Two, to enhance international collaboration among governments, business and civil society.

    Of course, the UK works with the UAE on Mission Innovation, for example. Speeding up innovation in clean energy technologies.

    Three, I want to get finance flowing to climate action – both public and private.

    And I am calling on developed countries to honour their commitments on international climate finance and raise that $100 billion a year.

    And I am urging investors to take climate risk into account, and capitalise on the shift to clean, resilient growth across the world.

    I thank our hosts, Masdar, for their work on the global energy transition,

    including their support for UK offshore wind, which is powering British homes and businesses as we speak.

    The fourth, incredibly important, goal I want us to work towards is reducing emissions.

    I am calling on world leaders to come forward with ambitious Nationally Determined Contributions.

    To set out net zero targets, and long-term plans to achieve them.

    And to introduce policies to make these targets a reality.

    Phasing out fossil fuel subsidies.

    Deploying renewables faster.

    And moving to clean transport.

    I welcome the leadership the UAE has shown amongst the Gulf states.

    Its new NDC last December, setting a target that covers the whole economy,

    and some of the lowest solar power prices in the world.

    I am also urging business, cities and regions to take actions.

    To sign up to the Race to Zero campaign.

    And work to reach net zero emissions by 2050 at the latest.

    By signing up you will be joining over 450 cities, and 1400 firms which have already done so.

    Including the likes of the UAE’s Globesight, Microsoft and EDF.

    This is not just the right thing to do.

    It also helps to drive shareholder value.

    Whether it is finance, business, or our national economies, the opportunities presented by the move to clean growth are enormous.

    Once pre-election commitments made by President-elect Joe Biden are enacted, almost two-thirds of the world’s emissions will be covered by net zero commitments. A club that is growing all the time.

    Global trade in low-carbon goods and services is expected to grow up to 34 times between 2015 and 2050.

    By investing in clean sectors today, as we recover from the coronavirus pandemic, we can build clean growth into the heart of our economies.

    Creating jobs and prosperity.

    Here in the UK for example, our Ten Point Plan for a green industrial revolution will support and create a quarter of a million green jobs.

    Government investment in wind power, hydrogen, carbon capture usage and storage, electric vehicles and much more, will help to leverage in three times the amount from the private sector.

    The opportunities are there for the taking.

    So, friends, in this vital year for our planet, let’s come together.

    Let’s increase our ambition.

    And take action.

    To put the world on course for a clean and prosperous future.

  • Alok Sharma – 2021 Speech at the 11th International Renewable Energy Agency Conference

    Alok Sharma – 2021 Speech at the 11th International Renewable Energy Agency Conference

    The speech made by Alok Sharma, the COP26 President, on 19 January 2021.

    Excellencies, ladies, and gentlemen. It is an absolute pleasure to join you today.

    And I would like to thank Mr Francesco La Camera for the fantastic work IRENA is doing under his leadership.

    Friends, we all know that we must act now on climate change.

    If we do not, the consequences will be almost unimaginable:

    With crops failing.

    Nature devastated.

    And hundreds of millions threatened by rising seas.

    To avoid this, it is vital to decarbonise the energy sector, which accounts for around two-thirds of global emissions.

    And so I am asking governments around the world to do three key things to achieve it.

    First, raise ambition and action at home.

    Second, invest in clean recoveries in response to the COVID pandemic.

    And, third, work together to make progress on our climate ambitions.

    I am urging all countries to come forward with new Nationally Determined Contributions, and long-term strategies.

    And to put clear policies in place to achieve them.

    Policies like improving product efficiency standards.

    Phasing out coal power.

    Encouraging decarbonisation in those sectors where it is a challenge.

    And creating the policy environment to attract private finance.

    Getting finance flowing, both public and private, is one of my key COP26 priorities.

    Including urging developed countries to honour the commitment they have made to raise $100 billion a year in international climate finance.

    I am grateful to IRENA for its work on NDCs and long-term planning. And its support for countries on the clean energy transition.

    And I am pleased to say that here in the UK, we are acting.

    We announced a new NDC, consistent with our target to reach net zero by 2050.

    And last year, Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced our ten-point plan for a green industrial revolution.

    A plan to mobilise £12 billion of government investment.

    That spurs three times as much from the private sector.

    A plan to power every home in the country from offshore wind within a decade.

    And invest in nuclear, hydrogen technologies and Carbon Capture Usage and Storage.

    A plan which will support and create a quarter of a million jobs.

    This shows how investment in clean technology can drive our recovery from COVID-19.

    Which I know has been a focus of IRENA’s work.

    By aligning our recovery packages with the Paris Agreement, we can help to build clean growth into the heart of our economies.

    And of course many countries are doing fantastic work to invest in green recoveries. And now we need all leaders to follow suit.

    We are confident in this approach because we have seen that clean growth is absolutely possible.

    Over the past thirty years in the UK, we have seen our economy grow by 75 per cent while reducing our emissions by 43 per cent.

    We have also seen how, by working together, we can make progress faster.

    By increasing incentives for investment.

    Creating economies of scale.

    And accelerating innovation.

    Solar and wind power costs have fallen by 28% and 15% respectively, each time global deployment has doubled.

