Tag: Speeches

  • Andrew Mitchell – 2024 Speech on UK-Nepal Development Portfolio and Funding

    Andrew Mitchell – 2024 Speech on UK-Nepal Development Portfolio and Funding

    The speech made by Andrew Mitchell, the Development Minister, in Nepal on 20 February 2024.

    Distinguished guests, honourable Finance Minister Mahat, friends, and colleagues. Namaste.

    It is wonderful to be in Nepal again. I know we have just celebrated an important milestone: 100 years of our Nepal-Britain Treaty of Friendship.

    But the truth is we go back much further. Bonds forged on the battlefields with the Gurkhas – who are so rightly famed for their extraordinary courage – date back 2 centuries. Those admirable soldiers epitomise the deep and lasting friendship between the UK and Nepal. A friendship that continues to evolve and shape our future together.

    When I last visited Nepal, over a decade ago, you were still recovering after a decade of civil war. Today, we are witnessing the fruits of progress. 92% of people have access to electricity from 67% in 2011. Literacy rates have jumped from 66% to 76%. Infant mortality is nearly one third of what it was 25 years ago. You have made huge strides in economic growth.

    Your constitution enshrines important rights and addresses inequalities. Millions are engaging in the new democratic system. Not just at home but abroad, Nepal is also showing it is a model citizen – whether defending the UN Charter on Ukraine or as a peacekeeping superpower.

    Progress has been remarkable. But Nepal still faces challenges. We need to work together to solve them together.

    This is why, I will today set out how the UK is re-shaping our development approach focusing on 8 programmes that aim to deliver over £400 million in grant support to Nepal by the end of the decade.

    In December, I set out a clear UK vision for development that will help us – together – get our sustainable development goals back on track.

    Nepal is delivering great things. The UK is proud to support its initiatives including on Green Resilient and Inclusive Development.

    And I’ve seen how the UK-Nepal partnership is evolving. I’ve met members of a Dalit community in Karnali who are better able to grow crops thanks to UK-backed climate-resilient irrigation. I met dedicated professionals at Butwal hospital helping end preventable deaths.

    The UK’s new development approach focuses on Nepali leadership and systems, on mobilising money, on opportunities for all, and on securing a future for young Nepalis – a future in Nepal.

    This portfolio is not just about ‘good projects delivering great things’ – although that is what they will do! It is a joined-up, coherent approach, based on strong evidence, and focused on strong outcomes. Spanning economic transformation, climate resilience, stronger social services, inclusion and much more besides.

    How will we do this?

    First. We will work with government to unlock money for Nepal to mobilise funding for development and growth – which in turn will generate further investment.

    The private sector is central to this work. There is no doubt in my mind that the private sector is the engine, not the enemy, of development. The private sector creates jobs, puts food on the table, turbocharges growth and enables societies to thrive on their own terms.

    We’re committed to expand this and support the government’s investment summit – though I stress how vital it is that investors have the right environment. For example, legal reforms and ensuring all actions needed to avoid the Financial Action Task Force grey-list.

    We aim to mobilise private capital – helping government remove barriers to attract investors, supporting the sort of excellent engagement Minister Mahat had with the City of London last year. Helping develop a Sovereign Credit rating, helping Green Bonds, helping Investment Board Nepal get the best deals. With the Asian Development Bank, it will help Nepal access climate finance and work with the World Bank and others to help the country deal with the threats of climate change.

    Developing the economy will also help to create productive, attractive jobs such as those, Upaya – the delivery company – is creating with UK support. And I am looking forward to meeting young innovators who, with UK support, are using technology to identify climate risks.

    Second. Our new portfolio will help tackle the climate change crisis and deliver economic transformation.

    Yesterday I flew over the Himalayas and saw first-hand the beauty and the fragility of glaciers that took thousands of years to form but are melting 3 times faster than elsewhere. Our work with Nepal will help to protect the most vulnerable here, and beyond, recognising the Hindu Kush Himalaya supports a quarter of the world’s population. We will not sit back when reports suggest 80% of the ice here could be gone by the end of the century.

    Yesterday I also saw how British International Investment is helping Nepal realise some of its immense potential in green energy, at Upper Trishuli Hydropower Plant. Our new development portfolio will further support Nepal to access private and UN climate finance for projects like this and wider adaptation. It will help Nepal to plan for risk – like developing early warning systems through our RAIN programme.

    Our third offer focuses on women and girls: I’ve always said that to understand development, you need see the world through the eyes of women and girls.

    Later today I will have the pleasure of meeting inspiring Nepali women leaders, entrepreneurs and activists who spoke about their passions and ambitions. Increasing opportunities for women – which starts by ensuring every girl has a chance at a decent education – is not only the right thing to do but the smart thing to do. The most successful societies are the most inclusive; built around equality of opportunity for all.

    Finally, we will harness innovation and new technologies. Research, digital, AI and data will underpin what we do and how we deliver.

    I want to conclude by assuring you that my visit is just part of the UK’s lasting, and sustained engagement with Nepal.

    We have a tremendous chance now to galvanise the private sectors work in Nepal, and Britain will be your friend at your side throughout this process. Because the conflicts that damaged Nepal in the past are in the past, of the brilliance of your visit to the city of London last year, because of the focus and evidence what the private sector can be here.

    And because of the fact that BII is investing here on the ground now and will be a leader for so many others, now is the time through the use of private sector, the ability of the private sector to deliver huge amounts of investment, huge numbers of jobs, and huge amounts of tax which is so important to any government.

    Now is the time on the back of the Investment Summit that you are holding at the end of April, that we can see real progress made with the laws that are going through your Cabinet and your Parliament are clearly set in action, put in place, to assuring the private sector that here is a welcoming environment in which they can pride and prosper.

    You are, and remain, our uniquely close and valued partner. Today, I have outlined how that partnership will respond to the opportunities and the challenges we share, as we enter a new century of friendship. And today I salute that friendship and say, here’s to the next 100 years of working together.

  • Rishi Sunak – 2024 Speech to the NFU Annual Conference

    Rishi Sunak – 2024 Speech to the NFU Annual Conference

    The speech made by Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister, on 20 February 2024.

