Tag: Speeches

  • Keir Starmer – 2024 Comments on the Government’s Rwanda Project

    Keir Starmer – 2024 Comments on the Government’s Rwanda Project

    The comments made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 23 May 2024.

    Rishi Sunak clearly does not believe in his Rwanda plan. I think that’s been clear from this morning, because he’s not going to get any flights off.

    I think that tells its own story. I don’t think he’s ever believed that plan is going to work, and so he has called an election early enough to have it not tested before the election.

  • Daisy Cooper – 2024 Comments on Liberal Democrats Not Helping Conservatives Stay in Power

    Daisy Cooper – 2024 Comments on Liberal Democrats Not Helping Conservatives Stay in Power

    The comments made by Daisy Cooper, the Deputy Leader of the Liberal Democrats, on 23 May 2024.

    We have ruled out doing any deal whatsoever with this Conservative Government because it is really quite clear that there are lifelong Conservative voters who can no longer stomach voting for this Conservative Party, they simply don’t recognise it anymore.

  • Keir Starmer – 2024 Statement Following Announcement of General Election

    Keir Starmer – 2024 Statement Following Announcement of General Election

    The statement made by Sir Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 22 May 2024.

    Tonight the Prime Minister has finally announced the next General Election.

    A moment the country needs – and has been waiting for. And where, by the force of our democracy power returns to you.

    A chance to change for the better. Your future. Your community. Your country.

    It will feel like a long campaign – I’m sure of that. But no matter what else is said and done. That opportunity for change is what this election is about.

    Over the course of the last four years – we have changed the Labour Party. Returned it once more to the service of working people.

    All we ask now – humbly – is to do exactly the same for our country. And return Britain to the service of working people. To that purpose.

    We offer three reasons why you should change Britain with Labour.

    One – because we will stop the chaos.

    Look around our country. The sewage in our rivers. People waiting on trolleys in A&E. Crime virtually unpunished. Mortgages and food prices – through the roof.

    It’s all – every bit of it – a direct result of the Tory chaos in Westminster.

    Time and again, they pursue their own interests. Rather than tackling the issues that affect your family.

    And if they get another five years, they will feel entitled to carry on exactly as they are. Nothing will change.

    A vote for Labour is a vote for stability – economic and political. A politics that treads more lightly on all our lives. A vote to stop the chaos.

    Two – because it’s time for change.

    Our offer is to reset both our economy and our politics.

    So that they once again serve the interests of working people.

    We totally reject the Tory view that economic strength is somehow gifted from those at the top.

    Over the past fourteen years – through all the crises we have had to face – sticking with this idea has left our country exposed, insecure and unable to unlock the potential of every community.

    But a vote for Labour is a vote to turn the page on all that. A vote for change.

    And finally, three – because we have a long-term plan to rebuild Britain. A plan that is ready to go. Fully-costed and fully funded.

    We can deliver economic stability. Cut the NHS waiting times. Secure our borders with a New Border Security Command.

    Harness Great British Energy to cut your bills for good. Tackle anti-social behaviour.

    And get the teachers we need in your children’s classroom.

    But most of importantly of all, we do all this with a new spirit of service.

    Country first, party second.

    A rejection of the gesture politics you will see in this campaign, I have no doubt from the Tories and from the SNP.

    I am well aware of the cynicism people hold towards politicians at the moment.

    But I came into politics late, having served our country as leader of the Crown Prosecution Service.

    And I helped the Police Service in Northern Ireland to gain the consent of all communities.

    Service of our country is the reason – and the only reason – why I am standing here now – asking for your vote.

    And I believe with patience, determination and that commitment to service there is so much pride and potential we can unlock across our country.

    So – here it is – the future of the country – in your hands.

    On 4th July you have the choice. And together, we can stop the chaos.

    We can turn the page. We can start to rebuild Britain. And change our country.

    Thank you.

  • John Swinney – 2024 First Speech as First Minister

    John Swinney – 2024 First Speech as First Minister

    The speech made by John Swinney, the Scottish First Minister, on 7 May 2024.

    Presiding Officer

    When I stood down as Deputy First Minister in March last year, I believed that would be the last senior office I would hold in politics. Having served then as a senior Minister for 16 years, I felt I had – to coin a phrase – done my bit. To find myself accepting office as First Minister of Scotland today is therefore – to utter a classic understatement – something of a surprise. It is however an extraordinary privilege and it is my honour to accept the office of First Minister, committing myself to do the best I can for Scotland.

    As I navigated my way through the media pack in the corridors of this Parliament last week, prior to announcing my candidacy for the SNP Leadership, I tried to explain that I was taking my time to decide whether to stand because I had to be certain it was a decision that was right for my family. For me, that was not a stalling tactic or an evasive answer from an experienced politician. For me, it was the truth.

    Members will know that my wife Elizabeth has multiple sclerosis. She is indefatigable in trying to make sure that MS does not get in the way of her living life to the full. But much to her frustration, she does often have to rely on her husband for support and assistance. I could not just commit myself to become First Minister without properly working out how we will be able to manage as a family. We have talked that through and we will manage. But I cannot let this moment pass without making clear to Elizabeth my profound gratitude for the sacrifices she is prepared to make to enable her husband to serve our Country as First Minister.

    I am so pleased that my Father, my wife and children, members of my family and our dearest friends, are able to be here today to see this moment. My only regret is that my beloved Mother did not live long enough to see this day. As her Parish Minister wrote to me yesterday “Your Mum would have been (quietly) proud”. My Mother’s love of literature and poetry – which rubbed off on her two sons – would have prompted her to find some words that would sum up this moment.

    Yesterday, I was asked what would be the single most important policy objective for my Government. I made clear it would be the eradication of child poverty.

    So, in searching for some words to sum up this occasion, perhaps my Mother would have chosen these words from one of Scotland’s greatest poets, Hamish Henderson, who was born in Blairgowrie, in the very heart of my Perthshire North constituency. In his epic anthem, Freedom Come All Ye, which I heard Henderson sing from an open top bus in the Meadows of our great Capital City during a rally that demanded the establishment of a Scottish Parliament in the early 1990s, the poet wrote :

    “So come all ye at hame wi Freedom,

    Never heed whit the hoodies croak for doom.

    In your hoose a’ the bairns o’ Adam,

    Can find breid, barley-bree and painted room.”

    If there was ever an anthem that railed against child poverty, those words from Hamish Henderson echo through the straths and streets of our diverse country as a call for us to act.

    So I will be unapologetic about bringing to this Parliament the measures we can take to eradicate child poverty and I look forward to seeking the support of others to achieve that aim.

    Because I recognise, that is how it is going to have to work. I am leading a minority Government. I will need to reach out to others to make things happen. To pass legislation. To agree a Budget.

    To pass legislation. To agree a Budget. These sound like dry technical parliamentary terms. But what they mean in reality is if we want to fund our schools and our hospitals, if we want to give our businesses a competitive edge, if we want to take climate action, if we want to eradicate child poverty, if we want to change people’s lives for the better, we have to work together to do so.

    This Parliament is intensely polarised at this time. I accept my part in creating that environment – whether that is by shouted put downs from the front bench or heckling from a sedentary position. I do promise Presiding Officer that will all stop – I have changed.

    This is not the collaborative place it has been in the past, a collaborative place that has done much good to improve the lives of people in Scotland. As the Parliament marks its 25 year anniversary, and as one of the now relatively small group who have been here from the start, I reflect on the major developments that have taken place by collaborative work and agreement over that time. Major developments taken forward by the Labour and Liberal Executive such as the ban on smoking in public places, or Minimum Unit Pricing by the SNP Government, or the introduction of free bus travel for under 22s by the SNP-Green partnership.

    I commit my Government to working to create that agreement across the Chamber. I hope there is the space and the willingness for that to happen in the interests of the people who sent us here.

    It is hardly a surprise to anyone in this Chamber that I believe that this country could do more if we had the powers of a normal independent nation. Others in this Chamber take the opposite view. That is the essence of democracy – people free to hold and express and pursue different opinions. The question we face in this Parliament today however is a more practical one.

