Tag: Speeches

  • Horizon Inquiry’s Chair’s 2024 Statement Regarding Former Post Office General Counsel, Jane MacLeod

    Horizon Inquiry’s Chair’s 2024 Statement Regarding Former Post Office General Counsel, Jane MacLeod

    The statement issued by the Chair of the Horizon IT Inquiry on 24 May 2024.

    1. Many of you will have noticed that Jane MacLeod was listed to give evidence on 3 and 4 June 2024, but that her name has been removed from the timetable. I wish to make a brief statement on this matter and the background to Ms MacLeod’s removal from the timetable.
    2. The Inquiry sent Ms MacLeod a request to produce a written witness statement pursuant to rule 9 of the Inquiry Rules 2006. I was satisfied before seeing Ms MacLeod’s draft witness statement that she would be an important witness from whom I wished to hear oral evidence. On 23 February 2024, the Inquiry wrote to Ms MacLeod to inform her that she was listed to give oral evidence on 3 and 4 June 2024. Thereafter, my team and Ms MacLeod’s representatives liaised regarding practical arrangements for her attending the Inquiry to give evidence.
    3. Ms MacLeod provided a draft of her witness statement on 11 April 2024. Her recognised legal representative informed the Inquiry that, due to the passage of time, Ms MacLeod considered that her written statement was the best evidence that she could offer and that she was “questioning…whether she would be able to assist the Inquiry further” by providing oral evidence. The Inquiry restated its position that it considered it important to hear oral evidence from Ms MacLeod. Further, it offered to meet Ms MacLeod’s travel and accommodation expenses. However, Ms MacLeod has made it clear that she will not co-operate with the Inquiry by providing oral evidence, whether by attending the Inquiry in person or by giving evidence remotely via live video link.
    4. I have considered the options available to me in respect of Ms MacLeod. I note that the conventional view is that section 21 of the Inquiries Act 2005 cannot be used to compel witnesses who are based abroad and not UK nationals to give evidence. If that is correct, then I have no further express power under the Inquiries Act 2005 to compel Ms MacLeod to attend. However, even if that conventional view is wrong, I consider that there is little benefit in serving Ms MacLeod with a notice under section 21. Issuing the notice is different from enforcing it, and I consider that the methods of enforcement available to me are very limited in respect of a person who is resident abroad.
    5. First, I could seek an order of enforcement in the High Court pursuant to section 36 of the Inquiries Act 2005. However, the High Court in England and Wales would not have the power to compel Ms MacLeod to give evidence whilst she is based in Australia. As such, section 36 does not take matters much further.
    6. Second, section 35(1) of the Inquiries Act 2005 provides that a person is guilty of an offence if he or she fails without reasonable excuse to do anything that he or she is required to do by a section 21 notice. For the purposes of argument, I shall assume, without making a final decision, that where a non-UK national who, without reasonable excuse, fails to comply with a section 21 notice served whilst he or she is outside of the UK, he or she commits a criminal offence. Even in those circumstances, this would mean that Ms MacLeod may face criminal sanction in this country, but it would not bring her before the Inquiry. In order to do that, a magistrates’ court would have to convict Ms MacLeod in her absence and sentence her to a term of imprisonment of four months or more. In those circumstances, it may be that extradition proceedings could be initiated against Ms MacLeod: see section 148(5) of the Extradition Act 2003. Assuming that it was proper and possible to take all of those steps, it would be an extraordinarily long process. I am in little doubt that it would be impossible to do that within a reasonable timeframe for me to report to Parliament.
    7. I therefore consider that there are no adequate means of compelling Ms MacLeod to attend pursuant to the Inquiries Act 2005. However, I note that I have received a considerable amount of disclosure on the issues that are relevant to Ms MacLeod. I shall be able to compare what Ms MacLeod says in her witness statement alongside the extensive contemporaneous documentation I have received. Whilst it would have been greatly preferable to hear from Ms MacLeod, I do not consider that her absence prevents me from establishing the facts of her involvement in the matters relevant to the Terms of Reference. As such, I propose that we read Ms MacLeod’s statement into the record.
    8. Sir Wyn Williams
  • Post Office – 2024 Letter to Postmasters Impacted by the Horizon Project

    Post Office – 2024 Letter to Postmasters Impacted by the Horizon Project

    The letter sent by the Post Office on 24 May 2024.

    Dear postmasters,

    The Horizon IT Scandal is one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in our history. Some of you have endured financial ruin, the loss of homes, livelihoods, and reputation. We have a duty to right these wrongs and deliver justice to you as quickly as possible. That’s why we introduced this Act, and why we acted quickly to make sure it was passed by Parliament before the general election.

    Parliament’s decision means that hundreds of convictions of innocent postmasters have been quashed. This clears your names, delivers justice, and ensures swift access to the financial redress that postmasters deserve.

    Convictions will be quashed if they meet the criteria set out in the Act, but in summary you will be eligible if:

    • prosecutions were brought about by the Post Office or CPS (or in Northern Ireland, the state prosecutor or the police)
    • offences were carried out in connection with Post Office business between 1996 and 2018
    • your conviction(s) were for relevant offences such as theft, fraud and false accounting
    • your conviction(s) were against postmasters, their employees, officers, family members or direct employees of the Post Office working in a Post Office that used the Horizon system software
    • the conviction has not been considered by the Court of Appeal

    Updating court and criminal records

    At this stage you do not need to take any further action. The Ministry of Justice has established a casework team who are in the process of identifying individuals in England & Wales whose convictions have been quashed by the Act and will write to them in the coming weeks to inform them of the quashing of their convictions. The Department of Justice is responsible for identifying and notifying individuals in Northern Ireland.

    The Ministry of Justice casework team will then provide details of convictions to His Majesty’s Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) and the Police, and those agencies will amend court and police records to reflect the changes brought about by the legislation. The National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC) acting for the Police Service will entirely delete any records relating to quashed convictions from the Police National Computer.

    Completely deleting the conviction record from the Police National Computer will mean the information is not available for any operational Police or law enforcement investigations, and in addition will no longer show up on any criminal record check, such as a DBS check. The Department of Justice, Northern Ireland Courts & Tribunals Service and Police Service of Northern Ireland will take similar steps to amend records in Northern Ireland.

    We will write to you again to confirm when your relevant court and criminal records have been updated.

    Claiming financial redress

    If you have had your convictions quashed under this legislation you will be entitled to financial redress. Work to establish the new redress scheme is underway and it will be in place by the summer, in line with previous government commitments. We will provide further information on how you can register for this scheme in due course.

    When you should contact us

    We will provide further updates on progress but expect that most relevant convictions will have been identified and letters sent by the end of July. If you have not heard from the Ministry of Justice casework team or the Department of Justice by the end of July, we would encourage you to contact them directly to ensure that your conviction has been considered.

    To make us aware of your conviction, or for any further queries, please email: PostOfficeConvictions@justice.gov.uk, or, for Northern Ireland, PostOfficeHorizon@justice-ni.gov.uk

    If you would prefer you can write to:

    Post Office Convictions

    Unit 8B
    Berkley Way
    South Tyneside
    Tyne & Wear
    NE31 1SF

    Or for Northern Ireland:

    Post Office Convictions (Northern Ireland)

    Legacy Litigation & Projects Unit
    Massey House
    Stormont Estate
    Belfast
    BT4 3SX

  • Keir Starmer – 2024 Speech on a Safer Britain

    Keir Starmer – 2024 Speech on a Safer Britain

    The speech made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 3 June 2024.

    Thank you, let me start by saying thank you Louise – for your service. What a fantastic contribution you will make to Parliament as the Labour MP for North East Derbyshire. And thank you John – for all your support and your leadership on this vital issue.

    Now, this week is the 80th anniversary of D-Day, so I want to start by remembering the bravery of those soldiers who sailed from the South of England to the beaches of France. The individual courage and the collective strength of our troops whose sacrifice that day turned the tide of the Second World War, brought liberation to Europe, and secured our freedom.

    This week and every week – we will remember them.

    And we will honour them.

    Some gave their lives so we could live freely. Others returned home to build a new Britain. We salute those who remain with us today and keep the memory of their fallen comrades alive. And we recognise with one voice, as a nation, that our debt can never be paid in full.

    But of course – we can honour their sacrifice with our decisions today. And we must. Because sadly, the world we live in today is perhaps more dangerous and volatile than at any time since then, and frankly, for my generation, that’s a shock.

    I mean, I remember vividly the day the Berlin Wall came down in 1989. I remember how I felt. A sense of freedom, of possibility, of peace. European countries once again free to choose their own futures, new allegiances being made, friendships forged out of the scars of war.

    And above all, a sense – as the wall came down – nothing like that could happen again. An end of an era.

    I didn’t think that in my lifetime I would see Russian tanks entering a European country again. The rumble of war rolling across our continent, soldiers kissing their children goodbye, desperate families fleeing across European borders in search of safety.

    But in that moment, as we saw those pictures from Kyiv, I understood.

    The post-war era is over and a new age of insecurity has begun. An era where the burden of history – for people and nations will once again, be heavier on our backs.

    National security is the most important issue of our times. Something which, of course, is always true, and which for us, if we are privileged to serve our country, will become our solemn responsibility.

    That’s not something I say lightly: the security and defence of our nation is personal to my family. Like so many families, I have relatives who served in the second world war. My mum’s brother, my uncle Roger, served in the Falklands on HMS Antelope. And I remember the terrible wait when his ship was bombed.

    My mum’s fear as she sat by the radio every day, listening for news, and then the relief, a long week later, when we found out he had survived. So I know the courage, the service, and the sacrifice that allows us to sleep soundly at night from our forces and their families.

    I know it. I respect it. And I will serve it – with every decision. It is part of my story, and the reason why I said – from day one of my leadership – that the Labour Party had to change.

    Change for a purpose. To respect your service, face the future in this dangerous world, and above all – to keep Britain safe. That is why, with my changed Labour Party, national security will always come first.

    That’s a message I took to Kyiv last year when I visited President Zelensky. A pledge of unwavering British support in the face of Russian tyranny. But we have to be resolute, not just in our support for Ukraine but also – in this era, at home.