    I know, Minette, this is your last conference as NFU President – so I actually wanted to start by first paying a brief tribute to you.

    During a momentous period, you’ve been a formidable champion of our farmers – always fair, always thoughtful, and always forceful. If you asked some of my ministers down they’d probably say very forceful.

    But I know everyone will want to join me in once again paying a special tribute and a thanks to Minette for everything she’s done.

    Nine years ago, I gave my maiden speech in the House of Commons.

    I pledged that day to be a champion of agriculture, the countryside and all of my hard-working rural constituents.

    It’s farmers who feed us.

    Farmers who embody those British values of strength, resilience, warmth and independence.

    I see that in North Yorkshire – and across the country – week in and week out.

    I’ve been to the auction marts.

    I’ve walked the fields up and down Swaledale and Wensleydale.

    Enjoyed our high-quality British meat – which let me tell you we’ll continue supporting people to eat.

    I’ve visited upland farms, hill farms, arable and livestock farms.

    I even tried my hand at milking once – not very successfully I must say.

    But I see first hand the long hours that you work, the weather that you contend with, the family businesses you support, the communities you build…

    …the beautiful countryside, the pastures, the hedgerows, the fields, that would not be the same without you.

    You do it not for praise, or high reward…

    …but to put food on our tables…

    …to maintain a tradition and a way of life…

    … and to steward our landscape.

    It’s part of who we are.

    And we don’t celebrate you enough.

    And so, on behalf of the nation, I just wanted to say: thank you.

    Biggest change in a generation

    Now while the importance of farmers will never change – farming is going through its biggest change in a generation.

    And as you do so, this government will be by your side.

    You’ve been dealing with soaring global prices in things like fuel and fertiliser.

    So we’ve been working hard to get inflation down – from 11% last year to 4% now.

    And we’re increasing payments in our farming schemes by an average of 10 per cent.

    You’re dealing with climate change and extreme weather too.

    Devastating flooding has damaged crops…

    …delayed planting…

    … and has taken a huge toll on our farming communities.

    That’s why we quickly set out our flooding support…

    … and why we’re going faster than almost anyone else in the world to tackle climate change, even as we reduce the burdens on families.

    You’re also at the forefront of innovation – from gene editing to boost resilience to disease, to automation to harvest crops.

    And while thanks to you we enjoy good quality food all year round…

    … global events – including Russia’s invasion of Ukraine – have put food security back at the top of the agenda.

    We’ll never take our food security for granted.

    We’ve got a plan to support British farming – and we’re going further again, today, in three specific areas.

    First, we’re investing in farming.

    We promised that across this parliament, every penny of the £2.4 billion annual farming budget would be spent on you.

    And we will absolutely meet that promise.

    I know that the transition from the Common Agricultural Policy has been frustrating.

    It’s taken time.

    And I appreciate the perception that we didn’t always get the balance exactly right.

    But I still believe the vision is the right one.

    CAP disproportionately rewarded the largest landowners and held back smaller farmers.

    It did little for food productivity or the environment.

    It was far, far too bureaucratic.

    Just remember – we used to argue about whether a cauliflower and a cabbage were the same crop…

    … and you could be fined thousands for a gateway being too wide, or a buffer strip too narrow.

    So it’s right that our new system invests in the foundations of food security – from healthy soils to clean water.

    [Please note: Political content redacted here]

    And today we want to go further to support you.

    So we’re announcing new steps to make our support schemes more generous and easier to use.

    Take the Management Payment.

    It’s working, with many farmers – small farmers especially – signing up.

    So I can announce today that we’re going to double that payment to £2,000…

    … with thousands of farmers receiving that money this Spring.

    We’re also launching the biggest ever package of grants this year…

    … to boost productivity and resilience, which will total £220 million.

    Increasing the Improving Farming Productivity scheme to invest in things like robotics and barn-top solar.

    We’re opening a new round of the Farming Equipment and Technology fund too, worth £70m.

    Second, as farming changes, how we work with you in government must change too.

    The services we provide must be shaped around your needs.

    And we’ve got to build a culture that’s based on trust.

    As President Eisenhower said: “You know, farming looks mighty easy when your plow is a pencil, and you’re a thousand miles from a corn field.”

    So we’re changing the culture.

    That means trust, support, co-operation…

    It means delivering on our promise to cut planning red tape that’s stopping you from diversifying.

    In April, for instance, we’ll lay legislation so you can create bigger farm shops or outdoor sports venues.

    And it means more funding for grassroots mental health support…

    …because we know what a tough job farming is.

    Thirdly, we’re strengthening support for your primary role…

    …to produce the nation’s food.

    Food security is a vital part of our national security.

    And recent years have brought home the truth of that.

    Putin set off not just an energy price bomb…

    …but a food price bomb, too.

    And as Minette has so powerfully reminded us time after time…

    …in an age of climate change and instability…

    …global food production will become increasingly volatile…

    …so it’s important to strengthen food security here at home.

    Our Agriculture Act introduced a three-yearly report to monitor food security.

    But given how much has happened in the last three years, it’s clear that we need to go further.

    So today, I can announce we’ll step up our monitoring with a new annual Food Security Index, which we expect to be UK-wide.

    And yes Minette, we’ll make this statutory when parliamentary time allows.

    We’ll publish the first draft at the Farm to Fork Summit this spring.

    And I’m also delighted to say those Summits will become an annual event.

    One way to improve food security is to stop millions of tonnes of good, fresh farm food from going to waste…

    … just because of its shape or size.

    So we’ll also provide funding today, £15m, to redirect that surplus into the hands of those who need it.

    Conclusion

    So in conclusion, supporting farmers, changing our approach, and strengthening food security – that’s our plan.

    And you can trust us to deliver – because… we already are.

    You said you wanted a fair price for your products…

    …tomorrow we’re laying new regulations for the dairy sector, and we’re launching a review of the poultry sector.

    You asked for fair treatment in our trade deals…

    …so we’re standing up for our farmers in those negotiations – whether it’s with Canada or anybody else.

    You asked for a fairer, more supportive regulatory system…

    … and we’ve reformed our approach, cutting penalties for minor issues, already down by 40%.

    But more than this, you can trust us because I know how important my neighbours, our farmers, all of you, truly are.