    Does our disagreement on the Constitution prevent us from working collaboratively to eradicate child poverty, build the economy, support jobs, address the cost of living crisis, improve the health service and tackle the climate crisis?

    I will give all of my energy, and my willingness to engage and listen, to ensure that is not the case. I invite others to do the same.

    When I pitched up at Forrester High School in this City in 1979, at the age of 15 wearing my SNP badge, and my friends and teachers wondered why I had become involved in this fringe party, I could scarcely have imagined that my journey would involve becoming the First Minister of Scotland. It is an extraordinary privilege to hold this office and I thank Parliament warmly for the honour that has been given to me.

    To the people of Scotland I would simply say this.

    I offer myself to be the First Minister for everyone in Scotland. I am here to serve you. I will give everything I have to build the best future for our Country.

  • Tim Farron – 2024 Comments on the Announcement of the General Election

    Tim Farron – 2024 Comments on the Announcement of the General Election

    The comments made by Tim Farron, the Liberal Democrat MP for Westmorland and Lonsdale, on 22 May 2024.

    It’s on!

    Rishi Sunak has just called a General Election for Thursday 4th July.

    Serving our communities as our MP is an absolute privilege. Together we have achieved so much, whether it’s saving local vital health services or even running our train service on the Lakes Line!

    In just a few weeks time, you get to decide who will be your MP for the next 5 years – me or a Conservative.

    I would be honoured if you would put your faith in me to carry on serving you as we make our own luck and get things done.

  • Rishi Sunak – 2024 Speech Announcing the 2024 General Election

    Rishi Sunak – 2024 Speech Announcing the 2024 General Election

    The speech made by Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister, on 22 May 2024.

    In the last five years our country has fought through the most challenging times since the Second World War.

    As I stand here as your Prime Minister, I can’t help but reflect that my first proper introduction to you was just over four years ago.

    I stood behind one of the podiums, upstairs in the building behind me.

    I told you that we faced a generation defining moment, and that we as a society would not be judged by some government action, but by the small acts of kindness we showed one another.

    You met that challenge and then some.

    And I have never been prouder to be British.

    And when I introduced the furlough scheme, I did so not because I saw a country simply in need of desperate help, albeit we were, but because I saw a country whose future hung in the balance.

    I could be bold and trust in the tens of millions of you at home, that you would rise to the moment, or I could accept the inevitable, millions of job losses, and pick up the pieces.

    In truth, it was no choice at all.

    I have never, and will never, leave the people of this country to face the darkest of days alone. And you know that, because you’ve seen it.

    As I did then, I will forever, do everything in my power to provide you with the strongest protection I possibly can.

    That is my promise to you.

    Because, for so many of us, it’s easy to forget the scale of what we’ve been through. We were hit by a pandemic that upended normal life.

    Who would have thought the government would ever tell us how many times a day we could leave our homes.

    Then, just as we were recovering from Covid, war returned to Europe, with Putin’s invasion of Ukraine sending your energy bills spiralling.

    I came to office, above all, to restore economic stability.

    Economic stability is the bedrock of any future success.

    Whether that is rising wages and good jobs, investment in our public services, or the defence of our country.

    And because of our collective sacrifice and your hard work, we have reached two major milestones in delivering that stability.

    Showing that when we work together, anything is possible.

    Our economy is now growing faster than anyone predicted, outpacing Germany, France and the United States.

    And this morning, it was confirmed that inflation is back to normal.

    This means that the pressure on prices will ease and mortgage rates will come down.

    This is proof that the plan and priorities I set out are working.

    I recognise that it has not always been easy, some of you may just be starting to feel the benefits, for some it might still feel hard when you look at your bank balance.

    But this hard-earned economic stability was only ever meant to be the beginning.

    The question now is how and who do you trust to turn that foundation into a secure future for you, your family and our country.

    Now is the moment for Britain to choose its future.

    To decide whether we want to build on the progress we have made or risk going back to square one with no plan and no certainty.

    Earlier today I spoke with His Majesty the King to request the dissolution of parliament.

    The King has granted this request, and we will have a general election on the 4th July.

    This election will take place at a time when the world is more dangerous than it has been since the end of the Cold War.

    Putin’s Russia is waging a brutal war in Ukraine; and will not stop there if he succeeds.

    That war has also made all too clear the risks to our energy security. In the Middle East, the forces of Islamist extremism threaten regional and, ultimately, global stability.

    These tensions are exploited by extremists who seek to undermine our values and divide our society here at home.

    China is seeking to dominate the 21st century by stealing a lead in technology.

    And migration is being weaponised by hostile states to threaten the integrity of our borders.

    These uncertain times call for a clear plan and bold action to chart a course to a secure future.

    You must choose in this election who has that plan, who is prepared to take that bold action to secure a better future for our country and our children.

    I cannot, and will not, claim that we have got everything right, no government should.

    But I am proud of what we have achieved together, the bold action we have taken and confident about what we can do in the future.

    We have tackled inflation, controlled debt, cut workers’ taxes, and increased the state pension by £900 this year.

    We have reduced taxes on investment and seized the opportunities of Brexit, to make this the best place in the world to grow a business.

    Put record amounts of funding into our NHS and ensured it is now training the doctors and nurses it needs in the decades to come.

    We have reformed education and our children are now the best readers in the Western world.

    We prioritised energy security and your family finances over environmental dogma in our approach to Net Zero.

    We have fully funded an increase in defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP.

    We made a decision to invest more in local transport that you actually use rather than endlessly plough more money into HS2.

    We set out a comprehensive plan to reform our welfare system to make it fair to those who pay for it as well as those who need it.

    Immigration is finally coming down and we will stop the boats with our Rwanda partnership.

    And we will ensure that the next generation grows up smoke free.

    I hope that my work since I became Prime Minister shows that we have a plan and are prepared to take the bold action necessary for our country to flourish.

    I have stuck with that plan and always been honest with you about what is needed even when that’s been difficult.

    Because I am guided by doing what is right for the country, not what is easy.

    I cannot say the same thing for the Labour party.

    Because I don’t know what they offer. And in truth, I don’t think you know either.

    And that’s because they have no plan. There is no bold action.

    And as a result, the future can only be uncertain with them.

    On the 5th of July, either Keir Starmer or I will be Prime Minister.

    He has shown time and time again that he will take the easy way out and do anything to get power.

    If he was happy to abandon all of the promises he made to become Labour leader once he got the job, how can you know he won’t do exactly the same thing if he were to become Prime Minister?

    If you don’t have the conviction to stick to anything you say…

    If you don’t have the courage to tell people what you want to do…

    And if you don’t have a plan…

    How can you possibly be trusted to lead our country, especially at this most uncertain of times?

    Over the next few weeks, I will fight for every vote, I will earn your trust, and I will prove to you:

    That only a Conservative government, led by me:

    Will not put our hard-earned economic stability at risk.

    Can restore pride and confidence in our country.

    And with a clear plan and bold action will deliver a secure future for you, your family and our United Kingdom.

  • Rishi Sunak – 2024 Policy Exchange Speech on Security

    Rishi Sunak – 2024 Policy Exchange Speech on Security

    The speech made by Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister, on 13 May 2024.

    Thank you Dean for that warm welcome. At some point during the second half of this year, we will all go to the polls and make a choice. Not just about Conservatives versus Labour, or Sunak versus Starmer. It will be a choice between the future and the past. I remain confident that my party can prevail, not just because of our record alone, but because we will be the only party really talking about the future and not with vague lofty platitudes, but with bold ideas and a clear plan that can change our society for the better and restore peoples’ confidence and pride in our country.

    I feel a profound sense of urgency. Because more will change in the next five years than in the last thirty.

    I’m convinced that the next few years will be some of the most dangerous, yet the most transformational, our country has ever known.

    So the question we face today is this: Who has the clear plan and bold ideas to deliver a secure future for you and your family?

    The dangers that threaten our country are real. They are increasing in number. An axis of authoritarian states like Russia, Iran, North Korea, and China is working together to undermine us and our values.

    War has returned to Europe, with our NATO allies warning that if Putin succeeds in Ukraine, they might be next.

