Tag: Speeches

  • Volodymyr Zelenskyy – 2022 Speech to the Halifax International Security Forum

    Volodymyr Zelenskyy – 2022 Speech to the Halifax International Security Forum

    The speech made by Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the President of Ukraine, on 19 November 2022.

    Dear friends!

    Maybe most of the discussions at this year`s forum will address one question – how to end the Russian war.

    But I will ask you to formulate a more precise question – how to restore real and just peace.

    Simply the end of the war does not guarantee peace. Russia is now looking for a short truce – a respite to regain strength. Someone may call this the war`s end. But such a respite will only worsen the situation.

    Any voiced ideas of our land`s concessions or of our sovereignty cannot be called peace. Immoral compromises will lead to new blood.

    A truly real, long-lasting and honest peace can only be the result of the complete demolition of Russian aggression.

    There are 10 items in the Ukrainian Peace Formula. These are challenges which should be overcome for the sake of security of Ukraine, Europe and the world. This is the Peace Formula for the world.

    Ukraine proposed precisely such a Peace Formula. I presented it to the UN General Assembly and the G20 Summit. And I am asking you to help us implement this formula! This is the only way to real peace.

    First item is radiation and nuclear safety. The second one is food security. The third is energy security. The fourth is the release of all war prisoners and deportees. The fifth is the implementation of the UN Charter and the restoration of our territorial integrity and world order. The sixth is the pull out of Russian troops and the end of hostilities. The seventh is the restoration of justice, namely the Tribunal for those guilty of aggression crime, and – damages compensation. The eighth is countering ecocide. Ninth are the security guarantees for Ukraine to prevent escalation. And the tenth is the confirmation of the war`s end.

    What is the goal of such approach?

    We emphasize on all of the elements of Russian aggression, and offer our partners to demolish all aspects of aggression together with us in order to provide security. That is something where each of our partners can show their leadership.

    We have already succeeded in some things, for example, we extended the grain export initiative and offer a new humanitarian initiative – Grain From Ukraine to enhance food security.

    In the same way, we can go step by step in other items of our Peace Formula.

    I suggest you, dear Forum participants, to choose the possible leadership options for your countries. Each item of our Peace Formula has the proposals for particular solutions. Please choose which item you can help with.

    I believe that Canada, which strongly supports us, will also choose one of the Peace Formula items for itself and will show all the strength of its leadership.

    I assure you that peace is possible! But for it to exist, we must make impossible Russian aggression – all of its elements.

    Let it happen! Let there be peace!

    Glory to Ukraine!

  • Volodymyr Zelenskyy – 2022 Speech to the University Community of Ireland

    Volodymyr Zelenskyy – 2022 Speech to the University Community of Ireland

    The speech made by Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the President of Ukraine, on 18 November 2022.

    Dear friends!

    Mr. Minister, Mr. President, dear students!

    I am glad to see you!

    While preparing for this meeting, I learned that Russia has recently imposed sanctions against 52 political figures of your country.

    And for what? For the fact that your country supports European efforts to end Russian terror and to revive international law.

    Of course, the restrictions imposed by Russia do not particularly affect anything. This is more of a propaganda thing, so that on Russian television they can lie that Russia is allegedly capable of something in diplomacy.

    But after seeing this message about your 52 politicians, I remembered another number – 52, and a recent one too. And also the one that is related to sanctions.

    As you know, the summit of the countries with the largest economies just took place in Indonesia. And the participants of the summit agreed on a joint declaration – exactly 52 points. Quite meaningful – they reflect many existing global problems.

    Formally, Russia also supported the declaration, but in reality, it violates most of the things contained in the declaration. And some of the acute global problems that the “twenty” declares to solve are deliberately created by Russia.

    That is, after carefully reading these 52 points of the Bali Declaration, you can see why international pressure on Russia, particularly sanctions, should be not only maintained, but also intensified. Russia continues to destroy international relations and people’s lives, and pretends that it is fighting against this destabilization together with everyone.

    This is from the fourth point of the declaration: “It is important to uphold international law and the multilateral system that guarantees peace and stability… Today’s era must not be an era of war.”

    And this is when Russia mobilized all resources to not only turn our time into a time of war, but to become the largest terrorist state in history.

    Point five of the declaration – Russia says that it will allegedly, together with others, take measures to promote energy stability and market stability.