    You help support millions of jobs…

    …add billions to our economy…

    … shape the landscape…

    … but most of all, you produce the food we need –

    …food that is some of the best and highest quality anywhere in the world.

    And that’s why I say to all of you and to Britain’s farmers…

    … just as I did in my first days in Parliament:

    I’ve got your back.

    Thank you very much.

  • James Cleverly – 2024 Speech at the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners General Meeting

    James Cleverly – 2024 Speech at the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners General Meeting

    The speech made by James Cleverly, the Home Secretary, in the House of Commons on 7 February 2024.

    Thank you. I’m trying to work out whether the applause is for my attendance or for the announcement of the money.

    First of all, thank you all. It’s great to have the opportunity to speak to you all. I hope that those who know me, and some of you who have known me for quite some time, will have explained my credentials to those who’ve been maybe not known me for quite so long. I’m a big fan of the police and crime commissioner model. I was an advocate for it before it was cool. Back before it was legislation, and of course, I’ve come from my own background in police governance from the time that I was at City Hall in London.

    You are the voice of the local communities. When it comes to the governance of policing laws with our policing model, being of the community, for community from the community, having that golden thread of community accountability to the police forces that serve them, I think is incredibly important. And I also think it’s important that we maintain this pattern of dialogue, and that not only do I get to speak and you get to listen, which is of course always my favourite model of communication, but you also get to speak and I promise that I will listen.

    So the situation we find ourselves in the headlines can sometimes give the impression that we’re in uniquely dark and difficult times. But when we compare the situation with the end of September 2023, to the year ending December 2019, as we look back over those couple of years, we each have seen some really positive figures.

    So for example, hospital admissions, following an assault with a sharp object, which is the most objective measure of youth knife crime and violence, was down by 25%. And these are not figures you can fudge. That’s real. Homicides are down by 16%, neighbourhood crime down by 24%, 35% (fall) in domestic burglary, and an 18% fall in victim related crime. This is stuff that people in communities feel. This is what has an impact upon them. And those figures are heading in the right direction. But we will recognise that if you personally are a victim of crime, speaking about a general reduction is no solace, and that’s why it is so important that we cannot ever lose sight of the importance of the individual, of the victim, when we talk about those overall numbers.

    And I’m absolutely clear that the job of the Home Secretary, the job of the Home Office, I suspect, you will, at least in part agree with me on this, is about reassurance as well as the practicalities. It is really important that we ensure not only that people are safe, but that they also feel safe. Because, and I mentioned this, I think in the very first speech that I made as Home Secretary, because when people feel safe, they go out, they engage in their local communities, they volunteer, they live a fuller life than they would otherwise do. So of course trying to create an effect on people’s lives, but the fear of crime also has a corrosive effect. It limits people’s opportunity to live the best life they can lead.

    And that’s why I want to be able to look into the eyes of people around the country wherever they may be and know that they are feeling safe. I said so at the National Policing Board that I chaired recently, and this of course means as well as driving down those figures, it is about visible policing – and it is about the policing of visible crime crimes.

    High harm crimes are of course also incredibly important, but the public are also concerned about things like shoplifting. And sadly, in conversations I’ve had with members my own family and my friends, it’s still the case that far, far too many women and girls do not feel safe when they are out in the public domain and in a society such as ours, a modern society, that is unacceptable, and we absolutely have to prioritise the work that we do to address that.

    So I want to see major improvements in the quality of investigations. It’s a core function of policing. Because again, we know the far too many people report that the information that they provide to the police does not in their mind get appropriately acted on. So a key aim for this year for me is to increase the percentage of reported crimes that result in a successful outcome, because sadly on average only 8% of victim-based crime in England and Wales results in a successful outcome. Sadly, this has declined, and there is much, much, more to learn. And there is variation of course between forces, and fixing this I believe very strongly, more than anything else is central to build the general confidence of the public in policing.

    And so, back to basics is a bit of a cliché phrase from politicians. So, this is about going back to the core functions. Core policing, that core investigatory set of skills. Of course, that can be amplified, accelerated and supported with the use of cutting-edge technology, like retrospective and indeed live facial recognition software, which in the trials that I’ve seen the results of this had a dramatic effect, and we need to make sure all forces are operating at their full potential.

    And one of the reasons why I want to strengthen the role of PCCs, is that you, with your closest relationships and your intimate knowledge of the forces that you’re responsible for, are best placed at a local level, to drive forward a focus on that core policing functionality. And I know that you want to see increased safety and confidence in our neighbourhoods just as much as I do. This is, I don’t believe, me pushing you to do anything you don’t naturally want to do. And so we are looking for alliances and to get a commitment not just from the political level but of course from all the Chief Constables around the country to ensure that they pursue every reasonable line of enquiry, they attend home burglaries, they deliver on the commitments made by the Retail Crime Action Plan, all these things will be important steps in the right direction.

    And when I discussed this at the recent National Policing Board just last week, what I got was very, very supportive and very, very committed responses and it was great to hear that the Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police was able to run through a list of results, which was in large part driven by that commitment to core policing. So I’m more confident than ever this is actually the right approach. And it’s also what the people we serve expect of us, it is what they want us to focus on. And so, in terms of tackling things like car theft, home theft, criminal damage, shoplifting, we do need to make sure we stay focused on the this and of course, the invisible crimes, those high harm crimes, are absolutely key, but those visible crimes – we must not lose sight of the impact they have on communities.

    When I first spoke my first public utterances as Home Secretary, I think of saying there is no such thing as minor crime – it’s a phrase that I despise and I think that implying that somehow there’s criminality which the police take less seriously or we take less seriously is something that we should avoid in all circumstances, for the reasons I said about the criminal behaviour that people see and feel most acutely in their communities.

    Now, I mentioned about the commitment I feel, particularly for women and girls, and it is incredibly important that alongside the tackling of that visible crime, that we dramatically improve the victims experience of the justice system for women and girls. You will be well aware of course of Operation Soteria, which is now being implemented in all 43 police forces in England and Wales. Government is ensuring that 2000 officers receive specialist training on the investigation of rape by April this year.