    War rages, too, in the Middle East as Israel defends itself not only against the terrorists of Hamas but a barrage of missiles fired – for the first time – directly from Iran.

    Right now in Africa, conflicts are being fought in 18 different countries. And Putin’s recklessness has taken us closer to a dangerous nuclear escalation than at any point since the Cuban missile crisis.

    These are not faraway problems. Iranian proxies are firing on British ships in the Red Sea, disrupting goods destined for our high streets.

    Here at home, China has conducted cyber targeting of our democratically elected MPs. Russia has poisoned people with chemical weapons.

    And when Putin cut off the gas supplies it had a devastating impact on people’s lives and threatened our energy security.

    And in this world of greater conflict and danger, 100 million people are now displaced globally.

    Countries like Russia are weaponising immigration for their own ends, and criminal gangs keep finding new routes across European borders.

    Illegal migration is placing an intolerable strain on our security and our sense of fairness, and unless we act now and act boldly this problem is only going to grow.

    Extremists are also exploiting these global conflicts to divide us.

    People are abusing our liberal democratic values – the freedom of speech and right of protest – to intimidate, threaten and assault others, to sing antisemitic chants on our streets and our university campuses, and to weaponise the evils of anti-Semitism or anti-Muslim hatred in a divisive, ideological attempt to set Briton against Briton.

    And from gender activists hijacking children’s sex education to cancel culture, vocal and aggressive fringe groups are trying to impose their views on the rest of us.

    They’re trying to make it morally unacceptable to believe something different and undermine people’s confidence and pride in our own history and identity. Scottish nationalists are even trying to tear our United Kingdom apart.

    But for all the dangers ahead, few are felt more acutely than people’s sense of financial insecurity. We’ve been pounded by a series of once-in-a-generation shocks.

    The worst international financial crisis since the great depression in the 1930s. The first global pandemic since the Spanish flu in 1918.

    The biggest energy shock since the 1970s. Global forces, yet they are hitting our living standards here at home.

    We must be prepared strategically, economically, with robust plans and greater national resilience, to meet this time of instability with strength.

    And people’s sense of insecurity is only heightened by the fears about new technologies like AI.

    When the IMF says 40% of jobs could be affected, or hundreds of leading experts say the risks could be on a par with pandemics or nuclear war, and when children are exposed to bullying, sexualised content or even self-harm online, people want to know they’ve got someone in charge who understands these dangers, because only if you understand what is happening can you be trusted to keep us safe.

    But the paradox of our age is that for all the profound dangers we face, right now, we also hold in our hands an opportunity for human progress that could surpass the industrial revolution in speed and breadth.

    Technologies like AI will do for the 21st century what the steam engine and electricity did for the 19th.

    They’ll accelerate human progress by complementing what we do, by speeding up the discovery of new ideas, and by assisting almost every aspect of human life.

    Think of the investment they will bring, the jobs they’ll create, and the increase in all our living standards they’ll deliver.

    Credible estimates suggest AI alone could double our productivity in the next decade.

    And in doing so, help us create a world of less suffering, more freedom, choice, and opportunity.

    Just imagine. Every child in school with their own personalised tutor, and every teacher free to spend more time personally developing each student.

    New frontiers in medical diagnostics where a single picture of your eyes can not only detect blindness but predict other diseases like heart attacks or Parkinson’s.

    And counterintuitive as it may seem, throughout human history, the greatest breakthroughs of science and learning have so often come at the moments of greatest danger.

    The first electronic digital computers were developed by British codebreakers in the Second World War. Solar technology went from powering pocket calculators to a viable commercial technology following the energy crisis of the 1970s.

    The fastest development, and deployment, of a vaccine in history came during the Covid pandemic.

    And so it is incumbent upon us to make this a period not just of great danger, but great progress, too.

    That’s why we launched a bold plan to make science and technology our new national purpose.

    We’re rightly proud of Britain’s spirit of discovery and entrepreneurship made us the leading country in the industrial revolution.

    But we can be just as proud, just as confident, just as optimistic about our future, and our prospects to lead again in this new industrial age.

    And doing so will enrich our lives and create good, well-paid jobs in the growth industries of the future here at home.

    At the same time, new and fast-growing economic superpowers like India, Indonesia, and Nigeria are significantly reshaping the global economy.

    And just as this ever more interconnected world creates new dangers, it also creates new possibilities.

    The United Kingdom is uniquely placed to benefit. We’ve always been an open, trading, maritime nation; and Brexit has given us the opportunity to trade even more.

    And we invent, discover, and produce new products and services that the world wants to buy.

    From aircraft wings in Filton, to financial services in Glasgow, to incredible cultural exports like film, music, and TV, or sports like the Premier League.

    Everywhere from rural Kenya to the cityscapes of South Korea, people stay up all times of day and night to watch their favourite British team.

    It’s no wonder that Brexit Britain has leapt above France, Japan, and the Netherlands to become the world’s fourth biggest exporter.

    And the more we export, the better our businesses will do, the more jobs we will create, the more wealth we will generate – right across our country.

    This is the opportunity before us. A world transformed by technological progress. Huge global markets hungry for new talent, goods, and services. You can see it all around us.

    Two brothers from Merseyside sat around their kitchen table and built Castore a £1bn sportswear business taking on global giants like Nike and Adidas, their kit now worn by Red Bull Formula 1 and Bayer Leverkusen.

    British companies and workers right across the country are pioneering offshore wind and exporting it around the world. Already, we’ve built the first floating offshore wind farm.

    And our innovations have helped reduce the cost of wind energy by around two-thirds, and increased the size of turbines to the equivalent of the Eiffel Tower with blades bigger than Big Ben.

    And you can see the opportunity too in healthcare, giving people longer, healthier lives. In Denmark, NovoNordisk created the Ozempic drug which is not only helping to tackle chronic disease globally, but singlehandedly grew Denmark’s entire economy last year.

    All this progress should show us that while this is one of the most dangerous periods we’ve ever known, it will also be one of the most transformational.

    And if we make the right choices, if we have a bold enough vision, then we should feel confidence, pride, and optimism that Britain’s future is secure.

    My point is this: our country stands at a crossroads. Over the next few years, from our democracy to our society to our economy – to the hardest questions of war and peace – almost every aspect of our lives is going to change.

    How we act in the face of these changes – not only to keep people safe and secure but to realise the opportunities too, will determine whether or not Britain will succeed in the years to come.

    There is an important choice facing the country because despite having 14 years with nothing to do but think about the future, Labour have almost nothing to say about it. No plans for our border, no plans for our energy security, no plans for our economy either and no principles either. Keir Starmer has gone from embracing Jeremy Corbyn to Natalie Elphicke, all in the cynical pursuit of power at any price. So Labour have no ideas, what they did have they’ve u-turned on. They have just one thing, a calculation that they can make you feel so bad about your country that you won’t have the energy to ask about what they might do with the incredible power that they will yield. I’m not saying the past doesn’t matter, I know people are feeling anxious and uncertain, that their sense of confidence and pride in this country has been knocked. I understand that, I accept it and I want to change it. What I cannot accept is Labour’s view that all the worries you have are because of 14 years of Conservative Government. In the last 14 years, we’ve made progress in the most difficult conditions any governments has faced since the Second World War.

    A world leading economy, we’ve seen the 3rd highest growth rate in the G7, and created 4 million jobs, 800 a day.

    We took difficult decisions to restore our country’s financial security and control national debt, and that allowed us to support the country through Covid, deliver the fastest vaccine roll-out in the world, provide record funding to the NHS, and protect state pensions with the triple lock.

    We’ve reformed welfare by capping benefits and introducing Universal Credit to help people into work.

    We’ve reduced absolute poverty, pensioner poverty, child poverty. We’ve cut carbon emissions by a third.

    Maintained our position as NATO’s second biggest defence power. Halved violent and neighbourhood crime. And improved standards in our schools with English schoolchildren not just the best readers in the UK, but in the western world.

    We’ve legislated for equal marriage. And it is now not even surprising for people from ethnically diverse backgrounds to lead Scotland, Wales, and the United Kingdom.

    And the economy now decisively has momentum. Inflation down from over 11% to 3%. Wages rising faster than prices.