    And at the same time, when this summit in Indonesia is still going on, Russia is carrying out a missile attack against our country. Almost a hundred missiles – specifically against the energy sphere. Another missile attack the next day. And not only against power plants, but also against gas production facilities. This is energy stability in Russian.

    The thirteenth point of the Bali Declaration is about combating climate change. Russia allegedly confirms the protection of the natural environment, but it has already destroyed almost three million hectares of forests in our country with its aggression! They were burned by shelling. And this is only one of thousands of crimes committed by Russia against the environment.

    Point 22 of the declaration – “Countries will make every effort for timely access to vaccines, therapeutic and diagnostic tools.”

    And in fact, hundreds of hospitals were destroyed by Russian shelling. In most of the territory occupied by Russia, there is no access to medicine at all. Even to the simplest medicines, to surgical operations, to insulin… And this is in Europe. In 2022.

    And this is the case for almost all 52 points of the Bali Declaration. You read and see the scale of Russia’s lies and that it is now the biggest threat to the world.

    I will add point 44. It specifically states: “Access to education is a human right and a key tool for inclusive and sustainable economic recovery.”

    Do you know how many educational institutions in Ukraine the Russian army destroyed in 9 months of war? 2,719 were shelled, and 332 were completely destroyed. These are universities, schools…

    Dear friends!

    Russian aggression does not stop for a single day. Just as Russian lies to the world never stop. Therefore, for all this, the international pressure on Russia should not stop for a single day. And this can be done not only by politicians, but also by everyone at their own level.

    Of course, new sanctions should be applied against Russia. It is effective. A new European sanctions package is needed. Please defend this need at the pan-European level.

    We must be active in spreading the truth about the war and the crises provoked by it. This is something that all of you can definitely do. Please talk about what is happening and find a format convenient for you to support honest media or bloggers who cover global affairs and, in particular, Russian aggression.

    And please look for specific projects that can help our defense and our people. The more collective efforts are made, the sooner we will force Russia to leave the territory of Ukraine and fulfill its obligations to the world.

    Thank you for your attention!

    Thank you for your support, Ireland!

    Glory to Ukraine!

  • Alex Chalk – 2022 Speech at the Make UK Defence Summit

    Alex Chalk – 2022 Speech at the Make UK Defence Summit

    The speech made by Alex Chalk, the Defence Procurement Minister, in Birmingham on 23 November 2022.

    It’s a pleasure to be here in Birmingham today for this Make UK Defence summit.

    Before continuing I should formally introduce myself – I’ve been the Minister for Defence Procurement for around a month now.

    As was just touched upon, unlike my ministerial colleagues in the department, I have a legal rather than a military background.

    Which means I bring two things, I hope, to Defence.

    First, an understanding of – and deep respect for – the rule of law. When we see the atrocities being committed in Ukraine, as unlawful as they are heinous, we are reminded how important it is to protect the rules-based international order, but also to do so with hard edged military assistance if required.

    Second, I bring an open mind and a willingness to listen and learn from you. I’m not coming in with any preconceptions, other than this, I believe very passionately in small business and I believe it is in your interest and the nations interest that you get a fair shot when it comes to defence procurement.

    That is particularly so in an era that is described by some as “a Golden Age of innovation”. That is digital innovation but other innovation, new ways of management, how to manage data.

    And let me say this too as an overarching way of principle. I come to this job very conscious of the advantages that come with speed of procurement and the risk that come with delay.

    Perfect is the enemy of the good and 80% capability today is very often preferable to 100% capability tomorrow if tomorrow never comes.

    There are so many examples of firms of all sizes giving us a crucial defensive advantage in this part of the world alone.

    There’s the team at Birmingham Airport who are converting Boeing 737s into E-7 airborne early warning aircraft.

    There’s the work being undertaken in Telford to manufacture Boxer armoured vehicles.

    And all the exciting small businesses in this region who we will be championing next weekend on Small Business Saturday.

    Take for example the Coventry-based SME Hygiene Pro Clean who – with help from our Defence and Security Accelerator which provides access to over £250 million in excess funding – won a contract with the Welsh Ambulance Trust to roll out their rapid cleaning system to speed up the decontamination of ambulances during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    So, it’s no surprise our current defence spend in the West Midlands is about £120 for every person living here.

    But the important work of the SME work stretches beyond the boundaries of Birmingham and the Black Country.