    We must face down malign actors who try to attack and weaken our nation, and not just through traditional warfare over air, land and sea, but with hybrid threats – to our energy supply, cyber security, information warfare.

    Now – I would prefer if politics were kept out of this issue – even at this election. Throughout the whole of this Parliament. I have deliberately not been partisan over issues of national security.

    Yet just before this election, the Tories questioned this Labour Party’s commitment to national security. And I will not let that stand. The people of Britain need to know that their leaders will keep them safe – and we will. Furthermore, the truth is that after 14 years of the Tories, we are less safe and less secure.

    You don’t have to take my word for it. The Tory’s own former defence secretary says the government has failed to take defence seriously. We have the smallest army since the time of Napoleon, at a time when other countries are firmly on a war footing.

    So – even as we work tirelessly for peace, we have to be fit to fight.

    So let me be unequivocal. This Labour Party is totally committed to the security of our nation. To our armed forces. And, importantly, to our nuclear deterrent.

    Just a few weeks ago I visited BAE Systems in Barrow-in-Furness. I was the first Labour leader to visit in 30 years.

    I saw the nuclear submarines being made. I saw an industry that supports the local community and I met workers who are proud to be doing their bit for our national security.

    They deserve our full support, and they will get it. The nuclear deterrent is the foundation of any plan to keep Britain safe – it is essential.

    That’s why Labour has announced a new triple-lock commitment to our nuclear deterrent. We’ll maintain Britain’s Continuous at Sea deterrent 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.

    Deliver all the needed future upgrades and we will build four new nuclear submarines like the ones I saw in Barrow. That won’t just keep us safe, it will also support good jobs and growth across the UK.

    One of my first visits after I became leader of the Labour Party was to Plymouth, the frontline of defence in this country. Devonport alone employs 2,500 service people and civilians, it supports 400 local businesses, and it generates around 10% of Plymouth’s income.

    And when I was there, I met the shipbuilding apprentices – talented, ambitious young people. And I looked them in the eye and promised that I would fight for the future of Plymouth’s defence industry. And I will.

    Because it’s only by harnessing and supporting the strength of proud communities like Plymouth, Barrow, Aldershot, and so many more, that means we can safeguard our security and our growth for the decades to come.

    I mean look at Ukraine now. Industrial capacity is an absolutely critical part of security. So with Labour, Britain will be fit to fight. Within the first year of a Labour government, we will carry out a new strategic defence review. And we’re absolutely committed to spending 2.5% of GDP on defence as soon as possible, because we know our security isn’t just vital for our safety today, it’s absolutely central to our success for the future.

    National security and economic security must go hand in hand.

    And we also know that playing our part on the world stage makes us stronger and better off at home. So make no mistake: I am absolutely committed to rebuilding relationships with our allies. I went to the Munich Security Conference back in February, I met with world leaders from the US, Europe and the Middle East and I met the Secretary General of NATO. And I pledged to each of them that with a Labour government, the UK would be a point of stability in a chaotic world, that we would always meet our international obligations, take our responsibilities seriously and be a leader on the world stage once more.

    Because when I spoke about D-Day at the beginning I wasn’t just talking about respect for our past, I was thinking about our future as well. Because that is the best example of what cooperation can achieve in the face of fascism and aggression.

    Our joint endeavour, our shared values, our common respect for freedom, democracy, liberty, that’s what we were fighting for and that fight never stops.

    There is a narrative you see sometimes that our values are a point of weakness. That’s what Putin thinks.

    But he’s wrong. Ukraine has shown that, and we must be prepared to stand up as well, because those values are our cause and our strength.

    Let me be clear. This is not a party-political issue, this is a national issue. It affects every single individual, every community, and Labour will always put our country first. We will serve working people across our nation, and respect our armed forces as they continue to protect our country.

    But on July 4th there is a choice. And you can choose to rebuild a country that is proud to stand shoulder to shoulder with European allies, that leads the way in standing up for our values and our freedom, all around the world, and that will never shy away from doing our duty at home and abroad.

    A stronger, safer, more secure Britain with Labour.

    That is the choice. It’s time to stop the chaos, time to turn the page and rebuild our country, together.

    Thank you very much.

  • Keir Starmer – 2024 Speech on Labour’s Six Steps for Change in Wales

    Keir Starmer – 2024 Speech on Labour’s Six Steps for Change in Wales

    The speech made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 30 May 2024.

    Thank you, Michael. That was a really powerful address from you, and it’s a big thing, to come up here and say what you just said, and it’s means a huge amount, to make the big decision to change the party you vote for, as a life long Tory voter, is a really big thing.

    For me, it vindicates all the hard work of the last four and a half years. I was determined to change this Labour Party and put it back in the service of working people, and your words are so important to me, to all of our candidates, to all of our staff, to all of the Labour movement, when you say: life long Tory voter, I’ve had enough, I’m voting Labour. Thank you, Michael.

    Vaughan, thank you for your words. Thank you for your leadership here in Wales, it’s been really good to work with you so far in my position as Leader of the Opposition. I’m really looking forward to a new partnership, where we can both deliver together for Wales. Thank you Vaughan.

    And thank you all for that incredibly warm reception when we walked in. It was fantastic to see everybody in the room, such a great feeling, and Abergavenny, what am amazingly beautiful place. We arrived last night and the sun was shining, absolutely stunning.

    Not that long ago, Vic and I and the kids were at Crickhowell, we holiday up there. It is a really beautiful part of Wales, and many people in this room will have been to the Bear Pub, I’m sure in Crickhowell. If you haven’t been, make sure you go before you leave this part of the world.  As Caroline Harris will attest, Vic and I holiday in Wales every year. We go down to Swansea, she looks after and last year we were in The Gower near Oxwich and it’s really really beautiful.

    So I love being here, and it’s fantastic to be back here today in Wales. And what an opportunity, what a chance to launch our campaign. Because Rishi Sunak has finally called the General Election. He has given us our chance to take our case to the country, and I don’t know about you, but I think Wales has been waiting for this General Election for a very very long time.

    And we in the Labour Party have been working for, and waiting of this general election for a very very long time. And if just over a week ago, Rishi Sunak thought he was laying a careful trap of an ambush, he didn’t get catch us. He caught himself in his own ambush, so now we get the chance. What went through all of those speeches this morning, is this strong sense that now is the time for change.

    Change and hope for a better future. With that sense of national renewal, taking our communities, our countries forward for the future. So I say to you, if you were a family, that’s been struggling with the cost of living for a long time now. And I mean struggling. Struggling across Wales, struggling elsewhere, if you are a business that has been absolutely up against it these past few years, and if you have been serving your country, or serving your community, then this election, this election is for you.

    Because this is the chance to end the chaos and the division, to turn the page, to rebuild Wales and rebuild our entire country together to elect a government that as Vaughan said, would serve working people here in Wales and make that connection – a government in Westminster, and government in Wales, working together and delivering for Wales.

    I don’t know about, but I think we have all had enough of fourteen years of chaos and division. Chaos and division, feeding chaos and division. And it feels like we’re spinning round and round in circles and getting absolutely nowhere.

    And there’s a cost to that. There’s a human cost to that. Go to Port Talbot, talk as I did who are facing the prospect of losing their job in the steel industry. And I say to Rishi Sunak, go and look those people in the eye as I’ve done, and you’ll see their anxiety about the damage that is being done by a government that doesn’t have a plan. A government that is too divide to take our county and our industries forward. Go and talk to those workers, those families, years and years of investment, skills that they have put in, facing now an uncertain future. That is the human cost, that they are paying, for a Government that is divided, chaotic and for a Prime Minister who won’t pick up the phone to the former First Minister in Wales to do a blind thing about those jobs.

    I’ve been there, I’ve looked them in the hours, and I’ve told those workers: I will fight for every single job that they have there and for the future of steel here in Wales. We must fight.

    Because this is a change election. There are two futures, two futures out there on the 4th of July. Two paths that we can take. It is a very very clear choice. And we need to spell it out. More chaos and division, cos they’re not going to change. It would be more – fourteen years already – another five years of chaos and division, non-delivery and failure.

    Or, turn the page, hope and unity, and rebuild our communities and our countries with Labour. A Government that works for you. That tires cup no more conflict, between the first minister here and the prime minister in London, but both working together for Wales Imagine what could be delivered for Wales, with that combination of two government. This is a huge prize. To elect a Government that wants devolution to work. That doesn’t want the conflict, will get around the table, will work together, and every day deliver for the working people of Wales.

    So the first thing we have to do is end that chaos and division. The good news is, the good news is, you don’t have to put up with it anymore.

    A vote for Labour is a vote to turn the page to change our country. We’ve changed the Labour Party. Put it back in the service of working people. We are humbly asking permission from people for the opportunity to change our country and put it back in the service of working people.

    Now I know that will be difficult. I’m not going to stand here and say it will be easy. It will be difficult. Tireless work. But I’ve never shied away from the difficult. When I was heading up the CPS, we had to change it, it was difficult. Many people said don’t do It, slow down. But we changed it.

    When I worked in Northern Ireland, it was difficult work. We were trying to change the police service, so it served all communities. It was difficult, painstaking work, but we did it.

    And here in the Labour Party, we had to change our party, and put it back in the service of working people. That wasn’t easy. Lots of people said don’t do it that way. Don’t go so fast. But we did it. We will never shy away from that.

    Because driving through this for me has always been country first, party second.

    And the opportunity is now there to work together to deliver for Wales. And there is no brighter future without Wales. Because I believe that the solidarity of working people is not just our identity, it is our argument. It’s the most powerful force for uniting all four nations across the United Kingdom. So this is the change that we must bring about.

    It is difficult. It is ambitious. And like any ambition, you need first steps. You need to set out what the big thing is that you want to change, and what the first steps are going to be realise that change.

    And that’s why I’m proud to set out our first steps here today. As you would expect, ruthlessly well-prepared. Thought through. Ready to deliver. Fully costs and fully funded. Which is more that can be said of the ideas the Tories are flinging on the table on the daily basis, rummaging around in the toy box of bad ideas and putting one on the table very day. Unfunded and uncosted.

    Step 1: Economic stability.

    In 2024, it feels odd to have to say to you that stability is change. But it is. That’s what we haven’t had. Stability. Because stability is the foundation of growth. We won’t get economic growth without stability. And we all know that if you lose control of the economy, it’s working people who pay the price.