    And our actions are about supporting the actions you’re taking locally. To help improve the way that teams operate, are treated and to ensure that more rapists are arrested, prosecuted and put behind bars. His Majesty’s Inspectorate has found sadly victims are not regularly updated during the investigation at certain important points. And of course, this must change. The Victims’ Code of Practice will outline the minimum levels of support a victim of crime should expect from a local force and from their local Crown Prosecution Service. But that is a floor not a ceiling. That is the minimum, not what we should be aiming for.

    So everything that we do hinges on the broader confidence of the British public in the whole criminal justice system, and I’ve made the point that whilst the headline figures have come now, sadly, public confidence has not gone up. Part of that reason is because of a number of high profile and terrible failures in professional conduct by police officers, and for every headline grabbing incident, sadly, there are a number of others, less public, less high profile (incidents) where conduct has fallen short of what we expect. And inevitably, this has shaken, and certainly in some instances, shattered public confidence in policing.

    Again, I said when I was appointed that I will always seek to praise publicly, the people that keep us safe. But part of that contract is that I expect leaders in policing to do the right thing and demonstrate a commitment to reform – a deep seated commitment to reform and a complete commitment to professional standards.

    And that is why the government is giving police leaders enhanced tools, enhanced powers, but also an enhanced expectation that they do the right thing and lead their forces robustly. Once again, you as a group of people have a pivotal role in ensuring that police leaders hold their officers to account and that they in turn are held to account if they fail to do so. Just last week the families of Barnaby Webber, Grace O’Malley Kumar and Ian Coates visited the Prime Minister and had the chance to meet with him, and they raised serious questions about the events leading up to the tragic killings of their loved ones. It’s actually the right place to share that the Nottinghamshire police have referred themselves to the IOPC and I pay tribute to Caroline, the Nottinghamshire PCC, for commissioning a comprehensive College of Policing review into what happened.

    We have to be willing to learn painful lessons when situations like this occur. Part one of the Angiolini Inquiry is expected to report in the coming months and policing must absolutely take into consideration its findings, just as I will. I think I mentioned this again when I first spoke to you just up the road in my first week on the job, that one of the first roles I performed in the London Assembly whilst I was a member of the Metropolitan Police Authority as it was then, was on the professional standards committee. So I know first-hand just how critical it is to remove from the force those police officers whose integrity and behaviour are unacceptable.

    And I am still to this day committed that those unfit to wear the uniform must be removed, but that those who have proven to be innocent need to be swiftly exonerated. The government is delivering changes to the misconduct, vetting and performance system. So we’re helping police leaders grip this issue, giving them more control to act over those who fail vetting or fall short of requirements of required standards. And we know that in this room, that there are a group of people who are probably more angry about bad coppers than almost anybody else, outside those in uniform themselves, and equally I would suggest the only people perhaps who are more angry about bad coppers are good coppers. So we have to support the good coppers in doing the right thing. And that’s why we agreed to fund the development. We’ve agreed to fund the development of the system for policing, which provides forces with a timely alerting solution, so they can act speedily on any concerning intelligence about officers or police staff.

    And as I said, critical to public confidence is people seeing the police and seeing crime being dealt with; improving the visibility of police in a very targeted way, to deter criminals and ensure that communities feel confident. So I’m grateful to everyone who’s contributed to the autumn 2023 returns on visibility and especially to the APCC for coordinating the contributions. I wouldn’t say to the police chief, I expect them to give me hard evidence that they are prioritising the neighbourhood policing that is demanded of them.

    So with regard to hotspots and hotspot policing, I promised I would listen to you. We published an ambitious anti-social behaviour action plan in March 2023. The government pilot of antisocial behaviour hotspot responses has been, I’m pleased to say, a success, with additional patrolling, delivering on those promised outcomes. We’ve also provided GRIP funding to police forces in areas with the highest levels of serious violence. But coming back to the PCCs and given the overlap between ASB [antisocial behaviour] hotspots activity, and the GRIP serious violence fund, we will combine the 2 funding streams for a wider rollout to territorial forces across England and Wales in 2024 to 2025. In total funding available will be over £66 million, and each PCC area will receive at least £1 million each.

    Now, of course, I am sure that you will have been lobbied by your police officers, you will be lobbying me no doubt, about the police funding settlement in 2024 to 2025. We’ve listened to the forces about financial demands they face and giving police the resources they need to protect the public is of course a priority for us. And that’s why for the coming settlements for 2024 to 2025, the money available to PCCs will increase by up to £922.2 million, and there’s been an increase in the total settlement the more than 30% in cash terms since 2019 to 2020. And of course that is to support the uplift in police numbers.

    So having delivered a way to recruit 20,000 police officers: thank you very much for that. I look forward to working with you and your chief constables to ensure that those numbers are maintained. There are now 149,000 officers in England and Wales, higher than the pre-uplift peak of 2010. And of course the funding is there to stay, to maintain those office numbers, to ensure that they are on the beat, to ensure that they are supported.

    Finally, I wanted to say something directed towards you as a cohort, as well as the police forces that you work with. I said I’m a big fan of PCCs, of the PCC model, and I want to support you in that role. And as we discussed when I first stood up, I’m very much aware that you are increasingly visible high-profile individuals. And that is why I’m very, very happy to give additional money to help support your personal security, and to protect you in the role that you do. The security minister is continuing to work on cross government work to protect the security of all elected officials, including yourselves, and I’m very grateful for Katy Bourne who gave the APCCs engagement on this. I really hope it does make a difference; that additional million pounds of support is something that matters. I know it matters to you. And it matters because I want to protect your role and to protect you as individuals.

    So let’s continue working together. Let’s continue serving the people who elect us. Let’s make sure that we focus resources on the things that people care most about. And let’s ensure that when we look back on this forthcoming year, not only do we see an ongoing reduction in crime, we see an increase in the confidence of policing the country.

    Thank you very much.

  • Stephen Flynn – 2024 Speech on Ceasefire Vote Controversy in the House of Commons

    Stephen Flynn – 2024 Speech on Ceasefire Vote Controversy in the House of Commons

    The speech made by Stephen Flynn, the SNP MP for Aberdeen South and the party leader, in the House of Commons on 22 February 2024.