    As we battled the pandemic, we saw the entire Defence supply chain step up to produce ventilators, build Nightingale hospitals and move millions of pieces of equipment around the country.

    More recently, it’s been fantastic to see firms pulling together nationwide to get vital defensive weaponry into the hands of Ukrainians as quickly as possible.

    And that takes me onto the third thing I want to do this morning and that is to set out my priorities for this role.

    But before I do that, it’s worth reminding ourselves of the context in which Defence is currently operating.

    First, the threats we face as a nation are proliferating and intensifying.

    Whether it’s state-on-state aggression like we are seeing in Ukraine.

    Or so-called sub-threshold dangers, including disinformation campaigns, cyber warfare and the sabotage of undersea cables.

    Meanwhile, the global pandemic, the energy crisis and ongoing impact of climate change have not just increased the demands on our forces, but imposed additional demands on our resources.

    Which means – as the Chancellor made clear in his financial statement last week – we need to deliver the maximum value for money, we need to deliver the maximum punch for our pound so to speak.

    As a result, your role as suppliers to our armed forces is more important than ever.

    Not just in keeping our forces equipped with everything they need, not just providing that innovation, technology, and cutting-edge capability which keeps us ahead of our adversaries, but through your achievements strengthening the entire sector so that no matter what happens, when the call comes, our nation is ready to respond.

    Let me also say by way of context, that where there are challenges there are also great opportunities for firms like yours to expand into new markets.

    Nations across the world are reawakening to the value of Defence.

    France, Australia, the United States and Germany, of course, are among the countries to have increased their Defence spending in the last year.

    That means we are now looking at a Defence export market potentially worth many billions of pounds more over the next decade.

    So, how are we going to grip this moment and seize this opportunity?

    Well, the good news is that we aren’t starting from scratch – this is the third bit of context.

    Most of you will be well acquainted with the Defence and Security Industrial Strategy – better known as DSIS.

    Launched under one of my predecessors Jeremy Quin, DSIS marked a step-change in our approach to industry.

    It means we now think about defence industry as a national strategic capability in its own right.

    It means we are considering the much broader impacts of our commercial decisions, such as how we can boost regional economies, how we can develop new skills bases, and how we can develop national industrial capability.

    But publishing any strategy is of course only the beginning, it is delivery that really counts.

    We’ve been working alongside industry to deliver on over 50 commitments during the last year and a half.

    Driving innovation, improving efficiency, and strengthening the entire sector.

    Now, we need to build on that success and create Defence supply chains which are truly fit for this new, more competitive and unstable era.

    So, turning to those priorities, they are only threefold:

    First, we want to see a more resilient supply chain.

    In this new era of global competition, we must make ourselves agile and resilient by design.

    That’s why last week we launched our new Supply Chain Strategy, the first in over a decade. You will be hearing from Major General Simon Hutchings who will cover in more detail our approach to that strategy.

    But in a nutshell, this is a clear mandate to do things differently to maximise the resources at our disposal.

    That means moving away from an exclusive focus on cost-cutting and efficiency savings.

    And instead considering reliability, through-life service and environmental sustainability as part of the package too.

    We’re also going to prioritise in ensuring supply chains are flexible enough to cope with sudden disruption.

    And we want to work closer than ever with you, our industrial partners, to build genuinely collaborative relationships.

    Including by having better visibility of firms – the SME and mid-tier companies – in that critical supply chain.

    And doing so by sharing more information because that allows us to make better decisions.

    And that brings me onto my second objective; greater collaboration with SMEs.

    Now, perhaps more than ever we need SMEs to play their proper part in this national mission and I am personally committed to that goal.

    So where have we got to?

    Last year 23% of our procurement budget went to SMEs – that’s a procurement budget of over £20 billion a year – that’s up from 13% in 2016/17.

    But we want to go further and we are targeting 25% for next year. That’s a bold but important ambition.

    Now I recognise, even after a few short weeks in this post, that smaller suppliers face unique challenges like ‘barriers to entry’ as economists sometimes refer to them.

    And that is why we are determined to make the barriers to working with us as low and as navigable as possible.

    At the heart of that determination is our SME Action Plan, published in January.

    Setting out how we’re maximising SMEs’ opportunities to do business with us.

    Take for example our £16 million Defence Technology Exploitation Programme – it’s offering grants up to £500,000 to help SMEs develop new technologies and processes.