    And in the first quarter of this year, we grew faster than France, Germany, Japan, Italy, and even America.

    The plan is working – so we must stick to it, and not go back to square one.

    And when Labour ignores the achievements of the last 14 years, or try to reduce the last 14 years to 49 days, remember what they’ve actually doing is trying to distract you from the thing that matters most, the future. Maybe they can depress their way to victory with all their talk and scaremongering, but I don’t think it’ll work because at heart, we’re a nation of optimists. We’re not blind to the challenges or threats that we face.

    We just have an innate belief that whatever they are, we can overcome them, as we have done so many times in our history. And create a secure future for you and your family.

    Let me tell you more about my vision for how I would lead this country through this time of danger and transformation.

    The highest priority of a Conservative Government is to keep our country safe. We’ve proudly taken the generational decision to increase defence spending to a new baseline of 2.5% of GDP, by 2030. Yet Labour have refused to match our pledge. Keir Starmer supported a former Labour leader who wanted to abolish the army and withdraw from NATO and Labour’s current deputy leader, Shadow Foreign Secretary and many others, voted against our nuclear deterrent, the ultimate guarantee of our security.

    The global displacement of a hundred million people is a new and defining challenge of our age. But we can and will protect ourselves against illegal migration. That’s why we’re pioneering the Rwanda scheme. And so, when people see that if they come here illegally, they will be swiftly detained and removed, they will be deterred from making that perilous journey, stopping the boats and saving thousands of lives.

    I know that our international frameworks are outdated. So there may be flashpoints ahead with the ECHR.

    And if the Strasbourg Court make me choose between the ECHR and this country’s security, I will choose our country’s security every single time.

    And nor will I ever compromise on defending our values, our history, and our way of life, against those who seek to undermine them.

    I am unapologetically proud of who we are.

    And under my leadership, ours will be a country where people can disagree in good faith, but where they must do so with respect and decency for others.

    A country where the benefits of belonging to our Union are self-evident to the overwhelming majority of our people.

    A country where we protect and strengthen the greatest institution of all – the family, better protect children from the harms of the online and offline worlds, and do more to protect single sex spaces.

    A country where we celebrate the small acts of kindness that bind our society together, and where we actively work to rebuild the civic involvement and pride that have always formed part of our distinctive national culture.

    A country where we honour those prepared to pay the highest price for our freedoms, as we make this the best place in the world to be a veteran here at home.

    And a country where we properly respect the older generation.

    They’ve contributed all their lives, so whatever the triple lock costs, it is morally right to give older people dignity and comfort in retirement.

    But as well as strengthening our national security and restoring pride in our national culture, we’ll also protect you from the dangers of a more unstable world by giving you greater peace of mind over your financial security.

    People have been struggling to make ends meet – I know that. In the last few years, you’ve seen rising energy bills, mortgage rates, the cost of the weekly shop.

    And I hope I’ve shown through my time in office that, from furlough to support with your energy bills, the government I lead will always be there for you.

    But that’s only possible if we take the tough decisions to strengthen the country’s finances and control debt.

    You can trust me to do that.

    When I stood for the leadership of my party, and my opponent’s policies imperilled our financial strength, I was sooner prepared to lose than abandon what I believe so deeply is right for our country.

    I feel the same conviction about Net Zero.

    In a more unstable world, where dictators like Putin have held us to ransom over energy prices, I reject the ideological zeal of those who want us to adopt policies that go further, faster than any other country, no matter the cost or disruption to people’s lives.

    But even as we strengthen our security and our sense of pride and confidence in ourselves, I also feel a sense of urgency about readying our country to succeed in a world transformed.

    That starts by giving all our young people – wherever they live and whatever their background – the skills and knowledge to succeed.

    Building on the success of the last 14 years, we will create a truly world-class education system.

    The Advanced British Standard is the most far-reaching reform to education for 16-18 year olds in a generation.

    We’re tearing down the artificial barriers between technical and academic education.

    Increasing children’s time in the classroom.

    Studying a greater breadth of subjects to match our competitors.

    And unapologetically saying that every single child must leave school not just literate but numerate as well.

    Now, I know this will not win universal acclaim but maths will be fundamental to our children’s life chances in this new technological age.

    And it is our duty to give them those skills. And more. We’ll end rip-off degrees and massively expand the number of apprenticeships, because a degree is not the only path to success in the modern economy.

    And we’ll make sure that everyone has the funding they need to retrain or learn new skills, at any point in their lives, because in the future education won’t stop when you walk out of the school gates.

    But for Britain to finish first in today’s world, we don’t just need the skills to succeed, we need to create a dynamic, innovative economy fuelled by technological progress, so we lead in the industries of the future and help you and your family become wealthier and more economically secure.

    The government I lead is creating the conditions for a new British dynamism. By investing in the new infrastructure of the future – not just roads, railways, and buses, but gigabit broadband, research and development, computing power.

    By helping to create hundreds of thousands of good, secure, well-paid, highly-skilled jobs, that will level up opportunity right across our country.

    And yes, by taking the necessary decisions to build the right homes in the right places to support those jobs.

    But true British dynamism won’t come from the State alone. It will come from you. It will come from the ingenuity and creativity of the British people, given the support, the opportunities and the rewards to have, pursue and realise big ambitions.

    If you have a brilliant new idea – I want you to build it. If you’re passionate about solving a problem – I want you to pursue it.

    If you simply want to set up on your own – I want you to get out there and do it.

    Because you won’t find the future written in a slide deck in a Whitehall quango.

    You’ll find it out there in our country.

    And so the government I lead will create the conditions for people themselves to try, to build, to invent – yes, sometimes to fail, but more often to succeed.

    That’s why we’re cutting taxes directly on investment. It’s why we’re cutting taxes to encourage innovation.

    And it’s why we’re seizing the freedom and flexibility of Brexit. Because so often, the EU’s default approach was top down, precautionary regulation.

    Whereas we in the UK now have the chance to be more agile, so that rather than stifling innovation and growth, we encourage it, in everything from financial services to agriculture, from healthcare to house building.

    Above all, we will reward hard work.

    Because you don’t get anything in life without hard work.

    So we’re making the tax system simpler, fairer, and more rewarding, cutting National Insurance by £900 for the average worker, alongside increasing the state pension by £900 this year.

    We’re raising the National Living Wage to end low pay.

    And we’re reforming welfare to make sure that work always pays, and our safety net is fair to those who pay for it.

    Not least because giving people support to get off welfare and into work gives them purpose, dignity and hope and it is also the only sustainable way to cut legal migration.

    A world-class education system.

    A dynamic, innovative economy.

    Hard work valued and rewarded.

    That’s how Britain will succeed in future.

    That’s how we’ll grow the economy.

    And that’s how we’ll transform public services, too.

    Imagine a welfare system where new technologies allow us to crack down on the fraudsters, exploiting the hardworking taxpayers who fund it.

    Imagine the huge opportunities to cut crime through technologies like live facial recognition, helping police catch wanted criminals, find missing people, and spend more time on the beat.

    And imagine our NHS, still free at the point of use, but transformed for the future.

    A service staffed by tens of thousands more doctors and nurses, thanks to our Long Term Workforce Plan.

    Backed by record funding made possible by years of fiscal discipline. With far greater choice over where you can receive your care, made as simple as choosing what to watch on iPlayer.

    And I believe there will be no more powerful example of what all the forces of British dynamism, innovation, scientific discovery and technological progress can achieve, than this:

    To address, finally, the fear of one word that still lurks in the back of everyone’s minds, that touches almost every family in our country, and that envelopes our whole world, if we or a loved one hears it: cancer.

    Yet even here, if we are bold enough, there can be cause for new hope. We already know we can prevent most lung cancer cases – the UK’s leading cause of cancer deaths – by stopping smoking.

    That’s why I took the important decision to create a smokefree generation.

    And with huge breakthroughs in early diagnosis and new treatments, like the MRNA vaccine for skin cancer, I believe we can be just as bold and ambitious in improving rates of cancer survival.