    Last evening, we saw the best of this House in its ability to debate, and we also saw the worst of this House as it descended into farce. I think I speak for everyone in the Chamber now, and yesterday, when I express my deep sorrow that that was able to happen, given the content of what we were debating.

    Nevertheless, Mr Speaker, it descended into farce because of a decision that you—and you alone—made to ignore the advice that was given to you by the Clerks. In doing so, on the Opposition day of the Scottish National party, my colleagues and I were denied the ability to vote on a matter which is of grave concern to us, and which, over recent months, we have sought to raise in this Chamber at every available opportunity. It ultimately turned into a Labour Opposition day. That, quite frankly, is not acceptable. As I have expressed to you privately, prior to today’s proceedings, we do not, on these Benches, believe that you can continue in your role as Speaker. We do not have confidence in your ability to do so. I would therefore welcome clarity, either from you or the Leader of the House, about how we can best facilitate the earliest possible vote in this Chamber to that effect.

  • Lindsay Hoyle – 2024 Statement on Ceasefire Vote Controversy in the House of Commons

    Lindsay Hoyle – 2024 Statement on Ceasefire Vote Controversy in the House of Commons

    The statement made by Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker of the House of Commons, on 22 February 2024.

    I will also come in at this point. I reiterate that I made a judgment call that did not end up in the position where I expected it to. I regret it and I apologise to the SNP—[Interruption.] Just bear with me. I apologise to the House. I made a mistake: we do make mistakes and I own up to mine. We can have an SO24 to get an immediate debate because the debate is so important to the House.

    I will defend every Member in this House. Every Member matters to me in this House. As has been said, I never, ever want to go through a situation where I pick up a phone to find a friend, on whatever side, has been murdered by a terrorist. I also do not want another attack on this House—I was in the Chair on that day. I have seen, I have witnessed. I will not share the details, but the details of the things that have been brought to me are absolutely frightening for all Members of the House, on all sides. I have a duty of care and I say that. If my mistake is looking after Members, I am guilty. I am guilty because—[Interruption.]—I have a duty of care that I will carry out to protect people; it is the protection that led me to make a wrong decision. With the risk being put on all Members at the moment, I had serious meetings yesterday with the police on these issues and on threats to politicians as we head towards an election. I do not want anything to happen again.

    Yes, I will apologise, as I always will when I make a mistake as I did. I offer an SO24—that is within my gift and power—but I will also do whatever it is to protect anybody in this Chamber or anybody who works in this House. That is my duty of care.

  • Owen Thompson – 2024 Speech on the Gaza Vote in the House of Commons

    Owen Thompson – 2024 Speech on the Gaza Vote in the House of Commons

    The speech made by Owen Thompson, the SNP MP for Midlothian, in the House of Commons on 22 February 2024.

    Yesterday was incredibly disappointing, from our point of view. It was meant to be an Opposition day, and it was one of only three times in a calendar year when our party gets an opportunity to put forward its business to the House. I do not think that what we came forward with was a surprise to anyone. We were allocated an Opposition day four or five weeks ago, but totally understandably, it had to be moved when the Northern Ireland Assembly was reconvening. At that stage, there were conversations, and I was asked when people would have sight of the Gaza motion that we would bring forward, so it is quite extraordinary for anyone to suggest that they did not know we might come forward with a motion on that topic. When it got to our Opposition day—one of the very few times when we can put forward our policies—our voice was silenced: our motion could not be voted on. That is incredibly disappointing for me and a significant number of my constituents, and those of my hon. Friends and hon. Members from across the Chamber who wanted to support the motion.

    Given that, in effect, we did not get an Opposition day yesterday, can we be allocated an alternative date? As others have said, we lost a significant amount of time at the start of the debate, and because of the Speaker’s decision, unfortunately we lost 40 minutes at the end of the debate. That meant that colleagues were cut short, and some withdrew from the debate. What consideration will the Leader of the House give to that suggestion—and, beyond that, to protection for the smaller parties, so that they are not simply railroaded for the political purposes of either of the bigger parties?

    I echo the comments of the shadow Leader of the House, but it is critical that all Members of this place, whatever their position or status, be protected from bullying and intimidation. If reports from many media outlets are to be believed, it is entirely unacceptable that significant pressure was put on Mr Speaker to come to his decision yesterday. What steps will the Leader of the House take to investigate those very serious claims? If there is any substance to them, it is an affront to democracy that a party leader can direct decisions of the Chair of this place.

    As you know, Madam Deputy Speaker, I am, as Chief Whip, involved in a number of conversations on how business comes forward. I had direct assurances that I would have a vote on the words of my motion yesterday. Everyone knew well in advance what the potential outcome would be at the end of yesterday’s debate, so to suggest that no one knew is utter nonsense. The reason we are in this position is that convention and the Standing Orders of this House were overruled, against the advice of the Clerks. That only happened because the Labour party wanted to be dug out of a hole. That is unacceptable.

  • Liz Twist – 2024 Speech on the Inter Faith Network Closure

    Liz Twist – 2024 Speech on the Inter Faith Network Closure

    The speech made by Liz Twist, the Shadow Levelling Up Minister, in the House of Commons on 22 February 2024.

    I thank my right hon. Friend the Member for East Ham (Sir Stephen Timms) for securing the urgent question.

    Inter-faith and multi-faith dialogue are absolutely essential components of society, not only to resolve differences but to build strong and collaborative communities that are able to come together in times of need. Given recent events—the war and violence in Gaza—that is more important than ever. As I am sure the whole House recognises, the Government have a special responsibility to facilitate positive relationships between different faith communities, and although I appreciate that the Minister has now given some explanation of why they have chosen to withdraw funding for the IFN, outstanding questions remain.

    Let me ask the Minister some straightforward questions. When was the decision to withdraw funding from the network made? What impact assessment was made, and what discussions were had about the vital need to continue to promote understanding about and between different faith groups, and to encourage co-operation? When was the Inter Faith Network notified of the decision? Does the Minister have plans to increase support for other groups to make up for any loss of provision arising from this decision?

    Every Department will inevitably monitor and review the grants that they award, but the House should expect that to be done in the spirit of due process. As politicians, we have a responsibility to bring communities together. At a time when divisions are being exposed, I hope that the Minister can assure the House that the Government remain committed to inter-faith and multi-faith dialogue.