    Liz Truss lost control of the economy. And in Wales, working people on a mortgage, are now paying an average £240 more each and every month.

    Rishi Sunak says we’ve turned a page.

    Liz Truss says – put the people who helped me in the House of Lords.

    Rishi Sunak says “OK”.

    And in Wales, each and every day, families are paying hundreds of pounds more, a reminder of the cost, they are paying of the damage the Tories did. TATA Steel are paying the price. We have to invest if we want the future of steel in this country. We have to invest in all of the sectors that need it. That’s why we want to set up a National Wealth Fund. Other countries have it. We can drive our industries forward, with the growth that we need, the businesses, the partnership that will help us deliver. And that’s why economic stability is step one.

    Step 2: Working with Vaughan, bringing down those waiting list.

    There’s too many people on waiting lists. And we’ll do that – fully funded and fully costed. We’re going to get rid of the non-dom tax status. Properly. That’s the tax that allows the super rich to be here in this country, making their money, but not pay their tax here. I don’t agree with that. I think you should be paying your tax here, and we’ll make sure that people do.

    And we’ll also crack down on those who are avoiding their tax. And with that money, we’ll bring down the waiting list. And that means we can invest in England in the NHS, 40,000 appointments each and every week. What a difference that will make. And that of course, as you all know, also means more money for the NHS in Wales. SO that in Wales are can build on the work that is being done.

    Now this matters to me. My mum was a nurse. She was a really proud nurse. There are some fantastic pictures of her in her nursing uniform. Such pride. We say this yesterday buy the way as well, we were in Worcester at the college there where they ar training up the next generation of nurses. I saw the same pride there that  I saw on the pictures of my mum. It was her livelihood. But of course, it became her lifeline. Because she was extremely ill for most of her life, and literally her life depended on the care that the NHS gave her time and time and time again, in her particular case.

    There other cases in this room as I look around. SO it matters to me, and it matters to Vaughan, because of cause the NHS saved his life earlier in his life. So it matters to me. And the idea of us being able to work together, to make sure the NHS is at its very best, capable of delivering. Not just back on it’s fit, but fit for the future.

    Of course we are proud of the NHS. Roots right here. We look back great pride every year. Every year in the Labour movement we celebrate the NHS. It is one of the greatest achievements of any government ever, that Labour achievement. I want not just to look back, proudly, I want to look forward and be able to say that the NHS that we will build will be there for the next seventy years to be able toy rely on it in the way that Vaughan and I and my mum relied on it.

    Step 3: Boarder Security Command.

    Now the government has lost control of our borders. Lost control of our borders. 10,000 people this year alone have crossed the channel in small boats. Ten thousand. That is a record. So for all of the rhetoric, that is a record number coming across.

    Nobody but nobody should be making that dangerous journey across the channel, and it’s a test for all governments as to how they respond to it – and would be governments – it’s a test for the current government, and for us: what is your response to this serious problem? Exploited vulnerable people being put in boats to go across the channel by gangs that are making huge amounts of money from them. And there is a choice, as there is a choice in pretty well everything political, what is your response:

    You can either have a gimmick, or a serious response.

    What has the government gone for? A gimmick. The Rwanda Scheme. Now Rishi Sunak never believed in it. When he first saw it, as Chancellor, he didn’t back it. He tried to block it. He didn’t think it would work. I’m not surprised. Because if the numbers going to Rwanda are less than one percent of those that arrive by small boat, the ninety nine per cent of them are not going.

    And if you don’t think that the criminal gangs running this trade are telling that tot the people that they’re exploiting, then you don’t know criminal gangs. IT was never going to work. He knew it wouldn’t work,. But what did he do. He caved in to his party. He didn’t stick to his guns. He caved in. £600 million later, of taxpayer money – it’s not working, and what has he done, he has called an election before it can be tested.

    Weakness upon weakness. In the Labour Party this changed Labour Party, we go for serious solutions. This is a serious problem. So, Border Security Command: A new elite force, with a new commander, bringing together MI5, the police, national security agencies, the crown prosecution services: an elite force, a new command with new resources and new powers drawing on counter terrorism powers. Because when I was Chief Prosecutors had to work with police and law enforcement across Europe to bring down terrorist gangs. These were sophisticated terrorist gangs, and we did it, and we bought them down, and they’re now serving time.

    I will never accept that somehow the only gangs that apparently we can’t take down by the same means are the vile gangs running this smuggling trades. I’ll never accept that. We will break it.

    Step 4: Great British Energy.

    A publicly owned company. This is a company owned by the taxpayer, making money for the taxpayer, and investing in green British power. And I’ll tell you why we need it, Because we have been overly exposed by the terrible decisions of this government. Ten years or so ago, they said “cut the green crap”.

    Remember that? Cut the green crap. And they stopped investing in renewables. They stopped the insulation that we need on our homes, and they left us exposed to the sort of challenges that we have internationally. Exposed.

    And so when Ukraine was invaded, and Putin invaded. We were more exposed than other countries, and you’re paying more on your bill because of the approach that they took. Bills are up. We have got to turn that around.

    It is a challenge, we’ll rise to that challenge. We’ve lost ten years because of the approach of the Tories. But it is also probably the single biggest opportunity that we have – not just for lower bills – but for the next generation of jobs. And Vaughan and I went to Holyhead Port just a few weeks ago, to look at the potential of that port, for floating offshore wind.

    And we have a plan to transform that port to make sure it can handle floating off shore wind. Floating offshore wind is the next generation. It is going to be the gamechanger. And some country is going to get ahead and be the leader in the world. We’ve got the skills, we’ve the potential, we’ve got the ports, we need to take advantage of that, and what we’ve got from this government, is such a lack of direction that just as all the other countries are getting in to the race, they’re in the changing room.

    Not prepared to let that happen. The race is on. I want to be not just in that race, but as you’d expect with me, I want to win that race. And I think we can win that race.

    Step 5 – Tackling anti social behaviour.

    Now I don’t know how many times people have said to me, when I was prosecutor, since I’ve been in politics: Keir, anti social behaviour, it’s low level, it’s low level crime. Shouldn’t really concentrate on it.

    I don’t want to hear that ever again. It blights the lives of so many people.

    Whether they are living in a huge community, a small community, a middle sized community. If you feel that you can’t open your front door after dark, if you feel can’t walk down your own street, or walk around your own community, if you feel as some of our young people do, that they can’t even walk down their high streets without antisocial behaviour, that has a huge impact on people’s lives and how they feel about taking themselves forward.

    And, of course, on our business. It is not low level. And that’s why we’ll have 13,000 new neighbourhood police, working in their communities and dealing with antisocial behaviour, because I am determined that we will have a safe and secure environment for every single person in Wales and across the United Kingdom to live in, so that they can take themselves forward, and build the lives that they deserve.

    Step 6 – Working with the Welsh Government, to ensure that we have, and are able through our education, to prepare our young children, your young people, for the lives that they are actually going to live and the work they’re actually going to do.

    Now I was the first in my family to go to university. I know the power that education can have on a young person’s life. And I want every single young person, wherever they come from, whatever their background, to feel that success belongs to them.

    Vaughan shares this approach. And Welsh Labour is already doing so much. The biggest I think school and college building programme since the 1960s. That’s the investment already happening here in Wales. Imagine how much more we could with the Government in Westminster working with the Government in Wales and delivering for our children, the future that they deserve.

    So six steps, one card, make sure you’ve got yours. We’re going to take this to every single doorstep across Wales to make our case for a changed future. One card, six steps. Wales and Westminster working together. Turning the page. A change election. Where we can stop the chaos and division. Put an end to it. We can turn the page and rebuild Wales and the United Kingdom together, working together for the future. That is the way forward, that is the choice, Vote Labour.

  • Keir Starmer – 2024 Country First, Party Second Speech

    Keir Starmer – 2024 Country First, Party Second Speech

    The speech made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 27 May 2024.

    Thank you all for coming here on a Bank Holiday Monday.

    At least we’re by the seaside. And we are in Sussex, this is a part of the world I know very well. I have family here – close family. Both my sisters, and my uncle lived for many many years in Worthing.

    Now, like everyone, I imagine my character is shaped by where I started in life. I grew up in a small town, not a million miles away from here, a place called Oxted on the Surrey-Kent border.

    Similar to Lancing, minus the sea. And should you go to Oxted, some of you could stop off if you’re travelling back to London, you will see a place that, in my opinion, is about as English as it gets.

    A mix of Victorian red bricks and pebble-dashed semis while all around you have rolling pastures and the beautiful chalk hills of the North Downs.

    I loved growing up there. You could make easy pocket money clearing stones for the local farmers, that was actually my first job. And you could play football until the cows came home – literally. At my first football club, Boulthurst Athletic, we shared our home pitch with the local cows.

    It’s part of why I love our country. Not just the beauty – or the football – also the sort of quiet, uncomplaining resilience. The togetherness of the countryside. That is the best of British.

    And, to be honest – it’s just as well. Because you need it. I mean – anyone who thinks that hardship in Britain is found only in our cities, anyone who thinks there’s no struggle outside of our cities, yes even here in the South East, let me tell you – they know nothing of the countryside.

    My own story is a testament to this. Because it wasn’t easy for us.  My dad was a tool-maker. He worked in a factory – my Mum was a nurse. But for most of her life she had a debilitating illness, Still’s disease. To be honest, she would hate that word, ‘debilitating’, because mum never gave up, she never complained. But her illness did shape our lives.

    This was the 1970s of course, so there were hard times. I know what out of control inflation feels like, how the rising cost-of-living can make you scared of the postman coming down the path: “will he bring another bill we can’t afford?”

    We used to choose the phone bill because when it got cut off, it was always the easiest to do without. We didn’t have mobiles back then but you could still just about get on with it.

    Now, all this has stayed with me. It’s shaped the plan I have drawn up for Britain and the importance, above all, of economic stability. The need to never put working people through the whirlwind of chaos, the rising taxes, rising prices, rising mortgage costs – five thousand pounds for every working family – that’s what the Tories have inflicted on Britain.

    The price working people have paid for their chaos, it’s unforgivable.