    Because if we can bring together my vision of a country transformed, with our world class education system that trains the PhD oncologists and apprentice lab technicians, and our dynamic economy that attracts investors and incubates the billion-pound biotech businesses of the future, our post-Brexit regulatory freedoms to approve trials in a safe but faster way.

    And the scale of our NHS to help us research and trial those new drugs in a way no other country can, then just one example of the incredible achievements this country can make would be to make a generational breakthrough against this cruel disease and fundamentally change what it will mean for our children and grandchildren to hear the word cancer.

    Today I’ve set out my vision for how Britain can succeed in one of the most dangerous yet transformational eras we’ve ever known.

    The values that lie behind that vision are a new patriotism: a confidence in ourselves and in all that we can achieve.

    I reject those who insidiously question our history and our identity.

    I believe in that innate confidence in ourselves that has always run through our island story.

    And just as we’re proud of all that we created, invented, and discovered in our past, so we can be confident and optimistic about what we will achieve in our future.

    My pledge to you is that I will create the conditions to make that possible, to help you fulfil your ambitions.

    To build the world-class education system that gives our children the skills they need to succeed, no matter where they started off in life.

    To create the dynamic, innovative economy that will give you the opportunity of a wealthier, more financially secure life for you and your family.

    To restore our sense of civic pride and national cohesion so we can be secure in the knowledge that we are all on the same side.

    And above all, you can trust me to keep you and your family safe and secure from the threats we face at home and abroad.

    There are storms ahead.

    The dangers are all too real.

    But Britain can feel proud again.

    Britain can feel confident again.

    Because with bold action and a clear plan, we can and we will create a secure future.

  • Alex Chalk – 2024 Speech at the Times Law Awards

    Alex Chalk – 2024 Speech at the Times Law Awards

    The speech made by Alex Chalk, the Lord Chancellor, in London on 8 May 2024.

    My Lords, Ladies and gentlemen, it is my great pleasure to join you tonight.

    I am, as you’ve just heard, the Lord Chancellor. It was a predecessor of mine who went along to HMP Wormwood Scrubs, and the Governor said, “thank you very much for coming” and “if you wouldn’t mind addressing the prisoners, please”.  He thought it was a bit strange, but that he had better do as he was told. Anyway, the prisoners were in the exercise yard, and they were looking at him – rather as you are now – and he was looking at them – rather as I am now – and he didn’t know how to begin, so he just said, “I’m delighted to see you all here.”  But I am, I am delighted to see you all here!

    Thank you, Lord Grabiner, for inviting me, and for your kind introduction. I am told Lord Grabiner is standing down as Head of Chambers; but he is definitely not retiring from One Essex Court…or indeed defecting. I want to make that clear as well.

    Thank you too to The Times and One Essex Court for organising and sponsoring this wonderful event.

    Now, the essay question this year is about AI. I know some of you are worried that AI is coming for your jobs. After the local election results in Cheltenham, I’m not entirely unsympathetic…

    But actually, being at the Times Law Awards reminds me that I’ve been in post for a year. This was the first event I spoke at as Lord Chancellor. By current standards a year’s not bad going – longer I’m told than at least three of the last ten Lord Chancellors. And about the going rate for a First Minister of Scotland.

    But one of the consequences of becoming Lord Chancellor and being cloistered in the MOJ for a year, is that when there is a defection you find out about colleagues that you never knew existed…

    And what a pleasure it is to be back in this extraordinary building. This is the place where Lady Jane Grey was sentenced to death, where Henry Garnet was actually executed as an accessory to the Gunpowder Plot. And just outside, beneath Guildhall Yard, lie the ruins of London’s first Roman amphitheatre where criminals were routinely put to death. To you that may sound like history. To me, it sounds like inspiration for a manifesto. I am joking, that was a joke. Seriously.

    The essay question this year is topical. I won’t seek to add to the erudition in so many of these essays. Instead, I want to make a few observations about context: specifically, AI’s place as part of a gathering global lawtech revolution – a revolution in which we can credibly say that England and Wales is at the leading edge.

    This jurisdiction has of course, long been fertile ground for innovation. It isn’t by luck, still less sentimentality, or tradition, that English and Welsh common law is used as the basis for over a quarter of the world’s 320 legal jurisdictions. It’s not out of habit that international businesses choose our law to govern their contracts, and our courts to settle their disputes. Nor is it mere coincidence that we have the largest legal sector in Europe, second only to the USA in the world rankings.

    The success of our justice system for centuries has been underpinned by its ability to evolve, to adapt and to modernise, while never losing sight of its values and its standards.

    And in that spirit, let us not see our current leading position as a high watermark. Let us instead see it as the springboard for further success. We must be relentlessly ambitious to increase our legal sector’s international market share.

    We don’t want that simply for the sake of it, although getting one over on France is helpful from time to time! We do it because of what it can deliver for our people and our economy. We achieve that principally on the basis of our people. Our legal profession and our judiciary are rightly renowned around the world for quality and integrity. That will remain, of course, far and away our most precious asset. But increasingly important in future will be our ability to harness new and changing technology.

    And what are our competitors up to?

    In Singapore, the Supreme Court now uses a digital transcription system to capture court proceedings, meaning that transcripts can be turned around rapidly, including near real time transcription with annotations made by judges during hearings.

    And they are developing a generative AI programme to help users of the Small Claims Tribunal to file claims by auto-filling the required forms and advising on possible outcomes and claim amounts, prompting parties to settle earlier or consider mediation.

    In India, the justice system is embarking on one of the largest digital rollouts in history, computerising almost 15,000 courts and creating 7 digital platforms to provide real time information on case status, court listings and judgments.

    In British Columbia, they have set up an online dispute resolution platform that supports parties to negotiate online and settle their cases without going in front of judges.

    There are many other examples. But we should be confident in the ambitious approach we are taking on digital justice.

    Last year, with the judiciary, I set out a shared vision for a digital justice system that gives citizens the option to resolve their disputes entirely online. One that harnesses technology – like AI – to guide people in what they need to do and when. And crucially, that clearly sets out all their options, including mediation and arbitration, so that people don’t end up in court unnecessarily. Sometimes the best legal advice is that your issue is not really a legal issue at all.

    Meanwhile, we are, I believe, the first jurisdiction to have established an Online Procedure Rule Committee to set standards and govern our digital justice system. This is a genuinely historic step forward – one of the most significant since the introduction of the CPR in 1999.

    Of course, all this hasn’t come from a standing start: it builds on the progress we are making in Lawtech, a sector that has grown dramatically in the last three years. The UK has become a global hub for Lawtech and a haven for innovators – supported by LawtechUK, an industry-led programme set up by the Government in 2019.

    In that time, it has:

    Created a LawTech accelerator to nurture start-ups and support them to access the legal market.

    Created a Regulatory Response Unit to make it easier for startups to navigate the complex landscape of legal regulation.

    Developed a ground-breaking feasibility study for an online dispute resolution platform for SMEs and so much more…

    And take quiet pride that today we are home to some 43 percent of all lawtech startups in Europe.

    That is not a coincidence. Lawtech in the UK benefits from a technology talent pipeline, a competitive tax system, a liberal regulatory regime and (dare I say it) Government recognition of the importance of innovation.

    And let us also take pride in the fact that we also have one of the most open legal markets anywhere in the world, where any foreign lawyer can practice foreign and international law. As I said to the legal professionals at the Bar Council of India’s Conference in Delhi, which I was delighted to be invited to last year, I said to them that any one of them in the audience could jump on the plane back to the UK and start practising Indian and international law in our country the very next day.

    And in that context, is it any wonder that London is now home to more than 200 foreign law firms from over 40 different jurisdictions. I believe, it’s a model for the open, globalist, enterprising country we should inspire to be.

    Politicians are pretty good by and large at setting out the ‘what’ – the statistics, the achievements and so on. But I think we spend less time talking about the ‘why’. Why does any of this matter? Why is it important to stay ahead?

    First, straightforwardly, of course it’s about the economic benefit, we shouldn’t be squeamish talking about that, our legal services drive prosperity – generating billions for our economy each year, around £34 billion gross value added in 2022 alone. At the same time, annual demand for lawtech products and services in the UK is estimated to be worth up to £22 billion a year – and only likely to grow further, and that’s of course important for the public services that we cherish.