    Meanwhile our new Procurement Reform Bill is helping SMEs by slashing the number of complex regulations which govern public procurement.

    But we have also created a new single supplier registration system, which means bidding companies will only have to submit their core credentials once, making it cheaper and easier for you to work with us too.

    Another key part of the Action Plan is our new SME Working Group within the Defence Suppliers Forum – which works closely with Make UK.

    It brings together SMEs from across the country, to sit alongside primes and MOD representatives. It is already beginning to bear fruit.

    During its first year, it’s addressed the use of Framework contracts on Defence and how to measure our impact on the SME community.

    So, to my third priority; boosting exports.

    That’s because partnerships are not just crucial on our own shores.

    If we are going to capitalise on the massive potential export market that I eluded to earlier, we need to strengthen industrial ties with our global partners.

    That’s because that in turn enables greater information sharing, greater interoperability with our allies as I saw myself in the Mojave Desert a couple of weeks ago with our Australian and American allies, and it also enables greater strategic planning.

    So, I want to drive better use of our strong and unique network of military officers, industry secondees and over 5,000 trade specialists.

    Based across the UK and within 120 countries, they can help promote innovation, opportunity and partnership around the world.

    We are also creating a more efficient system for managing any government-to-government relations in support of your exports.

    Meanwhile the UK DSE Export Faculty is working with the wider Department for International Trade Export Academy to provide SMEs with advice and support.

    So that’s an overview of what we’re doing and where we want to go.

    There’s a lot of different strategies and policies in there but the three most important words are ambition, resilience, and collaboration.

    And that collaboration really matters because if we are to really succeed, if we are to grasp these opportunities of this era to make you thrive and to make us safe, we are going to need your support too.

    So let us know what support you need to innovate and expand. Constructive engagement is welcome.

    Let us grasp those opportunities on offer to turn your cutting-edge ideas into cutting-edge capabilities.

    Let us seize the moment presented by excellent events like this, to meet new people and new business partners to strike up new business relationships.

    Your success is our country’s success and government will be willing you on.

    Thank you.

  • Alister Jack – 2022 Statement on Supreme Court Ruling

    Alister Jack – 2022 Statement on Supreme Court Ruling

    The statement made by Alister Jack, the Secretary of State for Scotland, on 23 November 2022.

    We note and respect the unanimous ruling from the Supreme Court today.

    People in Scotland want both their governments to be concentrating all attention and resources on the issues that matter most to them. That’s why we are focussed on issues like restoring economic stability, getting people the help they need with their energy bills, and supporting our NHS.

    Today alone, 11.6 million UK pensioners – around one million in Scotland – are starting to receive up to £600 to help with their energy bills this winter.

    As the Prime Minister has made clear, we will continue to work constructively with the Scottish Government in tackling all the challenges we share and face.

  • Nicola Sturgeon – 2022 Initial Statement on Supreme Court Ruling

    Nicola Sturgeon – 2022 Initial Statement on Supreme Court Ruling

    The statement issued by Nicola Sturgeon, the Scottish First Minister, on Twitter on 23 November 2022.

    1/ While disappointed by it I respect ruling of @UKSupremeCourt – it doesn’t make law, only interprets it.

    A law that doesn’t allow Scotland to choose our own future without Westminster consent exposes as myth any notion of the UK as a voluntary partnership & makes case for Indy

    2/ Scottish democracy will not be denied.

    Today’s ruling blocks one route to Scotland’s voice being heard on independence – but in a democracy our voice cannot and will not be silenced.

    I’ll make a full statement later this morning – tune in around 11.30am

  • Volodymyr Zelenskyy – 2022 Speech to the Bloomberg New Economy Forum

    Volodymyr Zelenskyy – 2022 Speech to the Bloomberg New Economy Forum

    The speech made by Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the President of Ukraine, on 17 November 2022.

    Ladies and Gentlemen!

    Thank you for your attention to Ukraine!

    Our communication today actually finalizes the work of your Forum, it is symbolic.

    Symbolic, because the global situation directly depends on when and how the Russian aggression will end.

    Look at how many threats and crises for everyone in the world have been provoked by this aggression. I will give three examples now, but there are more – much more.

    Another Russian terrorist attack has just taken place, in the morning – dozens of missiles, civilian objects are the main target. Russia is fighting against electricity and heat for people, blowing up power plants and other energy facilities.