    But we only realise these benefits if we tailor our response to each challenge and sector.

    That is why international collaboration is one of the key goals of my COP Presidency.

    Our COP26 campaigns are bringing government, industry, investors, development banks, and civil society together, around five critical areas:

    Finance, nature, adaptation and resilience, clean transport, and, of course, clean energy.

    And we have created new forums for collaboration, like the Zero Emission Vehicle Transition Council, and the Energy Transition Council.

    And I would like to thank everyone involved with this work. Including IRENA, as a member of the COP26 Energy Transition Council.

    The work of this council includes improving the international support to developing countries to move away from coal.

    Friends, together, through ambition, collaboration, and investment in green recoveries, we can transform the global energy sector.

    So let’s take action now, to put the world on track for a clean and prosperous future.

  • Paul Blomfield – 2021 Speech on Dental Services

    Paul Blomfield – 2021 Speech on Dental Services

    The speech made by Paul Blomfield, the Labour MP for Sheffield Central, in the House of Commons on 14 January 2021.

    Can I, too, express my gratitude to my hon. Friend the Member for Putney (Fleur Anderson) for securing this debate? Dentistry often does not get the attention it deserves when we are looking at health provision for the country, and today is an opportunity to address that.

    Clearly, the pressure on dental services preceded covid-19, but the pandemic has exacerbated it. In normal times—if we can remember them—the demand for NHS dentistry in Sheffield was huge, with unmet need amounting to more than 35,000 patients. That clearly has a long-term impact on oral health, and one that is particularly worrying for children.

    Then came covid-19, which has hit the sector hard. Frankly, to choose this time to impose new targets, without warning or consultation, shows either a lack of understanding or a lack of regard for the consequences. The 45% target will disrupt the priorities of dentists by imposing penalties for failing to hit levels of what are described as normal NHS activity in what are blatantly abnormal times. It will threaten the viability of practices, and worsen access to dental care across Sheffield and the rest of England.

    Dental practices have made huge efforts to be covid-secure, with cleaning and air-clearing procedures that mean they cannot see as many patients as usual. Many have therefore prioritised emergency and urgent care, and this normal activity target will skew their priorities away from those patients most in need. As one dentist explained it to me, they will be

    “forced to stop seeing emergency patients…and to push the limits of the sound infection control procedures brought in to protect patients and staff”.

    Another simply said:

    “These targets are the wrong choice at the wrong time”.

    This is not scaremongering, as has been suggested, but a real and genuine concern from dental professionals who care about the services they provide.

    Sheffield Central is in the top 10% of areas where NHS dental care was most impacted by the pandemic, according to a survey, and the Association of Dental Groups says that problems are particularly acute in the most deprived urban, coastal and rural areas. Imposing this target will hit those most in need—levelling down, not levelling up. We need to be growing our dental services, not threatening them with damaging targets.

    I have great regard for the Minister—we have worked together on other issues, and I know she takes her responsibilities seriously—so I do hope that she will listen to the concerns she has heard today from both sides of the House, talk to colleagues and review this contract.

  • Anthony Mangnall – 2021 Speech on Dental Services

    Anthony Mangnall – 2021 Speech on Dental Services

    The speech made by Anthony Mangnall, the Conservative MP for Totnes, in the House of Commons on 14 January 2021.

    I congratulate the hon. Member for Putney (Fleur Anderson) on securing this debate.

    The impact of covid on the dental sector has been profound, from the sector’s closure in March to the 20 million lost appointments, the 15 million-appointment backlog and the year-on-year decrease in those who visit the dentist. In previous years, being able to avoid the dentist may have seemed an art form, but it is rapidly becoming a significant and desperately serious problem, with mouth cancer diagnoses significantly down and major operations being put on hold or just avoided due to lack of access.

    It is right that we have to clear the significant backlog. While I do not oppose the concept of a UDA target, I do oppose the mechanism that penalises dentists who do not meet that target. I respectfully ask the Minister to consider whether the target could be rejigged so that people have the security and understanding that if they are unable to meet it, they will not see a loss of salary or any penalisation from the Government. Of course, we have already heard that 50% of dental practices are meeting that target, so we have seen an ability to deliver.

    The intent is right, but the mechanism is wrong and only adds to the extra stress that those who work in dental practices are already suffering. I do not deny that dental practices in my constituency are safe, but the individual set-up of each is very different; things such as the air purification systems that they implement will mean that they have different fallow times and will therefore also impact the UDA issue. There is a result here whereby different circumstances will mean that the overall target is unable to be met.

    I ask the Government to consider taking away the penalisation mechanism of UDAs, reimbursing the VAT costs faced by dentists on PPE, and ensuring that our dentists are treated as part of the primary healthcare network. We hope to encourage people to stay in this sector. We want them to do so—we do not want them to go towards private alone—so I hope that the Minister will be able to reassure me and many of the dental practices in my constituency.

    Dentists are not asking for any more than anyone else, but they have received significantly less than many of those out there. All that we ask the Government today is to treat our dental sector with the respect that it deserves and to help it deliver for those who most need it across the whole United Kingdom.