    Second, access to justice, so that citizens can vindicate their individual rights. Because a nation of laws must be, of course, one nation of laws – where legal remedies aren’t the preserve of those with the deepest pockets. Tech is our friend here, as we know from our work to digitise the courts system through our modernisation programme. More claims are being made digitally online, more quickly. And our new digital services – including for civil money and injury claims – have been used over 2 million times. That broadens access to justice.

    Remember this as well. Many people in this room – people who have worked hard and focused on their practices, will also believe passionately in social mobility. When I was in practice at the Bar, I used to go in my wig and gown to tough inner London schools and do cross-examinations, do mock trials, and so on. And I remember one young man came with me to the Old Bailey, because I’d spotted that his cross examination was truly exceptional. He came to watch a trial and was absolutely transfixed by the whole thing. Five years later I was reminded by his school about him, and he’d won a place at Cambridge to read law. So, yours is a sector that can genuinely change lives.

    Third, the rule of law – fundamental to our values as a nation. Keeping our justice system up-to-date means that the rule of law remains relevant as tech moves on. In simple terms, more people are able to use the law to vindicate their rights and to secure just outcomes. That strengthens the rule of law. And, because of our international standing, with litigants from around the world choosing England and Wales, I hope we can reasonably observe that it strengthens the international rule of law too.

    That in turn strengthens our position and our voice in upholding the international rules-based order. Let me give you just a brief example. When I travelled recently to the United States, I met with Merrick Garland, US Attorney General, Lisa Monaco, Deputy Attorney General, and Samuel Alito, Supreme Court Justice. And which is the nation that the US turns to as a trusted friend as we grapple with difficult legal issues, such as how to manage billions in immobilised Russian assets – is there a legal route to go from freezing to seizing? Which is the nation with the expertise they very often turn to, and did so in that case? It’s the United Kingdom.

    Finally, let me touch on AI. I’m not going to drill into the detail of each of these essays, but one core theme shines out. By and large our winners believed that AI is a good thing – that its promise outweighs its threats. That’s also the Governments position – so there’s the kiss of death for your collective credibility….!

    Harnessing the power of AI is, of course, a big priority for Government and the PM – backed by a £900 million fund and plans for a world-leading AI research centre in Bristol, which will make sure the UK is securing its leadership position in AI development.

    And when it comes to legal services, LawtechUK, along with the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce and the Law Commission, has and continues to bring together lawyers, investors, technologists, and other experts to explore how Generative AI is shaping the legal landscape – and how we can use it to open up access to justice.

    But as our essayists set out, if we’re to harness the benefits, we need to manage the risks. To gain public trust requires transparency, reliable data, and an understanding of how bias can accidentally be embedded – and how to prevent it, as well as protection against cyber security threats.

    Again, the UK is playing a leading role with the PM convening a global AI safety summit last year. And we have signed an MoU with the United States, to work together to develop tests for the most advanced AI.

    So, let me turn now to those finalists who entered this competition. My congratulations to you all. Your cases were powerfully and engagingly made, and it was a genuine pleasure to read them.

    To produce such strong pieces of work, despite myriad demands on your time, says a great deal about your commitment to, and aptitude for, the law. You should all be very proud.

    And if the standard of these essays is anything to go by, the future of our profession is bright. I look forward to seeing great things from you in the years ahead.

    So, without further ado, let me announce our runners up. I’m going to ask you please to come up and collect your prizes – Jonathan Macarthy, Laura Wilson, and Jay Staker.

    Next, our third prize winner is… Maximilian Mutkin

    Second prize goes to… Jonathan Stelzer

    And, finally, I’m delighted to announce our first prize winner…. Henrik Tiemroth.

    And that’s your lot, thank you very much indeed.

  • Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech on Birth Trauma

    Victoria Atkins – 2024 Speech on Birth Trauma

    The speech made by Victoria Atkins, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 13 May 2024.

    Good evening everyone.

    It is an absolute privilege to be speaking to you all this evening as we mark the launch of the first ever birth trauma inquiry report.

    And I’d like to start by thanking my dear friend Theo [Theo Clarke MP] for her strength in speaking out about her own experiences and in so doing, creating this incredible workstream whereby other women are being invited to give their experiences and to be listened to.

    I mean, Theo is, to my mind the exemplar of a Parliamentary powerhouse, and it’s been an absolute pleasure working with you, but also I genuinely think the work that you have achieved will have very, very long-term and positive benefits for women across England.

    The reaction that you have received from women shows just how critical this work is.

    You have given a voice to those who may never have shared the pain and the suffering that they have been through, or when they have spoken up, they have not been listened to.

    And so, thanks to you and to the brave women in this room, but also the many, many brave women who have contributed to this report, or who have shared their stories today with media outlets, as it has rightly got such media attention.

    But thanks to those brave women, things are changing and you are shining a bright light on the struggles that too many women face, and you are putting birth trauma at the heart of our national conversation, and ensuring that other mums do not have to suffer in silence.

    And I’d also really like to thank the wider APPG, co-chaired by Theo but also by Rosie [Rosie Duffield MP], and both of whom have really demonstrated, along with APPG colleagues, just how cross-party working can work to the very best for us as a country.

    And so thank you to every single Parliamentarian involved in the APPG.

    And in that spirit, I am determined to make care for new mums and mums to be faster, simpler and fairer because the birth of a child should be among the happiest moments in our lives.

    That said, of course, for the overwhelming majority of families it is.

    Each week around 10,000 babies are born in England on the NHS and most of them are born safely and with mothers and families reporting a good experience of the care they receive.

    But we want that for every woman and every family.

    And as this inquiry demonstrates so starkly, there is far too much unacceptable variation across the country in the service that women receive.

    Some mums endure simply unacceptable care and live with the consequences of that trauma for the rest of their lives.

    Now I’ve been open about my own experiences with the NHS.

    The NHS is genuinely one of the reasons I came into politics.

    I was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of 3 and I’ve seen the very best of the NHS, but I’ve also seen some of its darker corners and that includes in my own experience when I was pregnant.

    As you can imagine the clinicians in the room will understand a type 1 diabetic being pregnant brings its own complications. And I had wonderful, wonderful care in many, many instances. But I also had examples where I wouldn’t wish other women to go through the same, including – and I’ve spoken about this – I was rushed into hospital earlier than anyone had planned, and I was put on a ward, heavily pregnant, not quite knowing what the future was holding for me or my baby.

    And, I was on the ward where women who had just experienced extremely traumatic, dare I say it, dangerous births were being rushed from theatre on to the ward where I was.

    Now clearly their experiences were far, far worse and far more traumatic than my own.

    But you can imagine how frightening actually that experience was for a first-time mum to be, with the concerns that I was having to live with at the time.

    So just that, as an example, I know everybody was trying to do their best at that point, but I desperately want to ensure that women who are expecting and who need additional support don’t find themselves in similar or even worse situations as I did.

    And I want to make sure that no woman goes through a physical and mental trauma, and while giving birth, that could have been prevented.

    Now I know that at the Women’s Health Summit in January, Dame Lesley Regan and I talked about – and forgive me, gentlemen – we talked about the NHS being a system that was created by men, for men.

    And that struck a chord with many women, particularly those who know Lesley and know she is another female powerhouse. And the truth is that women have suffered in pain that would simply not be tolerated in any other part of the hospital.

    Women have tried to raise concerns about unacceptable care, but they’re being told it’s all just natural.

    And it is that, if you like, silencing, that really should not be the reality that women face in the 21st century.

    We can and we will do better.

    Now, being made Health Secretary in November, I have been impatient to make progress.

    And that is why in January I held the Women’s Health Summit, where I made birth trauma one of the top priorities for the second year of the Women’s Health Strategy.

    And I want to make this year not just the year that we listen, but that we act and that this is happening now.

    We are rolling out new maternal mental health services for new mums, which are already available in all but 3 local health systems.

    We are, believe you me, paying close attention to those final 3 areas to make sure they finalise their plans at pace this year.