    But as I reflect and look forward to this election I believe my background has also shaped my politics in a deeper way. Look – this England has always felt fairly removed from Westminster. Politics has always been something that happens far away.

    And yet something more profound has changed during the last fourteen years of Tory Government. People now feel like more and more of the decisions that affect their community are taken by people who not only live miles away but have little empathy for their challenges.

    A politics that is at best doing something to people, not with them. But at its worst, as we saw in horrifying detail in Westminster last week, those twin injustices – the Horizon and Infected Blood scandals, is something much, much darker even than that.

    It’s about respect, or to be more precise, the lack of it – that is the canary in the mine of injustice. For a long time now working people have believed opportunity in Britain is stacked against them. But now we are at a dangerous new point close to crossing a rubicon on trust, not just in politics but in so many of the institutions that are meant to serve and protect the British people.

    A moment where people no longer believe their values or interests carry the respect of those in power. And when you put that alongside a Government, that over fourteen years has left living standards in this country worse than when they found them, that has torched any semblance of standards in public life, Westminster parties that broke rules they put in place to save lives – rules they expected you to follow but ignored themselves – then you get a crisis in nothing less than who we are as a nation.

    The values that have held us together, that have driven us on, through the hard times, towards our greatest achievements, taken to the edge by these Tories.

    Healing these wounds is what national renewal means. Politics has to be about service. Britain must be a country that respects your contribution. Everyone – not just those at the top – deserves the chance to get on. These are the ideas I’m fighting for.

    This is my project – a Britain once more in the service of working people. Country first, party second.

    Now – I don’t know if this is a new politics or whether it’s simply a return to something older that used to be taken for granted.

    But public service is the bare minimum you should expect. And you also deserve the security, the certainty, the basic ordinary hope, that Britain will be better for your children. No matter our struggles – we always had that in the 1970s – my parents always believed that, in the end, hard work would be rewarded and Britain would be better for their children. For me.

    Now, that might not sound like much to some people but you can’t underestimate how important it is for working class families like mine, how much it comforted my parents.

    It gave us a hope and a stability we could build our lives around and I believe it’s what working people want now – more than anything. They want to believe in the future. They want, when they say to their children “work hard and you can achieve anything”, for that to feel true.

    But after fourteen years of Tory damage to our values, the service and security they should expect as a given. They just don’t believe it anymore – and that has consequences for all parties.

    Look – whatever the polls say, I know there are countless people who haven’t decided how they’ll vote in this election. They’re fed up with the failure, chaos and division of the Tories, but they still have questions about us: has Labour changed enough? Do I trust them with my money, our borders, our security.

    My answer is yes you can, because I have changed this party, permanently.

    This has been my driving mission since day one. I was determined to change Labour so that it could serve the British people, give them a government that matches the ambition they have for their family and community.

    And the very foundation of any good government is economic security, border security, national security. Make no mistake – if the British people give us the opportunity to serve, then this is their core test. It is always their core test. The definition of service. Can you protect this country?

    I haven’t worked for four years on this, just to stop now. This is the foundation, the bedrock that our manifesto and our first steps, will be built upon.

    And then on that foundation with an end to the Tory chaos. We can start to rebuild our country.

    Step one – economic stability. The very foundation of growth, with tough spending rules that mean we can keep inflation, taxes and mortgages low. I am fed up of listening to the Prime Minister tell you we have turned the corner. That is a form of disrespect in itself.

    Taxes – higher than at any time since the war. Chaos – hitting every working family to the tune of £5000, and a Prime Minister prepared to do it all over again. He says he wants to get rid of National Insurance. £46bn – that is currently used on your pension and the NHS and he’s not prepared to say how he will fund it.

    That means, at this election – either your pension is under threat, or he’s prepared to blow the economy up all over again. He hasn’t learned a thing. Working people need stability. They want things to improve, they want things to move on, they want change.

    But they expect you to take care of the public finances as well. Because if you lose control of the economy – it’s working people who pay the price. Liz Truss lost control of the economy. I am not prepared to let a Labour Government ever do that to working people.

    That’s why stability is our first step – a non-negotiable pact with working people – the symbol of a changed Labour Party – ready to serve our country.

    Step two – we will cut NHS waiting times. 40,000 extra appointments every week paid for by cracking down on tax avoidance and non-doms.

    Step three – we will launch a new Border Security Command with new specialist investigators, new resources, and new powers – including counter-terrorism powers. These vile criminals are making a fortune putting vulnerable people in boats made to order, sending them across the busiest shipping lane in the world. Nobody but nobody should be making that journey.

    When I was Director of Public Prosecutions – I worked on operations that smashed terrorist gangs across Europe. I will never accept we can’t do the same for these vile gangs. Labour will secure Britain’s borders.

    Step Four – we will set up Great British Energy, paid for by a windfall tax on the energy giants who made record profits while your bills went through the roof. A new company – owned by the taxpayer, making money for the taxpayer, harnessing the opportunity of clean British power, making us energy independent, removing Putin’s boot from our throat and cutting bills in your home – for good.

    Step five – we’ll crackdown on anti-social behaviour. I don’t want to hear another person tell me this is low-level crime – I’ve been hearing that all my life. It blights communities big and small, it always has. I know Worthing well, as I say – my Uncle lived here. And three years ago – I walked around with the police here, talked to some of the people on the high street and they told me in no uncertain terms the impact anti-social behaviour was having on them.

    So we will get more police on the streets in your town. 13,000 new officers and community support officers paid for by cutting down on wasteful contracts.

    And step six – we’ll also get 6,500 new teachers in the classroom paid for by removing tax breaks on private schools, a down payment on an education system that we will reform. More creativity, more confidence, more resilience, for all children.

    I was the first person in my family to go to university. I know the power of education. Every child should grow up believing that success belongs to them, that they don’t have to change who they are just to get on, that is the Britain we will fight for.

    Labour will deliver opportunity for our children.

    Now – I am proud of these first steps. They are a new path for our country, a plan that will turn the page, deliver stability and change. And because we have been so ruthless in making sure these policies are deliverable, fully-funded, ready to go.

    We also provide the certainty that working people, businesses and communities need. A clear direction. Not the endless spinning around that successive Conservative governments have subjected our country to. The Prime Minister with a new plan every week, a new strategy every month, and at this rate – a new election campaign every day!

    I’m not joking. All this spinning round and round, it’s symbolic of the chaos and the instability. You’ve seen that again over the past few days. The desperation of this national service policy – a teenage dad’s army – paid for by cancelling levelling-up funding and money from tax avoidance that we would use to invest in our NHS.

    All elections are a choice and this is a clear one: levelling up and the NHS with Labour. Or more desperate chaos with the Tories. That is the choice.

    But in a way this desperation tells another story and underlines how elections are about more than individual changes or policies, but about values, temperament, character and a bigger question: whose side are you on? Who do you hold in your mind’s eye when you are making decisions?

    Everything I have fought for has been shaped by my life, every change I have made to this party has been about this cause, the answer to that question, the only answer, the working people of this country delivering on their aspirations, earning their respect, serving their interests.

    I know those people are looking at this election, looking at me personally. So I make this promise: I will fight for you.

    I took this Labour Party four and a half years ago and I changed it into the party you see today. I was criticised for some of the changes I’ve made – change is always like that, there are always people who say don’t do that, don’t go so fast – but whenever I face a fork in the road, at the Crown Prosecution Service, in my work in Northern Ireland, and especially here in the Labour Party… it always comes back to this, the golden thread: country first, Party second.

    Because you cannot restore trust and respect with the politics of protest. You cannot move our country forward with gimmicks and gestures. And you cannot truly serve the country if you only do what is convenient, that is why I changed the Labour Party. That is how we serve the British people.

    I see no fight in the Prime Minister. No appetite to do the same for his party. They will not change. Seriously – whenever he is confronted by factions in his party, people who are miles away from serving the values of the British people, he caves in – every time. A ‘party-first’ weakness at the heart of his leadership.

    Rwanda is the perfect example. He knows it won’t work, he said that. He tried to stop it when he was Chancellor but he was too weak to stand up to his party. He caved in and now he’s gone through with it anyway it’s cost you six hundred million pounds and he’s called an election before it can be tested. Weakness upon weakness.

    How do you think working people feel when the Prime Minister says we’ve turned a corner? How do you think they feel when they see the people who did that to their mortgages, swanning around in the House of Lords because he was too weak to stand up to them.

    Service isn’t just a word, it requires action. You have to roll up your sleeves and change things for the better. I have changed this Labour party, dragged it back to service, and I will do exactly the same for Westminster – that is the choice at this election: Service or self-interest, stability or chaos, a Labour Party that has changed or a Tory Party that has run away from the mainstream.

    The choice is yours. You can stop the chaos, you can turn the page, you can join with us, and together we can rebuild our country.

    Thank you.

  • Rachel Reeves – 2024 Speech to Business Leaders at Rolls Royce

    Rachel Reeves – 2024 Speech to Business Leaders at Rolls Royce

    The speech made by Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 28 May 2024.

    Good morning.

    In five weeks’ time, the British people will go to the polls.

    To make a profound choice about the future of our country.

    And where better to think about the future than here at Rolls Royce, in Derby.

    Away from the short-termism of politics, the pessimism of our present moment, here you have the very model of a great British business…

    … a global brand synonymous with excellence…

    … that continues to this day to pioneer in new technologies critical to the challenges of a changing world…

    … from submarine technologies crucial to defence, to the development of carbon neutral aviation at the frontier of the climate transition.

    And a business partnering with homegrown small and medium enterprises throughout its supply chain…

    … which has nurtured deep roots in this city going back more than a century.

    A business built on the foundations of a past in which we can take pride, with a vision of a future that we can invest our hope in.

    **

    As Shadow Chancellor, one of the great privileges of this role has been to travel the country and meet entrepreneurs, innovators and business leaders all across the UK.

    In the most challenging of economic times, they give me immense optimism.

    Today I want to put forward a simple proposition:

    That this changed Labour Party is today the natural party of British business.

    And I want to set out the central economic fault line in this election, the choice before the British people on the fourth of July:

    Five more years of chaos with the Conservative Party, leaving working people worse off;

    Or stability with a changed Labour Party.