    Felicity Buchan

    I thank the hon. Member for her comments. Again, I stress the importance of inter-faith work. I see it in my own constituency; it is very important. The Government are already supporting other institutions that do such work.

    The hon. Member asked specifically for timelines. The Secretary of State wrote to the IFN on 19 January saying that he was “minded to withdraw” the offer of funding in light of what we have discussed. He invited the Inter Faith Network to make representations to him on this matter, and he received its response on 22 January. After careful consideration of those representations, he confirmed that he wishes to withdraw the offer of funding to the Inter Faith Network for the reasons that we have discussed. He wrote to the co-chairs on 21 February to inform them of his decision. I stress again that the Department has been very clear that the Inter Faith Network should have been developing other sustainable sources of funding.

  • Felicity Buchan – 2024 Statement on the Inter Faith Network Closure

    Felicity Buchan – 2024 Statement on the Inter Faith Network Closure

    The statement made by Felicity Buchan, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, in the House of Commons on 22 February 2024.

    May I thank the right hon. Gentleman for raising the issue of the Inter Faith Network? I am grateful for all his work as chair of the all-party group on faith and society and as a long-standing advocate for dialogue across faiths.

    As the Under-Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, my hon. Friend the Member for North Dorset (Simon Hoare) said during an Adjournment debate in January, we know full well the role that faith communities play in our society. We are extremely supportive of efforts by faith groups and others to bring together people of different faiths and beliefs.

    The Secretary of State wrote to the co-chairs of the Inter Faith Network on 19 January this year to inform them that he was minded to withdraw the offer of funding for the 2023-24 financial year. This was because of the appointment of a member of the Muslim Council of Britain to the board of trustees of the IFN. As the House will be aware, successive Governments have had a long-standing policy of non-engagement with the MCB. The appointment of an MCB member to the core governance structure of a Government-funded organisation therefore poses a reputational risk to the Government.

    The Secretary of State invited the IFN to make representations on this matter, which it subsequently did. He carefully considered the points raised by the IFN before concluding that its points were outweighed by the need to maintain the Government’s policy of non-engagement with the MCB, and the risk of compromising the credibility and effectiveness of that policy. Inter-faith work is valuable, but that does not require us to use taxpayers’ money in a way that legitimises the influence of organisations such as the MCB.

    The Department regularly reminds our partners, including the IFN, of the importance of developing sustainable funding arrangements rather than relying on taxpayers’ money, which can never be guaranteed. The potential closure of the organisation is therefore a matter for the IFN, as an independent charity, and not the Government. The Government continue to be fully supportive of developing and maintaining strong relationships across faiths and beliefs.

    Sir Stephen Timms (East Ham) (Lab)

    Since 1987, the Inter Faith Network has been the UK’s principal vehicle for inter-faith dialogue, supporting the annual Inter Faith Week, and activities and dialogue undertaken by inter-faith groups across the whole country. The network has been supported by Government funding for some 20 years. The IFN was told on 31 March last year, before the trustee appointment that the Minister referred to, that its funding would be ended from the following day. Why has the organisation been treated in that extraordinary way? Last July, the network received a letter from the Secretary of State to inform it that it would, after all, receive funding for the current financial year. That promise has never been honoured. Why not?

    Given the debate in this Chamber yesterday, is it not extraordinarily stupid to be shutting down at this precise point our principal vehicle in the UK for Muslim-Jewish dialogue? Surely we need more, not to be shutting it down? Why has the Secretary of State not honoured the commitment that he made to me to meet me, the right hon. Member for Chipping Barnet (Theresa Villiers) and the noble Lord Singh to discuss this matter before making his decision, and will the Minister pay tribute and express thanks to the trustees and officers of the Inter Faith Network for the very important contribution that they have made to UK national life over the last 37 years?

    Felicity Buchan

    I truly believe that inter-faith work makes a good contribution to our society. My constituency is one of the most diverse in the entire country, and I have on a number of occasions brought together my mosque, my synagogue, Christian churches and my gurdwara. We recognise the benefits of inter-faith activity. I thank the Inter Faith Network for its work; however, we have always been clear with that organisation and any other organisation or charity that the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities funds that they need to put in place alternative sources of funding. As I said, the Government cannot fund this organisation when a trustee is part of the MCB.

    Theresa Villiers (Chipping Barnet) (Con)

    I was contacted last year by my constituent Esmond Rosen of the Barnet Multi Faith Forum, who expressed concern about the imminent withdrawal of funding from the IFN. As we have heard, it looked in July as if the problem was resolved—at least for the financial year—so it is regrettable that we are in this position. I completely understand the importance of not engaging with organisations that have hard-line views, but surely we can find some compromise to keep the IFN in business, because it does incredibly valuable work to foster respect and mutual understanding between different faith groups.

    Felicity Buchan

    I thank my right hon. Friend for all her work on inter-faith matters. What has changed since July is the appointment in November of a trustee who is a member of the MCB. In terms of inter-faith work, there are so many examples of positive, thriving initiatives across the country that are bringing people together. The Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities funds a number of those partners, including Near Neighbours and Strengthening Faith Institutions, which organise local-level inter-faith events to foster community cohesion.

  • Kevin Hollinrake – 2024 Statement on the Post Office Horizon Scandal

    Kevin Hollinrake – 2024 Statement on the Post Office Horizon Scandal

    The statement made by Kevin Hollinrake, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business and Trade, on 22 February 2024.

    As a Back Bencher, I first spoke on the matter of compensation for victims in March 2020, which is obviously long after the right hon. Gentleman first campaigned for it. I pay tribute to his campaigning on this subject, which remains undiminished. My appetite for compensation for postmasters is equally undiminished, although I accept the need to increase the pace of delivery.

    As of this month, £160 million has been paid in financial redress to more than 2,700 victims affected by the Horizon scandal. More than 78% of eligible full claims received have been settled as follows: 102 convictions have been overturned, and 42 full claims have been submitted, of which 32 have been settled; 2,793 applications to the Horizon shortfall scheme have been received, and 2,197 have been settled; 58 full claims have been submitted to the group litigation order scheme, and 41 have been settled.