    This is everyday life in Ukraine now – because of Russian terror. That is why we put so much effort into getting modern air defense and anti-missile defense systems from our partners. Plus constant hostilities on the frontline more than a thousand kilometers long.

    What does this mean from a global perspective?

    Instead of investing trillions of dollars in the development of human capital, the world will spend colossal amounts of money on rearmament – in addition to those already planned. You will see.

    Now everyone is paying close attention to how we defend ourselves in Ukraine. They look – which weapons are the best, which tactics work, which defense systems give the maximum result.

    To be honest, few countries could now defend themselves against aggression as intensively as we do. So many shells and weapons are simply non-existent. But there are still more potential aggressors in the world and frozen conflicts that can flare up again than such countries. Hence, there is an insane security deficit.

    Therefore, the more forms of terror Russia will use in this war, the more funds the world will eventually direct to weapons and to defense against a potential repetition of such attacks as we are experiencing.

    Another example… Instead of paying maximum attention to the green transformation, various governments are equally looking for ways to guarantee cheaper supplies of oil, gas, and coal in order to lower energy prices.

    It is the price of energy, not the purity of energy, that is the number 1 issue for many. And it wouldn’t be like that if it weren’t for Russian aggression – and Russia’s use of energy resources as a weapon.

    The third example… In just a few weeks, the threat of starvation for tens of millions of people arose completely artificially. Not because of a drought or an economic crisis, but because of the military blockade of our ports – a food exporting country.

    The world has not seen anything like this for decades.

    Any new disaster in one or another country due to high food prices or, God forbid, due to famine, is minus years for global development.

    Many different topics were discussed at your Forum during these days… But how many of them do not depend on what Russian aggression has brought and, unfortunately, can still bring? Minority.

    Therefore, when Ukraine offers a peace formula, it is really a peace formula not just for us, but for the world.

    When the threat is complex, the response must be complex as well. Nothing can be solved by simply ceasing fire. This is our formula. We need to restore peace – reliably and for the long term. You will not restore stability by simply mitigating the crises provoked by Russia. Every threat must be completely dismantled.

    The other day, at the summit in Indonesia, I presented exactly such proposals of ours – reliable peace and complete dismantling of Russian threats. And I thank everyone who supports the Ukrainian peace formula.

    And now I want to add one more component.

    What does peace mean? It’s very practical, actually. This is saving lives. Stabilization. Development.

    Development!

    Already now, by joining the reconstruction of Ukraine, various countries and companies are receiving incentives for growth.

    But when we restore territorial integrity and guarantee reliable peace, Ukraine will become a powerful source of new global development.

    And it’s not just about the economy. It’s about the modern economy.

    I will give you three more examples.

    Ukraine is able to replace dirty fossil fuels from Russia with clean energy.

    We have huge potential in low-carbon energy. Ukraine is capable of becoming a key partner of the European Union for the purposes of decarbonization.

    We will become one of the main suppliers of green hydrogen and green electricity in the EU.

    Climatic conditions of Ukraine, free space, solar energy, wind energy will allow the production of green electricity with a very competitive cost.

    Just three years before the Russian invasion, we built 7 gigawatts of renewable energy. The potential is many times more.

    Plus, Ukraine can produce tens of millions of tons of green and cheap ammonia. Plus, strong positions in bioenergy. Plus, powerful nuclear energy and energy infrastructure, which is integrated with the energy grid of the European Union.

    Now the Russian missile terror is targeted primarily at these our facilities. Only the day before yesterday, Russia fired almost a hundred missiles against our energy facilities in one day. Almost a hundred! Today again…

    Of course, the losses are great. But this only means that the reconstruction will be large-scale.

    I invite your countries and companies to already assess the prospects and join our reconstruction.

    By the way, we now have the decision of one of the largest Australian private investment groups, which has committed to invest the first 500 million dollars specifically in the Green Growth Initiative of Ukraine as part of the creation of the $25 billion Recovery Fund.

    I am grateful to Mr. Andrew Forrest for the decision to be the first, and also to Mr. Larry Fink of BlackRock for helping to structure this Fund.

    Another example is resource extraction.

    The modern economy needs lithium, graphite and other rare earth metals. We have the largest reserves of some of these resources in Europe.