    TORY INSTABILITY

    I can tell you exactly what Rishi Sunak wants you to think on polling day.

    He’s already saying it.

    That the plan is working – don’t change course now.

    That the chaos and instability wrought by Liz Truss was just a blip.

    That the deep problems we face are down to global events – they’re not his fault at all.

    ‘Don’t judge 14 years on 49 days’, he will say.

    **

    I want to take that head on.

    Because while it is true that the crises we have faced are global in origin, our unique exposure to those crises…

    … the reasons we have been hit harder than many comparable countries…

    … by the economic impact of covid and then by inflation and rising energy prices…

    … can only be explained by choices made by Conservative governments here at home.

    And because while the Prime Minister want this election to be about whether inflation is coming down this month…

    … he omits to mention when it started to rise:

    On his watch as Chancellor;

    Even before the Conservatives, in their clamour to cut taxes for those at the very top, sent interest rates and mortgage costs spiralling.

    He omits to mention when it peaked too…

    … on his watch as Prime Minister.

    And he omits to mention the families and businesses dealing with the consequences of Conservative economic mismanagement today.

    **

    Like the family I met in Redcar:

    The dad doing an apprenticeship, the mum working in a supermarket…

    … who spend every evening talking about money, because there’s just not enough to pay the bills.

    The small business owner in Milton Keynes…

    … desperate to expand, but faced with a system of business rates that are stacked against her.

    Or just down the road from here, the workers at Alstom, some of whom I met just a few months ago…

    … who are facing the uncertainty that results…

    … when a government is unwilling to take a long-term, strategic approach, in partnership with business and trade unions…

    … the only responsible approach to economic policy.

    The Conservatives are insulting the intelligence of millions of people like these, forced to deal with the consequences of their failure.

    **

    But we won’t let them get away with it.

    Because the Conservatives do deserve to be judged on the record of those fourteen years.

    The general election, in five weeks’ time, is a chance for the British people to pass judgement on fourteen years of economic chaos and decline under the Conservatives.

    Fourteen years that have seen taxes reach a seventy year high.

    National debt more than double.

    And the typical homeowner re-mortgaging this year paying £240 more every single month, after the disastrous mini-budget.

    Wages flat.

    Public services on their knees – taxpayers asked to put more and more in, but getting less and less in return.

    And economic growth on the floor.

    Five Prime Ministers.

    Seven Chancellors.

    Twelve plans for growth, each yielding less than the last.

    To put this into perspective:

    If the UK economy had grown at the average rate of OECD economies under the Tories, it would now be £150 billion larger;

    An additional £5,000 for every household;

    Providing an additional £55 billion more investment in our public services.

    **

    That is their record – and they deserve to be judged on it.

    The Conservatives have failed on the economy.

    The plan isn’t working.

    And Rishi Sunak’s decision to call an early election is the clearest sign of that.

    If he doesn’t believe his plan is working, why should you?

    TAX

    And no matter how much they tell us that Liz Truss was nothing to do with them, their every action tells us otherwise.

    They haven’t learnt their lesson.

    They’re singing from the same songbook.

    With the Prime Minister’s priorities dissolving into thin air, what is his last, desperate throw of the dice?

    Not to deliver on the promises he has made over the last two years.

    But instead, to offer up £64 billion worth of unfunded tax cuts.

    They offered up another one just last night.

    The Conservative cannot say how they’re going to pay for them.

    What cuts will they make to public services?

    What other taxes will they raise?

    Or will they be paid for by yet more borrowing?

    And why should anyone believe them, after – I’ll say it again – the tax burden has reached it’s highest in seventy years?

    Be in no doubt, the single biggest risk to Britain’s economy is five more years of the Conservative Party.

    CHANGED LABOUR

    My ambitions for Britain are so much greater than that.

    I don’t think we need fantasy economics to look and hope for a better future – just look around us.

    But we do need change.

    Under Keir’s leadership, we have changed the Labour Party so that we may have the chance to change our country for the better.

    To offer a government that is pro-worker and pro-business, in the knowledge that each depends upon the success of the other.

    A party that understands business.

    That works with business.

    I’m not one of those politicians who thinks the private sector is a dirty word, or a necessary evil.

    I’ve worked in the private sector.

    Before politics, I worked in financial services in West Yorkshire.

    I know what a successful business can do for places like those.

    And I know that economic growth comes from the success of businesses, large, medium and small – there is no other way.

    I’m not talking about the old trickle down, free market dogmas of the past…

    … but instead, a new spirit of partnership between government and business.

    An approach fit for a more uncertain world.

    I know there is no policy that I can announce…

    … no plan that can be drawn up in Whitehall…

    … that will not be improved from engagement with business.

    And our manifesto will bear the imprint of that engagement.

    I want to lead the most pro-growth, pro-business Treasury in our country has ever seen…

    … with a laser focus on making working people better off.

    Today, more than 120 senior business leaders have signed a letter, expressing their support for a Labour government.

    Across the world of business, Labour is being recognised as the natural partner of business;

    The party of growth and of enterprise.

    **

    A few years ago, you might not have expected to hear those things from the Labour Party.

    Think how far we have come under Keir’s leadership, in four short years.

    If we can change this party, to bring it back to the service of working people;

    If we can return it to the centre ground of politics;

    If we can bring business back to Labour;

    Then I know we can bring business back to Britain.

    To bring investment back to Britain.

    To bring growth back to Britain.

    To bring hope back to Britain.

    Because by bringing business back to Britain, we can deliver a better future for working people.

    Whatever ideologues on left and right say, it’s not either-or:

    This Labour Party understands that business success is crucial to good jobs, and good work is crucial to successful businesses.

    It is by bringing business back to Britain that we can create good jobs that pay a decent wage;

    Bring in investment to build strong communities with thriving high streets;

    Put more money in people’s pockets;

    And take pride in goods and services made here in Britain, but exported around the world.

    LABOUR’S PLAN

    Our plans for growth are built on partnership with business;

    A mission-led government, prepared to take on the big challenges that we face and ready to seize the opportunities of the future.

    And a government that will build all its plans for the future on the bedrock of economic stability.

    It is clearer than ever that at this election, there is a choice between Tory chaos or Labour stability. And stability is change.

    Stability, so that we never again see a repeat of the mini budget and the damage it did to family finances.

    Stability, so that families and business can plan for the future.

    Stability of direction…

    … so we can bring together government, business and working people in common purpose…

    … to meet the great challenges of our time.

    **

    That will be underpinned by robust fiscal rules, that get debt falling by the end of the parliament.

    I will never play fast and loose with the public finances – because when you do so, you put family finances at risk.

    We have started as we mean to go on:

    I have been very clear that every policy we announce, and every line in our manifesto, will be fully costed and fully funded.

    No ifs, no ands, no buts.

    That is the attitude I will take into the Treasury.

    Because taxpayers’ money should be spent with the same care with which we spend our own money.

    **

    I remember how, when I was growing up, my mum used to sit at the kitchen table, combing over, line by line, her bank statements and her receipts.

    We weren’t badly off, but we didn’t have money to spare.

    To my mum, every penny mattered.

    Believe me, I understand – the basic test for whoever is Chancellor is to bring that attitude to the public finances.

    **

    And stability will rest – as it always has done when Britain has enjoyed economic success – on strong institutions.

    I started my career as an economist at the Bank of England.

    I know why the stability it brings and its independence from short term politics matter to economic success and the battle against inflation.

    So Labour will not play – I will not play – the Tory game of undermining the Treasury or the Bank of England;

    And I will introduce a new fiscal lock;

    So that any government making significant and permanent changes to tax and spending…

    … will be subject to a forecast from the independent Office for Budget Responsibility.

    So that there is never a repeat of the mini budget.

    Stability must mean something else too – and I have heard time and time again from business how important this is:

    Certainty in our tax system;

    Which is why we have committed to the publication of a business tax roadmap…

    … covering the duration of the parliament, within the first six months of a Labour government;

    And it is why corporation tax will be capped at its current rate for the duration of the next Parliament.

    That is the lowest rate among G7 economies.

    And  should our competitiveness be under threat, we will act.

    STABILITY

    Stability will be the bedrock of everything we do.

    But stability alone is not enough.

    It is one, central part of what I call securonomics;

    A new approach, which recognises that our age of insecurity requires new answers to new economic challenges.

    So stability must stand alongside a plan to fix our weak levels of investment.

    Britain today is the only G7 country with investment below 20 percent of GDP.

    I am not under the illusion that government can fix this alone – the lifeblood of economic growth is business investment.

    So investment will be delivered through a new partnership between government and business;

    Embodied in a modern industrial strategy;

    And in a new National Wealth Fund…

    … with government investing to crowd in tens of billions of pounds of private investment…

    … to create the jobs of the future, drive down bills, and achieve energy independence.

    **

    And we will need reform too.

    No more ducking the difficult decisions.

    No more shrinking from vested interests.

    No more accepting that this is as good as it gets.

    So we will reform our politics…

    … pushing power out of Westminster so our local and regional leaders can deliver for their areas.

    We will reform our skills system…

    … to give working people the chance to succeed in a changing world of work…

    … replacing the Apprenticeship Levy with a new Growth and Skills Levy.

    We will reform our planning system…

    … taking head on the single biggest obstacle to growth and investment we face, to get Britain building again.

    We will deliver reform for security in work, with a New Deal for Working People.

    And we will forge a closer relationship with our nearest neighbours in the European Union, to ease the burden of bureaucracy and red tape on British businesses;

    Including a new veterinary agreement, an agreement on touring visas, and the mutual recognition of professional qualifications.

    **

    Stability, investment, reform.

    You’re going to hear those three words a lot from me.

    Because they are the ingredients of a genuine plan for the future.

    An alternative to managed decline.

    The reason that I can say today, with confidence, that this Labour Party is the natural party of British business.

    CHANGE

    The choice at the next election is simple:

    Five more years of the vicious cycle of chaos and decline which the Conservatives have set in motion;

    Or a changed Labour Party;

    Putting stability first, in the service of working people.

    **

    We will fight this election on the economy.

    Every day we will expose the damage the Conservatives have done…

    … the further damage they threaten to do.

    And we will set out Labour’s alternative.