    Our top priority remains ensuring that victims can access swift and fair compensation. We have introduced optional fixed-sum awards of £600,000 for victims with overturned convictions and of £75,000 for group litigation order members as a swift means of settlement, and 100% of original applicants to the Horizon shortfall scheme have received offers of compensation. Today we are discussing what other measures can be taken to speed up compensation with the Horizon compensation advisory board, on which the right hon. Gentleman sits.

    Since the Prime Minister’s announcement on 10 January, officials in the Department for Business and Trade and the Ministry of Justice have been working at pace to progress legislation for overturning convictions related to the Post Office’s prosecutorial behaviour and Horizon evidence. I will provide a further update to the House very soon.

    Mr Jones

    Thank you, Mr Speaker, for granting the urgent question. I draw the attention of the House to my interest as a member of the Horizon compensation advisory board.

    I like the Minister. He campaigned on this issue before he was a Minister, and he has been a very good Minister, but a lot of that good work was undone on Monday by the performance of the Secretary of State for Business and Trade. I am disappointed that he has not taken the opportunity today to talk about the overturned convictions. I understand that later today, at 12 o’clock, there will be a written ministerial statement on the subject. I do not think that is the way to do it, as the House needs an opportunity to discuss the overturned convictions.

    I will ask the Minister a few questions. It is quite clear now that Nick Read, the Post Office chief executive, wrote to the Lord Chancellor basically opposing the overturning of all convictions, saying that up to 300 people were “guilty”. It is not yet clear who instructed him to do that. On Monday, the Secretary of State said it was done off his own bat. I would like to hear what the Minister has to say on that.

    If there are to be overturned convictions, they cannot just be about Horizon; they should also be about Capture. Evidence that I have put to the public inquiry and sent to the Minister yesterday clearly indicates that the scandal predates Horizon. Those affected need to be included in both the compensation scheme and among those with overturned convictions.

    The board is meeting this afternoon, and we have made recommendations to the Minister on how to simplify and speed up the compensation scheme. Will he give an assurance to the House that once the recommendations are agreed, we can announce them quite quickly, primarily to restore to the sub-postmasters some faith, which was wrecked by the performance of the Secretary of State on Monday?

    If the Minister’s written ministerial statement at 12 o’clock is about overturning convictions, will he give a commitment to come back to the House on Monday to give an oral statement, so that the House can interrogate him and discuss that issue?

    Kevin Hollinrake

    I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his question. The overturned convictions are a key priority for me and my Department. I am always keen to update the House whenever I can. There always has to be a sequence to ensure that we follow proper process. What we are doing potentially affects the devolved Administrations, so it is really important that we engage with them properly. That is one of the reasons why we need to make the written statement later today. I have never been unwilling to come before the House and report on what we are doing. I will, of course, continue to do that.

    On the letter from the chief executive to the Justice Secretary, I am aware of the allegations by Mr Staunton. They are very serious allegations that should not be made lightly or be based on a vague recollection. If the right hon. Gentleman looks at the letter from the former permanent secretary, it is clear that she believes the allegations are incorrect, and that there was never any conversation along the lines referred to by Mr Staunton. I think it is pretty clear that those allegations are false.

    The right hon. Gentleman has regularly brought up Capture. We are keen to continue to engage with him on that to ensure that those affected are included in any compensation where detriment has occurred. I note his point about an oral statement. As I say, I am always keen to give such statements whenever possible, and to be interrogated on our plans. I do not think he will be disappointed by what we announce later today.

    Paul Scully (Sutton and Cheam) (Con)

    Now that the then permanent secretary has outlined that she did not implicitly or explicitly tell the then chairman of the Post Office to slow down compensation, I hope we can spend time less time talking about someone who has lost his job and more time talking about postmasters who have lost everything. Will the Minister, who is doing great work in sorting this out, recommit to August as his target date for getting compensation—life-changing compensation—out of the door as soon as possible?

    Kevin Hollinrake

    I thank my hon. Friend for his work on this matter; as my predecessor, he did a tremendous job. The most concerning allegation we heard over the weekend was about the delay in the payment of compensation. In her letter, which is publicly available, the permanent secretary wrote:

    “It is not true that I made any instruction, either explicitly or implicitly. In fact, no mention of delaying compensation appears in either note.”

    So I agree with my hon. Friend that we should move on from that and focus on what really matters, which is getting what he rightly described as life-changing compensation to postmasters as quickly as possible. That is his, and will remain our, No. 1 priority.

  • Lucy Frazer – 2024 Speech at the Ad Association LEAD Conference

    Lucy Frazer – 2024 Speech at the Ad Association LEAD Conference

    The speech made by Lucy Frazer, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport on 8 February 2024.

    Good morning everyone. I want to start by recognising the significant role that you, and your sector, play in our economy and there couldn’t be a better forum for that message.

    The Advertising Association, IPA and ISBA – are among the strongest voices for the ad industry in the UK and each body is recognised for being an effective champion for all of our brilliant media agencies, brands and creatives.

    And it’s a pertinent week for this Conference. Because on the other side of the Atlantic, they are gearing up for one of – if not the – most important days in the advertising calendar. The Super Bowl.

    Despite all that has changed with the revolution in what we watch…when we watch…and where we watch TV – this sporting moment has retained its place at the pinnacle of advertising.

    With a TV audience over 100 million, the pressure to deliver compelling material is overwhelming.

    Last year alone, the cost for a 30 second slot was $7 million.

    But what stands out is not the cost, it’s the quality. And the adverts have become part of the event and part of the spectacle.

    Ahead of today’s event I was reflecting on what makes advertising so important.

    The first thing that comes to mind is the creativity that you see every day expressed through advertising – and how that creativity is the basis for one of the most successful industries in the country.

    But more than that, the success of these industries actually provides: cheaper newspapers and magazines for readers to enjoy; your favourite hits on commercial radio; the ability to watch Coronation Street for free; and seeing the entire industry of podcasts setting up from nothing a few years ago and entertaining, informing and challenging us today.

    None of these would be free or available at affordable prices without the work you do with adverts.

    Advertising is an essential cog in the free market.