    These are already colossal opportunities.

    Plus production and transport capabilities, plus our potential in mechanical engineering, our work culture and access to the world’s leading markets – this is the basis for exactly the economic growth that everyone so desperately needs.

    The third is the agricultural sector. The world saw that it is impossible to guarantee global food security without Ukrainian exports.

    Our export grain initiative already helps with stabilization. And a decision has just been made to extend it by 120 days. But Ukraine’s proposal is to extend the Black Sea Initiative indefinitely. This is vital for stability.

    Plus, we founded the Grain From Ukraine program to provide together with our partners as much food aid to the poorest countries as possible.

    But the return of peace to Ukraine will mean that we will be able not only to stabilize the market in response to the crisis, but to guarantee food stability and the prevention of any crises.

    And again, I gave only three examples, and there are many more.

    Peace in Ukraine is a global need. I emphasize – not a temporary lull, not an illusion of peace, which Russia tempts with to simply prepare a new stage of aggression, but real peace. I know it can be achieved.

    But for this we need to preserve global unity – and continue to support our struggle for freedom. It is necessary to preserve global integrity – and increase pressure on Russia for terror. And it is necessary to preserve global rationality – and cooperate with us for the sake of future development already now.

    Once again, thank you for your attention!

    And let there be reliable peace.

    Glory to Ukraine!

  • Volodymyr Zelenskyy – 2022 Speech at G20 Digital Transformation Panel

    Volodymyr Zelenskyy – 2022 Speech at G20 Digital Transformation Panel

    The speech made by Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the President of Ukraine, on 16 November 2022.

    Thank you very much, Mr. President Widodo.

    Dear colleagues!

    Yesterday at our summit, everyone talked about how to end the Russian war. The Russian representative even made some comments…

    And after that, almost 100 Russian missiles hit Ukraine. Burnt residential buildings. Destroyed power plants again. Hundreds of cities were left without electricity, water and heat. Internet traffic has fallen by two-thirds – imagine the scale.

    Unfortunately, there are human casualties. And not only in Ukraine! Russian missiles hit the territory of neighboring Poland yesterday. There should be a quick response.

    This missile attack is Russia’s real performance at G20. So when I say G19, I’m not wrong. Because Russia is a terrorist, and we protect ourselves from it. Such is the reality.

    And I urge you to look at today’s panel of our Digital Transformation Summit from a security perspective. This will be a timely view.

    Dear leaders, you now clearly see what modern war is. Today, it is impossible to imagine life without computer networks, high-speed communication, the Internet, and even more so – without electricity. But your enemies may try to deprive you of just that.

    My good advice to you is to take Ukrainian defense experience in order to guarantee the safety of your people.

    We have created an IT army that prevails in cyberspace. The best specialists and companies of the country have united to protect the state.

    We repelled more than 1,300 cyberattacks during the 8 months of the Russian war. In the first week of the invasion, Russia destroyed a key data center of our country, and the response solution is the “clouds” into which we moved part of the information systems.

    We have built the protection of public registers. We have preserved the digital resilience of banks. Thanks to digitization, we can quickly organize social payments to those affected by hostilities.

    Millions of Ukrainians use our Diia state service every day. These are more than 100 public services without contact with officials. A digital passport, opening accounts, paying fines and taxes, receiving state aid, raising funds to support the army… All this is Ukrainian “Diia”.

    If you or your allies and partners do not already have such a system and such digital protection, we will be happy to help you build them!

    Cyber defense is about cooperation. The stability of institutions is cooperation. Reliable communication, including satellite communication, is also about cooperation.

    What we all need is to put aside disputes and develop collective efforts for global peace. The G19 can be very successful in this!

    Ukraine is willing to help. Our security experience is your security experience.

    And please remember that everything must now be considered from the point of view of security.

    Thank you Mr. President Widodo for a very meaningful summit! Thank you all for your support!

    Let there be peace!

    Glory to Ukraine!

  • Peter Bottomley – 2022 Speech on Jeremy Hunt’s Financial Statement

    Peter Bottomley – 2022 Speech on Jeremy Hunt’s Financial Statement

    The speech made by Peter Bottomley, the Conservative MP for Worthing West and the Father of the House, in the House of Commons on 17 November 2022.