    On physical injuries too, we are rolling out improved perinatal pelvic health services, including guidance to better support women who experience serious tears and to prevent these from happening in the first place.

    We’re halfway through. We plan to get to full coverage by the end of the financial year. And these services will be supported by our announcement at the Spring Budget of an extra £35 million more for more midwives and better training for when things go wrong.

    On top of the extra £186 million a year we are already investing into maternity services and safety compared to 3 years ago.

    And thanks to Theo, we have also introduced stand-alone GP appointments 6 to 8 weeks after giving birth to ask those crucial questions about whether mum is okay while keeping separate checks for her baby, because we know a happy, healthy mum means a happy, healthy baby.

    And this is supported by new guidance to prompt direct questions about their birth experience, even if there is nothing in her notes to suggest that the birth was traumatic.

    I want to embed a culture that listens to women right from the start of their pregnancy, and so I’m delighted that NHS England are co-producing new decision-making tools with new mums to help guide through choices on how they give birth, what interventions could happen and what pain relief they should be offered.

    These will be made available in a range of languages and formats to make sure that they can be tailored to different settings and to different local populations, because the ethnic disparities that Kim [Dr Kim Thomas] and Theo have highlighted have to be tackled, and we are determined to do that.

    Theo’s speech in Parliament spoke to the lasting impact that birth trauma can have on the whole family. And of course, dads and partners are very much part of that. And so I’m extremely grateful to Theo’s husband for making that point.

    But also we have listened in government and Maria Caulfield, my minister, who is responsible for men’s health along with a great many other things, will be chairing the next session of the Men’s Health Task and Finish Group in June to focus on dads’ mental health and trauma so that we can better understand how to support partners.

    And I’m delighted to announce that the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) will commission new research into the economic impact of birth trauma, including how this affects women returning to work.

    That’s a really important idea and a really important commitment.

    I know there is so much work to do to deliver on the detailed findings of this report and I, together with NHS England, fully support the APPG’s call to develop a comprehensive cross-government national strategy for maternal care.

    I’m very grateful to the NHS for the progress that has been made so far on the 3-year delivery plan for maternity and neonatal services, but I want to go further and a comprehensive national strategy will help us to keep driving that work forward while making sure everyone across government and the health service are crystal clear about what we need in maternity services to focus on.

    And I also want to be clearer to mums and those looking after them, what their rights and expectations should be, so that everybody can be clear about the standard of care that mums deserve.

    So watch this space.

    Now in conclusion, this is the first time in the NHS’s 75-year history that I, as the Secretary of State, but also the chief executive of NHS England, are both mums.

    We get it.

    And for this, this is not just professional, it is personal.

    Both Amanda [Pritchard] and I take our responsibilities to all of you incredibly seriously and I have to say more soon on how I plan to make this area of our health system faster, simpler and fairer.

    So I want to finish by thanking you, each and every one of you that has been involved in this report, for everything you have done to kickstart the national conversation about birth, trauma and how women should be listened to and their concerns acted upon.

    And I really look forward to continuing this conversation with you in the months ahead.

    Thank you so much.

  • Steve Barclay – 2024 Speech at the Farmers Weekly Transition Live Event

    Steve Barclay – 2024 Speech at the Farmers Weekly Transition Live Event

    The speech made by Steve Barclay, the Environment Secretary, on 9 May 2024.

    Well, thanks very much. Good afternoon, and it’s great to organise this on home turf, as a Cambridgeshire MP. I’m very conscious we meet on a beautiful day. The sun is shining, the ice cream van has arrived outside.

    But I think what’s very much on many minds at the moment is the extremely challenging wet weather that we have seen in recent months.

    Just to put that in a bit of context, we’ve seen 60% above average rainfall, if you take that compared to say a decade ago, this is the second wettest winter that we have on record and therefore what’s very much shaping my, Mark Spencer and the ministerial team in Defra is a recognition of just how challenging that landscape is.

    And so, whilst I think the focus from Farmers Weekly and today’s event is absolutely right on transition and how we build that sustainable agriculture, a lot of those benefits are for the longer term.

    By their nature, where you do environmental schemes, where you do nature recovery schemes they have a long lead time. If you’re looking at things like soil quality. If you’re looking at improving our number of pollinators. These are long term transitions, and I’m very acutely aware of the immediate challenges that I’m sure are in the minds of many in the room given the flooding just near me in Lincolnshire that we have seen

    So, I just wanted to start by addressing that. And there’s a number of things that we’re doing.

    So firstly, we moved quickly in response with the Farming Recovery Fund, getting that announcement out quickly. That gave us grants of up to £25,000 for uninsured losses. We listened actively to the feedback on things like 150 metre rule, so we got that changed. We responded with announcements such as the Prime Minister at the NFU conference, with the £75 million in grants for drainage boards.

    As someone who represents a farming constituency in Northeast Cambridgeshire in the middle of the Fens, I’m acutely aware having been a constituency MP for the last 14 years of just how central drainage boards are in certain parts of the country, and so £75 million targeted at infrastructure modernisation, which needs to happen.

    There are longer term things we’re doing. So, we’ve doubled the flood defences – £5.6bn over 6 years which is broadly double what it was in the previous six years. That has protected over 900,000 acres of farmland. But again, we can see with the winter we’ve had, just how challenging that is for many other areas still. So, there’s a lot that we’re doing, but within that, clearly there are still current pressures. And the first thing I really wanted to say to this farming audience is we are very much actively listening and reviewing what we can do in our response to that. And I will come on to that.

    We’ve got the Farm to Fork Summit chaired by the Prime Minister next week, which is part of us looking and engaging with farming leaders in terms of recognising those very real current challenges and certainly for my part being in the cabinet, and also as a constituency MP, I’m very clear that those changes are all too real.

    And so, on that point, firstly just to say that we will provide flexibility and delegations in our agri-environment schemes. So, we’re looking at in the context of SFI… farmers that have been unable to carry out their scheme requirements due to wet weather will not miss out and can still receive payments. So, we will set out more details of that at the Farm to Fork Summit.

    Also, I plan to extend the Farming Recovery Fund to support farmers significantly impacted by water on their land this winter, and it’s important we do take time to get this right. So, our systems are ready, and we are directing support to where it is needed most. But that is why we are talking to stakeholders and we will provide more details on that, hopefully later this month. But we very much recognise that there is an issue that we need to engage on.

    As part of that, a huge credit to Farmers Weekly for the role that it has played both in helping inform, helping communicate the issues around the transition that we’re seeing in agriculture at the moment, keeping farmers abreast of those developments and also for the focus of today’s discussion, which I think is extremely well timed and is all part of us ensuring that we have a successful transition in terms of building greater profitability on farms, but also greater resilience.

    And as I come on to some of the immediate things that we’re doing, I wanted just to put that in a bit of longer-term context.

    So, within the November 2020 Agricultural Transition Plan, the focus in that was about sustainability in our food production. That was a central theme of our plan and I think we should be candid with each other about the previous situation we had.

    The EU scheme saw 50% of the money going to 10% of the farmers. It was a bureaucratic scheme; it wasn’t the scheme that drove environmental improvements. It wasn’t the scheme that was bespoke to our national needs. By its nature, it was a scheme that looked to many others. And so, the opportunity we have through this transition is to really target our support in ways that boost both the environment but specifically boost food production and food security.

    And as Minnette Batters said at the NFU conference, they are two sides of the same coin. Often, it’s almost portrayed as two rival camps. The environment over here, and food production over there.

    But when it comes to things like our soil quality, actually targeting our environmental support in ways that enhance our food production is all part of that long term transition and building a more resilient and sustainable agricultural sector. For my part, since arriving in my post in November, what I’ve tried to do is re-emphasise our productivity grants more specifically to food production and food security.

    And there’s a number of reasons for that. When I was in the Treasury, I was acutely aware that food security is national security, value for money at a time when national crisis changes.  And therefore, I think it is important we focus on food security.

    But one of the impediments, there is a tendency sometimes in government to think the announcement of a grant is the delivery. And what I noticed on the food production side was often we were announcing grants where the upper limit was 40% for logical reasons. On behalf of the taxpayer, you want to ensure there is value for money. Therefore, if the farm gets the benefit, you do not want the taxpayer to pay the whole amount, so we were contributing up to 40%. But because of the volatility within farming, and because of some of the constraints and access to capital, quite often those grants were not being taken out, they were not being as effective as they needed to be.