    And on top of that, you arm people with the information they need to make decisions about what to buy.

    I recognise – and this Government recognises – what your industry does for our economy.

    Our Creative Industries are growing at twice the rate of the rest of our economy and last year accounted for £126 billion.

    And advertising is a massive part of that success story. It already accounts for around 15% of Creative Industries output and all indicators suggest it will continue to grow in size.

    Last year alone, Ad Association figures show the UK ad market is estimated to have grown by 6% to reach £37 billion.

    This growth and value is a credit to the way our companies have become magnets for the best ingenuity, the best creativity and the best talent.

    Today, in 2024, there are very few places in the world that can rival our status as a global hub for the industry.

    I’m proud to be the Secretary of State responsible for the advertising industry. It’s undeniably a world-class sector.

    But I believe we’re just scratching the surface of what’s possible.

    When I became Culture Secretary, I made it one of my first priorities to maximise the potential of our Creative Industries.

    And I want advertising to help lead that charge.

    Last year I set out a Creative Industries Vision to deliver £50bn of extra economic growth, 1 million extra jobs and a pipeline of talent for 2030.

    This will only be possible with Government and industry working together and with a shared purpose.

    It’s a blueprint that is packed with measures, from investment in R&D to support for businesses scaling up across the country.

    And a major part of it is a focus on skills.

    If we want our advertising industry to thrive in the future, we need the right skills for the right jobs.

    Advertising has long been an incubator for creative skills and where some of our great artists got their break.

    …before Salman Rushdie wrote Midnight’s Children, he worked at Ogilvy and came up with slogans like ‘Irresistibubble’ for Aero.

    …Jonathan Glazer – the English director of the haunting new portrayal of Auschwitz, The Zone of Interest – started off as a filmmaker for brands like Stella Artois and Volkswagen.

    All incredible talents. All artists who originally found expression in advertising.

    So through our Creative Industries Vision we’re working closely with the Department for Education on a Cultural Education Plan.

    The aim of which will be to give our children greater access to culture and art at school age.

    This week is also National Apprenticeships Week.

    Like you, I’m determined to increase take-up of apprenticeships in advertising and marketing sectors.

    And that’s why in July I co-chaired, with the Education Secretary, a roundtable exploring solutions to apprenticeship challenges and how we can make sure they are flexible and work in the interests of companies in sectors like advertising.

    We’re also working closely with the Advertising Association and The Institute of Practitioners in Advertising on the Creative Careers Programme.

    That programme will help encourage 11 to 18 year olds to pursue creative careers through events, panel talks and filmed content with industry leaders, and I know that the Ad Unlocked section of the programme reached around 2,500 students from 100 schools during Discover Week 2023

    The programme will help highlight the range of skills that are relevant to professions like advertising in the future.

    Because as we see skills in data and Artificial Intelligence are becoming more and more relevant.

    And of course we must all recognise the impact of AI.

    I know that, in the same way that advertising was one of the first industries to use machine learning and algorithms for more effective analytics and customer targeting advertising is already leading the way in applying AI to different parts of its day-to-day work.

    From more conventional uses like making ads easier to generate and track…

    Or writing marketing emails with subject lines and delivery times tailored to specific subscribers.

    To less conventional uses like Heinz giving fans of its Ketchup bottle a chance to see it redesigned in an infinite range of styles, from impressionism to a stained glass Ketchup window. Or a recent campaign from Virgin Voyages that allowed users to prompt a digital avatar of Jennifer Lopez to issue customised video invitations to a cruise.

    We are seeing companies across this sector beginning to innovate, experiment and embrace AI. To use AI in a positive way, and one that customises the experience for audiences.

    WPP’s chief executive, Mark Read, said recently that AI will be as transformative as the internet was 30 years ago. He’s right.

    And as the world’s largest advertising group, WPP has been at the forefront of investments in AI and is a company that clearly recognises that this technology should be a creativity-enhancing tool.

    As a government, we want to harness the benefits of AI – right across society – to spur productivity and growth.

    And I see no reason why it cannot be a force for good for UK advertising.

    Advertising agencies have an enviable record of growing in response to technological shifts, not shrinking.

    But we are also clear that AI – which relies purely on data – cannot replicate the creativity that can only come from a human being.

    We are looking closely at how to ensure creators have the control and transparency they need over their content when it is used by AI models.

    And we are committed to ensuring that AI is used responsibly.

    To that end, the Advertising Standards Authority recently published their 5 year strategy for AI-Assisted collective ad regulation.

    This strategy sets out how they will use their new AI-based Active Ad Monitoring system to identify and swiftly act against irresponsible online ads.

    But there is work to do, across all sectors, to understand the risks associated with AI – as well as the benefits.

    I want to finish by touching on our online advertising programme.

    As many of you will know, tackling online harm has been a key focus for this government and this includes harms associated with advertising.

    When we published the response to our consultation on the Online Advertising Programme in July, we set out a plan to build a regulatory framework that would be agile and fit for purpose.

    And this included a targeted focus on tackling illegal advertising, and increasing protections for under-18s against adverts for products and services that are illegal to be sold to them.

    We’re committed to doing this and there will be legislation when Parliamentary time allows.

    Ahead of that though, we’ll be publishing a further consultation on the details.

    And we will look carefully at the interaction with the Online Safety Act, and its fraudulent advertising duty which captures the largest online platforms and search services.

    At the same time, under the leadership of people like the co-Chair, Mark Lund, the Online Advertising Taskforce is driving forward actions to raise standards.

    And we continue to encourage industry to work closely with the Advertising Standards Authority, including on its principles for intermediaries and platforms.

    I know this is something many of you have been involved in and that there’s collaboration across the Advertising Association, IAB UK, IPA & ISBA to address illegal advertising and improve the overall advertising landscape.

    I’d like to finish by thanking you all again for the generous invitation to this important event and for your engagement with my department.

    You’ve got a packed agenda and one that reflects the fact that advertising has arguably never been more influential than it is today.

    I want to continue working with you in a way that is strategic and forward thinking.

    And in a way that maximises the true potential of your businesses, your agencies and your brands.

    So thank you again, and I look forward to continuing our work with all of you in the future.