    Sir Peter Bottomley (Worthing West) (Con)

    The Chancellor will have noticed that Labour Members laughed when he talked about stability, growth and public services. Those who are watching our proceedings will have noticed, as will he, that when he was making his announcements about how we will ease the burden on the poorest and give opportunities to those who most need them, those Members were silenced. People around the country will give backing to his approach. We may have arguments about details, but the key point is to get stability and growth, and to defend public services.

    Jeremy Hunt

    I thank my hon. Friend the Father of the House. He is right. What I have discovered in the short time that I have been doing this job is that although one might arrive thinking that decisions about money are about numbers and spreadsheets, they are actually about values. Today, I have tried to express our values not just as a Conservative party but as a country. That means protecting the most vulnerable.

  • Alison Thewliss – 2022 Speech on Jeremy Hunt’s Financial Statement

    Alison Thewliss – 2022 Speech on Jeremy Hunt’s Financial Statement

    The speech made by Alison Thewliss, the SNP MP for Glasgow Central and Westminster spokesperson for the party on economic matters, in the House of Commons on 17 November 2022.

    The current Chancellor comes here today as the seventh Chancellor in seven years, and a mere 55 days after the last Chancellor came to this House to present his chaotic mini-Budget. His predecessor managed to crash the economy in 26 minutes; this Chancellor has spent the past 53 minutes trying to patch up those mistakes. The reality is that we will all be living with the disastrous consequences of Trussonomics for some time to come.

    The Chancellor has brought forward new targets because he is failing to meet the old ones. His difficult choices are of nothing compared with what many of our constituents face. The Tories spent the summer squabbling in a leadership contest when they should have been preparing for the difficult winter ahead. Now the UK is £30 billion worse off because of the incompetence of the Conservative party. Scotland is paying a heavy price indeed for being in this Union.

    The Tories are attempting to cut their way out of a recession. It will not work. Public sector workers deserve a proper pay rise to face the cost of living crisis that the Tories have created, and the Scottish Government do not have the same flexibility as this Chancellor to borrow or make changes in-year. Their existing budgets have already been squeezed and reprioritised and there is nothing left to cut.

    The Chancellor says Scotland will get £1.5 billion in Barnett consequentials, yet the Scottish Government’s budget is worth £1.7 billion less than when it was introduced last December. Scotland is being short-changed yet again. Will he listen carefully to what John Swinney has asked for and provide the funding Scotland deserves?

    The Chancellor is proposing fiscal tightening on a scale not seen since George Osborne—and we are still living with the real consequences of those poverty-inducing policies: the two-child limit, the rape clause, the brutal benefits sanctions. The Glasgow Centre for Population Health has been clear that the previous round of Tory austerity caused 330,000 excess deaths. More of the same from this Chancellor is a price society cannot afford.

    Restoring the triple lock and uprating benefits by inflation is not some victory to be celebrated. Barnardo’s has described it as a “minimum first step”. The rate of inflation announced by the Chancellor is not the actual rate of inflation now—nor, perhaps, will it be the rate of inflation by the time the measure comes into force. Again, the Government are not keeping step with the cost of living. Any compassionate Government with an ounce of humanity would not have to be dragged to make such a decision.

    The Chancellor talks about uprating the benefit cap—he should scrap the benefit cap. In Scotland, we have introduced the groundbreaking Scottish child payment and increased it to £25 per child per week, now up to the age of 16. There is no two-child limit in Scotland, because we value every child and want them all to have the best future. Will he commit to the same?

    The Chancellor mentioned nothing in his statement for those struggling on no recourse to public funds, and nothing either for asylum seekers trying to survive on just 40 quid a week. Will he increase that support or, better yet, allow them to work and to contribute, as so many want to do?

    Inflation is running at 11.1%, a 41-year high. For those in lower-income households, the Resolution Foundation says it runs at 12.5%, as more of their income goes on the essentials. The price of food is up 16.4% in a year, with basics such as bread, milk and pasta all increasing and squeezing household budgets. Combining that with the soaring cost of energy, households are finding it impossible to make ends meet.

    Cornwall Insight has estimated that the energy price cap next year may come in at an eye-watering £3,702. I appreciate what the Chancellor has said about energy support, but his energy support package must be wider and deeper. It must lift those who are stuck on prepayment meters and make sure they can turn the heating on. Will he listen to National Energy Action, which is calling for a targeted energy price guarantee, similar to a social tariff, set at £1,500 annually until October 2024?