    Five missions for a decade of national renewal.

    And six first steps to point the way to a better Britain.

    Cutting NHS waiting times, with 40,000 new appointments every single week;

    Launching a new Border Security Command to smash criminal gangs and strengthen our borders;

    Setting up Great British Energy, a new, publicly owned clean power company;

    Cracking down on antisocial behaviour;

    Recruiting 6,500 new teachers;

    All fully costed, all fully funded;

    All those ambitions built on the bedrock of economic stability.

    The foundation stones for a decade of national renewal.

    **

    To serve as Chancellor of the Exchequer would be the privilege of my life.

    Not to luxuriate in status;

    Not as a staging post in a career;

    But to serve.

    I know the responsibility that will come with that.

    I embrace it.

    I know that it will not be easy.

    It will take hard work.

    And it will require harder choices.

    I am ready for it.

    **

    As I travel around the country, I see great potential everywhere I go.

    In dynamic, great British businesses like this one.

    In labs and classrooms in our world-leading universities.

    And in the talent and effort of working people.

    It is time to unlock that potential.

    Turn the page on chaos and decline.

    And start a new chapter for Britain.

    Labour is ready.

    Thank you.

  • Keir Starmer – 2024 Comments on Jeremy Corbyn Standing at the General Election

    Keir Starmer – 2024 Comments on Jeremy Corbyn Standing at the General Election

    The comments made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 24 May 2024.

    I’m very clear, the first thing I said as Labour leader is that I would tear antisemitism out of our party by the roots.

    That was my first solemn promise, and I followed through on that, and that is why I took the decision that Jeremy Corbyn would not stand as a Labour candidate at this election.

    Now what’s happened with Jeremy standing as an independent, that’s a matter for him.

    We will have an excellent Labour candidate in Islington North making the same argument as we will across the country, which is it’s time to end 14 years of chaos and division, it’s time to turn the page and a fresh start and rebuild our country together.

  • Bim Afolami – 2024 Speech at the CityWeek Conference

    Bim Afolami – 2024 Speech at the CityWeek Conference

    The speech made by Bim Afolami, the Economic Secretary to the Treasury, on 20 May 2024.

    Good morning, everyone.  Thank you to William/New Financial for the invitation.

    Over the last 3 years, this government has embarked on the most comprehensive set of reforms to financial services in a generation.

    These could not have been more timely. Because in that time, our world has changed almost beyond recognition. A global pandemic. War in Europe. And, as a result, a cost-of-living crisis.

    We have risen to these challenges. That’s why inflation is now falling, wages are rising, and the IMF has forecast that we will grow faster than any G7 European economy over the next six years.

    But through all the changes – and difficulties – of recent years, one thing has remained constant – the UK’s pre-eminence as a global financial centre – with London at the heart of its success.

    In periods of rapid change, you risk becoming extinct unless you can adapt and evolve accordingly.

    I’m a student of history.  So, believe me when I say that we have been here before.

    Breton-Woods, the Big-Bang, and now Brexit. These were all responses to profound economic, political and historical shifts.

    And rightly so. Because in those moments, unless you adapt and evolve accordingly, you will become extinct.

    Today, we find ourselves at another of these moments. As the Prime Minister himself noted last week, more will change in the next five years, than in the last thirty.

    That transformation carries potential for both risks and rewards.

    And it is why for the UK’s financial services sector, everything has had to change for our success to be maintained. And the political, legal, and economic sovereignty that we have gained since 2016 allows us to do so.

    It meant we could roll out a national Covid vaccination scheme faster than any other country in Europe. It allowed us to be amongst the first to help Ukraine defend herself. And – working hand in hand with industry – we are successfully delivering a new model for the UK’s FS sector.

    Now as I mentioned in a speech I gave to the think tank Bright Blue last week, this model has three key elements. First, it is open to the world. Secondly it embraces the opportunities of tomorrow. And finally, it is firmly at the heart of a modern, dynamic UK economy.

    Capital Markets

    This philosophy has underpinned our reform of capital markets. The UK already has some of the oldest and deepest capital markets in the world – and today, we are Europe’s leading hub for investment.

    The government is committed to building on those strong foundations. That’s why almost four years ago, our Prime Minister – at that point, our Chancellor – set out his vision of a technologically advanced, open, sustainable, and competitive financial services sector.

    But promises alone are not enough. You have to deliver. And my promise to you I that I will continue to do so as long as I am in this post.

    That’s why we are completely rewriting the UK’s Prospectus regime to make it easier for companies to list and raise capital on UK markets. This will increase the pool of investors with a stake in UK markets and allow firms to more easily raise larger sums of capital to invest in their growth.

    Alongside this, the FCA are rewriting our listing rules for a new generation. This will bring our regulatory regime in line with international counterparts and provide greater flexibility to firms and founders when raising capital.

    I’d like to thank Lord Hill and Mark Austin in particular for their support of this reform agenda.

    But in particular, I am extremely excited that we are establishing a world-first new class of market, the Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System PISCES.

    1. This will give private companies better access to UK capital markets and create regulatory coherence between public and private markets.
    2. Here is what it means for the UK’s approach.

    That we are on the front-foot.  That we have lent into the structural shift to private markets. That we evolve in response to circumstance and allow ourselves to take risks in doing so.

    Because as I said in my “capital markets renaissance” speech at Bloomberg earlier this year – there’s no point having the safest graveyard.

    Pensions Reforms

    Achieving that capital markets renaissance requires rediscovering the productive potential of UK pension funds.

    The numbers are sobering. UK pension fund holdings in UK listed equities have fallen – from 53% in 1997 to around just 6%. They invest even less in unlisted equity, especially in comparison to international peers like Australia. Friends, that’s not good enough.

    But I know the rewards of changing those numbers are clear. Improved saver returns and improve economic growth. Billions of pounds of investment for high-growth companies. And thriving capital markets.

    That why we are building on the Chancellor’s package from Mansion House 2023, which will unlock up to £75 billion of financing for growth by 2030.

    To do so we are undertaking three workstreams. First, we will further consolidate the pensions market.

    Secondly, we will ensure our regulatory framework rewards investment for long term returns rather than high costs.

    And finally, we will ensure that pension funds have access to high-growth assets – including in the science and tech sectors – via the ‘LIFTS’ initiative. We announced the winners of this initiative at Spring Budget 2024.

    Partnerships

    Of course, just as our economic sovereignty has allowed us to chart a new domestic approach for UK capital markets, we have also used it to renew our international partnerships.

    We are clear about what the UK can achieve on the global stage. That’s why the Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office’s 2023 refresh of our foreign policy approach – against a background of profound geopolitical shifts – highlighted financial services as a key competitive advantage of the UK economy, and a tool of statecraft that we can use to align the international order with our values.

    You might think that’s somewhat academic. I know from my work with the City that you are practically minded people, who want to understand the impact of our decisions.

    So allow me to set out what we have achieved with key international partners.

    Gulf States

    Take the Gulf, whose jurisdictions are fast emerging as key capital markets partners for innovative financial services.

    We echo that positive approach to a changing industry. That’s why in 2023 we agreed with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to collaborate on financial services, including capital markets – which will harness that dynamism to maximise the full potential of UK sourced capital and finance in the Kingdom.

    The EU

    Of course, although we’ve been busy making new friends halfway across the world, the UK still needs to be a good neighbour.

    The UK and EU’s financial markets remain deeply interconnected – in 2023 the EU was 35% of our financial services trade – our largest trading partner, and it’s right that in the current global climate, they remain so.

    Although our regimes will of course evolve differently over time, I know that we are aligned on our principles: open markets, supported by high global standards. I am confident in saying that, under my watch, the EU will never have cause for concern about regulatory standards in the UK.

    Our UK-EU regulatory forum is an important vehicle to facilitate access between our capital markets. At the inaugural event last year, we shared best practice on our work – including our innovative T+1 settlement.

    China

    Finally, it is crucial that we continue to engage with our strategic competitors – such as China. Although – as with any bilateral relationship – we won’t always agree on everything, you simply cannot give the cold shoulder to an economy that is home to a fifth of the world’s globally systemically important banks, four of the world’s largest banks, and almost a third of the world’s leading global financial centres.

    It is in our interests to engage where we can – profoundly so – it makes good economic sense, and it also means we can continue to tackle shared global challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss and ageing societies.

    Where China is concerned, we must take the long view.

    Of course, we should only engage where it is consistent with our interests. But be in no doubt – that is absolutely not the same as disengagement. If we hesitate too much – as Lord Cameron himself noted two weeks ago – our competitors will write our future for us.

    I echo that view – and it underlines why we must continue to engage with China on financial services.

    That’s why I took the opportunity to speak at the China – Britain Business Forum in March this year, where I set out how financial services sits at the heart of many of the shared challenges we face, and how working together we can resolve them with outcomes that benefit us all.

    Conclusion

    But I have spoken enough for today. And so I will leave you with this.

    What you have seen from this government – both at home and abroad – has been nothing less than an ambitious parliament of delivery.

    We have drawn on our long history of expertise in financial services to meet today’s challenges. We are rebuilding our framework from the bottom up – and nowhere better encapsulates that than our capital markets reforms.

    But why is financial services so critical? Because it lies at the heart of the real economy, and the challenges our society faces.

    It’s not just numbers on a spreadsheet, or bankers getting richer. Because products like mortgages, loans, investment – mean homeownership, small businesses and education.

    People sometimes like to talk about the social contract between government and society. That if you are willing to work hard, and operate within the rules, then you will thrive.

    Well, financial services underwrite that contract. A contract which requires industry, regulators and government to work together – to deliver a sector, and a future, that will benefit families and businesses up and down the country.

    Now let’s get out there and deliver.

    Thank you.

  • Michael Gove – 2024 Speech on Antisemitism

    Michael Gove – 2024 Speech on Antisemitism

    The speech made by Michael Gove, the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, on 21 May 2024.

    Since the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7th last year we have seen a shadow spread. Across the world. And here in the UK.