    And if you look in contrast to our environmental grants we offered up to 100% because from a tax point of view, there was an environmental benefit.

    My key shift that I’ve tried to deliver as Secretary of State is to sort of reemphasise our environmental grants much more on to things that are both good for the environment using less pesticide but also good for food production lowering more costs.

    To give you an example, because I think sometimes in politics people come out with phrases and you think well where is the evidence? Where is the proof? Show me an example.

    If I take the River Wye. Quite often, people would respond to that by saying there is too much chicken production. There is too much chicken litter producing phosphate into our rivers. We need to reduce the amount of farming that happens.

    My approach is to target our environmental grants with 35 million targeted to support anaerobic digestion on the Wye. So then that chicken litter can be burnt, producing energy, producing fertiliser if you separate it out of phosphate. So actually, you safeguard your chicken production, but you do so in a way that is good for the environment and as a result  we can offer 70% as a contribution, not 40%.

    What we are doing is taking those environmental schemes and looking at how we focus them in ways that better align with my priority of food production and food security.

    And that isn’t by lowering environmental standards but by dealing with our waste, enhancing our water quality, dealing with our soil quality, dealing with our pollinators. These are ways we can enhance the environment, but we can also do that in a way that is good for our food security.

    And then looking to do that much more through the farming community because I’m also acutely aware that 72% of our land is farmland and I again as a constituency MP have always felt very strongly with my engagement with my farmers that no one cares more about  passing on their land to the next generation, who cares about the nature on their farm than the people who are actually out there farming it! That is why I’m very keen that with these environmental schemes that we are trusting our farmers, we’re looking at our ALB relationship with our farmers. We trust them, we direct the grants, we look at the access to capital constraint and we do that in a way that supports food production. but also brings benefits from an environmental point of view. And that’s a key sort of reengineering that we have done.

    And first of all, a statistic that you won’t often hear. That actually we are making progress on that. The Sustainable Farming Incentive now has over 20,000 successful applications. What you don’t always hear is it is the most successful scheme that Defra has ever done. It’s had more participation than any other scheme that the department has run.

    That’s not to say that as part of this transition that there aren’t things we won’t tweak along the way. Through the work that Janet Hughes and the team, a lot of tweaks have been done about how we sort of refocus some of those payments but that is something that we’re extremely keen to do is to ensure the take up of actions continues where we can see that there is progress being made.

    And again perhaps as a proof of point on that, that is why at the Oxford Farming Conference we increased the average payment under SFI by 10%, that is why we added 50 additional actions. We have actions on moorland and grassland, we have actions, having spoken to Kate Rock, in fact when I was in No.10, I helped commission the Rock Review, recognising that it wasn’t working for tenant farmers as it should so bringing it from the seven years to the three years in terms of the length of agreements, looking at the outcome of the Rock Review.

    Another bit of feedback from sessions like this I got was the risk of people taking from and out of production entirely to go into environmental schemes. Now, to be frank, the data didn’t really support that so when I got that message at many sessions from people I go back to my department and say that this is a big concern. But they say “don’t worry about it minister the data doesn’t support this”, but the perception was clearly there.

    In response to that we put in the 25% cap so that we don’t see that distorting effect where if there is a concern that people have of too much farmland is being taken out because there’s less volatility with some of the environmental schemes then we get a better balance.

    And again that’s sort of for the environment too because often putting in 100% of land into these schemes was not in itself an environmental solution either. Again, that’s an example of coming to sessions like this feeding back, coming forward putting that 25% limit on, so that if there is a risk of that, that people are concerned about then, we’re ensuring that that does not happen.

    Moving forward, the other thing that has often been raised with me is around the red tape. If you’ve been out on the farm all day, having to come and do a load of forms, so again, we’re looking at working with the sector on how we streamline, how we simplify, so a single application process for SFI and Countryside Stewardship Mid Tier is one of the things we’re keen to introduce.

    We’re looking at how we improve the guidance. We’re looking at how we change the culture within the arms-length bodies from one where I feel in the past there’s been almost an air of suspicion, to one which should be based more on trust.

    To give you a practical example of that, I’ve said there should be no unannounced farm inspections. There should be 48 hours notice, because the purpose should be to advise and help people do the right thing, not to try and go there and catch someone out who’s busy trying to juggle lots of other things as well. We’re looking at how we create a more engaged, supportive environment.

    And then there are the mental health challenges and the pressure, particularly from the wet weather, that many people have been feeling. How do we ensure that those arms-length bodies are thinking about the pressures that people are under and having an approach that is supportive rather than one that is trying to catch people out? That’s been a key issue that we’re trying to address.

    Sometimes I come to these sessions and people ask about the next generation and how can we make farming attractive to the next generation.

    Our focus there is particularly around £427 million in grants that the Prime Minister announced at the NFU Conference around automation. That is good for productivity. It’s good for our resilience. It also changes some of the opportunities and employment opportunities that are within the rural economy in a way that is very attractive to future generations.

    You can drive farm productivity to reduce our import costs to better manage our water, to reduce our energy costs or our solar battery grants, on-farm reservoirs, our slurry grants, our investment in sprayers and equipment. These are all things that build a more resilient more productive sector and that’s what the £427 million in grants is focused on.

    And then finally, while to me there’s much more we can and should be doing on automation (and an area like pack houses is one that we’re going to particularly focus on) there is a recognition that there are limits to what can be done with automation, there’s certain parts of agriculture where that is less ready-to-go than others.

    Today we’re announcing our response to John Shropshire’s report – John being very highly respected farmer just down the road – so we recognise that automation is not a quick fix, but we will be extending the seasonal worker visa schemes of 43,000.

    Making the commitment for the next five years in terms of the 43,000 for horticulture, 2,000 for poultry to ensure that businesses in the supply chain have the workforce they need to succeed in this transition.

    But what we’re also then doing is looking at how automation can then play into that and we’re going to start, as I say, looking at what support we can do through areas like packhouses.

    And then the final thing I really wanted to emphasise is I’m very keen that we use our freedoms in ways that support the agricultural sector, so let me give you a couple of quick examples.

    First through our legislation, had we been in the EU, we would not be able to deliver the gene-editing legislation that is a huge opportunity to develop more disease resistant drought resistant crops, which again is good for the environment: it needs less spraying. That is something we’ve passed legislation on that is a key opportunity we should embrace.

    We have control now over our public sector procurement in a way that we didn’t before when we were subject to EU procurement rules.

    We’ve got the Quince Review looking at how we better utilise that spend in our hospitals, our schools, our armed forces to better reflect the high quality of being British produce, so the Quince Review is looking at that. Mark Spencer, who will be known to many in the room, is a farmer himself. As farming Minister, he’s working through the supply chains, looking at the balance in terms of the supermarkets, where there are often concerns raised, and Mark is working through that.

    We also have a rapid review of labelling, but there’s a concern about empowering the consumer, and I don’t believe it’s empowering the consumer if they buy British bacon thinking it’s being reared here when actually it’s being reared overseas but packaged in England but it’s not actually British, so we’re looking at our labelling and how we strengthen that.

    In conclusion, a lot of the benefits in terms of the environment and nature take time and that is the very element of transition.

    But it gives us a huge opportunity to design what works for us. I think in designing things that are good for the environment and meet our legislative commitments, we can do that in ways that boost yield and better farm water management. Look at our unit costs, look at our automation, look at how we use our common sense with procurement and labelling, and in terms of our supply chain and our sales. And we can do that in a way that boosts profitability and ultimately creates a sector that is attractive for the next generation to come into.

    That all requires us all to navigate, in the short term, the wet weather and other challenges.

    The Farm to Fork Summit next week, which is now an annual event, or the commitment to the Food Security Index that the Prime Minister has made, hopefully gives you an indication that we are keen to work with you.

    You’re managing that short term, but within a clear plan that we have for the longer-term transition in a way that is good for food security but is also good for the environment.