    National Energy Action says that should be for all households on means-tested benefits and disability benefits, those in receipt of attendance allowance and carers allowance and those who are living on less than two thirds of the median household income, and it should be targeted to people living in areas of multiple deprivation. We all know that energy bills will not be reducing any time soon. The Chancellor must ensure that people get the help they need to stay safe and warm.

    Insulation schemes should have happened already. The UK Government cut back dramatically on schemes while the Scottish Government invested. More than 100,000 homes in Scotland have been made more energy efficient, while the UK Government have ignored the problem. Now they say, “Wait until 2025.” It is not even jam tomorrow; it is, “Huddle under a blanket for three years until we get to you.” It is absolutely ludicrous.

    Will the Chancellor consider not a rent cap, but a rent freeze to help renters, as the Scottish Government have done? For those struggling with their mortgages, will he do all he can to encourage banks to support their customers, and will he fix and expand the restrictive support for mortgage interest scheme, to make it more accessible to those who need it?

    There is little in this statement to give hope to businesses. Many that managed to survive the pandemic are now struggling to keep going. Increased labour and energy costs, supply chain difficulties and the crash in the pound have all made a difficult situation so much worse.

    I have raised many times in this place the impossibly high contracts that companies are having to sign for their energy bills right now, and the Chancellor was not at all clear how he expects them to keep going once the reprieve finishes in the spring. Companies cannot wait any longer for answers, because for too many it will be too much. We know insolvencies are already on the rise, and with companies going bust, rising unemployment will inevitably follow.

    We know that recession has a bigger impact on younger workers. When we look at the Chancellor’s statement, the minimum wage rates are still lagging behind for younger workers. They are being discriminated against on the basis of their age, and that continues to be unacceptable.

    There was also nothing in the Chancellor’s statement about carbon capture and storage in the north-east of Scotland. Why not? There was a 45% hike on electricity generators—more than on oil and gas—which will hammer Scotland’s renewables sector.

    I will give the Chancellor some opportunities to bring some cash into the UK Government’s coffers. The London School of Economics says that ending the non-dom status could bring in £3.2 billion of additional tax. Taxing dividends at the same rate as income from work would stand to raise more than £6 billion a year.

    For some time now, big companies have been engaging in significant share buybacks. Oil and gas, financial services and other companies are using share buybacks because their mega-profits are more than they know what to do with. Those profits are not being invested in new development; they are simply being creamed off. It is estimated that FTSE 100 firms are now due to return £55.5 billion to their shareholders via share buybacks this year.

    The Institute for Public Policy Research estimates that a one-off 25% windfall tax on share buybacks of FTSE-listed companies could raise £11 billion in a single year. Even if companies were discouraged from buying back shares under the scheme, it would lead to higher reinvestment in development rather than profits. Why would the Chancellor pass up such an economic opportunity?

    The Chancellor should also grow the tax base by increasing immigration and improving the lot of those who have already done us the significant honour of coming to live, work and study in our communities. We should thank them, not tell them they are not welcome. It is beyond time that the UK had a sensible, grown-up conversation about immigration. We on the SNP Benches are clear that immigration is an economic good. The OBR forecasts that higher net migration reduces pressures on Government debt over time. The Chancellor should consider that.

    Finally, I come to the policy that unites all the Unionist parties in this House: Brexit. The Tories, Labour, the Lib Dems—all Brexiteers now, fully committed to this futile project of deliberate self-destruction. Dr Swati Dhingra of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee told the Treasury Committee yesterday:

    “It’s undeniable now that we’re seeing a much bigger slowdown in trade in the UK”

    than in the rest of the world. Wages are lower, business investment is lower, and the UK is underperforming in both imports and exports. That political choice has brought us here today, to the Chancellor’s decisions, which will affect us all but will hit the least well off the very hardest.

    The economist Michael Saunders said this week:

    “If we hadn’t had Brexit, we probably wouldn’t be talking about an austerity budget”.

    Put that on the side of a bus.

    Scotland did not vote for this. We did not choose austerity and we did not choose Brexit. The OBR says that living standards are to fall by 7% over the next two years. It ought to be of no surprise to anybody that just shy of half of Scots think the UK will not exist in its current form in the next five years. This is a UK so weak that no one would wish to join it. Scotland cannot be forced to stay in broke, broken Brexit Britain.