    October 7th was the largest pogrom perpetrated against the Jews since the Holocaust. The perpetrators of those killings have said that if they could, they would kill many, many more. And yet within hours of news of the massacre being broadcast worldwide, and long before Israel had launched its current military operation inside Gaza, there was growing evidence of a remarkable phenomenon. Not sympathy and solidarity with the Jewish people as they faced another enemy bent on their extermination. No. Quite the opposite. A questioning of the facts. A blaming of the victims. A campaign of hate directed not just against the Jewish state but Jewish people everywhere.

    Let me quote from a speech given by my friend David Wolfson in the House of Lords last October just a few weeks after the October 7th attack.

    David began his speech with this comparison.

    “On Saturday night I had two children in uniform. My son was in the uniform of the Israel Defence Forces. Like many twenty-year-olds in Israel, he is doing military service because if he didn’t, there wouldn’t be an Israel. He witnessed the aftermath of Hamas’ atrocities firsthand.”

    My other child in uniform was my daughter. Her uniform was trainers, jeans, and a Star of David necklace around her neck. That is her traditional Saturday night uniform, as with many teens who come in on the Tube to enjoy this great city’s nightlife.

    I was more concerned about my daughter. How on earth have we gotten to that place?”

    How on earth.

    That was six months ago. When a father feared that his daughter was under threat in London if she was – to coin a phrase – openly Jewish.

    Since then, the shadow has only spread. The hate grown. We have seen an explosion in antisemitism. The charity charged with recording antisemitic incidents – the Community Security Trust – recorded 4,103 incidents in 2023 -– as we’ve heard an increase of 147% on the previous year, which was itself a record high. Of those figures 2,699 incidents occurred after October 7th. That is more antisemitic incidents occurred between October 7th and December 31st, 2023, than in any previous twelve-month period.

    And every day brings fresh examples.

    The chaplain driven off campus at Leeds University because he was Jewish. The visitor to a mosque promoting inter-faith dialogue told he was not welcome because he was Jewish. The family who found their baby’s passport defaced because they were Jewish.

    The stand-up comic who was told – by a BBC comedy star - that she would be killed, and her family would be grieving for her in the cemetery – because she was Jewish. The renovator of a dilapidated building threatened with a machete and told he should leave the “jew building” he was working in – because he was Jewish. The reporter told not to cover an event because her eyes looked Jewish.

    And inseparable from these incidents are the increasingly strident, visible and lurid, demonstrations of antisemitism on our streets during protest marches. Swastikas, Hamas banners, depictions of Jews as exploiters, devils, child killers pigs. It’s incessant. We saw it again only this weekend. The imagery of Der Sturmer paraded past the gates of Downing Street.

    Now, of course, I know that many of those on these marches are compassionate people – driven by a desire for peace and an end to suffering. But they are side by side with those who are promoting hate.

    The organisers of these marches could do everything in their power to stop that.  Many – the majority – don’t.

    And we now know that it is – genuinely – dangerous for people to be openly, clearly, proudly, Jewish near these marches. At a time when we are all encouraged to be our whole authentic selves, to celebrate our identity, to be out and proud – there is only one group told they – and they alone – can only be tolerated on terms set by others – Jews.

    The organisers of the marches say that there are Jewish people on their demonstrations.

    But they are only safe if they deny what is dear to so many Jewish people – the safety of people in Israel. If they are to be accepted on these marches then they must knuckle under, accept the calls to globalise the intifada or end the Zionist entity.

    They have to obey the rules laid down by others – those march organisers. Who reserve the right to tell Jews both where they should live in the world and how they should live on our streets.

    It is a classic antisemitic trope to set the terms on which Jews will be accepted. Safe, provided they live in their ghetto. Safe, provided they don’t get above themselves. Safe, provided they don’t contemplate the use of force in self-defence.

    Until, of course,  they aren’t safe anymore.

    History tells us that the dismantling of the right of Jews to live, like others, on their own terms leads, inevitably, to the destruction of Jewish lives.

    That is why we must make a stand.

    We have seen where the unchecked growth of antisemitism has led in the past. We all know that what starts with the Jews never ends with the Jews.

    It’s an ironclad law of history that countries which are descending into darkness are those which are becoming progressively more unsafe for Jewish individuals and the Jewish community – the Spain of the Inquisition, the Vienna of the 1900s, Germany in the Thirties, Russia in the last decade.

    It is a parallel law that those countries in which the Jewish community has felt most safe at any time are the countries where freedom and progress is most secure at any time. The Netherlands of the 17th century. Britain in the first decades of the last century. America in the second half of that century.

    So when Jewish people are under threat, all our freedoms are threatened. The safety of the Jewish community is the canary in the mine. Growing antisemitism is a fever which weakens the whole body politic. It is a mark of a society turning to darkness and in on itself.

    And I see that directly in my work tackling extremism and promoting community cohesion. There is one thing which – increasingly – unites the organisations and individuals which give cause for extremist concern. Antisemitism. It is the common currency of hate. It is at the dark heart of their world view. Whether Islamist. Far Right. Or Hard Left.

    In the past we have tended to bracket Islamists, the Far right and the extreme Left as different causes for concern.

    And indeed, it is vitally important in dealing with extremism to be precise in the use of data and definitions. But increasingly we find that those undermining our democracy and society from different points on the extremist compass are all drawn, magnetically, to converge on antisemitic tropes, language, ideas and agitation.

    So far right figures – like Nick Griffin, formerly of the BNP, Mark Collett of an organisation called Patriotic Alternative, Jayda Fransen of Britain First, and Jim Dowson, a transatlantic hate preacher – have been invited to share space with Islamist advocates and broadcast from Islamist platforms, where the common focus of concern is Jewish influence, the Jewish state, the Jewish threat.

    And on the extreme Left, academics such as Professor David Miller and groups such as the Socialist Workers’ Party, the Socialist Party and the Revolutionary Communist Party jostle to share platforms with Islamist groupings, deploy aggressive language about “Zionists”, support calls for intifada and praising te the resistance – a synonym for Hamas – in terms that Jewish students say cause them physical fear.

    And extreme Islamist groups then weaponise this growing antisemitism to divide Muslim from Muslim. Islamists have demanded that mosques become no-go zones for “Zionists”, that inter-faith dialogue exclude any Jewish voice sympathetic to Israel’s existence, and that believers show that they are truly faithful by demonstrating their commitment in the fight against Israel. By making ardour against Israel and hostility to Jewish voices the litmus test of how good a Muslim you are, Islamists polarise and divide our Muslim communities.

    That is why none of us can afford to be indifferent to the increasing prevalence of antisemitism in our society. There is a reason television series about the 1930s are called “A Lesson from History”.

    A growth in antisemitism is both a precursor of greater hate and an enabler of further extremism.

    Antisemitic tropes which encourage people to think criticism of Israel is muted or censored by Jewish control of the media feed into greater distrust of the “MSM”. That leads to a greater willingness to believe in conspiracy theories and a stronger propensity to seek out “alternative” truth tellers – whether on incel message boards, anti-vax YouTube channels, far-right Telegram groups or Islamist podcasts. And thus,The common ground on which our democracy depends is eroded.

    The continual insinuation, sometimes open assertion, that the major political parties are in hock to Jewish finance is also an effort to divide and demonise. Extremists will argue that Jewish money drives both foreign policy and domestic decision-making in countries like our own in order to deliberately fuel disaffection with democracy and encourages a further flight to the extremes.

    So understanding, and countering, the rise in antisemitism all around us is central to the wider struggle against extremism, division and hate and the defence of democracy, freedom and civilisation.

    This new development in the nature of extremist activity is related to the changing nature of the time of antisemitism.

    Antisemitism, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks pointed out, is a virus that evolves.

    In medieval times it was a religious prejudice – requiring conversion on the part of Jewish individuals to eliminate the Jewish faith. In the late 19th and early 20th century, the focus changed – the perverted notions of “racial science” and ethnic purity led the Nazis and their collaborators to wish to end Jewish lives in order to eliminate the Jewish people.

    And antisemitism now is increasingly focussed on the Jewish home – on Israel. Self-styled progressive opinion – against borders, sceptical of the nation state, determined to link prosperity to exploitation, anxious to make every conflict one centred on privilege – has been mobilised and charged.

    So now the focus is on the delegitimization and demonization of the state of Israel, as a prelude to its dismantlement and destruction. That is what the cry of “From the River to the Sea” envisages. The erasure of the Jewish people’s home. Bethlehem, Nazareth and Jerusalem to become Judenfrei.

    These protests may ostensibly be presented as against Israel’s actions in Gaza but in reality they are directed against Israel’s continued existence. Israel is denounced as an apartheid state conducting a genocide. The worst evils of the last 100 years are, apartheid, genocide, are situated in one country – the Zionist construct – the Jewish home.

    The calls for Boycotts, Divestment and Sanctions from protestors are endorsements of a campaign – the BDS campaign – which I can see is explicitly antisemitic. The Britain-Israel Communications and Research Centre has submitted evidence to Parliament making clear that the “founder and ideologue of the BDS movement – has repeatedly made clear his non-recognition of the rights of Israel to exist”, and that the BDS campaign“[they] oppose a Jewish state in any part of Palestine”. The end point is clear – the elimination of Israel.

    Being clear about what the BDS campaign wants is very far from giving the Israeli government, any Israeli government, a free pass. It is, of course, legitimate, and sometimes necessary to criticise the conduct of Israel’s government. That is why we have continually, since October 7th, stressed the need for aid to flow freely to civilians in Gaza, we have worked for diplomatic progress towards peace, emphasised that there will have to be, ultimately, a two-state solution and argued that military action must be governed by international humanitarian law.

    But while it is necessary to be clear about where we may differ from the Israeli government at any point, just as we differ from other friends from time to time, it is even more necessary to be clear about what is going on more broadly. We must draw attention to the way in which Israel, unique among nations, is so consistently treated differently from others. To consider why. And to see what the impact of that is on the Jewish community in Britain.

    There are no BDS campaigns directed against Bashar Assad’s Syria, the regime guilty of killing more Muslims in living memory than any other. There are no student encampments urging university administrators to cut all ties with China given what is happening in Xinjiang or Hong Kong, or what happened in Tibet. I know of no efforts to organise marchers in their thousands to demand immediate action to stop the persecution of the Rohingya or Karen people by Myanmar’s Government. I may have missed it, but agitation to end the war in Sudan, or in the Democratic Republic of Congo or Mali or Ethiopia does not seem to energise our campuses.

    And nowhere is there any suggestion, other than with Israel, that the errors or even crimes of a country’s leaders should necessitate the end of that country’s independent existence. No one argues that the state of Syria is illegitimate, or Myanmar should be dismantled or deconstructed.

    That is why the argument that the cry of “From the River to the Sea”, or calls for the globalisations of the intifada, or demands for victory for the resistance are not really antisemitic are so disingenuous. They are cries targeted against the reality of collective Jewish experience.  Denials of the reality of collective Jewish suffering. Calls for the end of collective Jewish existence.

    We should all remember what those who have endured antisemitism at its worst have asked for when they were at last free. A safe home. When the British Army liberated Bergen-Belsen in 1945 the survivors in that camp marked the end of their persecution with a song of salvation. It was the Hatikvah – the song that has become Israel’s national anthem –

    As long as the Jewish spirit is yearning deep in the heart,

    With eyes turned toward the East, looking toward Zion,

    Then our hope – the two-thousand-year-old hope – will not be lost: To be a free people in our land,

    The land of Zion and Jerusalem.

    Those voices could not be crushed eighty years ago. But there are a growing number who want to silence that song today.

    And nowhere is that campaign more visible today than on our campuses.

    The encampments which have sprung up in recent weeks across universities have been alive with anti-Israel rhetoric and agitation. But more than that they have been deeply, profoundly intimidatory to Jewish students and others. Yet they have not appeared in a vacuum. They have followed years of ideological radicalisation.

    The encampments, in their slogans, programmes and demands reflect the prevailing intellectual fashion: of decolonisation.

    The radical left, the extreme left, rejects the idea that successful states – whether the United Kingdom, Israel, South Korea, the United States or any European nation – can have prospered because of free markets, enlightenment values, liberal parliamentarianism, property rights and capitalism. and so on.

    The hard left finds it impossible to acknowledge that higher material living standards – and indeed greater human flourishing – in some states rather than in others – is better explained by reference to Adam Smith, John Locke, Edmund Burke and Karl Popper rather than Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Franz Fanon and Edward Said. That historic fact is unconscionable for the dedicated activists of the radical hard left.

    So they argue that the prosperity of states such as the US, the UK, France, Spain and even Australia or Canada must be built on exploitation and empire.

    That argument, as my colleague Kemi Badenoch has brilliantly shown, and historians from Niall Ferguson to Nigel Biggar have reinforced, is inherently flawed.

    But these ideas are deeply congenial to those authoritarian states who are, increasingly, arrayed together against us. For Iran, for China and even for Russia, the decolonisation narrative is meat and drink.

    The idea that the success of liberal Western nations is built on plunder and exploitation, that we seek even now to dominate others through illegitimate means and that our attachment to freedom is mere hypocrisy is central to their efforts to advance their goals.

    That is why forces within those powers seek to influence the debate in our country. They want to weaken our collective resolve in support of democratic values and fellow democracies.

    And they know that if they can undermine support for Israel by encouraging a broader lack of self-confidence in the West’s values, they have secured a signal victory. It is no mere coincidence that Iran, Russia and China are sources and spreaders of antisemitic and anti-Israel narratives. They know those intellectual currents erode our shared defences.

    And they know that if the decolonisation narrative and the delegitimization which follows can prevail in the case of Israel then it will be a profound breach in the West’s collective defence. Because nowhere is the narrative more ahistorical and illogical than when it comes to Israel. But they know that if they Undermine Israel and the other dominos will fall.

    Why is delegitimizing Israel so important?

    Because Israel is transparently successful because of its democratic values, not a history of exploitation.

    Israel has next to no material resources. It has been surrounded by enemies since its re-creation. And those enemies sought to strangle it at birth.

    It is a land of refugees and asylum seekers. Built by those fleeing persecution, not enacting it.

    And Israel was itself a nation reborn after imperial subjugation -– under the Ottoman Empire -– which endured for hundreds of years.

    So Israel in 1948 was a poor, shunned, embattled and fragile child of Empire.

    And yet Israel succeeds. Why? Because of its values. A belief in courage, enterprise and endeavour. A belief in the worth of every individual’s soul. A robust democracy. A market economy. A commitment to liberty.

    But for a section of the extreme radical left to acknowledge that would be to admit that their ideology is wrong, decolonisation theory is refuted by facts on the ground, the real route to prosperity and progress lies through free markets and free peoples in strong liberal nation states.

    So Israel’s success must be delegitimised, its achievements denigrated, its example dismantled. It has to be branded as a settler state, a colonial construct, a racist endeavour. It has to be found guilty of the greatest sins of empire – apartheid and genocide.

    If these arguments were restricted to the seminar room and the journal article that might be one thing. But as history reminds us, ideas have consequences.

    Young minds can become entranced, and ideologies can lead to action.

    Indeed, some of those advancing these ideas have subsequently celebrated the most terrible actions. There were actually voices in academia who described the pogrom of October 7th as de-colonisation in action.

    Mahvish Ahmad, assistant professor in human rights and politics at the London School of Economics responded to the Hamas massacre by saying that decolonisation ‘is not a metaphor’. And an associate professor at McMaster University in Canada, Ameil J Joseph, occupied the same intellectual terrain. ‘Post-colonial, anti-colonial and decolonial are not just words you heard in your EDI [equality, diversity and inclusion] workshop’, he tweeted.

    And the effect of that rhetoric, those views, that celebration of resistance has been felt by Jewish students as hostile and intimidating on campuses here in the UK.

    In Leeds University earlier this month graffiti proclaimed that the faculty were funding an “f…ing genocide” and the graffiti went on, “Israel is harvesting Palestinian organs”. That is a direct invocation of one of the oldest and most vicious antisemitic tropes. The blood libel.

    On Bristol University the encampment posters claim that our media and politicians are lying because they are “Zionist funded”. Another antisemitic trope – the all-powerful Jewish conspiracy.

    At SOAS, part of London University, there is a declaration of “full solidarity” with the Palestinian resistance – i.e., Hamas – and a proclamation that the student union is a “historically anti-Zionist space with a duty to uphold BDS”. Yet again, telling Jewish students they are not welcome unless they deny their own identity. Antisemitism re-purposed for the Instagram age.

    Alongside these student demonstrations, academics on the Far Left who advance decolonisation narratives, such as David Miller, outline a programme that tells Jews in Britain what their terms of surrender should be. He calls for the end of “Zionist organisations”, a programme of “individual de-Zionisation”, and “abolishing the fact of the Zionist entity or any hope that it could ever be resurrected” as well as a “re-education programme” to deal with the “toxic effects”, in our country, of “Zionist ideas”.

    How can Jewish students experience this as anything other than the most direct hostility and hate?

    And how can we allow it to continue unchallenged?

    We cannot.

    That is why the Government is taking action.

    That is why we are legislating to prevent universities from enabling antisemitism by endorsing the antisemitic BDS campaign.

    The legislation is making its way through the House of Lords and has been endorsed by politicians from all parties as well as the Board of Deputies of British Jews and the Jewish Leadership Council. [Political content redacted] Listen to the Jewish community, send a message to the antisemites on our campuses, back the Bill now.

    There is much more that needs to be done. I believe universities, schools, government departments, the NHS and local government – indeed all public bodies – should sign up to a charter against antisemitism, adopt the IHRA definition of antisemitism and make clear that antisemitic agitation will be met with clear disciplinary action.

    We also need to ensure that the marches on our streets which have caused so much distress, indeed physical intimidation, of Jewish people are dealt with more effectively.

    That is not to criticise the police, who have to operate within a framework we politicians set.  We politicians must do better.

    And we can. Today the former Labour MP, John Woodcock, will publish a ground-breaking report into political violence and intimidation. Its analysis is brilliant and its recommendations both compelling and far-reaching. Some will require detailed debate and thought but that cannot be an excuse for delay in dealing with the challenges he addresses. We must make rapid progress to deal with the intimidatory consequences of marches by looking at their cumulative effect, consider more closely how to police repeated invocations of prejudice, and ensure organisers pay for the consequences of their actions.

    There is also more we need to do to bolster the role of the Government’s Independent Adviser on Antisemitism; and to take the matter with the seriousness it demands, I intend to establish a parallel Independent Adviser on Anti-Muslim Hatred. We must also call out extremist groups, ensure they aren’t given public platforms, endorsement or money, tighten the rules on charities and look at how to ensure extremists cannot abuse our tax system.

    But alongside legislation in parliament and executive action by Government there is a broader duty. One for all of us.

    We must not be silent.

    We must not let tolerance for different views become a moral relativism that refuses to defend the democratic principles and traditions we cherish in this country.

    We must say to every Jewish citizen in this country – your safety is the best guarantee of our security, your freedom to live as you choose the only way we can be certain we remain a land of liberty, your future is our future. We said Never Again. And that is a promise we will never, ever, disavow.

  • Victoria Atkins – 2024 Statement on the Infected Blood Inquiry report

    Victoria Atkins – 2024 Statement on the Infected Blood Inquiry report

    The statement made by Victoria Atkins, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 21 May 2024.

    Yesterday we heard the harrowing conclusion of Sir Brian Langstaff’s inquiry on infected blood. The report lays bare the many failings of successive governments, including historic failings in my own department. As the Secretary of State, I apologise unreservedly for the actions which have hurt and harmed so many people, culminating in the damning conclusions of the report.

    “Instances of the destruction of records and withholding of information are shocking and unacceptable. This should not have happened and must never happen again. We will study the report to make sure the lessons of Sir Brian’s Inquiry are learned and that these mistakes can never be repeated.

    “I give my sincere thanks to all of the victims, families and campaigners for sharing their pain and for their fortitude in pursuing the truth over many decades, as well as to Sir Brian for his meticulous and comprehensive analysis. I am working with the NHS Business Services Authority to ensure that all those eligible receive a second interim payment of £210,000 as soon as possible.

    “This terrible history of failures, experiments, disbelief, and cover ups has stolen the lives of victims and their families; instead of birthdays, careers, freedoms and joy, the victims’ lives are measured in pain, mental anguish, the crushing burden of stigma and the agony of wondering what could have been. Never again.